Unmet Supportive Care Needs after Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Resection at a Tertiary Hospital in Seoul, South Korea
by
, ,
Junhee Park
1
,
Wonyoung Jung
2,
Genehee Lee
3,4,
Danbee Kang
3,
Young Mog Shim
5,
Hong Kwan Kim
5,
Ansuk Jeong
6,
Juhee Cho
3,7 and
Dong Wook Shin
1,3,8,* 1
Department of Family Medicine & Supportive Care Center, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Republic of Korea
2
Department of Family Medicine, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University, Seoul 05355, Republic of Korea
3
Department of Clinical Research Design and Evaluation, Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences and Technology (SAIHST), Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul 06351, Republic of Korea
4
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul 06351, Republic of Korea
5
Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul 06351, Republic of Korea
6
Department of Psychology, DePaul University, Chicago, IL 60604, USA
7
Cancer Education Center, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul 06351, Republic of Korea
8
Department of Digital Health, Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Science & Technology (SAIHST), Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06355, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Healthcare 2023, 11(14), 2012; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11142012
Submission received: 19 June 2023
/
Revised: 10 July 2023
/
Accepted: 11 July 2023
/
Published: 12 July 2023
Abstract
:The aim of this study is to identify the prevalence and predictors of unmet needs of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients undergoing surgical resection in Seoul, South Korea. A total of 949 patients who completed survey questionnaires that included the Cancer Survivors’ Unmet Needs Korean version (CaSUN-K), fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) inventory-short form, and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) were recruited from January to October 2020. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the potential correlation of significant unmet needs, defined as any moderate or strong need, for each domain of CaSUN-K. Of the 949 participants, the mean age was 63.4 ± 8.8 years old, and 529 (55.7%) were male. Overall, 91.8% of participants reported one or more unmet need. The highest domains of moderate-to-strong unmet needs were existential survivorship (59.1%), comprehensive cancer care (51.2%), and information (49.7%). High FCR and poor emotional function were associated with moderate-to-strong unmet needs across all domains of CaSUN-K. NSCLC survivors with a recent diagnosis had more frequent disease-related unmet needs. Interventions to reduce the unmet needs of NSCLC patients should focus on relieving FCR and improving emotional functioning. Furthermore, emphasis should be placed on decreasing disease-related needs, particularly for early survivors of lung cancer during the re-entry phase.
1. Introduction
Lung cancer is the second most commonly diagnosed cancer (11.4% of total cases) and the leading cause of cancer death (18.0% of total cancer deaths) worldwide [1]. Due to improvements in early cancer detection [2,3] and advances in intensive multidisciplinary treatments [4] that have improved survival rates, the number of cancer survivors is expected to increase. Most survivors receive treatment such as surgery, radiation therapy, and/or chemotherapy and experience a higher burden of comorbidity [5]. Cancer treatment does not guarantee a full recovery; thus, many survivors experience less than adequate overall and health-related quality of life (QoL) with potential long-term decline [5,6].
Cancer-related outcomes can have a significant effect on the psychological experiences of cancer survivors such as distress, anxiety, depression, fear of cancer recurrence (FCR), social support, relationship issues, and QoL [7]. As awareness of the psychosocial effect of cancer increases, attempts have been made to assess individual needs more broadly to improve supportive care services [8,9,10]. Reportedly, lung cancer patients have a greater number of unmet needs compared with patients with other types of cancer [11] and constitute a unique population of cancer patients who likely have greater disease-specific supportive care needs such as information on managing symptoms such as dyspnea and cough [12].
In a recent systematic review [13] in which six studies of unmet supportive care needs in lung cancer patients were examined using a standardized tool, unmet needs were associated with poorer QoL [13]. Among the studies, the unmet needs based on the Cancer Survivors’ Unmet Needs (CaSUN) scale [13] were investigated in only one study, and the moderate-to-strong unmet needs of various cancer survivors, including lung cancer, in Asian countries were reported [14]. However, the authors only reported results collected from the unmet needs survey and did not perform any further analysis such as exploring correlates of unmet needs in each domain. Based on the identification of unique needs using domain-specific analysis, the results of the present study could aid in understanding the unmet needs and address suitable supportive care for lung cancer patients.
In Korea, Yun et al. previously attempted to determine several significant correlates of unmet needs in Korean lung cancer survivors including socioeconomic burden (female, employment, and fewer family members) and medical burden (chemotherapy and long disease duration after cancer diagnosis) [15]. However, in that study, a validated instrument for assessing unmet needs was not used, and psychological factors known to be associated with unmet needs, such as QoL, were not evaluated [13].
Therefore, in the present study, the prevalence of unmet needs of lung cancer survivors was evaluated and the correlates, including demographic, disease-related, and psychological factors, associated with unmet needs in different domains were explored. The results provide detailed information regarding the main correlates of unmet needs and show how NSCLC survivors’ unmet needs can be best addressed.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Design, Setting, and Population
This cross-sectional study recruited 1220 patients using convenience sampling from the outpatient clinics of thoracic surgery and long-term survivorship at the Samsung Comprehensive Cancer Center in South Korea from January to October 2020. Among them, 1014 (83.1%) provided informed consent to participate the study. Individuals who were diagnosed with primary non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and received curative pulmonary resection with or without neo-adjuvant treatment were enrolled in this study. Cancer patients <18 years of age or not able to communicate in Korean were excluded. Patients who did not complete treatment within at least 1 month before the study participation, experienced recurrence/metastasis of cancer, or had secondary cancer were also excluded from the study. Finally, a total of 949 patients was included in the final analysis.
2.2. Data Collection
The medical records of participants were collected, and cancer-related information was comprehensively reviewed such as the time since the end of active treatments, the stage of cancer, and all types of cancer treatments received. A trained research assistant conducted a face-to-face interview to complete a questionnaire that included the CaSUN Korean version (CaSUN-K), the Korean version of the FCR (K-FCRI-SF) Inventory-Short Form, and the Korean version of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30). Sociodemographic characteristics items such as age, sex, marital status, educational level, monthly family income, and work status were also included in the questionnaire.
2.3. Measurement of Unmet Need
The original CaSUN contains 35 items used to evaluate the supportive care needs of cancer survivors across five dimensions: information (3 items), comprehensive cancer care (6 items), existential survivorship (14 items), quality of life (2 items), and relationship (3 items) [16]. For each item, participants answer whether or not they had a particular need and, if they did, whether or not that need was met or unmet. If an unmet need was reported, the participant then rated the intensity of the need as weak, moderate, or strong. In the present study, moderate-to-strong ratings of unmet needs were mainly discussed based on several previous studies [17,18,19].
In a previous study, CaSUN-K was shown to be a valid measurement tool for unmet needs in Korean NSCLC survivors [20]. In the CaSUN-K, the financial dimension was newly added. In addition, 7 items that were originally not grouped into any dimension were distributed; 4 of them were classified into the financial dimension in CaSUN-K [20] (Figure 1).
2.4. Other Measures
The K-FCRI-SF has been validated and widely used to measure FCR severity in cancer survivors in Korea [21,22]. The 9-item K-FCRI-SF is rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 0 to 4, and total scores range from 0 to 36. The higher the score, the higher the FCR. We defined higher FCR as a K-FCRI-SF score ≥13 points based on a previous study [23].
The EORTC QLQ-C30 has been translated into Korean, validated, and widely used to measure the QoL of cancer survivors in Korea [24]. Each item was rated based on a symptom score ranging from 0 to 100. The higher the score, the better the functional level. A cut-off score of 66.7 was used to define poor function based on previous studies [25,26].
2.5. Statistical Analysis
Descriptive statistics were used to describe the domains of unmet needs as well as all other variables. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to analyze the potential correlates of each domain of the unmet need. Known confounding factors of age, sex, smoking, educational level, marital status, working status, family monthly income, comorbidity, neo-adjuvant treatment, pathologic staging, adjuvant treatment, time since the end of active treatment, FCR, and functioning collected from EORTC QLQ-C30 were included in the multivariable logistic models using stepwise backward selection. Stratified analyses were performed to determine the differences between lengths of survival. All statistical analyses were conducted using STATA/MP 14.0 (Stata Corp., College Station, TX, USA).
3. Results
3.1. General Characteristics of Study Participants
Among the 949 participants, the mean age was 63.4 ± 8.8 years old, and 529 (55.7%) were male. Among them, 48.9% were never smokers and 41.9% were employed. The median time since the end of active treatment was 18 months. A high FCR was found in 530 (55.8%) participants. In terms of the EORTC QLQ-C30 function scale, poor physical function (17.7%), poor role function (40.5%), poor emotional function (30.9%), poor cognitive function (25.7%), and poor social function (35.0%) were observed (Table 1).
3.2. Prevalence of Unmet Needs
The CaSUN-K identifies ranges and domains of different needs, allowing comparisons across the lung cancer survivor population. The prevalence of at least one moderate-to-strong unmet need in each domain of CaSUN-K was 59.1% for existential survivorship, 51.2% for comprehensive cancer care, 49.7% for information, 38.9% for QoL, 31.0% for relationship, and 22.6% for financial issue (Figure 1). In order of frequency, the top five moderate-to-strong unmet need items were “concerns about cancer recurrence” (51.5%) in the existential survivorship domain, “communication among doctors” (49.8%), “manage health with team” (48.4%), and “local healthcare services” (44.5%) in the comprehensive cancer care domain, and “understandable information” (44.3%) in the information domain. The higher ranked met needs were “best medical care” (16.2%) and “manage health with team” (15.1%) in the comprehensive cancer care domain; “reduce stress in my life” (15.0%) and “survivor expectations” (14.8%) in the existential survivorship domain; and “up-to-date information” (14.2%) in the information domain (Table 2).
In Table 3, information needs were associated with high FCR, poor emotional function, and poor cognitive function. Comprehensive cancer care needs were associated with male gender, shorter time since the end of active treatment, high FCR, poor emotional function, and poor social function. Existential survivorship needs were associated with shorter time since the end of active treatment, high FCR, poor physical function, poor emotional function, and poor social function. QoL needs were associated with shorter time since the end of active treatment, high FCR, poor emotional function, and poor social function. Relationship needs were associated with high FCR and poor emotional and poor social function. Financial needs were associated with young age, high FCR, poor role function, and poor emotional function. In a sensitivity analysis by length of survival dichotomized as <18 and ≥18 months (Supplementary Tables S1 and S2), high FCR was associated with moderate-to-strong unmet needs across all domains. Poor social function was significant in NSCLC patients with shorter survival duration (<18 months), while poor emotional function was significant in those with longer survival duration (≥18 months).
4. Discussion
In the present cross-sectional study, the prevalence and correlates of unmet needs in NSCLC survivors were investigated. 91.8% of participants reported one or more unmet need. The highest domains of unmet needs were existential survivorship (59.1%), comprehensive cancer care (51.2%), and information (49.7%), in agreement with the Australian population of the CaSUN [16].
Lung cancer patients in this study in Korea were likely to have disease-specific supportive care needs, similar to a previous study [12]. In detail, the leading moderate-to-strong unmet needs were associated with disease cure or health service such as “concerns about cancer recurrence” in the existential survivorship domain; “communication among doctors”, “manage health with team”, and “local healthcare services” in the comprehensive cancer care domain; and “understandable information” in the information domain. These results were consistent in the order of frequency with a previous study of patients across the Asia–Pacific region [14], in which the top five moderate-to-strong unmet needs in Korea were “concerns about cancer recurrence” in the existential survivorship domain and “local healthcare services”, “best medical care”, “manage health with team”, and “communication among doctors” in the comprehensive cancer care domain.
Notably, the “best medical care” was the highest met need. This difference could have resulted from the quality of the investigating institute, which was a university-affiliated hospital with a separate cancer center providing cancer care for approximately 15% of Korean lung cancer patients [27].
4.1. Correlates of Unmet Needs
High FCR and poor emotional function were associated with moderate-to-strong unmet needs across all domains of CaSUN-K. In previous studies, “managing concerns about cancer recurrence” was the top unmet need in lung cancer survivors [12,14,28]. Most cancer patients fear that illness will progress [29,30]. Furthermore, high FCR remained significant in sensitivity analysis by length of survival. Survivors who have a physical condition or have received medical treatment that interfered with their social life had an increased risk of unmet needs across all domains in those with a shorter duration of survival. However, survivors gradually adapt over time; those with poor emotional function such as depressed are at risk of having moderate-to-strong unmet needs across all domains. The emotional function in EORTC QLQ-C30 consists of questions regarding patient tension, worry, irritability, and/or depression. Anxiety and depression were the most significant factors in unmet supportive care needs in a study from Taiwan [31]. A higher level of unmet needs was associated with lower perceived QoL [16] in various cancer survivors [13,32,33,34,35]. Therefore, interventions to relieve the FCR and improve emotional function should be performed to reduce unmet needs in NSCLC survivors.
Information needs were associated with poor cognitive function. Presumably, a greater amount of information is required for comprehension in patients with decreased cognitive function. In a previous study in Iran [36], the reasons for insufficient fulfillment of information needs in subjects with poor cognitive abilities were outlined. A concern expressed by patients was that their lack of understanding regarding health hindered their ability to effectively communicate with medical personnel during the treatment process, resulting in a potential misinterpretation of the medical information provided by the experts [36]. Therefore, information needs of NSCLC patients with cognitive impairments should be taken into consideration.
Comprehensive cancer care needs were associated with male gender, shorter duration after treatment, and poor social function. The domain of comprehensive cancer care consists of items associated with disease cure or health service such as “best medical care”, “local healthcare services”, “manage health with team”, and “communication among doctors” that were closely linked to the health system of supportive care needs (SCNS) [8,9]. Male patients had greater expectations for sexual information and psychosocial support [37] as well as for health system-related needs than female patients. In addition, an individual with a recent diagnosis reportedly had more unmet needs associated with disease [14,38]. Thus, healthcare providers should focus on patients, particularly early survivors of NSCLC, during the re-entry phase. Previously, the social function in EORTC-QLQ-C30 was associated with domains of comprehensive cancer care (beta coefficient, −0.27), existential survivorship (−0.39), QoL (−0.32), and relationship (−0.28) in CaSUN-K [20].
Existential survivorship needs were predicted based on shorter disease duration after treatment, poor physical function, and poor social function. The highest unmet needs were found in the existential survivorship domain with the “concerns about cancer recurrence” item accounting for more than half of the unmet needs. In the present study, physical function and social function were shown to play an important role in addressing the unmet needs in existential survivorship. This highlights the need for healthcare professionals to provide comprehensive care to NSCLC patients with poor function in physical and social areas.
QoL needs were associated with a shorter duration after treatment and poor social function. The QoL domain included items such as “manage side effects” and “changes to QoL”. The results of the present study add to the present knowledge that early survivors of NSCLC appear to be more focused on side effects to improve their QoL needs.
Relationship needs were associated with poor social function. The relationship domain included items relating to social issues such as “support partner or family”, “impact on my relationship”, “changes to partner’s life”, and sexual issues such as “problems with sex life”. Individuals who struggle with social interactions may have unfulfilled social-related needs.
Financial needs were associated with young age and poor role function. This is consistent with findings in previous studies [20,39] that younger patients are expected to have a greater need for rehabilitation and to experience multiple challenges such as losing a full-time job or not fulfilling their family responsibilities [20,40,41]. Similarly, patients with poor role function who want to contribute to their family but cannot do so may be at risk of unmet needs in the financial issue domain.
4.2. Clinical Implications
The results of the present study contribute to the existing knowledge by highlighting that unmet supportive care needs in lung cancer patients are associated with poorer psychological factors such as QoL. FCR and poor emotional function were associated with unmet needs across all domains. Therefore, interventions of supportive care for NSCLC patients such as cognitive behavioral therapy or patient education should be focused on relieving FCR and improving emotional and social functioning. Furthermore, caregivers should prioritize supportive care to early survivors of NSCLC during the re-entry phase to reduce unmet supportive care needs.
4.3. Limitations
The present study had several limitations. First, the study cohort might not represent the general NSCLC survivor population because it included only patients from one tertiary hospital recruited using convenience sampling. In addition, patients who had previously experienced second cancer or cancer recurrence/metastasis were excluded. Therefore, a selection bias may limit the generalization of these findings to other NSCLC survivors. Second, the study was conducted based on self-reported measures, so there could be social desirability and recall biases. Third, there is no consensus on the standard cut-off point of the EORTC-QLQ-C30 with cancer patients. A cut-off point <66.7 was used in the present study based on the population distribution of scores. In addition, this was an observational study, and the cross-sectional settings restrict the conclusion of any causal relationship between unmet needs and psychological traits such as FCR and poor functioning. Reciprocal relationships between unmet needs and QoL are also possible. Cohort studies are needed to elucidate such complex relationships. Finally, there was a potential for unadjusted confounding factors.
5. Conclusions
In the present study, the correlates of unmet needs were investigated using validated instruments including psychological variables with a large number of NSCLC patients in Seoul, South Korea. The findings indicated that higher FCR and poor emotional and social functioning were correlates of unmet needs in most domains. In addition, emphasis should be placed on decreasing disease-related needs, particularly of early lung cancer survivors. Therefore, interventions should aim to alleviate the FCR and enhance the emotional and social well-being of lung cancer patients by addressing their unmet needs.
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/healthcare11142012/s1, Table S1: Correlates of moderate-to-strong level of unmet need of CaSUN-K in each domain in survivors with shorter duration (<18 months). Table S2: Correlates of moderate-to-strong level of unmet need of CaSUN-K in each domain in survivors with longer duration (≥18 months).
Author Contributions
Conception and design: J.P. and D.W.S. Analysis and interpretation of data: J.P., W.J. and A.J. Acquisition of data: G.L., D.K., Y.M.S., H.K.K. and J.C. Writing the manuscript: J.P. and D.W.S. Critical revision of manuscript: J.P., W.J., G.L., D.K., Y.M.S., H.K.K., A.J., J.C. and D.W.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research was supported by a grant from the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Korean government (Grant Number: MSIT; 2019R1A2C2009751).
Institutional Review Board Statement
The Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Samsung Medical Center (SMC 2018-09-037) reviewed and approved this study. The study complied with the ethical rules for human experimentation described in the Declaration of Helsinki.
Informed Consent Statement
Informed consent was obtained from all participants and/or their proxy prior to participation in the study.
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Sung, H.; Ferlay, J.; Siegel, R.L.; Laversanne, M.; Soerjomataram, I.; Jemal, A.; Bray, F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2021, 71, 209–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Usman Ali, M.; Miller, J.; Peirson, L.; Fitzpatrick-Lewis, D.; Kenny, M.; Sherifali, D.; Raina, P. Screening for lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Prev. Med. 2016, 89, 301–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- de Koning, H.J.; van der Aalst, C.M.; de Jong, P.A.; Scholten, E.T.; Nackaerts, K.; Heuvelmans, M.A.; Lammers, J.J.; Weenink, C.; Yousaf-Khan, U.; Horeweg, N.; et al. Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Volume CT Screening in a Randomized Trial. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 503–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wao, H.; Mhaskar, R.; Kumar, A.; Miladinovic, B.; Djulbegovic, B. Survival of patients with non-small cell lung cancer without treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst. Rev. 2013, 2, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Vijayvergia, N.; Shah, P.C.; Denlinger, C.S. Survivorship in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Challenges Faced and Steps Forward. J. Natl. Compr. Cancer Netw. 2015, 13, 1151–1161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Stein, K.D.; Syrjala, K.L.; Andrykowski, M.A. Physical and psychological long-term and late effects of cancer. Cancer 2008, 112, 2577–2592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jarrett, N.; Scott, I.; Addington-Hall, J.; Amir, Z.; Brearley, S.; Hodges, L.; Richardson, A.; Sharpe, M.; Stamataki, Z.; Stark, D.; et al. Informing future research priorities into the psychological and social problems faced by cancer survivors: A rapid review and synthesis of the literature. Eur. J. Oncol. Nurs. 2013, 17, 510–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maguire, R.; Papadopoulou, C.; Kotronoulas, G.; Simpson, M.F.; McPhelim, J.; Irvine, L. A systematic review of supportive care needs of people living with lung cancer. Eur. J. Oncol. Nurs. 2013, 17, 449–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moghaddam, N.; Coxon, H.; Nabarro, S.; Hardy, B.; Cox, K. Unmet care needs in people living with advanced cancer: A systematic review. Support. Care Cancer 2016, 24, 3609–3622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Molassiotis, A.; Uyterlinde, W.; Hollen, P.J.; Sarna, L.; Palmer, P.; Krishnasamy, M. Supportive care in lung cancer: Milestones over the past 40 years. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2015, 10, 10–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Girgis, A. Supportive care needs: Are patients with lung cancer a neglected population? Psycho-Oncology 2006, 15, 509–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Giuliani, M.E.; Milne, R.A.; Puts, M.; Sampson, L.R.; Kwan, J.Y.; Le, L.W.; Alibhai, S.M.; Howell, D.; Abdelmutti, N.; Liu, G.; et al. The prevalence and nature of supportive care needs in lung cancer patients. Curr. Oncol. 2016, 23, 258–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Cochrane, A.; Woods, S.; Dunne, S.; Gallagher, P. Unmet supportive care needs associated with quality of life for people with lung cancer: A systematic review of the evidence 2007–2020. Eur. J. Cancer Care 2022, 31, e13525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Molassiotis, A.; Yates, P.; Li, Q.; So, W.K.W.; Pongthavornkamol, K.; Pittayapan, P.; Komatsu, H.; Thandar, M.; Yi, M.; Titus Chacko, S.; et al. Mapping unmet supportive care needs, quality-of-life perceptions and current symptoms in cancer survivors across the Asia-Pacific region: Results from the International STEP Study. Ann. Oncol. 2017, 28, 2552–2558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yun, Y.H.; Shon, E.J.; Yang, A.J.; Kim, S.H.; Kim, Y.A.; Chang, Y.J.; Lee, J.; Kim, M.S.; Lee, H.S.; Zo, J.I.; et al. Needs regarding care and factors associated with unmet needs in disease-free survivors of surgically treated lung cancer. Ann. Oncol. 2013, 24, 1552–1559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hodgkinson, K.; Butow, P.; Hunt, G.E.; Pendlebury, S.; Hobbs, K.M.; Lo, S.K.; Wain, G. The development and evaluation of a measure to assess cancer survivors’ unmet supportive care needs: The CaSUN (Cancer Survivors’ Unmet Needs measure). Psycho-Oncology 2007, 16, 796–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Q.; Lin, Y.; Zhou, H.; Xu, Y.; Xu, Y. Supportive care needs and associated factors among Chinese cancer survivors: A cross-sectional study. Support. Care Cancer 2019, 27, 287–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mazariego, C.G.; Juraskova, I.; Campbell, R.; Smith, D.P. Long-term unmet supportive care needs of prostate cancer survivors: 15-year follow-up from the NSW Prostate Cancer Care and Outcomes Study. Support. Care Cancer 2020, 28, 5511–5520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miroševič, Š.; Prins, J.; Borštnar, S.; Besić, N.; Homar, V.; Selič-Zupančič, P.; Smrdel, A.; Klemenc-Ketiš, Z. Factors associated with a high level of unmet needs and their prevalence in the breast cancer survivors 1–5 years after post local treatment and (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy during the COVID-19: A cross-sectional study. Front. Psychol. 2022, 13, 969918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kang, D.; Lee, G.; Kim, S.; Nam, H.; Kong, S.; Shim, S.; Lee, J.K.; Jung, W.; Shin, S.; Kim, H.K.; et al. Psychometric Validation of the Korean Version of the Cancer Survivors’ Unmet Needs (CaSUN) Scale Among Korean Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Survivors. Cancer Res. Treat. 2022, 55, 61–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shin, J.; Goo, A.; Ko, H.; Kim, J.-H.; Lim, S.-U.; Lee, H.-K.; Simard, S.; Song, Y.-M. Validation Study for the Korean Version of Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory. J. Korean Med. Sci. 2017, 32, 1792–1799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jung, W.; Park, J.; Jeong, A.; Cho, J.H.; Jeon, Y.J.; Shin, D.W. Fear of cancer recurrence and its predictors among patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). J. Cancer Surviv. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Simard, S.; Savard, J. Screening and comorbidity of clinical levels of fear of cancer recurrence. J. Cancer Surviv. 2015, 9, 481–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yun, Y.H.; Park, Y.S.; Lee, E.S.; Bang, S.M.; Heo, D.S.; Park, S.Y.; You, C.H.; West, K. Validation of the Korean version of the EORTC QLQ-C30. Qual. Life Res. 2004, 13, 863–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahn, S.H.; Park, B.W.; Noh, D.Y.; Nam, S.J.; Lee, E.S.; Lee, M.K.; Kim, S.H.; Lee, K.M.; Park, S.M.; Yun, Y.H. Health-related quality of life in disease-free survivors of breast cancer with the general population. Ann. Oncol. 2007, 18, 173–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fayers, P.M. Interpreting quality of life data: Population-based reference data for the EORTC QLQ-C30. Eur. J. Cancer 2001, 37, 1331–1334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Clinical Oncology Network for Unifying Electronic Medical Data. Available online: https://bigdata-cancer.kr/ncc/lungInfo.do (accessed on 1 July 2023).
- Chen, S.C.; Chiou, S.C.; Yu, C.J.; Lee, Y.H.; Liao, W.Y.; Hsieh, P.Y.; Jhang, S.Y.; Lai, Y.H. The unmet supportive care needs-what advanced lung cancer patients’ caregivers need and related factors. Support. Care Cancer 2016, 24, 2999–3009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Herschbach, P.; Dinkel, A. Fear of progression. Recent Results Cancer Res. 2014, 197, 11–29. [Google Scholar]
- Simard, S.; Thewes, B.; Humphris, G.; Dixon, M.; Hayden, C.; Mireskandari, S.; Ozakinci, G. Fear of cancer recurrence in adult cancer survivors: A systematic review of quantitative studies. J. Cancer Surviv. 2013, 7, 300–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liao, Y.C.; Liao, W.Y.; Shun, S.C.; Yu, C.J.; Yang, P.C.; Lai, Y.H. Symptoms, psychological distress, and supportive care needs in lung cancer patients. Support. Care Cancer 2011, 19, 1743–1751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Afiyanti, Y.; Besral, B.; Haryani, H.; Milanti, A.; Nasution, L.A.; Wahidi, K.R.; Gayatri, D. The relationships of unmet needs with quality of life and characteristics of Indonesian gynecologic cancer survivors. Can. Oncol. Nurs. J. 2021, 31, 298–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rha, S.Y.; Lee, H.J.; Lee, J. Unmet needs in the physical and daily living domain mediates the influence of symptom experience on the quality of life of gastric cancer patients. Support. Care Cancer 2020, 28, 1419–1431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Willems, R.A.; Bolman, C.A.; Mesters, I.; Kanera, I.M.; Beaulen, A.A.; Lechner, L. Cancer survivors in the first year after treatment: The prevalence and correlates of unmet needs in different domains. Psycho-Oncology 2016, 25, 51–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smith, A.B.; Butow, P.; Olver, I.; Luckett, T.; Grimison, P.; Toner, G.C.; Stockler, M.R.; Hovey, E.; Stubbs, J.; Turner, S.; et al. The prevalence, severity, and correlates of psychological distress and impaired health-related quality of life following treatment for testicular cancer: A survivorship study. J. Cancer Surviv. 2016, 10, 223–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amiri, P.; Mohammadi, A.; Bahaadinbeigy, K.; Kalantari Khandani, B.; Maazed, V. Identifying unmet information needs of advanced cancer patients in Iran: An in-depth qualitative study. Health Sci. Rep. 2022, 5, e914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, H.W.; Kim, Y.H.; Kang, S.Y.; Lee, E.J.; Lee, J.L.; Kim, Y. Gender Differences in Sexual Information Needs and Relating Factors in Cancer Patients: A Cross-Sectional Survey. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 3752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, B.W.; Hwang, S.Y. Unmet needs of breast cancer patients relative to survival duration. Yonsei Med. J. 2012, 53, 118–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Nicklasson, M.; Bergman, B. Validity, reliability and clinical relevance of EORTC QLQ-C30 and LC13 in patients with chest malignancies in a palliative setting. Qual. Life Res. 2007, 16, 1019–1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Holm, L.V.; Hansen, D.G.; Johansen, C.; Vedsted, P.; Larsen, P.V.; Kragstrup, J.; Søndergaard, J. Participation in cancer rehabilitation and unmet needs: A population-based cohort study. Support. Care Cancer 2012, 20, 2913–2924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kim, J.Y.; Chun, M.; Kim, S.W.; Song, J. Identification of Korean cancer survivors’ unmet needs and desired psychosocial assistance: A focus group study. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0228054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1.
Moderate-to-strong unmet needs of CaSUN-K’s dimensions.
Table 1.
Baseline characteristics of the total study population.
| Characteristics | Total Study Population (n = 949) |
|---|---|
| Number (%) | |
| Sociodemographic characteristics | |
| Mean age, years * | 63.4 ± 8.8 |
| <65 | 510 (53.7) |
| ≥65 | 439 (46.3) |
| Sex | |
| Male | 529 (55.7) |
| Female | 420 (44.3) |
| Smoking status | |
| Never smoker | 464 (48.9) |
| Ex- or current smoker | 485 (51.1) |
| Education level | |
| ≥University | 353 (37.2) |
| High school | 328 (34.6) |
| ≤Middle school | 267 (28.1) |
| Unknown | 1 (0.1) |
| Marital status | |
| Married | 820 (86.4) |
| Working status | |
| Unemployed | 551 (58.1) |
| Employed | 398 (41.9) |
| Household monthly income | |
| <USD$3000 | 335 (35.3) |
| ≥USD$3000 | 536 (56.5) |
| Unknown | 78 (8.2) |
| Disease-related characteristics | |
| Comorbidity | |
| No | 239 (25.2) |
| Yes | 710 (74.8) |
| Pathologic stage | |
| 0 | 12 (1.3) |
| I | 697 (73.4) |
| II | 140 (14.8) |
| III ** | 100 (10.5) |
| Time since the end of active treatment | |
| <18 months | 461 (48.6) |
| ≥18 months | 488 (51.4) |
| Psychological characteristics | |
| Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) | |
| Low FCR (<13) | 419 (44.2) |
| High FCR (≥13) | 530 (55.8) |
| Function domain of EORTC-QoL-C30 | |
| Poor Physical Function | 168 (17.7) |
| Poor Role Function | 384 (40.5) |
| Poor Emotional Function | 293 (30.9) |
| Poor Cognitive Function | 244 (25.7) |
| Poor Social Function | 332 (35.0) |
Abbreviation: FCR = Fear of cancer recurrence; EORTC-QoL-C30 = European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life core questionnaire. * Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. ** Subjects with metastasis are excluded.
Table 2.
Severity according to the Korean version of the Cancer Survivor’s Unmet Needs (CaSUN-K).
| CaSUN-K’s Survey Items | Question Number | No Need | Met Need | Unmet Need, Weak | Unmet Need, Moderate | Unmet Need, Strong | Unmet Need Moderate-to-Strong |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number (%) | Number (%) | Number (%) | Number (%) | Number (%) | Number (%) | ||
| Information | |||||||
| Up-to-date information | 1 | 178 (18.8) | 135 (14.2) | 239 (25.2) | 178 (18.8) | 219 (23.1) | 397 (41.8) |
| Information for others | 2 | 221 (23.3) | 108 (11.4) | 256 (27.0) | 177 (18.7) | 187(19.7) | 364 (38.4) |
| Understandable information | 3 | 176 (18.5) | 98 (10.3) | 255 (26.9) | 188 (19.8) | 232 (24.4) | 420 (44.3) |
| Comprehensive cancer care | |||||||
| Best medical care | 4 | 238 (25.1) | 154 (16.2) | 175 (18.4) | 172 (18.1) | 210 (22.1) | 382 (40.3) |
| Local healthcare services | 5 | 228 (24.0) | 124 (13.1) | 175 (18.4) | 192 (20.2) | 230 (24.2) | 422 (44.5) |
| Manage health with team | 6 | 144 (15.2) | 143 (15.1) | 203 (21.4) | 193 (20.3) | 266 (28.0) | 459 (48.4) |
| Communication among doctors | 7 | 145 (15.3) | 131 (13.8) | 200 (21.1) | 200 (21.1) | 273 (28.8) | 473 (49.8) |
| Complaints are addressed | 8 | 236 (24.9) | 127 (13.4) | 176 (18.5) | 185 (19.5) | 225 (23.7) | 410 (43.2) |
| Complimentary therapy * | 9 | 405 (42.7) | 80 (8.4) | 199 (21.0) | 134 (14.1) | 131 (13.8) | 265 (27.9) |
| Accessible hospital parking | 18 | 557 (58.7) | 95 (10.0) | 95 (10.0) | 66 (7.0) | 136 (14.3) | 202 (21.3) |
| Existential survivorship | |||||||
| Reduce stress in my life | 10 | 274 (28.9) | 142 (15.0) | 262 (27.6) | 150 (15.8) | 121 (12.8) | 271 (28.6) |
| Concerns about cancer coming back | 19 | 155 (16.3) | 71 (7.5) | 234 (24.7) | 159 (16.8) | 330 (34.8) | 489 (51.5) |
| Emotional support for me | 20 | 352 (37.1) | 102 (10.7) | 218 (23.0) | 166 (17.5) | 111 (11.7) | 277 (29.2) |
| New relationships | 23 | 470 (49.5) | 107 (11.3) | 184 (19.4) | 102 (10.7) | 86 (9.1) | 188 (19.8) |
| Talk to others | 24 | 355 (37.4) | 110 (11.6) | 230 (24.2) | 138 (14.5) | 116 (12.2) | 254 (26.8) |
| Handle social/work situations | 25 | 462 (48.7) | 100 (10.5) | 196 (20.7) | 109 (11.5) | 82 (8.6) | 191 (20.1) |
| Changes to my body | 26 | 371 (39.1) | 113 (11.9) | 234 (24.7) | 142 (15.0) | 89 (9.4) | 231 (24.3) |
| Ongoing case manager * | 28 | 490 (51.6) | 68 (7.2) | 167 (17.6) | 110 (11.6) | 114 (12.0) | 224 (23.6) |
| Move on with my life | 29 | 424 (44.7) | 124 (13.1) | 216 (22.8) | 105 (11.1) | 80 (8.4) | 185 (19.5) |
| Changes to beliefs | 30 | 422 (44.5) | 111 (11.7) | 228 (24.0) | 114 (12.0) | 74 (7.8) | 188 (19.8) |
| Acknowledging the impact | 31 | 518 (54.6) | 121 (12.8) | 165 (17.4) | 85 (9.0) | 60 (6.3) | 145 (15.3) |
| Survivor expectations | 32 | 415 (43.7) | 140 (14.8) | 209 (22.0) | 101 (10.6) | 84 (8.9) | 185 (19.5) |
| Decisions about my life | 33 | 467 (49.2) | 110 (11.6) | 192 (20.2) | 103 (10.9) | 77 (8.1) | 180 (19.0) |
| Spiritual beliefs | 34 | 546 (57.5) | 136 (14.3) | 134 (14.1) | 82 (8.6) | 51 (5.4) | 133 (14.0) |
| Make my life count | 35 | 476 (50.2) | 117 (12.3) | 189 (19.9) | 96 (10.1) | 71 (7.5) | 167 (17.6) |
| Quality of life | |||||||
| Manage side effects | 11 | 352 (37.1) | 83 (8.7) | 201 (21.2) | 136 (14.3) | 177 (18.7) | 313 (33.0) |
| Changes to quality of life | 12 | 300 (31.6) | 112 (11.8) | 235 (24.8) | 143 (15.1) | 159 (16.8) | 302 (31.8) |
| Relationships | |||||||
| Support partner/family | 21 | 410 (43.2) | 100 (10.5) | 203 (21.4) | 133 (14.0) | 103 (10.9) | 236 (24.9) |
| Impact on my relationship | 22 | 450 (47.4) | 92 (9.7) | 188 (19.8) | 122 (12.9) | 97 (10.2) | 219 (23.1) |
| Changes to partner’s life * | 13 | 900 (94.8) | 23 (2.4) | 11 (1.2) | 6 (0.6) | 9 (0.9) | 15 (1.6) |
| Problems with sex life | 27 | 707 (74.5) | 66 (7.0) | 109 (11.5) | 44 (4.6) | 23 (2.4) | 67 (7.1) |
| Financial issues (new dimension) | |||||||
| Impact on my working life * | 14 | 729 (76.8) | 59 (6.2) | 78 (8.2) | 37 (3.9) | 46 (4.8) | 83 (8.7) |
| Financial support * | 15 | 502 (52.9) | 77 (8.1) | 141 (14.9) | 104 (11.0) | 125 (13.2) | 229 (24.1) |
| Life/travel insurance * | 16 | 584 (61.5) | 73 (7.7) | 139 (14.6) | 71 (7.5) | 82 (8.6) | 153 (16.1) |
| Legal services * | 17 | 600 (63.2) | 53 (5.6) | 118 (12.4) | 92 (9.7) | 86 (9.1) | 178 (18.8) |
* Seven items, originally not grouped into any dimension, were distributed into the 1 new or an existing dimension.
Table 3.
Predictors of moderate-to-strong level of unmet needs of CaSUN-K in each domain by uni- and multivariable logistic regression analyses.
Table 3.
Predictors of moderate-to-strong level of unmet needs of CaSUN-K in each domain by uni- and multivariable logistic regression analyses.
| Information | Comprehensive Cancer Care | Existential Survivorship | Quality of Life | Relationship | Financial Issues | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) | aOR * (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | aOR * (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | aOR * (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | aOR * (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | aOR * (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | aOR * (95% CI) | |
| Sociodemographic characteristics | ||||||||||||
| Age | ||||||||||||
| ≥65 years | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||||
| <65 years | 1.09 (0.85, 1.41) | 1.09 (0.84, 1.40) | 1.20 (0.93, 1.56) | 1.19 (0.91, 1.55) | 1.17 (0.89, 1.55) | 1.48 (1.09, 2.02) | 1.54 (1.09, 2.18) | |||||
| Sex | ||||||||||||
| Female | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||||
| Male | 0.88 (0.67, 1.13) | 1.11 (0.86, 1.43) | 1.37 (1.01, 1.85) | 0.77 (0.59, 1.00) | 0.83 (0.63, 1.07) | 1.00 (0.76, 1.32) | 0.92 (0.68, 1.25) | |||||
| Marital status | ||||||||||||
| Non-married | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||||
| Married | 0.81 (0.56, 1.18) | 1.24 (0.86, 1.80) | 0.61 (0.41, 0.91) | 0.75 (0.51, 1.09) | 1.04 (0.70, 1.56) | 0.40 (0.27, 0.59) | ||||||
| Education level | ||||||||||||
| ≥University | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||||
| High school | 1.00 (0.74, 1.35) | 1.10 (0.82, 1.49) | 1.08 (0.80, 1.47) | 1.01 (0.74, 1.38) | 0.92 (0.67, 1.28) | 1.02 (0.71, 1.45) | ||||||
| ≤Middle school | 1.09 (0.79, 1.50) | 1.05 (0.77, 1.45) | 1.04 (0.75, 1.44) | 1.06 (0.76, 1.46) | 0.86 (0.61, 1.21) | 0.86 (0.59, 1.27) | ||||||
| Employment status | ||||||||||||
| Employed | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||||
| Unemployed | 1.07 (0.83, 1.39) | 0.90 (0.69, 1.16) | 1.29 (0.99, 1.68) | 1.09 (0.84, 1.42) | 1.16 (0.88, 1.54) | 0.97 (0.71, 1.32) | ||||||
| Household monthly income | ||||||||||||
| <USD$3000 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||||
| ≥USD$3000 | 0.91 (0.69, 1.19) | 1.03 (0.78, 1.35) | 0.79 (0.60, 1.05) | 0.92 (0.70, 1.22) | 0.90 (0.67, 1.20) | 0.76 (0.55, 1.05) | ||||||
| Disease-related characteristics | ||||||||||||
| Comorbidity | ||||||||||||
| No | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||||
| Yes | 1.12 (0.83, 1.50) | 1.21 (0.90, 1.62) | 1.13 (0.84, 1.52) | 1.27 (0.93, 1.72) | 1.06 (0.77, 1.45) | 0.80 (0.57, 1.13) | ||||||
| Pathologic stage | ||||||||||||
| 0–I | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||||
| II | 1.25 (0.87, 1.79) | 1.09 (0.76, 1.56) | 1.23 (0.85, 1.79) | 1.37 (0.95, 1.97) | 1.47 (1.01, 2.14) | 1.32 (0.87, 2.01) | ||||||
| III | 1.37 (0.80, 1.07) | 1.38 (0.90, 2.10) | 1.67 (1.07, 2.62) | 1.92 (1.26, 2.92) | 1.19 (0.76, 1.86) | 1.72 (1.08, 2.72) | ||||||
| Lapse after active treatment | ||||||||||||
| ≥18 months | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||||
| <18 months | 1.49 (1.16, 1.93) | 1.58 (1.22, 2.04) | 1.50 (1.11, 2.02) | 1.65 (1.27, 2.14) | 1.55 (1.12, 2.14) | 1.70 (1.31, 2.21) | 1.59 (1.17, 2.15) | 1.43 (1.09, 1.89) | 1.55 (1.14, 2.11) | |||
| Psychological characteristics | ||||||||||||
| Fear of Cancer Recurrence | ||||||||||||
| Low FCR (<13) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||||
| High FCR (≥13) | 4.64 (3.52, 6.12) | 4.13 (3.02, 5.64) | 4.29 (3.26, 5.64) | 3.87 (2.83, 5.30) | 7.05 (5.28, 9.41) | 5.99 (4.32, 8.30) | 4.97 (3.69, 6.68) | 3.90 (2.79, 5.46) | 5.44 (3.90, 7.57) | 4.39 (3.02, 6.39) | 3.89 (2.72, 5.57) | 2.77 (1.85, 4.15) |
| EORTC-QoL-C30 | ||||||||||||
| Poor Physical Function | 2.27 (1.60, 3.21) | 1.92 (1.36, 2.71) | 3.13 (2.10, 4.67) | 1.64 (1.01, 2.65) | 2.14 (1.53, 3.00) | 1.78 (1.26, 2.50) | 1.71 (1.18, 2.48) | |||||
| Poor Role Function | 2.22 (1.71, 2.90) | 2.05 (1.57, 2.67) | 2.19 (1.66, 2.88) | 2.19 (1.68, 2.86) | 2.30 (1.74, 3.04) | 2.45 (1.80, 3.35) | 1.56 (1.09, 2.24) | |||||
| Poor Emotional Function | 3.47 (2.58, 4.66) | 1.93 (1.35, 2.77) | 3.11 (2.32, 4.17) | 1.70 (1.18, 2.44) | 3.99 (2.89, 5.52) | 1.65 (1.09, 2.49) | 3.53 (2.65, 4.71) | 1.86 (1.30, 2.65) | 3.65 (2.72, 4.89) | 1.87 (1.31, 2.68) | 3.73 (2.72, 5.13) | 2.31 (1.60, 3.35) |
| Poor Cognitive Function | 2.64 (1.95, 3.59) | 1.65 (1.18, 2.31) | 2.38 (1.75, 3.23) | 2.67 (1.92, 3.70) | 2.17 (1.62, 2.92) | 2.32 (1.72, 3.15) | 2.39 (1.72, 3.30) | |||||
| Poor Social Function | 2.73 (2.07, 3.61) | 2.87 (2.17, 3.80) | 1.89 (1.34, 2.66) | 4.18 (3.07, 5.70) | 2.34 (1.59, 3.44) | 3.27 (2.48, 4.33) | 2.00 (1.42, 2.80) | 3.01 (2.26, 4.01) | 1.79 (1.26, 2.53) | 2.57 (1.88, 3.51) | ||
Abbreviation: CaSUN-K = Korean version of the Cancer Survivors’ Unmet Needs, EORTC-QoL-C30 = European organization for research and treatment of cancer quality of life core questionnaire, OR = odds ratio, aOR = adjusted odds ratio, CI = confidence interval. * Data are expressed based on multivariable logistic models by stepwise backward selection considering significance at p < 0.054.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Park, J.; Jung, W.; Lee, G.; Kang, D.; Shim, Y.M.; Kim, H.K.; Jeong, A.; Cho, J.; Shin, D.W. Unmet Supportive Care Needs after Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Resection at a Tertiary Hospital in Seoul, South Korea. Healthcare 2023, 11, 2012. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11142012
AMA Style
Park J, Jung W, Lee G, Kang D, Shim YM, Kim HK, Jeong A, Cho J, Shin DW. Unmet Supportive Care Needs after Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Resection at a Tertiary Hospital in Seoul, South Korea. Healthcare. 2023; 11(14):2012. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11142012
Chicago/Turabian StylePark, Junhee, Wonyoung Jung, Genehee Lee, Danbee Kang, Young Mog Shim, Hong Kwan Kim, Ansuk Jeong, Juhee Cho, and Dong Wook Shin. 2023. "Unmet Supportive Care Needs after Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Resection at a Tertiary Hospital in Seoul, South Korea" Healthcare 11, no. 14: 2012. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11142012
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
