Next Article in Journal
Cumulative Effect Assessment of Common Genetic Variants on Prostate Cancer: Preliminary Studies
Previous Article in Journal
Genomic and Immune Approach in Platinum Refractory HPV-Negative Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients Treated with Immunotherapy: A Novel Combined Profile
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomedicines
Volume 10
Issue 11
10.3390/biomedicines10112730
biomedicines-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Experimental Static Cold Storage of the Rat Uterus: Protective Effects of Relaxin- or Erythropoietin-Supplemented HTK-N Solutions

by
Lina Jakubauskiene
1,2,
Matas Jakubauskas
1,2,
Gintare Razanskiene
2,3,
Bettina Leber
1,
Diana Ramasauskaite
2,
Kestutis Strupas
2,
Philipp Stiegler
1,* and
Peter Schemmer
1
1
General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 2, 8036 Graz, Austria
2
Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, M. K. Ciurlionio Street 21, 03101 Vilnius, Lithuania
3
National Centre of Pathology, Affiliate of Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos, P. Baublio Street 5, 08406 Vilnius, Lithuania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomedicines 2022, 10(11), 2730; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10112730
Submission received: 13 September 2022 / Revised: 16 October 2022 / Accepted: 26 October 2022 / Published: 28 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular and Translational Medicine)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Uterus transplantation (UTx) is the only treatment method for women with absolute uterine infertility. Currently, the number of grafts retrieved from deceased donors is increasing; hence, prolonged cold ischemia time is inevitable. Thus, this study was designed to assess the effect of the novel relaxin (RLN)- or erythropoietin (EPO)-supplemented Custodiol-N (HTK-N) solutions in an experimental uterus static cold storage (SCS) model. A total of 15 Sprague Dawley rats were used. Uterus horns were randomly assigned into three groups (n = 10/group). SCS was performed by keeping samples at 4 °C in HTK-N solution without or with different additives: 10 IU/mL EPO or 20 nM RLN. Tissue samples were taken after 8 and 24 h of preservation. Uterine tissue histology, and biochemical and immunohistochemical markers were analyzed. No significant differences in SCS-induced tissue damage were observed between groups after 8 h of preservation. Uterine tissue histology, MDA, SOD levels and the TUNEL-positive cell number showed severe damage in HTK-N without additives after 24 h of preservation. This damage was significantly attenuated by adding RLN to the preservation solution. EPO showed no favorable effect. Our study shows that RLN as an additive to an HTK-N solution can serve as an effective uterine tissue preservative in the uterus SCS setting.

1. Introduction

Uterus transplantation (UTx) is gaining interest as being the only treatment method for women with absolute uterine infertility. It affects 1 in 500 women of reproductive age and results either from congenital or acquired causes [1]. Uterine agenesis in Mayer–Rokitansky–Küster–Hauser syndrome is one of the congenital causes, which is relatively rare with a prevalence of 1 in 4500 women, while hysterectomy is the second most common female surgery mainly performed due to large myomas, peripartum bleeding, postpartum sepsis or malignancies [2]. UTx can serve as an alternative to adoption or surrogacy and enable a woman to have a childbirth experience [3].
The first UTx was performed in Saudi Arabia in 2000 [4]. Unfortunately, the transplanted graft had to be removed due to thrombosis three months after UTx. In 2014, a Swedish team led by Brännström successfully performed UTx, which resulted in the first live birth [2]. Since then, more than 40 UTxs have been successfully performed including transplantations from deceased donors [1,5]. There is an interest in improving protocols for UTx from deceased donors as this eliminates the risk of donor morbidity and mortality [6]. Furthermore, although the surgical procedure for performing UTx from a living or deceased donor is the same, longer graft vascular pedicles can be dissected from deceased donors, which further increases the probability of the success of the transplant [6,7]. For these reasons, research into the factors influencing the success of UTx from deceased donors is needed.
One of the primary factors influencing the ability to perform UTx from deceased donors is the time during which the ex situ uterus is stored. Static cold storage (SCS) has been the standard method for solid organ preservation since the 1960s [8]. The use of this method relies on reduced temperature, which causes the decrease in cell metabolic activity to the minimum required for survival and ultimately prolongs graft viability [9,10]. The susceptibility to SCS varies by organ and is shortest for the heart (4–6 h), whereas the kidney and liver can successfully survive cold ischemia for up to 44 h [11]. Previously published studies report uterine tolerance to cold ischemia for at least 6 h with maintained contractile function and histological characteristics [12]. Custodiol-N is a novel preservative solution developed after base Custodiol® solution was supplemented with glycine, alanine, iron chelators and sucrose instead of mannitol [13]. Custodiol-N showed its superiority to Custodiol® in a uterus SCS model likely by reducing tissue edema and inhibiting oxidative stress [14].
In recent years, a concerted scientific effort has been dedicated to finding ways to reduce tissue damage following SCS [15,16]. In particular, studies addressing whether the additional substances could be employed to minimize tissue damage during SCS.
Relaxin (RLN) is a peptide hormone, which belongs to the insulin family of structurally-related molecules [17]. The RLN receptor (RXFP1) is expressed on many organs, such as the kidney, heart, brain, arteries, lungs and even blood cells [18]. It plays an important role during the early stages of pregnancy and is highly expressed in reproductive tissues such as the ovaries, uterus (both endometrium and smooth muscles) and placenta. This hormone has already been studied in cell culture and animal models and demonstrated its antiinflammatory, antifibrotic, cytoprotective and antioxidant properties as well as a role in hemodynamic changes [19,20,21,22]. Given its central role, it is also under investigation in transplantation research [23].
Erythropoietin (EPO) is an endogenous hormone, produced by interstitial fibroblasts in the kidney or fetal liver under hypoxic conditions [24]. It is used for anemia treatment in people who need dialysis or have cancer. EPO receptors were found outside the hemopoietic system, such as in the uterus’ epithelial and stromal cells [25,26]. EPO showed its antioxidant effect by reducing lipid peroxidation and increasing superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity [27]. Moreover, preservation solutions supplemented with EPO reduced liver damage during SCS [28].
This study was designed to investigate the protective effect of RLN or EPO in a rat uterus SCS model and to examine morphological and biochemical changes in rat uterine tissue over different SCS time periods.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animals

A total of 15 female (12 weeks old, weighing 250–330 g) Sprague Dawley rats (Janvier Labs, Le Genest-Saint-Isle, France) were used for this study. All rats were housed in the Division for Biomedical Research at the Medical University, Graz, and kept under controlled environment with a 12-h light/dark cycle, 22 ± 1 °C temperature and unlimited access to fresh water and standard rat chow. Before conducting the experiments, rats were acclimatized to the new surroundings for 7 days. The study was approved by the Austrian Ministry for Science, Research and Economy on the 17th of September 2019 (approval number: BMBWF-66.010/0154-V/3b/2019) and conducted according to the 3R guidelines.

2.2. Experimental Design

A total of 15 rats were used in an experimental SCS model. The initial anesthesia was achieved with 2% 2 L/min isoflurane (Piramal-Isoflurane, Piramal Critical Care Deutschland GmbH, Hallbergmoos, Germany). After the induction, anesthetic agent mixture consisting of 0.15 g/kg medetomidine (Domitor, Orion Pharma, Vienna, Austria), 2 mg/kg midazolam (Midazolam, Accord Healthcare GmbH, Munich, Germany) and 5 μg/kg fentanyl (Fentanyl-Hameln, Hameln, Germany) was injected intramuscularly. After midline laparotomy, the uterus was procured, and each uterus horn was randomly assigned into one of three groups (n = 10/group). Uterus SCS was performed by using Custodiol-N (HTK-N) solution in different compositions: Group HTKN (HTK-N + no additives), Group EPO (HTK-N + 10 IU/mL recombinant human erythropoietin (Erypo; Janssen-Cilag GmbH, Germany)) and Group RLN (HTK-N + 20 nM synthetic human relaxin-2 (Relaxera, Bensheim, Germany)). The concentrations for experimental substances were chosen according to previously published studies [28,29]. Uterine horns were gently flushed with the respective experimental preservation solution, immediately packaged into the same solution and placed on ice at 4 °C. Tissue samples were taken after 8 and 24 h of preservation. These timepoints were chosen based on our research group published data [14]. One part of the sample was flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C for biochemical analysis and the other part was fixed in 4% formalin for histological analysis.

2.3. Tissue Morphological Evaluation

Uterine tissue was fixed in 4% formalin and embedded in paraffin and sections of 2 μm were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). Slides were evaluated by a blinded pathologist using an adapted scoring system for uterus SCS damage and analyzing the whole section at 100× magnification (Table 1) [14].

2.4. Biochemical Analyses

Two biochemical markers were chosen to evaluate the tissue oxidative stress. Malondialdehyde (MDA) is the final product of polyunsaturated fatty acids’ peroxidation in the cells and SOD acts as an agent against reactive oxygen species [30,31].
Frozen tissue samples were homogenized with ceramic beads in a phosphate-buffered solution (PBS) or Lysis buffer using the MagNA Lyser instrument (Roche Life Science, Mannheim, Germany). After homogenization, samples were centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C. The following assay kits, according to the manufacturer’s manuals, were performed using the collected supernatant: Pierce™ BCA Protein Assay Kit (catalog number: 23225, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), Lipid peroxidation (MDA) assay kit (catalog number: ab118970, Abcam, Cambridge, United Kingdom), Superoxide Dismutase Colorimetric Activity Kit (catalog number: EIASODC, Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Tissue MDA and SOD levels were measured and expressed per milligram (mg) of tissue protein.

2.5. Terminal Deoxynucleotidyl Transferase-Mediated dUTP Nick-End Labeling (TUNEL) Assay

Cell apoptosis was evaluated using TUNEL Assay Kit—HRP-DAB (catalog number: Ab206386, Abcam, Cambridge, United Kingdom). The staining was performed according to the manufacturer’s manual.
Stained sections were scanned and positive cells in whole section were counted using QuPath software (open source software for Quantitative Pathology, version 0.2.0) [32]. The number of positive cells was expressed as the percentage of stained cells of total nuclei.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 23.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and GraphPad Prism 9 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA). Variable distribution was determined using the Shapiro–Wilk test. As most of the continuous variables were non-normally distributed, the Kruskal–Wallis test and Dunn’s post hoc test were used for analysis. Data are reported as median and quartiles (Q1; Q3). Statistical significance was considered when p < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Tissue Biochemical Analysis

After 8 h of organ preservation, no significant differences in tissue MDA concentration and SOD activity were observed between the groups (Figure 1A,B). However, after 24 h of preservation, MDA levels increased in all groups compared to 8 h and differences between the groups after 24 h became significantly different. MDA concentration was highest in the HTKN group with no additives. MDA concentration in samples of the RLN group was significantly lower compared to samples in the HTKN group. Adding RLN to the preservative solution inhibited lipid peroxidation as samples after 24 h presented with similar MDA levels when compared to the 8 h group. EPO did not have a significant effect on MDA concentration after 24 h of SCS.
Moreover, differences in SOD activity between the groups became evident only after 24 h of SCS. The lowest SOD activity was observed in the HTK-N without additives group. In samples kept in the HTK-N solution with RLN, SOD activity remained significantly higher and was even similar compared to samples measured 8 h after preservation. No significant differences were observed in samples kept in the HTK-N solution supplemented with EPO.

3.2. Histology and Immunohistochemistry

The histological examination of uterine tissue showed no differences between groups after 8 h of preservation (Figure 1C and Figure 2). Samples of all groups presented with mild tissue edema and minor changes in the epithelium (Figure 2). In contrast, preservation of 24 h led to significant uterine tissue injury. Although no tissue necrosis was observed across any group, samples exhibited signs of severe edema, smooth muscle contraction and changes in the endometrium. According to our adapted scoring system, samples kept in HTK-N with no additives or with EPO had a higher tissue injury score compared to samples kept in the HTK-N solution supplemented with RLN.
TUNEL staining revealed a low apoptotic activity ranging from 0.14 to 0.47% in all experimental groups after 8 h of preservation (Figure 1D and Figure 2). After 24 h of preservation, the TUNEL-positive cell numbers were significantly higher compared to those after 8 h, the highest being in the HTK-N solution without additives (3.89% (IQR 2.02; 4.97)). The TUNEL-positive cell number was significantly decreased only in samples when the HTK-N solution was supplemented with RLN. Apoptotic activity in samples preserved in HTK-N + RLN did not increase between the 8 h and 24 h timepoints. No favorable effect of EPO as an additive was observed.

4. Discussion

Here we investigated whether RLN or EPO could alleviate the negative impact of SCS on uterus tissue in a rat uterus SCS model. The results of this study revealed that RLN could serve as an effective additive to an HTK-N preservation solution by reducing lipid peroxidation, oxidative stress and apoptosis and preserving uterine tissue morphology.
Many animal studies have already been conducted to assess uterus myometrial tissue tolerance to cold ischemia. From recent studies it is known that the murine uterus can tolerate cold ischemia for up to 24 h and still obtain a pregnancy [33]. Our study demonstrates that cold ischemia lasting up to 24 h has a negative impact on the uterine tissue resulting in biochemical and histological changes, but the damage can be diminished by adding RLN to the preservation solution. These findings are important as the uterus is not a vital organ and therefore is procured lastly from a brain-dead donor, resulting in an extended ischemic time [7].
SCS induces several pathophysiological mechanisms, which ultimately result in tissue damage. It impairs the activity of Na+/K+ ATPase, which causes cell swelling, depletes ATP and shifts cell metabolism to an anaerobic state; furthermore, one of the most important damage pathways is the formation of excess reactive oxygen species [10]. Therefore, in this study we decided to use the particular uterine tissue lesion indicators (lipid peroxidation (MDA) and antioxidative (SOD) markers, impairment of tissue morphology, and apoptotic cell number) as their changes are associated with posttransplant outcomes [34,35].
Various preservation solutions, as well as different additives, have already been used in the experimental and clinical practice of UTx. The most studied preservation solutions are Celsior®, HTK (Custodiol®), University of Wisconsin solution, Perfadex® and IGF-1® [1,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43]. Some studies revealed that adjuvants such as L-carnitine and Iloprost to an HTK solution significantly attenuate uterine tissue alteration after 24 h of cold ischemia when compared to preservation in a plain HTK solution [15,16]. Currently, there is no consensus concerning the best storage fluid for uterus SCS. However, in a previous study, our group found that Custodiol-N is superior to Custodiol in a uterus SCS model most likely by inhibiting oxidative stress and reducing tissue edema [14]. Therefore, we investigated the possibility to further improve HTK-N solution in the setting of uterine SCS.
RLN is one of the protective agents that is already being widely studied in preclinical kidney, lung, heart and liver transplantation research [23,29,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53]; however, to our knowledge, this has not yet been applied in a uterine transplant. RLN acts through different target molecules and pathways of which some are organ related [54]. It reduces expression of intracellular adhesion molecule 1, induces expression of Notch1 in macrophages and reduces the adhesion of neutrophils through the increased synthesis of nitric oxide [23,45]. In hepatocytes, it acts via glucocorticoid receptors and inhibits the release of cytochrome c from mitochondria showing antiapoptotic properties [51]. Moreover, RLN reduces vasoconstriction via the inhibition of endothelin 1 production and increases vasodilation through the increased production of nitric oxide [47].
Our study results revealed that RLN added to an HTK-N solution reduces MDA concentration and preserves SOD activity in rat uterine horns after SCS. Moreover, this translated into the histological findings such as reduced morphological damage and the inhibition of cellular apoptosis. Our findings are in line with the reported results from a similar study by Boehnhart et al. in which the effects of RLN were tested on liver tissue during SCS [55]. This study reported that RLN managed to sustain lower MDA and myeloperoxidase levels in hepatocytes.
The second preservative additive used in our study was EPO. Several of its protective properties were demonstrated in a variety of studies [27,56,57]. We chose this substance as, currently, there are no studies analyzing its properties on uterus SCS. Unfortunately, the addition of EPO to the HTK-N solution at our tested dose did not yield any additional protective properties to the uterine tissue in our study.
There are several limitations of our study that should be addressed. First of all, this is an animal study conducted in an experimental rat model. Even though these experimental results are promising, it remains unclear if they will fully generalize to human tissues and organs. Furthermore, our study design mainly focused on the uterine tissue’s morphologic and biochemical changes, and we did not examine the possible functional changes, which may be crucial for a successful uterus transplantation. Lastly, the human uterus is much thicker than the rat uterus, making it even more prone to ischemia. This limits the translational value of the study.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, our study shows that RLN as an additive to an HTK-N solution can serve as an effective uterine tissue preservative in a uterus SCS setting. Further studies are warranted for introducing its usage in clinical practice.

Author Contributions

P.S. (Philipp Stiegler) and P.S. (Peter Schemmer) were responsible for the study concept, design and critical revision of the drafted manuscript. L.J., M.J., G.R., B.L., D.R. and K.S. were responsible for the data collection and analysis, literature review, interpretation of data and drafting of the manuscript. All authors have read and agree to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study followed the guidelines for the handling and care of experimental animals issued by the Federation of European Laboratory Animal Science Associations (FELASA) and was approved by the Austrian Federal Ministry of Education, Science and Research (Approval number: BMBWF-66.010/0154-V/3b/2019; 17th of September 2019).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data relevant to the study are included in the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ejzenberg, D.; Andraus, W.; Baratelli Carelli Mendes, L.R.; Ducatti, L.; Song, A.; Tanigawa, R.; Rocha-Santos, V.; Macedo Arantes, R.; Soares, J.M.; Serafini, P.C.; et al. Livebirth after Uterus Transplantation from a Deceased Donor in a Recipient with Uterine Infertility. Lancet 2018, 392, 2697–2704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Brännström, M.; Johannesson, L.; Dahm-Kähler, P.; Enskog, A.; Mölne, J.; Kvarnström, N.; Diaz-Garcia, C.; Hanafy, A.; Lundmark, C.; Marcickiewicz, J.; et al. First Clinical Uterus Transplantation Trial: A Six-Month Report. Fertil. Steril. 2014, 101, 1228–1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Brännström, M.; Johannesson, L.; Bokström, H.; Kvarnström, N.; Mölne, J.; Dahm-Kähler, P.; Enskog, A.; Milenkovic, M.; Ekberg, J.; Diaz-Garcia, C.; et al. Livebirth after Uterus Transplantation. Lancet 2015, 385, 607–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Fageeh, W.; Raffa, H.; Jabbad, H.; Marzouki, A. Transplantation of the Human Uterus. Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet. 2002, 76, 245–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Flyckt, R.; Falcone, T.; Quintini, C.; Perni, U.; Eghtesad, B.; Richards, E.G.; Farrell, R.M.; Hashimoto, K.; Miller, C.; Ricci, S.; et al. First Birth from a Deceased Donor Uterus in the United States: From Severe Graft Rejection to Successful Cesarean Delivery. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2020, 223, 143–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kvarnström, N.; Enskog, A.; Dahm-Kähler, P.; Brännström, M. Live versus Deceased Donor in Uterus Transplantation. Fertil. Steril. 2019, 112, 24–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kisu, I.; Banno, K.; Matoba, Y.; Aoki, D. Uterus Transplantation: Advantages and Disadvantages of a Deceased Donor. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2019, 299, 1213–1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. McAnulty, J.F. Hypothermic Organ Preservation by Static Storage Methods: Current Status and a View to the Future. Cryobiology 2010, 60, S13–S19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Southard, J.H.; Belzer, F.O. Organ Preservation. Annu. Rev. Med. 1995, 46, 235–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Maathuis, M.-H.J.; Leuvenink, H.G.D.; Ploeg, R.J. Perspectives in Organ Preservation. Transplantation 2007, 83, 1289–1298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Krezdorn, N.; Tasigiorgos, S.; Wo, L.; Turk, M.; Lopdrup, R.; Kiwanuka, H.; Win, T.-S.; Bueno, E.; Pomahac, B. Tissue Conservation for Transplantation. Innov. Surg. Sci. 2017, 2, 171–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wranning, C.A.; Mölne, J.; El-Akouri, R.R.; Kurlberg, G.; Brännström, M. Short-Term Ischaemic Storage of Human Uterine Myometrium—Basic Studies towards Uterine Transplantation. Hum. Reprod. 2005, 20, 2736–2744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Kniepeiss, D.; Houben, P.; Stiegler, P.; Berghold, A.; Riedl, R.; Kahn, J.; Schemmer, P. A Prospective, Randomized, Single-Blind, Multicentre, Phase III Study on Organ Preservation with Custodiol-N Solution Compared with Custodiol® Solution in Organ Transplantation (Kidney, Liver and Pancreas). Trials 2020, 21, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zitkute, V.; Kvietkauskas, M.; Maskoliunaite, V.; Leber, B.; Ramasauskaite, D.; Strupas, K.; Stiegler, P.; Schemmer, P. Custodiol-N Is Superior to Custodiol® Solution in Experimental Rat Uterus Preservation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 8015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Barun, S.; Özat, M.; Güngor, T.; Demiroǧullari, B.; Sökmensüer, L.K.; Aksakal, F.N.; Erçin, U.; Gülbahai, Ö.; Müftüoğlu, S. The Use of a Prostacyclin Analog, Iloprost, as an Adjunct to Uterus Preservation with Histidine-Tryptophan-Ketoglutarate Solution. Transplant. Proc. 2011, 43, 1998–2003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ugurlu, T.; Ozogul, C.; Saribas, G.S.; Gurgen, S.G.; Akyol, S.N.; Kartal, B. The Effect of Antioxidants on Angiogenesis in Uterine Transplantation. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2018, 38, 382–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hsu, S.Y.; Nakabayashi, K.; Nishi, S.; Kumagai, J.; Kudo, M.; Sherwood, O.D.; Hsueh, A.J.W. Activation of Orphan Receptors by the Hormone Relaxin. Sci. New Ser. 2002, 295, 671–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bathgate, R.a.D.; Halls, M.L.; van der Westhuizen, E.T.; Callander, G.E.; Kocan, M.; Summers, R.J. Relaxin Family Peptides and Their Receptors. Physiol. Rev. 2013, 93, 405–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Lodhi, R.S.Z.; Nakabayashi, K.; Suzuki, K.; Yamada, A.Y.; Hazama, R.; Ebina, Y.; Yamada, H. Relaxin Has Anti-Apoptotic Effects on Human Trophoblast-Derived HTR-8/SV Neo Cells. Gynecol. Endocrinol. 2013, 29, 1051–1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Nistri, S.; Cinci, L.; Perna, A.-M.; Masini, E.; Mastroianni, R.; Bani, D. Relaxin Induces Mast Cell Inhibition and Reduces Ventricular Arrhythmias in a Swine Model of Acute Myocardial Infarction. Pharmacol. Res. 2008, 57, 43–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lekgabe, E.D.; Kiriazis, H.; Zhao, C.; Xu, Q.; Moore, X.L.; Su, Y.; Bathgate, R.A.D.; Du, X.-J.; Samuel, C.S. Relaxin Reverses Cardiac and Renal Fibrosis in Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats. Hypertension 2005, 46, 412–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Teichman, S.L.; Unemori, E.; Teerlink, J.R.; Cotter, G.; Metra, M. Relaxin: Review of Biology and Potential Role in Treating Heart Failure. Curr. Heart Fail. Rep. 2010, 7, 75–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Kageyama, S.; Nakamura, K.; Ke, B.; Busuttil, R.W.; Kupiec-Weglinski, J.W. Serelaxin Induces Notch1 Signaling and Alleviates Hepatocellular Damage in Orthotopic Liver Transplantation. Am. J. Transpl. 2018, 18, 1755–1763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Jelkmann, W. Erythropoietin: Structure, Control of Production, and Function. Physiol. Rev. 1992, 72, 449–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yokomizo, R. Erythropoietin and Erythropoietin Receptor Expression in Human Endometrium throughout the Menstrual Cycle. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 2002, 8, 441–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Tug, N.; Ayvaci Tasan, H.; Sargin, M.A.; Dogan Taymur, B.; Ayar, A.; Kilic, E.; Yilmaz, B. Effects of Erythropoietin on Spontaneous and Oxytocin Induced Myometrial Contractions in the Nonpregnant Rat. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2017, 21, 5028–5033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Elshiekh, M.; Kadkhodaee, M.; Seifi, B.; Ranjbaran, M.; Ahghari, P. Ameliorative Effect of Recombinant Human Erythropoietin and Ischemic Preconditioning on Renal Ischemia Reperfusion Injury in Rats. Nephrourol. Mon. 2015, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Eipel, C.; Hübschmann, U.; Abshagen, K.; Wagner, K.F.; Menger, M.D.; Vollmar, B. Erythropoietin as Additive of HTK Preservation Solution in Cold Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury of Steatotic Livers. J. Surg. Res. 2012, 173, 171–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bausys, A.; Maneikyte, J.; Leber, B.; Weber, J.; Feldbacher, N.; Strupas, K.; Dschietzig, T.; Schemmer, P.; Stiegler, P. Custodiol® Supplemented with Synthetic Human Relaxin Decreases Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury after Porcine Kidney Transplantation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 11417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Gaweł, S.; Wardas, M.; Niedworok, E.; Wardas, P. Malondialdehyde (MDA) as a lipid peroxidation marker. Wiad. Lek. 2004, 57, 453–455. [Google Scholar]
  31. Younus, H. Therapeutic Potentials of Superoxide Dismutase. Int. J. Health Sci. 2018, 12, 88–93. [Google Scholar]
  32. Bankhead, P.; Loughrey, M.B.; Fernández, J.A.; Dombrowski, Y.; McArt, D.G.; Dunne, P.D.; McQuaid, S.; Gray, R.T.; Murray, L.J.; Coleman, H.G.; et al. QuPath: Open Source Software for Digital Pathology Image Analysis. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 16878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. El-Akouri, R.R. Pregnancy in Transplanted Mouse Uterus after Long-Term Cold Ischaemic Preservation. Hum. Reprod. 2003, 18, 2024–2030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Ayala, A.; Muñoz, M.F.; Argüelles, S. Lipid Peroxidation: Production, Metabolism, and Signaling Mechanisms of Malondialdehyde and 4-Hydroxy-2-Nonenal. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2014, 2014, 1–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Fonseca, I.; Reguengo, H.; Almeida, M.; Dias, L.; Martins, L.S.; Pedroso, S.; Santos, J.; Lobato, L.; Henriques, A.C.; Mendonça, D. Oxidative Stress in Kidney Transplantation: Malondialdehyde Is an Early Predictive Marker of Graft Dysfunction. Transplantation 2014, 97, 1058–1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Tricard, J.; Ponsonnard, S.; Tholance, Y.; Mesturoux, L.; Lachatre, D.; Couquet, C.; Terro, F.; Yardin, C.; Marquet, P.; Piccardo, A.; et al. Uterus Tolerance to Extended Cold Ischemic Storage after Auto-Transplantation in Ewes. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2017, 214, 162–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Tardieu, A.; Chazelas, P.; Faye, P.-A.; Favreau, F.; Nadal-Desbarats, L.; Sallée, C.; Margueritte, F.; Couquet, C.-Y.; Marquet, P.; Guellec, C.B.-L.; et al. Changes in the Metabolic Composition of Storage Solution with Prolonged Cold Ischemia of the Uterus. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2019, 36, 1169–1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Tholance, Y.; Tricard, J.; Chianea, T.; Marquet, P.; Ponsonnard, S.; Sturtz, F.; Piccardo, A.; Gauthier, T. Metabolic Alterations of Uterine Grafts after Extended Cold Ischemic Storage: Experimental Study in Ewes. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 2019, 25, 647–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Obara, H.; Kisu, I.; Kato, Y.; Yamada, Y.; Matsubara, K.; Emoto, K.; Adachi, M.; Matoba, Y.; Umene, K.; Nogami, Y.; et al. Surgical Technique for Allogeneic Uterus Transplantation in Macaques. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 35989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Brännström, M.; Bokström, H.; Dahm-Kähler, P.; Diaz-Garcia, C.; Ekberg, J.; Enskog, A.; Hagberg, H.; Johannesson, L.; Kvarnström, N.; Mölne, J.; et al. One Uterus Bridging Three Generations: First Live Birth after Mother-to-Daughter Uterus Transplantation. Fertil. Steril. 2016, 106, 261–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Wei, L.; Xue, T.; Yang, H.; Zhao, G.-Y.; Zhang, G.; Lu, Z.-H.; Huang, Y.-H.; Ma, X.-D.; Liu, H.-X.; Liang, S.-R.; et al. Modified Uterine Allotransplantation and Immunosuppression Procedure in the Sheep Model. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e81300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Johannesson, L.; Enskog, A.; Molne, J.; Diaz-Garcia, C.; Hanafy, A.; Dahm-Kahler, P.; Tekin, A.; Tryphonopoulos, P.; Morales, P.; Rivas, K.; et al. Preclinical Report on Allogeneic Uterus Transplantation in Non-Human Primates. Hum. Reprod. 2013, 28, 189–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Padma, A.M.; Truong, M.; Jar-Allah, T.; Song, M.J.; Oltean, M.; Brännström, M.; Hellström, M. The Development of an Extended Normothermic Ex Vivo Reperfusion Model of the Sheep Uterus to Evaluate Organ Quality after Cold Ischemia in Relation to Uterus Transplantation. Acta Obstet. Et Gynecol. Scand. 2019, 98, 1127–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Yoshida, T.; Kumagai, H.; Kohsaka, T.; Ikegaya, N. Relaxin Protects against Renal Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury. Am. J. Physiol.-Ren. Physiol. 2013, 305, F1169–F1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Collino, M.; Rogazzo, M.; Pini, A.; Benetti, E.; Rosa, A.C.; Chiazza, F.; Fantozzi, R.; Bani, D.; Masini, E. Acute Treatment with Relaxin Protects the Kidney against Ischaemia/Reperfusion Injury. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2013, 17, 1494–1505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Alexiou, K.; Matschke, K.; Westphal, A.; Stangl, K.; Dschietzig, T. Relaxin Is a Candidate Drug for Lung Preservation: Relaxin-Induced Protection of Rat Lungs from Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury. J. Heart Lung Transplant. 2010, 29, 454–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Alexiou, K.; Wilbring, M.; Matschke, K.; Dschietzig, T. Relaxin Protects Rat Lungs from Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury via Inducible NO Synthase: Role of ERK-1/2, PI3K, and Forkhead Transcription Factor FKHRL1. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e75592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Valle Raleigh, J.; Mauro, A.G.; Devarakonda, T.; Marchetti, C.; He, J.; Kim, E.; Filippone, S.; Das, A.; Toldo, S.; Abbate, A.; et al. Reperfusion Therapy with Recombinant Human Relaxin-2 (Serelaxin) Attenuates Myocardial Infarct Size and NLRP3 Inflammasome Following Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury via ENOS-Dependent Mechanism. Cardiovasc. Res. 2017, 113, 609–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Perna, A.-M.; Masini, E.; Nistri, S.; Briganti, V.; Chiappini, L.; Stefano, P.; Bigazzi, M.; Pieroni, C.; Sacchi, T.B.; Bani, D. Novel Drug Development Opportunity for Relaxin in Acute Myocardial Infarction: Evidences from a Swine Model. FASEB J. 2005, 19, 1525–1527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Masini, E.; Bani, D.; Sardi, I.; Baronti, R.; Bani-Sacchi, T.; Bigazzi, M.; Mannaioni, P.F. Dual Role of Nitric Oxide in Myocardial Ischemia-Reperfusion. Inflamm. Res. 2000, 49, 78–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kageyama, S.; Nakamura, K.; Fujii, T.; Ke, B.; Sosa, R.A.; Reed, E.F.; Datta, N.; Zarrinpar, A.; Busuttil, R.W.; Kupiec-Weglinski, J.W. Recombinant Relaxin Protects Liver Transplants from Ischemia Damage via Hepatocyte Glucocorticoid Receptor: From Bench-to-Bedside. Hepatology 2018, 68, 258–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Boehnert, M.U.; Armbruster, F.P.; Hilbig, H. Relaxin as a Protective Substance in Preservation Solutions for Organ Transplantation, as Shown in an Isolated Perfused Rat Liver Model. Transplant. Proc. 2008, 40, 978–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Boehnert, M.U.; Armbruster, F.P.; Hilbig, H. Relaxin as a Protective Substance in the Preserving Solution for Liver Transplantation: Spectrophotometric in Vivo Imaging of Local Oxygen Supply in an Isolated Perfused Rat Liver Model. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2009, 1160, 320–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Jakubauskiene, L.; Jakubauskas, M.; Leber, B.; Strupas, K.; Stiegler, P.; Schemmer, P. Relaxin Positively Influences Ischemia—Reperfusion Injury in Solid Organ Transplantation: A Comprehensive Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Boehnert, M.U.; Hilbig, H.; Armbruster, F.P. Relaxin as an Additional Protective Substance in Preserving and Reperfusion Solution for Liver Transplantation, Shown in a Model of Isolated Perfused Rat Liver. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2005, 1041, 434–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Akisu, M.; Tuzun, S.; Arslanoglu, S.; Yalaz, M.; Kultursay, N. Effect of Recombinant Human Erythropoietin Administration on Lipid Peroxidation and Antioxidant Enzyme(s) Activities in Preterm Infants. Acta Med. Okayama 2001, 55, 357–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Schmeding, M.; Hunold, G.; Ariyakhagorn, V.; Rademacher, S.; Boas-Knoop, S.; Lippert, S.; Neuhaus, P.; Neumann, U.P. Erythropoietin Reduces Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury after Liver Transplantation in Rats. Transpl. Int. 2009, 22, 738–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Biomedicines 10 02730 g001 550
Figure 1. Uterine tissue lesion markers after 8 and 24 h of SCS. (A) uterine tissue MDA concentration, (B) uterine tissue SOD concentration, (C) histological uterine tissue injury score, (D) TUNEL positive cell count. HTK-N—Custodiol -N, EPO—erythropoietin, RLN—relaxin, MDA—malondialdehyde, SOD—superoxide dismutase, TUNEL—terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling. Data presented as median (Q1; Q3).
Figure 1. Uterine tissue lesion markers after 8 and 24 h of SCS. (A) uterine tissue MDA concentration, (B) uterine tissue SOD concentration, (C) histological uterine tissue injury score, (D) TUNEL positive cell count. HTK-N—Custodiol -N, EPO—erythropoietin, RLN—relaxin, MDA—malondialdehyde, SOD—superoxide dismutase, TUNEL—terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling. Data presented as median (Q1; Q3).
Biomedicines 10 02730 g001
Biomedicines 10 02730 g002 550
Figure 2. Micrographs of histological changes (A–F) and TUNEL-positive cells (G–L) in uterine tissue after 8 h and 24 h of preservation. (A–C) Samples after 8 h of preservation presented with mild tissue edema and minor changes in the epithelium. (D,E) Preservation of 24 h in HTK-N without additives or with EPO caused signs of tissue severe edema, smooth muscle contraction and changes in the endometrium. (F) Preservation of 24 h in HTK-N solution with RLN, samples presented with tissue edema, vacuolization of the endometrium and preserved integrity of surface epithelium. HTK-N—Custodiol-N, EPO—erythropoietin, RLN—relaxin, H&E—hematoxylin and eosin, TUNEL—terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling.
Figure 2. Micrographs of histological changes (A–F) and TUNEL-positive cells (G–L) in uterine tissue after 8 h and 24 h of preservation. (A–C) Samples after 8 h of preservation presented with mild tissue edema and minor changes in the epithelium. (D,E) Preservation of 24 h in HTK-N without additives or with EPO caused signs of tissue severe edema, smooth muscle contraction and changes in the endometrium. (F) Preservation of 24 h in HTK-N solution with RLN, samples presented with tissue edema, vacuolization of the endometrium and preserved integrity of surface epithelium. HTK-N—Custodiol-N, EPO—erythropoietin, RLN—relaxin, H&E—hematoxylin and eosin, TUNEL—terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling.
Biomedicines 10 02730 g002
Table
Table 1. Light microscopy morphological evaluation scoring system for uterus SCS model.
Table 1. Light microscopy morphological evaluation scoring system for uterus SCS model.
Score
0123
EdemaAbsent<15%15–30%>30%
NecrosisAbsent<15%15–30%>30%
Smooth muscle contractionAbsentPresent
Impaired integrity of surface epitheliumAbsentPresent
Disruption of epithelial cellsAbsentPresent
Endometrial loss of cellsAbsentPresent
Note Percentages are calculated as (surface of the affected area/surface of the whole section) × 100.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jakubauskiene, L.; Jakubauskas, M.; Razanskiene, G.; Leber, B.; Ramasauskaite, D.; Strupas, K.; Stiegler, P.; Schemmer, P. Experimental Static Cold Storage of the Rat Uterus: Protective Effects of Relaxin- or Erythropoietin-Supplemented HTK-N Solutions. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 2730. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10112730

AMA Style

Jakubauskiene L, Jakubauskas M, Razanskiene G, Leber B, Ramasauskaite D, Strupas K, Stiegler P, Schemmer P. Experimental Static Cold Storage of the Rat Uterus: Protective Effects of Relaxin- or Erythropoietin-Supplemented HTK-N Solutions. Biomedicines. 2022; 10(11):2730. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10112730

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jakubauskiene, Lina, Matas Jakubauskas, Gintare Razanskiene, Bettina Leber, Diana Ramasauskaite, Kestutis Strupas, Philipp Stiegler, and Peter Schemmer. 2022. "Experimental Static Cold Storage of the Rat Uterus: Protective Effects of Relaxin- or Erythropoietin-Supplemented HTK-N Solutions" Biomedicines 10, no. 11: 2730. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10112730

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop