Next Article in Journal
Influence of Workload on Primary Care Nurses’ Health and Burnout, Patients’ Safety, and Quality of Care: Integrative Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Practice-Based Research in Complementary Medicine: Could N-of-1 Trials Become the New Gold Standard?
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Clinical Usefulness of Bright White Light Therapy for Depressive Symptoms in Cancer Survivors: Results from a Series of Personalized (N-of-1) Trials
 
 
Protocol
Peer-Review Record

Protocol: Using Single-Case Experimental Design to Evaluate Whole-Body Dynamic Seating on Activity, Participation, and Quality of Life in Dystonic Cerebral Palsy

by Hortensia Gimeno 1,2,* and Tim Adlam 3,4
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3:
Submission received: 27 November 2019 / Revised: 17 December 2019 / Accepted: 30 December 2019 / Published: 31 December 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue N-of-1 Trials in Healthcare)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Well-designed and innovative study! 

 

Author Response

Thank you very much for your advice.

Reviewer 2 Report

Overall, my comments were address. I suggest making the limitations clearer (e.g. parent reported outcomes).

Author Response

Thank you very much for your advice. We have revised the manuscript accordingly.

Reviewer 3 Report

Thank you for your responses and incorporation of my previous suggestions into the revised manuscript. I had also suggested adding a flow-chart to the manuscript to increase clarity on timing and individual involved in completing the various assessments. I also suggested adding a brief statement summarizing reliability/validity and justification for your selected measures.

In the response, it states that a flow chart has been created for the manuscript and information on each measure added to this. I do not see a flow chart in the version of the manuscript that I have downloaded. I am unsure if this is an oversight, or if I have been given access to the wrong version of the manuscript!

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 3 Report

Thank you for adding the flow diagram- It is excellent and increases the clarity for the reader. I believe this manuscript is ready for publication 

Back to TopTop