Next Article in Journal
The Time Trajectory of Choroid Plexus Enlargement in Multiple Sclerosis
Next Article in Special Issue
Return to Work in Breast Cancer Patients following an Interdisciplinary Rehabilitation Program in a Community-Based Cancer Rehabilitation Center: A Pilot Study
Previous Article in Journal
Quasi-Seniors’ Perception, Response, and Planning from the Perspective of Successful Aging
Previous Article in Special Issue
Rehabilitation Technologies for Chronic Conditions: Will We Sink or Swim?
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Real-Time Feedback Methods on Static Balance Training in Stroke Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

1
Department of Physical Therapy, Graduate School of Daejeon University, 62, Daehak-ro, Dong-gu, Daejeon 34520, Republic of Korea
2
Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health Medical Science, Daejeon University, 62, Daehak-ro, Dong-gu, Daejeon 34520, Republic of Korea
3
Department of Physical Therapy, Graduate School of Health and Medicine, Daejeon University, 62, Daehak-ro, Dong-gu, Daejeon 34520, Republic of Korea
4
Department of Beauty Design, College of Design and Art, Daejeon University, 62, Daehak-ro, Dong-gu, Daejeon 34520, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Healthcare 2024, 12(7), 767; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12070767
Submission received: 11 March 2024 / Revised: 25 March 2024 / Accepted: 29 March 2024 / Published: 1 April 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine)

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of real-time feedback methods on static balance training in stroke patients. There are two types of real-time feedback methods, as follows: one is Knowledge of Result (KR), and the other is Knowledge of Performance (KP). Method: Thirty stroke patients participated in this study and were randomly assigned to the KR group (n = 15) or the KP group (n = 15). All of the groups underwent real-time feedback training for four weeks (30 min per session, five sessions per week). The primary outcomes were sway length, sway velocity, and area 95%, which were assessed before and after the intervention. The secondary outcomes included the Berg Balance Scale, the Fugl Meyer Assessment for Lower Extremity, the Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke Trunk Impairment Scale, and the Fall Efficacy Scale. A group × time interaction was assessed using two-way ANOVA with repeated measures. Result: There was a significant increase over time in all outcomes (p < 0.05). Significant differences were observed for a group × time interaction in sway length and area 95% (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Real-time feedback training for static balance enhanced stroke patients’ static balance abilities, clinical outcome assessments, and promoted self-efficacy against falls.
Keywords: static balance; knowledge of result; knowledge of performance; stroke static balance; knowledge of result; knowledge of performance; stroke

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kwon, I.-H.; Shin, W.-S.; Choi, K.-S.; Lee, M.-S. Effects of Real-Time Feedback Methods on Static Balance Training in Stroke Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Healthcare 2024, 12, 767. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12070767

AMA Style

Kwon I-H, Shin W-S, Choi K-S, Lee M-S. Effects of Real-Time Feedback Methods on Static Balance Training in Stroke Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Healthcare. 2024; 12(7):767. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12070767

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kwon, Il-Ho, Won-Seob Shin, Kyu-Seong Choi, and Myung-Sun Lee. 2024. "Effects of Real-Time Feedback Methods on Static Balance Training in Stroke Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial" Healthcare 12, no. 7: 767. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12070767

APA Style

Kwon, I.-H., Shin, W.-S., Choi, K.-S., & Lee, M.-S. (2024). Effects of Real-Time Feedback Methods on Static Balance Training in Stroke Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Healthcare, 12(7), 767. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12070767

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop