Next Article in Journal
Cell-Free DNA in the Pathogenesis and Therapy of Non-Infectious Inflammations and Tumors
Previous Article in Journal
Hyperlipoproteinemia(a) and Severe Coronary Artery Lesion Types
Previous Article in Special Issue
Testosterone Serum Levels Are Related to Sperm DNA Fragmentation Index Reduction after FSH Administration in Males with Idiopathic Infertility
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Volatilomics as an Emerging Strategy to Determine Potential Biomarkers of Female Infertility: A Pilot Study

by
Ana Teresa Brinca
1,
Ofélia Anjos
2,3,
Maria Manuel Casteleiro Alves
1,4,
Ângela Sousa
1,
António Hélio Oliani
4,5,
Luiza Breitenfeld
1,6,
Luís A. Passarinha
1,7,8,9,*,
Ana Cristina Ramalhinho
1,4,6,* and
Eugenia Gallardo
1,9
1
Health Sciences Research Centre, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Beira Interior, 6200-506 Covilhã, Portugal
2
Instituto Politécnico de Castelo Branco, Quinta da Senhora de Mércules, 6001-909 Castelo Branco, Portugal
3
CEF—Centro de Estudos Florestais, Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Universidade de Lisboa, Tapada da Ajuda, 1349-017 Lisboa, Portugal
4
Assisted Reproduction Laboratory of Academic Hospital of Cova da Beira, 6200-251 Covilhã, Portugal
5
São José do Rio Preto School of Medicine, Gynaecology and Obstetrics, São José do Rio Preto 15090-000, Brazil
6
C4—Cloud Computing Competence Centre, University of Beira Interior, 6201-001 Covilhã, Portugal
7
Applied Molecular Biosciences Unit, Departament of Chemistry, NOVA School of Science and Technology, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal
8
Associate Laboratory i4HB-Institute for Health and Bioeconomy, NOVA School of Science and Technology, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, 2819-516 Caparica, Portugal
9
Laboratório de Fármaco-Toxicologia, UBIMedical, University of Beira Interior, 6200-284 Covilhã, Portugal
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomedicines 2022, 10(11), 2852; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10112852
Submission received: 11 October 2022 / Revised: 2 November 2022 / Accepted: 4 November 2022 / Published: 8 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms of Infertility)

Abstract

:
Due to its high prevalence, infertility has become a prominent public health issue, posing a significant challenge to modern reproductive medicine. Some clinical conditions that lead to female infertility include polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), endometriosis, and premature ovarian failure (POF). Follicular fluid (FF) is the biological matrix that has the most contact with the oocyte and can, therefore, be used as a predictor of its quality. Volatilomics has emerged as a non-invasive, straightforward, affordable, and simple method for characterizing various diseases and determining the effectiveness of their current therapies. In order to find potential biomarkers of infertility, this study set out to determine the volatomic pattern of the follicular fluid from patients with PCOS, endometriosis, and POF. The chromatographic data integration was performed through solid-phase microextraction (SPME), followed by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS). The findings pointed to specific metabolite patterns as potential biomarkers for the studied diseases. These open the door for further research into the relevant metabolomic pathways to enhance infertility knowledge and diagnostic tools. An extended investigation may, however, produce a new mechanistic understanding of the pathophysiology of the diseases.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Infertility, or impaired fecundity, is defined as the inability to generate a clinical pregnancy after six months to one year of unprotected sexual activity [1,2]. Around 186 million people, both women and men, are impacted globally with this medical condition [3,4]. The World Health Organization (WHO) recognized infertility as a social disease when it became clear that it posed a threat to contemporary reproductive medicine [3,5], becoming a public health issue [6,7]. Infertility is a disease affecting couples, since individuals might be in excellent physical and mental condition but still be unsuccessful in conceiving as a pair [1,3,5,6,8,9]. Age, acute or chronic illnesses, environmental contaminants, occupational exposures, general lifestyle choices, infectious diseases, genetic abnormalities, and specific reproductive disorders can affect either men or women and impact fertility rates [6]. Due to the social environment, women tend to seek medical attention and establish reproductive health evaluations at an earlier age [1]. Ovarian dysfunction, fallopian tube obstruction, and irregular uterine shape are the typical causes of female infertility [1]. When approaching such cases, the diagnosis should be targeted to make the process less time-consuming and more effective and achieve the best possible chances for a safe pregnancy and posterior delivery [3]. The prevalence of infertility has remained consistent over the past few decades [6,8,9]. However, the demand for infertility services has significantly increased, partly because of trends toward delayed childbirth and improvements in assisted reproductive technology [6,8,9]. Clinical behavior varies greatly due to the many conditions that cause infertility and the body’s reaction to hormonal stimulation. Therefore, in addition to the currently available diagnostic and treatment tools, different approaches must continue to be developed in order to improve the success of infertility treatments [10].
PCOS is one of the prevailing gynecological, endocrine, and metabolic disorders among women of reproductive age, representing one of the leading causes of anovulatory infertility. The Rotterdam Consensus on Diagnostic Criteria for PCOS estimates that 5% to 20% of women globally are affected by this condition [11,12,13,14]. In order to be diagnosed with PCOS, two out of the following three traits must be present: biochemical or clinical hyperandrogenism (HA) [15], oligoanovulation [16], and polycystic ovarian morphology [17]. These women usually present metabolic abnormalities [18,19,20,21] that can further generate an increased risk of type 2 diabetes [19,22,23], insulin resistance [19,24,25], and cardiovascular diseases [19,26,27,28,29,30] and disturb the body mass index [18,19]. Endometriosis is a complex disease that affects 10–15% of reproductive-age women [31,32], 10–50% of infertile women, and approximately 80% of women suffering from chronic pelvic pain [33]. Endometriosis is a condition in which ectopic tissue with glands and stroma, such as the endometrium, grows outside the uterine cavity [31,33,34,35,36,37]. This abnormality is a gynecologic disease associated with estrogen-dependent chronic inflammation [31,33,34,38,39]. It leads to reproductive dysfunction, infertility, and the development of chronic pelvic pain syndrome [31,33,38]. POF occurs when the exhaustion of the number of ovarian follicles is concurrent with autoimmune ovarian damage, along with genetic predisposition [40,41], and develops in about 1% of women [40,41]. Due to ovarian disfunction, its main features are oligomenorrhea or frequent menstruation; blood with increased gonadotropin and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels; decreased AMH, antral follicle count (AFC), inhibin B, estradiol, testosterone, and estrogen levels; and a series of low-estrogen symptoms [40,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49].
Germ cell–somatic cell communication is possible due to follicular fluid (FF), a complex milieu. It includes a range of metabolites and allows for several reactions essential to oocyte development [12,50]. It is composed of metabolites produced in the follicular wall, transudates of plasma, and serum diffusion. Additionally, substances derived from regional follicular metabolic processes and ovarian cell biological functions, such as granulosa and theca cells, also contribute to and change FF composition according to the oocyte’s needs. Therefore, the oocyte’s growth and differentiation in vivo are directly linked to this biological matrix [50,51,52,53]. Further research into conditions such as PCOS, endometriosis, and early ovarian failure will benefit from a thorough knowledge of FF, since it is a non-invasive matrix that provides biological insights into fertility, reflecting the changes in the patient’s microenvironment. FF chemical and biomolecular hallmarks have sparked a great deal of attention, becoming a crucial source of knowledge and inspiring much research to find new targets for assessing oocyte development. Therefore, a detailed characterization and consideration of FF may identify potential metabolites that interfere with normal female function and promote infertility [50,52,53,54].
Metabolomics, a high-throughput technique, identifies various metabolic components in diverse biological matrixes. Untargeted metabolomics focuses on the dynamic adjustment of small molecules in response to an organismal disturbance, offering significant insights into the pathophysiology of various diseases and helping identify specific biomarkers [12,50]. These molecules are present in biological matrixes such as tissues, cells [10,50,55,56], blood, urine, plasma, serum, and FF [10,50,51,55,56,57] due to their medical and chemical signature, which allows for the quantitative measurement of the dynamic chemical reactions that take place in living systems in response to pathophysiological insults or genetic variations [10,50,55,56]. Volatilomics, a metabolomic subgroup that reflects biochemical metabolic activity and environmental influences, offers new insights into the physiological processes of several disorders [58,59,60,61]. It encompasses all volatile organic compounds (VOCs) that derive from exogenous sources, including nutrition, medications, and environmental exposure, as well as internal sources, such as endogenous metabolomic and biochemical processes [58,59,60]. Multiple pathologies, such as cancer, genetic and metabolic disorders, schizophrenia, and infectious diseases, have already been connected to particular VOC signatures [59,62] and potential biomarkers [63,64]. The volatilomics approach is based on highly sensitive analytical techniques and does not require invasive procedures, since VOCs can be found in readily accessible biofluids [61,65,66,67], such as urine [61,63,66,68,69,70,71,72], exhaled breath [61,63,66,71,72,73,74,75,76,77], saliva [61,63,71,72,78,79,80,81,82,83], blood [63,71,72], serum [61,78,79,83], skin emanations, breast milk [63,71,72], and tissues [10,69,84,85]. Volatilomics studies involve the targeted analysis of a limited number of metabolites connected to a specific biological pathway or the fingerprinting of a significant fraction of metabolites [61,65,66,67]. In this study, a more untargeted approach was required to detect and identify unexpected changes in the concentrations of specific metabolites [61,86].
Instrumentation that is precise, dependable, and efficient is essential for VOC detection [61,68]. Due to its consistent and reproducible results, headspace (HS) solid-phase microextraction (SPME) in combination with gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS) is the typically used method for the extraction and posterior analysis of VOCs [10,61,69,84,85,87,88]. SPME involves the partitioning of analytes from the sample solution into the sorbent coating of the SPME fiber due to the intermolecular interaction with the sorbent material [61,87,88,89]. This method is very effective, since it combines sampling, extraction, and concentration, resulting in greater sensitivity, automation, and portability while reducing the concentration of interferents [61,69,87,90,91]. Mass spectrometry (MS) is the most widely used technique for determining the volatilomic profile of biological matrices. It separates metabolites by gas or liquid chromatography, followed by ionization and resolution according to the mass-to-charge ratio. High sensitivity and low-concentration secondary metabolite detection are two main features of MS techniques [61,65,92]. GC is now one of the most widely used techniques for quantifying and qualifying multicomponent mixtures, showing the best separation power. The combination of the two techniques results in improved sensitivity, specificity, and the separation of the components to be analyzed [93,94,95]. It also enables the determination of detailed information regarding the structure of various compounds, allowing the correct identification and quantification based on their mass-to-charge ratio (m/z) [93,96].
This study aimed to qualitatively determine all the VOCs present in the FF of women diagnosed with diverse causes of infertility. Subsequently, and according to the results obtained, we traced the metabolomic profile of each clinical condition, compared the control FFs and FFs referring to the different pathologies, and established possible biomarkers. This research identified 136 VOCs, and 37 (27%) of them were found in at least two samples. To our knowledge, this is the first study to attempt to establish the volatomic profile of the FF from women with endometriosis, PCOS, and POF who underwent IVF procedures and find possible biomarkers for these diseases using HS-SPME/GC-MS combined with multivariate statistical tools. This high-throughput methodology may be applicable to clinical settings as a diagnostic approach or as a means to improve diagnostic decisions when combined with the existing diagnostic and screening tools.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials and Reagents

The SPME fiber holder for manual use and the 100 μm polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) coated fibers were obtained from Supelco (Bellefonte, PA, USA). The SPME fibers were conditioned according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

2.2. Subject Sample Collection

To investigate the metabolomic pattern of FF, 52 samples from women who underwent IVF procedures were analyzed. These include 15 patients with PCOS, 8 with endometriosis, 12 with POF, and 17 controls. The 17 controls corresponded to women submitted to IVF procedures due to specific conditions that did not affect the FF, such as tubal obstruction, or when the couple’s primordial fertility factor was male-driven. Women were enrolled between October 2015 and July 2019. All subjects were Caucasian. The samples were obtained at the Assisted Reproduction Laboratory of the Academic Hospital Center of Cova da Beira in Covilhã, Portugal. All experiments were performed in accordance with the standard guidelines and national requirements, namely, the Declaration of Helsinki and Portuguese Law 21/2014, and approved by the institutional ethics committee of the Academic Hospital Center of Cova da Beira, Covilhã, Portugal (reference number 47/2015, approved on 15 July 2015). Informed consent was obtained from all individuals before inclusion.

2.3. Follicular Fluid Sample Collection

Oocyte retrieval was performed by transvaginal ultrasound-guided aspiration 36 h after the injection of human chorionic gonadotrophin, and each follicle was aspirated. To avoid any blood contamination, only clear fluid samples were included, whereas bloodstained and cloudy follicular fluid samples were excluded.

2.4. Follicular Fluid Preparation

All FF samples from the same patient were pooled, and a volume of 15 mL was centrifuged at 3 kg for 15 min. Supernatants were filtered with 0.2 um filters to eliminate cell debris and then stored at −80 °C until cfDNA extraction.

2.5. Extraction of Metabolites from the FF

During the procedure, all samples were stored at 4 °C. After placing 2 mL of each FF in a vial, the volatile metabolites were extracted using a 100 μm PDMS, non-bonded SPME fiber exposed in the headspace of the flasks for 45 min at 40 °C, under continuous agitation (125 rpm). This procedure is diagrammed in Figure 1. Subsequently, the SPME syringe was injected into the GC injection port for 5 min to allow the desorption of VOCs from the fiber. This methodology was adapted from a previous study carried out by C. Silva et al. [97]. PDMS fibers were chosen due to their compatibility with volatile analytes ranging from 80 to 500 MW and compatibility with a manual holder.

2.6. Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) Conditions

VOCs in the headspace were analyzed using an HP 7890B gas chromatographic system in conjunction with an Agilent Technologies 5977A mass spectrometer and an Agilent 7693 autosampler. For the separation of the analytes, a capillary column (30 m, 0.25 mm I.D., 0.25 m film thickness) with 5% phenylmethylsiloxane (HP-5MS) was provided by J & W Scientific (Folsom, CA, USA). The oven temperature profile was: (a) 5 min at 45 °C; (b) increase in temperature until 150 °C, at a rate of 2 °C min−1; (c) 150 °C for 10 min; (d) increase in temperature until 220 °C, at a rate of 7 °C min−1; and (e) 220 °C for 10 min. Column flow was kept constant at 1.0 mL/min using helium (He ultrapure, Nippon gases, Vila Franca de Xira, Portugal) as the carrier gas. The injection port was maintained at 250 °C and operated in the splitless mode (5 min). Regarding MS analyses, the operating temperatures of the transfer line, quadrupole, and ionization source were 280, 150, and 230 °C, respectively. The electron impact mass spectra were recorded at 70 eV, the ionization current was 35μ A, and data acquisition was performed in scan mode (50–550 m/z). The identification of metabolites was performed by comparing mass spectra using Agilent MS ChemStation software, version B.04.03 (Palo Alto, CA, USA) equipped with the NIST20, Wiley12, and SWGDRUGv8 mass spectral libraries with a similarity threshold higher than 80%, or using commercial standards when available.

3. Results and Discussion

A heatmap was obtained, representing values for the main variable of interest across two axes as a cluster effect. To create the heatmap, STATISTICA 7 (StatSoft. Inc., Tulsa, OK, USA) software was used.
Figure 2 represents a heatmap of the different metabolites and their respective tendencies towards each disease. From this heatmap, it is possible to observe some associations between the samples and their unique metabolomic expressions. The colours range from red to blue according to the comparative abundance of metabolites in the FFs. To compare the results for each pathology, red indicates a lower presence, while blue indicates a greater presence.
Figure 3 depicts a percentual representation of all VOCs present for each medical condition. Several VOCs had similar incidences throughout the various health conditions, such as palmitic acid, tetradecamethylcycloheptasiloxane, cyclotetradecane, and methyl stearate. At the same time, some metabolites were not present in all the samples pertaining to a specific pathology. Therefore, some metabolites could not be identified with a particular medical condition.
The controls, represented by “C”, showed a profile that differentiated itself from those of the infertility complications. The most frequently identified metabolites were tetradecamethylcycloheptasiloxane, with an occurrence of 59%; dodecamethylcyclohexasiloxane (53%); 4-methyl-2,4-bis(4-hydroxyphenyl)pent-1-ene (35%); and diethyl phthalate (35%). Even though tetradecamethylcycloheptasiloxane was present in several control samples, it is notable that this compound was also present in the remaining samples from women with clinical conditions associated to infertility. Additionally, these FFs presented a small incidence of several compounds. Metabolites such as 1-dodecanol, 4,6-dimethyldodecane, and all VOCs identified in group F were not represented.
POF and E were the two diseases with the most similarities, forming a cluster of their own. Diethyl phthalate, a phthalic acid ester, was found in 83% of the endometriosis samples and 75% of the POF samples. This metabolite was identified in samples of both these conditions twice as frequently as in the controls. Phthalic acid esters are considered endocrine disrupters [98,99,100,101]. Some toxicological studies have described phthalates as toxic for human reproduction [102,103,104]. They decrease fertility rates [105], produce anti-androgenic effects by reducing testosterone and estrogen production at high doses [106,107,108], affect folliculogenesis [105] by restricting antral follicle growth through the inhibition of 17-beta-estradiol production [109,110,111,112], generate ovarian dysfunction [109,110,111,112], and impact oocyte maturation and embryonic development [105]. Du et al. found relevant phthalate concentrations in the FF of women undergoing IVF [105]. These can arise from intoxication, industrial exposure, or ingestion [72,113,114]. In 2013, Upsona et al. released a study on the exposure to select phthalates, showing how pervasive they were among female enrolees. Their research also suggested that phthalates may increase the risk of developing endometriosis, a hormonally mediated disease, among reproductive-age women [115]. Buck Louis et al. also demonstrated that select phthalates are associated with a higher chance of an endometriosis diagnosis [106]. Furthermore, these compounds can be found in distinct biological matrixes and are related to diseases such as cancer [72,113,114]. However, there is still a lack of consistency in these results, reducing the impact of some findings and methodologies [106,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122].
The POF samples presented exclusive compounds, 1-dodecanol and 4,6-dimethyldodecane. Even though they were only present in 17% of the samples, as shown in Figure 3, Figure 2 demonstrates a relevant correlation when considering the controls and remaining diseases. The compound 1-dodecanol appeared in the para-axillary and nipple–areola regions of pregnant women. Some reports have shown that this VOC is affected by emotional anomalies [123]. When compared to the controls, urinary samples from specific types of cancer also presented high levels of 1-dodecanol, namely colorectal cancer, leukaemia, and lymphoma [124]. However, its effects on the reproductive system are not fully understood, and more accurate data are required to formulate a precise mechanism of action for this metabolite [125]. Groups A and B were also highly represented in the POF FFs, as exemplified by diethyl phthalate. On the other hand, group E was mainly absent, as shown by the VOC dodecamethylcyclohexasiloxane.
Endometriosis had a versatile volatilomic profile, with specific compounds detected in many samples. Since these metabolites were not as abundant in the other samples, they might be able to characterize the disease. Endometriosis samples were most obviously correlated with metabolites from group C (tetradecanal (75%), octadecanal (63%), hexadecanal (63%), and eicosamethyl-cyclodecasiloxane (38%)). Group C components varied throughout all the samples, but the FFs from the three pathologies presented a slight prevalence of these metabolites compared with the controls. However, according to the heatmap, these may not be suitable markers. Octadecanal and tetradecanal are both fatty aldehydes [126,127]. Tetradecanal, also known as myristyl aldehyde, is the reduced form of myristyl acid [127]. Hexadecanal is a volatile straight-chain aldehyde [72] and a final product of glycosphingolipid metabolism [128]. Its metabolization forms phospholipids that can produce signals within cells [129,130]. Hexadecanal is present in several biological fluids [72], but its levels tend to be low, particularly in cumulus–oocyte complexes, according to some animal studies [129]. Cordeiro and his team showed that age is closely related to enhanced glycosphingolipid metabolism [131], demonstrating a negative correlation. Overall, sphingolipids are associated with steroid hormone synthesis, mainly through the modulation of steroidogenic pathways. These molecules may act as secondary messengers or paracrine regulators for genetic transcription, although the sphingolipid mechanism is still not fully understood [132,133]. The abundance of these compounds in FF may indicate alterations in the proper steroidogenesis process for these patients [132]. Sphingolipid breakdown is also a relevant event during apoptosis [131,133,134]. Tetradecamethylhexasiloxane and hexadecamethylheptasiloxane, belonging to group F, and some metabolites from group A, such as diethyl phthalate, might also help differentiate the FF of women with endometriosis. The first two are also siloxanes [135], and tetradecamethylhexasiloxane has already been related to male infertility [136,137]. Dodecamethylcyclohexasiloxane (cyclomethicone 6) is a cyclic dimethyl polysiloxane compound [138], which was mostly found in the FF of controls and endometriosis patients. Its toxicity is confirmed, and some studies have reported that odecamethylcyclohexasiloxane causes endometrial tumours. Its mechanism of action, however, remains a mystery [139].
Marianna et al. used 1H-NMR to analyze the FF of women with various stages of endometriosis. When compared to the endometriosis patients, the follicular fluids of the controls contained lower levels of phospholipids, lactate, and insulin and higher levels of fatty acids, lysine, choline, glucose, aspartate, alanine, leucine, valine, proline, phosphocholine, and total LDH [140]. According to NMR data collected by Karaer and coworkers, the metabolomic profiles of the follicular fluids from women with endometriosis contained higher levels of glucose, pyruvate, and valine, as well as higher concentrations of lactate, unlike the studies carried out by Marinna et al. [141]. LysoPC (18:2(9Z,12Z)) and LysoPC (18:0) were upregulated, in line with Sun et al.’s SWATH study, whereas phytosphingosine was downregulated [142].
The PCOS samples presented the smallest number of compounds. Even though the prevalent VOC was tetradecamethylcycloheptasiloxane, 1-ethyl-2,3-dimethylbenzene and docosane might be the best predictors, as they were only present in the FF of PCOS patients. Tetradecamethylcycloheptasiloxane, also known as cyclomethicone 7, is a cyclic dimethyl polysiloxane compound [138]. These metabolites are known to interfere with fertility and present potential carcinogenic effects (uterine tumours in females). They increase ovarian atrophy and vaginal mucification [143], disturb hormonal function, and are reproductive toxicants [144]. The compound 1-ethyl-2,3-dimethylbenzene, or ethyl xylene, is considered a BTEX (benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylene) member [145]. Exposure to these components leads to several health concerns, especially regarding female reproduction and its regulators [146,147]. Human studies have demonstrated alterations in the menstrual cycle, abnormal endocrine function, adverse birth outcomes, and other potential reproductive health risks [148]. Furthermore, again considering Figure 3, the components from group F might also help differentiate the PCOS profile. The absence of group A and B components might also be used to characterize the PCOS profile, since these metabolites were relatively well-represented in the controls.
The metabolite 4-methyl-2,4-bis(4-hydroxyphenyl)pent-1-ene was very abundant in the controls, but its occurrence was even higher in the samples of the three diseases. This discrepancy may be of high relevance. The compound 4-methyl-2,4-bis(4-hydroxyphenyl)pent-1-ene, or MBP, is also a phthalate metabolite [105]. It was present in 88% of the endometriosis samples and 67% of both the PCOS and POF samples. It is formed by the liver S9 fractions, and its metabolic activation may occur in the fetal liver, being detected as an in vivo metabolite in the fetus [149]. MBP is a very potent estrogenic metabolite of bisphenol A (BPA) [149], an interferent for oocyte development and maturation [98]. However, it presents 1000 times more biological activity than BPA [150]. The binding to steroid receptors is one of many possible mechanisms that might lead to endocrine disturbance. The development and operation of the reproductive system rely on the androgen receptor (AR) and progesterone receptor (PR). The endogenous native AR and PR ligands may be blocked or interfered with by MBP, affecting the AR- and PR-mediated pathways and resulting in malfunction [150]. Okuda et al. demonstrated that MBP-potent estrogenic activity affected uterine weight, myometrial thickness, and luminal epithelial cell height in rat studies [151]. MBP activity has also been associated with breast cancer [152,153], lung disfunction [154], and pancreatic β-cell death [155].
Hou et al., using GC-MS analysis, showed that elevated L-tryptophan and L-tyrosine caused metabolic alterations in PCOS FF, and these complications in amino acid metabolism could negatively influence patients [156]. When compared to controls, the FF exhibited elevated concentrations of chenodeoxycholic acid-3-d-glucuronide, glycocholic, taurocholic, and glycochenodeoxycholic acids, suggesting that this metabolic pathway is also significantly affected by bile acid metabolism, according to Yang et al.’s analysis of this pathway employing ultra-performance liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry [157]. Gongadashetti et al.’s findings revealed that the PCOS group’s levels of ROS, TAC, and 8-IP were higher than those of the controls [158]. Via high-performance liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry, several authors have discovered differences between species in the metabolism of lipids, such as triglycerides, phosphatidylethanolamines, and phosphatidylinositols [12,159,160]. Zhang and his team used NMR to show increased glycoprotein, acetate, and cholesterol and decreased levels of lactic acid, glutamine, pyruvate, and alanine in the FF, indicating a change in pyruvate metabolism and glycolysis [161].
Although the FF presents numerous biomarkers, there are few consistent results across the literature. The parameters utilized in the analytical procedures, such as the method of FF sample preparation, the presence of impurities, and the mass range, have generated disagreement. This may have arisen from the examination of follicles with various diameters and discrepancies in the measurement techniques, patient age, BMI, number of samples examined, ovarian stimulation, genetics, and other diagnosed diseases [11,13,132,158,162,163,164].
Our results exhibited interesting discriminating factors for FF samples, demonstrating that volatilomics could be an advantageous approach for identifying potential infertility biomarkers. Our findings also suggested the possibility of classifying certain endogenous metabolites.

4. Conclusions

In this work, we described the application of an HS-SPME/GC–MS methodology to determine the VOCs present in FF samples from women with clinical manifestations related to infertility. The GC-MS analysis identified 136 VOCs in all 52 specimens, corresponding to 15 PCOS, 8 endometriosis, and 12 POF patients and 17 controls. Due to their prevalence in all the samples, 37 of the 136 VOCs were studied, and multivariate statistical analysis revealed significant alterations in the levels of certain metabolites according to each pathology. The altered biochemical profiles revealed several compromised metabolomic pathways in the various diseases, with endometriosis and POF presenting several similarities. The high-throughput methodologies employed suggested the possibility of using metabolite identification as a springboard for determining potential infertility biomarkers. Our findings may also benefit the exploration of the associated metabolomic pathways and the improvement of clinical diagnostic tools. However, it should be noted that this research represents a pilot study, and more testing is needed regarding the volatilomic profile of FF in order to improve future prospects.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.T.B., A.C.R., Â.S., A.H.O., L.B., L.A.P. and E.G.; methodology, A.T.B., O.A., A.C.R., L.A.P. and E.G.; formal analysis, A.T.B. and O.A.; investigation, A.T.B., A.C.R., O.A., M.M.C.A., L.A.P. and E.G.; resources, A.T.B., A.C.R., L.A.P. and E.G.; data curation, A.T.B., A.C.R., L.A.P. and E.G.; writing—original draft preparation, A.T.B., A.C.R., O.A., L.A.P. and E.G.; writing—review and editing, A.T.B., A.C.R., O.A., M.M.C.A., Â.S., A.H.O., L.B., L.A.P. and E.G.; supervision, A.C.R., L.A.P. and E.G.; project administration, A.C.R.; funding acquisition, A.C.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work is part of the project Centro-01-0145- FEDER-000019—C4—Centro de Competências em Cloud Computing supported by the European Regional Development Fund through the “Programa Operacional Regional do Centro (Centro 2020)—Sistema de Apoio à Investigação Científica e Tecnológica—Programas Integrados de IC&DT (Covilhã)”. The authors acknowledge the Laboratório de Fármaco-Toxicologia for the funding support. This work was developed within the scope of the CICS-UBI projects UIDB/00709/2020 and UIDP/00709/2020 and the CEF project UIDB/00239/2020, and financed by national funds through the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT)/MCTES. It was also supported by the Applied Molecular Biosciences Unit UCIBIO (UIDB/04378/2020 and UIDP/04378/2020) and the Associate Laboratory Institute for Health and Bioeconomy—i4HB (project LA/P/0140/2020), which are financed by national funds from FCT/MCTES.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all individuals before inclusion.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Chu, K.Y.; Patel, P.; Ramasamy, R. Consideration of gender differences in infertility evaluation. Curr. Opin. Urol. 2019, 29, 267–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zegers-Hochschild, F.; Adamson, G.D.; Dyer, S.; Racowsky, C.; De Mouzon, J.; Sokol, R.; Rienzi, L.; Sunde, A.; Schmidt, L.; Cooke, I.D.; et al. The international glossary on infertility and fertility care, 2017. Hum. Reprod. 2017, 32, 1786–1801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Szamatowicz, M. Assisted reproductive technology in reproductive medicine—Possibilities and limitations. Ginekol. Pol. 2016, 87, 820–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Inhorn, M.C.; Patrizio, P. Infertility around the globe: New thinking on gender, reproductive technologies and global movements in the 21st century. Hum. Reprod. Update 2015, 21, 411–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Boivin, J.; Bunting, L.; Collins, J.A.; Nygren, K.G. Reply: International estimates on infertility prevalence and treatment seeking: Potential need and demand for medical care. Hum. Reprod. 2007, 24, 2380–2383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Cunningham, J. Infertility: A primer for primary care providers. J. Am. Acad. Physician Assist. 2017, 30, 19–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Lindsay, T.J.; Vitrikas, K.R. Evaluation and treatment of infertility. Am. Fam. Physician 2015, 91, 308–314. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  8. Crawford, N.M.; Steiner, A.Z. Age-related infertility. Obstet. Gynecol. Clin. N. Am. 2015, 42, 15–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gleicher, N.; Kushnir, V.A.; Weghofer, A.; Barad, D.H. The “graying” of infertility services: An impending revolution nobody is ready for. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2014, 12, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Silva, C.; Perestrelo, R.; Silva, P.; Capelinha, F.; Tomás, H.; Câmara, J.S. Volatomic pattern of breast cancer and cancer-free tissues as a powerful strategy to identify potential biomarkers. Analyst 2019, 144, 4153–4161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yu, L.; Liu, M.; Wang, Z.; Liu, T.; Liu, S.; Wang, B.; Pan, B.; Dong, X.; Guo, W. Correlation between steroid levels in follicular fluid and hormone synthesis related substances in its exosomes and embryo quality in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2021, 19, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Ban, Y.; Ran, H.; Chen, Y.; Ma, L. Lipidomics analysis of human follicular fluid form normal-weight patients with polycystic ovary syndrome: A pilot study. J. Ovarian Res. 2021, 14, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Chen, W.; Pang, Y. Metabolic Syndrome and PCOS: Pathogenesis and the Role of Metabolites. Metabolites 2021, 11, 869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Liu, R.; Bai, S.; Zheng, S.; Zhu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, B.; Zhao, W. Identification of the Metabolomics Signature of Human Follicular Fluid from PCOS Women with Insulin Resistance. Dis. Markers 2022, 2022, 6877541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Azziz, R. PCOS: A diagnostic challenge. Reprod. Biomed. Online 2004, 8, 644–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Broekmans, F.J.; Knauff, E.A.H.; Valkenburg, O.; Laven, J.S.; Eijkemans, M.J.; Fauser, B.C.J.M. PCOS according to the Rotterdam consensus criteria: Change in prevalence among WHO-II anovulation and association with metabolic factors. BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2006, 113, 1210–1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Azziz, R.; Hincapie, L.A.; Knochenhauer, E.S.; Dewailly, D.; Fox, L.; Boots, L.R. Screening for 21-hydroxylase-deficient nonclassic adrenal hyperplasia among hyperandrogenic women: A prospective study. Fertil. Steril. 1999, 72, 915–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Azziz, R.; Tarlatzis, R.; Dunaif, A.; Ibanez, L.; Pugeat, M.; Taylor, A.; Fauser, C.J.M.; Medicine, R. Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil. Steril. 2004, 81, 19–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Cleeman, J.I. Executive summary of the third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (adult treatment panel III). J. Am. Med. Assoc. 2001, 285, 2486–2497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mohammad, M.B.; Seghinsara, A.M. Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), diagnostic criteria, and AMH. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2017, 18, 17–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. de Zegher, F.; López-Bermejo, A.; Ibáñez, L. Central Obesity, Faster Maturation, and ‘PCOS’ in Girls. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2018, 29, 815–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ehrmann, D.A.; Barnes, R.B.; Rosenfield, R.L.; Cavaghan, M.K.; Imperial, J. Prevalence of Impaired Glucose Tolerance and Diabetes in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. Diabetes Care 1999, 22, 141–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Dunaif, A.; Legro, R.S. Prevalence and Predictors of Risk for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Impaired Glucose Tolerance in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome-Authors’ Response. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1999, 84, 297–2976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Dunaif, A.; Graf, M.; Mandeli, J.; Laumas, V.; Dobrjansky, A. Characterization of Groups of Hyperaiidrogenic Women with Acanthosis Nigricans, Impaired Glucose Tolerance, and/or Hyperinsulinemia. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1987, 65, 499–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Robinson, S.; Kiddy, D.; Gelding, S.V.; Willis, D.; Niththyananthan, R.; Bush, A.; Johnston, D.G.; Franks, S. The relationship of insulin insensitivity to menstrual pattern in women with hyperandrogenism and polycystic ovaries. Clin. Endocrinol. 1993, 39, 351–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Dahlgren, E.; Janson, P.O.; Johansson, S.; Lapidus, L.; Odén, A. Polycystic ovary syndrome and risk for myocardial infarction: Evaluated from a risk factor model based on a prospective population study of women. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 1992, 71, 599–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kiddy, D.S.; Hamilton-Fairley, D.; Bush, A.; Short, F.; Anyaoku, V.; Reed, M.J.; Franks, S. Improvement in endocrine and ovarian function during dietary treatment of obese women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Clin. Endocrinol. 1992, 36, 105–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Clark, A.M.; Ledger, W.; Galletly, C.; Tomlinson, L.; Blaney, F.; Wang, X.; Norman, R.J. Weight loss results in significant improvement in pregnancy and ovulation rates in anovulatory obese women. Hum. Reprod. 1995, 10, 2705–2712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Huber-Buchholz, M.M.; Carey, D.G.P.; Norman, R.J. Restoration of reproductive potential by lifestyle modification in obese polycystic ovary syndrome: Role of insulin sensitivity and luteinizing hormone. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1999, 84, 1470–1474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Morán, C.; Knochenhauer, E.; Boots, L.R.; Azziz, R. Adrenal androgen excess in hyperandrogenism: Relation to age and body mass. Fertil. Steril. 1999, 71, 671–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Pocate-Cheriet, K.; Santulli, P.; Kateb, F.; Bourdon, M.; Maignien, C.; Batteux, F.; Chouzenoux, S.; Patrat, C.; Wolf, J.P.; Bertho, G.; et al. The follicular fluid metabolome differs according to the endometriosis phenotype. Reprod. Biomed. Online 2020, 41, 1023–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. De Ziegler, D.; Gayet, V.; Aubriot, F.X.; Fauque, P.; Streuli, I.; Wolf, J.P.; De Mouzon, J.; Chapron, C. Use of oral contraceptives in women with endometriosis before assisted reproduction treatment improves outcomes. Fertil. Steril. 2010, 94, 2796–2799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Mikhaleva, L.M.; Davydov, A.I.; Patsap, O.I.; Mikhaylenko, E.V.; Nikolenko, V.N.; Neganova, M.E.; Klochkov, S.G.; Somasundaram, S.G.; Kirkland, C.E.; Aliev, G. Malignant Transformation and Associated Biomarkers of Ovarian Endometriosis: A Narrative Review. Adv. Ther. 2020, 37, 2580–2603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Vinatier, D.; Cosson, M.; Dufour, P. Is endometriosis an endometrial disease? Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2000, 91, 113–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Prins, J.R.; Marissen, L.M.; Scherjon, S.A.; Hoek, A.; Cantineau, A.E.P. Is there an immune modulating role for follicular fluid in endometriosis? A narrative review. Reproduction 2020, 159, R45–R54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Kennedy, S.; Bergqvist, A.; Chapron, C.; D’Hooghe, T.; Dunselman, G.; Greb, R.; Hummelshoj, L.; Prentice, A.; Saridogan, E.; Koninckx, P.; et al. ESHRE guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of endometriosis. Hum. Reprod. 2005, 20, 2698–2704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Sampson, J.A.; Novak, E. Peritoneal Endometriosis, Due to the Menstrual Dissemination of Endometrial Tissue into the Peritoneal Cavity. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1927, 15, 101–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Chapron, C.; Marcellin, L.; Borghese, B.; Santulli, P. Rethinking mechanisms, diagnosis and management of endometriosis. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2019, 15, 666–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Adachi, M.; Nasu, K.; Tsuno, A.; Yuge, A.; Kawano, Y.; Narahara, H. Attachment to extracellular matrices is enhanced in human endometriotic stromal cells: A possible mechanism underlying the pathogenesis of endometriosis. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2011, 155, 85–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Jankowska, K. Premature ovarian failure. Przegląd Menopauzalny 2017, 16, 51–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Coulam, C.B.; Adamson, S.C.; Annegers, J.F. Incidence of Premature Ovarian Failure. Obstet. Gynecol. 1986, 67, 604–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Yu, L.; Qing, X. Diagnosis of Idiopathic Premature Ovarian Failure by Color Doppler Ultrasound under the Intelligent Segmentation Algorithm. Hindawi Comput. Math. Methods Med. 2022, 2022, 2645607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Paules, C.; Dantas, A.P.; Miranda, J.; Crovetto, F.; Eixarch, E.; Rodriguez-Sureda, V.; Dominguez, C.; Casu, G.; Rovira, C.; Nadal, A.; et al. Premature placental aging in term small-for-gestational-age and growth-restricted fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2019, 53, 615–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Kouatcheu, S.D.; Marko, J.; Tamura, D.; Khan, S.G.; Lee, C.R.; DiGiovanna, J.J.; Kraemer, K.H. Thyroid nodules in xeroderma pigmentosum patients: A feature of premature aging. J. Endocrinol. Investig. 2021, 44, 1475–1482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Zhang, P.; Zhang, H.; Lin, J.; Xiao, T.; Xu, R.; Fu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Du, Y.; Cheng, J.; Jiang, H. Insulin impedes osteogenesis of BMSCs by inhibiting autophagy and promoting premature senescence via the TGF-β1 pathway. Aging 2020, 12, 2084–2100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Camilleri, E. A Brief Overview On Premature Ovarian Failure. Malta Med. Stud. Assoc. 2022, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  47. Pal, L.; Torrealday, S.; Kodaman, P. Premature Ovarian Insufficiency—An update on recent advances in understanding and management. F1000Research 2017, 6, 2069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Pankiewicz, K.; Laudański, P.; Issat, T. The role of noncoding rna in the pathophysiology and treatment of premature ovarian insufficiency. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 9336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Popat, V.B.; Calis, K.A.; Kalantaridou, S.N.; Vanderhoof, V.H.; Koziol, D.; Troendle, J.F.; Reynolds, J.C.; Nelson, L.M. Bone mineral density in young women with primary ovarian insufficiency: Results of a three-year randomized controlled trial of physiological transdermal estradiol and testosterone replacement. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2014, 99, 3418–3426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Brinca, A.T.; Ramalhinho, A.C.; Sousa, Â.; Oliani, A.H.; Breitenfeld, L.; Passarinha, L.A.; Gallardo, E. Follicular Fluid: A Powerful Tool for the Understanding and Diagnosis of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 1254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. O’Gorman, A.; Wallace, M.; Cottell, E.; Gibney, M.J.; McAuliffe, F.M.; Wingfield, M.; Brennan, L. Metabolic profiling of human follicular fluid identifies potential biomarkers of oocyte developmental competence. Reproduction 2013, 146, 389–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Sun, Z.; Wu, H.; Lian, F.; Zhang, X.; Pang, C.; Guo, Y.; Song, J.; Wang, A.; Shi, L.; Han, L. Human Follicular Fluid Metabolomics Study of Follicular Development and Oocyte Quality. Chromatographia 2017, 80, 901–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Luti, S.; Fiaschi, T.; Magherini, F.; Modesti, P.A.; Piomboni, P.; Governini, L.; Luddi, A.; Amoresano, A.; Illiano, A.; Pinto, G.; et al. Relationship between the metabolic and lipid profile in follicular fluid of women undergoing in vitro fertilization. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 2020, 87, 986–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Rajska, A.; Buszewska-Forajta, M.; Rachoń, D.; Markuszewski, M.J. Metabolomic insight into polycystic ovary syndrome—An overview. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. McCartney, A.; Vignoli, A.; Biganzoli, L.; Love, R.; Tenori, L.; Luchinat, C.; Di Leo, A. Metabolomics in breast cancer: A decade in review. Cancer Treat. Rev. 2018, 67, 88–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Koek, M.M.; Jellema, R.H.; van der Greef, J.; Tas, A.C.; Hankemeier, T. Quantitative metabolomics based on gas chromatography mass spectrometry: Status and perspectives. Metabolomics 2011, 7, 307–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Wörheide, M.A.; Krumsiek, J.; Kastenmüller, G.; Arnold, M. Multi-omics integration in biomedical research—A metabolomics-centric review. Anal. Chim. Acta 2021, 1141, 144–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Janfaza, S.; Khorsand, B.; Nikkhah, M.; Zahiri, J. Digging deeper into volatile organic compounds associated with cancer. Biol. Methods Protoc. 2019, 4, bpz014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Longo, V.; Forleo, A.; Provenzano, S.P.; Coppola, L.; Zara, V.; Ferramosca, A.; Siciliano, P.; Capone, S. HS-SPME-GC-MS metabolomics approach for sperm quality evaluation by semen volatile organic compounds (VOCs) analysis. Biomed. Phys. Eng. Express 2018, 5, 015006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Schmidt, K.; Podmore, I. Current Challenges in Volatile Organic Compounds Analysis as Potential Biomarkers of Cancer. J. Biomark. 2015, 2015, 981458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Berenguer, C.V.; Pereira, F.; Pereira, J.A.M.; Câmara, J.S. Volatilomics: An Emerging and Promising Avenue for the Detection of Potential Prostate Cancer Biomarkers. Cancers 2022, 14, 3982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Buljubasic, F.; Buchbauer, G. The scent of human diseases: A review on specific volatile organic compounds as diagnostic biomarkers. Flavour Fragr. J. 2015, 30, 5–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Longo, V.; Forleo, A.; Ferramosca, A.; Notari, T.; Pappalardo, S.; Siciliano, P.; Capone, S.; Montano, L. Blood, urine and semen Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) pattern analysis for assessing health environmental impact in highly polluted areas in Italy. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 286, 117410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Di Lena, M.; Porcelli, F.; Altomare, D.F. Volatile organic compounds as new biomarkers for colorectal cancer: A review. Color. Dis. 2016, 18, 654–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Trock, B.J. Application of metabolomics to prostate cancer. Urol. Oncol. Semin. Orig. Investig. 2011, 29, 572–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Gao, Q.; Lee, W.-Y. Urinary metabolites for urological cancer detection: A review on the application of volatile organic compounds for cancers. Am. J. Clin. Exp. Urol. 2019, 7, 232–248. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  67. Spratlin, J.L.; Serkova, N.J.; Eckhardt, S.G. Clinical applications of metabolomics in oncology: A review. Clin. Cancer Res. 2009, 15, 431–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Aggarwal, P.; Baker, J.; Boyd, M.T.; Coyle, S.; Probert, C.; Chapman, E.A. Optimisation of urine sample preparation for headspace-solid phase microextraction gas chromatography-mass spectrometry: Altering sample ph, sulphuric acid concentration and phase ratio. Metabolites 2020, 10, 482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Silva, C.L.; Passos, M.; Câmara, J.S. Solid phase microextraction, mass spectrometry and metabolomic approaches for detection of potential urinary cancer biomarkers—A powerful strategy for breast cancer diagnosis. Talanta 2012, 89, 360–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Shirasu, M.; Touhara, K. The scent of disease: Volatile organic compounds of the human body related to disease and disorder. J. Biochem. 2011, 150, 257–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Amann, A.; Costello, B.D.L.; Miekisch, W.; Schubert, J.; Buszewski, B.; Pleil, J.; Ratcliffe, N.; Risby, T. The human volatilome: Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in exhaled breath, skin emanations, urine, feces and saliva. J. Breath Res. 2014, 8, 034001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. De Lacy Costello, B.; Amann, A.; Al-Kateb, H.; Flynn, C.; Filipiak, W.; Khalid, T.; Osborne, D.; Ratcliffe, N.M. A review of the volatiles from the healthy human body. J. Breath Res. 2014, 8, 014001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Rudnicka, J.; Kowalkowski, T.; Buszewski, B. Searching for selected VOCs in human breath samples as potential markers of lung cancer. Lung Cancer 2019, 135, 123–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Kischkel, S.; Miekisch, W.; Patricia, F.; Schubert, J.K. Breath analysis during one-lung ventilation in cancer patients. Eur. Respir. J. 2012, 40, 706–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Pereira, J.; Porto-Figueira, P.; Cavaco, C.; Taunk, K.; Rapole, S.; Dhakne, R.; Nagarajaram, H.; Câmara, J.S. Breath analysis as a potential and non-invasive frontier in disease diagnosis: An overview. Metabolites 2015, 5, 3–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Tienpont, B.; David, F.; Bicchi, C.; Sandra, P. High capacity headspace sorptive extraction. J. Microcolumn Sep. 2000, 12, 577–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Pugliese, G.; Trefz, P.; Brock, B.; Schubert, J.K.; Miekisch, W. Extending PTR based breath analysis to real-time monitoring of reactive volatile organic compounds. Analyst 2019, 144, 7359–7367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Cavaco, C.; Pereira, J.A.M.; Taunk, K.; Taware, R.; Rapole, S.; Nagarajaram, H.; Câmara, J.S. Screening of salivary volatiles for putative breast cancer discrimination: An exploratory study involving geographically distant populations. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2018, 410, 4459–4468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Cavaco, C.; Perestrelo, R.; Silva, C.; Aveiro, F.; Pereira, J.; Câmara, J.S. Establishment of the Saliva Volatomic Profi le as an Exploratory and Non-invasive Strategy to Find Potential Breast Cancer Biomarkers; Labmate Ltd.: Hertfordshire, UK, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  80. Streckfus, C.F.; Brown, R.E.; Bull, J.M. Proteomics, morphoproteomics, saliva and breast cancer: An emerging approach to guide the delivery of individualised thermal therapy, thermochemotherapy and monitor therapy response. Int. J. Hyperth. 2010, 26, 649–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Malathi, N.; Mythili, S.; Vasanthi, H.R. Salivary Diagnostics: A Brief Review. ISRN Dent. 2014, 2014, 158786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Pereira, J.A.M.; Taware, R.; Porto-Figueira, P.; Rapole, S.; Câmara, J.S. The salivary volatome in breast cancer. In Precision Medicine for Investigators, Practitioners and Providers; Elsevier Inc.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 301–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Bobkov, Y.V.; Walker, W.B.; Cattaneo, A.M. Altered functional properties of the codling moth Orco mutagenized in the intracellular loop-3. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 3893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Silva, C.L.; Perestrelo, R.; Silva, P.; Tomás, H.; Câmara, J.S. Volatile metabolomic signature of human breast cancer cell lines. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 43969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Porto-Figueira, P.; Pereira, J.A.M.; Câmara, J.S. Exploring the potential of needle trap microextraction combined with chromatographic and statistical data to discriminate different types of cancer based on urinary volatomic biosignature. Anal. Chim. Acta 2018, 1023, 53–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Salciccia, S.; Capriotti, A.L.; Laganà, A.; Fais, S.; Logozzi, M.; De Berardinis, E.; Busetto, G.M.; Di Pierro, G.B.; Ricciuti, G.P.; Del Giudice, F.; et al. Biomarkers in prostate cancer diagnosis: From current knowledge to the role of metabolomics and exosomes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 4367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Živković Semren, T.; Brčić Karačonji, I.; Safner, T.; Brajenović, N.; Tariba Lovaković, B.; Pizent, A. Gas chromatographic-mass spectrometric analysis of urinary volatile organic metabolites: Optimization of the HS-SPME procedure and sample storage conditions. Talanta 2018, 176, 537–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Lima, A.R.; Araújo, A.M.; Pinto, J.; Jerónimo, C.; Henrique, R.; Bastos, M.D.L.; Carvalho, M.; Guedes De Pinho, P. Discrimination between the human prostate normal and cancer cell exometabolome by GC-MS. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 5539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Câmara, J.S.; Perestrelo, R.; Berenguer, C.V.; Andrade, C.F.P.; Gomes, T.M.; Olayanju, B.; Kabir, A.; Rocha, C.; Teixeira, J.A.; Pereira, J.A.M. Green Extraction Techniques as Advanced Sample Preparation Approaches in Biological, Food, and Environmental Matrices: A Review. Molecules 2022, 27, 2953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Arthur, C.L.; Pawliszyn, J. Solid Phase Microextraction with Thermal Desorption Using Fused Silica Optical Fibers. Anal. Chem. 1990, 62, 2145–2148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Porto-Figueira, P.; Pereira, J.; Miekisch, W.; Câmara, J.S. Exploring the potential of NTME/GC-MS, in the establishment of urinary volatomic profiles. Lung cancer patients as case study. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 13113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Lima, A.R.; Pinto, J.; Amaro, F.; Bastos, M.d.L.; Carvalho, M.; Guedes De Pinho, P. Advances and perspectives in prostate cancer biomarker discovery in the last 5 years through tissue and urine metabolomics. Metabolites 2021, 11, 181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Caramelo, D. Determination of Antipsychotic Drugs in Oral Fluid Samples Using Dried Saliva Spots Versão Final Após Defesa; Universidade da Beira Interior: Covilhã, Portugal, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  94. Eiceman, G.A. Instrumentation of Gas Chromatography. Encycl. Anal. Chem. 2000, 10671–10679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Maurer, H.H. Role of gas chromatography-mass spectrometry with negative ion chemical ionization in clinical and forensic toxicology, doping control, and biomonitoring. Ther. Drug Monit. 2002, 24, 247–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Sneddon, J.; Masuram, S.; Richert, J.C. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry-basic principles, instrumentation and selected applications for detection of organic compounds. Anal. Lett. 2007, 40, 1003–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Silva, C.L.; Perestrelo, R.; Silva, P.; Tomás, H.; Câmara, J.S. Implementing a central composite design for the optimization of solid phase microextraction to establish the urinary volatomic expression: A first approach for breast cancer. Metabolomics 2019, 15, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Hart, R.J. Physiological aspects of female fertility: Role of the environment, modern lifestyle, and genetics. Physiol. Rev. 2016, 96, 873–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Sifakis, S.; Androutsopoulos, V.P.; Tsatsakis, A.M.; Spandidos, D.A. Human exposure to endocrine disrupting chemicals: Effects on the male and female reproductive systems. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2017, 51, 56–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Gore, A.C.; Chappell, V.A.; Fenton, S.E.; Flaws, J.A.; Nadal, A.; Prins, G.S.; Toppari, J.; Zoeller, R.T. EDC-2: The Endocrine Society’s Second Scientific Statement on Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals. Endocr. Rev. 2015, 36, E1–E150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Vander Borght, M.; Wyns, C. Fertility and infertility: Definition and epidemiology. Clin. Biochem. 2018, 62, 2–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Bang, D.Y.; Lee, I.K.; Lee, B.M. Toxicological characterization of phthalic acid. Toxicol. Res. 2011, 27, 191–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Przybylińska, P.A.; Wyszkowski, M. Environmental contamination with phthalates and its impact on living organisms. Ecol. Chem. Eng. S 2016, 23, 347–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Matsumoto, M.; Hirata-Koizumi, M.; Ema, M. Potential adverse effects of phthalic acid esters on human health: A review of recent studies on reproduction. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2008, 50, 37–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Du, Y.Y.; Fang, Y.L.; Wang, Y.X.; Zeng, Q.; Guo, N.; Zhao, H.; Li, Y.F. Follicular fluid and urinary concentrations of phthalate metabolites among infertile women and associations with in vitro fertilization parameters. Reprod. Toxicol. 2016, 61, 142–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Buck Louis, G.M.; Peterson, C.M.; Chen, Z.; Croughan, M.; Sundaram, R.; Stanford, J.; Varner, M.W.; Kennedy, A.; Giudice, L.; Fujimoto, V.Y.; et al. Bisphenol A and phthalates and endometriosis: The Endometriosis: Natural History, Diagnosis and Outcomes Study. Fertil. Steril. 2013, 100, 162–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  107. Coldham, N.G.; Dave, M.; Sivapathasundaram, S.; McDonnell, D.P.; Connor, C.; Sauer, M.J. Evaluation of a recombinant yeast cell estrogen screening assay. Environ. Health Perspect. 1997, 105, 734–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Okubo, T.; Suzuki, T.; Yokoyama, Y.; Kano, K.; Kano, I. Estimation of estrogenic and anti-estrogenic activities of some phthalate diesters and monoesters by MCF-7 cell proliferation assay in Vitro. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2003, 26, 1219–1224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Hannon, P.R.; Niermann, S.; Flaws, J.A. Acute Exposure to Di(2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate in Adulthood Causes Adverse Reproductive Outcomes Later in Life and Accelerates Reproductive Aging in Female Mice. Toxicol. Sci. 2016, 150, 97–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Davis, B.; Maronpot, R.; Heindel, J. DEHP suppresses estradioland ovuation in cycling rats. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 1994, 128, 216–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Craig, Z.R.; Singh, J.; Gupta, R.K.; Flaws, J.A. Co-treatment of mouse antral follicles with 17β-estradiol interferes with mono-2-ethylhexyl phthalate (MEHP)-induced atresia and altered apoptosis gene expression. Reprod. Toxicol. 2014, 45, 45–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  112. Bala, R.; Singh, V.; Rajender, S. Environment, Lifestyle, and Female Infertility. Reprod. Sci. 2021, 28, 617–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Silva, M.J.; Slakman, A.R.; Reidy, J.A.; Preau, J.L.; Herbert, A.R.; Samandar, E.; Needham, L.L.; Calafat, A.M. Analysis of human urine for fifteen phthalate metabolites using automated solid-phase extraction. J. Chromatogr. B Anal. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 2004, 805, 161–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. da Costa, B.R.B.; De Martinis, B.S. Analysis of urinary VOCs using mass spectrometric methods to diagnose cancer: A review. Clin. Mass Spectrom. 2020, 18, 27–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Upsona, K.; Sathyanarayana, S.; De Roosa, A.J.; Thompson, M.L.; Scholes, D.; Dills, R.; Holt, V.L. Phthalates and risk of endometriosis. NIH Public Access 2013, 126, 91–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  116. Cobellis, L.; Latini, G.; DeFelice, C.; Razzi, S.; Paris, I.; Ruggieri, F.; Mazzeo, P.; Petraglia, F. High plasma concentrations of di-(2-ethylhexyl)-phthalate in women with endometriosis. Hum. Reprod. 2003, 18, 1512–1515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Reddy, B.S.; Rozati, R.; Reddy, S.; Kodampur, S.; Reddy, P.; Reddy, R. High plasma concentrations of polychlorinated biphenyls and phthalate esters in women with endometriosis: A prospective case control study. Fertil. Steril. 2006, 85, 775–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Reddy, B.; Rozati, R.; Reddy, B.; Raman, N. Association of phthalate esters with endometriosis in Indian women. BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2006, 113, 515–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Itoh, H.; Iwasaki, M.; Hanaoka, T.; Sasaki, H.; Tanaka, T.; Tsugane, S. Urinary phthalate monoesters and endometriosis in infertile Japanese women. Sci. Total Environ. 2009, 408, 37–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Weuve, J.; Hauser, R.; Calafat, A.M.; Missmer, S.A.; Wise, L.A. Association of exposure to phthalates with endometriosis and uterine leiomyomata: Findings from NHANES, 1999–2004. Environ. Health Perspect. 2010, 118, 825–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Huang, P.C.; Tsai, E.M.; Li, W.F.; Liao, P.C.; Chung, M.C.; Wang, Y.H.; Wang, S.L. Association between phthalate exposure and glutathione S-transferase M1 polymorphism in adenomyosis, leiomyoma and endometriosis. Hum. Reprod. 2010, 25, 986–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  122. Kim, S.H.; Chun, S.; Jang, J.Y.; Chae, H.D.; Kim, C.H.; Kang, B.M. Increased plasma levels of phthalate esters in women with advanced-stage endometriosis: A prospective case-control study. Fertil. Steril. 2011, 95, 357–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Vaglio, S.; Minicozzi, P.; Bonometti, E.; Mello, G.; Chiarelli, B. Volatile signals during pregnancy: A possible chemical basis for mother-infant recognition. J. Chem. Ecol. 2009, 35, 131–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Silva, C.L.; Passos, M.; Cmara, J.S. Investigation of urinary volatile organic metabolites as potential cancer biomarkers by solid-phase microextraction in combination with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Br. J. Cancer 2011, 105, 1894–1904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  125. Nordic Council of Ministers. Health Effects of Selected Chemicals; Nordic Council of Ministers: Copenhagen, Demark, 1992; Volume 4–5. [Google Scholar]
  126. Octadecanal|C18H36O—PubChem. Available online: https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/12533 (accessed on 28 September 2022).
  127. Tetradecanal|C14H28O—PubChem. Available online: https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/31291 (accessed on 28 September 2022).
  128. Song, J.; Xiang, S.; Yang, Y.; Sun, Z. Assessment of follicular fluid metabolomics of polycystic ovary syndrome in kidney yang deficiency syndrome. Eur. J. Integr. Med. 2019, 30, 100944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Prates, E.G.; Alves, S.P.; Marques, C.C.; Baptista, M.C.; Horta, A.E.M.; Bessa, R.J.B.; Pereira, R.M. Fatty acid composition of porcine cumulus oocyte complexes (COC) during maturation: Effect of the lipid modulators trans-10, cis-12 conjugated linoleic acid (t10,c12 CLA) and forskolin. Vitr. Cell. Dev. Biol.-Anim. 2013, 49, 335–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Tiper, I.V.; East, J.E.; Subrahmanyam, P.B.; Webb, T.J. Sphingosine 1-phosphate signaling impacts lymphocyte migration, inflammation and infection. Pathog. Dis. 2016, 74, ftw063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  131. Cordeiro, F.B.; Montani, D.A.; Pilau, E.J.; Gozzo, F.C.; Fraietta, R.; Turco, E.G. Lo Ovarian environment aging: Follicular fluid lipidomic and related metabolic pathways. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2018, 35, 1385–1393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Cordeiro, F.B.; Cataldi, T.R.; de Souza, B.Z.; Rochetti, R.C.; Fraietta, R.; Labate, C.A.; Lo Turco, E.G. Hyper response to ovarian stimulation affects the follicular fluid metabolomic profile of women undergoing IVF similarly to polycystic ovary syndrome. Metabolomics 2018, 14, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Lucki, N.C.; Sewer, M.B. The interplay between bioactive sphingolipids and steroid hormones. Steroids 2010, 75, 390–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  134. Andrieu-Abadie, N.; Levade, T. Sphingomyelin hydrolysis during apoptosis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta-Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids 2002, 1585, 126–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Schmitt, B.G.; Jensen, E.; Laufersweiler, M.C.; Rose, J.L. Threshold of Toxicological Concern: Extending the chemical space by inclusion of a highly curated dataset for organosilicon compounds. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2021, 127, 105074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Neumann, F.; Diallo, F.A.; Hasan, S.H.; Schenck, B.; Traore, I. The Influence of Pharmaceutical Compounds on Male Fertility. Andrologia 1976, 8, 203–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Kala, S.V.; Lykissa, E.D.; Lebovitz, R.M. Detection and Characterization of Poly(dimethylsiloxane)s in Biological Tissues by GC/AED and GC/MS. Anal. Chem. 1997, 69, 1267–1272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Johnson, W.; Bergfeld, W.F.; Belsito, D.V.; Hill, R.A.; Klaassen, C.D.; Liebler, D.C.; Marks, J.G.; Shank, R.C.; Slaga, T.J.; Snyder, P.W.; et al. Safety Assessment of Cyclomethicone, Cyclotetrasiloxane, Cyclopentasiloxane, Cyclohexasiloxane, and Cycloheptasiloxane. Int. J. Toxicol. 2011, 30, 149S–227S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Etteieb, S.; Cherif, S.; Kawachi, A.; Han, J.; Elayni, F.; Tarhouni, J.; Isoda, H. Combining Biological and Chemical Screenings to Assess Cytotoxicity of Emerging Contaminants in Discharges into Surface Water. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2016, 227, 341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Marianna, S.; Alessia, P.; Susan, C.; Francesca, C.; Angela, S.; Francesca, C.; Antonella, N.; Patrizia, I.; Nicola, C.; Emilio, C. Metabolomic profiling and biochemical evaluation of the follicular fluid of endometriosis patients. Mol. Biosyst. 2017, 13, 1213–1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Karaer, A.; Tuncay, G.; Mumcu, A.; Dogan, B. Metabolomics analysis of follicular fluid in women with ovarian endometriosis undergoing in vitro fertilization. Syst. Biol. Reprod. Med. 2019, 65, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Sun, Z.; Song, J.; Zhang, X.; Wang, A.; Guo, Y.; Yang, Y.; Wang, X.; Xu, K.; Deng, J. Novel SWATHTM technology for follicular fluid metabolomics in patients with endometriosis. Pharmazie 2018, 73, 218–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Montiel, M.C.; Máximo, F.; Serrano-Arnaldos, M.; Ortega-Requena, S.; Murcia, M.D.; Bastida, J. Biocatalytic solutions to cyclomethicones problem in cosmetics. Eng. Life Sci. 2019, 19, 370–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  144. Dominguez, A.; Fagan, J. Toxins in cosmetics. What Consumers and Government can do to get Safer Cosmetic Products on the Market. Available online: https://rucore.libraries.rutgers.edu/rutgers-lib/54763/PDF/1/ (accessed on 28 September 2022).
  145. Sirotkin, A.V.; Harrath, A.H. Influence of oil-related environmental pollutants on female reproduction. Reprod. Toxicol. 2017, 71, 142–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Sharma, R.P.; Schuhmacher, M.; Kumar, V. Review on crosstalk and common mechanisms of endocrine disruptors: Scaffolding to improve PBPK/PD model of EDC mixture. Environ. Int. 2017, 99, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  147. Kim, B.M.; Park, E.K.; LeeAn, S.Y.; Ha, M.; Kim, E.J.; Kwon, H.; Hong, Y.C.; Jeong, W.C.; Hur, J.; Cheong, H.K.; et al. BTEX exposure and its health effects in pregnant women following the Hebei Spirit oil spill. J. Prev. Med. Public Health 2009, 42, 96–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Suaidi, N.A.; Alshawsh, M.A.; Hoe, S.Z.; Mokhtar, M.H.; Zin, S.R.M. Toxicological Effects of Technical Xylene Mixtures on the Female Reproductive System: A Systematic Review. Toxics 2022, 10, 235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Yoshihara, S.; Mizutare, T.; Makishima, M.; Suzuki, N.; Fujimoto, N.; Igarashi, K.; Ohta, S. Potent estrogenic metabolites of bisphenol A and bisphenol B formed by rat liver S9 fraction: Their structures and estrogenic potency. Toxicol. Sci. 2004, 78, 50–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  150. Rehan, M.; Ahmad, E.; Sheikh, I.A.; Abuzenadah, A.M.; Damanhouri, G.A.; Bajouh, O.S.; Al Basri, S.F.; Assiri, M.M.; Beg, M.A. Androgen and progesterone receptors are targets for bisphenol a (BPA), 4-methyl-2,4-bis-(p-hydroxyphenyl)pent-1-ene-A potent metabolite of BPA, and 4-tert-octylphenol: A computational insight. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0138438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  151. Okuda, K.; Takiguchi, M.; Yoshihara, S. In vivo estrogenic potential of 4-methyl-2,4-bis(4-hydroxyphenyl)pent-1-ene, an active metabolite of bisphenol A, in uterus of ovariectomized rat. Toxicol. Lett. 2010, 197, 7–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Hirao-Suzuki, M.; Nagase, K.; Suemori, T.; Tsutsumi, K.; Shigemori, E.; Tanaka, M.; Takiguchi, M.; Sugihara, N.; Yoshihara, S.; Takeda, S. 4-Methyl-2,4-bis(4-hydroxyphenyl)pent-1-ene (MBP) Targets Estrogen Receptor β, to Evoke the Resistance of Human Breast Cancer MCF-7 Cells to G-1, an Agonist for G Protein-Coupled Estrogen Receptor 1. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2021, 44, 1524–1529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Hirao-Suzuki, M.; Takeda, S.; Okuda, K.; Takiguchi, M.; Yoshihara, S. Repeated Exposure to 4-Methyl-2,4-bis(4-hydroxyphenyl)pent-1-ene (MBP), an Active Metabolite of Bisphenol A, Aggressively Stimulates Breast Cancer Cell Growth in an Estrogen Receptor β (ERβ)–Dependent Manner. Mol. Pharmacol. 2019, 95, 260–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  154. Liu, S.H.; Su, C.C.; Lee, K.I.; Chen, Y.W. Effects of Bisphenol A Metabolite 4-Methyl-2,4-bis(4-hydroxyphenyl)pent-1-ene on Lung Function and Type 2 Pulmonary Alveolar Epithelial Cell Growth. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 39254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  155. Huang, C.C.; Yang, C.Y.; Su, C.C.; Fang, K.M.; Yen, C.C.; Lin, C.T.; Liu, J.M.; Lee, K.I.; Chen, Y.W.; Liu, S.H.; et al. 4-Methyl-2,4-Bis(4-Hydroxyphenyl)Pent-1-Ene, a Major Active Metabolite of Bisphenol a, Triggers Pancreatic Β-Cell Death Via a Jnk/Ampkα Activation-Regulated Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress-Mediated Apoptotic Pathway. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 4379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Hou, E.; Zhao, Y.; Hang, J.; Qiao, J. Metabolomics and correlation network analysis of follicular fluid reveals associations between l-tryptophan, l-tyrosine and polycystic ovary syndrome. Biomed. Chromatogr. 2020, 35, e4993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Yang, X.; Wu, R.; Qi, D.; Fu, L.; Song, T.; Wang, Y.; Bian, Y.; Shi, Y. Profile of Bile Acid Metabolomics in the Follicular Fluid of PCOS Patients. Metabolites 2021, 11, 845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Gongadashetti, K.; Gupta, P.; Dada, R.; Malhotra, N. Follicular fluid oxidative stress biomarkers and art outcomes in PCOS women undergoing in vitro fertilization: A cross-sectional study. Int. J. Reprod. Biomed. 2021, 19, 449–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Zhang, X.; Wang, T.; Song, J.; Deng, J.; Sun, Z. Study on follicular fluid metabolomics components at different ages based on lipid metabolism. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2020, 8, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Liu, L.; Yin, T.L.; Chen, Y.; Li, Y.; Yin, L.; Ding, J.; Yang, J.; Feng, H.L. Follicular dynamics of glycerophospholipid and sphingolipid metabolisms in polycystic ovary syndrome patients. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2018, 185, 142–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Zhang, Y.; Liu, L.; Yin, T.L.; Yang, J.; Xiong, C.L. Follicular metabolic changes and effects on oocyte quality in polycystic ovary syndrome patients. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 80472–80480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  162. Naessen, T.; Kushnir, M.M.; Chaika, A.; Nosenko, J.; Mogilevkina, I.; Rockwood, A.L.; Carlstrom, K.; Bergquist, J.; Kirilovas, D. Steroid profiles in ovarian follicular fluid in women with and without polycystic ovary syndrome, analyzed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Fertil. Steril. 2010, 94, 2228–2233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Yang, Z.; Zhou, W.; Zhou, C.; Zhou, Y.; Liu, X.; Ding, G.; Hu, Y.; Pan, J.; Sheng, J.; Jin, L.; et al. Steroid metabolome profiling of follicular fluid in normo- and hyperandrogenic women with polycystic ovary syndrome. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2021, 206, 105806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Iaccarino, N.; Amato, J.; Pagano, B.; Pagano, A.; D’Oriano, L.; Pelliccia, S.; Giustiniano, M.; Brancaccio, D.; Merlino, F.; Novellino, E.; et al. 1H NMR-based metabolomics study on follicular fluid from patients with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Nunzia. Biochim. Clin. 2018, 42, 26–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic representation of VOC extraction from FF: (1) SPME syringe; (2) vial with 2 mL of FF; (3) heating mantle with magnetic stirrer. Created using BioRender.com.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of VOC extraction from FF: (1) SPME syringe; (2) vial with 2 mL of FF; (3) heating mantle with magnetic stirrer. Created using BioRender.com.
Biomedicines 10 02852 g001
Figure 2. Heatmap of the correlation and tendencies between the FFs of the four medical conditions and respective VOCs. The abscises correspond to: (C) controls; (POF) premature ovarian failure; (E) endometriosis; (PCOS) polycystic ovary syndrome. The coordinates represent the VOCs considered, which were assigned numbers. They were separated into six groups according to their distribution throughout the samples. Each number corresponded to a single VOC: (1) palmitic acid; (3) tetradecanal; (4) 2,4-di-tert-butylphenol; (5) diethyl phthalate; (7) 1,2,3,4-tetramethylbenzene; (8) 4-methyl-2,4-bis(4-hydroxyphenyl)pent-1-ene; (9) palmitic acid ME; (13) isopropyl myristate; (14) octadecanal; (16) tetradecamethylcycloheptasiloxane; (17) hexadecanal; (18) gamma-stearolactone; (19) dodecane; (20) dodecamethylcyclohexasiloxane; (21) hexadecyloxirane; (22) octadecane; (23) diisooctylphthalate; (25) 1,2,3,5-tetramethylbenzene; (28) stearyl alcohol; (30) stearic acid; (31) tetradecamethylhexasiloxane; (32) hexadecamethylheptasiloxane; (34) eicosamethyl-cyclodecasiloxane; (35) octadecan-1-ol trimethylsilvyethe; (39) cyclotetradecane; (40) hexadecanoic acid; (41) methyl stearate; (43) heptadecane; (47) butyl-2-methylpropylphthalate; (49) ethyl xylene; (55) tetracosamethyl-cyclododecasiloxane; (56) docosane; (57) hexamethyldisiloxane; (58) 1,3-di-tert-butylbenzene; (60) 1-dodecanol; (67) oleamide; (71) 4,6-dimethyldodecane.
Figure 2. Heatmap of the correlation and tendencies between the FFs of the four medical conditions and respective VOCs. The abscises correspond to: (C) controls; (POF) premature ovarian failure; (E) endometriosis; (PCOS) polycystic ovary syndrome. The coordinates represent the VOCs considered, which were assigned numbers. They were separated into six groups according to their distribution throughout the samples. Each number corresponded to a single VOC: (1) palmitic acid; (3) tetradecanal; (4) 2,4-di-tert-butylphenol; (5) diethyl phthalate; (7) 1,2,3,4-tetramethylbenzene; (8) 4-methyl-2,4-bis(4-hydroxyphenyl)pent-1-ene; (9) palmitic acid ME; (13) isopropyl myristate; (14) octadecanal; (16) tetradecamethylcycloheptasiloxane; (17) hexadecanal; (18) gamma-stearolactone; (19) dodecane; (20) dodecamethylcyclohexasiloxane; (21) hexadecyloxirane; (22) octadecane; (23) diisooctylphthalate; (25) 1,2,3,5-tetramethylbenzene; (28) stearyl alcohol; (30) stearic acid; (31) tetradecamethylhexasiloxane; (32) hexadecamethylheptasiloxane; (34) eicosamethyl-cyclodecasiloxane; (35) octadecan-1-ol trimethylsilvyethe; (39) cyclotetradecane; (40) hexadecanoic acid; (41) methyl stearate; (43) heptadecane; (47) butyl-2-methylpropylphthalate; (49) ethyl xylene; (55) tetracosamethyl-cyclododecasiloxane; (56) docosane; (57) hexamethyldisiloxane; (58) 1,3-di-tert-butylbenzene; (60) 1-dodecanol; (67) oleamide; (71) 4,6-dimethyldodecane.
Biomedicines 10 02852 g002
Figure 3. Percentual occurrence of VOCs in all the samples for each medical condition. The abscises correspond to: (C) controls; (POF) premature ovarian failure; (E) endometriosis; (PCOS) polycystic ovary syndrome. The coordinates represent the VOCs considered, which were assigned numbers: (1) palmitic acid; (3) tetradecanal; (4) 2,4-di-tert-butylphenol; (5) diethyl phthalate; (7) 1,2,3,4-tetramethylbenzene; (8) 4-methyl-2,4-bis(4-hydroxyphenyl)pent-1-ene; (9) palmitic acid ME; (13) isopropyl myristate; (14) octadecanal; (16) tetradecamethylcycloheptasiloxane; (17) hexadecanal; (18) gam-ma-stearolactone; (19) dodecane; (20) dodecamethylcyclohexasiloxane; (21) hexadecyloxirane; (22) octadecane; (23) diisooctylphthalate; (25) 1,2,3,5-tetramethylbenzene; (28) stearyl alcohol; (30) stearic acid; (31) tetradecamethylhexasiloxane; (32) hexadecamethylheptasiloxane; (34) eicosamethyl-cyclodecasiloxane; (35) octadecan-1-ol trimethylsilvyethe; (39) cyclotetradecane; (40) hexadecanoic acid; (41) methyl stearate; (43) heptadecane; (47) bu-tyl-2-methylpropylphthalate; (49) ethyl xylene; (55) tetracosamethyl-cyclododecasiloxane; (56) docosane; (57) hexamethyldisiloxane; (58) 1,3-di-tert-butylbenzene; (60) 1-dodecanol; (67) oleamide; (71) 4,6-dimethyldodecane.
Figure 3. Percentual occurrence of VOCs in all the samples for each medical condition. The abscises correspond to: (C) controls; (POF) premature ovarian failure; (E) endometriosis; (PCOS) polycystic ovary syndrome. The coordinates represent the VOCs considered, which were assigned numbers: (1) palmitic acid; (3) tetradecanal; (4) 2,4-di-tert-butylphenol; (5) diethyl phthalate; (7) 1,2,3,4-tetramethylbenzene; (8) 4-methyl-2,4-bis(4-hydroxyphenyl)pent-1-ene; (9) palmitic acid ME; (13) isopropyl myristate; (14) octadecanal; (16) tetradecamethylcycloheptasiloxane; (17) hexadecanal; (18) gam-ma-stearolactone; (19) dodecane; (20) dodecamethylcyclohexasiloxane; (21) hexadecyloxirane; (22) octadecane; (23) diisooctylphthalate; (25) 1,2,3,5-tetramethylbenzene; (28) stearyl alcohol; (30) stearic acid; (31) tetradecamethylhexasiloxane; (32) hexadecamethylheptasiloxane; (34) eicosamethyl-cyclodecasiloxane; (35) octadecan-1-ol trimethylsilvyethe; (39) cyclotetradecane; (40) hexadecanoic acid; (41) methyl stearate; (43) heptadecane; (47) bu-tyl-2-methylpropylphthalate; (49) ethyl xylene; (55) tetracosamethyl-cyclododecasiloxane; (56) docosane; (57) hexamethyldisiloxane; (58) 1,3-di-tert-butylbenzene; (60) 1-dodecanol; (67) oleamide; (71) 4,6-dimethyldodecane.
Biomedicines 10 02852 g003
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Brinca, A.T.; Anjos, O.; Alves, M.M.C.; Sousa, Â.; Oliani, A.H.; Breitenfeld, L.; Passarinha, L.A.; Ramalhinho, A.C.; Gallardo, E. Volatilomics as an Emerging Strategy to Determine Potential Biomarkers of Female Infertility: A Pilot Study. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 2852. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10112852

AMA Style

Brinca AT, Anjos O, Alves MMC, Sousa Â, Oliani AH, Breitenfeld L, Passarinha LA, Ramalhinho AC, Gallardo E. Volatilomics as an Emerging Strategy to Determine Potential Biomarkers of Female Infertility: A Pilot Study. Biomedicines. 2022; 10(11):2852. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10112852

Chicago/Turabian Style

Brinca, Ana Teresa, Ofélia Anjos, Maria Manuel Casteleiro Alves, Ângela Sousa, António Hélio Oliani, Luiza Breitenfeld, Luís A. Passarinha, Ana Cristina Ramalhinho, and Eugenia Gallardo. 2022. "Volatilomics as an Emerging Strategy to Determine Potential Biomarkers of Female Infertility: A Pilot Study" Biomedicines 10, no. 11: 2852. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10112852

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop