Recent Advances of Smart Systems and Internet of Things (IoT) for Aquaponics Automation: A Comprehensive Overview
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Smart Systems
3. Internet of Things (IoT)
4. Sensing of Aquaponics Parameters
4.1. Water Quality Parameters
4.2. Aquaponics Environment
5. Smart System-Based Aquaponics
5.1. Microcontrollers Used in Smart Aquaponics
5.2. Neural Networks and Deep Learning Methods for Smart Aquaponics
5.2.1. Prediction of Water Quality Parameters
5.2.2. Fish Detection and Species Classification
5.2.3. Estimation of Fish Size
5.2.4. Feeding Decisions
5.2.5. Plant Detection
5.3. Aquaponics and Industry 4.0
6. IoT-Based Aquaponics
- Perception Layer: This layer consists of various sensors for acquiring aquaponics parameters (such as DO, T, pH, and EC), various actuators and microcontrollers, a wireless sensor network (WSN), Radio-frequency identification (RFID) tags, readers, and so on.
- Network layer: This is the infrastructure of an IoT system, which includes a group of different wired (CAN bus and RS485 bus) and wireless (Zigbee, Bluetooth, and LoRa) communication networks. This network transmits the information collected by the perception layer to the upper layer and sends control commands from the application layer to the perception layer to take appropriate action in devices related to the sensing layer.
- Middleware Layer: This layer collects data and procedures received from IoT devices to provide developers with a more versatile tool for building their applications. There are different types of middleware such as HYDRA, UBIWARE, UBIROAD, SMEPP, SOCRADES, GSN, and SIRENA.
- Common platform layer: This layer consists of common processing technologies such as fog computing, cloud computing, machine, and deep learning algorithms, as well as their establishment models. This layer is responsible for storing, making decisions, statistics, and creating intelligence algorithms such as control, decision making, forecasting, and early warning.
- Application layer: This is the highest level of the IoT structure and the position in which the importance and value of IoT is more clearly visible to the final users. This layer includes many smart platforms and systems for monitoring, real-time environmental control, and early warning of various diseases and disorders. All of these measures can contribute to improving the final product and saving effort, time, and costs.
6.1. Remote Monitoring Interfaces
6.2. Remote Control Applications and Strategies
6.3. Wireless Sensor Network (WSN)
7. Future of Smart Aquaponics
8. Current Limitations in Aquaponics
9. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
References
- Wei, Y.; Li, W.; An, D.; Li, D.; Jiao, Y.; Wei, Q. Equipment and intelligent control system in aquaponics: A review. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 169306–169326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blidariu, F.; Grozea, A. Increasing the economical efficiency and sustainability of indoor fish farming by means of aquaponics-review. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2011, 44, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
- Love, D.C.; Fry, J.P.; Genello, L.; Hill, E.S.; Frederick, J.A.; Li, X.; Semmens, K. An international survey of aquaponics practitioners. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, 102662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Yep, B.; Zheng, Y. Aquaponic trends and challenges—A review. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 228, 1586–1599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tyson, R.V.; Treadwell, D.D.; Simonne, E. Opportunities and challenges to sustainability in aquaponic systems. HortTechnology 2011, 21, 6–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martinez, P.; Ahmad, R.; Al-Hussein, M. A vision-based system for pre-inspection of steel frame manufacturing. Autom. Constr. 2019, 97, 151–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blau, B.; Kramer, J.; Conte, T. Service value networks. In Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE Conference on Commerce and Enterprise Computing, Vienna, Austria, 20–23 July 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Li, Q.; Tang, Q.; Chan, I.; Wei, H.; Pu, Y.; Jiang, H.; Li, J.; Zhou, J. Smart manufacturing standardization: Architectures, reference models and standards framework. Comput. Ind. 2018, 101, 91–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- El Hendy, M.; Miniaoui, S.; Fakhry, H. Towards strategic information & communication technology (ICT) framework for smart cities decision-makers. In Proceedings of the 2nd Asia-Pacific World Congress on Computer Science and Engineering (APWC on CSE), Nadi, Fiji, 2–4 December 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Wolter, D.; Kirsch, A. Smart environments: What is it and why should we care? KI-Künstliche Intell. 2017, 31, 231–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Smith, I.G. The Internet of Things 2012 New Horizons; CASAGRAS2: Halifax, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Ighalo, J.O.; Adeniyi, A.G.; Marques, G. Internet of things for water quality monitoring and assessment: A comprehensive review. Artif. Intell. Sustain. Dev. Theory Pract. Future Appl. 2021, 912, 245–259. [Google Scholar]
- Ali, O.; Ishak, M.K.; Bhatti, M.K.L.; Khan, I.; Kim, K. A Comprehensive Review of Internet of Things: Technology Stack, Middlewares, and Fog/Edge Computing Interface. Sensors 2022, 22, 995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hong, W.J.; Shamsuddin, N.; Abas, E.; Apong, R.A.; Masri, Z.; Suhaimi, H.; Gödeke, S.H.; Noh, M.N. Water Quality Monitoring with Arduino Based Sensors. Environments 2021, 8, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, C.; Wang, Y. Development of a cloud-based IoT monitoring system for Fish metabolism and activity in aquaponics. Aquac. Eng. 2020, 90, 102067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rozie, F.; Syarif, I.; Al Rasyid, M.U.H. Design and Implementation of Intelligent Aquaponics Monitoring System based on IoT. In Proceedings of the International Electronics Symposium (IES), Surabaya, Indonesia, 29–30 September 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Zamora- Izquierdo, M.A.; Santa, J.; Martínez, J.A.; Martínez, V.; Skarmeta, A.F. Smart farming IoT platform based on edge and cloud computing. Biosyst. Eng. 2019, 177, 4–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mandap, J.P.; Sze, D.; Reyes, G.N.; Dumlao, S.M.; Reyes, R.; Chung, W.Y.D. Aquaponics ph level, temperature, and dissolved oxygen monitoring and control system using raspberry pi as network backbone. In Proceedings of the TENCON IEEE Region 10 Conference, Jeju, Korea, 28–31 October 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Manju, M.; Karthik, V.; Hariharan, S.; Sreekar, B. Real time monitoring of the environmental parameters of an aquaponic system based on Internet of Things. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Science Technology Engineering & Management (ICONSTEM), Chennai, India, 23–24 March 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Kuhn, D.D.; Drahos, D.D.; Marsh, L.; Flick, G., Jr. Evaluation of nitrifying bacteria product to improve nitrification efficacy in recirculating aquaculture systems. Aquac. Eng. 2010, 43, 78–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, Z.; Wu, W.; Gao, J. A wireless passive SAW delay line temperature and pressure sensor for monitoring water distribution system. In Proceedings of the IEEE SENSORS, New Delhi, India, 28–31 October 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Singh, P.; Saikia, S. Arduino-based smart irrigation using water flow sensor, soil moisture sensor, temperature sensor and ESP8266 WiFi module. In Proceedings of the IEEE Region 10 Humanitarian Technology Conference (R10-HTC), Agra, India, 21–23 December 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Muhammad, D.; Endro, A.; Sidik, P. Design and implementation of smart bath water heater using Arduino. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Information and Communication Technology (ICoICT), Bandung, Indonesia, 3–5 May 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Khaoula, T.; Abdelouahid, R.A.; Ezzahoui, I.; Marzak, A. Architecture design of monitoring and controlling of IoT-based aquaponics system powered by solar energy. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2021, 191, 493–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahkeswaran, R.; Ng, A.K. Smart and Sustainable Home Aquaponics System with Feature-Rich Internet of Things Mobile Application. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Control, Automation and Robotics (ICCAR), Singapore, 20–23 April 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Nichani, A.; Kumar, A.; Iyer, S.; Ramya, M.A. Environmental Parameter Monitoring and Data Acquisition for Aquaponics. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Comput. Sci. Electron. 2017, 24, 29–34. [Google Scholar]
- Sreelekshmi, B.; Madhusoodanan, K. Automated aquaponics system. In Emerging Trends in Engineering, Science and Technology for Society, Energy and Environment; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2018; pp. 719–724. [Google Scholar]
- Hassan, Z.; Hossain, G.J.; Islam, M.M. Internet of Things (IoT) Based Water Quality Monitoring System. Educ. Res. 2020, 2, 168–180. [Google Scholar]
- Bárta, A.; Souček, P.; Bozhynov, V.; Urbanová, P. Automatic multiparameter acquisition in aquaponics systems. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering, Garanda, Spain, 26–28 April 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Manoharan, S.; Sathiyaraj, G.; Thiruvenkadakrishnan, K.; Vetriselvan, G.; Kishor, P. Water quality analyzer using IoT. Int. J. Innov. Technol. Explor. Eng. 2019, 8, 34–37. [Google Scholar]
- Nagayo, A.M.; Mendoza, C.; Vega, E.; Al Izki, R.K.; Jamisola, R.S. An automated solar-powered aquaponics system towards agricultural sustainability in the Sultanate of Oman. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid and Smart Cities (ICSGSC), Singapore, 23–26 July 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Mellit, A.; Benghanem, M.; Herrak, O.; Messalaoui, A. Design of a Novel Remote Monitoring System for Smart Greenhouses Using the Internet of Things and Deep Convolutional Neural Networks. Energies 2021, 14, 5045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, D.; Zhao, J.; Huang, L.; Xu, D. Design of a smart monitoring and control system for aquaponics based on OpenWrt. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Information Engineering for Mechanics and Materials, Huhhot, Inner Mongolia, 25–26 July 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Pasha, A.K.; Mulyana, E.; Hidayat, C.; Ramdhani, M.A.; Kurahman, O.T.; Adhipradana, M. System design of controlling and monitoring on aquaponic based on Internet of Things. In Proceedings of the 2018 4th International Conference on Wireless and Telematics (ICWT), Nusa Dua, Indonesia, 12–13 July 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Zaini, A.; Kurniawan, A.; Herdhiyanto, A. Internet of Things for monitoring and controlling nutrient film technique (NFT) aquaponic. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Engineering, Network and Intelligent Multimedia (CENIM), Surabaya, Indonesia, 26–27 November 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Aishwarya, K.; Harish, M.; Prathibhashree, S.; Panimozhi, K. Survey on IoT based automated aquaponics gardening approaches. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Inventive Communication and Computational Technologies (ICICCT), Coimbatore, India, 20–21 April 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Shaout, A.; Scott, S.G. IoT fuzzy logic aquaponics monitoring and control hardware real-time system. In Proceedings of the International Arab Conference on Information Technology, Giza, Egypt, 28–30 November 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Saaid, M.; Fadhil, N.; Ali, M.M.; Noor, M. Automated indoor Aquaponic cultivation technique. In Proceedings of the IEEE 3rd international conference on system engineering and technology, Shah Alam, Malaysia, 19–20 August 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Kyaw, T.Y.; Ng, A.K. Smart aquaponics system for urban farming. Energy Procedia 2017, 143, 342–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sheikh, B. Hydroponics: Key to sustain agriculture in water stressed and urban environment. Pak. J. Agric. Agril. Eng. Vet. Sci. 2006, 22, 53–57. [Google Scholar]
- Somerville, C.; Cohen, M.; Pantanella, E.; Stankus, A.; Lovatelli, A. Small-Scale Aquaponic Food Production: Integrated Fish and Plant Farming; FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Þórarinsdóttir, R.I.; Kledal, P.R.; Skar, S.L.G.; Sustaeta, F.; Ragnarsdóttir, K.V.; Mankasingh, U.; Pantanella, E.; Ven, R.v.d.; Shultz, C. Aquaponics Guidelines; Haskolaprent: Reykjavik, Iceland, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Stone, N.M.; Thomforde, H.K. Understanding Your Fish Pond Water Analysis Report; Cooperative Extension Program, University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff, US Department of Agriculture and County Governments Cooperating: Washington, DC, USA, 2004; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
- Espinal, C.A.; Matulić, D. Recirculating aquaculture technologies. In Aquaponics Food Production Systems; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019; pp. 35–76. [Google Scholar]
- Eck, M.; Körner, O.; Jijakli, M.H. Nutrient cycling in aquaponics systems. In Aquaponics Food Production Systems; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019; pp. 231–246. [Google Scholar]
- García- Rodríguez, A.; García-Rodríguez, S.; Díez-Mediavilla, M.; Alonso-Tristán, C. Photosynthetic active radiation, solar irradiance and the CIE standard sky classification. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 8007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhatnagar, A.; Singh, G. Culture fisheries in village ponds: A multi-location study in Haryana, India. Agric. Biol. J. N. Am. 2010, 1, 961–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Azevedo, R.V.; de Oliveira, K.F.; Flores-Lopes, F.; Teixeira-Lanna, E.A.; Takishita, S.S.; Tavares-Braga, L. Responses of Nile tilapia to different levels of water salinity. Lat. Am. J. Aquat. Res. 2015, 43, 828–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Petric, M.; Dodigović, F.; Grčić, I.; Markužić, P.; Radetić, L.; Topić, M. Ammonia concentration monitoring using arduino platform. Environ. Eng. Inženjerstvo Okoliša 2019, 6, 21–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yanes, A.R.; Martinez, P.; Ahmad, R.J. Towards automated aquaponics: A review on monitoring, IoT, and smart systems. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 263, 121571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jacob, N.K. IoT powered portable aquaponics system. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Internet of things, Data and Cloud Computing, Cambridge, UK, 22–23 March 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Nichani, A.; Saha, S.; Upadhyay, T.; Ramya, A.; Tolia, M. Data Acquisition and Actuation for Aquaponics using IoT. In Proceedings of the 2018 3rd IEEE International Conference on Recent Trends in Electronics, Information & Communication Technology (RTEICT), Bangalore, India, 18–19 May 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Cortella, G.; Saro, O.; De Angelis, A.; Ceccotti, L.; Tomasi, N.; Dalla Costa, L.; Manzocco, L.; Pinton, R.; Mimmo, T.; Cesco, S. Temperature control of nutrient solution in floating system cultivation. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2014, 73, 1055–1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blom, T.; Straver, W.; Ingratta, F.; Khosla, S.; Brown, W. Carbon Dioxide in Greenhouses; Ministry of Agriculture and Food: Guelph, ON, Canada, 1984. [Google Scholar]
- Salamone, F.; Belussi, L.; Danza, L.; Ghellere, M.; Meroni, I. How to control the Indoor Environmental Quality through the use of the Do-It-Yourself approach and new pervasive technologies. Energy Procedia 2017, 140, 351–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, N.H.; Baskaran, S.; Hariraj, S.; Krishnan, V. An autonomous aquaponics system using 6lowpan based wsn. In Proceedings of the IEEE 4th International Conference on Future Internet of Things and Cloud Workshops (FiCloudW), Vienna, Austria, 22–24 August 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Da Silva, L.F.; Yang, Z.; Pires, N.M.; Dong, T.; Teien, H.-C.; Storebakken, T.; Salbu, B. Monitoring aquaculture water quality: Design of an early warning sensor with Aliivibrio fischeri and predictive models. Sensors 2018, 18, 2848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rakocy, J.E. Aquaponics-integrating fish and plant culture. In Book Aquaculture Production Systems, 1st ed.; James, H., Tidwell, A., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Oxford, UK, 2012; pp. 344–386. [Google Scholar]
- Rakocy, J.E.; Shultz, R.C.; Bailey, D.S. Commercial aquaponics for the Caribbean. In Proceedings of the 51st Gulf and Caribbean Fisheries Institute (GCFI). 2000. Available online: http://hdl.handle.net/1834/29306 (accessed on 15 July 2022).
- Lennard, W.A.; Leonard, B.V. A comparison of reciprocating flow versus constant flow in an integrated, gravel bed, aquaponic test system. Aquac. Int. 2004, 12, 539–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Endut, A.; Jusoh, A.; Ali, N.; Nik, W.W.; Hassan, A. A study on the optimal hydraulic loading rate and plant ratios in recirculation aquaponic system. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 1511–1517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haryanto, M.U.; Ibadillah, A.; Alfita, R.; Aji, K.; Rizkyandi, R. Smart aquaponic system-based Internet of Things (IoT). In Proceedings of the Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Medan, Indonesia, 19–20 July 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Aishwarya, K.; Harish, M.; Prathibhashree, S.; Panimozhi, K. Survey on automated aquaponics based gardening approaches. In Proceedings of the 2018 Second International Conference on Inventive Communication and Computational Technologies (ICICCT), Coimbatore, India, 20–21 April 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Arvind, C.; Jyothi, R.; Kaushal, K.; Girish, G.; Saurav, R.; Chetankumar, G. Edge Computing Based Smart Aquaponics Monitoring System Using Deep Learning in IoT Environment. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI), Canberra, Australia, 1–4 December 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Cheong, C.; Iskandar, A.; Azhar, A.; Othman, W.J. Smart Aquaponics System: Design and Implementation using Arduino Microcontroller. Int. J. Res. 2018, 2348–6848. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, Z.; Qiu, K.; Zhang, J. Smart microcontroller architecture for the Internet of Things. Sensors 2020, 20, 1821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Verma, S.; Bhatia, A.; Chug, A.; Singh, A.P. Recent advancements in multimedia big data computing for IoT applications in precision agriculture: Opportunities, issues, and challenges. In Multimedia Big Data Computing for IoT Applications; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; pp. 391–416. [Google Scholar]
- LeCun, Y.; Bengio, Y.; Hinton, G. Deep learning. Nature 2015, 521, 436–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taha, M.F.; Abdalla, A.; ElMasry, G.; Gouda, M.; Zhou, L.; Zhao, N.; Liang, N.; Niu, Z.; Hassanein, A.; Al-Rejaie, S. Using Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Image-Based Diagnosis of Nutrient Deficiencies in Plants Grown in Aquaponics. Chemosensors 2022, 10, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, L.; Zhang, C.; Taha, M.; Qiu, Z.; He, L. Determination of Leaf Water Content with a Portable NIRS System Based on Deep Learning and Information Fusion Analysis. Trans. ASABE 2021, 64, 127–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, L.; Zhang, C.; Taha, M.F.; Wei, X.; He, Y.; Qiu, Z.; Liu, Y. Wheat Kernel Variety Identification Based on a Large Near-Infrared Spectral Dataset and a Novel Deep Learning-Based Feature Selection Method. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 575810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lekunberri, X.; Ruiz, J.; Quincoces, I.; Dornaika, F.; Arganda-Carreras, I.; Fernandes, J.A. Identification and measurement of tropical tuna species in purse seiner catches using computer vision and deep learning. Ecol. Inform. 2022, 67, 101495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Álvarez-Ellacuría, A.; Palmer, M.; Catalán, I.A.; Lisani, J. Image-based, unsupervised estimation of fish size from commercial landings using deep learning. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 2020, 77, 1330–1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, F.; Zhu, J.; Liu, B.; Zhang, B.; Xie, F. Fish shoals behavior detection based on convolutional neural network and spatiotemporal information. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 126907–126926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ubina, N.; Cheng, S.-C.; Chang, C.-C.; Chen, H.-Y. Evaluating fish feeding intensity in aquaculture with convolutional neural networks. Aquac. Eng. 2021, 94, 102178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ren, Q.; Zhang, L.; Wei, Y.; Li, D. A method for predicting dissolved oxygen in aquaculture water in an aquaponics system. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2018, 151, 384–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ta, X.; Wei, Y. Research on a dissolved oxygen prediction method for recirculating aquaculture systems based on a convolution neural network. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2018, 145, 302–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mehra, M.; Saxena, S.; Sankaranarayanan, S.; Tom, R.J.; Veeramanikandan, M. IoT based hydroponics system using Deep Neural Networks. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2018, 155, 473–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thai-Nghe, N.; Thanh-Hai, N.; Chi Ngon, N.J. Deep learning approach for forecasting water quality in IoT systems. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 2020, 11, 686–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barzegar, R.; Aalami, M.T.; Adamowski, J. Short-term water quality variable prediction using a hybrid CNN–LSTM deep learning model. Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 2020, 34, 415–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pitakphongmetha, J.; Boonnam, N.; Wongkoon, S.; Horanont, T.; Somkiadcharoen, D.; Prapakornpilai, J. Internet of things for planting in smart farm hydroponics style. In Proceedings of the 2016 International Computer Science and Engineering Conference (ICSEC), Chiang Mai, Thailand, 14–17 December 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Jalal, A.; Salman, A.; Mian, A.; Shortis, M.; Shafait, F. Fish detection and species classification in underwater environments using deep learning with temporal information. Ecol. Inform. 2020, 57, 101088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salman, A.; Siddiqui, S.A.; Shafait, F.; Mian, A.; Shortis, M.R.; Khurshid, K.; Ulges, A.; Schwanecke, U. Automatic fish detection in underwater videos by a deep neural network-based hybrid motion learning system. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 2020, 77, 1295–1307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hasan, N.; Ibrahim, S.; Aqilah Azlan, A.J. Fish diseases detection using convolutional neural network (CNN). Int. J. Nonlinear Anal. Appl. 2022, 13, 1977–1984. [Google Scholar]
- Monkman, G.G.; Hyder, K.; Kaiser, M.J.; Vidal, F.P. Using machine vision to estimate fish length from images using regional convolutional neural networks. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2019, 10, 2045–2056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garcia, R.; Prados, R.; Quintana, J.; Tempelaar, A.; Gracias, N.; Rosen, S.; Vågstøl, H.; Løvall, K.J. Automatic segmentation of fish using deep learning with application to fish size measurement. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 2020, 77, 1354–1366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, H.; Ma, X. Hybrid decision tree-based machine learning models for short-term water quality prediction. Chemosphere 2020, 249, 126169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Junior, A.D.; Sant’Ana, D.A.; Pache, M.C.B.; Garcia, V.; de Moares Weber, V.A.; Astolfi, G.; de Lima Weber, F.; Menezes, G.V.; Menezes, G.K.; Albuquerque, P.L. Fingerlings mass estimation: A comparison between deep and shallow learning algorithms. Smart Agric. Technol. 2021, 1, 100020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Måløy, H.; Aamodt, A.; Misimi, E. A spatio-temporal recurrent network for salmon feeding action recognition from underwater videos in aquaculture. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2019, 167, 105087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adegboye, M.A.; Aibinu, A.M.; Kolo, J.G.; Aliyu, I.; Folorunso, T.A.; Lee, S. Incorporating intelligence in fish feeding system for dispensing feed based on fish feeding intensity. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 91948–91960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohanty, S.P.; Hughes, D.P.; Salathé, M. Using deep learning for image-based plant disease detection. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lu, J.Y.; Chang, C.L.; Kuo, Y.F. Monitoring growth rate of lettuce using deep convolutional neural networks. In Proceedings of the ASABE Annual International Meeting, Boston, MA, USA, 7–10 July 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Alhnaity, B.; Pearson, S.; Leontidis, G.; Kollias, S. Using deep learning to predict plant growth and yield in greenhouse environments. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Advanced Technologies and Management for Innovative Greenhouses, Angers, France, 16–20 June 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Hazra, A.; Adhikari, M.; Amgoth, T.; Srirama, S.N. A comprehensive survey on interoperability for IIoT: Taxonomy, standards, and future directions. ACM Comput. Surv. 2021, 55, 1–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lelli, F. Interoperability of the Time of Industry 4.0 and the Internet of Things. Future Internet 2019, 11, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rabiya, A.; Martinez, P.; Ahmad, R. An ontology model to represent aquaponics 4.0 system’s knowledge. Inf. Process. Agric. 2021, 100, 55–60. [Google Scholar]
- Ge, W.; Zhao, C. State-of-the-art and developing strategies of agricultural internet of things. Nongye Jixie Xuebao Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach. 2014, 45, 222–277. [Google Scholar]
- Abraham, S.; Shahbazian, A.; Dao, K.; Tran, H.; Thompson, P. An Internet of Things (IoT)-based aquaponics facility. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology Conference (GHTC), San Jose, CA, USA, 19–22 October 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Dutta, A.; Dahal, P.; Prajapati, R.; Tamang, P.; Kumar, E.S. IOT based aquaponics monitoring system. In Proceedings of the 1st Kantipur Engineering College (KEC) Conference Proceedings, Dhapakhel, Nepal, 27 September 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Raju, K.R.S.R.; Varma, G.H.K. Knowledge based real time monitoring system for aquaculture using IoT. In Proceedings of the IEEE 7th International Advance Computing Conference (IACC), Hyderabad, India, 5–7 January 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Elsokah, M.M.; Sakah, M. Next generation of smart aquaponics with internet of things solutions. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Sciences and Techniques of Automatic Control and Computer Engineering (STA), Sousse, Tunisia, 24–26 March 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, S.S.C.; Lin, W.L.; Hsieh, C. To improve the production of agricultural using IoT-based aquaponics system. Int. J. Appl. Sci. Eng. 2020, 17, 207–222. [Google Scholar]
- Vernandhes, W.; Salahuddin, N.S.; Kowanda, A.; Sari, S.P. Smart aquaponic with monitoring and control system based on IoT. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Informatics and Computing (ICIC), Jayapura, Indonesia, 1–3 November 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Odema, M.; Adly, I.; Wahba, A.; Ragai, H. Smart aquaponics system for industrial Internet of Things (IIoT). In Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Systems and Informatics, Cairo, Egypt, 9–11 September 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Llaban, A.; Ella, V. Conventional and sensor-based streamflow data acquisition system for sustainable water resources management and agricultural applications: An extensive review of literature. In Proceedings of the IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Bogor, Indonesia, 11–13 October 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Lelli, F.; Frizziero, E.; Gulmini, M.; Maron, G.; Orlando, S.; Petrucci, A.; Squizzato, S. The many faces of the integration of instruments and the grid. Int. J. Web Grid Serv. 2007, 3, 239–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Murad, S.; Harun, A.; Mohyar, S.; Sapawi, R.; Ten, S. Design of aquaponics water monitoring system using Arduino microcontroller. In Proceedings of the AIP Conference Proceedings, Bydgoszcz, Poland, 30 September 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Mamatha, M.; Namratha, S. Design & implementation of indoor farming using automated aquaponics system. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Smart Technologies and Management for Computing, Communication, Controls, Energy and Materials (ICSTM), Chennai, India, 2–4 August 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Peharda, D.; Ivanković, I.; Jaman, N. Using data from SCADA for centralized transformer monitoring applications. Procedia Eng. 2017, 202, 65–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jacobs, F.R. Enterprise resource planning (ERP)—A brief history. J. Oper. Manag. 2007, 25, 357–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Da Xu, L.; He, W.; Li, S. Internet of things in industries: A survey. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2014, 10, 2233–2243. [Google Scholar]
Eco-System | Sensing System | Water | Environment | References | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Smart | IoT | TAN | pH | EC | T | Level | DO | TDS | SL | Flow | T | RH | CO2 | Light | ||
Water quality | × | ✓ | × | ✓ | × | ✓ | × | × | ✓ | × | × | × | × | × | × | [14] |
Aquaponics | × | ✓ | × | ✓ | × | × | × | ✓ | × | × | × | × | × | × | × | [15] |
Aquaponics | × | ✓ | × | ✓ | × | × | ✓ | × | ✓ | × | × | × | × | × | × | [16] |
Hydroponic | × | ✓ | × | ✓ | ✓ | × | ✓ | × | × | × | ✓ | × | ✓ | × | × | [17] |
Aquaponics | ✓ | × | × | ✓ | × | ✓ | × | ✓ | × | × | × | × | × | × | × | [18] |
Aquaponics | × | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | × | ✓ | ✓ | × | × | × | × | × | × | × | × | [19] |
Aquaculture | × | × | × | ✓ | × | ✓ | × | ✓ | × | ✓ | × | × | × | × | × | [20] |
Water quality | × | × | × | × | × | ✓ | × | × | × | × | × | × | × | × | × | [21] |
Irrigation sys. | × | × | × | × | × | ✓ | × | × | × | × | ✓ | × | × | × | × | [22] |
Water quality | ✓ | × | × | × | × | ✓ | × | × | × | × | × | × | × | × | × | [23] |
Aquaponics | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | × | ✓ | × | × | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | [24] |
Aquaponics | × | × | × | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | × | × | × | ✓ | ✓ | × | ✓ | [25] |
Aquaponics | ✓ | ✓ | × | ✓ | × | ✓ | ✓ | × | × | × | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | × | ✓ | [26] |
Aquaponics | × | ✓ | × | × | × | ✓ | ✓ | × | × | × | × | ✓ | ✓ | × | × | [27] |
Water quality | × | ✓ | × | ✓ | × | ✓ | × | ✓ | × | ✓ | × | × | × | × | × | [28] |
Aquaponics | × | × | × | ✓ | × | ✓ | × | ✓ | × | × | × | × | × | × | × | [29] |
Water quality | ✓ | ✓ | × | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | × | × | × | × | × | × | × | × | × | [30] |
Aquaponics | × | ✓ | × | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | × | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | × | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | × | [31] |
Greenhouse | × | ✓ | × | × | × | × | × | × | × | × | × | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | [32] |
Aquaponics | × | × | × | × | × | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | × | × | × | × | ✓ | × | ✓ | [33] |
Aquaponics | ✓ | × | × | × | × | × | ✓ | × | × | × | × | × | × | × | × | [34] |
Aquaponics | ✓ | × | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | × | × | × | × | × | × | × | × | [35] | |
Aquaponics | ✓ | × | × | × | × | ✓ | ✓ | × | × | × | × | × | × | × | × | [36] |
Aquaponics | ✓ | × | × | ✓ | × | ✓ | × | × | × | × | × | ✓ | × | × | ✓ | [37] |
Aquaponics | ✓ | × | × | × | × | ✓ | ✓ | × | × | × | × | × | × | × | × | [38] |
Aquaponics | ✓ | × | × | ✓ | × | ✓ | × | × | × | × | ✓ | × | × | × | ✓ | [39] |
Parameter | Optimal Range | Reference |
---|---|---|
pH | 6.5–8.0 | [4] |
Water T | 17–34 °C | [42] |
Water Level | 0.02 kg/L | [41] |
Dissolved Oxygen | >4 mg/L | [42] |
Electro-Conductivity | 30–5000 uS/cm | [43] |
Total Dissolved Solids | <1000 mg/L | [41] |
Salinity | 0–2 ppt CaCO3 | [41] |
Alkalinity | 50–150 mg/L CaCO3 | [43] |
TAN | <2 mg/L | [44] |
Nitrites | 0.25–1 mg/L | [4] |
Nitrates | 50–100 ppm | [45] |
Flow | 1–2 Liters/min | [41] |
Air T | 18–30 °C | [41] |
Relative Humidity | 60–80% | [41] |
CO2 | 340–1300 ppm | [41] |
Light Intensity | 600–900 PPFD | [46] |
Parameter | Sensors | Reference |
---|---|---|
NH3 | WINSEN-MQ-137 | [49] |
NO2 | Apure-NO2-201 sensor | [50] |
NO3 | WINSEN-MQ-137 | [49] |
pH | DFROBOT-SKU:SEN0169 | [15] |
B&C Electronics–SZ 1093 model | [17] | |
OMEGA PHE-45P pH sensor | [19] | |
Orion 3 Star pH meter | [20] | |
T | DFROBOT-DS18B20 | [24] |
Level | Omron K8AK-LS1 | [17] |
HC-SR04 ultrasonic sensor | [25] | |
BC546 NPN transistor circuit | [51] | |
DO | DFROBOT-SEN0237 | [15] |
Atlas DO probe | [18] | |
EC | DFROBOT-SKU:DFR0300-H | [31] |
TDS | DFROBOT-Analog TDS sensor | [24] |
SL | DFROBOT-SKU:DFR0300-H | [50] |
W.H | DFROBOT-SKU:DFR0300-H | [50] |
Flow | ETC1:YF-S201 | [52] |
System Control Degree | Technique or Method | Component | Ways of Data Acquisition | Data Acquisition | Control Unit | Effect | Advantages/Disadvantages | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Manual control | Manual control | A fish-rearing tank, a solids-removal unit, two hydroponic tanks, and a reservoir | Experience | Sludge, DO, and pH | Vertical-lift pump, drain valve, and add small amounts of base to regulate | Well suited for tropical regions where fresh water is scarce or level farmland is limited. | Low efficiency, inevitable mistakes, and more maintenance costs | [58] |
Fish rearing, Solids removal, and hydroponic components | DO, water T, and pH | Chillers and evaporative cooling towers, pump, and feeders | Meet the need for more food fish and plant crop production in small Caribbean islands. | [59] | ||||
Auto-Control | Control by using timers | Fish-holding tank, associated biofilter, and hydroponic growth bed | Meter and sonde probe, multiparameter meter, and various reagents. | Flow | Water pump, airlift, valve in the hydroponic bed drain line, and lighting unit | Managing the flow rate increases both biomass and yield. | Increased efficiency, automation control is realized, and higher management accuracy | [60] |
Recirculating aquaculture system (RAS). | YSI multi-probe meter (model YSI 550A) and pH cyber scan waterproof | DO, water T, and pH | Adjust the gate valves, air stones, and connected to an air blower | Effectively guarantee the flow rate of water, and stable operation of the system is guaranteed | [61] | |||
Smart monitoring and control system | IoT | A fish-rearing tank, biofilter, Hydroponic growth bed | pH, EC, T, Level, Do, Air T, RH, Light sensors | pH, EC, water T, water level, Do, air T, RH, and light | Water heater, air pump, light-emitting diode grow lights, and exhaust fan | Effective and efficient aquaponics system | Efficacy automated aquaponics, minimal costs, and human intervention | [25] |
Microcontroller, sensor, web interface, display, pump, feeder, and emergency source | pH and T sensors | pH and water T | Water pump and fish feeder | The ultrasonic sensor has a 99.94% success rate, pH sensor of 92.35%, and T sensor of 97.91%. | Autonomous monitoring | [62] | ||
Source node, sink, database server, and visualization in mobile application | Level, T, pH, and TAN sensors | Water level, T, pH, and TAN | Water heater, coolant, fish feeder, and ammonia alarm | The plant growth was improved | [35] | |||
Fish feeder and water supplier | T, water level, and moisture sensors | T, water level, and moisture content | Water pump, oxygen pump, fish feeder, and LED light | The climate has the least or no interference in the aquaponics, cost-effective, and less water consumption | [63] | |||
IoT and deep learning | Recirculating aquaculture system, actuators, and sensors | DHT11, BH1750 light, soil moisture, HC-SR04 water level, and pH sensors | Air T, RH, soil moisture, light, water level, and pH | Water pump, and lamps, | Helped enhance the plant and fish growth. | [64] | ||
Websocket | pH, water temperature monitoring system and controlling system | DS18B20, DFROBOT analog pH, and water level sensors | Water T, water level, pH | Water pump, lights, fan, and lamp | Allows displaying multiple aquaponic parameter in specified delayed time | Automatic early warning | [34] | |
Raspberry Pi | Data acquisition, alarm, unit, web application, mobile application, and cloud server | T, pH, flow, light, and plant height sensors | T, pH, flow, light, plant height | Water heater, water pump, LED grow light, and fish feeder | Self-sustainable, cost-effective, and eco-friendly urban farming | Autonomous monitoring | [39] | |
Fuzzy logic | Microcontroller, relay control, and fuzzy interface system | Water T, air T, pH, and luminance sensors | Water/air T, pH, light and intensity | Light, heater, and alarm | Accurate, low cost, and convenient | Continuous autonomous monitoring | [37] | |
Open Wrt and WRT node | Data acquisition, mobile transfer, and smart application | Water T, water level, and RH sensors | Water T, light, water level, DO, and RH | Water pump, air pump, feeder, and lamps | Monitoring and controlling smart aquaponics remotely | Store data in cloud and analyzing data using smart technology | [33] | |
Arduino microcontroller | controller, actuators, and sensors | Water T, and float sensors | Water T, water level, amount of food | Feeder, pump, and dimmer | Closed loop control system, and plant grow successfully | Continuous autonomous monitoring | [38] | |
Hydroponics, aquaculture, and water reservoir | Water level and water T sensors | Water level and water T | DC motor, LED, an alarm | All functionality of the system were working as intended | [65] |
Application | Models/Algorithm Technology | Results/Accuracy | Reference |
---|---|---|---|
Predicting DO | DCNN and genetic algorithms | — | [76] |
Predicting water temperature, pH, salinity, water level, relative humidity, and light intensity | DCNN | — | [78] |
Monitoring and predicting temperature, DO, salinity, and pH of water using | DCNN and LSTM algorithm | — | [79] |
Predicting dissolved oxygen | DCNN | — | [77] |
Prediction of EC and pH | artificial neural network | — | [81] |
Predicting the content of both chlorophyll (Chl-a) and DO using CNN-LSTM prediction model | Hybrid CNN–LSTM deep learning model | — | [80] |
Detecting fish in underwater videos | ResNet-50 with YOLO (You Only Look Once) | 95.47% | [82] |
Detecting moving live fish | DCNN | 87.44% | [83] |
detection of fish disease | DCNN | 94.44% | [84] |
Classifying tuna fish | R-CNN and ResNet50V2 | 70% | [72] |
Estimating fish length | R-CNN | 99% | [73] |
Fish length | R-CNN | 97.8% | [85] |
Estimation of fishs length | Local gradient technique and Mask RCNN | 0.89 | [86] |
Estimation the pond fish length | CNN | 93.93% | [87] |
Estimation of fingerlings mass | InceptionV3, Exception, VGG19, VGG16, and ResNet50. | 67.08% | [88] |
Assessing the feeding intensity of fish | Convolutional neural networks, | 95% | [75] |
Identify salmon feeding behavior or non-feeding | Dual-Stream Recurrent Network | 80% | [89] |
Prediction feeding behavior | Artificial neural networks | 100%. | [90] |
Plant disease detection | CNN | 99.35% | [91] |
Diagnose nutrient deficiencies of lettuce | ResNet18 and Inceptionv3 | 96.5% | [69] |
Monitor the growth rate of lettuce | Mask R-CNN | 97.63% | [92] |
Prediction tomato yield and stem growth | RNN with LSTM | Performed well | [93] |
Parameters | Standard | Frequency Band | Data Rate | Transmission Range | Consumption | Cost |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WiFi | IEEE 802.11a/c/b/d/g/n | 5–60 GHz | 1 Mb/s–7 Gb/s | 20–100 m | High | High |
ZigBee | IEEE 802.15.4 | 2.4 GHz | 20–250 kb/s | 10–20 m | Low | Low |
LoRa | LoRaWAN R1.0 | 868/900 MHz | 0.3–50 kb/s | <30 Km | Very low | High |
RFID | ISO 18000-6C | 860–960 MHz | 40 to 160 kb/s | 1–5 m | Low | Low |
Mobile communication | 2G-GSM, CDMA 3G-UMTS, CDMA2000, 4G-LTE, GPRS | 865 MHz, 2.4 GHz | 2G: 50–100 kb/s 3G: 200 kb/s 4G: 0.1–1 Gb/s | Entire Celluar Area | Low | Low |
Bluetooth | IEEE 802.15.1 | 24 GHz | 1–24 Mb/s | 8–10 m | Very low | Low |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Taha, M.F.; ElMasry, G.; Gouda, M.; Zhou, L.; Liang, N.; Abdalla, A.; Rousseau, D.; Qiu, Z. Recent Advances of Smart Systems and Internet of Things (IoT) for Aquaponics Automation: A Comprehensive Overview. Chemosensors 2022, 10, 303. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors10080303
Taha MF, ElMasry G, Gouda M, Zhou L, Liang N, Abdalla A, Rousseau D, Qiu Z. Recent Advances of Smart Systems and Internet of Things (IoT) for Aquaponics Automation: A Comprehensive Overview. Chemosensors. 2022; 10(8):303. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors10080303
Chicago/Turabian StyleTaha, Mohamed Farag, Gamal ElMasry, Mostafa Gouda, Lei Zhou, Ning Liang, Alwaseela Abdalla, David Rousseau, and Zhengjun Qiu. 2022. "Recent Advances of Smart Systems and Internet of Things (IoT) for Aquaponics Automation: A Comprehensive Overview" Chemosensors 10, no. 8: 303. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors10080303
APA StyleTaha, M. F., ElMasry, G., Gouda, M., Zhou, L., Liang, N., Abdalla, A., Rousseau, D., & Qiu, Z. (2022). Recent Advances of Smart Systems and Internet of Things (IoT) for Aquaponics Automation: A Comprehensive Overview. Chemosensors, 10(8), 303. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors10080303