Next Article in Journal
The Use of a Hybrid Closed-Loop System for Glycemic Control in Two Pediatric Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Undergoing Minor Surgery
Next Article in Special Issue
Muscle Activity Characteristics of the Pronator Teres during Throwing in Baseball Pitchers: A Pilot Study
Previous Article in Journal
Stocking Practices of Anti-Tuberculosis Medications among Community Pharmacists and Patent Proprietary Medicine Vendors in Two States in Nigeria
Previous Article in Special Issue
Efficacy of Injury Prevention Using Functional Movement Screen Training in High-School Baseball Players: Secondary Outcomes of a Randomized Controlled Trial
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Changes in Medial Elbow Joint Parameters Due to Selective Contraction of the Forearm Flexor–Pronator Muscles

Healthcare 2023, 11(4), 586; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11040586
by Hiroshi Hattori 1,2, Kiyokazu Akasaka 1,2,*, Takahiro Otsudo 3, Yutaka Sawada 1 and Toby Hall 4
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Healthcare 2023, 11(4), 586; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11040586
Submission received: 26 December 2022 / Revised: 7 February 2023 / Accepted: 14 February 2023 / Published: 15 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sport Injury Prevention and Rehabilitation in Adolescents)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Dear Authors,

I would like to congratulate you on the conducted research - it is well conducted and precisely described. I have only minor suggestions that could improve this manuscript. The Table 1 is difficult to read in this orientation. Could you consider reworking it for different presentation? I understand, that it may be hard, but please check the possibilities. You should improve the quality of figures - they seems to be a bit blurred. I would also suggest to broaden the section of clinical implications in the discussion.

With regards,

The reviewer

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Thank you for the presentation of the work. 

We are struck by several things I would like to classify:

1- there is no difference between men and women or gender? you have not put it in your material and methodology. it is a compulsory factor to mention the gender of the subjects and if it influences the result.

2- we are not clear about the starting position and how the work was carried out. a photo or diagram of the positions and the material is necessary.

3- the sample is very young with an average age of 24 years, which makes the result conditioned even partly because the sample is very small.

4- What test did you use to find out the laterality or dominant side of the participants? how did you do it?

thank you 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

Nice study with possible applications in various healthcare areas, although a comparison between healthy elbows of men and women, of athletes versus non-athletes, of the dominant and non-dominant side is missing. Also, prior knowledge of the functional state of the structures in other variables other than the separation and elasticity of structures. 

It would be convenient to indicate in the title the specific characteristics of the elbows evaluated. Also, to reflect the sporting activity carried out by the sample subjects (if any). It is recommended the inclusion of a flow chart with the selection process of the dead. Was the experiment recorded?

Finally, authors are advised to include a "procedure" section right after participants. This section should accurately describe the steps performed during the applied method. Were the test subjects blinded?

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

good modification 

thank you for your work

Back to TopTop