Next Article in Journal
Optimal Deep Stacked Sparse Autoencoder Based Osteosarcoma Detection and Classification Model
Next Article in Special Issue
Assessment of Diagnostic Imaging Sector in Public Hospitals in Northern Jordan
Previous Article in Journal
The Effects of Prior Mammography Screening on the Performance of Breast Cancer Detection in Taiwan
Previous Article in Special Issue
Quality Assurance of a Cross-Border and Sub-Specialized Teleradiology Service
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Quantitative MRI of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions: A New Diagnostic Approach

Healthcare 2022, 10(6), 1039; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10061039
by Paul Andrei Ștefan 1,2, Roxana Adelina Lupean 3,*, Andrei Lebovici 2,4, Csaba Csutak 2,4, Carmen Bianca Crivii 1, Iulian Opincariu 1 and Cosmin Caraiani 5,6
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Healthcare 2022, 10(6), 1039; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10061039
Submission received: 29 April 2022 / Revised: 30 May 2022 / Accepted: 31 May 2022 / Published: 2 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Collection Radiology-Driven Projects: Science, Networks, and Healthcare)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

  1. Key words are reflect the focus of the manuscript, but should be simplified.
  2. The first author self-cited 11 times. Some of the citations have nothing to do with the topic of the article.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

In this retrospective study, authors investigated the role of quantitative MRI in the distinction between mucinous and non-mucinous pancreatic cystic lesions, focusing on SIM and radiomics analysis.

Overall, the article is well organized and structured, and results are clearly described in tables and figures.

  • Introduction should be summarized
  • Lines 131-132: authors define the acronym SIM as signal intensity measurement, but, in the text, they still use SI measurement (e.g. line 321, Table 2) for the same value.
  • In the Methods, authors should specify the Tesla of the MRI machine
  • A Table with patients’ characteristics could be added to have an overview about the included population
  • Conclusions should be improved, especially regarding the absence of statically significance of SIM
  • Authors should check the maximum number of keywords according to journal’s guidelines

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Dear Author;
Thank you for response.

Author Response

Point 1: Dear Author; Thank you for response.

Answer 1: Dear Reviewer, thank you for the good observations and your effort in reviewing this manuscript. With gratitude, The Authors

Back to TopTop