Soft Neutrosophic Modules
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
In this paper the concept of soft neutrosophic module is introduced.
Authors must highlight in the introduction sections the aims and the benefits of the introduced concepts.
More extensive examples of weak soft-N modules and strong soft-N modules. Finally, and of soft-N module homomorphism and soft-N module isomorphism must be added.
Future perspectives should be added in section 4.
Author Response
Thank you very much for your all kind comments and corrections.
The article was checked by someone who knows better English. All English grammar errors are corrected. There may still be some typographical errors
We have rearranged the Introduction and Conclusion Sections. We gave more extensive examples of weak soft-N modules and strong soft-N modules. Soft-N module homomorphism and soft-N module isomorphism are added.
Reviewer 2 Report
Comments and Suggestions for Authors
COMMENTS ON “Soft Neutrosophic Modules”
Format comments:
1. The additional formatting of the text is required.
Content comments:
2. The manuscript is concerned with soft neutrosophic modules problem; this topic is interesting. It is relevant and within the scope of the journal.
3. However, the manuscript, its present form, contains several weaknesses. The adequate revisions concerning the following points should be undertaken to justify the recommendation for publication.
4. The manuscript deals with the analysis of the weak soft neutrosophic modules and strong soft neutrosophic modules. Therefore, the application aspects of these modules must be also discussed. More details should be furnished.
5. The manuscript deals with the soft-N module homomorphism and the soft-N module isomorphism.. Therefore, the implementation details of these features must be also presented. More details should be furnished.
6. The discussion section in the present form is relatively weak and should be strengthened with more details and justifications.
Comments for author File: 
Comments.pdf
Author Response
Thank you very much for your all kind comments and corrections.
1. Fixed the problematic format of the article (Microsoft Word 2007).
2. In this article, we tried to define the algebraic structures of the subject and their applications.
3. We have revisions the article.
4. We gave relations and more extensive examples of weak soft-N modules and strong soft-N modules.
5. We gave more extensive examples of the soft-N module homomorphism and the soft-N module isomorphism.
6. We have rearranged the Introduction and Conclusion Sections.
Reviewer 3 Report
There are some typewriting errors in the paper, and the number of them is quite large. For this reason, the article is hard to read.
For example (just some examples)
Line 32 in Introduction "..., We described" -> upperletter in the middle of the sentence.
Lines 64, 82: there is "x+yI" in the formula, perhaps is a missing "appartenence relation"
I do not understand some Theorems, such as Theorem 2.2.2 and Theorem 2.2.4 which seem to me to be some some Remarks, and not some statements which usually must include some demostrations.
Also, the authors do not respect the citations order required by the MDPI journals (see Author Instructions)
But definetely, the authors must improve the quality of their presentation: The math formula should be written with a specialized editor, or in Latex using dedicated commands.
Author Response
Thank you very much for your all kind comments and corrections.
The article was checked by someone who knows better English. All English grammar errors are corrected. There may still be some typographical errors.
Fixed the problematic format of the article (Microsoft Word 2007).
The math formulas are written with a specialized editor (Microsoft Equation 3.0)
We have rearranged the Introduction and Conclusion Sections.
Citations in the article are corrected with respect the citations order required by the MDPI journals.
Round 2
Reviewer 1 Report
In this new version of their paper authors take into account all my suggestions. I consider this manuscript publishable in the current form.
Author Response
Thank you very much for your all kind comments and corrections.
Reviewer 2 Report
The manuscript can be published.
Author Response
Thank you very much for your all kind comments and corrections.
