Next Article in Journal
Factors That Affect Symptoms of Injection Site Infection among Japanese Patients Who Self-Inject Insulin for Diabetes
Previous Article in Journal
Project Report on Telemedicine: What We Learned about the Administration and Development of a Binational Digital Infrastructure Project
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Healthcare
Volume 9
Issue 4
10.3390/healthcare9040401
healthcare-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Safety and Efficacy of Vaccines during COVID-19 Pandemic in Patients Treated with Biological Drugs in a Dermatological Setting

by
Oriana Simonetti
1,*,†,
Giulio Rizzetto
1,†,
Elisa Molinelli
1,
Federico Diotallevi
1,
Giulia Radi
1,
Oscar Cirioni
2,
Marcello Mario D’Errico
3 and
Annamaria Offidani
1
1
Clinic of Dermatology, Department of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, 60121 Ancona, Italy
2
Clinic of Infectious Diseases, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Public Health, Polytechnic University of Marche, 60121 Ancona, Italy
3
Department of Biomedical Sciences and Public Health, Section of Hygiene, Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Polytechnic University of the Marche, 60121 Ancona, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Equally contributed to the manuscript.
Healthcare 2021, 9(4), 401; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9040401
Submission received: 11 March 2021 / Revised: 24 March 2021 / Accepted: 24 March 2021 / Published: 1 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Coronaviruses (CoV) and COVID-19 Pandemic)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 vaccines, consisting of mRNA, have recently become available. The absolute novelty of these vaccines introduces questions about their safety and efficacy, especially in patients who are treated with biological drugs in dermatology. The aim of our review was to provide a broad overview of the current use of all available vaccinations in concomitance with biological therapy and to suggest indications for the new mRNA Covid-19 vaccines. We conducted a narrative review of the literature regarding the indications and safety of the various types of vaccines currently available in dermatological patients treated with biological therapy. The safety and efficacy of administering inactivated vaccines in patients undergoing biological therapy with inhibitors of TNF-α, IL-17, IL-12/23, and IL-4/13 was confirmed. Inactivated vaccines can be administered during therapy with inhibitors of IL-23 and IgE, taking into account that the level of evidence is lower due to the lack of specific studies. Live attenuated vaccines were contraindicated in concomitance with all biological therapies considered, except omalizumab. According to this evidence, we assume that there are currently no contraindications to the administration of the new Covid-19 BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 vaccines during biological therapy with inhibitors of TNF-α, IL-17, IL-12/23, IL-23, and IL-4/13, since these vaccines are comparable to inactivated ones. For patients with chronic urticaria or allergic asthma treated with omalizumab, we currently recommend caution in using the mRNA Covid-19 vaccines (30 min observation). The only contraindications were a previous history of hypersensitivity to the Covid-19 vaccines themself or to their excipients. In conclusion, further randomized clinical trials are needed to evaluate the efficacy of the antibody response in these patients.

1. Introduction

The recent Covid-19 pandemic has radically changed people’s lives and the organization of national healthcare systems. In dermatology, numerous solutions have been proposed to minimize the risk of infection while still providing the best care for patients [1]. The recent introduction of the Covid-19 vaccination may lead to a new phase in the fight against the virus, ensuring greater safety and a progressive return to normal life.
The new BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 vaccines produced, respectively, by Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna, are currently available and consist of messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) capable of inducing human cells to produce specific antigenic portions (spike proteins) of the SARS-CoV-2 virus [2]. Currently, the BNT162b2 vaccine is being administered in the United States of America, the United Kingdom, and in Europe, while the mRNA-127 vaccine has recently achieved authorization from the European Medicines Agency (EMA). However, the sheer novelty of this method raises questions about its safety and efficacy, especially in patients being treated with biological and immunomodulatory drugs [2].
In dermatology, inhibitors of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), interleukin (IL)-17, IL-12/23, IL-23, IL-4/13, and immunoglobulin E (IgE) are widely used. In the literature, numerous studies have evaluated the safety and efficacy of available vaccinations; however there is a lack of a synthesizing work in the dermatological field that includes the most frequent biological therapies. The aim of our review was to provide an up-to-date and comprehensive overview of the latest evidence that can be used in clinical practice to guide the choice of available vaccines. In assessing the evidence produced, we assumed that there were also indications for the new Covid-19 vaccine, although no specific data were yet available at the time of the assessment.
However, the importance of vaccinations in patients undergoing biological therapy derives from an increased infectious risk correlated with inhibitors of TNF-a, IL-17, IL-12/23, IL-23 [3,4,5,6]. For this reason, it is important that patients have received all the vaccines required by the national vaccination plan of the country of residence before starting biologic therapy, as well as pneumococcal and influenza vaccines if other risk factors are present.
Psoriasis patients also suffer from a chronic inflammatory condition [7,8] associated with an increased cardiovascular risk [9], alteration of hepatic lipid metabolism [10], inflammatory bowel diseases, arthritis, osteoporosis, and uveitis [11]. Biological therapies target a specific level of the inflammatory pathway, modifying the progression of the disease. The infectious risk varies depending on the type of biological drug considered.
Specifically, IL-17 inhibitors correlate with upper respiratory tract infections, nasopharyngitis, neutropenia, and mucocutaneous candidiasis [12]. In a systematic review [13], TNF-α inhibitors were also found to be associated with upper respiratory tract infections and flu-like syndrome. Severe infections are very unusual and etanercept appears to be the safest drug in this respect [14]. Anti-IL-23 and -IL-12/23 are most frequently associated with upper respiratory tract infections, influenza, and urinary tract infections [11].
In a recent pooled analysis of 2932 patients with atopic dermatitis [15], dupilumab (anti-IL-4/13) was not associated with an increased risk of infection compared to placebo, and reductions in severe infections and non-herpetic skin infections were also reported. However, a slight increase in the incidence of herpetic infections, albeit not severe, was reported. Finally, omalizumab, an IgE inhibitor, may cause an increased risk of helminth infections, although it has been seen to reduce the clinical manifestations of the rhinovirus and related asthma exacerbations [16].

2. Materials and Methods

We conducted a narrative review of the literature regarding the indications and safety of the various types of vaccines currently available in dermatological patients undergoing biological therapy. The bibliographic research was carried out on the PubMed database on 10 December 2020 by seeking combinations of the following keywords: vaccine, anti-TNF-α, anti-IL-17, anti-IL-12/23, anti-IL-23, anti-IL-4/13, adalimumab, infliximab, secukinumab, ixekyzumab, brodalumab, risankizumab, dupilumab, and omalizumab.
The aim of our review was to provide a broad overview of the current use of vaccinations in concomitance with biological therapy. The recent beginning of the vaccination campaign against Covid-19 led us to evaluate the current state-of-the-art of vaccination, integrating it with the newest data available.
We discarded studies that were not in English and preferred randomized, double-blind, multi-center studies, followed by meta-analyses, observational studies, case series, and case reports.

3. TNF-α inhibitors

TNF-α inhibitors are an important treatment option for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis [13]. The evaluation of safety and efficacy in developing an adequate immune response to pneumococcal polysaccharide and inactivated influenza vaccine has been conducted in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis [17,18,19,20,21,22]. Treatment with etanercept, adalimumab and infliximab was shown not to affect the response to the pneumococcal vaccine. Concomitant use of methotrexate (MTX) or disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) may result in a lower antibody response to the pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine, although they do not alter the response to the inactivated influenza vaccine [17,23]. These two vaccinations are very important in patients receiving anti-TNF therapy to reduce complications related to those infections.
The administration of live attenuated vaccines is contraindicated in concomitance with TNF-α inhibitors due to the increased infectious risk and lack of available data. However, one study by Suissa et al. [24] showed a possible protective role of etanercept in exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, making it the first choice in patients at particularly high infectious risk or receiving a live attenuated vaccine.
Transplacental passage of IgG occurs in pregnant women on anti-TNF-α therapy during the third trimester and anti-TNF-α IgG has been found up to 6 months after birth in an infant [25]. For this reason, live attenuated vaccines should be avoided for the first six months in infants of mothers treated with TNF-α inhibitors [26], with the exception of certolizumab pegol [27]. In fact, one death from disseminated tuberculosis occurred in an infant exposed to infliximab and vaccinated with Bacillus Calmette–Guérin [28]. TNF-α inhibitors that can cross the blood-placental barrier can also be excreted in breast milk, so breastfeeding should be avoided if therapy cannot be discontinued [29]. The newborn vaccination schedule should be re-evaluated in the event of exposure to anti-TNF-α therapy, possibly by assessing the serum level of the biologic considered prior to administration of a live-attenuated vaccine [30].

3.1. Certolizumab

Certolizumab pegol is a pegylated Fab fragment of a monoclonal antibody targeting TNF-α, indicated in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis [31]. In the literature, a randomized phase IV trial on 224 subjects confirmed the efficacy and safety of inactivated trivalent influenza and polysaccharide pneumococcal vaccination in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with certolizumab pegol, reporting a humoral response comparable to placebo patients. Lower antibody responses were seen in patients treated with anti-TNF-α and concomitant DMARD (MTX) [32].

3.2. Adalimumab

Adalimumab is a monoclonal antibody that inhibits the action of TNF-a. In the literature, a randomized, multi-center, double-blind clinical trial involving 226 adult subjects with rheumatoid arthritis reported similar antibody responses to trivalent influenza virus vaccine and 23-valent pneumococcal vaccine in subjects treated with adalimumab or placebo [18]. This underlines the efficacy and safety of vaccination with both pneumococcal capsular polysaccharide antigens and inactivated influenza vaccine.
In a study by Burmester et al. [33], 15,132 patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with adalimumab were analyzed. Of these, 351 patients received influenza vaccination, reporting fewer infection-related adverse effects than unvaccinated subjects.
No data are available on secondary transmission of infection from live vaccines in patients receiving adalimumab but, given the increased risk of infection, administration is not recommended [34].
As for pediatric patients, it is recommended to administer adalimumab after having performed the vaccinations required for age. Administration of live and live-attenuated vaccines to children exposed to adalimumab in utero is not recommended until five months after the last administration of adalimumab to the mother during pregnancy [35,36].

4. IL-17 inhibitors

The immunogenicity of inactivated vaccines is maintained with IL-17 inhibitors. Although some studies showed that IL-17 deficient mice are unable to produce an adequate immune response [37], in vitro it has been reported that IL-17 alone is unable to induce an immune response; however, B cells with CD4 and T cells lacking IL-17 produced antibodies [38].

4.1. Secukinumab

Secukinumab is an IgG1/κ monoclonal antibody that selectively inhibits IL-17A. Live vaccines should not be given with secukinumab, while inactivated or non-live vaccines, such as flu vaccines, can be used [39]. A study by Frieder et al. [40] on 32 patients with psoriatic arthritis showed that secukinumab does not alter the antibody response to the influenza vaccine. In an open-label, parallel-group, randomized study by Chioato et al. [41], 50 healthy patients treated with 150 mg of secukinumab and placebo following the administration of the meningococcal vaccine C and the inactivated influenza vaccine were able to develop an adequate immune response, confirming the efficacy of these vaccines.

4.2. Ixekizumab

Ixekizumab is an IgG4 monoclonal antibody that inhibits interleukin 17A with high specificity. Since no data are available on the response to live vaccines, the administration of live-attenuated vaccines is not recommended. A randomized, open-label, parallel-group study by Gomez et al. [42] on 83 healthy subjects showed that ixekizumab does not impair the humoral response of inactivated vaccines, specifically antipneumococcal (Pneumovax 23) and tetanus toxoid (Boostrix), received two weeks after administration of 160 mg of ixekizumab and concomitantly with the 80 mg dose. Treatment with ixekizumab did not suppress either T-cell-independent or T-cell-dependent immune responses and demonstrated an excellent safety profile [42].

4.3. Brodalumab

Brodalumab is an IgG2 monoclonal antibody that binds to the IL-17 receptor, blocking its possible interaction with the various isoforms of IL-17. Before treatment with brodalumab, it is recommended that all vaccinations required by local immunization guidelines be performed, since live vaccines should not be administered during brodalumab therapy [43]. However, there are no data in the literature on response to live or inactivated vaccines.

5. IL-12/23 inhibitors

Ustekinumab

Ustekinumab is an IgG1κ monoclonal antibody that inhibits IL-12/23. The use of live viral or bacterial vaccines during ustekinumab administration is contraindicated, although no specific clinical studies have been conducted. Ustekinumab administration should be discontinued for at least 15 weeks before administering a live vaccine and may be resumed at least two weeks post-vaccination. Inactivated vaccines can be injected and several studies [44,45] demonstrated an effective immune response for pneumococcal polysaccharide, tetanus toxoid, and influenza vaccine. In the prospective study by Doornekamp et al. [44], 15 patients with Crohn’s disease who were treated with ustekinumab and underwent influenza vaccination (Influvac) were evaluated, reporting an antibody response higher than that of healthy controls. In the study by Brodmerkel et al. [45], 60 patients on ustekinumab therapy for several years were vaccinated with both the 23-valent pneumococcal vaccine and tetanus toxoid, reporting superior antibody responses to untreated psoriatic patients.

6. IL-23 inhibitors

Risankizumab

Risankizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody, consisting of IgG1, a selective inhibitor of IL-23. Live-attenuated vaccinations are contraindicated, and it is necessary to wait 21 weeks after the last administration of the drug before a live-attenuated vaccine. It is therefore recommended that all necessary vaccinations be carried out at least four weeks before starting risankizumab therapy [46]. There are currently no clinical studies that evaluate the efficacy and safety of vaccinations during risankizumab therapy, but inactivated vaccines can be administered.

7. IL-4/13 inhibitors

Dupilumab

Dupilumab is a monoclonal antibody that inhibits IL-4/13. Live attenuated vaccines should not be administered concomitantly with dupilumab as there are no studies ensuring their safety and clinical efficacy. It is therefore recommended that all planned vaccinations be performed before the start of therapy [47].
In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, adult patients with atopic dermatitis were evaluated for immune responses to T-cell dependent vaccines, such as tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccination, and T-cell independent vaccines, such as polysaccharide meningococcal vaccine, all of them inactivated vaccines. Antibody responses were evaluated after 12 weeks of dupilumab 300 mg weekly administration and were similar in dupilumab-treated and placebo-treated patients. No adverse interactions between any of the non-live vaccines and dupilumab were detected in the study. Therefore, patients taking dupilumab may receive concomitant inactivated or non-live vaccines [48].
Since dupilumab inhibits IL-4/13, which is responsible for the type 2 immune response, T-dependent IgG production is not affected. On the other hand, dupilumab shifts T-independent responses, characterized by IgG4 production, towards a type 1 immune response, with IgG1 production and a potential enhancement of the vaccine response [48].

8. IgE inhibitors

Omalizumab

Omalizumab is an IgE inhibitor used for the treatment of chronic idiopathic urticaria, nasal polyposis and asthma. No drug or vaccine interaction studies have been performed, but there are no contraindications to the use of vaccines in patients receiving omalizumab, unless there is a history of previous allergic and/or anaphylactic reactions related to a past vaccination [49].

9. Conclusions

Our review of the literature confirmed the safety and efficacy of administering inactivated vaccines in patients undergoing biological therapy with inhibitors of TNF-α, IL-17, IL-12/23, and IL-4/13. Inactivated vaccines can be administered during therapy with inhibitors of IL-23 and IgE according to the respective technical data sheet, but the level of evidence is lower due to the lack of specific studies. We reported in Table 1 all considered vaccines and current indications. Live attenuated vaccines are contraindicated in concomitance with all biological therapies considered, except omalizumab, since an interaction with the Th1 antibody response mechanism of vaccines is not probable [49]. Most of the data available on the safety of vaccines with concomitant anti-TNF-α administration are related to patients suffering from rheumatoid arthritis or other rheumatological diseases. However, the same drugs are also used in dermatology, often at the same or lower dosages, making the evidence produced comparable.
In our opinion, in cases where specific evidence is not available, such as for brodalumab and risankizumab, the indications identified for other drugs that inhibit the same inflammatory pathway can be considered applicable.
Considering the evidence produced in the literature on vaccines currently available, there are no cases in which the administration of the inactivated vaccine has caused an aggravation of the disease, neither for atopic dermatitis, nor for psoriasis, confirming the safety of this type of vaccine. The only vaccines that have been associated with worsening atopic dermatitis or complications such as eczema vaccinatum are live attenuated ones [50], which do not include the new Covid-19 vaccine.
The aim of this review was to provide guidance for vaccination with the new mRNA Covid-19 vaccines, comparing them in some respects to inactivated vaccines. The main similarity consists in the fact that there is no possibility of developing the infection following administration. The safety of mRNA vaccines is guaranteed as mRNA is a non-infectious, non-integrating platform and presents no potential risk of insertional mutagenesis or infection [48]. Since the contraindications to the use of vaccines in patients receiving biological drugs are related to the potential risk of the vaccine developing the disease, both inactivated vaccines and mRNA vaccines do not present this problem, making them practicable even in immunocompromised subjects [51]. The only doubt remains about the actual immune response in these patients.
According to this evidence, we assume that there are currently no contraindications to the administration of the new Covid-19 BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 vaccines during biological therapy with inhibitors of TNF-α, IL-17, IL-12/23, IL-23, and IL-4/13, since these vaccines are comparable to inactivated ones. There is no Covid-19 infectious risk linked to BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 vaccines as mRNA encodes only the spike proteins of the virus [52].
However, allergic and/or anaphylactic reactions, including two severe ones resolved with epinephrine in the UK, have occurred in patients with histories of severe allergic diathesis (previous anaphylactic shock for foods and drugs, respectively) who received the new vaccine BNT162b2. An excipient of the vaccine, polyethylene glycol (PEG), is thought to be responsible for the allergic reactions, but this has not yet been demonstrated [53,54]. If the role of PEG in allergic reactions is confirmed, it will be possible to test patients with allergic diathesis for sensitization to this substance, and to limit the exclusion of vaccine administration to positives. Since patients treated with omalizumab suffer from chronic urticaria or allergic asthma, we currently recommend caution when administering the mRNA Covid-19 vaccines in these patients due to the possible risk, not related to omalizumab, of allergic reactions, with a 30 min observation period. On the other hand, a previous history of hypersensitivity to the Covid-19 vaccines themselves or to their excipients constitutes a contraindication to their administration [55].
BNTb2162 and mRNA-1273 are being administered in the United States of America, the United Kingdom and Europe, but as this is the first time in history that an mRNA vaccine has been used, studies to assess its safety and efficacy in dermatological patients receiving biological therapy are not yet available. Further randomized clinical trials are needed to evaluate the efficacy of the antibody response in these patients.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: O.S. and G.R. (Giulio Rizzetto); methodology: E.M.; validation, A.O. and M.M.D.; writing—original draft preparation: G.R. (Giulio Rizzetto); writing—review and editing, F.D., G.R. (Giulia Radi); supervision: O.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Radi, G.; Simonetti, O.; Diotallevi, F.; Campanati, A.; Brisigotti, V.; Molinelli, E.; Offidani, A. How can I take care of you? The dermatologist meets patients’ needs during the COVID-19 pandemic. Dermatol. Ther. 2020, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Oliver, S.E.; Gargano, J.W.; Marin, M.; Wallace, M.; Curran, K.G.; Chamberland, M.; McClung, N.; Campos-Outcalt, D.; Morgan, R.L.; Mbaeyi, S.; et al. The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices’ Interim Recom-mendation for Use of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine-United States, December 2020. MMWR Morb. Mortal Wkly. Rep. 2020, 69, 1922–1924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Keystone, E.C. Does Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor-α Therapy Affect Risk of Serious Infection and Cancer in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis? A Review of Longterm Data. J. Rheumatol. 2011, 38, 1552–1562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ly, K.; Smith, M.P.; Thibodeaux, Q.; Reddy, V.; Liao, W.; Bhutani, T. Anti IL-17 in psoriasis. Expert Rev. Clin. Immunol. 2019, 15, 1185–1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Haugh, I.M.; Preston, A.K.; Kivelevitch, D.N.; Menter, A.M. Risankizumab: An anti-IL-23 antibody for the treatment of psoriasis. Drug Des. Dev. Ther. 2018, 12, 3879–3883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Blauvelt, A.; Reich, K.; Tsai, T.-F.; Tyring, S.; Vanaclocha, F.; Kingo, K.; Ziv, M.; Pinter, A.; Vender, R.; Hugot, S.; et al. Secukinumab is superior to ustekinumab in clearing skin of subjects with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis up to 1 year: Results from the CLEAR study. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2017, 76, 60–69.e9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Campanati, A.; Goteri, G.; Simonetti, O.; Ganzetti, G.; Giuliodori, K.; Stramazzotti, D.; Morichetti, D.; Bernardini, M.L.; Mannello, B.; Fabris, G.; et al. CTACK /CCL27 expression in psoriatic skin and its modification after administration of etanercept. Br. J. Dermatol. 2007, 157, 1155–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Simonetti, O.; Lucarini, G.; Campanati, A.; Goteri, G.; Zizzi, A.; Marconi, B.; Ganzetti, G.; Minardi, D.; Di Primio, R.; Offidani, A. VEGF, survivin and NOS overexpression in psoriatic skin: Critical role of nitric oxide synthases. J Dermatol Sci. 2009, 54, 205–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Offidani, A.M.; Ferretti, G.; Taus, M.; Simonetti, O.; Dousset, N.; Valdiguie, P.; Curatola, G.; Bossi, G. Lipoprotein peroxidation in adult psoriatic patients. Acta Derm.-Venereol. Suppl. 1994, 186, 38–40. [Google Scholar]
  10. Ganzetti, G.; Campanati, A.; Offidani, A. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and psoriasis: So far, so near. World J. Hepatol. 2015, 7, 315–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Gordon, K.B.; Strober, B.; Lebwohl, M.; Augustin, M.; Blauvelt, A.; Poulin, Y.; A Papp, K.; Sofen, H.; Puig, L.; Foley, P.; et al. Efficacy and safety of risankizumab in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (UltIMMa-1 and UltIMMa-2): Results from two double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled and ustekinumab-controlled phase 3 trials. Lancet 2018, 392, 650–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Conti, H.R.; Gaffen, S.L. IL-17–Mediated Immunity to the Opportunistic Fungal PathogenCandida albicans. J. Immunol. 2015, 195, 780–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Campanati, A.; Paolinelli, M.; Diotallevi, F.; Martina, E.; Molinelli, E.; Offidani, A. Pharmacodynamics OF TNF α inhibitors for the treatment of psoriasis. Expert Opin. Drug Metab. Toxicol. 2019, 15, 913–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Fink, D.; Hedley, L.; Miller, R. Systematic review of the efficacy and safety of biological therapy for inflammatory conditions in HIV-infected individuals. Int. J. STD AIDS 2016, 28, 110–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Eichenfield, L.F.; Bieber, T.; Beck, L.A.; Simpson, E.L.; Thaçi, D.; De Bruin-Weller, M.; Deleuran, M.; Silverberg, J.I.; Ferrandiz, C.; Fölster-Holst, R.; et al. Infections in Dupilumab Clinical Trials in Atopic Dermatitis: A Comprehensive Pooled Analysis. Am. J. Clin. Dermatol. 2019, 20, 443–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Esquivel, A.; Busse, W.W.; Calatroni, A.; Togias, A.G.; Grindle, K.G.; Bochkov, Y.A.; Gruchalla, R.S.; Kattan, M.; Kercsmar, C.M.; Hershey, G.K.; et al. Effects of Omalizumab on Rhinovirus Infections, Illnesses, and Exacerbations of Asthma. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2017, 196, 985–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Kapetanovic, M.C.; Saxne, T.; Sjoholm, A.; Truedsson, L.; Jonsson, G.; Geborek, P. Influence of methotrexate, TNF blockers and prednisolone on antibody responses to pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology 2006, 45, 106–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Kaine, J.L.; Kivitz, A.J.; Birbara, C.; Luo, A.Y. Immune responses following administration of influenza and pneumococcal vaccines to patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving adalimumab. J. Rheumatol. 2007, 34, 272–279. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  19. Brezinschek, H.P.; Hofstaetter, T.; Leeb, B.F.; Haindl, P.; Graninger, W.B. Immunization of patients with rheumatoid arthritis with antitumor necrosis factor alpha therapy and methotrexate. Curr. Opin. Rheumatol. 2008, 20, 295–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Elkayam, O.; Paran, D.; Caspi, D.; Litinsky, I.; Yaron, M.; Charboneau, D.; Rubins, J.B. Immunogenicity and safety of pneumococcal vaccination in patients with rheumatoid ar-thritis or systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2002, 34, 147–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Broyde, A.; Arad, U.; Madar-Balakirski, N.; Paran, D.; Kaufman, I.; Levartovsky, D.; Wigler, I.; Caspi, D.; Elkayam, O. Longterm Efficacy of an Antipneumococcal Polysaccharide Vaccine among Patients with Autoimmune Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases. J. Rheumatol. 2016, 43, 267–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Ding, T.; Ledingham, J.; Luqmani, R.; Westlake, S.; Hyrich, K.; Lunt, M.; Kiely, P.; Bukhari, M.; Abernethy, R.; Bosworth, A.; et al. BSR and BHPR rheumatoid arthritis guidelines on safety of anti-TNF therapies. Rheumatology 2010, 49, 2217–2219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Chalmers, A.; Scheifele, D.; Patterson, C.; Williams, D.; Weber, J.; Shuckett, R.; Teufel, A. Immunization of patients with rheumatoid arthritis against influenza: A study of vaccine safety and immunogenicity. J. Rheumatol. 1994, 21, 1203–1206. [Google Scholar]
  24. Suissa, S.; Ernst, P.; Hudson, M. TNF-α antagonists and the prevention of hospitalisation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Pulm. Pharmacol. Ther. 2008, 21, 234–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Julsgaard, M.; Christensen, L.A.; Gibson, P.R.; Gearry, R.B.; Fallingborg, J.; Hvas, C.L.; Bibby, B.M.; Uldbjerg, N.; Connell, W.R.; Rosella, O.; et al. Concentrations of Adalimumab and Infliximab in Mothers and Newborns, and Effects on Infection. Gastroenterology 2016, 151, 110–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Mahadevan, U.; Wolf, D.C.; Dubinsky, M.; Cortot, A.; Lee, S.D.; Siegel, C.A.; Ullman, T.; Glover, S.; Valentine, J.F.; Rubin, D.T.; et al. Placental Transfer of Anti–Tumor Necrosis Factor Agents in Pregnant Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2013, 11, 286–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Mariette, X.; Förger, F.; Abraham, B.; Flynn, A.D.; Moltó, A.; Flipo, R.-M.; Van Tubergen, A.; Shaughnessy, L.; Simpson, J.; Teil, M.; et al. Lack of placental transfer of certolizumab pegol during pregnancy: Results from CRIB, a prospective, postmarketing, pharmacokinetic study. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2018, 77, 228–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Cheent, K.; Nolan, J.; Shariq, S.; Kiho, L.; Pal, A.; Arnold, J. Case Report: Fatal case of disseminated BCG infection in an infant born to a mother taking infliximab for Crohn’s Disease. J. Crohns Coliti 2010, 4, 603–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Gisbert, J.P.; Chaparro, M. Safety of Anti-TNF Agents during Pregnancy and Breastfeeding in Women With Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2013, 108, 1426–1438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Götestam, S.C.; Hoeltzenbein, M.; Tincani, A.; Fischer-Betz, R.; Elefant, E.; Chambers, C.; da Silva, J.; Nelson-Piercy, C.; Cetin, I.; Costedoat-Chalumeau, N.; et al. The EULAR points to consider for use of antirheumatic drugs before pregnancy, and during pregnancy and lactation. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2016, 75, 795–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Blauvelt, A.; Paul, C.; Van De Kerkhof, P.; Warren, R.; Gottlieb, A.; Langley, R.; Brock, F.; Arendt, C.; Boehnlein, M.; Lebwohl, M.; et al. Long-term safety of certolizumab pegol in plaque psoriasis: Pooled analysis over 3 years from three phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled studies. Br. J. Dermatol. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Kivitz, A.J.; Schechtman, J.; Texter, M.; Fichtner, A.; De Longueville, M.; Chartash, E.K. Vaccine Responses in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Treated with Certolizumab Pegol: Results from a Single-blind Randomized Phase IV Trial. J. Rheumatol. 2014, 41, 648–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Burmester, G.R.; Landewé, R.; Genovese, M.C.; Friedman, A.W.; Pfeifer, N.D.; A Varothai, N.; Lacerda, A.P. Adalimumab long-term safety: Infections, vaccination response and pregnancy outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2017, 76, 414–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Humira Prescribing Information. Available online: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2018/125057s406lbl.pdf (accessed on 10 December 2020).
  35. Van Assen, S.; Agmon-Levin, N.; Elkayam, O.; Cervera, R.; Doran, M.F.; Dougados, M.; Emery, P.; Geborek, P.; Ioannidis, J.P.A.; Jayne, D.R.W.; et al. EULAR recommendations for vaccination in adult patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2011, 70, 414–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Di Lernia, V.; Bianchi, L.; Guerriero, C.; Stingeni, L.; Gisondi, P.; Filoni, A.; Guarneri, C.; Belloni Fortina, A.; Lasagni, C.; Simonetti, O.; et al. Adalimumab in severe plaque psoriasis of childhood: A multi-center, retrospective real-life study up to 52 weeks observation. Dermatol. Ther. 2019, 32, e13091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Nakae, S.; Komiyama, Y.; Nambu, A.; Sudo, K.; Iwase, M.; Homma, I.; Sekikawa, K.; Asano, M.; Iwakura, Y. Antigen-Specific T Cell Sensitization Is Impaired in IL-17-Deficient Mice, Causing Suppression of Allergic Cellular and Humoral Responses. Immunity 2002, 17, 375–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Shibui, A.; Shimura, E.; Nambu, A.; Yamaguchi, S.; Leonard, W.J.; Okumura, K.; Sugano, S.; Sudo, K.; Nakae, S. Th17 cell-derived IL-17 is dispensable for B cell antibody production. Cytokine 2012, 59, 108–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Richi, P.; Martín, M.D.; De Ory, F.; Gutiérrez-Larraya, R.; Casas, I.; Jiménez-Díaz, A.M.; Cava, F.; Muñoz-Fernandez, S. Secukinumab does not impair the immunogenic response to the influenza vaccine in patients. RMD Open 2019, 5, e001018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Frieder, J.; Kivelevitch, D.; Menter, A. Secukinumab: A review of the anti-IL-17A biologic for the treatment of psoriasis. Ther. Adv. Chronic Dis. 2018, 9, 5–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Chioato, A.; Noseda, E.; Stevens, M.; Gaitatzis, N.; Kleinschmidt, A.; Picaud, H. Treatment with the Interleukin-17A-Blocking Antibody Secukinumab Does Not Interfere with the Efficacy of Influenza and Meningococcal Vaccinations in Healthy Subjects: Results of an Open-Label, Parallel-Group, Randomized Single-Center Study. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 2012, 19, 1597–1602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Gomez, E.V.; Bishop, J.L.; Jackson, K.; Muram, T.M.; Phillips, D. Response to Tetanus and Pneumococcal Vaccination Following Administration of Ixekizumab in Healthy Participants. BioDrugs 2017, 31, 545–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Kyntheum: EPAR–Product Information [Internet]. Last Updated 27 July 2020. Available online: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/kyntheum-epar-product-information_en.pdf (accessed on 10 December 2020).
  44. Doornekamp, L.; Goetgebuer, R.; Schmitz, K.; Goeijenbier, M.; Van Der Woude, C.; Fouchier, R.; Van Gorp, E.; De Vries, A. High Immunogenicity to Influenza Vaccination in Crohn’s Disease Patients Treated with Ustekinumab. Vaccines 2020, 8, 455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Brodmerkel, C.; Wadman, E.; Langley, R.G.; Papp, K.A.A.; Bourcier, M.; Poulin, Y.; Ho, V.; Guenther, L.; Kunynetz, R.; Nigen, S.; et al. Immune response to pneumococcus and tetanus toxoid in patients with moder-ate-to-severe psoriasis following long-term ustekinumab use. J. Drugs Dermatol. 2013, 12, 1122–1129. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  46. Skyrizi: EPAR–Product Information [Internet]. Last Updated 22 November 2020. Available online: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/skyrizi-epar-product-information_en.pdf (accessed on 10 December 2020).
  47. Dupixent: EPAR–Product Information [Internet]. Last Updated 02 July 2020. Available online: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/dupixent-epar-product-information_en.pdf (accessed on 10 December 2020).
  48. Blauvelt, A.; Simpson, E.L.; Tyring, S.K.; Purcell, L.A.; Shumel, B.; Petro, C.D.; Akinlade, B.; Gadkari, A.; Eckert, L.; Graham, N.M.; et al. Dupilumab does not affect correlates of vaccine-induced immunity: A randomized, placebo-controlled trial in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2019, 80, 158–167.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Xolair: EPAR-Product Information [Internet]. Last Updated 24 August 2020. Available online: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/xolair-epar-product-information_en.pdf (accessed on 10 December 2020).
  50. Reed, J.L.; Scott, D.E.; Bray, M. Eczema vaccinatum. Clin Infect Dis. 2012, 54, 832–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Ortega Rodríguez, N.R.; Audícana Berasategui, M.T.; de la Hoz Caballer, B.; Valero Santiago, A. The Century of mRNA Vaccines: COVID-19 Vaccines and Allergy. J. Investig. Allergol. Clin. Immunol. 2021, 31, 89–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Polack, F.P.; Thomas, S.J.; Kitchin, N.; Absalon, J.; Gurtman, A.; Lockhart, S.; Perez, J.L.; Marc, G.P.; Moreira, E.D.; Zerbini, C.; et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 383, 2603–2615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Mahase, E. Covid-19: People with history of significant allergic reactions should not receive Pfizer vaccine, says regulator. BMJ 2020, 371, m4780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Cabanillas, B.; Akdis, C.; Novak, N. Allergic reactions to the first COVID-19 vaccine: A potential role of Polyethylene glycol? Allergy 2020. Epub ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Shimabukuro, T.; Nair, N. Allergic Reactions Including Anaphylaxis After Receipt of the First Dose of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine. JAMA 2021, 325, 780–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table
Table 1. Available vaccines and biologic therapy.
Table 1. Available vaccines and biologic therapy.
VaccineAnti-TNF-aAnti-IL-17Anti-IL-12/23Anti-IL-23Anti-IL-4/13Anti-IgE
Live-attenuatedNot indicatedNot indicatedNot indicatedNot indicated Not indicatedIndicated
Inactivated influenzaIndicatedIndicatedIndicatedIndicated IndicatedIndicated
Pneumococcus
polysaccharide		IndicatedIndicatedIndicatedIndicated IndicatedIndicated
Other inactivated *IndicatedIndicatedIndicatedIndicated IndicatedIndicated
Recombinant VZV
(Shingrix)		IndicatedIndicatedIndicatedIndicated IndicatedIndicated
* Inactivated vaccines: hepatitis A, hepatitis B, diphtheria, Haemophilus influenzae b, Neisseria meningitides, human papillomavirus, influenza, pertussis, Streptococcus pneumoniae (conjugated), parenteral poliomyelitis, tetanus toxoid, parenteral typhoid fever, tick-borne encephalitis, trivalent subunit influenza; live-attenuated vaccines: oral poliomyelitis, mumps, measles, oral typhoid fever, yellow fever, varicella zoster. Not contraindicated according to the respective technical data sheet, but the level of evidence is lower due to the lack of specific studies about the vaccine.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Simonetti, O.; Rizzetto, G.; Molinelli, E.; Diotallevi, F.; Radi, G.; Cirioni, O.; D’Errico, M.M.; Offidani, A. Safety and Efficacy of Vaccines during COVID-19 Pandemic in Patients Treated with Biological Drugs in a Dermatological Setting. Healthcare 2021, 9, 401. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9040401

AMA Style

Simonetti O, Rizzetto G, Molinelli E, Diotallevi F, Radi G, Cirioni O, D’Errico MM, Offidani A. Safety and Efficacy of Vaccines during COVID-19 Pandemic in Patients Treated with Biological Drugs in a Dermatological Setting. Healthcare. 2021; 9(4):401. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9040401

Chicago/Turabian Style

Simonetti, Oriana, Giulio Rizzetto, Elisa Molinelli, Federico Diotallevi, Giulia Radi, Oscar Cirioni, Marcello Mario D’Errico, and Annamaria Offidani. 2021. "Safety and Efficacy of Vaccines during COVID-19 Pandemic in Patients Treated with Biological Drugs in a Dermatological Setting" Healthcare 9, no. 4: 401. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9040401

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop