2. Vertex Degree and a Consequence
In this section, we first determine
, the degree of a vertex
x of the graph
. After that, we determine whether
is a tree. Corresponding to Theorems 2.1 and 2.2 of [
18], we have the following two results for
.
Theorem 1. Let be any vertex in .
- (a)
If , then
- (b)
If and , then
- (c)
If and , then , whenever x is conjugate to .
Proof. (a) Let
. Then,
is the number of
such that
. Hence,
Proceeding as the proof of (Theorem 2.1 (b), (c), [
18]), parts (b) and (c) follow noting that the vertex set of
is
. □
Theorem 2. Let be any vertex in .
- (a)
If , then
- (b)
If and , then
- (c)
If and , then , whenever x is conjugate to , for some element in H.
Proof. (a) Let
. Then,
is the number of
such that
. Hence,
Proceeding as the proof of (Theorem 2.2 (b), (c), [
18]), parts (b) and (c) follow noting that the vertex set of
is
. □
As a consequence of the above results, we have the following:
Theorem 3. If , then is not a tree.
Proof. Suppose that is a tree. Then, there exists a vertex such that . If , then we have the following cases.
Case 1: If , then by Theorem 1(a), we have . Therefore, , contradiction.
Case 2: If
and
, then by Theorem 1(c), we have
. That is,
Therefore,
or 2. Thus, (
1) gives
or 4. Therefore,
or 8. Since
, we must have
or
and
and hence, by (Theorem 2.5, [
22]), we get a contradiction.
Case 3: If
and
, then by Theorem 1(b), we have
, which will lead to (
1) (and eventually to a contradiction) or
. That is,
Therefore,
or 2. Thus, if
, then (
2) gives
, which is a contradiction since
G is non-abelian. Again, if
, then (
2) gives
or 4. Therefore,
or
. If
, then we get a contradiction as shown in Case 2 above. If
, then
or
, since
. In both of the cases, we must have
and hence, by (Theorem 2.5, [
22]), we get a contradiction.
Now, we assume that and consider the following cases.
Case 1: If , then by Theorem 2(a), we have . Therefore, , a contradiction.
Case 2: If
and
, then by Theorem 2(c), we have
. That is,
Therefore, or 4, a contradiction.
Case 3: If
and
, then by Theorem 2(b), we have
, which leads to (
3) or
. That is,
Therefore,
or 2. Thus, if
, then (
4) gives
, a contradiction. If
, then (
4) gives
, a contradiction. □
The following theorems also show that the conditions on as mentioned in Theorem 3 can not be removed completely.
Theorem 4. If G is a non-abelian group of order and , then is a tree if and only if or and .
Proof. If
H is the trivial subgroup of
G, then
is an empty graph. If
, then, by (Theorem 2.5, [
22]), we have
is not a tree. Thus, we examine only the proper subgroups of
G, where
or
. We consider the following cases:
Case 1:. If , then , where and . We have for all . Therefore, is a star graph and hence a tree. If , then . In this case, the vertices a, , and b make a cycle since and .
Case 2:. If , then or , where . Clearly is an empty graph if . If , then, in each case, is an isolated vertex in (since ). Hence, is disconnected. If , then , or . If , then, the vertices , a, b, and make a cycle; if , then the vertices , b, and make a cycle, and, if , then the vertices , a, and b make a cycle (since ).
Case 3:. If , then and so is an empty graph. If , then , and . Again, if , then the vertices a, b, and make a cycle; if , then the vertices b, , and make a cycle; and if , then the vertices , a, and make a cycle (since ).
Case 4:. If , then , for every integer r such that . For each case of H, is a star graph since for all . If , then . In this case, the vertices a, , and make a cycle in since , , and .
Case 5:. If , then or , for every integer r such that . If , then . If , then , or . If , then , or . Note that is an empty graph if . If (for ), , or , then, in each case, the vertex is an isolated vertex in (since ) and hence is disconnected. We have and . Therefore, if , then the vertices b, , and make a cycle; if , then the vertices a, , and make a cycle; if , then the vertices , , and make a cycle; and if , then the vertices a, b, and make a cycle.
Case 6:. If , then , or . Since the elements and commute among themselves, in each case the remaining two elements in remain isolated and hence is disconnected. If , then , where , , , . In each case, the vertices x, a, and make a cycle. If , then . In this case, the vertices a, b, and make a cycle.
Case 7:. If , then and so is an empty graph. If , then . In this case, is an isolated vertex in (since ) and so is disconnected. If , then , or . If , then . We have and . Therefore, if , then the vertices , b, and make a cycle; if , then the vertices a, , and make a cycle; if , then the vertices , , and make a cycle; and if , then the vertices a, b, and make a cycle. This completes the proof. □
Theorem 5. If G is a non-abelian group of order and , then is a tree if and only if , and such that .
Proof. If
H is the trivial subgroup of
G, then
is an empty graph. If
, then, by (Theorem 2.5, [
22]), we have
is not a tree. Thus, we examine only the proper subgroups of
G, where
, or
. We consider the following two cases.
Case 1:
In this case, , or . If , then and . If , then or , for every integer r such that . For , is an empty graph. For , in each case, a is an isolated vertex in (since ) and hence is disconnected. If , then , or . For , b is an isolated vertex in (since ) and hence is disconnected. If or , then a is an isolated vertex in (since for every integer r such that ) and hence is disconnected.
If , then and . If , then and hence is an empty graph. If , then , or . In each case, vertices of commute with each other and commutator of these vertices and those of equals . Hence, the vertices in remain isolated and so is disconnected.
If
, then
and
. If
, then
,
or
. If
, then
is a star graph because
for all
and hence a tree; otherwise,
is not a tree as shown in
Figure 1,
Figure 2,
Figure 3,
Figure 4,
Figure 5 and
Figure 6. If
, then
, where
or their inverses. We have
,
and
. Therefore,
x,
and
g make a triangle for each such subgroup in the graph
. If
, then
. Since
H is abelian, the vertices
a,
and
make a triangle in the graph
.
Case 2:
In this case, , , or .
If , then and . We have since . If , then , where and . We have for all and so is an empty graph. If , then . In this case, the vertices of remain isolated since, for , we have .
If , then and . We have and since and . Suppose that . Then, , for every integer r such that . If , then for each subgroup H, is an isolated vertex in (since for every integer r such that ). If , then for each subgroup H, a is an isolated vertex in (since for every integer r such that ). Hence, is disconnected for each g and each subgroup H of order 2. Now, suppose that . Then, we have . In this case, the vertices a, , and make a cycle in for each g as they commute among themselves.
If , then and . We have since . Suppose that , then or , for every integer r such that . For , is an empty graph. For , in each case, a is an isolated vertex in (since for every integer r such that ) and hence is disconnected. If , then . In this case, the vertices a, and make a triangle in since they commute among themselves. If , then , or . For all these H, a is an isolated vertex in (since for every integer r such that ) and hence is disconnected. If , then , or . For all these H, the vertices a, , and make a cycle in since they commute among themselves.
If , then and . We have since . If , then and so is an empty graph. If , then . In this case, the vertices a, and make a triangle in since they commute among themselves. If , then , or . For all these H, a is an isolated vertex in (since for every integer r such that ) and hence is disconnected. If , then . In this case, the vertices a, , and make a cycle in since they commute among themselves. □
3. Connectivity and Diameter
Connectivity of
was studied in [
19,
20,
21]. It was conjectured that the diameter of
is equal to 2 if
is connected. In this section, we discuss the connectivity of
. In general,
is not connected. For any two vertices
x and
y, we write
and
respectively to mean that they are adjacent or not. We write
and
to denote the distance between the vertices
and diameter of
, respectively.
Theorem 6. If and , then .
Proof. Let be any vertex of . Then, which implies since . Since , it follows that . Therefore, and hence . □
Lemma 1. Let such that and , where is the order of g. If and , then .
Proof. Since
and
, it follows that
. We have
If
, then, by (
5), we have
, a contradiction. Therefore,
. Hence,
. □
Theorem 7. Let and . Then, .
Proof. If , then, by Theorem 6, we have . Therefore, we assume that . Let be any two vertices of such that . Therefore, or . If and , then and so . If and , then, by Lemma 1, we have and so . Therefore, we shall not consider these two situations in the following cases.
Case 1:
Suppose that one of is adjacent to g and the other is not. Without any loss, we assume that and . Then, and . By Lemma 1, we have .
Consider the element . If , then . Therefore, and so .
If , then we have . In addition, . Hence, and so .
Case 2: One of belongs to H and the other does not.
Without any loss, assume that and . If and , then, by Lemma 1, we have . In addition, and so . Therefore, and hence . If and , then and . By Lemma 1, we have . Consider the element . If , then . Therefore, and so . Thus, .
If , then we have . In addition, . Hence, and so .
Case 3:.
Suppose that one of is adjacent to g and the other is not. Without any loss, we assume that and . Then, by Lemma 1, we have . In addition, and so . Therefore, and hence .
Thus, for all . Hence, the result follows. □
The rest part of this paper is devoted to the study of connectivity of
, where
is the dihedral group of order
. It is well known that
, the commutator subgroup
if
n is odd and
and
if
n is even. By (Theorem 4, [
19]), it follows that
is disconnected if
. Therefore, we consider
and
accordingly, as
n is even or odd in the following results.
Theorem 8. Consider the graph , where is even.
- (a)
If , then is connected and .
- (b)
Let for . Then, is connected with diameter 2 if and is not connected if .
- (c)
If for , then is not connected.
Proof. Since n is even, we have for .
(a) Case 1:
Since H is abelian, the induced subgraph of on is empty. Thus, we need to see the adjacency of these vertices with those in . Suppose that and for every integer such that . Then, or and so or . Therefore, every vertex in is adjacent to all the vertices in . Thus, is connected and .
Case 2:
Since H is abelian, the induced subgraph of on is a complete graph. Therefore, it is sufficient to prove that no vertex in is isolated. If , then . Suppose that and for every integer such that . Then, and so or . If and for every integer such that , then and so or . Therefore, there exists an integer j such that and for which is adjacent to all the vertices in . If , then . Suppose that and for every integer such that , then and so or . Therefore, there exists an integer j such that and for which is adjacent to all the vertices in . Thus, is connected and .
(b) Case 1:
We have for every integer r such that . Therefore, the induced subgraph of on is empty. Thus, we need to see the adjacency of these vertices with those in . Suppose and for every integer i such that . Then, and so . Therefore, for every integer i such that and , is adjacent to both and . In addition, we have and for every integer s such that . Suppose and . Then, or . Therefore, for every integer s such that and , is adjacent to both and . Thus, is connected and .
Case 2:
If for , then . We have for every integer i such that . That is, and for every integer i such that . Thus, is an isolated vertex in . Hence, is not connected.
(c) Case 1:
We have for every integer r such that . Thus, is an isolated vertex in . Hence, is not connected.
Case 2:
If for , then . We have for every integer i such that . Thus, is an isolated vertex in . Hence, is not connected. □
Theorem 9. Consider the graph , where and are even.
- (a)
If , then is connected with diameter 2 if and only if .
- (b)
If or , then is connected and .
Proof. Since n is even, we have for .
(a) Case 1:
We know that the vertices in H commutes with all the odd powers of a. That is, any vertex in of the form , where i is an odd integer and , is not adjacent with any vertex. Hence, is not connected.
Case 2:
Since H is abelian, the induced subgraph of on is a complete graph. In addition, the vertices in H commutes with all the odd powers of a. That is, a vertex of the form , where i is an odd integer, in is adjacent with all the vertices in H. We have and for every integer such that and . Thus, for , every vertex of H is adjacent to the vertices of the form , where . Therefore, is connected and . In addition, if for some integer i where (i.e., ), then the vertices , where , will remain isolated. Hence, is disconnected in this case. This completes the proof of part (a).
(b) Case 1:
Suppose that . Then, but for all such that , ; is an odd number and because and . We shall find a path to , where is an odd number. We have and for all j such that is an odd number. Therefore, . Hence, is connected and .
If , then but for all such that , ; is an odd number and because and . We shall find a path to , where is an odd number. We have and for all j such that is an odd number. Therefore, . Hence, is connected and .
Case 2:
We have . Therefore, if , then every vertex in is adjacent to all other vertices in both cases (as discussed in part (a)). Hence, is connected and . Suppose that for some integer i, where .
Suppose that . Then, but for all such that is an odd number and because and . We shall find a path between and for all such that and . We have and for all j such that is an odd number. Therefore, . Consider the vertices of the form , where . We have . Suppose , then it gives , which implies or . Therefore, if and only if and . Thus, we have , where and and . Again, we know that and , so . If we are able to find a path between and any one of and , then we are done. Now, and for any odd number j such that so we have . Thus, , , and , where and and . Hence, is connected and .
If , then but for all such that is an odd number and because and . We shall find a path between and for all such that and . We have and for all j such that is an odd number. Thus, we have . Consider the vertices of the form , where . We have . Suppose , then it gives which implies or . Therefore, if and only if and . Thus, we have , where and and . Again, we know that and , so . If we are able to find a path between and any one of and , then we are done. Now, and for any odd number j such that so we have . Thus, , , and , where and and . Hence, is connected and . □
Theorem 10. Consider the graph , where is even and is odd.
- (a)
If , then is not connected if and is connected with if .
- (b)
If or , then is not connected if and is connected with if .
Proof. Since n is even, we have for .
(a) Case 1:
We know that the vertices in H commute with all the odd powers of a. That is, any vertex of the form , where i is an odd integer, is not adjacent with any vertex in . Hence, is not connected.
Case 2:
Since H is abelian, the induced subgraph of on is a complete graph. In addition, the vertices in H commute with all the odd powers of a. That is, a vertex of the form , where i is an odd integer, in is adjacent with all the vertices in H. We claim that at least one element of is adjacent to all ’s such that . Consider the following cases.
Subcase 1:
If , i.e., for all and , then we get , a contradiction. If , i.e., for all and , then we get , a contradiction. Therefore, g is adjacent to all other vertices of the form such that .
Subcase 2:
If , i.e., , then for all and . Now, if , then , a contradiction since for . If , then for all , which is a contradiction since . Therefore, is adjacent to all other vertices of the form such that .
Thus, there exists a vertex in , which is adjacent to all other vertices in . Hence, is connected and .
(b) Case 1:
We know that the vertices in H commute with the vertex . That is, the vertex is not adjacent with any vertex in . Hence, is not connected.
Case 2:
As shown in Case 2 of part (a), it can be seen that either g or is adjacent to all other vertices. Hence, is connected and . □
Theorem 11. Consider the graph , where is odd.
- (a)
If , then is connected and .
- (b)
If , where , then is connected with if and is not connected if .
Proof. Since n is odd, we have for .
(a) Case 1:
Since H is abelian, the induced subgraph of on is empty. Therefore, we need to see the adjacency of these vertices with those in . Suppose that and for every integer such that . Then, and so , a contradiction. Therefore, for every integer j such that , is adjacent to all the vertices in . Thus, is connected and .
Case 2:
Since H is abelian, the induced subgraph of on is a complete graph. Therefore, it is sufficient to prove that no vertex in is isolated. Since n is odd, we have . If and for every integer such that , then or . If and for every integer such that , then or . Therefore, there exists an integer j such that and for which is adjacent to all other vertices in . Thus, is connected and .
(b) Case 1:
We have and for every integer such that . Thus, is adjacent to for every integer j such that . In addition, we have for every integer such that . Supposing that , then as is not possible. Therefore, for every integer such that and , is adjacent to . Thus, is connected and .
Case 2:
If i is even, then and so the vertex remains isolated. If i is odd, then is even and we have . Therefore, the vertex remains isolated. Hence, is not connected. □
Theorem 12. Consider the graph , where is odd.
- (a)
If , where and , then is not connected.
- (b)
If , or , where and , then is connected with diameter 2 if .
- (c)
If , where and , then is connected and
Proof. (a) Given . We have , and for all r such that . Therefore, or . If or , then and for all r such that . Thus, is disconnected. If , then the vertex remains isolated because . Hence, is not connected.
(b) If , then is adjacent to all other vertices, as discussed in part (a). Hence, is connected and .
(c) Case 1:
Since n is odd, we have for all integers i such that . Therefore, if , then b is adjacent to all other vertices because and for all integers such that . Hence, is connected and .
Case 2: or
Since , we have . In addition, all the vertices of the form commute among themselves, where . Therefore, for all such that . Again, for all . If or for all , then or d respectively. Therefore, , , , , and for all such that . If or for all , then or , which gives or d, respectively. Therefore, , , and for all such that . Hence, is connected and . □