Next Article in Journal
Tenofovir Hampers the Efficacy of Sorafenib in Prolonging Overall Survival in Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Next Article in Special Issue
Ribosome Biogenesis Serves as a Therapeutic Target for Treating Endometriosis and the Associated Complications
Previous Article in Journal
Smart and Biomimetic 3D and 4D Printed Composite Hydrogels: Opportunities for Different Biomedical Applications
Previous Article in Special Issue
Sphingosine 1-Phosphate (S1P) in the Peritoneal Fluid Skews M2 Macrophage and Contributes to the Development of Endometriosis
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomedicines
Volume 9
Issue 11
10.3390/biomedicines9111536
biomedicines-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Systematic Review

Placenta Previa Complicated with Endometriosis: Contemporary Clinical Management, Molecular Mechanisms, and Future Research Opportunities

by
Shinya Matsuzaki
1,2,*,†,
Yoshikazu Nagase
2,†,
Yutaka Ueda
2,*,
Mamoru Kakuda
2,
Michihide Maeda
1,
Satoko Matsuzaki
3 and
Shoji Kamiura
1
1
Department of Gynecology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka 541-8567, Japan
2
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
3
Osaka General Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka 558-8558, Japan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Authors contributed equally.
Biomedicines 2021, 9(11), 1536; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9111536
Submission received: 25 September 2021 / Revised: 23 October 2021 / Accepted: 23 October 2021 / Published: 26 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Research in Endometriosis 2.0)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Endometriosis is a common gynecological disease characterized by chronic inflammation, with an estimated prevalence of approximately 5–15% in reproductive-aged women. This study aimed to assess the relationship between placenta previa (PP) and endometriosis. We performed a systematic review of the literature until 30 June 2021, and 24 studies met the inclusion criteria. Using an adjusted pooled analysis, we found that women with endometriosis had a significantly increased rate of PP (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 3.17, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.58–3.89) compared to those without endometriosis. In an unadjusted analysis, severe endometriosis was associated with an increased prevalence of PP (OR 11.86, 95% CI 4.32–32.57), whereas non-severe endometriosis was not (OR 2.16, 95% CI 0.95–4.89). Notably, one study showed that PP with endometriosis was associated with increased intraoperative bleeding (1.515 mL versus 870 mL, p < 0.01) compared to those without endometriosis. Unfortunately, no studies assessed the molecular mechanisms underlying PP in patients with endometriosis. Our findings suggest that there is a strong association between endometriosis and a higher incidence of PP, as well as poor surgical outcomes during cesarean delivery. Therefore, the development of novel therapeutic agents or methods is warranted to prevent PP in women with endometriosis.

1. General Overview

Placenta previa (PP) is a well-recognized obstetrical complication of postpartum hemorrhage, and about 50% of pregnant women with PP experience postpartum hemorrhage [1]. Severe postpartum hemorrhage is associated with high maternal morbidity and mortality and leads to approximately 140,000 annual maternal deaths worldwide [2,3,4,5,6]. Moreover, PP is the most significant risk factor for placenta accreta spectrum (PAS). If PP is complicated by PAS, surgical morbidity and mortality drastically increase (e.g., mean blood loss increases from 1200 mL to 3000 mL, hysterectomy rates increase from 3% to 42%, etc.). Recently, endometriosis has been consistently found to be associated with a higher prevalence of PP [7,8] Although the correlation between endometriosis and a higher incidence of PP is robust [9,10,11,12,13], the surgical outcomes in PP patients with endometriosis are unclear.
Endometriosis is an inflammatory benign gynecological condition that involves the presence of dysfunctional endometrial-like stroma and glands frequently with muscular metaplasia and reactive fibrosis outside the uterus [14]. In reproductive-aged women, the estimated prevalence of endometriosis is around 5–15%, and the prevalence of endometriosis is increasing [15,16,17,18]. In fact, in fertile women, the estimated prevalence of endometriosis is approximately 25–50%, although the development of assisted reproductive technology (ART) has led to an increase in pregnancy rates among women with endometriosis [15,16,17,18,19]. Furthermore, the number of PP patients with endometriosis may increase in the future, as ART has increased the rate of successful pregnancies in this population [19,20,21]. In the context of gynecologic surgery, women with endometriosis have been found to have increased rates of ureteral injury and prolonged operative times compared to women without endometriosis [22,23].
For example, as shown in Figure 1, pregnant women with endometriosis often have extrauterine posterior adhesions, making it difficult to exteriorize the uterus. Therefore, PP patients with endometriosis who had a cesarean delivery may have an increased rate of surgical complications compared to PP patients without endometriosis.
We performed a systematic review of computerized databases from their inception until June 2021, synthesizing a narrative review from the findings of previous studies. The primary aim of this review was to focus on the clinical research surrounding PP complicated with endometriosis, as well as studies assessing the molecular characteristics of PP complicated with endometriosis. If no studies were identified in our systematic review regarding the outcome of interest in women with PP complicated with endometriosis, a narrative review about the topic in pregnant women with endometriosis was added.

2. Definition of Endometriosis in Previous Studies

We previously performed a systematic review that assessed the effect of endometriosis on the incidence of postpartum hemorrhage and PP [24]. In this systematic review, 19 studies were included and the definition used in each study was reviewed [7,8,11,12,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39]. Of those (n = 19), women who had undergone surgery for endometriosis were defined as having endometriosis during pregnancy in 10 studies [7,8,11,27,30,31,32,34,36,37]; four others were defined as having past surgery for endometriosis or clinical diagnosis of endometriosis [12,25,33,35]; four studies used the International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 code, and the remaining two studies did not report the criteria they used to define endometriosis. Of the included studies, none used the intraoperative findings of cesarean delivery, histopathological analysis after cesarean delivery, nor clinical diagnosis of endometriosis during pregnancy. Notably, no studies to date have diagnosed endometriosis during pregnancy.
Based on the results of previous studies, and the fact that the accurate diagnosis of endometriosis during pregnancy is difficult, we defined endometriosis during pregnancy in this study as follows: (i) previous surgery for endometriosis; (ii) clinical diagnosis of endometriosis (sonographic findings, pelvic adhesion, uterine posterior adhesion, presence of endometrioma, etc.); (iii) clinical or histopathological diagnosis of endometriosis during cesarean delivery; (iv) classified as endometriosis using an ICD code. In this study, we defined severe endometriosis as those with revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine (rASRM) stage III-IV endometriosis or deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE).

3. Systematic Literature Search

3.1. Approach for the Systematic Literature Review

A systematic literature search was conducted to examine the influence of endometriosis on surgical morbidity in women with PP complicated with endometriosis. The search terms were expanded from our previous systematic review to establish the definition of endometriosis defined in this study. The outcomes of interest for this review were as follows: (i) population-based prevalence of endometriosis during pregnancy; (ii) diagnosis of endometriosis in women with PP during pregnancy; (iii) the influence of endometriosis on the incidence of PP; (iv) the influence of endometriosis on the surgical outcomes of PP patients with endometriosis; and (v) molecular research regarding PP complicated with endometriosis.
In accordance with the 2020 edition of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines [40], a systematic search was performed using PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library from their inception to 30 June 2021, using Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms (if applicable) and medical terms for the concepts of PP complicated with endometriosis.

3.2. Information Sources, Eligibility Criteria, and Search Strategy

Previous articles were screened by their titles, abstracts, and full texts, as previously described with modification [41,42,43,44]. All abstracts were screened by Sa.M. and Sh.M. using the MeSH terms (Supplemental Files S1 and S2) applied in the PubMed search and Cochrane Library search to identify studies that determined the correlation between endometriosis and PP.

3.3. Study Selection

The following inclusion criteria were used: (1) women with endometriosis who met the definition (of endometriosis) in this study; (2) women with pelvic adhesion due to suspected endometriosis (more than half of the patients had a clinical or histopathological diagnosis); (3) original articles that examined the outcome of interest; (4) the incidence of PP complicated with endometriosis was shown; (5) the surgical morbidity of PP complicated with endometriosis was shown; (6) the diagnostic method of PP complicated with endometriosis was shown; and (7) molecular studies that focused on PP complicated with endometriosis.
Studies were excluded according to the following criteria: (1) information was insufficient to identify the outcome of interest; (2) the definition of endometriosis was unclear or did not meet the definition of this study; (3) articles were not written in English; and (4) case reports, case series, letter, conference abstracts, narrative reviews, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses.

3.4. Data Extraction

The author (Sh.M.) extracted all data. The variables were recorded as follows: first author’s name, year of study, study location, number of included women, definition of endometriosis, and outcomes of interest. The data to be included in the analysis were double-checked by two authors (L.M. and Sa.M.).

3.5. Analysis of Outcome Measures and Assessment of Bias Risk

For the analysis of clinical information, we aimed to assess the effect of endometriosis on the surgical outcome of PP. The co-primary objective of this study was to examine the effect of endometriosis on the incidence of PP and surgical outcomes during cesarean delivery in women with PP. Moreover, we examined the effect of severe endometriosis, such as rASRM stage III-IV endometriosis and DIE, on the prevalence of PP. The second objective of this study was to review the diagnosis of women with PP complicated with endometriosis. Further study outcomes included the molecular characteristics of PP complicated with endometriosis.

3.6. Meta-Analysis Plan

Using the eligible data, the risks of the incidence of PP were computed using the 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) of the related values to calculate the odds ratios (OR) for the incidence of PP. The heterogeneity across the studies was examined using I2 statistics to calculate the proportion of total variation. Per version 6.0 of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, heterogeneity was examined based on the I2 value. The severity of heterogeneity was defined as the following modifications: low heterogeneity (0–30%); moderate heterogeneity (30–60%); substantial heterogeneity (50–90%); and considerable heterogeneity (75–100%) [45].
A meta-analysis was also performed, and all images were produced using the RevMan ver. 5.4.1 software (Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen, Denmark). During the pooled analysis, a fixed-effect analysis was applied to the studies with low heterogeneity, and a random-effect analysis was applied to the studies with moderate to considerable heterogeneity.

3.7. Statistical Analyses

Differences in patients’ demographics between the two groups were analyzed using the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate [46]. All statistical analyses were based on two-sided hypotheses, and the threshold for statistical significance was set at a p-value of less than 0.05. The Statistical Package for Social Sciences (IBM SPSS, version 28.0, Armonk, NY, USA) was used for all analyses.

4. Results

4.1. Study Characteristics

A systematic literature search was performed to identify studies that included the outcomes of interest (Figure 2). The number of identified studies were as follows: (i) population-based prevalence of endometriosis during pregnancy (n = 0); (ii) the diagnosis of endometriosis in women with PP during pregnancy (n = 0); (iii) the influence of endometriosis on the incidence of PP (n = 23); (iv) the influence of endometriosis on the surgical morbidity of PP patients with endometriosis (n = 1); and (v) molecular studies focused on PP complicated with endometriosis (n = 0). While endometriosis is strongly correlated with a higher prevalence of PP, our systematic research reveals that there is a scarcity of both clinical and molecular research focused on PP complicated with endometriosis.

4.2. Epidemiology and Outcomes

4.2.1. Results of the Systematic Review

We performed a systematic literature search on the epidemiology of endometriosis during pregnancy. However, to date, no population-based studies have examined the prevalence of endometriosis during pregnancy. To discuss this topic, we performed a narrative review of the prevalence of endometriosis in the general population.

4.2.2. Population-Based Prevalence of Endometriosis in the General Population

Recently, four population-based studies that examined the prevalence of endometriosis in the general population were reported [20,47,48,49,50,51]. The estimated overall prevalence of endometriosis in these population-based studies varies from 0.8–2.0% (approximately 3–5% in reproductive-aged women) [20,47,48,49,50,51]. Nevertheless, some population-based studies support the notion that the prevalence of endometriosis is increasing [51]. Additionally, since the development of ART has increased pregnancy rates among women with endometriosis [15,16,17,18,19], the number of pregnant women with endometriosis may consequently increase [19,20,21]. Therefore, future studies examining the nationwide prevalence of endometriosis during pregnancy are warranted.

4.3. Association between PP and Endometriosis

Results of the Systematic Review

We identified 20 comparator studies and three non-comparator studies that determined the influence of endometriosis on the prevalence of PP (Table 1) [7,8,11,12,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,52,53,54,55]. Of those (n = 23), five were population-based and 18 were retrospective studies. We found that the prevalence of PP in pregnant women with endometriosis ranged from 1.7–17.1%, while the prevalence of PP in pregnant women without endometriosis ranged from 0.5–4.3%. Among the non-comparator studies (n = 3), all included patients with severe endometriosis, such as women with DIE or women with rASRM stage III-IV endometriosis.
A meta-analysis was conducted to examine the influence of endometriosis on the prevalence of PP using the 20 included comparator studies (Table 1) [7,8,11,12,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,52]. A random-effect analysis was conducted due to the existence of substantial heterogeneity. In the unadjusted pooled analysis (n = 20), endometriosis was associated with an increased rate of PP compared to those without endometriosis (Figure 3) (OR 3.61, 95%CI 3.05–4.26; heterogeneity: p < 0.01, I2 = 73%).
Although the search terms were updated to meet the modified definition of endometriosis and the search period was extended, the studies included in the adjusted pooled analysis using the random-effects models were the same as those included in our previous meta-analysis (n = 12) [24]. We found that women with endometriosis were more likely to have a higher rate of PP (Figure 3) (adjusted OR 3.17, 95% CI 2.58–3.89; heterogeneity: p < 0.01, I2 = 86%), compared to those without endometriosis [7,12,25,26,28,31,33,34,35,37,38,39].

4.4. Association between Severe Endometriosis and PP

Results of the Systematic Review

As shown in Table 2, 11 studies determined the influence of severe endometriosis on the incidence of PP in pregnant women. Of these studies (n = 11), six studies compared the obstetric outcomes between women with and without DIE; one study investigated the occurrence of PP in women with and without DIE; one study evaluated the incidence of PP in women with DIE; and three studies evaluated the effect of severe endometriosis (rASRM stage III–IV).
A meta-analysis was performed to determine the impact of severe and non-severe endometriosis on the rate of PP. An unadjusted analysis using the random-effects model was performed to compare the incidence of PP in severe and non-severe endometriosis. In this analysis, women with severe endometriosis had a substantially higher rate of PP compared to those with non-severe endometriosis (Figure 4A) (n = 6, OR 5.22, 95% CI 2.51–10.85; heterogeneity: p = 0.051, I2 = 0%). In the unadjusted analysis using a fixed-effects model, severe endometriosis was associated with an increased prevalence of PP (Figure 4B) (OR 11.86, 95% CI 4.32–32.57; heterogeneity: p = 0.04, I2 = 55%), whereas non-severe endometriosis was not associated with an increased incidence of PP (Figure 5A) (OR 2.16, 95% CI 0.95–4.89; heterogeneity: p = 0.56, I2 = 0%).
In the sub-analysis comparison between women with non-DIE endometriosis and women without endometriosis (fixed-effects analysis), non-DIE endometriosis was not associated with an increased rate of PP (Figure 5B) (n = 3, OR 2.07, 95% CI 0.87–4.94; heterogeneity: p = 0.37, I2 = 0%). Similar results were observed in the comparison between women with rASRM stage I-II endometriosis versus women without endometriosis (Figure 5C) (n = 2, OR 1.10, 95% CI 0.08–14.49; heterogeneity: p = 0.16, I2 = 49%). The results of the meta-analysis suggest that severe endometriosis is associated with an increased rate of PP, whereas non-severe endometriosis is not.

4.5. Influence of Endometriosis on the Surgical Outcomes of PP Patients

In this systematic literature search, we identified one study that reported the surgical morbidity of PP patients with endometriosis [56]. This study included 24 women with PP who had posterior extrauterine adhesion. Of these patients, approximately 20% (5/24) had histologically confirmed endometriosis, 50% (12/24) were diagnosed with endometriosis based on intraoperative findings during cesarean delivery, and the remaining approximately 30% (7/24) were suspected to have endometriosis since uterine exteriorization was infeasible due to posterior extrauterine adhesion. In this study, they used propensity score-matching (PS-matching) analysis to match the patient’s background. After PS-matching (n = 72), median intraoperative bleeding was substantially higher in the endometriosis group (n = 24) compared to those in the control group (n = 48) (1.515 mL versus 870 mL, p < 0.01), whereas the transfusion rate was comparable between the two groups (2/24 (8.3%) versus 2/48 (4.2%), p = 0.60).
This retrospective study also examined the characteristics of PP complicated with endometriosis and found that endometriosis was correlated with a higher rate of total PP (66.7% vs. 42.7%, p = 0.04), posterior placenta (95.8% versus 63.2%, p < 0.01), longer cervical length (56.1 mm versus 36.1 mm, p < 0.01), and increased intraoperative bleeding (1.515 mL versus 870 mL, p < 0.01) compared to those without endometriosis [56]. These findings suggest that PP complicated with endometriosis appears to be a high risk factor for postpartum hemorrhage; however, the underlying cause of increased intraoperative bleeding remains unclear.

4.6. Diagnosis of Endometriosis in Women with PP during Pregnancy

4.6.1. Results of the Systematic Review

During our systematic review, we found no studies assessing the diagnosis of endometriosis in women with PP during pregnancy. Moreover, identifying pelvic adhesions using imaging modalities remains challenging even in non-pregnant women [57]. These findings suggest that although there is a strong association between endometriosis and PP, and that identifying the presence of endometriosis is important, the diagnostic method of endometriosis, except for endometrioma during pregnancy, is understudied.

4.6.2. Diagnostic Method of Extrauterine Posterior Wall Adhesion during Pregnancy

Clinicians earlier had a preconception that pregnancy had a beneficial effect on endometriosis; however, a systematic review of endometriosis during pregnancy that evaluated the progression of endometriosis during pregnancy refuted this theory [58]. The systematic review concluded that the data available on the progress of endometriosis during pregnancy showed fewer significant implications than previously reported [58]. Since no effective diagnostic method for endometriosis during pregnancy has been reported, it is necessary to determine the presence of endometriosis and/or any past surgical history of endometriosis before pregnancy through a medical interview.
Our previous retrospective study reported a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) finding that predicts posterior uterine adhesion in women with PP. In the retrospective study, a total of 96 women with PP were included, 21 of whom had posterior uterine adhesions. However, the cause of posterior extrauterine adhesion was not clarified; thus, the study did not meet the inclusion criteria for this review. Nevertheless, we focused on and defined the angle of the uterine cervix in this study as shown in Figure 6. The mean cervical canal angle was 38.4°, and the angle decreased by 3.3° per week in women without extrauterine posterior adhesions. In contrast, the mean cervical canal angle was 5.95° in the extrauterine posterior adhesion group, which increased by roughly 0.2° per gestational week (p < 0.01).

5. Molecular Mechanisms

5.1. Molecular Research Focused on PP Complicated with Endometriosis

We were unable to identify any studies assessing the underlying molecular mechanisms of PP complicated with endometriosis during our systematic review. However, a few studies have reported a possible mechanism explaining the association between endometriosis and an increased rate of PP [58].

5.2. Role of Estrogen in Endometriosis

Previous studies have proposed a possible mechanism by which a congenital ectopic or transplanted endometrium develops into endometriosis. Furthermore, intracellular estrogen production significantly affects the etiology of endometriosis [14]. Aromatase P450 is physiologically expressed in a variety of human tissues such as adipose tissue and in the ovaries, but not usually in the endometrium, and it catalyzes the conversion of androgens to estrogens [59]. Notably, this enzyme has been found in both endometrial tissue and ectopic endometrium in patients with endometriosis [14,60]. Furthermore, in women with endometriosis, the protective activity of 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (17β-HSD) type 2 is missing due to a loss of the enzyme [61]. This is important because 17β-HSD lowers the levels of the potent 17β-estradiol, converts it to estrone, and modulates exposure to estrogenic effects. Therefore, local estrogen production combined with the loss of protective mechanisms likely leads to high estradiol levels that characterize both endometriosis and ectopic endometrium in affected women [14].
To our knowledge, the association between local estrogen levels and the rate of PP has not been determined. However, high serum estradiol levels, when the human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) is triggered during assisted reproductive treatment, have been associated with an increased rate of PP (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.13–1.65) [62]. Furthermore, high serum estradiol leads to a thicker endometrium, and an endometrial thickness of >12 mm is associated with an increased risk of PP (adjusted-OR: 3.74, 95% CI: 1.90–7.34) compared to women with an endometrial thickness of <9 mm [63]. Therefore, high serum estrogen levels and a thick endometrium in women with endometriosis may lead to a high rate of PP [63]. Future studies that examine the association between serum estrogen level, local estrogen level, endometrial thickness, and the rate of PP are therefore warranted.

5.3. Possible Mechanisms Underlying the Increased Rate of PP in Endometriosis

Molecular studies examining the mechanisms responsible for the increased occurrence of PP patients with endometriosis are scarce. To achieve a successful human pregnancy, a number of critical stages are surpassed, including the following: (i) implantation of the blastocyst into the endometrium; (ii) successful placentation in the endometrium; and (iii) remodeling of the uterine vasculature. Furthermore, implantation deferred beyond the window of receptivity may lead to misguided implantation of the embryo, which can result in PP (abnormal placentation), PAS disorders (ectopic placentation), or placental insufficiency causing fetal growth restriction and/or a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy [58,64]. Therefore, deferred implantation is a possible mechanism underlying the increased rate of PP in pregnant women with endometriosis.
Another possible mechanism is inadequate uterine contractility. Specifically, uterine contractions are observed throughout the menstrual cycle or pregnancy in both non-pregnant and pregnant women [58]. In fact, in non-pregnant women, the uterus displays wave-like activity throughout the menstrual cycle and this activity is known as ‘endometrial waves’ [65]. These contractions seem to involve the sub-endometrial layer of the uterine myometrium [58]. Approximately 1–2 contraction waves occur per minute and last for 10–15 s in the early follicular phase with a low amplitude [66]. The frequency and amplitude of these contractions decrease during the luteal phase, likely to facilitate implantation. In the absence of blastocyst implantation, the contraction frequency remains low; however, the amplitude increases significantly, creating contractions during the menstrual period similar to those observed in labor [66].
Notably, women with endometriosis have been shown to have uterine contractions with a higher frequency, amplitude, and basal pressure tone compared to women without endometriosis [67]. Taken together, PP in women with endometriosis may result from these abnormal uterine contractions.

5.4. Molecular Aspects of Endometriosis-Associated Pelvic Adhesion

Previous studies have suggested that endometriosis is a disorder correlated with an inflammatory response in the peritoneal cavity and is therefore considered to be a chronic inflammatory disease [68,69]. Intraperitoneal chronic inflammation and the growth and persistence of vascularized endometrial tissue outside of the uterus are characteristic features of endometriosis [70]. In the acute phase, transplanted ectopic endometrium induces an inflammatory response, which is associated with conscription and stimulation of regulatory T (Tregs) and helper T cells [71,72]. After the acute phase, monocytes and macrophages sustain a chronic state of inflammation, which promotes angiogenesis and peritoneal adhesion formation [71].
These hypotheses are supported by studies utilizing animal models. For example, one study conducted in baboons (Papio anubis) examined the role of Tregs in promoting and maintaining ectopic endometrial growth [73]. The findings in this study showed that the level of Tregs decreased in the ectopic endometrium, which led to an increase in the volume of ectopic endometrium allowing for the maintenance and growth of lesions [73]. Another study examined the role of macrophages using a murine model, in which macrophages were depleted using clodronate liposomes or monoclonal antibodies [70]. This study found that tissue fragments adhered and implanted into the abdominal peritoneal wall, but ectopic endometrial cells failed to organize and develop, whereas ectopic endometrial cells were organized in control mice [70].
In terms of human data, most studies have shown an increase in the presence of inflammatory mediators (chemokines, cytokines, and prostaglandins) in the peritoneal fluid of women with endometriosis [74,75]. Moreover, few human studies have focused on the role of Tregs in women with endometriosis. For example, one case-control study including 17 histopathologically-confirmed ovarian endometriosis patients and 15 women without endometriosis compared the percentage of CD25 (high) FOXP3+ Treg cells in the peripheral blood and peritoneal fluid between the groups [76]. In this study, women with endometriosis were more likely to have a decreased percentage of CD25 (high) FOXP3+ Treg cells in the peripheral blood than women in the control group. In contrast, the percentage of these cells substantially increased in the peritoneal fluid of endometriosis patients [76]. These results suggest that intraperitoneal Treg cells can repress effector T cells and stimulate proliferation and spread of endometrial stromal cells [71].

5.5. Genetics: Hereditary Genetic Polymorphism

The idea of a genetic basis for the development of endometriosis stems from years of observations showing the familial occurrence of the disease [77,78,79,80]. Especially in women with monochorionic twins (n = 42), 40 pairs were concordant (>80%) for endometriosis. These results suggested that genetic factors are associated with the development of endometriosis.
Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) account for about 90% of the total phenotypic variability [80]. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) can identify SNPs with effects on the risk for disease or those that affect the mean value of a quantitative trait [81] and several studies have already examined endometriosis-associated SNPs. Early GWAS on endometriosis have been reported between 2010 and 2011 [80]; two were studies on the Japanese population [82,83] and one was on the European population [84]. Since then, more than 15 GWAS have been reported and a systematic review of GWAS in endometriosis published until the end of 2019 revealed that WNT4 rs7521902, IL1A rs6542095, FN1 rs1250248, GREB1 rs13394619, and VEZT rs10859871 variants appeared to be important as the frequency was high and in terms of pathways as well as function that each gene affected in the development of endometriosis [85].
Reproducibility and validation of these variants in different populations are essential to better understand the etiology of endometriosis, optimize diagnosis, and improve the efficacy of clinical treatments [80]. Investigation of the relationship between gene expression and polymorphisms and endometriosis has the potential to contribute to developing new treatment strategies. However, to date, these studies have not yet been translated into clinical practice; thus, future molecular studies are expected to develop personalized therapies for endometriosis to decrease the rate of PP.

5.6. Genetics: Somatic Mutations

The association between endometriosis and ovarian cancer, especially in clear cell carcinoma or endometrioid carcinoma, led to an interest in the role of somatic mutations in genes implicated in ovarian cancer [86,87]. With regard to cancer-associated gene mutations in endometriosis, KRAS, ARID1A, PIK3CA, and PPP2R1A are frequently noted [88,89].
In non-cancer patients, an analysis of the exomes of nodules in 24 women with DIE, as compared to those in adjacent normal peritoneum was performed. Of these (n = 24), five women (21%) showed somatic mutations in endometriotic tissue for ARID1A, KRAS, PIK3CA, and PPP2R1A with mutations confined to glandular epithelial cells [86,90].
Exome and targeted sequencing analysis of epithelium isolated from 107 endometrioma samples compared to 82 histologically normal ectopic endometrial samples, identified hotspot mutation sites in KRAS and PIK3CA in both endometrium and endometrial epithelium [91]. The marked increase in mutant allele frequency of cancer-related genes in endometriotic epithelium suggests that retrograde flow of endometrial cells already harboring cancer-related mutations, selectively predominate in ectopic locations, leading to the development of endometriosis [91].
The impact of these mutations on the development of endometriosis is complex and highlights the need for further evaluation. Moreover, while the association between endometriosis and ovarian cancer has already been examined in numerous studies [88,92,93,94,95,96,97,98], the effect of these mutations on the prevalence of PP has not been reported. Further studies are warranted to examine the effect of these mutations on the prevalence of PP. We believe that by identifying genes undergoing mutations in endometriosis, a novel treatment that blocks endometriosis development may be able to decrease the incidence of PP.

6. Discussion

6.1. Key Findings

The key findings of this study consist of the following points: (i) severe endometriosis is related to a higher prevalence of PP, whereas non-severe endometriosis is not; (ii) only one comparator study examined the surgical morbidity of women with PP with endometriosis; (iii) there is a lack of studies assessing the underlying molecular mechanisms of endometriosis during pregnancy. Although the finding of a correlation between severe endometriosis and a higher occurrence of PP is unique, the mechanism(s) underlying the lack of an association between non-severe endometriosis and an increased rate of PP is unresolved and thus warrants future studies.

6.2. Comparison with Existing Literature

6.2.1. Relationship between Endometriosis and PP

While previous systematic reviews, including our previous work, have already reported that endometriosis correlated to a higher occurrence of PP [9,10,58,99], it was not examined according to the severity of endometriosis; thus, we believe that the results of our systematic review are relevant. In contrast, as the findings of our systematic review were based on a univariate pooled analysis and the number of included studies was limited, we should note that this analysis may have severe bias.

6.2.2. Surgical Outcomes of PP Complicated with Endometriosis

While there is a strong association between endometriosis and a higher rate of PP, data regarding surgical morbidity in PP patients with endometriosis remains scarce.
We identified one study that compared and examined the surgical outcomes between PP patients with and without endometriosis [56]. This study suggested that PP complicated with endometriosis appears to be a high risk factor for postpartum hemorrhage; however, the reason for increased intraoperative bleeding remains unclear. Although the results from this study are unique, there are still some concerns regarding the diagnosis of endometriosis [100,101,102]. For example, among the 24 patients, seven had a history of endometriosis, 12 were confirmed to have endometriosis by intraoperative findings, and the remaining cases were suspected to have endometriosis based on the infeasibility of uterine exteriorization due to extrauterine posterior wall adhesion. Therefore, it is important to note that because the quality of diagnosis for endometriosis in this study was low, the results need to be thoroughly interpreted. Moreover, the number of patients included in this study was limited; thus, future studies are needed to confirm these findings.
The hypotheses for increased intraoperative blood loss during cesarean delivery in women with PP complicated with endometriosis were tested, and the results are as follows: (i) adverse surgical outcomes were observed in women with endometriosis who had a cesarean delivery [24]; (ii) there is a possibility that endometriosis leads to increased incidence of cesarean delivery difficulty due to pelvic adhesions. Given that women with severe endometriosis, such as DIE, have been reported to have high surgical morbidity during cesarean delivery, we consider that these results support our hypotheses [8].

6.2.3. Proposed Surgical Treatment for Postpartum Hemorrhage in Women with PP Complicated with Endometriosis

In general, various procedures, including, uterine compression suture, intrauterine balloon tamponade (IUBT), uterine artery embolization, and hysterectomy, can be performed in women with PP [5,103,104,105,106,107,108,109]. Of these, uterine exteriorization is crucial to perform uterine compression sutures. We consider that adhesions of the intestine and/or ovaries to the uterine posterior wall frequently make these techniques difficult to achieve.
Nevertheless, placement of the IUBT for PP complicated with endometriosis is difficult since the balloon catheter is twisted by the long, narrow cervix with strong retroflexion of the uterus [56]. Therefore, the exteriorization of the uterus is required to fix the strong retroflexion, which induces further bleeding from the uterine posterior wall due to inevitable detachment of the pelvic adhesion. Due to these factors, it is exceptionally challenging to insert the intrauterine balloon transabdominally through a uterine incision or transvaginally without performing uterine exteriorization [56].
To overcome the difficulty of IUBT placement, we propose the use of the Nelaton catheter method for cervical passage during IUBT placement. This method was originally described by Matsubara et al. as a simple and quick method for the placement of an IUBT during cesarean delivery in women with PP complicated with postpartum hemorrhage [110,111,112,113]. We modified this method into one that facilitates the insertion of IUBT without exteriorization of the uterus and allows passage through the long and narrow cervix (Figure 7). An intraoperative movie depicting this method is shown in Supplemental File S3.
Supplemental File S3. Intraoperative movie inserting the Bakri balloon using the modified Matsubara method.
This case involved a woman with complete PP without endometriosis, and a postpartum hemorrhage was observed during cesarean delivery. Inserting the Bakri balloon using the modified Matsubara method is a quick and easy method to place a Bakri balloon. In this case, this method successfully controlled the postpartum hemorrhage due to PP.

6.3. Strengths and Limitations

This study is likely to be the first to focus on the surgical outcomes of PP patients with endometriosis. We found that patients with PP and endometriosis may experience increased intraoperative blood loss during cesarean delivery. Our study also found that endometriosis is correlated with a higher occurrence of PP. Moreover, severe endometriosis is associated with an increased incidence of PP. Notably, a meta-analysis comparing severe versus non-severe endometriosis on the incidence of PP has not been conducted; thus, this can be also considered the strength of this study.
However, some notable limitations of this study exist. First, since all studies included in the review were retrospective in nature, there was an unmeasured bias in this meta-analysis. Other possible confounding factors of this meta-analysis included the various definitions of endometriosis among the identified studies, the limited number of PP patients with endometriosis, and the substandard quality of the diagnoses in some of the studies. These factors may lead to severe bias in the study. Second, we only found one similar study that determined the surgical outcomes between PP patients with and without endometriosis. However, the definition of endometriosis was ambiguous in that study, and future studies should aim to confirm our observations.
Third, women with endometriosis are more likely to conceive by ART than those without endometriosis [19,114]. Although various factors (advanced maternal age, ART pregnancy, maternal smoking, etc.) are correlated with a higher rate of PP [100,101,102], most studies [7,8,11,25,26,27,29,30,31,32,35,36,37] did not perform a multivariate analysis with adjustments for obstetric background; thus, our study cannot distinguish endometriosis as an independent risk factor for PP due to the confounding factors.
Fourth, studies that stratify the rate of PP along with the severity of endometriosis using the rASRM scoring system or DIE are limited. Importantly, a multivariate analysis with adjustments for the obstetric background has not been performed. Therefore, our analysis regarding the association between the relationship of endometriosis and the incidence of PP has the possibility of severe bias. Taken together, these are notable limitations that readers should recognize when interpreting the results of this meta-analysis.

6.4. Conclusions and Implications

6.4.1. Implications for Practice

Endometriosis is associated with adverse maternal outcomes during cesarean delivery, such as postpartum hemorrhage, hysterectomy, and bladder injury. Furthermore, endometriosis is associated with increased intraoperative blood loss during cesarean delivery for PP, which leads to adverse surgical outcomes. Future research focused on identifying intraoperative treatments that improve the surgical outcomes of women with PP complicated with endometriosis is warranted.

6.4.2. Implications for Clinical Research

Alleviating the adverse surgical outcomes of PP complicated with endometriosis as well as identifying the presence of endometriosis will help clinicians prevent the incidence of adverse events. Nevertheless, there is a scarcity of research assessing the diagnostic methods used during pregnancy. Since MRI is not routinely performed due to its high cost, future studies assessing the efficacy of diagnosing endometriosis during pregnancy using transvaginal ultrasonography are needed.

6.4.3. Implications for Molecular Research

While we are moving towards unraveling the molecular and cellular pathogenesis of endometriosis, novel treatments that block the formation of pelvic adhesions and decrease the incidence of PP in women with endometriosis have not yet been developed. To that end, more research examining the mechanisms underlying the increased rate of PP in women with endometriosis is necessary for the development of these novel treatments.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/biomedicines9111536/s1, Supplemental File S1: The search strategy for the study about the diagnosis of endometriosis during pregnancy.; Supplemental File S2: The search strategy for the study that examined the effect of placenta previa on the rate of placenta previa.; Supplemental File S3: Intraoperative movie inserting the Bakri balloon using the modified Matsubara method.

Author Contributions

S.M. (Shinya Matsuzakiand), Y.N. and Y.U. designed the study, initiated the collaborations, cleaned and analyzed the data, created the figures and tables, interpreted the results, and drafted and revised the manuscript with others. S.M. (Shinya Matsuzakiand) and Y.U. are the corresponding authors of the study. S.M. (Satoko Matsuzaki) contributed to the literature overview, intellectual inputs, interpreted the results, and edited the manuscript. M.K., Y.N. and S.K. contributed to the study concept and design, instructed on the analytic approach, and interpreted the results. S.M. (Satoko Matsuzaki) and M.M. revised the manuscript. S.K. supervised the study and revised the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Osaka University (No. 16054, approved on 14 June 2016).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All the studies included in this study are published in the literature.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank M. Lee, S. Kakuda, H. Sakaguchi, M. Koizumi, M. Watanabe, and T. Hisa for their assistance in preparing this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

Research funding, MSD (S.M.); none for others. The funder had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

References

  1. Rosenberg, T.; Pariente, G.; Sergienko, R.; Wiznitzer, A.; Sheiner, E. Critical analysis of risk factors and outcome of placenta previa. Arch. Gynecol. Obs. 2011, 284, 47–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Adnan, N.; Conlan-Trant, R.; McCormick, C.; Boland, F.; Murphy, D.J. Intramuscular versus intravenous oxytocin to prevent postpartum haemorrhage at vaginal delivery: Randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2018, 362, k3546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Bishanga, D.R.; Charles, J.; Tibaijuka, G.; Mutayoba, R.; Drake, M.; Kim, Y.M.; Plotkin, M.; Rusibamayila, N.; Rawlins, B. Improvement in the active management of the third stage of labor for the prevention of postpartum hemorrhage in Tanzania: A cross-sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2018, 18, 223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Pacheco, L.D.; Saade, G.R.; Costantine, M.M.; Clark, S.L.; Hankins, G.D. An update on the use of massive transfusion protocols in obstetrics. Am. J. Obs. Gynecol. 2016, 214, 340–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Matsuzaki, S.; Endo, M.; Ueda, Y.; Mimura, K.; Kakigano, A.; Egawa-Takata, T.; Kumasawa, K.; Yoshino, K.; Kimura, T. A case of acute Sheehan's syndrome and literature review: A rare but life-threatening complication of postpartum hemorrhage. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2017, 17, 188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Kearney, L.; Kynn, M.; Reed, R.; Davenport, L.; Young, J.; Schafer, K. Identifying the risk: A prospective cohort study examining postpartum haemorrhage in a regional Australian health service. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2018, 18, 214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Berlac, J.F.; Hartwell, D.; Skovlund, C.W.; Langhoff-Roos, J.; Lidegaard, O. Endometriosis increases the risk of obstetrical and neonatal complications. Acta Obs. Gynecol. Scand. 2017, 96, 751–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Exacoustos, C.; Lauriola, I.; Lazzeri, L.; De Felice, G.; Zupi, E. Complications during pregnancy and delivery in women with untreated rectovaginal deep infiltrating endometriosis. Fertil. Steril. 2016, 106, 1129–1135.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Lalani, S.; Choudhry, A.J.; Firth, B.; Bacal, V.; Walker, M.; Wen, S.W.; Singh, S.; Amath, A.; Hodge, M.; Chen, I. Endometriosis and adverse maternal, fetal and neonatal outcomes, a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum. Reprod. 2018, 33, 1854–1865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Zullo, F.; Spagnolo, E.; Saccone, G.; Acunzo, M.; Xodo, S.; Ceccaroni, M.; Berghella, V. Endometriosis and obstetrics complications: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil. Steril. 2017, 108, 667–672.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Uccella, S.; Manzoni, P.; Cromi, A.; Marconi, N.; Gisone, B.; Miraglia, A.; Biasoli, S.; Zorzato, P.C.; Ferrari, S.; Lanzo, G.; et al. Pregnancy after Endometriosis: Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes according to the Location of the Disease. Am. J. Perinatol. 2019, 36, S91–S98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Miura, M.; Ushida, T.; Imai, K.; Wang, J.; Moriyama, Y.; Nakano-Kobayashi, T.; Osuka, S.; Kikkawa, F.; Kotani, T. Adverse effects of endometriosis on pregnancy: A case-control study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2019, 19, 373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Matsuzaki, S.; Okada, A.; Endo, M.; Nagase, Y.; Nakagawa, S.; Hiramatsu, K.; Kakigano, A.; Mimura, K.; Takiuchi, T.; Tomimatsu, T.; et al. Horizontal Cervix as a Novel Sign for Predicting Adhesions on the Posterior Extrauterine Wall in Cases of Placenta Previa. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8, 2141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Lagana, A.S.; Garzon, S.; Gotte, M.; Vigano, P.; Franchi, M.; Ghezzi, F.; Martin, D.C. The Pathogenesis of Endometriosis: Molecular and Cell Biology Insights. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Fuldeore, M.J.; Soliman, A.M. Prevalence and Symptomatic Burden of Diagnosed Endometriosis in the United States: National Estimates from a Cross-Sectional Survey of 59,411 Women. Gynecol. Obstet. Investig. 2017, 82, 453–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Macer, M.L.; Taylor, H.S. Endometriosis and infertility: A review of the pathogenesis and treatment of endometriosis-associated infertility. Obstet. Gynecol. Clin. N. Am. 2012, 39, 535–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Meuleman, C.; Vandenabeele, B.; Fieuws, S.; Spiessens, C.; Timmerman, D.; D'Hooghe, T. High prevalence of endometriosis in infertile women with normal ovulation and normospermic partners. Fertil. Steril. 2009, 92, 68–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Horton, J.; Sterrenburg, M.; Lane, S.; Maheshwari, A.; Li, T.C.; Cheong, Y. Reproductive, obstetric, and perinatal outcomes of women with adenomyosis and endometriosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum. Reprod. Update 2019, 25, 592–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Senapati, S.; Sammel, M.D.; Morse, C.; Barnhart, K.T. Impact of endometriosis on in vitro fertilization outcomes: An evaluation of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technologies Database. Fertil. Steril. 2016, 106, 164–171.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Eisenberg, V.H.; Weil, C.; Chodick, G.; Shalev, V. Epidemiology of endometriosis: A large population-based database study from a healthcare provider with 2 million members. BJOG 2018, 125, 55–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Nagase, Y.; Matsuzaki, S.; Mizuta-Odani, C.; Onishi, H.; Tanaka, H.; Nakagawa, S.; Mimura, K.; Tomimatsu, T.; Endo, M.; Kimura, T. In-vitro fertilisation-embryo-transfer complicates the antenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta spectrum using MRI: A retrospective analysis. Clin. Radiol. 2020, 75, 927–933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Uccella, S.; Marconi, N.; Casarin, J.; Ceccaroni, M.; Boni, L.; Sturla, D.; Serati, M.; Carollo, S.; Podesta' Alluvion, C.; Ghezzi, F. Impact of endometriosis on surgical outcomes and complications of total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2016, 294, 771–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hwang, J.H.; Lim, M.C.; Joung, J.Y.; Seo, S.S.; Kang, S.; Seo, H.K.; Chung, J.; Park, S.Y. Urologic complications of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy. Int. Urogynecol. J. 2012, 23, 1605–1611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Matsuzaki, S.; Nagase, Y.; Ueda, Y.; Lee, M.; Matsuzaki, S.; Maeda, M.; Takiuchi, T.; Kakigano, A.; Mimura, K.; Endo, M.; et al. The association of endometriosis with placenta previa and postpartum hemorrhage: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. MFM 2021, 3, 100417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Epelboin, S.; Labrosse, J.; Fauque, P.; Levy, R.; Gervoise-Boyer, M.J.; Devaux, A.; Bergere, M.; de Vienne, C.; Jonveaux, P.; De Mouzon, J.; et al. Endometriosis and assisted reproductive techniques independently related to mother-child morbidities: A French longitudinal national study. Reprod. Biomed. Online 2021, 42, 627–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yi, K.W.; Cho, G.J.; Park, K.; Han, S.W.; Shin, J.H.; Kim, T.; Hur, J.Y. Endometriosis Is Associated with Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: A National Population-Based Study. Reprod. Sci. 2020, 27, 1175–1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Lin, S.; Xie, X.; Guo, Y.; Zhang, H.; Liu, C.; Yi, J.; Su, Y.; Deng, Q.; Zhu, W. Clinical characteristics and pregnancy outcomes of infertile patients with endometriosis and endometrial polyps: A retrospective cohort study. Taiwan. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2020, 59, 916–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Shmueli, A.; Salman, L.; Hiersch, L.; Ashwal, E.; Hadar, E.; Wiznitzer, A.; Yogev, Y.; Aviram, A. Obstetrical and neonatal outcomes of pregnancies complicated by endometriosis. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019, 32, 845–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chen, I.; Lalani, S.; Xie, R.H.; Shen, M.; Singh, S.S.; Wen, S.W. Association between surgically diagnosed endometriosis and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Fertil. Steril. 2018, 109, 142–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Nirgianakis, K.; Gasparri, M.L.; Radan, A.P.; Villiger, A.; McKinnon, B.; Mosimann, B.; Papadia, A.; Mueller, M.D. Obstetric complications after laparoscopic excision of posterior deep infiltrating endometriosis: A case-control study. Fertil. Steril. 2018, 110, 459–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Li, H.; Zhu, H.L.; Chang, X.H.; Li, Y.; Wang, Y.; Guan, J.; Cui, H. Effects of Previous Laparoscopic Surgical Diagnosis of Endometriosis on Pregnancy Outcomes. Chin. Med. J. 2017, 130, 428–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Mannini, L.; Sorbi, F.; Noci, I.; Ghizzoni, V.; Perelli, F.; Di Tommaso, M.; Mattei, A.; Fambrini, M. New adverse obstetrics outcomes associated with endometriosis: A retrospective cohort study. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2017, 295, 141–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Benaglia, L.; Candotti, G.; Papaleo, E.; Pagliardini, L.; Leonardi, M.; Reschini, M.; Quaranta, L.; Munaretto, M.; Viganò, P.; Candiani, M.; et al. Pregnancy outcome in women with endometriosis achieving pregnancy with IVF. Hum. Reprod. 2016, 31, 2730–2736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Fujii, T.; Wada-Hiraike, O.; Nagamatsu, T.; Harada, M.; Hirata, T.; Koga, K.; Fujii, T.; Osuga, Y. Assisted reproductive technology pregnancy complications are significantly associated with endometriosis severity before conception: A retrospective cohort study. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2016, 14, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Harada, T.; Taniguchi, F.; Onishi, K.; Kurozawa, Y.; Hayashi, K.; Harada, T. Obstetrical Complications in Women with Endometriosis: A Cohort Study in Japan. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0168476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Baggio, S.; Pomini, P.; Zecchin, A.; Garzon, S.; Bonin, C.; Santi, L.; Festi, A.; Franchi, M.P. Delivery and pregnancy outcome in women with bowel resection for deep endometriosis: A retrospective cohort study. Gynecol. Surg. 2015, 12, 279–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lin, H.; Leng, J.H.; Liu, J.T.; Lang, J.H. Obstetric outcomes in Chinese women with endometriosis: A retrospective cohort study. Chin. Med. J. 2015, 128, 455–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Takemura, Y.; Osuga, Y.; Fujimoto, A.; Oi, N.; Tsutsumi, R.; Koizumi, M.; Yano, T.; Taketani, Y. Increased risk of placenta previa is associated with endometriosis and tubal factor infertility in assisted reproductive technology pregnancy. Gynecol. Endocrinol. Off. J. Int. Soc. Gynecol. Endocrinol. 2013, 29, 113–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Healy, D.L.; Breheny, S.; Halliday, J.; Jaques, A.; Rushford, D.; Garrett, C.; Talbot, J.M.; Baker, H.W. Prevalence and risk factors for obstetric haemorrhage in 6730 singleton births after assisted reproductive technology in Victoria Australia. Hum. Reprod. 2010, 25, 265–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Moher, D. Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: Development of the PRISMA 2020 statement. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2021, 134, 103–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Matsuzaki, S.; Lee, M.; Nagase, Y.; Jitsumori, M.; Matsuzaki, S.; Maeda, M.; Takiuchi, T.; Kakigano, A.; Mimura, K.; Ueda, Y.; et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of obstetric and maternal outcomes after prior uterine artery embolization. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 16914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Matsuzaki, S.; Yoshino, K.; Endo, M.; Tomimatsu, T.; Takiuchi, T.; Mimura, K.; Kumasawa, K.; Ueda, Y.; Kimura, T. Successful anticoagulant therapy for disseminated intravascular coagulation during conservative management of placenta percreta: A case report and literature review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2017, 17, 443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Matsuzaki, S.; Jitsumori, M.; Hara, T.; Matsuzaki, S.; Nakagawa, S.; Miyake, T.; Takiuchi, T.; Kakigano, A.; Kobayashi, E.; Tomimatsu, T.; et al. Systematic review on the needle and suture types for uterine compression sutures: A literature review. BMC Surg. 2019, 19, 196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Matsuzaki, S.; Matsuzaki, S.; Chang, E.J.; Yasukawa, M.; Roman, L.D.; Matsuo, K. Surgical and oncologic outcomes of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for uterine leiomyosarcoma: A systematic review of literature. Gynecol. Oncol. 2021, 161, 70–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Chapter 10: Analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses. In Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions; Version 6.1; 2020; Available online: https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/current/chapter-10 (accessed on 18 December 2020).
  46. Matsuzaki, S.; Enomoto, T.; Serada, S.; Yoshino, K.; Nagamori, S.; Morimoto, A.; Yokoyama, T.; Kim, A.; Kimura, T.; Ueda, Y.; et al. Annexin A4-conferred platinum resistance is mediated by the copper transporter ATP7A. Int. J. Cancer 2014, 134, 1796–1809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Christ, J.P.; Yu, O.; Schulze-Rath, R.; Grafton, J.; Hansen, K.; Reed, S.D. Incidence, prevalence, and trends in endometriosis diagnosis: A United States population-based study from 2006 to 2015. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2021, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Cea Soriano, L.; Lopez-Garcia, E.; Schulze-Rath, R.; Garcia Rodriguez, L.A. Incidence, treatment and recurrence of endometriosis in a UK-based population analysis using data from The Health Improvement Network and the Hospital Episode Statistics database. Eur. J. Contracept. Reprod. Health Care 2017, 22, 334–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Stahlman, S.; Williams, V.F.; Taubman, S.B. Incidence and burden of gynecologic disorders, active component service women, U.S. Armed Forces, 2012–2016. MSMR 2017, 24, 30–38. [Google Scholar]
  50. Abbas, S.; Ihle, P.; Koster, I.; Schubert, I. Prevalence and incidence of diagnosed endometriosis and risk of endometriosis in patients with endometriosis-related symptoms: Findings from a statutory health insurance-based cohort in Germany. Eur. J. Obs. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2012, 160, 79–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Okoth, K.; Wang, J.; Zemedikun, D.; Thomas, G.N.; Nirantharakumar, K.; Adderley, N.J. Risk of cardiovascular outcomes among women with endometriosis in the United Kingdom: A retrospective matched cohort study. BJOG 2021, 128, 1598–1609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Jacques, M.; Freour, T.; Barriere, P.; Ploteau, S. Adverse pregnancy and neo-natal outcomes after assisted reproductive treatment in patients with pelvic endometriosis: A case-control study. Reprod. Biomed. Online 2016, 32, 626–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Tuominen, A.; Saavalainen, L.; Tiitinen, A.; Heikinheimo, O.; Harkki, P. Pregnancy and delivery outcomes in women with rectovaginal endometriosis treated either conservatively or operatively. Fertil. Steril. 2021, 115, 406–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Farella, M.; Chanavaz-Lacheray, I.; Verspick, E.; Merlot, B.; Klapczynski, C.; Hennetier, C.; Tuech, J.J.; Roman, H. Pregnancy outcomes in women with history of surgery for endometriosis. Fertil. Steril. 2020, 113, 996–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Vercellini, P.; Parazzini, F.; Pietropaolo, G.; Cipriani, S.; Frattaruolo, M.P.; Fedele, L. Pregnancy outcome in women with peritoneal, ovarian and rectovaginal endometriosis: A retrospective cohort study. BJOG 2012, 119, 1538–1543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Nagase, Y.; Matsuzaki, S.; Endo, M.; Hara, T.; Okada, A.; Mimura, K.; Hiramatsu, K.; Kakigano, A.; Nakatsuka, E.; Miyake, T.; et al. Placenta previa with posterior extrauterine adhesion: Clinical features and management practice. BMC Surg. 2021, 21, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Holland, T.K.; Yazbek, J.; Cutner, A.; Saridogan, E.; Hoo, W.L.; Jurkovic, D. Value of transvaginal ultrasound in assessing severity of pelvic endometriosis. Ultrasound Obs. Gynecol. 2010, 36, 241–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Leone Roberti Maggiore, U.; Ferrero, S.; Mangili, G.; Bergamini, A.; Inversetti, A.; Giorgione, V.; Viganò, P.; Candiani, M. A systematic review on endometriosis during pregnancy: Diagnosis, misdiagnosis, complications and outcomes. Hum. Reprod. Update 2016, 22, 70–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Noble, L.S.; Simpson, E.R.; Johns, A.; Bulun, S.E. Aromatase expression in endometriosis. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1996, 81, 174–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  60. Noble, L.S.; Takayama, K.; Zeitoun, K.M.; Putman, J.M.; Johns, D.A.; Hinshelwood, M.M.; Agarwal, V.R.; Zhao, Y.; Carr, B.R.; Bulun, S.E. Prostaglandin E2 stimulates aromatase expression in endometriosis-derived stromal cells. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1997, 82, 600–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Zeitoun, K.; Takayama, K.; Sasano, H.; Suzuki, T.; Moghrabi, N.; Andersson, S.; Johns, A.; Meng, L.; Putman, M.; Carr, B.; et al. Deficient 17beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2 expression in endometriosis: Failure to metabolize 17beta-estradiol. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1998, 83, 4474–4480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Royster, G.D.t.; Krishnamoorthy, K.; Csokmay, J.M.; Yauger, B.J.; Chason, R.J.; DeCherney, A.H.; Wolff, E.F.; Hill, M.J. Are intracytoplasmic sperm injection and high serum estradiol compounding risk factors for adverse obstetric outcomes in assisted reproductive technology? Fertil. Steril. 2016, 106, 363–370.e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Rombauts, L.; Motteram, C.; Berkowitz, E.; Fernando, S. Risk of placenta praevia is linked to endometrial thickness in a retrospective cohort study of 4537 singleton assisted reproduction technology births. Hum. Reprod. 2014, 29, 2787–2793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Cha, J.; Sun, X.; Dey, S.K. Mechanisms of implantation: Strategies for successful pregnancy. Nat. Med. 2012, 18, 1754–1767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. van Gestel, I.; IJland, M.M.; Hoogland, H.J.; Evers, J.L. Endometrial wave-like activity in the non-pregnant uterus. Hum. Reprod. Update 2003, 9, 131–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Aguilar, H.N.; Mitchell, B.F. Physiological pathways and molecular mechanisms regulating uterine contractility. Hum. Reprod. Update 2010, 16, 725–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Bulletti, C.; De Ziegler, D.; Polli, V.; Del Ferro, E.; Palini, S.; Flamigni, C. Characteristics of uterine contractility during menses in women with mild to moderate endometriosis. Fertil. Steril. 2002, 77, 1156–1161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Imanaka, S.; Maruyama, S.; Kimura, M.; Nagayasu, M.; Kobayashi, H. Towards an understanding of the molecular mechanisms of endometriosis-associated symptoms (Review). World Acad. Sci. J. 2020, 2, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Donnez, J.; Binda, M.M.; Donnez, O.; Dolmans, M.M. Oxidative stress in the pelvic cavity and its role in the pathogenesis of endometriosis. Fertil. Steril. 2016, 106, 1011–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Bacci, M.; Capobianco, A.; Monno, A.; Cottone, L.; Di Puppo, F.; Camisa, B.; Mariani, M.; Brignole, C.; Ponzoni, M.; Ferrari, S.; et al. Macrophages are alternatively activated in patients with endometriosis and required for growth and vascularization of lesions in a mouse model of disease. Am. J. Pathol. 2009, 175, 547–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Tanbo, T.; Fedorcsak, P. Endometriosis-associated infertility: Aspects of pathophysiological mechanisms and treatment options. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2017, 96, 659–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Giudice, L.C.; Kao, L.C. Endometriosis. Lancet 2004, 364, 1789–1799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Braundmeier, A.; Jackson, K.; Hastings, J.; Koehler, J.; Nowak, R.; Fazleabas, A. Induction of endometriosis alters the peripheral and endometrial regulatory T cell population in the non-human primate. Hum. Reprod. 2012, 27, 1712–1722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Borrelli, G.M.; Carvalho, K.I.; Kallas, E.G.; Mechsner, S.; Baracat, E.C.; Abrao, M.S. Chemokines in the pathogenesis of endometriosis and infertility. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2013, 98, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Tao, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Huang, W.; Zhu, H.; Zhang, D.; Luo, W. The peritoneal leptin, MCP-1 and TNF-alpha in the pathogenesis of endometriosis-associated infertility. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2011, 65, 403–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Olkowska-Truchanowicz, J.; Bocian, K.; Maksym, R.B.; Bialoszewska, A.; Wlodarczyk, D.; Baranowski, W.; Zabek, J.; Korczak-Kowalska, G.; Malejczyk, J. CD4(+) CD25(+) FOXP3(+) regulatory T cells in peripheral blood and peritoneal fluid of patients with endometriosis. Hum. Reprod. 2013, 28, 119–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Moen, M.H.; Magnus, P. The familial risk of endometriosis. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 1993, 72, 560–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Moen, M.H. Endometriosis in monozygotic twins. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 1994, 73, 59–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Hadfield, R.M.; Mardon, H.J.; Barlow, D.H.; Kennedy, S.H. Endometriosis in monozygotic twins. Fertil. Steril. 1997, 68, 941–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Smolarz, B.; Szyłło, K.; Romanowicz, H. Endometriosis: Epidemiology, Classification, Pathogenesis, Treatment and Genetics (Review of Literature). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 10554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Ek, W.E.; Rask-Andersen, M.; Karlsson, T.; Enroth, S.; Gyllensten, U.; Johansson, A. Genetic variants influencing phenotypic variance heterogeneity. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2018, 27, 799–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Uno, S.; Zembutsu, H.; Hirasawa, A.; Takahashi, A.; Kubo, M.; Akahane, T.; Aoki, D.; Kamatani, N.; Hirata, K.; Nakamura, Y. A genome-wide association study identifies genetic variants in the CDKN2BAS locus associated with endometriosis in Japanese. Nat. Genet. 2010, 42, 707–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Adachi, S.; Tajima, A.; Quan, J.; Haino, K.; Yoshihara, K.; Masuzaki, H.; Katabuchi, H.; Ikuma, K.; Suginami, H.; Nishida, N.; et al. Meta-analysis of genome-wide association scans for genetic susceptibility to endometriosis in Japanese population. J. Hum. Genet. 2010, 55, 816–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Painter, J.N.; Anderson, C.A.; Nyholt, D.R.; Macgregor, S.; Lin, J.; Lee, S.H.; Lambert, A.; Zhao, Z.Z.; Roseman, F.; Guo, Q.; et al. Genome-wide association study identifies a locus at 7p15.2 associated with endometriosis. Nat. Genet. 2011, 43, 51–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Cardoso, J.V.; Perini, J.A.; Machado, D.E.; Pinto, R.; Medeiros, R. Systematic review of genome-wide association studies on susceptibility to endometriosis. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2020, 255, 74–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Zondervan, K.T.; Becker, C.M.; Missmer, S.A. Endometriosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 1244–1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Yachida, N.; Yoshihara, K.; Suda, K.; Nakaoka, H.; Ueda, H.; Sugino, K.; Yamaguchi, M.; Mori, Y.; Yamawaki, K.; Tamura, R.; et al. Biological significance of KRAS mutant allele expression in ovarian endometriosis. Cancer Sci. 2021, 112, 2020–2032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Yachida, N.; Yoshihara, K.; Yamaguchi, M.; Suda, K.; Tamura, R.; Enomoto, T. How Does Endometriosis Lead to Ovarian Cancer? The Molecular Mechanism of Endometriosis-Associated Ovarian Cancer Development. Cancers 2021, 13, 1439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Suda, K.; Nakaoka, H.; Yoshihara, K.; Ishiguro, T.; Adachi, S.; Kase, H.; Motoyama, T.; Inoue, I.; Enomoto, T. Different mutation profiles between epithelium and stroma in endometriosis and normal endometrium. Hum. Reprod. 2019, 34, 1899–1905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Anglesio, M.S.; Papadopoulos, N.; Ayhan, A.; Nazeran, T.M.; Noë, M.; Horlings, H.M.; Lum, A.; Jones, S.; Senz, J.; Seckin, T.; et al. Cancer-Associated Mutations in Endometriosis without Cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017, 376, 1835–1848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Suda, K.; Nakaoka, H.; Yoshihara, K.; Ishiguro, T.; Tamura, R.; Mori, Y.; Yamawaki, K.; Adachi, S.; Takahashi, T.; Kase, H.; et al. Clonal Expansion and Diversification of Cancer-Associated Mutations in Endometriosis and Normal Endometrium. Cell Rep. 2018, 24, 1777–1789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Hossain, M.M.; Nakayama, K.; Shanta, K.; Razia, S.; Ishikawa, M.; Ishibashi, T.; Yamashita, H.; Sato, S.; Iida, K.; Kanno, K.; et al. Establishment of a Novel In Vitro Model of Endometriosis with Oncogenic KRAS and PIK3CA Mutations for Understanding the Underlying Biology and Molecular Pathogenesis. Cancers 2021, 13, 3174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Yachida, N.; Yoshihara, K.; Suda, K.; Nakaoka, H.; Ueda, H.; Sugino, K.; Yamaguchi, M.; Mori, Y.; Yamawaki, K.; Tamura, R.; et al. ARID1A protein expression is retained in ovarian endometriosis with ARID1A loss-of-function mutations: Implication for the two-hit hypothesis. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 14260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Suda, K.; Cruz Diaz, L.A.; Yoshihara, K.; Nakaoka, H.; Yachida, N.; Motoyama, T.; Inoue, I.; Enomoto, T. Clonal lineage from normal endometrium to ovarian clear cell carcinoma through ovarian endometriosis. Cancer Sci. 2020, 111, 3000–3009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Matsuzaki, S.; Yoshino, K.; Ueda, Y.; Matsuzaki, S.; Kakuda, M.; Okazawa, A.; Egawa-Takata, T.; Kobayashi, E.; Kimura, T. Potential targets for ovarian clear cell carcinoma: A review of updates and future perspectives. Cancer Cell Int. 2015, 15, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Murakami, K.; Kotani, Y.; Nakai, H.; Matsumura, N. Endometriosis-Associated Ovarian Cancer: The Origin and Targeted Therapy. Cancers 2020, 12, 1676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Guo, S.W. Cancer-associated mutations in endometriosis: Shedding light on the pathogenesis and pathophysiology. Hum. Reprod. Update 2020, 26, 423–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Matsuzaki, S.; Serada, S.; Morimoto, A.; Ueda, Y.; Yoshino, K.; Kimura, T.; Naka, T. Annexin A4 is a promising therapeutic target for the treatment of platinum-resistant cancers. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets 2014, 18, 403–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Gasparri, M.L.; Nirgianakis, K.; Taghavi, K.; Papadia, A.; Mueller, M.D. Placenta previa and placental abruption after assisted reproductive technology in patients with endometriosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2018, 298, 27–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Matsuzaki, S.; Nagase, Y.; Takiuchi, T.; Kakigano, A.; Mimura, K.; Lee, M.; Matsuzaki, S.; Ueda, Y.; Tomimatsu, T.; Endo, M.; et al. Antenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta spectrum after in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 9205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Romundstad, L.B.; Romundstad, P.R.; Sunde, A.; von Düring, V.; Skjaerven, R.; Vatten, L.J. Increased risk of placenta previa in pregnancies following IVF/ICSI; a comparison of ART and non-ART pregnancies in the same mother. Hum. Reprod. 2006, 21, 2353–2358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  102. Hayashi, M.; Nakai, A.; Satoh, S.; Matsuda, Y. Adverse obstetric and perinatal outcomes of singleton pregnancies may be related to maternal factors associated with infertility rather than the type of assisted reproductive technology procedure used. Fertil. Steril. 2012, 98, 922–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Nagase, Y.; Matsuzaki, S.; Kawanishi, Y.; Nakagawa, S.; Kakigano, A.; Takiuchi, T.; Mimura, K.; Tomimatsu, T.; Endo, M.; Kimura, T. Efficacy of Prophylactic Antibiotics in Bakri Intrauterine Balloon Placement: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis and Literature Review. AJP Rep. 2020, 10, e106–e112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  104. Matsuzaki, S.; Endo, M.; Tomimatsu, T.; Nakagawa, S.; Matsuzaki, S.; Miyake, T.; Takiuchi, T.; Kakigano, A.; Mimura, K.; Ueda, Y.; et al. New dedicated blunt straight needles and sutures for uterine compression sutures: A retrospective study and literature review. BMC Surg. 2019, 19, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Said Ali, A.; Faraag, E.; Mohammed, M.; Elmarghany, Z.; Helaly, M.; Gadallah, A.; Taymour, M.A.; Ahmad, Y.; Ibrahim Eissa, A.; Ibrahim Ogila, A.; et al. The safety and effectiveness of Bakri balloon in the management of postpartum hemorrhage: A systematic review. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021, 34, 300–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Suzuki, Y.; Matsuzaki, S.; Mimura, K.; Kumasawa, K.; Tomimatsu, T.; Endo, M.; Kimura, T. Investigation of perioperative complications associated with use of uterine compression sutures. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2017, 139, 28–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Li, B.; Miners, A.; Shakur, H.; Roberts, I.; Collaborators, W.T. Tranexamic acid for treatment of women with post-partum haemorrhage in Nigeria and Pakistan: A cost-effectiveness analysis of data from the WOMAN trial. Lancet Glob. Health 2018, 6, e222–e228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Phung, L.C.; Farrington, E.K.; Connolly, M.; Wilson, A.N.; Carvalho, B.; Homer, C.S.E.; Vogel, J.P. Intravenous oxytocin dosing regimens for postpartum hemorrhage prevention following cesarean delivery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2021, 225, 250.e1–250.e38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Arulkumaran, S.; Fuchtner, C. Uterine balloon tamponade for the treatment of postpartum hemorrhage: A systematic review and meta-analysis-commentary. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2020, 222, 291–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Matsubara, S. An easy insertion procedure of Bakri balloon during cesarean section for placenta previa: Use of Nelaton rubber catheter. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2014, 290, 613–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Matsuzaki, S.; Kakigano, A.; Mimura, K.; Kimura, T. Letter to “Cervical varices unrelated to placenta previa as an unusual cause of antepartum hemorrhage: A case report and literature review”: Successful management of postpartum hemorrhage due to cervical varix: Modified Matsubara Nelaton method using Bakri balloon. Taiwan. J. Obs. Gynecol. 2019, 58, 721–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Matsubara, S.; Takahashi, H.; Baba, Y.; Usui, R. Inserting the Bakri balloon during cesarean section in patients with a narrow cervix: Nelaton method (Matsubara). Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2015, 94, 1147–1148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Takahashi, H.; Baba, Y.; Usui, R.; Ohkuchi, A.; Matsubara, S. Video image: Matsubara’s Nelaton and Fishing methods for easier Bakri balloon insertion and avoiding its prolapse during cesarean section. Hypertens. Res. Pregnancy 2018, 6, 73–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Opoien, H.K.; Fedorcsak, P.; Omland, A.K.; Abyholm, T.; Bjercke, S.; Ertzeid, G.; Oldereid, N.; Mellembakken, J.R.; Tanbo, T. In vitro fertilization is a successful treatment in endometriosis-associated infertility. Fertil. Steril. 2012, 97, 912–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Biomedicines 09 01536 g001 550
Figure 1. Intraoperative images during cesarean delivery of patients with endometriosis. (A) Intraoperative image of a patient with placenta previa (PP) and endometriosis who had a history of laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis showing the uterine posterior wall that was actively bleeding; it took a long time to control the bleeding. (B) Intraoperative image of a PP patient with endometriosis, but without a history of surgery for endometriosis. Strong adhesions were observed between the left posterior uterine wall and the rectum. Lt, left; Rt, right.
Figure 1. Intraoperative images during cesarean delivery of patients with endometriosis. (A) Intraoperative image of a patient with placenta previa (PP) and endometriosis who had a history of laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis showing the uterine posterior wall that was actively bleeding; it took a long time to control the bleeding. (B) Intraoperative image of a PP patient with endometriosis, but without a history of surgery for endometriosis. Strong adhesions were observed between the left posterior uterine wall and the rectum. Lt, left; Rt, right.
Biomedicines 09 01536 g001
Biomedicines 09 01536 g002 550
Figure 2. Study selection scheme of the systematic search of articles. Abbreviation: PP, placenta previa.
Figure 2. Study selection scheme of the systematic search of articles. Abbreviation: PP, placenta previa.
Biomedicines 09 01536 g002
Biomedicines 09 01536 g003 550
Figure 3. Meta-analysis of the influence of endometriosis on the occurrence of PP. Reproduced and updated, Matsuzaki S et al. [24] The association of endometriosis with placenta previa and postpartum hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis/Figure 2. Meta-analysis of the effect of endometriosis on the rate of placenta previa. Copyright (2021), with permission from Elsevier. The position of the box is a point estimate of the OR. The size of the box represents the weight of study. A horizontal line representing the 95%CI of the study result, with each end of the line representing the boundaries of the CI. Clip CIs to arrows when they exceed specified limits. The diamond represents the combined results of the studies. The pooled OR of the (A) unadjusted analysis for PP and (B) adjusted analysis for PP between women with endometriosis and women without endometriosis is shown. The forest plots were ordered within the stratum by year of publication and relative weight (%) of the study. Substantial heterogeneity was observed in A (I2 = 73%), and considerable heterogeneity was observed in B (I2 = 86%). Some values slightly vary from the original values, as calculations were performed using Revman ver. 5.4.1. Abbreviations: OR, odds ratio; SE, standard error; CI, confidence interval; PP, placenta previa.
Figure 3. Meta-analysis of the influence of endometriosis on the occurrence of PP. Reproduced and updated, Matsuzaki S et al. [24] The association of endometriosis with placenta previa and postpartum hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis/Figure 2. Meta-analysis of the effect of endometriosis on the rate of placenta previa. Copyright (2021), with permission from Elsevier. The position of the box is a point estimate of the OR. The size of the box represents the weight of study. A horizontal line representing the 95%CI of the study result, with each end of the line representing the boundaries of the CI. Clip CIs to arrows when they exceed specified limits. The diamond represents the combined results of the studies. The pooled OR of the (A) unadjusted analysis for PP and (B) adjusted analysis for PP between women with endometriosis and women without endometriosis is shown. The forest plots were ordered within the stratum by year of publication and relative weight (%) of the study. Substantial heterogeneity was observed in A (I2 = 73%), and considerable heterogeneity was observed in B (I2 = 86%). Some values slightly vary from the original values, as calculations were performed using Revman ver. 5.4.1. Abbreviations: OR, odds ratio; SE, standard error; CI, confidence interval; PP, placenta previa.
Biomedicines 09 01536 g003
Biomedicines 09 01536 g004 550
Figure 4. Meta-analysis of the influence of severe endometriosis on the incidence of PP. Pooled odds ratio of unadjusted analyses for PP. The position of the box is a point estimate of the OR. The size of the box represents the weight of study. A horizontal line representing the 95%CI of the study result, with each end of the line representing the boundaries of the CI. Clip CIs to arrows when they exceed specified limits. The diamond represents the combined results of the studies. (A) Severe endometriosis versus non-severe endometriosis, and (B) severe endometriosis versus control. The forest plots were arranged within the stratum by year of publication and the relative weight (%) of the study. No heterogeneity was observed in the analysis of A (I2 = 0%), while moderate heterogeneity was observed in the analysis of B (I2 = 55%). Therefore, a fixed-effects analysis was applied to panel A, whereas a random-effect analysis was used for panel B. Some values may be slightly different from the original values, as calculations were performed using Revman ver. 5.4.1. Abbreviations: OR, odds ratio; SE, standard error; CI, confidence interval; PP, placenta previa.
Figure 4. Meta-analysis of the influence of severe endometriosis on the incidence of PP. Pooled odds ratio of unadjusted analyses for PP. The position of the box is a point estimate of the OR. The size of the box represents the weight of study. A horizontal line representing the 95%CI of the study result, with each end of the line representing the boundaries of the CI. Clip CIs to arrows when they exceed specified limits. The diamond represents the combined results of the studies. (A) Severe endometriosis versus non-severe endometriosis, and (B) severe endometriosis versus control. The forest plots were arranged within the stratum by year of publication and the relative weight (%) of the study. No heterogeneity was observed in the analysis of A (I2 = 0%), while moderate heterogeneity was observed in the analysis of B (I2 = 55%). Therefore, a fixed-effects analysis was applied to panel A, whereas a random-effect analysis was used for panel B. Some values may be slightly different from the original values, as calculations were performed using Revman ver. 5.4.1. Abbreviations: OR, odds ratio; SE, standard error; CI, confidence interval; PP, placenta previa.
Biomedicines 09 01536 g004
Biomedicines 09 01536 g005 550
Figure 5. Influence of non-severe endometriosis on the occurrence of PP. Pooled odds ratio of unadjusted analyses for PP. The position of the box is a point estimate of the OR. The size of the box represents the weight of study. A horizontal line representing the 95%CI of the study result, with each end of the line representing the boundaries of the CI. The diamond represents the combined results of the studies. (A) non-severe endometriosis versus control, (B) non-DIE versus control, and (C) rASRM stage I–II endometriosis versus control. The forest plots were arranged within the stratum by year of publication and the relative weight (%) of the study. Low heterogeneity was observed in the analysis of panel C (I2 = 49%), whereas no heterogeneity was observed in the analysis of panels A and B (I2 = 0%). Therefore, a fixed-effects analysis was applied to panels A and B, whereas a random-effect analysis was used for panel C. Some values may slightly vary from the original values, as calculations were performed using Revman ver. 5.4.1. Abbreviations: OR, odds ratio; SE, standard error; CI, confidence interval; and PP, placenta previa.
Figure 5. Influence of non-severe endometriosis on the occurrence of PP. Pooled odds ratio of unadjusted analyses for PP. The position of the box is a point estimate of the OR. The size of the box represents the weight of study. A horizontal line representing the 95%CI of the study result, with each end of the line representing the boundaries of the CI. The diamond represents the combined results of the studies. (A) non-severe endometriosis versus control, (B) non-DIE versus control, and (C) rASRM stage I–II endometriosis versus control. The forest plots were arranged within the stratum by year of publication and the relative weight (%) of the study. Low heterogeneity was observed in the analysis of panel C (I2 = 49%), whereas no heterogeneity was observed in the analysis of panels A and B (I2 = 0%). Therefore, a fixed-effects analysis was applied to panels A and B, whereas a random-effect analysis was used for panel C. Some values may slightly vary from the original values, as calculations were performed using Revman ver. 5.4.1. Abbreviations: OR, odds ratio; SE, standard error; CI, confidence interval; and PP, placenta previa.
Biomedicines 09 01536 g005
Biomedicines 09 01536 g006 550
Figure 6. Determination of the cervical canal angle. Modified from BMC Surg. 6 January 2021;21:10. Nagase Y et al. Placenta previa with posterior extrauterine adhesion: clinical features and management practice/Supplemental Figure S1, Determination of the horizontal cervix sign [56]. (A) The method for measuring the angle of the cervical canal on magnetic resonance images. Line P is a straight line through a broad part of the patient’s back. Line Q is a line perpendicular to line P. Line R is a line passing through the internal os to the external os, and Angle X is the angle formed by lines Q and R (defined as the cervical canal angle). (B) Typical magnetic resonance imaging of a woman with PP complicated with endometriosis. (C) A typical magnetic resonance imaging of a PP patient without endometriosis. Abbreviation: PP, placenta previa.
Figure 6. Determination of the cervical canal angle. Modified from BMC Surg. 6 January 2021;21:10. Nagase Y et al. Placenta previa with posterior extrauterine adhesion: clinical features and management practice/Supplemental Figure S1, Determination of the horizontal cervix sign [56]. (A) The method for measuring the angle of the cervical canal on magnetic resonance images. Line P is a straight line through a broad part of the patient’s back. Line Q is a line perpendicular to line P. Line R is a line passing through the internal os to the external os, and Angle X is the angle formed by lines Q and R (defined as the cervical canal angle). (B) Typical magnetic resonance imaging of a woman with PP complicated with endometriosis. (C) A typical magnetic resonance imaging of a PP patient without endometriosis. Abbreviation: PP, placenta previa.
Biomedicines 09 01536 g006
Biomedicines 09 01536 g007 550
Figure 7. Preparation of the modified Matsubara Nelaton catheter. Reproduced from Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;58:721-722. Matsuzaki S et al. Letter to “Cervical varices unrelated to placenta previa as an unusual cause of antepartum hemorrhage: A case report and literature review.” Successful management of postpartum hemorrhage due to cervical varix: modified Matsubara-Nelaton method using Bakri balloon/ Figure 1, Transvaginal sonography and speculum examination results., Copyright (2019) with permission from Elsevier [111]. (A,B) A Nelaton rubber tube is connected to perform the modified Matsubara Nelaton method as previously described [110,111,112,113]. However, we modified the Nelaton rubber tube type and its connections used from that of the original method. A No. 13 Nelaton rubber tube was attached to the blood drainage port of the Bakri balloon.
Figure 7. Preparation of the modified Matsubara Nelaton catheter. Reproduced from Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;58:721-722. Matsuzaki S et al. Letter to “Cervical varices unrelated to placenta previa as an unusual cause of antepartum hemorrhage: A case report and literature review.” Successful management of postpartum hemorrhage due to cervical varix: modified Matsubara-Nelaton method using Bakri balloon/ Figure 1, Transvaginal sonography and speculum examination results., Copyright (2019) with permission from Elsevier [111]. (A,B) A Nelaton rubber tube is connected to perform the modified Matsubara Nelaton method as previously described [110,111,112,113]. However, we modified the Nelaton rubber tube type and its connections used from that of the original method. A No. 13 Nelaton rubber tube was attached to the blood drainage port of the Bakri balloon.
Biomedicines 09 01536 g007
Table
Table 1. Influence of endometriosis on the incidence of placenta previa (PP).
Table 1. Influence of endometriosis on the incidence of placenta previa (PP).
AuthorYearAreaNo.Endo
No.		Severe
Cases #		Study
Type		IVFPrevia
Endo (%)Control (%)EndoControl
Comparator studies: women with endometriosis versus women without endometriosis
Epelboin, S. [25]2020FRN411483331101--Nationwide18.2%0 *1.7%0.6%
Yi, W.K. [26]2020KOR193842444428--Nationwide----3.6%1.1%
Lin, S. [27]2020CHN24682--Retro----13.4%4.3%
Shumueli, A. [28]2019ISR61535135--Retro19.3%2.6%3.0%0.3%
Miura, M. [12]2019JPN276980--Retro28.7%12.8%12.5%4.1%
Uccella, S. [11]2019ITA1808118DIERetro----3.4%0.5%
Chen, I. [29]2018CAN52202469 Nationwide----2.4%0.8%
Nirgianakis, K. [30]2018CHE24862DIERetro24.2%27.4%6.5%0.0%
Berlac, J.F. [7]2017DEN109125119331--Nationwide19.0%3.3%2.1%0.5%
Li, H. [31]2017CHN37575--Retro----2.7%1.7%
Mannini, L. [32]2017ITA786262DIERetro26.0%10.1%3.8%1.1%
Benaglia, L. [33]2016ITA478239--RetroAllAll5.9%1.3%
Jacques, M. [52]2016FRN226113DIERetroAllAll2.7%2.7%
Fujii, T. [34]2016JPN60492rASRMRetroAllAll8.7%0.8%
Exacoustos, C. [8]2016ITA34141DIERetro----17.1%0.3%
Harada, T. [35]2016JPN9186330--Nationwide8.8%2.2%3.6%0.6%
Baggio, S. [36]2015ITA14451DIERetro----3.9%1.1%
Lin, H. [37]2015CHN498249--Retro005.2%1.2%
Takemura, Y. [38]2013JPN31853--RetroAllAll17.0%1.5%
Healy, D. [39]2010AUS67301265--RetroAllAll3.8%2.3%
Non-comparator studies: women with endometriosis
Tuominen, A. [53]2021FIN243243DIERetro----11.1%--
Farella, M. [54]2020FRN535535rASRMRetro----1.7%--
Vercellini, P. [55]2012ITA419419DIERetro0--2.9%--
Reproduced and updated the data from Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2021;3:100417. Matsuzaki S et al. [24].The association of endometriosis with placenta previa and postpartum hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis/Supplemental Table S2, Results of a systematic review of the effect of endometriosis on the prevalence of placenta previa and postpartum hemorrhage. Copyright (2021), with permission from Elsevier. The number (percentage per column) is presented. * IVF pregnancies without endometriosis were excluded from the analysis. # We defined severe cases as women with DIE or rASRM stage III-IV endometriosis. Abbreviations: --, not applicable; Endo, endometriosis; No., number of included cases; retro, retrospective; AUS, Australia; JPN, Japan; CHN, China; ITA, Italy; DEN, Denmark: CHE, Switzerland; CAN, Canada; KOR, Korea; and ISR, Israel; DIE, deep infiltrating endometriosis; rASRM; revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine.
Table
Table 2. Effect of severe and non-severe endometriosis on the prevalence of PP.
Table 2. Effect of severe and non-severe endometriosis on the prevalence of PP.
AuthorYearNo.Endo
No.		Severe
Endo #		Severe
No.		Non-Severe
No.		Control
No.		Previa
SevereNon-SevereControl
Comparator studies: women with DIE versus women without endometriosis
Uccella, S. [11]20191808118DIE348416904/34 (11.8%)0/84 (0%)8/1690 (0.5%)
Nirgianakis, K. [30]201824862DIE62--1864/62 (6.5%)--0
Mannini, L. [32]2017786262DIE402225182/40 (5.0%)8/222 (3.6%)6/518 (1.2%)
Jacques, M. [52] †2016226113DIE49641132/49 (4.1%)1/64 (1.6%)3/113 (2.7%)
Exacoustos, C. [8]201634141DIE41--3007/41 (17.1%)--1/300 (0.3%)
Baggio, S. [36]201514451DIE51--932/51 (3.9%)--1/93 (1.1%)
Non-comparator studies: women with DIE
Tuominen, A. [53]2021243243DIE243----27/243 (11.1%)----
Vercellini, P. [55]2012419419DIE150269--9/150 (6.0%)3/269 (1.1%)--
Comparator studies: endometriosis was classified with rASRM
Farella, M. [54]2020535535rASRM359176--9/359 (2.5%)0--
Fujii, T. [34]201660492rASRM43415127/43 (16.3%)1/41 (2.4%)4/512 (0.8%)
Jacques, M. [52] †2016226113rASRM52591132/52 (3.8%)03/113 (2.7%)
The number (percentage per column) is presented. # We defined severe cases as women with DIE or rASRM stage III–IV endometriosis. † In this study, severe endometriosis was determined both in the classifications of DIE and rASRM stage III-IV. Some cases overlapped, and some were examined as women with severe endometriosis. Abbreviations: Endo, endometriosis; No., number of included cases; DIE, deep infiltrating endometriosis; rASRM; revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Matsuzaki, S.; Nagase, Y.; Ueda, Y.; Kakuda, M.; Maeda, M.; Matsuzaki, S.; Kamiura, S. Placenta Previa Complicated with Endometriosis: Contemporary Clinical Management, Molecular Mechanisms, and Future Research Opportunities. Biomedicines 2021, 9, 1536. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9111536

AMA Style

Matsuzaki S, Nagase Y, Ueda Y, Kakuda M, Maeda M, Matsuzaki S, Kamiura S. Placenta Previa Complicated with Endometriosis: Contemporary Clinical Management, Molecular Mechanisms, and Future Research Opportunities. Biomedicines. 2021; 9(11):1536. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9111536

Chicago/Turabian Style

Matsuzaki, Shinya, Yoshikazu Nagase, Yutaka Ueda, Mamoru Kakuda, Michihide Maeda, Satoko Matsuzaki, and Shoji Kamiura. 2021. "Placenta Previa Complicated with Endometriosis: Contemporary Clinical Management, Molecular Mechanisms, and Future Research Opportunities" Biomedicines 9, no. 11: 1536. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9111536

APA Style

Matsuzaki, S., Nagase, Y., Ueda, Y., Kakuda, M., Maeda, M., Matsuzaki, S., & Kamiura, S. (2021). Placenta Previa Complicated with Endometriosis: Contemporary Clinical Management, Molecular Mechanisms, and Future Research Opportunities. Biomedicines, 9(11), 1536. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9111536

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop