1. Introduction
At the beginning of the previous century, the exponential function was generalized by the Swedish mathematician G.M. Mittag-Leffler, who introduced a new power series that is named after him today [
1]. Quite unexpectedly, enormous interest has developed regarding the Mittag-Leffler functions over the last four decades because of their ability to describe diverse physical phenomena far more easily than other approaches in a host of scientific and engineering disciplines. Consequently, the Mittag-Leffler functions have become one of the most important special functions in mathematics. Examples where they appear include kinetics of chemical reactions, time and space fractional diffusion, nonlinear waves, viscoelastic systems, neural networks, electric field relaxations, and statistical distributions [
2,
3,
4,
5,
6,
7,
8]. In mathematics, the Mittag-Leffler functions play an important role in fractional calculus, solution of systems with fractional differential, and integral equations [
9,
10]. As a result of all this activity, there is now extensive literature on their properties and history [
11,
12,
13]. A number of reviews have been produced [
14,
15,
16], and of these, the monograph by Gorenflo, Kilbas, Mainardi, and Rogosin [
17] occupies a special place.
The one-parameter, classical Mittag-Leffler function
Eα(
z) is defined in the whole complex plane by the following power series:
where Re
α > 0.
Later, Wiman [
18] introduced the two-parameter Mittag-Leffler function
Eα,β(
z), which is given by
where Re
α > 0 and Re
β > 0. Only these two functions, not generalizations thereafter, will be studied here.
There are two main aims in this work. The first is to show that many well-known and new functional relations can be easily derived via the Laplace transform theory and the second is to consider differentiation with respect to the parameters α and β. Throughout this paper, all mathematical operations or manipulations with functions, series, integrals, integral representations, and transforms will be formal. There will be no proofs of validity of given expressions, though they are, without doubt, correct. The following sections present many results that have been derived independently by other methods, while the new results are verified by two different numerical procedures. Thus, in the framework of applied operational calculus, the reported results are only valid for real positive values of arguments and parameters.
My previous involvement with the Mittag-Leffler functions has been limited only to establishing their connections to the Volterra functions. In my monograph devoted to the Volterra functions [
19], I presented in Appendix A some representations of the Mittag-Leffler functions in terms of other special functions. They can also be derived directly using the Laplace transform technique when applied to
Eα(±
tα) functions. Evidently, this restricts the transform–inverse pair only to the positive real axis. New results, together with some from [
19], are presented below.
According to the definitions of the Mittag-Leffler functions, there is a clear distinction between the argument, z, and the parameters, α and β, as the latter appear in the coefficients. Nevertheless, Eα(z) = f(α, z) and Eα,β(z) = f(α, β, z) can be regarded as the bivariate and trivariate functions, respectively.
As this is the first investigation dealing with mathematical operations with respect to variables α and β, its scope is only limited to derivatives of the Mittag-Leffler functions. The special forms of the Laplace transforms of Eα(±tα) and Eα,β(±tα) functions will be studied extensively to establish known properties of the Mittag-Leffler functions and to derive new functional relations. As will be demonstrated, the differentiation operations will lead to power series with coefficients being quotients of psi and gamma functions. In some cases, these series can be evaluated in a closed form, i.e., in terms of elementary and special functions. Computation methods used in this investigation to obtain the Mittag-Leffler functions and their derivatives with respect to α differ from those reported in the literature. This results from the fact that the Mittag-Leffler functions are available as the build-in functions in the MATHEMATICA program.
2. Properties of the Mittag-Leffler Functions in the Laplace Transform Approach
The Laplace transform of the Mittag-Leffler function
Eα(
tρ) is given by
which is not valid to all values of
ρ and
α as discussed in [
17].
For
ρ =
α, (3) becomes
where Re
α > 0 and Re
s > 1 and for negative
tα is
In a similar manner, the Laplace transforms of two-parameter Mittag-Leffler functions,
tβ−1Eα,β(±
λtα), in [
17] are found to be
where Re
α > 0, Re
β > 0 and Re
s > |
λ|
1/α.
Not only are the inverse transforms simple to derive from them results, but one is able to identify functions for particular values of α and β. Carrying this out will require algebraic manipulations, the similarity properties of the Laplace transformation, the Heaviside expansion theorem, the convolution (product) theorem, some substitution formulas, and other techniques and rules of the operational calculus.
In the first application of the Laplace transform theory, we consider positive integer values of α from 1 to 4. Then, the Mittag-Leffler functions reduce to elementary or special functions due to the simple inverse transforms.
For
α = 1, one finds that
For
α = 2, one obtains
where the dominator has been decomposed into partial fractions. However, the more expedient method is to evaluate the contributions from the residues at
s = ±1.
Carrying out this procedure for −
t2 yields
For
α = 3, one finds that
Similarly, for negative
tα, one arrives at
The calculations become more tedious as
α increases. However, for
α =
n, an integer, we obtain in general case
It is obvious that for integer values of α, the Mittag-Leffler functions can be expressed in terms of elementary functions, such as combination of exponential, hyperbolic, and trigonometric functions.
When
α is not an integer, special functions are involved. Then, one must use a combination of tables of inverse Laplace transforms, substitution formulas, the convolution theorem, and other rules. For example, from the table of inverse transforms [
20], we have
The cases with
α = ±1/4 are more complex. Therefore, only the final result for
α = 1/4 from [
19] is presented here. This is
where the last equation in (15) is the integral representation for the incomplete gamma function.
We can also determine relations between the Mittag-Leffler functions using the Laplace transformation. Putting
β = α + 1 in (6) yields
However, noting that
we can derive the well-known relation for the Mittag-Leffler functions
A similar result for the two-parameter Mittag-Leffler function can be derived from
and
For
α and
β integers, (21) can be written as
Of the many substitution formulas in the Laplace transform theory, only three will be employed here. From [
21] we have
By wring the Laplace transform of
Eα(
tα) as
we find that the Mittag-Leffler function can be represented by
The operational rule for the Macdonald function
K1/3(
z) is
Writing the Laplace transform of
Eα(
tα) as
gives
For specific values of α, the Mittag-Leffler functions in the integrands of (25) and (28) can be expressed as elementary or special functions. Then, the Mittag-Leffler functions on the left-hand side will be represented by definite integrals over infinity.
The third substitution formula is
where
J1(
z) is the Bessel function of the first kind and of the first order
Many properties and functional relations for the Mittag-Leffler functions can be obtained from the convolution theorem. These are found by expressing the Laplace transforms of
Eα(
tα) in various forms and then evaluating the inverses via convolution integrals. For example, using
immediately yields
All convolution integrals can be transformed into finite trigonometric integrals by a suitable change of variable. Therefore, putting
u =
t[
cosθ]
2 in (33) yields
Similarly, from
it follows that
A different convolution integral can be derived from
whose inverse Laplace transform is
Introducing the Laplace transform of
Eα,β(±
tα) in the form
gives
For
α and
β, positive integers, (40) reduces to
where
n = 1, 2, 3, … and
m = 2, 3, 4, ….
These convolution integrals are easily evaluated because the Mittag-Leffler functions reduce to elementary functions. For example, for
n = 1 and
m = 2 and 3 and noting that
E1(
t) = e
t, it follows that
The Mittag-Leffler functions for
n = 1 to 4 and
m = 2 to 4 are presented in [
19].
The operational rules of the Laplace transformation enable us to obtain representations for derivatives of the Mittag-Leffler functions
tβ−1Eα,β(
tα). It is obvious from (2) that the derivative for any order is zero at the origin. In this case, differentiation of the Mittag-Leffler function is equivalent to multiplying the Laplace transform by powers of
s. Because
we find that for Re
α > 0, Re
β ≥
n + 1 and Re
s > 1
Hence, the Laplace inverse transform becomes
In case of
Eα(
tα) function, its value is unity at the origin. Only the first derivative has a simple Laplace transform, which is
the inverse transform of (47) is
However, according to (41), this convolution integral is also given by
The
n-dimensional integrals of the Mittag-Leffler functions are easily evaluated because this is equivalent to dividing the Laplace transform,
F(
s), by
snThe inverse transform of (51) is
Together with the linearity property of the Laplace transformation, operational calculus is able to determine the sums of the Mittag-Leffler functions as power series. Consider the infinite and finite geometrical series, namely,
where 0 <
x < 1.
By taking the Laplace transforms of all the terms in the power series of the corresponding Mittag-Leffler function, one obtains for
s > 1,
The inverse transform of
F(
s) is given by the following series of the Mittag-Leffler functions:
In order to invert
F(s), one must express (55) as
The series inside the brackets is merely the geometric series. Using (54) one finds that
Finally, inverting
F(
s) yields
For the case of a finite series of the Mittag-Leffler functions, one requires the second result in (54) to determine the Laplace transform
F(
s), which is given by
According to the convolution theorem, the inverse transform of this finite sum is
Similarly, we can use (54) for negative value of
xThen, the corresponding Laplace transform becomes
Inversion of this result yields
According to the binomial theorem for
x < 1, we have
The Laplace transform corresponding to this series is
The inverse transform of the second term in (66) is
Thus, the infinite series of the Mittag-Leffler functions in (65) and (67) is
From the preceding examples, it is obvious that if the function
f(
t) is expanded into the Taylor series,
Then, the sum of the corresponding series of the Mittag-Leffler functions can be expressed in terms of convolution integrals. This is only possible if the inverse Laplace transforms, L−1[f(1/s) − 1], are known.
Now, consider the binomial series with the power of 1/2. Then, we have some derivatives of the function
f(
t), which are equal to zero at the origin
The corresponding series of the Mittag-Leffler functions is
while the Laplace transform of
S(
tα) after few manipulations is given by
Noting that the inverse Laplace transform of the Bessel function of the first kind and of the first order is
one finds that the series of the Mittag-Leffler functions in (74) can be expressed as
3. Differentiation and Integration of the Mittag-Leffler Functions with Respect to Parameters in the Laplace Transform Approach
The operational rules of the Laplace transformation are also appropriate in the evaluation of derivatives of the Mittag-Leffler functions with respect to parameters. Differentiation under the integral transform sign is permissible if the function
f(
t,
α) is continuous with respect to the variable
t and the parameter
α. Then, we have
The Laplace transform
G(
s,
α) of the derivative of the Mittag-Leffler function
Eα(
tα) is
In order to avoid evaluating a complex integral in the inversion process,
G(
s,
α) is expressed as the product of three Laplace transforms. The convolution theorem can be applied for
G(
s,
α) because inverse of the third term in (76) is given for Re
λ > 0 in [
20]
From (76) and (77) it follows that
where
α > 1.
Thus, due to two convolutions, the derivative with respect to
α is expressed by a double convolution integral. If the Laplace transform in (76) is written as
the inverse transform of (79) becomes
where 0 <
λ <
α < 1.
The case α = 1 will be considered in the next section.
In a similar manner, the Laplace transform of derivative of the Mittag-Leffler function
tβ−1Eα,β(
tα) with respect to
α is
As expected, for β = 1, (82) reduces to (78).
For 0 <
α < 1, from (79), it follows that
and
0 < λ < α < 1.
For
β, a variable, the Laplace transform of
tβ−1Eα,β(
tα) derivative is
and the inverse transform is
where
β >
λ > 0.
As in the case with differential operations, there are rules in the Laplace transformation for evaluation of integrals. The Laplace transform of the Mittag-Leffler function
tβ−1Eα,β(
tα) enables one to derive the following integral
The Laplace transform of (87) can be determined by changing the order of integration as follows:
The inverse of (ln
s)
−1 is closely related to a Volterra function [
19] as
It follows from (47) that
whereas (49) gives
The final result in terms of convolution integrals is
Two limits of integration in (87) can be altered to
The second term on the right-hand side of (88), written in a different form as inversion of the Volterra function, is as follows
The connection between the Mittag-Leffler functions and the Volterra functions in the Laplace transformation is discussed in detail in [
19].
4. Derivatives of the Mittag-Leffler Functions with Respect to Parameters α and β Expressed as Power Series
As it has been shown in the previous section, the differentiation with respect to parameters of the Mittag-Leffler functions can be represented formally, in closed form, in terms of double convolution integrals. Unfortunately, these convolution integrals are not amenable to numerical computations. Hence, an alternative approach is required. Differentiating (1) and (2) with respect to
α and
β yields
and
The second derivatives are
and
Higher derivatives with respect to α and β yield similar summands, only differing in powers of k.
Infinite series with the digamma functions in their summands do not appear often in mathematical investigations [
22,
23]. This changed in 2008 with the huge collection of results in the book by Brychkov [
24]. Nevertheless, in their general form, infinite series with quotients of the digamma and gamma functions in their summands are still unsolved. However, for specific values of
α and
β, MATHEMATICA is able to determine closed forms for them, although they are rather cumbersome with mixture of elementary and special functions. Their validity was checked by carrying out numerical calculations with (95) and (96). Only a limited number of results will appear in this section, with the remainder appearing in
Table 1 and
Table 2.
Convergence conditions for the power series reported in this section were not established, and therefore t values are in some cases restricted (e.g., in (99) and (100) for |t| < 1). These summands were obtained from MATHEMATICA, but the validity was numerically checked for only some of them.
The simplest cases occur when
α and
β equal zero or unity. Then, we find that
and
where
Γ(0,
t) = −
Ei(−
t), and the hyperbolic sine and cosine integrals and the exponential integral are defined by
γ represents Euler’s constant.
For
α, β = 0, 1, and 2, the following sums of infinite series are known:
and
and
where the sine and cosine integrals are defined by
A number of numerical methods for evaluating the Mittag-Leffler functions and their derivatives with respect to the argument
z are given in the literature [
25,
26,
27]. Fortunately, the Mittag-Leffler functions are available in MATHEMATICA, which means that the first and the second derivatives with respect to
α can also be evaluated. The results for 0.05 <
α < 5.0 and 0 <
t < 2.25 can be obtained from the author on request. Two numerical methods were used to verify the results. In the first method, direct summation of infinite series (95) and (96) was performed in MATHEMATICA module, while in the second method, the calculations were carried out by applying the central differences to
O(
h4) with
h = 0.001.
and
The above results of the Mittag-Leffler functions were evaluated in MATHEMATICA.
The Mittag-Leffler functions,
f(α,
t) =
Eα(
t), as a function of
α for constant
t are plotted in
Figure 1. The rapid exponential behavior of these functions means that only narrow intervals of the functions can be plotted. As can be seen, they are always positive and become more divergent as
t increases. For 0 <
α < 1, they possess a maximum, which moves as
t is increased. For large values
α and
t, they tend to zero.
The first derivatives of the Mittag-Leffler with respect to
α or
G(α,
t) =
∂Eα(
t)/
∂α are plotted in
Figure 2 Their behavior mirrors
Eα(
t), except that they are inverted as they are always negative.
The second derivatives with respect to
α,
G’(
α,
t) =
∂2Eα(
t)/
∂α2 are presented in
Figure 3. Their behavior resembles that of the Mittag-Leffler functions (
Figure 1). However, for small values of
t, they move from negative to positive values. The divergent behavior of
G’(α,
t) also applies for large values of
t, but for increasing values of
α and
t, they tend to zero.