Next Article in Journal
Emergence of Atrial Fibrillation and Flutter in COVID-19 Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Previous Article in Journal
Geriatric Trauma Outcome Score as a Mortality Predictor in Isolated Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Single-Center Retrospective Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Deviation of the Nail Lamina after Unilateral Partial Matricectomy

by
Álvaro Saura-Sempere
1,
Rubén Sánchez-Gómez
2,
José Manuel Reguera-Medina
3,
Salvador Márquez-Reina
4,
Rafael Rodríguez-León
5 and
Álvaro Gómez-Carrión
2,*
1
Podiatry Clinic Álvaro Saura, Mairena del Aljarafe, 41927 Sevilla, Spain
2
Nursing Department, Faculty of Nursing, Physiotherapy, and Podiatry, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain
3
Sanipie Clinic, Utrera, 41704 Sevilla, Spain
4
Podiatry Department, Faculty of Nursing, Physiotherapy, and Podiatry, Universidad de Sevilla, 41009 Sevilla, Spain
5
GIGI Studios, 08174 Barcelona, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Healthcare 2024, 12(16), 1681; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12161681
Submission received: 29 June 2024 / Revised: 12 August 2024 / Accepted: 18 August 2024 / Published: 22 August 2024

Abstract

:
Deviation of the nail plate in the transverse plane has traditionally been regarded as a postoperative complication following the definitive surgical treatment of ingrown toenails, particularly when only a single nail fold is addressed. The quantification and longitudinal comparison of the operated versus non-operated nail folds could elucidate potential transverse deviations of the nail plate. The objective of this study was to assess the presence or absence of transverse nail plate deviation following ingrown toenail surgery on a single nail fold. Methods: A cohort of 11 patients (three males, eight females) with recurrent ingrown toenails undergoing unilateral partial matricectomy were included in this study. Preoperative measurements were compared to those taken at 7, 14, 21, 28, and 35 days postoperatively. Results: The analysis revealed no statistically significant differences in measurements between the operated and non-operated nail folds, nor were there significant changes in the measurements over time within each group (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Despite the absence of visible deviations in the orientation of the nail plate, the angular measurements post-surgery at 35 days showed no statistically significant alterations. The angular values observed across all time points appeared to be influenced by the intrinsic morphological characteristics of each nail plate.

1. Introduction

Onychocryptosis is a prevalent condition characterized by the interaction of the nail plate with the periungual skin, leading to pain, inflammation, and an increased risk of infection, particularly if not treated in the early stages [1]. This condition most commonly affects the first toe and can present across all age groups [2]. Various classifications have been proposed for its management [3], with surgical intervention being a frequently employed approach [4,5].
Surgical techniques for the resolution of onychocryptosis typically focus on the removal of the offending portion of the nail plate [6]. This is often accompanied by the excision of the corresponding segment of the nail matrix, achieved through mechanical excision [7], wedge resection [8], or chemical ablation techniques [9].
Longitudinal biopsies in the central region of the nail plate can result in chronic dystrophy or even complete detachment of the nail. In contrast, lateral biopsies tend to avoid these complications, though they may lead to onycholysis [10], permanent narrowing of the nail, and potential acquired misalignment [11].
From an anatomical standpoint, 85% of cases involve a ligamentous structure, an extension of the lateral ligament of the distal interphalangeal joint, which originates from the middle phalanx (or distal phalanx in the thumb) and is inserted into the nail matrix and lunula. This ligament might contribute to biomechanical deformation of the nail, possibly explaining certain types of dystrophic nails associated with joint misalignment in fingers and toes [12]. In patients with osteoarthritic changes, alterations at this level could also occur [13].
Physically, there is a correlation between nail shape, growth patterns, and various pathological conditions such as pincer nail and onychocryptosis [14]. However, the aforementioned ligamentous complex is not implicated in any acquired or congenital pathological processes affecting the nail plate [11,15,16,17,18].
Among the secondary complications of surgical treatment for onychocryptosis, acquired lateralization of the nail plate is not widely documented, unlike infection and hemorrhage, which are well-recognized complications [6]. This acquired postsurgical misalignment could potentially lead to poor aesthetic outcomes for patients. Nonetheless, a scarring associated with an excisional matricectomy is currently the primary source of aesthetic dissatisfaction following partial matricectomy, with a chemical matricectomy generally yielding higher satisfaction rates compared to those involving tissue excision [19].
Nail misalignment is a potential complication of extensive excision of the lateral portion of the nail. This misalignment likely arises from a disruption in the forces within the nail unit, affecting both the matrix and the nail plate. The objective of this study is to evaluate the potential for acquired nail plate deviation following surgical techniques for the resolution of onychocryptosis in a single nail fold, particularly when excision of the ligamentous complex is involved.

2. Materials and Methods

This study was approved by the Bioethics and Biosafety Committee of the University of Extremadura (CBBUEx) under the approval code ID 13_2023. The ethical guidelines and human research principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki were strictly adhered to. All participants were informed of the study’s requirements and provided written informed consent in compliance with Organic Law 15/1999 of 13 December.

2.1. Participants

The sample size calculation for this study was performed by the Calculation Center of the Complutense University of Madrid. This study aimed to evaluate the angular differences between the surgically treated nail canals over time. The sample size was determined using G*Power software (version 3.1.9.6, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany). Based on the existing literature indicating that nail plate deviation occurs in 100% of cases following a unilateral matricectomy [5], the calculation was conducted with a 95% confidence interval, a 5% alpha error, and an 80% statistical power with a 20% beta error. A minimum of 8 subjects was calculated to be necessary. To account for potential dropouts, a final sample size of 11 subjects was selected.
The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) diagnosis of onychocryptosis affecting a single nail edge with a history of previous episodes and no prior diagnosis of onychocryptosis on the opposite edge of the same toe; (2) signed informed consent for the surgical intervention; (3) aged over 18 years. The exclusion criteria included: (1) previous surgical intervention for onychocryptosis; (2) trauma to the treated nail plate at the time of measurement; (3) refusal of the proposed surgical treatment; (4) presence of ungual onychogryphosis; (5) failure to provide signed informed consent for participation in the study.

2.2. Instruments, Measurement Procedures, and Variables

For the surgical treatment of onychocryptosis, the excision of the nail matrix was performed using a chemical technique involving phenol, followed by the removal of the phenolized tissue.
Participants were screened for adherence to the inclusion criteria through a face-to-face interview conducted by a member of the research team. The entire procedure was explained in detail, and participants were asked to read and sign the informed consent form before proceeding. Demographic data, including age, height, weight, and BMI, were subsequently collected.
The angle formed by the tangent of the operated and non-operated nail folds relative to the bisector of the nail plate was measured using software developed in MATLAB R2017a, following Pearsons method [20] (Figure 1). Photographs were taken under standardized conditions according to protocol (Figure 2).
  • Proximal edge limit point: termination of the lunula in each nail canal (points x and x1) (Figure 3);
  • Bisector of the nail plate (perpendicular line to segment x − x1) (Figure 4);
  • Tangent line to the medial nail edge (Figure 5);
  • Tangent line to the lateral nail Edge (Figure 6);
  • Medial angle: formed by the bisector and medial tangent lines;
  • Lateral angle: formed by the bisector and lateral tangent lines.
Data were collected during the anamnesis process, followed by the capture and measurement of the photographic images. The angle formed by the tangent of the operated and non-operated nail canals relative to the bisector of the nail plate was measured for each hallux.
Measurements were conducted on both pre- and post-surgical photographs, with each angle measured three times to ensure accuracy. This measurement protocol was consistently repeated for 7 days postoperatively.
Photographs were taken under standardized conditions, maintaining a fixed distance of 30 cm, an inclination of 90°, and a magnification of 3×. A specialized camera support was used to achieve these conditions (Figure 7). The 90° camera inclination was verified for each image captured using a gravitational goniometer.
The data were recorded in an Excel database for Windows 2010 and securely stored on electronic media, in full compliance with current regulations as stipulated in Article 10 of Organic Law 15/1999 on the Protection of Personal Data and Articles 91 and 93 of Royal Decree 1720/2007 concerning security measures for access to personal data in information systems. Post-surgical reviews were conducted according to protocol, with new measurements taken on two occasions: at two and four weeks post-surgery.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

To analyze the sociodemographic characteristics of the study population, the mean, standard deviation, and upper and lower limits were calculated for age, weight (kg), height (cm), and Body Mass Index (BMI) (Table 1). The normality of these variables was assessed using the Shapiro–Wilk test (Table 2).
The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) was calculated to assess the reliability of the measurements. Values (ICC > 0.9) would indicate the absence of significant errors for each measurement taken (Table 3).
Given that the study involved two groups and aimed to analyze the goniometric characteristics of the measurements between the operated and non-operated groups, independent Student’s t-tests were performed. A p-value of less than 0.05 (p < 0.05) would indicate statistically significant differences between the measurements taken in the operated and non-operated channels (Table 4).
To compare the goniometric characteristics of measurements within the intervened group over time (preoperative and postoperative), paired Student’s t-tests were performed (Table 5).
Similarly, the same statistical test was applied to the non-intervened group to compare these measurements in the preoperative and postoperative periods (Table 6). Values (p < 0.05) would indicate no significant differences between the measurements taken for each group over time.

3. Results

A total of 11 cases of unilateral partial matricectomies were performed, including three males and eight females, for recurrent onychocryptosis affecting a single nail canal. Five cases involved the right foot, while six involved the left. Based on the affected canal, four interventions were performed on the medial canal and seven on the lateral canal (one medial canal on the right foot, three lateral canals on the right foot, four medial canals on the left foot, and three lateral canals on the left foot). The mean age of the patients undergoing surgery was 42.27 years (Table 1).
Measurements taken for each nail canal using the photographic method showed no significant differences between the operated and non-operated nail folds (p > 0.05) (Table 4). Regarding angular differences over time between measurements taken for the intervened and non-intervened channels, no statistically significant differences were found (p > 0.05) (Table 5 and Table 6). The orientation of the nail plate remained unchanged for 35 days post-surgery. All measurements exhibited angular values characteristic of the morphology of each nail, with no significant differences observed between preoperative and postoperative measurements.

4. Discussion

This study aims to evaluate the potential deviation of the nail plate following surgery in a single canal for the treatment of onychocryptosis. Such deviation has been minimally described in the literature as a postoperative complication, though some authors have suggested its occurrence [11,15,17].
Our study results did not reveal statistically significant differences (p > 0.05), indicating that the data do not allow us to definitively assert the absence of nail plate deviation following surgical intervention in a single canal for onychocryptosis. Contrary to the observations made by Berker and Baran [11], we did not detect any visually discernible misalignments associated with lateral excisions of the nail plate, even in cases where the excised nail fragment exceeded 3 mm in width. Furthermore, no deviations toward the operated side were observed. The nail plate was sectioned parallel to its bisector, which may have influenced its final visual appearance.
Pearson’s photographic method [20] for assessing potential nail abnormalities suggests that symptomatic onychocryptosis treatment should not be based on correcting a non-existent nail deformity. Therefore, in light of this approach and our study results, we find no evidence to support the systematic association of surgical techniques for onychocryptosis with interventions in both nail canals when only one is affected.
Regarding the potential lateralization of the nail plate as a consequence of resecting the ligamentous complex described by Guéro [12] and supported by Berker and Baran [11], although our study did not produce statistically significant results, we cannot conclusively state that its resection during nail surgery leads to the aforementioned deviation.
As highlighted by Sano et al. [21], cases of nail plate lateralization involve a resultant force imbalance among all structures implicated in the deformity (F ≠ 0), indicating a disruption in the harmony these structures should maintain. This includes the upward mechanical forces, notably the ground reaction force, and the intrinsic forces of the nail unit, such as the extensor tendon of the first toe, nail plate, matriciophalangeal ligament, lateral ligament, and phalangeal-hyponychial ligament.
In surgical cases involving dystrophic or pincer nail deformities [22], the matriciophalangeal, lateral, and phalangeal-hyponychial ligaments, as deformity-maintaining structures, could indeed contribute to lateralization by creating a true imbalance among the involved structures [23]. The valgus component of the first toe could also be an anatomical/biomechanical factor influencing this imbalance. Plantar pressures in patients with nail pathology are slightly lower than in those without pathology at this level [21]. The proprioceptive changes theoretically induced by the absence of a nail plate fragment may also contribute to the mechanical alterations involved in this process.
Future research directions could utilize the method employed in our study to compare nail plate deviations over time with different surgical techniques or to quantify the improvement in certain nail diseases under treatment.

5. Limitations

This study has several limitations. The use of an angular measurement program on photographs, even under controlled conditions, presents challenges in achieving precise positioning of measurement points. Additionally, the requirement to take photographs shortly after the surgical procedure may cause inconvenience for the patient. If the surgery proceeds without complications, patients must return for measurements upon surgical discharge.
Moreover, there is a need to extend the data collection period, as we believe that 35 days post-surgery may be insufficient for a comprehensive assessment of potential transverse nail deviation. Another limitation is the small sample size of the study, coupled with the calculation of an 80% power of analysis with a 20% beta error, which must be taken into account.

6. Conclusions

Performing unilateral matricectomies for the surgical treatment of onychocryptosis does not exhibit any apparent visual changes suggesting a deviation of the nail plate post-procedure. However, based on the data collected, it is not possible to quantitatively confirm that such deviations do not occur in the transverse plane.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Á.S.-S.; methodology, R.S.-G.; software, R.R.-L.; formal analysis, R.S.-G.; investigation, J.M.R.-M.; data curation, J.M.R.-M.; writing—original draft preparation, S.M.-R.; writing—review and editing, S.M.-R. and Á.G.-C.; project administration, S.M.-R. and R.R.-L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study received approval from the Bioethics and Biosafety Committee of the University of Extremadura (CBBUEx) under code ID 89_2018.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

Author Rafael Rodríguez-León was employed by the company GIGI Studios. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Eekhof, J.A.H.; Van Wijk, B.; Knuistingh Neven, A.; van der Wouden, J.C. Interventions for ingrowing toenails. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2012, 18, CD001541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Chabchoub, I.; Litaiem, N. Ingrown Toenails. In StatPearls [Internet]; Updated 2022 September 18; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2024. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK546697/ (accessed on 20 June 2024).
  3. Kline, A. Onychocryptosis: A simple classification system. Foot Ankle J. 2008, 1, 6–13. [Google Scholar]
  4. Hassan, R.E.; Khan, L.; Shah, S.H.; Naeem, H.; Noor, N.; Iqbal, M.; Khan, F.D.; Rehman, Z.; Ahmad, W.; Tanveer, S.; et al. Surgical Strategies for Ingrown Toenails: A Comprehensive Review of Techniques, Outcomes, and Advancements. Cureus 2024, 16, e52501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Exley, V.; Jones, K.; Watson, J.; Backhouse, M. A survey of the treatment and management of ingrown toenails by UK podiatrists: A cross-sectional survey. J. Foot Ankle Res. 2024, 17, e12017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Exley, V.; Jones, K.; Watson, J.; Backhouse, M. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of surgical treatments for ingrown toenails part II: Healing time, post-operative complications, pain, and participant satisfaction. J. Foot Ankle Res. 2023, 16, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Frost, L. Root resection for incurved nail. J. Natl. Assoc. Chiropodist. 1950, 40, 19–25. [Google Scholar]
  8. Winograd, A.M. A Modification in the Technic of Operation for Ingrown Toe-Nail. J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc. 2007, 97, 274–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Boll, O.F. Surgical correction of ingrowing nails. J. Am. Podiatr. Assoc. 1945, 35, 8–9. [Google Scholar]
  10. Rich, P. Nail Biopsy: Indications and Methods. Dermatol. Surg. 2001, 27, 229–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. De Berker, A.R.; Baran, R. Acquired Malalignment: A Complication of Lateral Longitudinal Nail Biopsy. Acta Derm.-Venereol. 1998, 78, 468–470. [Google Scholar]
  12. Guéro, S.; Guichard, S.; Fraitag, S. Ligamentary structure of the base of the nail. Surg. Radiol. Anat. 1994, 16, 47–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Shum, C.; Bruno, R.J.; Ristic, S.; Rosenwasser, M.P.; Strauch, R.J. Examination of the anatomic relationship of the proximal germinal nail matrix to the extensor tendon insertion. J. Hand Surg. 2000, 5, 1114–1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Rauch, C.; Cherkaoui-Rbati, M. Physics of nail conditions: Why do ingrown nails always happen in the big toes? Phys. Biol. 2014, 11, 066004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Baran, R.; Bureau, H. Congenital malalignment of the big toe-nail as a cause of ingrowing toe-nail in infancy. Pathology and treatment (a study of thirty cases). Clin. Exp. Dermatol. 1983, 8, 619–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Baran, R.; Kechijian, P. Longitudinal melanonychia (melanonychia striata): Diagnosis and management. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 1989, 21, 1165–1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hanno, R.; Mathes, B.M.; Krull, E.A. Longitudinal nail biopsy in evaluation of acquired nail dystrophies. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 1986, 14, 803–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Reardon, C.M.; McArthur, P.A.; Survana, S.K.; Brotherston, T.M. The Surface Anatomy of the Germinal Matrix of the Nail Bed in the Finger. J. Hand Surg. 1999, 24, 531–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kruijff, S.; Van Det, R.J.; Van Der Meer, G.T.; Van Den Berg, I.C.M.A.E.; Van Der Palen, J.; Geelkerken, R.H. Partial Matrix Excision or Orthonyxia for Ingrowing Toenails. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2008, 206, 148–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Pearson, H.J.; Bury, R.N.; Wapples, J.; Watkin, D.F. Ingrowing toenails: Is there a nail abnormality? A prospective study. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 1987, 69, 840–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sano, H.; Shionoya, K.; Ogawa, R. Foot loading is different in people with and without pincer nails: A case control study. J. Foot Ankle Res. 2015, 8, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Baran, R.; Haneke, E.; Richert, B. Pincer Nails: Definition and Surgical Treatment. Dermatol. Surg. 2001, 27, 261–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Young Kim, J. Matrixplasty for the Treatment of Severe Incurved Toenail with Growth Plate Deformity. J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc. 2012, 102, 198–204. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Scheme of the measurements to be taken for the comparison of the intervened and non-intervened nail canals.
Figure 1. Scheme of the measurements to be taken for the comparison of the intervened and non-intervened nail canals.
Healthcare 12 01681 g001
Figure 2. Image taken in constant position according to protocol.
Figure 2. Image taken in constant position according to protocol.
Healthcare 12 01681 g002
Figure 3. Marking of the first two points (x − x1): termination of the lunula in each nail canal.
Figure 3. Marking of the first two points (x − x1): termination of the lunula in each nail canal.
Healthcare 12 01681 g003
Figure 4. The program automatically determines the line that joins x − x1 and its perpendicular line.
Figure 4. The program automatically determines the line that joins x − x1 and its perpendicular line.
Healthcare 12 01681 g004
Figure 5. Tracing the tangent line to the lateral nail canal. The angle it forms with the line perpendicular to x − x1 will be angle 1 (lateral angle in this case).
Figure 5. Tracing the tangent line to the lateral nail canal. The angle it forms with the line perpendicular to x − x1 will be angle 1 (lateral angle in this case).
Healthcare 12 01681 g005
Figure 6. Drawing of the tangent line to the medial nail canal. The angle formed with the line perpendicular to x − x1 will be angle 2 (medial angle in this case).
Figure 6. Drawing of the tangent line to the medial nail canal. The angle formed with the line perpendicular to x − x1 will be angle 2 (medial angle in this case).
Healthcare 12 01681 g006
Figure 7. Camera support designed for this study.
Figure 7. Camera support designed for this study.
Healthcare 12 01681 g007
Table 1. Sociodemographic characteristics of the study population, according to the division by sex.
Table 1. Sociodemographic characteristics of the study population, according to the division by sex.
PatientAgeWeight (kg)Size (cm)IMC
Media42.27270.590168.00029.000
SD19.0458.6834.4924.020
Lim inf29.4864.76164.9526.30
Lim sup55.0776.42171.0231.70
Abbreviations: SD, Standard Deviation; kg, kilogram; cm, centimeters.
Table 2. Normality Tests of the Variables Studied.
Table 2. Normality Tests of the Variables Studied.
VariablesShapiro–Wilk
p Value *
Mean measurement of operated angle day 00.364
Half measurement of operated angle day 70.463
Half measurement of operated angle day 140.320
Half measurement of operated angle day 210.307
Half measurement of the operated angle on day 28 0.634
Half measurement of operated angle day 350.636
Average measurement of non-operated angle day 00.080
Half measurement of non-operated angle day 70.106
Half measurement of non-operated angle day 140.370
Half measurement of non-operated angle day 210.051
Half measurement of non-operated intervened angle day 28 0.638
Half measurement of non-operated angle day 350.237
* Shapiro–Wilk Test p value.
Table 3. Reliability of the variables studied.
Table 3. Reliability of the variables studied.
ICCLim. Inf–Lim. Sup
Operated angle measurement day 00.9800.943–0.994
Operated angle measurement day 70.9940.982–0.998
Operated angle measurement day 140.9880.966–0.996
Operated angle measurement day 210.9880.967–0.997
Operated angle measurement day 280.9790.941–0.994
Operated angle measurement day 350.9610.893–0.989
Operated angle measurement day 00.9950.985–0.998
Operated angle measurement day 70.9950.985–0.998
Operated angle measurement day 140.9880.966–0.996
Operated angle measurement day 210.9960.990–0.999
Operated angle measurement day 280.9920.979–0.998
Operated angle measurement day 350.9870.963–0.996
Abbreviations: ICC, Intraclass Correlation Coefficient.
Table 4. Goniometric characteristics of the measurements of the intervened and non-intervened group.
Table 4. Goniometric characteristics of the measurements of the intervened and non-intervened group.
Goniometric MeasurementSurgical Group (n = 11)
Media ± SD (IC 95%)
Non-Surgical Group (n = 11)
Media ± SD(IC 95%)
Valor p *
Angle measurement day 010.8 ± 6.84 (5.88–15.07)10.16 ± 7.40 (5.19–15.14)0.919
Angle measurement day 710.08 ± 7.34 (5.14–15.07)9.07 ± 5.88 (5.12–13.02)0.727
Angle measurement day 1410.13 ± 5.93 (6.14–14.12)10.21 ± 6.59 (5.78–14.64)0.977
Angle measurement day 2110.28 ± 5.31 (6.71–13.85)10.16 ± 7.34 (5.23–15.10)0.964
Angle measurement day 2811.25 ± 4.44 (8.26–14.24)10.83 ± 5.93 (6.85–14.82)0.854
Angle measurement day 3510.81 ± 3.93 (8.17–13.46)10.96 ± 6.20 (6.79–15.12)0.949
Abbreviations: SD, Standard Deviation; IC 95%, Confident Interval 95%. * Parametric Student’s T for paired samples. Statistical significance for a value p ˂ 0.05.
Table 5. Goniometric characteristics of the measurements comparing the operated group over time in the preoperative and postoperative periods.
Table 5. Goniometric characteristics of the measurements comparing the operated group over time in the preoperative and postoperative periods.
Goniometric MeasurementMedia ± SD (IC 95%)Media ± SD (IC 95%)Valor p *
Comparison of operated angle
measurement day 0–day 7
10.48 ± 6.84 (5.88–15.07)10.16 ± 7.40 (5.19–15.14)0.477
Comparison of operated angle
measurement day 7–day 14
10.16 ± 7.40 (5.19–15.14)10.13 ± 5.93 (6.15 ± 14.11)0.977
Comparison of operated angle
measurement day 14–day 28
10.13 ± 5.93 (6.15 ± 14.11)11.25 ± 4.44 (8.27 ± 14.23)0.877
Comparison of operated angle
measurement day 28–day 35
11.25 ± 4.44 (8.27 ± 14.23)10.81 ± 3.93 (8.17 ± 13.45)0.319
Abbreviations: SD, Standard Deviation; IC 95%, Confident Interval 95%. * Parametric Student’s T for paired samples. Statistical significance for a value p ˂ 0.05.
Table 6. Goniometric characteristics of the measurements comparing the group that did not intervene over time in the preoperative and postoperative periods.
Table 6. Goniometric characteristics of the measurements comparing the group that did not intervene over time in the preoperative and postoperative periods.
Goniometric MeasurementMedia ± SD (IC 95%)Media ± SD (IC 95%)Valor p *
Comparison of non-operated angle
measurement day 0–day 7
10.16 ± 7.40 (5.19–15.13)9.07 ± 5.88 (5.12–13.02)0.07
Comparison of non-operated angle
measurement day 7–day 14
9.07 ± 5.88 (5.12–13.02)10.21 ± 6.59 (5.78–14.64)0.109
Comparison of non-operated angle
measurement day 14–day 28
10.21 ± 6.59 (5.78–14.64)10.16 ± 7.34 (5.23–15.09)0.320
Comparison of non-operated angle
measurement day 28–day 35
10.16 ± 7.34 (5.23–15.09)10.96 ± 6.20 (6.80–15.12)0.725
Abbreviations: SD, Standard Deviation; IC 95%, Confident Interval 95%. * Parametric Student’s T for paired samples. Statistical significance for a value p ˂ 0.05.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Saura-Sempere, Á.; Sánchez-Gómez, R.; Reguera-Medina, J.M.; Márquez-Reina, S.; Rodríguez-León, R.; Gómez-Carrión, Á. Deviation of the Nail Lamina after Unilateral Partial Matricectomy. Healthcare 2024, 12, 1681. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12161681

AMA Style

Saura-Sempere Á, Sánchez-Gómez R, Reguera-Medina JM, Márquez-Reina S, Rodríguez-León R, Gómez-Carrión Á. Deviation of the Nail Lamina after Unilateral Partial Matricectomy. Healthcare. 2024; 12(16):1681. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12161681

Chicago/Turabian Style

Saura-Sempere, Álvaro, Rubén Sánchez-Gómez, José Manuel Reguera-Medina, Salvador Márquez-Reina, Rafael Rodríguez-León, and Álvaro Gómez-Carrión. 2024. "Deviation of the Nail Lamina after Unilateral Partial Matricectomy" Healthcare 12, no. 16: 1681. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12161681

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop