2. Topological Transversality Theorem
We begin this section with essential maps. Let be a completely regular topological space (i.e., a Tychonoff space) and an open subset of (now is the closure of in and the boundary of in ).
Definition 1. Writeifis an acyclic compact map.
Definition 2. Writeifwithwhen.
Definition 3. Considering two mapsand they are said to be homotopic inwritteninif there exists a u.s.c. compact mapwithfor each,and(where).
Note is an equivalence relation in .
Definition 4. A map is essential in if for any with and with in there exists a with .
In [
4] we established the topological transversality theorem.
Theorem 1. Consider two maps and in with in . Now is essential in iff is essential in .
We now present two ways of proceeding from here.
Approach 1.
This approach is motivated from [
4,
7] (here we present a more general result). We consider the question: If
and
are two maps in
with
is
in
? We will now show that this is true if
E is a topological (Hausdorff) vector space,
U is convex and
[Note if
E is an infinite dimensional Banach space and
U is convex then [
7] we know
holds].
Let
be two maps in
with
and let
r be as in
. Consider
defined by
,
. Note
,
since
. With
(here
(note
is convex) is
) it is immediate that
note
is a u.s.c. compact map and for any fixed
and
note
has acyclic values and finally note if
and
with
then
, a contradiction.
With
we have
Consequently
in
.
In this situation we replace Definition 4 with:
Definition 5. A map is essential in if any map with there exists a with .
Recall topological vector spaces are Tychonoff so from Theorem 1 we have:
Theorem 2. Let be a topological vector space, an open convex subset of and suppose holds. Suppose with in . Now is essential (Definition 5) in iff is essential (Definition 5) in .
From Theorem 2 we present very general Leray-Schauder type results.
Definition 6. Write if is an acyclic compact map.
Theorem 3. Let be a topological vector space, an open convex subset of , holds and . Assume withandSuppose in . Then is essential (Definition 5) in . Proof. We show
J is essential (Definition 5) in
. If this is true then
is essential (Definition 5) in
from Theorem 2. Let
with
. We need to show that
G has a fixed point in
U. Let
Note
so from
we have a
with
. Now
yields
so
. □
Corollary 1. Let be a topological vector space, an open convex subset of , holds, , and suppose holds. Suppose in . Then is essential (Definition 5) in .
Proof. Let for and the result follows from Theorem 3. □
Remark 1. (i). For spaces E which satisfy we refer the reader to [11]. (ii). Without loss of generality, take . Note if E is a completely metrizable locally convex space and for and then one homotopy from F to is (here and ). To see this note is a u.s.c. compact (see [12], Theorem 4.18) map and also note for a fixed and a fixed that is acyclic valued (recall homeomorphic spaces have isomorphic homology groups) so . [Note E being a completely metrizable locally convex space can be replaced by any (Hausdorff) topological vector space E which has the property that the closed convex hull of a compact set in E is compact]. Approach 2.
Here we do not assume E is a topological vector space and we do not assume . In this approach, instead of concentrating on homotopies, we will consider essential maps and spaces in general.
From Theorem 1, we present very general Leray-Schauder type results.
Definition 7. Consider two maps and they are said to be homotopic in , written in , if there exists a u.s.c. compact map with for each , and (where ).
Theorem 4. Let be a completely regular topological space, an open subset of and suppose . Assume with holding and supposeandSuppose in . Then is essential (Definition 4) in . Proof. We show
J is essential (Definition 4) in
(so then
is essential (Definition 4) in
from Theorem 1). Let
with
and with
in
. We need to show
G has a fixed point in
U. There exists (see Definition 3) a u.s.c. compact map
with
for each
,
and
and let
Notice
(see
) is closed and compact and
(note
for
). Thus, there exists a continuous map
with
and
. Define
by
Note
is an upper semicontinuous compact map with
for each
, so as a result
in
. From
we have a
with
. If
then
which contradicts
. Consequently
so
and as a result
which implies
and so
. □
Corollary 2. Let be a completely regular topological space, an open subset of , and suppose . AssumeSuppose in . Then is essential (Definition 4) in . Proof. Let for and apply Theorem 4. □
Of course if holds then automatically holds. We now give a result where in plays a major role.
Theorem 5. Let be a (metrizable) ANR, an open subset of , , and suppose in . Then is essential (Definition 4) in .
Proof. It follows immediately from Corollary 2. once we show
. Let
with
in
, so (see Definition 7) there exists a u.s.c. compact map
with
for each
,
and
. Note
can be regarded as a closed subset of a normed space
(see the Arens-Eells theorem). Since
there is an open neighborhood
of
in
and a retraction (continuous)
. Let
be a (continuous) function with
and
and let
(note if
then
). For fixed
note
is acyclic valued and
is a u.s.c. compact map i.e.,
. Now from [3] there exists a
with
. If
then
, a contradiction (note
and
). If
then since
(note
) and
one has
, a contradiction. Thus,
,
,
so
i.e.,
holds. □
Remark 2. From the proof above, please note that one could replace E is a (metrizable) ANR with any space provided the following hold: (i). can be regarded as a closed subset of a normal space , (ii). there exists an open neighborhood of in and a retraction , and (iii). any map has a fixed point in X.
One can extend the above ideas to many other natural situations. In the remainder of this section, we will consider several extensions. Let be a (Hausdorff) topological vector space (so automatically Tychonoff), a topological vector space, and an open subset of . Also is a linear (not necessarily continuous) single valued map where is a vector subspace of and finally let be a linear, continuous single valued map with an isomorphism (i.e., a linear homeomorphism) and for convenience we say .
A map is said to be upper semicontinuous ( u.s.c.) if is u.s.c. Now is said to be compact if is a compact map.
Definition 8. Write if .
Definition 9. Write if with for .
Definition 10. Consider two maps and they are said to be homotopic in , written in , if there exists a u.s.c., compact mapping such that for each and with (where ).
Definition 11. A map is L-essential in if for any with and with in there exists a with .
In [
2,
4,
5] we established the topological transversality theorem.
Theorem 6. Consider maps and in with in . Now is L-essential in if and only if is L-essential in .
We present the analogue of Theorem 2. Suppose holds and U is convex. Let be in with . Then in . To see this let , and be as before Definition 5 Note and are u.s.c. and compact mappings and in (if and with then , a contradiction) and in . Combining gives in .
In this situation we replace Definition 11 with:
Definition 12. A map is L-essential in if for any with there exists a with .
From Theorem 6 we have:
Theorem 7. Let U be convex and suppose holds. Consider two maps and in with in . Now is L-essential (Definition 12) in if and only if is L-essential (Definition 12) in .
Now we present the analogue of Theorem 4.
Definition 13. Write if .
Definition 14. Consider two maps and they are said to be homotopic in , written in , if there exists a u.s.c., compact mapping with for each , and (where ).
Theorem 8. Let , , , and be as above and suppose . Assume and the following hold:Suppose in . Then is L-essential (Definition 11) in . Proof. We show
J is L-essential (Definition 11) in
(and then apply Theorem 6). Let
with
and with
in
. We need to show there exists a
with
. There exists (see Definition 10) a
u.s.c.,
compact mapping
with
for each
,
and
and let
Now
(see
) is compact,
, and since
X is Tychonoff there exists a (continuous) map
with
and
. Let
be
Now
is a
u.s.c.,
compact mapping and
for each
, so
in
. Now from
there exists
with
. If
then
which contradicts
. Consequently
so
and so
,
and
. □
Next we consider a generalization of essential maps, namely the d-essential maps. Let be a completely regular topological space and an open subset of .
Consider
and write
, here
is
, and let
be any map with values in the nonempty set
where
.
Definition 15. Let and write . We write is d-essential if for any (write ) and and in we have .
Remark 3. If is -essential thenso there exists a with . In [
6] we established the topological transversality theorem.
Theorem 9. Consider two maps and in (write and ) with in . Now is d-essential if and only if is d-essential.
We present the analogue of Theorem 2. Suppose E is a (Hausdorff) topological vector space, U is convex and assume holds. Let be in with . Then before Definition 5 we showed in . In this situation, we can replace Definition 15 with:
Definition 16. Let and write . We write is d-essential if for any (write ) and we have .
From Theorem 9 we have:
Theorem 10. Let be a topological vector space, an open convex subset of , and suppose holds. Consider two maps and in (write and ) with in . Now is d-essential (Definition 16) if and only if is d-essential (Definition 16).
Now we present the analogue of Theorem 4.
Consider
and write
, here
is
, and let
be any map with values in the nonempty set
where
.
Theorem 11. Let be a completely regular topological space, an open subset of , , and d is the map defined in . Suppose (write ), (write ) and and hold. Also supposeand in . Then is d-essential (Definition 15). Proof. We show
J is
d-essential (Definition 15) (and then
is
d-essential (Definition 15) from Theorem 9). Let
(write
),
with
in
. We need to show
. There exists (see Definition 3) a u.s.c. compact map
with
for each
,
and
. Let
be
and let
Notice
(see
) is compact and
. Thus, there exists a continuous function
with
and
. Let
be
Note
is a u.s.c. compact map with
for each
, so
in
. Write
and
implies
Note from
that
and also from
(note
for
) that
so
Finally, note
(note
) so
and as a result
□
Next we consider a generalization of L-essential maps, namely the d-L-essential maps. Let and T be as described after Remark 2.
Consider
and write
, here
is
, and let
be any map with values in the nonempty set
where
.
Definition 17. Let and write . We write is d-L-essential if for any (write ) with and in we have .
Remark 4. If is -L-essential thenso there exists a with . In [
5] we established the topological transversality theorem.
Theorem 12. Consider maps and in (write and ) with in . Now is d-L-essential if and only if is d-L-essential.
We present the analogue of Theorem 2. Suppose holds and U is convex. Let be in with . Then after Theorem 6 we showed in . In this situation we can replace Definition 17 with:
Definition 18. Let and write . We write is d-L-essential if for any (write ) with we have .
From Theorem 12 we have:
Theorem 17. Let U be convex and suppose holds. Consider two maps and in (write and ) with in . Now is d-L-essential (Definition 18) if and only if is d-L-essential (Definition 18).
Finally, we present the analogue of Theorem 4. Consider
and write
, here
given is
, and let
be any map with values in the nonempty set
where
.
Theorem 18. Let , , , and be as above, , and d is the map defined in . Suppose (write ), (write ) and and hold. In addition assumeand in . Then is d-L-essential (Definition 17). Proof. We show
J is
d-
L-essential (Definition 17) (and then apply Theorem 12). Let
and write
,
with
in
. Now there exists (Definition 10) a
u.s.c.,
compact map
with
for each
,
and
. Let
be
and let
Note
(see
) is compact,
and since
X is Tychonoff there exists a (continuous) map
with
and
. Let
by
Note
is a
u.s.c.,
compact map with
for each
, so
in
. Write
and
implies
Note from
that
and also from
(note
for
) we have
so
Finally, note
(note
) so
and so
□