Next Article in Journal
Anti-NLRP3 Inflammasome Natural Compounds: An Update
Next Article in Special Issue
Advances in Nanomaterial-Mediated Photothermal Cancer Therapies: Toward Clinical Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Pancreastatin Reduces Alternatively Activated Macrophages, Disrupts the Epithelial Homeostasis and Aggravates Colonic Inflammation. A Descriptive Analysis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Non-Oncologic Applications of Nanomedicine-Based Phototherapy
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomedicines
Volume 9
Issue 2
10.3390/biomedicines9020137
biomedicines-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Nanomedicine-Based Strategies Assisting Photodynamic Therapy for Hypoxic Tumors: State-of-the-Art Approaches and Emerging Trends

by
Chun-Yan Shih
1,†,
Pei-Ting Wang
1,†,
Wu-Chou Su
2,3,
Hsisheng Teng
1,2,4 and
Wei-Lun Huang
2,5,*
1
Department of Chemical Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 70101, Taiwan
2
Center of Applied Nanomedicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 70101, Taiwan
3
Department of Oncology, College of Medicine and Hospital, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 70101, Taiwan
4
Hierarchical Green-Energy Materials (Hi-GEM) Research Center, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 70101, Taiwan
5
Department of Medical Laboratory Science and Biotechnology, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 70101, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally.
Biomedicines 2021, 9(2), 137; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9020137
Submission received: 17 December 2020 / Revised: 21 January 2021 / Accepted: 22 January 2021 / Published: 1 February 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Nanomedicines for Optical Imaging and Phototherapy)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Since the first clinical cancer treatment in 1978, photodynamic therapy (PDT) technologies have been largely improved and approved for clinical usage in various cancers. Due to the oxygen-dependent nature, the application of PDT is still limited by hypoxia in tumor tissues. Thus, the development of effective strategies for manipulating hypoxia and improving the effectiveness of PDT is one of the most important area in PDT field. Recently, emerging nanotechnology has benefitted progress in many areas, including PDT. In this review, after briefly introducing the mechanisms of PDT and hypoxia, as well as basic knowledge about nanomedicines, we will discuss the state of the art of nanomedicine-based approaches for assisting PDT for treating hypoxic tumors, mainly based on oxygen replenishing strategies and the oxygen dependency diminishing strategies. Among these strategies, we will emphasize emerging trends about the use of nanoscale metal–organic framework (nMOF) materials and the combination of PDT with immunotherapy. We further discuss future perspectives and challenges associated with these trends in both the aspects of mechanism and clinical translation.

1. Introduction

Cancer is one of the most concerning diseases all around the world, especially in developed countries [1]. Cancer’s wide variety made it a very hard-to-cure disease. Although recent advances in target therapies and immune therapies have proven to work quite well against cancer, it is still a long way to being effectively controlled [2]. In addition to conventional cancer therapy methods, such as surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy, photodynamic therapy (PDT) has been developed and been approved for cancer treatment for decades [3].

1.1. Photodynamic Therapy

Like surgery and radiotherapy (RT), PDT is a local treatment method, but it is less invasive and the side effects are relatively mild and not long-lasting [4,5]. PDT combines non-toxic photosensitizers (PSs), light illumination, and oxygen to produce reactive oxygen species (ROS), such as singlet oxygen (1O2), superoxide anions (O2− •), hydroxyl radicals (OH •), and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) to kill cancer cells. Typically, PDT can be divided into Type I PDT and Type II PDT (Figure 1). After absorbing photons during light illumination, PSs are activated from their ground state (S0) to a transient singlet excited state (S1) that can subsequently be converted to a long-lived triplet state (T1) through intersystem crossing. The type I mechanism describes the interactions of T1 electrons and the accompanying holes with surrounding substrates, such as water, biomolecules, and oxygen, to generate ROS like O2− •, OH •, and H2O2. The type II mechanism is based on the transfer of the T1 electrons to the S0 state and accompanying energy release for 1O2 generation [6]. These ROS generated by PDT can oxidize different cellular components and induce different types of cell death, such as apoptosis, necrosis, and autophagy, according to the type, location, and amount of ROS generated [7]. Since the first clinical cancer treatment in 1978, PDT has also been approved for the clinical treatment of various cancers, including head and neck cancer, lung cancer, melanoma, colon cancer, bladder cancer, breast cancer, brain cancer, prostate cancer, liver cancer, and esophagus cancer [3,4,5,8].

1.2. Hypoxia

Hypoxia results from the inadequate supply of oxygen that compromises biologic functions. Tumor hypoxia is a hallmark of most advanced solid tumors, and is mainly caused by the aggressive proliferation of cancer cells and the abnormal vascular system in tumor area. Hypoxia has been shown to not only promote tumor metastasis but also have adverse impacts on different anticancer therapies, and play important roles in chemo-/radio-resistance [9,10]. Moreover, via the up-regulated, hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α), hypoxia has also been shown to facilitate immunosuppression and immune escape by activating lymphocytes, myeloid-derived suppressive cells, dendritic cells, and tumor-associated macrophages [11]. Although the oxygen concentrations in different types of human tumors are highly heterogeneous, generally the oxygen concentrations in the tumor tissues are much lower than those in the surrounding normal tissue. In many cases, many regions of tumors are even less than 5 mmHg partial pressure of oxygen (pO2), which corresponds to approximately 0.7% O2 in the gas phase or 7 μM in solution [12]. Thus, the efficiency of the anti-cancer strategies like RT and PDT that heavily rely on the existence of oxygen are largely hampered (the critical pO2 for RT and PDT are 25–30 and 15–35 mmHg, respectively) [10]. In the hypoxic area, a shortage of blood supply also lowers the efficiency of PDT by diminishing the penetration of PSs, which is worsen by the high expression of hypoxia-associated P-glycoprotein. Furthermore, the oxygen consumption by PDT itself would also reduce oxygen concentration, especially in cases that require continuous treatment. Thus, hypoxia can be the Achilles’ heel of PDT, and novel strategies are urgently needed [13].

1.3. Nanomedicines

In recent years, nanotechnological methods have been introduced in various different industries to provide a more efficient and effective alternative for solving a problem or providing a better product. Typically, nano-materials are defined as material with one or more external dimensions in the size range 1–100 nm [14]. Over the past decade, nanomaterials also developed rapidly and opened up new areas in biomedical applications for imaging, drug delivery, and various tumor therapeutic modalities, including photothermal therapy (PTT), radio-sensitization therapy, magnetic therapy, and also PDT [9,13,15]. For PDT application, in addition to leverage, the enhanced permeation and retention (EPR) effect for increasing the accumulation of PSs containing nanomedicines in tumor tissues, the large surface-to-volume ratios also effectively increase the number of PSs that can be delivered to the target cells. The nanomedicine delivery strategies also prevent the leakage of PSs and diminish the nonspecific accumulation of PSs in normal tissues that reduce overall photosensitivity [16]. Furthermore, a series of nanomedicine-based strategies have been designed for assisting photodynamic therapy for treating hypoxic tumors.
In this review, we will discuss the state of the art of the nanomedicine-based approaches for assisting PDT for treating hypoxic tumors, mainly based on oxygen replenishing strategies and the oxygen dependency diminishing strategies. Among these strategies, we will emphasize emerging trends about the use of nanoscale metal–organic framework (nMOF) materials and the combination of PDT with immunotherapy. We further discuss the future perspectives and challenges associated with these trends in both the aspects of mechanism and clinical translation.

2. Oxygen Replenishing Strategies

To restore PDT efficiency hampered by the shortage of oxygen in the hypoxic tumor microenvironment, replenishing the oxygen levels should be the most straightforward thinking. Oxygen levels can be replenished either by delivering oxygen via nano-carriers or generating oxygen in situ. In addition, modulating a tumor microenvironment, such as decreasing tumor oxygen consumption or improving blood flow, can also gradually restore local oxygen level.

2.1. Oxygen Carrying Strategies

Direct delivery of oxygen into tumor microenvironments is one of the most common approaches to overcome tumor hypoxia during PDT. It has been shown that the therapeutic efficiency of PDT can be enhanced by manipulating tumor oxygenation by hyperoxygenation or carbogen, not only in mouse models but also in clinical trials [17,18,19,20]. Recently, many types of oxygen nano-carriers have been developed.

2.1.1. Oxygen Nano/Microbubbles

Free gas bubbles are not recommended to be injected directly into blood flow for hemolysis reasons. Instead, nano/microbubbles consisting of a stabilizing monolayered shell made by lipids or polymers and a gas core carrying oxygen have been shown to delivery oxygen for tumor oxygenation without side effects and enhancement of tumor therapy, including PDT [21,22,23]. Nano/microbubbles can also be loaded with drugs, either by encapsulation in the core or by coating the outer shell, according to the hydrophobic or hydrophilic properties [24]. In addition to direct administration, Huang et al. demonstrated that oxygen and PSs containing nano/microbubbles can be first internalized into tumortropic monocytes, and then be co-delivered via the tumortropic monocytes into the tumor microenvironment for improving PDT efficacy [25]. Furthermore, to avoid premature oxygen release and reduce side effects, the nano/microbubbles can be designed to control the oxygen release via external stimuli. Song et al. developed an acetylated, dextran-based, pH-responsive polymer to enable the release of oxygen preferentially in the tumor microenvironment [26]. Although significant progress has been made, the stability and storage issues of oxygen nano/microbubbles are still challenging.

2.1.2. Artificial Red Blood Cells and Hemoglobin-Based Nanomaterials

Inside red blood cells (RBC), hemoglobin (Hb), which consists of four heme groups strongly binding to oxygen, is the natural carrier of oxygen in our body. However, free Hb is not a good candidate for delivering oxygen to hypoxic tumors, due to its low stability that would subsequently cause serious renal toxicity [27]. Thus, a series of Hb-based nanomaterials, often referred to as artificial RBCs, have been developed, and they have been shown to be highly potent for relieving tumor hypoxia and restoring PDT efficiency [28]. For example, Luo et al. developed stable, nano-sized artificial RBCs by loading complexes of Hb and indocyanine green (ICG), which serves as a PS, to incorporate an oxygen supply with PDT. The close distance between ICG and Hb by hydrophobic and electrostatic interactions in the artificial RBC enables self-enrichment of oxygen source for effective ROS production during PDT. In addition, the ROS subsequently induces the oxidation of ferrous Hb to become highly cytotoxic products and augment tumor destruction [29]. Although Hb has good biocompatibility, its limited oxygen transporting efficiency (only four oxygen binding sites for each Hb) restricts the application of artificial RBCs.

2.1.3. Perfluorocarbon-Based Nanomaterials

Perfluorocarbons (PFCs) are organofluorines with the formula CxFy. Due to the extremely low polarizability of fluorine, PFCs exhibit great gas solubility, and their oxygen carrying capacity is 1.5 times higher than Hb [30]. In addition, PFCs have been approved for intravenous use by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as an artificial blood substitute [31]. Although PFCs have excellent oxygen carrying capacity, their super-hydrophobic features limit their development in tumor therapy. Fortunately, various nano-formulations, such as hollow nanoparticles (NPs), can solve this problem. For instance, hollow mesoporous silica NPs were used to load PFCs together with PSs or sonosensitizers, in order to generate ROS under near-infrared (NIR) light or ultrasound [32,33].

2.1.4. Nanoscale Metal-Organic Frameworks

As a kind of porous nanomaterial, with uniform pore size and large surface area (Figure 2), nanoscale metal–organic frameworks (nMOFs) have great capacity for gas storage, especially for oxygen [34,35,36]. In addition, based on the flexible cargo design, the multifunctional characteristics of nMOF make it a good choice of vehicle for oxygen-enhanced PDT, loading PS with oxygen [37,38]. The tunable feature enables nMOFs to be smart carriers that can preferentially release oxygen cargos in the tumor microenvironments. For examples, Lin et al. developed a novel multifunctional nanocarrier UC@mSiO2-RB@ZIF-O2-DOX-PEGFA, which combines oxygen-enhanced PDT with pH-responsive chemotherapy. The outermost shell, constructed with the zeolitic imidazolate framework 90, can be decomposed under acidic conditions, allowing preferential release of oxygen at tumor microenvironments with low pH, and therefore improving the PDT efficiency conducted by the co-delivered Rose Bengal PSs [38]. In addition to directly carrying oxygen, nMOFs are also capable to transport the PFC cargos for oxygen delivery [39].

2.2. Oxygen-Generating Strategies

Besides replenishing the oxygen levels in the hypoxic tumor microenvironment by direct delivery of oxygen, the oxygen level in the hypoxic tumor microenvironments can also be increased by in situ oxygen generation. This approach can avoid the side effects of oxygen toxicity caused by potential leakage via the oxygen-carrying strategies in the normal part of the body.

2.2.1. Hydrogen Peroxide Decomposition

Besides the induction of hypoxia, the aggressive proliferation of cancer cells also results in the accumulation of ROS in the cancer cells. It has been shown that the H2O2 concentration is largely elevated in tumor tissues compared to the normal parts, which has also been linked to some key alterations in cancer, including cell proliferation, angiogenesis, and HIF-1 activation [13,36,40]. In normal tissue, catalase plays an important role to protect cells from oxidative damage from H2O2 by catalyzing the decomposition of H2O2 to oxygen and water [13]. Though free catalases have great efficiency in catalyzing the decomposition of H2O2 to generate oxygen, the instability of free catalases in vivo in the presence of proteases and poor half-lives have made the nanomedicine-based formulations, such as nMOF loading, essential for their application [41,42]. Leveraging the abnormal H2O2 concentrations in tumor microenvironments, many advanced nanomedicine-based PDT strategies have been designed to relieve the hypoxic condition and elevate the therapeutic efficiency of PDT by introducing a catalase to transform endogenous H2O2 to oxygen [43,44]. For example, Chen et al. constructed an αvβ3 integrin-targeting, H2O2-responsive, and O2-evolving NP to specifically eliminate αvβ3 integrin-rich tumor cells with elevated H2O2 levels. After specific uptake via the RGDfK–αvβ3 integrin interaction by cancer cells, the intracellular H2O2 penetrated the NPs, and was then catalyzed by catalase to generate oxygen. The continuously generated oxygen greatly improves the PDT efficacy in hypoxic tumors without damaging normal cells [44].
Besides catalase, MnO2-, gold-, and platinum-based nanomaterials have been shown to exhibit similar catalytic function, and have been used in oxygen-enhanced PDT systems to catalyze the decomposition of H2O2 to replenish oxygen levels in hypoxic tumors and restore the PDT efficiency [13,45,46,47,48]. For example, Lin et al. recently developed a magnetofluorescent carbon dot assembly as an oxygenerator to relieve tumor hypoxia, which can exert fluorescent/ Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) imaging and enhanced PDT simultaneously [45]. As shown in Figure 3, the nano-assembly was derived from manganese (II) phthalocyanine (Mn-Pc), followed by cooperative self-assembly with DSPE–PEG polymers to improve the solubility and biocompatibility. In addition to efficient 1O2 generation and tumor killing under normaxia, the Mn–carbon dots (CD) assembly can highly catalyze H2O2 to generate oxygen, and also successfully relieve tumor hypoxia for improving PDT efficiency. A two-fold increase in 1O2 production under irradiation was showed compared with that of counterpart NPs without MnO2. In addition, the oxygen levels increased 3.5-fold after intravenous injection of this nano-assembly.

2.2.2. Water Splitting

Although catalase and the nanozymes are capable of catalyzing H2O2 to generate oxygen effectively, the endogenous H2O2 levels in the tumor microenvironments limit hydrogen peroxide decomposition strategies, especially in tumors with relative lower endogenous H2O2 levels [49,50,51]. Thus, some researchers tried to generate oxygen by decomposing/splitting water instead of H2O2 for replenishing oxygen levels in tumor microenvironments, which has already drawn a lot of attention in energy and environmental areas [52,53,54]. Some natural materials like thylakoid can be used to efficiently catalyze oxygen generation via water splitting. It has been reported thylakoid membrane-coated NPs re-oxygenate the hypoxic microenvironment and inhibit anaerobic respiration [55].
However, the extraction and preservation of natural materials is complicated, and the efficiency of oxygen generation is largely influenced by the physiologic environment. It is recognized that the well-known, metal-free, water-splitting material carbon nitride (C3N4) has the potential for biomedical applications. However, the absorption wavelength of pure C3N4 is in the ultraviolet and visible range, which limits its penetration depth with potential side effects, such as skin damage. Zheng et al. decorated a C3N4 nanocomposite with carbon dots that enhanced red light absorption and showed that the decorated nanocomposite efficiently produced oxygen from water [56]. Wang et al. also introduced the tungsten nitride (WN)-based nanomaterial that was originally designed for green energy application via water splitting to provide oxygen support to oxygen-enhanced PDT against hypoxic tumors [57,58]. Unlike semiconductor photocatalysts, WN with metallic properties could photocatalyze overall water splitting at longer wavelengths, up to 765 nm, which is suitable for in vivo oxygen production via water splitting due to the better light penetration. Although water-splitting materials used for generating clean energy in the energy and environment fields might also have the potential to be used for biomedical applications, the biocompatibility of these materials should be carefully deliberated.

2.2.3. Self-Decomposition Compounds

Self-decomposition compounds, such as calcium peroxide (CaO2), gold oxide (Au2O3), and some platinum (IV)–azide complexes, which are mainly composed of metal, provide another safe and precisely controlled way to generate oxygen in situ in the tumor microenvironment [59,60,61]. CaO2 has been used for oxygen generating to relieve hypoxia induced by tissue necrosis within tissue-engineered implants in the early engraftment period [62,63]. Inspired by this concept, CaO2 has recently been introduced to synergistically work with PSs for oxygen-enhanced PDT efficiency. Liu et al. reported that the release of CaO2 from the damaged liposome-based NPs, caused by lipid peroxidation after laser irradiation, increased the contact of CaO2 to water and induced oxygen generation. The elevated oxygen improved the 1O2 generated by methylene blue (MB) under irradiation [59].

2.3. Tumor Microenvironment Modulating Strategies

Besides delivering oxygen to the tumor microenvironment or generating oxygen in situ, modulating a tumor microenvironment, such as decreasing tumor oxygen consumption or improving blood flow, can also gradually restore local oxygen levels.

2.3.1. Improving Blood Flow

Since one major cause of tumor hypoxia is insufficient blood flow due to an abnormal vascular system in the tumor area, improving blood flow should be an effective approach to replenish oxygen levels in hypoxic tumors. It has been shown that a low concentration (1 μM−1 mM) of NO can relieve tumor hypoxia by modulating blood vessel relaxation to increase blood flow, decreasing tumor oxygen consumption rate, and accelerating the metabolism of intracellular glutathione (GSH) at the same time [64,65,66]. The great effects of NO on hypoxia relief have pushed the development of a series of strategies to achieve targeted delivery and the controllable release of NO [64,66,67]. For example, Wan et al. developed a tumor-specific, ROS-responsive NO generator nanoplatform by incorporating the NO donor l-Arginine (l-Arg) into a porous coordination network (PCN), which is a porphyrinic nMOF. Local ROS generation by a PCN under NIR led to the conversion of L-Arg into NO, which mediated the sensitized photodynamic therapy of the hypoxic tumor [68].
It has been also shown that tumor blood flow could be increased by mild heating [69,70]. Thus, pretreatment with mild heating by PTT is a favorable approach to relieve tumor hypoxia and regain the efficiency of PDT. To achieve the PTT heat-activated PDT, Feng et al. co-encapsulated a hexylamine conjugated chlorin e6 (hCe6) PS together with a lipophilic, NIR, DiR dye for PTT into PEG-shelled liposomes. A 785 nm laser was used to excite DiR-mediated PTT, followed by a 660 nm light-emitting diode that was used to trigger the hCe6 mediated PDT. The in vivo data showed that this protocol significantly improved intratumoral blood flow, which relieved tumor hypoxia and achieved the PTT heating-activated PDT [71]. In addition to using NO or mild heating to improve intratumoral blood flow, chemotherapeutic agents like taxane, gemcitabine, cyclophosphamide, and cisplatin also have been employed to modulate the abnormal tumor microvasculature for a more efficient blood and oxygen supply into tumors [72,73,74,75].

2.3.2. Tumor Oxygen Consumption Decreasing

Besides directly increasing oxygen supply, diminishing oxygen consumption can also replenish oxygen levels in a tumor microenvironment. Respiration is the main mechanism that consumes oxygen in living cells [76]. Although aerobic glycolysis is the major metabolic pathway of tumor cells, respiration still plays an important role in tumor growth [77]. Thus, strategies for inhibiting respiration to decrease tumor oxygen consumption also have to be designed to solve the hypoxia issues in tumors. For example, metformin, a clinically approved type II diabetes drug, has been shown to alleviate tumor hypoxia by inhibiting respiration [78,79]. Song et al. co-encapsulated hydrophobic hCe6 and hydrophilic metformin into the outer membrane and inner cavity of the liposome. They showed that the sustained release of metformin greatly improved tumor oxygenation as well as the therapeutic efficiency of PDT in different tumor models [78]. Similarly, inhibiting respiration by NO or inhibiting mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation with the oxygen regulator atovaquone have also been shown to overcome the hypoxia barrier and enhance PDT [80,81].

3. Oxygen Dependency Diminishing Strategies

In addition to replenishing the oxygen level in tumor microenvironments, alternatively, the therapeutic efficiency of PDT can also be achieved by strategies to diminish oxygen dependency. Thus, new paradigms that diminish oxygen dependency, such as type I PDT and fractional PDT, have recently become very popular. In addition, to enhance overall therapeutic efficacy, several other types of oxygen-independent therapies with potential synergistic effects have been used in combination with PDT, especially to overcome the hypoxic challenges in the tumor microenvironments.

3.1. Type I Photodynamic Therapies

As mentioned in Figure 1, in contrast to the type II PDT used in most existing PDT systems, which relies on the direct energy transfer from excited PSs to oxygen to generate 1O2, type I PDT can transfer energy from photosensitizers to other substrates like water and produce respective radical ions or radicals. Although the details of the operation of type I mechanisms are still under debate, many studies have reported that type I PDT has great efficiency, even under hypoxic conditions [82,83]. Thus, type I PDT might be a lead for designing new strategies to overcome the limits of hypoxia [84,85,86,87].
Titanium dioxide (TiO2) is widely used in nanomaterials, due to its high photocatalytic activity and biocompatibility. After absorbing UV light, TiO2 nanomaterials can oxidize the water to form OH by photogenerated holes, and exhibit good antitumor effects in animal models [88,89]. However, the penetration issues of UV limits its application. To solve the problem, many studies have tried to move the absorption of TiO2 nanomaterials to longer wavelengths with various decorations, such as carbon nanodots and upconversion nanoparticles, and have successfully demonstrated that near-infrared light triggers PDT [90,91]. Similarly, Lv et al. demonstrated excellent type I PDT with a high OH-based photocytotoxic effect under hypoxia using the cyclometalated Ru complex [84]. In this study, a coumarin group was covalently incorporated into this complex to increase its light-harvesting ability, and also to enable it to serve as a good electron donor, which is critical for type I PDT.

3.2. Fractional Photodynamic Therapies

Due to the oxygen consumption during PDT process, PDT itself is a course of hypoxia. Thus, the PDT efficiency will be gradually decreased after continuous irradiation. To overcome this problem, researchers have tried to alter the irradiation protocol that introduces breaks between irradiation periods for the replenishment of intracellular oxygen. Many studies suggest that fractional (intermittent) delivery of light might be a better approach to PDT [88,90,91,92,93,94]. For example, Xiao et al. showed that the fractional irradiation protocol of 100 s on/600 s off cycles have better therapeutic efficiency than the continuous irradiation protocol and the 1 s on/6 s off cycles with the same light energy input in rat prostate cancer model [90].
In addition to the approach of editing irradiation protocols, efforts toward PS improvement have also been ongoing. To further enhance fractional PDT, Turan et al. developed a boron–dipyrromethene (BODIPY)-based PS [92]. In this system, BODIPY is incorporated with 2-pyrdidone to a bifunctional compound (PYR), in which 2-pyridone and its endoperoxide (EPO) derivative undergo a reversible recovery reaction that releases 1O2 efficiently (Figure 4). Upon light irradiation (light cycle), Pyr produces 1O2, so that some of it is absorbed by reaction with 2-pyridone to form endoperoxide. When irradiation is stopped (dark cycle), EPO releases 1O2 and regenerates PYR. Therefore, the PDT process can continue in the dark cycles as well as in the light cycles. The results pose the potential that this new type of fractional PDT approach significantly enhances photocytotoxic activity compared with the traditional PDT.

3.3. Combination Therapy Strategies

To enhance overall therapeutic efficacy, several other types of oxygen-independent therapies with potential synergistic effects have been used in combination with PDT, in particular to overcome hypoxic challenges in the tumor microenvironments. In addition, some of them can even leverage the special features in the hypoxic tumor microenvironment, such as low oxygen levels, mild acidity, and elevated H2O2 levels [95]. Here, we briefly introduce some of the most important therapies that have been designed in combination with PDT, including (1) hypoxia-targeting therapies, (2) photothermal therapies, (3) chemodynamic therapies, and (4) immunotherapies, and summarize them in Table 1.

3.3.1. Hypoxia-Targeting Therapies

The emergence of hypoxia-responsive chemotherapeutic drugs provides a chance to utilize the adverse hypoxic environment to kill tumor cells via “turn corruption into wonder” methods [9]. Many of these belong to hypoxia-activated prodrugs, such as AQ4N, TPZ, TH-302, PR-104A, NLCQ-1, and SN 23,862 which can be transformed into therapeutic agents like superoxide by various intracellular reductases under hypoxia [96,97]. In contrast, in normal tissues, superoxide can be efficiently removed by oxygen. However, the use of hypoxia-activated prodrugs alone usually is not effective enough for eliminating the whole tumor, due to the hypoxic heterogeneity of tumors. Fortunately, they can compensate perfectly with PDT, according to the oxygen levels in different areas of the tumor, so that hypoxia-activated prodrugs can dominate in the area with lower oxygen levels, and PDT will be more efficient in the area with higher oxygen levels [96].

3.3.2. Photothermal Therapies

Since PTT is oxygen-independent, the combination of these two phototherapeutic methods with a single nanoplatform can ensure effective co-delivery and synergistically increase the tumor killing capability. Furthermore, using nanomedicine strategies can further solve the low solubility issues of PDT agents and provide tumor-specific targeting in addition to EPR-based passive tumor targeting. Thus, many PTT/PDT dual-functional nanomedicines have been developed, such as gold nanospheres, graphene oxide NPs, WS2 nanosheets, and poly(dopamine) [98,99,100,115]. In addition, pretreatment with mild PTT heating to improve blood flow provides a favorable approach to relieve tumor hypoxia and regain the efficiency of PDT, and further emphasizes the clinical feasibility of the PTT/PDT combination therapy [71].

3.3.3. Chemodynamic Therapies

Generally, chemodynamic therapies (CDTs) kill tumor cells by •OH generated from in situ H2O2 by a Fenton/Fenton-like reaction, without the help of oxygen and external energy input [95]. Thus, the hypoxic tumor microenvironment with mild acidity and elevated H2O2 levels, provides a perfect working condition for CDT [104,106,107]. It has been shown that Fenton/Fenton-like reactions can simultaneously produce oxygen along with •OH, suggesting that CDT may relieve oxygen deficiency in PDT and improve its therapeutic efficiency [102,105]. In addition, the UV–Vis or NIR irradiation used in PDT can improve •OH generation efficiency in Fenton reactions to enhance the activity of CDT [103,104]. All this evidence hints that CDT will be a good partner for PDT combination therapy. For example, Liu et al. fabricated a biodegradable biomimic copper/manganese silicate nanospheres (CMSNs) for CDT/PDT synergistic therapy [95]. They showed that the CMSNs could not only exhibit effective PDT under irradiation, but also could diminish GSH levels and catalyze CDT for generating •OH at the same time (Figure 5).

3.3.4. Immunotherapies

Recently, due to clinical breakthroughs, immunotherapy has become a hot area in the field of cancer treatment. Many investigations have tried to use a combination of immunotherapy and PDT to enhance the efficiency of tumor control, especially with immune checkpoint blockade strategies [108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115]. For example, Yang et al. demonstrated that combining PDT with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibody-based checkpoint blockade immunotherapy not only effectively inhibited tumor growth, but also decreased metastasis by potentially inducing the abscopal effect [114]. This result implies that the PDT/immunotherapy combination might have the potential to decrease the recurrence of tumors and provide better long-term control of the disease.

4. Emerging Trends and Outlook

In the past 20 years, significant progress has been made in nanomedicine-based PDTs, especially for enhancing the efficiency of PDT in the hypoxic tumor microenvironment. In this review, we present an overview of the state-of-the-art approaches to overcome the limits of hypoxia in PDT, mainly based on the oxygen replenishing strategies and the oxygen dependency diminishing strategies. Among the variety of approaches, some emerging trends seems to stand out.
Firstly, the versatile nMOFs are now being widely applied within different categories of hypoxia, relieving strategies for PDT. Although MOFs have been intensely studied since the 1990s for diverse applications, the first nMOF-based PDT came as late as 2014 [116]. However, the outstanding properties caught scientists’ attention very soon. Compared to other PS nanomedicines, the porous and crystalline structures of nMOFs isolate PSs from each other to avoid self-quenching. The biodegradability of nMOFs diminish long-term toxicity when the tunable compositions and structures allow for the optimization of nMOFs for PDT applications. As mentioned previously, the great capacity of nMOFs are particularly suitable for the storage and transport of oxygen, as are PFCs for relieving tumor hypoxia [34,35,36,39]. In addition, nMOFs are also good vehicles for catalases, as is l-Arg for the generation of oxygen and NO [41,42,68]. Similarly, nMOFs also exhibit significant benefits in the application of CDT, including the availability of multiple catalytic sites and the ability to control their components. In addition, they are also effective drug delivery platforms, owing to their intrinsic porous structures for the loading of drugs, and thus can be combined with other treatment modalities easily [117]. For example, Ni et al. developed a biomimetic nMOF as a multifunction platform combining CDT, RT, radiodynamic therapy (RDT), and immunotherapy, to harnesses hypoxia for efficient tumor management (Figure 6) [118]. Thus, we can expect to see more and more nMOF-based, combination hypoxic tumor therapies. However, solubility and biocompatibility issues might limit the clinical utility of nMOFs [117].
Secondly, more and more attention is now being paid to properly incorporating immunotherapies into PDT-based tumor management. PDT has been shown to induce immunogenic cell death and stimulate innate and adaptive immune responses against tumor cells by the release of damage-associated molecular patterns and antigens from dying tumor cells [119]. The up-regulated HIF-1α has been shown to facilitate immunosuppression and immune escape by modulating lymphocytes, myeloid-derived suppressive cells, dendritic cells, and tumor-associated macrophages [9,11]. This implies that the hypoxic tumor microenvironment can hamper the induction of effective antitumor immunity via many different methods. Thus, immune checkpoint blockade strategies alone might not be sufficient to fully restore functional immune responses. In addition, the administration sequence of the combination of immunotherapy and PDT can also significantly affect the outcome. More detailed studies are still needed for designing more comprehensive and effective combination managements.
However, by surveying the recent investigation about nanomedicine-based strategies for enhancing PDT in hypoxic tumors, we find many challenges remain to be addressed still. For example, the solubility and biocompatibility issues of nMOFs and the simplified immunotherapy/PDT combination treatment protocols that might hinder their clinical usage. However, as the advance in nanomaterial modification and the knowledge about the detailed immunomodulation of PDT in hypoxic tumor microenvironments, we can expect a more valid PDT system in the near feature. Theoretically, this could be achieved by designing comprehensive therapeutic protocols via integrating the advanced nanotechnologies with other therapeutic approaches in a sophisticated time sequence. For example, oxygen and PFCs, as well as immunostimulants and cytokines, can be carried by nMOF vehicles to relieve hypoxic conditions and reverse the immunosuppressive microenvironment caused by hypoxia. These could largely increase the efficiency of the followed PDT and the stimulation of innate immune responses by the release of damage-associated molecular patterns and antigens from dying tumor cells (PDT-mediated immunogenic cell death). Then, the checkpoint blockade-based strategies can be subsequently introduced to further augment the induction of adaptive immunity.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: C.-Y.S., P.-T.W., and W.-L.H.; writing—original draft preparation: C.-Y.S., P.-T.W., and W.-L.H.; writing—review and editing: W.-C.S. and H.T.; visualization: W.-L.H., W.-C.S., and H.T.; supervision: W.-L.H., W.-C.S., and H.T.; project administration: W.-L.H., W.-C.S., and H.T.; funding acquisition: W.-L.H., W.-C.S., and H.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors acknowledge the financial support by the Center of Applied Nanomedicine, National Cheng Kung University, from the Featured Areas Research Center Program within the framework of the Higher Education Sprout Project by the Ministry of Education (MOE) in Taiwan.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the financial support by the Center of Applied Nanomedicine, National Cheng Kung University, from the Featured Areas Research Center Program within the framework of the Higher Education Sprout Project by the Ministry of Education (MOE) in Taiwan.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors state that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article.

References

  1. Siegel, R.L.; Miller, K.D.; Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA-Cancer J. Clin. 2020, 70, 7–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Dong, J.S.; Li, B.J.; Lin, D.; Zhou, Q.H.; Huang, D.P. Advances in targeted therapy and immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer based on accurate molecular typing. Front. Pharmacol. 2019, 10, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Li, X.S.; Lovell, J.F.; Yoon, J.; Chen, X.Y. Clinical development and potential of photothermal and photodynamic therapies for cancer. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2020, 17, 657–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Zhang, Q.Y.; Li, L.B. Photodynamic combinational therapy in cancer treatment. J. BUON Off. J. Balk. Union Oncol. 2018, 23, 561–567. [Google Scholar]
  5. Benov, L. Photodynamic therapy: Current status and future directions. Med. Princ. Pract. 2015, 24, 14–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Abrahamse, H.; Hamblin, M.R. New photosensitizers for photodynamic therapy. Biochem. J. 2016, 473, 347–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Lucky, S.S.; Soo, K.C.; Zhang, Y. Nanoparticles in photodynamic therapy. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 1990–2042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Agostinis, P.; Berg, K.; Cengel, K.A.; Foster, T.H.; Girotti, A.W.; Gollnick, S.O.; Hahn, S.M.; Hamblin, M.R.; Juzeniene, A.; Kessel, D.; et al. Photodynamic therapy of cancer: An update. CA-Cancer J. Clin. 2011, 61, 250–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sun, Y.X.; Zhao, D.Y.; Wang, G.; Wang, Y.; Cao, L.L.; Sun, J.; Jiang, Q.K.; He, Z.G. Recent progress of hypoxia-modulated multifunctional nanomedicines to enhance photodynamic therapy: Opportunities, challenges, and future development. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 2020, 10, 1382–1396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hockel, M.; Vaupel, P. Tumor hypoxia: Definitions and current clinical, biologic, and molecular aspects. JNCI-J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2001, 93, 266–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Kumar, V.; Gabrilovich, D.I. Hypoxia-inducible factors in regulation of immune responses in tumour microenvironment. Immunology 2014, 143, 512–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Brown, J.M.; William, W.R. Exploiting tumour hypoxia in cancer treatment. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2004, 4, 437–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Li, X.S.; Kwon, N.; Guo, T.; Liu, Z.; Yoon, J. Innovative strategies for hypoxic-tumor photodynamic therapy. Angew. Chem. Int. Edit. 2018, 57, 11522–11531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Buzea, C.; Pacheco, I.I.; Robbie, K. Nanomaterials and nanoparticles: Sources and toxicity. Biointerphases 2007, 2, MR17–MR71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Adeel, M.; Duzagac, F.; Canzonieri, V.; Rizzolio, F. Self-therapeutic nanomaterials for cancer therapy: A review. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2020, 3, 4962–4971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Master, A.; Livingston, M.; Sen Gupta, A. Photodynamic nanomedicine in the treatment of solid tumors: Perspectives and challenges. J. Control. Release 2013, 168, 88–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Larue, L.; Myrzakhmetov, B.; Ben-Mihoub, A.; Moussaron, A.; Thomas, N.; Arnoux, P.; Baros, F.; Vanderesse, R.; Acherar, S.; Frochot, C. Fighting hypoxia to improve PDT. Pharmaceuticals 2019, 12, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Hetzel, F.; Shakil, A.; Beckers, J.; Chen, Q. Hyperoxygenation enhances photodynamic therapy tumor cure. SPIE 2001, 4248, 56–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Huang, Z.; Chen, Q.; Shakil, A.; Chen, H.; Beckers, J.; Shapiro, H.; Hetzel, F.W. Hyperoxygenation enhances the tumor cell killing of photofrin-mediated photodynamic therapy. Photochem. Photobiol. 2003, 78, 496–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chen, Q.; Huang, Z.; Chen, H.; Shapiro, H.; Beckers, J.; Hetzel, F. Improvement of tumor response to photodynamic therapy by manipulation of tumor oxygenation in an in-vivo model system. SPIE 2002, 4916, 43–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Iijima, M.; Gombodorj, N.; Tachibana, Y.; Tachibana, K.; Yokobori, T.; Honma, K.; Nakano, T.; Asao, T.; Kuwahara, R.; Aoyama, K.; et al. Development of single nanometer-sized ultrafine oxygen bubbles to overcome the hypoxia-induced resistance to radiation therapy via the suppression of hypoxia-inducible factor-1. Int. J. Oncol. 2018, 52, 679–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Song, R.Y.; Hu, D.H.; Chung, H.Y.; Sheng, Z.H.; Yao, S.H. Lipid-polymer bilaminar oxygen nanobubbles for enhanced photodynamic therapy of cancer. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 36805–36813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Owen, J.; McEwan, C.; Nesbitt, H.; Bovornchutichai, P.; Averre, R.; Borden, M.; McHale, A.P.; Callan, J.F.; Stride, E. Reducing tumour hypoxia via oral administration of oxygen nanobubbles. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0168088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Khan, M.S.; Hwang, J.; Lee, K.; Choi, Y.; Seo, Y.; Jeon, H.; Hong, J.W.; Choi, J. Anti-tumor drug-loaded oxygen nanobubbles for the degradation of HIF-1 alpha and the upregulation of reactive oxygen species in tumor cells. Cancers 2019, 11, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Huang, W.C.; Shen, M.Y.; Chen, H.H.; Lin, S.C.; Chiang, W.H.; Wu, P.H.; Chang, C.W.; Chiang, C.S.; Chiu, H.C. Monocytic delivery of therapeutic oxygen bubbles for dual-modality treatment of tumor hypoxia. J. Control. Release 2015, 220, 738–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Song, R.Y.; Peng, S.; Lin, Q.G.; Luo, M.; Chung, H.Y.; Zhang, Y.L.; Yao, S.H. pH-responsive oxygen nanobubbles for spontaneous oxygen delivery in hypoxic tumors. Langmuir 2019, 35, 10166–10172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Li, T.H.; Jing, X.B.; Huang, Y.B. Polymer/Hemoglobin assemblies: Biodegradable oxygen carriers for artificial red blood cells. Macromol. Biosci. 2011, 11, 865–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Modery-Pawlowski, C.L.; Tian, L.L.; Pan, V.; Sen Gupta, A. Synthetic approaches to RBC mimicry and oxygen carrier systems. Biomacromolecules 2013, 14, 939–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Luo, Z.Y.; Zheng, M.B.; Zhao, P.F.; Chen, Z.; Siu, F.M.; Gong, P.; Gao, G.H.; Sheng, Z.H.; Zheng, C.F.; Ma, Y.F.; et al. Self-monitoring artificial red cells with sufficient oxygen supply for enhanced photodynamic therapy. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Riess, J.G. Understanding the fundamentals of perfluorocarbons and perfluorocarbon emulsions relevant to in vivo oxygen delivery. Artif. Cells Blood Substit. Biotechnol. 2005, 33, 47–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kerins, D.M. Role of the perfluorocarbon fluosal-DA in coronary angioplasty. Am. J. Med. Sci. 1994, 307, 218–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Yu, Z.Z.; Zhou, P.; Pan, W.; Li, N.; Tang, B. A biomimetic nanoreactor for synergistic chemiexcited photodynamic therapy and starvation therapy against tumor metastasis. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Chen, J.; Luo, H.L.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, W.; Li, H.X.; Luo, T.; Zhang, K.; Zhao, Y.X.; Liu, J.J. Oxygen-self-produced nanoplatform for relieving hypoxia and breaking resistance to sonodynamic treatment of pancreatic cancer. ACS Nano 2017, 11, 12849–12862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Li, B.; Wen, H.M.; Cui, Y.J.; Zhou, W.; Qian, G.D.; Chen, B.L. Emerging multifunctional metal-organic framework materials. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 8819–8860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. DeCoste, J.B.; Weston, M.H.; Fuller, P.E.; Tovar, T.M.; Peterson, G.W.; LeVan, M.D.; Farha, O.K. Metal-organic frameworks for oxygen storage. Angew. Chem. Int. Edit. 2014, 53, 14092–14095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhang, C.; Qin, W.-J.; Bai, X.-F.; Zhang, X.-Z. Nanomaterials to relieve tumor hypoxia for enhanced photodynamic therapy. Nano Today 2020, 35, 100960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Gao, S.T.; Zheng, P.L.; Li, Z.H.; Feng, X.C.; Yan, W.X.; Chen, S.Z.; Guo, W.S.; Liu, D.D.; Yang, X.J.; Wang, S.X.; et al. Biomimetic O2-evolving metal-organic framework nanoplatform for highly efficient photodynamic therapy against hypoxic tumor. Biomaterials 2018, 178, 83–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Xie, Z.X.; Cai, X.C.; Sun, C.Q.; Liang, S.; Shao, S.; Huang, S.S.; Cheng, Z.Y.; Pang, M.L.; Xing, B.G.; Al Kheraif, A.A.; et al. O2-loaded pH-responsive multifunctional nanodrug carrier for overcoming hypoxia and highly efficient chemo-photodynamic cancer therapy. Chem. Mater. 2019, 31, 483–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wanigarathna, D.K.J.A.; Gao, J.; Liu, B. Metal organic frameworks for adsorption-based separation of fluorocompounds: A review. Mater. Adv. 2020, 1, 310–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lopez-Lazaro, M. Dual role of hydrogen peroxide in cancer: Possible relevance to cancer chemoprevention and therapy. Cancer Lett. 2007, 252, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Cheng, H.; Zhu, J.Y.; Li, S.Y.; Zeng, J.Y.; Lei, Q.; Chen, K.W.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, X.Z. An O2 self-sufficient biomimetic nanoplatform for highly specific and efficient photodynamic therapy. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2016, 26, 7847–7860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Gu, Z.; Biswas, A.; Zhao, M.X.; Tang, Y. Tailoring nanocarriers for intracellular protein delivery. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40, 3638–3655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Chen, H.C.; Tian, J.W.; He, W.J.; Guo, Z.J. H2O2-activatable and O2-evolving nanoparticles for highly efficient and selective photodynamic therapy against hypoxic tumor cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 1539–1547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Zou, M.Z.; Liu, W.L.; Li, C.X.; Zheng, D.W.; Zeng, J.Y.; Gao, F.; Ye, J.J.; Zhang, X.Z. A multifunctional biomimetic nanoplatform for relieving hypoxia to enhance chemotherapy and inhibit the PD-1/PD-L1 axis. Small 2018, 14, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Jia, Q.Y.; Ge, J.C.; Liu, W.M.; Zheng, X.L.; Chen, S.Q.; Wen, Y.M.; Zhang, H.Y.; Wang, P.F. A magnetofluorescent carbon dot assembly as an acidic H2O2-driven oxygenerator to regulate tumor hypoxia for simultaneous bimodal imaging and enhanced photodynamic therapy. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Wei, J.P.; Li, J.C.; Sun, D.; Li, Q.; Ma, J.Y.; Chen, X.L.; Zhu, X.; Zheng, N.F. A novel theranostic nanoplatform based on Pd@Pt-PEG-Ce6 for enhanced photodynamic therapy by modulating tumor hypoxia microenvironment. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zhang, Y.Y.; Lv, F.; Cheng, Y.R.; Yuan, Z.P.; Yang, F.; Liu, C.H.; Cao, Y.; Zhang, K.; Lu, H.T.; Zada, S.; et al. Pd@Au bimetallic nanoplates decorated mesoporous MnO2 for synergistic nucleus-targeted NIR-II photothermal and hypoxia-relieved photodynamic therapy. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2020, 9, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Liang, J.H.; Zheng, Y.; Wu, X.W.; Tan, C.P.; Ji, L.N.; Mao, Z.W. A tailored multifunctional anticancer nanodelivery system for ruthenium-based photosensitizers: Tumor microenvironment adaption and remodeling. Adv. Sci. 2020, 7, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Zhang, L.; Wan, S.S.; Li, C.X.; Xu, L.; Cheng, H.; Zhang, X.Z. An adenosine triphosphate-responsive autocatalytic Fenton nanoparticle for tumor ablation with self-supplied H2O2 and acceleration of Fe(III)/Fe(II) conversion. Nano Lett. 2018, 18, 7609–7618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Chen, Q.; Chen, J.W.; Yang, Z.J.; Xu, J.; Xu, L.G.; Liang, C.; Han, X.; Liu, Z. Nanoparticle-enhanced radiotherapy to trigger robust cancer immunotherapy. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Huo, M.F.; Wang, L.Y.; Chen, Y.; Shi, J.L. Tumor-selective catalytic nanomedicine by nanocatalyst delivery. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zou, M.-Z.; Liu, W.-L.; Chen, H.-S.; Bai, X.-F.; Gao, F.; Ye, J.-J.; Cheng, H.; Zhang, X.-Z. Advances in nanomaterials for treatment of hypoxic tumor. Natl. Sci. Rev. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Ni, M.; Leung, M.K.H.; Leung, D.Y.C.; Sumathy, K. A review and recent developments in photocatalytic water-splitting using TiO2 for hydrogen production. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2007, 11, 401–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Walter, M.G.; Warren, E.L.; McKone, J.R.; Boettcher, S.W.; Mi, Q.X.; Santori, E.A.; Lewis, N.S. Solar water splitting cells. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 6446–6473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Zheng, D.W.; Li, B.; Xu, L.; Zhang, Q.L.; Fan, J.X.; Li, C.X.; Zhang, X.Z. Normalizing tumor microenvironment based on photosynthetic abiotic/biotic nanoparticles. ACS Nano 2018, 12, 6218–6227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zheng, D.W.; Li, B.; Li, C.X.; Fan, J.X.; Lei, Q.; Li, C.; Xu, Z.S.; Zhang, X.Z. Carbon-dot-decorated carbon nitride nanoparticles for enhanced photodynamic therapy against hypoxic tumor via water splitting. ACS Nano 2016, 10, 8715–8722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Wang, Y.L.; Nie, T.; Li, Y.H.; Wang, X.L.; Zheng, L.R.; Chen, A.P.; Gong, X.Q.; Yang, H.G. Black tungsten nitride as a metallic photocatalyst for overall water splitting operable at up to 765 nm. Angew. Chem. Int. Edit. 2017, 56, 7430–7434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Wang, S.B.; Zhang, C.; Liu, X.H.; Chen, Z.X.; Peng, S.Y.; Zhong, Z.L.; Zhang, X.Z. A tungsten nitride-based O2 self-sufficient nanoplatform for enhanced photodynamic therapy against hypoxic tumors. Adv. Ther. 2019, 2, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Liu, L.H.; Zhang, Y.H.; Qiu, W.X.; Zhang, L.; Gao, F.; Li, B.; Xu, L.; Fan, J.X.; Li, Z.H.; Zhang, X.Z. Dual-stage light amplified photodynamic therapy against hypoxic tumor based on an O2 self-sufficient nanoplatform. Small 2017, 13, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Yao, C.; Wang, W.X.; Wang, P.Y.; Zhao, M.Y.; Li, X.M.; Zhang, F. Near-infrared upconversion mesoporous cerium oxide hollow biophotocatalyst for concurrent pH-/H2O2-responsive O2-evolving synergetic cancer therapy. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Xu, S.T.; Zhu, X.Y.; Zhang, C.; Huang, W.; Zhou, Y.F.; Yan, D.Y. Oxygen and Pt(ll) self-generating conjugate for synergistic photo-chemo therapy of hypoxic tumor. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Oh, S.H.; Ward, C.L.; Atala, A.; Yoo, J.J.; Harrison, B.S. Oxygen generating scaffolds for enhancing engineered tissue survival. Biomaterials 2009, 30, 757–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Pedraza, E.; Coronel, M.M.; Fraker, C.A.; Ricordi, C.; Stabler, C.L. Preventing hypoxia-induced cell death in beta cells and islets via hydrolytically activated, oxygen-generating biomaterials. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 4245–4250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Jin, Z.K.; Wen, Y.Y.; Hu, Y.X.; Chen, W.W.; Zheng, X.F.; Guo, W.S.; Wang, T.F.; Qian, Z.Y.; Su, B.L.; He, Q.J. MRI-guided and ultrasound-triggered release of NO by advanced nanomedicine. Nanoscale 2017, 9, 3637–3645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Guo, R.R.; Tian, Y.; Wang, Y.J.; Yang, W.L. Near-infrared laser-triggered nitric oxide nanogenerators for the reversal of multidrug resistance in cancer. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2017, 27, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Deng, Y.Y.; Jia, F.; Chen, S.Y.; Shen, Z.D.; Jin, Q.; Fu, G.S.; Ji, J. Nitric oxide as an all-rounder for enhanced photodynamic therapy: Hypoxia relief, glutathione depletion and reactive nitrogen species generation. Biomaterials 2018, 187, 55–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Jordan, B.F.; Sonveaux, P.; Feron, O.; Gregoire, V.; Beghein, N.; Gallez, B. Nitric oxide-mediated increase in tumor blood flow and oxygenation of tumors implanted in muscles stimulated by electric pulses. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2003, 55, 1066–1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Wan, S.S.; Zeng, J.Y.; Cheng, H.; Zhang, X.Z. ROS-induced NO generation for gas therapy and sensitizing photodynamic therapy of tumor. Biomaterials 2018, 185, 51–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Song, C.W.; Rhee, J.G.; Levitt, S.H. Effect of hyperthermia on hypoxic cell fraction in tumor. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 1982, 8, 851–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Brizel, D.M.; Scully, S.P.; Harrelson, J.M.; Layfield, L.J.; Dodge, R.K.; Charles, H.C.; Samulski, T.V.; Prosnitz, L.R.; Dewhirst, M.W. Radiation therapy and hyperthermia improve the oxygenation of human soft tissue sarcomas. Cancer Res. 1996, 56, 5347–5350. [Google Scholar]
  71. Feng, L.Z.; Tao, D.L.; Dong, Z.L.; Chen, Q.; Chao, Y.; Liu, Z.; Chen, M.W. Near-infrared light activation of quenched liposomal Ce6 for synergistic cancer phototherapy with effective skin protection. Biomaterials 2017, 127, 13–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Chen, Q.; Chen, J.W.; Liang, C.; Feng, L.Z.; Dong, Z.L.; Song, X.J.; Song, G.S.; Liu, Z. Drug-induced co-assembly of albumin/catalase as smart nano-theranostics for deep intra-tumoral penetration, hypoxia relieve, and synergistic combination therapy. J. Control. Release 2017, 263, 79–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Cham, K.K.Y.; Baker, J.H.E.; Takhar, K.S.; Flexman, J.A.; Wong, M.Q.; Owen, D.A.; Yung, A.; Kozlowski, P.; Reinsberg, S.A.; Chu, E.M.; et al. Metronomic gemcitabine suppresses tumour growth, improves perfusion, and reduces hypoxia in human pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Br. J. Cancer 2010, 103, 52–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Jain, R.K. Normalization of tumor vasculature: An emerging concept in antiangiogenic therapy. Science 2005, 307, 58–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Mpekris, F.; Baish, J.W.; Stylianopoulos, T.; Jain, R.K. Role of vascular normalization in benefit from metronomic chemotherapy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 1994–1999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Denko, N.C. Hypoxia, HIF1 and glucose metabolism in the solid tumour. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2008, 8, 705–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Heiden, M.G.V.; Cantley, L.C.; Thompson, C.B. Understanding the Warburg effect: The metabolic requirements of cell proliferation. Science 2009, 324, 1029–1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Song, X.J.; Feng, L.Z.; Liang, C.; Gao, M.; Song, G.S.; Liu, Z. Liposomes co-loaded with metformin and chlorin e6 modulate tumor hypoxia during enhanced photodynamic therapy. Nano Res. 2017, 10, 1200–1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Weinberg, S.E.; Chandel, N.S. Targeting mitochondria metabolism for cancer therapy. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2015, 11, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Fan, Y.T.; Zhou, T.J.; Cui, P.F.; He, Y.J.; Chang, X.; Xing, L.; Jiang, H.L. Modulation of intracellular oxygen pressure by dual-drug nanoparticles to enhance photodynamic therapy. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019, 29, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Yu, W.Y.; Liu, T.; Zhang, M.K.; Wang, Z.X.; Ye, J.J.; Li, C.X.; Liu, W.L.; Li, R.Q.; Feng, J.; Zhang, X.Z. O2 economizer for inhibiting cell respiration to combat the hypoxia obstacle in tumor treatments. ACS Nano 2019, 13, 1784–1794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Juarranz, A.; Jaen, P.; Sanz-Rodriguez, F.; Cuevas, J.; Gonzalez, S. Photodynamic therapy of cancer. Basic principles and applications. Clin. Transl. Oncol. 2008, 10, 148–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Li, X.; Zheng, B.D.; Peng, X.H.; Li, S.Z.; Ying, J.W.; Zhao, Y.Y.; Huang, J.D.; Yoon, J. Phthalocyanines as medicinal photosensitizers: Developments in the last five years. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2019, 379, 147–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Lv, Z.; Wei, H.J.; Li, Q.; Su, X.L.; Liu, S.J.; Zhang, K.Y.; Lv, W.; Zhao, Q.; Li, X.H.; Huang, W. Achieving efficient photodynamic therapy under both normoxia and hypoxia using cyclometalated Ru(II) photosensitizer through type I photochemical process. Chem. Sci. 2018, 9, 502–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Gilson, R.C.; Black, K.C.L.; Lane, D.D.; Achilefu, S. Hybrid TiO2-ruthenium nano-photosensitizer synergistically produces reactive oxygen species in both hypoxic and normoxic conditions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 10717–10720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Zhang, C.; Zhao, K.L.; Bu, W.B.; Ni, D.L.; Liu, Y.Y.; Feng, J.W.; Shi, J.L. Marriage of scintillator and semiconductor for synchronous radiotherapy and deep photodynamic therapy with diminished oxygen dependence. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 1770–1774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Ding, H.Y.; Yu, H.J.; Dong, Y.; Tian, R.H.; Huang, G.; Boothman, D.A.; Sumer, B.D.; Gao, J.M. Photoactivation switch from type II to type I reactions by electron-rich micelles for improved photodynamic therapy of cancer cells under hypoxia. J. Control. Release 2011, 156, 276–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Gibson, S.L.; Vandermeid, K.R.; Murant, R.S.; Raubertas, R.F.; Hilf, R. Effects of various photoradiation regimens on the antitumor efficacy of photodynamic therapy for R3230AC mammary carcinomas. Cancer Res. 1990, 50, 7236–7241. [Google Scholar]
  89. Lan, Y.C.; Lu, Y.L.; Ren, Z.F. Mini review on photocatalysis of titanium dioxide nanoparticles and their solar applications. Nano Energy 2013, 2, 1031–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Xiao, Z.W.; Halls, S.; Dickey, D.; Tulip, J.; Moore, R.B. Fractionated versus standard continuous light delivery in interstitial photodynamic therapy of dunning prostate carcinomas. Clin. Cancer Res. 2007, 13, 7496–7505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Tromberg, B.J.; Orenstein, A.; Kimel, S.; Barker, S.J.; Hyatt, J.; Nelson, J.S.; Berns, M.W. In vivo tumor oxygen tension measurements for the evaluation of the efficiency of photodynamic therapy. Photochem. Photobiol. 1990, 52, 375–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Turan, I.S.; Yildiz, D.; Turksoy, A.; Gunaydin, G.; Akkaya, E.U. A bifunctional photosensitizer for enhanced fractional photodynamic therapy: Singlet oxygen generation in the presence and absence of light. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 2875–2878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. De Souza, A.L.R.; Marra, K.; Gunn, J.; Samkoe, K.S.; Kanick, S.C.; Davis, S.C.; Chapman, M.S.; Maytin, E.V.; Hasan, T.; Pogue, B.W. Comparing desferrioxamine and light fractionation enhancement of ALA-PpIX photodynamic therapy in skin cancer. Br. J. Cancer 2016, 115, 805–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  94. Yang, L.Y.; Wei, Y.C.; Xing, D.; Chen, Q. Increasing the efficiency of photodynamic therapy by improved light delivery and oxygen supply using an anticoagulant in a solid tumor model. Lasers Surg. Med. 2010, 42, 671–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Liu, C.H.; Wang, D.D.; Zhang, S.Y.; Cheng, Y.R.; Yang, F.; Xing, Y.; Xu, T.L.; Dong, H.F.; Zhang, X.J. Biodegradable biomimic copper/manganese silicate nanospheres for chemodynamic/photodynamic synergistic therapy with simultaneous glutathione depletion and hypoxia relief. ACS Nano 2019, 13, 4267–4277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. O’Connor, L.J.; Cazares-Korner, C.; Saha, J.; Evans, C.N.G.; Stratford, M.R.L.; Hammond, E.M.; Conway, S.J. Design, synthesis and evaluation of molecularly targeted hypoxia-activated prodrugs. Nat. Protoc. 2016, 11, 781–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Hunter, F.W.; Wouters, B.G.; Wilson, W.R. Hypoxia-activated prodrugs: Paths forward in the era of personalized medicine. Br. J. Cancer 2016, 114, 1071–1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Zhang, D.; Wu, M.; Zeng, Y.Y.; Wu, L.J.; Wang, Q.T.; Han, X.; Liu, X.L.; Liu, J.F. Chlorin e6 conjugated poly(dopamine) nanospheres as PDT/PTT dual-modal therapeutic agents for enhanced cancer therapy. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 8176–8187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Vijayaraghavan, P.; Liu, C.H.; Vankayala, R.; Chiang, C.S.; Hwang, K.C. Designing multi-branched gold nanoechinus for NIR light activated dual modal photodynamic and photothermal therapy in the second biological window. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 6689–6695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Chen, Q.; Wang, C.; Cheng, L.; He, W.W.; Cheng, Z.; Liu, Z. Protein modified upconversion nanoparticles for imaging-guided combined photothermal and photodynamic therapy. Biomaterials 2014, 35, 2915–2923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Yong, Y.; Zhou, L.J.; Gu, Z.J.; Yan, L.; Tian, G.; Zheng, X.P.; Liu, X.D.; Zhang, X.; Shi, J.X.; Cong, W.S.; et al. WS2 nanosheet as a new photosensitizer carrier for combined photodynamic and photothermal therapy of cancer cells. Nanoscale 2014, 6, 10394–10403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Liu, Y.; Zhen, W.Y.; Jin, L.H.; Zhang, S.T.; Sun, G.Y.; Zhang, T.Q.; Xu, X.; Song, S.Y.; Wang, Y.H.; Liu, J.H.; et al. All-in-one theranostic nanoagent with enhanced reactive oxygen species generation and modulating tumor microenvironment ability for effective tumor eradication. ACS Nano 2018, 12, 4886–4893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Ranji-Burachaloo, H.; Gurr, P.A.; Dunstan, D.E.; Qiao, G.G. Cancer Treatment through nanoparticle-facilitated Fenton reaction. ACS Nano 2018, 12, 11819–11837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Tang, Z.M.; Liu, Y.Y.; He, M.Y.; Bu, W.B. Chemodynamic therapy: Tumour microenvironment-mediated Fenton and Fenton-like reactions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 946–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Kim, J.; Cho, H.R.; Jeon, H.; Kim, D.; Song, C.; Lee, N.; Choi, S.H.; Hyeon, T. Continuous O2-evolving MnFe2O4 nanoparticle-anchored mesoporous silica nanoparticles for efficient photodynamic therapy in hypoxic cancer. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 10992–10995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Hu, P.; Wu, T.; Fan, W.P.; Chen, L.; Liu, Y.Y.; Ni, D.L.; Bu, W.B.; Shi, J.L. Near infrared-assisted Fenton reaction for tumor-specific and mitochondrial DNA-targeted photochemotherapy. Biomaterials 2017, 141, 86–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Zhang, C.; Bu, W.B.; Ni, D.L.; Zhang, S.J.; Li, Q.; Yao, Z.W.; Zhang, J.W.; Yao, H.L.; Wang, Z.; Shi, J.L. Synthesis of iron nanometallic glasses and their application in cancer therapy by a localized Fenton reaction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 2101–2106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Wang, D.; Wang, T.; Liu, J.; Yu, H.; Jiao, S.; Feng, B.; Zhou, F.; Fu, Y.; Yin, Q.; Zhang, P.; et al. Acid-activatable versatile micelleplexes for PD-L1 blockade-enhanced cancer photodynamic immunotherapy. Nano Lett. 2016, 16, 5503–5513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Mitsunaga, M.; Ogawa, M.; Kosaka, N.; Rosenblum, L.T.; Choyke, P.L.; Kobayashi, H. Cancer cell-selective in vivo near infrared photoimmunotherapy targeting specific membrane molecules. Nat. Med. 2011, 17, 1685–1691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Song, W.; Kuang, J.; Li, C.-X.; Zhang, M.; Zheng, D.; Zeng, X.; Liu, C.; Zhang, X.-Z. Enhanced immunotherapy based on photodynamic therapy for both primary and lung metastasis tumor eradication. ACS Nano 2018, 12, 1978–1989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Yang, G.; Xu, L.; Chao, Y.; Xu, J.; Sun, X.; Wu, Y.; Peng, R.; Liu, Z. Hollow MnO2 as a tumor-microenvironment-responsive biodegradable nano-platform for combination therapy favoring antitumor immune responses. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  112. Lan, G.X.; Ni, K.Y.; Xu, Z.W.; Veroneau, S.S.; Song, Y.; Lin, W.B. Nanoscale metal-organic framework overcomes hypoxia for photodynamic therapy primed cancer immunotherapy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 5670–5673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Castano, A.P.; Mroz, P.; Hamblin, M.R. Photodynamic therapy and anti-tumour immunity. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2006, 6, 535–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  114. Yang, G.; Xu, L.; Xu, J.; Zhang, R.; Song, G.; Chao, Y.; Feng, L.; Han, F.; Dong, Z.; Li, B.; et al. Smart nanoreactors for pH-responsive tumor homing, mitochondria-targeting, and enhanced photodynamic-immunotherapy of cancer. Nano Lett. 2018, 18, 2475–2484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Zeng, J.-Y.; Zou, M.-Z.; Zhang, M.; Wang, X.-S.; Zeng, X.; Cong, H.; Zhang, X.-Z. π-Extended benzoporphyrin-based metal-organic framework for inhibition of tumor metastasis. ACS Nano 2018, 12, 4630–4640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Lu, K.; He, C.; Lin, W. Nanoscale metal–organic framework for highly effective photodynamic therapy of resistant head and neck cancer. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 16712–16715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  117. Hwang, E.; Jung, H.S. Metal-organic complex-based chemodynamic therapy agents for cancer therapy. Chem. Commun. 2020, 56, 8332–8341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Ni, K.Y.; Lan, G.X.; Song, Y.; Hao, Z.Y.; Lin, W.B. Biomimetic nanoscale metal-organic framework harnesses hypoxia for effective cancer radiotherapy and immunotherapy. Chem. Sci. 2020, 11, 7641–7653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  119. Nam, J.; Son, S.; Park, K.S.; Zou, W.P.; Shea, L.D.; Moon, J.J. Cancer nanomedicine for combination cancer immunotherapy. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2019, 4, 398–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Biomedicines 09 00137 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of Type I photodynamic therapy (PDT) and Type II PDT. (hv: photon energy; CB: conduction band; VB: valence band).
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of Type I photodynamic therapy (PDT) and Type II PDT. (hv: photon energy; CB: conduction band; VB: valence band).
Biomedicines 09 00137 g001
Biomedicines 09 00137 g002 550
Figure 2. Schematic illustration of the construction of a nanoscale metal–organic framework (nMOF) from metal-based secondary building units and organic linkers.
Figure 2. Schematic illustration of the construction of a nanoscale metal–organic framework (nMOF) from metal-based secondary building units and organic linkers.
Biomedicines 09 00137 g002
Biomedicines 09 00137 g003 550
Figure 3. Schematic illustration of Mn–CD assembly catalyzing the decomposition of H2O2 to oxygen under acidic/hypoxic microenvironments, which exerts oxygen-enhanced PDT. Reproduced with permission [45]. Copyright 2018, Wiley-VCH.
Figure 3. Schematic illustration of Mn–CD assembly catalyzing the decomposition of H2O2 to oxygen under acidic/hypoxic microenvironments, which exerts oxygen-enhanced PDT. Reproduced with permission [45]. Copyright 2018, Wiley-VCH.
Biomedicines 09 00137 g003
Biomedicines 09 00137 g004 550
Figure 4. Schematic illustration of the mechanism of the novel fractional PDT photosensitizer (PS) based on the 2-pydidone-conjugated boron–dipyrromethene (BODIPY). Reproduced with permission [92]. Copyright 2016, Wiley-VCH.
Figure 4. Schematic illustration of the mechanism of the novel fractional PDT photosensitizer (PS) based on the 2-pydidone-conjugated boron–dipyrromethene (BODIPY). Reproduced with permission [92]. Copyright 2016, Wiley-VCH.
Biomedicines 09 00137 g004
Biomedicines 09 00137 g005 550
Figure 5. Schematic illustration of the therapeutic mechanism of copper/manganese silicate nanosphere (CMSN)-based chemodynamic therapies (CDT)/PDT combination therapy. Reproduced with permission [95]. Copyright 2019, American Chemical Society.
Figure 5. Schematic illustration of the therapeutic mechanism of copper/manganese silicate nanosphere (CMSN)-based chemodynamic therapies (CDT)/PDT combination therapy. Reproduced with permission [95]. Copyright 2019, American Chemical Society.
Biomedicines 09 00137 g005
Biomedicines 09 00137 g006 550
Figure 6. Schematic illustration of the mechanism of the nMOF as a multifunction platform for combining CDT, radiotherapy (RT), RDT, and immunotherapy for treating hypoxic tumors. Reproduced from [118]. Published by The Royal Society of Chemistry.
Figure 6. Schematic illustration of the mechanism of the nMOF as a multifunction platform for combining CDT, radiotherapy (RT), RDT, and immunotherapy for treating hypoxic tumors. Reproduced from [118]. Published by The Royal Society of Chemistry.
Biomedicines 09 00137 g006
Table
Table 1. Summary of therapies usually combined with PDT.
Table 1. Summary of therapies usually combined with PDT.
MechanismTypical CasesAdvantagesRefs
Hypoxia-targeting TherapiesThe prodrug can be transformed into therapeutic agents by various intracellular reductases under hypoxia.
  • ˙ Hypoxia-activated prodrugs (AQ4N, TPZ, TH-302, PR-104A, NLCQ-1, and SN 23862)
  • ˙ Leveraging the tumor microenvironment with low oxygen levels.
  • ˙ Perfectly compensate with PDT, according to different oxygen levels in different tumor areas.
[9,96,97]
Photothermal therapies (PPTs)Releases vibrational energy (heat) after photosensitizers are excited by light energy.
  • ˙ Gold nanospheres, graphene oxide NPs, WS2 nanosheets, and poly(dopamine)
  • ˙ It is convenient to design the irradiation method with these two phototherapeutic methods.
  • ˙ Pretreatment with mild PTT heating to improve blood flow provides a favorable approach to relieve tumor hypoxia and regain the efficiency of PDT.
[71,98,99,100,101]
Chemodynamic therapies (CDTs)Generating •OH from in situ H2O2 by Fenton/Fenton-like reaction.
  • ˙ Iron-based inorganic nanomaterials; other metal-based inorganic nanomaterials (with Mn2+, Ti3+, Cu2+, and Co2+ ions); nMOFs
  • ˙ Leveraging the mild acidic hypoxic tumor microenvironment with elevated H2O2 levels.
  • ˙ Oxygen generated by CDT can enhance PDT efficiency, and irradiation in PDT can facilitate the •OH generation in CDT.
[95,102,103,104,105,106,107]
ImmunotherapiesAugments antitumor immunity and reverses immunosuppression by immunostimulants, cytokines, and checkpoint blockades.
  • ˙ Immunostimulants (such as Toll-like receptor ligands), cytokines (such as GMCSF), and checkpoint blockades (such as anti-PDL-1)
  • ˙ Reverses the immunosuppressive microenvironment caused by hypoxia.
  • ˙ Enhances the antitumor immunity induced by PDT-mediated tumor killing and tumor antigen release
[108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shih, C.-Y.; Wang, P.-T.; Su, W.-C.; Teng, H.; Huang, W.-L. Nanomedicine-Based Strategies Assisting Photodynamic Therapy for Hypoxic Tumors: State-of-the-Art Approaches and Emerging Trends. Biomedicines 2021, 9, 137. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9020137

AMA Style

Shih C-Y, Wang P-T, Su W-C, Teng H, Huang W-L. Nanomedicine-Based Strategies Assisting Photodynamic Therapy for Hypoxic Tumors: State-of-the-Art Approaches and Emerging Trends. Biomedicines. 2021; 9(2):137. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9020137

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shih, Chun-Yan, Pei-Ting Wang, Wu-Chou Su, Hsisheng Teng, and Wei-Lun Huang. 2021. "Nanomedicine-Based Strategies Assisting Photodynamic Therapy for Hypoxic Tumors: State-of-the-Art Approaches and Emerging Trends" Biomedicines 9, no. 2: 137. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9020137

APA Style

Shih, C. -Y., Wang, P. -T., Su, W. -C., Teng, H., & Huang, W. -L. (2021). Nanomedicine-Based Strategies Assisting Photodynamic Therapy for Hypoxic Tumors: State-of-the-Art Approaches and Emerging Trends. Biomedicines, 9(2), 137. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9020137

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop