Next Article in Journal
A Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the ‘Return to Duty Readiness Questionnaire’
Next Article in Special Issue
Using Task-Evoked Pupillary Response to Predict Clinical Performance during a Simulation Training
Previous Article in Journal
Exploring the Presence of Humanoid Social Robots at Home and Capturing Human-Robot Interactions with Older Adults: Experiences from Four Case Studies
Previous Article in Special Issue
Advancing Access to Healthcare through Telehealth: A Brownsville Community Assessment
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Collaborative Interprofessional Health Science Student Led Realistic Mass Casualty Incident Simulation

by
Deborah L. McCrea
1,
Robert C. Coghlan
1,*,
Tiffany Champagne-Langabeer
2,* and
Stanley Cron
1
1
Cizik School of Nursing, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
2
School of Biomedical Informatics, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 7000 Fannin St., Houston, TX 77030, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Healthcare 2023, 11(1), 40; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11010040
Submission received: 12 October 2022 / Revised: 6 December 2022 / Accepted: 19 December 2022 / Published: 23 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Innovations in Interprofessional Care and Training)

Abstract

In collaboration, a health science university and a fire department offered a mass casualty incident (MCI) simulation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a cross-section of student health care providers to determine their working knowledge of an MCI. Students were given a pretest using the Emergency Preparedness Information Questionnaire (EPIQ) and the Simple Triage and Rapid Transport (START) Quiz. The EPIQ instrument related to knowledge of triage, first aid, bio-agent detection, critical reporting, incident command, isolation/quarantine/decontamination, psychological issues, epidemiology, and communications. The START Quiz gave 10 scenarios. Didactic online content was given followed by the simulation a few weeks later. A posttest with the same instruments was given after the simulation. Participants were majority female (81.7%), aged between 25–34 (41.7%), and 61.7% (n = 74) had undergraduate or post-graduate degrees. The overall pretest mean was 2.92 and posttest mean was 3.64. The START Quiz found participants struggled to correctly assign triage levels. Students also experienced challenges correctly assigning patients to specific triage categories. Findings will assist educators to understand knowledge gaps, so revisions can be made to enhance learning in disaster management. Concentration in proper field triage is also a needed focus.
Keywords: interprofessional; mass casualty incident; emergency preparedness; disaster preparedness; Emergency Preparedness Information Questionnaire; Emergency Triage interprofessional; mass casualty incident; emergency preparedness; disaster preparedness; Emergency Preparedness Information Questionnaire; Emergency Triage

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

McCrea, D.L.; Coghlan, R.C.; Champagne-Langabeer, T.; Cron, S. Collaborative Interprofessional Health Science Student Led Realistic Mass Casualty Incident Simulation. Healthcare 2023, 11, 40. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11010040

AMA Style

McCrea DL, Coghlan RC, Champagne-Langabeer T, Cron S. Collaborative Interprofessional Health Science Student Led Realistic Mass Casualty Incident Simulation. Healthcare. 2023; 11(1):40. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11010040

Chicago/Turabian Style

McCrea, Deborah L., Robert C. Coghlan, Tiffany Champagne-Langabeer, and Stanley Cron. 2023. "Collaborative Interprofessional Health Science Student Led Realistic Mass Casualty Incident Simulation" Healthcare 11, no. 1: 40. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11010040

APA Style

McCrea, D. L., Coghlan, R. C., Champagne-Langabeer, T., & Cron, S. (2023). Collaborative Interprofessional Health Science Student Led Realistic Mass Casualty Incident Simulation. Healthcare, 11(1), 40. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11010040

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop