1. Introduction
Completely monotonic functions have attracted the attention of many authors. They play an important role in the mathematical analysis, statistics, physics and so on. For example, in the book ([
1], p. 275), it can be found that Hanyga [
2] showed that complete monotonicity is essential to ensure the monotone decay of the energy in isolated systems (as it appears reasonable from physical considerations); thus, restricting to completely monotonic functions is essential for the physical acceptability and realizability of the dielectric models. Next, in the paper [
3], it was shown that, according to consequences of complete monotonicity properties of some functions involving the gamma function, authors established various new upper and lower bounds for the gamma function and the harmonic numbers. Monotonic functions have been studied very intensively by many researchers. A detailed list of references on completely monotonic functions can be found in [
1,
2,
4,
5,
6,
7,
8,
9,
10,
11,
12,
13,
14,
15,
16,
17].
We remind some useful definitions and theorems.
It is well known that the function
is called as digamma or psi function, where
is the classical Euler’s gamma function [
6]. The following useful formula
is valid for
Definition 1 ([
14]).
We say that a function f is a completely monotonic on the interval if has derivatives of all orders on I and the inequality holds for and A characterization of completely monotonic function is given by the Bernstein–Widder theorem [
17,
18], which reads that a function
on
is completely monotonic if and only if there exists bounded and non-decreasing function
such that the integral
converges for
Definition 2 ([
14]).
Let be a completely monotonic function on and let If the function is a completely monotonic on when and only when then we say is of completely monotonic degree r; if is a completely monotonic on for all then we say that the completely monotonic degree of is In the paper [
9], Guo designed a notation
for denoting the completely monotonic degree
r of
with respect to
Recall that in the paper [
4] Alzer and all disproved the following Conjecture 1 of Clark and Ismail [
6]:
Conjecture 1 ([
6]).
Let where denotes the logarithmic derivative of Euler’s gamma function. Then, the function is completely monotonic on for each Clark and Ismail [
6] showed that the function
is completely monotonic for
and they conjectured that it is true for all
Alzer and all proved [
4] that there is
such that if
then
is not completely monotonic on
The proof of Alzer, Berg and Koumandos [
4] was based on properties of new function
where
is the Hardy–Littlewood function [
7,
8,
10,
11,
15] defined for
Authors showed that the functions
are all completely monotonic on
if and only if
for
In their proof, it was shown that, for each
, there is
such that
It implies Conjecture 1 is not valid. In the paper [
13] Matejíčka showed that the result of Alzer is valid for function
where
is the Nielsen
function and he also showed that the functions
and
are completely monotonic on
for each
In the paper [
12] it was shown that the function
is completely monotonic on
for
. Recall that the Nielsen
function can be defined as
for
We believe that the information mentioned and the ideas used in the paper can give some directions for obtaining new results for the Nielsen function.
Definition 3 ([
16]).
A function f has exponential order α if there exist constants and α such that, for some , Definition 4 is a lower exponential order of function f.
In the paper [
13], the following theorem was proved.
Theorem 1 ([
13]).
Let and … be continuous functions of lower exponential orders … respectively, on . Let; for ; on . Letandfor . Then, is a completely monotonic function on Remark 1 ([
13]).
We note that, if the conditionsare fulfilled for and where then are also valid. In the paper ([
4], p. 110), Alzer and all posed the following open problem:
Conjecture 2 ([
4]).
Determine all such that the function is completely monotonic on Our goal is to find the solution of the Conjecture 2.
2. Results
Lemma 1. There is only one such that is completely monotonic on for and is not completely monotonic on for
Proof. In the paper [
13], it was presented that
is completely monotonic for
if and only if
for
where
Repeating the above procedure
times, we obtain
for
and
Now, we show that, if
for
and
, then
for
Let
and
for
If
for some
, then (
1) implies
so there is
such that
Put
Then,
or
If
, then we have again
and
Thus, there is
such that
This is a contradiction with a definition of
Thus,
and
In the paper ([
4], p. 108), the following formula
for
where
are Bernoulli numbers, was presented.
This implies so However, this is a contradiction with if
We remind readers that Alzer and all [
4] showed that there is
such that
is not completely monotonic on
for all
so
is not valid for all
and each
Put
Clark and Ismail [
6] proved that
is completely monotonic on
if
Thus,
It is easy to see that, if
, then
is not completely monotonic on
and, if
, then
is completely monotonic on
according to
is completely monotonic on
and so
for all
This implies
on
for all
Thus,
is completely monotonic on
for
, which completes our proof.□
Lemma 2. Let Letfor t>0. Then, - (a)
for
- (b)
for
Proof. Case
Using
for
and integration by parts gives
Applying the Formula (
2) leads to
This implies that, for each
and each
, there is
such that
for
Thus, for
, we have
Using mathematical induction leads to
for
If
, then
for
and
Thus, for
Case
Denote again
for
and
It is obvious that
Considering that
we obtain, for each
, the inequality
is valid for
Thus,
if
Alzer and all presented ([
4], p. 112) that
for
It is easy to show that
is a decreasing function on
Thus,
for
This implies
for
Thus, we observe that
for
Next, it is evident that
for
and
Putting
yields
By mathematical induction, it is easy to show that
for
and
Using the Formula (
3), the inequality (
5) and the similar way of estimation for
yields to
for
The proof is complete. □
Theorem 2. Let such that Letfor Let Then, the function is completely monotonic on if and only if
Proof. Using the well known formulas
for
and
for
reveals
Applying the convolution theorem leads to
If the function
fulfills the conditions
of the Theorem 1, then the function
is completely monotonic if and only if
for
The conditions
are fulfilled according to Lemmas 1 and 2. The inequality
for
is equivalent to
Using the Formula (
2) gives
This completes the proof. □