Next Article in Journal
Factors Associated with Primary Care Provider’s Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment in China: A Machine Learning-Based Random Forest Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Pediatric Hematology and Oncology Center Integrated by Telemedicine: Experience, Challenges and First Results of a Cross Border Network
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Effective Patient–Dentist Communication with a Simulation System for Orthodontics

Healthcare 2023, 11(10), 1433; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11101433
by Yi-Cheng Chiang 1,2, Fan Wu 3,* and Shu-Han Ko 3
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Healthcare 2023, 11(10), 1433; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11101433
Submission received: 5 March 2023 / Revised: 7 May 2023 / Accepted: 8 May 2023 / Published: 15 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Health Informatics and Big Data)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report


Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

In general, this is a poor written and disorganized manuscript. The format of this article needs to divided 4 sections: introduction, materials & methods, results, and discussion. 

Without the result section in the text, this article need to provide the scientific evidences of this 3D dentist – patient communication system for simulation of orthodontics.

In addition, there is also no any information of questionnaire such as reliability, validity, and even results.   

 Without the solid evidences, therefore, this manuscript can not be recommended for the publication in Healthcare.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

Thank you for this helpful contribution. I applaud the effort of promoting studies for the investigation of Patient - Dentist communication. I appreciate their methods including study design and data analysis. I write some comments below that could benefit the article.

 

Discussion??? It is a main section. it is very important to compare the results with similar studies.

 

Results. Information is shown in duplicate. If it appears in the figures and tables, delete the information from the text.

 

References. It is advisable to reference articles published in scientific journals. The section is very short.

 

Congratulation again!!!

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Many thanks for your resubmission. You have put a lot of effort into it and the article is now organised in a much more understandable and comprehensible way. My questions have been answered to my satisfaction. Best regards

Author Response

Thanks for your precisous comments, and it is our mission to let the paper be understandable and comprehensible.  We invite the English editing service to promote its readability.  We hope we have the chance to share the study to the academic through this prestigous journal. Thanks a lot. 

Back to TopTop