Next Article in Journal
Progress on Genetic Basis of Primary Aldosteronism
Previous Article in Journal
Comparison of Characteristics and Survival Rates of Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma according to Tumor Location
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomedicines
Volume 9
Issue 11
10.3390/biomedicines9111707
biomedicines-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Systematic Review

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Statins on Circulating E-Selectin, L-Selectin, and P-Selectin

by
Angelo Zinellu
1 and
Arduino A. Mangoni
2,3,*
1
Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Sassari, 07100 Sassari, Italy
2
Discipline of Clinical Pharmacology, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA 5042, Australia
3
Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Flinders Medical Centre, Southern Adelaide Local Health Network, Bedford Park, SA 5042, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomedicines 2021, 9(11), 1707; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9111707
Submission received: 1 November 2021 / Revised: 15 November 2021 / Accepted: 16 November 2021 / Published: 17 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular and Translational Medicine)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The pleiotropic effects of statins might involve preventing inflammatory cell adhesion to the endothelium, which is a critical step in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of statins on the circulating cell adhesion molecules E-Selectin, L-Selectin, and P-Selectin. A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus, from inception to July 2021. Risk of bias and certainty of evidence were assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist and GRADE, respectively. In 61 studies, statins significantly reduced P-selectin (standard mean difference, SMD = −0.39, 95% CI −0.55 to −0.22, p < 0.001; moderate certainty of evidence), L-selectin (SMD = −0.49, 95% CI −0.89 to −0.10, p = 0.014; very low certainty of evidence), and E-Selectin (SMD = −0.73, 95% CI −1.02 to −0.43, p < 0.001; moderate certainty of evidence), independently of baseline lipid profile and other study and patient characteristics. The corresponding pooled SMD values in sensitivity analysis were not substantially altered when individual studies were sequentially removed. Simvastatin had a significant lowering effect on both P-selectin and E-selectin. Therefore, statins significantly reduce circulating selectins. Further studies are required to investigate whether selectin lowering mediates cardiovascular risk reduction with these agents. (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021282778).

1. Introduction

A critical step in the pathophysiology of atherosclerosis involves the adhesion of inflammatory cell types to the endothelium. This process is facilitated by several cell adhesion molecules [1]. The selectins are a key family of cell adhesion molecules that includes the C-type lectins P-selectin, stored in platelets and endothelial cells [2]; L-selectin, expressed in leukocytes [3]; and E-selectin, expressed in the endothelium [2,4]. L-selectin mediates lymphocyte rolling, whereas P-selectin and E-selectin are primarily expressed in states of endothelial inflammation and facilitate monocyte, neutrophil, and lymphocyte rolling [4]. E-Selectin, L-Selectin, and P-Selectin also exist in soluble forms and can be measured in blood to characterize the state of endothelial and platelet activation in atherosclerosis [4,5,6].
The pathophysiological role of selectins, particularly P-Selectin and E-selectin, in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease is supported both by experimental and human studies [7]. In particular, epidemiological studies have reported significant and positive associations between the concentration of soluble selectins and adverse cardiovascular outcomes. For example, higher soluble P-selectin concentrations have been shown to be significantly associated with incident cardiovascular events in women [8]. Similar associations between P-selectin and cardiovascular events have been reported in other studies [9,10]. Soluble E-selectin has also shown significant associations with incident cardiovascular disease in patients with renal failure [11] and atrial fibrillation [12].
Therefore, the available evidence suggests that soluble selectins play a critical role in the pathophysiology of atherosclerosis and endothelial dysfunction and as markers of cardiovascular risk [7], and that interventions targeting this family of cell adhesion molecules might exert atheroprotective effects [13].
Treatment with statins, the leading class of lipid-lowering agents for cardiovascular prevention [14,15], has been shown to exert beneficial effects on endothelial and vascular homeostasis independently of their primary target, inhibition of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA (HMG-CoA) reductase [16]. These so-called pleiotropic effects of statins include the suppression of specific pro-inflammatory cytokines with consequent reduced activation of selectins [17,18,19]. As human studies have investigated the effects of treatment with statins on soluble concentrations of selectins, we sought to critically appraise this evidence by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of statins on circulating E-Selectin, L-Selectin, and P-Selectin. Meta-regression and subgroup analyses were also conducted to investigate associations between effect size and specific study and patient characteristics.

2. Materials and Methods

A systematic literature search was conducted in the electronic databases PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus, from inception to July 2021, using the following terms and their combination: “Selectin” or “P-Selectin” or “L-Selectin” or “E-Selectin” and “Statin”. Abstracts were independently screened by two investigators. If relevant, the full-text articles were reviewed according to the following eligibility criteria: (1) assessment of soluble P-Selectin and/or L-Selectin and/or E-Selectin in plasma or serum at baseline and after statin treatment; (2) ≥10 adult participants; (3) English language; and (4) full-text available. The references of the retrieved articles were also searched to identify additional studies. Any disagreement between reviewers was resolved by a third investigator. Data extracted from each study included the year of publication; the continent where the study was conducted; age; the proportion of males; the concentrations of P-Selectin, L-Selectin, and E-Selectin before and after treatment; the primary condition studied; baseline lipid profile; statin and daily dose used; and treatment duration.
The risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist for analytical studies. A score of ≥5, 4, and <4 indicated low, moderate, and high risk, respectively [20]. The certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group system. GRADE considers the study design (randomized vs. observational), the risk of bias (JBI checklist), the presence of unexplained heterogeneity, the indirectness of evidence, the imprecision of results (sample size, 95% confidence interval width and threshold crossing), the effect size (small, SMD < 0.5, moderate, SMD 0.5–0.8, and large, SMD >0.8) [21], and the probability of publication bias [22,23,24]. The study complied with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 statement (Supplementary Materials, Tables S1 and S2) [25]. The protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021282778).

Statistical Analysis

Standardized mean differences (SMDs) were calculated to generate forest plots of continuous data and to evaluate differences in selectin serum concentrations before and after statin treatment. If necessary, means and standard deviations were extrapolated from medians and interquartile ranges [26], or from graphs using the Graph Data Extractor software. Heterogeneity of SMD across studies was assessed using the Q-statistic (significance level set at p < 0.10) and I2-statistic (<25%, no heterogeneity; between 25–50%, moderate heterogeneity; between 50–75%, large heterogeneity; and >75%, extreme heterogeneity) [27,28]. Random-effects models were used in the presence of significant heterogeneity (I2 ≥ 50%). Sensitivity analysis was conducted to investigate the influence of each study on the overall risk estimate [29]. The presence of publication bias was assessed using the Begg’s and Egger’s tests (significance level set at p < 0.05) [30,31], and the Duval and Tweedie “trim-and-fill” method [32].
Univariate meta-regression analyses were conducted to investigate associations between effect size and the following study and patient characteristics: age; proportion of males; body mass index; baseline total cholesterol, low-density lipoproteins (LDL)-cholesterol, high-density lipoproteins (HDL)-cholesterol, and triglycerides; year of publication; sample size; continent where the study was conducted; specific statin and class used (lipophilic: atorvastatin, simvastatin, lovastatin, fluvastatin, cerivastatin, and pitavastatin; hydrophilic: rosuvastatin, pravastatin); and treatment duration. Pre-planned subgroup analyses investigated the effects of specific statins, statin classes, and continent where the study was conducted. Statistical analyses were performed using Stata 14 (STATA Corp., College Station, TX, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Systematic Research

A flow chart describing the screening process is presented in Figure 1. We initially identified 1698 articles. A total of 1613 were excluded after the first screening because they were either duplicates or irrelevant. After a full-text review of the remaining 85 articles, 24 were further excluded due to missing data (n = 7) or because they did not fulfil the inclusion criteria (n = 1, age < 18 years; n = 4, participants already on lipid-lowering treatment; n = 3, sample size < 10; n = 9 measurement of cell surface selectin). Thus, 61 studies published between 1999 and 2018 were included in the final analysis (Table 1) [33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93].

3.2. Meta-Analysis of Soluble P-Selectin

3.2.1. Study Characteristics

Thirty-three studies reported 41 treatment arms in 1238 participants (mean age 59 years, 55% males) [34,35,38,40,43,44,47,49,50,52,56,58,59,60,62,63,64,65,66,68,70,71,72,74,76,78,80,81,82,84,87,90,93]. Simvastatin was used in 17 arms [47,52,56,58,59,60,62,66,78,81,82,90,93], atorvastatin in 9 [43,44,63,70,72,74,80,87], pravastatin in 7 [34,38,40,65,84], fluvastatin in 3 [35,49,50], pitavastatin in 3 [68,76], and rosuvastatin [71] and combination of various statins [64] in 1, respectively. Treatment duration ranged between 2 and 24 weeks (Table 1).

3.2.2. Risk of Bias

The risk of bias was low in all studies [34,35,38,40,43,44,47,49,50,52,56,58,59,60,62,63,64,65,66,68,70,71,72,74,76,78,80,81,82,84,87,90,93] (Table 2).

3.2.3. Results of Individual Studies and Syntheses

The forest plot for circulating P-Selectin concentrations before and after statin treatment is shown in Figure 2. In six arms [34,44,60,68,74,78], concentrations were higher after treatment (mean difference range, 0.10 to 0.62); however, the difference was statistically significant only in one [34]. In the remaining arms [35,38,40,43,47,49,50,52,56,58,59,62,63,64,65,66,70,71,72,76,80,81,82,84,87,90,93], P-Selectin concentrations were lower after treatment (mean difference range, −0.03 to −4.11) with a significant difference reported in nine [47,49,52,56,59,64,65,87,90]. The large between-study heterogeneity observed (I2 = 74.1%, p < 0.001) prompted the use of random-effects models. Pooled results showed that P-Selectin concentrations were significantly lower after statin treatment (SMD = −0.39, 95% CI −0.55 to −0.22, p < 0.001).
In sensitivity analysis, the corresponding pooled SMD values were not substantially altered when individual studies were sequentially removed (effect size range, between −0.41 and −0.33, Figure 3A). However, the funnel plot analysis, reported in Figure 3B, detected a distortive effect of one study [52]. Removing this study mildly attenuated both the effect size (SMD = −0.35, 95% CI −0.50 to −0.20, p < 0.001) and the heterogeneity (I2 = 68.5%, p < 0.001).

3.2.4. Publication Bias

The analysis of the remaining 40 arms, after removing the previously described study [52], did not show significant publication bias (Begg’s test, p = 0.12; Egger’s test, p = 0.57). The “trim-and-fill” method identified one potential missing study to be added to the left side of the funnel plot to ensure symmetry (adjusted SMD = −0.37, 95% CI −0.52 to −0.22, p < 0.001; Figure 4).

3.2.5. Meta-Regression and Subgroup Analysis

In univariate meta-regression, there were no significant associations between effect size and age (t = −0.61, p = 0.55); proportion of males (t = 0.03, p = 0.98); body mass index (t = 0.43, p = 0.67); publication year (t = −0.37, p = 0.71); sample size (t = −0.23, p = 0.81); baseline total cholesterol (t = 0.80, p = 0.43), LDL-cholesterol (t = 0.95, p = 0.35), HDL-cholesterol (t = 0.36, p = 0.72), and triglycerides (t = 0.79, p = 0.44); and treatment duration (t = 0.19, p = 0.85). In sub-group analysis, the P-Selectin-lowering effect with lipophilic statins (SMD = −0.37, 95% CI −0.55 to −0.18, p < 0.001; I2 = 72.2%, p < 0.001) was relatively larger than that with hydrophilic statins (SMD = −0.19, 95% CI −0.38 to −0.004, p = 0.046; I2 = 22.7%, p = 0.25, Figure 5); however, this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.45).
When considering individual agents, a significant lowering effect was observed with simvastatin (SMD = −0.32, 95% CI −0.57 to −0.08, p = 0.005; I2 = 64.5%, p < 0.001) and fluvastatin (SMD = −0.67, 95% CI −1.05 to −0.28, p = 0.001; I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.89), but not with atorvastatin (SMD = −0.39, 95% CI −0.88 to 0.11, p = 0.12; I2 = 86.5%, p < 0.001), pravastatin (SMD = −0.19, 95% CI −0.41 to 0.02, p = 0.06; I2 = 32.9%, p = 0.18), or pitavastatin (SMD = −0.21, 95% CI −0.44 to 0.02, p = 0.07; I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.98) (Figure 6). As reported in Figure 7, a significant P-Selectin-lowering effect was reported in studies conducted in Asia (SMD = −0.47, 95% CI −0.82 to −0.12, p = 0.008; I2 = 86.3%, p < 0.001) and Europe (SMD = −0.35, 95% CI −0.51 to −0.18, p < 0.001; I2 = 32.9%, p = 0.08) but not America (SMD = −0.05, 95% CI −0.28 to 0.17, p = 0.63; I2 = 20.7%, p = 0.26).
We further sought to identify more homogeneous study sub-groups according to statin used and continent. In a sub-group of nine studies (10 treatment arms) conducted in Europe using atorvastatin [43,47,58,60,62,66,82,90,93], the significant reduction in P-Selectin concentrations (SMD = −0.37, 95% CI −0.60 to −0.14, p = 0.002) was associated with a markedly lower heterogeneity (I2 = 24.1%, p = 0.22) (Figure 8).

3.2.6. Certainty of Evidence

The initial level of certainty for P-Selectin SMD values was considered moderate because of the interventional nature of the studies (rating 3, ⊕⊕⊕⊝). After considering the low risk of bias in all studies (upgrade one level), a generally large heterogeneity was partially explained by the specific statin used and the continent where the study was conducted (no rating change required), the lack of indirectness (no rating change required), the relatively low imprecision (relatively narrow confidence intervals without threshold crossing, no rating change required), the relatively small effect size (SMD = −0.39, downgrade one level), and the absence of publication bias (no rating change required); the overall level of certainty remained moderate (rating 3, ⊕⊕⊕⊝).

3.3. Meta-Analysis of Soluble L-Selectin

3.3.1. Study Characteristics

Four studies reported six treatment arms in 186 participants (mean age 55 years, 59% males) [34,42,76,93]. The statin used was simvastatin in two arms [34,93], pitavastatin in two [76], and atorvastatin [42] and pravastatin [34] in one, respectively. Duration of therapy ranged between 4 and 24 weeks (Table 1).

3.3.2. Risk of Bias

The risk of bias was low in all studies [34,42,76,93] (Table 2).

3.3.3. Results of Individual Studies and Syntheses

The forest plot for circulating L-Selectin concentrations before and after statin treatment is shown in Figure 9. In five arms [34,42,76], concentrations were lower after treatment (mean difference range, −1.50 to −0.13), and the difference was statistically significant in two [34,76]. In the remaining arm [93], L-Selectin concentrations were non-significantly higher after treatment. Random-effects models were used in view of the large heterogeneity observed (I2 = 71.1%, p = 0.004). Pooled results showed that L-Selectin concentrations were significantly lower after treatment (SMD = −0.49, 95% CI −0.89 to −0.10, p = 0.014). In sensitivity analysis, the corresponding pooled SMD values were not substantially altered when individual studies were sequentially removed (effect size range, between −0.61 and −0.33, Figure 10).

3.3.4. Publication Bias

Assessment of publication bias was not possible because of the small number of studies.

3.3.5. Meta-Regression and Subgroup Analysis

Meta-regression and sub-group analysis were not possible because of the small number of studies.

3.3.6. Certainty of Evidence

The initial level of certainty for L-Selectin SMD values was considered moderate because of the interventional nature of the studies (rating 3, ⊕⊕⊕⊝). After considering the low risk of bias in all studies (upgrade one level), a large unexplained heterogeneity (downgrade one level), the lack of indirectness (no rating change required), the relatively low imprecision (relatively narrow confidence intervals without threshold crossing, no rating change required), the relatively small effect size (SMD = −0.49, downgrade one level), and the lack of assessment of publication bias (downgrade one level), the overall level of certainty was considered very low (rating 1, ⊕⊝⊝⊝).

3.4. Meta-Analysis of Soluble E-Selectin

3.4.1. Study Characteristics

Thirty-eight studies reported 41 treatment arms in 1097 patients (mean age 55 years, 60% males) [33,36,37,39,40,41,43,44,45,46,48,51,53,54,55,57,58,60,61,64,67,69,72,73,75,76,77,79,80,82,83,85,86,88,89,91,92,93]. Simvastatin was used in 19 arms [33,36,37,39,43,53,54,55,57,58,60,61,73,82,83,85,86,91,92,93], atorvastatin in 15 [43,44,45,46,51,67,72,75,77,79,80,88,89], pravastatin in 2 [40,69], pitavastatin in 2 [76], various combination of statins in 2 [48,64], and fluvastatin in 1 [41]. Duration of therapy ranged between 4 and 52 weeks (Table 1).

3.4.2. Risk of Bias

The risk of bias was low in all studies [33,36,37,39,40,41,43,44,45,46,48,51,53,54,55,57,58,60,61,64,67,69,72,73,75,76,77,79,80,82,83,85,86,88,89,91,92,93] (Table 2).

3.4.3. Results of Individual Studies and Syntheses

The forest plot for circulating E-Selectin concentrations before and after statin treatment is shown in Figure 11. In nine arms [43,49,67,70,74,79,82,87,93], concentrations were higher after treatment (mean difference range, 0.03 to 0.63); however, a significant difference was reported only in one [83]. Virtually identical pre- and post-treatment concentrations were reported in two arms [36,54]. In the remaining arms [37,40,41,43,44,45,46,48,51,53,55,58,61,67,73,75,76,79,80,82,85,86,88,89,91,92,93], E-Selectin concentrations were lower after treatment (mean difference range, −0.04 to −11.66), with a significant difference reported in 13 [37,41,44,45,48,51,61,76,79,82,92]. Extreme heterogeneity between studies was observed (I2 = 90.4%, p < 0.001), requiring the use of random-effects models. Pooled results showed that circulating E-Selectin concentrations were significantly lower after treatment (SMD = −0.73, 95% CI −1.02 to −0.43, p < 0.001). In sensitivity analysis, the corresponding pooled SMD values were not substantially altered when individual studies were sequentially removed (effect size range, between −0.76 and −0.53, Figure 12A). However, the funnel plot analysis, reported in Figure 12B, detected a distortive effect of three studies (four treatment arms) [45,51,61]. Their removal attenuated both the effect size (SMD = −0.33, 95% CI −0.50 to −0.16, p < 0.001) and the magnitude of the heterogeneity (I2 = 71.4%, p < 0.001).

3.4.4. Publication Bias

The analysis of the remaining 37 treatment arms did not show publication bias (Begg’s test, p = 0.57; Egger’s test, p = 0.90). However, the “trim-and-fill” method identified four potential missing studies to be added to the left side of the funnel plot to ensure symmetry (adjusted SMD = −0.41, 95% CI −0.58 to −0.24, p < 0.001; Figure 13).

3.4.5. Meta-Regression and Subgroup Analysis

In univariate meta-regression, there were no significant associations between effect size and age (t = −0.23, p = 0.82), proportion of males (t = −0.58, p = 0.57), body mass index (t = 0.43, p = 0.67), publication year (t = −0.87, p = 0.31), sample size (t = −0.90, p = 0.38), baseline total cholesterol (t = −0.37, p = 0.71), LDL-cholesterol (t = −0.30, p = 0.77), HDL-cholesterol (t = 0.91, p = 0.37), and triglycerides (t = 0.94, p = 0.36), and treatment duration (t = −1.44, p = 0.16). In sub-group analysis, a significant lowering effect was observed with lipophilic (SMD = −0.35, 95% CI −0.54 to −0.17, p < 0.001; I2 = 71.4%, p < 0.001) but not hydrophilic statins (SMD = −0.06, 95% CI −0.49 to 0.37, p = 0.65; I2 = 33.5%, p = 0.22) (Figure 14). When assessing individual agents, a significant lowering effect was observed with simvastatin (SMD = −0.28, 95% CI −0.52 to −0.03, p = 0.03; I2 = 70.2%, p < 0.001), atorvastatin (SMD = −0.27, 95% CI −0.53 to −0.02, p = 0.035; I2 = 54.1%, p = 0.016), and pitavastatin (SMD = −1.20, 95% CI −1.63 to −0.76, p < 0.001; I2 = 35.0%, p = 0.22), but not pravastatin (SMD = −0.06, 95% CI −0.49 to 0.37, p = 0.65; I2 = 33.5%, p = 0.22) (Figure 15). Moreover, as reported in Figure 16, a significant decrease in E-Selectin concentrations was reported in studies conducted in Europe (SMD = −0.36, 95% CI −0.55 to −0.16, p < 0.001; I2 = 66.7%, p < 0.001) but not America (SMD = −0.13, 95% CI −0.67 to 0.40 p = 0.62; I2 = 20.7%, p = 0.26) or Asia (SMD = −0.53, 95% CI −1.10 to 0.03, p = 0.06; I2 = 84.7%, p < 0.001).

3.4.6. Certainty of Evidence

The initial level of certainty for E-Selectin SMD values was considered moderate because of the interventional nature of the studies (rating 3, ⊕⊕⊕⊝). After considering the low risk of bias in all studies (upgrade one level), a large heterogeneity that was only partially attenuated after removing three studies (downgrade one level); the lack of indirectness (no rating change required); the relatively low imprecision (relatively narrow confidence intervals without threshold crossing, no rating change required); the relatively moderate effect size (SMD = −0.73, no rating change required); and the lack of publication bias (no rating change required), the overall level of certainty remained moderate (rating 3, ⊕⊕⊕⊝).

4. Discussion

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, statin treatment significantly reduced the concentrations of soluble E-Selectin, L-Selectin, and P-Selectin in participants with a range of cardiovascular risk profiles. In sensitivity analysis, the pooled SMD values were not substantially altered when individual studies were sequentially removed. In meta-regression, no significant associations were observed between effect size and various patient and study characteristics, including baseline lipids. The absence of significant associations with treatment duration, ranging between 2 and 52 weeks, suggests that the selectin-lowering effects of statins are evident relatively early during treatment and are maintained for up to 1 year.
The activation of selectins, particularly P-Selectin and E-Selectin, has an established role in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis and its clinical manifestations [94]. The results of several observational studies further support this proposition. In the Women’s Health Study, participants with baseline soluble P-selectin concentrations in the highest quartile had a relative risk of suffering a cardiovascular event during a 3.5-year follow up period 2.2 times higher than those in the lowest quartile (95% CI 1.2 to 4.2). Notably, this association was independent of obesity, hypertension, hypercholesterolaemia, diabetes, and physical activity [8]. In another study in 733 patients undergoing coronary revascularization, those with baseline P-selectin concentrations in the second, third, and fourth quartile were at higher risk of experiencing a major cardiovascular event during a 9.7-year follow up period compared to the first quartile (hazard ratio, HR, 1.23, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.69; HR 1.48, 95% CI 1.08 to 2.02; and HR 1.57, 95% CI 1.11 to 2.15, respectively), after adjusting for confounders [9]. In a prospective study of 1041 adult patients with end-stage chronic kidney disease, each 0.1-log unit increase in P-selectin concentrations was significantly associated, after adjusting for confounders, with cardiovascular mortality (HR 1.10, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.27) and sudden cardiac death (HR 1.12, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.25) in males, but not in females, during a median follow-up of 38.2 months [10]. In a similar group of patients with end-stage renal disease, the risk of fatal and non-fatal cardiovascular events was significantly higher, after adjusting for confounders, in the highest vs. lowest tertile of soluble E-Selectin concentrations (HR 1.93, 95% CI 1.03 to 3.56) during a 21-month follow-up period [11]. Finally, in 423 patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and other cardiovascular risk factors followed for 19 months, those with soluble E-Selectin concentrations in the upper tertile had a significantly higher risk of adverse clinical events when compared to the bottom tertile (relative risk, RR, 3.70, 95% CI 2.51 to 5.31) [12].
The observed associations between soluble selectins and cardiovascular risk have stimulated the search for novel therapies that target these cell adhesion molecules. One of these agents, the monoclonal antibody against P-selectin inclacumab, has shown some promise in minimizing cardiac damage in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention [95,96]. The results of our systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that soluble selectin-lowering might also be important in the context of statin therapy, an established treatment option in primary and secondary cardiovascular prevention [97,98,99]. Whist the exact mechanisms of action involved in the statin-mediated reduction in soluble selectin concentrations remain elusive, in vitro studies have shown that atorvastatin significantly prevents the overexpression of E-Selectin induced by cigarette smoking extract in human umbilical vein endothelial cells through inhibiting the NF-KB signal pathway, a critical pathway involved in inflammatory processes [100,101]. Treatment with simvastatin has been shown to prevent the release of the enzyme semicarbazide-sensitive amine oxidase/vascular adhesion protein 1, with consequent reduction of soluble E-Selectin [102]. Similar effects of simvastatin on the expression of P-Selectin and E-selectin have been reported in other studies [103]. Furthermore, treatment with atorvastatin significantly reduced the expression of P-Selectin in platelet-derived microparticles in patients with peripheral vascular disease [104].
In subgroup analysis, lipophilic, but not hydrophilic, statins significantly reduced soluble E-Selectin concentrations. However, these results need to be interpreted with caution because of the extremely low number of treatment arms, two, involving hydrophilic statins. Significant differences were also observed with individual statins, with simvastatin and fluvastatin being particularly effective against P-Selectin, and simvastatin, atorvastatin, and pitavastatin against E-Selectin. Further research is warranted to investigate whether specific statin classes and individual agents have superior capacity to reduce soluble selectin concentrations and whether this effect might be particularly beneficial in specific patient groups. Another interesting observation, in subgroup analysis, was the difference in selectin-lowering according to specific continent, with studies conducted in Europe showing a particular efficacy against P-Selectin and E-Selectin. Previous studies have investigated the concentrations of soluble selectins in different ethnic groups. In the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis, no significant differences in soluble E-Selectin concentrations were observed between white, black, Hispanic, and Chinese participants [105]. Other studies have also failed to detect significant differences in soluble E-Selectin and P-Selectin across ethnic groups [106,107,108]. It remains to be established whether potential ethnic-related differences in statin-mediated selectin-lowering effects might translate into different effects on surrogate markers and/or clinical endpoints in intervention trials.
The strengths of our study include the relatively large number of treatment arms analysed (41 for P-Selectin, five for L-Selectin, and 41 for E-Selectin), the assessment of possible associations between effect size and a comprehensive range of study and patient characteristics by means of meta-regression and/or subgroup analysis, and a robust assessment of the certainty of evidence according to GRADE. One significant limitation is the large-to-extreme between-study heterogeneity, which limits the generalizability of our results. However, particularly in studies investigating P-selectin, this heterogeneity was substantially attenuated in a sub-group of studies performed in Europe using atorvastatin.

5. Conclusions

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, treatment with statins was associated with a significant reduction in the concentrations of soluble P-Selectin, L-Selectin, and E-Selectin, a critical family of cell adhesion molecules that is involved in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. The selectin-lowering effect was independent of various patient and study characteristics, particularly baseline lipid profile and treatment duration, and was more prominent with specific agents, i.e., simvastatin, in studies conducted in Europe. These results warrant adequately designed intervention trials to determine whether selectin-lowering can mediate the atheroprotective effects of these agents and whether specific patient groups are more likely to benefit from this phenomenon. In particular, the reported differences in effect size according to the continent where the study was conducted require further research to determine whether ethnicity is an important mediator of the effects of statin treatment on circulating soluble selectins.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/biomedicines9111707/s1, Table S1: PRISMA 2020 abstract checklist; Table S2: PRISMA 2020 checklist and search strategy.

Author Contributions

A.Z. and A.A.M. designed the study, screened the articles, assessed the risk of bias, extracted the data, analysed, and interpreted the data. A.A.M. wrote the first draft of the manuscript. A.A.M. and A.Z. reviewed the subsequent versions and the final draft. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not required as this was a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies.

Informed Consent Statement

Not required as this was a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this systematic review and meta-analysis are available from the first author, A.Z., upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Price, D.T.; Loscalzo, J. Cellular adhesion molecules and atherogenesis. Am. J. Med. 1999, 107, 85–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. McEver, R.P. Selectins: Lectins that initiate cell adhesion under flow. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2002, 14, 581–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Eriksson, E.E.; Xie, X.; Werr, J.; Thoren, P.; Lindbom, L. Importance of primary capture and L-selectin-dependent secondary capture in leukocyte accumulation in inflammation and atherosclerosis in vivo. J. Exp. Med. 2001, 194, 205–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Galkina, E.; Ley, K. Vascular adhesion molecules in atherosclerosis. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2007, 27, 2292–2301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Roldan, V.; Marin, F.; Lip, G.Y.; Blann, A.D. Soluble E-selectin in cardiovascular disease and its risk factors. A review of the literature. Thromb. Haemost. 2003, 90, 1007–1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Nagy, B., Jr.; Miszti-Blasius, K.; Kerenyi, A.; Clemetson, K.J.; Kappelmayer, J. Potential therapeutic targeting of platelet-mediated cellular interactions in atherosclerosis and inflammation. Curr. Med. Chem. 2012, 19, 518–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Theofilis, P.; Sagris, M.; Oikonomou, E.; Antonopoulos, A.S.; Siasos, G.; Tsioufis, C.; Tousoulis, D. Inflammatory Mechanisms Contributing to Endothelial Dysfunction. Biomedicines 2021, 9, 781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ridker, P.M.; Buring, J.E.; Rifai, N. Soluble P-selectin and the risk of future cardiovascular events. Circulation 2001, 103, 491–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tscharre, M.; Vogel, B.; Tentzeris, I.; Freynhofer, M.K.; Rohla, M.; Wojta, J.; Weiss, T.W.; Ay, C.; Huber, K.; Farhan, S. Prognostic Impact of Soluble P-Selectin on Long-Term Adverse Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Thromb. Haemost. 2019, 119, 340–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Scialla, J.J.; Plantinga, L.C.; Kao, W.H.; Jaar, B.; Powe, N.R.; Parekh, R.S. Soluble P-selectin levels are associated with cardiovascular mortality and sudden cardiac death in male dialysis patients. Am. J. Nephrol. 2011, 33, 224–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Malatino, L.S.; Stancanelli, B.; Cataliotti, A.; Bellanuova, I.; Fatuzzo, P.; Rapisarda, F.; Leonardis, D.; Tripepi, G.; Mallamaci, F.; Zoccali, C. Circulating E-selectin as a risk marker in patients with end-stage renal disease. J. Intern. Med. 2007, 262, 479–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Krishnamoorthy, S.; Khoo, C.W.; Lim, H.S.; Lane, D.A.; Pignatelli, P.; Basili, S.; Violi, F.; Lip, G.Y. Prognostic role of plasma von Willebrand factor and soluble E-selectin levels for future cardiovascular events in a ‘real-world’ community cohort of patients with atrial fibrillation. Eur. J. Clin. Investig. 2013, 43, 1032–1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Voutyritsa, E.; Kyriakos, G.; Patsouras, A.; Damaskos, C.; Garmpi, A.; Diamantis, E.; Garmpis, N.; Savvanis, S. Experimental Agents for the Treatment of Atherosclerosis: New Directions. J. Exp. Pharmacol. 2021, 13, 161–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chou, R.; Dana, T.; Blazina, I.; Daeges, M.; Jeanne, T.L. Statins for Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in Adults: Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA 2016, 316, 2008–2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Koskinas, K.C.; Siontis, G.C.M.; Piccolo, R.; Mavridis, D.; Raber, L.; Mach, F.; Windecker, S. Effect of statins and non-statin LDL-lowering medications on cardiovascular outcomes in secondary prevention: A meta-analysis of randomized trials. Eur. Heart J. 2018, 39, 1172–1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Liao, J.K. Effects of statins on 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme a reductase inhibition beyond low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Am. J. Cardiol. 2005, 96, 24F–33F. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Oikonomou, E.; Leopoulou, M.; Theofilis, P.; Antonopoulos, A.S.; Siasos, G.; Latsios, G.; Mystakidi, V.C.; Antoniades, C.; Tousoulis, D. A link between inflammation and thrombosis in atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases: Clinical and therapeutic implications. Atherosclerosis 2020, 309, 16–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wong, D.; Dorovini-Zis, K. Regualtion by cytokines and lipopolysaccharide of E-selectin expression by human brain microvessel endothelial cells in primary culture. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 1996, 55, 225–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Hansson, G.K. Immune mechanisms in atherosclerosis. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2001, 21, 1876–1890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Moola, S.; Munn, Z.; Tufanaru, C.; Aromataris, E.; Sears, K.; Sfetcu, R.; Currie, M.; Qureshi, R.; Mattis, P.; Lisy, K.; et al. Systematic reviews of etiology and risk. In Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewer’s Manual; Aromataris, E., Munn, Z., Eds.; Johanna Briggs Institute: Adelaide, SA, Australia, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  21. Cohen, J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed.; Erlbaum: Hillsdale, NJ, USA, 1988. [Google Scholar]
  22. Balshem, H.; Helfand, M.; Schunemann, H.J.; Oxman, A.D.; Kunz, R.; Brozek, J.; Vist, G.E.; Falck-Ytter, Y.; Meerpohl, J.; Norris, S.; et al. GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2011, 64, 401–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hultcrantz, M.; Rind, D.; Akl, E.A.; Treweek, S.; Mustafa, R.A.; Iorio, A.; Alper, B.S.; Meerpohl, J.J.; Murad, M.H.; Ansari, M.T.; et al. The GRADE Working Group clarifies the construct of certainty of evidence. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2017, 87, 4–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Zhang, Y.; Coello, P.A.; Guyatt, G.H.; Yepes-Nunez, J.J.; Akl, E.A.; Hazlewood, G.; Pardo-Hernandez, H.; Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta, I.; Qaseem, A.; Williams, J.W., Jr.; et al. GRADE guidelines: 20. Assessing the certainty of evidence in the importance of outcomes or values and preferences-inconsistency, imprecision, and other domains. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2019, 111, 83–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021, 372, n71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hozo, S.P.; Djulbegovic, B.; Hozo, I. Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 2005, 5, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Bowden, J.; Tierney, J.F.; Copas, A.J.; Burdett, S. Quantifying, displaying and accounting for heterogeneity in the meta-analysis of RCTs using standard and generalised Q statistics. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 2011, 11, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Higgins, J.P.; Thompson, S.G. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat. Med. 2002, 21, 1539–1558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Tobias, A. Assessing the influence of a single study in the meta-analysis estimate. Stata Tech. Bull. 1999, 47, 15–17. [Google Scholar]
  30. Begg, C.B.; Mazumdar, M. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics 1994, 50, 1088–1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sterne, J.A.; Egger, M. Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis: Guidelines on choice of axis. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2001, 54, 1046–1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Duval, S.; Tweedie, R. Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics 2000, 56, 455–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Koh, K.K.; Cardillo, C.; Bui, M.N.; Hathaway, L.; Csako, G.; Waclawiw, M.A.; Panza, J.A.; Cannon, R.O., 3rd. Vascular effects of estrogen and cholesterol-lowering therapies in hypercholesterolemic postmenopausal women. Circulation 1999, 99, 354–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Rauch, U.; Osende, J.I.; Chesebro, J.H.; Fuster, V.; Vorchheimer, D.A.; Harris, K.; Harris, P.; Sandler, D.A.; Fallon, J.T.; Jayaraman, S.; et al. Statins and cardiovascular diseases: The multiple effects of lipid-lowering therapy by statins. Atherosclerosis 2000, 153, 181–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Romano, M.; Mezzetti, A.; Marulli, C.; Ciabattoni, G.; Febo, F.; Di Ienno, S.; Roccaforte, S.; Vigneri, S.; Nubile, G.; Milani, M.; et al. Fluvastatin reduces soluble P-selectin and ICAM-1 levels in hypercholesterolemic patients: Role of nitric oxide. J. Investig. Med. 2000, 48, 183–189. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  36. Sbarouni, E.; Kroupis, C.; Kyriakides, Z.S.; Koniavitou, K.; Kremastinos, D.T. Cell adhesion molecules in relation to simvastatin and hormone replacement therapy in coronary artery disease. Eur. Heart J. 2000, 21, 975–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Alonso, R.; Mata, P.; De Andres, R.; Villacastin, B.P.; Martinez-Gonzalez, J.; Badimon, L. Sustained long-term improvement of arterial endothelial function in heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia patients treated with simvastatin. Atherosclerosis 2001, 157, 423–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Blann, A.D.; Gurney, D.; Hughes, E.; Buggins, P.; Silverman, S.H.; Lip, G.Y.H. Influence of Pravastatin on Lipoproteins, and on Endothelial, Platelet, and Inflammatory Markers in Subjects With Peripheral Artery Disease. Am. J. Cardiol. 2001, 88, 89–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sardo, M.A.; Castaldo, M.; Cinquegrani, M.; Bonaiuto, M.; Maesano, A.; Schepis, F.; Zema, M.C.; Campo, G.M.; Squadrito, F.; Saitta, A. Effects of simvastatin treatment on sICAM-1 and sE-selectin levels in hypercholesterolemic subjects. Atherosclerosis 2001, 155, 143–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Solheim, S.; Seljeflot, I.; Arnesen, H.; Eritsland, J.; Eikvar, L. Reduced levels of TNF alpha in hypercholesterolemic individuals after treatment with pravastatin for 8 weeks. Atherosclerosis 2001, 157, 411–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Van Haelst, P.L.; van Doormaal, J.J.; May, J.F.; Gans, R.O.; Crijns, H.J.; Tervaert, J.W. Secondary prevention with fluvastatin decreases levels of adhesion molecules, neopterin and C-reactive protein. Eur. J. Intern. Med. 2001, 12, 503–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Atalar, E.; Ozmen, F.; Haznedaroglu, I.; Acil, T.; Ozer, N.; Ovunc, K.; Aksoyek, S.; Kes, S. Effects of short-term atorvastatin treatment on global fibrinolytic capacity, and sL-selectin and sFas levels in hyperlipidemic patients with coronary artery disease. Int. J. Cardiol. 2002, 84, 227–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Seljeflot, I.; Tonstad, S.; Hjermann, I.; Arnesen, H. Reduced expression of endothelial cell markers after 1 year treatment with simvastatin and atorvastatin in patients with coronary heart disease. Atherosclerosis 2002, 162, 179–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Bogaty, P.; Dagenais, G.R.; Poirier, P.; Boyer, L.; Auclair, L.; Pepin, G.; Jobin, J.; Arsenault, M. Effect of atorvastatin on exercise-induced myocardial ischemia in patients with stable angina pectoris. Am. J. Cardiol. 2003, 92, 1192–1195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Dalla Nora, E.; Passaro, A.; Zamboni, P.F.; Calzoni, F.; Fellin, R.; Solini, A. Atorvastatin improves metabolic control and endothelial function in type 2 diabetic patients: A placebo-controlled study. J. Endocrinol. Investig. 2003, 26, 73–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Empen, K.; Frost, R.J.; Geiss, H.C.; Otto, C.; Parhofer, K.G. Differential effects of fenofibrate versus atorvastatin on the concentrations of E-selectin and vascular cellular adhesion molecule-1 in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and mixed hyperlipoproteinemia: A randomized cross-over trial. Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 2003, 2, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Ferroni, P.; Martini, F.; Cardarello, C.M.; Gazzaniga, P.P.; Davi, G.; Basili, S. Enhanced interleukin-1beta in hypercholesterolemia: Effects of simvastatin and low-dose aspirin. Circulation 2003, 108, 1673–1675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Hernandez, C.; Lecube, A.; Barbera, G.; Chacon, P.; Lima, J.; Simo, R. Effects of hypolipidemic treatment on serum markers of vascular inflammation in dyslipidemic men. Med. Sci. Monit. 2003, 9, CR114–CR119. [Google Scholar]
  49. Homma, Y.; Homma, K.; Iizuka, S.; Iigaya, K. Effects of Fluvastatin on Plasma Levels of Low-Density Lipoprotein Subfractions, Oxidized Low-Density Lipoprotein, and Soluble Adhesion Molecules: A Twenty-Four–Week, Open-Label, Dose-Increasing Study. Curr. Ther. Res. 2003, 64, 236–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Malyszko, J.; Malyszko, J.S.; Mysliwiec, M. Fluvastin therapy affects TAFI concentration in kidney transplant recipients. Transpl. Int. 2003, 16, 53–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Nawawi, H.; Osman, N.S.; Annuar, R.; Khalid, B.A.K.; Yusoff, K. Soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 and interleukin-6 levels reflect endothelial dysfunction in patients with primary hypercholesterolaemia treated with atorvastatin. Atherosclerosis 2003, 169, 283–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Puccetti, L.; Pasqui, A.L.; Pastorelli, M.; Bova, G.; Di Renzo, M.; Leo, A.; Cercignani, M.; Palazzuoli, A.; Auteri, A.; Bruni, F. Platelet hyperactivity after statin treatment discontinuation. Thromb. Haemost. 2003, 90, 476–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Van Haelst, P.L.; van Doormaal, J.J.; Asselbergs, F.W.; van Roon, A.M.; Veeger, N.J.; Henneman, M.M.; Smit, A.J.; Tervaert, J.W.; May, J.F.; Gans, R.O. Correlates of endothelial function and their relationship with inflammation in patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia. Clin. Sci. 2003, 104, 627–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Brown, S.L.; Raal, F.J.; Panz, V.R.; Stevens, B.A.; Veller, M.G. High-dose atorvastatin therapy is required for significant improvement of endothelial function in heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemic patients. Cardiovasc. J. S. Afr. 2004, 15, 70–75. [Google Scholar]
  55. Ceriello, A.; Quagliaro, L.; Piconi, L.; Assaloni, R.; Da Ros, R.; Maier, A.; Esposito, K.; Giugliano, D. Effect of postprandial hypertriglyceridemia and hyperglycemia on circulating adhesion molecules and oxidative stress generation and the possible role of simvastatin treatment. Diabetes 2004, 53, 701–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Cha, J.K.; Jeong, M.H.; Kim, J.W. Statin reduces the platelet P-selectin expression in atherosclerotic ischemic stroke. J. Thromb. Thrombolysis 2004, 18, 39–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Koh, K.K.; Son, J.W.; Ahn, J.Y.; Jin, D.K.; Kim, H.S.; Choi, Y.M.; Ahn, T.H.; Kim, D.S.; Shin, E.K. Vascular effects of diet and statin in hypercholesterolemic patients. Int. J. Cardiol. 2004, 95, 185–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Malyszko, J.; Malyszko, J.S.; Hryszko, T.; Mysliwiec, M. Increased soluble CD40L levels are reduced by long-term simvastatin treatment in peritoneally dialyzed patients. Blood Coagul. Fibrinolysis 2004, 15, 463–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Nomura, S.; Shouzu, A.; Omoto, S.; Nishikawa, M.; Iwasaka, T. Effects of losartan and simvastatin on monocyte-derived microparticles in hypertensive patients with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus. Clin. Appl. Thromb. Hemost. 2004, 10, 133–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Skrha, J.; Stulc, T.; Hilgertova, J.; Weiserova, H.; Kvasnicka, J.; Ceska, R. Effect of simvastatin and fenofibrate on endothelium in Type 2 diabetes. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2004, 493, 183–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Akcay, M.N.; Akcay, G.; Kiziltunc, A.; Ozturk, G.; Aydinli, B. The effect of short-term treatment with atorvastatin on E-selectin levels in severely burned patients. Int. J. Clin. Pharmacol. Res. 2005, 25, 65–69. [Google Scholar]
  62. Undas, A.; Celinska-Lowenhoff, M.; Domagala, T.B.; Iwaniec, T.; Dropinski, J.; Lowenhoff, T.; Szczeklik, A. Early antithrombotic and anti-inflammatory effects of simvastatin versus fenofibrate in patients with hypercholesterolemia. Thromb. Haemost. 2005, 94, 193–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Bleske, B.E.; Nicklas, J.M.; Bard, R.L.; Brook, R.D.; Gurbel, P.A.; Bliden, K.P.; Rajagopalan, S.; Pitt, B. Neutral effect on markers of heart failure, inflammation, endothelial activation and function, and vagal tone after high-dose HMG-CoA reductase inhibition in non-diabetic patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy and average low-density lipoprotein level. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2006, 47, 338–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Marschang, P.; Friedrich, G.J.; Ditlbacher, H.; Stoeger, A.; Nedden, D.Z.; Kirchmair, R.; Dienstl, A.; Pachinger, O.; Patsch, J.R. Reduction of soluble P-selectin by statins is inversely correlated with the progression of coronary artery disease. Int. J. Cardiol. 2006, 106, 183–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Peverill, R.E.; Smolich, J.J.; Malan, E.; Goldstat, R.; Davis, S.R. Comparison of effects of pravastatin and hormone therapy on soluble P-selectin and platelet P-selectin expression in postmenopausal hypercholesterolemic women. Maturitas 2006, 53, 158–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Potaczek, D.P.; Undas, A.; Celinska-Lowenhoff, M.; Szczeklik, A. Interleukin-6 -174 G/C promoter polymorphism and effects of fenofibrate and simvastatin on inflammatory markers in hypercholesterolemic patients. Blood Coagul. Fibrinolysis 2006, 17, 35–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Alber, H.F.; Frick, M.; Sussenbacher, A.; Dorler, J.; Dichtl, W.; Stocker, E.M.; Pachinger, O.; Weidinger, F. Effect of atorvastatin on peripheral endothelial function and systemic inflammatory markers in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Wien. Med. Wochenschr. 2007, 157, 73–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Inami, N.; Nomura, S.; Shouzu, A.; Omoto, S.; Kimura, Y.; Takahashi, N.; Tanaka, A.; Nanba, M.; Shouda, Y.; Iwasaka, T. Effects of pitavastatin on adiponectin in patients with hyperlipidemia. Pathophysiol. Haemost. Thromb. 2007, 36, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Jeffs, L.S.; Skilton, F.; Nitschke, J.; Bannister, K.M.; Faull, R.J. Effect of pravastatin on markers of endothelial activation in dialysis patients. Nephrology 2007, 12, 234–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Souza-Costa, D.C.; Sandrim, V.C.; Lopes, L.F.; Gerlach, R.F.; Rego, E.M.; Tanus-Santos, J.E. Anti-inflammatory effects of atorvastatin: Modulation by the T-786C polymorphism in the endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene. Atherosclerosis 2007, 193, 438–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Barreto, A.C.; Maeda, N.Y.; Soares, R.P.; Cicero, C.; Lopes, A.A. Rosuvastatin and vascular dysfunction markers in pulmonary arterial hypertension: A placebo-controlled study. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. 2008, 41, 657–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Bolewski, A.; Lipiecki, J.; Plewa, R.; Burchardt, P.; Siminiak, T. The effect of atorvastatin treatment on lipid profile and adhesion molecule levels in hypercholesterolemic patients: Relation to low-density lipoprotein receptor gene polymorphism. Cardiology 2008, 111, 140–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Del Papa, N.; Cortiana, M.; Vitali, C.; Silvestris, I.; Maglione, W.; Comina, D.P.; Lucchi, T.; Cortelezzi, A. Simvastatin reduces endothelial activation and damage but is partially ineffective in inducing endothelial repair in systemic sclerosis. J. Rheumatol. 2008, 35, 1323–1328. [Google Scholar]
  74. Forst, T.; Wilhelm, B.; Pfutzner, A.; Fuchs, W.; Lehmann, U.; Schaper, F.; Weber, M.; Muller, J.; Konrad, T.; Hanefeld, M. Investigation of the vascular and pleiotropic effects of atorvastatin and pioglitazone in a population at high cardiovascular risk. Diabetes Vasc. Dis. Res. 2008, 5, 298–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Hogue, J.C.; Lamarche, B.; Tremblay, A.J.; Bergeron, J.; Gagne, C.; Couture, P. Differential effect of atorvastatin and fenofibrate on plasma oxidized low-density lipoprotein, inflammation markers, and cell adhesion molecules in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Metabolism 2008, 57, 380–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Nomura, S.; Shouzu, A.; Omoto, S.; Inami, N.; Tanaka, A.; Nanba, M.; Shouda, Y.; Takahashi, N.; Kimura, Y.; Iwasaka, T. Correlation between adiponectin and reduction of cell adhesion molecules after pitavastatin treatment in hyperlipidemic patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Thromb. Res. 2008, 122, 39–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Stulc, T.; Vrablik, M.; Kasalova, Z.; Marinov, I.; Svobodova, H.; Ceska, R. Leukocyte and endothelial adhesion molecules in patients with hypercholesterolemia: The effect of atorvastatin treatment. Physiol. Res. 2008, 57, 185–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Wang, L.; Rockwood, J.; Zak, D.; Devaraj, S.; Jialal, I. Simvastatin reduces circulating plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 activity in volunteers with the metabolic syndrome. Metab. Syndr. Relat. Disord. 2008, 6, 149–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Baldassarre, D.; Porta, B.; Camera, M.; Amato, M.; Arquati, M.; Brusoni, B.; Fiorentini, C.; Montorsi, P.; Romano, S.; Veglia, F.; et al. Markers of inflammation, thrombosis and endothelial activation correlate with carotid IMT regression in stable coronary disease after atorvastatin treatment. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2009, 19, 481–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Grip, O.; Janciauskiene, S. Atorvastatin reduces plasma levels of chemokine (CXCL10) in patients with Crohn’s disease. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e5263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Nomura, S.; Shouzu, A.; Omoto, S.; Inami, N.; Shimazu, T.; Satoh, D.; Kajiura, T.; Yamada, K.; Urase, F.; Maeda, Y.; et al. Effects of pitavastatin on monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 in hyperlipidemic patients. Blood Coagul. Fibrinolysis 2009, 20, 440–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Prazny, M.; Kasalova, Z.; Mazoch, J.; Kvasnicka, J.; Skrha, J. Microvascular Reactivity and Endothelial Function in Type 2 Diabetic Patients with Hyperlipidemia Treated with Simvastatin: 3-year Follow-up. Prague Med. Rep. 2009, 110, 290–300. [Google Scholar]
  83. Serrano, C.V., Jr.; Pesaro, A.E.; de Lemos, J.A.; Rached, F.; Segre, C.A.; Gomes, F.; Ribeiro, A.F.; Nicolau, J.C.; Yoshida, V.M.; Monteiro, H.P. Native LDL-cholesterol mediated monocyte adhesion molecule overexpression is blocked by simvastatin. Cardiovasc. Drugs Ther. 2009, 23, 215–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Fichtenbaum, C.J.; Yeh, T.M.; Evans, S.R.; Aberg, J.A. Treatment with pravastatin and fenofibrate improves atherogenic lipid profiles but not inflammatory markers in ACTG 5087. J. Clin. Lipidol. 2010, 4, 279–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Kater, A.L.; Batista, M.C.; Ferreira, S.R. Improved endothelial function with simvastatin but unchanged insulin sensitivity with simvastatin or ezetimibe. Metabolism 2010, 59, 921–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Kirmizis, D.; Papagianni, A.; Dogrammatzi, F.; Skoura, L.; Belechri, A.M.; Alexopoulos, E.; Efstratiadis, G.; Memmos, D. Effects of simvastatin on markers of inflammation, oxidative stress and endothelial cell apoptosis in patients on chronic hemodialysis. J. Atheroscler. Thromb. 2010, 17, 1256–1265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Xu, D.Y.; Shu, J.; Huang, Q.Y.; Wasti, B.; Chen, C.; Liu, L.; Zhao, S.P. Evaluation of the lipid lowering ability, anti-inflammatory effects and clinical safety of intensive therapy with Zhibitai, a Chinese traditional medicine. Atherosclerosis 2010, 211, 237–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Wu, Y.W.; Kao, H.L.; Huang, C.L.; Chen, M.F.; Lin, L.Y.; Wang, Y.C.; Lin, Y.H.; Lin, H.J.; Tzen, K.Y.; Yen, R.F.; et al. The effects of 3-month atorvastatin therapy on arterial inflammation, calcification, abdominal adipose tissue and circulating biomarkers. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2012, 39, 399–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Altun, I.; Oz, F.; Arkaya, S.C.; Altun, I.; Bilge, A.K.; Umman, B.; Turkoglu, U.M. Effect of statins on endothelial function in patients with acute coronary syndrome: A prospective study using adhesion molecules and flow-mediated dilatation. J. Clin. Med. Res. 2014, 6, 354–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Pawelczyk, M.; Chmielewski, H.; Kaczorowska, B.; Przybyla, M.; Baj, Z. The influence of statin therapy on platelet activity markers in hyperlipidemic patients after ischemic stroke. Arch. Med. Sci. 2015, 11, 115–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Hernandez-Mijares, A.; Banuls, C.; Rovira-Llopis, S.; Diaz-Morales, N.; Escribano-Lopez, I.; de Pablo, C.; Alvarez, A.; Veses, S.; Rocha, M.; Victor, V.M. Effects of simvastatin, ezetimibe and simvastatin/ezetimibe on mitochondrial function and leukocyte/endothelial cell interactions in patients with hypercholesterolemia. Atherosclerosis 2016, 247, 40–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Barale, C.; Frascaroli, C.; Senkeev, R.; Cavalot, F.; Russo, I. Simvastatin Effects on Inflammation and Platelet Activation Markers in Hypercholesterolemia. Biomed. Res. Int. 2018, 2018, 6508709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Kotyla, P.J. Short course of simvastatin has no effect on markers of endothelial activation in normolipidemic patients with systemic sclerosis. J. Int. Med. Res. 2018, 46, 1893–1901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Dong, Z.M.; Chapman, S.M.; Brown, A.A.; Frenette, P.S.; Hynes, R.O.; Wagner, D.D. The combined role of P- and E-selectins in atherosclerosis. J. Clin. Investig. 1998, 102, 145–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Tardif, J.C.; Tanguay, J.F.; Wright, S.R.; Duchatelle, V.; Petroni, T.; Gregoire, J.C.; Ibrahim, R.; Heinonen, T.M.; Robb, S.; Bertrand, O.F.; et al. Effects of the P-selectin antagonist inclacumab on myocardial damage after percutaneous coronary intervention for non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: Results of the SELECT-ACS trial. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2013, 61, 2048–2055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Stahli, B.E.; Gebhard, C.; Duchatelle, V.; Cournoyer, D.; Petroni, T.; Tanguay, J.F.; Robb, S.; Mann, J.; Guertin, M.C.; Wright, R.S.; et al. Effects of the P-Selectin Antagonist Inclacumab on Myocardial Damage After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention According to Timing of Infusion: Insights From the SELECT-ACS Trial. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2016, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Cai, T.; Abel, L.; Langford, O.; Monaghan, G.; Aronson, J.K.; Stevens, R.J.; Lay-Flurrie, S.; Koshiaris, C.; McManus, R.J.; Hobbs, F.D.R.; et al. Associations between statins and adverse events in primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: Systematic review with pairwise, network, and dose-response meta-analyses. BMJ 2021, 374, n1537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Blais, J.E.; Wei, Y.; Yap, K.K.W.; Alwafi, H.; Ma, T.T.; Brauer, R.; Lau, W.C.Y.; Man, K.K.C.; Siu, C.W.; Tan, K.C.B.; et al. Trends in lipid-modifying agent use in 83 countries. Atherosclerosis 2021, 328, 44–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Salami, J.A.; Warraich, H.; Valero-Elizondo, J.; Spatz, E.S.; Desai, N.R.; Rana, J.S.; Virani, S.S.; Blankstein, R.; Khera, A.; Blaha, M.J.; et al. National Trends in Statin Use and Expenditures in the US Adult Population From 2002 to 2013: Insights From the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. JAMA Cardiol. 2017, 2, 56–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Wang, H.; Yin, J.; Guo, Y. Atorvastatin might resist tobacco smoking-induced endothelial inflammation through the inhibition of NF-kappaB signal pathway. Clin. Exp. Hypertens. 2019, 41, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Liu, T.; Zhang, L.; Joo, D.; Sun, S.C. NF-kappaB signaling in inflammation. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2017, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Sun, P.; Hernandez-Guillamon, M.; Campos-Martorell, M.; Simats, A.; Montaner, J.; Unzeta, M.; Sole, M. Simvastatin blocks soluble SSAO/VAP-1 release in experimental models of cerebral ischemia: Possible benefits for stroke-induced inflammation control. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Basis Dis. 2018, 1864, 542–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Eccles, K.A.; Sowden, H.; Porter, K.E.; Parkin, S.M.; Homer-Vanniasinkam, S.; Graham, A.M. Simvastatin alters human endothelial cell adhesion molecule expression and inhibits leukocyte adhesion under flow. Atherosclerosis 2008, 200, 69–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Mobarrez, F.; He, S.; Broijersen, A.; Wiklund, B.; Antovic, A.; Antovic, J.; Egberg, N.; Jorneskog, G.; Wallen, H. Atorvastatin reduces thrombin generation and expression of tissue factor, P-selectin and GPIIIa on platelet-derived microparticles in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease. Thromb. Haemost. 2011, 106, 344–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Steffen, B.T.; Steffen, L.M.; Tracy, R.; Siscovick, D.; Jacobs, D.; Liu, K.; He, K.; Hanson, N.Q.; Nettleton, J.A.; Tsai, M.Y. Ethnicity, plasma phospholipid fatty acid composition and inflammatory/endothelial activation biomarkers in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2012, 66, 600–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Stepanikova, I.; Bateman, L.B.; Oates, G.R. Systemic Inflammation in Midlife: Race, Socioeconomic Status, and Perceived Discrimination. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2017, 52, S63–S76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Makin, A.J.; Chung, N.A.; Silverman, S.H.; Lip, G.Y. Thrombogenesis and endothelial damage/dysfunction in peripheral artery disease. Relationship to ethnicity and disease severity. Thromb. Res. 2003, 111, 221–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Jaumdally, R.J.; Varma, C.; Blann, A.D.; Macfadyen, R.J.; Lip, G.Y. Indices of angiogenesis, platelet activation, and endothelial damage/dysfunction in relation to ethnicity and coronary artery disease: Differences in central versus peripheral levels. Ann. Med. 2007, 39, 628–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Biomedicines 09 01707 g001 550
Figure 1. PRISMA 2020 flow chart.
Figure 1. PRISMA 2020 flow chart.
Biomedicines 09 01707 g001
Biomedicines 09 01707 g002 550
Figure 2. Forest plot of circulating P-Selectin concentrations before and after statin treatment.
Figure 2. Forest plot of circulating P-Selectin concentrations before and after statin treatment.
Biomedicines 09 01707 g002
Biomedicines 09 01707 g003 550
Figure 3. (A) Sensitivity analysis of the association between P-Selectin and statin treatment. The influence of individual studies on the overall standardized mean difference (SMD) is shown. The middle vertical axis indicates the overall SMD, and the two vertical axes indicate the 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The hollow circles represent the pooled SMD when the remaining study is omitted from the meta-analysis. The two ends of each broken line represent the 95% CIs. (B) Funnel plot of studies investigating P-Selectin concentrations before and after statin treatment.
Figure 3. (A) Sensitivity analysis of the association between P-Selectin and statin treatment. The influence of individual studies on the overall standardized mean difference (SMD) is shown. The middle vertical axis indicates the overall SMD, and the two vertical axes indicate the 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The hollow circles represent the pooled SMD when the remaining study is omitted from the meta-analysis. The two ends of each broken line represent the 95% CIs. (B) Funnel plot of studies investigating P-Selectin concentrations before and after statin treatment.
Biomedicines 09 01707 g003
Biomedicines 09 01707 g004 550
Figure 4. Funnel plot of P-Selectin concentrations before and after statin treatment after “trimming-and-filling”. Dummy studies and genuine studies are represented by enclosed circles and free circles, respectively.
Figure 4. Funnel plot of P-Selectin concentrations before and after statin treatment after “trimming-and-filling”. Dummy studies and genuine studies are represented by enclosed circles and free circles, respectively.
Biomedicines 09 01707 g004
Biomedicines 09 01707 g005 550
Figure 5. Forest plot of P-Selectin concentrations before and after statin treatment according to statin class (hydrophilic or lipophilic).
Figure 5. Forest plot of P-Selectin concentrations before and after statin treatment according to statin class (hydrophilic or lipophilic).
Biomedicines 09 01707 g005
Biomedicines 09 01707 g006 550
Figure 6. Forest plot of P-Selectin concentrations before and after statin treatment according to individual agents.
Figure 6. Forest plot of P-Selectin concentrations before and after statin treatment according to individual agents.
Biomedicines 09 01707 g006
Biomedicines 09 01707 g007 550
Figure 7. Forest plot of P-Selectin concentrations before and after statin treatment according to continent where the study was conducted.
Figure 7. Forest plot of P-Selectin concentrations before and after statin treatment according to continent where the study was conducted.
Biomedicines 09 01707 g007
Biomedicines 09 01707 g008 550
Figure 8. Forest plot of a sub-group of 10 studies examining P-Selectin concentrations, homogeneous for statin used and continent.
Figure 8. Forest plot of a sub-group of 10 studies examining P-Selectin concentrations, homogeneous for statin used and continent.
Biomedicines 09 01707 g008
Biomedicines 09 01707 g009 550
Figure 9. Forest plot of L-Selectin concentrations before and after statin treatment.
Figure 9. Forest plot of L-Selectin concentrations before and after statin treatment.
Biomedicines 09 01707 g009
Biomedicines 09 01707 g010 550
Figure 10. Sensitivity analysis of the association between L-Selectin and statin treatment. The influence of individual studies on the overall standardized mean difference (SMD) is shown. The middle vertical axis indicates the overall SMD, and the two vertical axes indicate the 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The hollow circles represent the pooled SMD when the remaining study is omitted from the meta-analysis. The two ends of each broken line represent the 95% CIs.
Figure 10. Sensitivity analysis of the association between L-Selectin and statin treatment. The influence of individual studies on the overall standardized mean difference (SMD) is shown. The middle vertical axis indicates the overall SMD, and the two vertical axes indicate the 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The hollow circles represent the pooled SMD when the remaining study is omitted from the meta-analysis. The two ends of each broken line represent the 95% CIs.
Biomedicines 09 01707 g010
Biomedicines 09 01707 g011 550
Figure 11. Forest plot of E-Selectin concentrations before and after statin treatment.
Figure 11. Forest plot of E-Selectin concentrations before and after statin treatment.
Biomedicines 09 01707 g011
Biomedicines 09 01707 g012 550
Figure 12. (A) Sensitivity analysis of the association between E-Selectin and statin treatment. The influence of individual studies on the overall standardized mean difference (SMD) is shown. The middle vertical axis indicates the overall SMD, and the two vertical axes indicate the 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The hollow circles represent the pooled SMD when the remaining study is omitted from the meta-analysis. The two ends of each broken line represent the 95% CIs. (B) Funnel plot of studies investigating E-Selectin concentrations before and after statin treatment.
Figure 12. (A) Sensitivity analysis of the association between E-Selectin and statin treatment. The influence of individual studies on the overall standardized mean difference (SMD) is shown. The middle vertical axis indicates the overall SMD, and the two vertical axes indicate the 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The hollow circles represent the pooled SMD when the remaining study is omitted from the meta-analysis. The two ends of each broken line represent the 95% CIs. (B) Funnel plot of studies investigating E-Selectin concentrations before and after statin treatment.
Biomedicines 09 01707 g012
Biomedicines 09 01707 g013 550
Figure 13. Funnel plot of studies investigating E-Selectin concentrations before and after statin treatment after “trimming-and-filling”. Dummy studies and genuine studies are represented by enclosed circles and free circles, respectively.
Figure 13. Funnel plot of studies investigating E-Selectin concentrations before and after statin treatment after “trimming-and-filling”. Dummy studies and genuine studies are represented by enclosed circles and free circles, respectively.
Biomedicines 09 01707 g013
Biomedicines 09 01707 g014 550
Figure 14. Forest plot of E-Selectin concentrations before and after statin treatment according to statin class (hydrophilic or lipophilic).
Figure 14. Forest plot of E-Selectin concentrations before and after statin treatment according to statin class (hydrophilic or lipophilic).
Biomedicines 09 01707 g014
Biomedicines 09 01707 g015 550
Figure 15. Forest plot of E-Selectin concentrations before and after statin treatment according to individual agents.
Figure 15. Forest plot of E-Selectin concentrations before and after statin treatment according to individual agents.
Biomedicines 09 01707 g015
Biomedicines 09 01707 g016 550
Figure 16. Forest plot of E-Selectin concentrations before and after statin treatment according to the continent where the study was conducted.
Figure 16. Forest plot of E-Selectin concentrations before and after statin treatment according to the continent where the study was conducted.
Biomedicines 09 01707 g016
Table
Table 1. Study characteristics.
Table 1. Study characteristics.
First Author, Year, Country [Reference]NAge
(Years)		Males
(%)		P-Selectinbefore
Mean ± SD
(ng/mL)		P-Selectinafter
Mean ± SD
(ng/mL)		L-Selectinbefore
Mean ± SD
(ng/mL)		L-Selectinafter
Mean ± SD
(ng/mL)		E-Selectinbefore
Mean ± SD
(ng/mL)		E-Selectinafter
Mean ± SD
(ng/mL)		Primary Condition
Statin and Daily Dose
Treatment Duration
Koh KK, 1999, USA [33]28570----49 ± 1851 ± 19Hypercholesterolaemia
Simvastatin 10 mg
6 weeks
Rauch U (a), 2000, USA [34]2462NR130 ± 30129 ± 22753 ± 30738 ± 31--Hypercholesterolaemia
Pravastatin 40 mg
12 weeks
Rauch U (b), 2000, USA [34]2658NR105 ± 17115 ± 15834 ± 42778 ± 32--Hypercholesterolaemia
Simvastatin 20 mg
12 weeks
Romano M, 2000, Italy [35]135923118 ± 6381 ± 36----Hypercholesterolaemia
Fluvastatin 80 mg
12 weeks
Sbarouni E, 2000, Greece [36]16660----17 ± 2817 ± 30Ischaemic heart disease
Simvastatin 20 mg
8 weeks
Alonso R, 2001, Spain [37]254844----16 ± 318 ± 4Familial hypercholesterolaemia
Simvastatin 40–80 mg
52 weeks
Blann AD, 2001, UK [38]17655930 ± 926 ± 10----Peripheral artery disease
Pravastatin 40 mg
4 weeks
Sardo MA, 2001, Italy [39]204545----46 ± 1251 ± 17Hypercholesterolaemia
Simvastatin 20 mg
24 weeks
Solheim S, 2001, Norway [40]405410054 ± 1352 ± 13--36 ± 834 ± 8Hypercholesterolaemia
Pravastatin 40 mg
8 weeks
van Haelst PL, 2001, The Netherlands [41]105290----59 ± 1245 ± 12Ischaemic heart disease
Fluvastatin 80 mg
48 weeks
Atalar E, 2002, Turkey [42]365361--666 ± 201584 ± 162--Hypercholesterolaemia
Atorvastatin 10 mg
12 weeks
Seljeflot I (a), 2002, Norway [43]28NR7999 ± 3086 ± 21--43 ± 1942 ± 19Ischaemic heart disease
Atorvastatin 20 mg
12 weeks
Seljeflot I (b), 2002, Norway [43]30NR93106 ± 3096 ± 36--49 ± 1947 ± 21Ischaemic heart disease
Simvastatin 20 mg
12 weeks
Bogaty P, 2003, Canada [44]1760656 ± 2058 ± 23--74 ± 1854 ± 14Ischaemic heart disease
Atorvastatin 10–80 mg
11 weeks
Dalla Nora I, 2003, Italy [45]136654----16 ± 38 ± 1Type 2 diabetes
Atorvastatin 10 mg
12 weeks
Empen K, 2003, Germany [46]116255----70 ± 3767 ± 40Type 2 diabetes
Atorvastatin 10 mg
6 weeks
Ferroni P, 2003, Italy [47]25543670 ± 2052 ± 18----Hypercholesterolaemia
Simvastatin 20 mg
8 weeks
Hernández C, 2003, Spain [48]4450100----36 ± 433 ± 4Hypercholesterolaemia
Various statins and doses
16 weeks
Homma Y, 2003, Japan [49]306713250 ± 103196 ± 81----Type 2 hyperlipoproteinemia
Fluvastatin 20–40 mg
24 weeks
Malyszko J, 2003, Poland [50]12NR58115 ± 5284 ± 13----Kidney transplant
Fluvastatin 20 mg
12 weeks
Nawawi H (a), 2003, Malaysia [51]274241----209 ± 1835 ± 11Familial hypercholesterolaemia
Atorvastatin 80 mg
9 weeks
Nawawi H (b), 2003, Malaysia [51]474855----246 ± 14144 ± 11Familial hypercholesterolaemia
Atorvastatin 10 mg
9 weeks
Puccetti L, 2003, Italy [52]14505723 ± 410 ± 2----Hypercholesterolaemia
Simvastatin 20 mg
6 weeks
van Haelst PL, 2003, The Netherlands [53]354260----69 ± 2762 ± 27Familial hypercholesterolaemia
Simvastatin 80 mg
52 weeks
Brown SL, 2004, South Africa [54]233670----61 ± 5861 ± 55Familial hypercholesterolaemia
Simvastatin 20–80 mg
24 weeks
Ceriello A, 2004, Italy [55]305473----79 ± 7346 ± 55Type 2 diabetes
Simvastatin 40 mg
12 weeks
Cha JK, 2004, Korea [56]32608797 ± 1287 ± 8----Ischaemic stroke
Simvastatin 20 mg
12 weeks
Koh KK, 2004, Korea [57]326241----44 ± 1745 ± 20Hypercholesterolaemia
Simvastatin 20 mg
14 weeks
Malyszko J, 2004, Poland [58]1550NR103 ± 4694 ± 36--64 ± 2651 ± 10Peritoneal dialysis
Simvastatin 10 mg
24 weeks
Nomura S (a), 2004, Japan [59]306737190 ± 23164 ± 23----Hypertension and diabetes
Simvastatin 10 mg
24 weeks
Nomura S (b), 2004, Japan [59]186456108 ± 15107 ± 15----Hypertension
Simvastatin 10 mg
24 weeks
Skhra J, 2004, Czech Republic [60]205760190 ± 54199 ± 55--65 ± 1970 ± 19Type 2 diabetes
Simvastatin 20 mg
12 weeks
Akçay MN, 2005, Turkey [61]104140----24 ± 311 ± 1Type 2 diabetes
Simvastatin 20 mg
12 weeks
Undas A, 2005, Poland [62]205670118 ± 54100 ± 45----Hypercholesterolaemia
Simvastatin 40 mg
4 weeks
Bleske BE, 2006, USA [63]15566030 ± 1923 ± 20----Non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy
Atorvastatin 80 mg
12 weeks
Marschang P, 2006, Austria [64]47596492 ± 7552 ± 27--55 ± 2760 ± 27Ischaemic heart disease
Various statins and doses
12 weeks
Peverill RE, 2006, Australia [65]2459043 ± 1134 ± 9----Hypercholesterolaemia
Pravastatin 20 mg
24 weeks
Potaczek PD (a), 2006, Poland [66]1054NR135 ± 63129 ± 66----Hypercholesterolaemia
Simvastatin 40 mg
4 weeks
Potaczek PD (b), 2006, Poland [66]1054NR118 ± 5491 ± 41----Hypercholesterolaemia
Simvastatin 40 mg
4 weeks
Alber HF, 2007, Austria [67]1557NR----56 ± 2352 ± 25Ischaemic heart disease
Atorvastatin 20 mg
12 weeks
Inami N (a), 2007, Japan [68]656535177 ± 226203 ± 282----Hypercholesterolaemia without diabetes
Pitavastatin 2 mg
24 weeks
Inami N (b), 2007, Japan [68]526246238 ± 260200 ± 296----Hypercholesterolaemia and diabetes
Pitavastatin 2 mg
24 weeks
Jeffs LS, 2007, Australia [69]255764----3.6 ± 1.53.9 ± 1.6End-stage renal disease
Pravastatin 10–40 mg
20 weeks
Souza-Costa DC (a), 2007, Brazil [70]152810030 ± 1629 ± 15----Healthy
Atorvastatin 10 mg
2 weeks
Souza-Costa DC (b), 2007, Brazil [70]153110042 ± 1831 ± 21----Healthy
Atorvastatin 10 mg
2 weeks
Barreto AC, 2008, Brazil [71]30354040 ± 2235 ± 16----Pulmonary arterial hypertension
Rosuvastatin 10 mg
24 weeks
Bolewski A, 2008, France [72]26576255 ± 2654 ± 20--36 ± 2038 ± 20Hypercholesterolaemia
Atorvastatin 20 mg
12 weeks
Del Papa N, 2008, Italy [73]20590----52 ± 8938 ± 45Systemic sclerosis
Simvastatin 20 mg
12 weeks
Forst T, 2008, Germany [74]806248277 ± 125291 ± 161----High cardiovascular risk
Atorvastatin 40 mg
24 weeks
Hogue JC, 2008, Canada [75]155584----50 ± 2848 ± 22Type 2 diabetes
Atorvastatin 20 mg
6 weeks
Nomura S (a), 2008, Japan [76]306043136 ± 33128 ± 62784 ± 121769 ± 11452 ± 1042 ± 11Hypercholesterolaemia
Pitavastatin 2 mg
24 weeks
Nomura S (b), 2008, Japan [76]456244238 ± 64223 ± 33896 ± 141814 ± 12974 ± 2151 ± 10Hypercholesterolaemia
Pitavastatin 2 mg
24 weeks
Stulc T, 2008, Czech Republic [77]275230----58 ± 3859 ± 35Hypercholesterolemia
Atorvastatin 20 mg
12 weeks
Wang L, 2008, USA [78]25NRNR111 ± 36119 ± 71----Metabolic syndrome
Simvastatin 40 mg
8 weeks
Baldassarre D, 2009, Italy [79]855885----32 ± 1522 ± 10Ischaemic heart disease
Atorvastatin 20 mg
12 weeks
Grip O, 2009, Sweden [80]103250255 ± 105222 ± 41--18 ± 915 ± 9Crohn’s disease
Atorvastatin 80 mg
12 weeks
Nomura S (a), 2009, Japan [81]6361NR188 ± 50182 ± 48----Hypercholesterolaemia
Simvastatin 10 mg
24 weeks
Nomura S (b), 2009, Japan [81]7261NR184 ± 47175 ± 51----Hypercholesterolaemia
Pitavastatin 2 mg
24 weeks
Prázný M, 2009, Czech Republic [82]205750203 ± 64178 ± 51--66 ± 2733 ± 10Type 2 diabetes
Simvastatin 20 mg
12 weeks
Serrano CV, 2009, Brazil [83]236356----46 ± 1759 ± 24Hypercholesterolaemia
Simvastatin 40 mg
12 weeks
Fichtenbaum CJ, 2010, USA [84]37NR9261 ± 2157 ± 13----Hypercholesterolaemia
Pravastatin 40 mg
12 weeks
Kater AL, 2010, Brazil [85]255376----44 ± 2040 ± 15Pre-diabetes
Simvastatin 20 mg
12 weeks
Kirmizis K, 2010, Greece [86]256348----77 ± 3169 ± 31Haemodialysis
Simvastatin 10 mg
24 weeks
Xu DY, 2010, China [87]796459101 ± 1973 ± 15----High cardiovascular risk
Atorvastatin 10 mg
8 weeks
Wu YW, 2012, Taiwan [88]345471----44 ± 5042 ± 50Ischaemic heart disease
Atorvastatin 40 mg
12 weeks
Altun I, 2014, Turkey [89]3053100----100 ± 3589 ± 31Acute coronary syndrome
Atorvastatin 40 mg
12 weeks
Pawelczyk M, 2015, Poland [90]316257124 ± 6078 ± 38----Ischaemic stroke,
Simvastatin 20 mg
24 weeks
Hernandez-Mijares A, 2016, Spain [91]205833----45 ± 3139 ± 20Hypercholesterolaemia,
Simvastatin 40 mg
4 weeks
Barale C, 2018, Italy [92]255944----44 ± 1525 ± 8Hypercholesterolaemia
Simvastatin 40 mg
8 weeks
Kotyla PJ, 2018, Poland [93]25551267 ± 4166 ± 26887 ± 222927 ± 385276 ± 122253 ± 125Systemic sclerosis
Simvastatin 20 mg
4 weeks
Legend: NR, not reported.
Table
Table 2. The Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist.
Table 2. The Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist.
StudyWere the Criteria for Inclusion in the Sample Clearly Defined?Were the Study Subjects and the Setting Described in Detail?Was the Exposure Measured in a Valid and Reliable Way?Were Objective, Standard Criteria Used for Measurement of the Condition?Were Confounding Factors Identified?Were Strategies to Deal with Confounding Factors Stated?Were the Outcomes Measured in a Valid and Reliable Way?Was Appropriate Statistical Analysis Used?Risk of Bias
Koh KK [33]YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesLow
Rauch U [34]YesYesYesYesNoNoYesNoLow
Romano M [35]YesYesYesYesNoNoYesNoLow
Sbarouni E [36]YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesLow
Alonso R [37]YesYesYesYesNoNoYesNoLow
Blann AD [38]YesYesYesYesNoNoYesNoLow
Sardo MA [39]YesYesYesYesNoNoYesYesLow
Solheim S [40]YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesLow
van Haelst PL [41]YesYesYesYesNoNoYesNoLow
Atalar E [42]YesYesYesYesNoNoYesNoLow
Seljeflot I [43]YesYesYesYesNoNoYesYesLow
Bogaty P [44]YesYesYesYesNoNoYesNoLow
Dalla Nora [45]YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesLow
Empen K [46]YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesLow
Ferroni P [47]YesYesYesYesNoNoYesNoLow
Hernández C [48]YesYesYesYesNoNoYesNoLow
Homma Y [49]YesYesYesYesNoNoYesNoLow
Malyszko J [50]YesYesYesYesNoNoYesNoLow
Nawawi H [51]YesYesYesYesNoNoYesNoLow
Puccetti L [52]YesYesYesYesNoNoYesNoLow
van Haelst PL [53]YesYesYesYesNoNoYesNoLow
Brown SL [54]YesYesYesYesNoNoYesNoLow
Ceriello A [55]YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesLow
Cha JK [56]YesYesYesYesNoNoYesNoLow
Koh KK [57]YesYesYesYesNoNoYesYesLow
Malyszko J [58]YesYesYesYesNoNoYesNoLow
Nomura S [59]YesYesYesYesNoNoYesNoLow
Skrha J [60]YesYesYesYesNoNoYesNoLow
Akçay MN [61]YesYesYesYesNoNoYesNoLow
Undas A [62]YesYesYesYesNoNoYesNoLow
Bleske BE [63]YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesLow
Marschang P [64]YesYesYesYesNoNoYesNoLow
Peverill RE [65]YesYesYesYesNoNoYesNoLow
Potaczek PD [66]YesYesYesYesNoNoYesNoLow
Alber HF [67]YesYesYesYesNoNoYesNoLow
Inami N [68]YesYesYesYesNoNoYesYesLow
Jeff LS [69]YesYesYesYesNoNoYesNoLow
Souza-Costa DC [70]YesYesYesYesNoNoYesNoLow
Barreto AC [71]YesYesYesYesNoNoYesYesLow
Bolewski A [72]YesYesYesYesNoNoYesNoLow
Del Papa N [73]YesYesYesYesNoNoYesNoLow
Forst T [74]YesYesYesYesNoNoYesNoLow
Hogue JC [75]YesYesYesYesNoNoYesNoLow
Nomura S [76]YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesLow
Stulc T [77]YesYesYesYesNoNoYesNoLow
Wang L [78]YesYesYesYesNoNoYesNoLow
Baldassarre D [79]YesYesYesYesNoNoYesNoLow
Grip O [80]YesYesYesYesNoNoYesNoLow
Nomura S [81]YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesLow
Prázný M [82]YesYesYesYesNoNoYesNoLow
Serrano CV [83]YesYesYesYesNoNoYesNoLow
Fichtenbaum CJ [84]YesYesYesYesNoNoYesNoLow
Kater AL [85]YesYesYesYesNoNoYesYesLow
Kirmizis K [86]YesYesYesYesNoNoYesYesLow
Xu DY [87]YesYesYesYesNoNoYesNoLow
Wu YW [88]YesYesYesYesNoNoYesNoLow
Altun I [89]YesYesYesYesNoNoYesNoLow
Pawelczyk M [90]YesYesYesYesNoNoYesNoLow
Hernandez-Mijares A [91]YesYesYesYesNoNoYesNoLow
Barale C [92]YesYesYesYesNoNoYesNoLow
Kotyla PJ [93]YesYesYesYesNoNoYesNoLow
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zinellu, A.; Mangoni, A.A. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Statins on Circulating E-Selectin, L-Selectin, and P-Selectin. Biomedicines 2021, 9, 1707. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9111707

AMA Style

Zinellu A, Mangoni AA. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Statins on Circulating E-Selectin, L-Selectin, and P-Selectin. Biomedicines. 2021; 9(11):1707. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9111707

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zinellu, Angelo, and Arduino A. Mangoni. 2021. "Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Statins on Circulating E-Selectin, L-Selectin, and P-Selectin" Biomedicines 9, no. 11: 1707. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9111707

APA Style

Zinellu, A., & Mangoni, A. A. (2021). Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Statins on Circulating E-Selectin, L-Selectin, and P-Selectin. Biomedicines, 9(11), 1707. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9111707

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop