Next Article in Journal
Multi-Omics Approaches for the Prediction of Clinical Endpoints after Immunotherapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Comprehensive Review
Next Article in Special Issue
The Vascular-Immune Hypothesis of Alzheimer’s Disease
Previous Article in Journal
IRW (Isoleucine–Arginine–Tryptophan) Improves Glucose Tolerance in High Fat Diet Fed C57BL/6 Mice via Activation of Insulin Signaling and AMPK Pathways in Skeletal Muscle
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomedicines
Volume 10
Issue 6
10.3390/biomedicines10061236
biomedicines-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Co-Ultramicronized Palmitoylethanolamide/Luteolin Restores Oligodendrocyte Homeostasis via Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-α in an In Vitro Model of Alzheimer’s Disease

by
Roberta Facchinetti
1,†,
Marta Valenza
1,†,
Chiara Gomiero
2,
Giulia Federica Mancini
1,3,
Luca Steardo
1,4,
Patrizia Campolongo
1,3 and
Caterina Scuderi
1,*
1
Department of Physiology and Pharmacology “Vittorio Erspamer”, SAPIENZA University of Rome—P. le Aldo Moro, 5, 00185 Rome, Italy
2
Epitech Research Group, 35030 Padova, Italy
3
Centro Europeo di Ricerca sul Cervello (CERC), IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation Rome, 00143 Rome, Italy
4
Università Telematica Giustino Fortunato, 82100 Benevento, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors have contributed equally to the work.
Biomedicines 2022, 10(6), 1236; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10061236
Submission received: 29 April 2022 / Revised: 24 May 2022 / Accepted: 25 May 2022 / Published: 26 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Determinants of Neurodegenerative Diseases)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Oligodendrocytes are cells fundamental for brain functions as they form the myelin sheath and feed axons. They perform these critical functions thanks to the cooperation with other glial cells, mainly astrocytes. The astrocyte/oligodendrocyte crosstalk needs numerous mediators and receptors, such as peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs). PPAR agonists promote oligodendrocyte precursor cells (OPCs) maturation in myelinating oligodendrocytes. In the Alzheimer’s disease brain, deposition of beta-amyloid (Aβ) has been linked to several alterations, including astrogliosis and changes in OPCs maturation. However, very little is known about the molecular mechanisms. Here, we investigated for the first time the maturation of OPCs co-cultured with astrocytes in an in vitro model of Aβ1–42 toxicity. We also tested the potential beneficial effect of the anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective composite palmitoylethanolamide and luteolin (co-ultra PEALut), which is known to engage the isoform alfa of the PPARs. Our results show that Aβ1–42 triggers astrocyte reactivity and inflammation and reduces the levels of growth factors important for OPCs maturation. Oligodendrocytes indeed show low cell surface area and few arborizations. Co-ultra PEALut counteracts the Aβ1–42-induced inflammation and astrocyte reactivity preserving the morphology of co-cultured oligodendrocytes through a mechanism that in some cases involves PPAR-α. This is the first evidence of the negative effects exerted by Aβ1–42 on astrocyte/oligodendrocyte crosstalk and discloses a never-explored co-ultra PEALut ability in restoring oligodendrocyte homeostasis.

1. Introduction

Aberrant myelination of neuronal axons is a common hallmark of several neurodegenerative diseases [1]. Physiologically, myelination consists in wrapping axons in a sheath of lipid called myelin, which is able to increase the rate of action potentials along the axon [2]. Thus, any impairment in myelin formation may alter neurotransmission and lead to reduced cognitive functions and dementia [3].
Myelination is performed by oligodendrocytes, brain cells belonging to the macroglia family of glial cells [3]. They originate from oligodendrocyte precursor cells (OPCs), mainly localized in the ventricular zones of the central nervous system (CNS). From there, they migrate to the developing brain, where they become active oligodendrocytes [4]. In the adult brain, the OPCs cell cycle is accelerated in case of myelin loss due to brain injury, aging, or diseases [5], to counteract the damage.
OPCs survival and proliferation are under the control of another macroglia cell type, namely astrocytes [3,6]. The latter are star-shaped cells able to maintain brain homeostasis at all levels of organization [7,8,9]. Among their innumerable functions, astrocytes contribute to myelination because they support OPCs survival by establishing direct cell–cell contacts as well via secreted mediators [7,10]. Among many, astrocytes release both the fibroblast growth factor (FGF)2 and the transforming growth factor (TGF)-β, two enhancers of OPCs differentiation. During aging or some pathological conditions, astrocytes modify the production of these and other factors, thus hampering important physiological functions, including OPCs differentiation and myelin sheath formation [11,12]. For instance, in multiple sclerosis (MS), astrocytes secrete proinflammatory factors such as the tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interleukin (IL)-1β, and IL-6, negatively affecting OPCs differentiation [10,13,14]. Astrogliosis and demyelination also occur in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) [15,16,17,18]. Brain imaging studies have linked myelin impairments with AD pathogenesis, appointing beta-amyloid (Aβ) cerebral deposition as a possible etiological factor [19,20]. Myelin damage coincides indeed with Aβ accumulation and concurrent impairment in OPCs maturation in the brains of AD patients [21]. To date, the molecular mechanisms involved have not been clarified yet. Very recent in vitro and in vivo evidence reported the effect of Aβ in stimulating the maturation of OPCs and promoting the expression of the myelin basic protein (MBP) [22,23]. In order to contribute to understanding these counterintuitive findings, here we investigated the effects of Aβ1–42 on the maturation of OPCs co-cultured with astrocytes, exploring the molecular mechanisms.
Numerous mediators and receptors and, among these, the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) seem to play a prominent role in regulating the communication between astrocytes and oligodendrocytes [24,25,26,27]. PPARs represent a family of ligand-activated transcription factors playing a vital role in cellular processes [28]. Three different isoforms have been identified named α, β/δ, and γ. All of them are expressed in oligodendrocytes, astrocytes, and neurons [29]. Molecules acting as agonists of these receptors have demonstrated anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective properties in different in vitro and in vivo models of CNS diseases [30,31,32,33,34,35]. In animal models of demyelinating diseases, such as encephalomyelitis and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, the administration of PPAR-γ agonists delayed the onset and ameliorated the clinical manifestations of the pathology by mainly exerting anti-inflammatory effects [36].
It was recently shown in vitro that a formulation containing palmitoylethanolamide (PEA) co-ultramicronized with the flavonoid luteolin (co-ultra PEALut) promotes OPCs morphological development into mature oligodendrocytes [37,38]. Furthermore, co-ultra PEALut significantly reduced the development of encephalomyelitis in an in vivo experimental model of MS [39]. The co-ultra PEALut mechanism of action was not investigated in either of these studies. We and others have shown that PEA exerts anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective properties through the interaction with the PPAR-α [40,41]. Moreover, our laboratory has demonstrated PEA efficacy in dampening astrocyte reactivity in several preclinical models of AD by engaging the PPAR-α [32,42,43,44]. In the light of this, here we tested the effects of the agonism at PPAR-α by co-ultra PEALut in modulating the proper communication between astrocytes and oligodendrocytes necessary for myelination.
Primary OPCs were cultured on permeable membranes inserted in wells containing primary astrocytes, thus allowing secreted soluble factors to diffuse while preventing physical contact between the two different cell types. Using this model, we tested the possible beneficial effect of co-ultra PEALut treatment in counteracting Aβ1–42-induced toxicity. We concurrently verified the involvement of PPAR-α by carrying out experiments in the presence or absence of GW6471, a selective PPAR-α antagonist.
The results of the present study provide the very first evidence indicating that the exposure of primary astrocytes to Aβ1–42 impairs some astrocytic functions and changes the differentiation and cellular morphology of co-cultured oligodendrocytes. Moreover, here we show a new and never-explored ability of co-ultra PEALut in counteracting Aβ1–42-induced damage on oligodendrocyte homeostasis, exerting some effects through the PPAR-α. Considering that co-ultra PEALut is already approved for human use as a food for special medical purposes, altogether, our findings open new opportunities for the treatment of diseases characterized by myelination impairments.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Primary Cell Cultures

All animal procedures were performed in agreement with the guidelines of the Italian Ministry of Health (D.L. 26/2014) and with the European Parliament directive 2010/63/EU.
Primary astrocytes and OPCs were isolated from cerebral cortices of female Sprague Dawley rat pups (6 pups/experimental group) according to our previous studies [32,40,42] and published protocols [45,46] with minor modifications. Rats at postnatal day 0–2 were sacrificed by decapitation. The cortices were isolated, and the meningeal membranes were removed. Each cortex was mechanically grinded in cold sterile Phosphate Buffer Saline (PBS) 1X added with 10 U/mL penicillin and 100 μg/mL streptomycin and then centrifuged (200× g for 30 s). The pellet was resuspended in High-glucose Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) containing papain, L-cysteine, and DNase I. After 60 min (min) in a 37 °C water bath with occasional swirling, an ovomucoid solution (DMEM supplemented with DNase I solution, 1% bovine serum albumin solution (BSA), and trypsin inhibitor) was added for additional 2 min. After centrifugation (400× g for 3 min), cells were triturated by pipetting several times in fresh ovomucoid solution. Then, DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 μg/mL streptomycin (complete DMEM) was added to the suspension. After centrifugation (400× g for 5 min), the obtained mixed glial cells were plated on 75 cm2 tissue culture flasks (3,000,000 cells/flask) in complete DMEM and cultured at 37 °C in a humified atmosphere containing 5% CO2. Complete DMEM was replaced 24 h and 7 days later. Ten days after isolation, microglial cells were dislodged by shaking flasks for 1 h and discarded. OPCs were separated from astrocytes through an overnight shaking session and plated on semi-porous membranes (0.4 μm pore size; density 100,000 cells/membrane), previously coated with poly-D-lysine hydrobromide, in Sato medium, that is DMEM supplemented with 4% 3,3′,5-triiodo-L-thyronine, 4% L-thyroxine, 200 U/mL penicillin and 200 μg/mL streptomycin, 1% FBS, 2% N2 supplement (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Astrocytes were plated (200,000 cells/well) in 24-well plates (Nunc, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) in 1 mL of complete DMEM. Then, semi-porous membranes containing OPCs were located in the 24-well plates containing astrocytes. After plating, OPCs and astrocytes were allowed to acclimatize and grow for 72 h in the respective media before treatments. Remaining astrocytes were plated at 1,000,000 cells/well in 6-well plates for Western Blot experiments and at 30,000 cells/well on 13 mm glass coverslips located in a 24-well plate for immunofluorescence experiments. The procedure is outlined in Figure 1a.
Otherwise specified, all reagents and plasticware used in the above-described protocol were purchased from Sigma Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA.

2.2. Drugs and Schedule of Treatments

Human Aβ1–42 was purchased from AnaSpec (Fremont, CA, USA) and dissolved in sterile NaOH 10 mM at a concentration of 221.5 μM following the manufacturer’s instructions. In order to obtain the fibrillary form, Aβ1–42 solution was diluted in PBS 1X and let aggregate for 24 h at 37 °C [47,48,49].
The selective PPAR-α antagonist GW6471 was purchased by Tocris Bioscience (Bristol, UK) and dissolved in DMSO, whereas a preparation containing co-ultra PEALut (PEA and Luteolin co-ultramicronized, 10:1 by mass; a kind gift of Epitech Group SpA, Saccolongo, Italy) was dissolved in Pluronic F-68 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and sonicated for 20 min in a water bath until complete dissolution.
Primary astrocytes were treated with Aβ1–42 1 μM in the presence or absence of the following substances: co-ultra PEALut (3 µm) and GW6471 (3 μM). Concentrations and schedule of treatments were chosen based on the available literature [23,32,40,50,51] and according to the results of neutral red uptake assays. All reagents were lipopolysaccharide-free.
After 48 h of treatment, astrocytes and oligodendrocytes were collected separately and processed for analyses.

2.3. Neutral Red Uptake Assay

Respective astrocyte and oligodendrocyte viability was tested by neutral red uptake assay, as previously described [42]. Cells were bathed for 3 h in 50 μg/mL neutral red solution (Sigma-Aldrich) at +37 °C. Later, cells were rinsed first in Ca2+- and Mg2+-free PBS and then in a de-staining solution containing ethanol, deionized water, and glacial acetic acid (50:49:1 v/v). Cell absorbance (540 nm) was read by a microplate spectrophotometer (Epoch, BioTek, Winooski, VT, USA). The proportional number of viable cells was calculated and expressed as percentage to control sample (CTRL).

2.4. Protein Extraction and Western Blot Analysis

Western blot analysis was performed on protein lysates of primary astrocytes, following our published protocol [42]. Cells were lysed in ice-cold hypotonic buffer containing 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 50 mM Tris/HCl pH 7.5, 1% triton X-100 complete of inhibitors of protease (0.1 mM leupeptin, 10 μg/mL aprotinin, and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, all from Sigma-Aldrich). Homogenates were incubated for 40 min at +4 °C, then centrifuged at 18,440× g for 30 min. Supernatants containing proteins were stored at −80 °C until use. An equivalent amount of each sample (50 μg), calculated by Bradford assay, was resolved through 12% acrylamide SDS-PAGE Stain-Free precast gels (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Segrate, Italy). All samples were run concurrently. Proteins were transferred from gels to nitrocellulose papers using a trans-blot SD semidry transfer cell (Bio-Rad Laboratories). After 1 h incubation in a blocking solution containing 5% no-fat dry milk and 0.1% Tween 20 in TBS (TBS-T) at room temperature (Tecnochimica Moderna, Rome, Italy), membranes were left overnight at +4 °C in a blocking solution containing one of the following primary antibodies: rabbit anti-glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) 1:25,000 (Abcam, Cambridge, UK), mouse-anti-glutamine synthetase (GS) 1:500 (Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA), and mouse anti-high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) 1:1000 (BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA). The following morning, membranes were rinsed using 0.05% TBS-T and incubated with a blocking solution containing the appropriate secondary horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated antibody for 1 h at room temperature. Lastly, membranes were washed with T-TBS and briefly bathed in a specific solution of the enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) kit (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Milan, Italy). Immunocomplexes were detected by a Chemidoc XRS and analyzed by Image Lab software (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Values were normalized to the total protein content. Experimental conditions are summarized in Table 1.

2.5. Real Time-Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-qPCR)

RT-qPCR was carried out as previously described [52] and summed up in Table 2. The TRI-Reagent (Sigma-Aldrich) was added to primary astrocyte samples to extract total mRNA. An equal amount of mRNA (1 μg) from each experimental group was quantified by a D30 BioPhotometer spectrophotometer (Eppendorf AG, Hamburg, Germany) and reverse transcribed using a QuantiTect Reverse Transcription Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). RT-PCR reactions (20 μL) were set mixing specific primers, cDNA (20 ng) with the iTaq Universal SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) and run in 96-well plates using the CFX96 Touch thermocycler (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). All samples were run concurrently in triplicate. A two-step thermal protocol was used for 40 cycles (10 s at 95 °C and then 30 s at 60 °C) preceded by a polymerase activation step (3 min at 95 °C). Gene-specific amplification was controlled by including a melting curve analysis of the amplification products at the end of the reaction. The Glyceraldehyde-3-Phosphate Dehydrogenase (GAPDH) was used as reference gene to normalize each target amplicon. Data were analyzed using the Pfaffl method, correcting the delta Ct values for each primer efficiency [53]. All primer sequences are listed in Table 2.

2.6. Immunofluorescence

Immunofluorescence was performed according to our previous studies [54]. Briefly, semi-porous membranes containing primary oligodendrocytes were carefully cut out and laid down on glass slides (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA). Cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (Santa Cruz, Dallas, TX, USA) in PBS 1X for 20 min at room temperature. After being washed three times with PBS 1X, they underwent a 10 min bath in PBS 1X with 0.25% Triton X-100 (Sigma-Aldrich) to promote cell permeabilization. Then, cells were submerged for 2 h in a blocking solution containing 5% BSA and 0.25% Triton X-100 in PBS 1X and subsequently incubated overnight at 4 °C with the blocking solution added of the following primary antibodies: rabbit anti-GFAP (1:1500, Abcam), rabbit anti-Olig2 (1:200), and mouse anti-MBP (1:200), both from Santa Cruz. The following day, cells were washed 3 times with PBS 1X and incubated for 1 h with a fresh blocking solution containing the FITC-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (H + L) antibody (1:200) and TRITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (H + L) antibody (1:200) (Jackson ImmunoResearch, Suffolk, UK). Nuclei were stained with Hoechst (1:500, Thermo Fisher Scientific). Lastly, cells were rinsed 3 times in PBS 1X before being covered with Fluoromount aqueous mounting medium (Sigma-Aldrich) and a glass coverslip. Experimental conditions are summarized in Table 3. The specificity of the signal was confirmed in cells that underwent the same protocol procedure except for the incubation with the primary antibody.
Data were collected using an Eclipse E600 microscope equipped with Nikon Plan 20× and 40× objectives (Nikon instruments, Rome, Italy) connected to a Qimaging camera (Surrey, BC, Canada), and controlled by the software NIS-Elements-BR 3.2 64 bit (Nikon instruments). Parameters of gain and exposure were kept constant to allow comparisons between samples within the same experiment.

2.7. Image Analysis

In order to calculate the percentage of MBP+/Olig2+ oligodendrocytes, cells were counted manually from six random fields per condition for each independent experiment using the Fiji software by two investigators blinded to treatments.
The morphology of MBP+ oligodendrocytes was analyzed by measuring the surface, expressed in μm2, of each individual cell [55].
The complexity of MBP+ oligodendrocytes was analyzed by using the Sholl analysis plugin [56,57]. Fluorescent pictures were converted into binary 8-bit images, background subtracted, and the free edges were detected. Starting radius was set at 10 μm and step size at 5 μm, thus creating 5 concentric radii up to 30 µm distance from the soma. The number of cell processes intersecting those circles was plotted as a function of the radial distance from the cell soma. Several descriptors of cell arborization were analyzed, which are the maximum intersections (calculated as the highest number of processes/branches in each cell arbor), the sum of intersections (calculated as the sum of intersections detected at each concentric circle), and the mean of intersections (calculated as the sum of intersections divided by intersecting radii) [23,58,59]. Images were analyzed by an investigator blinded to treatments.

2.8. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism software version 6.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). Data were analyzed by either the Student’s t-test, in case just two experimental groups were compared, or one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) in all other experiments. Upon detection of a main significant effect from ANOVA, a post hoc test was carried out as either the Dunnett’s test, in case groups needed to be compared only to the CTRL, or the Student Newman Keuls (SNK) test in case of multiple comparisons among groups. Differences between mean values were considered statistically significant when p < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Characterization of OPCs Maturation In Vitro and Effects of Treatments on the Viability of OPCs and Astrocytes

To monitor the maturation of OPCs in our experimental conditions, we performed a longitudinal immunofluorescence study testing the appearance of the MBP signal. We studied the MBP+/Olig2+ cell ratio, which is considered an index of the level of maturation of OPCs [60]. Indeed, MBP is the major protein constituent of myelin, and it is produced only by mature oligodendrocytes, whereas Olig2 is a specific transcriptional factor expressed by oligodendrocytes at all developmental stages, from precursors to mature cells [60,61,62]. According to literature data, our results show that primary oligodendrocytes cultured alone survive approximately 10 days and start to express MBP between the second and third day in vitro (DIV). MBP expression progressively increases to reach the highest value at about the seventh DIV (Figure 1b). Provided these data, we decided to study the effects of treatments on the initial phase of OPCs maturation, that is, the third DIV.
Figure 1c–e shows the results of viability assays performed to choose the appropriate concentrations of treatments to be applied for 48 h to astrocytes. In Figure 1, we also report the effects of the selected concentrations and of the relative vehicles used to solubilize each substance on astrocyte (f) and oligodendrocyte (g) viability. No significant variation versus control was observed when co-ultra PEALut or GW6471 were provided alone.

3.2. Aβ1–42 Triggers Astrocyte Reactivity

To study the effects of human fibrillary Aβ1–42 1 µm on astrocyte function in our transwell culture system, we performed immunofluorescence and western blot experiments analyzing the expression levels of key proteins that are commonly related to a reactive and proinflammatory phenotype [63,64]. Our results show that 48 h treatment with Aβ1–42 triggers this astrocytic phenotype as documented by the increased expression of GFAP, GS, and HMGB1 (Figure 2).

3.3. Co-Ultra PEALut Prevents the Astrocyte Reactivity and the Reduction in Growth Factors Transcription Induced by Aβ1–42 Exposure

Experiments investigated whether co-ultra PEALut exerts beneficial effects in primary astrocytes exposed to Aβ1–42, focusing on astrocytic factors able to affect OPCs survival and development. The possible engagement of the PPAR-α in such co-ultra PEALut effects was also explored.
As shown in Figure 3a–e, the challenge with Aβ1–42 triggered both astrocyte reactivity and an inflammatory process, detected by the increase in GFAP, S100B, p50NFκB, IL-6, and IL-1β mRNA compared with control cells. Co-ultra PEALut significantly prevented the Aβ1–42-induced raises. Concurrent treatment with the PPAR-α antagonist GW6471 hampered co-ultra PEALut to block Aβ1–42-induced transcription of IL-6 and IL-1β, indicating PPAR-α involvement in co-ultraPEALut effects.
Furthermore, our results show that Aβ1–42 significantly reduced the gene expression of both astrocytic FGF2 and TGF-β compared with control cells (Figure 3f,g). Co-ultra PEALut treatment significantly prevented such Aβ1–42-induced modifications. However, concurrent treatment with GW6471 did not change the observed co-ultra PEALut effect, thus indicating that the PPAR-α was not engaged.3.4. Co-ultra PEALut counteracts the altered MBP+/Olig2+ ratio triggered by Aβ1–42 exposure
Experiments investigated whether exposing primary astrocytes to Aβ1–42 affects the maturation of co-cultured OPCs and whether co-ultra PEALut prevents the observed Aβ1–42-induced changes. The possible involvement of the PPAR-α in co-ultra PEALut effects was tested too. As shown in Figure 4, we observed an increase in the number of MBP+ oligodendrocytes when these cells were co-cultured with Aβ1–42-challenged astrocytes but not with the vehicle (Figure 4a,b). Olig2+ cell count was not affected by treatment, suggesting that no proliferation or death of oligodendrocytes occurred (Figure 4a,c). Coherently, the MBP+/Olig2+ ratio increased in oligodendrocytes indirectly exposed to Aβ1–42 (Figure 4d). Co-ultra PEALut significantly prevented such an Aβ1–42-induced effect (Figure 4a–d). Concurrent treatment with GW6471 did not reverse the co-ultra PEALut effect indicating that other mechanisms of action could be involved.

3.4. Co-Ultra PEALut Controls the Oligodendrocyte Morphological Changes Induced by Aβ1–42 Exposure

Oligodendrocytes change their cell morphology in various CNS pathological conditions, including AD [65,66,67,68,69,70]. As we observed that Aβ1–42 increased MBP+ cells, we decided to clarify the Aβ1–42 effects by performing a thorough morphological analysis of oligodendrocytes. We analyzed the cell surface area and the number of arborizations of MBP+ oligodendrocytes. As shown in Figure 5, we observed a reduction in the cell surface area of oligodendrocytes when these cells were co-cultured with astrocytes challenged with Aβ1–42 but not with the vehicle. Co-ultra PEALut significantly prevented such Aβ1–42-induced effect. Concurrent treatment with the PPAR-α antagonist GW6471 did not block the effect of co-ultra PEALut, suggesting the involvement of other mechanisms.
The Sholl analysis revealed a significant reduction both in the maximum number of intersections and the sum of intersections of MBP+ cell branches when oligodendrocytes were indirectly exposed to Aβ1–42 (Figure 6a–d). Similarly, the mean number of intersections was reduced (Figure 6e). Co-ultra PEALut prevented such Aβ1–42-induced modifications in oligodendrocyte morphology through PPAR-α involvement. Indeed, GW6471 blocked the observed co-ultra PEALut effect (Figure 6a,c–e). By counting the number of arborizations from the MBP+ cell soma outwards every 5 µm (Figure 6f), we found that Aβ1–42-exposed oligodendrocytes showed a lower number of arborizations at three distance measures (10, 15, and 20 µm) compared to control cells, reaching the greatest and most significant reduction at 20 µm from the soma (Figure 6f). Co-ultra PEALut treatment was effective in preventing these Aβ1–42-induced morphological changes. The co-treatment with GW6471 significantly blunted such co-ultra PEALut effect, indicating an engagement of the PPAR-α in the co-ultra PEALut mechanism of action (Figure 6f).

4. Discussion

Neuroglia is an extremely heterogeneous population of cells present in the nervous system. The heterogeneity of glial cells correlates with the multiplicity of functions that they perform. Regardless of their morphology and functions, the common fundamental role of all types of glial cells in the maintenance of CNS homeostasis [71]. Among glial cells, astrocytes have recently gained great attention for their homeostatic support that takes place at all levels of brain organization. Therefore, alterations affecting astrocytes are nowadays considered to be implicated in the etiology or progression of almost all disorders affecting the nervous system, including AD [72,73,74,75]. For this reason, neuropharmacologists look at these cells as possible targets for the development of new therapeutics [76,77].
One of the less explored functions of astrocytes is their supportive role in the maturation of oligodendrocytes. Astrocytes establish physical and functional connections with oligodendrocytes, thus allowing, among many other processes, the proper formation of myelin [10]. Changes in this cell–cell communication may alter myelination, impairing neurotransmission, ultimately leading to cognitive decline and dementia [3]. Indeed, aberrant myelination is considered one of the key features of AD [17], although it remains an overlooked field of study. To contribute to filling this gap, here we set up an in vitro model of Aβ1–42 toxicity to study the interaction between astrocytes and oligodendrocytes, with particular emphasis on astrocyte reactivity and the release of trophic factors required for OPCs maturation, which is predictive of their ability to form myelin. By using semi-porous inserts to grow the two populations of glial cells separately, we treated astrocytes with human Aβ1–42 and studied the resulting changes in the two cell populations, with special reference to OPCs maturation. We observed that 48 h exposure to human fibrillary Aβ1–42 induced astrocytes to acquire a reactive and proinflammatory phenotype. We indeed observed an increase in the expression of key proteins related to astrocyte reactivity, such as GFAP, GS, and HMGB1. Similarly, elevated transcriptional levels of p50NFkB, IL-6, and IL-1β, well-known proinflammatory mediators, have been observed. Intriguingly, the elevation of such meditators has already been linked to a toxic environment that damages all cells, including oligodendrocytes [78,79,80]. Furthermore, our data reveal that Aβ1–42-exposure causes a significant reduction in the astrocytic transcriptional levels of FGF2 and TGF-β, two factors strictly implicated in OPCs maturation [11,12]. Based on these results and literature evidence indicating Aβ-induced altered myelination [81,82], we predicted to observe a defective maturation of co-cultured OPCs in our experimental condition. Our immunofluorescence experiments instead revealed a higher number of MBP+ cells and MBP+/Olig2+ ratio in oligodendrocytes indirectly exposed to human Aβ1–42 compared with vehicle. In agreement with these counterintuitive results, direct treatment of oligodendrocytes with oligomeric Aβ1–42 promoted MBP upregulation in primary rat oligodendrocyte cultures [23]. Furthermore, a marked increase in oligodendrocyte differentiation was found in the corpus callosum and hippocampus of transgenic models of AD, namely 3xTg-AD and APP/PS1 mice, compared with the wild-type counterparts [83]. As suggested by some researchers, a possible explanation of the Aβ effect on oligodendrocyte MBP expression could be linked to the reaction of these cells to the toxic stimulus [5]. Oligodendrocytes, indeed, may react by increasing their rate of differentiation in the attempt to restore the lost homeostasis [84,85]. By performing an in-depth morphological analysis, here we unveil that this push to the maturation operated by the toxic insult with Aβ1–42 actually causes severe morphological changes to oligodendrocytes. We observed that MBP+ oligodendrocytes lose their proper dimension and complexity as a consequence of the toxic insult. A significant reduction in the cell surface area, the maximum number of intersections, and both the sum and mean of intersections of MBP+ cell branches were detected in oligodendrocytes co-cultured with astrocytes challenged with Aβ1–42. All these structural changes highlight oligodendrocyte loss of planarity and their confused organization of branches. Data obtained agree with some recent in vivo findings in 3xTg-AD mice. In particular, oligodendrocytes of six-month-old transgenic mice appeared atrophic when compared to non-transgenic age-matched animals [55].
The new and extremely interesting evidence that emerges from the present results concerns the ability of co-ultra PEALut to restore oligodendrocyte homeostasis impaired by the Aβ1–42 challenge. Our and other groups have extensively documented the neuroprotective and beneficial effects of PEA in several preclinical and clinical settings [41,86,87,88]. We also demonstrated the ability of both PEA and co-ultra PEALut to modulate glial reactivity and dampen neuroinflammation, thus fostering neuron survival in different AD models [32,40,42,43,44].
Here, we provide the very first evidence about co-ultra PEALut’s ability to restore the pathological changes occurring in both astrocytes and oligodendrocytes after a toxic insult with the human Aβ1–42. We also show that co-ultra PEALut exerts some of these effects with a mechanism mediated by the PPAR-α. The activation of PPAR-α has been linked to NFκB inhibition, reduction of proinflammatory mediators, increased transcription of antioxidant enzymes, and promotion of cell survival through the inhibition of caspase 3 [89]. All these pathways could theoretically explain our results; however, further experiments are needed to clarify the effects of co-ultra PEALut.
By increasing FGF2 and TGF-β mRNA levels and blunting the expression of proinflammatory mediators, co-ultra PEALut normalized astrocyte functions and preserved the morphological features of oligodendrocytes indirectly exposed to Aβ1–42. It is worth noting that co-ultra PEALut provided concurrently with Aβ1–42, apart from preventing Aβ1–42-induced branching loss throughout the entire cell, even increases the number of intersections at 20 µm from the soma compared with the control group. Interestingly, the total area occupied by oligodendrocytes and the number of cellular arborizations are associated with the ability of these cells to create the myelin sheath around neuronal axons [90,91]. We are aware that further studies are required to better clarify the molecular mechanisms. However, our data are promising as they suggest the potential use of co-ultra PEALut in neurological disorders characterized by impaired myelination. In agreement, recent studies showed the co-ultra PEALut’s ability to promote in vitro OPCs differentiation [37,38,46] and to reduce the development of clinical signs in an in vivo experimental model of MS [39].
This study has some limits: first, our in vitro system is not able to fully reproduce the physiological environment where myelination occurs, which also comprehends neurons. Secondly, the mechanism of action of co-ultra PEALut could be further explored since not all the observed effects here are mediated by the PPAR-α. Indeed, other receptors have been proposed as PEA targets, including the transient receptor potential vanilloid type 1 channel and the orphan G-protein coupled receptor 55; PEA could engage the endocannabinoid enzyme fatty acid amide hydrolase acting as a false substrate and, in turn, indirectly increasing anandamide concentration [77,92]. Finally, further studies are needed to characterize additional markers targeting myelin and to explore OPCs differentiation and maturation longitudinally.
In conclusion, our data show a novel and never-explored ability of co-ultra PEALut in counteracting the negative effects exerted by Aβ on oligodendrocyte homeostasis. Altogether, our findings open new opportunities for the adjuvant treatment of AD, and co-ultra PEALut is a promising composite capable of exerting beneficial effects in both experimental and clinical settings. Since it is already licensed for human use, the potential to proceed to clinical use rapidly is reasonable.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.F., M.V. and C.S.; methodology, M.V. and R.F.; formal analysis, C.S.; investigation R.F., M.V. and G.F.M.; resources, L.S., P.C., C.G. and C.S.; data curation, R.F., M.V. and C.S. writing—original draft preparation, R.F.; writing—review and editing, M.V. and C.S.; supervision, P.C. and C.S.; project administration, C.S.; funding acquisition, R.F. and C.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The present study was funded by SAPIENZA, University of Rome grant n. AR22117A7347A4F9 (R.F.).

Institutional Review Board Statement

All animal procedures were performed in agreement with the guidelines of the Italian Ministry of Health (D.L. 26/2014) and with the European Parliament directive 2010/63/EU.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We gratefully thank the Epitech Group SpA for providing us with co-ultra PEALut.

Conflicts of Interest

C.G. discloses a contract with Epitech Group SpA, which had no role in study design and execution, data analysis and interpretation, in the writing of the report, and in the decision to submit the paper for publication. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Whang, S.; Zhang, Z.; Zhu, T.; Chu, S.; He, W.; Chen, N. Myelin injury in the central nervous system and Alzheimer’s disease. Brain Res. Bull. 2018, 140, 162–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Simons, M.; Nave, K.A. Oligodendrocytes: Myelination and Axonal Support. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2015, 8, a020479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Kıray, H.; Lindsay, S.L.; Hosseinzadeh, S.; Barnett, S.C. The multifaceted role of astrocytes in regulating myelination. Exp. Neurol. 2016, 283, 541–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Tilborg, E.; de Theije, C.; van Hal, M.; Wagenaar, N.; de Vries, L.; Benders, M.; Rowitch, D.H.; Nijboer, C.H. Origin and dynamics of oligodendrocytes in the developing brain: Implications for perinatal white matter injury. Glia 2018, 66, 221–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bergles, D.E.; Richardson, W.D. Oligodendrocyte Development and Plasticity. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2015, 8, a020453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tognatta, R.; Karl, M.T.; Fyffe-Maricich, S.L.; Popratiloff, A.; Garrison, E.D.; Schenck, J.K.; Abu-Rub, M.; Miller, R.H. Astrocytes Are Required for Oligodendrocyte Survival and Maintenance of Myelin Compaction and Integrity. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2020, 14, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Domingues, H.; Portugal, C.; Socodato, R.; Relvas, J. Oligodendrocyte, Astrocyte, and Microglia Crosstalk in Myelin Development, Damage, and Repair. Front. Cell. Dev. Biol. 2016, 4, 71. [Google Scholar]
  8. Verkhratsky, A.; Nedergaard, M. Physiology of Astroglia. Physiol. Rev. 2018, 98, 239–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Valenza, M.; Facchinetti, R.; Steardo, L.; Scuderi, C. Altered Waste Disposal System in Aging and Alzheimer’s Disease: Focus on Astrocytic Aquaporin-4. Front. Pharmacol. 2020, 10, 1656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Nutma, E.; van Gent, D.; Amor, S.; Peferoen, L.A.N. Astrocyte and Oligodendrocyte Cross-Talk in the Central Nervous System. Cells 2020, 9, 600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Hamaguchi, M.; Muramatsu, R.; Fujimura, H.; Mochizuki, H.; Kataoka, H.; Yamashita, T. Circulating transforming growth factor-β1 facilitates remyelination in the adult central nervous system. eLife 2019, 8, e41869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Linnerbauer, M.; Rothhammer, V. Protective Functions of Reactive Astrocytes Following Central Nervous System Insult. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 573256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bonora, M.; de Marchi, E.; Patergnani, S.; Suski, J.M.; Celsi, F.; Bononi, A.; Giorgi, C.; Marchi, S.; Rimessi, A.; Duszyński, J.; et al. Tumor necrosis factor-α impairs oligodendroglial differentiation through a mitochondria-dependent process. Cell Death Differ. 2014, 21, 1198–1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Petković, F.; Campbell, I.L.; Gonzalez, B.; Castellano, B. Astrocyte-targeted production of interleukin-6 reduces astroglial and microglial activation in the cuprizone demyelination model: Implications for myelin clearance and oligodendrocyte maturation. Glia 2016, 64, 2104–2119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Bouhrara, M.; Reiter, D.A.; Bergeron, C.M.; Zukley, L.M.; Ferrucci, L.; Resnick, S.M.; Spencer, R.G. Evidence of demyelination in mild cognitive impairment and dementia using a direct and specific magnetic resonance imaging measure of myelin content. Alzheimers Dement. 2018, 14, 998–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Nasrabady, S.E.; Rizvi, B.; Goldman, J.E.; Brickman, A.M. White matter changes in Alzheimer’s disease: A focus on myelin and oligodendrocytes. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 2018, 6, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ota, M.; Sato, N.; Kimura, Y.; Shigemoto, Y.; Kunugi, H.; Matsuda, H. Changes of Myelin Organization in Patients with Alzheimer’s Disease Shown by q-Space Myelin Map Imaging. Dement. Geriatr. Cogn. Disord. Extra 2019, 9, 24–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Papuć, E.; Rejdak, K. The role of myelin damage in Alzheimer’s disease pathology. Arch. Med. Sci. 2020, 16, 345–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Benitez, A.; Fieremans, E.; Jensen, J.H.; Falangola, M.F.; Tabesh, A.; Ferris, S.H.; Helpern, J.A. White matter tract integrity metrics reflect the vulnerability of late-myelinating tracts in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroimage Clin. 2014, 4, 64–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Zhan, X.; Jickling, G.C.; Ander, B.P.; Stamova, B.; Liu, D.; Kao, P.F.; Zelin, M.A.; Jin, L.-W.; DeCarli, C.; Sharp, F.R. Myelin basic protein associates with AβPP, Aβ1-42, and amyloid plaques in cortex of Alzheimer’s disease brain. J. Alzheimers Dis. 2015, 44, 1213–1229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Dean, D.C., 3rd; Hurley, S.A.; Kecskemeti, S.R.; O’Grady, J.P.; Canda, C.; Davenport-Sis, N.J.; Carlsson, C.M.; Zetterberg, H.; Blennow, K.; Asthana, S.; et al. Association of Amyloid Pathology With Myelin Alteration in Preclinical Alzheimer Disease. JAMA Neurol. 2017, 74, 41–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Quintela López, T. Role of Amyloid β Oligomers in Oligodendrocyte and Myelin Pathology in Alzheimer’s Disease. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea, Biscay, Spain, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  23. Quintela-López, T.; Ortiz-Sanz, C.; Serrano-Regal, M.P.; Gaminde-Blasco, A.; Valero, J.; Baleriola, J.; Sánchez-Gómez, M.V.; Matute, C.; Alberdi, E. Aβ oligomers promote oligodendrocyte differentiation and maturation via integrin β1 and Fyn kinase signaling. Cell Death Dis. 2019, 10, 445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Leisewitz, A.V.; Urrutia, C.R.; Martinez, G.R.; Loyola, G.; Bronfman, M. A PPARs cross-talk concertedly commits C6 glioma cells to oligodendrocytes and induces enzymes involved in myelin synthesis. J. Cell. Physiol. 2008, 217, 367–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. De Nuccio, C.; Bernardo, A.; de Simone, R.; Mancuso, E.; Magnaghi, V.; Visentin, S.; Minghetti, L. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ agonists accelerate oligodendrocyte maturation and influence mitochondrial functions and oscillatory Ca(2+) waves. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 2011, 70, 900–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Mandrekar-Colucci, S.; Sauerbeck, A.; Popovich, P.G.; McTigue, D.M. PPAR agonists as therapeutics for CNS trauma and neurological diseases. ASN Neuro 2013, 5, e00129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Bernardo, A.; Plumitallo, C.; de Nuccio, C.; Visentin, S.; Minghetti, L. Curcumin promotes oligodendrocyte differentiation and their protection against TNF-α through the activation of the nuclear receptor PPAR-γ. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 4952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kersten, S.; Desvergne, B.; Wahli, W. Roles of PPARs in health and disease. Nature 2000, 405, 421–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kliewer, S.A.; Forman, B.M.; Blumberg, B.; Ong, E.S.; Borgmeyer, U.; Mangelsdorf, D.J.; Umesono, K.; Evans, R.M. Differential expression and activation of a family of murine peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1994, 91, 7355–7359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Bordet, R.; Ouk, T.; Petrault, O.; Gelé, P.; Gautier, S.; Laprais, M.; Deplanque, D.; Duriez, P.; Staels, B.; Fruchart, J.C.; et al. PPAR: A new pharmacological target for neuroprotection in stroke and neurodegenerative diseases. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2006, 34, 1341–1346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Garrido-Gil, P.; Joglar, B.; Rodriguez-Perez, A.I.; Guerra, M.J.; Labandeira-Garcia, J.L. Involvement of PPAR-γ in the neuroprotective and anti-inflammatory effects of angiotensin type 1 receptor inhibition: Effects of the receptor antagonist telmisartan and receptor deletion in a mouse MPTP model of Parkinson’s disease. J. Neuroinflamm. 2012, 9, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Scuderi, C.; Valenza, M.; Stecca, C.; Esposito, G.; Carratù, M.R.; Steardo, L. Palmitoylethanolamide exerts neuroprotective effects in mixed neuroglial cultures and organotypic hippocampal slices via peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α. J. Neuroinflamm. 2012, 9, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Jin, J.; Albertz, J.; Guo, Z.; Peng, Q.; Rudow, G.; Troncoso, J.C.; Ross, C.A.; Duan, W. Neuroprotective effects of PPAR-γ agonist rosiglitazone in N171-82Q mouse model of Huntington’s disease. J. Neurochem. 2013, 125, 410–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Barbiero, J.K.; Santiago, R.M.; Persike, D.S.; Da Silva Fernandes, M.J.; Tonin, F.S.; Da Cunha, C.; Boschen, S.L.; Lima, M.M.S.; Vital, M.A.B.F. Neuroprotective effects of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha and gamma agonists in model of parkinsonism induced by intranigral 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahyropyridine. Behav. Brain Res. 2014, 274, 390–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Scuderi, C.; Steardo, L.; Esposito, G. Cannabidiol promotes amyloid precursor protein ubiquitination and reduction of beta amyloid expression in SHSY5YAPP+ cells through PPARγ involvement. Phytother. Res. 2014, 28, 1007–1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Bernardo, A.; Bianchi, D.; Magnaghi, V.; Minghetti, L. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma agonists promote differentiation and antioxidant defenses of oligodendrocyte progenitor cells. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 2009, 68, 797–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Barbierato, M.; Facci, L.; Marinelli, C.; Zusso, M.; Argentini, C.; Skaper, S.D.; Giusti, P. Co-ultramicronized Palmitoylethanolamide/Luteolin Promotes the Maturation of Oligodendrocyte Precursor Cells. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 16676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Facci, L.; Barbierato, M.; Fusco, M.; Giusti, P.; Zusso, M. Co-Ultramicronized Palmitoylethanolamide/Luteolin-Induced Oligodendrocyte Precursor Cell Differentiation is Associated with Tyro3 Receptor Upregulation. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 698133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Contarini, G.; Franceschini, D.; Facci, L.; Barbierato, M.; Giusti, P.; Zusso, M. A co-ultramicronized palmitoylethanolamide/luteolin composite mitigates clinical score and disease-relevant molecular markers in a mouse model of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J. Neuroinflamm. 2019, 16, 126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Scuderi, C.; Esposito, G.; Blasio, A.; Valenza, M.; Arietti, P.; Steardo, L., Jr.; Carnuccio, R.; De Filippis, D.; Petrosino, S.; Iuvone, T.; et al. Palmitoylethanolamide counteracts reactive astrogliosis induced by β-amyloid peptide. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2011, 15, 2664–2674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. D’Agostino, G.; Russo, R.; Avagliano, C.; Cristiano, C.; Meli, R.; Calignano, A. Palmitoylethanolamide protects against the amyloid-β25-35-induced learning and memory impairment in mice, an experimental model of Alzheimer disease. Neuropsychopharmacology 2012, 37, 1784–1792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Bronzuoli, M.R.; Facchinetti, R.; Steardo, L., Jr.; Romano, A.; Stecca, C.; Passarella, S.; Cassano, T.; Scuderi, C. Palmitoylethanolamide Dampens Reactive Astrogliosis and Improves Neuronal Trophic Support in a Triple Transgenic Model of Alzheimer’s Disease: In Vitro and In Vivo Evidence. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2018, 2018, 4720532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Scuderi, C.; Bronzuoli, M.R.; Facchinetti, R.; Pace, L.; Ferraro, L.; Broad, K.D.; Serviddio, G.; Bellanti, F.; Palombelli, G.; Carpinelli, G.; et al. Ultramicronized palmitoylethanolamide rescues learning and memory impairments in a triple transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease by exerting anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective effects. Transl. Psychiatry 2018, 8, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Facchinetti, R.; Valenza, M.; Bronzuoli, M.R.; Menegoni, G.; Ratano, P.; Steardo, L.; Campolongo, P.; Scuderi, C. Looking for a Treatment for the Early Stage of Alzheimer’s Disease: Preclinical Evidence with Co-Ultramicronized Palmitoylethanolamide and Luteolin. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 3802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Barbierato, M.; Skaper, S.D.; Facci, L. Oligodendrocyte Progenitor Cell Cultures: A Model to Screen Neurotrophic Compounds for Myelin Repair. Methods Mol. Biol. 2018, 1727, 155–166. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  46. Skaper, S.D.; Facci, L. Culture of Neonatal Rodent Microglia, Astrocytes, and Oligodendrocytes from the Cortex, Spinal Cord, and Cerebellum. Methods Mol. Biol. 2018, 1727, 49–61. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  47. Dahlgren, K.N.; Manelli, A.M.; Stine, W.B., Jr.; Baker, L.K.; Krafft, G.A.; LaDu, M.J. Oligomeric and fibrillar species of amyloid-beta peptides differentially affect neuronal viability. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 32046–32053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Ahmed, M.; Davis, J.; Aucoin, D.; Sato, T.; Ahuja, S.; Aimoto, S. Structural conversion of neurotoxic amyloid-beta (1-42) oligomers to fibrils. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2010, 17, 561–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Stine, W.B.; Jungbauer, L.; Yu, C.; LaDu, M.J. Preparing synthetic Aβ in different aggregation states. Methods Mol. Biol. 2011, 670, 13–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Roth, A.D.; Ramírez, G.; Alarcón, R.; Von Bernhardi, R. Oligodendrocytes damage in Alzheimer’s disease: Beta amyloid toxicity and inflammation. Biol. Res. 2005, 38, 381–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Horiuchi, M.; Maezawa, I.; Itoh, A.; Wakayama, K.; Jin, L.W.; Itoh, T.; DeCarli, C. Amyloid β1-42 oligomer inhibits myelin sheet formation in vitro. Neurobiol. Aging 2012, 33, 499–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Bronzuoli, M.R.; Facchinetti, R.; Ingrassia, D.; Sarvadio, M.; Schiavi, S.; Steardo, L.; Verkhratsky, A.; Trezza, V.; Scuderi, C. Neuroglia in the autistic brain: Evidence from a preclinical model. Mol. Autism 2018, 9, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Pfaffl, M.W. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001, 29, e45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Bronzuoli, M.R.; Facchinetti, R.; Valenza, M.; Cassano, T.; Steardo, L.; Scuderi, C. Astrocyte Function Is Affected by Aging and Not Alzheimer’s Disease: A Preliminary Investigation in Hippocampi of 3xTg-AD Mice. Front. Pharmacol. 2019, 10, 644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Vanzulli, I.; Papanikolaou, M.; De-La-Rocha, I.C.; Pieropan, F.; Rivera, A.D.; Gomez-Nicola, D.; Verkhratsky, A.; Julio Rodríguez, J.; Butt, A.M. Disruption of oligodendrocyte progenitor cells is an early sign of pathology in the triple transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol. Aging 2020, 94, 130–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Schindelin, J.; Arganda-Carreras, I.; Frise, E.; Kaynig, V.; Longair, M.; Pietzsch, T.; Preibisch, S.; Rueden, C.; Saalfeld, S.; Schmid, B.; et al. Fiji: An open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 2012, 9, 676–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Ferreira, T.A.; Blackman, A.V.; Oyrer, J.; Jayabal, S.; Chung, A.J.; Watt, A.J.; Sjöström, P.J.; van Meyel, D.J. Neuronal morphometry directly from bitmap images. Nat. Methods 2014, 11, 982–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Barateiro, A.; Fernandes, A. Temporal oligodendrocyte lineage progression: In vitro models of proliferation, differentiation and myelination. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2014, 1843, 1917–1929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Janowska, J.; Ziemka-Nalecz, M.; Sypecka, J. The Differentiation of Rat Oligodendroglial Cells Is Highly Influenced by the Oxygen Tension: In Vitro Model Mimicking Physiologically Normoxic Conditions. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Willis, C.M.; Nicaise, A.M.; Bongarzone, E.R.; Givogri, M.; Reiter, C.R.; Heintz, O.; Jellison, E.R.; Sutter, P.A.; TeHennepe, G.; Ananda, G.; et al. Astrocyte Support for Oligodendrocyte Differentiation can be Conveyed via Extracellular Vesicles but Diminishes with Age. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Zecević, N.; Andjelković, A.; Matthieu, J.M.; Tosić, M. Myelin basic protein immunoreactivity in the human embryonic CNS. Brain Res. Dev. Brain Res. 1998, 105, 97–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Kuhn, S.; Gritti, L.; Crooks, D.; Dombrowski, Y. Oligodendrocytes in Development, Myelin Generation and Beyond. Cells 2019, 8, 1424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Nishibori, M.; Wang, D.; Ousaka, D.; Wake, H. High Mobility Group Box-1 and Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption. Cells 2020, 9, 2650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Escartin, C.; Galea, E.; Lakatos, A.; O’Callaghan, J.P.; Petzold, G.C.; Serrano-Pozo, A.; Steinhäuser, C.; Volterra, A.; Carmignoto, G.; Agarwal, A.; et al. Reactive astrocyte nomenclature, definitions, and future directions. Nat. Neurosci. 2021, 24, 312–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Levine, J. The reactions and role of NG2 glia in spinal cord injury. Brain Res. 2016, 1638, 199–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Rodríguez, J.J.; Butt, A.M.; Gardenal, E.; Parpura, V.; Verkhratsky, A. Complex and differential glial responses in Alzheimer’s disease and ageing. Curr. Alzheimer Res. 2016, 13, 343–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Dong, Y.X.; Zhang, H.Y.; Li, H.Y.; Liu, P.H.; Sui, Y.; Sun, X.H. Association between Alzheimer’s disease pathogenesis and early demyelination and oligodendrocyte dysfunction. Neural Regen. Res. 2018, 13, 908–914. [Google Scholar]
  68. Li, W.; Tang, Y.; Fan, Z.; Meng, Y.; Yang, G.; Luo, J.; Ke, Z.-J. Autophagy is involved in oligodendroglial precursor-mediated clearance of amyloid peptide. Mol. Neurodegener. 2013, 8, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Nielsen, H.M.; Ek, D.; Avdic, U.; Orbjörn, C.; Hansson, O.; Veerhuis, R.; Rozemuller, A.J.M.; Brun, A.; Minthon, L.; Wennström, M.; et al. NG2 cells, a new trail for Alzheimer’s disease mechanisms? Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 2013, 1, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Zhang, P.; Kishimoto, Y.; Grammatikakis, I.; Gottimukkala, K.; Cutler, R.G.; Zhang, S.; Abdelmohsen, K.; Bohr, V.A.; Sen, J.M.; Gorospe, M.; et al. Senolytic therapy alleviates Aβ-associated oligodendrocyte progenitor cell senescence and cognitive deficits in an Alzheimer’s disease model. Nat. Neurosci. 2019, 22, 719–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Verkhratsky, A.; Parpura, V.; Li, B.; Scuderi, C. Astrocytes: The Housekeepers and Guardians of the CNS. Adv. Neurobiol. 2021, 26, 21–53. [Google Scholar]
  72. Phatnani, H.; Maniatis, T. Astrocytes in neurodegenerative disease. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2015, 7, a020628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. De Waard, D.M.; Bugiani, M. Astrocyte-Oligodendrocyte-Microglia Crosstalk in Astrocytopathies. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2020, 14, 608073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Scuderi, C.; Verkhratsky, A.; Parpura, V.; Li, B. Neuroglia in Psychiatric Disorders. Adv. Neurobiol. 2021, 26, 3–19. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  75. Verkhratsky, A.; Li, B.; Scuderi, C.; Parpura, V. Principles of Astrogliopathology. Adv. Neurobiol. 2021, 26, 55–73. [Google Scholar]
  76. Bronzuoli, M.R.; Facchinetti, R.; Steardo, L.; Scuderi, C. Astrocyte: An Innovative Approach for Alzheimer’s Disease Therapy. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2017, 23, 4979–4989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Valenza, M.; Facchinetti, R.; Menegoni, G.; Steardo, L.; Scuderi, C. Alternative Targets to Fight Alzheimer’s Disease: Focus on Astrocytes. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Merrill, J.E. Effects of interleukin-1 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha on astrocytes, microglia, oligodendrocytes, and glial precursors in vitro. Dev. Neurosci. 1991, 13, 130–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Okuda, Y.; Sakoda, S.; Fujimura, H.; Saeki, Y.; Kishimoto, T.; Yanagihara, T. IL-6 plays a crucial role in the induction phase of myelin oligodendrocyte glucoprotein 35–55 induced experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J. Neuroimmunol. 1999, 101, 188–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Singh, I.; Pahan, K.; Khan, M.; Singh, A.K. Cytokine-mediated induction of ceramide production is redox-sensitive. Implications to proinflammatory cytokine-mediated apoptosis in demyelinating diseases. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 20354–20362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Jantaratnotai, N.; Ryu, J.K.; Kim, S.U.; McLarnon, J.G. Amyloid beta peptide-induced corpus callosum damage and glial activation in vivo. Neuroreport 2003, 14, 1429–1433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Lee, J.T.; Xu, J.; Lee, J.M.; Ku, G.; Han, X.; Yang, D.I.; Chen, S.; Hsu, C.Y. Amyloid-beta peptide induces oligodendrocyte death by activating the neutral sphingomyelinase-ceramide pathway. J. Cell Biol. 2004, 164, 123–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Wu, Y.; Ma, Y.; Liu, Z.; Geng, Q.; Chen, Z.; Zhang, Y. Alterations of myelin morphology and oligodendrocyte development in early stage of Alzheimer’s disease mouse model. Neurosci. Lett. 2017, 642, 102–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Franklin, R.J.M.; Ffrench-Constant, C. Regenerating CNS myelin—From mechanisms to experimental medicines. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2017, 18, 753–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Hesp, Z.C.; Goldstein, E.Z.; Miranda, C.J.; Kaspar, B.K.; McTigue, D.M. Chronic oligodendrogenesis and remyelination after spinal cord injury in mice and rats. J. Neurosci. 2015, 35, 1274–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Calabrò, R.S.; Naro, A.; de Luca, R.; Leonardi, S.; Russo, M.; Marra, A.; Bramanti, P. PEALut efficacy in mild cognitive impairment: Evidence from a SPECT case study! Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 2016, 28, 1279–1282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Caltagirone, C.; Cisari, C.; Schievano, C.; Di Paola, R.; Cordaro, M.; Bruschetta, G.; Esposito, E.; Cuzzocrea, S.; Stroke Study Group. Co-ultramicronized Palmitoylethanolamide/Luteolin in the Treatment of Cerebral Ischemia: From Rodent to Man. Transl. Stroke Res. 2016, 7, 54–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  88. Bellanti, F.; Naik, B.V.; Moola, A.; Villani, R.; Scuderi, C.; Steardo, L.; Palombelli, G.; Canese, R.; Beggiato, S.; Altamura, M.; et al. Effects of Ultramicronized Palmitoylethanolamide on Mitochondrial Bioenergetics, Cerebral Metabolism, and Glutamatergic Transmission: An Integrated Approach in a Triple Transgenic Mouse Model of Alzheimer’s Disease. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2022, 14, 890855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Moreno, S.; Cerù, M.P. In search for novel strategies towards neuroprotection and neuroregeneration: Is PPARα a promising therapeutic target? Neural Regen. Res. 2015, 10, 1409–1412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Bauer, N.G.; Richter-Landsberg, C.; Ffrench-Constant, C. Role of the oligodendroglial cytoskeleton in differentiation and myelination. Glia 2009, 57, 1691–1705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Snaidero, N.; Simons, M. Myelination at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 2014, 127, 2999–3004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Rankin, L.; Fowler, C.J. The Basal Pharmacology of Palmitoylethanolamide. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 7942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Biomedicines 10 01236 g001 550
Figure 1. Experimental design, characterization of OPCs maturation and effects of treatments. (a) Schematic representation of the experimental design. (b) MBP+/Olig2+ cell count at 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9 days in vitro (DIV). (c) Astrocyte viability after 48 h treatment with human fibrillary Aβ1–42 (0–0.5–1–5–10 µm). (d) Astrocyte viability tested by neutral red uptake assay after 48 h treatment with co-ultra PEALut (0–0.5–1–3–7 µm). (e) Astrocyte viability tested by neutral red uptake assay after 48 h treatment with GW6471 (0–0.25–1–3–7 µm). (f) Astrocyte and (g) oligodendrocytes viability after 48 h treatment with either complete DMEM or Sato medium (CTRL), Aβ1–42 1 µm, co-ultra PEALut 3 µm, GW6471 3 µm, Pluronic F-68, and DMSO. Data are plotted as mean ± SEM and expressed as percentage variations to the control group (CTRL). ** p < 0.01 vs. CTRL (Dunnett’s test).
Figure 1. Experimental design, characterization of OPCs maturation and effects of treatments. (a) Schematic representation of the experimental design. (b) MBP+/Olig2+ cell count at 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9 days in vitro (DIV). (c) Astrocyte viability after 48 h treatment with human fibrillary Aβ1–42 (0–0.5–1–5–10 µm). (d) Astrocyte viability tested by neutral red uptake assay after 48 h treatment with co-ultra PEALut (0–0.5–1–3–7 µm). (e) Astrocyte viability tested by neutral red uptake assay after 48 h treatment with GW6471 (0–0.25–1–3–7 µm). (f) Astrocyte and (g) oligodendrocytes viability after 48 h treatment with either complete DMEM or Sato medium (CTRL), Aβ1–42 1 µm, co-ultra PEALut 3 µm, GW6471 3 µm, Pluronic F-68, and DMSO. Data are plotted as mean ± SEM and expressed as percentage variations to the control group (CTRL). ** p < 0.01 vs. CTRL (Dunnett’s test).
Biomedicines 10 01236 g001
Biomedicines 10 01236 g002 550
Figure 2. Effects of Aβ1–42 on astrocytes. (a) Representative photomicrographs of GFAP immunolabeled cells. Results from western blot experiments show increased expression of GFAP (b), GS (c), and HMGB1 (d) in astrocytes treated with human fibrillary Aβ1–42 1 µm for 48 h compared with vehicle-treated cells (CTRL). Data are plotted as mean ± SEM and expressed as percentage variations vs. CTRL. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01 vs. CTRL (Student’s t-test).
Figure 2. Effects of Aβ1–42 on astrocytes. (a) Representative photomicrographs of GFAP immunolabeled cells. Results from western blot experiments show increased expression of GFAP (b), GS (c), and HMGB1 (d) in astrocytes treated with human fibrillary Aβ1–42 1 µm for 48 h compared with vehicle-treated cells (CTRL). Data are plotted as mean ± SEM and expressed as percentage variations vs. CTRL. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01 vs. CTRL (Student’s t-test).
Biomedicines 10 01236 g002
Biomedicines 10 01236 g003 550
Figure 3. Co-ultra PEALut blunts the Aβ1–42-induced reactive and proinflammatory astrocyte phenotype. Astrocytic transcriptional changes of GFAP (a) and S100B (b), two markers of astrocyte reactivity, proinflammatory mediators p50NFκB (c), IL-6 (d), and IL-1β (e), and growth factors FGF2 (f), and TGF-β (g). Treatments with human fibrillary Aβ1–42 1 µm in the presence or absence of co-ultra PEALut 3 µm and GW6471 3 µm (or respective vehicles) were added to the culture media of primary astrocytes set in co-cultures with OPCs. Primary astrocytes were collected 48 h later and processed for RT-qPCR. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM of the fold change to the vehicle-treated group (CTRL). * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001 vs. CTRL; ° p < 0.05; °° p < 0.01; °°° p < 0.001 vs. Aβ1–42; $$ p < 0.01; $$$ p < 0.001 vs. Aβ1–42 + co-ultra PEALut (SNK test).
Figure 3. Co-ultra PEALut blunts the Aβ1–42-induced reactive and proinflammatory astrocyte phenotype. Astrocytic transcriptional changes of GFAP (a) and S100B (b), two markers of astrocyte reactivity, proinflammatory mediators p50NFκB (c), IL-6 (d), and IL-1β (e), and growth factors FGF2 (f), and TGF-β (g). Treatments with human fibrillary Aβ1–42 1 µm in the presence or absence of co-ultra PEALut 3 µm and GW6471 3 µm (or respective vehicles) were added to the culture media of primary astrocytes set in co-cultures with OPCs. Primary astrocytes were collected 48 h later and processed for RT-qPCR. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM of the fold change to the vehicle-treated group (CTRL). * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001 vs. CTRL; ° p < 0.05; °° p < 0.01; °°° p < 0.001 vs. Aβ1–42; $$ p < 0.01; $$$ p < 0.001 vs. Aβ1–42 + co-ultra PEALut (SNK test).
Biomedicines 10 01236 g003
Biomedicines 10 01236 g004 550
Figure 4. Co-ultra PEALut dampens the altered MBP+/Olig2+ ratio caused by Aβ1–42. (a) Representative photomicrographs of MBP (red) and Olig2 (green) staining of primary oligodendrocytes obtained using a 20× objective mounted on a fluorescent microscope. Cell nuclei were stained with Hoechst (blue). Scale bar is 40 μm. (b) MBP+ cell count. (c) Olig2+ cell count. (d) The ratio of MBP+ to Olig2+ cell counts. Treatments with human fibrillary Aβ1–42 1 µm in the presence or absence of co-ultra PEALut 3 µm, GW6471 3 µm (or respective vehicles) were added to the astrocytic culture medium. Semi-permeable inserts containing the primary oligodendrocytes were collected 48 h later and processed by immunofluorescence. Data are plotted as mean ± SEM and expressed as percentage variations vs. the vehicle-treated group (CTRL). * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01 vs. CTRL; ° p < 0.05 vs. Aβ (SNK test).
Figure 4. Co-ultra PEALut dampens the altered MBP+/Olig2+ ratio caused by Aβ1–42. (a) Representative photomicrographs of MBP (red) and Olig2 (green) staining of primary oligodendrocytes obtained using a 20× objective mounted on a fluorescent microscope. Cell nuclei were stained with Hoechst (blue). Scale bar is 40 μm. (b) MBP+ cell count. (c) Olig2+ cell count. (d) The ratio of MBP+ to Olig2+ cell counts. Treatments with human fibrillary Aβ1–42 1 µm in the presence or absence of co-ultra PEALut 3 µm, GW6471 3 µm (or respective vehicles) were added to the astrocytic culture medium. Semi-permeable inserts containing the primary oligodendrocytes were collected 48 h later and processed by immunofluorescence. Data are plotted as mean ± SEM and expressed as percentage variations vs. the vehicle-treated group (CTRL). * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01 vs. CTRL; ° p < 0.05 vs. Aβ (SNK test).
Biomedicines 10 01236 g004
Biomedicines 10 01236 g005 550
Figure 5. Co-ultra PEALut prevents oligodendrocyte shrinkage caused by Aβ1–42. (a) Representative thresholded (white color) photomicrographs of MBP+ cells taken under a 40× objective mounted on a fluorescent microscope. Scale bar is 20 μm. (b) Quantification of total MBP+ cell surface area expressed in µm2. Cell contours were manually drawn using Fiji. Data are plotted as mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05 vs. CTRL; ° p < 0.05 vs. Aβ (SNK test).
Figure 5. Co-ultra PEALut prevents oligodendrocyte shrinkage caused by Aβ1–42. (a) Representative thresholded (white color) photomicrographs of MBP+ cells taken under a 40× objective mounted on a fluorescent microscope. Scale bar is 20 μm. (b) Quantification of total MBP+ cell surface area expressed in µm2. Cell contours were manually drawn using Fiji. Data are plotted as mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05 vs. CTRL; ° p < 0.05 vs. Aβ (SNK test).
Biomedicines 10 01236 g005
Biomedicines 10 01236 g006 550
Figure 6. Co-ultra PEALut limits the Aβ1–42-induced alterations in oligodendrocyte morphology. (a) Representative photomicrographs of MBP+ cells taken using a 40× objective mounted on a fluorescent microscope. Scale bar is 10 μm. (b) Eight-bit image of a representative MBP+ cell, used in the Sholl analysis, in which concentric circles were juxtaposed on each MBP+ cell starting from 10 μm far from the cell soma and spaced 5 μm apart. (c) Maximum number of intersections, that is the highest number of processes/branches counted in each MBP+ cell. (d) Sum of intersections, that is the number of intersections counted in each circle. (e) Mean of intersections, that is the ratio sum of intersections /number of circles. (f) Number of intersections counted every 5 µm starting from 10 μm far from the cell soma until 30 μm. At least 20 cells per animal were counted. Data are plotted as mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001 vs. CTRL; ° p < 0.05; °° p < 0.01; °°° p < 0.001 vs. Aβ1–42; $ p < 0.05; $$ p < 0.01; $$$ p < 0.001 vs. Aβ1–42 + co-ultra PEALut (SNK).
Figure 6. Co-ultra PEALut limits the Aβ1–42-induced alterations in oligodendrocyte morphology. (a) Representative photomicrographs of MBP+ cells taken using a 40× objective mounted on a fluorescent microscope. Scale bar is 10 μm. (b) Eight-bit image of a representative MBP+ cell, used in the Sholl analysis, in which concentric circles were juxtaposed on each MBP+ cell starting from 10 μm far from the cell soma and spaced 5 μm apart. (c) Maximum number of intersections, that is the highest number of processes/branches counted in each MBP+ cell. (d) Sum of intersections, that is the number of intersections counted in each circle. (e) Mean of intersections, that is the ratio sum of intersections /number of circles. (f) Number of intersections counted every 5 µm starting from 10 μm far from the cell soma until 30 μm. At least 20 cells per animal were counted. Data are plotted as mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001 vs. CTRL; ° p < 0.05; °° p < 0.01; °°° p < 0.001 vs. Aβ1–42; $ p < 0.05; $$ p < 0.01; $$$ p < 0.001 vs. Aβ1–42 + co-ultra PEALut (SNK).
Biomedicines 10 01236 g006
Table
Table 1. Western blot conditions.
Table 1. Western blot conditions.
Primary AntibodyBrandDilutionSecondary AntibodyBrandDilution
Rabbit α-GFAPAbcam1:25,000
5% milk in TBS-T 0.1%		HRP conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgGJackson ImmunoResearch1:10,000
5% milk in TBS-T 0.1%
Rabbit α-GSMillipore1:500
5% milk in TBS-T 0.1%		HRP conjugated goat anti-mouse IgGJackson ImmunoResearch1:10,000
5% milk in TBS-T 0.1%
Rabbit α-HMGB1BioLegend1:1000
5% milk in TBS-T 0.1%		HRP conjugated goat anti-mouse IgGJackson ImmunoResearch1:10,000
5% milk in TBS-T 0.1%
GFAP: glial fibrillary acidic protein; GS: glutamine synthetase; HMGB1: high mobility group box 1; TBS-T: tris buffered saline tween 20; HRP: horseradish peroxidase.
Table
Table 2. RT-qPCR parameters and list of primers.
Table 2. RT-qPCR parameters and list of primers.
GeneBrandPrimer (5′ → 3′)Ann. (60 °C)Efficiency (%)R2
IL-1βBio-RadForwardN/A (Cod. qRnoCID0004680)6098.00.999
Reverse
IL-6Sigma
Aldrich		ForwardCAGAGTCATTCAGAGCAATAC6096.10.997
ReverseCTTTCAAGATGAGTTGGATGG
TGF-βBio-RadForwardN/A (Cod. qRnoCID0006448)60102.00.999
Reverse
FGF2Bio-RadForwardN/A (Cod. qRnoCID0003540)6096.00.999
Reverse
p50NFκBBio-RadForwardN/A (Cod. qRnoCID0003698)6092.00.997
Reverse
GFAPSigma
Aldrich		ForwardCGGCTCTGAGAGAGATTCGC60101.70.994
ReverseGCAAACTTGGACCGATACCA
S100BBio-Fab
Research (Roma, Italy)		ForwardTCAGGGAGAGAGGGTGACAA60106.40.994
ReverseACACTCCCCATCCCCATCTT
GAPDHBio-Fab
research		ForwardGCGAGATCCCGCTAACATCAAAT60100.00.999
ReverseGCCATCCACAGTCTTCTGAGTGG
Ann.: annealing; IL: interleukin; TGF-β: transforming growth factor-β; FGF2: fibroblast growth factor 2; NFκB: nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells; GFAP: glial fibrillary acidic protein; GAPDH: glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase.
Table
Table 3. Immunofluorescence conditions.
Table 3. Immunofluorescence conditions.
Primary AntibodyBrandDilutionSecondary
Antibody		BrandDilution
Rabbit α-Olig2Santa Cruz1:200
5% BSA in PBS/0.25% Triton X-100		FITC conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (H + L) Jackson
ImmunoResearch		1:200, 5% BSA in PBS/0.25% triton X-100
Mouse α-MBPSanta Cruz1:200
5% BSA in PBS/0.25% Triton X-100		TRITC conjugated goat anti-mouse
IgG (H + L) 		Jackson
ImmunoResearch		1:200, 5% BSA in PBS/0.25% triton X-100
Mouse α-GFAPAbcam1:1500
5% BSA in PBS/0.25% Triton X-100		FITC conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (H + L) Jackson
ImmunoResearch		1:200, 5% BSA in PBS/0.25% triton X-100
MBP: myelin basic protein; GFAP: glial fibrillary acidic protein; BSA: bovine serum albumin; FITC: fluorescein isothiocyanate; TRITC: tetramethyl rhodamine; PBS: phosphate buffer saline.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Facchinetti, R.; Valenza, M.; Gomiero, C.; Mancini, G.F.; Steardo, L.; Campolongo, P.; Scuderi, C. Co-Ultramicronized Palmitoylethanolamide/Luteolin Restores Oligodendrocyte Homeostasis via Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-α in an In Vitro Model of Alzheimer’s Disease. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 1236. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10061236

AMA Style

Facchinetti R, Valenza M, Gomiero C, Mancini GF, Steardo L, Campolongo P, Scuderi C. Co-Ultramicronized Palmitoylethanolamide/Luteolin Restores Oligodendrocyte Homeostasis via Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-α in an In Vitro Model of Alzheimer’s Disease. Biomedicines. 2022; 10(6):1236. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10061236

Chicago/Turabian Style

Facchinetti, Roberta, Marta Valenza, Chiara Gomiero, Giulia Federica Mancini, Luca Steardo, Patrizia Campolongo, and Caterina Scuderi. 2022. "Co-Ultramicronized Palmitoylethanolamide/Luteolin Restores Oligodendrocyte Homeostasis via Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-α in an In Vitro Model of Alzheimer’s Disease" Biomedicines 10, no. 6: 1236. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10061236

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop