Next Article in Journal
Hydrogen Inhalation Reduces Lung Inflammation and Blood Pressure in the Experimental Model of Pulmonary Hypertension in Rats
Next Article in Special Issue
The Effects of IL-23/IL-18-Polarized Neutrophils on Renal Ischemia–Reperfusion Injury and Allogeneic-Skin-Graft Rejection in Mice
Previous Article in Journal
Uncovering the Neural Correlates of Anhedonia Subtypes in Major Depressive Disorder: Implications for Intervention Strategies
Previous Article in Special Issue
SKAP2—A Molecule at the Crossroads for Integrin Signalling and Immune Cell Migration and Function
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Inflammation in Prostate Cancer: Exploring the Promising Role of Phenolic Compounds as an Innovative Therapeutic Approach

by
Raquel Fernandes
1,*,
Cátia Costa
1,
Rúben Fernandes
2,3,4 and
Ana Novo Barros
1,*
1
Centre for Research and Technology of Agro-Environmental and Biological Sciences, CITAB, Inov4Agro, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, UTAD, Quinta de Prados, 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal
2
FP-I3ID, Instituto de Investigação, Inovação e Desenvolvimento, FP-BHS, Biomedical and Health Sciences, Universidade Fernando Pessoa, 4249-004 Porto, Portugal
3
CECLIN, Centro de Estudos Clínicos, Hospital Fernando Pessoa, 4420-096 Gondomar, Portugal
4
I3S, Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomedicines 2023, 11(12), 3140; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11123140
Submission received: 31 October 2023 / Revised: 20 November 2023 / Accepted: 23 November 2023 / Published: 24 November 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pathophysiological Mechanisms of Leukocyte Activation and Recruitment)

Abstract

:
Prostate cancer (PCa) remains a significant global health concern, being a major cause of cancer morbidity and mortality worldwide. Furthermore, profound understanding of the disease is needed. Prostate inflammation caused by external or genetic factors is a central player in prostate carcinogenesis. However, the mechanisms underlying inflammation-driven PCa remain poorly understood. This review dissects the diagnosis methods for PCa and the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying the disease, clarifying the dynamic interplay between inflammation and leukocytes in promoting tumour development and spread. It provides updates on recent advances in elucidating and treating prostate carcinogenesis, and opens new insights for the use of bioactive compounds in PCa. Polyphenols, with their noteworthy antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties, along with their synergistic potential when combined with conventional treatments, offer promising prospects for innovative therapeutic strategies. Evidence from the use of polyphenols and polyphenol-based nanoparticles in PCa revealed their positive effects in controlling tumour growth, proliferation, and metastasis. By consolidating the diverse features of PCa research, this review aims to contribute to increased understanding of the disease and stimulate further research into the role of polyphenols and polyphenol-based nanoparticles in its management.

1. Introduction

The prostate, a walnut-shaped gland in males, plays a vital role in the production of seminal fluid, which serves to nourish and transport sperm [1]. Several risk factors including age, ethnicity, genetic predisposing, infection, obesity, and diet, have been linked to the development of prostate malignancies, subsequently leading to prostate inflammation and carcinogenesis [2]. Prostate cancer (PCa) stands as a significant cause of morbidity and cancer-related deaths among men [3]. As the population ages and the prevalence of food processing, coupled with poor dietary habits, continues to rise, there is an anticipated increase in the absolute number of PCa cases [4,5]. However, it is crucial to note that the association between a high-fat diet and obesity as risk factors for PCa development remains a subject of controversy, a topic that will be explored in the following sections. Inflammation is a pivotal player in the development of prostate carcinogenesis. Dysregulation in the mechanisms governing the production and activation of inflammatory cells contributes to abnormal damage within the prostate tissue. Furthermore, the prostate tumour microenvironment hosts highly heterogeneous and plastic cell populations, which leads to patient resistance to therapies and heightened disease recurrence [6]. PCa cells may be modulated into different phenotypes in response to different signals. Consequently, immune cells such as neutrophils, basophils, eosinophils, mast cells, macrophages, and B and T lymphocytes within the tumour microenvironment can be activated into either pro-tumoral or anti-tumoral phenotypes. The precise roles of each immune population in PCa progression, as well as the controversial aspects surrounding the inflammatory mediators they produce, remain subjects of debate in the literature. In most reviewing articles available, the primary focus is on immune populations with higher prevalence in PCa and their roles in promoting cancer progression through pro-inflammatory mediators. However, it is crucial to recognize the importance of other immune populations that influence the phenotype of tumour-associated infiltrates. Additionally, the specific mechanisms governing cytokine and chemokine production from distinct immune populations, along with their roles in particular pathways, are areas where gaps in knowledge persist.
Recent investigations have explored the role of polyphenol compounds and their incorporation into nanoparticles in the context of PCa [7,8,9]. Data suggests that their capacity to scavenge free radicals and act as antioxidants could hold promise for improving PCa therapies. This article seeks to delve into the roles of various leukocyte populations, their production of inflammatory mediators, and their relationships with PCa progression. It will also provide a comprehensive exploration of the role of polyphenols in PCa development and progression, shedding light on potential avenues for their incorporation into nanoparticles. This innovative approach aims to enhance polyphenol delivery to target cells, thereby increasing the effectiveness of current therapies while reducing side effects and therapy resistance.

2. Epidemiology of Prostate Cancer

According to the World Health Organization (WHO) [10] the global incidence of PCa was 1,414,259 cases in 2020, with 375,304 reported deaths. PCa incidence varies significantly across different geographic regions and among ethnic groups. Incidence rates range from 6.3 to 83.4 cases per 100,000 people worldwide [11]. The countries with the highest PCa incidence are Northern Europe, Western Europe, and the Caribbean, while the highest mortality rates are observed in the Caribbean, Middle Africa, and Southern Africa [10]. Notably, Black men are more susceptible to PCa than White men, with a higher risk of aggressive carcinogenesis and mortality. These disparities may be attributed to factors such as mistrust of the healthcare system, lack of education, information, and access to diagnosis and treatment, as well as societal stigma associated with the disease [12]. Conversely, the high PCa incidence rates observed in developed countries can be attributed to proactive diagnosis and prevention measures established within healthcare systems. This includes the widespread practice of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing for screening [13]. Looking ahead to the next decade, the aging global population is expected to drive an increase in PCa cases to an estimated 1.7 million new cases and 499,000 deaths [14].

3. Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer

PCa is typically asymptomatic, which means that by the time it is clinically detected, it has usually reached an advanced stage and often metastasized to other organs. Consequently, clinical therapies tend to be ineffective at this stage, resulting in high mortality rates associated with PCa. Given this scenario, there was a pressing need to implement screening measures for this disease to diagnose it at a treatable stage. This need led to the discovery of the of PSA [15]. After its clinical implementation, the PSA test allowed for the detection of more cases of PCa, leading to an increase in its incidence [16,17]. In fact, the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) reported a 20% reduction of PCa mortality following PSA screening. However, this screening also led to overdiagnosis, causing increased anxiety due to false positive PSA tests, as well as complications related to further biopsies and hospitalizations [18].
According to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NNCN) Foundation, the clinical approach and guidelines for patient diagnosis depend on the stage of the disease [19]. If PSA levels are higher than normal for a patient’s age, it is recommended to perform additional imaging tests, biopsies, or genetic tests.
PSA, a serine protease produced in the prostate epithelium and overexpressed in PCa tissues, is widely used as a screening test for PCa diagnosis [20]. Normal PSA levels also vary with age. NNCCN defines normal PSA ranges as 0.0–2.5 ng/mL, 2.5–3.5 ng/mL, 3.5–4.5 ng/mL, and 4.5–6.5 ng/mL for patients between 40 and 49 years, 50 and 59 years, 60 and 69 years, and 70 and 79 years, respectively. In clinical practice, the PSA test is the most common screening method for PCa. If PSA levels are elevated but the patient exhibits no other symptoms of PCa, a second PSA test is recommended. Another used screening method is the digital rectal exam (DRE), which is a straightforward way to assess the size and texture of the prostate. Typically, this test is used in conjunction with the PSA test, taking into consideration factors such as age, race, or family history of PCa. If PSA levels are higher than normal or if patients have risk factors such as a family history, race, or age, suggesting a potential case of PCa, additional diagnostic tests become necessary (Figure 1).
PCa stages and cell patterns are defined by Gleason Patterns, which are used to estimate the tumour’s Gleason Score. According to the Gleason Score, the tumour’s classification is translated into a tumour grade group that estimates the risk of PCa. The Gleason Pattern ranges from 3 to 5, where 3 resembles normal cells, and 5 is attributed to cells with an abnormal pattern [21]. PCa cells exhibit significant heterogeneity, so the Gleason Pattern considers a primary pattern related to the pattern of cells found in the largest area of the tumour and a secondary pattern accounting for the second largest area [19]. The Gleason Score is the sum of these primary and secondary Gleason Patterns. Gleason Scores ranging from 2 (1 + 1) to 5 (3 + 2) are considered benign, with only tumours scoring 6 (3 + 3) or higher classified as malignant. A higher Gleason Score indicates that the tumour is more likely to grow and spread rapidly. Prostate tumours assigned a Gleason Score of 6 (3 + 3) or 7 (3 + 4 or 4 + 3) are considered low-grade and intermediate-grade, respectively, while tumours with a score of 8 (4 + 4, 3 + 5, or 5 + 3), 9 (4 + 5 or 5 + 4), or 10 (5 + 5) are categorized as high-grade [22]. Following this, a Grade Group, numbered 1 to 5, is assigned based on the Gleason Score, reflecting tumour aggressiveness. Grade Group 1 corresponds to a Gleason Score of 6 and represents the lowest score. Grade Group 2 (3 + 4) and 3 (4 + 4) correspond to a Gleason Score of 7 while Grade Groups 4 and 5 correspond to Gleason Scores of 8 and 9 or 10, respectively, representing the highest level of malignancy. Histologically, Grade Group 1 is characterized by individual, discrete, and well-formed glands. Grade Group 2 has predominantly well-formed glands with a few poorly-formed/fused/cribriform glands. Grade Group 3 has predominantly poorly formed/fused/cribriform glands with lesser (5%) component of well-formed glands. Grade Group 4 has only poorly formed/fused/cribriform glands (4 + 4), or predominantly well-formed glands and lesser component lacking glands (3 + 5), or predominantly lacking glands and lesser component of well-formed glands (5 + 3). Grade Group 5 has lack gland formation (or with necrosis) with or without poorly-formed/fused/cribriform glands (Table 1) [23].

4. Pathophysiology of Prostate Cancer

The prostate comprises a central zone (CZ) that contains the ductal tube from the seminal vesicle, the peripheral zone (PZ) located at the posterior region and where the majority of cancer appear, and the transitional zone (TZ) placed below the bladder [1]. The prostate consists of organized layers with three types of epithelial cells—basal, luminal, and neuroendocrine cells—a fibro-muscular network, an endothelial membrane, and immune cells [27]. Basal cells constitute 40% of the epithelium and are characterized by the expression of cytokeratin (KRT) 5, KRT14, KRT17, and p63. Luminal cells make up 60% of the total epithelium and express KRT8, KRT18, cluster of differentiation (CD) 26 and androgen-regulated secretory proteins such as kallikrein related peptidase 3 (KLK3). Neuroendocrine cells are found in lower percentages in the basal lamina, approximately 1%, and express chromogranin A (CHGA) [27,28] (Figure 2a,b).
Disruptions in the epithelial lineages, alterations in the number and phenotype of epithelial cells [29], along with mutations in tumour suppressors, oncogenes [30] and external factors that induce inflammation [2] can result in the dysregulation of the prostate environment. These events may lead to abnormal production of epithelial cells, including an overproduction of luminal cells and a decreased production of basal cells, constituting 99% and 0.1% of tumours, respectively. Simultaneously, there is a breakdown of the basement membrane, infiltration of immune cells, and increased stromal reactivity. Smooth muscle cells are replaced by activated fibroblasts and myofibroblasts, contributing to the heterogeneity and high plasticity of the tumour [27].
Firstly, an increase in the inflammatory response leads to proliferative inflammatory atrophy (PIA) (Figure 2c), which is characterized by a hyperproliferative response of the epithelia. Repeated cycles of cell injury and regeneration result in increased oxidative stress mediated by the inflammatory system [31]. These impact the increased levels of glutathione S-transferase P1 (GSTP1) in response to oxidant stress [32]. PIA regions also show an increased expression of p27Kip1 (also known as cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1B or CDKN1B), which inhibits the cell cycle, and B-cell lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2), which regulates apoptosis [32]. However, there is downregulation of tumour suppressor genes, including the transcription factor NK3 homeobox 1 (NKX3.1), which is essential for maintaining prostate cell fate and suppressing PCa initiation, and the tumour suppressor phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) gene [33]. PIA has been proposed as a precursor of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) and PCa (Figure 2d) [34]. The mechanisms underlying these transitions are not fully understood, but evidence suggest that PIA is an intermediate state to PIN [31]. This hypothesis is supported by the fact that PIA regions overlap with regions of tumour tissue, recognizing the sequence of events that occur after inflammation-induced prostate carcinogenesis [31].
PIN is characterized by luminal epithelial hyperplasia, reduction of basal cells, enlargement of nuclei, increased proliferative markers, loss of NKX3.1, and alteration of mitotic rates of the epithelial bilayer (Figure 2d) [35,36]. Studies have also demonstrated that PIN tissue overlaps with tumour tissue, supporting the hypothesis that PCa originates from this prostate state [37]. This phase of the disease is also characterized for telomere shortening [38], increase of genomic instability, chromosome mutations [39], and telomerase activation to restore telomere length, avoiding replicative cell senescence [39,40]. Studies also demonstrated the involvement of the ETS transcription factor rearrangements in PIN [41]. One of these mutations create a transmembrane serine protease isoform 2 (TMPRSS2)-ERG fusion gene, which increase the predisposition to tumour progression [42]. Additionally, missense mutations of the speckle-type POZ protein (SPOP) gene frequently occur in this phase. SPOP is a tumour suppressor protein and substrate adaptor of the cullin 3-RING-ubiquitin ligase (CUL3). SPOP mutations disrupt substrate binding and ubiquitination, leading to increased expression of oncogenic substrates [43].
Continued elevation of the inflammatory response and genetic alterations cause cellular damage leading to cancer progression. Increased influx of T cell infiltrates [44], tumour associated macrophages [45], and B cells [46] result in continuous damage to prostate tissue, leading to the production of a reactive milieu of pro-inflammatory cytokines and growth factors (Figure 2e). These events ultimately lead to the alteration of the epithelial niche toward a pro-inflammatory phenotype [47]. Concurrently, there is luminal cell hyperproliferation, loss of basal cells, and PTEN, and disintegration of the basement membrane, allowing tumour and tumour microenvironment cells to invade surrounding tissues [48]. During this phase, aberrantly differentiated cells acquire a telomerase-positive signature to maintain clonal heterogeneity and viability [49]. Additionally, there is a loss of the tumour suppressor retinoblastoma 1 (RB1) [50].

5. Current Therapeutic Strategies Used in Prostate Cancer

The current therapeutic strategies for PCa encompass a range of approaches, including active surveillance, surgery, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, and immunotherapy, often in combination [19].
Active surveillance involves a tailored plan for each patient, considering specific needs. Typically, this includes periodic PSA tests (once or twice a year), a DRE (once a year), and a prostate biopsy (every 1 to 3 years). This decision is made by a team of clinicians, generally for patients with lower-risk PCa, a life expectancy of 10 years or more, overall patient health, tumour characteristics, and potential side effects [51]. Illness uncertainty could be a potential adverse effect of this type of control.
Surgery aims to remove cancer and the type of procedure is determined by factors such as tumour size, location, and metastasis. Radical prostatectomy, which removes the entire prostate gland, is recommended for patients with local recurrence without metastasis after treatments such as radiotherapy, brachytherapy, or cryotherapy. Nevertheless, surgery is often associated with significant morbidity, including erectile dysfunction, urinary incontinence, and infertility [52].
Radiotherapy employs high-energy radiation, such as X-rays or gamma rays, to eliminate PCa cells. It can be used as an alternative to surgery or after surgery to prevent cancer recurrence. External beam radiation therapy delivers precise radiation to prostate tissue, sparing healthy cells, and is considered effective for intermediate-risk and high-risk PCa [53]. However, studies have shown that PCa cells can adapt to radiotherapy, increasing the risk of disease recurrence [54]. Side effects may include high urinary frequency, dysuria, diarrheal, proctitis, erectile dysfunction, and urinary incontinence [55]. Brachytherapy involves the direct delivery of radiation into the prostate gland using seeds, injections, or wires guided by transrectal ultrasounds. This technique can help preserve continence and erectile function but requires anaesthesia and may raise the risk of urinary retention [56].
Chemotherapy employs anticancer drugs to inhibit the survival, proliferation, and metastasis of tumour cells. Docetaxel is a common choice for PCa, acting by binding to β-tubulin and inhibiting microtubule depolymerization, mitotic cell division, and promoting apoptosis. Resistance to this drug may involve the upregulation of the multidrug resistance (MDR) 1 gene, which encodes P-glycoprotein [57]. Cabazitaxel is a second-generation therapy designed to counter docetaxel resistance, with low affinity for P-glycoprotein due to an additional methyl group [58]. Enzalutamide, a second-generation androgen receptor inhibitor, can act through competitive inhibition of androgen binding to the androgen receptor, inhibition of nuclear translocation, co-factor recruitment, and inhibition of DNA binding by the activated androgen receptor [59]. However, chemotherapy is associated with severe side effects in patients, including anaemia, neutropenia, nausea, vomiting, diarrheal, mucositis, ototoxicity, nephrotoxicity, pulmonary toxicity, and neurotoxicity [60].
Hormonal therapy, also known as androgen deprivation therapy, is commonly employed in advanced and metastasized PCa. It involves blocking hormone production, including testosterone, leading to the inhibition of androgen and androgen receptor signalling. This can be achieved through the use of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) analogues or antagonists. LHRH analogues, like leuprolide, goserelin, triptorelin, and histrelin, initially increase luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels by stimulating pituitary receptors. Subsequently, these drugs downregulate pituitary receptors, resulting in reduced LH and FSH levels and subsequent testosterone inhibition. LHRH antagonists, on the other hand, block pituitary receptors, triggering testosterone inhibition [61]. However, this therapy is associated with side effects such as hyperlipidaemia, fatigue, hot flashes, a flare effect, osteoporosis, insulin resistance, cardiovascular disease, anaemia, and sexual dysfunction [62].
Immunotherapy offers a promising approach to PCa treatment by manipulating the immune system’s response to fight cancer cells. Sipuleucel-T was the first FDA-approved immunotherapy for PCa. It involves collecting a patient’s immune cells, specifically dendritic cells, exposing them to a PCa protein, and then reinfusing these activated cells into the patient. This treatment has shown potential in extending survival in some patients with advanced PCa [63]. Checkpoint inhibitors, which block proteins like PD-1 and PD-L1 that prevent immune cells from attacking cancer cells, have been successful in other cancer types but have shown limited efficacy in PCa [64]. Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T) genetically engineers a patient’s T cells to target specific antigens on cancer cells, and it is being explored as a potential treatment for advanced PCa, focusing on antigens like prostate-specific membrane antigen [65]. Additionally, various vaccine-based approaches for PCa, including dendritic cell vaccines and viral vector-based vaccines, are under investigation to stimulate the patient’s immune system to recognize and combat PCa cells [66].

6. Inflammation and Prostate Cancer

Around 20% of all cancers are related with inflammation [67]. Different studies have suggested that inflammation plays a crucial role in prostatic carcinogenesis and tumour progression [68]. In fact, numbers have shown that inflammatory tissue is prevalent in 77.6% of prostate biopsy tissues and can even reach up to 80% in the general population [69].
Inflammation serves as a crucial immune response that occurs in the aftermath of injury or infection. It functions as an essential defence mechanism responsible for clearing pathogenic materials and debris from damaged tissues while also initiating the wound healing process [70]. Studies have demonstrated the role of neutrophils [71,72], B cells [73,74], T cells, [75,76,77], and macrophages [45,78,79,80] in PCa [81]. Persistent tissue damage leading to chronic inflammation or dysregulation of the inflammatory mechanisms promote increased release of inflammatory mediators, cytokines recruitment, expansion of leukocytes, and genomic instability [82]. Consequently, these processes can cause DNA damage in epithelial cells, which accumulates DNA mutations [83].
The impact of inflammation on PCa has been demonstrated in a population-based case-control trial [84]. This study revealed a 23% reduction in the risk of PCa associated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and an even stronger association among patients treated with cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) inhibitors. Another study reported that daily aspirin consumption led to a long-term reduction of 29% in PCa risk compared to non-consumers [85]. Additionally, statins were found to be correlated with a reduced risk of PCa by inhibiting 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) [86,87]. These results underscore the role of inflammation as a driver of prostate carcinogenesis.

Origins of Inflammation

The initial cause of prostatic inflammation is difficult to predict. It can arise from the dysregulation of inflammatory pathways or by an external agent which drives inflammation. Environmental factors that have been identified as potential drivers of PCa include bacterial infections including sexual transmitted infections [88], viral infections [89], androgen and androgen receptor levels [90], diet and obesity [91], urine reflux [92], and genetic predisposition [93]. Bacterial and viral infections can exacerbate inflammation in the prostate, potentially leading to prostatitis. Notably, not all prostate infections progress to PCa, and the contribution of these infections to PCa remains unclear and inadequately covered in the literature, requiring further studies. The link between a high-fat diet and obesity as risk factors for PCa development remains controversial. This correlation has been explored due to variations in PCa incidence and mortality across different geographic and cultural regions [94]. Furthermore, evidence indicates that obesity, weight gain, and increased visceral fat are significantly associated with an elevated risk of biochemical recurrence after primary prostatectomy, more aggressive disease, and increased PCa-specific mortality [95]. Studies have also suggested that diets rich in red meat, charred meat, and saturated fats are risk factors for PCa [91]. Urine reflux has been proposed as a cause of chronic inflammation in the prostate due to chemical irritation resulting from the accumulation of uric acid. Several studies have demonstrated that uric acid is the primary chemical compound involved in this type of damage [96]. Notably, the hereditary risk of PCa is greater than that of any other human cancer [93]. Genome-wide association studies have identified genetic loci associated with PCa and emphasized the significance of family history in PCa development [97,98]. The diversity of genetic abnormalities identified suggest that there is no single dominant molecular pathway for prostatic carcinogenesis but rather a combination of alterations [35,99]. The exact mechanisms involved in inflammation driven PCa are not fully understood. Nevertheless, somatic genome alterations in genes such as ribonuclease L (RNASEL), macrophage scavenger receptor 1 (MSR1), macrophage inhibitory cytokine-1 (MIC-1), intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM), and Toll-like receptors (TLR) are among the most well-identified factors [35]. Due to the complexity of the process, hundreds of genes are implicated in the inflammatory response that leads to PCa. Therefore, new technology platforms and approaches are urgently needed to screen, identify, and correlate genes involved in the entire pathway. These advances could be pivotal in predicting, early detecting, treating, and preventing PCa development and progression.

7. Role of Leukocytes in Prostate Cancer

Chronic inflammation is evident in malignant prostate tissue, with PCa samples exhibiting a higher percentage of T lymphocytes and macrophages compared to neutrophils, eosinophils, and B cells typically found in acute inflammatory responses [100]. A study conducted in the UK Biobank found no correlation between white blood cells, including neutrophils, eosinophils, basophils, monocytes, and lymphocytes, and PCa diagnosis. However, a higher total white blood cell count, and neutrophil count were associated with an increased risk of PCa-related mortality [101].
The use of the CIBERSORT method to examine the relative proportion of immune cell populations in PCa revealed infiltrated T cells, CD8+ T cells, resting memory CD4+ T cells, and total macrophages counted, respectively, 39%, 13%, 20%, and 13% [102]. An immunophenotypic analysis from isolated prostatectomy specimens demonstrated an increase of CD11b+CD68+CD14+HLA-DRhigh monocytes and CD11b+CD68CD16+HLA-DRlow monocytes among the CD11b+ myeloid cells, a high fraction of CD8+ T cells within total CD45+ immune cells in PCa tissues and an increase of CD4+ forkhead box subfamily 3+ (FOXP3+) in high-grade PCa compared to low-grade PCa [103].
The discrepancies observed in different studies may be attributed to the heightened heterogeneity of PCa, leading to variations in immune subset phenotypes depending on the tissue samples collected from each patient. Moreover, different immune populations may express distinct immunophenotypic markers and be programmed toward either a pro-tumoral or anti-tumoral phenotype (Table 2).

7.1. Neutrophils

Neutrophils, originating from hematopoietic stem cells, are among the first immune cells recruited after an insult. They possess a short lifespan to prevent excessive tissue damage, owing to their high plasticity and robust effector response [150]. When recruited to a damaged area, neutrophils release proteases, including neutrophil elastase, neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), and reactive oxygen species (ROS), which exacerbate damage and contribute to the development of chronic inflammation [151]. Under normal circumstances, neutrophils can shift their function towards immunosuppression, thus regulating the production of pro-inflammatory mediators. However, in disease states, this shift may not occur correctly, leading to the development of carcinogenesis [152]. Therefore, neutrophils serve as a crucial link between inflammation and cancer. A study has observed a correlation between low neutrophil counts and a positive PCa biopsy, while elevated neutrophil counts may indicate a benign prostate biopsy [153]. These results can predict the progression from an acute response, characterized by increased neutrophil levels, to a carcinogenic phenotype dominated by chronic inflammation [154]. Tumour associated neutrophils (TANs) have been reported in cancer-affected regions. TANs, along with regular neutrophils, secrete substantial amounts of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-9, which play a role in the degradation of the extracellular matrix and cancer progression [104].
TANs are a complex population in the tumour microenvironment, associated with poor outcomes in some PCa studies [72] and demonstrating antitumoral effects in others [155]. In vitro assays showed that coculture of human PCa cells in the presence of neutrophils leads to a reduction of cell growth via caspase activation [156]. These findings suggest that, as tumours progress, neutrophil cytotoxicity diminishes, allowing PCa to avoid neutrophil cytotoxic effects. Studies have linked neutrophils as crucial cells in PCa prevention. In bone metastatic PCa, there is an increased formation of neutrophils and NETs to limit the spread of infection and control metastasis [156]. The role of different inflammatory mediators produced by neutrophils and its role in cancer progression is summarized on Table 2.

7.2. Basophils

Basophils constitute approximately 1% of circulating white blood cells and serve as protectors against allergens, pathogens, and parasites. In an inflammatory context, basophils can migrate to inflammatory regions and promote M2-like macrophage polarization, highlighting the disparity in function between circulating and resident basophils [157].
Elevated basophil and basophil-to-lymphocyte ratio were associated with a poor outcome in metastatic hormone sensitive PCa [158]. Epithelial-derived pro-inflammatory cytokines including interleukin (IL)-33, IL-18, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), and growth factors including IL-3, IL-7, transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β), vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF) promote activation of basophils [159]. Several studies demonstrated that activated basophils can secrete different cytokines involved in PCa including IL-4, which promotes tumour-promoting Th2 inflammation [112,160] and M2 macrophage polarization related to a poor prognosis [161], IL-13 [157], and tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) [162]. Studies also suggested the role of basophils in angiogenesis. Basophils release high amount of VEGFA, a potent proangiogenic molecule [115]. Basophils are a source of hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), a powerful angiogenic factor in tumours [116]. Human basophils also express angiopoietins (ANGPT) 1 and ANGPT2 mRNAs which are involved in vascular permeability [117]. Other studies showed the protective role of basophils in cancer development [114]. Low levels of circulating basophils correlated with higher size and extend of the tumour, higher number of lymph nodes and poor survival in colorectal cancer patients [163]. The effects of different inflammatory molecules produced by basophils in cancer are described in Table 2.
While most data on the role of basophils in cancer progression pertains to cancers other than PCa, additional studies are needed to elucidate the mechanisms by which basophils influence PCa.

7.3. Eosinophils

Eosinophils constitute 1–4% of white blood cells and play a vital role in maintaining homeostasis and defending the host against infectious agents. They originate from multipotent CD34+ progenitors in the bone marrow [164]. Under normal conditions they are located in spleen, lymph nodes and thymus. When activated, they have the capacity to modulate the immune response, including the phenotype of T cells. [165]. The migration and recruitment of eosinophils to the tumour microenvironment are orchestrated by eotaxins, namely CC chemokine ligand (CCL)11, CCL24, CCL26, and CCL5 which activate the CCR3 receptor, highly expressed on eosinophils [166]. Eosinophils secrete cytotoxic granules including eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), major basic protein (MBP), eosinophil derived neurotoxin (EDN) and eosinophil peroxidase (EPO). Additionally, they release pro-inflammatory mediators such as IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, TGF-β, TNF-α, GM-CSF, and interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) [167]. IL-5 is a key mediator for eosinophil growth, differentiation, and activation [168]. Moreover, eosinophils express adhesion molecules CD11a/CD18, allowing them to interact with tumour cells, indicating their role in cancer progression [169]. Histological analysis of PCa samples revealed an increase in eosinophils compared to healthy controls in correlation with age and Gleason score [170].
On the other hand, activated eosinophils inhibited PCa cell growth through upregulation of E-cadherin, a metastasis suppressor molecule [171]. Evidence demonstrated that incubation of PCa cell lines with activated eosinophils inhibited cell growth [172]. Treatment of patients with metastatic castration-resistant PCa with Sipuleucel-T led to an increase in eosinophil counts, correlated with improved survival and enhanced maximal T-cell proliferation responses [120]. The role of different cytokines and chemokines produced by eosinophils are labelled in Table 2.
To advance the understanding of eosinophils in the tumour microenvironment and their interactions with other immune cells, it is crucial to improve the technological detection of eosinophils and discover novel biomarkers for defining eosinophil subpopulations. This will provide insights into their ability to modulate various cells in different cancers, including PCa, and their role in cancer progression.

7.4. Mast Cells

Mast cells derive from CD34+/CD117+ hematopoietic stem cells in the bone marrow and they undergo maturation within target tissues [173]. Besides KIT activation, which is essential for mast cell development, several cytokines, including IL-3, IL-4, IL-9, IL-10, IL-33, and TGF-β, influence their growth and survival [174]. Mast cells exhibit significant plasticity and can adopt various phenotypes depending on the host’s genetic background and local or systemic factors [175]. These cells are characterized by the presence of numerous granules rich in histamine and heparin. Upon activation, mast cells can degranulate and release inflammatory mediators to combat pathogens [176]. This response leads to the synthesis of specific cytokines, including anti-inflammatory TGF-β, IL-10, as well as the proinflammatory associated cytokines IL-4, IL-6, and IFN-γ [131]. Evidence demonstrated that mast cells are present in several tumours [177,178]. Zadvornyi et al. [179] demonstrated that increased mast cell infiltration and degranulation were associated with malignancy of PCa. Another study demonstrated the potential of mast cells to promote PCa cell proliferation and epithelial mesenchymal transition which is linked with invasion and metastasis [180]. A study dissected that infiltrating mast cells in PCa suppress androgen receptor-MMP signalling promoting PCa cell invasion [181]. Intratumoral mast cell tryptase+/chymase+/CD117+ phenotype was founded in malignant PCa samples [182]. Additionally, a high extratumoral mast cell count was linked with a high risk of biochemical recurrence and PCa metastasis [183].
Release of IL-1, IL-4 and IL-6 from mast cells was associated with elimination of tumour cells and rejection of tumours [129]. Other studies demonstrated that IL-1 is linked with tumour growth, angiogenesis, macrophage recruitment and metastasis [128]. Another study in human PCa samples associated higher mast cell infiltrates with a better PCa prognosis [184]. Moreover, mast cells can contribute to angiogenesis inhibition through secretion of prostaglandin D2 (PGD2) [132]. Table 2 dissects the role of each cytokine released by mast cells on cancer progression.

7.5. Macrophages

Macrophages are vital phagocytic cells integral to the innate immune response. The primary sources of macrophages are monocytes, which circulate in the blood, and tissue-resident macrophages originating from the yolk sac. These cells are recruited and activated by the specific microenvironment in which they operate. In the context of the tumour microenvironment, macrophage activation plays a significant role in influencing tumour development, progression, metastasis, immune regulation, and angiogenesis [79].
Activated macrophages can be classified into two main categories: M1-like macrophages, which promote inflammation to combat pathogen invasion and cancer, and M2-like macrophages, which are associated with tissue repair and support tumour progression [185]. M1-like macrophages secrete proinflammatory mediators including IL-12, TNF-α, chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand (CXCL)-10, IFN-γ, and nitric oxide synthase (NOS), whereas M2-like macrophages produce anti-inflammatory IL-10, IL-13, and IL-4, arginase-1, the mannose receptor CD206, and scavenger receptors [186,187]. The polarization of macrophages into M1 or M2 phenotypes depends on the signals present in the microenvironment.
Research has demonstrated that tumour-associated macrophages (TAMs) often acquire a tumour-suppressive M2-like phenotype, contributing to the development of carcinogenesis [188]. The release of IL-1β, IL-8, TNF-α, TGF-β [133,134,135], MMP-2, and MMP-9 [136] by macrophages is involved in epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), which promotes cancer cell invasion and metastasis. It is believed that metastatic processes could not be a late event in tumour progression. The primary tumours could prime the metastatic organ before tumour cell arrival. Macrophages are involved in the formation of this pre-metastatic niches. They are mobilized to bloodstream and are then clustered in these regions by CCL2, CSF-1, VEGF, platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), TNF-α, and TGF-β [189,190]. The role of inflammatory mediators produced by macrophages in cancer is discussed in Table 2.
Given their ability to modulate the tumour microenvironment, the strategic targeting of macrophages has emerged as a promising approach in the development of new strategies for treating PCa. This approach holds the potential to provide novel and effective therapeutic alternatives for PCa patients.

7.6. T Cells

T cells play a crucial function in the adaptive immune response and were identified as key cells in the PCa tumour microenvironment [191]. These cells originate from the bone marrow and comprise various subtypes, including CD8+ T cells, CD4+ T cells, Th17 and regulatory T cells (Tregs). CD8+ T cells, known as cytotoxic T cells, exert their effects directly on infected cells. They predominantly secrete immune mediators such as IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-2, granzyme, and perforin. In contrast, CD4+ T cells, or T helper cells, orchestrate immune responses by activating B cells and CD8+ T cells. They can be further categorized into Th1, Th2, Th17, and regulatory T cell (Treg) subsets. Th1 cells release proinflammatory cytokines, including IFN-γ, TNF-α, and IL-2, while Th2 cells secrete IL-4, IL-5, IL-13, IL-25, and IL-10, driving an anti-inflammatory response [192]. Th17 cells, characterized by secretion of IL-17A, IL-17F, IL-21, and IL-22, have been implicated in PCa metastasis. Studies have shown that the loss of Th17 function can hinder the development of microinvasive PCa in murine models [141]. Tregs were firstly defined as CD4+CD25high cells and were found to be increased in PCa patients [193]. These cells play a vital role in discriminating self from foreign antigens and can either activate or suppress immune responses. Tregs release immunosuppressive cytokines, including IL-10, TGF-β, IL-35, CD39, CD73, and indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) [194]. The immunosuppressive functions of Tregs favour tumour progression, and elevated Treg levels in PCa patients have been associated with poorer survival outcomes [80]. CD8+ T cells have been associated with a good prognosis and a study identified CD8+CD44+ population as important for reducing the tumour burden [195]. On the other hand, accumulation of CD4+ T cells in the PCa tumour microenvironment was associated with a poor survival [75]. In fact, this population is increased in PCa patients in comparison to healthy controls. An increase of CD4+ T cells was also associated with increased chemo-resistance to docetaxel in PCa cells [76]. Later, Kaur et al. [196] showed an association between increased transcription factor FOXP3+ Treg cells and risk of metastasis. Another study identified CD4+FOXP3+ Tregs and CD8+FOXP3+ Tregs increased in PCa samples and associated with increased risk of death [77,197].
Understanding the intricate roles of T cells, including their subtypes and cytokine profiles (Table 2), is essential for deciphering the complex immune landscape within the PCa microenvironment.

7.7. B Cells

B cells originate in the bone marrow and have the ability to migrate to the spleen and lymph nodes. Naïve B cells undergo activation into plasma cells in response to specific antigens during their development, leading to proliferation and differentiation. The maturation of B cells results in changes to their epitopes, and their characterization relies on CD markers such as CD19, CD20, CD21, CD40, and CD79b [198]. B cells can influence the tumour microenvironment through various mechanisms, including antibody presentation, antibody production, and cytokine secretion [199]. Studies have demonstrated that B cells activate CD4+ T cells, resulting in the accumulation of T cells in the tumour microenvironment and the differentiation of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells into distinct phenotypes [200]. Interactions between CD20+ B cells and T cells in the tumour microenvironment have been shown to impact the protective function of T cells [201]. Regulatory B cells (Bregs) are frequently found in advanced hepatocellular, gastric, and PCa, suggesting their potential influence on tumour development and progression [73,202,203]. Bregs are associated with an anti-immune function, as they release immunosuppressive molecules such as IL-10, IL-35, and TGF-β, which hinder the activity of T cells [146,204,205,206].
Literature data suggest that the infiltration of B cells increases the risk of adverse events in prostate carcinogenesis and malignancies. The effect of inflammatory modulators produced by B cells on tumour progression is described in Table 2.

7.8. Overall Remarks

Overall, IL-1, IL-6, IL-2, IL-4, IL-7, IL-8, IL-10, IL-17, IL-23, TNF-α, TGF-β, IFN-γ, VEGF, and GM-CSF are the main inflammatory mediators involved in PCa (Figure 3).
IL-1 and IL-6 promote cancer growth, proliferation, and progression [207,208]. IL-1 is increased in PCa and induces immunosuppressive function of mesenchymal stem cells [209,210]. IL-6 is increased in PCa, induces EMT and metastasis, increases the expression of androgen receptor, and induces infiltration of T cells into the tumour microenvironment [211,212]. IL-2 has been found to stimulate Tregs, with some studies associating it with tumour growth and progression, while others suggest its potential anti-tumour activity [213]. IL-4 increases the expression of androgens, activates the JNK pathway, and promotes tumour progression [214]. IL-7 induces EMT and cancer metastasis [215]. IL-8 stimulates proliferation of prostate stromal cells, regulates the expression of MMPs, promotes PCa progression, angiogenesis, and metastasis [216]. IL-10 inhibits anti-tumour responses and regulates androgen signalling, promoting cancer metastasis [217]. IL-17 promotes PCa growth, angiogenesis, and metastasis [218], increases the expression of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and COX-2 and induces the release of IL-6 and IL-8 [219]. IL-23 regulates the androgen response and Th17 survival [217]. TNF-α and TGF-β are able to promote PCa progression and metastasis [220]. TNF-α upregulates the expression of PD-L1, and its control is indicative of tumour cell behaviour [219,221]. TGF-β induces EMT, inhibition of anti-tumour activity, reduces the expression of major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-I, regulates angiogenesis, the formation of the premetastatic niche, and metastasis in bone [222,223,224]. IFN-γ induces the release of IL-6 and IL-8 and promotes anti-tumour response [225]. VEGF contributes to angiogenesis, formation of premetastatic niche, tumour microenvironment remodelling, tumour invasion, and metastasis [224,226]. GM-CSF stimulates leukocytes and increases tumour antigen presentation to effector T cells [227,228].
The activity of interleukins is primarily modulated through the Janus Kinase/signal transducers and activators of transcription (JAK/STAT) pathway. This signalling pathway is integral to normal development, cellular homeostasis, cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis [229]. Ligand binding initiates the multimerization of receptor subunits, leading to the activation of the JAK/STAT pathway and the transmission of signals through the phosphorylation of receptor-associated JAK tyrosine kinases. Consequently, activated JAKs induce the phosphorylation and activation of STATs. This phosphorylation prompts the dimerization of STATs via their conserved SH2 domain, subsequently allowing them to enter the nucleus. Within the nucleus, STATs bind to specific DNA sequences, either stimulating or suppressing the transcription of target genes [230]. It was reported that JAK/STAT3 inhibition suppress PCa cell growth and increases apoptosis [231]. BRCA1 via JAK1/2 and STAT3 phosphorylation can induce cell proliferation and inhibit cancer cell death [232]. The androgen receptor could also activate JAK/STAT3 and stimulate cell proliferation and antiapoptotic effect increasing tumour invasion [233,234].
NF-κB is a transcription factor predominantly activated by cytokines such as TNF-α in PCa. In androgen-dependent PCa, IL-6 and VEGF stimulates the increase of the expression of NF-κB [235]. NF-κB targets a transcription regulatory element of PSA and correlates with cancer progression, chemoresistance, and PSA recurrence [236].
Growth factors including VEGF, epidermal growth factor (EGF), insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-1, HGF, and TGF-β are key players in the receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) signalling pathway. These growth factors activate the extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERK)/MAPK or PI3K/AKT/mTOR mechanisms [237]. Growth factor receptors possess RTK activity, and their binding to ligands leads to the activation of transcription factors, resulting in the altered expression of genes associated with cell growth, proliferation, and survival [238]. IGF-1 functions as a positive growth-promoting signal transduction pathway, while FGF plays a dual role as a positive growth factor and an angiogenic growth factor. On the other hand, TGF-β serves as a negative growth factor, regulating cell differentiation and proliferation [239]. Studies demonstrated that alterations on the expression of TGF-β, EGF and their receptors correlates with PCa progression and biochemical recurrence [240,241]. The phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (AKT) pathway is often upregulated due to the loss of the tumour suppressor PTEN, which negatively regulates the PI3K/AKT pathway [242]. It has been demonstrated that the aberrant PI3K/AKT pathway disturbs the action of ERKs, thereby supporting androgen receptor-independent growth in PCa [243]. Overexpression of growth factors promotes the activation of Ras and MAPK pathways [244]. Upon activation, MAPKs phosphorylate transcription factors such as c-Jun, c-Fos, ATF2, and p53. Additionally, ERK or p38 MAPKs can activate MAPK interacting protein kinases 1 and 2 (MNK1 and MNK2), which controls signals involved in mRNA translation [245]. Interestingly, MNKs have been found to be overexpressed in PCa [246].
As discussed in this review, inflammatory signalling plays a significant role in the development and progression of PCa. Considering these findings, therapeutic strategies targeting inflammatory signalling pathways in PCa may help manage the disease and potentially improve outcomes.
Ongoing research is exploring new treatments and strategies, especially those utilizing natural bioactive compounds, to mitigate the severe side effects, radiotherapy resistance, and recurrence of PCa.

8. Polyphenol Compounds in Prostate Cancer

In recent years, the utilization of natural compounds in cancer treatment has gained substantial attention and research interest for several compelling reasons. These compounds, when administered in appropriate doses and forms, often exhibit fewer adverse effects in comparison to conventional cancer treatments, thereby enhancing the overall quality of life for cancer patients. Furthermore, specific natural compounds can target distinct signalling pathways and molecular processes involved in cancer growth and progression. They can be utilized in conjunction with chemotherapy or radiation therapy to augment the delivery of therapeutic drugs to cancer cells, thereby improving their effectiveness. Additionally, these natural compounds, primarily polyphenols, possess antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties that are of utmost importance in cancer treatment. Notably, they can also bolster the body’s natural defences, facilitating a more effective targeting and elimination of cancer cells [247].
Polyphenols are plant secondary metabolites that have garnered significant attention in cancer research owing to their potent antioxidant capabilities in neutralizing free radicals [248]. These polyphenols fall into various categories, including flavonoids, phenolic acids, lignans, and stilbenes [7]. They typically feature one or more hydroxyl groups attached to the ortho, meta, or para positions on a benzene ring. These hydroxyl groups are highly reactive, readily donating electrons or hydrogens to neutralize free radicals, thus playing a crucial role in their antioxidant activity. The aromatic rings in phenolic compounds form conjugated systems, enabling the delocalization of electrons, which contributes to their stability (Figure 4). This structural characteristic enhances their ability to scavenge free radicals and prevent their propagation within cells.
The effectiveness of each polyphenol relies on its specific chemical structure, with flavonoids standing out for their significant anti-cancer properties. The architecture of flavonoids features two benzene rings connected by a heterocyclic pyran ring, providing structural stability, and facilitating electron delocalization, which in turn enhances their antioxidant potential. Moreover, the presence of a double bond between C2 and C3, a hydroxyl group in ortho-positions, carbonyl conjugation at C4, and methoxy groups on the benzene rings greatly enhances their ability to donate electrons, effectively neutralizing and stabilizing free radicals [249]. In addition to these attributes, certain polyphenols can also exhibit chelating properties, binding to metal ions that can otherwise trigger the production of free radicals. This chelation process serves to prevent the formation of reactive species, further bolstering their antioxidative impact [9].
The role of polyphenol compounds in PCa was demonstrated by several authors (Table 3).
Curcumin is the active compound in turmeric, a spice commonly used in Indian cuisine. It promoted apoptosis and inhibited angiogenesis and metastasis in DU-145 PCa cells [250] and inhibited cell proliferation, migration, and invasion in PC-3 and DU-145 cells by regulating the miR-30a-5p/PCLAF axis [251]. In another study, curcumin was found to block the growth of LNCaP xenografts through several mechanisms. It induced apoptosis, hindered proliferation, and upregulated the expression of key factors, including TRAIL-R1/DR4, TRAIL-R2/DR5, Bax, Bak, p21/WAF1, and p27/KIP1. Simultaneously, it curbed the activation of NF-kB and its downstream gene products, including cyclin D1, VEGF, uPA, MMP-2, MMP-9, Bcl-2, and Bcl-xL [252]. Curcumin analogues inhibited growth and progression of PC-3-induced tumours in vivo [253,254].
Anacardic acid is the active phenolic lipid found in the Amphipterygium adstringens plant. It was reported that this phenolic acid inhibited PCa angiogenesis by targeting the proto-oncogene tyrosine-protein kinase (Src)/focal adhesion kinase (FAK)/rhodopsin (Rho) guanosine triphosphate (GTP)ase signalling pathway [255]. It mediates PCa by inhibiting cell proliferation and inducing G1/S cell cycle arrest and apoptosis [256].
Caffeic acid is a hydroxy-cinnamate metabolites existent in plant tissues. Caffeic acid derivates were involved in anti-proliferative effects by alterations in oestrogen receptors (ER)-α and ER-β abundance [257]. Other studies showed that caffeic acid-phenyl ester (CAPE) treatment suppressed proliferation and cell cycle progression in PC-3 cells [258].
Ellagic acid is a polyphenolic compound present in fruits and berries. Studies revealed that it modulates apoptosis inducing factor (AIF), leading to an increase in ROS levels and caspase-3 and a reduction in TGF-β and IL-6 [259]. Another study showed that ellagic acid inhibited invasion and motility of PCa cells [260].
Gallic acid is ubiquitously present either in free form or, more commonly, as a constituent of tannins in red and white wines. Gallic acid inhibited cell viability in DU-145 and 22Rν1 PCa cells by promoting apoptosis [261] and inhibited tumour growth in DU-145 and 22Rν1 PCa xenografts [262].
Resveratrol is one of the best studied stilbenes and is found in grapes. Resveratrol inhibited cancer cell growth, promoted cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in PCa cells [263,264,265] and, interestingly, increased the sensitivity of PCa cells to ionizing radiation [266]. Piceatannol is a metabolite bio transformed from resveratrol also with impact in PCa. Studies suggested that the effect of resveratrol in PCa cells is partially explained through its conversion to piceatannol [290]. This compound inhibited migration by a decrease in IL-6/STAT-3 signalling [267], and delayed G1 cell cycle progression by inhibition of CDK2 and CDK4 [268] in DU-145 PCa cells. Other studies showed that piceatannol inhibited TNF-α-induced invasion by suppression of MMP-9 activation via AKT-mediated NF-κB pathways in DU-145 PCa cells [269].
Pterostilbene is an antioxidant mainly found in berries and grapes. Its conjugate pterostilbene-isothiocyanate repressed proliferation, induced apoptosis by modulating PI3K/AKT and ERK/MAPK pathways, and down regulated androgen receptor expression in LNCaP cells [270]. This conjugate promoted cell cycle arrest in LNCaP cells by increasing p53 and p21 expression, which protects against the effects of AMPK activation [271].
The role of flavonoids including epigallocathechin-3-gallate (EGCG), fisetin, quercetin, apigenin, and proanthocyanidins in PCa was also revealed. EGCG is a polyphenol found in green tea. Studies showed that green tea polyphenols decreased risk and slower progression PCa [291] by modulating NF-κB/MAPK/IGFR/COX-2 signalling pathways, inhibiting protein kinases, and suppressing the activation of transcription factors [8]. EGCG promoted apoptosis via expression of caspase-9a [272], and suppressed pro-inflammatory cytokines, MMPs-2 and -9 in PCa cells [273].
Fisetin belongs to the flavanol subgroup of flavonoids. Studies showed that fisetin decreased the viability of LNCaP, 22Rν1, and PC-3 cells [274,275], suppressed cell proliferation by hypophosphorylation of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E-binding protein-1, and induced autophagic cell death in PCa cells through suppression of mTORC1 and mTORC2 complexes [276].
Quercetin is a plant pigment flavanol found in citrus fruits. Studies showed that quercetin decreased ROS, and increased superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT) in Sprague Dawley rats [277] but increased ROS production in DU-145 cell line acting as a pro-oxidant agent [278]. Quercetin decreased the expression of androgen receptor in LNCaP cells [279], decreased CDK2, cyclin E and D levels, VEGF, and promoted G0/G1 cycle arrest in PC-3 cells [280,281].
Apigenin is a naturally occurring plant flavone present in common fruits and vegetables. Apigenin mediated growth inhibitory responses through inhibition of histone deacetylases (HDACs) [282]. Apigenin induced PCa cell apoptosis via upregulation of p21 and subsequent inhibition of polo-like kinase (PLK)-1 transcription [283] and inhibition of class 1 HDACs and HDAC1 protein expression increasing the acetylation of Ku70 and the dissociation of Bax [284]. This molecule attenuated IGF-1/IGF binding protein-3 signalling associated with inhibition of p-AKT and p-ERK1/2, suppressing invasion and progression of PCa [285]. A study also showed that apigenin inhibit PCa progression via targeting PI3K/AKT/forkhead box FoxO pathways [286].
Proanthocyanidins, commonly known as condensed tannins, are found abundantly in various plants and foods. A study showed that proanthocyanidins downregulated MMP activity, upregulated endogenous tissue inhibitors of MMP’s (TIMP) activity in DU-145 cells [287] and affected the growth of androgen-dependent growth of PCa cells [288]. Proanthocyanidins also mediated inhibition of CDKs, cyclins, activation of tumour suppressors p21 and p27, Bcl-2/Bax ratio favouring apoptosis and induced cellular differentiation by increasing MAPK p44/42 in PCa cells [289].
It is evident that polyphenols play a crucial role in inhibiting the progression of PCa. However, the low bioavailability and limited absorption of free polyphenols in the human body have sparked interest in innovative strategies to enhance their delivery to target cells.

Polyphenol-Gold Based Nanoparticles

In recent years, nanoparticles (NPs) have emerged as a promising approach to improve the delivery and targeting potential of polyphenols [292]. The encapsulation of polyphenols within NPs not only shields them from degradation but also enhances their solubility, thus improving absorption in the gastrointestinal tract. Moreover, the size, shape, and morphology of NPs can be precisely tailored to optimize polyphenol delivery and biocompatibility. Additionally, NPs can be functionalized with ligands to facilitate targeted delivery to specific organs and cells [293]. However, it is essential to note that conventional methods of AuNP synthesis are environmentally damaging, resource-intensive, and energy-consuming, with NPs prone to aggregation and toxicity within the human body [294]. This underscores the urgency of transitioning to environmentally-friendly, biocompatible, cost-effective, and sustainable green NP synthesis approaches [295]. The interest in developing polyphenol-based nanoparticles has been steadily growing. Polyphenols exhibit a high reducing capacity, allowing them to reduce metal ions and produce metal NPs. Their strong biocompatibility reduces NP toxicity, and they can serve as capping agents to prevent NP aggregation and enhance stability [296,297]. Furthermore, polyphenols exhibit synergistic effects with conventional drugs, potentially reducing the required drug concentrations and their associated toxicity. Additionally, the antioxidant properties of polyphenols can contribute to the overall efficacy of cancer treatment [298].
A comprehensive examination of polyphenol-based nanoparticles has been conducted to elucidate their impact on PCa progression (Table 4).
Curcumin incorporation in nanoparticles demonstrated high PCa cellular uptake [299]. Moreover, conjugation of this polyphenol with nanoparticles decreased proliferation and viability of PCa cells [300,301]. A combination of resveratrol and docetaxel downregulated the expression of NF-kB p65, COX-2, and upregulated cleaved caspase-3 [302]. Moreover, resveratrol improves internalization of NPs into PCa cells [303], increased their anti-proliferative activity, promotes cell cycle arrest. and decreased tumour cell viability [304,305]. EGCG nanoparticles had proapoptotic and antiangiogenetic effects on 22Rr1 cells [306], inhibited tumour growth in PC-3 cells [307], induced apoptosis and reduced viability of DU-145 cells [308], and inhibited tumour growth and secretion of PSA by increase of Bax, induction of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerases cleavage, and activation of caspases and apoptosis [309,310].
In conclusion, the encapsulation of polyphenols and their utilization in green NP synthesis represents an innovative therapeutic approach for PCa. This approach shows promise in attenuating the severe side effects and resistance associated with conventional treatments.

9. Conclusions

Nanotechnology has served as the foundation for remarkable industrial applications and exponential growth. Notably, in the pharmaceutical sector, nanotechnology has made a substantial impact on medical devices, including diagnostic biosensors, imaging probe delivery systems, and pharmaceuticals.
AuNPs offer diverse potential applications across various domains. Several in vitro studies demonstrated the anticancer potential of AuNPs as an anti-cancer agent as well as their stability, low toxicity, and specificity to PCa cells [6]. The traditional synthesis of AuNPs is highly polluting, wastes high levels of resources and energy, and nanoparticles can be toxic to the human body. A novel approach in the green synthesis of metal nanoparticles involves the use of bioactive natural compounds, rather than whole or partial plant extracts. Recent research has explored the synthesis and biomedical application of metal nanostructures based on phytochemicals. Natural phenolic acids offer a wide variety of metal ion bioreduction capabilities, making them ideal for creating biocompatible metal nanoparticles with numerous biomedical applications [296,297]. However, most metal nanoparticles produced with phenolic acids have only been applied in a limited range of biomedical applications. This is due to insufficient compelling results regarding biomedical properties and safety concerns, as compared to commonly chemically-coated metal nanoparticles. Comprehensive laboratory analysis considering various parameters such as size, shape, surface chemistry, the type of phenolic acids, and metal nanoparticles, must be conducted through rigorous animal models and well-designed molecular studies.
Recent reviews and meta-analyses have established a strong correlation between a history of clinical chronic prostatitis and the development of PCa in the general population [31]. The causes of prostate inflammation are multifaceted, ranging from bacterial triggers of prostatitis and sexually transmitted diseases to imbalances in oestrogen hormone levels, physical trauma, urine reflux into the prostate gland, and environmental factors such as diet [68]. Although prostate biopsy remains the gold standard for diagnosing prostate inflammation, various parameters, including laboratory biomarkers (cytokines) and clinical factors (familiar historical, age, prostatic calcifications, symptom severity, and response to therapy), can be valuable in everyday clinical practice when prostate inflammation is suspected [19]. Figure 3 illustrates the impact of prostatic inflammation and inflammatory mediators on tumour initiation, growth, and progression.
To develop more effective drug combinations and minimize toxicity, comprehensive studies are necessary to determine the optimal dosage of each drug within a combination and to monitor pharmacodynamic endpoints.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.N.B., R.F. (Rúben Fernandes), C.C. and R.F. (Raquel Fernandes); methodology, R.F. (Raquel Fernandes), R.F. (Rúben Fernandes) and A.N.B.; writing—original draft preparation, R.F. (Raquel Fernandes); writing, review, and editing, R.F. (Raquel Fernandes), C.C., R.F. (Rúben Fernandes) and A.N.B.; supervision, R.F. (Rúben Fernandes) and A.N.B.; funding acquisition, A.N.B. and R.F. (Rúben Fernandes). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by National Funds from the FCT-Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology, under the project 2023.03608.BD and funded by the Centre for the Research and Technology of Agro-Environmental and Biological Sciences (CITAB) research unit, supported from FCT, under the project UIDB/04033/2020. All authors acknowledge CITAB for the conditions to the elaboration of this paper.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Packer, J.R.; Maitland, N.J. The Molecular and Cellular Origin of Human Prostate Cancer. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Res. 2016, 1863, 1238–1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Maitland, N.J.; Collins, A.T. Inflammation as the Primary Aetiological Agent of Human Prostate Cancer: A Stem Cell Connection? J. Cell Biochem. 2008, 105, 931–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ferlay, J.; Soerjomataram, I.; Dikshit, R.; Eser, S.; Mathers, C.; Rebelo, M.; Parkin, D.M.; Forman, D.; Bray, F. Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: Sources, Methods and Major Patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int. J. Cancer 2015, 136, E359–E386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Trudeau, K.; Rousseau, M.-C.; Barul, C.; Csizmadi, I.; Parent, M.-É. Dietary Patterns Are Associated with Risk of Prostate Cancer in a Population-Based Case-Control Study in Montreal, Canada. Nutrients 2020, 12, 1907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Godtman, R.A.; Kollberg, K.S.; Pihl, C.-G.; Månsson, M.; Hugosson, J. The Association between Age, Prostate Cancer Risk, and Higher Gleason Score in a Long-Term Screening Program: Results from the Göteborg-1 Prostate Cancer Screening Trial. Eur. Urol. 2022, 82, 311–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Soares, S.; Faria, I.; Aires, F.; Monteiro, A.; Pinto, G.; Sales, M.G.; Correa-Duarte, M.A.; Guerreiro, S.G.; Fernandes, R. Application of Gold Nanoparticles as Radiosensitizer for Metastatic Prostate Cancer Cell Lines. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 4122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bhosale, P.B.; Ha, S.E.; Vetrivel, P.; Kim, H.H.; Kim, S.M.; Kim, G.S. Functions of Polyphenols and Its Anticancer Properties in Biomedical Research: A Narrative Review. Transl. Cancer Res. 2020, 9, 7619–7631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Khan, N.; Mukhtar, H. Modulation of Signaling Pathways in Prostate Cancer by Green Tea Polyphenols. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2013, 85, 667–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Rudrapal, M.; Khairnar, S.J.; Khan, J.; Dukhyil, A.B.; Ansari, M.A.; Alomary, M.N.; Alshabrmi, F.M.; Palai, S.; Deb, P.K.; Devi, R. Dietary Polyphenols and Their Role in Oxidative Stress-Induced Human Diseases: Insights into Protective Effects, Antioxidant Potentials and Mechanism(s) of Action. Front. Pharmacol. 2022, 13, 283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sung, H.; Ferlay, J.; Siegel, R.L.; Laversanne, M.; Soerjomataram, I.; Jemal, A.; Bray, F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2021, 71, 209–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Giona, S. The Epidemiology of Prostate Cancer. In Prostate Cancer; Exon Publications: Brisbane City, Australia, 2021; pp. 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  12. Lillard, J.W.; Moses, K.A.; Mahal, B.A.; George, D.J. Racial Disparities in Black Men with Prostate Cancer: A Literature Review. Cancer 2022, 128, 3787–3795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Haas, G.P.; Delongchamps, N.; Brawley, O.W.; Wang, C.Y.; De La Roza, G. The Worldwide Epidemiology of Prostate Cancer: Perspectives from Autopsy Studies. Can. J. Urol. 2008, 15, 3866–3871. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  14. Taitt, H.E. Global Trends and Prostate Cancer: A Review of Incidence, Detection, and Mortality as Influenced by Race, Ethnicity, and Geographic Location. Am. J. Mens. Health 2018, 12, 1807–1823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Wang, M.C.; Valenzuela, L.A.; Murphy, G.P.; Chu, T.M. Purification of a Human Prostate Specific Antigen. Investig. Urol. 1979, 17, 159–163. [Google Scholar]
  16. Catalona, W.J.; Smith, D.S.; Ratliff, T.L.; Dodds, K.M.; Coplen, D.E.; Yuan, J.J.J.; Petros, J.A.; Andriole, G.L. Measurement of Prostate-Specific Antigen in Serum as a Screening Test for Prostate Cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 1991, 324, 1156–1161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Siegel, R.L.; Miller, K.D.; Jemal, A. Cancer Statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2019, 69, 7–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hugosson, J.; Roobol, M.J.; Månsson, M.; Tammela, T.L.J.; Zappa, M.; Nelen, V.; Kwiatkowski, M.; Lujan, M.; Carlsson, S.V.; Talala, K.M.; et al. A 16-Yr Follow-up of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (Figure Presented). Eur. Urol. 2019, 76, 43–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. NCCN Guidelines for Patients, Early-Stage Prostate Cancer. Available online: https://www.nccn.org/patients/guidelines/content/PDF/prostate-early-patient.pdf (accessed on 30 October 2023).
  20. Logozzi, M.; Angelini, D.F.; Iessi, E.; Mizzoni, D.; Di Raimo, R.; Federici, C.; Lugini, L.; Borsellino, G.; Gentilucci, A.; Pierella, F.; et al. Increased PSA Expression on Prostate Cancer Exosomes in in Vitro Condition and in Cancer Patients. Cancer Lett. 2017, 403, 318–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Humphrey, P.A. Histopathology of Prostate Cancer. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2017, 7, a030411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Amin, M.B.; Omar, T.; Hussain, A.; Aron, M.; Brimo, F. The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Gradind System. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2016, 40, 244–252. [Google Scholar]
  23. Kim, C.-H.; Bhattacharjee, S.; Prakash, D.; Kang, S.; Cho, N.-H.; Kim, H.-C.; Choi, H.-K.; Prakash, S.; Kang, D.; Cho, S.; et al. Artificial Intelligence Techniques for Prostate Cancer Detection through Dual-Channel Tissue Feature Engineering. Cancers 2021, 13, 1524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kweldam, C.F.; van Leenders, G.J.; van der Kwast, T. Grading of Prostate Cancer: A Work in Progress. Histopathology 2019, 74, 146–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Inamura, K. Prostatic Cancers: Understanding Their Molecular Pathology and the 2016 WHO Classification. Oncotarget 2018, 9, 14723–14737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Avenel, C.; Tolf, A.; Dragomir, A.; Carlbom, I.B. Glandular Segmentation of Prostate Cancer: An Illustration of How the Choice of Histopathological Stain Is One Key to Success for Computational Pathology. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2019, 7, 125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Dong, B.; Miao, J.; Wang, Y.; Luo, W.; Ji, Z.; Lai, H.; Zhang, M.; Cheng, X.; Wang, J.; Fang, Y.; et al. Single-Cell Analysis Supports a Luminal-Neuroendocrine Transdifferentiation in Human Prostate Cancer. Commun. Biol. 2020, 3, 778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Henry, G.H.; Malewska, A.; Joseph, D.B.; Malladi, V.S.; Lee, J.; Torrealba, J.; Mauck, R.J.; Gahan, J.C.; Raj, G.V.; Roehrborn, C.G.; et al. A Cellular Anatomy of the Normal Adult Human Prostate and Prostatic Urethra. Cell Rep. 2018, 25, 3530–3542.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Grisanzio, C.; Signoretti, S. P63 in Prostate Biology and Pathology. J. Cell Biochem. 2008, 103, 1354–1368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Vogelstein, B.; Papadopoulos, N.; Velculescu, V.E.; Zhou, S.; Diaz, L.A.; Kinzler, K.W. Cancer Genome Landscapes. Science 2013, 339, 1546–1558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Putzi, M.J.; De Marzo, A.M. Morphologic transitions between proliferative inflammatory atrophy and high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. Urology 2000, 56, 828–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. De Marzo, A.M.; Marchi, V.L.; Epstein, J.I.; Nelson, W.G. Proliferative Inflammatory Atrophy of the Prostate Implications for Prostatic Carcinogenesis. Am. J. Pathol. 1999, 155, 1985–1992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Bethel, C.R.; Faith, D.; Li, X.; Guan, B.; Hicks, J.L.; Lan, F.; Jenkins, R.B.; Bieberich, C.J.; De Marzo, A.M. Decreased NKX3.1 Protein Expression in Focal Prostatic Atrophy, Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia, and Adenocarcinoma: Association with Gleason Score and Chromosome 8p Deletion. Cancer Res. 2006, 66, 10683–10690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wang, W. Inflammation and Prostatic Carcinogenesis: A Morphological Study of the Human Prostate. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Urology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, The Sahlgrenska Academy at Göteborg University, Gothenburg, Sweden, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  35. Shen, M.M.; Abate-Shen, C. Molecular Genetics of Prostate Cancer: New Prospects for Old Challenges. Genes. Dev. 2010, 24, 1967–2000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Bostwick, D.G.; Qian, J. High-Grade Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia. Mod. Pathol. 2004, 17, 360–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Sakr, W.A.; Haas, G.P.; Cassin, B.F.; Pontes, J.E.; Crissman, J.D. The Frequency of Carcinoma and Intraepithelial Neoplasia of the Prostate in Young Male Patients. J. Urol. 1993, 150, 379–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kallakury, B.V.; Brien, T.P.; Lowry, C.V.; Muraca, P.J.; Fisher, H.A.; Kaufman, R.P., Jr.; Ross, J.S. Telomerase activity in human benign prostate tissue and prostatic adenocarcinomas. Diagn. Mol. Pathol. 1997, 6, 192–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. O’Sullivan, R.J.; Karlseder, J. Telomeres: Protecting Chromosomes against Genome Instability. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2010, 11, 171–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Wymenga, L.F.A.; Wisman, G.B.A.; Veenstra, R.; Ruiters, M.H.J.; Mensink, H.J.A. Telomerase Activity in Needle Biopsies from Prostate Cancer and Benign Prostates. Eur. J. Clin. Investig. 2000, 30, 330–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Tomlins, S.A.; Rhodes, D.R.; Perner, S.; Dhanasekaran, S.M.; Mehra, R.; Sun, X.-W.; Varambally, S.; Cao, X.; Tchinda, J.; Kuefer, R. Recurrent Fusion of TMPRSS2 and ETS Transcription Factor Genes in Prostate Cancer. Science 2005, 310, 644–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Park, K.; Dalton, J.T.; Narayanan, R.; Barbieri, C.E.; Hancock, M.L.; Bostwick, D.G.; Steiner, M.S.; Rubin, M.A. TMPRSS2:ERG Gene Fusion Predicts Subsequent Detection of Prostate Cancer in Patients with High-Grade Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia. J. Clin. Oncol. 2014, 32, 206–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Geng, C.; He, B.; Xu, L.; Barbieri, C.E.; Eedunuri, V.K.; Chew, S.A.; Zimmermann, M.; Bond, R.; Shou, J.; Li, C.; et al. Prostate Cancer-Associated Mutations in Speckle-Type POZ Protein (SPOP) Regulate Steroid Receptor Coactivator 3 Protein Turnover. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 6997–7002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Sfanos, K.S.; Bruno, T.C.; Meeker, A.K.; De Marzo, A.M.; Isaacs, W.B.; Drake, C.G. Human Prostate-Infiltrating CD8+ T Lymphocytes Are Oligoclonal and PD-1+. Prostate 2009, 69, 1694–1703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Nonomura, N.; Takayama, H.; Nakayama, M.; Nakai, Y.; Kawashima, A.; Mukai, M.; Nagahara, A.; Aozasa, K.; Tsujimura, A. Infiltration of Tumour-Associated Macrophages in Prostate Biopsy Specimens Is Predictive of Disease Progression after Hormonal Therapy for Prostate Cancer. BJU Int. 2011, 107, 1918–1922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Woo, J.R.; Liss, M.A.; Muldong, M.T.; Palazzi, K.; Strasner, A.; Ammirante, M.; Varki, N.; Shabaik, A.; Howell, S.; Kane, C.J.; et al. Tumor Infiltrating B-Cells Are Increased in Prostate Cancer Tissue. J. Transl. Med. 2014, 12, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Birnie, R.; Bryce, S.D.; Roome, C.; Dussupt, V.; Droop, A.; Lang, S.H.; Berry, P.A.; Hyde, C.F.; Lewis, J.L.; Stower, M.J.; et al. Gene Expression Profiling of Human Prostate Cancer Stem Cells Reveals a Pro-Inflammatory Phenotype and the Importance of Extracellular Matrix Interactions. Genome Biol. 2008, 9, R83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Testa, U.; Castelli, G.; Pelosi, E. Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Prostate Cancer Development: Therapeutic Implications. Medicines 2019, 6, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Allory, Y.; Beukers, W.; Sagrera, A.; Flández, M.; Marqués, M.; Márquez, M.; Van Der Keur, K.A.; Dyrskjot, L.; Lurkin, I.; Vermeij, M.; et al. Telomerase Reverse Transcriptase Promoter Mutations in Bladder Cancer: High Frequency across Stages, Detection in Urine, and Lack of Association with Outcome. Eur. Urol. 2014, 65, 360–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Sharma, A.; Yeow, W.S.; Ertel, A.; Coleman, I.; Clegg, N.; Thangavel, C.; Morrissey, C.; Zhang, X.; Comstock, C.E.S.; Witkiewicz, A.K.; et al. The Retinoblastoma Tumor Suppressor Controls Androgen Signaling and Human Prostate Cancer Progression. J. Clin. Investig. 2010, 120, 4478–4492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Luzzago, S.; Suardi, N.; Dell’Oglio, P.; Cardone, G.; Gandaglia, G.; Esposito, A.; De Cobelli, F.; Cristel, G.; Kinzikeeva, E.; Freschi, M.; et al. Multiparametric MRI Represents an Added Value but Not a Substitute of Follow-up Biopsies in Patients on Active Surveillance for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer. Eur. Urol. Suppl. 2017, 16, e1395–e1396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Keyes, M.; Crook, J.; Morton, G.; Vigneault, E.; Usmani, N.; Morris, W.J. Treatment Options for Localized Prostate Cancer. Can. Fam. Physician 2013, 59, 1269–1274. [Google Scholar]
  53. Kipriyanov, E.A.; Karnaukh, P.A.; Vazhenin, I.A.; Vazhenin, A.V. Radical prostatectomy and robotic radiosurgery as treatment options for localized prostate cancer. Sib. J. Oncol. 2020, 19, 50–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Hoey, C.; Ray, J.; Jeon, J.; Huang, X.; Taeb, S.; Ylanko, J.; Andrews, D.W.; Boutros, P.C.; Liu, S.K. MiRNA-106a and Prostate Cancer Radioresistance: A Novel Role for LITAF in ATM Regulation. Mol. Oncol. 2018, 12, 1324–1341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Baskar, R.; Lee, K.A.; Yeo, R.; Yeoh, K.W. Cancer and Radiation Therapy: Current Advances and Future Directions. Int. J. Med. Sci. 2012, 9, 193–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Wallner, K.; Lee, H.; Wasserman, S.; Dattoli, M. Low risk of urinary incontinence following prostate brachytherapy in patients with a prior transurethral prostate resection. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 1997, 37, 565–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Zhu, Y.; Liu, C.; Nadiminty, N.; Lou, W.; Tummala, R.; Evans, C.P.; Gao, A.C. Inhibition of Abcb1 Expression Overcomes Acquired Docetaxel Resistance in Prostate Cancer. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2013, 12, 1829–1836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Abidi, A. Cabazitaxel: A Novel Taxane for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer-Current Implications and Future Prospects. J. Pharmacol. Pharmacother. 2013, 4, 230–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Cookson, M.S.; Roth, B.J.; Dahm, P.; Engstrom, C.; Freedland, S.J.; Hussain, M.; Lin, D.W.; Lowrance, W.T.; Murad, M.H.; Oh, W.K.; et al. Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: AUA Guideline. J. Urol. 2013, 190, 429–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Zraik, I.M.; Heß-Busch, Y. Management von Nebenwirkungen Der Chemotherapie Und Deren Langzeitfolgen. Urologe 2021, 60, 862–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Heidenreich, A.; Aus, G.; Bolla, M.; Joniau, S.; Matveev, V.B.; Schmid, H.P.; Zattoni, F. EAU Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Eur. Urol. 2008, 53, 68–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Seidenfeld, J.; Samson, D.J.; Hasselblad, V.; Aronson, N.; Albertsen, P.C.; Bennett, C.L.; Wilt, T.J. Single-Therapy Androgen Suppression in Men with Advanced Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Ann. Intern. Med. 2000, 132, 566–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Molina, A.; Belldegrun, A. Novel Therapeutic Strategies for Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer: Inhibition of Persistent Androgen Production and Androgen Receptor Mediated Signaling. J. Urol. 2011, 185, 787–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Wang, I.; Song, L.; Wang, B.Y.; Rezazadeh Kalebasty, A.; Uchio, E.; Zi, X. Prostate Cancer Immunotherapy: A Review of Recent Advancements with Novel Treatment Methods and Efficacy. Am. J. Clin. Exp. Urol. 2022, 10, 210–233. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  65. Perera, M.P.J.; Thomas, P.B.; Risbridger, G.P.; Taylor, R.; Azad, A.; Hofman, M.S.; Williams, E.D.; Vela, I. Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy in Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer. Cancers 2022, 14, 503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Rastogi, I.; Muralidhar, A.; McNeel, D.G. Vaccines as Treatments for Prostate Cancer. Nat. Rev. Urol. 2023, 20, 544–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. De Marzo, A.M.; Platz, E.A.; Sutcliffe, S.; Xu, J.; Grönberg, H.; Drake, C.G.; Nakai, Y.; Isaacs, W.B.; Nelson, W.G. Inflammation in Prostate Carcinogenesis. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2007, 7, 256–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Yuan, J.; Houlahan, K.E.; Ramanand, S.G.; Lee, S.; Baek, G.; Yang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Strand, D.W.; Zhang, M.Q.; Boutros, P.C.; et al. Prostate Cancer Transcriptomic Regulation by the Interplay of Germline Risk Alleles, Somatic Mutations, and 3D Genomic Architecture. Cancer Discov. 2022, 12, 2838–2855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Sfanos, K.S.; de Marzo, A.M. Prostate Cancer and Inflammation: The Evidence. Histopathology 2012, 60, 199–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Coussens, L.M.; Werb, Z. Inflammation and Cancer. Nature 2002, 420, 860–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Costanzo-Garvey, D.L.; Keeley, T.; Case, A.J.; Watson, G.F.; Alsamraae, M.; Yu, Y.; Su, K.; Heim, C.E.; Kielian, T.; Morrissey, C.; et al. Neutrophils Are Mediators of Metastatic Prostate Cancer Progression in Bone. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2020, 69, 1113–1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Shaul, M.E.; Fridlender, Z.G. Tumour-Associated Neutrophils in Patients with Cancer. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2019, 16, 601–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Roya, N.; Fatemeh, T.; Faramarz, M.A.; Milad, S.G.; Mohammad-Javad, S.; Najmeh, S.V.; Yousef, M.; Nader, B. Frequency of IL-10+CD19+ B Cells in Patients with Prostate Cancer Compared to Patients with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. Afr. Health Sci. 2020, 20, 1264–1272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Deola, S.; Panelli, M.C.; Maric, D.; Selleri, S.; Dmitrieva, N.I.; Voss, C.Y.; Klein, H.; Stroncek, D.; Wang, E.; Marincola, F.M. Helper B Cells Promote Cytotoxic T Cell Survival and Proliferation Independently of Antigen Presentation through CD27/CD70 Interactions. J. Immunol. 2008, 180, 1362–1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Hu, S.; Li, L.; Yeh, S.; Cui, Y.; Li, X.; Chang, H.-C.; Jin, J.; Chang, C. Infiltrating T Cells Promote Prostate Cancer Metastasis via Modulation of FGF11→miRNA-541→androgen Receptor (AR)→MMP9 Signaling. Mol. Oncol. 2015, 9, 44–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Xiang, P.; Jin, S.; Yang, Y.; Sheng, J.; He, Q.; Song, Y.; Yu, W.; Hu, S.; Jin, J. Infiltrating CD4+ T Cells Attenuate Chemotherapy Sensitivity in Prostate Cancer via CCL5 Signaling. Prostate 2019, 79, 1018–1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Kiniwa, Y.; Miyahara, Y.; Wang, H.Y.; Peng, W.; Peng, G.; Wheeler, T.M.; Thompson, T.C.; Old, L.J.; Wang, R.-F. CD8+ Foxp3+ Regulatory T Cells Mediate Immunosuppression in Prostate Cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2007, 13, 6947–6958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Gocheva, V.; Wang, H.W.; Gadea, B.B.; Shree, T.; Hunter, K.E.; Garfall, A.L.; Berman, T.; Joyce, J.A. IL-4 Induces Cathepsin Protease Activity in Tumor-Associated Macrophages to Promote Cancer Growth and Invasion. Genes Dev. 2010, 24, 241–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Lin, Y.; Xu, J.; Lan, H. Tumor-Associated Macrophages in Tumor Metastasis: Biological Roles and Clinical Therapeutic Applications. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2019, 12, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Erlandsson, A.; Carlsson, J.; Lundholm, M.; Fält, A.; Andersson, S.O.; Andrén, O.; Davidsson, S. M2 Macrophages and Regulatory T Cells in Lethal Prostate Cancer. Prostate 2019, 79, 363–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Wang, C.; Zhang, Y.; Gao, W.Q. The Evolving Role of Immune Cells in Prostate Cancer. Cancer Lett. 2022, 525, 9–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Lu, H.; Ouyang, W.; Huang, C. Inflammation, a Key Event in Cancer Development. Mol. Cancer Res. 2006, 4, 221–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Ames, B.N.; Gold, L.S.; Willettt, W.C. The Causes and Prevention of Cancer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1995, 92, 5258–5265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Doat, S.; Cénée, S.; Trétarre, B.; Rebillard, X.; Lamy, P.J.; Bringer, J.P.; Iborra, F.; Murez, T.; Sanchez, M.; Menegaux, F. Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) and Prostate Cancer Risk: Results from the EPICAP Study. Cancer Med. 2017, 6, 2461–2470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Salinas, C.A.; Kwon, E.M.; Fitzgerald, L.M.; Feng, Z.; Nelson, P.S.; Ostrander, E.A.; Peters, U.; Stanford, J.L. Use of Aspirin and Other Nonsteroidal Antiinflammatory Medications in Relation to Prostate Cancer Risk. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2010, 172, 578–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Longo, J.; Freedland, S.J.; Penn, L.Z.; Hamilton, R.J. Statins and Prostate Cancer—Hype or Hope? The Biological Perspective. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2022, 25, 650–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Boudreau, D.M.; Yu, O.; Johnson, J. Statin Use and Cancer Risk: A Comprehensive Review. Expert. Opin. Drug Saf. 2010, 9, 603–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Sutcliffe, S.; Zenilman, J.M.; Ghanem, K.G.; Jadack, R.A.; Sokoll, L.J.; Elliott, D.J.; Nelson, W.G.; De Marzo, A.M.; Cole, S.R.; Isaacs, W.B.; et al. Sexually Transmitted Infections and Prostatic Inflammation/Cell Damage as Measured by Serum Prostate Specific Antigen Concentration. J. Urol. 2006, 175, 1937–1942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Moghoofei, M.; Keshavarz, M.; Ghorbani, S.; Babaei, F.; Nahand, J.S.; Tavakoli, A.; Mortazavi, H.S.; Marjani, A.; Mostafaei, S.; Monavari, S.H. Association between Human Papillomavirus Infection and Prostate Cancer: A Global Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Asia Pac. J. Clin. Oncol. 2019, 15, e59–e67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Heinlein, C.A.; Chang, C. Androgen Receptor in Prostate Cancer. Endocr. Rev. 2004, 25, 276–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Nakai, Y.; Nelson, W.G.; De Marzo, A.M. The Dietary Charred Meat Carcinogen 2-Amino-1-Methyl-6-Phenylimidazo [4,5-b] Pyridine Acts as Both a Tumor Initiator and Promoter in the Rat Ventral Prostate. Cancer Res. 2007, 67, 1378–1384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Kirby, R.S.; Lowe, D.; Bultitude, M.I.; Shuttleworth, K.E.D. Intra-Prostatic Urinary Reflux: An Aetiological Factor in Abacterial Prostatitis. Br. J. Urol. 1982, 54, 729–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Aul, P.; Ichtenstein, L.; Olm, I.V.H.; Erkasalo, I.K.V.; Nastasia, A.; Liadou, I.; Aakko, J.; Aprio, K.; Arkku, M.; Oskenvuo, K.; et al. Environmental and heritable factors in the causation of cancer—Analyses of Cohorts of Twins from Sweden, Denmark, and Finland A BSTRACT Background the Contribution of Hereditary Factors. N. Engl. J. Med. 2000, 343, 78–85. [Google Scholar]
  94. Haenszel, W.; Kurihara, M. Studies of Japanese Migrants. I. Mortality from Cancer and Other Diseases among Japanese in the United States. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1968, 40, 43–68. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  95. Dickerman, B.A.; Torfadottir, J.E.; Valdimarsdottir, U.A.; Giovannucci, E.; Wilson, K.M.; Aspelund, T.; Tryggvadottir, L.; Sigurdardottir, L.G.; Harris, T.B.; Launer, L.J.; et al. Body Fat Distribution on Computed Tomography Imaging and Prostate Cancer Risk and Mortality in the AGES-Reykjavik Study. Cancer 2019, 125, 2877–2885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Pan, S.Y.; Chen, W.C.; Huang, C.P.; Hsu, C.Y.; Chang, Y.H. The Association of Prostate Cancer and Urinary Tract Infections: A New Perspective of Prostate Cancer Pathogenesis. Medicina 2023, 59, 483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Takata, R.; Takahashi, A.; Fujita, M.; Momozawa, Y.; Saunders, E.J.; Yamada, H.; Maejima, K.; Nakano, K.; Nishida, Y.; Hishida, A.; et al. 12 New Susceptibility Loci for Prostate Cancer Identified by Genome-Wide Association Study in Japanese Population. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 4422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Grönberg, H.; Damber, L.; Damber, J.-E. Studies of Genetic Factors in Prostate Cancer in a Twin Population. J. Urol. 1994, 152, 1484–1487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Akhoundova, D.; Feng, F.Y.; Pritchard, C.C.; Rubin, M.A. Molecular Genetics of Prostate Cancer and Role of Genomic Testing. Surg Pathol Clin. 2022, 15, 617–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Cihan, Y.B.; Arslan, A.; Ergul, M.A. Subtypes of White Blood Cells in Patients with Prostate Cancer or Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia and Healthy Individuals. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2013, 14, 4779–4783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Watts, E.L.; Perez-Cornago, A.; Kothari, J.; Allen, N.E.; Travis, R.C.; Key, T.J. Hematologic Markers and Prostate Cancer Risk: A Prospective Analysis in UK Biobank. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2020, 29, 1615–1626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Song, J.; Wang, W.; Yuan, Y.; Ban, Y.; Su, J.; Yuan, D.; Chen, W.; Zhu, J. Identification of Immune-Based Prostate Cancer Subtypes Using MRNA Expression. Biosci. Rep. 2021, 41, BSR20201533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Adorno Febles, V.R.; Hao, Y.; Ahsan, A.; Wu, J.; Qian, Y.; Zhong, H.; Loeb, S.; Makarov, D.V.; Lepor, H.; Wysock, J.; et al. Single-Cell Analysis of Localized Prostate Cancer Patients Links High Gleason Score with an Immunosuppressive Profile. Prostate 2023, 83, 840–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Deryugina, E.I.; Zajac, E.; Juncker-Jensen, A.; Kupriyanova, T.A.; Welter, L.; Quigley, J.P. Tissue-Infiltrating Neutrophils Constitute the Major In Vivo Source of Angiogenesis-Inducing MMP-9 in the Tumor Microenvironment. Neoplasia 2014, 16, 771–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Yoshida, M.; Taguchi, A.; Kawana, K.; Adachi, K.; Kawata, A.; Ogishima, J.; Nakamura, H.; Fujimoto, A.; Sato, M.; Inoue, T.; et al. Modification of the Tumor Microenvironment in KRAS or C-MYC-Induced Ovarian Cancer-Associated Peritonitis. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0160330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Gong, L.; Cumpian, A.M.; Caetano, M.S.; Ochoa, C.E.; De La Garza, M.M.; Lapid, D.J.; Mirabolfathinejad, S.G.; Dickey, B.F.; Zhou, Q.; Moghaddam, S.J. Promoting Effect of Neutrophils on Lung Tumorigenesis Is Mediated by CXCR2 and Neutrophil Elastase. Mol. Cancer 2013, 12, 154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Campregher, C.; Luciani, M.G.; Gasche, C. Activated Neutrophils Induce an HMSH2-Dependent G2/M Checkpoint Arrest and Replication Errors at a (CA)13-Repeat in Colon Epithelial Cells. Gut 2008, 57, 780–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Romano, A.; Parrinello, N.L.; Vetro, C.; Tibullo, D.; Giallongo, C.; La Cava, P.; Chiarenza, A.; Motta, G.; Caruso, A.L.; Villari, L.; et al. The Prognostic Value of the Myeloid-Mediated Immunosuppression Marker Arginase-1 in Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 67333–67346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Nielsen, S.R.; Strøbech, J.E.; Horton, E.R.; Jackstadt, R.; Laitala, A.; Bravo, M.C.; Maltese, G.; Jensen, A.R.D.; Reuten, R.; Rafaeva, M.; et al. Suppression of Tumor-Associated Neutrophils by Lorlatinib Attenuates Pancreatic Cancer Growth and Improves Treatment with Immune Checkpoint Blockade. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 3414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Rodriguez, Y.I.; Campos, L.E.; Castro, M.G.; Bannoud, N.; Blidner, A.G.; Filippa, V.P.; Croci, D.O.; Rabinovich, G.A.; Alvarez, S.E. Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor-1 (P55) Deficiency Attenuates Tumor Growth and Intratumoral Angiogenesis and Stimulates CD8+ T Cell Function in Melanoma. Cells 2020, 9, 2469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Morimoto-Kamata, R.; Yui, S. Insulin-like Growth Factor-1 Signaling Is Responsible for Cathepsin G-Induced Aggregation of Breast Cancer MCF-7 Cells. Cancer Sci. 2017, 108, 1574–1583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. De Monte, L.; Wörmann, S.; Brunetto, E.; Heltai, S.; Magliacane, G.; Reni, M.; Paganoni, A.M.; Recalde, H.; Mondino, A.; Falconi, M.; et al. Basophil Recruitment into Tumor-Draining Lymph Nodes Correlates with Th2 Inflammation and Reduced Survival in Pancreatic Cancer Patients. Cancer Res. 2016, 76, 1792–1803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Baba, T.; Tanabe, Y.; Yoshikawa, S.; Yamanishi, Y.; Morishita, S.; Komatsu, N.; Karasuyama, H.; Hirao, A.; Mukaida, N. MIP-1a/CCL3-Expressing Basophil-Lineage Cells Drive the Leukemic Hematopoiesis of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Mice. Blood 2016, 127, 2607–2617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Sektioglu, I.M.; Carretero, R.; Bulbuc, N.; Bald, T.; Tüting, T.; Rudensky, A.Y.; Hämmerling, G.J. Basophils Promote Tumor Rejection via Chemotaxis and Infiltration of CD8+ T Cells. Cancer Res. 2017, 77, 291–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. de Paulis, A.; Prevete, N.; Fiorentino, I.; Rossi, F.W.; Staibano, S.; Montuori, N.; Ragno, P.; Longobardi, A.; Liccardo, B.; Genovese, A.; et al. Expression and Functions of the Vascular Endothelial Growth Factors and Their Receptors in Human Basophils. J. Immunol. 2006, 177, 7322–7331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Cerny-Reiterer, S.; Ghanim, V.; Hoermann, G.; Aichberger, K.J.; Herrmann, H.; Muellauer, L.; Repa, A.; Sillaber, C.; Walls, A.F.; Mayerhofer, M.; et al. Identification of Basophils as a Major Source of Hepatocyte Growth Factor in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: A Novel Mechanism of BCR-ABL1-Independent Disease Progression. Neoplasia 2012, 14, 572–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Prevete, N.; Staiano, R.I.; Granata, F.; Detoraki, A.; Necchi, V.; Ricci, V.; Triggiani, M.; De Paulis, A.; Marone, G.; Genovese, A. Expression and Function of Angiopoietins and Their Tie Receptors in Human Basophils and Mast Cells. J. Biol. Regul. Homeost. Agents 2013, 27, 827–839. [Google Scholar]
  118. Kryczek, I.; Wei, S.; Zou, L.; Altuwaijri, S.; Szeliga, W.; Kolls, J.; Chang, A.; Zou, W. Cutting Edge: Th17 and Regulatory T Cell Dynamics and the Regulation by IL-2 in the Tumor Microenvironment. J. Immunol. 2007, 178, 6730–6733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Michalaki, V.; Syrigos, K.; Charles, P.; Waxman, J. Serum Levels of IL-6 and TNF-α Correlate with Clinicopathological Features and Patient Survival in Patients with Prostate Cancer. Br. J. Cancer 2004, 90, 2312–2316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. McNeel, D.G.; Gardner, T.A.; Higano, C.S.; Kantoff, P.W.; Small, E.J.; Wener, M.H.; Sims, R.B.; DeVries, T.; Sheikh, N.A.; Dreicer, R. A Transient Increase in Eosinophils Is Associated with Prolonged Survival in Men with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Who Receive Sipuleucel-T. Cancer Immunol. Res. 2014, 2, 988–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Mumberg, D.; Monach, P.A.; Wanderling, S.; Philip, M.; Toledano, A.Y.; Schreiber, R.D.; Schreiber, H.; Rowley, J.D. CD4 T Cells Eliminate MHC Class II-Negative Cancer Cells in Vivo by Indirect Effects of IFN-gamma. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 8633–8638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Kawamata, H.; Kameyama, S.; Oyasu’, R. In Vitro and In Vivo Acceleration of the Neoplastic Phenotype of a Low-Tumorigenicity Rat Bladder Carcinoma Cell Line by Transfected Transforming Growth Factor-a. Mol. Carcinog. 1994, 9, 210–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Salven, P.; Ruotsalainen, T.; Mattson, K.; Joensuu, H. High pre-treatment serum level of vascular endothelial growth factor (vegf) is associated with poor outcome in small-cell lung cancer. Int. J. Cancer 1998, 79, 144–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Park, B.K.; Zhang, H.; Zeng, Q.; Dai, J.; Keller, E.T.; Giordano, T.; Gu, K.; Shah, V.; Pei, L.; Zarbo, R.J.; et al. NF-ΚB in Breast Cancer Cells Promotes Osteolytic Bone Metastasis by Inducing Osteoclastogenesis via GM-CSF. Nat. Med. 2007, 13, 62–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Taipale, J.; Lohi, J.; Saarinen, J.; Kovanen, P.T.; Keski-Oja, J. Human Mast Cell Chymase and Leukocyte Elastase Release Latent Transforming Growth Factor-PI from the Extracellular Matrix of Cultured Human Epithelial and Endothelial Cells. J. Biol. Chem. 1995, 270, 4689–4696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Johnson, C.; Huynh, V.; Hargrove, L.; Kennedy, L.; Graf-Eaton, A.; Owens, J.; Trzeciakowski, J.P.; Hodges, K.; Demorrow, S.; Han, Y.; et al. Inhibition of Mast Cell-Derived Histamine Decreases Human Cholangiocarcinoma Growth and Differentiation via c-Kit/Stem Cell Factor-Dependent Signaling. Am. J. Pathol. 2016, 186, 123–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Dudeck, J.; Ghouse, S.M.; Lehmann, C.H.K.; Hoppe, A.; Schubert, N.; Nedospasov, S.A.; Dudziak, D.; Dudeck, A. Mast-Cell-Derived TNF Amplifies CD8+ Dendritic Cell Functionality and CD8+ T Cell Priming. Cell Rep. 2015, 13, 399–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Litmanovich, A.; Khazim, K.; Cohen, I. The Role of Interleukin-1 in the Pathogenesis of Cancer and Its Potential as a Therapeutic Target in Clinical Practice. Oncol. Ther. 2018, 6, 109–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Cimpean, A.M.; Tamma, R.; Ruggieri, S.; Nico, B.; Toma, A.; Ribatti, D. Mast Cells in Breast Cancer Angiogenesis. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 2017, 115, 23–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Ribatti, D.; Ranieri, G. Tryptase, a Novel Angiogenic Factor Stored in Mast Cell Granules. Exp. Cell Res. 2015, 332, 157–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. da Silva, E.Z.M.; Jamur, M.C.; Oliver, C. Mast Cell Function: A New Vision of an Old Cell. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 2014, 62, 698–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Murata, T.; Aritake, K.; Matsumoto, S.; Kamauchi, S.; Nakagawa, T.; Hori, M.; Momotani, E.; Urade, Y.; Ozaki, H. Prostagladin D 2 Is a Mast Cell-Derived Antiangiogenic Factor in Lung Carcinoma. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 19802–19807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Wu, Y.; Deng, J.; Rychahou, P.G.; Qiu, S.; Evers, B.M.; Zhou, B.P. Stabilization of Snail by NF-ΚB Is Required for Inflammation-Induced Cell Migration and Invasion. Cancer Cell 2009, 15, 416–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Fu, X.T.; Dai, Z.; Song, K.; Zhang, Z.J.; Zhou, Z.J.; Zhou, S.L.; Zhao, Y.M.; Xiao, Y.S.; Sun, Q.M.; Ding, Z.; et al. Macrophage-Secreted IL-8 Induces Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells by Activating the JAK2/STAT3/Snail Pathway. Int. J. Oncol. 2015, 46, 587–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Kawata, M.; Koinuma, D.; Ogami, T.; Umezawa, K.; Iwata, C.; Watabe, T.; Miyazono, K. TGF-β-Induced Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition of A549 Lung Adenocarcinoma Cells Is Enhanced by pro-Inflammatory Cytokines Derived from RAW 264.7 Macrophage Cells. J. Biochem. 2012, 151, 205–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Cui, Q.; Wang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Shen, Y.; Qian, Y. Macrophage-Derived MMP-9 and MMP-2 Are Closely Related to the Rupture of the Fibrous Capsule of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Leading to Tumor Invasion. Biol. Proced. Online 2023, 25, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Chen, Y.; Zhang, S.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, X. Tumor-Recruited M2 Macrophages Promote Gastric and Breast Cancer Metastasis via M2 Macrophage-Secreted CHI3L1 Protein. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2017, 10, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Grivennikov, S.I.; Wang, K.; Mucida, D.; Stewart, C.A.; Schnabl, B.; Jauch, D.; Taniguchi, K.; Yu, G.Y.; Österreicher, C.H.; Hung, K.E.; et al. Adenoma-Linked Barrier Defects and Microbial Products Drive IL-23/IL-17-Mediated Tumour Growth. Nature 2012, 491, 254–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Kong, L.; Zhou, Y.; Bu, H.; Lv, T.; Shi, Y.; Yang, J. Deletion of Interleukin-6 in Monocytes/Macrophages Suppresses the Initiation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Mice. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2016, 35, 131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Thijssen, V.L.J.L.; Paulis, Y.W.J.; Nowak-Sliwinska, P.; Deumelandt, K.L.; Hosaka, K.; Soetekouw, P.M.M.B.; Cimpean, A.M.; Raica, M.; Pauwels, P.; van den Oord, J.J.; et al. Targeting PDGF-Mediated Recruitment of Pericytes Blocks Vascular Mimicry and Tumor Growth. J. Pathol. 2018, 246, 447–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Zhang, Q.; Liu, S.; Ge, D.; Cunningham, D.M.; Huang, F.; Ma, L.; Burris, T.P.; You, Z. Targeting Th17-IL-17 Pathway in Prevention of Micro-Invasive Prostate Cancer in a Mouse Model. Prostate 2017, 77, 888–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Adekoya, T.O.; Richardson, R.M. Cytokines and Chemokines as Mediators of Prostate Cancer Metastasis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Osawa, Y.; Nagaki, M.; Banno, Y.; Brenner, D.A.; Asano, T.; Nozawa, Y.; Moriwaki, H.; Nakashima, S. Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha-Induced Interleukin-8 Production via NF-ΚB and Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase/Akt Pathways Inhibits Cell Apoptosis in Human Hepatocytes. Infect. Immun. 2002, 70, 6294–6301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. SMith, P.; Hobisch, A.; Lin, D.; Culig, Z.; Keller, E. Interleukin-6 and Prostate Cancer Progression. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2001, 12, 33–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Ammirante, M.; Luo, J.L.; Grivennikov, S.; Nedospasov, S.; Karin, M. B-Cell-Derived Lymphotoxin Promotes Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. Nature 2010, 464, 302–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Parekh, V.V.; Prasad, D.V.R.; Banerjee, P.P.; Joshi, B.N.; Kumar, A.; Mishra, G.C. B Cells Activated by Lipopolysaccharide, But Not by Anti-Ig and Anti-CD40 Antibody, Induce Anergy in CD8+ T Cells: Role of TGF-Β1. J. Immunol. 2003, 170, 5897–5911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Wojciechowski, W.; Harris, D.P.; Sprague, F.; Mousseau, B.; Makris, M.; Kusser, K.; Honjo, T.; Mohrs, K.; Mohrs, M.; Randall, T.; et al. Cytokine-Producing Effector B Cells Regulate Type 2 Immunity to H. Polygyrus. Immunity 2009, 30, 421–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Barr, T.A.; Brown, S.; Mastroeni, P.; Gray, D. TLR and B Cell Receptor Signals to B Cells Differentially Program Primary and Memory Th1 Responses to Salmonella Enterica. J. Immunol. 2010, 185, 2783–2789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Zhang, B.; Vogelzang, A.; Miyajima, M.; Sugiura, Y.; Wu, Y.; Chamoto, K.; Nakano, R.; Hatae, R.; Menzies, R.J.; Sonomura, K.; et al. B Cell-Derived GABA Elicits IL-10+ Macrophages to Limit Anti-Tumour Immunity. Nature 2021, 599, 471–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Ballesteros, I.; Rubio-Ponce, A.; Genua, M.; Lusito, E.; Kwok, I.; Fernández-Calvo, G.; Khoyratty, T.E.; van Grinsven, E.; González-Hernández, S.; Nicolás-Ávila, J.Á.; et al. Co-Option of Neutrophil Fates by Tissue Environments. Cell 2020, 183, 1282–1297.e18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. El-Benna, J.; Hurtado-Nedelec, M.; Marzaioli, V.; Marie, J.C.; Gougerot-Pocidalo, M.A.; Dang, P.M.C. Priming of the Neutrophil Respiratory Burst: Role in Host Defense and Inflammation. Immunol. Rev. 2016, 273, 180–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Venet, F.; Monneret, G. Advances in the Understanding and Treatment of Sepsis-Induced Immunosuppression. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2018, 14, 121–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Fujita, K.; Imamura, R.; Tanigawa, G.; Nakagawa, M.; Hayashi, T.; Kishimoto, N.; Hosomi, M.; Yamaguchi, S. Low Serum Neutrophil Count Predicts a Positive Prostate Biopsy. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2012, 15, 386–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Fujita, K.; Hosomi, M.; Nakagawa, M.; Tanigawa, G.; Imamura, R.; Uemura, M.; Nakai, Y.; Takayama, H.; Yamaguchi, S.; Nonomura, N. White Blood Cell Count Is Positively Associated with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. Int. J. Urol. 2014, 21, 308–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Hedrick, C.C.; Malanchi, I. Neutrophils in Cancer: Heterogeneous and Multifaceted. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2022, 22, 173–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Alsamraae, M.; Costanzo-Garvey, D.; Teply, B.A.; Boyle, S.; Sommerville, G.; Herbert, Z.T.; Morrissey, C.; Dafferner, A.J.; Abdalla, M.Y.; Fallet, R.W.; et al. Androgen receptor inhibition suppresses anti-tumor neutrophil response against bone metastatic prostate cancer via regulation of TβRI expression. Cancer Letters 2023, 28, 216468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Cohen, M.; Giladi, A.; Gorki, A.D.; Solodkin, D.G.; Zada, M.; Hladik, A.; Miklosi, A.; Salame, T.M.; Halpern, K.B.; David, E.; et al. Lung Single-Cell Signaling Interaction Map Reveals Basophil Role in Macrophage Imprinting. Cell 2018, 175, 1031–1044.e18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Hadadi, A.; Smith, K.E.; Wan, L.; Brown, J.R.; Russler, G.; Yantorni, L.; Caulfield, S.; Lafollette, J.; Moore, M.; Kucuk, O.; et al. Baseline Basophil and Basophil-to-Lymphocyte Status Is Associated with Clinical Outcomes in Metastatic Hormone Sensitive Prostate Cancer. Urol. Oncol. Semin. Orig. Investig. 2022, 40, e9–e271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Pellefigues, C.; Mehta, P.; Chappell, S.; Yumnam, B.; Old, S.; Camberis, M.; Le Gros, G. Diverse Innate Stimuli Activate Basophils through Pathways Involving Syk and IκB Kinases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, 2019524118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Galeotti, C.; Stephen-Victor, E.; Karnam, A.; Das, M.; Gilardin, L.; Maddur, M.S.; Wymann, S.; Vonarburg, C.; Chevailler, A.; Dimitrov, J.D.; et al. Intravenous Immunoglobulin Induces IL-4 in Human Basophils by Signaling through Surface-Bound IgE. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2019, 144, 524–535.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. He, X.; Cao, Y.; Gu, Y.; Fang, H.; Wang, J.; Liu, X.; Lv, K.; Yu, K.; Fei, Y.; Lin, C.; et al. Clinical Outcomes and Immune Metrics in Intratumoral Basophil-Enriched Gastric Cancer Patients. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2021, 28, 6439–6450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Falkencrone, S.; Poulsen, L.K.; Bindslev-Jensen, C.; Woetmann, A.; Odum, N.; Poulsen, B.C.; Blom, L.; Jensen, B.M.; Gibbs, B.F.; Yasinska, I.M.; et al. IgE-Mediated Basophil Tumour Necrosis Factor Alpha Induces Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 from Monocytes. Allergy Eur. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2013, 68, 614–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Liu, Q.; Luo, D.; Cai, S.; Li, Q.; Li, X. Circulating Basophil Count as a Prognostic Marker of Tumor Aggressiveness and Survival Outcomes in Colorectal Cancer. Clin. Transl. Med. 2020, 9, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Fulkerson, P.C. Transcription Factors in Eosinophil Development and as Therapeutic Targets. Front. Med. 2017, 4, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Hogan, S.P.; Rosenberg, H.F.; Moqbel, R.; Phipps, S.; Foster, P.S.; Lacy, P.; Kay, A.B.; Rothenberg, M.E. Eosinophils: Biological Properties and Role in Health and Disease. Clin. Exp. Allergy 2008, 38, 709–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Ponath, P.D.; Qin, S.; Postyl, T.W.; Wang, J.; Wu, L.; Gerardyl, N.P.; Newman, W.; Gerard, C.; Mackay, C.R. Molecular Cloning and Characterization of a Human Eotaxin Receptor Expressed Selectively on Eosinophils. J. Exp. Med. 1996, 183, 2437–2448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Sakkal, S.; Miller, S.; Apostolopoulos, V.; Nurgali, K. Eosinophils in Cancer: Favourable or Unfavourable? Curr. Med. Chem. 2016, 23, 650–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Varricchi, G.; Bagnasco, D.; Borriello, F.; Heffler, E.; Canonica, G.W. Interleukin-5 Pathway Inhibition in the Treatment of Eosinophilic Respiratory Disorders: Evidence and Unmet Needs. Curr. Opin. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2016, 16, 186–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Caruso, R.A.; Parisi, A.; Quattrocchi, E.; Scardigno, M.; Branca, G.; Parisi, C.; Lucianò, R.; Paparo, D.; Fedele, F. Ultrastructural Descriptions of Heterotypic Aggregation between Eosinophils and Tumor Cells in Human Gastric Carcinomas. Ultrastruct. Pathol. 2011, 35, 145–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Rodríguez Bustos, H.; Cortés Chau, F.; Cortés Pino, F.; Aguirre, P.; Bravo, G.; Gallegos Méndez, I.; Arriaza Onel, C.; Cuellar Godoy, C.; Aguayo González, F.; Espinoza Navarro, O. Morphological Changes of the Cellularity in the Prostatic Gland from Patients with Confirmed Cancer: Gleason Level and Presence of Eosinophils and Mast Cells: Cellular Bioindicators. Int. J. Morphol. 2020, 38, 882–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Furbert-Harris, P.M.; Parish-Gause, D.; Hunter, K.A.; Vaughn, T.R.; Howland, C.; Okomo-Awich, J.; Forrest, K.; Laniyan, I.; Abdelnaby, A.; Oredipe, O.A. Activated Eosinophils Upregulate the Metastasis Suppressor Molecule E-Cadherin on Prostate Tumor Cells. Cell Mol. Biol. 2003, 49, 1009–1016. [Google Scholar]
  172. Furbert-Harris, P.; Parish-Gause, D.; Laniyan, I.; Hunter, K.A.; Okomo-Awich, J.; Vaughn, T.R.; Forrest, K.C.; Howland, C.; Abdelnaby, A.; Oredipe, O.A. Inhibition of Prostate Cancer Cell Growth by Activated Eosinophils. Prostate 2003, 57, 165–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Moon, T.C.; St Laurent, C.D.; Morris, K.E.; Marcet, C.; Yoshimura, T.; Sekar, Y.; Befus, A.D. Advances in Mast Cell Biology: New Understanding of Heterogeneity and Function. Mucosal Immunol. 2010, 3, 111–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Gurish, M.F.; Austen, K.F. Developmental Origin and Functional Specialization of Mast Cell Subsets. Immunity 2012, 37, 25–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  175. Dwyer, D.F.; Barrett, N.A.; Austen, K.F.; Kim, E.Y.; Brenner, M.B.; Shaw, L.; Yu, B.; Goldrath, A.; Mostafavi, S.; Regev, A.; et al. Expression Profiling of Constitutive Mast Cells Reveals a Unique Identity within the Immune System. Nat. Immunol. 2016, 17, 878–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Elieh Ali Komi, D.; Wöhrl, S.; Bielory, L. Mast Cell Biology at Molecular Level: A Comprehensive Review. Clin. Rev. Allergy Immunol. 2020, 58, 342–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  177. Varricchi, G.; Galdiero, M.R.; Loffredo, S.; Marone, G.; Iannone, R.; Marone, G.; Granata, F. Are Mast Cells MASTers in Cancer? Front. Immunol. 2017, 8, 424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Johansson, A.; Rudolfsson, S.; Hammarsten, P.; Halin, S.; Pietras, K.; Jones, J.; Stattin, P.; Egevad, L.; Granfors, T.; Wikström, P.; et al. Mast Cells Are Novel Independent Prognostic Markers in Prostate Cancer and Represent a Target for Therapy. Am. J. Pathol. 2010, 177, 1031–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Zadvornyi, T.; Lukianova, N.; Borikun, T.; Tymoshenko, A.; Mushii, O.; Voronina, O.; Vitruk, I.; Stakhovskyi, E.; Chekhun, V. Mast Cells as a Tumor Microenvironment Factor Associated with the Aggressiveness of Prostate Cancer. Neoplasma 2022, 69, 1490–1498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Ma, Z.; Yue, L.; Xu, Z.; Zeng, S.; Ma, Y.; Li, Z.; Li, W.; Wang, D. The Effect of Mast Cells on the Biological Characteristics of Prostate Cancer Cells. Cent. Eur. J. Immunol. 2018, 43, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Li, L.; Dang, Q.; Xie, H.; Yang, Z.; He, D.; Liang, L.; Song, W.; Yeh, S.; Chang, C. Infiltrating Mast Cells Enhance Prostate Cancer Invasion via Altering LncRNA-HOTAIR/PRC2-Androgen Receptor (AR)-MMP9 Signals and Increased Stem/Progenitor Cell Population. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 14179–14190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Globa, T.; Şptefrţi, L.; Ceauşu, R.A.; Gaje, P.; Cimpean, A.M.; Raica, M. Mast Cell Phenotype in Benign and Malignant Tumors of the Prostate. Pol. J. Pathol. 2014, 65, 147–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Sullivan, H.H.; Heaphy, C.M.; Kulac, I.; Cuka, N.; Lu, J.; Barber, J.R.; de Marzo, A.M.; Lotan, T.L.; Joshu, C.E.; Sfanos, K.S. High Extratumoral Mast Cell Counts Are Associated with a Higher Risk of Adverse Prostate Cancer Outcomes. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2020, 29, 668–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Nonomura, N.; Takayama, H.; Nishimura, K.; Oka, D.; Nakai, Y.; Shiba, M.; Tsujimura, A.; Nakayama, M.; Aozasa, K.; Okuyama, A. Decreased Number of Mast Cells Infiltrating into Needle Biopsy Specimens Leads to a Better Prognosis of Prostate Cancer. Br. J. Cancer 2007, 97, 952–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Biswas, S.K.; Mantovani, A. Macrophage Plasticity and Interaction with Lymphocyte Subsets: Cancer as a Paradigm. Nat. Immunol. 2010, 11, 889–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  186. Qian, B.Z.; Pollard, J.W. Macrophage Diversity Enhances Tumor Progression and Metastasis. Cell 2010, 141, 39–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  187. Movahedi, K.; Laoui, D.; Gysemans, C.; Baeten, M.; Stangé, G.; Den Van Bossche, J.; Mack, M.; Pipeleers, D.; In’t Veld, P.; De Baetselier, P.; et al. Different Tumor Microenvironments Contain Functionally Distinct Subsets of Macrophages Derived from Ly6C(High) Monocytes. Cancer Res. 2010, 70, 5728–5739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Laoui, D.; Movahedi, K.; van Overmeire, E.; van den Bossche, J.; Schouppe, E.; Mommer, C.; Nikolaou, A.; Morias, Y.; de Baetselier, P.; van Ginderachter, J.A. Tumor-Associated Macrophages in Breast Cancer: Distinct Subsets, Distinct Functions. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 2011, 55, 861–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  189. Kaplan, R.N.; Riba, R.D.; Zacharoulis, S.; Bramley, A.H.; Vincent, L.; Costa, C.; MacDonald, D.D.; Jin, D.K.; Shido, K.; Kerns, S.A.; et al. VEGFR1-Positive Haematopoietic Bone Marrow Progenitors Initiate the Pre-Metastatic Niche. Nature 2005, 438, 820–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  190. Sceneay, J.; Smyth, M.J.; Möller, A. The Pre-Metastatic Niche: Finding Common Ground. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2013, 32, 449–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Dai, J.; Lu, Y.; Roca, H.; Keller, J.M.; Zhang, J.; McCauley, L.K.; Keller, E.T. Immune Mediators in the Tumor Microenvironment of Prostate Cancer. Chin. J. Cancer 2017, 36, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Cenerenti, M.; Saillard, M.; Romero, P.; Jandus, C. The Era of Cytotoxic CD4 T Cells. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 867189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Miller, A.M.; Lundberg, K.; Özenci, V.; Banham, A.H.; Hellström, M.; Egevad, L.; Pisa, P. CD4+CD25high T Cells Are Enriched in the Tumor and Peripheral Blood of Prostate Cancer Patients. J. Immunol. 2006, 177, 7398–7405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Barkin, J.; Rodriguez-Suarez, R.; Betito, K. Association between Natural Killer Cell Activity and Prostate Cancer: A Pilot Study. Can. J. Urol. 2017, 24, 8708–8713. [Google Scholar]
  195. Strasner, A.; Karin, M. Immune Infiltration and Prostate Cancer. Front. Oncol. 2015, 5, 128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Kaur, H.B.; Guedes, L.B.; Lu, J.; Maldonado, L.; Reitz, L.; Barber, J.R.; De Marzo, A.M.; Tosoian, J.J.; Tomlins, S.A.; Schaeffer, E.M.; et al. Association of Tumor-Infiltrating T-Cell Density with Molecular Subtype, Racial Ancestry and Clinical Outcomes in Prostate Cancer. Mod. Pathol. 2018, 31, 1539–1552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  197. Sfanos, K.S.; Bruno, T.C.; Maris, C.H.; Xu, L.; Thoburn, C.J.; DeMarzo, A.M.; Meeker, A.K.; Isaacs, W.B.; Drake, C.G. Phenotypic Analysis of Prostate-Infiltrating Lymphocytes Reveals TH17 and Treg Skewing. Clin. Cancer Res. 2008, 14, 3254–3261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  198. Lebien, T.W.; Thomas, T.F. B Lymphocytes: How They Develop and Function. Blood 2008, 112, 1570–1580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  199. Hegde, P.S.; Chen, D.S. Top 10 Challenges in Cancer Immunotherapy. Immunity 2020, 52, 17–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Cui, C.; Wang, J.; Fagerberg, E.; Chen, P.M.; Connolly, K.A.; Damo, M.; Cheung, J.F.; Mao, T.; Askari, A.S.; Chen, S.; et al. Neoantigen-Driven B Cell and CD4 T Follicular Helper Cell Collaboration Promotes Anti-Tumor CD8 T Cell Responses. Cell 2021, 184, 6101–6118.e13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  201. Chen, Z.; Huang, Y.; Hu, Z.; Zhao, M.; Li, M.; Bi, G.; Zheng, Y.; Liang, J.; Lu, T.; Jiang, W.; et al. Landscape and Dynamics of Single Tumor and Immune Cells in Early and Advanced-stage Lung Adenocarcinoma. Clin. Transl. Med. 2021, 11, e350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Shao, Y.; Lo, C.M.; Ling, C.C.; Liu, X.B.; Ng, K.T.P.; Chu, A.C.Y.; Ma, Y.Y.; Li, C.X.; Fan, S.T.; Man, K. Regulatory B Cells Accelerate Hepatocellular Carcinoma Progression via CD40/CD154 Signaling Pathway. Cancer Lett. 2014, 355, 264–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Murakami, Y.; Saito, H.; Shimizu, S.; Kono, Y.; Shishido, Y.; Miyatani, K.; Matsunaga, T.; Fukumoto, Y.; Ashida, K.; Sakabe, T.; et al. Increased Regulatory B Cells Are Involved in Immune Evasion in Patients with Gastric Cancer. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 13083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Carter, N.A.; Rosser, E.C.; Mauri, C. Interleukin-10 Produced by B Cells Is Crucial for the Suppression of Th17/Th1 Responses, Induction of T Regulatory Type 1 Cells and Reduction of Collagen-Induced Arthritis. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2012, 14, R32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  205. Shen, P.; Roch, T.; Lampropoulou, V.; O’Connor, R.A.; Stervbo, U.; Hilgenberg, E.; Ries, S.; Dang, V.D.; Jaimes, Y.; Daridon, C.; et al. IL-35-Producing B Cells Are Critical Regulators of Immunity during Autoimmune and Infectious Diseases. Nature 2014, 507, 366–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Tian, J.; Zekzer, D.; Hanssen, L.; Lu, Y.; Olcott, A.; Kaufman, D.L. Lipopolysaccharide-Activated B Cells Down-Regulate Th1 Immunity and Prevent Autoimmune Diabetes in Nonobese Diabetic Mice. J. Immunol. 2001, 167, 1081–1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  207. Voronov, E.; Shouval, D.S.; Krelin, Y.; Cagnano, E.; Benharroch, D.; Iwakura, Y.; Dinarello, C.A.; Apte, R.N. IL-1 Is Required for Tumor Invasiveness and Angiogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 2645–2650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  208. Nguyen, D.P.; Li, J.; Tewari, A.K. Inflammation and Prostate Cancer: The Role of Interleukin 6 (IL-6). BJU Int. 2014, 113, 986–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  209. Bouraoui, Y.; Ricote, M.; García-Tuñón, I.; Rodriguez-Berriguete, G.; Touffehi, M.; Rais, N.B.; Fraile, B.; Paniagua, R.; Oueslati, R.; Royuela, M. Pro-Inflammatory Cytokines and Prostate-Specific Antigen in Hyperplasia and Human Prostate Cancer. Cancer Detect. Prev. 2008, 32, 23–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Cheng, J.; Li, L.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Z.; Zhu, X.; Bai, X. Interleukin-1α Induces Immunosuppression by Mesenchymal Stem Cells Promoting the Growth of Prostate Cancer Cells. Mol. Med. Rep. 2012, 6, 955–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Adler, H.L.; McCURDY, M.A.; Kattan, M.W.; Timme, T.L.; Scardino, P.T.; Thompson, T.C. Elevated levels of circulating interleukin-6 and transforming growth factor-p1 in patients with metastatic prostatic carcinoma. J. Urol. 1999, 161, 182–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Nakashima, J.; Tachibana, M.; Horiguchi, Y.; Oya, M.; Ohigashi, T.; Asakura, H.; Murai, M. Serum Interleukin 6 as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Prostate Cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2000, 6, 2702–2706. [Google Scholar]
  213. Sugimoto, Y.; Hirota, M.; Yoshikawa, K.; Sumitomo, M.; Nakamura, K.; Ueda, R.; Niwa, R.; Suzawa, T.; Yamasaki, M.; Shitara, K.; et al. The Therapeutic Potential of a Novel PSMA Antibody and Its IL-2 Conjugate in Prostate Cancer. Anticancer Res. 2014, 34, 89–97. [Google Scholar]
  214. Wise, G.J.; Marella, V.K.; Talluri, G.; Shirazian, D. Cytokine variations in patients with hormone treated prostate cancer. J. Urol. 2000, 164, 722–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  215. Seol, M.A.; Kim, J.H.; Oh, K.; Kim, G.; Seo, M.W.; Shin, Y.K.; Sim, J.H.; Shin, H.M.; Seo, B.Y.; Lee, D.S.; et al. Interleukin-7 Contributes to the Invasiveness of Prostate Cancer Cells by Promoting Epithelial–Mesenchymal Transition. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 6917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  216. Liu, L.; Li, Q.; Han, P.; Li, X.; Zeng, H.; Zhu, Y.; Wei, Q. Evaluation of Interleukin-8 in Expressed Prostatic Secretion as a Reliable Biomarker of Inflammation in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. Urology 2009, 74, 340–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Culig, Z. Response to Androgens and Androgen Receptor Antagonists in the Presence of Cytokines in Prostate Cancer. Cancers 2021, 13, 2944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  218. Steiner, G.E.; Newman, M.E.; Paikl, D.; Stix, U.; Memaran-Dagda, N.; Lee, C.; Marberger, M.J. Expression and Function of Pro-Inflammatory Interleukin IL-17 and IL-17 Receptor in Normal, Benign Hyperplastic, and Malignant Prostate. Prostate 2003, 56, 171–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  219. Wang, X.; Yang, L.; Huang, F.; Zhang, Q.; Liu, S.; Ma, L.; You, Z. Inflammatory Cytokines IL-17 and TNF-α up-Regulate PD-L1 Expression in Human Prostate and Colon Cancer Cells. Immunol. Lett. 2017, 184, 7–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Park, J.I.; Lee, M.G.; Cho, K.; Park, B.J.; Chae, K.S.; Byun, D.S.; Ryu, B.K.; Park, Y.K.; Chi, S.G. Transforming Growth Factor-Β1 Activates Interleukin-6 Expression in Prostate Cancer Cells through the Synergistic Collaboration of the Smad2, P38-NF-ΚB, JNK, and Ras Signaling Pathways. Oncogene 2003, 22, 4314–4332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Wang, H.; Fang, R.; Wang, X.F.; Zhang, F.; Chen, D.Y.; Zhou, B.; Wang, H.S.; Cai, S.H.; Du, J. Stabilization of Snail through AKT/GSK-3β Signaling Pathway Is Required for TNF-α-Induced Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition in Prostate Cancer PC3 Cells. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2013, 714, 48–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Mariathasan, S.; Turley, S.J.; Nickles, D.; Castiglioni, A.; Yuen, K.; Wang, Y.; Kadel, E.E.; Koeppen, H.; Astarita, J.L.; Cubas, R.; et al. TGFβ Attenuates Tumour Response to PD-L1 Blockade by Contributing to Exclusion of T Cells. Nature 2018, 554, 544–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Chen, X.H.; Liu, Z.C.; Zhang, G.; Wei, W.; Wang, X.X.; Wang, H.; Ke, H.P.; Zhang, F.; Wang, H.S.; Cai, S.H.; et al. TGF-β and EGF Induced HLA-I Downregulation Is Associated with Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition (EMT) through Upregulation of Snail in Prostate Cancer Cells. Mol. Immunol. 2015, 65, 34–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  224. Zhang, F.; Lee, J.; Lu, S.; Pettaway, C.A.; Dong, Z. Blockade of Transforming Growth Factor-B Signaling Suppresses Progression of Androgen-Independent Human Prostate Cancer in Nude Mice. Clin. Cancer Res. 2005, 11, 4512–4520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  225. Kramer, G.; Steiner, G.E.; Handisurya, A.; Stix, U.; Haitel, A.; Knerer, B.; Gessl, A.; Lee, C.; Marberger, M. Increased Expression of Lymphocyte-Derived Cytokines in Benign Hyperplastic Prostate Tissue, Identification of the Producing Cell Types, and Effect of Differentially Expressed Cytokines on Stromal Cell Proliferation. Prostate 2002, 52, 43–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  226. Tuxhorn, J.A.; McAlhany, S.J.; Yang, F.; Dang, T.D.; Rowley, D.R. Inhibition of Transforming Growth Factor-Beta Activity Decreases Angiogenesis in a Human Prostate Cancer-Reactive Stroma Xenograft Model. Cancer Res. 2002, 62, 6021–6025. [Google Scholar]
  227. Gillessen, S.; Naumov, Y.N.; Nieuwenhuis, E.E.S.; Exley, M.A.; Lee, F.S.; Mach, N.; Luster, A.D.; Blumberg, R.S.; Taniguchi, M.; Balk, S.P.; et al. CD1d-Restricted T Cells Regulate Dendritic Cell Function and Antitumor Immunity in a Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor-Dependent Fashion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 8874–8879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  228. Mo, L.; Zhang, X.; Shi, X.; Wei, L.; Zheng, D.; Li, H.; Gao, J.; Li, J.; Hu, Z. Norcantharidin Enhances Antitumor Immunity of GM-CSF Prostate Cancer Cells Vaccine by Inducing Apoptosis of Regulatory T Cells. Cancer Sci. 2018, 109, 2109–2118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  229. Kiu, H.; Nicholson, S.E. Biology and Significance of the JAK/STAT Signalling Pathways. Growth Factors 2012, 30, 88–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  230. Li, W.X. Canonical and Non-Canonical JAK-STAT Signaling. Trends Cell Biol. 2008, 18, 545–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  231. Liu, X.; He, Z.; Li, C.H.; Huang, G.; Ding, C.; Liu, H. Correlation Analysis of JAK-STAT Pathway Components on Prognosis of Patients with Prostate Cancer. Pathol. Oncol. Res. 2012, 18, 17–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  232. Gao, B.; Shen, X.; Kunos, G.; Meng, Q.; Goldberg, I.D.; Rosen, E.M.; Fan, S. Constitutive Activation of JAK-STAT3 Signaling by BRCA1 in Human Prostate Cancer Cells. FEBS Lett. 2001, 488, 179–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  233. Zhu, M.L.; Kyprianou, N. Androgen Receptor and Growth Factor Signaling Cross-Talk in Prostate Cancer Cells. Endocr. Relat. Cancer 2008, 15, 841–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  234. Bishop, J.L.; Thaper, D.; Zoubeidi, A. The Multifaceted Roles of STAT3 Signaling in the Progression of Prostate Cancer. Cancers 2014, 6, 829–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  235. Xiao, W.; Hodge, D.R.; Wang, L.; Yang, X.; Zhang, X.; Farrar, W.L. Co-Operative Functions between Nuclear Factors NFκB and CCAT/Enhancer-Binding Protein-β (C/EBP-β) Regulate the IL-6 Promoter in Autocrine Human Prostate Cancer Cells. Prostate 2004, 61, 354–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  236. Jin, R.; Yi, Y.; Yull, F.E.; Blackwell, T.S.; Clark, P.E.; Koyama, T.; Smith, J.A.; Matusik, R.J. Nf-Kb Gene Signature Predicts Prostate Cancer Progression. Cancer Res. 2014, 74, 2763–2772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  237. Ramalingam, S.; Ramamurthy, V.P.; Njar, V.C.O. Dissecting Major Signaling Pathways in Prostate Cancer Development and Progression: Mechanisms and Novel Therapeutic Targets. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2017, 166, 16–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  238. Lemmon, M.A.; Schlessinger, J. Cell Signaling by Receptor Tyrosine Kinases. Cell 2010, 141, 1117–1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  239. Reynolds, A.R.; Kyprianou, N. Growth Factor Signalling in Prostatic Growth: Significance in Tumour Development and Therapeutic Targeting. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2006, 147, 144–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  240. Derynck, R.; Akhurst, R.J.; Balmain, A. TGF-β Signaling in Tumor Suppression and Cancer Progression. Nat. Genet. 2001, 29, 117–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  241. Peraldo-Neia, C.; Migliardi, G.; Mello-Grand, M.; Montemurro, F.; Segir, R.; Pignochino, Y.; Cavalloni, G.; Torchio, B.; Mosso, L.; Chiorino, G.; et al. Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Mutation Analysis, Gene Expression Profiling and EGFR Protein Expression in Primary Prostate Cancer. BMC Cancer 2011, 11, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  242. Fresno Vara, J.Á.; Casado, E.; de Castro, J.; Cejas, P.; Belda-Iniesta, C.; González-Barón, M. P13K/Akt Signalling Pathway and Cancer. Cancer Treat. Rev. 2004, 30, 193–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  243. Gao, N.; Zhang, Z.; Jiang, B.H.; Shi, X. Role of PI3K/AKT/MTOR Signaling in the Cell Cycle Progression of Human Prostate Cancer. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2003, 310, 1124–1132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  244. Steiner, H.; Godoy-Tundidor, S.; Rogatsch, H.; Berger, A.P.; Fuchs, D.; Comuzzi, B.; Bartsch, G.; Hobisch, A.; Culig, Z. Accelerated in Vivo Growth of Prostate Tumors That Up-Regulate Interleukin-6 Is Associated with Reduced Retinoblastoma Protein Expression and Activation of the Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Pathway. Am. J. Pathol. 2003, 162, 655–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  245. Cargnello, M.; Roux, P.P. Activation and Function of the MAPKs and Their Substrates, the MAPK-Activated Protein Kinases. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2011, 75, 50–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  246. Mbatia, H.W.; Ramalingam, S.; Ramamurthy, V.P.; Martin, M.S.; Kwegyir-Afful, A.K.; Njar, V.C.O. Novel C-4 Heteroaryl 13- Cis -Retinamide Mnk/AR Degrading Agents Inhibit Cell Proliferation and Migration and Induce Apoptosis in Human Breast and Prostate Cancer Cells and Suppress Growth of MDA-MB-231 Human Breast and CWR22Rv1 Human Prostate Tumor Xenografts in Mice. J. Med. Chem. 2015, 58, 1900–1914. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  247. Dehelean, C.A.; Marcovici, I.; Soica, C.; Mioc, M.; Coricovac, D.; Iurciuc, S.; Cretu, O.M.; Pinzaru, I. Plant-Derived Anticancer Compounds as New Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Alternative Therapy. Molecules 2021, 26, 1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  248. Hussain, T.; Tan, B.; Yin, Y.; Blachier, F.; Tossou, M.C.B.; Rahu, N. Oxidative Stress and Inflammation: What Polyphenols Can Do for Us? Oxid. Med. Cell Longev. 2016, 2016, 7432797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  249. Speisky, H.; Shahidi, F.; Costa de Camargo, A.; Fuentes, J. Revisiting the Oxidation of Flavonoids: Loss, Conservation or Enhancement of Their Antioxidant Properties. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  250. Yang, J.; Wang, C.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, X.; Jia, Y.; Wang, B.; Kong, T. Curcumin Inhibits the Survival and Metastasis of Prostate Cancer Cells via the Notch-1 Signaling Pathway. APMIS 2017, 125, 134–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  251. Pan, L.; Sha, J.; Lin, W.; Wang, Y.; Bian, T. Curcumin Inhibits Prostate Cancer Progression by Regulating the MiR-30a-5p/PCLAF Axis. Exp. Ther. Med. 2021, 22, 969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  252. Shankar, S.; Ganapathy, S.; Chen, Q.; Srivastava, R.K. Curcumin Sensitizes TRAIL-Resistant Xenografts: Molecular Mechanisms of Apoptosis, Metastasis and Angiogenesis. Mol. Cancer 2008, 7, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  253. Zhou, D.-Y.; Ding, N.; Van Doren, J.; Wei, X.-C.; Du, Z.-Y.; Conney, A.H.; Zhang, K.; Zheng, X. Effects of Curcumin Analogues for Inhibiting Human Prostate Cancer Cells and the Growth of Human PC-3 Prostate Xenografts in Immunodeficient Mice. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2014, 36, 1029–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  254. Luo, C.; Li, Y.; Zhou, B.; Yang, L.; Li, H.; Feng, Z.; Li, Y.; Long, J.; Liu, J. A Monocarbonyl Analogue of Curcumin, 1,5-Bis(3-Hydroxyphenyl)-1,4- Pentadiene-3-One (Ca 37), Exhibits Potent Growth Suppressive Activity and Enhances the Inhibitory Effect of Curcumin on Human Prostate Cancer Cells. Apoptosis 2014, 19, 542–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  255. Wu, Y.; He, L.; Zhang, L.; Chen, J.; Yi, Z.; Zhang, J.; Liu, M.; Pang, X. Anacardic Acid (6-Pentadecylsalicylic Acid) Inhibits Tumor Angiogenesis by Targeting Src/FAK/Rho GTpases Signaling Pathway. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2011, 339, 403–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  256. Tan, J.; Chen, B.; He, L.; Tang, Y.; Jiang, Z.; Yin, G.; Wang, J.; Jiang, X. Anacardic Acid (6-Pentadecylsalicylic Acid) Induces Apoptosis of Prostate Cancer Cells through Inhibition of Androgen Receptor and Activation of P53 Signaling. Chin. J. Cancer Res. 2012, 24, 275–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  257. Tolba, M.F.; Esmat, A.; Al-Abd, A.M.; Azab, S.S.; Khalifa, A.E.; Mosli, H.A.; Abdel-Rahman, S.Z.; Abdel-Naim, A.B. Caffeic Acid Phenethyl Ester Synergistically Enhances Docetaxel and Paclitaxel Cytotoxicity in Prostate Cancer Cells. IUBMB Life 2013, 65, 716–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  258. Lin, H.P.; Jiang, S.S.; Chuu, C.P. Caffeic Acid Phenethyl Ester Causes P21 Cip1 Induction, Akt Signaling Reduction, and Growth Inhibition in PC-3 Human Prostate Cancer Cells. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e31286. [Google Scholar]
  259. Vanella, L.; Di Giacomo, C.; Acquaviva, R.; Barbagallo, I.; Cardile, V.; Kim, D.H.; Abraham, N.G.; Sorrenti, V. Apoptotic Markers in a Prostate Cancer Cell Line: Effect of Ellagic Acid. Oncol. Rep. 2013, 30, 2804–2810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  260. Pitchakarn, P.; Chewonarin, T.; Ogawa, K.; Suzuki, S.; Asamoto, M.; Takahashi, S.; Shirai, T.; Limtrakul, P. Ellagic Acid Inhibits Migration and Invasion by Prostate Cancer Cell Lines. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2013, 14, 2859–2863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  261. Veluri, R.; Singh, R.P.; Liu, Z.; Thompson, J.A.; Agarwal, R.; Agarwal, C. Fractionation of Grape Seed Extract and Identification of Gallic Acid as One of the Major Active Constituents Causing Growth Inhibition and Apoptotic Death of DU145 Human Prostate Carcinoma Cells. Carcinogenesis 2006, 27, 1445–1453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  262. Kaur, M.; Velmurugan, B.; Rajamanickam, S.; Agarwal, R.; Agarwal, C. Gallic Acid, an Active Constituent of Grape Seed Extract, Exhibits Anti-Proliferative, pro-Apoptotic and Anti-Tumorigenic Effects against Prostate Carcinoma Xenograft Growth in Nude Mice. Pharm. Res. 2009, 26, 2133–2140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  263. Sheth, S.; Jajoo, S.; Kaur, T.; Mukherjea, D.; Sheehan, K.; Rybak, L.P.; Ramkumar, V. Resveratrol Reduces Prostate Cancer Growth and Metastasis by Inhibiting the Akt/MicroRNA-21 Pathway. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e51655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  264. Wang, T.T.Y.; Hudson, T.S.; Wang, T.C.; Remsberg, C.M.; Davies, N.M.; Takahashi, Y.; Kim, Y.S.; Seifried, H.; Vinyard, B.T.; Perkins, S.N.; et al. Differential Effects of Resveratrol on Androgen-Responsive LNCaP Human Prostate Cancer Cells in Vitro and in Vivo. Carcinogenesis 2008, 29, 2001–2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  265. Kumar, S.; Eroglu, E.; Stokes Iii, J.A.; Scissum-Gunn, K.; Saldanha, S.N.; Singh, U.P.; Manne, U.; Ponnazhagan, S.; Mishra, M.K. Resveratrol Induces Mitochondria-Mediated, Caspase-Independent Apoptosis in Murine Prostate Cancer Cells. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 20895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  266. Rashid, A.; Liu, C.; Sanli, T.; Tsiani, E.; Singh, G.; Bristow, R.G.; Dayes, I.; Lukka, H.; Wright, J.; Tsakiridis, T. Resveratrol Enhances Prostate Cancer Cell Response to Ionizing Radiation. Modulation of the AMPK, Akt and MTOR Pathways. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 20895–20908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  267. Kwon, G.T.; Jung, J.I.; Song, H.R.; Woo, E.Y.; Jun, J.G.; Kim, J.K.; Her, S.; Park, J.H.Y. Piceatannol Inhibits Migration and Invasion of Prostate Cancer Cells: Possible Mediation by Decreased Interleukin-6 Signaling. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2012, 23, 228–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  268. Lee, Y.M.; Lim, D.Y.; Cho, H.J.; Seon, M.R.; Kim, J.K.; Lee, B.Y.; Park, J.H.Y. Piceatannol, a Natural Stilbene from Grapes, Induces G1 Cell Cycle Arrest in Androgen-Insensitive DU145 Human Prostate Cancer Cells via the Inhibition of CDK Activity. Cancer Lett. 2009, 285, 166–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  269. Jayasooriya, R.G.P.T.; Lee, Y.G.; Kang, C.H.; Lee, K.T.; Choi, Y.H.; Park, S.Y.; Hwang, J.K.; Kim, G.Y. Piceatannol Inhibits MMP-9-Dependent Invasion of Tumor Necrosis Factor-α-Stimulated DU145 Cells by Suppressing the Akt-Mediated Nuclear Factor-ΚB Pathway. Oncol. Lett. 2012, 5, 341–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  270. Nikhil, K.; Sharan, S.; Chakraborty, A.; Roy, P. Pterostilbene-Isothiocyanate Conjugate Suppresses Growth of Prostate Cancer Cells Irrespective of Androgen Receptor Status. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e93335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  271. Lin, V.C.H.; Tsai, Y.C.; Lin, J.N.; Fan, L.L.; Pan, M.H.; Ho, C.T.; Wu, J.Y.; Way, T. Der Activation of AMPK by Pterostilbene Suppresses Lipogenesis and Cell-Cycle Progression in P53 Positive and Negative Human Prostate Cancer Cells. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 6399–6407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  272. Hagen, R.M.; Chedea, V.S.; Mintoff, C.P.; Bowler, E.; Morse, H.R.; Ladomery, M.R. Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate Promotes Apoptosis and Expression of the Caspase 9a Splice Variant in PC3 Prostate Cancer Cells. Int. J. Oncol. 2013, 43, 194–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  273. Mukherjee, S.; Siddiqui, M.A.; Dayal, S.; Ayoub, Y.Z.; Malathi, K. Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate Suppresses Proinflammatory Cytokines and Chemokines Induced by Toll-like Receptor 9 Agonists in Prostate Cancer Cells. J. Inflamm. Res. 2014, 7, 89–101. [Google Scholar]
  274. Khan, N.; Afaq, F.; Syed, D.N.; Mukhtar, H. Fisetin, a Novel Dietary Flavonoid, Causes Apoptosis and Cell Cycle Arrest in Human Prostate Cancer LNCaP Cells. Carcinogenesis 2008, 29, 1049–1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  275. Khan, N.; Asim, M.; Afaq, F.; Zaid, M.A.; Mukhtar, H. A Novel Dietary Flavonoid Fisetin Inhibits Androgen Receptor Signaling and Tumor Growth in Athymic Nude Mice. Cancer Res. 2008, 68, 8555–8563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  276. Suh, Y.; Afaq, F.; Khan, N.; Johnson, J.J.; Khusro, F.H.; Mukhtar, H. Fisetin Induces Autophagic Cell Death through Suppression of MTOR Signaling Pathway in Prostate Cancer Cells. Carcinogenesis 2010, 31, 1424–1433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  277. Sharmila, G.; Bhat, F.A.; Arunkumar, R.; Elumalai, P.; Raja Singh, P.; Senthilkumar, K.; Arunakaran, J. Chemopreventive Effect of Quercetin, a Natural Dietary Flavonoid on Prostate Cancer in Invivo Model. Clin. Nutr. 2014, 33, 718–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  278. Ward, A.B.; Mir, H.; Kapur, N.; Gales, D.N.; Carriere, P.P.; Singh, S. Quercetin Inhibits Prostate Cancer by Attenuating Cell Survival and Inhibiting Anti-Apoptotic Pathways. World J. Surg. Oncol. 2018, 16, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  279. Xing, N.; Chen, Y.; Mitchell, S.H. Quercetin Inhibits the Expression and Function of the Androgen Receptor in LNCaP Prostate Cancer Cells inhibited by quercetin in a dose-dependent manner. Carcinogenesis 2001, 22, 409–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  280. Liu, K.C.; Yen, C.Y.; Wu, R.S.C.; Yang, J.S.; Lu, H.F.; Lu, K.W.; Lo, C.; Chen, H.Y.; Tang, N.Y.; Wu, C.C.; et al. The Roles of Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Mitochondrial Apoptotic Signaling Pathway in Quercetin-Mediated Cell Death of Human Prostate Cancer PC-3 Cells. Environ. Toxicol. 2014, 29, 428–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  281. Pratheeshkumar, P.; Budhraja, A.; Son, Y.O.; Wang, X.; Zhang, Z.; Ding, S.; Wang, L.; Hitron, A.; Lee, J.C.; Xu, M.; et al. Quercetin Inhibits Angiogenesis Mediated Human Prostate Tumor Growth by Targeting VEGFR- 2 Regulated AKT/MTOR/P70S6K Signaling Pathways. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e47516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  282. Pandey, M.; Kaur, P.; Shukla, S.; Abbas, A.; Fu, P.; Gupta, S. Plant Flavone Apigenin Inhibits HDAC and Remodels Chromatin to Induce Growth Arrest and Apoptosis in Human Prostate Cancer Cells: In Vitro and in Vivo Study. Mol. Carcinog. 2012, 51, 952–962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  283. Seo, Y.J.; Kim, B.S.; Chun, S.Y.; Park, Y.K.; Kang, K.S.; Kwon, T.G. Apoptotic Effects of Genistein, Biochanin-A and Apigenin on LNCaP and PC-3 Cells by P21 through Transcriptional Inhibition of Polo-like Kinase-1. J. Korean Med. Sci. 2011, 26, 1489–1494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  284. Shukla, S.; Fu, P.; Gupta, S. Apigenin Induces Apoptosis by Targeting Inhibitor of Apoptosis Proteins and Ku70-Bax Interaction in Prostate Cancer. Apoptosis 2014, 19, 883–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  285. Shukla, S.; MacLennan, G.T.; Fu, P.; Gupta, S. Apigenin Attenuates Insulin-like Growth Factor-I Signaling in an Autochthonous Mouse Prostate Cancer Model. Pharm. Res. 2012, 29, 1506–1517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  286. Shukla, S.; Bhaskaran, N.; Babcook, M.A.; Fu, P.; MacLennan, G.T.; Gupta, S. Apigenin Inhibits Prostate Cancer Progression in TRAMP Mice via Targeting PI3K/Akt/FoxO Pathway. Carcinogenesis 2014, 35, 452–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  287. Matchett, M.D.; MacKinnon, S.L.; Sweeney, M.I.; Gottschall-Pass, K.T.; Hurta, R.A.R. Inhibition of Matrix Metalloproteinase Activity in DU145 Human Prostate Cancer Cells by Flavonoids from Lowbush Blueberry (Vaccinium angustifolium): Possible Roles for Protein Kinase C and Mitogen-Activated Protein-Kinase- Mediated Events. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2006, 17, 117–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  288. Schmidt, B.M.; Erdman, J.W.; Lila, M.A. Differential Effects of Blueberry Proanthocyanidins on Androgen Sensitive and Insensitive Human Prostate Cancer Cell Lines. Cancer Lett. 2006, 231, 240–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  289. Neuwirt, H.; Arias, M.C.; Puhr, M.; Hobisch, A.; Culig, Z. Oligomeric Proanthocyanidin Complexes (OPC)Exert Anti-Proliferative and pro-Apoptotic Effects on Prostate Cancer Cells. Prostate 2008, 68, 1647–1654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  290. Hsieh, T.-C.; Bennett, D.; Lee, Y.-S.; Wu, E.; Wu, J. In Silico and Biochemical Analyses Identify Quinone Reductase 2 as a Target of Piceatannol. Curr. Med. Chem. 2013, 20, 4195–4202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  291. Khan, N.; Adhami, V.M.; Mukhtar, H. Review: Green Tea Polyphenols in Chemoprevention of Prostate Cancer: Preclinical and Clinical Studies. Nutr. Cancer 2009, 61, 836–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  292. Vieira, I.R.S.; Tessaro, L.; Lima, A.K.O.; Velloso, I.P.S.; Conte-Junior, C.A. Recent Progress in Nanotechnology Improving the Therapeutic Potential of Polyphenols for Cancer. Nutrients 2023, 15, 3136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  293. Rudrapal, M.; Mishra, A.K.; Rani, L.; Sarwa, K.K.; Zothantluanga, J.H.; Khan, J.; Kamal, M.; Palai, S.; Bendale, A.R.; Talele, S.G.; et al. Nanodelivery of Dietary Polyphenols for Therapeutic Applications. Molecules 2022, 27, 8706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  294. Ying, S.; Guan, Z.; Ofoegbu, P.C.; Clubb, P.; Rico, C.; He, F.; Hong, J. Green Synthesis of Nanoparticles: Current Developments and Limitations. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2022, 26, 102336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  295. Huston, M.; Debella, M.; Dibella, M.; Gupta, A. Green Synthesis of Nanomaterials. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 2130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  296. Zuhrotun, A.; Oktaviani, D.J.; Hasanah, A.N. Biosynthesis of Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Using Phytochemical Compounds. Molecules 2023, 28, 3240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  297. Lerma-García, M.; Ávila, M.; Fco Simó-Alfonso, E.; Ríos, Á.; Zougagh, M. Synthesis of Gold Nanoparticles Using Phenolic Acids and Its Application in Catalysis. J. Mater. Environ. Sci. 2014, 5, 1919–1926. [Google Scholar]
  298. Annaji, M.; Poudel, I.; Boddu, S.H.S.; Arnold, R.D.; Tiwari, A.K.; Babu, R.J. Resveratrol-Loaded Nanomedicines for Cancer Applications. Cancer Rep. 2021, 4, e1353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  299. Saralkar, P.; Dash, A.K. Alginate Nanoparticles Containing Curcumin and Resveratrol: Preparation, Characterization, and In Vitro Evaluation Against DU145 Prostate Cancer Cell Line. AAPS PharmSciTech 2017, 18, 2814–2823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  300. Bolat, Z.B.; Islek, Z.; Sahin, F.; Ucisik, M.H. Delivery of Curcumin within Emulsome Nanoparticles Enhances the Anti-Cancer Activity in Androgen-Dependent Prostate Cancer Cell. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2023, 50, 2531–2543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  301. Adahoun, M.A.; Al-Akhras, M.-A.H.; Jaafar, M.S.; Bououdina, M. Enhanced Anti-Cancer and Antimicrobial Activities of Curcumin Nanoparticles. Artif. Cells Nanomed. Biotechnol. 2017, 45, 98–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  302. Singh, S.K.; Lillard, J.W.; Singh, R. Reversal of Drug Resistance by Planetary Ball Milled (PBM) Nanoparticle Loaded with Resveratrol and Docetaxel in Prostate Cancer. Cancer Lett. 2018, 427, 49–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  303. Sharma, A.N.; Upadhyay, P.K.; Dewangan, H.K. Development, Evaluation, Pharmacokinetic and Biodistribution Estimation of Resveratrol-Loaded Solid Lipid Nanoparticles for Prostate Cancer Targeting. J. Microencapsul. 2022, 39, 563–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  304. Chaudhary, Z.; Subramaniam, S.; Khan, G.M.; Abeer, M.M.; Qu, Z.; Janjua, T.; Kumeria, T.; Batra, J.; Popat, A. Encapsulation and Controlled Release of Resveratrol Within Functionalized Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles for Prostate Cancer Therapy. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2019, 7, 225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  305. Nassir, A.M.; Shahzad, N.; Ibrahim, I.A.A.; Ahmad, I.; Md, S.; Ain, M.R. Resveratrol-Loaded PLGA Nanoparticles Mediated Programmed Cell Death in Prostate Cancer Cells. Saudi Pharm. J. 2018, 26, 876–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  306. Siddiqui, I.A.; Adhami, V.M.; Bharali, D.J.; Hafeez, B.B.; Asim, M.; Khwaja, S.I.; Ahmad, N.; Cui, H.; Mousa, S.A.; Mukhtar, H. Introducing Nanochemoprevention as a Novel Approach for Cancer Control: Proof of Principle with Green Tea Polyphenol Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate. Cancer Res. 2009, 69, 1712–1716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  307. Shukla, R.; Chanda, N.; Zambre, A.; Upendran, A.; Katti, K.; Kulkarni, R.R.; Kumar Nune, S.; Casteel, S.W.; Smith, C.J.; Vimal, J.; et al. Laminin Receptor Specific Therapeutic Gold Nanoparticles (198 AuNP-EGCg) Show Efficacy in Treating Prostate Cancer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 12426–12431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  308. Rocha, S.; Generalov, R.; Pereira, M.D.C.; Peres, I.; Juzenas, P.; Coelho, M.A.N. Epigallocatechin Gallate-Loaded Polysaccharide Nanoparticles for Prostate Cancer Chemoprevention. Nanomedicine 2011, 6, 79–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  309. Khan, N.; Bharali, D.J.; Adhami, V.M.; Siddiqui, I.A.; Cui, H.; Shabana, S.M.; Mousa, S.A.; Mukhtar, H. Oral Administration of Naturally Occurring Chitosan-Based Nanoformulated Green Tea Polyphenol EGCG Effectively Inhibits Prostate Cancer Cell Growth in a Xenograft Model. Carcinogenesis 2014, 35, 415–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  310. Chavva, S.; Deshmukh, S.; Kanchanapally, R.; Tyagi, N.; Coym, J.; Singh, A.; Singh, S. Epigallocatechin Gallate-Gold Nanoparticles Exhibit Superior Antitumor Activity Compared to Conventional Gold Nanoparticles: Potential Synergistic Interactions. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Diagnostic methods of prostate cancer (PCa) taking in consideration prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels by age. The information represented in black, pink, orange, and blue correspond to patients between 40–49, 50–59, 60–69 and 70–79 aging, respectively.
Figure 1. Diagnostic methods of prostate cancer (PCa) taking in consideration prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels by age. The information represented in black, pink, orange, and blue correspond to patients between 40–49, 50–59, 60–69 and 70–79 aging, respectively.
Biomedicines 11 03140 g001
Figure 2. Pathophysiological mechanisms of prostate cancer (PCa). (a) Physiology of the human prostate; (b) Normal human prostate; (c) External or internal events can trigger an inflammatory response leading to proliferative inflammatory atrophy (PIA). PIA is characterized by hyperproliferation of epithelial cells, accompanied by an increase in glutathione S-transferase P1 (GSTP1), p27Kip1, and B-cell lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2), and a decrease in NK3 homeobox 1 (NKX3.1) and phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) levels; (d) The subsequent phase of the disease, known as prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN), is marked by hyperproliferation of luminal cells, telomere shortening, activation and differentiation of fibroblasts into myofibroblasts, dysregulation of ETS transcription factor, speckle-type PO2 protein (SPOP) mutations, the presence of the transmembrane serine protease isoform 2 (TMPRSS2)-ERG fusion gene and loss of NKX3.1; (e) These events ultimately culminate in PCa, characterized by the loss of basal cells, activation of a pro-inflammatory phenotype, activation of myofibroblasts towards a pro-fibrotic state, telomerase activation and loss of PTEN and retinoblastoma 1 (RB1). Bcl-2: B-cell lymphoma-2, GSTP1: Glutathione S-transferase P1, NKX3.1: NK3 homeobox 1, PCa: Prostate cancer, PIA: Proliferative inflammatory atrophy, PIN: Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, PTEN: Phosphatase and tensin homolog, RB1: Retinoblastoma 1, SPOP: Speckle-type PO2 protein, TMPRSS2: Transmembrane serine protease isoform 2. Adapted from Packer et al. (2016) [1].
Figure 2. Pathophysiological mechanisms of prostate cancer (PCa). (a) Physiology of the human prostate; (b) Normal human prostate; (c) External or internal events can trigger an inflammatory response leading to proliferative inflammatory atrophy (PIA). PIA is characterized by hyperproliferation of epithelial cells, accompanied by an increase in glutathione S-transferase P1 (GSTP1), p27Kip1, and B-cell lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2), and a decrease in NK3 homeobox 1 (NKX3.1) and phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) levels; (d) The subsequent phase of the disease, known as prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN), is marked by hyperproliferation of luminal cells, telomere shortening, activation and differentiation of fibroblasts into myofibroblasts, dysregulation of ETS transcription factor, speckle-type PO2 protein (SPOP) mutations, the presence of the transmembrane serine protease isoform 2 (TMPRSS2)-ERG fusion gene and loss of NKX3.1; (e) These events ultimately culminate in PCa, characterized by the loss of basal cells, activation of a pro-inflammatory phenotype, activation of myofibroblasts towards a pro-fibrotic state, telomerase activation and loss of PTEN and retinoblastoma 1 (RB1). Bcl-2: B-cell lymphoma-2, GSTP1: Glutathione S-transferase P1, NKX3.1: NK3 homeobox 1, PCa: Prostate cancer, PIA: Proliferative inflammatory atrophy, PIN: Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, PTEN: Phosphatase and tensin homolog, RB1: Retinoblastoma 1, SPOP: Speckle-type PO2 protein, TMPRSS2: Transmembrane serine protease isoform 2. Adapted from Packer et al. (2016) [1].
Biomedicines 11 03140 g002
Figure 3. Leukocytes and leukocyte-mediated cytokines involved in prostate cancer (PCa). Representation of key cells in the prostate tumour microenvironment. Neutrophils mainly release matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-9, interleukin (IL)-1, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), reactive oxygen species (ROS), neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), IL-8, and tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α, all promoting PCa progression. Basophils promote activation of the M2-like phenotype in macrophages and Th2 response in T cells and release pro-tumour IL-4, VEGF, ANGPTs, and HGF cytokines. Eosinophils secrete pro-tumoral transforming growth factor (TGF)-β, IL-6, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and IL-4 cytokines and anti-tumoral interferon (IFN)-γ cytokine. Release of TNF-α, IL-2, and IL-5 from eosinophils can modulate a pro-tumoral or anti-tumoral activity depending on cell signals. IL-2 and IFN-γ stimulates activation of, respectively, Tregs/Th17 and CD4+ T cells. Mast cells secrete pro-tumoral TNF-α, IL-8, and IL-10 and anti-tumoral IL-1β, IL-4, and IL-6 cytokines. Tumour-associated macrophages secrete IL-1β, IL-8, IL-10, IL-23, MMP-2, MMP-9, and TGF-β, impacting tumour progression. Macrophages can shift to pro-inflammatory M1-like or anti-inflammatory M2-like phenotypes, influencing tumour outcomes. M1-like macrophages release IL-12, TNF-α, and IFN-γ, while M2-like macrophages secrete IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, and IL-13. T cells encompass CD4+ T cells (Th1, Th2, Th17, and Tregs) and CD8+ T cells, with Th1 having a pro-inflammatory response. Th2, Th17, and Tregs contribute to tumour progression. CD8+ T cells secrete IFN-γ, TNF-α, and IL-2, associated with a favourable prognosis in PCa. B cells release pro-tumoral IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, and TGF-β cytokines and the intermediate IL-2 cytokine. IL-2 and IL-4 stimulate CD4 and CD8 responses, while IL-6 activates Tregs in PCa. Green-coloured cytokines support tumour resolution and a positive prognosis. Red-coloured cytokines promote tumour growth, proliferation, and metastasis. Orange-coloured cytokines can trigger a pro- or anti-tumoral response in PCa. ANGPT: Angiopoietin, GM-CSF: Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, HGF: Hepatocyte growth factor, IFN: Interferon, IL- Interleukin, MMP: Matrix metalloproteinase, NETs: Neutrophil extracellular traps, PCa: Prostate cancer, ROS: Reactive oxygen species, TGF: Transforming growth factor, TNF: Tumour necrosis factor, Tregs: Regulatory T cells, VEGF: Vascular endothelial growth factor.
Figure 3. Leukocytes and leukocyte-mediated cytokines involved in prostate cancer (PCa). Representation of key cells in the prostate tumour microenvironment. Neutrophils mainly release matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-9, interleukin (IL)-1, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), reactive oxygen species (ROS), neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), IL-8, and tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α, all promoting PCa progression. Basophils promote activation of the M2-like phenotype in macrophages and Th2 response in T cells and release pro-tumour IL-4, VEGF, ANGPTs, and HGF cytokines. Eosinophils secrete pro-tumoral transforming growth factor (TGF)-β, IL-6, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and IL-4 cytokines and anti-tumoral interferon (IFN)-γ cytokine. Release of TNF-α, IL-2, and IL-5 from eosinophils can modulate a pro-tumoral or anti-tumoral activity depending on cell signals. IL-2 and IFN-γ stimulates activation of, respectively, Tregs/Th17 and CD4+ T cells. Mast cells secrete pro-tumoral TNF-α, IL-8, and IL-10 and anti-tumoral IL-1β, IL-4, and IL-6 cytokines. Tumour-associated macrophages secrete IL-1β, IL-8, IL-10, IL-23, MMP-2, MMP-9, and TGF-β, impacting tumour progression. Macrophages can shift to pro-inflammatory M1-like or anti-inflammatory M2-like phenotypes, influencing tumour outcomes. M1-like macrophages release IL-12, TNF-α, and IFN-γ, while M2-like macrophages secrete IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, and IL-13. T cells encompass CD4+ T cells (Th1, Th2, Th17, and Tregs) and CD8+ T cells, with Th1 having a pro-inflammatory response. Th2, Th17, and Tregs contribute to tumour progression. CD8+ T cells secrete IFN-γ, TNF-α, and IL-2, associated with a favourable prognosis in PCa. B cells release pro-tumoral IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, and TGF-β cytokines and the intermediate IL-2 cytokine. IL-2 and IL-4 stimulate CD4 and CD8 responses, while IL-6 activates Tregs in PCa. Green-coloured cytokines support tumour resolution and a positive prognosis. Red-coloured cytokines promote tumour growth, proliferation, and metastasis. Orange-coloured cytokines can trigger a pro- or anti-tumoral response in PCa. ANGPT: Angiopoietin, GM-CSF: Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, HGF: Hepatocyte growth factor, IFN: Interferon, IL- Interleukin, MMP: Matrix metalloproteinase, NETs: Neutrophil extracellular traps, PCa: Prostate cancer, ROS: Reactive oxygen species, TGF: Transforming growth factor, TNF: Tumour necrosis factor, Tregs: Regulatory T cells, VEGF: Vascular endothelial growth factor.
Biomedicines 11 03140 g003
Figure 4. Chemical structure of phenols and their resonance states’ stability, imparting antioxidant activity for scavenging free radicals and inhibiting their propagation.
Figure 4. Chemical structure of phenols and their resonance states’ stability, imparting antioxidant activity for scavenging free radicals and inhibiting their propagation.
Biomedicines 11 03140 g004
Table 1. Histological characterization of prostate cancer biopsies by Gleason Score. Adapted from the NCCN Guidelines for patients [19], Kweldam et al. (2019) [24], Ihamura et al. (2018) [25], and Avenel et al. (2019) [26].
Table 1. Histological characterization of prostate cancer biopsies by Gleason Score. Adapted from the NCCN Guidelines for patients [19], Kweldam et al. (2019) [24], Ihamura et al. (2018) [25], and Avenel et al. (2019) [26].
Gleason PatternGleason
Sore
Grade
Group
RiskHistological DefinitionHistological ImagePrognosis
3 + 361LowIndividual, discrete, well-formed glandsBiomedicines 11 03140 i001Low-grade Cancer
3 + 472Low to intermediateWell-formed glands with a few poorly-formed/fused/cribriform glandsBiomedicines 11 03140 i002Intermediate-grade cancer
4 + 373IntermediatePoorly formed/fused/cribriform glands with lesser (5%) component of well-formed glandsBiomedicines 11 03140 i003
4 + 484HighPoorly formed/fused/cribriform glandsBiomedicines 11 03140 i004High-grade cancer
3 + 5Well-formed glands with a few areas lacking glands (or with necrosis)Biomedicines 11 03140 i005
5 + 3Lack glands (or with necrosis) and a few well-formed glandsBiomedicines 11 03140 i006
4 + 5
5 + 4
5 + 5
9 or 105Very highLack gland formation (or with necrosis) with or without poorly-formed/fused/cribriform glandsBiomedicines 11 03140 i007
Table 2. Involvement of different leukocytes and their associated cytokines in cancer and prostate cancer progression.
Table 2. Involvement of different leukocytes and their associated cytokines in cancer and prostate cancer progression.
LeukocyteInflammatory
Mediator Produced
EffectRefs.
NeutrophilsMMP-9MMP-9 produced by TANs and neutrophils degrade ECM leading to cancer progression in human xenografts and Mmp9-knockout mice[104]
GM-CSF and CXCL8KRAS stimulated the expression of GM-CSF and CXCL8 in neutrophils which modulates the tumour microenvironment towards cancer progression in mouse models of ovarian cancer[105]
IL-8/CXCR2Overexpression of CXCR2 in neutrophils promotes their attachment in lung cancer regions in a K-RAS mutant mouse model of lung cancer[106]
NDE, ROS, RNENDE, ROS, and RNE release from neutrophils lead to hMSH2-dependent G2/M checkpoint arrest and for the presence of replication errors in a co-culture model that mimics intestinal inflammation in ulcerative colitis[107]
ARG-1Release of ARG-1 from neutrophils inhibit CD3-mediated T cell activation and proliferation leading to cancer progression in classic Hodgkin Lymphoma patients[108]
NETIncreased neutrophil and NET formation intended attenuate the rate of metastatic PCa in bones in vitro and an in vivo mouse model[71]
IL-1IL-1RA from neutrophils leads to inhibition of senescence promoting cancer progression[109]
TNF-αTNFR1 KO mice with depletion of TNF receptor 1 developed smaller tumours with attenuated proliferation and absence of metastasis[110]
Cathepsin GCathepsin G release from neutrophils increases cancer cell adhesion, and aggregation, and metastasis in breast cancer cells[111]
BasophilsIL-4Basophils from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas secrete IL-4 which induce GATA-3 expression in Th2 cells in patient samples and Mcpt8Cre mice[112]
CCL3Basophils express CCL3 to negatively regulate the normal hematopoietic process in MCPT8-DTR mice and bone marrow samples from patients with CML[113]
CCL3/CCL4Basophil plays a role in tumour rejection by increasing CD8+ T cell infiltration promoted by CCL3 and CCL4 in HCmel12-, B16-, and 616-OVA-induced transgenic FOXP3.LuciDTR-4 mice melanoma[114]
VEGFAImmunologic activation by VEGF-2 of basophils induced the release of VEGF-A which induce basophil chemotaxis[115]
HGFHGF is expressed in CML basophils in KU812-induced CML cell line[116]
ANGPTBasophils express ANGPT1 and ANGPT2 mRNAs[117]
EosinophilsIL-2IL-2 activate Tregs and Th17 cells involved in the promotion of cancer in a mouse model of PCa, and fibrosarcoma and head and neck human cancer tissues[118]
IL-4IL-4 production promotes tumour growth and interaction with TAMs in a pancreatic-induced cancer mouse model[78]
IL-6Increase of IL-6 correlated in patients with metastatic PCa compared with localized PCa[119]
IL-5 and CCL17Eosinophils increase after Sipuleucel-T treatment of patients with metastatic castration-resistant PCa correlated with increase of IL-5 and CCL17, survival and maximal T-cell proliferation responses[120]
IFN-γIFN-γ induced CD4+ T cells to eliminate MHC II-negative cancer cells[121]
TNF-αTNF-α correlated with increased extension of PCa in samples from PCa patients[119]
TGF-αOverexpression of TGF-α decreased latency, increased growth, and tumour size of bladder cancer rat model[122]
VEGFVEGF associated with poor prognosis of human small-cell lung carcinoma[123]
GM-CSFExpression of GM-CSF correlated with NF-κB activation in bone-metastatic tumour tissues from individuals with metastatic breast cancer[124]
Mast cellsChymaseChymase released from human mast cell release latent TGF-β-binding protein from the matrix [125]
HistamineHistamine inhibition from mast cells inactivate EMT and cholangiocarcinoma growth via inhibition of c-Kit signalling in Mz-ChA-1-induced cholangiocarcinoma mouse model and human Mz-ChA-1 cells[126]
TNF-αTNF-α released from mast cells amplifies and activates the functionality of CD8+ dendritic cells in Mcpt5-CreTNFfl/fl mice[127]
IL-1βOverexpression of IL-1β promoted tumour invasiveness and metastasis by inducing the expression of angiogenic genes and growth factors[128]
IL1, IL-4, IL-6Decreased cell growth and participates in tumour rejection in breast cancer cells[129]
IL-8, IL-10Mast cell-derived IL-8 and IL-10 act as tumour suppressors contributing to tumour cell growth[130,131]
PGD2PGD2 secretion from mast cells attenuates angiogenesis in a Lewis lung carcinoma mouse model[132]
MacrophagesIL-1βIL-1β induced Snail stabilization in Snail/MCF7 cells and this effect was dependent on cell types and IL-1β concentration[133]
IL-8IL-8 produced by macrophages induce EMT in hepatocellular carcinoma samples via JAK2/STAT3/Snail pathway[134]
TNF-αTNF-α induces the stabilization of Snail in a non-phosphorylated, functional form and thus enhances cell migration and invasion dependent on NF-κB activation[133]
TGF-β TGF-β induced EMT phenotypes in A549 cells, including changes in cell morphology and induction of mesenchymal marker expression in part by NF-κB signalling[135]
MMP-2, MMP-9Macrophage-derived MMP-9 and MMP-2 related with fibrous capsule leading led to the migration and invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma cells in human samples[136]
CHI3L1 M2 macrophage-secreted CHI3L1 promoted metastasis of gastric and breast cancer cells in vitro and in vivo; CHI3L1 interaction with IL-13Rα2 upregulates MMPs[137]
IL-23/IL-17Upregulation of IL-23 leads to tumour growth and progression and development of a tumoral IL-17 response which promote tumorigenesis in a mouse model of colorectal cancer[138]
IL-6TAM-derived IL-6 highly expressed in Hepatocellular carcinoma patients, which is correlated with disease grades and tumour progression[139]
PDGFPDGF release from macrophages mediates the recruitment of pericytes in human melanoma cell lines and OCM-1-induced melanoma mouse model[140]
T cellsIL17-AInhibition of IL17-A release by Th17 cells prevent development of microinvasive PCa in mouse models[141]
IL-17IL-17-producing T cells can promote PCa progression by enhancing inflammation and angiogenesis[69]
PD-1A high percentage of CD8+ T cells express PD-1 in PCa samples, which impair an effective immune response by these cells[44]
IL-3IL-3 expressed by T cells increase the recruitment of basophils and immune cells into the tumour microenvironment, which is linked with a poor survival[112]
IFN-γ IFN-γ can enhance antigen presentation and contribute to immune surveillance in PCa[142]
TNF-α TNF-α produced by activated T cells regulated apoptosis, angiogenesis, and inflammation in PCa[143]
TGF-βTGF-β produced by T cells can suppress and promote tumour growth in PCa depending on the signal it receives[144]
B cellsLymphotoxinLymphotoxin lead to CXCL13/IKKa/STAT3/E2F1/BMI1 (RNF51) activation, ubiquitination of histones within PCa cell nuclei and proliferation of androgen-deprived PCa cells in castration-resistant PCa in mice[145]
TGF-β Secretion of TGF-β by B-cells leads to anergy of CD8+ T cells[146]
IL-2IL-2 and IL-4 produced by B cells regulate the Th2 memory responses to Heligmosomoides polygyrus (Hp) in chimeric mice lacking AID infected with Hp[147]
IL-6Chimera’s mice with B cell lack IL-6 have impaired Th1 and Th17 responses to Salmonella[148]
GABA B cell-derived GABA promotes monocyte differentiation into anti-inflammatory macrophages that secrete IL-10 and inhibit CD8+ T cell killer function in mice[149]
ANGPT: Angiopoietin, ARG: Arginase, CCL: CC chemokine ligand, CML: Chronic myeloid leukaemia, CXCL: Chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand, ECM: Extracellular matrix, EMT: Epithelial-mesenchymal transition, FOXP3: Forkhead box subfamily 3, GABA: γ-amino butyric acid, GM-CSF: Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, HGF: Hepatocyte growth factor, IFN-γ: Interferon-gamma, IL: Interleukin, IL-13Rα2: Interleukin-13 receptor α2 chain, IL-1RA: IL-1 receptor antagonist, MHC: Major histocompatibility complex, MMP: Matrix metalloproteinase, NDE: Neutrophil-derived elastase, NET: Neutrophil extracellular traps, PD: Programmed death, PDGF: Platelet-derived growth factor, PGD: Prostaglandin, RNE: Reactive nitrogen species, ROS: Reactive oxygen species, TAM: Tumour-associated macrophages, TAN: Tumour-associated neutrophils, TGF: Transforming growth factor, TNF: Tumour necrosis factor, VEGF: Vascular endothelial growth factor.
Table 3. Effect of polyphenols in prostate cancer.
Table 3. Effect of polyphenols in prostate cancer.
PolyphenolModelStudy ConditionsEffectRef.
CurcuminPC-3 and DU-145 cells0–50 μM curcumin, 0–48 h, 37 °C5 μM curcumin reduced cell viability and proliferation in DU-145 cells; 25 μM curcumin reduced the survival and migration of DU-145 and PC-3 cells in 24 h[250]
PC-3 and DU-145 cells10, 20, 30, 40 or 50 µmol/L curcumin at 37 °C for 12 h, 24 h or 48 h30 µmol/L curcumin for 24 h decreased cell proliferation, migration, and invasion in PC-3 and DU-145 cells by regulating the miR-30a-5p/PCLAF axis[251]
LNCaP xenografts miceOA of 30 mg/kg curcumin 3×/week in athymic nude mice injected s.c with LNCaP cellsIncreased TUNEL staining, decreased the expression of PCNA andKi67, and inhibition of the activation of NF-kB in LNCaP xenografts[252]
Immunodeficient miceS.c injection of PC-3 cells and daily i.p injected after 4–6 weeks with curcumin analogues (10 μg/g body weight) for 31 daysCurcumin analogues inhibited growth and progression of PC-3 tumours[253]
BALB/c-nu/nuPC-3 cells injected s.c in mice and 0.25 μmol Ca 37, 0.5 μmol Ca 37, or 6 μmol curcumin administered i.p daily for 16 daysCa 37 analogue suppressed PCa tumour and promoted curcumin-induced growth inhibition of PCa cells[254]
Anacardic acidC57BL/6 mice and nude micePC-3 cells s.c injected into mice and anacardic acid (2 mg/kg per day) s.c injected for 30 daysInhibition of VEGF-induced cell proliferation, migration, and adhesion[255]
LNCaP cells1–125 µmol/L anacardic acid at 30 °C for 24 h125 µmol/L anacardic acid inhibited LNCaP cell proliferation, induced G1/S cell cycle arrest and apoptosis of LNCaP cells[256]
Caffeic acidPC-3, DU-145 and LNCaP cells10–106 nM CAPE for 72 hCAPE attenuates proliferation and promotes and cytotoxic effect by reducing AKT, ERK and ER-a(Ser-167) phosphorylation in PC-3 cells[257]
PC-3 cells20 µM CAPE for 24 h or 72 hCAPE decreased protein expression of cyclin D1, cyclin E, SKP2, c-Myc, AKT, mTOR, and Bcl-2[258]
Ellagic acidLNCaP cells25 and 50 μM ellagic acid for 48 hIncreased ROS, TGF-β, IL-6, and tumour suppressor protein p21 levels and activated caspase-3[259]
PC-3 and PLS-10 cells0, 25, and 50 μM ellagic acid for 24 h, 37 °CDecreased secretion of MMP-2 and proteolytic activity of collagenase/gelatinase secreted from PLS-10, inhibiting invasiveness of PCa cells[260]
Gallic acidDU-145 cells24 h, 48 h, or 72 h100 mg/mL gallic acid promoted maximal growth inhibition at 72 h and 25 and 50 mg/mL maximal apoptotic death at 24 and 48 h in human DU-145 cells[261]
DU-145 and 22Rv1 xenograft miceMice supplemented with 0.3% or 1% (w/v) gallic acidGallic acid feeding inhibited the growth of DU-145 and 22Rv1 PCa xenografts in nude mice[262]
ResveratrolImmunodeficient (SCID) miceC-3M-MM2 cells s.c injected, and 20 mg/kg resveratrol administered oral gavage every 2 daysInhibited PCa growth and metastatic lung lesions associated with reduced miR-21 and pAKT, and elevated PDCD4 levels[263]
BALB/cAnNCr-nu/nu miceSupplemented with 50 and 100 mg/kg resveratrol. 2 weeks after LNCaP cells s.c injectedDelayed LNCaP tumour growth and inhibited expression of a marker for steroid hormone responses[264]
TRAMP-C1, TRAMP-C2, and TRAMP-C3 cells50 or 100 μM resveratrol for 0 h, 2 h, 4 h, 8 h, 12 h, and 16 hTRAMP cells exposed to resveratrol showed mitochondria-mediated decreased cell viability, and altered cell morphology leading to aberrant expression of Bax and Bcl-2 proteins[265]
PC-3 and 22RV1 cells2.5–10 μM resveratrolResveratrol arrested cell cycle, promoted apoptosis, and sensitized PCa cells to ionization therapy, activated the ATM-AMPK-p53-p21cip1/p27kip1 and inhibit the AKT signaling pathways[266]
PiceatannolDU-145, MLL, PC-3 and TRAMP-C2 cellsTreatment with EGF for 0 h, 6 h, 12 h or 24 h with 0 or 10 μmol/L piceatannolPiceatannol reduced basal and EGF-induced migration and invasion of DU-145 cells-induced IL-6 secretion by IL-6/STAT3 inhibition[267]
DU-145 cells0 or 40 μmol/L piceatannol for 24 hPiceatannol increased the percentage of cells in G1 phase, cyclin A, cyclin D1, and reduced CDK4 and CDK2 activity[268]
DU-145 cells0–40 μM piceatannol for 24 hPiceatannol reduced TNF-α-induced invasion and MMP-9 gene expression via suppression of NF-κB activity[269]
Pterostilbene PC-3 and LNCaP cells0.1, 1, 10, 100, and 1000 mM pterostilbene for 24 h at 37 °CA conjugate molecule caused 50% growth inhibition, reduced accumulation of cells in G2/M phase and induction of apoptosis by downregulation of PI3K/AKT and MAPK/ERK pathways[270]
PC-3 and LNCaP cells0, 20, 40, 60, 80, and 100 mM pterostilbene for 48 h80 μM pterostilbene decreased lipid synthesis by decreasing FASN expression and inhibiting ACC activity, blocked cell cycle at G1 phase by inducing p53 and further up-regulating p21 expression[271]
Epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG)PC-3 cells1 and 25 μM EGCG for 48 h1 µM EGCG reduced PC-3 cell survival, promoted apoptosis by increasing the pro-apoptotic splice isoform of caspase-9 and enhanced apoptotic capacity of cisplatin[272]
DU-145, PC-3 and LNCaP cells20, 40, 80, and 100 μg/mL EGCG for 24 hEGCG inhibited cytokine and chemokine gene induction, activity of MMP-9 and -2, and NF-κB activity[273]
FisetinLNCaP cellsTreatment with fisetin 10–60 μM, 48 hFisetin induced apoptosis, PARP cleavage, modulation of Bcl-2 family protein expression, inhibition of PI3K, phosphorylation of AKT at Ser473 and Thr308, mitochondrial release of cytochrome c into cytosol, and activation of caspases-3, -8 and -9[274]
LNCaP cellsTreatment with fisetin 10–60 μmol/L 48 hFisetin acted as an AR ligand leading to decrease in AR stability and decreased transactivation of target genes including PSA[275]
PC-3, DU-145 and LNCaP cellsCells treated with fisetin 10–120 μM for 24 h, 48 h, 72 h, and 96 hFisetin activated the mTOR repressor TSC2 through inhibition of AKT and activation of AMPK leading to inhibition of Cap-dependent translation and induction of autophagic cell death in PC-3 cells[276]
QuercetinCancer-induced (MNU and Testosterone treated) ratsRats treated orally with 200 mg/kg quercetin 3×/weekQuercetin decreased expression of IGFIR, AKT, AR, cell proliferative and anti-apoptotic proteins[277]
LNCaP, DU-145, and PC-3 cells5, 10, 20, 40, 80, and 160 μM quercetin for 24 h, 48 h, and 72 hApoptotic and necrotic cell death and AKT and NF-κB activation in PC-3 and LNCaP cells; reduction of AKT pathway and activation of Raf/MEK in DU-145 cells[278]
LNCaP cells0, 1, 10, 25, 50, 100, and 150 μM quercetin for 24 h to 5 days depending on the type of analysisInhibited expression and function of the AR in LNCaP cells, decreased mRNA levels of PSA, NKX3.1, and ODC and repressed AR expression[279]
LNCaP cells50–200 μM quercetin for 24 h and 48 hQuercetin at 150 μM caused G0/G1 phase arrest via decreasing the levels of CDK2, cyclins E, and D proteins, stimulated the protein expression of ATF, GRP78, and GADD153, apoptotic cell death and DNA damage at 48 h, decreased Bcl-2, increased Bax, and activation of caspase-3, -8, and -9[280]
BALB/cA nude micePC-3 cells injected s.c, 20 mg/kg/d quercetin injected i.p for 16 daysReduced tumour growth, inhibited tumorigenesis by targeting angiogenesis, reduced cell viability and induced apoptosis correlated with downregulation of AKT, mTOR and P70S6K[281]
ApigeninPC-3 xenograft miceOrally administration of 20 and 50 μg/mouse/day apigenin for 8 weeksBoth doses of apigenin decreased tumour growth, HDAC activity, HDAC1 and HDAC3 protein expression, and bcl-2 expression shifting the Bax/Bcl-2 ratio in favour of apoptosis[282]
LNCaP and PC-3 cells0, 10, 20, 40, and 80 μM apigenin for 72 h at 37 °CUp-regulation of p21 expression, and p21 inhibits transcription of PLK-1[283]
PC-3 and DU-145 cells5–40 μM apigenin for 24 hDose-dependent suppression of XIAP, c-IAP1, c-IAP2 and survivin protein levels, decrease in cell viability and apoptosis, decrease in Bcl-xL and Bcl-2, and inhibition of class I histone deacetylases and HDAC1 protein expression[284]
C57BL/TGN TRAMP mice20 and 50 µg/day of apigenin for 20 weeksInhibition of VEGF, uPA, MMP-2, and MMP-9, tumour growth, and metastasis, reduction of IGF-I, and increase of IGFBP-3 through inhibition of p-AKT and p-ERK1/2[285]
TRAMP mice20 and 50 μg/mouse/day, 6 days/week for 20 weeks Apigenin-treated mice showed reduced proliferation, reduced phosphorylation of AKT (Ser473) and FoxO3a (Ser253), and upregulation of FoxO-responsive proteins BIM and p27/Kip1[286]
Proanthocyanidins DU-145 cells0.1, 0.5 and 1.0 mg/mL PAC for 24 hDown-regulation of MMP activity and up-regulation of TIMP activity[287]
DU-145 and LNCaP cells20 μg/mL of blueberry fraction, 2.38 mM quercetin for 48 h (DU-145) or 72 h (LNCaP)Inhibited growth of DU-145 and LNCaP cells[288]
DU-145, PC-3, and LNCaP cells1–100 mg/mL PAC complex for 48 hInhibited proliferation of PC-3 and DU-145 with higher effect in LNCaP cells by decreasing AR expressing, G1 cell cycle arrest, decreased cyclin-dependent kinases, and cyclins, stimulated p21 and p27, and increased phosphorylation of p44 and p42[289]
ACC: Acetyl-CoA carboxylase, AR: Androgen receptor, CAPE: Caffeic acid-phenyl ester, CDK: cyclin-dependent kinase, EGF: Epidermal growth factor, FASN: Fatty acid synthase, HPLC: High-performance liquid chromatography, I.p: Intraperitoneally, OA: Oral administration, PAC: Proanthocyanidin complex, PARP: Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase, PI3K: Phosphatidyl inositol 3-kinase, PSA: Prostate-specific antigen, S.c: Subcutaneously, TRAMP: Transgenic adenocarcinoma of mouse prostate.
Table 4. Effect of polyphenol-based nanoparticles in prostate cancer.
Table 4. Effect of polyphenol-based nanoparticles in prostate cancer.
Nanoparticle (Size) ModelTreatmentEffectRef.
Curcumin-CA-NP (12.53–60.23 nm)DU-145 cells0.0832–260 μM 72 hUptake by PCa cells[299]
Curcumin emulsome NP (184.21 nm)LNCaP cells10–40 μM for 24 h, 48 h or 72 hDecreased proliferation, cell cycle arrest at G2/M phase[300]
Curcumin NPs (34.0–359.4 nm)PC-3 cells50–600 μM overnightDecreased cell viability and increased haemolytic effect[301]
FA-RES + DTX-PBM NP (36.6 nm)PC-3, C4-2B and LNCaP cells3 μM RES + 0.01 μM DTX 24 h, 48 h, or 72 hReduced expression of NF-kB p65, COX-2, pro- and anti-apoptotic genes[302]
RSV-SLN (126.85 nm)PC-3 cells and Charles Foster rats2 mL for 0–48 h and 2 mg/kg i.v. for 0–24 hInternalization of NPs in PC-3 cells[303]
RES-MSNs (60 nm)PC-3 cells10–20 μg for 72 hIncreased anti-proliferative activity and sensitization of Docatexal[304]
RL-loaded PLGA (202.8 nm)LNCaP cells0–50 μM for 48 hDecreased cell viability, G1-S phase arrest, increased apoptosis[305]
EGCG-PA-PEG-NP (N.D.)Tumour xenograft mice1 mg in food consumptionProapoptotic and angiogenesis inhibitory effects, enhanced bioavailability[306]
198AuNP-EGCg (535 nm)PC-3 xenograft SCID mice136 μCi I.T. for 42 days72% retention in tumours after 24 h and 80% reduction of tumour volumes after 28 days[307]
EGCG-GA-MD-NPs (120 nm)DU-145 cells0.9–60 mg/mL for 64 hReduced cell viability and apoptosis induction[308]
Chitosan-based EGCG NP (150–200 nm)Athymic nude xenograft mice3–6 mg/kg by O.A 5x weekDecreased tumour growth and PSA levels[309]
EGCG-gold NPs (90.3 nm)PC-3 cells0–200 μg/mL for
1–24 h
Increased NF-κB activity and apoptosis[310]
198AuNP-EGCg: Epigallocatechin-gallate functionalized radioactive gold nanoparticles, FA-RES + DTX-PBM NP: Folic acid conjugated resveratrol and docetaxel planetary ball milled nano-particle, Curcumin-CA-NP: Curcumin loaded calcium alginate nanoparticles, EGCG-GA-MD-NPs: Epigallocatechin-gallate-based gum arabic maltodextrin nanoparticles, EGCG-PA-PEG-NP: Epigallocatechin-3-gallate encapsulated polylactic acid–polyethylene glycol nanoparticles, i.t.: Intratumorally, i.v.: Intravenously, N.D: Not defined, O.A: Oral intubation, PSA: Prostate specific antigen, RES-MSNs: Resveratrol-based mesoporous silica nanoparticles, RL-loaded PLGA: Resveratrol-loaded polylactic-co-glycolic acid, RSV-SLN: Resveratrol-solid lipid nanoparticles.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fernandes, R.; Costa, C.; Fernandes, R.; Barros, A.N. Inflammation in Prostate Cancer: Exploring the Promising Role of Phenolic Compounds as an Innovative Therapeutic Approach. Biomedicines 2023, 11, 3140. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11123140

AMA Style

Fernandes R, Costa C, Fernandes R, Barros AN. Inflammation in Prostate Cancer: Exploring the Promising Role of Phenolic Compounds as an Innovative Therapeutic Approach. Biomedicines. 2023; 11(12):3140. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11123140

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fernandes, Raquel, Cátia Costa, Rúben Fernandes, and Ana Novo Barros. 2023. "Inflammation in Prostate Cancer: Exploring the Promising Role of Phenolic Compounds as an Innovative Therapeutic Approach" Biomedicines 11, no. 12: 3140. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11123140

APA Style

Fernandes, R., Costa, C., Fernandes, R., & Barros, A. N. (2023). Inflammation in Prostate Cancer: Exploring the Promising Role of Phenolic Compounds as an Innovative Therapeutic Approach. Biomedicines, 11(12), 3140. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11123140

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop