Abstract
Let H be a subgroup of a finite non-abelian group G and . Let . We introduce the graph whose vertex set is and two distinct vertices x and y are adjacent if or and , where . In this paper, we determine whether is a tree among other results. We also discuss about its diameter and connectivity with special attention to the dihedral groups.
1. Introduction
Several properties of groups can be described through properties of graphs and vice versa. Characterizations of finite groups through various graphs defined on them have been an interesting topic of research over the last five decades. The non-commuting graph is one of such interesting graphs widely studied in the literature [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16] since its inception [17]. In this paper, we introduce a generalization of non-commuting graph of a finite group. Let H be a subgroup of a finite non-abelian group G and . Let . We introduce the graph whose vertex set is and two distinct vertices x and y are adjacent if or and , where . Clearly, . In addition, is an induced subgraph of , studied by the authors in [18], induced by . If and , then , the non-commuting graph of G. If , then , a generalization of called an induced g-noncommuting graph of G on studied extensively in [19,20,21] by Erfanian and his collaborators.
If , then any pair of vertices are adjacent in trivially if or one of x and y belongs to H. Therefore, we consider . In addition, if , then and so . Thus, throughout this paper, we shall consider and . In this paper, we determine whether is a tree among other results. We also discuss its diameter and connectivity with special attention to the dihedral groups. We conclude this section by the following examples of , where and the subgroup H is given by , or (see Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5 and Figure 6).
Figure 1.
.
Figure 2.
.
Figure 3.
.
Figure 4.
.
Figure 5.
.
Figure 6.
.
2. Vertex Degree and a Consequence
In this section, we first determine , the degree of a vertex x of the graph . After that, we determine whether is a tree. Corresponding to Theorems 2.1 and 2.2 of [18], we have the following two results for .
Theorem 1.
Let be any vertex in .
- (a)
- If , then
- (b)
- If and , then
- (c)
- If and , then , whenever x is conjugate to .
Proof.
(a) Let . Then, is the number of such that . Hence,
Proceeding as the proof of (Theorem 2.1 (b), (c), [18]), parts (b) and (c) follow noting that the vertex set of is . □
Theorem 2.
Let be any vertex in .
- (a)
- If , then
- (b)
- If and , then
- (c)
- If and , then , whenever x is conjugate to , for some element in H.
Proof.
(a) Let . Then, is the number of such that . Hence,
Proceeding as the proof of (Theorem 2.2 (b), (c), [18]), parts (b) and (c) follow noting that the vertex set of is . □
As a consequence of the above results, we have the following:
Theorem 3.
If , then is not a tree.
Proof.
Suppose that is a tree. Then, there exists a vertex such that . If , then we have the following cases.
Case 1: If , then by Theorem 1(a), we have . Therefore, , contradiction.
Case 2: If and , then by Theorem 1(c), we have . That is,
Therefore, or 2. Thus, (1) gives or 4. Therefore, or 8. Since , we must have or and and hence, by (Theorem 2.5, [22]), we get a contradiction.
Case 3: If and , then by Theorem 1(b), we have , which will lead to (1) (and eventually to a contradiction) or . That is,
Therefore, or 2. Thus, if , then (2) gives , which is a contradiction since G is non-abelian. Again, if , then (2) gives or 4. Therefore, or . If , then we get a contradiction as shown in Case 2 above. If , then or , since . In both of the cases, we must have and hence, by (Theorem 2.5, [22]), we get a contradiction.
Now, we assume that and consider the following cases.
Case 1: If , then by Theorem 2(a), we have . Therefore, , a contradiction.
Case 2: If and , then by Theorem 2(c), we have . That is,
Therefore, or 4, a contradiction.
Case 3: If and , then by Theorem 2(b), we have , which leads to (3) or . That is,
The following theorems also show that the conditions on as mentioned in Theorem 3 can not be removed completely.
Theorem 4.
If G is a non-abelian group of order and , then is a tree if and only if or and .
Proof.
If H is the trivial subgroup of G, then is an empty graph. If , then, by (Theorem 2.5, [22]), we have is not a tree. Thus, we examine only the proper subgroups of G, where or . We consider the following cases:
Case 1:. If , then , where and . We have for all . Therefore, is a star graph and hence a tree. If , then . In this case, the vertices a, , and b make a cycle since and .
Case 2:. If , then or , where . Clearly is an empty graph if . If , then, in each case, is an isolated vertex in (since ). Hence, is disconnected. If , then , or . If , then, the vertices , a, b, and make a cycle; if , then the vertices , b, and make a cycle, and, if , then the vertices , a, and b make a cycle (since ).
Case 3:. If , then and so is an empty graph. If , then , and . Again, if , then the vertices a, b, and make a cycle; if , then the vertices b, , and make a cycle; and if , then the vertices , a, and make a cycle (since ).
Case 4:. If , then , for every integer r such that . For each case of H, is a star graph since for all . If , then . In this case, the vertices a, , and make a cycle in since , , and .
Case 5:. If , then or , for every integer r such that . If , then . If , then , or . If , then , or . Note that is an empty graph if . If (for ), , or , then, in each case, the vertex is an isolated vertex in (since ) and hence is disconnected. We have and . Therefore, if , then the vertices b, , and make a cycle; if , then the vertices a, , and make a cycle; if , then the vertices , , and make a cycle; and if , then the vertices a, b, and make a cycle.
Case 6:. If , then , or . Since the elements and commute among themselves, in each case the remaining two elements in remain isolated and hence is disconnected. If , then , where , , , . In each case, the vertices x, a, and make a cycle. If , then . In this case, the vertices a, b, and make a cycle.
Case 7:. If , then and so is an empty graph. If , then . In this case, is an isolated vertex in (since ) and so is disconnected. If , then , or . If , then . We have and . Therefore, if , then the vertices , b, and make a cycle; if , then the vertices a, , and make a cycle; if , then the vertices , , and make a cycle; and if , then the vertices a, b, and make a cycle. This completes the proof. □
Theorem 5.
If G is a non-abelian group of order and , then is a tree if and only if , and such that .
Proof.
If H is the trivial subgroup of G, then is an empty graph. If , then, by (Theorem 2.5, [22]), we have is not a tree. Thus, we examine only the proper subgroups of G, where , or . We consider the following two cases.
Case 1:
In this case, , or . If , then and . If , then or , for every integer r such that . For , is an empty graph. For , in each case, a is an isolated vertex in (since ) and hence is disconnected. If , then , or . For , b is an isolated vertex in (since ) and hence is disconnected. If or , then a is an isolated vertex in (since for every integer r such that ) and hence is disconnected.
If , then and . If , then and hence is an empty graph. If , then , or . In each case, vertices of commute with each other and commutator of these vertices and those of equals . Hence, the vertices in remain isolated and so is disconnected.
If , then and . If , then , or . If , then is a star graph because for all and hence a tree; otherwise, is not a tree as shown in Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5 and Figure 6. If , then , where or their inverses. We have , and . Therefore, x, and g make a triangle for each such subgroup in the graph . If , then . Since H is abelian, the vertices a, and make a triangle in the graph .
Case 2:
In this case, , , or .
If , then and . We have since . If , then , where and . We have for all and so is an empty graph. If , then . In this case, the vertices of remain isolated since, for , we have .
If , then and . We have and since and . Suppose that . Then, , for every integer r such that . If , then for each subgroup H, is an isolated vertex in (since for every integer r such that ). If , then for each subgroup H, a is an isolated vertex in (since for every integer r such that ). Hence, is disconnected for each g and each subgroup H of order 2. Now, suppose that . Then, we have . In this case, the vertices a, , and make a cycle in for each g as they commute among themselves.
If , then and . We have since . Suppose that , then or , for every integer r such that . For , is an empty graph. For , in each case, a is an isolated vertex in (since for every integer r such that ) and hence is disconnected. If , then . In this case, the vertices a, and make a triangle in since they commute among themselves. If , then , or . For all these H, a is an isolated vertex in (since for every integer r such that ) and hence is disconnected. If , then , or . For all these H, the vertices a, , and make a cycle in since they commute among themselves.
If , then and . We have since . If , then and so is an empty graph. If , then . In this case, the vertices a, and make a triangle in since they commute among themselves. If , then , or . For all these H, a is an isolated vertex in (since for every integer r such that ) and hence is disconnected. If , then . In this case, the vertices a, , and make a cycle in since they commute among themselves. □
3. Connectivity and Diameter
Connectivity of was studied in [19,20,21]. It was conjectured that the diameter of is equal to 2 if is connected. In this section, we discuss the connectivity of . In general, is not connected. For any two vertices x and y, we write and respectively to mean that they are adjacent or not. We write and to denote the distance between the vertices and diameter of , respectively.
Theorem 6.
If and , then .
Proof.
Let be any vertex of . Then, which implies since . Since , it follows that . Therefore, and hence . □
Lemma 1.
Let such that and , where is the order of g. If and , then .
Proof.
Since and , it follows that . We have
If , then, by (5), we have , a contradiction. Therefore, . Hence, . □
Theorem 7.
Let and . Then, .
Proof.
If , then, by Theorem 6, we have . Therefore, we assume that . Let be any two vertices of such that . Therefore, or . If and , then and so . If and , then, by Lemma 1, we have and so . Therefore, we shall not consider these two situations in the following cases.
Case 1:
Suppose that one of is adjacent to g and the other is not. Without any loss, we assume that and . Then, and . By Lemma 1, we have .
Consider the element . If , then . Therefore, and so .
If , then we have . In addition, . Hence, and so .
Case 2: One of belongs to H and the other does not.
Without any loss, assume that and . If and , then, by Lemma 1, we have . In addition, and so . Therefore, and hence . If and , then and . By Lemma 1, we have . Consider the element . If , then . Therefore, and so . Thus, .
If , then we have . In addition, . Hence, and so .
Case 3:.
Suppose that one of is adjacent to g and the other is not. Without any loss, we assume that and . Then, by Lemma 1, we have . In addition, and so . Therefore, and hence .
Thus, for all . Hence, the result follows. □
The rest part of this paper is devoted to the study of connectivity of , where is the dihedral group of order . It is well known that , the commutator subgroup if n is odd and and if n is even. By (Theorem 4, [19]), it follows that is disconnected if . Therefore, we consider and accordingly, as n is even or odd in the following results.
Theorem 8.
Consider the graph , where is even.
- (a)
- If , then is connected and .
- (b)
- Let for . Then, is connected with diameter 2 if and is not connected if .
- (c)
- If for , then is not connected.
Proof.
Since n is even, we have for .
(a) Case 1:
Since H is abelian, the induced subgraph of on is empty. Thus, we need to see the adjacency of these vertices with those in . Suppose that and for every integer such that . Then, or and so or . Therefore, every vertex in is adjacent to all the vertices in . Thus, is connected and .
Case 2:
Since H is abelian, the induced subgraph of on is a complete graph. Therefore, it is sufficient to prove that no vertex in is isolated. If , then . Suppose that and for every integer such that . Then, and so or . If and for every integer such that , then and so or . Therefore, there exists an integer j such that and for which is adjacent to all the vertices in . If , then . Suppose that and for every integer such that , then and so or . Therefore, there exists an integer j such that and for which is adjacent to all the vertices in . Thus, is connected and .
(b) Case 1:
We have for every integer r such that . Therefore, the induced subgraph of on is empty. Thus, we need to see the adjacency of these vertices with those in . Suppose and for every integer i such that . Then, and so . Therefore, for every integer i such that and , is adjacent to both and . In addition, we have and for every integer s such that . Suppose and . Then, or . Therefore, for every integer s such that and , is adjacent to both and . Thus, is connected and .
Case 2:
If for , then . We have for every integer i such that . That is, and for every integer i such that . Thus, is an isolated vertex in . Hence, is not connected.
(c) Case 1:
We have for every integer r such that . Thus, is an isolated vertex in . Hence, is not connected.
Case 2:
If for , then . We have for every integer i such that . Thus, is an isolated vertex in . Hence, is not connected. □
Theorem 9.
Consider the graph , where and are even.
- (a)
- If , then is connected with diameter 2 if and only if .
- (b)
- If or , then is connected and .
Proof.
Since n is even, we have for .
(a) Case 1:
We know that the vertices in H commutes with all the odd powers of a. That is, any vertex in of the form , where i is an odd integer and , is not adjacent with any vertex. Hence, is not connected.
Case 2:
Since H is abelian, the induced subgraph of on is a complete graph. In addition, the vertices in H commutes with all the odd powers of a. That is, a vertex of the form , where i is an odd integer, in is adjacent with all the vertices in H. We have and for every integer such that and . Thus, for , every vertex of H is adjacent to the vertices of the form , where . Therefore, is connected and . In addition, if for some integer i where (i.e., ), then the vertices , where , will remain isolated. Hence, is disconnected in this case. This completes the proof of part (a).
(b) Case 1:
Suppose that . Then, but for all such that , ; is an odd number and because and . We shall find a path to , where is an odd number. We have and for all j such that is an odd number. Therefore, . Hence, is connected and .
If , then but for all such that , ; is an odd number and because and . We shall find a path to , where is an odd number. We have and for all j such that is an odd number. Therefore, . Hence, is connected and .
Case 2:
We have . Therefore, if , then every vertex in is adjacent to all other vertices in both cases (as discussed in part (a)). Hence, is connected and . Suppose that for some integer i, where .
Suppose that . Then, but for all such that is an odd number and because and . We shall find a path between and for all such that and . We have and for all j such that is an odd number. Therefore, . Consider the vertices of the form , where . We have . Suppose , then it gives , which implies or . Therefore, if and only if and . Thus, we have , where and and . Again, we know that and , so . If we are able to find a path between and any one of and , then we are done. Now, and for any odd number j such that so we have . Thus, , , and , where and and . Hence, is connected and .
If , then but for all such that is an odd number and because and . We shall find a path between and for all such that and . We have and for all j such that is an odd number. Thus, we have . Consider the vertices of the form , where . We have . Suppose , then it gives which implies or . Therefore, if and only if and . Thus, we have , where and and . Again, we know that and , so . If we are able to find a path between and any one of and , then we are done. Now, and for any odd number j such that so we have . Thus, , , and , where and and . Hence, is connected and . □
Theorem 10.
Consider the graph , where is even and is odd.
- (a)
- If , then is not connected if and is connected with if .
- (b)
- If or , then is not connected if and is connected with if .
Proof.
Since n is even, we have for .
(a) Case 1:
We know that the vertices in H commute with all the odd powers of a. That is, any vertex of the form , where i is an odd integer, is not adjacent with any vertex in . Hence, is not connected.
Case 2:
Since H is abelian, the induced subgraph of on is a complete graph. In addition, the vertices in H commute with all the odd powers of a. That is, a vertex of the form , where i is an odd integer, in is adjacent with all the vertices in H. We claim that at least one element of is adjacent to all ’s such that . Consider the following cases.
Subcase 1:
If , i.e., for all and , then we get , a contradiction. If , i.e., for all and , then we get , a contradiction. Therefore, g is adjacent to all other vertices of the form such that .
Subcase 2:
If , i.e., , then for all and . Now, if , then , a contradiction since for . If , then for all , which is a contradiction since . Therefore, is adjacent to all other vertices of the form such that .
Thus, there exists a vertex in , which is adjacent to all other vertices in . Hence, is connected and .
(b) Case 1:
We know that the vertices in H commute with the vertex . That is, the vertex is not adjacent with any vertex in . Hence, is not connected.
Case 2:
As shown in Case 2 of part (a), it can be seen that either g or is adjacent to all other vertices. Hence, is connected and . □
Theorem 11.
Consider the graph , where is odd.
- (a)
- If , then is connected and .
- (b)
- If , where , then is connected with if and is not connected if .
Proof.
Since n is odd, we have for .
(a) Case 1:
Since H is abelian, the induced subgraph of on is empty. Therefore, we need to see the adjacency of these vertices with those in . Suppose that and for every integer such that . Then, and so , a contradiction. Therefore, for every integer j such that , is adjacent to all the vertices in . Thus, is connected and .
Case 2:
Since H is abelian, the induced subgraph of on is a complete graph. Therefore, it is sufficient to prove that no vertex in is isolated. Since n is odd, we have . If and for every integer such that , then or . If and for every integer such that , then or . Therefore, there exists an integer j such that and for which is adjacent to all other vertices in . Thus, is connected and .
(b) Case 1:
We have and for every integer such that . Thus, is adjacent to for every integer j such that . In addition, we have for every integer such that . Supposing that , then as is not possible. Therefore, for every integer such that and , is adjacent to . Thus, is connected and .
Case 2:
If i is even, then and so the vertex remains isolated. If i is odd, then is even and we have . Therefore, the vertex remains isolated. Hence, is not connected. □
Theorem 12.
Consider the graph , where is odd.
- (a)
- If , where and , then is not connected.
- (b)
- If , or , where and , then is connected with diameter 2 if .
- (c)
- If , where and , then is connected and
Proof.
(a) Given . We have , and for all r such that . Therefore, or . If or , then and for all r such that . Thus, is disconnected. If , then the vertex remains isolated because . Hence, is not connected.
(b) If , then is adjacent to all other vertices, as discussed in part (a). Hence, is connected and .
(c) Case 1:
Since n is odd, we have for all integers i such that . Therefore, if , then b is adjacent to all other vertices because and for all integers such that . Hence, is connected and .
Case 2: or
Since , we have . In addition, all the vertices of the form commute among themselves, where . Therefore, for all such that . Again, for all . If or for all , then or d respectively. Therefore, , , , , and for all such that . If or for all , then or , which gives or d, respectively. Therefore, , , and for all such that . Hence, is connected and . □
4. Conclusions
In this paper, we generalize the induced g-noncommuting graph of a finite group G by introducing the graph , where H is a subgroup of G. We generalize certain results, namely (Lemma 2.4, [20]), (Lemma 3.1, [20]) and (Theorem 2.1, [21]) in Theorems 1, 6 and 7. In (Theorem 2.5, [22]), it was shown that is not a tree. In Section 2, we consider the question whether is a tree or not and we show that is not a tree in general. In [21], Nasiri et al. showed that if is connected. Furthermore, they conjectured that if is connected. In Section 3, we show that this is not true in case of the graph , where H is a proper subgroup of G. In particular, we identify a subgroup H of in Theorem 12 such that while discussing connectivity and diameter of . It will be interesting to consider other families of finite groups (e.g., semidihedral groups and generalized quaternion groups) and find .
Author Contributions
Investigation, M.S., R.K.N., Y.S.; writing—original draft preparation, M.S., R.K.N., Y.S.; writing—review and editing, M.S., R.K.N., Y.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.
Acknowledgments
The first author would like to thank DST for the INSPIRE Fellowship. The authors are grateful to the referees for their valuable comments and suggestions.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Abdollahi, A.; Akbari, S.; Maimani, H.R. Non-commuting graph of a group. J. Algebra 2006, 298, 468–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Afkhami, M.; Farrokhi, D.G.M.; Khashyarmanesh, K. Planar, toroidal and projective commuting and non-commuting graphs. Comm. Algebra 2015, 43, 2964–2970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahanjideh, N.; Iranmanesh, A. On the relation between the non-commuting graph and the prime graph. Int. J. Group Theory 2012, 1, 25–28. [Google Scholar]
- Darafsheh, M.R. Groups with the same non-commuting graph. Discret. Appl. Math. 2009, 157, 833–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Darafsheh, M.R.; Bigdely, H.; Bahrami, A.; Monfared, M.D. Some results on non-commuting graph of a finite group. Ital. J. Pure Appl. Math. 2010, 27, 107–118. [Google Scholar]
- Dutta, P.; Nath, R.K. On Laplacian energy of non-commuting graphs of finite groups. J. Linear Top. Algebra 2018, 7, 121–132. [Google Scholar]
- Dutta, P.; Dutta, J.; Nath, R.K. On Laplacian spectrum of non-commuting graphs of finite groups. Indian J. Pure Appl. Math. 2018, 49, 205–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jahandideh, M.; Darafsheh, M.R.; Sarmin, N.H.; Omer, S.M.S. Conditions on the edges and vertices of non-commuting graph. J. Tech. 2015, 74, 73–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Jahandideh, M.; Darafsheh, M.R.; Shirali, N. Computation of topological indices of non-commuting graphs. Ital. J. Pure Appl. Math. 2015, 34, 299–310. [Google Scholar]
- Jahandideh, M.; Modabernia, R.; Shokrolahi, S. Non-commuting graphs of certain almost simple groups. Asian-Eur. J. Math. 2019, 12, 1950081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jahandideh, M.; Sarmin, N.H.; Omer, S.M.S. The topological indices of non-commuting graph of a finite group. Int. J. Pure Appl. Math. 2015, 105, 27–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moghaddamfar, A.R. About non-commuting graphs. Sib. Math. J. 2005, 47, 1112–1116. [Google Scholar]
- Moghaddamfar, A.R.; Shi, W.J.; Zhou, W.; Zokayi, A.R. On the non-commuting graph associated with a finite group. Sib. Math. J. 2005, 46, 325–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nath, R.K.; Sharma, M.; Dutta, P.; Shang, Y. On r-noncommuting graph of finite rings. Axioms 2021, 10, 233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Talebi, A.A. On the non-commuting graphs of group D2n. Int. J. Algebra 2008, 2, 957–961. [Google Scholar]
- Vatandoost, E.; Khalili, M. Domination number of the non-commuting graph of finite groups. Electron. J. Graph Theory Appl. 2018, 6, 228–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neumann, B.H. A problem of Paul Erdös on groups. J. Aust. Math. Soc. 1976, 21, 467–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharma, M.; Nath, R.K. Relative g-Noncommuting Graph of Finite Groups. Available online: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2008.04123.pdf (accessed on 10 September 2020).
- Nasiri, M.; Erfanian, A.; Ganjali, M.; Jafarzadeh, A. g-noncommuting graph of some finite groups. J. Prime Res. Math. 2016, 12, 16–23. [Google Scholar]
- Nasiri, M.; Erfanian, A.; Ganjali, M.; Jafarzadeh, A. Isomorphic g-noncommuting graphs of finite groups. Pub. Math. Deb. 2017, 91, 33–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nasiri, M.; Erfanian, A.; Mohammadian, A. Connectivity and planarity of g-noncommuting graphs of finite groups. J. Agebra Appl. 2018, 16, 1850107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tolue, B.; Erfanian, A.; Jafarzadeh, A. A kind of non-commuting graph of finite groups. J. Sci. Islam. Repub. Iran 2014, 25, 379–384. [Google Scholar]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).





