Next Article in Journal
CD24 Is a Potential Immunotherapeutic Target for Mantle Cell Lymphoma
Next Article in Special Issue
First-Line Targeted Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Role of Atezolizumab/Bevacizumab Combination
Previous Article in Journal
Thirty-Five-Year History of Desialylated Lipoproteins Discovered by Vladimir Tertov
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Current State of Treatment and Future Directions in Cutaneous Malignant Melanoma
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomedicines
Volume 10
Issue 5
10.3390/biomedicines10051173
biomedicines-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Lung Inflammation Predictors in Combined Immune Checkpoint-Inhibitor and Radiation Therapy—Proof-of-Concept Animal Study

by
Benjamin Spieler
,
Teresa M. Giret
,
Scott Welford
,
Tulasigeri M. Totiger
and
Ivaylo B. Mihaylov
*
Department of Radiation Oncology, Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, 1475 NW 12th Ave., Suite 1500, Miami, FL 33136, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomedicines 2022, 10(5), 1173; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10051173
Submission received: 14 April 2022 / Revised: 28 April 2022 / Accepted: 6 May 2022 / Published: 19 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue State-of-the-Art Immunology and Immunotherapy in USA)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Purpose: Combined radiotherapy (RT) and immune checkpoint-inhibitor (ICI) therapy can act synergistically to enhance tumor response beyond what either treatment can achieve alone. Alongside the revolutionary impact of ICIs on cancer therapy, life-threatening potential side effects, such as checkpoint-inhibitor-induced (CIP) pneumonitis, remain underreported and unpredictable. In this preclinical study, we hypothesized that routinely collected data such as imaging, blood counts, and blood cytokine levels can be utilized to build a model that predicts lung inflammation associated with combined RT/ICI therapy. Materials and Methods: This proof-of-concept investigational work was performed on Lewis lung carcinoma in a syngeneic murine model. Nineteen mice were used, four as untreated controls and the rest subjected to RT/ICI therapy. Tumors were implanted subcutaneously in both flanks and upon reaching volumes of ~200 mm3 the animals were imaged with both CT and MRI and blood was collected. Quantitative radiomics features were extracted from imaging of both lungs. The animals then received RT to the right flank tumor only with a regimen of three 8 Gy fractions (one fraction per day over 3 days) with PD-1 inhibitor administration delivered intraperitoneally after each daily RT fraction. Tumor volume evolution was followed until tumors reached the maximum size allowed by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC). The animals were sacrificed, and lung tissues harvested for immunohistochemistry evaluation. Tissue biomarkers of lung inflammation (CD45) were tallied, and binary logistic regression analyses were performed to create models predictive of lung inflammation, incorporating pretreatment CT/MRI radiomics, blood counts, and blood cytokines. Results: The treated animal cohort was dichotomized by the median value of CD45 infiltration in the lungs. Four pretreatment radiomics features (3 CT features and 1 MRI feature) together with pre-treatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte (NLR) ratio and pre-treatment granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) level correlated with dichotomized CD45 infiltration. Predictive models were created by combining radiomics with NLR and GM-CSF. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses of two-fold internal cross-validation indicated that the predictive model incorporating MR radiomics had an average area under the curve (AUC) of 0.834, while the model incorporating CT radiomics had an AUC of 0.787. Conclusions: Model building using quantitative imaging data, blood counts, and blood cytokines resulted in lung inflammation prediction models justifying the study hypothesis. The models yielded very-good-to-excellent AUCs of more than 0.78 on internal cross-validation analyses.

1. Introduction

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), targeting programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) or programmed cell death protein ligand-1 (PD-L1), can provide lasting response and improve long-term survival in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. However, overall response rates to ICI monotherapy remain less than 50% and patients who do not respond can experience accelerated disease progression [14,15]. In comparison with cytotoxic chemotherapy, ICIs broadly offer an attractive side effect profile and are becoming a treatment of choice in various immunogenic cancers [16,17]. However, ICI-mediated immunomodulation can trigger adverse events in almost any organ system, with rash, vitiligo, gastrointestinal toxicities, pruritis, hyphophysitis, and pneumonitis most commonly observed [18].
Checkpoint-inhibitor-induced pneumonitis (CIP) is a potentially life-threatening adverse event seen most often among patients treated for NSCLC [19,20]. While life-threatening CIP is rare, in NSCLC patients, CIP can mimic conditions such as tumor progression or infection, complicating patient care. Most cases of CIP are mild and managed successfully in the outpatient environment, but inpatient management, long-term respiratory complications, or treatment-related deaths occur in ~20% of affected patients. Identification of patients at risk for CIP prior to immunotherapy could prevent significant morbidity, and discovery of signatures or methods for early CIP prediction represents an unmet clinical need in ICI cancer treatment [21].
Recently published studies suggest that systemic ICI therapy combined with local radiotherapy (RT) can result in enhanced systemic control of metastatic disease, surpassing the efficacy of ICI alone [16,22,23,24]. In the metastatic setting, ablative dose levels of focal RT have been theorized to potentiate ICI systemic effects through induction of an in situ vaccine, made possible by augmented antigen presentation and increased lymphoid cell trafficking due to radiation effects on the tumor microenvironment [23]. A logical but unintended consequence of an enhanced inflammatory state is an increase in number and severity of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) [25]. With the increasing use of ICI and RT, predictive models able to identify patients with elevated risk of irAEs, especially individuals without obvious predisposing factors, could offer clinical value.
In this study, it was hypothesized that lung inflammation after combined RT and ICI therapy is an observable phenomenon that can be predicted using pretreatment complete blood counts (CBCs), computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomics [26,27,28,29], and liquid biopsy cytokines. The hypothesis was tested on a preclinical subcutaneous syngeneic murine lung tumor model, where CD45 (lymphocyte common antigen)-positive cells were used as a surrogate for lung inflammation [30,31,32,33]. CD45 is a pan lymphocyte stain. Therefore, it will indicate if there is an excess of lymphocytes accumulating in the lungs, i.e., inflammation. Based on that rationale, we decided to use CD45 as a biomarker for pneumonitis, following already published methodology.

2. Materials and Methods

In this proof-of-principle investigation, there was no a priori basis for sample size estimation. Details on the rationale for the number of animals used are presented elsewhere [34]. In brief, the principle of reduction in animal usage dictated an experimental design with 4 control and 15 treated (combined RT and ICI) mice. The study design and approach were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC, protocol: 17-214-ad02 EDR).
Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC) cells (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) were implanted subcutaneously on both flanks [35] in nineteen C57BL/6 mice. The cell line was cultured in medium Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (Gibco®; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA), supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco®; Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin (HyClone; GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Logan, UT, USA). For subcutaneous implantation, a cell suspension of a density of 1 × 105 cells/mL was prepared for each animal.
The mice (6–8 weeks old; 18–20 g) were purchased from Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME, USA) and were housed at 22 ± 5 °C in a 12 h light/dark cycle and fed rodent chow and water ad libitum. Mice were subcutaneously inoculated with 100 µL LLC cell suspension (1 × 105 cells/mL) under 2% isoflurane anesthesia. The skin was tented up, and the tumor cells were implanted under the skin in the dorsal regions of both left and right flanks. The tumor volume was measured several times per week by calipers, and calculated using the formula, [width2 (mm2) × length (mm)]/2 (volume of an ellipsoid).
The treated animals received a combined RT and ICI regimen according to a published and widely adopted schema [35]. Approximately ten days after tumor implantation, when the tumors reached ~214 mm3 on average (range from 99.8 mm3 to 437 mm3), noncontrast MRI and CT imaging were performed. Figure 1 outlines the experimental design and approximate timeline according to which the tumors were inoculated, imaged, and treated.
For CT scans, a resolution of 0.4 × 0.4 × 0.6 mm3 was used, while for the MR imaging, a T1 sequence with image resolution of 0.5 × 0.5 × 0.5 mm3 was employed. The CT hardware was 64-slice Siemens (Erlangen, Germany) Somatom Definition AS scanner, while the MRI hardware was 3T Siemens (Erlangen, Germany) TrioTim scanner. After imaging, the tumor volumes on both flanks as well as the bilateral lung volumes were digitally segmented in their entirety on both MRI (panel A) and CT (panel B), as represented in Figure 2 screen captures. For the CT images, semi-automatic lung segmentation was performed, using threshold levels set between 800 and 1200 Hounsfield Units. All segmentation slices were carefully reviewed for consistency of the contours. In all instances where the trachea was inadvertently included in the contours due to semi-automatic segmentation, it was manually removed since it is not part of the lung parenchyma. Lung segmentation in the MRI images was performed manually. In order to facilitate MRI contouring, the already segmented CT studies were co-registered with the MRI images, so that adequate lung representation was achieved.
Quantitative imaging features (radiomics) were then extracted from the imaging studies for tumors and lungs [34]. The average bilateral lung volume over the fifteen animals in the treatment cohort was 823.5 mm3, with the range being from 615.6 mm3 to 1093.2 mm3. This average lung volume corresponds to more than 8500 CT voxels, and in excess of 6500 MRI voxels, sufficient resolution for radiomics calculations to be performed on both imaging modalities.
In addition to the CT and the MRI imaging features, blood was collected on the day of imaging and CBCs and blood cytokine levels were acquired. Approximately 100–200 µL of blood were collected from each mouse and suspended in an Eppendorf tube pre-loaded with 10 µL of 0.5M EDTA. CBC flow analysis was processed using automated blood counter Element H5 (HESKA, Loveland, CO, USA). The data were collected from the blood counter and assessed for standard CBC components. Derived CBCs components included white blood cells (WBCs), neutrophils (N), lymphocytes (L), monocytes, eosinophils, basophils, red blood cells, etc. Ratios of those components were later used in downstream categorization.
After imaging, the animals were irradiated using a RadSource 2000 X-ray Irradiator cabinet (Rad Source Technologies, Buford, GA, USA) and organ-specific irradiation jigs (160 kVp, 25 mA, 0.5 mM Cu, 1.8 Gy min−1) under 2% isoflurane. The RT involved daily treatment for three consecutive days to the right flank only with daily doses of 8 Gy [35]. On each of these 3 days, RT was followed by intraperitoneal injections of 200 μg of PD-1mAb (BioXcell anti-mouse PD-1 (CD279)). When tumors reached the designated maximum volume per IACUC the animals were euthanized, and lung tissues were harvested.
In order to measure the number of infiltrating lymphocytes into the lungs, the lungs were perfused with formaldehyde, processed and sectioned, and stained with an anti-CD45 antibody (Cat #14-0451-82, ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The number of CD45 positive cells from three representative sections of lungs from each individual animal were quantified. The CD45 infiltration was used as a surrogate measure for lung inflammation and potential pneumonitis. The significant distance between the flank tumors and the lungs is evident in the coronal views in Figure 2. Furthermore, during flank irradiation, the animals were placed in specially constructed lead jig, covering the entire animal except the irradiated tumor. Therefore, the radiation dose to lungs due to internal scatter or shielding penetration was minimal and lung inflammation present in the treatment cohort was attributed to ICI.
Overall, 92 CT and 92 MRI radiomics features were extracted for the segmented bilateral lungs. The MRI radiomics were extracted after intensity normalization [36,37,38], which is a pre-processing step deemed appropriate for minimizing intersubject variance due to MRI scanner parameters. For each imaging modality, the features were divided into four groups—geometric features, first order histogram features, second-order joint probability features (e.g., co-occurrence matrices), and third-order joint probability features, originally described by our group [26]. The geometric, the first-, and the second-order radiomics features [29] are among the most commonly used features in the radiomics studies, while the third-order joint probability features were developed in-house [26]. Radiomics studies use a wide range of features which they report on—from couple dozens to couple thousands. The studies with fewer radiomics usually use simpler features which are easier to interpret, while the studies with a large number of features involve more convoluted ones, thereby being more difficult to understand and interpret. The selection of quantitative imaging features presented herein was based on their widespread use and easer interpretation. All of the radiomics utilized in this study were extracted with in-house developed software [26,39,40], interfaced with the Pinnacle (Philips Radiation Oncology Systems, Madison, WI, USA) treatment planning system.
The animals from the treatment cohort were divided into two groups (7 and 8 animals, respectively) based on the median CD45 values obtained from immunohistochemistry. After radiomics feature extraction, CBC counts, and cytokines acquisition, ANOVA (SPSS Statistics V.25 software package, IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) analyses were performed on all variables and the dichotomized animal cohort based on CD45 infiltration. The imaging features, CBCs, and liquid biopsy cytokines with the highest statistical significance were selected. Furthermore, all selected variables were tested for correlation, where a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.5 was used for cut-off. If any two significant variables were correlated with a coefficient larger than 0.5, one of the variables was removed from the pool used for subsequent model building. The remaining uncorrelated variables were subjected to binary logistic regression, aiming to model the prediction of lung inflammation. Logistic regression analysis predicts the outcome odds of a categorical variable based on one or more predictor variables. A categorical variable is one that can take on a limited number of values, levels, or categories, such as “valid” or “invalid”. A major advantage of logistic regression is that its predictions are always between 0 and 1. The most common and widely used form of logistic regression is binomial logistic regression, which predicts a single category or binary decision such as “pneumonitis” vs. “no pneumonitis.” The simplicity of this model dictated the split of CD45 infiltration around its median value, and its utilization for lung inflammation modeling.
Two-fold internal cross-validation was performed on the developed lung inflammation prediction model. In the first fold, 7 of the animals were utilized in model building, while the remaining 8 were used for model validation. In the second fold, the role of the two groups was reversed. Binary logistic modeling was performed with an SPSS analysis module. All binary logistic models included the independent imaging, CBC, and blood biomarker significant variables, as well as a model constant for better model fitting.

3. Results

Since the tumors were implanted on the flanks of the animals, and only one of them was irradiated, the lungs were not directly affected by radiation—the large distance between the flank tumors and the lungs is evident on coronal views shown in Figure 2. Across the treatment cohort, the distance from the irradiated right flank tumor to the nearest lung tissue was ~2.5 cm, with the majority of the lung even further away from the irradiation field. Only the right flank tumor was irradiated with the rest of body shielded by a jig comprised by 2.0 mm of Pb. That amount of Pb shielding provides transmission of less than ~1.5%, since the half-value layer for Pb at 160 kVp is approximately 0.3 mm. Therefore, post-treatment lung inflammation was attributable to systemic effects rather than direct, local irradiation.
Data from the immunohistochemistry analyses of paraffin-embedded mouse lung tissue using anti-CD45 antibody are presented in Figure 3 and Table 1. The table outlines the descriptive statistics of the observed CD45 infiltration. The second row in the table presents the data for the control (untreated animals), the third row presents the data for the entire treated cohort of 15 animals, while the fourth and fifth rows show the data for the low inflammation (i.e., below median from all treated animals) and high inflammation (i.e., above median from all treated animals) sub-groups. Based on the averages and the standard deviations for the low and high inflammation groups, the difference estimated with ANOVA analysis is significant at a p-value of 0.006. Figure 3 depicts that information in a graphical format. The difference between CD45 cell infiltration in lung sections from the control group (top right; magnification 20) and mice treated with RT and ICI (bottom right; magnification 20) can be clearly identified. The quantification on the box chart (left) demonstrates the statistical differences in CD45 among the control and the treated animals. Independent samples t-test analyses, performed with ANOVA, indicated a significant difference between the two means (control and treated) with a p-value of 0.0003. Furthermore, a large spread in the CD45 for the 15 treated animals, with minimum of 0.094, median of 0.26, and maximum of 0.411, is evident from the plot, indicating a substantial differential response which can be used as a surrogate for lung inflammation/pneumonitis. Close inspection of the range of values for the control and the treated cohorts indicates that the variability in CD45 infiltration in the treated group is several times larger than in the control. In Figure 3, there is marked difference between the staining of lung tissues between the two cohorts, and the spread of CD45 in the RT + ICI group (red bar on the plot) indicates a large differential response, i.e., different animals have different inflammation in the lung tissues, facilitated by the administration of ICI.
After CT and MRI radiomics extraction and ANOVA analyses, three uncorrelated CT radiomics features emerged as highly significant—average gray, histogram kurtosis, and co-occurrence matrix entropy. For MRI radiomics, only one feature was selected for correlation with CD45 infiltration—histogram kurtosis (details on the imaging features are provided in the Supplementary Materials, Table S1).
Pretreatment CBC data are presented in Table 2. Minimum, maximum, average, and median values are reported for each parameter. The CBCs were derived from blood acquired prior to treatment. The only CBC component that correlated with increased lung inflammation was the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR).
Table 3 presents data for liquid biopsy cytokines extracted from pretreatment blood serum. Similar to Table 2, minimum, maximum, average, and median values are reported. The only statistically significant cytokine associated with the observed CD45 difference was granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF).
Table 4 outlines the descriptive statistics for the CBC, cytokines, and the imaging features which were used for model generation. In addition, the p-values describing the differences between the corresponding features from the high and low inflammation groups are presented. Since the sample size is small and this is proof-of-principle study, the predictive model utilized uncorrelated features that differed up to p-values of up to 0.1.
The selected imaging, CBC, and cytokine variables were subjected to binary logistic regression for modeling the dichotomized CD45 infiltration distribution. Modeling was achieved using the binary logistic regression module in SPSS. The animal cohort was randomly split in two with seven animals in one group and eight animals in the other, so that internal cross-validation of the binary logistic regression model was possible. The results of that two-fold internal cross-validation are presented in Figure 4, where several AUCs are outlined. The CT model (left) consists of average gray values, histogram kurtosis, co-occurrence matrix entropy, NLR, and GM-CSF (details on the model values are provided in the Supplementary Materials, Table S2), while the MRI model (right) utilizes histogram kurtosis, NLR, and GM-CSF (details on the model values are provided in the Supplementary Materials, Table S3). The green and the blue lines in each panel represent the ROCs from the two validation folds, while the red line is the average from combining the two ROC curves. The corresponding AUCs for each fold and for the average are presented in the parenthesis. It is evident from the data that the combined model including the CT imaging features have AUCs over the folds larger than 0.7 and as high as 0.87, with an average of more than 0.75. The spread of the AUCs over the two folds with MRI quantitative imaging data is somewhat larger ranging from 0.67 to 1.0, but the average is also larger, exceeding 0.8.

4. Discussion

Very few studies have attempted to predict clinical pneumonitis after ICI treatment [41,42,43,44]. With expanded utilization of ICI therapies, identification and prediction of potentially lethal irAEs such as CIP gain clinical importance [21]. To our knowledge, this is the first preclinical investigation to study ICI-induced lung inflammation in a systematic fashion using quantitative imaging, blood counts, and blood biomarkers drawn from treatment-naïve animals. The variables identified can discriminate high versus low CD45 infiltration in murine lung tissue and have the potential to be used for prediction of ICI-induced pneumonitis in humans. The obtained average area-under-the-curve measurements for both CT and MRI imaging modalities were all larger than ~0.75, indicating good-to-very-good predictive power of the developed models [45]. Overinterpretation of these findings should be avoided. This proof-of-principle investigation was performed in a single murine strain using a single ICI agent in combination with extrathoracic RT. A limitation of our model is that ICI +RT is not commonly used in clinical practice (in extracranial disease) and a similar model using ICI without RT would be of advantage to strengthen the results. Our findings need to be generalized further in additional murine strains and for different immunotherapy agents. Lung inflammation herein was characterized by histopathology alone, while clinical lung pneumonitis is a diagnosis of exclusion informed by high-resolution CT and a constellation of clinical factors (shortness of breath, dry cough, low-grade fever, chest tightness, general malaise, etc.) That approach is not feasible in a murine experiment, so histopathology-based lung inflammation was used as a correlate. Despite these limitations, our findings suggest that pretreatment diagnostic imaging and common blood markers could be incorporated into a model predictive of human pneumonitis.
CD45 infiltration is not the only marker that can be applied as a surrogate for lung inflammation. An excellent review [46] of the cellular and molecular immune markers in lung cancer identifies additional surrogates for lung inflammation that merit investigation in future validation studies.
An elevated neutrophil count is known to stimulate tumor angiogenesis and contribute to disease progression or resistance to therapy, while fewer neutrophils and more lymphocytes (lower NLR) in the pretreatment state correlate with better treatment response [47,48]. According to one published clinical study [49], high pretreatment NLR and lymphocytopenia are associated with poor clinical outcomes and the reverse is true for lower NLR. Interestingly, the mean NLR was elevated by 25% in our murine cohort with low-level lung inflammation compared to the murine cohort with high-level lung inflammation. Taken together, these findings suggest that a high absolute peripheral lymphocyte count (low NLR pre-treatment) brings both a higher probability of RT/ICI response as well as a higher risk of inflammatory side effects such as ICI-induced pneumonitis.

5. Conclusions

Over the past decade, ICIs have revolutionized the battle against cancer and in combination with existing therapies have dramatically improved patient outcomes. However, utilization of the immune system to fight cancer can trigger clinically significant complications. Refinement in patient selection aided by models that predict treatment-related toxicity represents an important advance toward fully personalized ICI therapeutics. With the development of predictive models capable of discriminating subjects with elevated risk of irAEs, it may become possible to preemptively modify cancer management, intensifying or de-intensifying dose concentrations, switching agents based on side effect profiles, or selecting multi-agent treatment for patients with low risk of side effects.
Future directions in our research will include extension of this model to other murine strains and ICIs with intent to validate and refine a generalized group of imaging features, CBCs, and inflammatory cytokines that predict both type and severity of toxic response to ICI agents. Longer follow-up times will allow patterns of murine lung inflammation to mature and better reflect actual pneumonitis, making subsequent analyses more clinically relevant and translatable.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/biomedicines10051173/s1, Table S1: All CBC, blood cytokines, CD45, CT, and MRI radiomics used in the regression modeling; Table S2: The model values of the parameters utilizing the CT imaging features in the binary logistic regression.; Table S3: The model values of the parameters utilizing the MRI imaging features in the binary logistic regression.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: I.B.M., B.S., S.W.; Data curation: T.M.T., T.M.G.; Formal analysis: I.B.M.; Investigation: I.B.M.; Methodology: I.B.M., B.S.; Project administration: S.W., I.B.M.; Supervision: I.B.M., S.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board) of University of Miami, protocol 17-214-ad02 EDR, 29 January 2020.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All supporting data is presented in the Supplementary Materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Baas, P.; Scherpereel, A.; Nowak, A.K.; Fujimoto, N.; Peters, S.; Tsao, A.S.; Mansfield, A.S.; Popat, S.; Jahan, T.; Antonia, S.; et al. First-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab in unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma (CheckMate 743): A multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2021, 397, 375–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Borghaei, H.; Paz-Ares, L.; Horn, L.; Spigel, D.R.; Steins, M.; Ready, N.E.; Chow, L.Q.; Vokes, E.E.; Felip, E.; Holgado, E.; et al. Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015, 373, 1627–1639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Brahmer, J.; Reckamp, K.L.; Baas, P.; Crino, L.; Eberhardt, W.E.; Poddubskaya, E.; Antonia, S.; Pluzanski, A.; Vokes, E.E.; Holgado, E.; et al. Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Squamous-Cell Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015, 373, 123–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Forde, P.M.; Chaft, J.E.; Smith, K.N.; Anagnostou, V.; Cottrell, T.R.; Hellmann, M.D.; Zahurak, M.; Yang, S.C.; Jones, D.R.; Broderick, S.; et al. Neoadjuvant PD-1 Blockade in Resectable Lung Cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018, 378, 1976–1986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Frederickson, A.M.; Arndorfer, S.; Zhang, I.; Lorenzi, M.; Insinga, R.; Arunachalam, A.; Burke, T.A.; Simon, G.R. Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy for first-line treatment of metastatic nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer: A network meta-analysis. Immunotherapy 2019, 11, 407–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Gandhi, L.; Rodriguez-Abreu, D.; Gadgeel, S.; Esteban, E.; Felip, E.; De Angelis, F.; Domine, M.; Clingan, P.; Hochmair, M.J.; Powell, S.F.; et al. Pembrolizumab plus Chemotherapy in Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018, 378, 2078–2092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hellmann, M.D.; Paz-Ares, L.; Bernabe Caro, R.; Zurawski, B.; Kim, S.W.; Carcereny Costa, E.; Park, K.; Alexandru, A.; Lupinacci, L.; de la Mora Jimenez, E.; et al. Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2019, 381, 2020–2031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Horn, L.; Spigel, D.R.; Vokes, E.E.; Holgado, E.; Ready, N.; Steins, M.; Poddubskaya, E.; Borghaei, H.; Felip, E.; Paz-Ares, L.; et al. Nivolumab Versus Docetaxel in Previously Treated Patients With Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Two-Year Outcomes From Two Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III Trials (CheckMate 017 and CheckMate 057). J. Clin. Oncol. 2017, 35, 3924–3933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Paz-Ares, L.; Ciuleanu, T.E.; Cobo, M.; Schenker, M.; Zurawski, B.; Menezes, J.; Richardet, E.; Bennouna, J.; Felip, E.; Juan-Vidal, O.; et al. First-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab combined with two cycles of chemotherapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (CheckMate 9LA): An international, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2021, 22, 198–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ready, N.; Hellmann, M.D.; Awad, M.M.; Otterson, G.A.; Gutierrez, M.; Gainor, J.F.; Borghaei, H.; Jolivet, J.; Horn, L.; Mates, M.; et al. First-Line Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (CheckMate 568): Outcomes by Programmed Death Ligand 1 and Tumor Mutational Burden as Biomarkers. J. Clin. Oncol. 2019, 37, 992–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Reck, M.; Rodriguez-Abreu, D.; Robinson, A.G.; Hui, R.; Csoszi, T.; Fulop, A.; Gottfried, M.; Peled, N.; Tafreshi, A.; Cuffe, S.; et al. Pembrolizumab versus Chemotherapy for PD-L1-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016, 375, 1823–1833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Reck, M.; Schenker, M.; Lee, K.H.; Provencio, M.; Nishio, M.; Lesniewski-Kmak, K.; Sangha, R.; Ahmed, S.; Raimbourg, J.; Feeney, K.; et al. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus chemotherapy as first-line treatment in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with high tumour mutational burden: Patient-reported outcomes results from the randomised, open-label, phase III CheckMate 227 trial. Eur. J. Cancer 2019, 116, 137–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Rittmeyer, A.; Barlesi, F.; Waterkamp, D.; Park, K.; Ciardiello, F.; von Pawel, J.; Gadgeel, S.M.; Hida, T.; Kowalski, D.M.; Dols, M.C.; et al. Atezolizumab versus docetaxel in patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (OAK): A phase 3, open-label, multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2017, 389, 255–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Champiat, S.; Dercle, L.; Ammari, S.; Massard, C.; Hollebecque, A.; Postel-Vinay, S.; Chaput, N.; Eggermont, A.; Marabelle, A.; Soria, J.C.; et al. Hyperprogressive Disease Is a New Pattern of Progression in Cancer Patients Treated by Anti-PD-1/PD-L1. Clin. Cancer Res. Off. J. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 2017, 23, 1920–1928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Chen, D.S.; Mellman, I. Elements of cancer immunity and the cancer-immune set point. Nature 2017, 541, 321–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Demaria, S.; Golden, E.B.; Formenti, S.C. Role of Local Radiation Therapy in Cancer Immunotherapy. JAMA Oncol. 2015, 1, 1325–1332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Marciscano, A.E.; Haimovitz-Friedman, A.; Lee, P.; Tran, P.T.; Tome, W.A.; Guha, C.; Spring Kong, F.M.; Sahgal, A.; El Naqa, I.; Rimner, A.; et al. Immunomodulatory Effects of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy: Preclinical Insights and Clinical Opportunities. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2019, 110, 35–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Thompson, J.A.; Schneider, B.J.; Brahmer, J.; Andrews, S.; Armand, P.; Bhatia, S.; Budde, L.E.; Costa, L.; Davies, M.; Dunnington, D.; et al. NCCN Guidelines Insights: Management of Immunotherapy-Related Toxicities, Version 1.2020. J. Natl. Compr. Cancer Netw. 2020, 18, 230–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Naidoo, J.; Wang, X.; Woo, K.M.; Iyriboz, T.; Halpenny, D.; Cunningham, J.; Chaft, J.E.; Segal, N.H.; Callahan, M.K.; Lesokhin, A.M.; et al. Pneumonitis in Patients Treated With Anti-Programmed Death-1/Programmed Death Ligand 1 Therapy. J. Clin. Oncol. 2017, 35, 709–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Nishino, M.; Giobbie-Hurder, A.; Hatabu, H.; Ramaiya, N.H.; Hodi, F.S. Incidence of Programmed Cell Death 1 Inhibitor-Related Pneumonitis in Patients With Advanced Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol. 2016, 2, 1607–1616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Mihaylov, I.B.; Montoya, C.; Spieler, B. Expanding Clinical Utilization of Checkpoint Inhibitors for Cancer Treatments Necessitates the Development of Predictive Models for Immunotherapy-Induced Pneumonitis. Biomed. J. Sci. Techn. Res. 2021, 36, 5827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Theelen, W.; Peulen, H.M.U.; Lalezari, F.; van der Noort, V.; de Vries, J.F.; Aerts, J.; Dumoulin, D.W.; Bahce, I.; Niemeijer, A.N.; de Langen, A.J.; et al. Effect of Pembrolizumab After Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy vs Pembrolizumab Alone on Tumor Response in Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Results of the PEMBRO-RT Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2019, 5, 1276–1282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Formenti, S.C.; Demaria, S. Combining radiotherapy and cancer immunotherapy: A paradigm shift. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2013, 105, 256–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Reynders, K.; Illidge, T.; Siva, S.; Chang, J.Y.; De Ruysscher, D. The abscopal effect of local radiotherapy: Using immunotherapy to make a rare event clinically relevant. Cancer Treat Rev. 2015, 41, 503–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Khan, S.; Gerber, D.E. Autoimmunity, checkpoint inhibitor therapy and immune-related adverse events: A review. Semin Cancer Biol. 2020, 64, 93–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ahmad, A.; Totiger, T.M.; Benaduce, A.P.; Marples, B.; Mihaylov, I.B. Establishing Correlations between Breast Tumor Response to Radio-Immunotherapy and Radiomics from Multi-Parametric Imaging: An Animal Study. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 6493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Gillies, R.J.; Kinahan, P.E.; Hricak, H. Radiomics: Images Are More than Pictures, They Are Data. Radiology 2016, 278, 563–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Lambin, P.; Rios-Velazquez, E.; Leijenaar, R.; Carvalho, S.; van Stiphout, R.G.P.M.; Granton, P.; Zegers, C.M.L.; Gillies, R.; Boellard, R.; Dekker, A.; et al. Radiomics: Extracting more information from medical images using advanced feature analysis. Eur. J. Cancer 2012, 48, 441–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Leijenaar, R.T.; Carvalho, S.; Velazquez, E.R.; van Elmpt, W.J.; Parmar, C.; Hoekstra, O.S.; Hoekstra, C.J.; Boellaard, R.; Dekker, A.L.; Gillies, R.J.; et al. Stability of FDG-PET Radiomics features: An integrated analysis of test-retest and inter-observer variability. Acta Oncol. 2013, 52, 1391–1397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Nuovo, G.J.; Hagood, J.S.; Magro, C.M.; Chin, N.; Kapil, R.; Davis, L.; Marsh, C.B.; Folcik, V.A. The distribution of immunomodulatory cells in the lungs of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Mod. Pathol. 2012, 25, 416–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Engeroff, P.; Belbezier, A.; Monsel, A.; Klatzmann, D. Anakinra reduces lung inflammation in experimental acute lung injury. Immun. Inflamm. Dis. 2022, 10, 123–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. De Vito, R.; Alisi, A.; Masotti, A.; Ceccarelli, S.; Panera, N.; Citti, A.; Salata, M.; Valenti, L.; Feldstein, A.E.; Nobili, V. Markers of activated inflammatory cells correlate with severity of liver damage in children with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2012, 30, 49–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Keeley, E.C.; Mehrad, B.; Strieter, R.M. The role of circulating mesenchymal progenitor cells (fibrocytes) in the pathogenesis of fibrotic disorders. Thromb. Haemost. 2009, 101, 613–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Mihaylov, I.B.; Totiger, T.M.; Giret, T.M.; Wang, D.Z.; Spieler, B.; Welford, S. Toward prediction of abscopal effect in radioimmunotherapy: Pre-clinical investigation. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0255923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Vanpouille-Box, C.; Alard, A.; Aryankalayil, M.J.; Sarfraz, Y.; Diamond, J.M.; Schneider, R.J.; Inghirami, G.; Coleman, C.N.; Formenti, S.C.; Demaria, S. DNA exonuclease Trex1 regulates radiotherapy-induced tumour immunogenicity. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 15618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Bauckhage, C. NumPy/SciPy Recipes for Image Processing: Intensity Normalization and Histogram Equalization. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281118372_NumPy_SciPy_Recipes_for_Image_Processing_Intensity_Normalization_and_Histogram_Equalization?channel=doi&linkId=55d73a6508aec156b9aa0758&showFulltext=true (accessed on 13 April 2022).
  37. Do, Q.N.; Lewis, M.A.; Madhuranthakam, A.J.; Xi, Y.; Bailey, A.A.; Lenkinski, R.E.; Twickler, D.M. Texture analysis of magnetic resonance images of the human placenta throughout gestation: A feasibility study. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0211060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Loizou, C.P.; Pantziaris, M.; Pattichis, C.S.; Seimenis, I. Brain MR image normalization in texture analysis of multiple sclerosis. J. Biomed. Graph. Comput. 2012, 3, 929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Spieler, B.; Azzam, G.; Asher, D.; Lopes, G.; Saravia, D.; Kwon, D.; Yechieli, R.; Dal Pra, A.; Diwanji, T.; Mihaylov, I.B. Overall Survival of Patients with Advanced NSCLC Treated with Nivolumab Correlates with Texture Features on Pre-Immunotherapy CT Imaging and Radiotherapy History. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. 2019, 105, E531–E532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Spieler, B.O.; Saravia, D.; Lopes, G.; Azzam, G.; Kwon, D.; Dal Pra, A.; Yechieli, R.; Diwanji, T.; Mihaylov, I. Can texture analysis of pre-immunotherapy CT imaging predict clinical outcomes for patients with advanced NSCLC treated with Nivolumab? J. Clin. Oncol. 2019, 37, e20720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Colen, R.R.; Fujii, T.; Bilen, M.A.; Kotrotsou, A.; Abrol, S.; Hess, K.R.; Hajjar, J.; Suarez-Almazor, M.E.; Alshawa, A.; Hong, D.S.; et al. Radiomics to predict immunotherapy-induced pneumonitis: Proof of concept. Investig. New Drugs 2017, 36, 601–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Montoya, C.; Spieler, B.; Dal Pra, A.; Diwanji, T.; Yechieli, R.; Lopes, G.; Mihaylov, I.B. Can radiomics combined with clinical data predict checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis? J. Clin. Oncol. 2021, 39, e14555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Spieler, B.; Azzam, G.; Kwon, D.; Saravia, D.; Lopes, G.; Dal Pra, A.; Diwanji, T.; Yechieli, R.; Freedman, L.M.; Mihaylov, I.B. Checkpoint Inhibitor Pneumonitis in Patients with Advanced NSCLC on Nivolumab Monotherapy is Underreported and Associated with Prior Radiotherapy History. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. 2020, 108, E89–E90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Spieler, B.O.; Lopes, G.; Dal Pra, A.; Diwanji, T.; Yechieli, R.; Freedman, L.M.; Mihaylov, I. Is checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis underreported in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) on PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy? J. Clin. Oncol. 2020, 38, 9579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Mandrekar, J.N. Receiver operating characteristic curve in diagnostic test assessment. J. Thorac. Oncol. Off. Publ. Int. Assoc. Study Lung Cancer 2010, 5, 1315–1316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Catacchio, I.; Scattone, A.; Silvestris, N.; Mangia, A. Immune Prophets of Lung Cancer: The Prognostic and Predictive Landscape of Cellular and Molecular Immune Markers. Transl. Oncol. 2018, 11, 825–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Cupp, M.A.; Cariolou, M.; Tzoulaki, I.; Aune, D.; Evangelou, E.; Berlanga-Taylor, A.J. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and cancer prognosis: An umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies. BMC Med. 2020, 18, 360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ethier, J.L.; Desautels, D.; Templeton, A.; Shah, P.S.; Amir, E. Prognostic role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res. 2017, 19, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Gustafson, M.P.; Bornschlegl, S.; Park, S.S.; Gastineau, D.A.; Roberts, L.R.; Dietz, A.B.; Hallemeier, C.L. Comprehensive assessment of circulating immune cell populations in response to stereotactic body radiation therapy in patients with liver cancer. Adv. Radiat. Oncol. 2017, 2, 540–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Biomedicines 10 01173 g001 550
Figure 1. Study design: From left to right—bilateral tumors are implanted and 1–2 weeks later (tumor volumes ~200 mm3), blood is acquired, animals are CT- and MR-imaged, image segmentation is performed, and RT + ICI is started on the day after imaging. RT is delivered for three consecutive days. On each treatment day, tumors are irradiated with 8 Gy followed by PD-1 is administered through intraperitoneal injection. After tumor volumes reach the maximum allowed size, the animals are sacrificed, and lung tissue is acquired for immunohistochemistry.
Figure 1. Study design: From left to right—bilateral tumors are implanted and 1–2 weeks later (tumor volumes ~200 mm3), blood is acquired, animals are CT- and MR-imaged, image segmentation is performed, and RT + ICI is started on the day after imaging. RT is delivered for three consecutive days. On each treatment day, tumors are irradiated with 8 Gy followed by PD-1 is administered through intraperitoneal injection. After tumor volumes reach the maximum allowed size, the animals are sacrificed, and lung tissue is acquired for immunohistochemistry.
Biomedicines 10 01173 g001
Biomedicines 10 01173 g002 550
Figure 2. T1 3T MRI image (panel A) and CT image (panel B) of treated animals. The tumors on both flanks and the lungs are segmented for radiomics features extraction. The panels contain coronal (top), sagittal (lower left), and axial (lower right) views.
Figure 2. T1 3T MRI image (panel A) and CT image (panel B) of treated animals. The tumors on both flanks and the lungs are segmented for radiomics features extraction. The panels contain coronal (top), sagittal (lower left), and axial (lower right) views.
Biomedicines 10 01173 g002
Biomedicines 10 01173 g003 550
Figure 3. Immunohistochemistry analysis of CD45 cell infiltration in lung sections from control (top right) and treated with RT and ICI mice (bottom right). The box chart (left) demonstrates the quantitative analysis of CD45 distribution in the two cohorts.
Figure 3. Immunohistochemistry analysis of CD45 cell infiltration in lung sections from control (top right) and treated with RT and ICI mice (bottom right). The box chart (left) demonstrates the quantitative analysis of CD45 distribution in the two cohorts.
Biomedicines 10 01173 g003
Biomedicines 10 01173 g004 550
Figure 4. ROC analyses results from the modeling of lung inflammation. The corresponding AUCs for the two models are presented in the parenthesis in the caption. The green and the blue lines represent the ROCs from the two validation folds, while the red line is from the average of the two folds. The corresponding AUCs for the folds and the average are presented in the parenthesis.
Figure 4. ROC analyses results from the modeling of lung inflammation. The corresponding AUCs for the two models are presented in the parenthesis in the caption. The green and the blue lines represent the ROCs from the two validation folds, while the red line is from the average of the two folds. The corresponding AUCs for the folds and the average are presented in the parenthesis.
Biomedicines 10 01173 g004
Table
Table 1. Descriptive statistics on CD45 infiltration obtained from the lung tissues through immunohistochemistry evaluation.
Table 1. Descriptive statistics on CD45 infiltration obtained from the lung tissues through immunohistochemistry evaluation.
GroupNumber MiceMinMaxAverageMedianStandard Deviation
Control40.0030.0370.0240.0280.015
All treated150.0940.4110.2580.2570.087
Low inflammation70.0940.2170.1760.1950.041
High inflammation80.2630.4110.3240.3270.055
Table
Table 2. Descriptive statistics on the complete blood counts, derived from the blood samples acquired before treatment administration.
Table 2. Descriptive statistics on the complete blood counts, derived from the blood samples acquired before treatment administration.
CBC TypeMinMaxAverageMedian
WBC (103/µL)0.987.955.2465.38
Neu # (103/µL)0.373.091.8231.82
Lym # (103/µL)0.534.432.9943.07
Mon # (103/µL)0.050.420.2490.26
Eos # (103/µL)0.020.280.1150.11
Bas # (103/µL)0.010.120.0640.06
Neu% (%)26.442.234.49333.8
Lym% (%)48.165.556.8657
Mon% (%)2.284.945.1
Eos% (%)0.85.72.42.2
Bas% (%)0.51.81.31.4
RBC (106/µL)1.798.436.7627.18
HGB (g/dL)413.410.911.7
HCT (%)8.842.434.0736
MCV (fL)48.552.750.3850.2
MCH (pg)15.622.616.4315.9
MCHC (g/dL)29.945.532.6231.7
RDW-CV (%)12.923.318.47318.3
PLT (103/µL)1841137769.466856
MPV (fL)5.15.95.51335.6
NLR0.4040.8730.6180.641
#：Number.
Table
Table 3. Descriptive statistics on the liquid biopsy cytokines derived from the blood serum derived from the pretreatment blood collection.
Table 3. Descriptive statistics on the liquid biopsy cytokines derived from the blood serum derived from the pretreatment blood collection.
CytokineMinMaxAverageMedian
KC (A5)33.345380.18138.9395.16
TNF-α (A6)3.7729.5912.7571911.465
MCP-1 (A7)232.2352362.091190.5261211.983
RANTES (A10)41.35541.35541.35541.355
IL-1β (B2)4.8729.2210.612819.4725
IP-10 (B3)82.44512.41320.8675331.5525
GM-CSF (B4)8.5415.5410.693139.905
Table
Table 4. Descriptive statistics on significant blood counts, blood cytokines, and radiomics used in model building. The low/high notation denotes where the corresponding number is from the low or high inflammation group, based on the observed CD45 from Table 1. The last column outlines the calculated ANOVA p-value of the difference.
Table 4. Descriptive statistics on significant blood counts, blood cytokines, and radiomics used in model building. The low/high notation denotes where the corresponding number is from the low or high inflammation group, based on the observed CD45 from Table 1. The last column outlines the calculated ANOVA p-value of the difference.
FeatureMinMaxAverageMedianStandard Deviationp-Value
NLR low/high0.5/0.40.9/0.70.7/0.60.6/0.50.1/0.10.035
GM-CSF low/high8.5/8.510.1/14.58.8/11.78.5/11.60.6/2.20.005
CT average gray low/high265.1/255.9291.2/309.9278.4/289.9277.4/292.29.0/15.30.104
CT histogram kurtosis low/high1.9/2.23.0/6.62.6/3.82.7/3.30.4/1.70.093
CT co-occurrence matrix entropy low/high11.9/12.212.3/12.512.1/12.312.2/12.30.1/0.10.012
MR histogram kurtosis low/high1.8/2.110.4/6.86.1/3.77.4/3.33.3/1.60.091
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Spieler, B.; Giret, T.M.; Welford, S.; Totiger, T.M.; Mihaylov, I.B. Lung Inflammation Predictors in Combined Immune Checkpoint-Inhibitor and Radiation Therapy—Proof-of-Concept Animal Study. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 1173. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10051173

AMA Style

Spieler B, Giret TM, Welford S, Totiger TM, Mihaylov IB. Lung Inflammation Predictors in Combined Immune Checkpoint-Inhibitor and Radiation Therapy—Proof-of-Concept Animal Study. Biomedicines. 2022; 10(5):1173. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10051173

Chicago/Turabian Style

Spieler, Benjamin, Teresa M. Giret, Scott Welford, Tulasigeri M. Totiger, and Ivaylo B. Mihaylov. 2022. "Lung Inflammation Predictors in Combined Immune Checkpoint-Inhibitor and Radiation Therapy—Proof-of-Concept Animal Study" Biomedicines 10, no. 5: 1173. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10051173

APA Style

Spieler, B., Giret, T. M., Welford, S., Totiger, T. M., & Mihaylov, I. B. (2022). Lung Inflammation Predictors in Combined Immune Checkpoint-Inhibitor and Radiation Therapy—Proof-of-Concept Animal Study. Biomedicines, 10(5), 1173. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10051173

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop