Next Article in Journal
Osteoporosis Pre-Screening Using Ensemble Machine Learning in Postmenopausal Korean Women
Previous Article in Journal
Video-Assisted Stylet Intubation with a Plastic Sheet Barrier, a Safe and Simple Technique for Tracheal Intubation of COVID-19 Patients
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Strengthening Breast Cancer Screening Mammography Services in Pakistan Using Islamabad Capital Territory as a Pilot Public Health Intervention

by
Ayesha Isani Majeed
1,2,*,
Assad Hafeez
1 and
Shahzad Ali Khan
1
1
Health Services Academy (HSA), Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan
2
Department of Radiology, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences (PIMS), Islamabad 44000, Pakistan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Healthcare 2022, 10(6), 1106; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10061106
Submission received: 8 May 2022 / Revised: 31 May 2022 / Accepted: 11 June 2022 / Published: 14 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Health Policy)

Abstract

:
Late diagnosis of treatable breast cancer is the reason for higher breast cancer mortality. Until now, no public breast cancer facility has been established in the Islamabad Capital Territory. First, a Federal Breast Screening Center (FBSC) was established. Afterward, awareness campaigns about breast cancer were organized among the public. Subsequently, women above 40 years of age were provided with mammography screenings. Data were analyzed in SPSS version 22.0. An intervention was performed using a six tier approach to strengthening the health system. Utilizing the offices of the FBSC and the national breast cancer screening campaign, breast cancer awareness has become a national cause and is being advocated by the highest offices of the country. The number of females undergoing mammography has increased each year, starting from 39 in 2015 to 1403 in 2019. Most of the cases were BI-RAD I (n = 2201, 50.74%) followed by BI-RAD II (n = 864, 19.92%), BI-RAD III (n = 516, 11.89%), BI-RAD IV (n = 384, 8.85%), BI-RAD V (n = 161, 3.71%), and BI-RVAD VI (n = 60, 1.38%). The current study has theoretical and practical implications for the contemplation of policymakers. The FBSC can serve as a model center for the establishment of centers in other parts of the country, thereby promoting nationwide screening coverage.

1. Introduction

The health system comprises multiple entities including organizations, resources, institutions, legislation as well as people who are striving to improve health. Health system strengthening (HSS) refers to addressing and ameliorating the issues faced by the people, resources, organizations, and other components of the health system. The World Health Organization (WHO) has put forward a breakdown for health system strengthening (HSS) by dividing it into six components: health service delivery, workforce, health information system, medical technology, health financing, and leadership/governance. When assessing the situation of health care service delivery in Pakistan, the picture is not very promising. According to a Lancet study, Pakistan’s health system ranked number 154 while that of India is 145 out of 195 countries based on overall performance [1]. Therefore, it is necessary to make amendments to Pakistan’s health care system for improvement. Pakistan has a per capita health expenditure of around USD 18. Estimates indicate that approximately 25% of the deaths in Pakistan are attributed to non-communicable diseases (NCD). NCDs exhort a significant burden on individuals and the country’s economy. The National Action Plan for Prevention and Control of Non-Communicable Diseases (NAP-NCD) aims to control and prevent NCDs, thereby decreasing the mortality rate and economic burden on the country. Among all of NCDs, one of the biggest challenges is the rising mortality and incidence of breast cancer [2].
Breast cancer is a basic public health problem responsible for a continual increase in cancer-related morbidities around the globe. In both developed and developing countries, the prevalence and mortality rate of breast cancer is on the rise, majorly affecting women above the age of 40 [3]. According to GLOBOCON 2020, worldwide, breast cancer incidence has surpassed lung cancer with 2.3 million new reported cases in 2020. A total of 684,996 deaths were reported to be due to breast cancer all over the world, thus breast cancer is responsible for the highest death toll among all cancers in females [4]. Breast cancer mortality is greatest in 156 out of 185 countries. Comparatively, breast cancer death rates are greater in underdeveloped countries [5].
The Breast Health Global Initiative (BHGI) developed a paradigm for early breast cancer diagnosis and treatment in developing nations [6]. They studied how early detection and multimodal treatment affected breast cancer outcomes. Studies have indicated that early breast cancer diagnosis lowered cancer mortality. Mammography screening detects malignancies. The American College of Radiology (ACR) advises starting mammography at the age of 40 [7]. More frequent screenings increase the likelihood of detecting malignancies early and successfully treating them. Thus, mammography screening programs and resources are needed for early diagnosis [8].
Mostly, the late diagnosis of treatable breast cancer is the reason for the higher breast cancer mortality rate [9]. In Pakistan, there is a literature gap as well as the lack of a national cancer registry, resulting in limited information on breast cancer prevalence in different regions [10]. However, according to some studies, almost one in nine women in Pakistan suffers from breast cancer [3].
Therefore, in Pakistan, there is a dire need for a breast cancer screening program. Until 2015, no public breast cancer facility had been established in the country’s capital (i.e., Islamabad Capital Territory (ICT)). Some diagnostic machines were previously available in Nuclear Medicine, Oncology and Radiotherapy Institute (NORI) as well as some private breast cancer diagnostic facilities that were available to the public in the ICT. The Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences (PIMS), the primary public health care facility in the ICT had one nonfunctional machine since 2005. This scenario presents a dire need for the establishment of an efficient yet cost-effective system for breast cancer screening in the Islamabad Capital Territory.
Apart from the establishment of a breast cancer screening facility, there is also a need for public awareness regarding the disease’s signs and symptoms, so that the people can perform breast self-examination (BSE) and clinical breast examination (CBE) for the early detection of breast cancer. Awareness relating to the need for regular mammography is also a prerequisite for early breast cancer diagnosis [11].
Factors responsible for breast cancer development must be identified and studied in detail as the knowledge of these factors can play a pivotal role in the early detection of breast cancer. Knowledge about these factors must also be made part of the awareness campaigns relating to breast cancer detection, as empowering women with knowledge about the causative factors in conjunction with breast cancer awareness can substantially increase a patient’s skill to carry out self-assessment for the early detection of breast cancer [12]. These practices will in turn benefit both the patient and the medical practitioners through an early presentation of the disease.
The study was conducted to strengthen the mammography screening system of Pakistan by using ICT as a pilot. Different aspects of the study include the analysis of the current situation of the health system of the ICT, setting up a free mammography service, awareness campaigns about breast cancer, the training of female health workers, and the analysis of this intervention.

2. Materials and Methods

The study was divided into different phases (Table 1).

2.1. Development of Screening Centre

In the first phase, a budget of PKR 225 million was generated by the government to carry out breast cancer awareness activities in the ICT and establish a dedicated breast cancer screening center at the PIMS, bearing in mind the need for mammography screening to reduce the morbidity and mortality of breast cancer in the ICT. A 2D mammography machine of Metrionics, a 3D digital computed tomomammography with stereotactic biopsy machine from Hologic, and an ultrasound with Elastography software from GE healthcare was purchased.

2.2. Community Based Interventions

In the next phase, awareness campaigns about breast cancer were organized among the general public. In 2016 and 2017, multiple field visits in urban and rural Islamabad were carried out to spread awareness regarding breast cancer and its detection.
To create awareness in the rural population, a team of doctors and nurses were given training at the Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences to recognize the signs and symptoms of breast cancer and to enable them to perform a proper clinical examination in the field. Lady health workers (LHWs) and lady health visitors (LHVs) recruited at the basic health units (BHUs) and rural health centers (RHCs) in the ICT were trained for these campaigns by general surgeons, radiologists, and gynecologists. The training included the awareness about the signs and symptoms of breast cancer, examination, management, and public awareness campaigns. LHWs and LHVs motivated the female population of selected areas to visit their closest BHUs and RHCs to attend lectures detailing the risk factors, warning signs, screening, self-examination, and therapeutic approaches to breast cancer.
A referral system was introduced among the BHUs, RHCs, and FBSC, Islamabad. The experts also visited girls’ schools, colleges, and universities in the Islamabad Capital Territory. Among this team of experts, radiologists, general surgeons, genetic counselors, and gynecologists delivered presentations on all aspects of breast cancer. These lectures also consisted of the risk factors, signs and symptoms, self-examination, screening, and the role of early screening in the effective management of breast cancer. After attending the awareness seminar, women from the rural background of all ages were referred to PIMS Screening Center.
In the years 2018 and 2019, the focus from field visits was shifted to the utilization of press/print and electronic media. On multiple occasions between 2015 and 2019, walks were conducted for the awareness of breast cancer and the benefits of screening.

2.3. Impact of Screening Mammography

The FBSC started operating in October 2015. It offers state-of-the-art free mammography services for all women over 40 years of age, and ultrasound facilities for women younger than 40 years of age.
Subsequently, all women from the selected areas above 30 years of age were provided with general breast examination. All women above 40 were willing to undergo mammography screening were provided with free screening services. Women between 30 and 40 years of age and with some symptoms or lump on examination were also offered a mammography. The 2D-mammography screening was performed by a female technologist via the digital enhanced stereotactic mammography machine with biopsy facilities from Hologic. Two views (i.e., cranio-caudal (CC) and medio-lateral oblique (MLO)) were taken. Images were categorized according to the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BIRADS) classification; fifth edition by post-graduate trainees and then verified by a consultant radiologist with a minimum of five years of experience [13]. The demographic data of these women were also collected. After three to six months, the BIRADS III lesions were followed with ultrasound. Patients with a family history were followed after three months while the rest were followed after six months as per the ACR guidelines. Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) was offered to those women with high suspicion. Trucut biopsies were conducted for the BIRADS IV and V patients, and the specimens were sent for histopathological classification. Patients confirmed via histopathological classification were categorized as BIRADS VI. From 2018, women under the age of 40 were provided with sonomammography services. Ultrasound examination was performed by a sonologist with five years of experience. The BIRADs classification was also performed on sonomammograms.
The flowsheet diagram showing the operation of breast cancer screening center is shown in Figure 1 below.
Detailed data analysis was performed after five years of functioning of FBSC. Since 2D-mammography screening was started in 2015 while sonomammography in 2018, therefore, the data included the five year data of 2D-mammography (2015–2019) and 2 year data of sonomammography (2018–2019). Data were managed and analyzed in SPSS version 22.0. A year-wise record of screening mammography was analyzed. Cross-tabulation was performed to check the distribution of the BIRADs year-wise and age-wise.

3. Results

3.1. Health System Strengthening by Screening Center Development

The establishment of the breast cancer screening center at PIMS took place bearing in mind the six tiers of health system strengthening (HSS). The establishment of the center itself comprised the ‘health service delivery’ component of HSS. ‘Medical technology’ consisting of ultrasound with elastography software, 2D mammography machine, 3D digital computed tomomammography with stereotactic biopsy machines worth PKR 75 million were installed. All machines were integrated with a hospital management information system (HMIS). The woman could be traced via the PCN-number allotted once they reported to the hospital. ‘Health financing’ was available in the form of an approved budget of PKR 225 million from the Government. A complete ‘workforce’ for the efficient working of the center was developed according to Table 2. ‘Leadership and governance’ was provided via involving the office of the District Health Officer (DHO) and principals of educational institutes for their kind permission and support regarding the project.

3.2. Community Based Interventions

A total of 269 LHWs were trained to carry out clinical breast examinations. A total of 1670 people of different age groups underwent breast examinations as part of the awareness and screening sessions. A referral system was created to send women to FBCSC in need of further evaluation by screening modalities such as ultrasound and mammography. Table 3 and Table 4 show the record of such activities in a rural population in 2016 and 2017.
A total of 1000–1500 students of different age groups underwent these awareness sessions in urban Islamabad. In addition to this, a student volunteer program was also launched. Those willing to participate were made part of teams visiting the BHUs and RHCs. Apart from lady health workers (LHW), 10 lady health supervisors (LHS) were also trained. Apart from the LHW, 10 LHS and two ALHS were also trained. Table 5 shows the list of LHS trained for the ICT population:
The colleges and universities visited in the urban ICT are shown in Table 6:
Pamphlets and brochures were disseminated to spread awareness (Supplementary Figure S1). Multiple journal clubs were arranged to share the new research and approaches in the field of breast cancer screening with the consultants and residents.
A walk was arranged to raise awareness regarding breast cancer in October 2019. The federal minister for the Ministry of National Health Services Regulation and Coordination (MoNHSRC) participated and led the walk (Supplementary Figure S2). A workshop was conducted from the platform of the Radiological Society of Pakistan (RSP). The concept of one-stop breast cancer was floated through this workshop. The surgeons and pathologists were also incorporated to ensure a multidisciplinary approach. The consultants and residents of surgery and pathology participated in this discussion and the mechanism of working a one-stop breast clinic was discussed in the workshop.
The primary researcher was appointed as the focal person for breast cancer awareness. A strong voice was raised from the presidency by the First Lady for breast cancer awareness.
Letters were sent to federal ministers for their participation in breast cancer awareness campaigns. In the same year, the metro buses and stations were branded with breast cancer awareness messages. The office of the district health officer (DHO) was taken on board to formulate an effective plan for the training of LHWs. Utilizing the impact of cellular services on the general population, messages for breast cancer awareness were transmitted by the Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA). The impact of media cannot be denied and it is considered as the fourth pillar of government. The awareness messages were broadcast over different TV channels of the benefits of breast cancer screening. Different talk shows and programs were also conducted.
Figure 2 shows the details of the number of patients visiting the center for mammography screening purposes:
As the results depict, we can see that the number of women undergoing mammograms increased every year. Month-wise analyses of all years were also performed, which are depicted in Figure 3:
The patients attending the scanning center were at the maximum in November, followed by December, April, March, and October.
The possible reason for this would be the pleasant weather in March and April after the winter spell and the breast cancer awareness campaign in October, which led to an increase in the number of patients visiting the scanning center up to December before the winter set in.
The total women imaged from October 2015 to December 2019 was 4337. The mean age for the women coming for mammography screening was 49.04 ± 8.93. Figure 4 shows the graphical representation of the age-wise distribution of women visiting for mammography screening.
The aged group most commonly attending the center was noted to be between 41 and 45 with the number being 1222 out of 4337, which was 28.17%, followed by the 46–50-year old age group with 1016 out of 4337, which was 23.42%.
Figure 5 shows the BIRADS categorization of women having mammogram screening.
Most of the cases were BIRAD I, which means normal without any findings. These cases accounted for 2201 out of 4337, which was 50.74%. The second most common category was BIRAD II, which was 864 out of 4337 (19.92%). BIRAD III was the third most common with 516 out of 4337, which made it 11.89%. The BIRAD IV (probably malignant) category accounted for 384 out of 4337 or 8.85%. The BIRAD V (definitely category) numbered 161 out of 4337 (3.71%). The BIRAD VI cases were 60 out of 4337, which was 1.38%.
The age group-wise distribution of the BIRADs is shown in Table 7.
An ultrasound machine was installed in 2017 at FBSC and became functional in 2018. A total of 3492 women underwent sonomammography during 2018 and 2019. The mean age of the women undergoing sonomammography was 31.83 ± 14 years. An increase in the trend was noted in the months of October and November. Figure 6 shows the detailed analysis of this trend.
The BIRADs categorization on sonommamography showed BIRADs I to be the most common type, followed by BIRADs II and III. BIRADs VI was found in 0.51% of the females. Figure 7 shows the detailed BIRADs categorization upon sonomammography.

4. Discussion

According to the World Health Organization (WHO), the health of an individual can be defined as “a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity’’ [14]. In order to ensure adequate health at a population level, a health system is required that aims at ameliorating the average health of a population. “Health system” is defined by the WHO as all the organizations, institutions, resources, and people whose primary purpose is to improve their health [15]. To strengthen health systems means to address the key constraints related to health worker staffing, infrastructure, health commodities (such as equipment and medicines), logistics, tracking progress, and effective financing at all levels of the system functioning. The WHO laid out a framework for action on strengthening health systems with six building blocks: service delivery; health workforce; information; medical products, vaccines, and technologies; financing; and leadership and governance [14]. Moreover, in developing health care systems, new situations or public health crises often arise, leading toward a need for an ‘intervention tool’, which serves to strengthen the health care system for a particular purpose.
Pakistan is a low- to middle-income (LMIC) country. Its health care system is far from being able to sustain its gigantic population. Out of all the women’s health concerns in middle income countries, breast cancer has emerged as one of the biggest dangers to public health [16]. As for the rest of the world, breast cancer is one the leading causes of NCD related deaths in the female population of Pakistan [17] According to recent GLOBOCAN cancer statistics, breast cancer forms 24.5% of the total cancers. The ACR recommends mammography screening to be started from forty years to the control and timely management of the disease [18]. In well-developed countries, where 90% of the population has screening coverage, disease is usually diagnosed at stage I. However, in middle- and low-income countries with poor screening coverage, disease is diagnosed at late stages, thus results in poor prognosis. Delays in diagnosis are usually due to poor facilities, poverty, cultural and religious beliefs, and misconceptions [19].
Due to the high burden of breast cancer in Pakistan, this study was designed to help strengthen the health system of the ICT. The total female population of the ICT was 950,721 with 474,887 females residing in urban Islamabad and 475,840 females in rural areas. Until the start of this study, no public health care facility related to screening breast cancer had been established in the ICT, though private hospitals have some equipment that perform mammography upon payment. This gap justified the need for the establishment of an efficient public breast cancer screening facility in the ICT. For this purpose, breast cancer screening was used as an interventional tool in this study.
In the first phase of the study, the FBSC was developed bearing in mind the six tiers of health system strengthening by the WHO.
In the next phase, awareness to the general public about the establishment of such a system and its utility is required. This was conducted via community-based medical education (CBME), which is the delivery of medical education in a social context. It has been proved to be successful in instigating the importance of medical issues in the minds of the public in many studies. This health advocacy has a pertinent role in HSS [20]. Important early detection steps in this context include CBME, clinical breast examination, and resource adapted mammography screening [8]. Thus, bearing these factors in mind, the urban and rural populations in the ICT were targeted for awareness campaigns. Effective awareness campaigns consist of many components such as in-person visits by experts, doctors, etc. to the community as well as the usage of other communication channels such as media, text messaging, etc., which are all multiple parts of an effective awareness campaign. The use of these multiple components is pivotal to the success of a CBME campaign.
In this study, multi-modal communication was used in the awareness campaign about the importance of early diagnosis and breast cancer screening utility for increased survival rates and the health of the patients. The purpose of this awareness campaign was to increase the number of patients visiting the FBSC so that this develops into an effective intervention for health system strengthening in the ICT.
The FBSC started operating in 2015 and since then, there has been an increased number of patients visiting the center and undergoing screening and mammography each year. Such an increasing trend in patients visiting the center is an effective translation of a successful awareness campaign. Globally, October is celebrated as breast cancer awareness month. The highest number of screening mammographies are conducted this month according to various statistics as a result of the increased community-based interventions this month. A study conducted on the attendance of women undergoing mammograms month-wise reported the highest number of mammograms in the month of October [21]. Our study results were in line with this observation, with the highest number of mammographies in November and December. After October, May and June were the other months with the highest attendance. They attributed this to pleasant weather conditions in their country. In our results, second peak attendance was noted in the months of March and April with the lowest attendance in June and July. This can be attributed to the pleasant weather of Islamabad in the months of March and April compared to the hot weather in June and July.
The main goal behind any screening program is the early diagnosis of breast cancer. In Asia, there is usually a late diagnosis and subsequently a high mortality rate for breast cancer. Only in some countries such as China, Korea, Taiwan, and Japan, are there population-based screening programs. The rest of the Asian countries usually have opportunistic screening programs. In Malaysia, a private setup showed a cancer diagnosis rate of only 0.39% [22]. In our study, histopathology-proven malignancy was detected in only 1.38% of the patients. This figure is comparable to other low-income countries that have inadequate screening coverage. A similar study in Nigeria reported a figure of 2% of histopathology proven malignancy among the screening mammography cases [23].
In contrast, countries with full coverage have reported high detection rates in contrast to countries without coverage. In the United States, 13% of cancer detection rates were reported during the results of the 2019–2020 screening (i.e., one in eight women has a risk of breast cancer) [24]. A good prognosis was evident by the fact that the majority of the patients had localized disease. A similar trend was observed in Europe where countries with 75–85% screening coverage such as Sweden, Finland, Denmark, and the UK have higher survival rates compared to countries with a screening coverage less than 50% (i.e., Serbia, Croatia, and Hungary) [25].

5. Conclusions

The current study has theoretical and practical implications for the contemplation of policymakers and experts. The Federal Breast Screening Center can serve as a model center for the establishment of centers in other parts of the country, thereby promoting nationwide screening coverage. Additionally, there is a need to focus on the continuous community-based medical education of women regarding breast cancer screening to prevent its lethal outcomes. For the prevention of disease at the national level, there is a need to establish a national-level free screening program. Only this can help in early diagnosis, thereby reducing the morbidity and mortality related to breast cancer in Pakistan.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/healthcare10061106/s1. Figure S1. Glimpse of awareness campaigns in rural areas of ICT. Figure S2. Workshop for creating awareness regarding Breast Cancer Prevention.

Author Contributions

A.I.M. (Deputy Project Director and in charge, project execution, research work, write-up), A.H. (Research Supervision and Review of Report), S.A.K. (Co-Supervision and review of the report). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The Public Sector Development Program (PSDP) through the Ministry of Capital Administration and Development Division (CADD) with Project ID no: 3694. A budget of PKR 225 million was handed over to the PIMS in the fiscal year 2013–2014 and the project was completed in 2017.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was conducted after approval from the Ethical Review Board (ERB) of the Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Medical University, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences (PIMS), and the Advanced Studies and Research Board (ASRB) of Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed verbal consent was obtained from all women joining the screening program.

Data Availability Statement

Data will be provided upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

Special thanks to all of the staff members of the PIMS who willingly participated in the project.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Fullman, N.; Yearwood, J.; Abay, S.M.; Abbafati, C.; Abd-Allah, F.; Abdela, J.; Abdelalim, A.; Abebe, Z.; Abebo, T.A.; Aboyans, V.; et al. Measuring performance on the Healthcare Access and Quality Index for 195 countries and territories and selected subnational locations: A systematic analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet 2018, 391, 2236–2271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Nishtar, S. Prevention of non-communicable diseases in Pakistan: An integrated partnership-based model. Health Res. Policy Syst. 2004, 2, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Zaheer, S.; Shah, N.; Maqbool, S.A.; Soomro, N.M. Estimates of past and future time trends in age-specific breast cancer incidence among women in Karachi, Pakistan: 2004–2025. BMC Public Health 2019, 19, 1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. WHO. Source: Globocan 2020. 2020; Volume 419, pp. 3–4. Available online: https://ascopost.com/news/december-2020/globocan-2020-database-provides-latest-global-data-on-cancer-burden-cancer-deaths/#:~:text=Female%20breast%20cancer%20has%20now,with%20685%2C000%20deaths%20in%202020 (accessed on 8 June 2021).
  5. Sung, H.; Ferlay, J.; Siegel, R.L.; Laversanne, M.; Soerjomataram, I.; Jemal, A.; Bray, F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2021, 71, 209–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Duggan, C.; Dvaladze, A.; Rositch, A.F.; Ginsburg, O.; Yip, C.-H.; Horton, S.; Camacho Rodriguez, R.; Eniu, A.; Mutebi, M.; Bourque, J.-M.; et al. The Breast Health Global Initiative 2018 Global Summit on Improving Breast Healthcare Through Resource-Stratified Phased Implementation: Methods and overview. Cancer 2020, 126 (Suppl. 10), 2339–2352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Monticciolo, D.L.; Newell, M.S.; Moy, L.; Niell, B.; Monsees, B.; Sickles, E.A. Breast Cancer Screening in Women at Higher-Than-Average Risk: Recommendations From the ACR. J. Am. Coll. Radiol. 2018, 15, 408–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Anderson, B.O.; Cazap, E. Breast health global initiative (BHGI) outline for program development in Latin America. Salud Publica Mex. 2009, 51, s309–s315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Waks, A.G.; Winer, E.P. Breast Cancer Treatment: A Review. JAMA—J. Am. Med. Assoc. 2019, 321, 288–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Riaz, R.; Masood, N.; Benish, A. Red flag symptoms: Detailed account of clinicopathological features in young-onset colorectal cancer. Intest. Res. 2017, 15, 203–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Horton, S.; Camacho Rodriguez, R.; Anderson, B.O.; Aung, S.; Awuah, B.; Delgado Pebé, L.; Duggan, C.; Dvaladze, A.; Kumar, S.; Murillo, R.; et al. Health system strengthening: Integration of breast cancer care for improved outcomes. Cancer 2020, 126, 2353–2364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ahmed, A.; Zahid, I.; Ladiwala, Z.F.; Sheikh, R.; Memon, A. Breast self-examination awareness and practices in young women in developing countries: A survey of female students in Karachi, Pakistan. J. Educ. Health Promot. 2018, 7, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Spak, D.A.; Plaxco, J.S.; Santiago, L.; Dryden, M.J.; Dogan, B.E. BI-RADS® fifth edition: A summary of changes. Diagn. Interv. Imaging 2017, 98, 179–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Manyazewal, T. Using the World Health Organization health system building blocks through survey of healthcare professionals to determine the performance of public healthcare facilities. Arch. Public Health 2017, 75, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. USAID. Child Survival and Health Grants Program (CSHGP) Health System Strengthening. 2010. Available online: http://www.mchip.net/sites/default/files/Health%20Systems%20Strengthening%202010.pdf (accessed on 10 June 2021).
  16. Key, T.J.; Verkasalo, P.K.; Banks, E. Epidemiology of breast cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2001, 2, 133–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Saeed, S.; Khan, J.A.; Iqbal, N.; Irfan, S.; Shafique, A.; Awan, S. Cancer and how the patients see it; prevalence and perception of risk factors: A cross-sectional survey from a tertiary care centre of Karachi, Pakistan. BMC Public Health 2019, 19, 360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Smith, R.A.; Andrews, K.; Brooks, D.; DeSantis, C.E.; Fedewa, S.A.; Lortet-Tieulent, J.; Manassaram-Baptiste, D.; Brawley, O.W.; Wender, R.C. Cancer screening in the United States, 2016: A review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and current issues in cancer screening. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2016, 66, 95–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gutnik, L.A.; Matanje-Mwagomba, B.; Msosa, V.; Mzumara, S.; Khondowe, B.; Moses, A.; Kohler, R.E.; Carey, L.A.; Lee, C.N.; Gopal, S. Breast Cancer Screening in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Perspective From Malawi. J. Glob. Oncol. 2015, 2, 4–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kelly, L.; Walters, L.; Rosenthal, D. Community-based medical education: Is success a result of meaningful personal learning experiences? Educ. Health 2014, 27, 47–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tsuruda, K.M.; Bhargava, S.; Mangerud, G.; Sagstad, S.; Hofvind, S.S.H. Monthly variation in mammographic screening attendance in Norway. Eur. J. Public Health 2017, 27, 1095–1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Lee, M.; Mariapun, S.; Rajaram, N.; Teo, S.-H.; Yip, C.-H. Performance of a subsidised mammographic screening programme in Malaysia, a middle-income Asian country. BMC Public Health 2017, 17, 127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Omidiji, O.A.; Campbell, P.C.; Irurhe, N.K.; Atalabi, O.M.; Toyobo, O.O. Breast cancer screening in a resource poor country: Ultrasound versus mammography. Ghana Med. J. 2017, 51, 6–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. American Cancer Society. Breast Cancer Facts & Figures 2019–2020; American Cancer Society: Atlanta, GA, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  25. OECD/European Union. Screening, Survival and Mortality for Breast Cancer”. Health at a Glance: Europe 2018: State of Health in the EU Cycle; OECD Publishing: Paris, France, 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Operation of Breast Cancer Screening Center.
Figure 1. Operation of Breast Cancer Screening Center.
Healthcare 10 01106 g001
Figure 2. The year-wise number of patients visiting the center for mammography screening purposes.
Figure 2. The year-wise number of patients visiting the center for mammography screening purposes.
Healthcare 10 01106 g002
Figure 3. The month-wise analyses of the number of women visiting the screening center.
Figure 3. The month-wise analyses of the number of women visiting the screening center.
Healthcare 10 01106 g003
Figure 4. The age-wise distribution of women visiting for mammography screening.
Figure 4. The age-wise distribution of women visiting for mammography screening.
Healthcare 10 01106 g004
Figure 5. The BIRADS categorization of women with mammogram screening.
Figure 5. The BIRADS categorization of women with mammogram screening.
Healthcare 10 01106 g005
Figure 6. The year versus month-wise trend of women visiting for sonomammography.
Figure 6. The year versus month-wise trend of women visiting for sonomammography.
Healthcare 10 01106 g006
Figure 7. The BIRAD categorization on sonomammography.
Figure 7. The BIRAD categorization on sonomammography.
Healthcare 10 01106 g007
Table 1. The study design depicting the phase wise distribution.
Table 1. The study design depicting the phase wise distribution.
PhaseObjectiveMethodology
Phase 1 (2013–15)Breast Cancer Screening Interventions Using 6 Tiers of Health System Strengthening in ICTA well-equipped center for the diagnosis of breast cancer was developed bearing in mind the six basic tiers of health system strengthening. The center was equipped with two mammography screening facilities and one ultrasound machine. The center became functional, and a referral system was created.
Phase 2 (2016–2018)Community Based Medical Education.To bring awareness among the female population of the capital territory, rural areas, and female educational institutions including higher schools, colleges, and universities were targeted.
Female health workers were also trained.
Phase 3 (2015–2020)Impact of Screening MammographyMammography screening started and the records were maintained and analyzed after five years of performance.
Table 2. The expenditure utilization breakdown in different components.
Table 2. The expenditure utilization breakdown in different components.
Expenditure Breakdown (in Million PKR)
Civil Works58.32
Machinery
Equipment/Furniture
87.86
Establishment7.950
Project Management Unit17.89
Health Education34.45
General1.50
Transport4.53
POL3.00
Computer and Equipment4.00
Purchase of Furniture and Fixture3.00
Repair and Maintenance1.00
Utilities1.00
Other0.50
Total225.00
Table 3. The activities carried out in rural Islamabad in 2016.
Table 3. The activities carried out in rural Islamabad in 2016.
LocationVisitAccompanying Healthcare WorkersNumber of People Reached
Rawat BHUJanuary 20161945
Sihala RHCAugust 20161690
Sihala RHCAugust 201616110
Shah Allah Ditta BHUAugust 20161240
Shah Allah Ditta BHUSeptember 20161243
Chirrah, BHUSeptember 20161647
Tarlai, RHCOctober 201617111
Pind Begwal, BHUOctober 20161448
Tumair, BHUNovember 20161243
Bhara Kahu, RHCNovember 20161697
Shah Allah Ditta BHUNovember 20161650
Rawat BHUDecember 20161945
BHU, HumakDecember 20161348
Shadrah, BHUDecember 20161435
Table 4. The activities carried out in rural Islamabad in 2017.
Table 4. The activities carried out in rural Islamabad in 2017.
LocationVisitAccompanying Health WorkersNo. of Patients Reached
Gokina, BHUJanuary 20171241
Bhimber Trar, BHUJanuary 20171345
Jagiot. BHUFebruary 20171340
Gagri, BHUFebruary 20171243
Sihala, RHCOctober 20171698
Shah Allah Ditta & Gagri, BHUOctober 20171642
Chirrah, BHUOctober 20171239
Tarlai, RHCOctober 201717110
Pind Begwal and Bhimber Tarar, BHUOctober 20171649
Tumair, BHUOctober 20171147
Bhara Kahu, RHCOctober 201713120
Rawat, BHUOctober 20171246
Humak, BHUOctober 20171250
Shahdrah, BHUOctober 20171448
Table 5. The LHS trained for the rural sector.
Table 5. The LHS trained for the rural sector.
SupervisorsAREA
LHS/ADCMC G-9 + CHC SAD + All Centers
LHSBHU Charra + BHU Tumair
LHSBHU Jageyot
LHSBHU Pind Bagwal + BHU Phulgran
LHSBHU Bhukkar + BHU Bimber Tarar
LHSRHC Sihala + BHU Gajri
LHSBHU Rawat
LHSBHU Sohan
LHSMC G-7 + Gokina Dispensary
LHSRHC Bharakhu + BHU Shahdara
ALHSRHC Tarlai
ALHSBHU Jhang Sayyadian + BHU Kirpa
Table 6. The institutes visited by the doctors’ team to create awareness in the urban population of Islamabad.
Table 6. The institutes visited by the doctors’ team to create awareness in the urban population of Islamabad.
Sr. No.InstituteNo. of Participants.
IIslamabad Model College for Girls, F.6/2, Islamabad88
IIFederal Government College for Women, F.7/2, Islamabad (95)95
IIIIslamabad Model College for Girls, F.7/4, Islamabad (107)107
IVIslamabad Model College for Girls, G.8/4 (T&T colony), Islamabad110
VIslamabad Model College for Girls, I-8/4, Islamabad86
VIFederal College For Women G.10/4 Islamabad95
VIIFederal College For Women F.7/4 (Margalla) Islamabad90
VIIIIslamabad College for Girls F.6/2 Islamabad82
IXBeacon House H-8, Islamabad103
XInternational Islamic University, Islamabad109
XIQuaid-e- Azam University, Islamabad150
XIIBahria University, Islamabad120
XIIIComsats, Islamabad.200
Table 7. The age group-wise distribution of BIRADs.
Table 7. The age group-wise distribution of BIRADs.
Age GroupsBIRAD 0BIRAD IBIRAD IIBIRAD IIIBIRAD IVBIRAD VBIRAD VITotal
≥30390542629
31–35732717175893
36–4016233634342154416
41–4544652248165772881222
46–50375182161218724131016
51–553034214873592016688
56–609201894140266412
61–654141552927203279
66–7024824161492115
<7022820111914296
Total1512195870516382161624337
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Majeed, A.I.; Hafeez, A.; Khan, S.A. Strengthening Breast Cancer Screening Mammography Services in Pakistan Using Islamabad Capital Territory as a Pilot Public Health Intervention. Healthcare 2022, 10, 1106. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10061106

AMA Style

Majeed AI, Hafeez A, Khan SA. Strengthening Breast Cancer Screening Mammography Services in Pakistan Using Islamabad Capital Territory as a Pilot Public Health Intervention. Healthcare. 2022; 10(6):1106. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10061106

Chicago/Turabian Style

Majeed, Ayesha Isani, Assad Hafeez, and Shahzad Ali Khan. 2022. "Strengthening Breast Cancer Screening Mammography Services in Pakistan Using Islamabad Capital Territory as a Pilot Public Health Intervention" Healthcare 10, no. 6: 1106. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10061106

APA Style

Majeed, A. I., Hafeez, A., & Khan, S. A. (2022). Strengthening Breast Cancer Screening Mammography Services in Pakistan Using Islamabad Capital Territory as a Pilot Public Health Intervention. Healthcare, 10(6), 1106. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10061106

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop