Next Article in Journal
Semiquantitative Classification of Two Oxidizing Gases with Graphene-Based Gas Sensors
Previous Article in Journal
3D Printing Technologies in Biosensors Production: Recent Developments
Previous Article in Special Issue
Visible-Light-Driven Room Temperature NO2 Gas Sensor Based on Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance: The Case of Gold Nanoparticle Decorated Zinc Oxide Nanorods (ZnO NRs)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Au Nanoparticles Decorated Graphene-Based Hybrid Nanocomposite for As(III) Electroanalytical Detection

1
Department of Chemistry, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Golgi 19, 20133 Milano, Italy
2
CNR-IPCF, Istituto per i Processi Chimico-Fisici, S.S. Bari, c/o Dip. Chimica Via Orabona 4, 70126 Bari, Italy
3
Department of Chemistry, Università degli Studi di Bari, Via Orabona 4, 70126 Bari, Italy
4
Department of Chemistry Ugo Schiff, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Via della Lastruccia 3-13, 50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Chemosensors 2022, 10(2), 67; https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors10020067
Submission received: 29 December 2021 / Revised: 31 January 2022 / Accepted: 5 February 2022 / Published: 8 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Quantum-Dots Sensors)

Abstract

:
Electrochemical sensors integrating hybrid nanostructured platforms are a promising alternative to conventional detection techniques for addressing highly relevant challenges of heavy metal determination in the environment. Hybrid nanocomposites based on graphene derivatives and inorganic nanoparticles (NPs) are ideal candidates as active materials for detecting heavy metals, as they merge the relevant physico-chemical properties of both the components, finally leading to a rapid and sensitive current response. In this work, a hybrid nanocomposite formed of reduced graphene oxide (RGO) sheets, surface functionalized by π-π interactions with 1-pyrene carboxylic acid (PCA), and decorated in situ by Au NPs, was synthesized by using a colloidal route. The hybrid nanocomposite was characterized by cyclic voltammetry and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy with respect to the corresponding single components, both bare and deposited as a layer-by-layer junction onto the electrode. The results demonstrated the high electrochemical activity of the hybrid nanocomposite with respect to the single components, highlighting the crucial role of the nanostructured surface morphology of the electrode and the PCA coupling agent at the NPs-RGO interphase in enhancing the nanocomposite electroactivity. Finally, the Au NP-decorated PCA-RGO sheets were tested by anodic stripping voltammetry of As(III) ion—a particularly relevant analyte among heavy metal ions—in order to assess the sensing ability of the nanocomposite material with respect to its single components. The nanocomposite has been found to present a sensitivity higher than that characterizing the bare components, with LODs complying with the directives established by the U.S. EPA and in line with those reported for state-of-the-art electrochemical sensors based on other Au-graphene nanocomposites.

1. Introduction

Hybrid nanocomposites based on inorganic nanoparticles (NPs) and graphene derivatives combine the unique size- and shape-dependent properties of inorganic matter at nanoscale [1] with the outstanding properties of graphene derivatives, allowing access to novel interesting multifunctionalities for diverse technology purposes [2,3].
In particular, a novel class of multifunctional hybrid nanocomposites can be ingeniously designed by exploiting the high chemical reactivity of graphene. Graphene can be functionalized with aromatic ligands anchoring the basal plane by π-π interactions without detrimentally affecting its structural properties, and can concomitantly coordinate inorganic NPs with different chemical compositions (metal, II-VI chalcogenide semiconductor, oxide). Hence, a plethora of interesting functionalities are possible [4], which can be integrated in sensors for the detection of hazardous compounds.
Arsenic(III) (As(III)) is a highly toxic heavy metal ion (HMI) responsible for contamination of surface and groundwater, deriving both from natural and anthropogenic sources [5]. It is hazardous to the environment and human health, even at trace levels, as it accumulates in living organisms and disturbs the biochemical activity of enzymes, leading to disorders of nervous, immune, reproductive and gastrointestinal systems [6]. The biological damage caused by As(III) has been found to be 20–30 times more than that of As(V). Furthermore, removal of As(III) from natural water is more difficult than As(V) [7]. In view of these adverse effects, WHO (World Health Organization) and U.S.-EPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) have recommended that the permissible level of As in drinking water should be as low as 10 ppb [8], leading to the development of methods to detect As(III) as a priority to fulfill such directives.
Several analytical techniques (i.e., AAS [9], ICP-MS [10] and ICP-OES [11]) have been used to detect As(III) in complex matrices with very low limits of detection (LODs) while also allowing simultaneous determination of diverse elements. However, though suitable for quantitative analysis, they often require an analyte pre-concentration step in the matrix, need to be coupled with other chromatographic techniques to perform ion speciation, are expensive, time consuming, and sometimes require multisampling with difficult analytical procedures that must be performed by trained personnel. Optical techniques can be used for As(III) detection in water, but they are costly and require complex equipment, high precision and high-power operations [12].
Electrochemical methods overcome these drawbacks, as they are more cost-effective, user-friendly, reliable, and allow the use of miniaturized devices which can be easily modified onto the surface with diverse multifunctionalities [13]. The compact and portable instrumentation facilitates online and on-site measurements for continuous monitoring [14]. Such integrated processes ensure a novel risk assessment-based approach to evaluate the environmental status, including chemical quality, morphological conditions, and ecological safety (regulated in Europe by the Water Framework Directive (WFD) 2000).
This class of methods, however, may suffer from lower sensitivity and LODs higher than those characterizing other analytical techniques, and hence, may require highly specific biosensing approaches. Immunosensors have been reported to use nanostructured platforms in the electroanalytical determination of As(III), particularly with anodic stripping voltammetry (ASV)), by exploiting the excellent redox electrocatalytic activity of Au NPs and high rate of electron transfer kinetics at the electrode/electrolyte interface [15]. Screen-printed electrodes (SPCEs), modified by Au NPs coated by L-cysteine conjugated to reduced lipoic acid, have been used for the detection of As(III) in ground water by square-wave anodic stripping voltammetry (SWV-ASV) [16].
On the other hand, the high conductivity and high electrocatalytic activity typical of graphene derivatives [17] have been used for the detection of As(III) in broiler meat by cyclic voltammetry, with a LOD of 3 ppb by modifying glassy carbon electrodes (GCEs) with the GO-Co/2-(4,5-diphenyl-1H-imidazol-2-yl)phenol (DIP) composite [18].
Hybrid nanocomposites formed of reduced graphene oxide (RGO), surface coated by electrodeposited Au NPs, have been used for detecting As(III) in water and soil samples [19] with high sensitivity and ease of application, thanks to the merging of the intrinsic functionalities of both components. In this work, nanoplatforms formed of carbon screen-printed electrodes (C-SPEs) surface modified by a hybrid nanocomposite formed of reduced graphene oxide (RGO), functionalized with 1-pyrene carboxylic acid (PCA), then decorated by a dense and uniform layer of Au NPs that were synthesized by an in situ approach [4], were investigated by cyclic voltammetry (CV) and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). These have been tested for the detection of As(III) in water, and their properties have been compared with respect to C-SPEs modified by bare PCA-RGO and Au NPs alone, and by their layer-by-layer PCA-RGO@Au NPs junction. The results have shown that the hybrid modified electrodes presented enhanced conductivity and electroactivity compared to its single components and the layer-by-layer PCA-RGO@Au NPs junction. They also have demonstrated a higher sensitivity in the detection of As(III), with a LOD of the same order of magnitude of the limits imposed by the directives and laws on the maximum amount of As in public water supplies (i.e., 10 ppb as established by USA EPA) and of those reported in literature [16,18,19,20]. These results have been ascribed to the crucial role of the PCA linker behaving as a coupling agent at the RGO-Au NPs interphase, effectively merging the unique properties of the hybrid components and resulting in enhanced electrochemical activity.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals

Commercial reduced graphene oxide (RGO) (1.6 nm flakes) was purchased from Graphene Supermarket. Additionally, 1-Pyrene Carboxylic Acid (PCA, 97%), n-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP, 99%), tetraoctylammonium bromide (TOAB, 99%), hydrogen tetrachloroaurate(III) hydrate (HAuCl4·3H2O, 99.999%), 3,4-dimethylbenzenethiol (DMBT, 98%), sodium borohydride (NaBH4, 99.99%), As2O3, toluene, and methanol were purchased from Sigma Aldrich.

2.2. Exfoliation and Functionalization of RGO with PCA

Commercial RGO powder was exfoliated and functionalized with 1-Pyrenecarboxylic acid (PCA) by sonicating in an ice-cooled water bath, a 1:17 w/w mixture of RGO and PCA in n-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP). The excess of PCA was removed by cycles of centrifugation and redispersion in methanol [4]. Finally, the purified PCA-RGO powder was dispersed in NMP, obtaining a final concentration of 3 mg mL−1.

2.3. Synthesis of PCA-RGO/Au NPs Hybrid Nanocomposite

For the preparation of the PCA-RGO/Au NPs hybrid nanocomposite, the two-phase method of M. Brust et al. [21], used for the synthesis of thiol-coated Au NPs, was followed with minor modifications. Briefly, 15 mg of PCA-RGO were dispersed in NMP and then added to a solution prepared by mixing 2.3744 g of TOAB in 35 cm3 of toluene, left to stir 30 min. Then, 0.354 g of HAuCl4·3H2O, dispersed in 15 cm3 of Milli-Q water, were added and left to stir 30 min. After TOAB-assisted transfer of the Au precursor from the water to the toluene phase, water was removed from the reaction flask, 60 µL of DMBT were added and the solution was left to stir 1 h. The thiol allowed the slow reduction of Au(III) to Au(I) which was then reduced to Au(0) by addition of 0.378 g of NaBH4 in 25 cm3 of Milli-Q water, and behaved as a coordinating agent for the formed Au NPs. The whole process was performed at room temperature.
The PCA–RGO/Au NPs dispersions were purified with methanol by cycles of precipitation by centrifugation and redissolution in solvent. In a final step, a precipitation procedure was performed by addition of methanol and centrifugation, in order to separate the PCA-RGO/Au NPs hybrid nanocomposite from the DMBT-coated Au NPs homonucleated in the supernatant of the reaction solution [4]. The isolated pellet containing the hybrid nanocomposite was finally redispersed in toluene for spectroscopy, morphology, electrical and electrochemical characterizations.

2.4. Synthesis of DMBT-Coated Au NPs

The synthesis of the DMBT-capped Au NPs was also performed under the same conditions of the procedure followed for obtaining the PCA-RGO/Au NP hybrid nanocomposite, except for the addition of PCA-RGO. Thus, DMBT-coated Au NPs in toluene, spherical in shape and 2–3 nm in size, were synthesized.

2.5. Characterization Techniques

UV-Vis-NIR absorption spectra of the PCA-RGO/Au NP hybrid nanocomposite dispersed in toluene were recorded using a Cary Varian 5000 spectrophotometer.
TEM analyses were performed using a Jeol Jem-1011 microscope operating at 100 kV, equipped with a high-contrast objective lens and a W filament as an electron source, having an ultimate point resolution of 0.34 nm. Images were acquired by a Quemesa Olympus CCD 11 MP Camera. Samples were prepared by dipping a 300-mesh amorphous carbon-coated Cu grid in toluene solutions of the PCA-RGO/Au NPs hybrid pellet and leaving the solvent to evaporate. Size statistical analysis of the NPs average size and size distribution was performed using the ImageJ analysis program.
Raman spectra were recorded using a LabRAM HR Horiba-Jobin Yvon spectrometer with a 532 nm continuous excitation laser source. Measurements were carried out under ambient conditions at low laser power (1 mW) to avoid laser-induced damage of the sample. Raman signal from a silicon wafer at 520 cm−1 was used to calibrate the spectrometer, and accuracy of the spectral measurement was estimated to be 1 cm−1.

2.6. Preparation of the Electrodes Modified by PCA-RGO/Au NPs Hybrid Pellet, PCA-RGO and DMBT-Au NPs

Carbon screen-printed electrodes (C-SPEs) (purchased from Metrohm DropSens) were modified by casting: (i) 1.8 µL of a toluene solution of the PCA-RGO/Au NPs hybrid nanocomposite, isolated by centrifugation from a sample synthesized starting from 3 mg mL−1 PCA-RGO and 2 × 10−4 M DMBT-coated Au NPs; (ii) 1.8 µL of a toluene solution 3 mg mL−1 in PCA-RGO; and (iii) 1.8 µL of a toluene solution 2 × 10−4 M in DMBT-coated Au NPs. Layer-by-layer films of PCA-RGO and Au NPs were prepared onto C-SPEs by casting 1.8 µL of a 3 mg mL−1 PCA-RGO solution and then 1.8 µL of a 2 × 10−4 M DMBT-Au NPs solution, both in toluene. This layer-by-layer sample was indicated herein as PCA-RGO@Au NPs.

2.7. Electrochemical Characterizations

The modified C-SPEs were electrochemically characterized by cyclic voltammetry (CV) and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) using a PGStat30 potentiostat/galvanostat equipped with the NOVA 2.1 Software (Metrohm AutoLab, Utrecht, The Netherlands). The experiments were carried out in a conventional three-electrode cell using the modified C-SPEs, saturated calomel electrode (SCE), and a Platinum wire, as working (WE), reference (RE), and counter (CE) electrodes, respectively. Additionally, 0.1 M solutions of KCl, NaClO4, and PBS (Phosphate Buffer, pH 7.4) were used as supporting electrolytes and K4[Fe(CN)6] was selected as a molecular redox probe. The current density values were normalized with respect to the geometric area of the electrodes, 0.126 cm2. EIS measurements were carried out at −0.1 V, +0.1 V, and +0.25 V (SCE) in the frequency range of 0.01 and 100,000 Hz, in the background and in the presence of the redox probe, in the above-mentioned electrolytes.

2.8. Electroanalytical Applications

As2O3 was dissolved in a 0.1 M NaOH aqueous solution. The µ-AutoLab III potentiostat/galvanostat, equipped with the NOVA 2.1 Software (Metrohm AutoLab, Utrecht, The Netherlands), was used for voltammograms registration. For As detection, anodic stripping voltammetry (ASV) was used as the electroanalytical technique. This comprised a preliminary accumulation step at the cathodic potential of +0.8 V (SCE) for 60 s, in order to reduce As(III) or As(V) ions in solution to As(0), followed by a linear sweep in the anodic scan direction, from −0.4 V to +0.8 V (SCE) at the scan rate of 0.1 V s−1. The analyses were performed in 0.1 M PBS at pH 7.4, which this electrolyte preferred over acidic conditions [19], after degassing the electrolyte solution with N2 for 15 min, and after As2O3 additions.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Synthesis and Characterization of the PCA-RGO/AuNPs Hybrid Nanocomposite

The PCA-RGO/Au NP hybrid nanocomposite has been synthesized by following the in situ approach reported in [4], relying on a modification of the two-step chemical route of M. Brust et al. [21]. In this approach, the HAuCl4·3H2O precursor is reduced in the presence of the DMBT thiol and of NaBH4 to Au NPs, which heteronucleate and grow onto the oxygen-based functionalities of the PCA-RGO basal plane (Scheme 1). DMBT slowly reduces Au(III) to Au(I), which is then reduced by NaBH4 to Au NPs, controls NPs morphology and size dispersion behaving as a coordinating ligand, promotes further NPs anchoring onto the RGO basal plane by π-π interactions, and stabilizes the NPs in organic solvents [4].
In the synthesis of the nanocomposite, concomitant homonucleation of the Au NPs in the reaction solution has been observed (Scheme 1), and thus, the hybrid nanostructures are separated by the homonucleated Au NPs by a post-synthetic precipitation procedure. Such a separation procedure relies on a slow addition of methanol, as an antisolvent for the synthesized PCA-RGO/Au NPs, thus inducing gradual and selective flocculation of the larger PCA-RGO/Au NPs, [4] that can be thus isolated and separated, by centrifugation, as a precipitate pellet, from the supernatant containing the smaller DMBT-capped Au NPs.
The TEM micrograph of the PCA-RGO complex has shown almost electron transparent sheet-like structure, accountable for exfoliated RGO sheets [4], with high contrast areas reasonably due to folded edges and wrinkles, due to mechanical lattice deformations of the basal plane (Figure 1A) [22]. On the other hand, the PCA-RGO/Au NPs hybrid nanocomposite presents sheets-like structures uniformly and densely coated by spherical and high contrast nanostructures, 2–3 nm in size, reasonably ascribed to the formed Au NPs (Figure 1B,C).
The Raman spectra of PCA-RGO and PCA-RGO/Au NPs (Figure 1D) has presented the typical D and G Raman modes of graphitic materials at ca. 1340 cm−1 and 1590 cm−1, respectively [23], assessing retention of the RGO structure upon in situ synthesis of the Au NPs. In the Raman spectrum of the hybrid nanocomposite, a broad background signal has been observed, reasonably originating from the PCA photoluminescence [24], along with an intensity ratio between the D and G peaks lower than PCA-RGO, indicating a reduction of the RGO defects [4,5], resulting from the treatment with NaBH4 and catalyzed by the immobilized Au NPs [25].
The UV-Vis-NIR absorption spectra of PCA-RGO/Au NPs have shown the characteristic localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) band of spherical and low nm in size Au NPs, at 519 nm. This originates from collective excitation of free conduction band electrons and its position is affected by the NPs local environment (i.e., solvent, capping ligand, supporting substrate and presence of adjacent NPs) [26] along with the absorption features in the UV spectral region, ascribed to π-π* transitions of the pyrene linker, confirming its anchoring onto the RGO basal plane [4,27] (Figure 1E).

3.2. Electrochemical Characterization of the PCA-RGO/Au NPs Hybrid Nanocomposite

C-SPEs have been modified by drop casting the DMBT-coated Au NPs, PCA-RGO, PCA-RGO/Au NPs and the layer-by-layer PCA-RGO@Au NPs samples (Scheme 2). The electrochemical and electrical properties have been investigated by cyclic voltammetry (CV) and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS).
Figure 2 reports the CVs of the modified C-SPEs, registered both in absence (Figure 2A) and presence of the inner-sphere redox probe K4[Fe(CN)6] [28], added to KCl, NaClO4, and PBS supporting electrolytes (Figure 2B–D), respectively.
K4[Fe(CN)6] has been selected as an inner-sphere probe to study the electron transfer and structural properties of the modified electrodes, as its electrochemical behavior has been found more sensitive to the chemistry (oxygen containing functionalities, impurities, and adsorption sites) and structure of the electrode material surface, rather than its electronic density of states (DOS) [29].
The cyclic voltammograms of the C-SPEs modified by PCA-RGO/Au NPs, DMBT-Au NPs and PCA-RGO@Au NPs have shown, in NaClO4, two cathodic peaks at ca. 0.1 V and 0.6 V (SCE) (Figure 2A), the latter being the classical peak due to the dissolution of the gold oxide layer formed in the anodic region [27].
It has been noted that, in spite of the lower amount of Au NPs in the PCA-RGO/Au NPs sample, it has presented the highest current density. This has been ascribed to the fact that, despite starting from the same amount of Au precursor, part of Au homonucleates in the reaction solution instead of heteronucleating on PCA-RGO. Thus, the highest current signal of the PCA-RGO/Au NPs C-SPEs has been ascribed to the increase of the electrode conductivity and to the enhancement of the heterogeneous electron transfer kinetics at the electrode/electrolyte interface. This has been also due to the presence of the PCA linker anchored onto the RGO basal plane by π-π interactions, which acts as an electron coupling agent between the Au NPs and RGO [4,27,30]. In addition, Figure 2B–D have shown that, in each investigated electrolyte, the PCA-RGO/Au NPs C-SPEs exhibit an electrochemical behavior in presence of the inner sphere redox probe, that differs from that of the other electrodes. These have shown the highest current density—which, again, could be accounted for by the high electrochemical activity of the hybrid electrodes—and high electrocatalytic activity, as evidenced by the shift of the oxidation and reduction peaks towards lowest potentials (Figure 2B–D, Table 1). Such an evidence addresses a more energetically favored red/ox process and more reversible electrochemical behavior, due to an increased electron transfer rate. This latter can be probably also related to a thin layer diffusion process.
Moreover, the CVs of panels B–D, except for those of the PCA-RGO/Au NPs C-SPEs, have presented a peak-shaped profile that has been explained by a semi-infinite diffusion mechanism of the redox probe toward the electrode, which, hence, behaves as a macroelectrode [31].
Panels B and D in Figure 2 have pointed out that the interaction of the inner-sphere redox probe with the PCA-RGO/Au NPs electrodes, both in NaClO4 and in PBS, leads to step-shaped voltammograms [31]. These results have been explained by the sensitivity of the redox probe toward the electrocatalytic Au NPs, which behaves as independent electroactive spots onto the RGO platform, forming a microarray of electrodes and providing a convergent diffusion mechanism of the probe to the electrode [32], resulting in the observed sigmoidal CVs typical of a microelectrode [33,34].
In PBS, the current density of the PCA-RGO/Au NPs electrodes have been found lower than in KCl and NaClO4, and the CV profile tends more toward a step-shaped signal. These findings can be reasonably accounted for by absorption phenomena of the phosphate ions onto the RGO basal plane, which are then stripped away in the following reduction [35], leaving more available sites for the reaction of the redox probe and leading to a rapid enhancement of the reductive current density.
Further supporting the indication that PCA-RGO does not contribute to the red/ox processes of the probe, irrespective of the nature of the supporting electrolyte, the most positive potential values of the anodic peak have been highlighted (Figure 2, Table 1), confirming that the oxidation of such an electrode is less energetically favored. Conversely, Au NPs and PCA-RGO@Au NPs have shown comparable anodic peak potentials (Figure 2, Table 1) indicating the involvement of Au NPs in catalyzing the red/ox processes of the probe.
Cyclic voltammetry has been performed at different voltage scan rates (v) in the 10–500 mV s−1 range in order to investigate in detail the reversibility of the red/ox process and the diffusional mechanism of the K4[Fe(CN)6] probe at the electrodes.
The results collected for the NaClO4 electrolyte solution are shown in Table 1. All the modified C-SPEs have presented a linear dependence of the current density with the square root of the scan rate, but the wave-shape profile and the variability of the peak-to-peak current with the voltage scan rate have assessed the quasi-reversible electrochemical behavior of the system [34]. As far as the slope of the log(j) vs. log(v) graph, in case of the Au NPs, this value has been found close to 0.5, which is the value expected for a semi-infinite diffusive mechanism of the red/ox probe towards the electrode [34]. The PCA-RGO@Au NPs modified C-SPEs have shown the same slope as the Au NPs, while the hybrid modified C-SPEs have the lowest values, as a confirmation of the occurrence of a different diffusion mechanism of the redox probe—specifically, the previously mentioned convergent diffusion [34].
Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) of the C-SPEs modified by PCA-RGO/Au NPs, PCA-RGO, Au NPs and PCA-RGO@Au NPs, have been collected in NaClO4, in presence of the K4[Fe(CN)6] redox probe at +0.25 V (SCE).
The Complex plane and Bode Phase plots are reported in Figure 3A,B. The corresponding theoretical equivalent circuits derived by using the Software ZView, are reported in Figure 3C.
As noted, the theoretical equivalent circuit of the PCA-RGO, Au NPs, and PCA-RGO@Au NP-modified C-SPEs (Figure 3C, top panel) differs from those of the PCA-RGO/Au NPs electrodes (Figure 3C, low panel), assessing differences in the electrical properties.
In both the circuit models reported in Figure 3C, RΩ is the resistance of the charge transfer at the electrode/electrolyte interphase. In the top panel, in series with RΩ, there is the typical Randles circuit, which is composed of a constant phase element that mimics an ideal parallel plate capacitor (CPEdl)—taking into account the surface morphology of the electrode and the total impedance of the Faradaic reaction of the probe at the electrode surface. CPEdl originated from the Debye layer, i.e., the layer of ions accumulates in proximity to the electrode for capacitive coupling, for compensating the charge accumulated at the hybrid electrode surface.
The capacitance values have been modeled as constant phase elements (CPEs) by the following equation:
CPE = [(Ciω)α]−1
where C is the capacitance, i a complex number, ω the frequency, and α the parameter of deviation from the pure capacitance behavior.
The model has provided for α = 1, a perfect and continuous working electrode which behaves as a pure capacitor. On the other hand, if 0.5 < α < 1, a nonideal capacitor behavior would be expected due to the non-homogenous porous electrode surface.
In the Randles circuit, in parallel with CPEdl, there is Rct, the resistance of the charge transfer between the probe and electrode surface, which has been estimated by the semicircle at the higher frequencies of Figure 3A.
The fitting of the EIS Bode-phase plots (Figure 3B) have provided an estimation of the values of resistance and capacitance of the equivalent circuits of Figure 3C, reported in Table 2.
The Table shows that the PCA-RGO/Au NPs C-SPEs present the highest CPEdl (likely due to the increase of the carrier density of RGO provided by the PCA-induced electron coupling with the Au NPs). They also have the lowest αdl values, exhibiting the most nonideal capacitor behavior, probably due to the non-homogenous porous surface, responsible for the thin layer and convergent diffusion mechanisms [32].
Among the investigated electrodes, the PCA-RGO/Au NPs modified C-SPEs have the lowest Rct, according to the observed highest electroactivity of such electrodes (Figure 2). On the other hand, PCA-RGO has the highest Rct, that of the Au NPs is quite low, and PCA-RGO@Au NPs has an intermediate Rct, likely due to a merging of the properties of PCA-RGO and Au NPs (Table 2).
In Figure 3B, the Bode plots of the hybrid electrodes have the maximum of the phase angle shifted to lower frequencies, meaning that the reaction is more energetically favored and the system less perturbed. As a matter of fact, in addition to the Randles circuit, another circuit has been added in the scheme of the equivalent circuit of hybrid electrodes. This likely originates from the interface region between the C-SPE and the electroactive material [36]. In this case, CPEm and Rm are the capacitance and the resistance of the material, respectively.
Finally, the mass transfer resistance, expressed by the Warburg elements (Zw, τw and αw), is comparable for the PCA-RGO/Au NPs and the Au NPs modified electrodes and is 2-fold lower in PCA-RGO and PCA-RGO@Au NPs (Table 2). These values have resulted from the interplay between the massive transport of the probe, which is affected not only by its charge, but also by steric hindrance effects that contribute to increasing it. In the case of PCA-RGO, the massive transport could be favored by thin layer diffusion effects, absent in Au NPs [37], that are instead surface coordinated by the aromatic thiol that contributes, with its steric hindrance, to increasing the Zw value.

3.3. Electroanalytical Applications of PCA-RGO/AuNPs Hybrid Nanocomposite

The electrodes modified by PCA-RGO/Au NPs have been tested for the electroanalytical detection of As(III) in water by anodic stripping voltammetry (ASV) by using a conventional three-electrode cell.
The stripping technique has relied first on a preconcentration step in which As2O3 is reduced to As(0), and then on a linear anodic scan for inducing reoxidation to As(III). The best accumulation potential in the cathodic region has been found −0.8 V (SCE); for lower potentials it is not possible to effectively accumulate As(III) at the electrode surface by reduction, because of the concomitant evolution of hydrogen at the electrodes.
Figure 4 reports the ASV scans collected at the PCA-RGO/Au NPs, Au NPs, PCA-RGO, and PCA-RGO@Au NPs electrodes from a 10−5 M As2O3 aqueous solution, for an accumulation time of 60 s and voltage of −0.8 V (SCE).
No oxidation currents have been observed at the PCA-RGO electrode. Thus, this electrode is not electroactive in the As(0) oxidation, underscoring the fundamental role of Au NPs in inducing such a process. In addition, the ASV scans have shown two distinct peaks of oxidation at ca. −0.2 V (SCE) and +0.4 V (SCE), respectively (Figure 4A).
In order to explain and assign the oxidation peaks observed in Figure 4, anodic scans in the voltage ranges from −0.4 V (SCE) to +0.1 V (SCE) and from +0.1 V (SCE) to +0.8 V (SCE) have been collected in As2O3 aqueous solutions, with and without the accumulation step at −0.8 V (SCE) (data not shown). The results have shown that, when the accumulation step is not performed, the first signal at ca. −0.2 V (SCE) is not detected, while the second signal at ca. +0.4 V (SCE) is present. Moreover, when aliquots of the As2O3 solution have been subsequently added and ASV scans recorded, only the oxidation peak at +0.4 V (SCE) is observed and, as expected, it has been found to increase (data not shown).
Such results have suggested that the first peak is due to the oxidation of As(0) to As(III) and the second signal is related to the consecutive oxidation of As(III) to As(V). In fact, if the accumulation step is not performed at the beginning of the analysis, As(III) is not reduced, and its oxidization peak is not detected in the following anodic scan.
Figure 4A shows that the PCA-RGO/Au NPs electrodes have the same intensity of anodic peaks, at −0.2 V, as the Au NPs electrodes. Owing to the fact that, as demonstrated by Figure 4A, only the Au NPs catalyze the oxidation of As(0) and PCA-RGO are not electroactive, the evidence that the PCA-RGO/Au NPs electrodes provide the same answer as the Au NPs with a lower concentration of NPs, underlines, once again, the beneficial effects of the PCA-induced NPs-RGO electron coupling, contributing to enhancing faradaic current.
The sensitivity of the modified electrodes toward As(III) detection has been investigated, and the LODs in the concentration range of 10−7 M to 10−4 M have been estimated. Calibration curves have been recorded for the C-SPEs modified with PCA-RGO/Au NPs, Au NPs and PCA-RGO@Au NPs (data not shown).
Figure 4B reports the ASV scans of the PCA-RGO/Au NPs electrodes after subsequent additions of As2O3 in solution. The inset shows the calibration curve obtained with the results at the second oxidation peak, namely at +0.4 V (SCE)).
The sensitivity (S), detection limit (LOD) and quantification limit (LOQ) values of the investigated electrodes are reported in Table 3.
Table 3 shows that the Au NPs and PCA-RGO/Au NPs have comparable LODs and LOQs, but the sensitivity is significantly higher in the latter, confirming the highest electroactivity of the hybrid electrodes. On the other hand, the PCA-RGO@Au NPs sample shows much lower sensitivities and much higher LODs and LOQs than even the sample of neat Au NPs.
The LODs and LOQs estimated for the hybrid electrodes have been found extremely promising, since they are of the same order of magnitude of the limits imposed by the directives and laws on the maximum amount of As in public water supplies (i.e., 10 ppb as established by U.S. EPA) and also in line with the values reported for other electrochemical sensors based on Au-graphene hybrids [16,18,19,20] (Table S1 of Supporting Information).

4. Conclusions

A novel hybrid nanocomposite based on 1-pyrene-carboxylic acid (PCA)-modified RGO flakes, surface decorated with 3,4-dimethylbenzenethiol (DMBT)-capped Au NPs, 2–3 nm in size, has been synthesized, comprehensively characterized, and tested for the voltammetric detection of As (III) in aqueous solutions.
The comparison of the electrochemical and electrical properties of the hybrid nanocomposite with those of its single components and of the layer-by-layer junction after deposition onto C-SPEs, by CV and EIS, has demonstrated the higher electroactivity of the hybrid C-SPEs, which has been accounted for by (i) the hot spot electroactive behaviors of the Au NPs anchored onto the PCA-RGO platform, which form a microarray of electrodes, and hence, are responsible for the occurrence of convergent diffusion mechanisms, and (ii) the NPs-RGO electron coupling, provided by the PCA molecules anchored onto the RGO basal plane by π-π interactions, responsible for an increase of the electrode conductivity and of heterogeneous charge transfers at the electrode/electrolyte interphase—as well as for thin layer effects at the electrode surface.
The achieved hybrid modified C-SPEs have demonstrated to be highly effective in the detection of As(III), one of the most toxic and dangerous pollutants in water. The estimated LODs and LOQs are in line with the values reported in the literature and are of the same order of magnitude of the LODs imposed by the directives and laws of the U.S. EPA.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/chemosensors10020067/s1, Table S1: Examples of LODs and dynamic ranges of some nanocomposite-modified electrodes for As(III) determination.

Author Contributions

C.I. and M.L.C. contributed to the synthesis of the nanocomposite material and the writing of the manuscript. V.P., A.T. and L.F. carried out the electrochemical and electrical characterization of the material, as well as the sensing tests. I.P. contributed to writing and project management. All of the authors carried out the discussion and interpretation of data and contributed to writing the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by National Project PRIN 2012 prot. 20128ZZS2H, CNR-MHESR bilateral project “Analytical Toolkit for Monitoring Water Pollution”, PON project Research and Innovation (2014-2020) TARANTO_ARS01_00637. PON project Research and Innovation (2014-2020) ECOTEC _ARS 01_00951.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Ingrosso, C.; Petrella, A.; Curri, M.L.; Striccoli, M.; Cosma, P.; Cozzoli, P.D.; Agostiano, A. Photoelectrochemical properties of Zn(II) phthalocyanine/ZnO nanocrystals heterojunctions: Nanocrystal surface chemistry effect. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2005, 246, 367–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kumunda, C.; Adekunle, A.S.; Mamba, B.B.; Hlongwa, N.W.; Nkambule, T.T.I. Electrochemical Detection of Environmental Pollutants Based on Graphene Derivatives: A Review. Front. Mater. 2021, 7, 616787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mondal, A.; Prabhakaran, A.; Gupta, S.; Subramanian, V.R. Boosting Photocatalytic Activity Using Reduced Graphene Oxide (RGO)/Semiconductor Nanocomposites: Issues and Future Scope. ACS Omega 2021, 6, 8734–8743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Ingrosso, C.; Corricelli, M.; Disha, A.; Fanizza, E.; Bianco, G.V.; Depalo, N.; Panniello, A.; Agostiano, A.; Striccoli, M.; Curri, M.L. Solvent dispersible nanocomposite based on Reduced Graphene Oxide in situ decorated with gold nanoparticles. Carbon 2019, 152, 777–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wuana, R.A.; Okieimen, F.E. Heavy Metals in Contaminated Soils: A Review of Sources, Chemistry, Risks and Best Available Strategies for Remediation. ISRN Ecol. 2011, 2011, 402647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Susan, A.; Rajendran, K.; Sathyasivam, K.; Krishnan, U.M. An overview of plant-based interventions to ameliorate arsenic toxicity. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2019, 109, 838–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Sun, J.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, A.; Liao, C. Preparation of Fe-co based MOF-74 and its effective adsorption of arsenic from aqueous solution. J. Environ. Sci. 2019, 80, 197–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Analytical Methods Support Document for Arsenic in Drinking Water. Available online: https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi?Dockey=2000JT4N.txt (accessed on 19 December 2021).
  9. Ghaedi, M.; Ahmadi, F.; Shokrollahi, A. Simultaneous Preconcentration and Determina-tion of Copper, Nickel, Cobalt and Lead Ions Content by Flame Atomic Absorption Spectrometry. J. Hazard. Mater. 2007, 142, 272–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Huang, C.; Hu, B. Silica-Coated Magnetic Nanoparticles Modified with γ-Mercaptopropyltrimethoxysilane for Fast and Selective Solid Phase Extraction of Trace Amounts of Cd, Cu, Hg, and Pb in Environmental and Biological Samples Prior to Their Determination by Inductively Coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Spectrochim. Acta Part B At. Spectrosc. 2008, 63, 437–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Faraji, M.; Yamini, Y.; Saleh, A.; Rezaee, M.; Ghambarian, M.; Hassani, R. A Nanoparticle-Based Solid-Phase Extraction Procedure Followed by Flow Injection Inductively Coupled Plasma-Optical Emission Spectrometry to Determine Some Heavy Metal Ions in Water Samples. Anal. Chim. Acta 2010, 659, 172–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Aragay, G.; Merkoçi, A. Nanomaterials Application in Electrochemical Detection of Heavy Metals. Electrochim. Acta 2012, 84, 49–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Palchetti, I.; Upjohn, C.; Turner, A.P.F.; Mascini, M. Disposable screen-printed electrodes (SPE) mercury-free for the lead detection. Anal. Lett. 2000, 33, 1231–1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bansod, B.K.; Kumar, T.; Thakur, R.; Rana, S.; Singh, I. A Review on Various Electrochemical Techniques for Heavy Metal Ions Detection with Different Sensing Platforms. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017, 94, 443–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Thakkar, S.; Dumée, L.F.; Guptaf, M.; Singha, B.R.; Yang, W. Nano–Enabled sensors for detection of arsenic in water. Water Res. 2021, 188, 116538–116550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Jijana, A.N.; Mphuthi, N.; Shumbula, P.; Vilakazi, S.; Sikhwivhilu, L. The Ultra-sensitive Electrochemical Detection of As(III) in Ground Water Using Disposable L-cysteine/Lipoic Acid Functionalised Gold Nanoparticle Modified Screen-Printed Electrodes. Electrocatalysis 2021, 12, 310–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Morales-Narváez, E.; Baptista, P.; Luis, M.; Zamora, G.A.; Merkoçi, A. Graphene-based biosensors: Going simple. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1604905–1604912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Subramanian, S.; Elaiyappillai, E.; Asir, O.; Arulappan, D.; Palanisamy, S.; Princy, M.J.; Subramanian, R.; Samuel, V.J. Electrochemical Detection of Trace Amounts of Arsenic (III) in Poultry Using a Graphene Oxide-Bis(2-(4,5-diphenyl-1Himidazol-2-yl)phenoxy)Cobalt Composite Modified Electrode. Electron. Mater. 2019, 48, 4498–4506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Srikant, S.; Kumar, S.P.; Kumar, S.A. Gold Nano Particle and Reduced Graphene Oxide. Composite Modified Carbon Paste Electrode for the Ultra Trace Detection of Arsenic (III). Electroanalysis 2017, 29, 1400–1409. [Google Scholar]
  20. Zhang, X.; Zeng, T.; Hu, C.; Hu, S.; Tian, Q. Studies on fabrication and application of arsenic electrochemical sensors based on titanium dioxide nanoparticle modified gold strip electrodes. Anal. Methods 2016, 8, 1162–1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Brust, M.; Walker, M.; Bethell, D.; Schiffrin, D.J.; Whyman, R.J. Synthesis of thiol-derivatised gold nanoparticles in a two-phase Liquid–Liquid system. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1994, 7, 801–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chua, C.K.; Pumera, M. Chemical reduction of graphene oxide: A synthetic chemistry viewpoint. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 291–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Ferrari, A.C.; Robertson, J. Interpretation of Raman spectra of disordered and amorphous carbon. Phys. Rev. B 2000, 61, 14095–14107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Li, L.; Zheng, X.; Wang, J.; Sun, Q.; Xu, Q. Solvent-Exfoliated and Functionalized Graphene with Assistance of Supercritical Carbon Dioxide. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2013, 1, 144–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhuo, Q.; Ma, Y.; Gao, J.; Zhang, P.; Xia, Y.; Tian, Y.; Sun, X.; Zhong, J.; Sun, X. Facile synthesis of graphene/metal nanoparticle composites via self-catalysis reduction at room temperature. Inorg. Chem. 2013, 52, 3141–3147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Ghosh S., K.; Nath, S.; Kundu, S.; Esumi, K.; Pal, T. Solvent and Ligand Effects on the Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance (LSPR) of Gold Colloids. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 13963–13971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ingrosso, C.; Corricelli, M.; Bettazzi, F.; Konstantinidou, E.; Bianco, G.V.; Depalo, N.; Striccoli, M.; Agostiano, A.; Curri, M.L.; Palchetti, I. Au nanoparticle in situ decorated RGO nanocomposites for highly sensitive electrochemical genosensors. J. Mater. Chem. B 2019, 7, 768–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ambrosi, A.; Pumera, M. Electrochemistry at CVD Grown Multilayer Graphene Transferred onto Flexible Substrates. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 2053–2058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Liu, L.; Ryu, S.; Tomasik, M.R.; Stolyarova, E.; Jung, N.; Hybertsen, M.S.; Steigerwald, M.L.; Brus, L.E.; Flynn, G.W. Seed/catalyst-free growth of zinc oxide nanostructures on multilayer graphene by thermal evaporation. Nano Lett. 2008, 8, 1965–1970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Bettazzi, F.; Ingrosso, C.; Pifferi, V.; Falciola, L.; Curri, M.L.; Palchetti, I. Gold Nano-particles Modified Graphene Platforms for Highly Sensitive Electrochemical Detection of Vitamin C in infant Food and Formulae. Food Chem. 2021, 334, 128692–128700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Cumba, L.R.; Foster, C.W.; Brownson, D.A.C.; Smith, J.P.; Iniesta, J.; Thakur, B.; do Carmo, D.R.; Banks, C.E. Can the mechanical activation (polishing) of screen-printed electrodes enhance their electroanalytical response? Analyst 2016, 141, 2791–2799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Compton, R.G.; Banks, C.E. Understanding Voltammetry; Imperial College Press: London, UK, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  33. Brownson, D.A.C.; Kampouris, D.K.; Banks, C.E. Graphene electrochemistry: Fundamental concepts through to prominent applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 6944–6976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Liu, X.; Cong, R.; Cao, L.; Liu, S.; Cui, H. The structure, morphology and photocatalytic activity of graphene–TiO2 multilayer films and charge transfer at the interface. New J. Chem. 2014, 38, 2362–2367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Vasudevan, S.; Lakshmi, J. The Adsorption of Phosphate by Graphene from Aqueous Solution. RSC Adv. 2012, 2, 5234–5242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lo Presti, L.; Pifferi, V.; Di Liberto, G.; Cerrato, G.; Ceotto, M. Direct measurement and modeling of spontaneous charge migration across anatase-brookite nanoheterojunctions. J. Mater. Chem. A 2021, 9, 7782–7790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Orazem, M.E.; Tribollet, B. Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
Scheme 1. Sketch of the in situ synthesis of the DMBT-capped Au NPs onto the PCA-RGO basal plane.
Scheme 1. Sketch of the in situ synthesis of the DMBT-capped Au NPs onto the PCA-RGO basal plane.
Chemosensors 10 00067 sch001
Figure 1. TEM micrographs of (A) PCA−RGO and (B,C) PCA−RGO/Au NPs (40 Kx and 60 Kx, respectively). (D) Raman and (E) UV−Vis−NIR spectra of 0.15 mg mL−1 PCA−RGO and 0.15 mg mL−1 PCA−RGO/Au NPs, 7 · 10−3 M in Au NPs and 2 mg mL−1 in PCA−RGO in toluene.
Figure 1. TEM micrographs of (A) PCA−RGO and (B,C) PCA−RGO/Au NPs (40 Kx and 60 Kx, respectively). (D) Raman and (E) UV−Vis−NIR spectra of 0.15 mg mL−1 PCA−RGO and 0.15 mg mL−1 PCA−RGO/Au NPs, 7 · 10−3 M in Au NPs and 2 mg mL−1 in PCA−RGO in toluene.
Chemosensors 10 00067 g001
Scheme 2. Sketch of the materials used to modify the C−SPEs: (A) DMBT−coated Au NPs, (B) PCA−capped RGO, (C) PCA−RGO/Au NPs hybrid nanocomposite and (D) PCA−RGO@Au NPs layer-by-layer junctions.
Scheme 2. Sketch of the materials used to modify the C−SPEs: (A) DMBT−coated Au NPs, (B) PCA−capped RGO, (C) PCA−RGO/Au NPs hybrid nanocomposite and (D) PCA−RGO@Au NPs layer-by-layer junctions.
Chemosensors 10 00067 sch002
Figure 2. CV curves of C−SPEs modified by PCA−RGO/Au NPs, PCA−RGO, DMBT−Au NPs, and PCA−RGO@Au NPs at 100 mV s−1, in 0.1 M (A) NaClO4, 0.1 M (B) NaClO4, (C) KCl, and (D) PBS aqueous solutions, with the addition of 3 mM K4[Fe(CN)6] (BD).
Figure 2. CV curves of C−SPEs modified by PCA−RGO/Au NPs, PCA−RGO, DMBT−Au NPs, and PCA−RGO@Au NPs at 100 mV s−1, in 0.1 M (A) NaClO4, 0.1 M (B) NaClO4, (C) KCl, and (D) PBS aqueous solutions, with the addition of 3 mM K4[Fe(CN)6] (BD).
Chemosensors 10 00067 g002
Figure 3. Complex plane (A) and Bode Phase (B) plots of the C−SPEs modified by PCA−RGO/Au NPs, Au NPs, PCA−RGO, and PCA−RGO@Au NPs in 0.1 M NaClO4 added by 3 mM K4[Fe(CN)6] and recorded at +0.25 V (SCE). (C) Equivalent circuits derived from the EIS spectra of Au NPs, PCA-RGO and PCA−RGO@Au NPs (top panel) and of PCA−RGO/Au NPs (low panel) modified C−SPEs.
Figure 3. Complex plane (A) and Bode Phase (B) plots of the C−SPEs modified by PCA−RGO/Au NPs, Au NPs, PCA−RGO, and PCA−RGO@Au NPs in 0.1 M NaClO4 added by 3 mM K4[Fe(CN)6] and recorded at +0.25 V (SCE). (C) Equivalent circuits derived from the EIS spectra of Au NPs, PCA-RGO and PCA−RGO@Au NPs (top panel) and of PCA−RGO/Au NPs (low panel) modified C−SPEs.
Chemosensors 10 00067 g003
Figure 4. (A) ASV curves at the PCA−RGO/Au NPs, PCA−RGO, Au NPs, PCA−RGO@Au NPs electrodes in 10−5 M As2O3 in 0.1 M PBS solution at pH 7.4. (B) ASV curves after consecutive additions of As2O3 in solution, in the concentration range of 10−4–10−7 M, and (inset) corresponding calibration curve obtained from the density current values of the peak at +0.4 V (SCE).
Figure 4. (A) ASV curves at the PCA−RGO/Au NPs, PCA−RGO, Au NPs, PCA−RGO@Au NPs electrodes in 10−5 M As2O3 in 0.1 M PBS solution at pH 7.4. (B) ASV curves after consecutive additions of As2O3 in solution, in the concentration range of 10−4–10−7 M, and (inset) corresponding calibration curve obtained from the density current values of the peak at +0.4 V (SCE).
Chemosensors 10 00067 g004
Table 1. Anodic peak potential (E) and current density (j) of 3 mM K4[Fe(CN)6] in NaClO4, KCl and PBS electrolytes at the voltage scan rate of 100 mV s−1 and electrode geometric area of 0.126 cm2.
Table 1. Anodic peak potential (E) and current density (j) of 3 mM K4[Fe(CN)6] in NaClO4, KCl and PBS electrolytes at the voltage scan rate of 100 mV s−1 and electrode geometric area of 0.126 cm2.
NaClO4KClPBS
E/Vj/(mA cm−2)log(i) vs. log(v) SlopeE/Vj/(mA cm−2)E/Vj/(mA cm−2)
PCA-RGO/Au NPs0.280.750(0.39 ± 0.01)0.280.5990.280.546
Au NPs0.340.482(0.47 ± 0.02)0.350.3550.430.300
PCA-RGO0.330.496(0.412 ± 0.005)0.350.4080.520.318
PCA-RGO@Au NPs0.350.472(0.47 ± 0.02)0.330.4020.420.309
Table 2. Estimated values of cell resistance (RΩ), double layer capacitance (CPEdl), charge transfer resistance (Rct), Warburg resistance (Zw), material capacitance (CPEm), and material resistance (Rm).
Table 2. Estimated values of cell resistance (RΩ), double layer capacitance (CPEdl), charge transfer resistance (Rct), Warburg resistance (Zw), material capacitance (CPEm), and material resistance (Rm).
ElectrodeRΩ/Ω cm2CPEm/(mF cm−2sα−1)αmRm/
(Ω cm2)
CPEdl/(µF cm−2sα−1)αdlRct/(Ω cm2)Zw/(Ω cm2)αWτw (s)
PCA-RGO/Au NPs31.162.780.553.48684.160.861262.550.38422
Au NPs32.71---29.850.922603.040.5042
PCA-RGO31.55---18.460.936761.500.4718
PCA-RGO@Au NPs31.85---29.090.923341.420.4624
Table 3. Sensitivity (S), Detection limit (LOD) and quantification limit (LOQ) estimated for the PCA-RGO/Au NPs, PCA-RGO, Au NPs, and PCA-RGO@Au NP-modified C-SPCEs in the detection of As(III) in PBS 0.1 M at pH 7.4. LOD and LOQ are calculated as (3.29 sb/S) and (10 sb/S), respectively.
Table 3. Sensitivity (S), Detection limit (LOD) and quantification limit (LOQ) estimated for the PCA-RGO/Au NPs, PCA-RGO, Au NPs, and PCA-RGO@Au NP-modified C-SPCEs in the detection of As(III) in PBS 0.1 M at pH 7.4. LOD and LOQ are calculated as (3.29 sb/S) and (10 sb/S), respectively.
E = −0.2 (SCE)E = +0.4 (SCE)
ElectrodeS/
(A cm−2 ppm−1)
R2LOD/
ppb
LOQ/
Ppb
S/
(A cm−2 ppm−1)
R2LOD/
ppb
LOQ/
ppb
PCA-RGO/Au NPs 1.8 × 10−20.9826801.4 × 10−20.981958
Au NPs3.5 × 10−30.9925767.7 × 10−30.952267
PCA-RGO@Au NPs5.2 × 10−40.972708201.1 × 10−30.964801500
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pifferi, V.; Testolin, A.; Ingrosso, C.; Curri, M.L.; Palchetti, I.; Falciola, L. Au Nanoparticles Decorated Graphene-Based Hybrid Nanocomposite for As(III) Electroanalytical Detection. Chemosensors 2022, 10, 67. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors10020067

AMA Style

Pifferi V, Testolin A, Ingrosso C, Curri ML, Palchetti I, Falciola L. Au Nanoparticles Decorated Graphene-Based Hybrid Nanocomposite for As(III) Electroanalytical Detection. Chemosensors. 2022; 10(2):67. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors10020067

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pifferi, Valentina, Anna Testolin, Chiara Ingrosso, Maria Lucia Curri, Ilaria Palchetti, and Luigi Falciola. 2022. "Au Nanoparticles Decorated Graphene-Based Hybrid Nanocomposite for As(III) Electroanalytical Detection" Chemosensors 10, no. 2: 67. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors10020067

APA Style

Pifferi, V., Testolin, A., Ingrosso, C., Curri, M. L., Palchetti, I., & Falciola, L. (2022). Au Nanoparticles Decorated Graphene-Based Hybrid Nanocomposite for As(III) Electroanalytical Detection. Chemosensors, 10(2), 67. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors10020067

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop