Next Article in Journal
The NMD Pathway Regulates GABARAPL1 mRNA during the EMT
Previous Article in Journal
Liquid Biopsy for EGFR Mutation Analysis in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients: Thoughts Drawn from a Real-Life Experience
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomedicines
Volume 9
Issue 10
10.3390/biomedicines9101301
biomedicines-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Myostatin and Follistatin—New Kids on the Block in the Diagnosis of Sarcopenia in IBD and Possible Therapeutic Implications

by
Dorota Skrzypczak
1,*,†,
Marzena Skrzypczak-Zielińska
2,†,
Alicja Ewa Ratajczak
1,
Aleksandra Szymczak-Tomczak
1,
Piotr Eder
1,
Ryszard Słomski
2,
Agnieszka Dobrowolska
1 and
Iwona Krela-Kaźmierczak
1,*
1
Department of Gastroenterology, Dietetics and Internal Diseases, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Przybyszewskiego Street 49, 60-355 Poznan, Poland
2
Institute of Human Genetics, Polish Academy of Sciences Poznan, Strzeszynska Street 32, 60-479 Poznan, Poland
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Biomedicines 2021, 9(10), 1301; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9101301
Submission received: 9 August 2021 / Revised: 7 September 2021 / Accepted: 15 September 2021 / Published: 23 September 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular and Translational Medicine)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Sarcopenia, which is a decrease in muscle strength and quality of muscle tissue, is a common disorder among patients suffering from inflammatory bowel disease. This particular group of patients often presents with malnutrition and shows low physical activity, which increases the risk of sarcopenia. Another important factor in the development of sarcopenia is an imbalanced ratio of myostatin and follistatin, which may stem from inflammation as well as genetic factors. Currently, research in this area continues, and is aimed at identifying an effective medication for the treatment of this condition. Additionally, we still have no sarcopenia markers that can be used for diagnosis. In this paper, we address the role of myostatin and follistatin as potential markers in the diagnosis of sarcopenia in patients with Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis, particularly in view of the genetic and biological aspects. We also present data on new perspectives in the pharmacotherapy of sarcopenia (i.e., myostatin inhibitors and gene therapy). Nevertheless, knowledge is still scarce about the roles of follistatin and myostatin in sarcopenia development among patients suffering from inflammatory bowel disease, which warrants further study.

1. Introduction—The Function of Myostatin and Follistatin in IBD Patients Suffering from Sarcopenia

Sarcopenia is characterised by decreased muscle strength and a reduced number and quality of muscle cells [1]. Although in the past, sarcopenia was associated with aging, it may also be a disorder occurring at every age, including childhood [2,3]. Sarcopenia constitutes a consequence of numerous diseases, such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) [1,4,5,6], chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [7], hepatic cirrhosis [8], chronic kidney disease [9] and various neurodegenerative diseases (e.g., Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy [10] or Parkinson’s disease) [11].
Malnutrition is a frequently discussed risk factor of sarcopenia among IBD patients, and currently, diet therapy [12,13,14] and physical activity [15] are the most essential elements of sarcopenia treatment.
Medications decreasing or inhibiting the progress of sarcopenia have already been developed [16,17,18]; nevertheless, it is vital to note that methods (e.g., biochemical markers) used for the diagnosis and monitoring of sarcopenia are scarce. Therefore, further research in this area is necessary.
According to the data, patients suffering from IBD are at a higher risk of malnutrition due to malabsorption. Sarcopenia is common among this group [1], and affects approximately 51–70% of patients [12,13,14]. In fact, 40% of IBD patients also suffer from non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), or even its more severe stage—non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) [19,20].
This article focuses on the genetic and biological mechanisms of myostatin and follistatin.

1.1. Myostatin

Myostatin (MSTN, GDF 8—growth differentiation factor 8), a highly conserved member of the transforming growth factor-β superfamily, is a negative regulator of muscle growth and development [21,22]. This protein occurs predominantly in the skeletal muscle tissue, although a decreased amount of myostatin is also observed in the adipose tissue, as well as in the cardiac muscle. Myostatin interacts with the activin type IIB (ActRIIB) receptor. Disorders in the functions of myostatin (e.g., as a consequence of mutation) lead to hyperplasia (an increase in the number of muscle cells) and hypotrophy (an increase in the size of muscle strands), which result in hypermuscular phenotypes [22,23]. Therefore, a modification of the myostatin metabolic pathway may constitute a contemporary way to inhibit the development of sarcopenia, or reverse the effects of the disease. Moreover, it may also protect against cachexia, and support the regeneration of the muscle tissue following trauma or neurodegenerative diseases [22].
It has been established that its serum concentration increases with age, and is inversely proportional to skeletal muscle mass. The metabolism of myostatin is complex, and its functionality is subject to various regulatory mechanisms (activation of the ActRIIB receptor-binding protein by BMP1 (bone morphogenetic protein 1)), and interactions with the three most important myostatin regulatory proteins: GASP (GDF-associated serum protein-1), follistatin, and FLRG (follistatin-related gene) [24]. Additionally, the research study demonstrated a correlation between the serum myostatin concentration and the adipose tissue mass. In fact, in patients with sarcopenic obesity, an elevated myostatin level is correlated with insulin resistance [25]. In contrast, in individuals undergoing diets, myostatin levels in the blood decrease, and the cellular response to insulin is normalised [26].

1.2. Follistatin

Follistatin is known as an inhibitor of transforming growth factor (TGF)-β superfamily ligands, including myostatin and activin A. It is a single chain glycoprotein and a specific FSH inhibitor. Follistatin was isolated for the first time from ovarian follicle by Robertson and Ueno in 1987 [27,28]. It is expressed in various tissues and is an antagonist of proteins from TGF-β group, including activin, myostatin and BMP (a bone morphogenetic protein). Additionally, follistatin is also one of the proteins that participates in responses to environmental stress (e.g., oxidative stress, hypoxia, or nutritional deficiency) and constitutes an element of cell responses to stress [29].
The abnormal expression of follistatin may be associated with various liver diseases, including NAFLD/NASH, hepatocellular carcinoma, and fibrosis [30]. In fact, studies show that follistatin can accelerate the progression of NALFD to NASH [31].
Oxidative stress, i.e., the imbalance between creation and elimination of ROS (reactive oxidative species), is the underlying cause of many disorders in the elderly [32]. However, follistatin reduces the number of ROS, whereas a deficiency of follistatin may lead to oxidative stress and result in numerous diseases, including sarcopenia and NAFLD [33,34]. These two diseases also show similarities in pathophysiology (vitamin D deficiency, insulin resistance, inflammation, obesity and too low physical activity) [35]. Nevertheless, with age, the number of ROS in muscles increases and the concentration of myostatin increases [36,37,38], while follistatin concentration is decreased.

2. Genetic Factors in Sarcopenia Affecting Patients with IBD

Sarcopenia, which is a common issue in patients with IBD, has been associated with fatigue and a reduction in the quality of life [1]. The cause of skeletal muscle atrophy is complex and, according to the literature, it is comprised of both environmental factors and genetic predispositions, as well as the interaction between both the environment and genetics [39,40]. Moreover, studies regarding heredity have revealed a strong genetic determination for muscle mass and muscle strength, ranging between 32–67% and 46–76%, respectively [39]. The aetiology of IBD is also multifactorial, and includes a substantial hereditary background. According to studies conducted in various centres around the world, it is estimated that in the group of 300 candidate genes, there are currently at least 40 genes that may be responsible for the development of IBD [41,42]. However, the question emerges as to whether the genetic factors of both phenotypes, i.e., muscular and gastroenterological disorders, can be related or interact with each other in IBD patients with sarcopenia. The experimental studies regarding the aforementioned aspect have not been described in the literature so far; nevertheless, it is worth summarizing the current knowledge from this new perspective. Inflammatory processes can be expected to share certain common elements, but it may not be as simple as that (Figure 1) [43,44].
The studies regarding the molecular genetics of sarcopenia gene identification include many different types of research, i.e., whole-genome linkage studies, quantitative trait loci mapping, candidate gene association studies, genome-wide association studies, and DNA microarrays, as well as microRNA studies of sarcopenia, or a related skeletal muscle phenotype. This variety results in a large quantity of data, which are frequently contradictory [39,40,45]. The most frequently mentioned genes correlated with the occurrence of sarcopenia include ACTN3, ACE and VDR, although in general, the list is more extensive, e.g., in the 54 studies of adults aged > 50 years, 26 genes and 88 DNA polymorphisms were analysed [39]. Therefore, in this paper, we focused only on the genetic relationships of sarcopenia, which potentially shares a common element with IBD or with the treatment response summarized in the Supplemental Table S1.
From the 30 IBD regions described in the Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man® (OMIM) database, seven regions shared the same localization on chromosome 1p, 7p, 7q, 10q, 12p, 12q and 18p as an association with the muscle-related phenotypes. Further research has contributed to expanding the available knowledge, and associations with both sarcopenia and IBD have been demonstrated for the following receptor genes: vitamin D receptor (VDR, MIM:601769) and glucocorticoid receptor (NR3C1, nuclear receptor subfamily 3 group C member 1, MIM:138040). The relationship was also found for the following cytokine genes: interleukin 6 (IL6, MIM:147620), interleukin 10 (IL10, MIM 124092), tumour necrosis factor (TNF, MIM:191160), lymphotoxin alpha (LTA, MIM:153440) (Supplemental Table S1).
VDR is one of the most frequently studied candidate genes for sarcopenia, due to its crucial regulatory role in calcium homeostasis and the skeletal muscle function. Thus, the VDR gene is a common research object, although the findings are often incompatible [39,40,45]. In general, nine studies with a total of five polymorphisms of this gene, including rs1544410 (BsmI), rs2228570 (FokI), rs7975232 (ApaI) and rs7136534, demonstrated a significant relationship with the sarcopenia phenotype (Supplemental Table S1). VDR activates the signal transduction pathways in the skeletal muscle cells, through which vitamin D regulates contractility and myogenesis [46]. Interestingly, the analysis regarding the addition of 1.25(OH)2 Vitamin D3 to C2C12 myoblasts clarified the vitamin D-related molecular pathways for muscle regulation. Specifically, 1.25(OH)2 Vitamin D3 leads to: (1) a greater expression and nuclear translocation of the vitamin D receptor; (2) a reduced cell proliferation and a decreased IGF-I expression; and (3) the promotion of myogenic differentiation by increasing IGF-II and follistatin expression as well as reducing the expression of myostatin—the only known negative regulator of muscle mass [47]. The VDR gene polymorphisms in two studies on IBD susceptibility also indicated a positive correlation (Supplemental Table S1). This correlation is substantiated by the local action of 1.25(OH)2 Vitamin D3 as a cytokine, following the synthesis and release by the activated macrophages. In addition, 1.25(OH)2 Vitamin D3 can inhibit the nuclear factor (NF)-kB and lead to the production of various different cytokines. Studies with animal models demonstrated that the loss of VDR expression in VDR-knockout mice resulted in impaired inflammation reactions in the gastrointestinal tract [48].
An association with the muscle-related phenotypes (a greater body height and an increased muscle mass and strength in young-adult males) has also been shown in the variant for the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) gen—NR3C1. Moreover, it has been demonstrated that these gene polymorphisms determine steroid therapy outcomes in IBD patients (Supplemental Table S1), since glucocorticoids (GCs) are often clinically used as anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive agents. NR3C1 is currently characterized as the key gene for the effects of GCs therapy. In fact, its mutations and polymorphisms may influence the formation of GR–GCs complex and change the expression of the target genes. The E22R/E23K (rs6189/rs6190) polymorphisms are located in the N-terminal transactivation domain of the GR, and influence the reduction in sensitivity for GCs [49]. On the other hand, GCs may decrease the rate of protein synthesis and increase protein breakdown, resulting in muscle atrophy. However, in terms of muscle phenotype, the exact mechanism of NR3C1 polymorphisms in action at the molecular level is unknown. According to the recent in vitro research, human myoblasts and myotubes treated with dexamethasone presented an enhanced mRNA expression in their myogenic proliferation and differentiation markers, although myoblasts were limited in their differentiation potential [50].
The search for common genetic factors for sarcopenia and IBD also revealed IL6, IL10, and TNF, as well as LTA, which encodes a multifunctional cytokine primarily involved in the immune functions. In particular, IL-6 has been associated with many inflammatory disorders, presumably due to its robust effects on the induction of pathogenic Th17-cell differentiation. IL-10 plays a critical regulatory role by means of promoting the expression of anti-inflammatory effectors, and is involved in the maintenance of intestinal mucosal homeostasis in the gastrointestinal tract [51]. On the other hand, TNF mediates pleiotropic effects—apoptosis, cell proliferation and differentiation, and cytokine production through binding to TNFR-I and TNFR-II receptors in the targeted tissue. LTA (also known as TNF-β) is produced by lymphocytes and participates in numerous immunological processes, and may also be associated with anti-TNF responses [52]. However, IBD research results regarding the aforementioned cytokine genes are also contradictory. The Supplemental Table S1 presents only the genes with a positive correlation. Additionally, chronic inflammation has been also considered to be involved in the development of sarcopenia, due to the production of numerous pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as TNF and IL-6, which promote muscle catabolism [53]. Moreover, IL-6 signalling affects the binding to the membrane-bound IL-6 receptor in the skeletal muscle, as well as the activation of downstream signalling pathways including MAPK/ERK, STAT3, p38, FoxO3 and myostatin pathways [54,55].
In recent years, numerous research studies have been performed and considerable attention has been devoted to the microRNA (miRNA) molecules. In fact, these molecules have been regarded as potent regulators in diverse biological processes at the post-transcriptional level. Moreover, proliferation and differentiation of the muscle stem cells requires the regulations signals for the optimal regeneration and the functioning of the muscles [56]. MiRNAs involved in muscle biology and the pathophysiology of IBD are presented in the Supplemental Table S1—they were selected on the basis of the available lists for both diseases [40,56,57]. We found six molecules to have their expression regulated in both sarcopenic and IBD patients: mi-206, mi-146a, mi-19, mi-21, mi-27, and mi-201. Nonetheless, the Supplemental Table S1 only includes the first two, since the available information for the remaining molecules regarding the function, signalling pathways, targets, and regulators is unknown or limited, particularly in the case of IBD. However, it is worth emphasizing that regulatory miRNAs, or other non-coding molecules, may be the key to explaining the coexistence of sarcopenia and IBD.
Overall, although there are currently indications to look for the genetic factors determining sarcopenia in patients with IBD, no strong genetic evidence between the two exists. Nevertheless, many ambiguities may be addressed soon, owing to non-coding RNA research. This may provide knowledge of new pathways in the mechanisms of the abovementioned diseases, as well as diagnostics and therapy.

2.1. Myostatin (MSTN) Gene

The myostatin gene (MSTN, also referred to as the growth differentiation factor 8, GDF8; MIM601788), encodes a skeletal muscle-specific secreted preproprotein, which is proteolytically processed to generate each subunit of the disulphide-linked homodimer [58]. Moreover, myostatin is a highly conserved member of the transforming growth factor-β superfamily, which is expressed mostly in the muscle tissue, and negatively regulates skeletal muscle cell proliferation and differentiation. Thus, mutations in MSTN gene are associated with an increased skeletal muscle mass in humans and other mammals [59]. One example is splicing variant c.373+5G>A (rs397515373), which causes large muscle hypertrophy and unusual strength in children with the homozygous variant [23].
According to the human genome reference assembly GRCh38.p13, this relatively small gene is located on chromosome 2 (2q32.2), between the coordinates 190,055,699 and 190,062,728 bp (Figure 2). It comprises 7029 bp of genomic DNA, and includes only three coding exons. The transcript length is 2819 bp, and the translation product consists of 375 amino acids containing five missense substitutions in conserved amino acid residues: p.A55T (rs1805085, c.163G>A), p.K153R (rs1805086, c.458A>G), p.E164K (rs35781413, c.490G>A), p.P198A (rs368949692, c.592C>G), and p.I225T (rs143242500, c.674T>C) (Figure 2). Changes in p.A55T in exon 1 and p.K153R in exon 2 are polymorphic in the general population, and they present significantly different allele frequencies in Europeans and African Americans (0% and 3% vs. 16% and 22%, respectively, p < 0.001). Simultaneously, the change in p.K153R (rs1805086, c.458A>G) in the heterozygous status was described as influencing the clinical presentation of women with McArdle disease [60].

2.2. Follistatin (FST) Gene

The follistatin gene (FST, MIM136470), encoding a highly conserved among the species cysteine-rich monomeric glycoprotein, is located on chromosome 5 (5q11.2), contains 6797 bp between coordinates 53,480,338 and 53,487,134 bp (GRCh38.p13), and comprises six exons (Figure 3). The follistatin, similarly to myostatin, is included in the TGF-beta superfamily. Moreover, the product of the FST gene is synthesized as pre-follistatin in isoforms 344 and 317 amino acids depending on the transcript, which differs in length at the C-terminus [61]. The mature protein was formed following the cleavage of the signal peptide (29 amino acids) (Figure 3). Different genetic variants of the FST gene have been described in the literature, such as the coding region, e.g., rs11745088 (c.454G>C, p.E152Q) and rs1127760 (c.715T>A, p.C239S). However, they were analysed in the context of susceptibility to polycystic ovarian syndrome (POS)) [62,63], or premature ovarian failure (POF) [64]. This line of research results from linkage and association studies [65], as well as from animal studies, which suggest that the FST loss may result in a premature ovarian cessation [66]. Further results are controversial, since some support this thesis [63], whereas other studies found no evidence that FST is a POS or POF disease-causing gene [62,64]. In terms of sarcopenia, the intronic variants rs3797297 (c.85+950G>T), rs3756498 (c.86−500G>A), rs12152850 (c.721+230C>T), and rs12153205 (c.722−241T>C) in the FST gene have all been investigated to date, and comprise a haplotype block [67]. The obtained data have demonstrated that FST loci may contribute to the interindividual variation in both skeletal muscle mass and strength in men, but not in women [67]. However, similar studies of FST gene variants have not been conducted so far.

3. The Pharmacotherapy of Sarcopenia—New Perspectives

3.1. Inhibitors of Myostatin and Other Myokines

The discovery of myostatin and its function has initiated a new phase of research into the treatment of sarcopenia. In mice models, the pharmacological blockade of myostatin induces muscle mass gain and improves metabolic management of insulin, triglycerides, and circulating adiponectin in obese mice with insulin resistance (128). Mice with either mutated or defective myostatin have been shown to be resistant to diet-induced obesity, dyslipidaemia, atherogenesis, and hepatic steatosis. Researchers are primarily interested in the antibodies against myostatin, propeptides, soluble ActRIIB receptors, and interacting proteins (GASP-1, follistatin and FLRG) [22,68,69,70].
The first myostatin inhibitor investigated in humans was Stamulumab (MYO-029) developed by Wyeth Pharmaceuticals of the Cambridge Antibody Technology Group. It is a recombinant human antibody that blocks the binding of myostatin to ACVR2B. Phase 2 clinical trials were conducted in patients with muscular dystrophy; however, these were discontinued due to a lack of efficacy in improving muscle strength [71]. Landogrozumab (LY2495655) (Eli Lilly and co) is a humanised κ-type IgG4 monoclonal antibody that binds to and neutralises the MSTN protein, which blocks the MSTN signalling pathway. This process leads to reduced protein breakdown and decreased muscle weakness. The study by Becker et al. of 365 elderly patients with a history of falls found an increase in the total lean body mass and a decrease in the fat mass in the group treated with Landogrozumab vs. placebo. Additionally, the implementation of LY2495655 also led to an overall increase in physical performance in fast gait tests, stair climbing tests, and chair rise tests [72]. Other investigated anti-myostatin antibodies include Trevogrumab and Domagrozumab (PF-06252616) (132). There is also ongoing research on the antibody against activin A (REGN-2477), which together with myostatin transmits a signal to the target cell [73].
Ramatercept (ACE-031) is an antibody that binds ActRIIB ligands, including myostatin, GDF11, and activins, thus blocking the interaction of bound ligands with endogenous ActRIIB receptors. However, the use of this drug was associated with numerous adverse reactions, mainly haemorrhage. Hence, further studies were abandoned. ACE-083, which also binds TBG-β molecules, but does not bind BMP9/10 ligands, is also currently being investigated [74]. ACE-083 was designed for clinical trials in patients with muscular dystrophy.
Bimagrumab (BYM-338) is a monoclonal antibody that blocks the type II receptor for activin and stimulates skeletal muscle growth by enhancing myoblast differentiation, and by counteracting differentiation induced by myostatin or activin A. The antibody acts by inhibiting Smad2/3 phosphorylation, which protects the myosin-heavy chain from degradation. BYM-338 may also counteract glucocorticosteroid-induced muscle atrophy, which could be promising for IBD cases where glucocorticosteroids are used to treat the exacerbations of the disease [75,76].
The effects of the pharmacological administration of follistatin are not limited to the skeletal muscles, since it may affect other tissues and organs by modulating various molecules, activin A, inhibin, follitropin, and certain BMP proteins, and can compromise the pineal gland and gonadal function [22]. Studies investigating the administration of soluble ActRIIB receptors in postmenopausal women and patients with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy were discontinued due to the occurrence of nose and gum haemorrhage, as well as the appearance of skin lesions [77].
However, it is worth emphasising that the aforementioned drugs have not yet been tested in a specific group of patients with IBD. Thus, further research is necessary to develop the most effective methods of blocking myostatin in order to safely increase the muscle mass and strength in patients with sarcopenia.

3.2. Gene Therapies for Sarcopenia

In addition to these therapeutic strategies in the treatment of sarcopenia, gene therapies remain a source of great interest [78]. Interestingly, Morine et al. described a unique method of inhibiting myostatin by using a recombinant adeno-associated virus to overexpress the secreted dominant negative myostatin in the liver of mice. As a result, myostatin inhibition led to an increase in muscle mass and strength in control mice [79].

4. Summary and Conclusions

Sarcopenia in IBD is a common but still poorly understood disorder. At present, the treatment is based on proper nutrition and physical exercise, whereas pharmacological treatment is still being investigated. Moreover, there are no biochemical sarcopenia markers. Therefore, the assessment of follistatin and myostatin levels seems necessary, particularly in patients suffering from IBD, who are at an increased risk of developing this condition. In fact, it may constitute the basis for research focused on investigating sarcopenia markers. Moreover, genetic factors may also affect the level of myostatin and follistatin. Hence, the search for the polymorphism responsible for coding these proteins may be essential in order to develop a better understanding of sarcopenia.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/biomedicines9101301/s1, Table S1: Genetic factors of sarcopenia associated with IBD.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, I.K.-K. and D.S.; writing—original draft preparation, D.S., M.S.-Z., A.E.R. and A.S.-T.; writing—review and editing, D.S., M.S.-Z., A.E.R., A.S.-T., P.E., R.S., A.D. and I.K.-K.; visualization, A.E.R., D.S. and I.K.-K.; supervision, I.K.-K.; project administration, R.S., A.D. and P.E.; funding acquisition, A.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Pizzoferrato, M.; de Sire, R.; Ingravalle, F.; Mentella, M.C.; Petito, V.; Martone, A.M.; Landi, F.; Miggiano, G.A.D.; Mele, M.C.; Lopetuso, L.R.; et al. Characterization of Sarcopenia in an IBD Population Attending an Italian Gastroenterology Tertiary Center. Nutrients 2019, 11, 2281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Dodds, R.M.; Syddall, H.E.; Cooper, R.; Benzeval, M.; Deary, I.J.; Dennison, E.M.; Der, G.; Gale, C.R.; Inskip, H.M.; Jagger, C.; et al. Grip Strength across the Life Course: Normative Data from Twelve British Studies. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e113637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Sayer, A.A.; Syddall, H.E.; Gilbody, H.J.; Dennison, E.M.; Cooper, C. Does Sarcopenia Originate in Early Life? Findings from the Hertfordshire Cohort Study. J. Gerontol. Ser. A 2004, 59, M930–M934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Adams, D.W.; Gurwara, S.; Silver, H.J.; Horst, S.N.; Beaulieu, D.B.; Schwartz, D.A.; Seidner, D.L. Sarcopenia Is Common in Overweight Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease and May Predict Need for Surgery. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2017, 23, 1182–1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Scaldaferri, F.; Pizzoferrato, M.; Lopetuso, L.R.; Musca, T.; Ingravalle, F.; Sicignano, L.L.; Mentella, M.; Miggiano, G.; Mele, M.C.; Gaetani, E.; et al. Nutrition and IBD: Malnutrition and/or Sarcopenia? A Practical Guide. Gastroenterol. Res. Pract. 2017, 2017, 8646495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ryan, E.; McNicholas, D.; Creavin, B.; Kelly, M.E.; Walsh, T.; Beddy, D. Sarcopenia and Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2019, 25, 67–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Benz, E.; Trajanoska, K.; Lahousse, L.; Schoufour, J.D.; Terzikhan, N.; De Roos, E.; de Jonge, G.B.; Williams, R.; Franco, O.H.; Brusselle, G.; et al. Sarcopenia in COPD: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Eur. Respir. Rev. Off. J. Eur. Respir. Soc. 2019, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Kim, G.; Kang, S.H.; Kim, M.Y.; Baik, S.K. Prognostic Value of Sarcopenia in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0186990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Rhee, C.M.; Ahmadi, S.-F.; Kovesdy, C.P.; Kalantar-Zadeh, K. Low-Protein Diet for Conservative Management of Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Controlled Trials. J. Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2018, 9, 235–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ciciliot, S.; Rossi, A.C.; Dyar, K.A.; Blaauw, B.; Schiaffino, S. Muscle Type and Fiber Type Specificity in Muscle Wasting. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2013, 45, 2191–2199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Krenovsky, J.-P.; Bötzel, K.; Ceballos-Baumann, A.; Fietzek, U.M.; Schoser, B.; Maetzler, W.; Ferrari, U.; Drey, M. Interrelation between Sarcopenia and the Number of Motor Neurons in Patients with Parkinsonian Syndromes. Gerontology 2020, 66, 409–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Zhang, T.; Cao, L.; Cao, T.; Yang, J.; Gong, J.; Zhu, W.; Li, N.; Li, J. Prevalence of Sarcopenia and Its Impact on Postoperative Outcome in Patients with Crohn’s Disease Undergoing Bowel Resection. J. Parenter. Enter. Nutr. 2017, 41, 592–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Schneider, S.M.; Al-Jaouni, R.; Filippi, J.; Wiroth, J.-B.; Zeanandin, G.; Arab, K.; Hébuterne, X. Sarcopenia Is Prevalent in Patients with Crohn’s Disease in Clinical Remission. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2008, 14, 1562–1568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lee, C.H.; Yoon, H.; Oh, D.J.; Lee, J.M.; Choi, Y.J.; Shin, C.M.; Park, Y.S.; Kim, N.; Lee, D.H.; Kim, J.S. The Prevalence of Sarcopenia and Its Effect on Prognosis in Patients with Crohn’s Disease. Intest. Res. 2020, 18, 79–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Naseeb, M.A.; Volpe, S.L. Protein and Exercise in the Prevention of Sarcopenia and Aging. Nutr. Res. 2017, 40, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Skrzypczak, D.; Ratajczak, A.E.; Szymczak-Tomczak, A.; Dobrowolska, A.; Eder, P.; Krela-Kaźmierczak, I. A Vicious Cycle of Osteosarcopeniain Inflammatory Bowel Diseases-Aetiology, Clinical Implications and Therapeutic Perspectives. Nutrients 2021, 13, 293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Hardee, J.P.; Lynch, G.S. Current Pharmacotherapies for Sarcopenia. Expert Opin. Pharmacother. 2019, 20, 1645–1657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Rooks, D.; Roubenoff, R. Development of Pharmacotherapies for the Treatment of Sarcopenia. J. Frailty Aging 2019, 8, 120–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bargiggia, S.; Maconi, G.; Elli, M.; Molteni, P.; Ardizzone, S.; Parente, F.; Todaro, I.; Greco, S.; Manzionna, G.; Bianchi Porro, G. Sonographic Prevalence of Liver Steatosis and Biliary Tract Stones in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Study of 511 Subjects at a Single Center. J. Clin. Gastroenterol. 2003, 36, 417–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Tarantino, G.; Citro, V.; Capone, D. Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Challenge from Mechanisms to Therapy. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 9, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Carnac, G.; Ricaud, S.; Vernus, B.; Bonnieu, A. Myostatin: Biology and Clinical Relevance. Mini Rev. Med. Chem. 2006, 6, 765–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. White, T.A.; LeBrasseur, N.K. Myostatin and Sarcopenia: Opportunities and Challenges—A Mini-Review. Gerontology 2014, 60, 289–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Schuelke, M.; Wagner, K.R.; Stolz, L.E.; Hübner, C.; Riebel, T.; Kömen, W.; Braun, T.; Tobin, J.F.; Lee, S.-J. Myostatin Mutation Associated with Gross Muscle Hypertrophy in a Child. N. Engl. J. Med. 2004, 350, 2682–2688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Lee, S.-J. Regulation of Muscle Mass by Myostatin. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2004, 20, 61–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hittel, D.S.; Berggren, J.R.; Shearer, J.; Boyle, K.; Houmard, J.A. Increased Secretion and Expression of Myostatin in Skeletal Muscle from Extremely Obese Women. Diabetes 2009, 58, 30–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Milan, G.; Dalla Nora, E.; Pilon, C.; Pagano, C.; Granzotto, M.; Manco, M.; Mingrone, G.; Vettor, R. Changes in Muscle Myostatin Expression in Obese Subjects after Weight Loss. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2004, 89, 2724–2727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Robertson, D.M.; Klein, R.; de Vos, F.L.; McLachlan, R.I.; Wettenhall, R.E.H.; Hearn, M.T.W.; Burger, H.G.; de Kretser, D.M. The Isolation of Polypeptides with FSH Suppressing Activity from Bovine Follicular Fluid Which Are Structurally Different to Inhibin. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1987, 149, 744–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ueno, N.; Ling, N.; Ying, S.Y.; Esch, F.; Shimasaki, S.; Guillemin, R. Isolation and Partial Characterization of Follistatin: A Single-Chain Mr 35,000 Monomeric Protein That Inhibits the Release of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1987, 84, 8282–8286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Zhang, L.; Liu, K.; Han, B.; Xu, Z.; Gao, X. The Emerging Role of Follistatin under Stresses and Its Implications in Diseases. Gene 2018, 639, 111–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Kreidl, E.; Oztürk, D.; Metzner, T.; Berger, W.; Grusch, M. Activins and Follistatins: Emerging Roles in Liver Physiology and Cancer. World J. Hepatol. 2009, 1, 17–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Polyzos, S.A.; Kountouras, J.; Anastasilakis, A.D.; Triantafyllou, G.A.; Mantzoros, C.S. Activin A and Follistatin in Patients with Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Metabolism 2016, 65, 1550–1558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. López-Otín, C.; Blasco, M.A.; Partridge, L.; Serrano, M.; Kroemer, G. The Hallmarks of Aging. Cell 2013, 153, 1194–1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Powers, S.K.; Kavazis, A.N.; DeRuisseau, K.C. Mechanisms of Disuse Muscle Atrophy: Role of Oxidative Stress. Am. J. Physiol.-Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2005, 288, R337–R344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Gonzalez, A.; Huerta-Salgado, C.; Orozco-Aguilar, J.; Aguirre, F.; Tacchi, F.; Simon, F.; Cabello-Verrugio, C. Role of Oxidative Stress in Hepatic and Extrahepatic Dysfunctions during Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD). Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2020, 2020, e1617805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hong, H.C.; Hwang, S.Y.; Choi, H.Y.; Yoo, H.J.; Seo, J.A.; Kim, S.G.; Kim, N.H.; Baik, S.H.; Choi, D.S.; Choi, K.M. Relationship between Sarcopenia and Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: The Korean Sarcopenic Obesity Study. Hepatol. Baltim. Md. 2014, 59, 1772–1778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Baumann, A.P.; Ibebunjo, C.; Grasser, W.A.; Paralkar, V.M. Myostatin Expression in Age and Denervation-Induced Skeletal Muscle Atrophy. J. Musculoskelet. Neuronal Interact. 2003, 3, 8–16. [Google Scholar]
  37. Raue, U.; Slivka, D.; Jemiolo, B.; Hollon, C.; Trappe, S. Myogenic Gene Expression at Rest and after a Bout of Resistance Exercise in Young (18–30 Yr) and Old (80–89 Yr) Women. J. Appl. Physiol. 2006, 101, 53–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Gilson, H.; Schakman, O.; Combaret, L.; Lause, P.; Grobet, L.; Attaix, D.; Ketelslegers, J.M.; Thissen, J.P. Myostatin Gene Deletion Prevents Glucocorticoid-Induced Muscle Atrophy. Endocrinology 2007, 148, 452–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Pratt, J.; Boreham, C.; Ennis, S.; Ryan, A.W.; De Vito, G. Genetic Associations with Aging Muscle: A Systematic Review. Cells 2019, 9, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Tan, L.-J.; Liu, S.-L.; Lei, S.-F.; Papasian, C.J.; Deng, H.-W. Molecular Genetic Studies of Gene Identification for Sarcopenia. Hum. Genet. 2012, 131, 1–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Jostins, L.; Ripke, S.; Weersma, R.K.; Duerr, R.H.; McGovern, D.P.; Hui, K.Y.; Lee, J.C.; Schumm, L.P.; Sharma, Y.; Anderson, C.A.; et al. Host-Microbe Interactions Have Shaped the Genetic Architecture of Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Nature 2012, 491, 119–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Liu, J.Z.; van Sommeren, S.; Huang, H.; Ng, S.C.; Alberts, R.; Takahashi, A.; Ripke, S.; Lee, J.C.; Jostins, L.; Shah, T.; et al. Association Analyses Identify 38 Susceptibility Loci for Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Highlight Shared Genetic Risk across Populations. Nat. Genet. 2015, 47, 979–986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Patel, H.P.; Jameson, K.A.; Syddall, H.E.; Martin, H.J.; Stewart, C.E.; Cooper, C.; Sayer, A.A. Developmental Influences, Muscle Morphology, and Sarcopenia in Community-Dwelling Older Men. J. Gerontol. A. Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2012, 67, 82–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Loddo, I.; Romano, C. Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Genetics, Epigenetics, and Pathogenesis. Front. Immunol. 2015, 6, 551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Garatachea, N.; Lucía, A. Genes and the Ageing Muscle: A Review on Genetic Association Studies. Age Dordr. Neth. 2013, 35, 207–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Wang, Y.; DeLuca, H.F. Is the Vitamin d Receptor Found in Muscle? Endocrinology 2011, 152, 354–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Woeckel, V.J.; van der Eerden, B.C.J.; Schreuders-Koedam, M.; Eijken, M.; Van Leeuwen, J.P.T.M. 1α,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 Stimulates Activin A Production to Fine-Tune Osteoblast-Induced Mineralization. J. Cell. Physiol. 2013, 228, 2167–2174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Froicu, M.; Weaver, V.; Wynn, T.A.; McDowell, M.A.; Welsh, J.E.; Cantorna, M.T. A Crucial Role for the Vitamin D Receptor in Experimental Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. Mol. Endocrinol. Baltim. Md 2003, 17, 2386–2392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Gabryel, M.; Skrzypczak-Zielinska, M.; Kucharski, M.A.; Slomski, R.; Dobrowolska, A. The Impact of Genetic Factors on Response to Glucocorticoids Therapy in IBD. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 2016, 51, 654–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Langendorf, E.K.; Rommens, P.M.; Drees, P.; Mattyasovszky, S.G.; Ritz, U. Detecting the Effects of the Glucocorticoid Dexamethasone on Primary Human Skeletal Muscle Cells-Differences to the Murine Cell Line. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 2497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Beser, O.F.; Conde, C.D.; Serwas, N.K.; Cokugras, F.C.; Kutlu, T.; Boztug, K.; Erkan, T. Clinical Features of Interleukin 10 Receptor Gene Mutations in Children with Very Early–Onset Inflammatory Bowel Disease. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2015, 60, 332–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Taylor, K.D.; Plevy, S.E.; Yang, H.; Landers, C.J.; Barry, M.J.; Rotter, J.I.; Targan, S.R. ANCA Pattern and LTA Haplotype Relationship to Clinical Responses to Anti-TNF Antibody Treatment in Crohn’s Disease. Gastroenterology 2001, 120, 1347–1355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Späte, U.; Schulze, P.C. Proinflammatory Cytokines and Skeletal Muscle. Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care 2004, 7, 265–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Tierney, M.T.; Aydogdu, T.; Sala, D.; Malecova, B.; Gatto, S.; Puri, P.L.; Latella, L.; Sacco, A. STAT3 Signaling Controls Satellite Cell Expansion and Skeletal Muscle Repair. Nat. Med. 2014, 20, 1182–1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Fan, J.; Kou, X.; Yang, Y.; Chen, N. MicroRNA-Regulated Proinflammatory Cytokines in Sarcopenia. Mediat. Inflamm. 2016, 2016, 1438686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Yanai, K.; Kaneko, S.; Ishii, H.; Aomatsu, A.; Ito, K.; Hirai, K.; Ookawara, S.; Ishibashi, K.; Morishita, Y. MicroRNAs in Sarcopenia: A Systematic Review. Front. Med. 2020, 7, 180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Ghafouri-Fard, S.; Eghtedarian, R.; Taheri, M. The Crucial Role of Non-Coding RNAs in the Pathophysiology of Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2020, 129, 110507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Zimmers, T.A.; Davies, M.V.; Koniaris, L.G.; Haynes, P.; Esquela, A.F.; Tomkinson, K.N.; McPherron, A.C.; Wolfman, N.M.; Lee, S.-J. Induction of Cachexia in Mice by Systemically Administered Myostatin. Science 2002, 296, 1486–1488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Elliott, B.; Renshaw, D.; Getting, S.; Mackenzie, R. The Central Role of Myostatin in Skeletal Muscle and Whole Body Homeostasis. Acta Physiol. 2012, 205, 324–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. González-Freire, M.; Santiago, C.; Gómez-Gallego, F.; Pérez, M.; Foster, C.; Arenas, J.; Lucia, A. Does the K153R Variant of the Myostatin Gene Influence the Clinical Presentation of Women with McArdle Disease? Neuromuscul. Disord. NMD 2009, 19, 220–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Shimasaki, S.; Koga, M.; Esch, F.; Cooksey, K.; Mercado, M.; Koba, A.; Ueno, N.; Ying, S.Y.; Ling, N.; Guillemin, R. Primary Structure of the Human Follistatin Precursor and Its Genomic Organization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1988, 85, 4218–4222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Jones, M.R.; Wilson, S.G.; Mullin, B.H.; Mead, R.; Watts, G.F.; Stuckey, B.G.A. Polymorphism of the Follistatin Gene in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 2007, 13, 237–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Panneerselvam, P.; Sivakumari, K.; Jayaprakash, P.; Srikanth, R. SNP Analysis of Follistatin Gene Associated with Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome. Adv. Appl. Bioinform. Chem. AABC 2010, 3, 111–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Liu, L.; Tan, R.; Liu, J.; Cui, Y.; Liu, J.; Wu, J. Mutational Analysis of the FST Gene in Chinese Women with Idiopathic Premature Ovarian Failure. Climacteric J. Int. Menopause Soc. 2013, 16, 469–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Urbanek, M.; Legro, R.S.; Driscoll, D.A.; Azziz, R.; Ehrmann, D.A.; Norman, R.J.; Strauss, J.F.; Spielman, R.S.; Dunaif, A. Thirty-Seven Candidate Genes for Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: Strongest Evidence for Linkage Is with Follistatin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 8573–8578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Kimura, F.; Sidis, Y.; Bonomi, L.; Xia, Y.; Schneyer, A. The Follistatin-288 Isoform Alone Is Sufficient for Survival but Not for Normal Fertility in Mice. Endocrinology 2010, 151, 1310–1319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Walsh, S.; Metter, E.J.; Ferrucci, L.; Roth, S.M. Activin-Type II Receptor B (ACVR2B) and Follistatin Haplotype Associations with Muscle Mass and Strength in Humans. J. Appl. Physiol. Bethesda Md. 1985 2007, 102, 2142–2148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Bogdanovich, S.; Krag, T.O.B.; Barton, E.R.; Morris, L.D.; Whittemore, L.-A.; Ahima, R.S.; Khurana, T.S. Functional Improvement of Dystrophic Muscle by Myostatin Blockade. Nature 2002, 420, 418–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Tsuchida, K. Myostatin Inhibition by a Follistatin-Derived Peptide Ameliorates the Pathophysiology of Muscular Dystrophy Model Mice. Acta Myol. Myopathies Cardiomyopathies Off. J. Mediterr. Soc. Myol. 2008, 27, 14–18. [Google Scholar]
  70. Tsuchida, K. Targeting Myostatin for Therapies against Muscle-Wasting Disorders. Curr. Opin. Drug Discov. Devel. 2008, 11, 487–494. [Google Scholar]
  71. Wagner, K.R.; Fleckenstein, J.L.; Amato, A.A.; Barohn, R.J.; Bushby, K.; Escolar, D.M.; Flanigan, K.M.; Pestronk, A.; Tawil, R.; Wolfe, G.I.; et al. A Phase I/IItrial of MYO-029 in Adult Subjects with Muscular Dystrophy. Ann. Neurol. 2008, 63, 561–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Becker, C.; Lord, S.R.; Studenski, S.A.; Warden, S.J.; Fielding, R.A.; Recknor, C.P.; Hochberg, M.C.; Ferrari, S.L.; Blain, H.; Binder, E.F.; et al. Myostatin Antibody (LY2495655) in Older Weak Fallers: A Proof-of-Concept, Randomised, Phase 2 Trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2015, 3, 948–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals. A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Ascending Dose Study to Assess. the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacodynamic Effects of REGN2477 Alone and in Combination with REGN1033 in Healthy Postmenopausal Women and Healthy Adult Men. 2019. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02943239 (accessed on 19 June 2019).
  74. Campbell, C.; McMillan, H.J.; Mah, J.K.; Tarnopolsky, M.; Selby, K.; McClure, T.; Wilson, D.M.; Sherman, M.L.; Escolar, D.; Attie, K.M. Myostatin Inhibitor ACE-031 Treatment of Ambulatory Boys with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: Results of a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial. Muscle Nerve 2017, 55, 458–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Lach-Trifilieff, E.; Minetti, G.C.; Sheppard, K.; Ibebunjo, C.; Feige, J.N.; Hartmann, S.; Brachat, S.; Rivet, H.; Koelbing, C.; Morvan, F.; et al. An Antibody Blocking Activin Type II Receptors Induces Strong Skeletal Muscle Hypertrophy and Protects from Atrophy. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2014, 34, 606–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Amato, A.A.; Sivakumar, K.; Goyal, N.; David, W.S.; Salajegheh, M.; Praestgaard, J.; Lach-Trifilieff, E.; Trendelenburg, A.-U.; Laurent, D.; Glass, D.J.; et al. Treatment of Sporadic Inclusion Body Myositis with Bimagrumab. Neurology 2014, 83, 2239–2246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  77. Attie, K.M.; Borgstein, N.G.; Yang, Y.; Condon, C.H.; Wilson, D.M.; Pearsall, A.E.; Kumar, R.; Willins, D.A.; Seehra, J.S.; Sherman, M.L. A Single Ascending-Dose Study of Muscle Regulator ACE-031 in Healthy Volunteers. Muscle Nerve 2013, 47, 416–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Berardi, E.; Annibali, D.; Cassano, M.; Crippa, S.; Sampaolesi, M. Molecular and Cell-Based Therapies for Muscle Degenerations: A Road under Construction. Front. Physiol. 2014, 5, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Morine, K.J.; Bish, L.T.; Pendrak, K.; Sleeper, M.M.; Barton, E.R.; Sweeney, H.L. Systemic Myostatin Inhibition via Liver-Targeted Gene Transfer in Normal and Dystrophic Mice. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e9176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Biomedicines 09 01301 g001 550
Figure 1. Genetics in aetiology of sarcopenia and IBD.
Figure 1. Genetics in aetiology of sarcopenia and IBD.
Biomedicines 09 01301 g001
Biomedicines 09 01301 g002 550
Figure 2. MSTN gene structure, variants distribution and the protein product.
Figure 2. MSTN gene structure, variants distribution and the protein product.
Biomedicines 09 01301 g002
Biomedicines 09 01301 g003 550
Figure 3. FST gene structure and protein product.
Figure 3. FST gene structure and protein product.
Biomedicines 09 01301 g003
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Skrzypczak, D.; Skrzypczak-Zielińska, M.; Ratajczak, A.E.; Szymczak-Tomczak, A.; Eder, P.; Słomski, R.; Dobrowolska, A.; Krela-Kaźmierczak, I. Myostatin and Follistatin—New Kids on the Block in the Diagnosis of Sarcopenia in IBD and Possible Therapeutic Implications. Biomedicines 2021, 9, 1301. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9101301

AMA Style

Skrzypczak D, Skrzypczak-Zielińska M, Ratajczak AE, Szymczak-Tomczak A, Eder P, Słomski R, Dobrowolska A, Krela-Kaźmierczak I. Myostatin and Follistatin—New Kids on the Block in the Diagnosis of Sarcopenia in IBD and Possible Therapeutic Implications. Biomedicines. 2021; 9(10):1301. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9101301

Chicago/Turabian Style

Skrzypczak, Dorota, Marzena Skrzypczak-Zielińska, Alicja Ewa Ratajczak, Aleksandra Szymczak-Tomczak, Piotr Eder, Ryszard Słomski, Agnieszka Dobrowolska, and Iwona Krela-Kaźmierczak. 2021. "Myostatin and Follistatin—New Kids on the Block in the Diagnosis of Sarcopenia in IBD and Possible Therapeutic Implications" Biomedicines 9, no. 10: 1301. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9101301

APA Style

Skrzypczak, D., Skrzypczak-Zielińska, M., Ratajczak, A. E., Szymczak-Tomczak, A., Eder, P., Słomski, R., Dobrowolska, A., & Krela-Kaźmierczak, I. (2021). Myostatin and Follistatin—New Kids on the Block in the Diagnosis of Sarcopenia in IBD and Possible Therapeutic Implications. Biomedicines, 9(10), 1301. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9101301

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop