Next Article in Journal
Nutritional Counseling in Children with Growth Hormone Deficiency Treated with Recombinant Human Growth Hormone: Analysis of Growth Response Parameters
Previous Article in Journal
Perioperative Oral Immunonutrient Regulation of Intestinal Barrier and Gut Microbiota in Patients with Gastric Cancer, a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Previous Article in Special Issue
Haplotypes, Genotypes, and DNA Methylation Levels of Neuromedin U Gene Are Associated with Cardio-Metabolic Parameters: Results from the Moli-sani Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Current Insights into Obesity and m6A Modification

Human Phenome Institute, Center for Medical Research and Innovation, Shanghai Pudong Hospital, Fudan University Pudong Medical Centre, Zhangjiang Fudan International Innovation Center, Fudan University, Shanghai 201203, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomedicines 2025, 13(9), 2164; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13092164
Submission received: 16 June 2025 / Revised: 18 July 2025 / Accepted: 24 July 2025 / Published: 5 September 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Epigenetics and Metabolic Disorders)

Abstract

Obesity has emerged as a global health challenge, closely associated with multiple metabolic diseases, such as cardiovascular diseases, type 2 diabetes, and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. The traditional “calories-in minus calories-out” paradigm is no longer sufficient to explain the heterogeneity of obesity; consequently, a growing body of research has turned its focus to epigenetic regulation—particularly chemical modifications at the RNA level. N6-methyladenosine (m6A) modification is one of the most abundant epigenetic modifications on RNA, which dynamically regulates the methylation reaction in specific sequences on mRNA through methyltransferases (writers), demethylases (erasers), and binding proteins (readers). Accumulating evidence in recent years has revealed that m6A modification plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis and progression of obesity, particularly through its regulation of key biological processes, such as adipocyte differentiation, lipid metabolism, and energy homeostasis. Given its critical involvement in metabolic dysregulation, targeting m6A-related mechanisms may offer novel therapeutic avenues for obesity management. This review systematically summarizes the current understanding of m6A modification in obesity, elucidates its underlying molecular mechanisms, and evaluates its potential as a therapeutic target. By integrating recent advances in the field, we aim to provide new perspectives for the development of innovative strategies in obesity treatment.

1. Introduction

Obesity is a complex metabolic disorder characterized by excessive adipose tissue accumulation and dysfunctional fat distribution, which induces chronic low-grade systemic inflammation and metabolic dysregulation, including dyslipidemia, hyperglycemia, and hyperuricemia. Epidemiological and clinical studies have established a strong association between obesity and multiple metabolic disorders, such as cardiovascular diseases (CVD), type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), hypertension, and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) [1,2]. Furthermore, obesity serves as a significant risk factor for comorbid conditions, including obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and osteoarthritis (OA), exacerbating their pathogenesis and clinical severity [3,4]. Beyond its pathophysiological consequences, obesity imposes a substantial burden on global public health, severely compromising patients’ quality of life. Alarmingly, obesity contributes to an estimated 4 million deaths worldwide per year, with its prevalence exhibiting a persistent upward trend [5]. Therefore, it has become increasingly urgent to find more effective strategies to combat obesity.
Epigenetics investigates the regulation and transmission of genetic information without alterations to the underlying DNA sequence. It explores the mechanisms of gene expression regulation and how external environmental factors influence gene expression. The key mechanisms of epigenetics mainly include DNA methylation, post-transcriptional modifications, and histone modifications [6]. Among these, post-transcriptional modifications play a crucial role in various physiological processes. Recent studies revealed diverse internal modifications within eukaryotic mRNA, including N6-methyladenosine (m6A), additional methylations of adenosine to form N1-methyladenosine (m1A) and N6,2′-O-dimethyladenosine (m6Am), as well as cytosine methylation to 5-methylcytosine and its oxidation product 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (hm5C). m6A is the most common modification in the mammalian RNA transcriptome, which is essential for modulating gene expression, RNA stability, splicing, and translation. Initially identified in 1974, m6A modification remained a relatively underexplored field for decades. However, advances in next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based m6A detection methods have propelled significant breakthroughs over the past decade, laying a solid foundation for a deeper understanding of its biological functions [7]. m6A modification is highly conserved in the mRNA of most eukaryotes and viruses and is widely present in almost all types of RNA, spanning the entire RNA lifecycle [8]. m6A modification sites are primarily enriched near the stop codon and the 3′ untranslated region (3′ UTR) and exhibit a conserved RRACH (R = G/A, H = A/C/U) sequence motif [9,10]. m6A modification has been confirmed as a key regulatory factor in the progression of various diseases, positioning it as a major research focus in biomedical science. This paper focuses on the potential link between m6A modification and obesity, aiming to provide novel perspectives and mechanistic insights to advance research in this field.

2. Obesity

In mammals, the development of obesity primarily arises from a dysregulation of energy balance, characterized by an imbalance between energy intake, expenditure, and conversion [11]. The physiological system that maintains energy homeostasis achieves balance through the fine regulation of energy intake and expenditure. The hypothalamus plays a central role in this regulatory process, integrating and processing complex metabolic signals. This system responds not only to long-term hormonal regulators, such as leptin and insulin, but also to short-term satiety and nutrient-sensing cues. Ultimately, hypothalamic output modulates energy balance by orchestrating appetite control, energy expenditure, circulating hormone levels, and physical activity [12].
Physiologically, obesity develops primarily through adipocyte hyperplasia (increase in cell number) and hypertrophy (increase in cell size). During infancy and adolescence, adipogenesis leads to the continuous expansion of adipocyte populations. In adulthood, adipocyte turnover maintains a relatively stable cell number through an annual renewal rate of approximately 10% [13,14]. Consequently, adult-onset obesity predominantly results from adipocyte hypertrophy rather than hyperplasia. Adipose tissue can be classified into white adipose tissue (WAT), brown adipose tissue (BAT), and beige adipose tissue, based on differences in cell morphology, function, and metabolic characteristics. WAT is mainly composed of large, spherical fat cells packed closely together and primarily serves as a store for chemical energy. BAT contains multilocular adipocytes rich in mitochondria that express uncoupling protein 1 (UCP1), functioning as a thermogenic organ. Beige adipose tissue, located primarily in subcutaneous WAT depots (e.g., inguinal region), represents a thermogenically inducible population. When exposed to stimuli such as cold exposure, beige adipose tissue undergoes browning—characterized by mitochondrial biogenesis, multilocular lipid droplet formation, and robust UCP1 expression—acquiring BAT-like characteristics [15].
Adipocytes originate from multipotent mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), which possess the pluripotent capacity to differentiate into various cell types, including adipocytes, muscle cells, chondrocytes, and osteocytes. Adipogenesis occurs through two distinct but interconnected phases: lineage commitment and terminal differentiation. During lineage commitment, multipotent MSCs are induced to transform into pre-adipocytes, acquiring adipogenic potential while losing competence for alternative lineages. The subsequent differentiation phase involves preadipocyte maturation into functionally competent adipocytes, characterized by lipid accumulation and endocrine function [16,17]. Recent decades have witnessed significant advances in understanding the complex transcriptional hierarchies governing adipogenesis [18]. These networks precisely coordinate the expression of genes essential for adipocyte development, lipid metabolism, and endocrine signaling. Proper regulation of these molecular cascades is critical for maintaining adipose tissue homeostasis, while their dysregulation has been implicated in the pathogenesis of metabolic disorders, particularly obesity.

3. m6A Modification

The m6A modification represents a highly dynamic and reversible regulatory process governed by three principal classes of regulatory proteins: the methyltransferase complex (writer), demethylases (eraser), and binding proteins (reader). These factors are responsible for the addition, removal, and recognition of m6A modifications on RNA, respectively. Their coordinated action finely tunes the dynamic balance of m6A modifications, thereby influencing RNA metabolism and gene expression (Figure 1).
The m6A methyltransferase catalyzes site-specific methylation at consensus RNA sequences. In 1994, Bokar and colleagues first discovered that methyltransferases function as a protein complex, providing the foundation for understanding the molecular mechanisms of m6A modification [19]. Current research has identified the methyltransferase-like 3 (METTL3) and methyltransferase-like 14 (METTL14) heterodimers as the catalytic core of the m6A methyltransferase complex (MTC), where their structural interaction enables cooperative m6A deposition [20]. The Wilms tumor 1-associated protein (WTAP) serves as a critical regulatory component that modulates MTC activity through direct physical association with METTL3 [21]. Additionally, factors such as VIRMA, HAKAI, ZC3H13, and RBM15B are involved in the functional regulation of MTC [22,23,24,25]. Apart from MTC, other independent m6A methyltransferases, including METTL16, METTL5, and ZCCHC4, also play significant roles in various biological processes [26,27,28].
The m6A demethylase family, comprising fat mass and obesity-associated protein (FTO) (first identified in 2011) and AlkB homolog 5 (ALKBH5) (discovered in 2013), plays a pivotal role in RNA metabolism by catalyzing the reversible removal of m6A modifications to regulate mRNA processing and nuclear export [29,30]. Recent studies have also shown that ALKBH1 and ALKBH3 exhibit demethylation activity, further expanding the functional scope of the m6A demethylase family [31,32]. These α-ketoglutarate-dependent dioxygenases mediate m6A demethylation through a conserved catalytic mechanism involving Fe(II)-coordinated molecular oxygen substitution for bound water at their active sites [33], highlighting their shared biochemical properties despite functional diversity in RNA epigenetic regulation.
m6A binding proteins specifically recognize m6A modification sites, thereby triggering a cascade of downstream biological processes. To date, the m6A binding proteins primarily include three classes: YTH domain-containing proteins (YTHs), heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins (HNRNPs), and the IGF2BP family (IGF2BPs). The YTH protein family consists of YTHDF1 [34], YTHDF2 [35], YTHDF3 [36], YTHDC1 [37], and YTHDC2 [38], all of which are extensively involved in various stages of mRNA metabolism, with each member playing a distinct biological role. HNRNPs are predominantly localized in the nucleus, with key members, such as HNRNPA2/B1 [39], HNRNPC [40], and HNRNPG [41], contributing critically to different stages of mRNA maturation. The IGF2BP family, comprising IGF2BP1, IGF2BP2, and IGF2BP3, enhances mRNA stability and facilitates translation efficiency [42]. In addition, other binding proteins, such as EIF3 [43] and FMRP [44], participate in regulatory processes through direct or indirect interactions, thereby broadening the functional repertoire of m6A modifications.

4. The Regulatory Role of m6A Modification in Adipogenesis

The dynamic interplay between m6A writers, erasers, and readers precisely modulates m6A deposition patterns on RNA transcripts, thereby post-transcriptionally regulating the expression and metabolic processing of adipogenic factors to control adipocyte differentiation and maturation. This section systematically examines the distinct molecular mechanisms through which each class of m6A regulators orchestrates adipogenesis, with particular emphasis on their target specificity and downstream regulatory networks.

4.1. m6A-Mediated Regulation of Adipocyte Lineage Commitment

During early postnatal development in mice, METTL3 levels significantly increase in interscapular brown adipose tissue, playing an essential role in its development [45]. Similarly, the knockdown of WTAP in brown adipocytes inhibits the differentiation of embryonic stem cells into mature brown adipocytes [46]. Conversely, the deletion of METTL3 in skeletal mesenchymal stem cells leads to an increased accumulation of bone marrow adipose tissue [47,48]. In contrast, the m6A demethylase FTO is crucial for promoting adipogenesis. Studies have demonstrated that the GDF11-FTO signaling pathway regulates the differentiation of mouse bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells into adipocytes by targeting PPARγ, a process that is dependent on the m6A demethylase activity of FTO [49]. Additionally, FTO was shown to regulate adipogenesis in the early stages of porcine primary preadipocyte differentiation through the JAK2–STAT3–C/EBPβ signaling pathway [50]. In summary, the methyltransferases and demethylases are pivotal in regulating adipocyte lineage commitment and the development of adipose tissue, although their effects are opposite.

4.2. m6A-Mediated Regulation of Adipocyte Terminal Differentiation

FTO mediates m6A demethylation, thereby influencing the RNA metabolism of regulatory factors associated with adipogenesis and playing a crucial role in the terminal differentiation of adipocytes. Specifically, FTO promotes cell differentiation by modulating the splicing of Srsf2 mRNA [51] and is indispensable during the differentiation of 3T3-L1 cells, with its effects mediated through the key adipogenesis regulator PPARγ [52]. Additionally, another demethylase, ALKBH5, impacts adipogenesis by regulating the expression of TRAF4 [53]. YTHDF2 modulates the mRNA stability and expression of ATG5 and ATG7 via an m6A -dependent pathway, thereby influencing adipogenesis [54]. Furthermore, YTHDF1 promotes the translation of ADIPOQ through an m6A modification-dependent mechanism, thereby enhancing the adipogenesis process in porcine longissimus dorsi muscle [55]. Collectively, m6A-related factors finely regulate adipogenesis through various signaling pathways and mechanisms, providing essential insights into the molecular regulatory mechanisms of adipose tissue development.

5. The Regulatory Role of m6A Modification in Lipid Metabolism

Lipids, including fatty acids, phospholipids, cholesterol, and their derivatives, are essential cellular components that serve as important energy storage molecules, structural constituents of biological membranes, and key players in signal transduction. Numerous studies have highlighted the crucial role of m6A modification in regulating lipid metabolism. Pioneering studies in yeast first established the conserved role of m6A in lipid metabolism, demonstrating that the methyltransferase IME4 modulates triglyceride metabolism through transcriptional regulation of fatty acyl-CoA synthetase FAA1 [56]. Subsequent investigations in mammalian systems utilizing MeRIP-seq analysis revealed enrichment of m6A modifications in lipid metabolic pathways during high-fat diet-induced hepatic steatosis [57], suggesting direct epigenetic control of lipogenic gene networks. Additionally, studies have shown that the m6A eraser FTO promotes triglyceride accumulation in HepG2 cells by reducing m6A levels, indicating that FTO-mediated demethylation of m6A enhances lipid metabolism [58]. Furthermore, knocking down METTL3 or YTHDF2 inhibits lipid accumulation in HepG2 cells [59], collectively demonstrating the bidirectional regulation of lipid metabolism by m6A machinery and highlighting its therapeutic potential for metabolic disorders, including non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.

6. The Regulatory Role of m6A Modification in Regulating Mitochondrial Function

The m6A modification plays a pivotal role in regulating mitochondrial function, which is central to diverse physiological processes, including energy metabolism, biosynthesis and degradation of biomolecules, apoptosis, and immune responses. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1-alpha (PGC1α) serves as a key regulator of mitochondrial function. In inflammatory monocytes, METTL3 and YTHDF2 collaboratively suppress PGC1α expression, thereby reducing ATP production and oxygen consumption. Additionally, METTL3 knockout was shown to mitigate mitochondrial inflammatory damage induced by oxidized low-density lipoprotein (oxLDL), highlighting the critical role of m6A modification in regulating mitochondrial function and the inflammatory response [60]. Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) promotes aerobic oxidation and mitochondrial biogenesis by upregulating PGC1α expression. Mechanistically, DHA enhances FTO expression, which in turn reduces global m6A modification levels. This reduction inhibits YTHDF2-mediated decay of DNA damage-inducible transcript 4 (Ddit4) mRNA. The stability of Ddit4 mRNA influences downstream PGC1α expression, thereby modulating mitochondrial function and energy metabolism [61]. FTO overexpression has been demonstrated to inhibit mitochondrial fission and promote fusion by regulating several factors related to mitochondrial dynamics, leading to decreased mitochondrial content and ATP levels [58]. Furthermore, FTO activates the JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway to promote lipogenesis and inhibit mitochondrial unfolded protein response-induced apoptosis in adipocytes by reducing m6A levels [50]. ALKBH1 was also shown to localize to mitochondria and influence the proliferation of HEK293 and HEK293T cells, although the precise mechanisms remain to be fully elucidated [62].

7. The Regulatory Role of m6A Modification in Neurological Regulation

The hypothalamus serves as a critical control center for food intake and energy homeostasis. FTO is highly expressed in this region, with its expression levels fluctuating under different nutritional conditions, thus being closely linked to the regulation of systemic metabolism. Studies have demonstrated that Fe2+ weakens the binding of FTO to its own promoter, thereby enhancing its gene expression and forming an autoregulatory loop involved in the hypothalamic control of body weight [63]. Furthermore, elevated hypothalamic expression of FTO and CX3CL1, coupled with increased levels of the cytokine signaling suppressor SOCS3, disrupts leptin signaling, promoting leptin resistance and obesity [64]. Additionally, high FTO expression increases the abundance of growth hormone-releasing peptide (GHRP) mRNA while specifically reducing its m6A modification levels. This alteration results in increased energy intake, ultimately contributing to the development of obesity [65]. Collectively, these findings highlight the role of m6A modification in modulating key hypothalamic appetite-regulatory genes, thereby influencing energy balance and contributing to obesity pathogenesis. However, the precise mechanisms underlying these regulatory processes remain to be fully elucidated (Figure 2).

8. The Regulatory Role of m6A Modification in Obesity-Related Diseases

8.1. The Role of m6A Modification in Type 2 Diabetes

Obesity is closely associated with insulin secretion dysfunction and impaired insulin sensitivity, significantly increasing the risk of type 2 diabetes in both rodents and humans. Recent studies have underscored the critical role of m6A modification in regulating insulin secretion and sensitivity. Mice with a brown adipose tissue (BAT)-specific knockout of the METTL14 gene exhibit enhanced insulin sensitivity and glucose tolerance, independent of body weight, gender, or classical BAT thermogenesis [66]. Pancreatic β-cell-specific METTL14 knockout mice display significantly reduced m6A modification levels in the islets, along with decreased β-cell proliferation and an early onset of diabetes, closely resembling the islet dysfunction observed in human type 2 diabetes [67]. Additionally, liver-specific knockdown of METTL3 was shown to decrease the m6A methylation of fatty acid synthase (FASN), consequently ameliorating high-fat diet-induced insulin resistance in murine models [59]. These findings highlight the vital role of m6A modification in regulating insulin secretion and sensitivity, positioning m6A-related regulatory machinery as promising therapeutic targets for obesity-related type 2 diabetes.

8.2. The Role of m6A Modification in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a complex metabolic disorder characterized by pathological lipid accumulation in hepatocytes, independent of alcohol consumption. Hepatic steatosis, a hallmark of NAFLD, primarily results from dysregulation in metabolic processes such as de novo lipogenesis, impaired fatty acid β-oxidation, altered lipid uptake, and defective triglyceride export mechanisms [68]. Emerging evidence implicates FTO as a critical regulator of hepatic lipid metabolism, where its activity in reducing m6A modification levels promotes intracellular triglyceride deposition and contributes to hepatic steatosis [58]. Elevated FTO levels in the liver contribute to lipid accumulation and accelerate the progression of NAFLD [69]. Notably, the natural compound curcumin has shown therapeutic potential by upregulating key methyltransferases METTL3 and METTL14, thereby mitigating lipopolysaccharide-induced hepatic injury and restoring normal lipid metabolism patterns [70]. Additionally, it has been demonstrated that the natural polyphenolic compound resveratrol can ameliorate the disruption of hepatic lipid homeostasis induced by a high-fat diet by reducing m6A modification levels [71]. These findings collectively establish m6A RNA modification as a multifaceted regulator influencing both the initiation and progression of NAFLD through diverse molecular mechanisms affecting hepatic lipid homeostasis.

8.3. The Role of m6A Modification in Cardiovascular Diseases

Recent studies have highlighted the crucial role of m6A modification in the pathological processes of various cardiovascular diseases, encompassing cardiac hypertrophy, heart failure, ischemic heart disease, aortic aneurysm, vascular calcification, and pulmonary hypertension. During cardiac remodeling, m6A methylation levels in cardiomyocytes significantly increase in response to hypertrophic stimuli. Experiments evidence that cardiomyocyte-specific overexpression of METTL3 can induce compensatory hypertrophic responses [72]. The expression of ALKBH5 increased in hypertrophic heart [73]. Conversely, knockdown of FTO in cardiomyocytes substantially increases arrhythmia susceptibility, suggesting that FTO is essential in the onset and progression of heart failure [74]. Macrophage-specific knockout of ALKBH5 was shown to inhibit Angiotensin II (Ang II)-induced macrophage-to-myofibroblast transition, thereby improving cardiac fibrosis and dysfunction [75]. Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a common vascular disease with a high mortality rate. Compared to healthy aortic tissue, m6A modification levels are significantly elevated in AAA. METTL14 has been implicated in inflammatory infiltration and neovascularization in AAA [76]. Additionally, METTL14 also contributes critically to vascular calcification pathogenesis, as evidenced by its upregulated expression in calcified arterial tissues and associated global increase in m6A methylation [77]. Furthermore, m6A modification participates in pulmonary hypertension pathogenesis by modulating circRNA stability within the circRNA–miRNA–mRNA regulatory network, ultimately activating Wnt and FoxO signaling pathways to promote disease onset [78]. These collective findings underscore the multifaceted involvement of m6A modification in cardiovascular disease pathophysiology through diverse molecular mechanisms affecting cardiac structure, vascular integrity, and pulmonary circulation (Table 1).

9. Limitations and Future Directions

Despite significant progress in understanding m6A modifications in obesity, several critical knowledge gaps and methodological limitations persist in current research. First, studies on the role of m6A in obesity remain in their nascent stages, with the majority of investigations relying on preclinical models and basic experimental approaches, while translational studies in human populations are notably lacking. Second, while technological advances have improved m6A detection capabilities, substantial limitations remain—current methodologies are challenged by the inherent heterogeneity of m6A distribution patterns, potentially compromising measurement accuracy and reproducibility. Moreover, existing techniques primarily focus on mRNA modifications, leaving the comprehensive profiling of m6A across diverse RNA species (including lncRNAs, circRNAs, and miRNAs) largely incomplete. Most importantly, although accumulating evidence demonstrates robust associations between m6A dysregulation and obesity phenotypes, establishing definitive causal relationships remains problematic. A fundamental unanswered question persists regarding whether observed m6A alterations constitute secondary consequences of metabolic dysfunction or primary pathogenic drivers—a distinction that demands rigorous investigation through well-designed longitudinal clinical studies and mechanistic experiments.
While m6A research has made significant strides in unraveling molecular mechanisms, its clinical translation remains markedly underdeveloped. Future investigations must not only deepen our understanding of m6A’s intricate regulatory networks but also prioritize the systematic evaluation of its clinical potential as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for obesity and related metabolic disorders. Such translational efforts could yield innovative tools for precision disease management while addressing a critical gap in current research. Notably, the therapeutic targeting of m6A modifications remains an untapped clinical frontier, as no m6A -directed therapies have yet entered clinical use. This underscores the imperative for pharmacological innovation focused on m6A-modifying enzymes, whose strategic manipulation may unlock novel therapeutic paradigms for metabolic diseases. By bridging mechanistic insights with clinical applications, researchers could transform m6A biology from a burgeoning field of study into a cornerstone of metabolic disease diagnostics and therapeutics.
As the most prevalent RNA modification, N6-methyladenosine (m6A) methylation serves as a dynamic epigenetic regulator of RNA metabolism, critically influencing RNA stability, splicing, and translational efficiency across diverse biological processes. Notably, the functional consequences of m6A modification enzymes exhibit remarkable context-dependent variability across tissue type, developmental stage, or environmental conditions. This review systematically examines the emerging roles of m6A modifications in obesity pathogenesis and discusses their translational potential for precision medicine approaches in obesity management. However, current insights into m6A’s involvement in metabolic disorders, particularly obesity, remain at a preliminary stage. Future investigations should aim to: (1) comprehensively elucidate the spatiotemporal dynamics of m6A -mediated regulation in metabolic tissues, including its interplay with nutrient-sensing pathways and hormonal signaling networks, and (2) rigorously evaluate its clinical potential as both a diagnostic biomarker and novel therapeutic target for obesity intervention strategies. Addressing these priorities will advance our mechanistic understanding of obesity pathophysiology while bridging the translational gap between m6A biology and innovative therapeutic interventions for metabolic diseases.

Author Contributions

C.M.: Writing—original draft, figures and tables. D.Y.: Writing—review and editing, Supervision, Conceptualization. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82370485 and 81903602), the Clinical Research Program of Health Industry of Shanghai Municipal Health Commission (20234Y0238), the Noncommunicable Chronic Diseases-National Science and Technology Major Project (2023ZD0503203), and the Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Major Project (2017SHZDZX01).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Abbreviations

m6AN6-methyladenosine modification
CVDcardiovascular diseases
T2DMtype 2 diabetes mellitus
NAFLDnon-alcoholic fatty liver disease
OSAobstructive sleep apnea
OAosteoarthritis
NGSnext-generation sequencing
WATwhite adipose tissue
BATbrown adipose tissue
UCP1uncoupling protein 1
MSCsmesenchymal stem cells
METTL3methyltransferase-like 3
METTL14methyltransferase-like 14
MTCm6A methyltransferase complex
VIRMAVir Like m6A Methyltransferase Associated
HAKAIE3 Ubiquitin-Protein Ligase Hakai
ZC3H13zinc finger CCCH domain-containing protein 13
RBM15BRNA Binding Motif Protein 15B
METTL16methyltransferase-like 16
METTL5methyltransferase-like 5
ZCCHC4Zinc Finger CCHC-Type Containing 4
FTOfat mass and obesity-associated protein
ALKBH5AlkB homolog 5
WTAPWilms tumor 1-associated protein
YTHsYTH domain-containing proteins
HNRNPsheterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins
IGF2BPsIGF2BP family
EIF3eukaryotic initiation factor 3
FMRPFragile X mental retardation protein
PGC1αperoxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ coactivator 1α
ATG5Autophagy Related 5
oxLDLoxidized low-density lipoprotein
DHADocosahexaenoic acid
Ddit4DNA damage-inducible transcript 4
GHRPgrowth hormone-releasing peptide
AAAAbdominal aortic aneurysm

References

  1. GBD 2015 Obesity Collaborators. Health Effects of Overweight and Obesity in 195 Countries over 25 Years. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017, 377, 13–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wang, T.; He, C. Pro-inflammatory cytokines: The link between obesity and osteoarthritis. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2018, 44, 38–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lyons, M.M.; Bhatt, N.Y.; Pack, A.I.; Magalang, U.J. Global burden of sleep-disordered breathing and its implications. Respirology 2020, 25, 690–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Schetz, M.; De Jong, A.; Deane, A.M.; Druml, W.; Hemelaar, P.; Pelosi, P.; Pickkers, P.; Reintam-Blaser, A.; Roberts, J.; Sakr, Y.; et al. Obesity in the critically ill: A narrative review. Intensive Care Med. 2019, 45, 757–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC). Trends in adult body-mass index in 200 countries from 1975 to 2014: A pooled analysis of 1698 population-based measurement studies with 19.2 million participants. Lancet 2016, 387, 1377–1396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tammen, S.A.; Friso, S.; Choi, S.-W. Epigenetics: The link between nature and nurture. Mol. Asp. Med. 2013, 34, 753–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Desrosiers, R.; Friderici, K.; Rottman, F. Identification of methylated nucleosides in messenger RNA from Novikoff hepatoma cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1974, 71, 3971–3975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Roundtree, I.A.; Evans, M.E.; Pan, T.; He, C. Dynamic RNA modifications in gene expression regulation. Cell 2017, 169, 1187–1200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Meyer, K.D.; Saletore, Y.; Zumbo, P.; Elemento, O.; Mason, C.E.; Jaffrey, S.R. Comprehensive analysis of mRNA methylation reveals enrichment in 3′ UTRs and near stop codons. Cell 2012, 149, 1635–1646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Dominissini, D.; Moshitch-Moshkovitz, S.; Schwartz, S.; Salmon-Divon, M.; Ungar, L.; Osenberg, S.; Cesarkas, K.; Jacob-Hirsch, J.; Amariglio, N.; Kupiec, M.; et al. Topology of the human and mouse m6A RNA methylomes revealed by m6A-seq. Nature 2012, 485, 201–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tseng, Y.-H.; Cypess, A.M.; Kahn, C.R. Cellular Bioenergetics as a Target for Obesity Therapy. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2010, 9, 465–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Flier, J.S. Obesity Wars: Molecular Progress Confronts an Expanding Epidemic. Cell 2004, 116, 337–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Arner, P.; Rydén, M. Human white adipose tissue: A highly dynamic metabolic organ. J. Intern. Med. 2022, 291, 611–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Spalding, K.L.; Arner, E.; Westermark, P.O.; Bernard, S.; Buchholz, B.A.; Bergmann, O.; Blomqvist, L.; Hoffstedt, J.; Naslund, E.; Britton, T.; et al. Dynamics of fat cell turnover in humans. Nature 2008, 453, 783–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Wu, J.; Boström, P.; Sparks, L.M.; Ye, L.; Choi, J.H.; Giang, A.-H.; Khandekar, M.; Virtanen, K.A.; Nuutila, P.; Schaart, G.; et al. Beige adipocytes are a distinct type of thermogenic fat cell in mouse and human. Cell 2012, 150, 366–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Ghaben, A.L.; Scherer, P.E. Adipogenesis and metabolic health. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2019, 20, 242–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Su, H.; Meng, C.; Xu, J.; Su, Z.; Xiao, C.; Yang, D. Histone methyltransferase Smyd2 drives adipogenesis via regulating STAT3 phosphorylation. Cell Death Dis. 2022, 13, 890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Tang, Q.Q.; Lane, M.D. Adipogenesis: From Stem Cell to Adipocyte. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2012, 81, 715–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bokar, J.; Rath-Shambaugh, M.; Ludwiczak, R.; Narayan, P.; Rottman, F. Characterization and partial purification of mRNA N6-adenosine methyltransferase from HeLa cell nuclei. Internal mRNA methylation requires a multisubunit complex. J. Biol. Chem. 1994, 269, 17697–17704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, Y.; Li, Y.; Toth, J.I.; Petroski, M.D.; Zhang, Z.; Zhao, J.C. N6-Methyladenosine modification destabilizes developmental regulators in embryonic stem cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 2014, 16, 191–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ping, X.-L.; Sun, B.-F.; Wang, L.; Xiao, W.; Yang, X.; Wang, W.-J.; Adhikari, S.; Shi, Y.; Lv, Y.; Chen, Y.-S.; et al. Mammalian WTAP is a regulatory subunit of the RNA N6-methyladenosine methyltransferase. Cell Res. 2014, 24, 177–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wen, J.; Lv, R.; Ma, H.; Shen, H.; He, C.; Wang, J.; Jiao, F.; Liu, H.; Yang, P.; Tan, L.; et al. Zc3h13 regulates nuclear RNA m6A methylation and mouse embryonic stem cell self-renewal. Mol. Cell 2018, 69, 1028–1038.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bawankar, P.; Lence, T.; Paolantoni, C.; Haussmann, I.U.; Kazlauskiene, M.; Jacob, D.; Heidelberger, J.B.; Richter, F.M.; Nallasivan, M.P.; Morin, V.; et al. Hakai is required for stabilization of core components of the m6A mRNA methylation machinery. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 3778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Yue, Y.; Liu, J.; Cui, X.; Cao, J.; Luo, G.; Zhang, Z.; Cheng, T.; Gao, M.; Shu, X.; Ma, H.; et al. VIRMA mediates preferential m6A mRNA methylation in 3′UTR and near stop codon and associates with alternative polyadenylation. Cell Discov. 2018, 4, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Patil, D.P.; Chen, C.-K.; Pickering, B.F.; Chow, A.; Jackson, C.; Guttman, M.; Jaffrey, S.R. m6A RNA methylation promotes XIST-mediated transcriptional repression. Nature 2016, 537, 369–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Van Tran, N.; Ernst, F.G.M.; Hawley, B.R.; Zorbas, C.; Ulryck, N.; Hackert, P.; Bohnsack, K.E.; Bohnsack, M.T.; Jaffrey, S.R.; Graille, M.; et al. The human 18S rRNA m6A methyltransferase METTL5 is stabilized by TRMT112. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, 7719–7733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Warda, A.S.; Kretschmer, J.; Hackert, P.; Lenz, C.; Urlaub, H.; Höbartner, C.; E Sloan, K.; Bohnsack, M.T. Human METTL16 is a N6-methyladenosine (m6A) methyltransferase that targets pre-mRNAs and various non-coding RNAs. Embo Rep. 2017, 18, 2004–2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ren, W.; Lu, J.; Huang, M.; Gao, L.; Li, D.; Wang, G.G.; Song, J. Structure and regulation of ZCCHC4 in m6A-methylation of 28S rRNA. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 5042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Jia, G.; Fu, Y.; Zhao, X.; Dai, Q.; Zheng, G.; Yang, Y.; Yi, C.; Lindahl, T.; Pan, T.; Yang, Y.-G.; et al. N6-Methyladenosine in nuclear RNA is a major substrate of the obesity-associated FTO. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2011, 7, 885–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Zheng, G.; Dahl, J.A.; Niu, Y.; Fedorcsak, P.; Huang, C.-M.; Li, C.J.; Vågbø, C.B.; Shi, Y.; Wang, W.-L.; Song, S.-H.; et al. ALKBH5 Is a Mammalian RNA Demethylase that Impacts RNA Metabolism and Mouse Fertility. Mol. Cell 2013, 49, 18–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ueda, Y.; Ooshio, I.; Fusamae, Y.; Kitae, K.; Kawaguchi, M.; Jingushi, K.; Hase, H.; Harada, K.; Hirata, K.; Tsujikawa, K. AlkB homolog 3-mediated tRNA demethylation promotes protein synthesis in cancer cells. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, srep42271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Liu, F.; Clark, W.; Luo, G.; Wang, X.; Fu, Y.; Wei, J.; Wang, X.; Hao, Z.; Dai, Q.; Zheng, G.; et al. ALKBH1-Mediated tRNA Demethylation Regulates Translation. Cell 2016, 167, 816–828.e16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Fedeles, B.I.; Singh, V.; Delaney, J.C.; Li, D.; Essigmann, J.M. The AlkB Family of Fe(II)/α-Ketoglutarate-dependent Dioxygenases: Repairing Nucleic Acid Alkylation Damage and Beyond. J. Biol. Chem. 2015, 290, 20734–20742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wang, X.; Zhao, B.S.; Roundtree, I.A.; Lu, Z.; Han, D.; Ma, H.; Weng, X.; Chen, K.; Shi, H.; He, C. N6-Methyladenosine Modulates Messenger RNA Translation Efficiency. Cell 2015, 161, 1388–1399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Du, H.; Zhao, Y.; He, J.; Zhang, Y.; Xi, H.; Liu, M.; Ma, J.; Wu, L. YTHDF2 destabilizes m6A-containing RNA through direct recruitment of the CCR4–NOT deadenylase complex. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 12626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Shi, H.; Wang, X.; Lu, Z.; Zhao, B.S.; Ma, H.; Hsu, P.J.; Liu, C.; He, C. YTHDF3 facilitates translation and decay of N6-methyladenosine-modified RNA. Cell Res. 2017, 27, 315–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Widagdo, J.; Anggono, V.; Wong, J.J.-L. The multifaceted effects of YTHDC1-mediated nuclear m6A recognition. Trends Genet. 2022, 38, 325–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hsu, P.J.; Zhu, Y.; Ma, H.; Guo, Y.; Shi, X.; Liu, Y.; Qi, M.; Lu, Z.; Shi, H.; Wang, J.; et al. Ythdc2 is an N6-methyladenosine binding protein that regulates mammalian spermatogenesis. Cell Res. 2017, 27, 1115–1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Alarcón, C.R.; Goodarzi, H.; Lee, H.; Liu, X.; Tavazoie, S.; Tavazoie, S.F. HNRNPA2B1 Is a Mediator of m6A-Dependent Nuclear RNA Processing Events. Cell 2015, 162, 1299–1308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Liu, N.; Dai, Q.; Zheng, G.; He, C.; Parisien, M.; Pan, T. N6-Methyladenosine-dependent RNA structural switches regulate RNA–protein interactions. Nature 2015, 518, 560–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Zhou, K.I.; Shi, H.; Lyu, R.; Wylder, A.C.; Matuszek, Ż.; Pan, J.N.; He, C.; Parisien, M.; Pan, T. Regulation of Co-transcriptional Pre-mRNA Splicing by m6A through the Low-Complexity Protein hnRNPG. Mol. Cell 2019, 76, 70–81.e9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Zhou, H.; Sun, Q.; Feng, M.; Gao, Z.; Jia, S.; Cao, L.; Yu, X.; Gao, S.; Wu, H.; Li, K. Regulatory mechanisms and therapeutic implications of insulin-like growth factor 2 mRNA-binding proteins, the emerging crucial m6A regulators of tumors. Theranostics 2023, 13, 4247–4265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Meyer, K.D.; Patil, D.P.; Zhou, J.; Zinoviev, A.; Skabkin, M.A.; Elemento, O.; Pestova, T.V.; Qian, S.-B.; Jaffrey, S.R. 5′ UTR m6A Promotes Cap-Independent Translation. Cell 2015, 163, 999–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Hsu, P.J.; Shi, H.; Zhu, A.C.; Lu, Z.; Miller, N.; Edens, B.M.; Ma, Y.C.; He, C. The RNA-binding protein FMRP facilitates the nuclear export of N6-methyladenosine–containing mRNAs. J. Biol. Chem. 2019, 294, 19889–19895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wang, Y.; Gao, M.; Zhu, F.; Li, X.; Yang, Y.; Yan, Q.; Jia, L.; Xie, L.; Chen, Z. METTL3 is essential for postnatal development of brown adipose tissue and energy expenditure in mice. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 1648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Tao, X.; Du, R.; Guo, S.; Feng, X.; Yu, T.; OuYang, Q.; Chen, Q.; Fan, X.; Wang, X.; Guo, C.; et al. PGE2-EP3 axis promotes brown adipose tissue formation through stabilization of WTAP RNA methyltransferase. EMBO J. 2022, 41, e110439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wu, Y.; Xie, L.; Wang, M.; Xiong, Q.; Guo, Y.; Liang, Y.; Li, J.; Sheng, R.; Deng, P.; Wang, Y.; et al. Mettl3-mediated m6A RNA methylation regulates the fate of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells and osteoporosis. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 4772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Liao, X.; Cai, D.; Liu, J.; Hu, H.; You, R.; Pan, Z.; Chen, S.; Xu, K.; Dai, W.; Zhang, S.; et al. Deletion of Mettl3 in mesenchymal stem cells promotes acute myeloid leukemia resistance to chemotherapy. Cell Death Dis. 2023, 14, 796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Shen, G.-S.; Zhou, H.-B.; Zhang, H.; Chen, B.; Liu, Z.-P.; Yuan, Y.; Zhou, X.-Z.; Xu, Y.-J. The GDF11-FTO-PPARγ axis controls the shift of osteoporotic MSC fate to adipocyte and inhibits bone formation during osteoporosis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Mol. Basis Dis. 2018, 1864, 3644–3654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wu, R.; Guo, G.; Bi, Z.; Liu, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Chen, N.; Wang, F.; Wang, Y.; Wang, X. m6A methylation modulates adipogenesis through JAK2-STAT3-C/EBPβ signaling. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Gene Regul. Mech. 2019, 1862, 796–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zhao, X.; Yang, Y.; Sun, B.-F.; Shi, Y.; Yang, X.; Xiao, W.; Hao, Y.-J.; Ping, X.-L.; Chen, Y.-S.; Wang, W.-J.; et al. FTO-dependent demethylation of N6-methyladenosine regulates mRNA splicing and is required for adipogenesis. Cell Res. 2014, 24, 1403–1419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zhang, M.; Zhang, Y.; Ma, J.; Guo, F.; Cao, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, B.; Chai, J.; Zhao, W.; Zhao, R.; et al. The Demethylase Activity of FTO (Fat Mass and Obesity Associated Protein) Is Required for Preadipocyte Differentiation. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0133788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Chen, Y.; Wu, R.; Chen, W.; Liu, Y.; Liao, X.; Zeng, B.; Guo, G.; Lou, F.; Xiang, Y.; Wang, Y.; et al. Curcumin prevents obesity by targeting TRAF4-induced ubiquitylation in m6A-dependent manner. Embo Rep. 2021, 22, e52146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Wang, X.; Wu, R.; Liu, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Bi, Z.; Yao, Y.; Liu, Q.; Shi, H.; Wang, F.; Wang, Y. m6A mRNA methylation controls autophagy and adipogenesis by targeting Atg5 and Atg7. Autophagy 2019, 16, 1221–1235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Gong, H.; Gong, T.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Wang, X. Profiling of N6-methyladenosine methylation in porcine longissimus dorsi muscle and unravelling the hub gene ADIPOQ promotes adipogenesis in an m6A-YTHDF1–dependent manner. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2023, 14, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Yadav, P.K.; Rajasekharan, R. The m6A methyltransferase Ime4 epitranscriptionally regulates triacylglycerol metabolism and vacuolar morphology in haploid yeast cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2017, 292, 13727–13744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Luo, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Tai, L.; Zhang, L.; Sun, Z.; Zhou, L. Comprehensive analysis of differences of N6-methyladenosine RNA methylomes between high-fat-fed and normal mouse livers. Epigenomics 2019, 11, 1267–1282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kang, H.; Zhang, Z.; Yu, L.; Li, Y.; Liang, M.; Zhou, L. FTO reduces mitochondria and promotes hepatic fat accumulation through RNA demethylation. J. Cell. Biochem. 2018, 119, 5676–5685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Xie, W.; Ma, L.L.; Xu, Y.Q.; Wang, B.H.; Li, S.M. METTL3 inhibits hepatic insulin sensitivity via N6-methyladenosine modification of Fasn mRNA and promoting fatty acid metabolism. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2019, 518, 120–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zhang, X.; Li, X.; Jia, H.; An, G.; Ni, J. The m6A methyltransferase METTL3 modifies PGC-1α mRNA promoting mitochondrial dysfunction and oxLDL-induced inflammation in monocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 2021, 297, 101058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Chen, W.; Chen, Y.; Wu, R.; Guo, G.; Liu, Y.; Zeng, B.; Liao, X.; Wang, Y.; Wang, X. DHA alleviates diet-induced skeletal muscle fiber remodeling via FTO/m6A/DDIT4/PGC1α signaling. BMC Biol. 2022, 20, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Müller, T.A.; Struble, S.L.; Meek, K.; Hausinger, R.P. Characterization of human AlkB homolog 1 produced in mammalian cells and demonstration of mitochondrial dysfunction in ALKBH1-deficient cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2018, 495, 98–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Liu, S.-J.; Tang, H.-L.; He, Q.; Lu, P.; Fu, T.; Xu, X.-L.; Su, T.; Gao, M.-M.; Duan, S.; Luo, Y.; et al. FTO is a transcriptional repressor to auto-regulate its own gene and potentially associated with homeostasis of body weight. J. Mol. Cell Biol. 2018, 11, 118–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Liu, S.; Song, S.; Wang, S.; Cai, T.; Qin, L.; Wang, X.; Zhu, G.; Wang, H.; Yang, W.; Fang, C.; et al. Hypothalamic FTO promotes high-fat diet-induced leptin resistance in mice through increasing CX3CL1 expression. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2024, 123, 109512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Karra, E.; O’dAly, O.G.; Choudhury, A.I.; Yousseif, A.; Millership, S.; Neary, M.T.; Scott, W.R.; Chandarana, K.; Manning, S.; Hess, M.E.; et al. A link between FTO, ghrelin, and impaired brain food-cue responsivity. J. Clin. Investig. 2013, 123, 3539–3551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Xiao, L.; De Jesus, D.F.; Ju, C.-W.; Wei, J.-B.; Hu, J.; DiStefano-Forti, A.; Gonzales, V.S.; Tsuji, T.; Wei, S.; Blüher, M.; et al. Divergent roles of m6A in orchestrating brown and white adipocyte transcriptomes and systemic metabolism. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. De Jesus, D.F.; Zhang, Z.; Kahraman, S.; Brown, N.K.; Chen, M.; Hu, J.; Gupta, M.K.; He, C.; Kulkarni, R.N. m6A mRNA Methylation Regulates Human β-Cell Biology in Physiological States and in Type 2 Diabetes. Nat. Metab. 2019, 1, 765–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Liu, W.; Cao, H.; Yan, J.; Huang, R.; Ying, H. ‘Micro-managers’ of hepatic lipid metabolism and NAFLD. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. RNA 2015, 6, 581–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Guo, J.; Ren, W.; Li, A.; Ding, Y.; Guo, W.; Su, D.; Hu, C.; Xu, K.; Chen, H.; Xu, X.; et al. Fat Mass and Obesity-Associated Gene Enhances Oxidative Stress and Lipogenesis in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2013, 58, 1004–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Lu, N.; Li, X.; Yu, J.; Li, Y.; Wang, C.; Zhang, L.; Wang, T.; Zhong, X. Curcumin Attenuates Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Hepatic Lipid Metabolism Disorder by Modification of m6A RNA Methylation in Piglets. Lipids 2018, 53, 53–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Wu, J.; Li, Y.; Yu, J.; Gan, Z.; Wei, W.; Wang, C.; Zhang, L.; Wang, T.; Zhong, X. Resveratrol Attenuates High-Fat Diet Induced Hepatic Lipid Homeostasis Disorder and Decreases m6A RNA Methylation. Front. Pharmacol. 2020, 11, 568006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Dorn, L.E.; Lasman, L.; Chen, J.; Xu, X.; Hund, T.J.; Medvedovic, M.; Hanna, J.H.; van Berlo, J.H.; Accornero, F. The N6-Methyladenosine mRNA Methylase METTL3 Controls Cardiac Homeostasis and Hypertrophy. Circulation 2019, 139, 533–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Meng, C.; Su, H.; Shu, M.; Shen, F.; Lu, Y.; Wu, S.; Su, Z.; Yu, M.; Yang, D. The functional role of m6A demethylase ALKBH5 in cardiomyocyte hypertrophy. Cell Death Dis. 2024, 15, 683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Mathiyalagan, P.; Adamiak, M.; Mayourian, J.; Sassi, Y.; Liang, Y.; Agarwal, N.; Jha, D.; Zhang, S.; Kohlbrenner, E.; Chepurko, E.; et al. FTO-Dependent m6A Regulates Cardiac Function During Remodeling and Repair. Circulation 2019, 139, 518–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Zhuang, T.; Chen, M.-H.; Wu, R.-X.; Wang, J.; Hu, X.-D.; Meng, T.; Wu, A.-H.; Yang, Y.-F.; Lei, Y.; Hu, D.-H.; et al. ALKBH5-mediated m6A modification of IL-11 drives macrophage-to-myofibroblast transition and pathological cardiac fibrosis in mice. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 1995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. He, Y.; Xing, J.; Wang, S.; Xin, S.; Han, Y.; Zhang, J. Increased m6A methylation level is associated with the progression of human abdominal aortic aneurysm. Ann. Transl. Med. 2019, 7, 797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Chen, J.; Ning, Y.; Zhang, H.; Song, N.; Gu, Y.; Shi, Y.; Cai, J.; Ding, X.; Zhang, X. METTL14-dependent m6A regulates vascular calcification induced by indoxyl sulfate. Life Sci. 2019, 239, 117034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Su, H.; Wang, G.; Wu, L.; Ma, X.; Ying, K.; Zhang, R. Transcriptome-wide map of m6A circRNAs identified in a rat model of hypoxia mediated pulmonary hypertension. BMC Genom. 2020, 21, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The molecular mechanism and biological functions of m6A modification. The adenosine (A) bases in mRNA could be methylated to form N6-methyladenosine (m6A) by the methyltransferase complex (writers). m6A could be reversibly removed by demethylases (erasers) or could be recognized by m6A binding proteins (readers) to affect mRNA fate.
Figure 1. The molecular mechanism and biological functions of m6A modification. The adenosine (A) bases in mRNA could be methylated to form N6-methyladenosine (m6A) by the methyltransferase complex (writers). m6A could be reversibly removed by demethylases (erasers) or could be recognized by m6A binding proteins (readers) to affect mRNA fate.
Biomedicines 13 02164 g001
Figure 2. Mechanism of m6A modification in obesity. m6A modification plays a crucial role in a variety of physiological processes, including adipogenesis, lipid metabolism, mitochondrial function, and neurological regulation.
Figure 2. Mechanism of m6A modification in obesity. m6A modification plays a crucial role in a variety of physiological processes, including adipogenesis, lipid metabolism, mitochondrial function, and neurological regulation.
Biomedicines 13 02164 g002
Table 1. The regulatory role of m6A modification in obesity-related diseases.
Table 1. The regulatory role of m6A modification in obesity-related diseases.
Diseasesm6A Regulatory FactorsOrganExpressionRefs.
Type 2 diabetesMETTL14Brown adipose tissueUpregulated[66]
METTL14PancreasDownregulated[67]
METTL3LiverUpregulated[59]
Nonalcoholic fatty liver diseaseFTOLiverUpregulated[69]
METTL14LiverDownregulated[70]
METTL3LiverDownregulated[70]
Heart diseaseALKBH5HeartUpregulated[72]
METTL3HeartUpregulated[71]
FTOHeartDownregulated[73]
Vascular diseaseMETTL14Thoracic aortaUpregulated[76]
METTL14Abdominal aortaUpregulated[75]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Meng, C.; Yang, D. Current Insights into Obesity and m6A Modification. Biomedicines 2025, 13, 2164. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13092164

AMA Style

Meng C, Yang D. Current Insights into Obesity and m6A Modification. Biomedicines. 2025; 13(9):2164. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13092164

Chicago/Turabian Style

Meng, Chen, and Di Yang. 2025. "Current Insights into Obesity and m6A Modification" Biomedicines 13, no. 9: 2164. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13092164

APA Style

Meng, C., & Yang, D. (2025). Current Insights into Obesity and m6A Modification. Biomedicines, 13(9), 2164. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13092164

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop