Next Article in Journal
Knowledge Retention of the NIH Stroke Scale among Stroke Unit Health Care Workers Using Video vs. E-Learning: Protocol for a Web-Based, Randomized Controlled Trial
Previous Article in Journal
Impact on Mental Well-Being and Resilience of Patients with Multiple Chronic Conditions in Different Periods during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Outbreak in Taiwan
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Development and Content Validation of the CEECCA Questionnaire to Assess Ability to Communicate among Individuals with Aphasia Based on the NANDA-I and NOC

Healthcare 2021, 9(11), 1459; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9111459
by Willian-Jesús Martín-Dorta 1,*, Pedro-Ruymán Brito-Brito 2,3 and Alfonso-Miguel García-Hernández 4
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Healthcare 2021, 9(11), 1459; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9111459
Submission received: 17 September 2021 / Revised: 18 October 2021 / Accepted: 26 October 2021 / Published: 28 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Nursing)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Thanks for recommending me as a reviewer. This study presents the development and content validation of an instrument assessing the ability to communicate among individuals with aphasia. If the authors complete the revision, the quality of the study will be further improved.

 

  1. The introduction section is well written. If the authors describes more specifically the theoretical background of "NANDA-I diagnoses" and "NOC outcome indicators" in the introduction section, it can help readers understand.

2. line 74-80: I suggest that the author state the research objective in a sentence in the introduction section.

3. line 82-88: I suggest combining "2.1. Design", "2.2. Setting and Participants", and "2.2.1. Sample of Professionals" into one paragraph.

4. line 102: "2.2.2. Sample of Participants " - Authors should be more specific about the characteristics of the subject.

Author Response

Consulte el archivo adjunto

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear Authors,

Please see the attachment.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Consulte el archivo adjunto

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop