Next Article in Journal
Rituximab Biosimilar BCD020 Shows Superior Efficacy above Conventional Non-Biologics Treatment in Pediatric Lupus Nephritis: The Data of Retrospective Cohort Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Suppressing Inflammation for the Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy and Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Dazdotuftide as a Potential New Multitarget Therapeutic Candidate
Previous Article in Journal
Association between Food/UGT2B7 Polymorphisms and Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics Properties of Indapamide in Healthy Humans
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Pilot Study of Implementing Diabetic Retinopathy Screening in the Oslo Region, Norway: Baseline Results
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Relationship between Diabetic Nephropathy and Development of Diabetic Macular Edema in Addition to Diabetic Retinopathy

by
Yukihisa Suzuki
1,2,* and
Motohiro Kiyosawa
3
1
Department of Ophthalmology, Japan Community Health Care Organization, Mishima General Hospital, Shizuoka 411-0801, Japan
2
Research Team for Neuroimaging, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology, Tokyo 173-0015, Japan
3
Jiyugaoka Kiyosawa Eye Clinic, Tokyo 152-0035, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomedicines 2023, 11(5), 1502; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11051502
Submission received: 12 April 2023 / Revised: 14 May 2023 / Accepted: 19 May 2023 / Published: 22 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Research and Recent Advances in Diabetic Retinopathy)

Abstract

:
This study aimed to examine the relationship between diabetic retinopathy (DR) and systemic factors. We evaluated 261 patients (143 men, 118 women, aged 70.1 ± 10.1 years) with type 2 diabetes. All participants underwent a fundus examination, fundus photography using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), and blood tests. For glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels, the average and highest values in the past were used. We observed DR in 127 (70 men and 57 women) of 261 patients. Logistic regression analyses revealed a significant correlation between DR development and the duration of diabetes (OR = 2.40; 95% CI: 1.50), average HbA1c level (OR = 5.57; 95% CI: 1.27, 24.4), highest HbA1c level (OR = 2.46; 95% CI: 1.12, 5.38), and grade of diabetic nephropathy (DN) (OR = 6.23; 95% CI: 2.70, 14.4). Regression analyses revealed a significant correlation between the severity of DR and duration of diabetes (t = –6.66; 95% CI: 0.21, 0.39), average HbA1c level (t = 2.59; 95% CI: 0.14, 1.02), and severity of DN (t = 6.10; 95% CI: 0.49, 0.97). Logistic regression analyses revealed a significant correlation between diabetic macular edema (DME) development and DN grade (OR = 2.22; 95% CI: 1.33, 3.69). DN grade correlates with the development of DR and DME, and decreased renal function predicts the onset of DR.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Diabetes is a disease that causes chronic hyperglycemia due to insufficient insulin secretion or insulin action. The number of people with diabetes worldwide was estimated at 420 million in 2015. This number is currently on the rise and is expected to reach 640 million by 2040 [1]. There are two main types of diabetes: insulin-dependent type 1 diabetes and non-insulin-dependent type 2 diabetes. In type 1 diabetes, almost no endogenous insulin is secreted due to the dysfunction of the insulin-producing beta cells. Type 2 diabetes is a disease in which endogenous insulin is secreted to some extent, but hyperglycemia occurs due to impaired insulin secretion or insulin resistance [2]. Complications of diabetes include retinopathy, nephropathy, and neuropathy, which can occur in both type 1 and type 2 diabetes.
Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a microvascular complication caused by persistent hyperglycemia that is common in diabetic patients and is a major cause of blindness along with glaucoma and age-related macular degeneration [3]. DR is classified into non-proliferative DR and proliferative DR, according to the degree of disease progression, and may be complicated by macular edema. Patients with nonproliferative DR are typically asymptomatic. If proliferative DR develops, the patient may present with a sudden loss of vision due to a vitreous hemorrhage. In type 2 diabetes, the incidence with 5 years of evolution is 20%, while with 15 years of evolution, it reaches 80% [4]. The risk of developing DR is thought to be associated with the duration of diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels [5]. HbA1c levels have been reported to be significantly associated with the progression of DR [6], and glycemic variability has been found to be associated with DR in type 2 diabetes [7]. In many patients with diabetes, HbA1c levels fluctuate from month to month and are thought to affect the retina over the next several decades. We thought it necessary to investigate the effects of the average HbA1c level and highest HbA1c level over the past years on the development and severity of retinopathy, respectively.
Macular edema (ME) can develop in various diseases such as uveitis [8], retinal vein occlusion [9], and diabetic macular edema [10] and is a major cause of vision loss. In macular edema, fluid leaking from capillaries accumulates in the subretinal or intraretinal region of the macula [11]. Diabetic macular edema (DME) also occurs with some frequency in non-proliferative DR and is a major cause of vision loss in such patients [12]. DME is defined as “retinal thickening within one disk diameter of the center of the macula or definite hard exudates in this region” [13]. The risk factors for developing DME include long-term diabetes, hypertension, and high HbA1c levels [14].
Diabetic nephropathy (DN) is also a major and important microvascular complication in diabetes [15]. DN is the leading cause of chronic kidney disease and accounts for 40% of new cases of end-stage renal disease each year. DN is characterized by persistent albuminuria and decreased glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and also causes elevated blood pressure. In patients with DN, persistent albuminuria reflects glomerular injury but may also reflect generalized endothelial dysfunction and widespread vascular injury [16,17]. Several studies have reported that DN is associated with the development and progression of DR [6,18]. DN generally causes body edema along with hypertension and proteinuria [19]. In patients with DN, hyperpermeability of the retinal blood vessels is expected to occur due to microvascular abnormalities, which are presumed to cause an increased leakage of serum into the extracellular space [20].
We hypothesized that DR development and severity are related not only to past average HbA1c levels but also to the highest HbA1c level. We also hypothesized that DME development is associated with DN. We investigated risk factors for developing DR and DME in patients with type 2 diabetes using logistic regression analyses.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Standard Protocol Approvals, Registrations, and Patient Consents

The study protocol was approved by the institutional ethics committee of the Japan Community Health Care Organization, Mishima General Hospital (protocol code: H30-005 and date of approval: 5 October 2018). All the procedures conformed to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. All measurements in this study were performed at the Japan Community Health Care Organization Mishima General Hospital. Informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to participation in the study.

2.2. Subjects and Examination

This study is retrospective consecutive case series. Our study included 261 patients (143 men, 118 women, aged 70.1 ± 10.1 years) with type 2 diabetes who visited the Department of Ophthalmology, Mishima General Hospital. Type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes are inherently different pathologies [1,2]. It has been also reported that the incidence of DR differs between type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes [21,22], and in this study, only type 2 diabetes was focused on. Individuals with diabetes were classified as those with fasting plasma glucose >126 mg/dL or casual blood glucose >200 mg/dL and a previous diagnosis of diabetes by an internist. Inclusion criteria included patients who had regular medical examinations and required blood tests (HbA1c, creatinine) and urinalysis (urinary protein, urinary albumin). Patients with HbA1c data at least once every 6 months and at least the past 7 years were included (Figure 1). Exclusion criteria were lack of HbA1c data for the past 7 years and being unable to perform urinalysis due to chronic renal failure. We performed fundus examination and fundus photography using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) after mydriasis in all cases. OCT scans were acquired using an RS-3000 device (NIDEK, Gamagori, Japan), capturing an area of 9 × 9 mm2 centered on the fovea. We performed fluorescein angiography to determine the grade of DR in patients with DR. In addition, the presence or absence of DME was determined from SD-OCT images. Blood tests (HbA1c, creatinine, LDL, triglyceride) and urinalysis (urinary protein, urinary albumin) were taken from ophthalmological examinations within 2 months, if available, or newly performed. The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in each case was calculated from the blood creatinine level and age. Based on these data, we examined the stages of DR and DN in each case. The new Fukuda classification was used to diabetic retinopathy [23]. DR is divided into benign (type A) and malignant (type B), each of which is divided into five stages. Benign retinopathies include background retinopathy (A1 and A2) before proliferative changes and interrupted proliferative retinopathy (A3, A4, and A5) after photocoagulation or vitrectomy. Benign retinopathy includes background retinopathy (A1 and A2) and interrupted proliferative retinopathy (A3, A4, and A5) after photocoagulation or vitrectomy. DME is defined as a retinal thickening within 500 μm of the fovea or hard exudates at or within 500 μm of the fovea associated with adjacent retinal thickening or an area of retinal thickening that is one disc area or larger in size located one disc diameter (1500 μm) or less from the fovea [24]. We defined DME severity as none, mild (identified by retinal thickening or hard exudates in the posterior pole but distant from the center of the macula), moderate (characterized by retinal thickening or hard exudates approaching the center of the macula but not affected by the center), and severe (characterized by retinal thickening or hard exudates affecting the center of the macular) [25]. The diabetic nephropathy staging [26] was used for DN staging. The diabetic nephropathy staging classifies nephropathy into five stages from the 1st stage (early stage of nephropathy) to the 5th stage (dialysis therapy stage) using urinary albumin level or urinary protein level and eGFR. Urinary albumin levels were classified into A1 (less than 30 mg/day), A2 (30–299 mg/day), and A3 (300 mg/day or more) according to the KINGO CKD guideline 2012. We examined each patient for a history of ischemic heart disease and use of rennin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAS) inhibitors and sodium/glucose cotransporter (SGLT)-2 inhibitors.
After resting for 2 min, the blood pressure of each patient was measured in a sitting position at our hospital. Systemic hypertension was defined as systolic blood pressure of 140 mmHg or higher or diastolic blood pressure of 90 mmHg or higher.
We collected data on blood tests (HbA1c, creatinine, LDL, triglyceride) and urinalysis (urinary protein, urinary albumin), fundus examination, and fundus photography using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography, and blood pressure. HbA1c data were collected at least once every 6 months and for at least the past 7 years.

2.3. Data Processing and Analysis of Risk Factors for Development and Severity of DR

The DR and DN stages in each case were converted into numerical values (retinopathy, 0–7, nephropathy, 1–5). We performed multivariable logistic regression analyses on all patients with type 2 diabetes to investigate the risk factors for developing DR. We selected the eye with more severe DR as the target eye for each patient. Cases with DR developing in only one eye were included in patients with DR. We used the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test to examine whether DR stage, average HbA1c level, high HbA1c level, and eGFR were normally distributed.
Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the association between the parameters (gender, duration of diabetes, body mass index, systemic hypertension, average HbA1c level, highest HbA1c level, serum LDL, and serum triglyceride, DN stage, ischemic heart disease, and use of RAS inhibitors and SGLT-2 inhibitors) and a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for each factor. Statistical significance for all analyses was defined as p < 0.05.
We also performed a regression analysis between DR stage and the parameters (gender, duration of diabetes, body mass index, systemic hypertension, average HbA1c level, highest HbA1c level, serum LDL, and serum triglyceride, DN stage, ischemic heart disease, and use of RAS inhibitors and SGLT-2 inhibitors) in patients with DR. If the DR stages of the left and right eyes were different, the more severe stage was considered as the DR stage of the patient. The t-statistic and 95% CI were estimated for each factor. Statistical significance for all analyses was defined as p < 0.05.
These regression models were constructed by identifying potential confounding variables. All analyses were conducted using EZR [27] (Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama, Japan), a graphical user interface for R (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).

2.4. Analysis of Risk Factors for Developing DME

We performed multivariable logistic regression analyses on all patients with type 2 diabetes to investigate the risk factors for DME. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the association between the parameters (gender, duration of diabetes, body mass index, systemic hypertension, average HbA1c level, highest HbA1c level, serum LDL, serum triglyceride, DN stage, ischemic heart disease, and use of RAS inhibitors and SGLT-2 inhibitors) and the presence of DME. Cases with DME developing in only one eye were included in patients with DME. The t-statistic and 95% CI were estimated for each factor. Statistical significance for all analyses was defined as p < 0.05.
We also performed a regression analysis between DME stage and the parameters (gender, duration of diabetes, body mass index, systemic hypertension, average HbA1c level, highest HbA1c level, serum LDL, and serum triglyceride, DN stage, ischemic heart disease, and use of RAS inhibitors and SGLT-2 inhibitors) in patients. If the DME stages of the left and right eyes were different, the more severe stage was considered the DME stage of the patient. The t-statistic and 95% CI were estimated for each factor. Statistical significance for all analyses was defined as p < 0.05.

2.5. Data Availability

All data used for analysis are presented in the tables in this article. Data will be provided in anonymized form after ethics approval if requested by other investigators for purposes of replicating the results.

3. Results

3.1. Our Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

We observed 127 (70 men and 57 women) patients with DR and 134 (73 men and 61 women) without DR (Table 1). The diabetes duration was significantly longer in patients with DR than in patients without DR. The average and highest HbA1c levels were significantly higher in patients with DR than in patients without DR. In addition, eGFR was low in patients with DR, and the DN grade was also high in patients with DR. On the other hand, DME was observed in 64 (50.4%) patients with DR but not in patients without DR. There were no differences in body mass index, prevalence of systemic hypertension, serum LDL, and serum triglyceride.

3.2. Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test

The DR grade (p < 0.001), average HBA1c level (p = 0.001), and high HBA1c level (p = 0.002) were not normally distributed, while eGFR was normally distributed.

3.3. Risk Factors for the Development of DR

Multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed a significant correlation between DR development and the diabetes duration (OR = 2.77; 95% CI: 1.14, 2.39; p = 0.009), average HbA1c level (OR = 5.60; 95% CI: 1.36, 23.1; p = 0.02), highest HbA1c level (OR = 2.46; 95% CI: 1.12–5.38; p = 0.02), and DN stage (OR = 7.62; 95% CI: 2.63, 22.1; p = 0.0002) (Table 2). Univariate analysis revealed a significant correlation between DR development and the eGFR (OR = 0.98; 95% CI: 0.97, 0.99; p = 0.0001), albuminuria (OR = 5.23; 95% CI: 3.14, 8.71; p < 0.00001) (Table 3). No significant correlation was observed between DR development and the other parameters.

3.4. Risk Factors for Severity of DR

Multivariate regression analyses revealed a significant correlation between DR severity and diabetes duration (t = 4.97; 95% CI: 0.15, 0.36; p < 0.00001), average HbA1c level (t = 3.25; 95% CI: 0.14, 1.02; p = 0.002), and DN stage (t = 4.32; 95% CI: 0.33, 0.89; p = 0.00004) (Table 4). Univariate analysis revealed a significant correlation between DR severity and the eGFR (OR = –4.96; 95% CI: –0.04, –0.020; p < 0.00001), albuminuria (OR = 0.19; 95% CI: 1.24, 1.99; p < 0.00001) (Table 5). No significant correlation was observed between the DR stage and the other parameters.

3.5. Risk Factors for the Development of DME

Multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed a significant correlation between DME development and the diabetes duration (OR = 1.33; 95% CI: 1.01, 1.75; p = 0.04), DN stage (OR = 2.80; 95% CI: 1.37, 5.72; p = 0.005) (Table 6). Univariate analysis revealed a significant correlation between DME development and the eGFR (OR = 0.98; 95% CI: 0.97, 0.99; p = 0.009), albuminuria (OR = 4.05; 95% CI: 2.30, 7.11; p < 0.00001) (Table 7). No significant correlation was observed between DME development and the other parameters.

3.6. Risk Factors for Severity of DME

Multivariate regression analyses revealed a significant correlation between DME severity and diabetes duration (t = 2.57; 95% CI: 0.02, 0.13; p = 0.001), average HbA1c level (t = 2.54; 95% CI: 0.08, 0.68; p = 0.01), and DN stage (t = 2.48; 95% CI: 0.04, 0.36; p = 0.002) (Table 8). Univariate analysis revealed a significant correlation between DR severity and the eGFR (OR = –2.44; 95% CI: –0.009, –0.001; p = 0.02), albuminuria (OR = 5.36; 95% CI: 0.26, 0.55; p < 0.00001) (Table 9). No significant correlation was observed between the DRE stage and the other parameters.

3.7. DME Prevalence by DR Grade

Our patients included 134 patients with Fukuda classification A0, 3 patients with A1, 49 patients with A2, 34 patients with B1, 7 patients with B2, 23 patients with B4, and 3 patients with B5, respectively (Table 10). DME prevalence was 32.7% in A2, 58.8% in B1, 71.4% in B2, 87.0% in B4, and 100% in B5, respectively. Additionally, DME was not observed in A0 and A1.

4. Discussion

We observed 127 (70 men and 57 women) patients with DR and 134 (73 men and 61 women) without DR. The diabetes duration was longer in patients with DR than in patients without DR. The average and highest HbA1c levels were higher in patients with DR than in patients without DR. Multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed a significant correlation between DR development and the duration of diabetes (OR = 1.65), average HbA1c level (OR = 5.60), highest HbA1c level (OR = 1.17), and DN grade (OR = 7.62). Multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed a significant correlation between DR stage and diabetes duration, average HbA1c level, and DN stage. We observed a significant correlation between DME development and diabetes duration (OR = 1.33), average HbA1c level (OR = 5.52), and DN grade (OR = 2.80). Multivariate regression analyses revealed a significant correlation between DME stage and diabetes duration, average HbA1c level, and DN stage.

4.1. Pathophysiology of DR

The primary retinal vascular response to exposure to hyperglycemia is vasodilation and changes in blood flow. These responses are thought to be metabolic autoregulation to increase retinal metabolism in diabetic patients [28]. On the other hand, high glucose triggers apoptosis of capillary pericytes, resulting in the localized outpouching of the capillary walls. This process results in the formation of a microaneurysm, which is the earliest clinical manifestation of DR [29]. In parallel with this, endothelial cell apoptosis and basement membrane thickening in diabetic microvessels, which are associated with blood-retinal barrier (BRB) impairment, have been reported [30]. Furthermore, the loss of vascular pericytes and endothelial cells induces capillary occlusion and causes retinal ischemia. Retinal ischemia and hypoxia activate hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF-1), leading to increased VEGF expression in the eye [31]. VEGF is a growth factor that induces angiogenesis and angiogenesis by stimulating the division, migration, and differentiation of vascular endothelial cells, and it is associated with the progression of PDR and DME. In addition, VEGF has a vascular hyperpermeability effect [32,33]. Adamis et al. [34] observed that VEGF was increased in the vitreous of patients with PDR. In the present study, the development of DR was associated with both the average and highest HbA1c levels, and the severity of DR was associated with the average HbA1c level. Song et al. [6] conducted a 3-year retrospective cohort study of 604 patients with type 2 diabetes. They observed that the mean HbA1c level was a significant predictor of DR progression, independent of the duration of diabetes and HbA1c-variability levels. In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, HbA1c variability such as microalbuminuria and decreased GFR is associated with DN initiation [35]. In recent studies, glycemic variability has been found to be strongly associated with DR in patients with type 2 diabetes [7]. It is unclear why HbA1c variations adversely affect the development of DR or DN, but one possible mechanism is associated with “metabolic memory” due to repeated exposure to glycemic instability [36], which can lead to increased oxidative stress [37]. If hyperglycemia continues for a certain period in the early stages of diabetes, it may be difficult to suppress the subsequent progression of complications even if hyperglycemia is corrected by subsequent treatment [38]. Concepts of “metabolic memory” include many factors such as mitochondrial DNA damage, activation of protein kinase C, polyol pathway, increased production of advanced glycation end products (AGEs), overexpression of AGE receptors, increased anion superoxide formation, glycation of mitochondrial proteins, and hexosamine influx alterations [39]. Kowluru et al. compared metabolites in the blood and urine of rats in which glycemic control was started immediately after the onset of diabetes and in a group in which control was delayed for 6 months. They observed that oxidative stressors such as lipid peroxides (LPO), 8-hydroxy-2-deoxyguanosine (8-OhdG), glutathione (GSH), and urinary nitric oxide (NO) increased in the control delay group, but these substances in the rapid control group were no different from those in healthy rats [40]. Ceriello et al. observed increased vascular endothelial dysfunction, inflammation, and oxidative stress in patients with high HbA1c levels, but these nearly normalized in patients with low HbA1c levels who normalized blood glucose [41]. These reports suggest that the early initiation of good glycemic control may reduce oxidative stress and associated damage in the body, but the damage may progress if treatment is delayed. Quagliaro et al. found that intermittent hyperglycemia increased nitrotyrosine and 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine, a marker of oxidative stress, and observed increased apoptosis in human venous endothelial cells, compared to stable high glucose condition [42]. Horvath et al. [43] observed that excessive glycemic changes stimulated nitrotyrosine production and caused endothelial dysfunction in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Alterations in the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) have also been reported in DR. Wang et al. [44] examined peripapillary vessel density and RNFL thickness using swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography (SS-OCTA) imaging in patients with nonproliferative DR, and they observed that peripapillary capillary vessel density and RNFL thickness were significantly lower in the superior temporal quadrants compared with healthy. Moreover, Cao et al. [45] observed that peripapillary capillary vessel density and RNFL thickness were significantly lower also in diabetic patients without DR compared to normal controls using OCTA.
Higher HbA1c levels, longer duration of diabetes, and use of insulin therapy for treatment have been reported to be risk factors for DR, and these may reflect poor glycemic control. Wat et al. reported that hypertension was positively correlated with the prevalence and progression of DR [46]. However, obesity, hyperlipidemia, sex, and smoking have not been established with clear associations with DR, as different studies have reported different results [46].

4.2. Pathophysiology of DN

The pathophysiologic mechanisms that lead to DN are multifactorial [19]. In the early stages of DN, hyperglycemia causes the release of vasoactive mediators such as VEGF, NO, glucagon, insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), and prostaglandins [47,48,49,50]. This causes dilation of the arterioles, leading to a temporary increase in the glomerular filtration rate. On the other hand, hyperglycemia causes the increased production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), activation of protein kinase C (PKC), and increased advanced glycation end products (AGEs), leading to vascular endothelial cell damage [50]. Damage to glomerular blood vessels results in increased glomerular permeability to macromolecules, leading to proteinuria. The transformation of IGF-1 also causes the hypertrophy of renal cells and the accumulation of extracellular matrix [51]. Sustained hyperglycemia also activates the renin-angiotensin system to form angiotensin II, which is involved in the development of DN and concomitant hypertension [52].
In patients with type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes, high HbA1c levels, longer duration of diabetes, and systemic hypertension are associated with an increased risk of development and progression of DN [53,54], similar to DR. In addition, dyslipidemia, obesity, age, smoking, and genetic factors are also risk factors for the development and progression of DN [53,54,55]. In a previous study, lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and triglyceride (TG) levels were associated with a reduced risk of progression from moderate to severe albuminuria or end-stage renal disease [56]. The onset and severity of DN take some time. Microalbuminuria occurs 5 to 10 years after the onset of diabetes, followed by macroalbuminuria in 20 years and end-stage renal disease in 30 years [57].
Many studies have reported a significant association between DR and DN [58,59,60], and Kotlarsky et al. [60] observed that DN precedes DR. High HbA1c levels, longer diabetes duration, and systemic hypertension are considered common risk factors for DR and DN. Therefore, it is predicted that DR and DN are likely to develop and progress in parallel in patients with these factors.

4.3. Pathophysiology of DME

In the present study, we observed DME in half of the patients with DR but not in patients without DR. On the other hand, patients who develop DR often already have DN, because DN tends to precede DR [60].
Several reports have investigated the relationship between DME and DN. Acan et al. [61] reported that DN is a risk factor for developing DME. Koo et al. [62] reported that the serous type of DME was associated with albuminuria. However, there have been several reports that DN did not significantly affect DME development or progression [18,63]. On the other hand, there have been reports that dialysis improves DME. Takamura et al. [64] observed that the central retinal thickness (CRT) values were decreased after hemodialysis initiation without ocular treatments for DME in most eyes. Theodossiadis et al. [65] reported that average macular thickness and total macular volume were also reduced after hemodialysis in patients with DME. The mechanism by which hemodialysis promotes subretinal fluid absorption is currently unknown, but it is believed that the mutual flow of the excess fluid between the retina and the choroidal tissue or the retinal pigment epithelium may have improved after hemodialysis [64]. On the other hand, it has been proposed that SGLT-2 inhibitors may be effective in treating DME. Tatsumi et al. [66] observed that the administration of SGLT-2 inhibitors significantly reduced CRT in patients with untreated DME. SGLT2 is thought to be present in retinal pericytes and mesangial cells, and it has been reported that SGLT2 inhibitors may protect the retina by acting directly on retinal pericytes [67]. Therefore, rather than a diuretic effect, this direct action on retinal pericytes may contribute to the reduction of macular edema.
Several theories have been proposed regarding the mechanisms through which DME develops. They include retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) pump impairment, oxygen tension, Starling’s law, and BRB impairment. In areas with DME, microaneurysms and abnormal deep capillary networks are observed in the outer layer of the superficial nucleus, which is usually an avascular region [68]. The retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) has ion and fluid pumps for the reabsorption of subretinal fluid. This RPE pump is the sole extracellular fluid uptake mechanism in the fovea, and the dysfunction of this pump may be involved in the development of DME [69]. Decreased choroidal circulation may be the cause of RPE pump dysfunction [70]. An oxygen theory has also been proposed to explain the pathogenesis of DME [71]. Long-term hyperglycemia reduces retinal perfusion, resulting in a lower partial pressure of oxygen in the inner retina. Retinal arterioles dilate in an autoregulatory response, thus increasing the hydrostatic pressure within the capillaries and venules within the retina [72]. The resulting increase in intravascular pressure can damage capillaries [72]. In parallel, decreased retinal oxygen tension upregulates the synthesis of VEGF and other permeability factors and increases microvascular leakage.
VEGF is expressed not only by retinal cells but also by retinal pigment epithelium, glial cells, vascular endothelial cells, and pericytes under hypoxic conditions [73]. VEGF also causes endothelial hyperpermeability and endothelial cell proliferation [32]. VEGF is thought to play an important role in macular edema [74]. Funatsu et al. assessed fluorescence leakage in patients with DME and observed that VEGF levels in the vitreous humor were also elevated in patients with hyperfluorescence [75]. Therefore, the intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF agents (aflibercept and ranibizumab) has become the main treatment for DME, replacing conventional laser photocoagulation, vitrectomy, and steroid triamcinolone acetonide [76].
Starling’s law, which relates hydrostatic and oncotic pressures opposing each other, has long been advocated. It is speculated that this law causes elevated intravascular pressure and increased vascular permeability, resulting in the flow of water, ions, and macromolecules from the intravascular space into the extravascular space [20]. BRB is composed of retinal vasculature and retinal pigment epithelium (RPE). Endothelial cells are responsible for maintaining the BRB, and damage to these cells increases vascular permeability [77].
We observed that the prevalence of DME increased as the DR grade progressed in this study (A2: 32.7%, B1: 58.8%, B2: 71.4%, B4: 87.0%, B5: 100%). DME is a frequent manifestation of DR and can occur during any stage of the disease [77]. However, de Faria et al. [24] reported that it occurs more frequently as the duration of diabetes and severity of DR increase (early DR: 0%, nonproliferative DR: 64%, preproliferative DR: 79%, proliferative DR: 84%). As DR progresses, damage to capillaries and BRB impairment increase in the macula, and it is thought that the prevalence of DME also increases.
We consulted previous systemic reviews to examine DR prevalence in patients with type 2 diabetes in a general cohort [78,79,80,81,82,83] (Table 11). The global DR prevalence was 22.2–34.6% [78,79,80], but those of China and India were lower [81,82]. The DR prevalence in this study was high, presumably because it included patients who were referred for the purpose of assessment and treatment of DR.

4.4. Limitations

The blood pressure of each participant was measured at our institution but may not accurately reflect the usual blood pressure of each patient due to effects such as white-coat hypertension. Fundus findings in grades A1 and A2 and DME are reversible. Even if these findings had been temporarily present before, they may have disappeared at the time of examination. Diabetes onset time was estimated based on patient interviews and past medical records, but the duration of disease in each patient may have been longer because diabetes in its early stages is often asymptomatic.
Many patients with early-stage DR do not experience vision loss. Patients with diabetes require ophthalmology consultations to manage DR in parallel with medical treatment. However, many patients with diabetes only visit internal medicine, and the onset and progression of DR may be overlooked in such patients. The present study and previous studies [54] suggest a parallel progression of DR and DN. DN deterioration may be a predictor of DR onset and progression.

5. Conclusions

We observed that DR development involves the average HbA1c level, highest HbA1c level, and DN severity in addition to the duration of diabetes. DR severity correlated with the duration of diabetes, average HbA1c level, and DN severity. DN severity may be associated with DME development. Furthermore, DN progress may be a predictive indicator of DR development. Both DR and DN are microvascular complications of diabetes, and good long-term glycemic control may suppress the progression of both.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.S.; methodology, Y.S.; software, Y.S.; validation, Y.S., and M.K.; formal analysis, Y.S.; investigation, Y.S.; resources, Y.S.; data curation, Y.S.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.S.; writing—review and editing, M.K.; visualization, Y.S.; supervision, Y.S.; project administration, Y.S.; funding acquisition, Y.S. and M.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study protocol was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of the Japan Community Health Care Organization, Mishima General Hospital. All procedures conformed to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. (Protocol code: H30-005 and date of approval: 5 October 2018).

Informed Consent Statement

All measurements in this study were performed in the Japan Community Health Care Organization, Mishima General Hospital. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects before participation in this study. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study. Written informed consent has been obtained from the patients to publish this paper.

Data Availability Statement

All data used for analysis are presented in the tables in this article. Data will be shared after ethics approval if requested by other investigators for the purpose of replicating the results.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the nurses of Mishima General Hospital for their technical support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas 2019, 9th ed.; International Diabetes Federation: Brussels, Belgium, 2019; Available online: http://diabetesatlas.org (accessed on 12 April 2023).
  2. Jameson, J.L.; Fauci, A.S.; Kasper, D.L.; Hauser, S.L.; Longo, D.L.; Loscalzo, J. Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine, 20th ed.; McGraw Hill Education: New York, NY, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  3. Cheung, N.; Mitchell, P.; Wong, T.Y. Diabetic retinopathy. Lancet 2010, 376, 124–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Moreno, A.; Lozano, M.; Salinas, P. Diabetic retinopathy. Nutr. Hosp. 2013, 28 (Suppl. S2), 53–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Lin, T.; Gubitosi-Klug, R.A.; Channa, R.; Wolf, R.M. Pediatric Diabetic Retinopathy: Updates in Prevalence, Risk Factors, Screening, and Management. Curr. Diabetes Rep. 2021, 21, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Song, K.H.; Jeong, J.S.; Kim, M.K.; Kwon, H.S.; Baek, K.H.; Ko, S.H.; Ahn, Y.B. Discordance in risk factors for the progression of diabetic retinopathy and diabetic nephropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J. Diabetes Investig. 2019, 10, 745–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lu, J.; Ma, X.; Zhang, L.; Mo, Y.; Ying, L.; Lu, W.; Zhu, W.; Bao, Y.; Zhou, J. Glycemic variability assessed by continuous glucose monitoring and the risk of diabetic retinopathy in latent autoimmune diabetes of the adult and type 2 diabetes. J. Diabetes Investig. 2019, 10, 753–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Fardeau, C.; Champion, E.; Massamba, N.; LeHoang, P. Uveitic macular edema. Eye 2016, 30, 1277–1292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Iijima, H. Mechanisms of vision loss in eyes with macular edema associated with retinal vein occlusion. Jpn. J. Ophthalmol. 2018, 62, 265–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lee, R.; Wong, T.Y.; Sabanayagam, C. Epidemiology of diabetic retinopathy, diabetic macular edema and related vision loss. Eye Vis. 2015, 2, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Coscas, G.; Cunha-Vaz, J.; Soubrane, G. Macular edema: Definition and basic concepts. Dev. Ophthalmol. 2017, 58, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ding, J.; Wong, T.Y. Current epidemiology of diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema. Curr. Diabetes Rep. 2012, 12, 346–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Treatment techniques and clinical guidelines for photocoagulation of diabetic macular edema. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Report Number 2. Ophthalmology 1987, 94, 761–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Browning, D.J.; Stewart, M.W.; Lee, C. Diabetic macular edema: Evidence-based management. Indian J. Ophthalmol. 2018, 66, 1736–1750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Nagib, A.M.; Matter, Y.E.; Gheith, O.A.; Refaie, A.F.; Othman, N.F.; Al-Otaibi, T. Diabetic Nephropathy Following Posttransplant Diabetes Mellitus. Exp. Clin. Transplant. 2019, 17, 138–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Deckert, T.; Feldt-Rasmussen, B.; Borch-Johnsen, K.; Jensen, T.; Kofoed-Enevoldsen, A. Albuminuria reflects widespread vascular damage. The Steno hypothesis. Diabetologia 1989, 32, 219–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ochodnicky, P.; Henning, R.; van Dokkum, R.P.E.; de Zeeuw, D. Microalbuminuria and endothelial dysfunction: Emerging targets for primary prevention of end-organ damage. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. 2006, 47 (Suppl. S2), S151–S162, discussion S72–S76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Jeng, C.J.; Hsieh, Y.T.; Yang, C.M.; Yang, C.H.; Lin, C.L.; Wang, I.J. Diabetic Retinopathy in Patients with Diabetic Nephropathy: Development and Progression. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0161897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Guo, M.F.; Dai, Y.J.; Gao, J.R.; Chen, P.J. Uncovering the Mechanism of Astragalus membranaceus in the Treatment of Diabetic Nephropathy Based on Network Pharmacology. J. Diabetes Res. 2020, 2020, 5947304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Miyamoto, K.; Khosrof, S.; Bursell, S.-E.; Moromizato, Y.; Aiello, L.P.; Ogura, Y.; Adamis, A.P. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-induced retinal vascular permeability is mediated by intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1). Am. J. Pathol. 2000, 156, 1733–1739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Li, W.; Cheng, Z.; Song, Y.; Fang, Y.; Yang, M.; Zhang, M. Is diabetic retinopathy affected by diabetes type? A retrospective study using electronic medical record data from patients with latent autoimmune diabetes in adults, type 1 diabetes, and type 2 diabetes. Acta Diabetol. 2021, 58, 1503–1511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Matuszewski, W.; Baranowska-Jurkun, A.; Stefanowicz-Rutkowska, M.M.; Modzelewski, R.; Pieczyński, J.; Bandurska-Stankiewicz, E. Prevalence of Diabetic Retinopathy in Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients in North-East Poland. Medicina 2020, 56, 164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Fukuda, M. Classification and treatment of diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 1994, 24, S171–S176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. De Faria, J.M.L.; Jalkh, A.E.; Trempe, C.L.; Mcmeel, J.W. Diabetic macular oedema: Risk factors and concomitants. Acta Ophthalmol. Scand. 1999, 77, 170–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Hwang, D.K.; Chou, Y.B.; Lin, T.C.; Yang, H.Y.; Kao, Z.K.; Kao, C.L.; Yang, Y.P.; Chen, S.J.; Hsu, C.C.; Jheng, Y.C. Optical coherence tomography–based diabetic macula edema screening with artificial intelligence. J. Chin. Med. Assoc. 2020, 83, 1034–1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wada, T.; Haneda, M.; Furuichi, K.; Babazono, T.; Yokoyama, H.; Iseki, K.; Araki, S.I.; Ninomiya, T.; Hara, S.; Suzuki, Y.; et al. The Research Group of Diabetic Nephropathy, Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare of Japan. Clinical impact of albuminuria and glomerular filtration rate on renal and cardiovascular events, and all-cause mortality in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes. Clin. Exp. Nephrol. 2014, 18, 613–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Kanda, Y. Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software ‘EZR’ for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013, 48, 452–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bek, T. Diameter changes of retinal vessels in diabetic retinopathy. Curr. Diabetes Rep. 2017, 17, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ejaz, S.; Chekarova, I.; Ejaz, A.; Sohail, A.; Lim, C.W. Importance of pericytes and mechanisms of pericyte loss during diabetes retinopathy. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 2008, 10, 53–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Beltramo, E.; Porta, M. Pericyte loss in diabetic retinopathy: Mechanisms and consequences. Curr. Med. Chem. 2013, 20, 3218–3225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Huang, H.; He, J.; Johnson, D.; Wei, Y.; Liu, Y.; Wang, S.; Lutty, G.A.; Duh, E.J.; Semba, R.D. Deletion of placental growth factor prevents diabetic retinopathy and is associated with Akt activation and HIF1alpha-VEGF pathway inhibition. Diabetes 2015, 64, 200–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Antonetti, D.A.; Barber, A.J.; Hollinger, L.A.; Wolpert, E.B.; Gardner, T.W. Vascular endothelial growth factor induces rapid phosphorylation of tight junction proteins occludin and zonula occluden 1. A potential mechanism for vascular permeability in diabetic retinopathy and tumors. J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274, 23463–23467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Rousseau, S.; Houle, F.; Landry, J.; Huot, J. p38 MAP kinase activation by vascular endothelial growth factor mediates actin reorganization and cell migration in human endothelial cells. Oncogene 1997, 15, 2169–2177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Adamis, A.P.; Miller, J.W.; Bernal, M.T.; D’Amico, D.J.; Folkman, J.; Yeo, T.K.; Yeo, K.T. Increased vascular endothelial growth factor levels in the vitreous of eyes with proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 1994, 118, 445–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Sugawara, A.; Kawai, K.; Motohashi, S.; Saito, K.; Kodama, S.; Yachi, Y.; Hirasawa, R.; Shimano, H.; Yamazaki, K.; Sone, H. HbA (1c) variability and the development of microalbuminuria in T2DM: Tsukuba Kawai Diabetes Registry 2. Diabetologia 2012, 55, 2128–2131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Ihnat, M.A.; Thorpe, J.E.; Ceriello, A. Hypothesis: The ‘metabolic memory’, the new challenge of diabetes. Diabet. Med. 2007, 24, 582–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Monnier, L.; Mas, E.; Ginet, C.; Michel, F.; Villon, L.; Cristol, J.P.; Colette, C. Activation of oxidative stress by acute glucose fluctuations compared with sustained chronic hyperglycemia in patients with T2DM. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 2006, 295, 1681–1687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Russell, N.D.; Cooper, M.E. 50 years forward: Mechanisms of hyperglycaemia driven diabetic complications. Diabetologia 2015, 58, 1708–1714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ceriello, A. The emerging challenge in diabetes: The “metabolic memory”. Vasc. Pharmacol. 2012, 57, 133–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kowluru, R.A.; Abbas, S.N.; Odenbach, S. Reversal of hyperglycemia and diabetic nephropathy: Effect of reinstitution of good metabolic control on oxidative stress in the kidney of diabetic rats. J. Diabetes Complicat. 2004, 18, 282–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ceriello, A.; Esposito, K.; Ihnat, M.; Thorpe, J.; Giugliano, D. Long-term glycemic control influences the long-lasting effect of hyperglycemia on endothelial function in type 1 diabetes. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2009, 94, 2751–2756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Quagliaro, L.; Piconi, L.; Assaloni, R.; Martinelli, L.; Motz, E.; Ceriero, A. Intermittent high glucose enhances apoptosis related to oxidative stress in human umbilical vein endothelial cells: The role of protein kinase C and NAD(P)H-oxidase activation. Diabetes 2003, 52, 2795–2804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Horvath, E.M.; Benko, R.; Kiss, L.; Murányi, M.; Pék, T.; Fekete, K.; Bárány, T.; Somlai, A.; Csordás, A.; Szabo, C. Rapid ‘glycaemic swings’ induce nitrosative stress, activate poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase and impair endothelial function in a rat model of diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia 2009, 52, 952–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wang, X.N.; Cai, X.; Li, T.T.; Long, D.; Wu, Q. Peripapillary vessel density and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness changes in early diabetes retinopathy. Int. J. Ophthalmol. 2022, 15, 1488–1495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Cao, D.; Yang, D.; Yu, H.; Xie, J.; Zeng, Y.; Wang, J.; Zhang, L. Optic nerve head perfusion changes preceding peripapillary retinal nerve fibre layer thinning in preclinical diabetic retinopathy. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2019, 47, 219–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Wat, N.; Wong, R.L.; Wong, I.Y. Associations between diabetic retinopathy and systemic risk factors. Hong Kong Med. J. 2016, 22, 589–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Ha, H.; Lee, H.B. Reactive oxygen species amplify glucose signaling in renal cells cultured under high glucose and in diabetic nephropathy. Nephrology 2005, 10, S7–S10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lee, H.B.; Yu, M.I.-R.A.; Yang, Y.; Jiang, Z.; Ha, H. Reactive oxygen species-regulated signaling pathways in diabetic nephropathy. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2003, 14 (Suppl. S3), S241–S245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Forbes, J.M.; Cooper, M.E.; Oldfield, M.D.; Thomas, M.C. Role of advanced glycation end products in diabetic nephropathy. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2003, 14 (Suppl. S3), S254–S258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Thallas-Bonke, V.; Lindschau, C.; Rizkalla, B.; Bach, L.A.; Boner, G.; Meier, M.; Haller, H.; Cooper, M.E.; Forbes, J.M. Attenuation of extracellular matrix accumulation in diabetic nephropathy by advanced glycation end product cross-link breaker ALT-711 via a PKC-α-dependent pathway. Diabetes 2004, 53, 2921–2930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Cao, Z.; Cooper, M.E. Pathogenesis of diabetic nephropathy. J. Diabetes Investig. 2011, 2, 243–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Funatsu, H.; Yamashita, H.; Nakanishi, Y.; Hori, S. Angiotensin II and vascular endothelial growth factor in the vitreous fluid of patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2002, 86, 311–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Tapp, R.J.; Shaw, J.E.; Zimmet, P.Z.; Balkau, B.; Chadban, S.J.; Tonkin, A.M.; Welborn, T.A.; Atkins, R.C. Albuminuria is evident in the early stages of diabetes onset: Results from the Australian Diabetes, Obesity, and Lifestyle Study (AusDiab). Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2004, 44, 792–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Cederholm, J.; Eliasson, B.; Nilsson, P.M.; Weiss, L.; Gudbjörnsdottir, S. Steering Committee of the Swedish National Diabetes Register. Microalbuminuria and risk factors in type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2005, 67, 258–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Gambaro, G.; Bax, G.; Fusaro, M.; Normanno, M.; Manani, S.M.; Zanella, M.; Dangelo, A.; Fedele, D.; Favaro, S. Cigarette smoking is a risk factor for nephropathy and its progression in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Nutr. Metab. 2001, 14, 337–342. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  56. De Boer, I.H.; Rue, T.C.; Cleary, P.A.; Lachin, J.M.; Molitch, M.E.; Steffes, M.W.; Sun, W.; Zinman, B.; Brunzell, J.D.; White, N.H.; et al. Long-term renal outcomes of patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus and microalbuminuria: An analysis of the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications cohort. Arch. Intern. Med. 2011, 171, 412–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Lin, Y.C.; Chang, Y.H.; Yang, S.Y.; Wu, K.D.; Chu, T.S. Update of pathophysiology and management of diabetic kidney disease. J. Formos. Med. Assoc. 2018, 117, 662–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Ahmed, M.H.; Elwali, E.S.; Awadalla, H.; Almobarak, A.O. The relationship between diabetic retinopathy and nephropathy in Sudanese adult with diabetes: Population based study. Diabetes Metab. Syndr. 2017, 11 (Suppl. S1), S333–S336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Saini, D.C.; Kochar, A.; Poonia, R. Clinical correlation of diabetic retinopathy with nephropathy and neuropathy. Indian J. Ophthalmol. 2021, 69, 3364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Kotlarsky, P.; Bolotin, A.; Dorfman, K.; Knyazer, B.; Lifshitz, T.; Levy, J. Link between retinopathy and nephropathy caused by complications of diabetes mellitus type 2. Int. Ophthalmol. 2015, 35, 59–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Acan, D.; Calan, M.; Er, D.; Arkan, T.; Kocak, N.; Bayraktar, F.; Kaynak, S. The prevalence and systemic risk factors of diabetic macular edema: A cross-sectional study from Turkey. BMC Ophthalmol. 2018, 18, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Koo, N.K.; Jin, H.C.; Kim, K.S.; Kim, Y.C. Relationship between the morphology of diabetic macular edema and renal dysfunction in diabetes. Korean J. Ophthalmol. 2013, 27, 98–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Temkar, S.; Karuppaiah, N.; Takkar, B.; Bhowmik, D.; Tripathi, M.; Ramakrishnan, S.; Sharma, Y.R.; Vohra, R.; Chawla, R.; Venkatesh, P. Impact of estimated glomerular filtration rate on diabetic macular edema. Int. Ophthalmol. 2018, 38, 1043–1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Takamura, Y.; Matsumura, T.; Ohkoshi, K.; Takei, T.; Ishikawa, K.; Shimura, M.; Ueda, T.; Sugimoto, M.; Hirano, T.; Takayama, K.; et al. Functional and anatomical changes in diabetic macular edema after hemodialysis initiation: One-year follow-up multicenter study. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 7788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Theodossiadis, P.G.; Theodoropoulou, S.; Neamonitou, G.; Grigoropoulos, V.; Liarakos, V.; Triantou, E.; Theodossiadis, G.P.; Vlahakos, D.V. Hemodialysis-induced alterations in macular thickness measured by optical coherence tomography in diabetic patients with end-stage renal disease. Ophthalmologica 2012, 227, 90–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Tatsumi, T.; Oshitari, T.; Takatsuna, Y.; Ishibashi, R.; Koshizaka, M.; Shiko, Y.; Baba, T.; Yokote, K.; Yamamoto, S. Sodium-Glucose Co-Transporter 2 Inhibitors Reduce Macular Edema in Patients with Diabetes mellitus. Life 2022, 12, 692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Wakisaka, M.; Nagao, T. Sodium glucose cotransporter 2 in mesangial cells and retinal pericytes and its implications for diabetic nephropathy and retinopathy. Glycobiology 2017, 27, 691–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Querques, G.; Bandello, F.; Souied, E.H. Abnormal deep retinal capillary networking and microaneurysms in the outer nuclear layer of diabetic eyes. Ophthalmology 2014, 121, 803–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Browning, D.J. (Ed.) Diabetic macular edema. In Diabetic Retinopathy, Evidence-Based Management, 1st ed.; Springer Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  70. Nagaoka, T.; Kitaya, N.; Sugawara, R.; Yokota, H.; Mori, F.; Hikichi, T.; Fujio, N.; Yoshida, A. Alteration of choroidal circulation in the foveal region in patients with type 2 diabetes. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2004, 88, 1060–1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Stefánsson, E. Ocular oxygenation and the treatment of diabetic retinopathy. Surv. Ophthalmol. 2006, 51, 364–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Lund-Andersen, H. Mechanisms for monitoring changes in retinal status following therapeutic intervention in diabetic retinopathy. Surv. Ophthalmol. 2002, 47 (Suppl. S2), S270–S277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Dvorak, H.F.; Brown, L.F.; Detmar, M.; Dvorak, A.M. Vascular permeability factor/vascular endothelial growth factor, microvascular hyperpermeability, and angiogenesis. Am. J. Pathol. 1995, 146, 1029–1039. [Google Scholar]
  74. Murata, T.; Nakagawa, K.; Khalil, A.; Ishibashi, T.; Inomata, H.; Sueishi, K. The relation between expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and breakdown of the blood-retinal barrier in diabetic rat retinas. Lab. Investig. 1996, 74, 819–825. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  75. Funatsu, H.; Yamashita, H.; Ikeda, T.; Mimura, T.; Eguchi, S.; Hori, S. Vitreous levels of interleukin-6 and vascular endothelial growth factor are related to diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology 2003, 110, 1690–1696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Funatsu, H.; Yamashita, H.; Noma, H.; Mimura, T.; Yamashita, T.; Hori, S. Increased levels of vascular endothelial growth factor and interleukin-6 in the aqueous humor of diabetics with macular edema. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2002, 133, 70–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Ciulla, T.A.; Amador, A.G.; Zinman, B. Diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macularoedema: Pathophysiology, screening, and novel therapies. Diabetes Care 2003, 26, 2653–2664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Teo, Z.L.; Tham, Y.C.; Yu, M.; Chee, M.L.; Rim, T.H.; Cheung, N.; Bikbov, M.M.; Wang, Y.X.; Tang, Y.; Lu, Y.; et al. Global Prevalence of Diabetic Retinopathy and Projection of Burden through 2045: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ophthalmology 2021, 128, 1580–1591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Yau, J.W.Y.; Rogers, S.L.; Kawasaki, R.; Lamoureux, E.L.; Kowalski, J.W.; Bek, T.; Chen, S.J.; Dekker, J.M.; Fletcher, A.; Grauslund, J.; et al. Meta-Analysis for Eye Disease (META-EYE) Study Group. Global prevalence and major risk factors of diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes Care 2012, 35, 556–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Cheloni, R.; Gandolfi, S.A.; Signorelli, C.; Odone, A. Global prevalence of diabetic retinopathy: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2019, 9, e022188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Song, P.; Yu, J.; Chan, K.Y.; Theodoratou, E.; Rudan, I. Prevalence, risk factors and burden of diabetic retinopathy in China: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Glob. Health 2018, 8, 010803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Brar, A.S.; Sahoo, J.; Behera, U.C.; Jonas, J.B.; Sivaprasad, S.; Das, T. Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in urban and rural India: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Indian J. Ophthalmol. 2022, 70, 1945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Heiran, A.; Azarchehry, S.P.; Dehghankhalili, S.; Afarid, M.; Shaabani, S.; Mirahmadizadeh, A. Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Int. Med. Res. 2022, 50, 3000605221117134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Flow chart of patient enrollment.
Figure 1. Flow chart of patient enrollment.
Biomedicines 11 01502 g001
Table 1. Demographic data of patients with type 2 diabetes.
Table 1. Demographic data of patients with type 2 diabetes.
With DRWithout DRp Value
Male:Female70:5773:610.9
Average year68.9 ± 10.871.2 ± 9.40.8
Diabetes duration12.0 ± 2.79.8 ± 2.0<0.0000001
DME64 (50.4%)0 (0%)<0.0000001
Body mass index24.2 ± 4.824.0 ± 4.50.9
Hypertension61 (48.0%)51 (38.1%)0.1
Average HbA1c7.9 ± 1.36.9 ± 0.7<0.0000001
Highest HbA1c9.5 ± 2.07.7 ± 1.3<0.0000001
Serum LDL117.3 ± 34.8115.9 ± 31.70.4
Serum triglyceride151.6 ± 137.3139.8 ± 69.30.4
eGFR56.2 ± 26.467.1 ± 17.00.00008
DN stage2.4 ± 1.21.4 ± 0.6<0.0000001
Ischemic heart disease9 (7.1%)5 (3.7%)0.2
RAS inhibitors22 (17.3%)38 (28.4%)0.04
SGLT-2 inhibitors20 (15.7%)23 (17.2%)0.8
DR: diabetic retinopathy, DME: diabetic macular edema, DN: diabetic nephropathy, HbA1c: glycated hemoglobin, LDL: low-density lipoprotein, eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate, RAS: rennin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, SGLT: sodium/glucose cotransporter.
Table 2. Multivariate logistic regression analyses related to diabetic retinopathy development.
Table 2. Multivariate logistic regression analyses related to diabetic retinopathy development.
FactorOdds Ratio95% CIp Value
Gender (male = 1, female = 0)2.770.43, 17.90.3
Diabetes duration1.651.14, 2.390.009
Body mass index1.080.87, 1.320.5
Hypertension0.420.09, 2.030.3
Average HbA1c5.601.36, 23.10.02
Highest HbA1c2.461.12, 5.380.02
Serum LDL1.020.99, 1.040.2
Serum triglyceride0.990.98, 1.000.07
DN stage7.622.63, 22.10.0002
History of ischemic heart disease0.550.03, 8.820.7
RAS inhibitors prescription1.270.26, 6.180.8
SGLT-2 inhibitors prescription1.570.30, 8.150.6
DN: diabetic nephropathy, HbA1c: glycated hemoglobin, LDL: low-density lipoprotein, RAS: rennin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, SGLT: sodium/glucose cotransporter.
Table 3. Univariate analysis with diabetic retinopathy development.
Table 3. Univariate analysis with diabetic retinopathy development.
FactorOdds Ratio95% CIp Value
eGFR0.980.97, 0.990.0001
Albuminuria5.233.14, 8.71<0.00001
History of ischemic heart disease0.550.03, 8.820.7
RAS inhibitors prescription0.770.42, 1.400.4
SGLT-2 inhibitors prescription1.550.79, 3.030.2
eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate RAS: rennin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, SGLT: sodium/glucose cotransporter.
Table 4. Multivariate regression analyses related to severity of diabetic retinopathy.
Table 4. Multivariate regression analyses related to severity of diabetic retinopathy.
Factort-Statistic95% CIp Value
Gender (male = 1, female = 0)–1.35–0.85, 0.160.4
Diabetes duration4.970.15, 0.36<0.00001
Body mass index–0.32–0.08, 0.050.8
Hypertension–1.99–1.01, 0.0050.06
Average HbA1c3.250.14, 1.020.002
Highest HbA1c–0.87–0.43, 0.170.4
Serum LDL1.60–0.002, 0.020.1
Serum triglyceride–0.26–0.002, 0.0020.8
DN stage4.320.33, 0.890.00004
History of ischemic heart disease1.30–0.35, 1.680.2
RAS inhibitors prescription0.71–0.39, 0.820.5
SGLT-2 inhibitors prescription0.66–0.45, 0.890.5
DN: diabetic nephropathy, HbA1c: glycated hemoglobin, LDL: low-density lipoprotein. RAS: rennin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, SGLT: sodium/glucose cotransporter.
Table 5. Univariate analysis with severity of diabetic retinopathy.
Table 5. Univariate analysis with severity of diabetic retinopathy.
Factort-Statistic95% CIp Value
eGFR–4.96–0.04, –0.02<0.00001
Albuminuria0.191.24, 1.99<0.00001
History of ischemic heart disease1.67–0.16, 1.910.1
RAS inhibitors prescription0.27–0.68, 0.390.6
SGLT-2 inhibitors prescription1.550.79, 3.030.5
eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate, RAS: rennin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, SGLT: sodium/glucose cotransporter.
Table 6. Multivariate logistic regression analyses related to diabetic macular edema development.
Table 6. Multivariate logistic regression analyses related to diabetic macular edema development.
FactorOdds Ratio95% CIp Value
Gender (male = 1, female = 0)0.630.15, 2.610.5
Duration of diabetes1.331.01, 1.750.04
Body mass index0.950.79, 1.150.6
Hypertension0.520.13, 2.040.3
Average HbA1c5.521.27, 24.10.02
Highest HbA1c0.750.35, 1.640.5
Serum LDL1.010.93, 1.030.6
Serum triglyceride1.000.99, 1.000.1
DN stage2.801.37, 5.720.005
History of ischemic heart disease2.630.27, 25.60.4
RAS inhibitors prescription1.70–0.27, 0.350.2
SGLT-2 inhibitors prescription–0.12–0.47, 0.220.2
DN: diabetic nephropathy, HbA1c: glycated hemoglobin, LDL: low-density lipoprotein. RAS: rennin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, SGLT: sodium/glucose cotransporter.
Table 7. Univariate analysis with diabetic macular edema development.
Table 7. Univariate analysis with diabetic macular edema development.
FactorOdds Ratio95% CIp Value
eGFR0.980.97, 0.990.009
Albuminuria4.052.30, 7.11<0.00001
RAS inhibitors prescription0.760.36, 1.590.1
SGLT-2 inhibitors prescription1.540.70, 3.370.3
eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate, RAS: rennin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, SGLT: sodium/glucose cotransporter.
Table 8. Multivariate regression analyses related to severity of diabetic macular edema.
Table 8. Multivariate regression analyses related to severity of diabetic macular edema.
Factort-Statistic95% CIp Value
Gender (male = 1, female = 0)–0.53–0.37, 0.210.6
Diabetes duration2.570.02, 0.130.001
Body mass index–0.21–0.04, 0.030.8
Hypertension–1.07–0.44, 0.130.3
Average HbA1c2.540.08, 0.680.01
Highest HbA1c–0.64–0.22, 0.110.5
Serum LDL0.95–0.005, 0.0050.07
Serum triglyceride–1.92–0.002, 0.00040.06
DN stage2.480.04, 0.360.002
History of ischemic heart disease–0.08–0.56, 0.520.9
RAS inhibitors prescription0.25–0.27, 0.350.8
SGLT-2 inhibitors prescription–0.70–0.47, 0.220.5
DN: diabetic nephropathy, HbA1c: glycated hemoglobin, LDL: low-density lipoprotein. RAS: rennin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, SGLT: sodium/glucose cotransporter.
Table 9. Univariate analysis with severity of diabetic macular edema.
Table 9. Univariate analysis with severity of diabetic macular edema.
Factort-Statistic95% CIp Value
eGFR–2.44–0.009, –0.0010.02
Albuminuria5.360.26, 0.55<0.00001
RAS inhibitors prescription–0.86–0.30, 0.120.4
SGLT-2 inhibitors prescription0.30–0.19, 0.260.8
eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate, RAS: rennin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, SGLT: sodium/glucose cotransporter.
Table 10. Patients with diabetic macular edema development by diabetic retinopathy grade.
Table 10. Patients with diabetic macular edema development by diabetic retinopathy grade.
Fukuda ClassificationPatients (Male/Female)DME (Male/Female)Prevalence
A0134 (73/61)0 (0/0)0%
A13 (3/0)0 (0/0)0%
A249 (26/23)16 (8/8)32.7%
B134 (21/13)20 (10/10)58.8%
B27 (4/3)5 (2/3)71.4%
B30 (0/0)0 (0/0)-
B423 (11/12)20 (9/11)87.0%
B53 (2/1)3 (2/1)100%
DME: diabetic macular edema.
Table 11. Report on DR prevalence in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Table 11. Report on DR prevalence in patients with type 2 diabetes.
ReportDR PrevalenceRegionYear
Teo et al., 59 studies22.3%Global2020
Yau et al., 35 studies34.6%Global1980–2008
Cheloni et al., 10 studies34.6%Global2008–2018
Song et al., 31 studies18.5%China1990–2017
Brar et al., 10 studies16.1%India1990–2021
Heiran et al., 109 studies31%Eastern Mediterranean2019–2020
Present study48.7%Japan2019–2022
DR: diabetic retinopathy.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Suzuki, Y.; Kiyosawa, M. Relationship between Diabetic Nephropathy and Development of Diabetic Macular Edema in Addition to Diabetic Retinopathy. Biomedicines 2023, 11, 1502. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11051502

AMA Style

Suzuki Y, Kiyosawa M. Relationship between Diabetic Nephropathy and Development of Diabetic Macular Edema in Addition to Diabetic Retinopathy. Biomedicines. 2023; 11(5):1502. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11051502

Chicago/Turabian Style

Suzuki, Yukihisa, and Motohiro Kiyosawa. 2023. "Relationship between Diabetic Nephropathy and Development of Diabetic Macular Edema in Addition to Diabetic Retinopathy" Biomedicines 11, no. 5: 1502. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11051502

APA Style

Suzuki, Y., & Kiyosawa, M. (2023). Relationship between Diabetic Nephropathy and Development of Diabetic Macular Edema in Addition to Diabetic Retinopathy. Biomedicines, 11(5), 1502. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11051502

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop