Next Article in Journal
Dual Transduction of H2O2 Detection Using ZnO/Laser-Induced Graphene Composites
Next Article in Special Issue
Recent Advances in Silicon FET Devices for Gas and Volatile Organic Compound Sensing
Previous Article in Journal
Electronic Surveillance and Security Applications of Magnetic Microwires
Previous Article in Special Issue
Identification of Mint Scents Using a QCM Based E-Nose
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Progress in Metal-Organic Frameworks Facilitated Mercury Detection and Removal

Department of Applied Chemistry, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu 30010, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Chemosensors 2021, 9(5), 101; https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors9050101
Submission received: 1 April 2021 / Revised: 30 April 2021 / Accepted: 2 May 2021 / Published: 4 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Organic-Inorganic Hybrid Chemo- and Bio-Sensors)

Abstract

:
Metal Organic Frameworks (MOFs) are noted as exceptional candidates towards the detection and removal of specific analytes. MOFs were reported in particular for the detection/removal of environmental contaminants, such as heavy metal ions, toxic anions, hazardous gases, explosives, etc. Among heavy metal ions, mercury has been noted as a global hazard because of its high toxicity in the elemental (Hg0), divalent cationic (Hg2+), and methyl mercury (CH3Hg+) forms. To secure the environment and living organisms, many countries have imposed stringent regulations to monitor mercury at all costs. Regarding the detection/removal requirements of mercury, researchers have proposed and reported all kinds of MOFs-based luminescent/non-luminescent probes towards mercury. This review provides valuable information about the MOFs which have been engaged in detection and removal of elemental mercury and Hg2+ ions. Moreover, the involved mechanisms or adsorption isotherms related to sensors or removal studies are clarified for the readers. Finally, advantages and limitations of MOFs in mercury detection/removal are described together with future scopes.

1. Introduction

Due to the harmful and hazardous effects on ecosystem, detection/removal of mercury in different states, such as elemental, ionic, and organometallic (like methyl mercury), is in high demand and has attracted intense research interest [1,2,3,4,5]. Accumulated mercury in environmental water often sedimented and converted as toxic methylmercury, which entered the food cycle and caused serious diseases in living beings as stated next [6]. Accumulation of mercury in human body may lead to various health issues, such as brain damage, central nervous syndromes, Minamata disease, cognitive and motion disorders, etc. [7,8,9] Therefore, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulated an allowable maximum level of mercury of 2 ppb (10 nM) in the drinking water and 3 ppm (1.5 μM) in fish tissue [10,11]. Moreover, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) of the U. S. Department of Health and Human Service has set a highest allowable mercury concentration of 625 ppb in normal soil [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. Till now the development of innovative tactics towards detection and removal of mercury are still the main focus of many research groups [12,13]. In this light, luminescent approaches comprising of nanoprobes, small molecules, supramolecular assemblies, aggregation induced emission, and covalent or metal organic frameworks (COFs/MOFs) are seemingly impressive with respect to their applicability, such as in vitro/vivo imaging studies [14,15,16,17,18,19]. However, design and development of metal organic frameworks (MOFs)-based probes towards specific analytes discrimination are highly anticipated with real time applications [20,21,22,23,24] due to the following advantages: existence of porosity to adsorb specific analyte, improved aqueous solubility, exceptional photophysical and chemical properties.
In fact, the majority of the MOFs are composed of organic ligand and metal nodes with certain porosity and tend to form different micro/nano-structures, such as particles, cubes, rods, spheres, etc. [25,26,27,28,29] Moreover, they also find their applications in multiple opto-electronics, photovoltaics, electronics, solar cells, light emitting devices (LEDs), field effect transistors (FETs), DNA detection, bio-analysis, real time detection/removal of specific analytes, etc. [30,31,32,33] In sensory studies, they can behave as single, dual, and non-emissive materials, which tend to provide diverse responses upon interaction with guest analytes [34]. Moreover, the MOFs may display luminescent responses when interact with guest analytes via one-dimension (1D) (wavelength change and intensity alteration) or two-dimension (2D) (ratiometric variation combined with 1D responses) signals [21,35]. However, by tuning the functional organic units mediated responses, MOFs can be utilized in numerous sensory applications, such as pH sensors, virus and antibiotic detection, metal ions recognition, anions detection, volatile explosives quantification, etc. [36,37,38,39,40,41] Similarly, by modulating the functional units in MOFs, capture and removal of specific analytes can be achieved and become an effective approach for toxic analyte removal [42,43,44,45,46]. In this track, studies on detection and removal of highly toxic mercury and its analogous can find inspiring and exceptional applicability towards the environmental and health safety [47].
So far, diverse MOFs have been demonstrated for exceptional detection and removal elemental mercury and Hg2+ [48,49,50,51]. In fact, detection of Hg2+ can be attained by assorted mechanisms, such as bands overlapping, ligand interaction, cation exchange, and framework collapse, etc. [20,33] On the contrary, removal of elemental mercury and Hg2+ ions are mostly achieved by tuning structural functionalities with organic ligands [52]. In addition, metal-organic coordination polymers and MOFs composited materials were demonstrated for mercury determination and removal [53,54]. So far, reviews on MOFs-based mercury detection and removal are deficient in valuable information, which encourages us to deliver a compact review to summarize the recent studies on this subject.
In this review, we described the sensory detection and removal utilities of simple and polymeric MOFs and composited MOFs towards elemental mercury and Hg2+ as noted in Figure 1. Moreover, mechanism, electron transport, and structural benefits for mercury quantification were outlined for reader′s clarifications. Finally, a brief note on the synthesis of MOFs involved in discrimination and removal of mercury and its analogous was provided in this paper.

2. Optimization Requirements for MOFs-Based Mercury Detection/Removal

To detect/remove mercury and it′s analogous by using MOFs, following optimization requirements must be taken into account.
A.
Selection of suitable organic linkers that can form MOFs with designated metal nodes with greater surface area to interact with mercury analogous in the environment. Similarly, organic linkers with side chains, such as thiol (-SH; which shows the greater affinity to Hg2+, Hg0 and CH3Hg+), can be chosen for effective removal and detection mercury [55].
B.
Selection of suitable metal nodes that can form MOFs with good stability in aqua/non-aqua solvents and afford large surface area for analyte (Hg2+) adsorption or collision for improving signal detection or quantification [56].
C.
Selection of appropriate synthetic tactics/conditions to afford high yield over impurities. Similarly, the selection of suitable solvent for sensory studies also needs attention [18].
D.
Many MOFs are well known coordinating polymers with porous nano/micro-structures [27], the design for capturing mercury requires more attention with respect to linkers, nodes, adsorbing ability, and opto-electronic properties.
E.
In the case of removal of mercury from environmental samples, design and development of MOFs with high adsorption efficiency and stability in aqua medium need more attention and optimization for improvement [57].
F.
To avoid the interfering effect from competing species, a unique MOF design with selectivity only to the mercury analogous must require optimization either by modulation of organic linkers or metal nodes or by tuning the opto-electronic properties [58].
G.
Post-modification of MOFs with certain materials to form composited structures towards mercury detection/removal also requires optimization for authorized applicability [59].

3. Synthetic Tactics Involved in MOFs Construction

By bridging the organic linkers with metal nodes, MOFs can be synthesized by many tactics as presented below [60].
(1)
Diffusion method: This is a tactic that involves gradual conveyance of various species into interaction and can be sub-divided into (i) solvent liquid diffusion method, which takes place between precipitant solvent and product in the solvent and leads to crystallization at interface via gradual diffusion; (ii) gradual diffusion of reactants by adjusting the physical barriers, such as placing two reactant vials with different sizes to form MOFs [60,61].
(2)
Hydro/solvothermal method: This technique involves self-assembly of products from soluble precursors. Wherein, precursors are introduced into the sealed tube under certain pressure and kept at 80–260 °C for days or weeks to produce the designated MOFs [60,62].
(3)
Microwave method: In this tactic, solution containing small metal oxide particles is treated with microwave to raise temperature so that nano-sized metal crystals can be generated and leads to MOFs formation with controlled shape and size [63]. Contrary to other synthetic methods, microwave technology is a promising tactic with reduced reaction time and less processing energy consumption to have control over MOF properties. It is able to easily produce MOFs and MOF-hybrids in an isolated manner [64]. For example, Le et al. developed the mesoporous MOF-MIL-100 (Fe) via microwave-assisted continuous flow synthesis [by reacting iron(III) chloride hexahydrate (FeCl3⋅6H2O), 1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylic acid (H3BTC)] to support the construction of Cu(I) modified adsorbents towards CO/CO2 separation [65].
(4)
Electrochemical method: This tactic is generally used in the industry to produce MOFs in bulk. Contrary to solvothermal synthesis, this method has the advantage of quick synthesis at low temperature and also avoids usage of anionic metal salts, such as metallic nitrates [66]. However, fine tuning in applied voltage is required to attain better results towards designed MOFs.
(5)
Mechanochemical method: Contrast to traditional way of synthesis (dissolving, heating, and stirring chemicals in a solution), this method is environmentally friendly for synthesizing MOFs via mechanical forces, such as grinding and ball milling at ambient temperature without any solvent consumption. Moreover, certain number of MOFs can be obtained in a short time (10–20 min). This method is also noted as a technique at the interface of mechanical engineering and chemistry [67].
(6)
Sonochemistry method: This is a quick synthesis tactic reported for producing MOFs in an environmentally friendly manner via treating the reaction mixture with high energy ultrasound force (10–20 MHz with upper limit of human hearing). During this process, dissolution of the starting materials can be enhanced, thereby becoming a special research topic for scientists for producing MOFs in bulk [68].
(7)
Post-synthetic modifications: Apart from the aforementioned tactics, the designated MOFs can be synthesized via post-synthetic modifications, such as ligand exchange, metal exchange, opening of the coordinating sites, etc [69].

4. MOFs in Optical Detection of Hg2+

Similar to nanomaterials-based sensors [70], MOFs in the form of micro/nano-structures can be used in effective detection of Hg2+. In this light, the zirconium (Zr) metal-incorporated MOFs were reported for luminescent and colorimetric quantification of Hg2+ ions [71,72,73,74,75,76,77]. Yang and co-workers developed a porous phorpyrinic luminescent metal–organic framework (LMOF; PCN-224) with meso-tetra(4-carboxyphenyl) porphyrin (TCPP) ligands and Zr metal nodes via modified solvothermal method and applied in Hg2+ sensors [71]. During detection of Hg2+, the probe displayed a bright red to dark red fluorescent quenching and a purple to light green colorimetric response within 2 min. The sensor response of PCN-224 was not affected by the presence of any competing ions and was reversible in the presence of KI solution (up to seven cycles) as depicted in Figure 2. The PCN-224 revealed a linear response to Hg2+ from 0.1 to 10 micromole (µM) with a detection limit (LOD) of 6 nanomole (nM). Moreover, probe PCN-224 was also more effective towards the detection of Hg2+ in real samples, such as tab and river water.
The UIO-66 (archetypal metal–organic framework (MOF) was reported for effective detection of Hg2+. It contains the metal nodes that comprise a zirconium oxide complex bridged by terepthalic acid (1,4-benzenedicarboxylic acid) ligands). Hg2+ detection in aqueous media can be further improved by tuning the structural features of UIO-66 via modifying the terephthalic acid bridging unit or by post-doping process (PSM) [72,73,74]. Zhang et al. developed the fluorescent MOF (UIO-66-PSM) via coupling UIO-66-N3 with phenylacetylene to use in sensing of Hg2+ in aqueous media [72]. Terephthalic acid with azide group was used to synthesize the UIO-66-N3, which showed reactivity to phenylacetylene. The Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface area of UIO-66-PSM was estimated as 606 m2 g−1 to N2 gas at 77K. In this work, UIO-66-PSM displayed great selectivity to Hg2+ via fluorescence quenching with a linear behavior from 0 to 78.1 µM and an estimated LOD of 5.88 µM. Moreover, Hg2+ detection by the UIO-66-PSM was demonstrated in tap and lake water interrogations. However, the adsorption capability of UIO-66-PSM to Hg2+ in the presence of other ions still needs to be clarified. In a similar fashion, Samanta and co-workers described synthesis of the UIO-66@Butyne by reacting ZrCl4 with 2,5-bis(but-3-yn-1-yloxy) terephthalic acid and applied it in quantifying Hg2+ in aqueous medium [73]. The UIO-66@Butyne displayed a fluorescence quenching response to Hg2+ via the reaction-based chemodosimeter mechanism. In which, the triple bonded acetylene unit present over the surface reacted with Hg2+ and led to green fluorescence quenching with a LOD of 10.9 nM. It also showed higher selectivity to Hg2+ than that of other ions. The BET surface area of UIO-66@Butyne was found to be 74 m2 g−1 for Hg2+ at 77K. Regarding to structural modification, Xiaoxiong et al. proposed post doping of Eu3+ over the surface of UIO-66 type MOF (Eu3+@UIO-66 (DPA) (synthesized by reacting ZrCl4 and isophthalic acid with 2,6-pyridinedicarboxylic acid (DPA)) to apply in sensor studies [74]. Due to the doping of Eu3+, the MOF displayed strong red fluorescence via coordination of Eu3+ with pyridine “nitrogen” and acid group. Upon the addition of metal ions to the above MOF system, only Fe3+ and Hg2+ ions showed fluorescence quenching at 615 nm (in water) via Eu3+ atom displacement. However, adding hydrogen peroxide (H2O2; acted as a masking agent for Fe3+) eliminated the interfering effect of Fe3+ over Hg2+ selectivity and delivered a linear response between 10 nM to 2.5 µM with a LOD of 8.26 nM (lower than the allowed limit). In terms of the strategy and LOD, this work is an impressive one, but demonstrations in real time applications are missing in this report.
Wang and co-workers constructed a novel Zr-based MOF (RuUIO-67) integrated with ruthenium (Ru) complex for colorimetric sensing of Hg2+, which was reversible with KI solution [75]. The UIO-67 is comprised of Zr6O4(OH)4 nodes strutted by linear 4,4′-biphenyldicarboxylic acid (H2bpdc) bridging ligands. It is further doped with ruthenium complex Ru(H2bpydc)(bpy)(NCS)2 (achieved by reacting [RuCl2(p-cymene)]2, 2,2′-bipyridine (bpy), 2,2′-bipyridine-5,5′-dicarboxy (H2bpydc) with ammonium thiocyanate (NH4NCS)) to yield the RuUIO-67 MOF. Upon the addition of Hg2+ (in HEPES buffer, pH 7.4) to RuUIO-67 in methanol-water (8:2), the initial absorption band at 540 nm gradually disappeared and a new band at 435 nm was visualized due to the strong binding of sulphur “S” atom present in the NCS group. The MOF showed a linear response between 0–13 µM with a LOD of 0.5 µM (0.1 ppm) and a naked eye LOD of 7.2 µM. Moreover, reversibility up to six cycles was achieved when I- (KI solution) was added to the sensory system. However, it still needs to focus on competing interrogations. Li et al. described the modified UIO-68 (Zr6O4(OH)4 clusters linked with 4,4′-terphenyldicarboxylate (TPDC)) MOFs UIO-68-NCS, UIO-68-R6G, and UIO-68-R6G′ via post-synthetic modification strategy towards colorimetric and fluorescent detection of Hg2+ [76]. Reaction of the UIO-68-NH2 with thio-phosgene and triethylamine led to formation of the UIO-68-NCS, which was further reacted with N-(rhodamine-6G) lactam-ethylenediamine (R6G-EDA) and Hg(NO3)2 hydrate to yield the UIO-68-R6G and UIO-68-R6G′, respectively. In the presence of Hg2+, UIO-68-R6G displayed in red and enhanced “turn-on” red emission with corresponding changes in particle sizes as seen in Figure 3.
Based on the N2 uptake at 77K, the BET surface area of UIO-68-NH2, UIO-68-NCS, UIO-68-R6G, and UIO-68-R6G′ were established as 674 cm3 g−1, 620 cm3 g−1, 405 cm3 g−1, and 326.83 cm3 g−1, correspondingly. The decrease in BET surface area was attributed to the incorporation of larger rhodamine-thiocarbamide unit, which reduced the porosity. The UIO-68-R6G in Tris-HCl buffer solution displayed a linear response to Hg2+ from 10−8 to 10−1 M with a LOD of 0.1 nM and was demonstrated with applicability in in-vitro/in- vivo bio-imaging studies. Thereafter, Kim and co-workers presented the MOF-SALI-MAA-3eq via incorporation of three equivalents of mercaptoacetic acid into NU-1000 (comprised of Zr63-O)43-OH)4(H2O)4(OH)4 nodes and tetratopic 1,3,6,8-(p-benzoate)pyrene linkers) towards the determination of Hg2+ [77]. Based on the N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms at 77K, the BET surface area of NU-1000 and SALI-MAA-3eq were found as 2253 m2 g−1 and 1906 m2 g−1, correspondingly. The decrease in surface area was related to the incorporation of mercaptoacetic acid. The SALI-MAA-3eq in water showed a linear response from 0.1 to 10 mM, however, the LOD was not provided. This work requires further investigations in competing and applicability studies.
Subsequently, by coordinating the 5-boronobezene-1, 3-dicarboxylic acid with Eu3+ ions, the boric acid (BA)-functionalized lanthanide metal-organic framework (BA-Eu-MOF) was reported in detection of Hg2+ and CH3Hg+ species in aqueous medium [78]. The BA-Eu-MOF was in the form of meso-porous nanoparticles with a uniform size distribution of ~400 nm. It also showed characteristics of red emission, good dispersive ability, and water solubility. Initially, the “antenna” effect was passivated by boric acid (BA) and the BA-Eu-MOF showed weak red emission. During detection of Hg2+ and CH3Hg+ species via chemodosimeter reaction between BA and the analytes, the “antenna” effect was recovered and led to strong red fluorescence under UV-lamp (λex = 365 nm). The BET surface area of BA-Eu-MOF was established as 39.7 m2 g−1 to N2 gas at 77K. Upon the addition of the Hg2+ and CH3Hg+, photoluminescence (PL) response at 620 nm was linearly enhanced between 1–60 µM and 1–80 µM with a LODs of 220 nM and 440 nM. Moreover, BA-Eu-MOF showed higher selectivity over other competing mono- and di-valent cations in real time river water applications.
MOFs composed of other lanthanide metal nodes have also been engaged in the Hg2+ discrimination. By reacting the organic ligand “4,4′,4′′-s-triazine-1,3,5-triyltri-p-amino-benzoic acid (H3TATAB)” with lanthanide metals (Ln = Eu, Tb, Sm, Dy and Gd), the Ln(TATAB)·(DMF)4(H2O)(MeOH)0.5 MOFs were produced in quantitative yields and were interrogated towards metal ions detection [79]. Wherein, only the TbTATAB in water showed selective sensitivity to Hg2+ but not the other lanthanide ions (Eu, Sm, Dy and Gd) containing MOFs. During Hg2+ detection, luminescence of TbTATAB at 494, 544, 587, and 622 nm (quantum yield = 77.48%) was quenched linearly from 0 to 50 µM with a LOD of 4.4 nM. This work also demonstrated Hg2+ detection in real water samples (river water, drinking water, and tap water), but information on the nanostructure and BET surface area were missing. Recently, Li et al. developed two MOFs, namely {[Tb2(bpda)3(H2O)3]·H2O}n and {[Dy2(bpda)3(H2O)3]·H2O}n, by reacting 2,2′-bipyridine-4,4′-dicarboxylic acid (H2bpda) with LnCl3.6H2O (Ln = Tb and Dy) and engaged them in sensory investigations [80]. The {[Dy2(bpda)3(H2O)3]·H2O showed fluorescent quenching with Hg2+ at 489, 543, 582, and 620 nm (λex = 310 nm) with a KSV value of 20,406 M−1 and a LOD of 7.2 nM. This work requires additional investigations on the BET surface area and interference studies.
Researches in Hg2+ sensing using zinc containing MOFs were also described as follows. Morsali′s research group proposed a double solvent sensing method (DSSM) to detect Hg2+ with great accuracy by using a zinc-based MOF [Zn(OBA)-(DPT)0.5]·DMF, namely TMU-34(-2H), where OBA, DPT, and DMF represent 4,4′-oxybis(benzoic acid), 3,6-di(pyridin-4-yl)-1,2,4,5-tetrazine, and N, N-dimethylformamide, respectively [81]. The BET specific surface area of TMU-34(-2H) to N2 gas at 77K was 667 m2 g−1 and was able to adsorb 201 cm3 g−1 of N2 gas. In the presence of Hg2+, the TMU-34(-2H) displayed 1D-transduction signals of 243% PL enhancement in water at 648 nm (λex = 504 nm) and 90% PL quenching in acetonitrile at 618 nm (λex = 458 nm) with estimated LODs as 1.8 µM and 6.9 µM, correspondingly, within 15 seconds. However, both solvents suffered interfering effects from other ions. Therefore, DSSM tactic was proposed to improve the sensitivity to Hg2+ by combining water and acetonitrile. Wherein, the sensing factor of Hg2+ was found as 41 by plotting 2D sensing curve, which was higher than that of all other metal ions with sensing factors between 0–2. Thus, the interfering effects was eliminated. However, its applicability is still in question due to the lack of mechanistic aspects. Thereafter an anionic MOF, namely Zn-TPTC (TPTC represents [2,2′:6′,2′′-Terpyridine]-4,4′,4′′-tricarboxylic acid), was presented for luminescent detection of Hg2+ [82]. Upon addition of Hg2+, the Zn-TPTC displayed linear PL quenching at 492 nm in a concentration range of 1 to 100 µM and an estimated LOD of 3.7 nM. The ‘N′ atoms of the MOF may interact with Hg2+ because of the greater affinity. There is no information regarding the BET surface area as well as the competing and application studies.
Subsequently, Pankajakshan et al. described Hg2+ sensing ability of {[Zn(4,4′-AP) (5-AIA)]. (DMF)0.5}n, (where 4,4′ AP = 4,4′-azopyridine, 5-AIA and DMF represent deprotonated 5-amino isophthalic acid and N,N′-dimethylformamide), via PL quenching at 405 nm in aqueous solution [83]. The MOF probe possessed a QY value of 11% and BET surface area of 173 m2 g−1. It was stable in pH range 4 to 11 and exhibited a linear PL quenching response to Hg2+ in a concentration range of 9.99 µM to 20 mM. Moreover, the MOF displayed a high selectivity to Hg2+ over a wide range of competing mono-, di-, and tri-valent cationic species with a LOD down to 10−11 M and an estimated KSV value of 1.011 ×109 M−1 s−1. In fact, the sensitivity was attributed to a specific interaction between Hg2+ and the free standing -N=N- of 4,4′-azopyridine. This work undoubtedly can be considered exceptional because of its performance in the real time Hg2+ detection (in seawater, river water, tap water, drinking water, and single crystals of MOF on an aluminum foil). Thereafter Khatun and co-workers developed the luminescent pillared paddle wheel MOF-Zn2(NDC)2(DPTTZ) with naphthalene dicarboxylate (NDC) antenna and N,N′-di(4-pyridyl)thiazolo-[5,4-d]thiazole (DPTTZ) pillars, which detected Hg2+ via red-shifts in PL emission [84]. In addition, MOF-Zn2(1,4-BDC)2(DPTTZ)2 was also synthesized for comparison, where the 1,4-BDC represents 1,4-benzenedicarboxylic acid. The BET surface area and pore volumes of MOFs-Zn2(NDC)2(DPTTZ) and Zn2(1,4-BDC)2(DPTTZ)2 to CO2 were estimated as 106.8 m2 g−1, 113.4 m2 g−1 and 6.6 × 10−2 cm3 g−1, 7.8 × 10−2 cm3 g−1, respectively. The Zn2(NDC)2(DPTTZ) in DMF showed an exceptional selectivity only to Hg2+ among all ions via bathochromic PL shift from 410 nm to 450 nm. Although lacking experimental evidences, it was speculated that the PL change could be attributed to the interaction between Hg2+ and DPTTZ group. This work requires further attention regarding the LOD, competing studies, and real time applications. Recently, Zn-based MOF-ZnAPA with 5-aminoisophthalic acid (H2APA) organic linkers was demonstrated for Hg2+ detection by means of fluorescence quenching in water [85]. Wherein, PL emission of MOF at 405 nm was linearly quenched during exposure to Hg2+ in a concentration range of 0–100 µM with a LOD of 0.12 µM. This might be due to the binding affinity of Hg2+ to ‘N′ atom of amino group. This work showed a great selectivity over many other competing mono- and di-valent cationic species; however, it still needs to put more focus on the BET surface area and real applications.
The Cd-based MOFs were also engaged in discrimination of Hg2+, in parallel to Zn-based MOFs. For example, Wu and co-workers constructed a Cd comprising 3D MOF-{[Cd1.5(C18H10O10)]·(H3O)(H2O)3}n-Cd-EDDA with dual emission and utilized it in ratiometric detection of Hg2+ in pure water [86]. By hydrothermally reacting 5,5′-[ethane-1,2-diylbis(oxy)]diisophthalic acid (H4EDDA) with Cd(ClO4)2·6H2O, the Cd-EDDA was produced with 80% yield. Upon addition of Hg2+ to the Cd-EDDA, intensity of PL emission at 350 nm decreased significantly (KSV = 4.3 ×103 M−1) accompanied with a new PL peak at 410 nm with a linear response (within 15s) between 4–25 µM and a calculated LOD of 2 nM, which was lower than the permitted level. Be noted that the Cd-EDDA displayed great selectivity over a wide range of metal ions by means of crystallinity destruction and was not reversible with Na2S. Thereby the probe behaves like a chemodosimeter. Information regarding the BET surface area and real time applicability requires further investigations. Subsequently, a MOF, namely [(Me2NH2)Cd3(OH)(H2O)3(TATAB)2](DMA)6], was formed as yellow crystals through solvothermally reacting Cd(NO3)2·6H2O and 4,4′,4″-s-triazin-1,3,5-triyltri-p-aminobenzoic acid (H3TATAB) in DMA (N,N-dimethylacetamide), methanol, and HCl at 95 °C for 3 days and was consumed towards luminescent Hg2+ detection in water [87]. Due to the binding between ‘N′ atoms of amino and triazine groups, PL emission at 365 nm was quenched in the presence of Hg2+. However, the selectivity was significantly affected by Fe3+. Moreover, there was no details regarding the BET surface area and applicability. Recently, interaction of Cd(ClO4)2.6H2O with 2-aminoterephthalic acid (NH2-H2BDC) by microwave synthetic was used as a tactic to derive the Cd2+-comprising MOF-NH2-Cd-BDC, which was applied in sensing of Hg2+ via PL quenching at 427 nm [88]. The -NH2 group of NH2-Cd-BDC reacted with Hg2+ and led to linearly quenched emission in a concentration range from 1 to 20 µM and a KSV value of 28.0 × 103 M−1 and a LOD of 0.58 µM. Though the work seems to be comparatively good with respect to earlier reports, it still lacks information on the BET surface area, real time applicability, and competing studies.
The ferrous (Fe2+) comprising MOF nanoparticles, namely Fe(II)-MOF-NPs, were developed via solvothermal reaction of FeSO4.7H2O with nano linkers (synthesized via refluxing 1, 2-phenylenediamine and 5-aminoisophthalic acid) and were engaged in colorimetric and PL detection of Hg2+ [89]. The nanoparticles have a size in the range between 100 to 250 nm and possess magnetic properties as well. During addition of Hg2+, PL emission at 416 nm displayed a ‘turn-on′ response and was red-shifted to 422 nm. The absorption peak at 427 nm was also enhanced and red-shifted to 456 nm accompanied with changes in colour from yellow to colorless. Both absorption and PL showed a linear response in a concentration range from 1 nM to 1 µM and LODs of 1.17 and 1.14 nM and limit of quantifications (LOQs) of 1.59 and 1.48 nM, respectively. Moreover, the Fe(II)-MOF-NPs in DMSO were also effective in discrimination of Hg2+ in competing and real environment (tap, mineral, river, sea, and waste water). Based on above results, the Fe(II)-MOF-NPs can be an excellent candidate for the discrimination of Hg2+, but mechanistic investigations and BET adsorption studies must be conducted to move towards Hg2+ removal studies. Towards sensing of Hg2+, Li and co-workers presented the hydrostable bromine-functionalized Mn-based MOF-{[Mn2(Bript)2(4,4′-bpy).5(DMF)]·(H2O)}n, where H2Bript, 4,4′-bpy, and DMF represent 4-Bromoisophthalic acid, 4,4′-bipyridine, and dimethylformamide, respectively [90]. The BET surface area of the MOF was established as 210 m2 g−1 and was further reduced to 33 m2 g−1 upon loading of Hg2+. Due to the binding affinity between Br atom and Hg2+, PL emission at 468 nm was linearly quenched (KSv = 1390.5 M−1) from 0 to 0.03 M with an estimated LOD of 48 µM. The MOF showed high selectivity toward Hg2+ (in water) among variety of competing species. However, studies on the real time applicability and LODs need more focus before proceeding further. To this track, Song et al. reported highly selective sensing of Hg2+ using Ag coordinated MOF [91]. Wherein, they developed three Ag+/Cu2+ comprising MOFs, namely [Ag(2,4′-Hpdc)(4,4′-bpy)]n, [Ag(2,2′-Hpdc)(4,4′-bpy)0.5]n, and [Cu(2,2′-Hpdc)2(1,4-bib)]n, via hydrothermal method, where 2,4′-Hpdc, 2,2′-Hpdc, 4,4′-bpy, and 1,4-bib represent 2,4′-biphenyldicarboxylic acid, 2,2′-biphenyldicarboxylic acid, 4,4′-bipyridine, and 1,4-bis(1-imidazolyl) benzene, respectively. Among them, only the [Ag(2,4′-Hpdc)(4,4′-bpy)]n in water showed selectivity to Hg2+ via ‘turn-on′ response with PL emission at 401 nm. Note that the Fe3+ showed PL quenching in the selectivity studies as seen in Figure 4. Due to the binding affinity between 2,4′-Hpdc to Hg2+, PL emission of the MOF (in water) was enhanced linearly between Hg2+ concentrations from 0 to 100 µM with a LOD of 9.63 nM. However, it still requires optimization for BET surface area, competing analysis, and real sample applications.
Many MOFs were also involved in detection of multiple analytes other than Hg2+ as detailed in the following. For example, 4,4′-(benzothiadiazole-4,7-diyl)dibenzoic acid ligand comprising MOFs, such as [Mn4(C20H10N2O4S)2-(HCOO)4(DEF)2] and [Pb(C20H10N2O4S)(DMF)] (where DEF and DMF represent N,N′-diethylformamide and N,N′-dimethylformamide; solvothermally synthesized), were described for the sensing of Hg2+and Tl3+ metal cations and chromate, dichromate, and permanganate anions [92]. Detection of the metal ions was attributed to the interaction of ‘S′ atom with metal cations. Moreover, PL emission at 500 nm was quenched rapidly with LODs down to parts per billion/parts per million (ppb/ppm) in the presence of these analytes. Be noted that both MOFs can be used to detect Hg2+ in samples free of Tl3+. Thus, these MOFs can be accounted as Hg2+ sensors. However, they are non-selective. Thereafter a ratiometric Hg2+ sensor was proposed by using MOF-[Zn(tpbpc)2]·solvent prepared via solvothermal tactic, where Htpbpc (4′-[4,2′;6′,4′′]-terpyridin-4′-yl-biphenyl-4-carboxylic acid and DMF solvent were used as an organic linker with Zn metal nodes [93]. This Zn-MOF was also demonstrated for detection of CrO42− and Cr2O72− species in water via PL quenching at 414 nm. Above sensory results may arise from interactions between pyridine ‘N” atoms and Hg2+ or by inhibition of energy transfer processes by CrO42− and Cr2O72− ions. During addition of Hg2+ ions from 0 to 1200 µM, PL emission peak at 414 nm was quenched linearly with a LOD of 0.32 µM, accompanied with appearance of a new peak at 500 nm (green emission under UV lamp λex = 365 nm). However, during competing studies, the selectivity may be affected in the presence of Cr(VI) ions (CrO42− and Cr2O72). Thus, more interrogations are required due to lack of information on the selectivity, BET surface area and practical applications.
Ma′s research group developed the stable dye-incorporated MOF-[(CH3)2NH2][In(TNB)4/3].(2DMF)(3H2O) via a solvothermal method, where H3TNB (4,4′,4′′-nitrilotribenzoicacid) was used as an organic linker and then incorporated with a dye 4-[p-(dimethylamino)styryl]-1-ethylpyridinium (DSM) to provide the MOF-DSM system [94]. The MOF-DSM system displayed sensing ability towards Hg2+, Cr2O72-, and a wide variety of nitro-compounds. The BET surface area of MOF and MOF-DSM systems were estimated as 491 m2 g−1 and 236 m2 g−1, respectively. During discrimination of Hg2+, PL emission peaks of MOF-DSM (in water) at 478 and 630 nm were linearly quenched between 1–10 µM with an estimated LOD of 1.75 ppb and a KSV value of 1.48 × 105 M−1. The energy transfer efficiency of the π-π* transitions diminished due to the binding affinity between Hg2+ and ‘N′ atoms of DSM. The MOF-DSM was found to be more effective in aqueous detection of Cr2O72- and vapour/aqueous detection of nitro-compounds. Subsequently, Li et al. derived the Co-based MOF-[Co (NPDC)(bpee)]·DMF·2H2O (where NPDC and bpee represent 2-nitro phenylenedicarboxylate and 1,2-bis(4-bipyridyl) ethylene) by means of the solvothermal tactic and established sensing ability towards Hg2+ and MnO4- [95]. This MOF in water displayed PL quenching in the presence of MnO4- and PL enhancement at 471 nm for Hg2+ ions. The linear response for Hg2+ ions by this MOF was found to be 1–120 µM with a LOD of 4.1 µM. However, this work still contains mechanistic flaws with non-optimal LODs and lacks information in applicability as well. To this track, Yang and co-workers synthesized two Cd-based MOFs, namely Cd(L)(atpa)]n and [Cd(L)(tbta)(H2O)]n (where H2atpa, H2tbta, and L represent 2-aminoterephthalic acid, tetrabromoterephthalic acid, and 1,4-bis(benz-imidazol-1-yl)-2-butene, respectively) via a hydrothermal method and utilized them as dual luminescent sensors (Cu2+ and Cr2O72- by [Cd(L)(atpa)]n, and Hg2+ and Cr2O72- by [Cd(L)(tbta)(H2O)]n in water [96]. PL intensity of [Cd(L)(tbta)(H2O)]n at 294 nm was linearly quenched during addition of Hg2+ from 0 to 0.25 mM with a LOD of 0.043 µM and a KSV value of 1.72 × 105 M−1. Moreover, fluorescence of [Cd(L)(tbta)(H2O)]n in water at 294 nm was also quenched in the presence of Cr2O72-. This work did not provide any details on the BET surface area, discriminative information between Hg2+ and Cr2O72- (Cr6+), and practicality.
Subsequently, 2,6-naphthalenedicarboxylic acid (NP) and 1,5 dihydroxy-2,6-naphthalenedicarboxylic (DNP) were conjugated with lanthanide cations (La3+ and Ce3+) to produce luminescent MOFs, namely AUBM-2 (Ce) and AUBM-2(La) with NP ligand and AUBM-3(Ce) and AUBM-3(La) with DNP ligand. They were engaged in sensory studies [97]. Wherein, upon excitation at 300 and 370 nm, the AUBM-2 (Ce) and AUBM-3(Ce) displayed sensory responses to Hg2+, Cr3+, Pb2+, Cd2+, and As3+ by means of fluorescent enhancement or quenching responses. This study requires further optimization for Hg2+ analyte detection. Next, Ren et al. proposed utilization of MOF nanosheet amino-MIL-53(Al) (hydrothermally synthesized by reacting AlCl3.6H2O with 2-amino-terephthalic acid) towards luminescent detection of Hg2+ and glutathione (GSH) [98]. Emission of amino-MIL-53(Al) nanosheets at 435 nm (in water) was linearly quenched by Hg2+ with concentrations between 1.96 nM to 38.27 µM and a detection limit of 0.23 nM. Furthermore, luminescent quenching was partially restored by addition of GSH (linear range: 210 nM to 15.25 µM and LOD = 8.11 nM). However, this work still lacks of information about the BET surface area. Solvothermally synthesized Cd-based MOFs [(Cd(II)BPDC)0.5(L1)(NO3)]·3.4DMF (where BPDC, L1, and DMF represent 4,4′-biphenyldicarboxylic acid, 1-(3,5-di(1H-imidazol-1-yl)phenyl)-1H-imidazole), and Dimethylformamide, respectively) and [(Cd2(4-tp-3-lad)(1,4- BDC)2}·2MeCN)n (where 4-tp-3-lad, 4-BDC, and MeCN represent 2,3,5,6-tetra(pyridin-4-yl)-bicyclo [2.2.0]hexane, 1, deprotonated 1,4-benzenedicarboxylic acid, and acetonitrile, respectively) were also proposed towards the detection of Hg2+ and nitro-explosives via fluorescence quenching [99,100]. However, due to insufficient information regarding the BET surface area, competing studies, and practicality, these reports are not impressive. Later, Su et al. reported sensing ability of Co-based MOF-{[Co2(L)(hfpd)(H2O)]·1.75H2O}n (where H4hfpd and L represent 4,4′-(hexa-fluoroisopropylidene)diphthalic acid and 4,4′-bis(imidazol-1-yl)-biphenyl) to Hg2+ and acetylacetone via luminescent quenching responses [101]. This hydrothermally synthesized MOF showed luminescence quenching in the presence of 0–200 µM Hg2+ with a KSV of 6497 M−1 and a LOD of 4 µM. However, this work requires further interrogations on the BET surface area, nano/micro-structure, competing studies, and practicality.

5. Metal Coordinated Polymers as Luminescent Hg2+ Sensors

In addition to MOFs, metal containing coordination polymers were proposed towards luminescent sensing of Hg2+ [100]. For instance, Sun′s research group developed Zn- and Cd-based coordination polymers-[Zn(TPDC-2CH3)(H2O)2].H2O and [Cd(TPDC-2CH3)(H2O)4].H2O via solvothermally reacting 2′,5′-dimethyl-[1,1′:4′,1′′-terphenyl]-4,4′′-dicarboxylic acid (H2TPDC-2CH3) with Zn2+ and Cd2+ ions, separately, and engaged them in sensory interrogations towards metal ions [102]. Emission of the [Zn(TPDC-2CH3)(H2O)2].H2O metal polymer at 380 nm (in water) was linearly quenched between 1–10 femtomole (fM) with a LOD of 3.6 fM. The solid chelation-enhanced fluorescence quenching (CHEQ) effect can be attributed to coordination between carboxyl group and Hg2+. However, this report did not provide any information regarding the BET surface area and practicality. Next, the Eu/IPA CPNPs (by solvothermal tactic) were prepared by reacting Eu3+ comprising coordination polymer nanoparticles (CPNPs) with isophthalic acid (IPA) bridging ligands and were employed in Hg2+ detection [103]. Initially, absorbance band of Eu/IPA CPNPs in Tris–HCl buffer (25 mM, pH 7.0) was overlapped with imidazole-4,5-dicarboxylic acid (Im), thus emission intensity at 615 nm was quenched due to the inner filter effect (IFE). During addition of Hg2+, the IFE was supressed and recovery of emission at 615 nm was observed. The linear correlation of Hg2+ ranged between 2 nM to 2µM with a LOD of 2 nM. Effectiveness of the probe was further demonstrated with applicability in biological fluid samples. Nevertheless, information regarding BET surface area must be evaluated for its exceptional applicability.
Towards the development of metal coordination polymers for Hg2+ sensors, Li et al. described the solvothermally synthesized Zn-based 3D coordination polymer-{[Zn2(1,4-bpyvna)(1,3,5-BTC)(OH)]·H2O}n (where 1,4-bpyvna and 1,3,5-H3BTC represent 1,4-bis(2-(pyridin-4-yl)vinyl)naphthalene and 1,3,5-benzene-tricarboxylic acid, respectively) as a Hg2+ sensor [104]. Due to the interactive effect of 1,4-bpyvna with Hg2+, the {[Zn2(1,4-bpyvna)(1,3,5-BTC)(OH)]·H2O}n in DMF displayed fluorescence quenching at 444 and 472 nm as seen in Figure 5.
A linear response of the polymer was found from 0 to 0.018 ppm with a LOD of 0.057 ppm. A fluorescent colour change from blue to yellow was also observed. However, further interrogations for the BET surface area and real time applications are still required. Subsequently, Zhang and co-workers presented Hg2+ sensing ability of hydrothermally synthesized fluorescent coordination polymer, namely [Zn(H3TTA)(H2O)2]·2H2O (where H3TTA represents [2,2′:6′,2″-terpyridine]-4,4′,4″-tricarboxylic acid)), in aqueous solution [105]. Emission band at 500 nm was quenched in the presence of Hg2+ with a KSV value of 4695 M−1. This work is incomplete due to lack of information in the BET surface area, LODs, and practicality. Utilization of Zn- and Cd-based luminescent coordination polymers towards the quantitation of Hg2+ and Cr2O72- has been reported by many research groups [106,107,108]. Since Cr2O72- is a well-known source of Cr6+ ions, discrimination between them are not available in those reports. Therefore, those works cannot be considered as exceptional Hg2+ sensor studies. Similarly, Lin et al. demonstrated Pb2+ and Hg2+ sensing ability of Eu3+ containing coordination polymer, namely {[Ln2(PBA)3(H2O)3]·DMF·3H2O}n, in DMF and aqueous media, where PBA, DMF, and H2O represent deprotonated 5-(4-pyridin-3-yl-benzoylamino)-isophthalic acid, Dimethylformamide, and water molecules, respectively [109]. Wherein, the polymer can be used to detect Hg2+ in samples free of Pb2+. Thus, these MOFs can be accounted as Hg2+ sensors. However, they are non-selective.
In addition to metal coordination polymer-based Hg2+ sensor, Rachuri and co-workers reported a luminescent coordination polymer, namely [Zn(μ2-1H-ade)(μ2-SO4)] (by solvothermal reaction of adinine (HAde) and Zn(SO4)·7H2O), as discussed in the following [110]. In the report, fluorescence intensity of the [Zn(μ2-1H-ade)(μ2-SO4)] at 395 nm (in water) was linearly quenched between 0–1 mM of Hg2+ with a LOD of 70 nM and a KSV value of 7.7 × 103 M−1. Moreover, this polymer also has an additional advantage that it showed selective sensing of the 2,4,6-trinitrophenol (TNP) in aqueous medium. The underlying mechanism of detection of Hg2+ was attributed to the interaction with basic sites (N atoms) of the adenine and TNP through the resonance energy transfer (RET). It should be noted that this work also described the Hg2+ detection in paper strips, therefore, it can be extended for effective Hg2+ removal in real samples with directed BET surface area analysis. Thereafter, Zhu et al. demonstrated Hg2+ sensing utility of two luminescent coordination polymers, namely [Cd(L)(NTA)]n and [Ni(L)(NPTA)H2O]n (obtained by solvothermal method, where L, H2NTA, and H2NPTA represent 1,6-bis(benzimidazol-1-yl)hexane, 2-nitroterephthalic acid, and 3-nitrophthalic acid, respectively) [111]. Emission peaks at 292 nm and 295 nm of the polymers [Cd(L)(NTA)]n and [Ni(L)(NPTA)⋅H2O]n (in water), respectively, were linearly quenched by Hg2+ in a concentration range between 1–200 µM with corresponding LODs of 3.05 μM and 2.29 μM and KSv values of 3565 M–1 for 1 and 7432 M–1. In addition, both polymers displayed selectivity only to acetylacetone among all solvents. However, this work requires information on the BET surface area, competing studies, mechanistic investigations, and practicality.

6. MOFs Holding Composites for Optical Recognition of Hg2+

To enhance sensing ability of MOFs to Hg2+, researchers also proposed to synthesize MOFs comprising composites as detailed in the following. A metal−polydopamine framework (MPDA—a dopamine loaded Co-based MOF developed by sonochemical reaction of Co(NO3)2 and 2-methylimidazole to afford ZIF-67 primarily) was reported as a fluorescent quencher towards the detection of Hg2+ and Ag+ via exonuclease III signal amplification activity with pico-molar level LODs (1.3 pM and 34 pM, respectively) [112]. Upon addition of Hg2+ to MPDA-T-rich ssDNA (T-rich ssDNA represents thymine rich single stranded Deoxyribonucleic acid) system, ‘turn-on′ PL emission enhancement at 520 nm was observed with a linear response from 0 to 2 nM and a LOD of 1.3 pM. The quenched luminescence of MPDA conjugated with T-rich ssDNA was recovered through T-Hg2+-T complexation during addition of Hg2+. This work was also well demonstrated in tap and river water applications. To this way, Huang and co-workers reported Cu-based MOFs as a hybrid sensory system with C-rich or T-rich DNA probes to detect the Ag+, Hg2+, and thiol comprising species at nanomolar-level via T-Hg2+-T complexation [113,114]. Wherein, Huang et al. developed a MOF, namely [Cu4(Dcbb)4(Dps)2(H2O)2]n (by reacting H2DcbbBr = 1-(3,5-dicarboxybenzyl)-4,4′-bipyridinium bromide and Dps (4,4′-dipyridyl sulfide) with Cu(NO3)2·3H2O), to detect Ag+, Hg2+, and biothiols with nM LODs [113]. Similarly, the MOF, namely [Cu(Cdcbp)(H2O)2·2H2O]n (synthesized by reacting H3CdcbpBr (3-carboxyl-(3,5-dicarboxybenzyl)-pyridinium bromide) with CuSO4·5H2O) was engaged in detection of Hg2+ and biothiols with nM LODs [114]. In both cases, the MOF tended to form a hybrid system initially with fluorescent dye loaded thymine rich (T-rich) DNA (labelled as P-DNA) which led to fluorescent quenching. It was then recovered upon addition of metal ions, Hg2+ in particular, via T-Hg2+-T complexation. The above hybrid MOFs-DNA system-based detection of Hg2+ and biothiols and the corresponding mechanism are illustrated in Figure 6. Following the same strategy, Zr- and Ce-based MOFs (UIO-66-NH2 and Ce/TBC) were also demonstrated to discriminate Hg2+ with nanomolar LODs [115,116]. Wherein the Ce/TBC (also noted as mixed-valence state cerium-based metal-organic framework (MVC-MOF) combined with thymine-rich ssDNA was engaged in colorimetric peroxidase like sensors to detect Hg2+ using oxidase substrate 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine [116]. Results of Hg2+ detection showed a linear response in a concentration range of 0.05 to 6 μM with a LOD of 10.5 nM and were further supported by environmental water analysis. In fact, many MOF-DNA hybrid systems were reported for detection of metal ions, aminoacids, and nucleic acids [117,118], which make the strategy as precise one.
Recently, gold nanoclusters composited MOFs, namely AuNCs/MIL-68(In)-NH2/Cys and AuNCs@UIO-66, were demonstrated in discrimination of Hg2+ [119,120]. To develop the AuNCs/MIL-68(In)-NH2/Cys, MIL-68(In)-NH2 was first solvothermally synthesized by reacting In(NO3)3·xH2O with 2-Aminoterephthalic acid (H2ATA) followed by evenly dispersing the AuNCs on its surface. The AuNCs exhibited emission bands at 438 nm and 668 nm (λex = 370 nm). By adding cysteine into above mixture, the AuNCs/MIL-68(In)-NH2/Cys was produced with enhanced emission [119]. Upon addition of Hg2+ to the AuNCs/MIL-68(In)-NH2/Cys at pH 7.4 (phosphate buffer), emission at 638 nm was quenched without affecting the peak at 438 nm. Due to the binding affinity of Hg2+ with thiol (-SH) of cysteine, PL quenching exhibited two linear responses (with a concentration range from 20 pM to 0.2 μM and from 0.2 μM to 60 μM) with a LOD of 6.7 pM, which was further supported by real water analysis and microfluidic paper device. Subsequently, the UIO-66 was obtained by solvothermally reacting zirconium chloride with 1,4-benzenedicarboxylic acid (H2BDC). The synthesized UIO-66 was then conjugated with AuNCs to afford AuNCs@UIO-66 with 11% quantum yield [120]. PL emission of the AuNCs@UIO-66 at pH 7.2 was observed at 650 nm and was quenched linearly by Hg2+ with concentrations from 800 nM to 10 μM and a LOD of 77 pM. The emission quenching was attributed to the Au-Hg amalgamation via interactive amino groups of bovine serum albumin (BSA) present over AuNCs surface. The applicability of the sensory study was also successfully demonstrated in tap and river water which can be accounted as a good candidate for Hg2+ discrimination.
To this track, Marieeswaran and co-workers presented Hg2+ sensing ability of the MOF containing composite consisted of magnetic nanoscale metal–organic framework (MNMOF) conjugated with fluorescein amidite (FAM)-labeled ssDNA [121]. The MNMOF was developed by one-pot reaction between Fe3O4 nano-spheres (synthesized hydrothermally), FeCl3.6H2O, and 2-aminoterephthalic acid. Emission intensity at 495 nm (in Tris-HCl buffer) was quenched up to 62% with adsorption of FAM-labeled ssDNA on the MNMOF. Addition of Hg2+ further lowered the emission quenching at 495 nm down to 52% via T-Hg2+-T complexation. The linear regression of Hg2+ detection was between 2–20 nM with a LOD of 8 nM. This work was also demonstrated in environmental water samples. However, the BET surface area information and competing studies still need to be updated. In addition to the MOF-DNA hybrid system, Hu and co-workers revealed the utilization of the {[Cu(Dcbb)(Bpe)]·Cl}n (where H2DcbbBr and Bpe represent 1-(3,5-dicarboxybenzyl)-4,4′-bipyridinium bromide and trans-1,2-bis(4-pyridyl)ethylene, respectively) towards sequential quantitation of Hg2+ and I- via the T−Hg2+−T motif and “off-on-off” fluorescence response [122]. Detection of Hg2+ and I- was verified by circular dichroism (CD) and the underlying mechanism was clarified by fluorescence anisotropy, binding constant, and simulation studies. LODs for Hg2+ and I- sensors were estimated as 3.2 and 3.3 nM, respectively. Though the sensor showed high selectivity, it can be considered a supplementary work due to the similar T−Hg2+−T motif approach.
The AuNP@MOF composite nanoparticles were used in colorimetric Hg2+ assay via gold amalgam-triggered reductase mimetic activity in aqueous medium [123]. The AuNP@MOF composite was developed by immobilizing Au NPs over the porous surface of iron-5,10,15,20-tetrakis (4-carboxyl)-21H,23H-porphyrin-based MOF- (Fe-TCPP-MOF) and was utilized in colorimetric sensing of Hg2+. Wherein, Hg2+ triggered the Au-mediated catalytic reduction of methylene blue and turned the blue colour to colourless, which was accompanied with quenching in absorbance peak of methylene blue at 665 nm as shown in Figure 7. Moreover, the absorbance at 665 nm was linearly quenched within 2s by Hg2+ with concentrations from 200–400 pM and a LOD of 103 pM. Apart from lack of the BET surface area information, the competing studies, tap and river water investigations attested the utility of the AuNP@MOF in Hg2+ detection.
In this light, Zhang et al. deposited Au nanoparticles on titanium-based MOF (NH2-MIL-125(Ti)) by solvothermal reaction between 2-aminoterephthalate and tetrabutyl titanate) to afford Au@NH2-MIL-125(Ti) for colorimetric detection of H2O2, cysteine, and Hg2+ via peroxidase-like activity using 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB-catalyst) [124]. The Au@NH2-MIL-125(Ti) and TMB showed a blue colour and a “turn-on” absorbance response at 652 nm in the presence of H2O2 via peroxidase like mimic. Upon addition of cysteine to above sensory system, absorbance at 652 nm was quenched accompanied with disappearance of the blue colour. However, the blue colour and absorbance peak were recovered by adding Hg2+. The Hg2+ detection showed a linear response in concentrations from 1 to 5 µM with a LOD of 100 nM and was authenticated by real sample analysis. A masking tactic with EDTA was proposed in this report to avoid the interference effect from other metal ions, however, this work required more complicated detection procedures.
A “CDs/AuNCs@ZIF-8” composite consisted of zeolitic imidazolate framework-8 (ZIF-8) encapsulated with carbon dots (CDs) and gold nanoclusters was produced and utilized in detection of Hg2+ [125]. The CDs/AuNCs@ZIF-8 in aqueous medium displayed emission bands at 440 and 640 nm (λex = 360 nm) due to the encapsulated CDs and AuNCs. In the presence of Hg2+, PL peak at 640 nm was quenched but emission band at 440 nm was not affected. Therefore, it was noted as a ratiometric sensor. Due to the Au-Hg amalgamation, the probe showed linear ratiometric response (I640/I440) between 3–30 nM with a LOD of 1 nM accompanied with visualization of red blue emission colour changes under UV-irradiation. This work was also demonstrated in tap and river water samples. Following the ratiometric sensing approach, Yang et al. constructed a ratiometric sensor MOF/CdTe QDs via physically mixing CdTe QDsem = 605 nm) with MOF (Fe-MIL-88NH2, λem = 425 nm) towards Hg2+ and Cu2+ discrimination [126]. During detection of metal analytes, ratiometric responses at I425/I605 due to the strong binding interaction between CdTe QDs and metal ions were evaluated by monitoring the colour changes (from pink to blue). Although this work was well supported by paper-based analysis, lake water, fruit juice, and red wine samples, but it lacks information in competing studies.

7. MOFs in Electrochemical Recognition of Hg2+

Similar to many inorganic electrochemical sensors [127], MOFs were also engaged in electrochemical-based detection of Hg2+ as described subsequently. For example, Zhang et al. demonstrated electrochemical sensing of Hg2+ in the presence of glucose by using the Cu2+ anchored MOFs as enzyme free catalyst [128]. MOFs were firstly synthesized By solvothermally reacting amino terephthalic acid (NH2-BDC) with Cu(NO3)2. The as-synthesized MOFs were then combined with Au NPs and sDNA to obtain the sDNA/MOF-Au probe. The cDNA/GO@Au/GCE electrode was immersed in the mixed solution of sDNA/MOF-Au and Hg2+ at certain concentration for Hg2+ sensing. The sDNA/MOF-Au probe detected Hg2+ via T-Hg2+-T coordination and induced a oxidase-like catalytic response. This work showed a linear response to Hg2+ in concentrations from 0.10 aM to 100 nM (aM = attomole = 10−18 M) with a LOD of 0.001 aM. Moreover, this work was also demonstrated in dairy product samples, which was impressive. However, careful optimization is required to attain the reproducible results. Recently, the ZIF-8 was synthesized via hydrothermal reaction of Zn(NO3)2⋅4H2O and 2-methylimidazole and employed in electrochemical discrimination of Hg2+ by coupling with Ag and Au nanoparticles [129]. This work also involved the electrochemical aptasensor based on the Au electrode (AE). Signals were obtained from the “APT/Ag@Au/ZIF-8/AE” aptasensor by means of differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) and electro-chemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). Due to the T-Hg-T complexation from T rich aptamer, Hg2+ detection became feasible. Linear responses were observed from detection of Hg2+ in concentrations from 1.0 × 10−16 to 1.0 × 10−12 M and from 5.0 × 10−15 to 1.0 × 10−12 M with LODs of 1.8 ± 0.04 × 10−17 M and 1.3 ± 0.01 ×10−16 M by DPV and EIS, respectively. This work was well supported by real water samples, thereby can be considered a report in T-Hg2+-T motif featured electrochemical sensors.
Similar results were reported from many MOFs-based electrochemical sensors with fM LODs [130,131,132]. Wherein, the Cu-based MOFs (Cu-MOFs), thioether side groups attached Zr-based MOFs (S-Zr-MOFs), and 2D-Co-based MOFs (PPF-3 nanosheets) were engaged in the fabrication of Cu-MOFs/Au, S-Zr-MOF/SPE (SPE represents screen printed electrode), and anchor−Au NPs@PPF-3 attached DNB/depAu/GCE (Au NPs, anchor, anchor, DNB, and depAu/GCE represent gold nanoparticles, dibenzocyclooctyne (DBCO), 3D DNA “nanosafe-box”, and gold nanoparticle-coated glassy carbon electrode, represtively) electrodes towards the specific detection of Hg2+ ions. The GCE/AuNPs/DNA2 sensor was incubated in a mixture of Cu-MOFs/DNA1 probes (T-rich DNA used in study) and Hg2+. It demonstrated a linear DPV response from 10 fM to 100 nM with a LOD of 4.8 fM and also real time applications [130]. Similarly, the S-Zr-MOF/SPE showed a linear differential pulse anodic stripping voltammetry (DPASV) response for Hg2+ between 0.03 nM to 3 µM with a LOD of 7.3 fM via multiple Hg-S interaction (by thio-ether side chains) and T-Hg2+-T formation [131]. By dropping the anchor−AuNPs@PPF-3 [the PPF-3 was synthesized by solvothermally reacting Co(NO3)2·6H2O, 5,10,15,20-tetrakis(4-carboxyl-phenyl)-porphyrin (TCPP), and 4′-bipyridine (BPY)] over the surface of DNB/depAu/GCE, the proposed electrode fabrication was completed. The electrode was subjected to Hg2+ detection to reveal a linear DPV response between 0.1 pM to 10 nM with a LOD of 33 fM [132]. Next, the Cu-MOF-mediated Hg2+ detection by means of differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) and cyclic voltammetry (CV) tactics in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (PB) at pH 9 was reported by Singh and co-workers [133]. In the report, CuNO3·3H2O and 2-aminoterephthalic acid were solvothermally reacted to afford porous Cu-MOF nanoparticles, which could absorb large amount of Hg2+. Through coupling with the GCE, the Cu-MOF detected Hg2+ linearly in concentrations from 0.1 to 50 nM with a LOD of 0.0633 nM. Reliability of this work was well demonstrated by the real tuna-fish and tap water samples investigations.
Thereafter Kokkinos and co-workers proposed utilization of the Ca-MOF modified working electrodes towards 3D-printed lab-in-a-syringe voltammetric cell mediated electrochemical detection of Hg2+ [134]. The Ca-MOF, namely [Ca(H4L)(DMA)2]·2DMA, where H6L and DMA represent N,N′-bis(2,4-dicarboxyphenyl)-oxalamide and N,N-dimethylacetamide), showed exceptional selectivity to Hg2+. Moreover, the voltammetric lab-in-a-syringe device consisted of a vessel assimilating two thermoplastic conductive electrodes (act as counter and pseudo-reference electrodes) was fabricated by a single-step process. A small detachable 3D-printed syringe loaded with a graphite paste/Ca-MOF mixture was used as a working electrode. The Ca-MOF participated in the ion exchange to form “Hg@CaMOF”. The device showed a linear response to Hg2+ with concentrations between 2–40 μg L−1 and a LOD of 0.6 μg L−1. Practicality of this work was also demonstrated in the fish oil and bottle water samples.
In contrast to direct electrochemical sensors, Zhang et al. proposed the MOF-involved light driven electrochemical (photoelectrochemical; PEC) sensor for Hg2+ discrimination as described next [135]. Firstly, Co(NO3)2·6H2O and 2-methylimidazole were solvothermally reacted to afford the ZIF-67. The ZIF-67 was then reacted with Cd(NO3)2·4H2O and thioacetamide (TAA) to yield the CoSx@CdS nanocomposites (CdS nanoparticles were grown over the surface of cobalt sulfide (CoSx) by using ZIF-67 polyhedrons as the sacrificial templates and cobalt precursors). The synthesized composite was drop casted on the ITO electrodes to engage in the photoelectrochemical sensing of Hg2+ as illustrated in Figure 8.
In the presence of Hg2+ ions in PBS (pH 7.4) containing 0.15 M triethanolamine (TEA) (see Figure 8), carrier transport and photocurrent of the device were improved and enhanced under illumination due to the combined CoSx and CdS components. In fact, the ion-exchange reaction took place to trigger in-situ generation of CoSx@CdS/HgS (new Z-scheme heterojunction photocatalyst) during the detection process. This sensor showed a linear response to Hg2+ with concentrations between 0.010–1000 nM and a LOD of 2 pM. It was also validated by tap and lake water analysis.

8. MOFs in Removal of Hg2+

Other than optical and electrochemical recognition of metal analytes, MOFs were also engaged in the selective removal heavy metal ions [136]. In this section, removal/extraction of Hg2+ in particular was described in detail. Many Zr-based MOFs displayed great adsorption capacity to Hg2+ due to their porous nature. For example, Kahkha and co-workers described the consumption of mesoporous porphyrinic containing Zr-MOF-PCN-222/MOF-545 for effective pipette-tip solid-phase extraction of Hg2+ [137]. The MOF was solvothermally synthesized by reacting meso-tetrakis(4-carboxyphenyl)porphyrin (H2TCPP) and ZrOCl2·8H2O. The as-synthesized MOF was then inserted into a Bio Plas pipette-tip attached to a 2000-μL micro pipette for Hg2+ adsorption. It was shown that 2 mg of MOF- sorbent was enough to accomplish extraction and desorption of Hg2+ up to 15 cycles at pH 5 by using 10% HCl as eluting solvent (fixed at 15 µL volume). A LOD of this method was estimated as 20 ng L−1 with an adsorption capacity (contrast to other ions), enrichment factor, and total extraction time of 35.5 mg g−1, 120-fold, and 7 min, respectively. This work was demonstrated for Hg2+ determination in the fish samples, however, information regarding the BET surface area and Langmuir/Freundlich isotherms requires further interrogations. Hasankola et al. engaged the MOF-PCN-221 (synthesized by solvothermal reaction), which comprised of 5,10,15,20-tetrakis(4-carboxyphenyl) porphyrin (H2TCPP) organic linker and ‘Zr′ metal node, towards selective removal of Hg2+ [138]. Wherein the time required for Hg2+ adsorption was 30 min at an optimal pH of 7.1 and an adsorption capacity of PCN-221 was established as 233 mg g−1. Be noted that the adsorption process of Hg2+ by PCN-221 can be properly interpreted with the pseudo-second-order kinetic model (with R2 = 0.99) and followed the Langmuir model adsorption isotherms for Hg2+. Investigations on the Hg2+ adsorption mechanism indicated that Hg2+ could not be replace with Zr ions. For the desorption process, 0.01 M HNO3 was used. This work requires more investigations for the BET surface area, practicality, and structural features.
Li et al. described the utilization of porous and highly defective Zr-based MOF-UIO-66-Zr6(OH)4O4(BDC)6 (where BDC represents benzene-1,4-dicarboxylate), namely UIO-66-50Benz (Benz represents benzene-1,4-dicarboxylate), for Hg2+ removal [139]. By means of topotactic transformations of MOFs and ligand extraction process, ZrOx (obtained by immersion of UIO-66-50Benz in 10 mol L−1 NaOH), ZrOxyPhos (obtained by immersion of UIO-66-50Benz in 210 mM Na3PO4), and ZrSulf (obtained by immersion of UIO-66-50Benz in 250 mg of Na2S solution in 10 mL) were developed and engaged in Hg2+ removal as seen in Figure 9.
The BET surface area of ZrOx, ZrOxyPhos, and ZrSulf were estimated as 430, 290, and 560 m2 g−1, correspondingly, which also confirmed the high effectiveness of ZrSulf. Among these materials, ZrSulf possessed the fastest adsorption kinetics (1.1 × 10−2 g (mg min)−1 and the highest adsorption capacity of 824 mg g−1. The distribution coefficient (Kd) of ZrSulf to Hg2+ was estimated as 4.98 × 105 mL g−1 at pH 6.8 Moreover, it was reusable for more than five cycles after washing with HCl and thio-urea. The high selectivity of Hg2+ was attributed to the covalent bond formation with sulfur-based functionality. From kinetic studies, it was established that the adsorption followed the pseudo-second order model and, at the same time, controlled by the film diffusion and pore diffusion. This material can be considered as a good candidate for Hg2+ removal in terms of its adsorption capacity and practicality.
Subsequently, Leus and co-workers solvothermally synthesized the thiolated Zr-based MOF-UIO-66-(SH)2 (by reacting ZrOCl2.8H2O and 2,5-dimercaptoterephthalic acid-(H2BDC-2,5SH)) and applied it for selective removal of Hg species [140]. The Langmuir surface area of UIO-66-(SH)2 was estimated as 499 m2 g−1. The UIO-66-(SH)2 showed a maximum Hg2+ adsorption capacity of 236.4 mg g−1 between pH 3.0–5.0. Due to the presence of -SH group, adsorption of Hg2+ showed the best fit with Langmuir isotherm and followed the pseudo-second order kinetics. Moreover, adsorption and desorption of Hg2+ can be extended up to three cycles by using 1 M HCl and 0.66 M thiourea. This work was also applied in waste water-based Hg2+ removal. The use of thiolated UIO-66-SH (an archetypal thiolated Zr-based MOF- Zr6(OH)4O4(BDC)6, where BDC represents benzene-1,4-dicarboxylate) towards Hg species removal applications was also demonstrated by Li and co-workers [141]. However, the presence of Zn2+ and Pb2+ may reduce the adsorption of Hg2+ by UIO-66-SH.
Next, Fu et al. employed the post-functionalized UIO-66-NH2 (Zr-based MOF) with 2,5-Dimercapto-1,3,4-thiadiazole to produce the UIO-66-DMTD for effective removal of Hg2+ in water [142]. Due to the Hg2+ adsorption over the MOF surface, the calculated BET surface area of UIO-66-DMTD-Hg decreased from 651 m2 g−1 to 42 m2 g−1, thereby confirming the adsorbing ability of the proposed MOFs. The maximum adsorption of Hg2+ was 670.5 mg g−1 at pH 3. The adsorption kinetic followed the pseudo-second-order and was linearly fitted with Langmuir isotherm. Moreover, selectivity to Hg2+ by the UIO-66-DMTD and its analogous (UIO-66-NH2 and UIO-66-SO3H) was higher than that of other species as seen in Figure 10.
At a fixed Hg2+ removal time of 120 min, recyclable usage of the UIO-66-DMTD was found to be effective up to 10 times. The Hg2+ removal is highly fascinated and can be effective in the lab wastewater-based extraction due to the high affinity of thiol (-SH) group to Hg2+.
Similar to the MOF-UIO-66-(SH)2 [140], Ding and co-workers proposed the Zr-based MOF-Zr-DMBD (synthesized by reacting 2,5-Dimercapto-1,4-benzenedicarboxylic acid (H2DMBD) and ZrCl4) for Hg2+ removal [143]. However, due to a high degree of similarity to the UIO-66-(SH)2-based research, this work will not be further discussed. Regarding the effectiveness of thiol functionalized or thiol comprising MOFs towards removal of Hg2+ species, Li et al. described the utilization of dense thiol arrays containing Zr-based MOF, namely ZrOMTP (via reacting 4,4′,4″,4‴-(pyrene-1,3,6,8-tetrayl)tetrakis(2,6-dimercaptobenzoic acid)(H4OMTP) with ZrCl4), in Ref. [144]. The BET surface area of ZrOMTP to N2 gas was estimated as 1290 m2 g−1 and the distribution coefficient (Kd) for Hg2+ was calculated as 1.60 × 108 mL g−1, which is far better than that of other thiol containing MOFs. This could be attributed to the dense thiol arrays present in ZrOMTP framework. Adsorption of Hg2+ followed the first order kinetic model and was best fitted with Langmuir isotherms. Moreover, this MOFs lowered Hg-based contaminants from ppm to below the allowed drinkable limit of 2 ppb.
Highly dense alkyl thiol comprising MOF-Zr-MSA was developed by hydrothermally reacting ZrCl4 and mercaptosuccinic acid (HOOC-CHSH-CH2-COOH, MSA) in aqueous phase and was engaged in Hg2+ removal [145]. The Zr-MSA showed an adsorption efficiency of 99.99% to Hg2+ in a pH range of 0–7 pH within 5 min and was reusable (with 6 M HCl) for up to five cycles. Moreover, the Zr-MSA showed a maximum adsorption capacity of 734 mg g−1 and a Kd value of 1.82 × 108 mL g−1, which was best correlated with Langmuir isotherm. Due to the higher affinity of -SH to Hg2+, this work reduced the Hg content from 10,000 ppb to 0.11 ppb, which was far below the drinking water limit. In addition to thiol containing MOFs, the Zr-MOFs (Zr-MOFs-SH(O)) was synthesized by one-pot reaction of ZrCl4, meso-tetra(4-carboxyphenyl)porphine (H2TCPP), and modulators—mercaptoacetic acid (MAA) or alpha lipoic acid (ALA)—and was employed in Hg2+ adsorption [146]. For comparison, the Zr-MOFs-SH(P) was synthesized via post-synthetic modification of the Zr-MOFs-SH(O) and was engaged in adsorption studies. Due to the higher -SH content in the Zr-MOFs-SH(O), it showed a higher adsorption capacity (for Hg2+) of 843.6 mg g−1 than that of the Zr-MOFs-SH(P) (138.5 mg g−1). Hg2+ adsorption of the Zr-MOFs-SH(O) followed the pseudo-second-order kinetic model and was best fitted with Langmuir isotherm. In addition, this study showed good selectivity, recyclability, and chemical stability. By functionalizing the NH2-UIO-66 with L-cysteine, the Cys-UIO-66 was obtained and was used for Hg2+ removal from solution [147]. The Cys-UIO-66 showed a maximum adsorption capacity of 350.14 mg g−1 (after 180 min) at pH 5.0 of Hg2+ adsorption which followed the pseudo-second-order model and was fitted with Langmuir isotherm. Due to the -SH (from cysteine) affinity to Hg2+, reusability of Hg2+ adsorption/desorption was up to five cycles (with 0.1 M HNO3 and 1% thiourea solution). In terms of the capacity and time consumption, this study could need more improvements. By following the similar approach, Liu and co-workers presented the cysteamine functionalized MOFs-MIL-101-SH (Cr) and UIO-66-SH (Zr) for Hg2+ removal [148]. The MOFs showed adsorption capacities of 10 and 250 mg g−1 at pH of 5, respectively, with certain reusability.
By utilizing four different types of organic ligands with bulky sulphur side chains, four Zr-based MOFs, namely Zr-L1, Zr-L2, Zr-L3, and Zr-L4 (Zr(IV)-carboxylate frameworks; where L1-L4 represents the deprotonated four thioether-equipped carboxylic acid linker molecules), were constructed for selective removal of Hg2+ ions [149]. The Kds values of Zr-L1, Zr-L2, Zr-L3, and Zr-L4 were estimated as 1.95 × 103 mL g−1, 1.47 × 104 mL g−1, 4.47 × 103 mL g−1, and 2.40 × 104 mL g−1, respectively. Moreover, Hg adsorption of Zr-L1, Zr-L2, Zr-L3, and Zr-L4 followed the Langmuir isotherm with capacities of 193 mg g−1, 275 mg g−1, 245 mg g−1, and 322 mg g−1 at pH 6.8, correspondingly. However, this work needs further investigations on interference studies and real time applications. The Zr-based MOF-DUT-67 (Zr) synthesized by solvothermal reaction of zirconium chloride with 2, 5-thiophene-dicarboxylic acid showed removal efficiencies for Hg2+ and CH3Hg+ from 69% to 90% and from 30% to 77%, respectively [150]. At pH 6, the DUT-67 (Zr) showed a great efficiency to Hg2+ and CH3Hg+ with adsorption capacities of 0.0451 mg g−1 and 0.0374 mg g−1, respectively. The adsorption followed the pseudo-second-order kinetic model. This work was also demonstrated in river and lake water samples, but mechanism and interference studies require further investigations. The ZrO2-based (MOF)-808 synthesized by a sol-gel method was grafted with amidoxime (AO) via wet-chemistry process to afford MOF-808/AO, which was used in Hg2+ removal and displayed high efficiencies [151]. In particular, the MOF-808/AO showed a higher adsorption efficiency in all pHs. The BET surface area of MOF-808 and MOF-808/AO were established as 2152 and 1899 m2 g−1, respectively. Moreover, adsorption capacities of MOF-808 and MOF-808/AO towards Hg2+ were estimated as 383.8 mg g−1 and 343.6 mg g−1 (at 70 min), correspondingly. The Hg2+ adsorption in both MOFs followed the pseudo-second-order kinetic model and was fitted with Langmuir isotherms. This work requires more efforts to obtain additional information on the mechanism, interference effect, and real time analysis.
The Zr-based MOFs and Zn-metal nodes comprising MOFs were also engaged in Hg2+ removal as detailed next. The Zn2(DHBDC)(DMF)2·(H2O)2, namely MOF-74-Zn, was synthesized by solvothermally reacting ZnNO3 and 2,5-dihydroxy-1,4-benzenedicarboxylic acid (DHBDC) and was applied in Hg2+ removal [152]. The MOF-74-Zn showed a maximum adsorption capacity of 63 mg g−1 (for Hg2+ at pH 6 in 90 min). The Hg2+ adsorption followed the pseudo-second-order kinetic model but was best fitted with the Langmuir isotherm rather than the Freundlich isotherm. The -OH group was directly involved in adsorption of Hg2+. However, this work showed a minimum adsorption capacity and lacked information on the interference effect. Wang and co-workers presented the Zn-based MOF, namely NTOU-4 (hydro(solvo)thermally synthesized by reacting ZnNO3 with 1H-1,2,4-triazole-3,5-diamine and 1,4-benzenedicarboxylate organic linkers) for Hg2+ removal applications [153]. The NTOU-4 showed an adsorption capacity of 163 mg g−1 at 30 min and was operable between pH 3–11. However, the underlying mechanism, kinetic model, and isotherm studies require further clarification. Next, Esrafili et al. described the utilization of dual functionalized Zn-based MOF, namely TMU-32S (synthesized by incorporation of different percentile of N1,N3-di(pyridine-4-yl) malonamide in TMU-32 (a Zn containing MOF with urea linkers)), towards Hg2+ adsorption and removal [154]. Due to the strong binding forces produced by urea and malonamide functional units, the TMU-32S showed a high adsorption capacity of 1428 mg g−1 (in just 17 min) and became more efficient at pH 4.4. The system followed the linear pseudo-second-order model and was linearly fitted with the Langmuir isotherm. Moreover, the material showed adsorption and desorption (with 0.2 M of EDTA) up to three cycles with 65% efficiency. This work requires more studies regarding the interference effect with several metal analytes.
Subsequently, the Cu-based MOFs were authorized as efficient adsorbents for Hg2+ removal as described next. Wu et al. developed the copper and 3,30,5,50-azobenzenetetracarboxylic acid containing porous MOF, namely JUC-62, for Hg2+ removal in tea and mushroom samples [155]. The adsorption capacity of the JUC-62 to Hg2+ was established as 836.7 mg g−1 at pH 4.6 in 15 min in aqueous media. This work followed the pseudo-second-order model and was fitted with Langmuir adsorption isotherm. Moreover, it was reusable with EDTA up to four cycles. However, further interrogations are required on the interference studies. Mon and co-workers described utilization of a Cu-based MOF, namely {Cu4II[(S,S)-methox]2}.5H2O (where methox represents bis[(S)-methionine]oxalyl diamide), for HgCl2 removal studies [156]. This microporous MOF was decorated with thioalkyl chains, thereby was able to adsorb HgCl2 efficiently to afford the HgCl2S2 adduct. This MOF adsorbed 99.95% of HgCl2 within 15 min and reduced the Hg2+ concentration from 10 ppm to below 2 ppb in drinking water. However, this work lacked information on the reusability, kinetic studies, and real applications. Next, the polysulfides functionalized benzene-1,3,5-tricarboxylic acid and Cu containing Sx-MOF (where MOF represents Cu-BTC (by solvothermal tactic) and Sx2−, X = 3, 4, 6) were described for efficient adsorption of Hg2+ [157]. Among these materials, the S4-MOF displayed great selectivity to Hg2+ with a LOD of 0.13 μg L−1 and a linear response from 30–200 μg L−1 at pH 6 in 30 min. The S4-MOF showed different adsorbing capacities to different metal ions in the following orders: Hg(II) > > Pb(II) > Zn(II) > Ni(II) > Co(II). By means of Hg2+-S bonding, adsorption was efficient and applicable in sea, tap, and wastewater. However, information regarding kinetic studies is still missing. A copper metallacycle complex, namely Cu2(PDMA)2(DMF) (comprised of 3,3′-((1E,1′E)-(pyrimidine-4,6-diylbis(2-methylhydrazin-2-yl-1-ylidene)) bis (methanylylidene)dibenzoic acid (H2PDMA)), was demonstrated for Hg2+ removal [158]. Due to the multi ‘N′ binding sites, the MOF showed an adsorption efficiency of 61.4% for Hg2+ (among Hg2 +, Mn2 +, Cd2 +, Pb2 + ions) with an adsorption capacity of 300 mg g−1. Moreover, this MOF was reusable with EDTA. The Hg2+ adsorption followed the pseudo-second-order kinetic model. Xu and co-workers proposed utilization of the SH@Cu-MOF towards adsorption of Hg2+ and Hg(0) species by grafting dithioglycol from the post-synthetic modified Cu-MOF (Cu with 5-aminoisophthalic) [159]. Though the material seems to be impressive compared to others reports, however, its adsorption capacity (173 mg g−1 in 6 h) was not up to standard. However, this work does point to a new direction for future development of the Cu-based MOFs.
Liang and co-workers described utilization of the sulfur-functionalized Co-based MOF, namely FJI-H12 (composed of NCS-, Co(II) and 2,4,6-tri(1-imidazolyl)-1,3,5-triazine (Timt)), for Hg2+ removal in water [160]. The FJI-H12 showed a Kd value of 1.85 × 106 mL g−1 with an adsorption capacity of 439.8 mg g−1 at pH 7. The adsorption was efficient because of the Hg2+ to S (of SCN-) affinity and it could be applied for continuous removal purpose. Moreover, this work followed the pseudo-second-order kinetic model and was also reusable, thereby is attested a nice work. Jiang et al. designed a stable sulfur containing Co-based MOF {[Co33-OH)(DMTDC)3(INT)3]-[Co2(OH)(H2O)2](NO3)19-(H2O)7(DMA)11}n, namely NENU-401 (where DMTDC, INT, DMF, and DMA represent 3,4-dimethylthieno[2,3-b]thiophene-2,5-dicarboxylic acid, isonicotinate, N,N-dimethylformamide, and N,N-dimethylacetamide), via introducing an INT group in NENU-400-{[Co33-OH)(H2O)3(DMTDC)3](NO3)10-(H2O)6(DMF)6} and utilized it successfully in Hg2+ removal [161]. Unlike the NENU-400, which collapsed easily during Hg2+ adsorption, the NENU-401 preserved its structural features, thereby was highly applicable for Hg2+ extraction. The Kd value of NENU-401 at 25 °C was estimated as 8.3 × 106 mL g−1 with an adsorption capacity of 596.57 mg g−1 in 10 min. The NENU-401 performed far better than many thiol containing MOFs. Moreover, Hg2+ extraction by the NENU-401 was recovered up to 90% of its original by thioglycol solution and was reusable for more than four cycles because of the effective coordination between Hg2+ and ‘-S′ atom. Note that the NENU-401-based Hg2+ extraction followed the pseudo-second-order kinetic model and was linearly fitted with Langmuir isotherm. This work demonstrated an impressive approach to improve the structural stability of MOFs. Moreover, it also displayed certain selectivity to Pb2+ (nearly 70%) but still required further optimization. Recently, Sun′s research group proposed employment of the sulfur-rich two-dimensional (2D) Co-based MOF nanosheets, namely 2D-NCS ({[Co(NCS)2(pyz)2]}n; where pyz represents pyrazine), for exceptional removal of HgCl2 [162]. The BET surface area of 2D-NCS to N2 gas at 77K was established as 365 m2 g−1 with a maximum adsorption capacity of 1698 mg g−1 in 15 min and a Kd value of 2.26 × 106 mL g−1. The MOF nanosheets reduced Hg2+ concentrations from 10 ppm to 1 ppb within 15 min and were also effective in environmental samples between pH 4–9. This work followed the pseudo-second-order model and was fitted with Langmuir isotherm. Due to the strong Hg–S interactions, extraction was efficient up to five cycles (by thioglycol solution) and could be further tuned towards development of 3D materials for future environmental remediation. Similar to the FJI-H12 [152], another Co-based MOF- [Co3(SCN)6(TPMA)4]n, namely FJI-H30 (synthesized by solvothermally refluxing TPMA (tris(pyridin-4-ylmethyl)amine) and Co(SCN)2), was engaged in Hg2+ adsorption [163]. Due to the exceptional interaction between SCN groups to Hg2+, its maximum adsorption capacity reached 705 mg g−1 with negligible interference. The BET surface area of FJI-H30 to CO2 gas at 195K was determined as 221 m2 g−1. This material showed a Kd value of 1.84 × 105 mL g−1 and operated efficiently between pH 4–9 with regeneration (by KSCN solution) of >90% up to three cycles. This work followed the pseudo-second-order model and was fitted with Langmuir isotherm. It can be applied in industrial waste water, thereby is considered a nice work.
Halder et al. engaged the thiocyanato ligand (SCN) comprising Ni-based 3D MOF, namely [Ni(3-bpd)2(NCS)2]n (where 3bpd represents 1,4-bis(3-pyridyl)-2,3-diaza-1,3-butadiene), for effective removal of Hg2+ in aqueous solution [164]. Because the uncoordinated S atom of SCN was strongly bonded with Hg2+ and formed the mercuric thiocyanate adduct, therefore, a great adsorption capacity of 713 mg g−1 was achieved. Nevertheless, this work still requires further optimization for the interference effect, adsorption kinetics, and practicality. A post-synthetic modified tactic was proposed to develop the thiol (-SH) functionalized In-based MOF, namely SH-MIL-68(In) (primarily NH2-MIL-68(In) obtained by solvothermally reacting 2-amino-benzene-1, 4-dicarboxylic acid (NH2-H2BDC) with In (NO3)3 followed by post-synthetic modification), towards Hg2+ extraction [165]. The SH-MIL-68(In) showed a highest Hg2+ adsorption capacity of 450 mg g−1 and a large adsorption rate (rate constant k2 = 1.25 g mg−1 min−1). As seen in Figure 11, the adsorption process took place within 2 min at pH 4 due to the presence of free -SH group.
The material was reusable (in the presence of 0.01 M HCl, 0.1% thiourea) up to five cycles. This work followed the pseudo-second-order model and was linearly fitted with Langmuir isotherm. It is an impressive work considering its short process time and negligible interferences. However, real time applicability still needs to be demonstrated. By means of diffusion and solvothermal strategies, Li et al. developed three thioether-based MOFs, namely [(ZnCl2)3(L1)2·χ(solvent)]n-(1), [(Cu2I3O2)4(CH4N0.5)4(L1)4(DMA)4·3(H2O)·χ(solvent)]n-(2), and [(CuBr2)2(L2)2 CH3CN·χ(solvent)]n-(3) (where L1 and L2 represent 1,3,5-tris((pyridin-4-ylthio)methyl)benzene and 2,4,6-trimethoxy-1,3,5-tris((pyridin-4-ylthio) methyl)benzene; DMA = Dimethylacetamide) to utilize them for effective removal of Hg2+ in water [166]. These MOFs removed 90% of Hg2+ within 5 min at optimum pHs 4 and 5. The maximum adsorption capacities of MOFs (1), (2), and (3) were estimated to be 362.3 mg g−1, 227.4 mg g−1, and 341.7 mg g−1, respectively. The observed higher efficiencies to Hg2+ was attributed to the strong binding between Hg-S. They were reusable up to five cycles (with Na2S). This work followed the pseudo-second-order model and was linearly correlated with the Langmuir isotherm. This work is considered a good one because of the negligible interference effect, but further optimization is required to improve the adsorption capacity.
The bi-metallic MOFs were also employed in Hg2+ removal/extraction as described next. Han and co-workers constructed the heterometallic metal−organic framework (HMOF): {[(CH3)2NH2]InCu4L4·xS}n, namely BUT-52 (where L represents 6,6′-dithiodinicotinic acid), to engage in Hg2+ removal, in which In(COO)4 and Cu6S6 clusters were rationally embedded [167]. The BET surface area of BUT-52 to N2 gas at 77K was 126.2 cm3 g−1. It showed 92% of mercury removal efficiency in ethanol. This work requires further optimization in anti-interference, pH, time, and real time application studies. Mon et al. described utilization of the Ca and Cu-based porous bimetallic MOF, namely {CaIICuII6[(S,S)-methox]3(OH)2(H2O)}·16H2O (where methox represents bis[(S)-methionine]oxalyl diamide), for Hg2+ and CH3Hg+ removal in aqueous media [168]. This BioMOF reduced Hg2+ and CH3Hg+ contents from 10 ppm to 5 and 27 ppb, respectively, with corresponding adsorbing ability of 99.95% and 99.0% (via Hg–S interactions) for dissolved HgCl2 and CH3HgCl salts. However, optimization is required to study the adsorption kinetics and real applications. In parallel with MOFs-based extraction/removal of Hg2+, a few MOFs were also reported in multiple heavy metal ions, including Hg2+ [169,170,171,172,173]. Though those reports demonstrated effective removal of Hg2+, but they were also affected by interfering effects from other ions. To avoid the interfering effects, complicated masking procedure is required. Therefore, those reports will not be discussed in this review.

9. MOFs Comprised Composites for Hg2+ Removal

Compared to MOFs, composites comprised of MOFs also become effective in Hg2+ removal [174]. For example, the Pt NPs encapsulated UIO-66-NH2-(denoted as Pt NP@UIO-66-NH2) was engaged in facile colorimetric detection and removal of Hg2+ in water [175]. The Pt NP@UIO-66-NH displayed a linear colorimetric response from 0 to 10 nM with a LOD 0.35 nM due to the peroxidase like activity which took place in the presence of 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine and H2O2. Moreover, the Pt NP@UIO-66-NH2 was used as an adsorbent for Hg2+ with a maximum adsorption capacity of 206.25 mg g−1. This material showed Hg2+ removal of 99% and reduced Hg2+ concentrations from 5 ppm to 2.39 ppb. Reusability of this composite was established up to four cycles by Na2S. This work followed the pseudo-second-order model and was linearly fitted with the Langmuir isotherm. With respect to multiple applications, this work is considered a nice one. The mercapto-functionalized Zr-MOF/melamine sponge composite (Zr-MOF-SH/MF) was proposed for removal of Hg2+ from water [176]. Firstly, zirconium chloride (ZrCl4) was reacted with meso-tetra(4-carboxyphenyl)porphine (H2TCPP). The product was then interacted with mercaptoacetic acid to afford PCN-224-MAA, which formed the composite structure with melamine sponge. In particular, the PCN-224-MAA/MF (where MAA and MF represent mercaptoacetic acid and melamine formaldehyde) showed great ability for Hg2+ removal (among other heavy metal ions) with a maximum adsorption capacity of 412.5 mg g−1 at pH 3 as seen in Figure 12. Due to the Hg–S interactions, the removal process was found to be efficient and effective. The presence of melamine sponge extended the Hg2+ adsorption cycle up to five times. This work showed more effectiveness in Hg2+ removal from water-oil mixture, but the underlying kinetics require further studies.
Novel ZnS-ZIF-8 monolith was explored in Hg2+ capture in wastewater [177]. The ZIF-8 filter paper was first developed by reacting Zn (NO3)2·6H2O with 2-methylimidazole followed by sulfurization to obtain the ZnS-ZIF-8 monolith, which possessed a hierarchical porous crystalline structure. At an optimum value of pH 5, the monolith showed a maximum adsorption capacity of 925.9 mg g−1 with recyclability with Na2S. The efficiency was found to be high because of the effective Hg–S interaction. This work followed the pseudo-second-order kinetic and was correlated with Langmuir isotherm. This work is considered a nice one in terms of its selectivity and applicability. Nosike and co-workers proposed utilization of the Fe3O4@ZIF-90-Cysteine composite towards Hg2+ adsorption as detailed below [178]. Wherein, the Fe3O4 was first embedded into the ZIF-90 (a Zn-based zeoliticimidazolate framework) as a core. Cysteine was then covalently attached to the Fe3O4@ZIF-90 via Schiff base reaction and post-synthetic modification strategy to obtain the Fe3O4@ZIF-90-Cysteine. Poly-acrylic acid (PAA) was capped on the above composite to avoid agglomeration of nanoparticles. Because of the pore size and free thiol (-SH) group of cysteine, this composite showed good adsorbing ability to Hg2+ with a maximum capacity of 900 mg g−1 at optimal pH 4. The adsorption followed the pseudo-second-order model. Desorption and regeneration were accomplished with HCl (0.1 M) up to four cycles. However, the synthetic complications may affect its applicability. Huang et al. described the magnetic MOF composite, namely bi-I-functionalized Fe3O4@SiO2@HKUST-1 (where HKUST-1 represents Cu-based MOF), with core–shell nanostructures for enhanced removal of Hg2+ in water [179]. The bismuthiol I (1,3,4-thiadiazole-2,5-dithiol, Bi-I) was functionalized over the Fe3O4@SiO2@HKUST-1 via post-synthetic modification. As shown in Figure 13, the bi-I-functionalized Fe3O4@SiO2@HKUST-1 displayed high adsorption ability to Hg2+ with a maximum capacity of 264 mg g−1 between pHs 2–9. This work followed the pseudo second order model and was linearly fitted with the Langmuir isotherm. In both composites, the Fe3O4 was used to afford the magnetic property and played a vital role to improve the adsorption capacity. Performance of the bi-I-functionalized Fe3O4@SiO2@HKUST-1 was effective in the presence of other competing species. However, the main drawback of this study is that it cannot be reused with any eluent because of the strong Hg–S bond and the hydrolysis of Bi-I. Thereby this material can only be consumed for one-time removal of Hg2+ ions in water.
Liang and co-workers reported incorporation of In2S3 nanoparticles into the MIL-101 (a Cr-based MOF) to afford the In2S3@MIL-101 for effective removal of Hg2+ with an efficiency of 99.95% within a minute [180]. The BET surface area of the In2S3@MIL-101 to N2 gas at 77K was 1476 m2 g−1 with a maximum adsorption capacity of 518.2 mg g−1 for Hg2+. This work followed the pseudo second order kinetic model and was linearly correlated with the Langmuir isotherm. The strong affinity between Hg2+ to S was the main reason for high efficiency of the In2S3@MIL-101, which was able to reduce Hg2+ concentrations from 10 ppm to 1.75 ppb. Moreover, the composite operated between pHs 3 to 8 and was effective in the presence of competing species. By using 0.1 M KCl solution, the materials can be recycled up to three times, thereby is noted a remarkable work. In fact, incorporation of In2S3 nanoparticles improves the adsorption ability of MIL-101 to Hg2+ ions. Similar to selective removal of Hg species, the MOF containing composites were also engaged in adsorption and capture of Pb2+ [181,182,183]. However, those reports will not be discussed in this review due to the possible interference effects.

10. MOFs and Its Analogous in Elemental Mercury (Hg0) Adsorption

Due to the high toxic effect of elemental mercury (Hg0) from flue gas, its adsorption and separation is in high demand. Moreover, feasible utilization of MOFs and its analogous have been predicted theoretically [184,185]. For example, Zhao et al. reported Hg0 removal from flue gas of iron and steel by using the MIL-101(Cr). Performance of the MIL-101(Cr) was compared to the Cu-BTC (BTC represents benzene-1,3,5-tricarboxylate), UIO-66, and activated carbon [186]. Wherein, Hg0 was primarily adsorbed over the surface of MIL-101(Cr) and was oxidized by the open metal site Cr3+. Be noted that the MIL-101(Cr) captured 88% of Hg0 at 250 °C and also showed good thermal and chemical stability. Exceptional adsorption ability of the MIl-101(Cr) was further demonstrated by Dong and co-workers through Hg0 removal from the coal-fired boiler flue gas experiment [187]. Simulation studies also agreed with the experimental results, in which Hg0 adsorption over the MIL-101(Cr) surface followed the pseudo-second-order model as shown in Figure 14. Moreover, the MIl-101(Cr) showed the Langmuir-type rate expression with an estimated equilibrium adsorption capacity for the MOF-sorbent of 25.656 μg g−1 at 200 °C. Thus, the MIL-101(Cr) is considered a potential candidate for Hg0 removal.
Utilization of the Cu-BTC (BTC represents benzene-1,3,5-tricarboxylate) for Hg0 removal from sintering gas was discussed by Chen and co-workers [188]. The Cu-BTC showed great efficiency in the presence of 15 ppm HCl with the combination of O2. The chemisorbed O2 (over Cu2+ surface) oxidized the Hg0 to Hg2+, which was then converted to HgCl2 in the presence of HCl. Moreover, the inhibition effect of SO2 was overcome by HCl, thereby the Cu-BTC is noted a material with good performance for Hg0 adsorption. The MnOx loaded on the MIL-100(Fe) (77.4% efficiency at 250 °C; GHSV = 18,000 h−1) and α-MnO2 anchored MIL-96(Al) were reported for Hg0 removal from flue gas [189,190]. Because the presence of both MnOx and α-MnO2 can enhance adsorption of Hg0 and oxidation process, therefore, such composited MOFs can be engaged for environmental remediation. Subsequently, Yang et al. reported the nanosized CuSe functionalized Zn-comprising zeolitic imidazolate framework-8 (CuSe/ZIF-8) for Hg0 adsorption and removal studies [191]. The as-prepared CuSe/ZIF-8 with the 80% mass ratio of CuSe to ZIF-8 (to afford 0.8NC-ZIF) displayed an equilibrium Hg0 adsorption capacity with an average rate of 309.8 mg g−1 and 105.3 µg g−1 min−1, correspondingly, which were far better than that of the reported metal sulfide and activated carbon sorbents. The HgSe, which is more stable than HgS, can be easily formed because of the strong affinity between Hg and Se2− (from CuSe). The composite can be used for continuous removal of Hg0, thereby is considered an exceptional material. Following the similar approach, the Se functionalized MIL-101-Cr (Se/MIL-101-Cr) was proposed for Hg0 removal [192]. By means of stable and water-insoluble HgSe formation, the Se/MIL-101-Cr showed a maximum Hg adsorption capacity of 48.19 mg g−1, which was far better than commercially activated carbon. Moreover, the adsorption rate reached a value of 44.8 μg g−1 min−1 and became more-effective in flue gas atmosphere containing SO2, NO, and H2O. Thus, it is noted as a nice candidate for Hg0 sorption.
Zhao and co-workers reported Hg0 removal by combining Ag NPs with the Zr-based MOF-UIO-66 [193]. The adsorption capacity reached a value of 3.7 mg g−1 at 50oC because of the significant synergistic effect of Ag NPs over the UIO-66. Removal of Hg0 was attributed to the Ag amalgam formation and channel adsorption at low temperature. At high temperature, removal of Hg0 was driven by the Ag-activated oxygen oxidation and channel capture. Zhang et al. proposed the consumption of the Mn–Ce loaded MOF (MnCe@MOF) for removal of Hg2+ and NO from flue gas at low temperature [194]. However, this study reported a possible interfering effect of NO over Hg0 adsorption.

11. MOFs for Simultaneous Detection and Removal of Hg2+

As suggested by earlier studies [153,175], MOFs were also engaged in simultaneous detection and removal studies as discussed in this section. For instance, Rudd et al. demonstrated heavy metal ions sensing and removal using solvothermally synthesized Zn-based luminescent MOFs, namely Zn2(ofdc)2(tppe)-LMOFs-261, Zn2(hfdc)2(tppe)-LMOFs-262, and Zn2(dbtdcO2)2(tppe)-LMOFs-263), where H2ofdc, H2dbtdcO2, and tppe represent [9-oxo-9H-fluorene-2,7-dicarboxylic acid], [dibenzo[b,d]thiophene-3,7-dicarboxylic acid-5,5-dioxide], and 1,1,2,2-tetrakis(4-(pyridine-4-yl)phenyl)ethane, respectively [195]. Among these MOFs, the LMOFs-263 displayed the highest luminescent selectivity to Hg2+ and Pb2+ with LODs of 3.3 and 19.7 ppb, respectively. Moreover, it showed a maximum adsorption capacity of 380 mg g−1 (for Hg2= within 30 min) and the adsorption followed pseudo-second-order kinetics. A Kd value of 6.45 × 105 mL g−1 was determined for the LMOFs-263. The effective adsorption was attributed to the strong interaction between Hg2+ and SO22− (of H2dbtdcO2) and the pore size. The BET surface area of LMOFs-263 was estimated as 1004 m2 g−1 to N2 gas at 77K, however, further investigations are required to overcome the Pb2+ interference. Al-based imidazolate framework, namely NH2-MIL-53(Al), for selective detection and removal of Hg2+ was reported by Zhang and co-workers [196]. Because of the coordination of amino (-NH2) group and ligand-to-metal charge transfer (LMCT) effect with Hg2+, fluorescent intensity of the NH2-MIL-53(Al) at 427 nm (λex = 330 nm) was linearly quenched between 1−17.3 μM with a LOD of 0.15 μM. In addition, Hg2+ sensing ability of the NH2-MIL-53(Al) was good at pHs 4–10 without any interference. The MOF showed an adsorption capacity of 53.85 mg g−1 (for Hg2+) and was reusable with 0.1 M HCl and 10% thiourea eluent. This work followed pseudo second order kinetic model and was linearly correlated with the Langmuir isotherm, thereby is a nice probe.
By loading the (bis(4-(dimethylamino)phenyl)methanethione) probe over the Al-based MOF (which was solvothermally synthesized by reacting Al(NO3)3·9H2O and terephthalic acid), detection and removal of Hg2+ in water and skin-whitening cosmetics was delivered by Radwan and co-workers [197]. These thioketone Al-MOFs monitors (TAM) acted as microporous carriers towards Hg2+ via fluorescent quenching at 470 nm and enhancement at 610 nm with a linear range from 2 nM to 2.1 µM and a LOD of 4.4 nM. Moreover, the thioketone Al-MOF (TAM) nanorods were used in effective adsorption of Hg2+, which showed a maximum adsorption capacity of 1110 mg g−1 with exceptional applicability in water and skin-whitening cosmetics. Shahat et al. engaged the modified amino-functionalized Al-MOF for optical recognition and removal of Hg2+ [198]. AlCl3·6H2O and 2-amino terephthalic acid was first solvothermally reacted to yield the MOF-NH2-MIL-101(Al) followed by modification with ninhydrin to obtain the final adduct Nin-NH-MIL-101(Al). The Nin-NH-MIL-101(Al) showed a BET surface area of 896.6 m2 g−1 for N2 gas at 77K. It was used as a colorimetric sensory probe for Hg2+ with a LOD of 0.494 µg L−1 and was further applied in removal studies. The probe displayed a maximum adsorption capacity of 127.4 mg g−1 and was recyclable in the presence of 0.1 M thiourea as shown in Figure 15. This work followed the pseudo second order kinetic model and was linearly fitted Langmuir isotherm. Be noted that the Nin-NH-MIL-101(Al)-based optical detection and removal of Hg2+ was not affected by any interference.
By means of hydrothermal reactions, the Cu-based MOFs and amide-functionalized pillar ligands (–NH–CO–), namely TMU-46, 47, and 48, were synthesized and then decorated with suitable functional group malonamide (S) to produce the labelled dual functionalized materials-TMU-46S, TMU-47S, and TMU-48S, respectively. They were applied towards Hg2+ sensing and removal [199]. The BET surface areas of TMU-46S, TMU-47S, and TMU-48S were 510 m2 g−1, 520 m2 g−1, and 408 m2 g−1, respectively. Because of the strong coordination of Hg to S, the TMU-48S displayed the highest selectivity to Hg2+ via fluorescent quenching at 480 nm (λex = 330 nm) with a KSV value of 86,087 M−1. Moreover, the TMU-48S showed a maximum adsorption capacity of 714 mg g−1. However, it also showed some selectivity to Pb2+ and Ag+. The CuS particles (PCuS) were synthesized via wet-treatment of Cu-based MOF- HKUST-1 and were engaged in colorimetric detection of Hg2+ in the presence of 3,3′,5′,5-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) and H2O2 (by peroxidase like activity) [200]. The BET surface area of PCuS was calculated to be 35 m2 g−1 with a linear colorimetric response between 3–40 µM and an established LOD of 0.22 µM. Moreover, the PCuS showed a maximum adsorption capacity of 2105 mg g−1. The system followed the pseudo second order kinetic and was linearly fitted with the Langmuir isotherm.
A porphyrinic Zr-based MOF, namely PCN-221 (by solvothermal reaction between meso-tetra(4-carboxyphenyl) porphyrin (TCPP) and ZrCl4), was proposed for fluorescent sensing and removal of Hg2+ in water [201]. The PCN-221 showed linear quenching at 436 nm (λex = 280 nm) in the presence of Hg2+ concentrations from 0 to 300 μM with a KSV value of 4021.9 M−1 and a LOD of 0.01 μM. Moreover, sensing ability of DMF by PCN-221 was also described in this report with extensive Hg2+ adsorption studies. The PCN-221 displayed a maximum capacity of 233.65 mg g−1 towards Hg2+ adsorption and was highly effective at pH 7. Three adsorption-desorption cycles were achieved in the presence of 0.2 M Na2EDTA without any interference effect. This study followed the pseudo second order model and was linearly correlated by the Langmuir isotherm. Recently, a 3D-microporous carbon/Zr-2,5-dimercaptoterephthalic acid MOFs (Zr-DMBD MOFs/3D-KSC) nanocomposite was delivered towards electrochemical detection and removal of Hg2+ [202]. Sensitivity of the nanocomposite to Hg2+ was established as 24.58 μA μM−1 cm−2 with a linear range of 0.25–3.5 μM and a LOD of 0.05 µM. It was confirmed that specificity and effectiveness of the composite were similar to sensory and other utilities of nanomaterials [203,204,205,206]. This may be due to the presence of thiol (-SH) group of 2,5-dimercaptoterephthalic acid, which has great affinity to Hg2+. The Zr-DMBD MOFs/3D-KSC showed a maximum adsorption capacity (for Hg2+) of 19.3 ± 0.52 mg g−1 (within 60 min at pH 6) and was reusable up to five cycles with EDTA. This work was also applied in real water samples. However, information regarding adsorption kinetics still needs to be discussed. Apart from specific Hg2+ sensing/adsorption utilization of MOFs, the Hg-metalated MOF scaffold can be employed for detection of other species. For example, Hg-metalated PCN-222 was reported as fluorescent and visual sensors for cysteine [207], which pointed out the possible future direction of MOFs-based Hg2+ sensors.

12. Advantages

Consumption of MOFs and their analogous for selective Hg2+ detection and removal possess many advantages and some restrictions as follows.
  • The majority of MOFs and their derivatives detect or adsorb the Hg species in aqueous media, therefore, MOFs-based detection and removal experiments could sustain the eco-friendly process via decontaminating the toxic mercury from aquatic environment.
  • Due to the porous nano/micro structural features, MOFs can be tuned towards encapsulation of specific Hg species, which could be further enhanced by post-synthetic modification or loading of specific groups, such as thiols (-SH).
  • MOFs and their analogous have the advantage of recognition of multiple analytes, including Hg2+, via variations of detection conditions, masking agents, and analyte concentrations.
  • MOFs can act as probes towards recognition and removal of Hg species through many tactics, such as optical, electrochemical, photoelectrochemical, etc. Thus, they are noted as materials with exceptional advantages.
  • By tuning the compositions to adjust the specific porous surface, many composites comprised of MOFs have unique advantages of capturing Hg species in the presence of other interfering analytes.
  • MOFs mediated Hg detection/removal process can be further extended towards recognition of specific bio-analytes, such as glutathione, cysteine, and thiol containing species.

13. Limitations

  • Synthesis of designated MOFs and their analogous is still considered a tough task due to certain limitations, such as possible co-adduct formation, suitable tactics, reaction conditions, solvent, etc.
  • Though MOFs display high sensitivity via fluorescence quenching or enhancement, however, many of them are consisted of toxic metals, such as Al, Cr, Zr, Lanthanides, etc. Therefore, bioimaging or biological assays of Hg2+ by these MOFs are restricted.
  • MOFs with free thiol (-SH) containing organic linkers also showed selectivity to Pb2+, Cd2+, and Ag+, thereby limiting high selectivity towards Hg species via certain interfering effect.
  • Majority of MOFs-based Hg2+ adsorption or removal studies were limited by many factors, such as MOFs concentration, structural stability, porosity, pH, time, operating temperature, suitable eluent, etc. Those factors require further attention.
  • Design and development of certain MOFs comprised composites are also limited by the multiple complicated procedures, which not only increase the cost of the processes but also restrict the commercialization of materials.
  • Complete characterizations of the Hg assay and removal processes also requires many costly instruments, such as scanning electron microscopy (SEM), powder-X-ray diffraction analyzer (PXRD), elemental analyzer, thermogravimetric analyzer (TGA), etc., which limits future research towards development of MOFs-based materials for mercury remediations.
  • Finally, adsorption capacities of a few MOFs were found to be affected by the multiple interference effects and physical/chemical stability of MOFs during the Hg assays in real samples. Thus, much focus is anticipated to address this problem.

14. Conclusions and Perspectives

This review provided valuable information regarding the utilities of MOFs and their analogous towards mercury species (Hg0, Hg2+ and CH3Hg+) detection and removal. By tuning the organic linkers and metal nodes, physical and chemical properties of MOFs can be adjusted to target at specific Hg species. Most of the MOFs displayed selective sensing responses to Hg2+ via luminescence quenching, which could be extended to adsorption studies in the future. At optimal conditions, MOFs-based adsorption of Hg2+ or Hg0 can be effective, which may pave the way for real time applications. MOFs with free thiol (-SH) or sulfur groups showed high adsorption and removal ability for Hg species via Hg–S bonding, thereby such designs are highly desirable. The pore size and specific surface area can be tuned by modifying the MOF ratios in MOFs containing composites to effectively trap Hg specie. Apart from the above statements, following points need to be addressed to further improve the efficiency of MOFs-based mercury detection and removal.
  • A standardized cost-effective synthetic and purification technique must be proposed to develop MOFs for mercury detection and removal towards reliable environmental remediation.
  • Luminescent MOFs of low toxicity must be developed by using less toxic metal nodes and organic linkers for detecting the presence of Hg2+ ions in biological samples.
  • Fewer reports are available for MOFs-based Hg2+ detection via fluorescent enhancement, thereby such designs require more attention in the future.
  • The underlying mechanisms of MOFs-based electrochemical detection of Hg2+ is not entirely clear, which require more experiments and investigations.
  • The T-Hg2+-T coordination-based Hg2+ detection has already been stabilized in many MOF-DNA hybrid systems. It could be extended towards removal studies, which is currently incomplete.
  • Many MOFs-based mercury detection and removal studies still lack evidence to strongly support the proposed mechanisms. This may require more attention.
  • Following parameters, such as MOFs concentrations, pH, time, eluent solvent, and temperature, must be carefully examined and controlled for mercury removal, which complicate the separation processes. Therefore, development of MOFs that can adsorb Hg under less optimal conditions is becoming important.
  • Development of MOFs for detection and removal of CH3Hg+ and Hg0 is currently less reported, thereby requiring much attention.
  • Many free thiol (-SH) containing MOFs have been reported for Hg2+ removal. Thus “state-of-the-art” procedure with certain well-known MOFs (such as UIO-66) must be developed towards commercialization.
  • Efficiency of post-synthetic modified MOFs over the unmodified one for mercury removal is still under debate, therefore, more evidence must be provided to support the PSM strategy.
  • Interaction between Hg to Se produces the water insoluble and stable HgSe as an adduct, which improves the recyclability of the MOF probe. Thus, such design should be a future-focused research.
  • Some MOFs also demonstrated moderately adsorption of other ions other than efficient mercury removal. This problem needs to be overcome for effective Hg separation in real samples.
  • There are not many studies available which report both detection and removal of Hg2+ ions. This kind of studies are able to achieve great impact towards environmental remediation and require more attention.
Though current MOFs-based mercury detection and removal studies do not completely satisfy above points, but they are still considered great materials which can be operated in aqueous environment and show higher efficiencies than that of other existing tactics. As an important research topic for environmental remediation and healthcare applications, many researchers are currently devoted to the development of MOFs towards mercury recognition and separation, which will be able to solve all the difficulties and to commercialize the MOFs as Hg absorbers in the near future.

Author Contributions

M.S. and K.-W.S. wrote and proofread the manuscript. Both authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan under the contract. MOST 109-2811-M-009-520-MY3 and MOST 109-2112-M-009-013.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Huang, J.-H.; Shetaya, W.H.; Osterwalder, S. Determination of (Bio)-available mercury in soils: A review. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 263, 114323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Botasini, S.; Heijo, G.; Méndez, E. Toward decentralized analysis of mercury (II) in real samples. A critical review on nanotechnology-based methodologies. Anal. Chim. Acta 2013, 800, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Xie, Z.-J.; Bao, X.-Y.; Peng, C.-F. Highly Sensitive and Selective Colorimetric Detection of Methylmercury Based on DNA Functionalized Gold Nanoparticles. Sensors 2018, 18, 2679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Shellaiah, M.; Simon, T.; Venkatesan, P.; Sun, K.W.; Ko, F.-H.; Wu, S.-P. Cysteamine-modified diamond nanoparticles applied in cellular imaging and Hg2+ ions detection. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 465, 340–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Aderinto, S.O. Fluorescent, colourimetric, and ratiometric probes based on diverse fluorophore motifs for mercuric(II) ion (Hg2+) sensing: Highlights from 2011 to 2019. Chem. Pap. 2020, 74, 3195–3232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Kobielska, P.A.; Howarth, A.J.; Farha, O.K.; Nayak, S. Metal–organic frameworks for heavy metal removal from water. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2018, 358, 92–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Selid, P.D.; Xu, H.; Collins, E.M.; Face-Collins, M.S.; Zhao, J.X. Sensing Mercury for Biomedical and Environmental Monitoring. Sensors 2009, 9, 5446–5459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Bernhoft, R.A. Mercury Toxicity and Treatment: A Review of the Literature. J. Environ. Public Health 2011, 2012, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Langford, N.J.; Ferner, R.E. Toxicity of mercury. J. Hum. Hypertens. 1999, 13, 651–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Rana, M.; Balcioglu, M.; Robertson, N.M.; Hizir, M.S.; Yumak, S.; Yigit, M.V. Low picomolar, instrument-free visual detection of mercury and silver ions using low-cost programmable nanoprobes. Chem. Sci. 2017, 8, 1200–1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Gauthama, B.; Narayana, B.; Sarojini, B.; Suresh, N.; Sangappa, Y.; Kudva, A.K.; Satyanarayana, G.; Raghu, S.V. Colorimetric “off–on” fluorescent probe for selective detection of toxic Hg2+ based on rhodamine and its application for in-vivo bioimaging. Microchem. J. 2021, 166, 106233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Busairi, N.; Syahir, A. Recent Advances in Mercury Detection: Towards Enabling a Sensitive and Rapid Point-of-Check Measurement. J. Toxicol. Risk Assess 2018, 4, 010. [Google Scholar]
  13. Nolan, E.M.; Lippard, S.J. Tools and Tactics for the Optical Detection of Mercuric Ion. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 3443–3480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Shellaiah, M.; Sun, K.W. Luminescent Metal Nanoclusters for Potential Chemosensor Applications. Chemosensors 2017, 5, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Shuai, H.; Xiang, C.; Qian, L.; Bin, F.; Xiaohui, L.; Jipeng, D.; Chang, Z.; Jiahui, L.; Wenbin, Z. Fluorescent sensors for detection of mercury: From small molecules to nanoprobes. Dyes Pigment. 2021, 187, 109125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Dai, D.; Li, Z.; Yang, J.; Wang, C.; Wu, J.-R.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, D.; Yang, Y.-W. Supramolecular Assembly-Induced Emission Enhancement for Efficient Mercury(II) Detection and Removal. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 4756–4763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Zhao, L.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, Y.; Wei, J.; Liu, Q.; Ran, P.; Li, X. Fibrous strips decorated with cleavable aggregation-induced emission probes for visual detection of Hg2+. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 385, 121556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Kumar, P.; Deep, A.; Kim, K.-H. Metal organic frameworks for sensing applications. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2015, 73, 39–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Li, Y.; Hu, T.; Chen, R.; Xiang, R.; Wang, Q.; Zeng, Y.; He, C. Novel thiol-functionalized covalent organic framework as adsorbent for simultaneous removal of BTEX and mercury (II) from water. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 398, 125566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chen, L.; Liu, D.; Peng, J.; Du, Q.; He, H. Ratiometric fluorescence sensing of metal-organic frameworks: Tactics and perspectives. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2020, 404, 213113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Razavi, S.A.A.; Morsali, A. Metal ion detection using luminescent-MOFs: Principles, strategies and roadmap. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2020, 415, 213299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Devaraj, M.; Sasikumar, Y.; Rajendran, S.; Ponce, L.C. Review—Metal Organic Framework Based Nanomaterials for Electrochemical Sensing of Toxic Heavy Metal Ions: Progress and Their Prospects. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2021, 168, 037513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Vardali, S.C.; Manousi, N.; Barczak, M.; Giannakoudakis, D.A. Novel Approaches Utilizing Metal-Organic Framework Composites for the Extraction of Organic Compounds and Metal Traces from Fish and Seafood. Molecules 2020, 25, 513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Li, X.; Ma, W.; Li, H.; Zhang, Q.; Liu, H. Sulfur-functionalized metal-organic frameworks: Synthesis and applications as advanced adsorbents. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2020, 408, 213191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Chen, L.; Luque, R.; Li, Y. Controllable design of tunable nanostructures inside metal–organic frameworks. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 4614–4630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Xia, W.; Mahmood, A.; Zou, R.; Xu, Q. Metal–organic frameworks and their derived nanostructures for electrochemical energy storage and conversion. Energy Environ. Sci. 2015, 8, 1837–1866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lee, K.J.; Lee, J.H.; Jeoung, S.; Moon, H.R. Transformation of Metal–Organic Frameworks/Coordination Polymers into Functional Nanostructured Materials: Experimental Approaches Based on Mechanistic Insights. Acc. Chem. Res. 2017, 50, 2684–2692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Xie, Z.; Xu, W.; Cui, X.; Wang, Y. Recent Progress in Metal–Organic Frameworks and Their Derived Nanostructures for Energy and Environmental Applications. ChemSusChem 2017, 10, 1645–1663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Song, Y.; Li, X.; Sun, L.; Wang, L. Metal/metal oxide nanostructures derived from metal–organic frameworks. RSC Adv. 2014, 5, 7267–7279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Heo, D.Y.; Do, H.H.; Ahn, S.H.; Kim, S.Y. Metal-Organic Framework Materials for Perovskite Solar Cells. Polymers 2020, 12, 2061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kaur, H.; Sundriyal, S.; Pachauri, V.; Ingebrandt, S.; Kim, K.-H.; Sharma, A.L.; Deep, A. Luminescent metal-organic frameworks and their composites: Potential future materials for organic light emitting displays. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2019, 401, 213077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wu, G.; Huang, J.; Zang, Y.; He, J.; Xu, G. Porous Field-Effect Transistors Based on a Semiconductive Metal–Organic Framework. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 1360–1363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. He, J.; Xu, J.; Yin, J.; Li, N.; Bu, X.-H. Recent advances in luminescent metal-organic frameworks for chemical sensors. Sci. China Mater. 2019, 62, 1655–1678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Wu, S.; Min, H.; Shi, W.; Cheng, P. Multicenter Metal–Organic Framework-Based Ratiometric Fluorescent Sensors. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, 1805871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Samanta, P.; Let, S.; Mandal, W.; Dutta, S.; Ghosh, S.K. Luminescent metal–organic frameworks (LMOFs) as potential probes for the recognition of cationic water pollutants. Inorg. Chem. Front. 2020, 7, 1801–1821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Huang, S.-Z.; Liu, S.-S.; Zhang, H.-j.; Han, Z.; Zhao, G.; Dong, X.-Y.; Zang, S.-Q. Dual-Functional Proton-Conducting and pH-Sensing Polymer Membrane Benefiting from a Eu-MOF. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 28720–28726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Wang, Y.; Hu, Y.; He, Q.; Yan, J.; Xiong, H.; Wen, N.; Cai, S.; Peng, D.; Liu, Y.; Liu, Z. Metal-organic frameworks for virus detection. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2020, 169, 112604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gai, S.; Zhang, J.; Fan, R.; Xing, K.; Chen, W.; Zhu, K.; Zheng, X.; Wang, P.; Fang, X.; Yang, Y. Highly Stable Zinc-Based Metal-Organic Frameworks and Corresponding Flexible Composites for Removal and Detection of Antibiotics in Water. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 8650–8662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Tang, J.; Feng, D.; Yang, J.; Ma, X.; Wang, X.-Q. A turn-on luminescent probe for Fe3+ and ascorbic acid with logic gate operation based on a zinc(ii)-based metal–organic framework. New J. Chem. 2020, 44, 8728–8735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wu, R.-Z.; Yang, X.; Zhang, L.-W.; Zhou, P.-P. Luminescent lanthanide metal–organic frameworks for chemical sensing and toxic anion detection. Dalton Trans. 2017, 46, 9859–9867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hu, Z.; Deibert, B.J.; Li, J. Luminescent metal–organic frameworks for chemical sensing and explosive detection. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 5815–5840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Dalapati, R.; Nandi, S.; Biswas, S. Post-synthetic modification of a metal-organic framework with a chemodosimeter for the rapid detection of lethal cyanide via dual emission. Dalton Trans. 2020, 49, 8684–8692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Koo, W.-T.; Jang, J.-S.; Kim, I.-D. Metal-Organic Frameworks for Chemiresistive Sensors. Chem 2019, 5, 1938–1963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lustig, W.P.; Mukherjee, S.; Rudd, N.D.; Desai, A.V.; Li, J.; Ghosh, S.K. Metal–organic frameworks: Functional luminescent and photonic materials for sensing applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 3242–3285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Goswami, R.; Mandal, S.C.; Pathak, B.; Neogi, S. Guest-Induced Ultrasensitive Detection of Multiple Toxic Organics and Fe3+ Ions in a Strategically Designed and Regenerative Smart Fluorescent Metal-Organic Framework. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 9042–9053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Tchalala, M.R.; Bhatt, P.M.; Chappanda, K.N.; Tavares, S.R.; Adil, K.; Belmabkhout, Y.; Shkurenko, A.; Cadiau, A.; Heymans, N.; De Weireld, G.; et al. Fluorinated MOF platform for selective removal and sensing of SO2 from flue gas and air. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Chen, G.; Guo, Z.; Zeng, G.; Tang, L. Fluorescent and colorimetric sensors for environmental mercury detection. Analyst 2015, 140, 5400–5443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Rouhani, F.; Morsali, A. Goal-Directed Design of Metal-Organic Frameworks for HgII and PbII Adsorption from Aqueous Solutions. Chem. Eur. J. 2018, 24, 17170–17179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Tan, H.; Liu, B.; Chen, Y. Lanthanide Coordination Polymer Nanoparticles for Sensing of Mercury(II) by Photoinduced Electron Transfer. ACS Nano 2012, 6, 10505–10511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Sohrabi, M.R. Preconcentration of mercury(II) using a thiol-functionalized metal-organic framework nanocomposite as a sorbent. Microchim. Acta 2014, 181, 435–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zhang, X.; Shen, B.; Zhu, S.; Xu, H.; Tian, L. UiO-66 and its Br-modified derivates for elemental mercury removal. J. Hazard. Mater. 2016, 320, 556–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Li, X.; Wang, B.; Cao, Y.; Zhao, S.; Wang, H.; Feng, X.; Zhou, J.; Ma, X. Water Contaminant Elimination Based on Metal–Organic Frameworks and Perspective on Their Industrial Applications. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 4548–4563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Fang, X.; Zong, B.; Mao, S. Metal-Organic Framework-Based Sensors for Environmental Contaminant Sensing. Nano-Micro Lett. 2018, 10, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Yao, C.-X.; Zhao, N.; Liu, J.-C.; Chen, L.-J.; Liu, J.-M.; Fang, G.-Z.; Wang, S. Recent Progress on Luminescent Metal-Organic Framework-Involved Hybrid Materials for Rapid Determination of Contaminants in Environment and Food. Polymers 2020, 12, 691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Yee, K.-K.; Reimer, N.; Liu, J.; Cheng, S.-Y.; Yiu, S.-M.; Weber, J.; Stock, N.; Xu, Z. Effective Mercury Sorption by Thiol-Laced Metal–Organic Frameworks: In Strong Acid and the Vapor Phase. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 7795–7798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Wang, Q.; Astruc, D. State of the Art and Prospects in Metal-Organic Framework (MOF)-Based and MOF-Derived Nanoca-talysis. Chem. Rev. 2020, 120, 1438–1511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Cui, J.; Ren, S.; Sun, B.; Jia, S. Optimization protocols and improved strategies for metal-organic frameworks for immobilizing enzymes: Current development and future challenges. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2018, 370, 22–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Hu, M.-L.; Razavi, S.A.A.; Piroozzadeh, M.; Morsali, A. Sensing organic analytes by metal–organic frameworks: A new way of considering the topic. Inorg. Chem. Front. 2020, 7, 1598–1632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Dalapati, R.; Biswas, S. Post-synthetic modification of a metal-organic framework with fluorescent-tag for dual naked-eye sensing in aqueous medium. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2017, 239, 759–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Safaei, M.; Foroughi, M.M.; Ebrahimpoor, N.; Jahani, S.; Omidi, A.; Khatami, M. A review on metal-organic frameworks: Synthesis and applications. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2019, 118, 401–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Al-Ghoul, M.; Issa, R.; Hmadeh, M. Synthesis, size and structural evolution of metal–organic framework-199 via a reaction–diffusion process at room temperature. CrystEngComm 2016, 19, 608–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Al Amery, N.; Abid, H.; Al-Saadi, S.; Wang, S.; Liu, S. Facile directions for synthesis, modification and activation of MOFs. Mater. Today Chem. 2020, 17, 100343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Klinowski, J.; Almeida Paz, F.A.; Silva, P.; Rocha, J. Microwave-Assisted Synthesis of Metal-Organic Frameworks. Dalton Trans. 2011, 40, 321–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Thomas-Hillman, I.; Laybourn, A.; Dodds, C.; Kingman, S.W. Realising the environmental benefits of metal-organic frameworks: Recent advances in microwave synthesis. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 11564–11581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Le, V.N.; Kwon, H.T.; Vo, T.K.; Kim, J.-H.; Kim, W.-S.; Kim, J. Microwave-assisted continuous flow synthesis of mesoporous metal-organic framework MIL-100 (Fe) and its application to Cu(I)-loaded adsorbent for CO/CO2 separation. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2020, 253, 123278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Li, W.-J.; Tu, M.; Cao, R.; Fischer, R.A. Metal-organic framework thin films: Electrochemical fabrication techniques and corresponding applications & perspectives. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 12356–12369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Wang, Z.; Li, Z.; Ng, M.; Milner, P.J. Rapid mechanochemical synthesis of metal–organic frameworks using exogenous organic base. Dalton Trans. 2020, 49, 16238–16244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Vaitsis, C.; Sourkouni, G.; Argirusis, C. Chapter 11—Sonochemical synthesis of MOFs. In Metal-Organic Frameworks for Bio-medical Applications; Mozafari, M., Ed.; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2020; pp. 223–244. [Google Scholar]
  69. Kalaj, M.; Cohen, S.M. Postsynthetic Modification: An Enabling Technology for the Advancement of Metal-Organic Frameworks. ACS Cent. Sci. 2020, 6, 1046–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Shellaiah, M.; Sun, K.W. Review on Sensing Applications of Perovskite Nanomaterials. Chemosensors 2020, 8, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Yang, J.; Wang, Z.; Li, Y.; Zhuang, Q.; Zhao, W.; Gu, J. Porphyrinic MOFs for reversible fluorescent and colorimetric sensing of mercury(II) ions in aqueous phase. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 69807–69814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Zhang, X.; Xia, T.; Jiang, K.; Cui, Y.; Yang, Y.; Qian, G. Highly sensitive and selective detection of mercury (II) based on a zirconium metal-organic framework in aqueous media. J. Solid State Chem. 2017, 253, 277–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Samanta, P.; Desai, A.V.; Sharma, S.; Chandra, P.; Ghosh, S.K. Selective Recognition of Hg2+ ion in Water by a Functionalized Metal–Organic Framework (MOF) Based Chemodosimeter. Inorg. Chem. 2018, 57, 2360–2364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Xiaoxiong, Z.; Wenjun, Z.; Cuiliu, L.; Xiaohong, Q.; Chengyu, Z. Eu3+-Postdoped UIO-66-Type Metal-Organic Framework as a Luminescent Sensor for Hg2+ Detection in Aqueous Media. Inorg. Chem. 2019, 58, 3910–3915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Wang, Z.; Yang, J.; Li, Y.; Zhuang, Q.; Gu, J. Zr-Based MOFs integrated with a chromophoric ruthenium complex for specific and reversible Hg2+sensing. Dalton Trans. 2018, 47, 5570–5574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Li, W.-Y.; Yang, S.; Li, Y.-A.; Li, Q.-Y.; Guan, Q.; Dong, Y.-B. Synthesis of an MOF-based Hg2+-fluorescent probe via stepwise post-synthetic modification in a single-crystal-to-single-crystal fashion and its application in bioimaging. Dalton Trans. 2019, 48, 16502–16508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Kim, J.; Oh, J.S.; Park, K.C.; Gupta, G.; Lee, C.Y. Colorimetric detection of heavy metal ions in water via metal-organic framework. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2019, 486, 69–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Wang, H.; Wang, X.; Liang, M.; Chen, G.; Kong, R.-M.; Xia, L.; Qu, F. A Boric Acid-Functionalized Lanthanide Metal-Organic Framework as a Fluorescence “Turn-on” Probe for Selective Monitoring of Hg2+ and CH3Hg+. Anal. Chem. 2020, 92, 3366–3372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Xia, T.; Song, T.; Zhang, G.; Cui, Y.; Yang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Qian, G. A Terbium Metal-Organic Framework for Highly Selective and Sensitive Luminescence Sensing of Hg2+ Ions in Aqueous Solution. Chem. A Eur. J. 2016, 22, 18429–18434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Liu, X.; Lin, H.; Xiao, Z.; Fan, W.; Huang, A.; Wang, R.; Zhang, L.; Sun, D. Multifunctional lanthanide–organic frameworks for fluorescent sensing, gas separation and catalysis. Dalton Trans. 2016, 45, 3743–3749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Razavi, S.A.A.; Masoomi, M.Y.; Morsali, A. Double Solvent Sensing Method for Improving Sensitivity and Accuracy of Hg(II) Detection Based on Different Signal Transduction of a Tetrazine-Functionalized Pillared Metal-Organic Framework. Inorg. Chem. 2017, 56, 9646–9652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Wan, Y.; Zou, D.; Cui, Y.; Yang, Y.; Qian, G. A Zn based anionic metal-organic framework for trace Hg2+ ion detection. J. Solid State Chem. 2018, 266, 70–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Pankajakshan, A.; Kuznetsov, D.; Mandal, S. Ultrasensitive Detection of Hg(II) Ions in Aqueous Medium Using Zinc-Based Metal-Organic Framework. Inorg. Chem. 2019, 58, 1377–1381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Khatun, A.; Panda, D.K.; Sayresmith, N.; Walter, M.G.; Saha, S. Thiazolothiazole-Based Luminescent Metal-Organic Frameworks with Ligand-to-Ligand Energy Transfer and Hg2+-Sensing Capabilities. Inorg. Chem. 2019, 58, 12707–12715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Jiang, J.; Lu, Y.; Liu, J.; Zhou, Y.; Zhao, D.; Li, C. An acid-base resistant Zn-based metal-organic framework as a luminescent sensor for mercury(II). J. Solid State Chem. 2020, 283, 121153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Wu, P.; Liu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Wang, J.; Li, Y.; Liu, W.; Wang, J. Cadmium-Based Metal-Organic Framework as a Highly Selective and Sensitive Ratiometric Luminescent Sensor for Mercury(II). Inorg. Chem. 2015, 54, 11046–11048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Liu, B.-H.; Liu, D.-X.; Yang, K.-Q.; Dong, S.-J.; Li, W.; Wang, Y.-J. A new cluster-based metal-organic framework with triazine backbones for selective luminescent detection of mercury(II) ion. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2018, 90, 61–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. El Taher, B.J.; Sabouni, R.; Ghommem, M. Luminescent metal organic framework for selective detection of mercury in aqueous media: Microwave-based synthesis and evaluation. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2020, 607, 125477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Basaleh, A.S.; Sheta, S.M. Novel advanced nanomaterial based on ferrous metal-organic framework and its application as chemosensors for mercury in environmental and biological samples. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2020, 412, 3153–3165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Li, Y.; Ma, D.; Chen, C.; Chen, M.; Li, Z.; Wu, Y.; Zhu, S.; Peng, G. A hydrostable and bromine-functionalized manganese-organic framework with luminescence sensing of Hg2+ and antiferromagnetic properties. J. Solid State Chem. 2019, 269, 257–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Song, Y.; Fan, R.; Fan, J.; Xing, K.; Du, X.; Wang, P.; Yang, Y. Highly sensitive and selective fluorescent probes for Hg2+ in Ag(i)/Cu(ii) 3D supramolecular architectures based on noncovalent interactions. Dalton Trans. 2016, 45, 16422–16432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Jana, A.K.; Natarajan, S. Fluorescent Metal-Organic Frameworks for Selective Sensing of Toxic Cations (Tl3+, Hg2+) and Highly Oxidizing Anions ((CrO4)2−, (Cr2O7)2−, (MnO4)). ChemPlusChem 2017, 82, 1153–1163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Xiao, J.; Liu, J.; Gao, X.; Ji, G.; Wang, D.; Liu, Z. A multi-chemosensor based on Zn-MOF: Ratio-dependent color transition detection of Hg (II) and highly sensitive sensor of Cr (VI). Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 269, 164–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Fu, H.-R.; Zhao, Y.; Xie, T.; Han, M.-L.; Ma, L.-F.; Zang, S.-Q. Stable dye-encapsulated indium-organic framework as dual-emitting sensor for the detection of Hg2+/Cr2O72− and a wide range of nitro-compounds. J. Mater. Chem. C 2018, 6, 6440–6448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Li, F.; Hong, Y.-S.; Zuo, K.-X.; Sun, Q.; Gao, E.-Q. Highly selective fluorescent probe for Hg2+ and MnO4 by the two-fold interpenetrating metal-organic framework with nitro functionalized linkers. J. Solid State Chem. 2019, 270, 509–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Yang, Y.-J.; Liu, D.; Li, Y.-H.; Dong, G.-Y. Two new luminescent ternary Cd(II)-MOFs by regulation of aromatic dicarboxylate ligands used as efficient dual-responsive sensors for toxic metal ions in water. Polyhedron 2019, 159, 32–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Mahmoud, M.E.; Moussa, Z.; Prakasam, T.; Li, L.; Abiad, M.G.; Patra, D.; Hmadeh, M. Lanthanides based metal organic frameworks for luminescence sensing of toxic metal ions. J. Solid State Chem. 2020, 281, 121031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Ren, M.; Wang, H.; Liu, Y.; Ma, Q.; Jia, W.; Liu, M.; Wang, H.; Lu, Y. Fluorescent Determination of Mercury (II) and Glutathione Using Amino-MIL-53(Al) Nanosheets. Anal. Lett. 2020, 53, 2700–2714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Yang, L.; Li, X.; Qin, C.; Shao, K.-Z.; Su, Z.-M. A fluorescent sensor for highly selective sensing of nitro explosives and Hg(ii) ions based on a 3D porous layer metal–organic framework. CrystEngComm 2016, 18, 4765–4771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Gong, W.-J.; Ren, Z.-G.; Li, H.-X.; Zhang, J.-G.; Lang, J.-P. Cadmium(II) Coordination Polymers of 4-Pyr-poly-2-ene and Carboxylates: Construction, Structure, and Photochemical Double [2 + 2] Cycloaddition and Luminescent Sensing of Nitroaromatics and Mercury(II) Ions. Cryst. Growth Des. 2017, 17, 870–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Su, Y.-Q.; Qu, Y.-H.; Fu, L.; Cui, G.-H. An unprecedented binodal (4,6)-connected Co(II) MOF as dual-responsive luminescent sensor for detection of acetylacetone and Hg2+ ions. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2020, 118, 108013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Sun, X.; Yang, P.; Hou, G.; Wei, J.; Wang, X.; Yang, D.; Zhang, X.; Dong, H.; Zhang, F. Luminescent Functionalised Supramolecular Coordination Polymers Based on an Aromatic Carboxylic Acid Ligand for Sensing Hg2+ Ions Aust. J. Chem. 2017, 70, 786–791. [Google Scholar]
  103. Li, Q.; Wang, C.; Tan, H.; Tang, G.; Gao, J.; Chen, C.-H. A turn on fluorescent sensor based on lanthanide coordination polymer nanoparticles for the detection of mercury(ii) in biological fluids. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 17811–17817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Li, W.-X.; Li, H.-X.; Li, H.-Y.; Chen, M.-M.; Shi, Y.-X.; Lang, J.-P. 1,4-Bis(2-(pyridin-4-yl)vinyl)naphthalene and Its Zinc(II) Coordination Polymers: Synthesis, Structural Characterization, and Selective Luminescent Sensing of Mercury(II) Ion. Cryst. Growth Des. 2017, 17, 3948–3959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Zhang, S.-R.; Wang, W.; Xu, G.-J.; Yao, C.; Xu, Y.-H.; Su, Z.-M. A fluorescent sensor for selective, sensitive, and recyclable detection of mercury(II) in aqueous solution based on a zinc(II) coordination polymer. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2018, 89, 73–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Gong, W.-J.; Yao, R.; Li, H.-X.; Ren, Z.-G.; Zhang, J.-G.; Lang, J.-P. Luminescent cadmium(ii) coordination polymers of 1,2,4,5-tetrakis(4-pyridylvinyl)benzene used as efficient multi-responsive sensors for toxic metal ions in water. Dalton Trans. 2017, 46, 16861–16871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Wang, X.; Han, Y.; Han, X.X.; Hou, X.; Wang, J.-J.; Fu, F. Highly selective and sensitive detection of Hg2+, Cr2O72−, and nitrobenzene/2,4-dinitrophenol in water via two fluorescent Cd-CPs. New J. Chem. 2018, 42, 19844–19852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Fang, Y.-M.; Ye, X.; Xia, L.; Dong, W.-W.; Zhao, J.; Li, D.-S. Four different dimensional Zn(II) coordination polymers as fluorescent sensor for detecting Hg2+, Cr2O72− in aqueous solution. J. Solid State Chem. 2018, 266, 181–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Lin, J.; Cheng, Q.; Zhou, J.; Lin, X.; Reddy, R.C.K.; Yang, T.; Zhang, G. Five 3D lanthanide-based coordination polymers with 3,3,6T13 topology: Structures and luminescent sensor for Hg2+ and Pb2+ ions. J. Solid State Chem. 2019, 270, 339–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Rachuri, Y.; Parmar, B.; Bisht, K.K.; Suresh, E. Multiresponsive Adenine-Based Luminescent Zn(II) Coordination Polymer for Detection of Hg2+ and Trinitrophenol in Aqueous Media. Cryst. Growth Des. 2017, 17, 1363–1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Zhu, H.; Han, C.; Li, Y.-H.; Cui, G.-H. Two new coordination polymers containing long flexible bis(benzimidazole) ligand as luminescent chemosensors for acetylacetone and Hg(II) ions detection. J. Solid State Chem. 2020, 282, 121132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Ravikumar, A.; Panneerselvam, P.; Morad, N. Metal-Polydopamine Framework as an Effective Fluorescent Quencher for Highly Sensitive Detection of Hg(II) and Ag(I) Ions through Exonuclease III Activity. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 20550–20558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Huang, N.-H.; Liu, Y.; Li, R.-T.; Chen, J.; Hu, P.-P.; Young, D.J.; Chen, J.-X.; Zhang, W.-H. Sequential Ag+/biothiol and synchronous Ag+/Hg2+ biosensing with zwitterionic Cu2+-based metal–organic frameworks. Analyst 2020, 145, 2779–2788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Huang, N.-H.; Li, R.-T.; Fan, C.; Wu, K.-Y.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, J.-X. Rapid sequential detection of Hg2+ and biothiols by a probe DNA-MOF hybrid sensory system. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2019, 197, 110690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Wu, L.-L.; Wang, Z.; Zhao, S.-N.; Meng, X.; Song, X.-Z.; Feng, J.; Song, S.-Y.; Zhang, H.-J. A Metal-Organic Framework/DNA Hybrid System as a Novel Fluorescent Biosensor for Mercury(II) Ion Detection. Chem. A Eur. J. 2015, 22, 477–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Wang, C.; Tang, G.; Tan, H. Colorimetric determination of mercury(II) via the inhibition by ssDNA of the oxidase-like activity of a mixed valence state cerium-based metal-organic framework. Microchim. Acta 2018, 185, 475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Wu, F.; Ye, J.; Cao, Y.; Wang, Z.; Miao, T.; Shi, Q. Recent advances in fluorescence sensors based on DNA-MOF hybrids. Luminescence 2020, 35, 440–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Chen, H.-L.; Li, R.-T.; Wu, K.-Y.; Hu, P.-P.; Zhang, Z.; Huang, N.-H.; Zhang, W.-H.; Chen, J.-X. Experimental and theoretical validations of a one-pot sequential sensing of Hg2+ and biothiols by a 3D Cu-based zwitterionic metal−organic framework. Talanta 2020, 210, 120596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Wu, X.-J.; Kong, F.; Zhao, C.-Q.; Ding, S.-N. Ratiometric fluorescent nanosensors for ultra-sensitive detection of mercury ions based on AuNCs/MOFs. Analyst 2019, 144, 2523–2530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Govindaraju, S.; Puthiaraj, P.; Lee, M.-H.; Yun, K. Photoluminescent AuNCs@UiO-66 for Ultrasensitive Detection of Mercury in Water Samples. ACS Omega 2018, 3, 12052–12059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  121. Marieeswaran, M.; Panneerselvam, P. A magnetic nanoscale metal-organic framework (MNMOF) as a viable fluorescence quencher material for ssDNA and for the detection of mercury ions via a novel quenching-quenching mechanism. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 3705–3714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  122. Hu, P.-P.; Liu, N.; Wu, K.-Y.; Zhai, L.-Y.; Xie, B.-P.; Sun, B.; Duan, W.-J.; Zhang, W.-H.; Chen, J.-X. Successive and Specific Detection of Hg2+ and I by a DNA@MOF Biosensor: Experimental and Simulation Studies. Inorg. Chem. 2018, 57, 8382–8389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Wang, X.; Wang, H.; Guo, L.; Chen, G.; Kong, R.; Qu, F.; Xia, L. Colorimetric detection of Hg(ii) based on the gold amalgam-triggered reductase mimetic activity in aqueous solution by employing AuNP@MOF nanoparticles. Analyst 2020, 145, 1362–1367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Zhang, Y.; Song, J.; Pan, Q.; Zhang, X.; Shao, W.; Quan, C.; Li, J. An Au@NH2-MIL-125(Ti)-based multifunctional platform for colorimetric detections of biomolecules and Hg2+. J. Mater. Chem. B 2020, 8, 114–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Guo, M.; Chi, J.; Li, Y.; Waterhouse, G.I.N.; Ai, S.; Hou, J.; Li, X. Fluorometric determination of mercury(II) based on dual-emission metal-organic frameworks incorporating carbon dots and gold nanoclusters. Microchim. Acta 2020, 187, 534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Yang, Y.; Liu, W.; Cao, J.; Wu, Y. On-site, rapid and visual determination of Hg2+ and Cu2+ in red wine by ratiometric fluorescence sensor of metal-organic frameworks and CdTe QDs. Food Chem. 2020, 328, 127119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Shellaiah, M.; Sun, K.W. Inorganic-Diverse Nanostructured Materials for Volatile Organic Compound Sensing. Sensors 2021, 21, 633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Zhang, X.; Jiang, Y.; Zhu, M.; Xu, Y.; Guo, Z.; Shi, J.; Han, E.; Zou, X.; Wang, D. Electrochemical DNA sensor for inorganic mercury(II) ion at attomolar level in dairy product using Cu(II)-anchored metal-organic framework as mimetic catalyst. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 383, 123182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Salandari-Jolge, N.; Ensafi, A.A.; Rezaei, B. Ultra-sensitive electrochemical aptasensor based on zeolitic imidazolate framework-8 derived Ag/Au core-shell nanoparticles for mercury detection in water samples. Sensors Actuators B Chem. 2021, 331, 129426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Zhang, X.; Zhu, M.; Jiang, Y.; Wang, X.; Guo, Z.; Shi, J.; Zou, X.; Han, E. Simple electrochemical sensing for mercury ions in dairy product using optimal Cu2+-based metal-organic frameworks as signal reporting. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 400, 123222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Fu, L.; Xie, K.; Wang, A.; Lyu, F.; Ge, J.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, H.; Su, W.; Hou, Y.-L.; Zhou, C.; et al. High selective detection of mercury (II) ions by thioether side groups on metal-organic frameworks. Anal. Chim. Acta 2019, 1081, 51–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Qing, M.; Chen, S.; Xie, S.; Tang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Yuan, R. Encapsulation and Release of Recognition Probes Based on a Rigid Three-Dimensional DNA “Nanosafe-box” for Construction of a Electrochemical Biosensor. Anal. Chem. 2020, 92, 1811–1817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Singh, S.; Numan, A.; Zhan, Y.; Singh, V.; Van Hung, T.; Nam, N.D. A novel highly efficient and ultrasensitive electro-chemical detection of toxic mercury (II) ions in canned tuna fish and tap water based on a copper metal-organic framework. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 399, 123042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Kokkinos, C.; Economou, A.; Pournara, A.; Manos, M.; Spanopoulos, I.; Kanatzidis, M.; Tziotzi, T.; Petkov, V.; Margariti, A.; Oikonomopoulos, P.; et al. 3D-printed lab-in-a-syringe voltammetric cell based on a working electrode modified with a highly efficient Ca-MOF sorbent for the determination of Hg(II). Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2020, 321, 128508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Zhang, L.; Feng, L.; Li, P.; Chen, X.; Jiang, J.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, A.; Chen, G.; Wang, H. Direct Z-scheme photocatalyst of hollow CoSx@CdS polyhedron constructed by ZIF-67-templated one-pot solvothermal route: A signal-on photoelectrochemical sensor for mercury (II). Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 395, 125072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Chen, Y.; Bai, X.; Ye, Z. Recent Progress in Heavy Metal Ion Decontamination Based on Metal-Organic Frameworks. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 1481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Rezaei Kahkha, M.R.; Daliran, S.; Oveisi, A.R.; Kaykhaii, M.; Sepehri, Z. The Mesoporous Porphyrinic Zirconium Metal-Organic Framework for Pipette-Tip Solid-Phase Extraction of Mercury from Fish Samples Followed by Cold Vapor Atomic Absorption Spectrometric Determination. Food Anal. Methods 2017, 10, 2175–2184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Hasankola, Z.S.; Rahimi, R.; Shayegan, H.; Moradi, E.; Safarifard, V. Removal of Hg2+ heavy metal ion using a highly stable mesoporous porphyrinic zirconium metal-organic framework. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2020, 501, 119264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Li, J.; Li, X.; Alsaedi, A.; Hayat, T.; Chen, C. Synthesis of highly porous inorganic adsorbents derived from metal-organic frameworks and their application in efficient elimination of mercury(II). J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2018, 517, 61–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Leus, K.; Perez, J.P.H.; Folens, K.; Meledina, M.; Van Tendeloo, G.; Du Laing, G.; Van Der Voort, P. UiO-66-(SH)2 as stable, selective and regenerable adsorbent for the removal of mercury from water under environmentally-relevant conditions. Faraday Discuss. 2017, 201, 145–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Li, J.; Liu, Y.; Ai, Y.; Alsaedi, A.; Hayat, T.; Wang, X. Combined experimental and theoretical investigation on selective removal of mercury ions by metal organic frameworks modified with thiol groups. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 354, 790–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Fu, L.; Wang, S.; Lin, G.; Zhang, L.; Liu, Q.; Fang, J.; Wei, C.; Liu, G. Post-functionalization of UiO-66-NH2 by 2,5-Dimercapto-1,3,4-thiadiazole for the high efficient removal of Hg(II) in water. J. Hazard. Mater. 2019, 368, 42–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Ding, L.; Luo, X.; Shao, P.; Yang, J.; Sun, D. Thiol-Functionalized Zr-Based Metal-Organic Framework for Capture of Hg(II) through a Proton Exchange Reaction. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 8494–8502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Li, M.-Q.; Wong, Y.-L.; Lum, T.-S.; Leung, K.S.-Y.; Lam, P.K.S.; Xu, Z. Dense thiol arrays for metal–organic frameworks: Boiling water stability, Hg removal beyond 2 ppb and facile crosslinking. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 14566–14570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Yang, P.; Shu, Y.; Zhuang, Q.; Li, Y.; Gu, J. A robust MOF-based trap with high-density active alkyl thiol for the super-efficient capture of mercury. Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 12972–12975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Lin, D.; Liu, X.; Huang, R.; Qi, W.; Su, R.; He, Z. One-pot synthesis of mercapto functionalized Zr-MOFs for the enhanced removal of Hg2+ ions from water. Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 6775–6778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Zhao, M.; Huang, Z.; Wang, S.; Zhang, L.; Zhou, Y. Design of l-Cysteine Functionalized UiO-66 MOFs for Selective Adsorption of Hg(II) in Aqueous Medium. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 46973–46983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Liu, F.; Xiong, W.; Feng, X.; Cheng, G.; Shi, L.; Chen, D.; Zhang, Y. Highly recyclable cysteamine-modified acid-resistant MOFs for enhancing Hg (II) removal from water. Environ. Technol. 2019, 41, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. He, Y.; Hou, Y.-L.; Wong, Y.-L.; Xiao, R.; Li, M.-Q.; Hao, Z.; Huang, J.; Wang, L.; Zeller, M.; He, J.; et al. Improving stability against desolvation and mercury removal performance of Zr(iv)-carboxylate frameworks by using bulky sulfur functions. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 6, 1648–1654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Chen, S.; Feng, F.; Li, S.; Li, X.-X.; Shu, L. Metal-organic framework DUT-67 (Zr) for adsorptive removal of trace Hg2+ and CH3Hg+ in water. Chem. Speciat. Bioavailab. 2018, 30, 99–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  151. Liu, Q.; Zhang, Q.; Liu, B.; Ma, J. A new synthesis and adsorption mechanism of ZrO2 based metal-organic frames for efficient removal of mercury ions from aqueous solution. Ceram. Int. 2019, 45, 15720–15724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Xiong, Y.Y.; Li, J.Q.; Le Gong, L.; Feng, X.F.; Na Meng, L.; Zhang, L.; Meng, P.P.; Luo, M.B.; Luo, F. Using MOF-74 for Hg2+ removal from ultra-low concentration aqueous solution. J. Solid State Chem. 2017, 246, 16–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Wang, C.-M.; Lin, Y.-J.; Pan, M.-F.; Su, C.-K.; Lin, T.-Y. A Highly Stable Framework of Crystalline Zinc Phosphite with Selective Removal, Recovery, and Turn-On Sensing Abilities for Mercury Cations in Aqueous Solutions. Chem. Eur. J. 2018, 24, 9729–9734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Esrafili, L.; Gharib, M.; Morsali, A. The targeted design of dual-functional metal–organic frameworks (DF-MOFs) as highly efficient adsorbents for Hg2+ ions: Synthesis for purpose. Dalton Trans. 2019, 48, 17831–17839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Wu, Y.; Xu, G.; Wei, F.; Song, Q.; Tang, T.; Wang, X.; Hu, Q. Determination of Hg (II) in tea and mushroom samples based on metal-organic frameworks as solid phase extraction sorbents. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2016, 235, 204–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Mon, M.; Qu, X.; Ferrando-Soria, J.; Pellicer-Carreño, I.; Sepúlveda-Escribano, A.; Ramos-Fernandez, E.V.; Jansen, J.C.; Armentano, D.; Pardo, E. Fine-tuning of the confined space in microporous metal–organic frameworks for efficient mercury removal. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 20120–20125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  157. Yazdi, M.N.; Yamini, Y.; Asiabi, H.; Alizadeh, A. A metal organic framework prepared from benzene-1,3,5-tricarboxylic acid and copper(II), and functionalized with various polysulfides as a sorbent for selective sorption of trace amounts of heavy metal ions. Microchim. Acta 2018, 185, 525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Xu, W.-Q.; Lin, C.-C.; Qiu, Y.-X.; He, S.; Jiang, T.; Liu, X.-J.; Xie, L.-J.; Fuhr, O.; Fenske, D.; Jiang, J.-J. A Recoverable Complex with Nitrogen-Rich Double Rings for Hg(II) Sorption. ChemistrySelect 2018, 3, 7592–7595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Xu, W.-Q.; He, S.; Liu, S.-J.; Liu, X.-H.; Qiu, Y.-X.; Liu, W.-T.; Jiang, L.-C.; Jiang, J.-J. Post-synthetic modification of a metal-organic framework based on 5-aminoisophthalic acid for mercury sorption. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2019, 108, 107515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Liang, L.; Chen, Q.; Jiang, F.; Yuan, D.; Qian, J.; Lv, G.; Xue, H.; Liu, L.; Jiang, H.-L.; Hong, M. In situ large-scale construction of sulfur-functionalized metal–organic framework and its efficient removal of Hg(ii) from water. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 15370–15374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  161. Jiang, S.-Y.; He, W.-W.; Li, S.-L.; Su, Z.-M.; Lan, Y.-Q. Introduction of Molecular Building Blocks to Improve the Stability of Metal–Organic Frameworks for Efficient Mercury Removal. Inorg. Chem. 2018, 57, 6118–6123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Wang, C.; He, C.; Luo, Y.-H.; Su, S.; Wang, J.-Y.; Hong, D.-L.; He, X.-T.; Chen, C.; Sun, B.-W. Efficient mercury chloride capture by ultrathin 2D metal-organic framework nanosheets. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 379, 122337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Tian, J.; Shi, C.; Xiao, C.; Jiang, F.; Yuan, D.; Chen, Q.; Hong, M. Introduction of Flexibility into a Metal-Organic Framework to Promote Hg(II) Capture through Adaptive Deformation. Inorg. Chem. 2020, 59, 18264–18275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Halder, S.; Mondal, J.; Ortega-Castro, J.; Frontera, A.; Roy, P. A Ni-based MOF for selective detection and removal of Hg2+ in aqueous medium: A facile strategy. Dalton Trans. 2017, 46, 1943–1950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Li, G.-P.; Zhang, K.; Zhang, P.-F.; Liu, W.-N.; Tong, W.-Q.; Hou, L.; Wang, Y.-Y. Thiol-Functionalized Pores via Post-Synthesis Modification in a Metal-Organic Framework with Selective Removal of Hg(II) in Water. Inorg. Chem. 2019, 58, 3409–3415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Li, K.; Li, J.-J.; Zhao, N.; Xie, T.-T.; Di, B.; Xu, L.-L. Thioether-based recyclable metal-organic frameworks for selective and efficient removal of Hg2+ from water. Dalton Trans. 2019, 48, 17800–17809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Han, Y.; Zheng, H.; Liu, K.; Wang, H.; Huang, H.; Xie, L.-H.; Wang, L.; Li, J.-R. In-Situ Ligand Formation-Driven Preparation of a Heterometallic Metal-Organic Framework for Highly Selective Separation of Light Hydrocarbons and Efficient Mercury Adsorption. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 23331–23337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Mon, M.; Lloret, F.; Ferrando-Soria, J.; Martí-Gastaldo, C.; Armentano, D.; Pardo, E. Selective and Efficient Removal of Mercury from Aqueous Media with the Highly Flexible Arms of a BioMOF. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 11167–11172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Saleem, H.; Rafique, U.; Davies, R.P. Investigations on post-synthetically modified UiO-66-NH2 for the adsorptive removal of heavy metal ions from aqueous solution. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2016, 221, 238–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Wu, J.; Zhou, J.; Zhang, S.; Alsaedi, A.; Hayat, T.; Li, J.; Song, Y. Efficient removal of metal contaminants by EDTA modified MOF from aqueous solutions. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2019, 555, 403–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  171. Rouhani, F.; Morsali, A. Fast and Selective Heavy Metal Removal by a Novel Metal-Organic Framework Designed with In-Situ Ligand Building Block Fabrication Bearing Free Nitrogen. Chem. A Eur. J. 2018, 24, 5529–5537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. Hakimifar, A.; Morsali, A. Urea-Based Metal-Organic Frameworks as High and Fast Adsorbent for Hg2+ and Pb2+ Removal from Water. Inorg. Chem. 2019, 58, 180–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  173. Mon, M.; Bruno, R.; Tiburcio, E.; Viciano-Chumillas, M.; Kalinke, L.H.G.; Ferrando-Soria, J.; Armentano, D.; Pardo, E. Multivariate Metal-Organic Frameworks for the Simultaneous Capture of Organic and Inorganic Contaminants from Water. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 13601–13609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  174. Ru, J.; Wang, X.; Wang, F.; Cui, X.; Du, X.; Lu, X. UiO series of metal-organic frameworks composites as advanced sorbents for the removal of heavy metal ions: Synthesis, applications and adsorption mechanism. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 208, 111577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Li, H.; Liu, H.; Zhang, J.; Cheng, Y.; Zhang, C.; Fei, X.; Xian, Y. Platinum Nanoparticle Encapsulated Metal-Organic Frameworks for Colorimetric Measurement and Facile Removal of Mercury(II). ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 40716–40725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Shi, M.; Lin, D.; Huang, R.; Qi, W.; Su, R.; He, Z. Construction of a Mercapto-Functionalized Zr-MOF/Melamine Sponge Composite for the Efficient Removal of Oils and Heavy Metal Ions from Water. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2020, 59, 13220–13227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Liu, F.; Xiong, W.; Feng, X.; Shi, L.; Chen, D.; Zhang, Y. A novel monolith ZnS-ZIF-8 adsorption material for ultraeffective Hg (II) capture from wastewater. J. Hazard. Mater. 2019, 367, 381–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Nosike, E.I.; Jiang, Z.; Miao, L.; Akakuru, O.U.; Yuan, B.; Wu, S.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, A. A novel hybrid nanoadsorbent for effective Hg2+ adsorption based on zeolitic imidazolate framework (ZIF-90) assembled onto poly acrylic acid capped Fe3O4 nanoparticles and cysteine. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 392, 122288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Huang, L.; He, M.; Chen, B.; Hu, B. A designable magnetic MOF composite and facile coordination-based post-synthetic strategy for the enhanced removal of Hg2+ from water. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 11587–11595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Liang, L.; Liu, L.; Jiang, F.; Liu, C.; Yuan, D.; Chen, Q.; Wu, D.; Jiang, H.-L.; Hong, M. Incorporation of In2S3 Nanoparticles into a Metal-Organic Framework for Ultrafast Removal of Hg from Water. Inorg. Chem. 2018, 57, 4891–4897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  181. Ke, F.; Jiang, J.; Li, Y.; Wan, X.; Ko, S. Highly selective removal of Hg 2+ and Pb2+ by thiol-functionalized Fe3O4@metal-organic framework core-shell magnetic microspheres. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 413, 266–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Sun, D.T.; Peng, L.; Reeder, W.S.; Moosavi, S.M.; Tiana, D.; Britt, D.K.; Oveisi, E.; Queen, W.L. Rapid, Selective Heavy Metal Removal from Water by a Metal-Organic Framework/Polydopamine Composite. ACS Cent. Sci. 2018, 4, 349–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  183. Abdollahi, N.; Akbar Razavi, S.A.; Morsali, A.; Hu, M.-L. High capacity Hg(II) and Pb(II) removal using MOF-based nanocomposite: Cooperative effects of pore functionalization and surface-charge modulation. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 387, 121667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Liu, Y.; Li, H.; Liu, J. Theoretical prediction the removal of mercury from flue gas by MOFs. Fuel 2016, 184, 474–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  185. Tang, H.; Fang, H.; Duan, Y.; Sholl, D.S. Predictions of Hg0 and HgCl2 Adsorption Properties in UiO-66 from Flue Gas Using Molecular Simulations. J. Phys. Chem. C 2019, 123, 5972–5979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Zhao, S.; Mei, J.; Xu, H.; Liu, W.; Qu, Z.; Cui, Y.; Yan, N. Research of mercury removal from sintering flue gas of iron and steel by the open metal site of Mil-101(Cr). J. Hazard. Mater. 2018, 351, 301–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Dong, L.; Huang, Y.; Liu, L.; Liu, C.; Xu, L.; Zha, J.; Chen, H.; Liu, H. Investigation of Elemental Mercury Removal from Coal-Fired Boiler Flue Gas over MIL101-Cr. Energy Fuels 2019, 33, 8864–8875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Chen, D.; Zhao, S.; Qu, Z.; Yan, N. Cu-BTC as a novel material for elemental mercury removal from sintering gas. Fuel 2018, 217, 297–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Zhou, J.; Cao, L.; Wang, Q.; Tariq, M.; Xue, Y.; Zhou, Z.; Sun, W.; Yang, J. Enhanced Hg0 removal via α-MnO2 anchored to MIL-96(Al). Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 483, 252–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Zhang, X.; Shi, Q.; Shen, B.; Hu, Z. MIL-100(Fe) supported Mn-based catalyst and its behavior in Hg0 removal from flue gas. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 381, 121003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Yang, Z.; Li, H.; Yang, J.; Feng, S.; Liu, X.; Zhao, J.; Qu, W.; Li, P.; Feng, Y.; Lee, P.-H.; et al. Nanosized Copper Selenide Functionalized Zeolitic Imidazolate Framework-8 (CuSe/ZIF-8) for Efficient Immobilization of Gas-Phase Elemental Mercury. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019, 29, 1807191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Yang, J.; Zhu, W.; Qu, W.; Yang, Z.; Wang, J.; Zhang, M.; Li, H. Selenium Functionalized Metal–Organic Framework MIL-101 for Efficient and Permanent Sequestration of Mercury. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 53, 2260–2268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  193. Zhao, S.; Chen, D.; Xu, H.; Mei, J.; Qu, Z.; Liu, P.; Cui, Y.; Yan, N. Combined effects of Ag and UiO-66 for removal of elemental mercury from flue gas. Chemosphere 2018, 197, 65–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  194. Zhang, X.; Shen, B.; Shen, F.; Si, M.; Yuan, P. The behavior of the manganese-cerium loaded metal-organic framework in elemental mercury and NO removal from flue gas. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 326, 551–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Rudd, N.D.; Wang, H.; Fuentes-Fernandez, E.M.A.; Teat, S.J.; Chen, F.; Hall, G.; Chabal, Y.J.; Li, J. Highly Efficient Luminescent Metal-Organic Framework for the Simultaneous Detection and Removal of Heavy Metals from Water. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 30294–30303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  196. Zhang, L.; Wang, J.; Du, T.; Zhang, W.; Zhu, W.; Yang, C.; Yue, T.; Sun, J.; Li, T.; Wang, J. NH2-MIL-53(Al) Metal–Organic Framework as the Smart Platform for Simultaneous High-Performance Detection and Removal of Hg2+. Inorg. Chem. 2019, 58, 12573–12581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  197. Radwan, A.; El-Sewify, I.M.; Shahat, A.; Azzazy, H.M.E.; Khalil, M.M.H.; El-Shahat, M.F. Multiuse Al-MOF Chemosensors for Visual Detection and Removal of Mercury Ions in Water and Skin-Whitening Cosmetics. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 15097–15107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Shahat, A.; Elsalam, S.A.; Herrero-Martínez, J.M.; Simó-Alfonso, E.F.; Ramis-Ramos, G. Optical recognition and removal of Hg(II) using a new self-chemosensor based on a modified amino-functionalized Al-MOF. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2017, 253, 164–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Esrafili, L.; Gharib, M.; Morsali, A. Selective detection and removal of mercury ions by dual-functionalized metal-organic frameworks: Design-for-purpose. New J. Chem. 2019, 43, 18079–18091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Xiong, Y.; Su, L.; Yang, H.; Ye, F.; Zhang, P. Fabrication of copper sulfide using a Cu-based metal organic framework for the colorimetric determination and the efficient removal of Hg2+ in aqueous solutions. New J. Chem. 2015, 39, 9221–9227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Moradi, E.; Rahimi, R.; Safarifard, V. Porphyrinic zirconium-based MOF with exposed pyrrole Lewis base site as an efficient fluorescence sensing for Hg2+ ions, DMF small molecule, and adsorption of Hg2+ ions from water solution. J. Solid State Chem. 2020, 286, 121277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Yang, H.; Peng, C.; Han, J.; Song, Y.; Wang, L. Three-dimensional macroporous Carbon/Zr-2,5-dimercaptoterephthalic acid metal-organic frameworks nanocomposites for removal and detection of Hg(II). Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2020, 320, 128447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Shellaiah, M.; Thirumalaivasan, N.; Sun, K.W.; Wu, S.-P. A pH cooperative strategy for enhanced colorimetric sensing of Cr(III) ions using biocompatible L-glutamic acid stabilized gold nanoparticles. Microchem. J. 2021, 160, 105754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Shellaiah, M.; Simon, T.; Thirumalaivasan, N.; Sun, K.W.; Ko, F.-H.; Wu, S.-P. Cysteamine-capped gold-copper nanoclusters for fluorometric determination and imaging of chromium(VI) and dopamine. Microchim. Acta 2019, 186, 788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  205. Shellaiah, M.; Chen, Y.-C.; Simon, T.; Li, L.-C.; Sun, K.W.; Ko, F.-H. Effect of Metal Ions on Hybrid Graphite-Diamond Nanowire Growth: Conductivity Measurements from a Single Nanowire Device. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  206. Shellaiah, M.; Sun, K.W. Review on Nanomaterial-Based Melamine Detection. Chemosensors 2019, 7, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  207. He, J.; Wu, X.; Long, Z.; Hou, X. Fast and sensitive fluorescent and visual sensing of cysteine using Hg-metalated PCN-222. Microchem. J. 2019, 145, 68–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of three possible MOFs-based mercury detection and removal mechanisms by (A) cavity trapping, (B) metal node displacement, and (C) interactive organic linkers.
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of three possible MOFs-based mercury detection and removal mechanisms by (A) cavity trapping, (B) metal node displacement, and (C) interactive organic linkers.
Chemosensors 09 00101 g001
Figure 2. Illustration of the sensor construction protocol. The inherent TCPP linker was designed as the recognition site as well as the signal reporter for Hg2+ sensing at the same time. Upon the addition of solution into the PCN-224-Hg2+ system, analytes were disassociated and fluorescence of PCN-224 was recovered while the visual colour also turned from light green to purple (Reproduced with the permission from Ref [71]).
Figure 2. Illustration of the sensor construction protocol. The inherent TCPP linker was designed as the recognition site as well as the signal reporter for Hg2+ sensing at the same time. Upon the addition of solution into the PCN-224-Hg2+ system, analytes were disassociated and fluorescence of PCN-224 was recovered while the visual colour also turned from light green to purple (Reproduced with the permission from Ref [71]).
Chemosensors 09 00101 g002
Figure 3. (a) SEM images of UIO-68-NH2, UIO-68-NCS, UIO-68-R6G, and UIO-68-R6G′ and their as-synthesized samples. (b) Emission spectra of UIO-68-R6G (0.1 mg mL−1) upon the addition of Hg2+ at different concentrations in the Tris-HCl buffer solution. Ksv = 4.1 × 109 L mol−1. The emission maximum was observed at 566 nm (λex = 488 nm). Linearity relationship between Hg2+ with different concentrations and relative emission intensities, and the time-dependent emission of UIO-68-R6G with the sequential addition of Hg2+ are shown in the insets. (c) Emission response of UIO-68-R6G toward various metal ions (10−4 M) in an aqueous solution (0.9 mL) of UIO-68-R6G (0.1 mg mL−1): (1) blank, (2) Ag+, (3) Ca2+, (4) Co2+, (5) Cr3+, (6) Cu2+, (7) Fe2+, (8) Hg2+, (9) K+, (10) Mg2+, (11) Na+, (12) Ni2+, (13) Pb2+, and (14) Zn2+. The corresponding sample photographs are inserted (Reproduced with the permission from Ref [76]).
Figure 3. (a) SEM images of UIO-68-NH2, UIO-68-NCS, UIO-68-R6G, and UIO-68-R6G′ and their as-synthesized samples. (b) Emission spectra of UIO-68-R6G (0.1 mg mL−1) upon the addition of Hg2+ at different concentrations in the Tris-HCl buffer solution. Ksv = 4.1 × 109 L mol−1. The emission maximum was observed at 566 nm (λex = 488 nm). Linearity relationship between Hg2+ with different concentrations and relative emission intensities, and the time-dependent emission of UIO-68-R6G with the sequential addition of Hg2+ are shown in the insets. (c) Emission response of UIO-68-R6G toward various metal ions (10−4 M) in an aqueous solution (0.9 mL) of UIO-68-R6G (0.1 mg mL−1): (1) blank, (2) Ag+, (3) Ca2+, (4) Co2+, (5) Cr3+, (6) Cu2+, (7) Fe2+, (8) Hg2+, (9) K+, (10) Mg2+, (11) Na+, (12) Ni2+, (13) Pb2+, and (14) Zn2+. The corresponding sample photographs are inserted (Reproduced with the permission from Ref [76]).
Chemosensors 09 00101 g003
Figure 4. (a) Suspension-state PL spectra (inset: the images under UV-light irradiation at 365 nm) and (b) the relative intensities of [Ag(2,4′-Hpdc)(4,4′-bpy)]n at 401 nm dispersed in aqueous solutions containing different metal ions (50 μM) when excited at 300 nm (reproduced with the permission from Ref [91]).
Figure 4. (a) Suspension-state PL spectra (inset: the images under UV-light irradiation at 365 nm) and (b) the relative intensities of [Ag(2,4′-Hpdc)(4,4′-bpy)]n at 401 nm dispersed in aqueous solutions containing different metal ions (50 μM) when excited at 300 nm (reproduced with the permission from Ref [91]).
Chemosensors 09 00101 g004
Figure 5. (a) Emission spectra of {[Zn2(1,4-bpyvna)(1,3,5-BTC)(OH)]·H2O}n in DMF in the absence/presence of Mn+ ions. (b) The colours of the suspensions of {[Zn2(1,4-bpyvna)(1,3,5-BTC)(OH)]·H2O}n with different metal ions under UV light. (c) Emission spectra of {[Zn2(1,4-bpyvna)(1,3,5-BTC)(OH)]·H2O}n in the presence of increasing Hg2+ concentrations (0–0.08 ppm) in DMF. Inset: linear relation between the quenching efficiency and the concentration of Hg2+ in the range of 0–0.018 ppm. (d) Fluorescence intensities of {[Zn2(1,4-bpyvna)(1,3,5-BTC)(OH)]·H2O}n immersed in the DMF solution of metal ion (blue colour) or mixed Hg2+ and metal ions (red colour) under an excitation of 389 nm (Reproduced with the permission from Ref [104]).
Figure 5. (a) Emission spectra of {[Zn2(1,4-bpyvna)(1,3,5-BTC)(OH)]·H2O}n in DMF in the absence/presence of Mn+ ions. (b) The colours of the suspensions of {[Zn2(1,4-bpyvna)(1,3,5-BTC)(OH)]·H2O}n with different metal ions under UV light. (c) Emission spectra of {[Zn2(1,4-bpyvna)(1,3,5-BTC)(OH)]·H2O}n in the presence of increasing Hg2+ concentrations (0–0.08 ppm) in DMF. Inset: linear relation between the quenching efficiency and the concentration of Hg2+ in the range of 0–0.018 ppm. (d) Fluorescence intensities of {[Zn2(1,4-bpyvna)(1,3,5-BTC)(OH)]·H2O}n immersed in the DMF solution of metal ion (blue colour) or mixed Hg2+ and metal ions (red colour) under an excitation of 389 nm (Reproduced with the permission from Ref [104]).
Chemosensors 09 00101 g005
Figure 6. The proposed Hg2+ and biothiols detection mechanism based on the P-DNA@1 hybrid (Reproduced with the permission from Ref [114]).
Figure 6. The proposed Hg2+ and biothiols detection mechanism based on the P-DNA@1 hybrid (Reproduced with the permission from Ref [114]).
Chemosensors 09 00101 g006
Figure 7. Selectivity of the sensing method by AuNP@MOF to other metal ions. Concentrations of Hg2+ and other metal ions (Na+, K+, Ag+, Ca2+, Mg2+, Cu2+, Al3+, Fe3+, Fe2+, Cd2+, Mn2+, Cr3+, Ba2+, Zn2+, Pb2+ and Ni2+) were 1 nM and 10 nM, respectively. (A) The UV spectra of the sensing system in response to various metal ions; (B) The UV absorbance of the sensing system at 665 nm towards various metal ions; (C) photographs of the sensing system responding to various metal ions (Reproduced with the permission from Ref [123]).
Figure 7. Selectivity of the sensing method by AuNP@MOF to other metal ions. Concentrations of Hg2+ and other metal ions (Na+, K+, Ag+, Ca2+, Mg2+, Cu2+, Al3+, Fe3+, Fe2+, Cd2+, Mn2+, Cr3+, Ba2+, Zn2+, Pb2+ and Ni2+) were 1 nM and 10 nM, respectively. (A) The UV spectra of the sensing system in response to various metal ions; (B) The UV absorbance of the sensing system at 665 nm towards various metal ions; (C) photographs of the sensing system responding to various metal ions (Reproduced with the permission from Ref [123]).
Chemosensors 09 00101 g007
Figure 8. Synthetic process of hollow CoSx polyhedrons and CoSx@CdS composites and the mechanism of photocurrent responses of CoSx@CdS composites, showing the band structures of CoSx@CdS/HgS composites and charge separation under the visible-light illumination (Reproduced with the permission from Ref [135]).
Figure 8. Synthetic process of hollow CoSx polyhedrons and CoSx@CdS composites and the mechanism of photocurrent responses of CoSx@CdS composites, showing the band structures of CoSx@CdS/HgS composites and charge separation under the visible-light illumination (Reproduced with the permission from Ref [135]).
Chemosensors 09 00101 g008
Figure 9. Schematic of the utilization of highly defective Zr-based porous MOFs- ZrOx, ZrOxyPhos, and ZrSulf towards Hg2+ removal and excellent Hg2+ removal performance by ZrSulf compared to other metal ions and at different pH ranges; coordinated solvents NaOH, Na3PO4, and Na2S were used to afford ZrOx, ZrOxyPhos, and ZrSulf, respectively. (Reproduced with the permission from Ref [139]).
Figure 9. Schematic of the utilization of highly defective Zr-based porous MOFs- ZrOx, ZrOxyPhos, and ZrSulf towards Hg2+ removal and excellent Hg2+ removal performance by ZrSulf compared to other metal ions and at different pH ranges; coordinated solvents NaOH, Na3PO4, and Na2S were used to afford ZrOx, ZrOxyPhos, and ZrSulf, respectively. (Reproduced with the permission from Ref [139]).
Chemosensors 09 00101 g009
Figure 10. Selective removal of Hg2+ by UIO-66-NH2, UIO-66-SO3H and UIO-66-DMTD (Reproduced with the permission from Ref [142]).
Figure 10. Selective removal of Hg2+ by UIO-66-NH2, UIO-66-SO3H and UIO-66-DMTD (Reproduced with the permission from Ref [142]).
Chemosensors 09 00101 g010
Figure 11. Schematic of post-synthetic modification of NH2-MIL-68(In) to afford SH-MIL-68(In) and its utilization in Hg2+ extraction (Reproduced with the permission from Ref [165]).
Figure 11. Schematic of post-synthetic modification of NH2-MIL-68(In) to afford SH-MIL-68(In) and its utilization in Hg2+ extraction (Reproduced with the permission from Ref [165]).
Chemosensors 09 00101 g011
Figure 12. (a) Adsorption of mixed heavy metal ions (concentration of each ion was 100 mg L−1 on the PCN-224-MAA/MF composite at pH 3. (b) Effect of pH on the removal of Hg2+ ions with an initial concentration of 20 mg L−1 on a PCN-224-MAA/MF (Reproduced with the permission from Ref [176]).
Figure 12. (a) Adsorption of mixed heavy metal ions (concentration of each ion was 100 mg L−1 on the PCN-224-MAA/MF composite at pH 3. (b) Effect of pH on the removal of Hg2+ ions with an initial concentration of 20 mg L−1 on a PCN-224-MAA/MF (Reproduced with the permission from Ref [176]).
Chemosensors 09 00101 g012
Figure 13. Selectivity of bi-I-functionalized Fe3O4@SiO2@HKUST-1 for Hg2+ conditions: each ion of 10 mg L−1 and pH 3 (reproduced with the permission from Ref [179]).
Figure 13. Selectivity of bi-I-functionalized Fe3O4@SiO2@HKUST-1 for Hg2+ conditions: each ion of 10 mg L−1 and pH 3 (reproduced with the permission from Ref [179]).
Chemosensors 09 00101 g013
Figure 14. Simulation of Hg0 adsorption on MIL-101(Cr) by the pseudo-second-order model. Reaction conditions: N2 + 5% O2, inlet concentration of Hg0 = 203 μg m−3, gas hourly space velocity (GHSV) = 8 × 105 h−1, 200 °C (reproduced with the permission from Ref [187]).
Figure 14. Simulation of Hg0 adsorption on MIL-101(Cr) by the pseudo-second-order model. Reaction conditions: N2 + 5% O2, inlet concentration of Hg0 = 203 μg m−3, gas hourly space velocity (GHSV) = 8 × 105 h−1, 200 °C (reproduced with the permission from Ref [187]).
Chemosensors 09 00101 g014
Figure 15. Representative design of the Nin-NH-MIL-101(Al) sensor applied to purification of water polluted with Hg(II) ions and the reversible process by using 0.1 M thiourea solution for several times (reproduced with the permission from Ref [198]).
Figure 15. Representative design of the Nin-NH-MIL-101(Al) sensor applied to purification of water polluted with Hg(II) ions and the reversible process by using 0.1 M thiourea solution for several times (reproduced with the permission from Ref [198]).
Chemosensors 09 00101 g015
Publisher′s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shellaiah, M.; Sun, K.-W. Progress in Metal-Organic Frameworks Facilitated Mercury Detection and Removal. Chemosensors 2021, 9, 101. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors9050101

AMA Style

Shellaiah M, Sun K-W. Progress in Metal-Organic Frameworks Facilitated Mercury Detection and Removal. Chemosensors. 2021; 9(5):101. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors9050101

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shellaiah, Muthaiah, and Kien-Wen Sun. 2021. "Progress in Metal-Organic Frameworks Facilitated Mercury Detection and Removal" Chemosensors 9, no. 5: 101. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors9050101

APA Style

Shellaiah, M., & Sun, K. -W. (2021). Progress in Metal-Organic Frameworks Facilitated Mercury Detection and Removal. Chemosensors, 9(5), 101. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors9050101

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop