Next Article in Journal
Current Considerations in Surgical Treatment for Adolescents and Young Women with Breast Cancer
Previous Article in Journal
Health Consequences of the COVID-19 Pandemic among Health-Care Workers: A Comparison between Groups Involved and Not Involved in COVID-19 Care
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Correction

Correction: Alijanzadeh et al. Measurement Invariance and Differential Item Functioning of the Health Literacy Instrument for Adults (HELIA): A Large-Scale Cross-Sectional Study in Iran. Healthcare 2022, 10, 2064

1
Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Research Institute for Prevention of Non-Communicable Diseases, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin 3419759811, Iran
2
Institute of Allied Health Sciences, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 70101, Taiwan
3
Biostatistics Consulting Center, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 70101, Taiwan
4
Department of Nursing, School of Health and Welfare, Jönköping University, 553 18 Jönköping, Sweden
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Healthcare 2022, 10(12), 2541; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10122541
Submission received: 22 November 2022 / Accepted: 22 November 2022 / Published: 15 December 2022
There were some errors in the original publication in the Abstract and Results sections [1]. Abstract: (N = 9678; 67.3% females; mean age = 36.44 years); Results: 9678 participants (3073 males; 31.4%).
A correction has been made to Abstract, line 6: (N = 9775; 67.3% females; mean age = 36.44 years); Results, Paragraph 1, line 1: 9775 participants (3073 males; 31.4%).
Table 1 has also been corrected with respect to the total number of participants as well as adding missing values to gender, city, educational status, accommodation and marital status. The DIF contrast across the age groups was then corrected in Section 3 and Table 2.
The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.

Reference

  1. Alijanzadeh, M.; Lin, C.-Y.; Yahaghi, R.; Rahmani, J.; Yazdi, N.; Jafari, E.; Alijani, H.; Zamani, N.; Fotuhi, R.; Taherkhani, E.; et al. Measurement Invariance and Differential Item Functioning of the Health Literacy Instrument for Adults (HELIA): A Large-Scale Cross-Sectional Study in Iran. Healthcare 2022, 10, 2064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 1. Participant characteristics (N = 9775).
Table 1. Participant characteristics (N = 9775).
Mean ± SD or n (%)
Age (years)36.44 ± 11.97
Gender
Male 3073 (31.4)
Female 6576 (67.3)
Missing126 (1.3)
City
Qazvin 4655 (47.6)
Takestan1216 (12.4)
Avaj330 (3.4)
Abyek 657 (6.7)
Bueenzahra963 (9.9)
Alborz1867 (19.1)
Missing87 (0.9)
Educational status
Primary school1082 (11.1)
Secondary school1576 (16.1)
Diploma 3220 (32.9)
University 3851 (39.4)
Missing46 (0.5)
Accommodation
City 7287 (74.6)
Rural 2309 (23.6)
Missing179 (1.8)
Marital status
Single 1779 (18.2)
Married 6987 (71.5)
Divorced/widowed 90 (0.9)
Missing 919 (9.4)
Table 2. Psychometric properties of the Health Literacy Instrument for Adults at the item level.
Table 2. Psychometric properties of the Health Literacy Instrument for Adults at the item level.
Item #Analyses from Classical Test TheoryRasch Analyses
Factor Loading *,†Item-Total CorrelationSKInfit MnSqOutfit MnSqDifficultyDiscrimination DIF Contrast across Gender §,¶DIF Contrast across Education §,#DIF Contrast across Accommodation §,# DIF Contrast across Age §,#
Re-10.795 0.7240.795 0.3751.161.18−0.380. 790.10−0.230.110.00
Re-20.846 0.7880.846 0.1060.890.890.051.12−0.220.00−0.050.16
Re-30.903 0.8160.903 0.0790.810.800.041.210.000.080.10−0.18
Re-40.921 0.7530.921 −0.1101.101.100.290.91−0.100.17−0.150.00
AC-10.833 0.7800.833 −0.0581.001.03−0.010.970.130.160.05−0.14
AC-20.850 0.8030.850 0.0960.880.86−0.311.13−0.10−0.140.15−0.18
AC-30.886 0.8100.886 −0.4410.910.920.501.09−0.04−0.110.00−0.07
AC-40.879 0.8240.879 −0.1670.830.820.131.19−0.09−0.080.00−0.09
AC-50.859 0.7940.859 −0.1340.990.990.201.02−0.100.02−0.100.36
AC-60.822 0.7230.822 0.3231.361.32−0.510.650.230.16−0.150.12
Un-10.700 0.7190.700 1.2831.051.11−0.310.91−0.07−0.160.060.06
Un-20.688 0.7580.688 1.4230.930.90−0.401.10−0.10−0.100.040.05
Und-30.811 0.7600.811 0.3730.980.990.361.030.100.14−0.110.00
Un-40.770 0.7950.770 1.0600.830.84−0.051.180.190.110.00−0.05
Un-50.706 0.7680.706 1.8040.960.90−0.521.09−0.070.000.15−0.13
Un-60.774 0.7590.774 0.5470.930.970.171.05−0.02−0.280.080.00
Un-70.839 0.6940.839 −0.0031.281.300.760.700.000.24−0.200.04
Ap-10.906 0.7260.906 −0.1771.111.090.330.920.000.56−0.15−0.35
Ap-20.847 0.7820.847 −0.0590.810.800.171.210.10−0.100.000.20
Ap-30.810 0.7770.810 0.0090.810.820.001.180.06−0.230.040.12
Ap-40.782 0.6660.782 0.4241.221.25−0.500.72−0.18−0.260.040.05
De-10.766 0.6440.766 0.3270.941.06−0.250.98−0.070.170.08−0.35
De-20.689 0.6600.689 1.0070.970.97−0.621.04−0.200.100.000.00
De-30.714 0.6620.714 0.0841.041.11−0.120.96−0.08−0.050.000.05
De-40.774 0.6320.774 −0.4291.301.310.160.720.040.000.00−0.06
De-50.743 0.7410.743 −0.1100.770.79−0.031.25−0.07−0.120.090.07
De-60.766 0.6310.766 −0.9691.261.290.790.680.13−0.03−0.180.13
De-70.732 0.7320.732 0.0190.740.75−0.121.260.07−0.120.14−0.12
De-80.757 0.7170.757 0.1420.820.81−0.231.20−0.13−0.100.14−0.13
De-90.787 0.6940.787 −0.2940.991.00.221.030.000.12−0.160.00
De-100.731 0.6960.731 −0.3490.920.970.331.060.00−0.100.040.06
De-110.682 0.6200.682 0.4031.211.24−0.320.810.220.22−0.190.28
De-120.786 0.7100.786 −0.2440.940.960.181.080.00−0.030.030.00
* All factor loadings were significant at 0.001; S = skewness; K = kurtosis; Re = reading; Ac = access to information; Un = understanding; Ap = appraisal; De = decision making/behavioral intention. Based on first-order confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). CFA model fit: χ2 (df) = 5052.419 (485); comparative fit index = 0.993; Tucker-Lewis index = 0.993; root mean square error of approximation (90% CI) = 0.033 (0.032,0.034); and standardized root mean square residual = 0.041. § DIF contrast >1 indicates substantial DIF. DIF contrast across gender = difficulty for females − difficulty for males. # DIF contrast across education = difficulty for participants with lower education (lower than diploma) − difficulty for participants with higher education (higher than diploma). # DIF contrast across accommodation = difficulty for participants living in city areas − difficulty for participants living in rural areas. # DIF contrast across age = difficulty for younger-aged participants (<36.44 years) − difficulty for older-aged participants (≥36.44 years). MnSq = mean square error; DIF = differential item functioning; S = skewness; K = kurtosis.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alijanzadeh, M.; Lin, C.-Y.; Yahaghi, R.; Rahmani, J.; Yazdi, N.; Jafari, E.; Alijani, H.; Zamani, N.; Fotuhi, R.; Taherkhani, E.; et al. Correction: Alijanzadeh et al. Measurement Invariance and Differential Item Functioning of the Health Literacy Instrument for Adults (HELIA): A Large-Scale Cross-Sectional Study in Iran. Healthcare 2022, 10, 2064. Healthcare 2022, 10, 2541. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10122541

AMA Style

Alijanzadeh M, Lin C-Y, Yahaghi R, Rahmani J, Yazdi N, Jafari E, Alijani H, Zamani N, Fotuhi R, Taherkhani E, et al. Correction: Alijanzadeh et al. Measurement Invariance and Differential Item Functioning of the Health Literacy Instrument for Adults (HELIA): A Large-Scale Cross-Sectional Study in Iran. Healthcare 2022, 10, 2064. Healthcare. 2022; 10(12):2541. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10122541

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alijanzadeh, Mehran, Chung-Ying Lin, Rafat Yahaghi, Jalal Rahmani, Nahid Yazdi, Elahe Jafari, Hashem Alijani, Narges Zamani, Razie Fotuhi, Elham Taherkhani, and et al. 2022. "Correction: Alijanzadeh et al. Measurement Invariance and Differential Item Functioning of the Health Literacy Instrument for Adults (HELIA): A Large-Scale Cross-Sectional Study in Iran. Healthcare 2022, 10, 2064" Healthcare 10, no. 12: 2541. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10122541

APA Style

Alijanzadeh, M., Lin, C. -Y., Yahaghi, R., Rahmani, J., Yazdi, N., Jafari, E., Alijani, H., Zamani, N., Fotuhi, R., Taherkhani, E., Buchali, Z., Jafari, R., Mahmoudi, N., Poorzolfaghar, L., Ahmadizade, S., Shahbazkhania, A., Alimoradi, Z., & Pakpour, A. H. (2022). Correction: Alijanzadeh et al. Measurement Invariance and Differential Item Functioning of the Health Literacy Instrument for Adults (HELIA): A Large-Scale Cross-Sectional Study in Iran. Healthcare 2022, 10, 2064. Healthcare, 10(12), 2541. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10122541

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop