Next Article in Journal
From Antisense RNA to RNA Modification: Therapeutic Potential of RNA-Based Technologies
Next Article in Special Issue
Surgical Management of Adrenocortical Carcinoma: Current Highlights
Previous Article in Journal
Combination of Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Delivered Oncolytic Virus with Prodrug Activation Increases Efficacy and Safety of Colorectal Cancer Therapy
Previous Article in Special Issue
Immunotherapy in Adrenocortical Carcinoma: Predictors of Response, Efficacy, Safety, and Mechanisms of Resistance
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Characterization of Direct Perturbations on Voltage-Gated Sodium Current by Esaxerenone, a Nonsteroidal Mineralocorticoid Receptor Blocker

1
Department of Biotechnology, Southern Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Tainan 71005, Taiwan
2
Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Chi-Mei Medical Center, Tainan 71004, Taiwan
3
Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 70101, Taiwan
4
Department of Physiology, National Cheng Kung University Medical College, Tainan 70101, Taiwan
5
Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, National Cheng Kung University Medical College, Tainan 70101, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomedicines 2021, 9(5), 549; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9050549
Submission received: 7 April 2021 / Revised: 7 May 2021 / Accepted: 11 May 2021 / Published: 13 May 2021

Abstract

:
Esaxerenone (ESAX; CS-3150, Minnebro®) is known to be a newly non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) antagonist. However, its modulatory actions on different types of ionic currents in electrically excitable cells remain largely unanswered. The present investigations were undertaken to explore the possible perturbations of ESAX on the transient, late and persistent components of voltage-gated Na+ current (INa) identified from pituitary GH3 or MMQ cells. GH3-cell exposure to ESAX depressed the transient and late components of INa with varying potencies. The IC50 value of ESAX required for its differential reduction in peak or late INa in GH3 cells was estimated to be 13.2 or 3.2 μM, respectively. The steady-state activation curve of peak INa remained unchanged during exposure to ESAX; however, recovery of peak INa block was prolonged in the presence 3 μM ESAX. In continued presence of aldosterone (10 μM), further addition of 3 μM ESAX remained effective at inhibiting INa. ESAX (3 μM) potently reversed Tef-induced augmentation of INa. By using isosceles-triangular ramp pulse with varying durations, the amplitude of persistent INa measured at high or low threshold was enhanced by the presence of tefluthrin (Tef), in combination with the appearance of the figure-of-eight hysteretic loop; moreover, hysteretic strength of the current was attenuated by subsequent addition of ESAX. Likewise, in MMQ lactotrophs, the addition of ESAX also effectively decreased the peak amplitude of INa along with the increased current inactivation rate. Taken together, the present results provide a noticeable yet unidentified finding disclosing that, apart from its antagonistic effect on MR receptor, ESAX may directly and concertedly modify the amplitude, gating properties and hysteresis of INa in electrically excitable cells.

1. Introduction

Esaxerenone (ESAX; Minnebro®, CS-3150, XL-560, Oklahoma, Japan), known to be a newly oral, non-steroidal selective blocker on the activity of mineralocorticoid receptor (MR), has been growingly used for the management of varying pathologic disorders, such as primary aldosteronism, refractory hypertension, chronic kidney disease, diabetic nephropathy, and heart failure [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. Alternatively, the activity of MR has been previously reported in pituitary cells including GH3 cells or in varying brain regions [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. However, whether ESAX exercises any perturbations on electrical activities (e.g., transmembrane ionic currents) in pituitary cells is largely unknown.
There are nine isoforms (i.e., NaV1.1–1.9 [or SCN1A-SCN5A and SCN8A-SCN11A]) which are expressed in mammalian excitable tissues, including endocrine system [19,20]. Of notice, several inhibitors have been previously described to preferentially block the late component of voltage-gated Na+ current (INa), such as ranolazine (Ran) and KMUP-1 [21,22], while some of NaV-channel activators (e.g., pyrethroids and telmisartan) have been reported in different types of excitable cells [23,24,25,26]. As an endocrine-disrupting agent, tefluthrin or cypermethrin is, respectively, type I or II pyrethroid known to activate INa [23,25,27]. The INa can be readily evoked in response to changes in the membrane potential sensed by the channel’s voltage-sensor domains, which are intimately coupled to its pore domain [28,29,30,31]. However, at present, whether and how ESAX is capable of interacting directly with NaV channels to perturb the magnitude, gating properties, or hysteretic strength of INa in electrically excitable cells remains little thoroughly reported.
In view of the aforesaid considerations, we sought to explore whether there are any possible modifications of ESAX on the amplitude, kinetics, and hysteretic behavior of voltage-gated Na+ current (INa) in electrically excitable cells (e.g., pituitary GH3 and MMQ cells). The present study, for the first time, demonstrated that, despite its effectiveness in antagonizing MR activity, the distinguishable inhibition by ESAX of peak and late INa may be caused by one of several ionic mechanisms underlying its marked perturbations on the functional activities of electrically excitable cells, assuming that similar observations exist in vivo.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals, Drugs, and Solutions Used in This Study

Esaxerenone (ESAX; Minnebro® CS-3150, XL-550, 1-(2-hydroxyethyl)-4-methyl-N-(4-methylsulfonylphenyl)-5-[2-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]pyrrole-3-carboxamide, C22H21F3N2O4S, https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Esaxerenone, accessed in Oklahoma, Japan, on 26 February 2019) was acquired from MedChemExpress (Genechain, Kaohsiung, Taiwan), aldosterone (Aldo), dexamethasone (Dex), tefluthrin (Tef), tetraethylammonium chloride (TEA), and tetrodotoxin (TTX) were from Sigma-Aldrich (Merck Ltd., Taipei, Taiwan), while ranolazine (Ran) was from Tocris (Union Biomed, Taipei, Taiwan). Unless otherwise stated, culture media (e.g., F-12 medium), horse or fetal bovine serum, L-glutamine, and trypsin/EDTA were purchased from HyCloneTM (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Kaohsiung, Taiwan), while all other chemicals, such as aspartic acid, CsOH, CsCl, EGTA, and HEPES, were of laboratory grade and taken from standard sources.
The HEPES-buffered normal Tyrode’s solution used in this investigation had an ionic composition, which contained (in mM): NaCl 136.5, CaCl2 1.8, KCl 5.4, MgCl2 0.53, glucose 5.5, and HEPES 5.5, and the solution pH was titrated to 7.4 by adding NaOH. For measurements of INa, we kept GH3 or MMQ cells bathed in Ca2+-free, Tyrode’s solution in order to preclude the contamination of Ca2+-activated K+ and voltage-gated Ca2+ currents. To record K+ currents, the solution used to fill up the recording electrode contained (in mM): K-aspartate 130, KCl 20, KH2PO4 1, MgCl2 1, Na2ATP 3, Na2GTP 0.1, EGTA 0.1, HEPES 5, and the solution was adjusted with KOH to pH 7.2. To record INa or INa(P), we substituted K+ ions in the internal solution for equimolar Cs+ ions and the pH value in the solution was then titrated to 7.2 by adding CsOH. All solutions used in this work were prepared using demineralized water from Mill-Q purification system (Merck Ltd., Taipei, Taiwan). On the day of experiments, we filtered the bathing or filling solution and culture medium by using an Acrodisc® syringe filter with a 0.2-μm pore size (Bio-Check, New Taipei City, Taiwan).

2.2. Cell Preparations

The pituitary adenomatous cell line (GH3) was acquired from the Bioresource Collection and Research Center (BCRC-60015, http://catalog.bcrc.firdi.org.tw/Bcrc-Content?bid=60015, accessed on 4 April 2012, Hsinchu, Taiwan) [32], while the MMQ cell line (ATCC® CRL-10609, https://www.atcc.org/products/all/CRL-10609.aspx, accessed on 18 April 2019), another established pituitary cell line originally derived from Rattus norvegicus pituitary prolactinoma, was from the American Type Cell Collection (Manassas, VA, USA) through Genechain (Kaohsiung, Taiwan). GH3 cells were maintained in Ham’s F-12 culture medium supplemented with 2.5% fetal bovine serum (v/v), 15% horse serum (v/v), and 2 mM L-glutamine [31], and MMQ cells were cultured in F12 medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (v/v) and 1.176 g/L NaHCO3 in a humidified incubator at 30 °C with 5% CO2 [33]. The cells were grown as a monolayer culture in a humidified environment of 5% CO2/95% air at 37 °C. The electrophysiological recordings were commonly made five or six days after the cells had been cultured to 60–80% confluence.

2.3. Electrophysiological Measurements

On the day of the experiments, we gingerly dispersed GH3 or MMQ cells with a 1% trypsin-EDTA solution, and a few drops of cell suspension was thereafter placed in a home-made chamber affixed on the stage of an inverted DM-II microscope (Leica; Major Instruments, Kaohsiung, Taiwan). Cells were kept immersed at room temperature (20–25 °C) in normal Tyrode’s solution, the composition of which was provided above, and they were allowed to settle on the chamber’s bottom. The patch electrodes were drawn from 1.8-mm OD round borosilicate glass tubing (Kimax-51 [#34500]; Kimble; Dogger, New Taipei City, Taiwan) using a two-stage pull on a vertical pipet puller (PP-83; Narishige; Major Instruments, Tainan, Taiwan). The recording electrodes used had a tip diameter of ~1 μm and a resistance of 3–5 MΩ. They were mounted in an air-tight holder, having a suction port on the side, and a chloride silver wire was used to make contact with the electrode solution. We recorded different types of ionic currents in the whole-cell mode of standard patch-clamp technique with dynamic adaptive suction (i.e., a decremental change in the suction pressure in response to progressive increase in the seal resistance) with the aid of either an Axoclamp-2B (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) or an RK-400 amplifier (Bio-Logic, Claix, France) [23,32]. This procedure was noticed to increase the success rate of forming gigaseals and reduced loss of the gigaseal in long-term recordings. For whole-cell current recordings, following seal formation (>1 GΩ) the membrane was ruptured by gentle suction. The liquid junction potentials were zeroed immediately before seal formation was made, and the whole-cell data were corrected.

2.4. Potential and Current Recordings

The signals were monitored and stored online at 10 kHz in an ASUS VivoBook Flip 14 laptop computer (TP412FA-0131A10210U; ASUS, Tainan, Taiwan) equipped with a Digidata 1440A interface (Molecular Devices). During the measurements with analog-to-digital and digital-to-analog conversion, the latter device was controlled using pCLAMP v10.7 software (Molecular Devices) run under Microsoft Windows 10 (Redmond, WA, USA). The laptop computer was put on the top of an adjustable Cookskin stand (Ningbo, Zheijiang, China) to allow efficient manipulation during the recordings. Through digital-to-analog conversion, the pCLAMP-created voltage-clamped protocols with varying rectangular or ramp waveforms were specifically designed and suited for determining the steady-state or instantaneous relationship pf current versus voltage (I–V) and voltage-dependent hysteresis of the current involved.

2.5. Data Analyses

The concentration-response data for inhibition of transient (peak) or late INa in pituitary GH3 cells were appropriately fitted to the Hill equation. That is,
%   decrease = [ E S A X ] n H × E m a x I C 50 n H + [ E S A X ] n H
In this equation, [ESAX] is the ESAX concentration applied, nH the Hill coefficient, Emax the maximal inhibition of transient (peak) or late INa by ESAX, and IC50 the concentration required for a 50% inhibition of transient (peak) or late INa.
The steady-state activation curve of peak INa with or without the ESAX addition observed in GH3 cells was established on the basis of a simple Boltzmann distribution (or the Fermi-Diract distribution) [31]:
G N a = G N a ( m a x ) 1 + e ( V V 1 2 ) q F R T
where GNa(max) is the maximal conductance of peak INa in the absence or presence of 3 μM ESAX; V the membrane potential in mV; V1/2 the half-point of the relationship; q the apparent gating charge; F Faraday’s constant; R the universal gas constant; T the absolute temperature, and RT/F = 25.4 mV.

2.6. Statistical Analyses

Curve-fitting (linear or non-linear) to experimental data sets was performed with the goodness of fit by using various maneuvers such as Microsoft Solver function embedded in Excel 2016 (Microsoft) and 64-bit OriginPro®2016 program (OriginLab; Scientific Formosa, Kaohsiung, Taiwan). The averaged results are presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM), with sample sizes (n) indicative of the number of GH3 or MMQ cells from which the experimental data were collected together. The Student’s t-test (paired or unpaired) and a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by post-hoc Fisher’s least-significance difference method, were implemented for the evaluation of differences among means. Statistical significance was determined at a p-value of <0.05, unless otherwise indicated.

3. Results

3.1. Effect of Esaxerenone (ESAX) on Voltage-Gated Na+ Current (INa) Measured from GH3 Cells

In the first stage of the whole-cell recordings, we measured the effects of ESAX on the amplitude and gating kinetics of INa activated by rapid membrane depolarization. We kept cells immersed in Ca2+-free, Tyrode’s solution containing 10 mM tetraethylammonium chloride (TEA), and the recording electrode was filled up with a Cs+-containing solution. As demonstrated in Figure 1A, 1 min after GH3-cells were exposed to ESAX at a concentration of 1 or 3 μM, the amplitude in the peak (i.e., initial) or late (i.e., end-pulse) components of INa by abrupt depolarizing pulse from −80 to −10 mV was progressively depressed. For example, as the rectangular voltage step from −80 to −10 mV with a duration of 40 ms was delivered (indicated in the inset of Figure 1A) to activate INa, the addition of 3 μM ESAX was noticed to result in an evident decrease in the peak or late amplitude of INa to 1104 ± 197 or 9 ± 1 pA (n = 8, p < 0.05) from control values of 1498 ± 241 or 19 ± 3 pA (n = 8), respectively. After removal of ESAX, the peak or late amplitude of the current returned to 1452 ± 228 or 18 ± 3 pA (n = 8, p < 0.05), respectively. Moreover, as cells were exposed to 1 μM tetrodotoxin (TTX) alone, peak amplitude of INa evoked by the same voltage protocol was almost abolished, as evidenced by a reduction of current amplitude to 54 ± 6 pA (n = 7, p < 0.01) from a control value of 1486 ± 235 pA (n = 7).
Figure 1B shows that the presence of ESAX to the bath can concentration-dependently decrease the amplitude of peak or late INa evoked by rapid depolarizing pulse. According the Hill equation detailed under Materials and Methods, the IC50 value needed for ESAX-mediated block of peak or late INa detected in GH3 cells was yielded to be 13.2 or 3.2 μM, respectively, the value of which was apparently distinguishable between its suppressive effects on these two components of the current. Our initial experiments; therefore, enable us to reflect that ESAX exercises a depressant action on the peak and late INa natively expressed in GH3 cells, and that this drug tends to be selective for later over peak INa in response to rectangular depolarizing step.

3.2. Effect of ESAX on the Steady-State Current-Voltage (I–V) or Conductance-Voltage Relationship of Peak INa

To characterize the inhibitory effect of ESAX on INa, we next examined whether this drug might exercise any perturbations on the steady-state I–V relationship of INa in GH3 cells. Figure 2A illustrates the mean I–V relationship of peak INa with or without the addition of 3 μM ESAX. It was noticed that the value of threshold or maximal voltage for the elicitation of INa did not differ between the absence and presence of 3 μM ESAX. The relationship of INa-conductance versus membrane potential obtained with or without the application of 3 μM ESAX was also established and depicted in Figure 2B. Similar experimental results were obtained in seven different cells examined. The data; thus, led us to reflect that no obvious change in the steady-state activation curve of peak INa in GH3 cells was detected during exposure to ESAX.

3.3. Effect of ESAX on the Recovery of I(Na) Block Recorded from GH3 Cells

In an effort to evaluate ESAX-induced inhibition of peak INa in these cells, we continued to investigate the recovery from current inactivation in the absence and presence of this drug. In this set of experiments, a stimulation protocol consisting of a first (conditioning) depolarizing voltage command which is sufficiently long to reach a steady-state was employed, and a second depolarizing (test pulse) was applied at the same potential as the conditioning pulse (Figure 3). Then the ratios of the peak INa in response to the second and first pulses were taken as a measure of recovery from I(Na) block, and they were thereafter established and plotted versus interpulse interval. The INa recovery from block with or without the application of 3 μM ESAX is illustrated in Figure 3. In the absence or presence of 3 μM ESAX, the time course could be described by single exponential with the time constants of 13.2 ± 2.1 ms (n = 8) or 21.5 ± 2.7 ms (n = 8), respectively. It is; thus, plausible to anticipate, from the present results, that the recovery of INa block was prolonged by the presence of ESAX, and that the delayed recovery caused by this agent may ascribe largely from the open channel block.

3.4. Comparisons among Effect of ESAX, ESAX plus Ranolazine (Ran), ESAX plus Dexamethasone (Dex), Aldosterone (Aldo), and Aldosterone plus ESAX on Peak INa Recorded from GH3 Cells

In another series of whole-cell experiments, we tested the possible effects of ESAX, ESAX plus Ran, ESAX plus Dex, Aldo, and Aldo plus ESAX on the peak amplitude of INa activated in response to abrupt membrane depolarization from −80 to −10 mV. Ranolazine has been demonstrated to inhibit INa potently [21,32], while Dex could perturb membrane ion currents in pituitary cells or bronchial smooth myocytes [34,35]. The expression of mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) has been shown previously to be expressed in GH3 cells [11,12,18,36,37]. As shown in Figure 4A, Aldo (10 μM) alone did not modify peak INa; however, further addition of ESAX (3 μM), but still in the presence of Aldo, decreased current amplitude. As summarized in Figure 4B, ESAX at a concentration of 3 μM produced an inhibitory effect on peak INa in GH3 cells; moreover, the subsequent addition of 10 μM ranolazine, still in the presence of 3 μM ESAX, was effective at decreasing INa amplitude further. However, as cells were continually exposed to 3 μM ESAX, further application of 10 μM Dex failed to modify its decrease in the peak INa. On the other hand, the presence of 10 μM Aldo alone did not produce any appreciable changes in the amplitude of peak INa; however, subsequent addition of 3 μM ESAX could reduce current amplitude further. Hence, its seems that Dex or Aldo did not exert any effect on ESAX-mediated decrease of peak INa.

3.5. Enhanced Amplitude by Tef of INa Attenuated by ESAX

As an endocrine disrupting action, pyrethroids such as cypermethrin have been reported to increase the plasma level of hormones including Aldo [27]. We, hence, next investigated whether the presence of ESAX could modify Tef-enhanced INa evoked in response to rapid depolarizing pulse in GH3 cells. In these experiments, when whole-cell current recordings were established, we maintained the examined cell in voltage clamp at −80 mV and the 40 ms depolarizing pulse to −10 mV was applied to it. Of notice, in keeping with previous observations [23,25,32], 1 min of exposing cells to 10 μM Tef alone, the peak amplitude of INa measured at the start of depolarizing pulse was enhanced, in combination with a measurable slowing in the inactivation or deactivation rate of the current. Moreover, subsequent addition of EASX at a concentration of 3 or 10 μM could attenuate Tef-mediated augmentation on depolarization-activated INa (Figure 5). For example, as the cells were depolarized from −80 to −10 mV to evoke INa, the exposure to 10 μM Tef resulted in a significant raise in peak INa amplitude from 557 ± 56 to 1221 ± 187 pA (n = 7, p < 0.05). The further application of 3 μM ESAX, still in the continued presence of Tef, greatly reduced to 984 ± 123 pA (n = 7, p < 0.05). Again, the presence of 10 μM Tef evidently increased the time constant (τinact(S)) in the slow component of INa inactivation from 1.5 ± 0.3 to 21.1 ± 3.2 ms (n = 7, p < 0.01), while subsequent addition of 3 μM ESAX resulted in a significant decline in the τinact(S) value to 12.2 ± 2.1 ms (n = 7, p < 0.05). In this regard, the data reflected that the presence of ESAX was capable of reversing Tef-mediated enhancement in both amplitude and τinact(S) of peak INa observed in GH3 cells.

3.6. Augmented Amplitude and Hysteresis by Tef of Persistent Na+ Current (INa(P)) Attenuated by ESAX

We next continued to investigate whether cell exposure to ESAX could modify the Tef-mediated enhancement of INa(P) activated in response to the isosceles-triangular ramp pulse in GH3 cells. In these whole-cell current recordings, the examined cell was voltage-clamped at −50 mV and a set of upright isosceles-triangular ramp pulses ranging between −100 and +50 mV with varying durations at a rate of 0.05 Hz was gingerly applied to it through digital-to-analog conversion (Figure 6A). In accordance with previous observations [25,38], when GH3 cells were exposed to 10 μM Tef alone, the amplitude of INa(P) at high or low threshold respectively activated by the upsloping (forward, ascending) or downsloping (backward, descending) end of upright triangular ramp voltage was raised and a striking figure-of-eight hysteresis (i.e., ∞) in the instantaneous I–V relationship of INa(P) was concurrently revealed (Figure 6B,C). For example, as the isosceles-triangular ramp pulse with a duration of 0.8 s (or ramp speed of ±0.38 mV/ms) was applied, in the presence of 10 μM Tef, the peak INa(P) amplitude measured at the level of −30 mV (i.e., high-threshold INa(P)) during the ascending phase of triangular ramp pulse was conceivably raised to 62 ± 9 pA (n = 7, p < 0.05) from a control value (measured at the same level of membrane potential) of 21 ± 4 pA (n = 7). Meanwhile, during exposure to 10 μM Tef, the peak INa(P) amplitude measured at −80 mV during the descending phase of such pule was concurrently raised from 38 ± 7 to 58 ± 9 pA (n = 7, p < 0.05). In particular, as depicted in Figure 6B, the subsequent addition of 3 μM ESAX, but still in the presence of 10 μM Tef, was able to produce a progressive reduction in the amplitude of high- or low-threshold peak INa(P) measured at −30 or −80 mV to 48 ± 7 or 58 ± 9 pA (n = 7, p < 0.05), respectively. These observations; therefore, led us to indicate that the voltage dependence of INa(P) resulting in hysteretic changes observed in GH3 cells markedly emerged in the presence of Tef (Figure 6B,C). Further application of ESAX (3 or 10 μM) was noticed to attenuate Tef-induced increase in the respective high- and low-threshold amplitude of INa(P) activated by the ascending (rising) and descending (declining) phases of the isosceles-triangular ramp pulse detected in these cells (Figure 6D). It is conceivable; therefore, that the addition of ESAX, but still in the presence of Tef, resulted in a marked reduction in voltage-dependent hysteretic strength of the instantaneous I–V relationship of INa(P) in response to isosceles-triangular ramp voltage in GH3 cells.

3.7. Effect of ESAX on INa Identified in Pituitary MMQ Cells

In another set of experiments, we tested whether INa present in another type of pituitary lactotrophs (i.e., MMQ cells) could still be modified by the presence of ESAX. The preparation on these cells was detailed under Materials and Methods. Cells were bathed in Ca2+-free, Tyrode’s solution containing 10 mM TEA and the pipet was filled up with Cs+-containing solution. Of notice, as MMQ cells were continually exposed to ESAX at a concentration of 1 or 3 μM, the amplitude of peak INa activated by abrupt 40 ms depolarization from −80 to −10 mV was appreciably diminished, in combination with the raised inactivation rate of the current (Figure 7). For example, cell exposure to 3 μM ESAX gradually decreased peak INa from 267 ± 26 to 187 ± 15 pA (n = 8, p < 0.05). After washout of the drug (i.e., ESAX was removed, but cells were still exposed to Ca2+-free, Tyrode’s solution containing 10 mM TEA), current amplitude returned to 259 ± 22 pA (n = 8, p < 0.05). Meanwhile, the τinact(S) value of the current was significantly shortened from 2.7 ± 0.8 to 1.7 ± 0.7 ms (n = 8, p < 0.05). Therefore, indistinguishable from the observations made in GH3 cells, the results that we have obtained showed the ability of ESAX to inhibit INa in response to the rapid depolarizing step in these cells.

4. Discussion

The principal findings in this study are that (a) the presence of ESAX could depress INa in a concentration, time-, state- and hysteresis-dependent manner identified in GH3 cells; (b) this drug resulted in the differential inhibition of peak or late amplitudes of INa activated by abrupt membrane depolarization with effective IC50 value of 13.2 or 3.2 μM, respectively; (c) ESAX did not modify the steady-state activation curve of peak INa; however, the recovery of INa block was robustly prolonged in its presence; (d) the presence of Tef enhanced both the amplitude and τinact(S) of peak INa, while, further addition of ESAX could effectively counteract Tef-induced modification of INa; (e) subsequent application of ESAX was capable of depressing Tef-induced increase in the high- or low-threshold amplitude of INa(P) elicited by the isosceles-triangular ramp at either upsloping or downsloping limb, respectively; and (f) the presence of ESAX was effective at decreasing the amplitude and gating of INa in pituitary MMQ cells. Taken together with the present observations, the results allow us to reflect that ESAX-perturbed change in the amplitude, gating properties, and hysteretic behavior of INa tends to be independent and upstream of its action on the MR activity, and that it would hence conceivably participate in the adjustments on varying functional activities in electrically excitable cells (e.g., GH3 or MMQ cells) occurring in vivo.
In this study, the presence of neither Dex nor Aldo had minimal change on INa. The addition of ESAX, but still in the continued presence of Aldo, was able to decrease the amplitude of peak INa in GH3 cells. Therefore, it seems unlikely that ESAX-mediated inhibition of the amplitude and gating kinetics of INa was largely associated with its blockade of MR. It is also important to be emphasized that the maximal plasma concentration of ESAX was reported previously to reach around 1416 ng/mL (or 3 μM) after 10-day administration with the dose of 100 mg/day [39]. As such, the inhibitory effects of ESAX on peak and late INa that we have obtained here could noticeably be of clinical or therapeutic relevance.
In the present investigations, the non-linear voltage-dependent hysteresis of INa(P) in the control period and during cell exposure to Tef or Tef plus ESAX was observed by the upright isosceles-triangular ramp voltage command with varying durations. In particular, as cells were exposed to 10 μM Tef, the peak INa(P) activated at the forward (upsloping) limb of the triangular ramp pulse with varying durations was noticed to be enhanced, particularly at the level of −30 mV, whereas the INa(P) amplitude at the backward (downsloping) end was increased at the level of −80 mV. Consequently, in the presence of 10 μM Tef, the figure-of-eight configuration in the hysteretic loop elicited by the triangular ramp pulse was evidently demonstrated (Figure 6). That is, there appeared to be the two types of INa(P), that is, low-threshold (i.e., activating at a voltage range near the resting potential) and high-threshold (i.e., activating at a voltage range near the maximal INa achieved) INa(P), observed during cell exposure to 10 μM Tef. The low-threshold INa(P) was noticeably activated (at the voltage range near the resting potential) upon the downsloping end of the triangular ramp pulse; however, the high-threshold (at the voltage range where peak INa was maximally activated) was by the upsloping end of such pulse. As the ramp speed decreased, the area of such hysteretic loop progressively reduced. Therefore, findings from the present observations revealed that the triangular pulse-induced INa(P) was observed to undergo hysteretic change in the voltage dependence found in GH3 cells [29,30,38].
In the present study, as GH3 cells were exposed to Tef, the voltage-dependent movement of S4 segment residing in NaV channels could be perturbed; consequently, the coupling of the pore domain to the voltage-sensor domain was enhanced [25,27,29]. The voltage sensor energetically coupled to channel activation is supposed to be a conformationally flexible region of the protein. It is; therefore, tempting to speculate that such INa(P), particularly during exposure to Tef, could intrinsically and dynamically possess “memory” of previous or past events, or that mode shift occurs with respect to the voltage sensitivity of gating charge movement, which depends on the previous state (or conformation) of the NaV channel [27,29,38]. Such unique type of hysteretic behavior inherently in NaV channels would potentially play substantial role in influencing electrical behavior, Na+ overload due to an excessive Na+ influx, or hormonal secretion in different types of excitable cells during exposure to pyrethroid insecticides (e.g., tefluthrin or cypermethrin) [23,25,37,40]. Moreover, it needs to be noticed that the subsequent addition of 3 μM ESAX, still in the continued presence of 10 μM Tef, resulted in a considerable reduction of hysteretic strength responding to triangular ramp voltage.
In concert with its antagonistic action on MR, ESAX might exert an additional ameliorating action on salt-induced elevation of blood pressure or on kidney injuries [1,6,8,10,41,42]. ESAX has indeed reported the ability of alleviating effects in hypertensive patients with normal kidney function and in diabetic patients with albuminuria [5]. The activity of NaV channels has been noticeably disclosed to be functionally expressed in varying types of vascular smooth muscle cells [19,32,43,44,45]. It was also shown that Ran, an inhibitor of late INa [21], could exercise certain beneficial action in the management of pulmonary hypertension [46]. The mRNA transcripts for the α-subunit of NaV1.1, NaV1.2, NaV1.3, and NaV1.6, as well as β1- and β3-subunits of NaV channels, have been previously demonstrated in GH3 cell line [47]. Therefore, it is worth pursuing to a further extent as to which, despite its blockade on MR, ESAX-induced antihypertensive action is linked to its additional inhibitory action on INa (i.e., NaV1.7-encoded current) inherently in vascular smooth myocytes.
Finerenone, another structurally similar agent of ESAX, has been reported previously to perturb Aldo-dependent nuclear import of the MR [48]. The Aldo binding site or MR expression was demonstrated to be present in pituitary cells including GH3 cells [11,12,16,18,36]. However, the effects of ESAX on the amplitude, kinetics, and hysteretic strength of INa demonstrated in this study were found to be rapid and robust in onset; hence, such hastened action is expected to be independent of its action on the cytosolic activity of MR and it tends to occur in a non-genomic mechanism.
On the basis of the present observations, despite the antagonistic effect on MR [2,10], our results strongly imply that the inhibitory action of ESAX on transmembrane ionic channels, particularly on NaV channels, tends to be direct obligate mechanisms. Through ionic mechanisms demonstrated herein, it or other structurally similar non-steroidal compounds (e.g., apararenone and finerenone), which can be preferentially used for oral intake, is able to adjust the functional activities of different types of endocrine or neuroendocrine cells, if similar in vivo findings exist. To this end, even during its perturbing action on the renin-angiotensin-Aldo system [5,6,42,49], findings from this study also highlight an important alternative aspect that needs to be taken into consideration, inasmuch as the beneficial effects of ESAX in different pathologic disorders, such as primary hyperaldosteronism, chronic kidney disease, refractory hypertension, and heart failure, have been currently evaluated [1,3,4,5,6,9,39,49,50,51].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.-N.W.; methodology, S.-N.W.; software, W.-T.C. and S.-N.W.; validation, W.-T.C. and S.-N.W.; formal analysis, S.-N.W.; investigation, W.-T.C. and S.-N.W.; resources, W.-T.C. and S.-N.W.; data curation, S.-N.W.; writing—original draft preparation, S.-N.W.; writing—review and editing, W.-T.C. and S.-N.W.; visualization, W.-T.C. and S.-N.W.; supervision, W.-T.C. and S.-N.W.; project administration, S.-N.W.; funding acquisition, W.-T.C. and S.-N.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was partly supported by a grant from the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST-108-23140B-006-094), Taiwan.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original data is available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Shin-Yen Chao and Tzu-Hsien Chuang for their assistances.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest, financial or otherwise. The authors are responsible for the content of writing of the paper.

Abbreviations

Aldo, aldosterone; Dex, dexamethasone; ESAX, esaxerenone (1-(2-hydroxyethyl)-4-methyl-N-(4-methylsulfonylphenyl)-5-[2-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]pyrrole-3-carboxamide); I–V, current versus voltage; IC50, concentration required for 50% inhibition; INa, voltage-gated Na+ current; INa(P), persistent Na+ current; MR, mineralocorticoid receptor; NaV channel, voltage-gated Na+ channel; Ran, ranolazine; SEM, standard error of mean; TEA, tetraethylammonium chloride; Tef, tefluthrin; TTX, tetrodotoxin; τinact(S), time constant in the slow component of current inactivation.

References

  1. Arai, K.; Tsuruoka, H.; Homma, T. CS-3150, a novel non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, prevents hypertension and cardiorenal injury in Dahl salt-sensitive hypertensive rats. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2015, 769, 266–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Duggan, S. Esaxerenone: First Global Approval. Drugs 2019, 79, 477–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Rakugi, H.; Ito, S.; Itoh, H.; Okuda, Y.; Yamakawa, S. Long-term phase 3 study of esaxerenone as mono or combination therapy with other antihypertensive drugs in patients with essential hypertension. Hypertens. Res. 2019, 42, 1932–1941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Capelli, I.; Gasperoni, L.; Ruggeri, M.; Donati, G.; Baraldi, O.; Sorrenti, G.; Caletti, M.T.; Aiello, V.; Cianciolo, G.; La Manna, G. New mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists: Update on their use in chronic kidney disease and heart failure. J. Nephrol. 2020, 33, 37–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Ito, S.; Itoh, H.; Rakugi, H.; Okuda, Y.; Iijima, S. Antihypertensive effects and safety of esaxerenone in patients with moderate kidney dysfunction. Hypertens. Res. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ito, S.; Itoh, H.; Rakugi, H.; Okuda, Y.; Yoshimura, M.; Yamakawa, S. Double-Blind Randomized Phase 3 Study Comparing Esaxerenone (CS-3150) and Eplerenone in Patients With Essential Hypertension (ESAX-HTN Study). Hypertension 2020, 75, 51–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Naruke, T.; Maemura, K.; Oki, T.; Yazaki, M.; Fujita, T.; Ikeda, Y.; Nabeta, T.; Ishii, S.; Minami, Y.; Fukaya, H.; et al. Efficacy and safety of esaxerenone in patients with hypertension and concomitant heart failure. Hypertens. Res. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Rahman, A.; Sawano, T.; Sen, A.; Hossain, A.; Jahan, N.; Kobara, H.; Masaki, T.; Kosaka, S.; Kitada, K.; Nakano, D.; et al. Cardioprotective Effects of a Nonsteroidal Mineralocorticoid Receptor Blocker, Esaxerenone, in Dahl Salt-Sensitive Hypertensive Rats. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 2069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Satoh, F.; Ito, S.; Itoh, H.; Rakugi, H.; Shibata, H.; Ichihara, A.; Omura, M.; Takahashi, K.; Okuda, Y.; Iijima, S. Efficacy and safety of esaxerenone (CS-3150), a newly available nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor blocker, in hypertensive patients with primary aldosteronism. Hypertens. Res. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wan, N.; Rahman, A.; Nishiyama, A. Esaxerenone, a novel nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor blocker (MRB) in hypertension and chronic kidney disease. J. Hum. Hypertens. 2021, 35, 148–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Stewart, P.M.; Whorwood, C.B. 11 beta-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase activity and corticosteroid hormone action. Steroids 1994, 59, 90–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Castren, M.; Patchev, V.K.; Almeida, O.F.; Holsboer, F.; Trapp, T.; Castren, E. Regulation of rat mineralocorticoid receptor expression in neurons by progesterone. Endocrinology 1995, 136, 3800–3806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Gomez Sanchez, E.P. Central mineralocorticoid receptors and cardiovascular disease. Neuroendocrinology 2009, 90, 245–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Gomez-Sanchez, E.P. Brain mineralocorticoid receptors in cognition and cardiovascular homeostasis. Steroids 2014, 91, 20–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Chen, J.; Gomez-Sanchez, C.E.; Penman, A.; May, P.J.; Gomez-Sanchez, E. Expression of mineralocorticoid and glucocorticoid receptors in preautonomic neurons of the rat paraventricular nucleus. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2014, 306, R328–R340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Haque, M.; Wilson, R.; Sharma, K.; Mills, N.J.; Teruyama, R. Localisation of 11beta-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase Type 2 in Mineralocorticoid Receptor Expressing Magnocellular Neurosecretory Neurones of the Rat Supraoptic and Paraventricular Nuclei. J. Neuroendocrinol. 2015, 27, 835–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Burford, N.G.; Webster, N.A.; Cruz-Topete, D. Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal Axis Modulation of Glucocorticoids in the Cardiovascular System. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 2150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Pearce, P.T.; McNally, M.; Funder, J.W. Nuclear localization of type 1 aldosterone binding sites in steroid-unexposed GH3 cells. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol. 1986, 13, 647–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Catterall, W.A.; Goldin, A.L.; Waxman, S.G. International Union of Pharmacology. XLVII. Nomenclature and structure-function relationships of voltage-gated sodium channels. Pharmacol. Rev. 2005, 57, 397–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Stojilkovic, S.S.; Tabak, J.; Bertram, R. Ion channels and signaling in the pituitary gland. Endocr. Rev. 2010, 31, 845–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Chen, B.S.; Lo, Y.C.; Peng, H.; Hsu, T.I.; Wu, S.N. Effects of ranolazine, a novel anti-anginal drug, on ion currents and membrane potential in pituitary tumor GH(3) cells and NG108-15 neuronal cells. J. Pharmacol. Sci. 2009, 110, 295–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Lo, Y.C.; Tseng, Y.T.; Liu, C.M.; Wu, B.N.; Wu, S.N. Actions of KMUP-1, a xanthine and piperazine derivative, on voltage-gated Na(+) and Ca(2+) -activated K(+) currents in GH3 pituitary tumour cells. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2015, 172, 5110–5122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Wu, S.N.; Wu, Y.H.; Chen, B.S.; Lo, Y.C.; Liu, Y.C. Underlying mechanism of actions of tefluthrin, a pyrethroid insecticide, on voltage-gated ion currents and on action currents in pituitary tumor (GH3) cells and GnRH-secreting (GT1-7) neurons. Toxicology 2009, 258, 70–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Chang, W.T.; Wu, S.N. Activation of voltage-gated sodium current and inhibition of erg-mediated potassium current caused by telmisartan, an antagonist of angiotensin II type-1 receptor, in HL-1 atrial cardiomyocytes. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol. 2018, 45, 797–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. So, E.C.; Wu, S.N.; Lo, Y.C.; Su, K. Differential regulation of tefluthrin and telmisartan on the gating charges of INa activation and inactivation as well as on resurgent and persistent INa in a pituitary cell line (GH3). Toxicol. Lett. 2018, 285, 104–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Lai, M.C.; Wu, S.N.; Huang, C.W. Telmisartan, an Antagonist of Angiotensin II Receptors, Accentuates Voltage-Gated Na(+) Currents and Hippocampal Neuronal Excitability. Front. Neurosci. 2020, 14, 902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ji, C.; Yu, C.; Yue, S.; Zhang, Q.; Yan, Y.; Fan, J.; Zhao, M. Enantioselectivity in endocrine disrupting effects of four cypermethrin enantiomers based on in vitro models. Chemosphere 2019, 220, 766–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Armstrong, C.M.; Bezanilla, F. Currents related to movement of the gating particles of the sodium channels. Nature 1973, 242, 459–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sheets, M.F.; Fozzard, H.A.; Hanck, D.A. Important Role of Asparagines in Coupling the Pore and Votage-Sensor Domain in Voltage-Gated Sodium Channels. Biophys. J. 2015, 109, 2277–2286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Villalba-Galea, C.A. Hysteresis in voltage-gated channels. Channels Austin 2017, 11, 140–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Villalba-Galea, C.A.; Chiem, A.T. Hysteretic Behavior in Voltage-Gated Channels. Front. Pharmacol. 2020, 11, 579596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Chang, W.T.; Liu, P.Y.; Gao, Z.H.; Lee, S.W.; Lee, W.K.; Wu, S.N. Evidence for the effectiveness of remdesivir (GS-5734), a nucleoside-analog antiviral drug in the inhibition of IKM or IK(DR) and in the stimulation of IMEP. Front. Pharmacol. 2020, 11, 1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Leng, L.; Zhang, Y. Effects of an estrogen receptor antagonist on proliferation, prolactin secretion and growth factor expression in the MMQ pituitary prolactinoma cell line. J. Clin. Neurosci. 2011, 18, 1694–1698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Huang, M.H.; So, E.C.; Liu, Y.C.; Wu, S.N. Glucocorticoids stimulate the activity of large-conductance Ca2+ -activated K+ channels in pituitary GH3 and AtT-20 cells via a non-genomic mechanism. Steroids 2006, 71, 129–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Nakajima, T.; Jo, T.; Meguro, K.; Oonuma, H.; Ma, J.; Kubota, N.; Imuta, H.; Takano, H.; Iida, H.; Nagase, T.; et al. Effect of dexamethasone on voltage-gated Na+ channel in cultured human bronchial smooth muscle cells. Life Sci. 2008, 82, 1210–1215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Gomez-Sanchez, E.; Gomez-Sanchez, C.E. The multifaceted mineralocorticoid receptor. Compr. Physiol. 2014, 4, 965–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Zimmer, C.; Spencer, K.A. Modifications of glucocorticoid receptors mRNA expression in the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in response to early-life stress in female Japanese quail. J. Neuroendocrinol. 2014, 26, 853–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Chang, W.T.; Wu, S.N. Effectiveness of columbianadin, a bioactive coumarin derivative, in perturbing transient and persistent INa. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kato, M.; Furuie, H.; Shimizu, T.; Miyazaki, A.; Kobayashi, F.; Ishizuka, H. Single- and multiple-dose escalation study to assess pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety of oral esaxerenone in healthy Japanese subjects. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2018, 84, 1821–1829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Sankaranarayanan, S.; Simasko, S.M. A role for a background sodium current in spontaneous action potentials and secretion from rat lactotrophs. Am. J. Physiol. 1996, 271, C1927–C1934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Okamura, K.; Matsushima, M.; Yamamoto, F.; Takamiya, Y.; Okuda, T.; Shirai, K.; Okamura, K.; Urata, H. A Patient with Bilateral Primary Aldosteronism Refractory to Oral Eplerenone Who Responded to Esaxerenone with Increased Renin Activity. Am. J. Case Rep. 2020, 21, e920615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Ghatage, T.; Goyal, S.G.; Dhar, A.; Bhat, A. Novel therapeutics for the treatment of hypertension and its associated complications: Peptide- and nonpeptide-based strategies. Hypertens. Res. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Saleh, S.; Yeung, S.Y.; Prestwich, S.; Pucovsky, V.; Greenwood, I. Electrophysiological and molecular identification of voltage-gated sodium channels in murine vascular myocytes. J. Physiol. 2005, 568, 155–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Meguro, K.; Iida, H.; Takano, H.; Morita, T.; Sata, M.; Nagai, R.; Nakajima, T. Function and role of voltage-gated sodium channel NaV1.7 expressed in aortic smooth muscle cells. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2009, 296, H211–H219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Berra-Romani, R.; Blaustein, M.P.; Matteson, D.R. TTX-sensitive voltage-gated Na+ channels are expressed in mesenteric artery smooth muscle cells. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol 2005, 289, H137–H145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Han, Y.; Forfia, P.; Vaidya, A.; Mazurek, J.A.; Park, M.H.; Ramani, G.; Chan, S.Y.; Waxman, A.B. Ranolazine Improves Right Ventricular Function in Patients With Precapillary Pulmonary Hypertension: Results From a Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial. J. Card. Fail. 2021, 27, 253–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Vega, A.V.; Espinosa, J.L.; Lopez-Dominguez, A.M.; Lopez-Santiago, L.F.; Navarrete, A.; Cota, G. L-type calcium channel activation up-regulates the mRNAs for two different sodium channel alpha subunits (Nav1.2 and Nav1.3) in rat pituitary GH3 cells. Brain Res. Mol. Brain Res. 2003, 116, 115–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Amazit, L.; Le Billan, F.; Kolkhof, P.; Lamribet, K.; Viengchareun, S.; Fay, M.R.; Khan, J.A.; Hillisch, A.; Lombes, M.; Rafestin-Oblin, M.E.; et al. Finerenone Impedes Aldosterone-dependent Nuclear Import of the Mineralocorticoid Receptor and Prevents Genomic Recruitment of Steroid Receptor Coactivator-1. J. Biol. Chem. 2015, 290, 21876–21889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Itoh, H.; Ito, S.; Rakugi, H.; Okuda, Y.; Nishioka, S. Efficacy and safety of dosage-escalation of low-dosage esaxerenone added to a RAS inhibitor in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes and albuminuria: A single-arm, open-label study. Hypertens. Res. 2019, 42, 1572–1581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Shimamoto, K.; Ando, K.; Fujita, T.; Hasebe, N.; Higaki, J.; Horiuchi, M.; Imai, Y.; Imaizumi, T.; Ishimitsu, T.; Ito, M.; et al. The Japanese Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension (JSH 2014). Hypertens. Res. 2014, 37, 253–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Bhuiyan, A.S.; Rafiq, K.; Kobara, H.; Masaki, T.; Nakano, D.; Nishiyama, A. Effect of a novel nonsteroidal selective mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, esaxerenone (CS-3150), on blood pressure and renal injury in high salt-treated type 2 diabetic mice. Hypertens. Res. 2019, 42, 892–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Effect of esaxerenone (ESAX) on voltage-gated Na+ current (INa) measured from pituitary tumor (GH3) cells. This set of experiments was undertaken in cells bathed in Ca2+-free, Tyrode’s solution containing 10 mM TEA, and we filled up the electrode by using Cs+-containing solution. (A) Representative INa traces obtained in (a) the control situation (i.e., ESAX was not present) and during cell exposure to 1 μM ESAX (b) or 3 μM ESAX (c). The voltage pulse protocol applied is shown in Inset. The lower panels in (A) show the expanded records from each dashed box. (B) Concentration-dependent relationship of ESAX on transient (or peak) (○) and late (■) component of INa evoked by abrupt membrane depolarization (mean ± SEM; n = 8 for each point). Each smooth line indicates the goodness-of-fit to the Hill equation, as described in Materials and Methods.
Figure 1. Effect of esaxerenone (ESAX) on voltage-gated Na+ current (INa) measured from pituitary tumor (GH3) cells. This set of experiments was undertaken in cells bathed in Ca2+-free, Tyrode’s solution containing 10 mM TEA, and we filled up the electrode by using Cs+-containing solution. (A) Representative INa traces obtained in (a) the control situation (i.e., ESAX was not present) and during cell exposure to 1 μM ESAX (b) or 3 μM ESAX (c). The voltage pulse protocol applied is shown in Inset. The lower panels in (A) show the expanded records from each dashed box. (B) Concentration-dependent relationship of ESAX on transient (or peak) (○) and late (■) component of INa evoked by abrupt membrane depolarization (mean ± SEM; n = 8 for each point). Each smooth line indicates the goodness-of-fit to the Hill equation, as described in Materials and Methods.
Biomedicines 09 00549 g001
Figure 2. Effect of ESAX on current versus voltage (I–V) and conductance versus voltage relationships of INa identified in GH3 cells. (A) Mean I–V relationship of peak INa taken without (□) or with (○) the addition of 3 μM ESAX (mean ± SEM; n = 7 for each point). Inset shows the voltage-clamp protocol delivered. (B) Mean conductance versus voltage relationship of peak INa taken in the control period (□) and during cell exposure (○) to 3 μM ESAX (mean ± SEM; n = 7 for each point). Of notice, the conductance versus voltage relationship of the current between the absence and presence of ESAX did not differ, despite the decrease in maximal conductance of peak INa.
Figure 2. Effect of ESAX on current versus voltage (I–V) and conductance versus voltage relationships of INa identified in GH3 cells. (A) Mean I–V relationship of peak INa taken without (□) or with (○) the addition of 3 μM ESAX (mean ± SEM; n = 7 for each point). Inset shows the voltage-clamp protocol delivered. (B) Mean conductance versus voltage relationship of peak INa taken in the control period (□) and during cell exposure (○) to 3 μM ESAX (mean ± SEM; n = 7 for each point). Of notice, the conductance versus voltage relationship of the current between the absence and presence of ESAX did not differ, despite the decrease in maximal conductance of peak INa.
Biomedicines 09 00549 g002
Figure 3. ESAX-induced prolongation in the recovery of INa block in GH3 cells. Cells were bathed in Ca2+-free, Tyrode’s solution, the electrode was filled with Cs+-containing solution, and a set of two-pulse voltage protocol was applied to the examined cells. (A) Representative current traces showing current recovery from block by use of two-step protocol with varying durations (as indicated in the uppermost part). Current traces in the upper part were obtained in the control period, while those in the lower part were taken during cell exposure to 3 μM ESAX. (B) Relationship of relative amplitude versus interpulse interval in the absence (□) and presence (○) of 3 μM ESAX. The relative amplitude of peak INa was taken by the ratio of current amplitudes elicited by the second depolarizing voltage step and those by the first pulse. Each point represents the mean ± SEM (n = 8). The smooth line indicates a best fit to single exponential.
Figure 3. ESAX-induced prolongation in the recovery of INa block in GH3 cells. Cells were bathed in Ca2+-free, Tyrode’s solution, the electrode was filled with Cs+-containing solution, and a set of two-pulse voltage protocol was applied to the examined cells. (A) Representative current traces showing current recovery from block by use of two-step protocol with varying durations (as indicated in the uppermost part). Current traces in the upper part were obtained in the control period, while those in the lower part were taken during cell exposure to 3 μM ESAX. (B) Relationship of relative amplitude versus interpulse interval in the absence (□) and presence (○) of 3 μM ESAX. The relative amplitude of peak INa was taken by the ratio of current amplitudes elicited by the second depolarizing voltage step and those by the first pulse. Each point represents the mean ± SEM (n = 8). The smooth line indicates a best fit to single exponential.
Biomedicines 09 00549 g003
Figure 4. Comparison among effects of ESAX, ESAX plus ranolazine (Ran), aldosterone (Aldo), and aldosterone plus ESAX on the amplitude of peak INa detected in GH3 cells. Cells were kept bathed in Ca2+-free, Tyrode’s solution, and the recording electrode was filled up with Cs+-containing solution. The INa was elicited by 40 ms depolarizing voltage command from −80 to −10 mV, and current amplitude at the start of the voltage pulse was measured. (A) Representative current traces obtained in the control (a) and during cell exposure to 10 μM aldosterone (Aldo) (b) or 10 μM Aldo plus 3 μM ESAX (c). Inset shows the voltage pulse protocol. (B) Summary bar graph showing effects of ESAX, ESAX plus Ran, ESAX plus Dex, Aldo, and Aldo plus ESAX. Each bar represents the mean ± SEM (n = 7–8). * Significantly different from control (i.e., none of the agents were present) (p < 0.05), + significantly different from ESAX (3 μM) alone group (p < 0.05), and ** significantly different from aldosterone (10 μM) alone group (p < 0.05).
Figure 4. Comparison among effects of ESAX, ESAX plus ranolazine (Ran), aldosterone (Aldo), and aldosterone plus ESAX on the amplitude of peak INa detected in GH3 cells. Cells were kept bathed in Ca2+-free, Tyrode’s solution, and the recording electrode was filled up with Cs+-containing solution. The INa was elicited by 40 ms depolarizing voltage command from −80 to −10 mV, and current amplitude at the start of the voltage pulse was measured. (A) Representative current traces obtained in the control (a) and during cell exposure to 10 μM aldosterone (Aldo) (b) or 10 μM Aldo plus 3 μM ESAX (c). Inset shows the voltage pulse protocol. (B) Summary bar graph showing effects of ESAX, ESAX plus Ran, ESAX plus Dex, Aldo, and Aldo plus ESAX. Each bar represents the mean ± SEM (n = 7–8). * Significantly different from control (i.e., none of the agents were present) (p < 0.05), + significantly different from ESAX (3 μM) alone group (p < 0.05), and ** significantly different from aldosterone (10 μM) alone group (p < 0.05).
Biomedicines 09 00549 g004
Figure 5. Effect of ESAX on tefluthrin (Tef)-mediated augmentation of INa recorded from GH3 cells. (A) Representative current traces activated by rapid membrane depolarization (indicated in the upper part). Current trace labeled a is control, that labeled b was taken during exposure to 10 μM Tef, and that labeled c was obtained in the presence of 10 μM Tef plus 10 μM ESAX. The upper part in (A) shows the voltage-clamp protocol applied. Summary bar graphs shown in (B,C) respectively demonstrate effects of Tef or Tef plus ESAX on peak INa and the time constant (τinact(S)) in the slow component of INa inactivation (mean ± SEM; n = 7 for each bar). * Significantly different from controls (p < 0.05), and + significantly different from Tef (10 μM) alone group (p < 0.05).
Figure 5. Effect of ESAX on tefluthrin (Tef)-mediated augmentation of INa recorded from GH3 cells. (A) Representative current traces activated by rapid membrane depolarization (indicated in the upper part). Current trace labeled a is control, that labeled b was taken during exposure to 10 μM Tef, and that labeled c was obtained in the presence of 10 μM Tef plus 10 μM ESAX. The upper part in (A) shows the voltage-clamp protocol applied. Summary bar graphs shown in (B,C) respectively demonstrate effects of Tef or Tef plus ESAX on peak INa and the time constant (τinact(S)) in the slow component of INa inactivation (mean ± SEM; n = 7 for each bar). * Significantly different from controls (p < 0.05), and + significantly different from Tef (10 μM) alone group (p < 0.05).
Biomedicines 09 00549 g005
Figure 6. Inhibitory effect of ESAX on Tef-mediated increase in persistent INa (INa(P)) activated by isosceles-triangular ramp pulse in GH3 cells. In these whole-cell current recordings, the potential applied to the examined cell was held at −50 mV and the isosceles-triangular ramp voltage with varying durations of 0.4 to 3.2 s (i.e., ramp speed of ± 0.094 to 0.75 to mV/ms) to activate INa(P) in response to the forward (from −100 to +50 mV) and backward (from +50 to −100 mV) ramp voltage-clamp command was delivered to it. (A) Representative current traces obtained in the control period (upper), and during cell exposure to Tef (10 μM) (middle), or to Tef (10 μM) plus ESAX (10 μM) (lower). The black, red, or blue color indicated in the right upper side respectively denote the duration of isosceles-triangular ramp pulse applied (i.e., 0.8, 1.6 or 3.2 s, (i.e., the ramp speed of ±0.38, ±0.19 or ±0.094 mV/ms)). Purple asterisks in the middle part of (A) shows Tef-induced augmentation in the amplitude of INa(P) elicited by the upsloping and downsloping ends of the triangular ramp. (B) Representative instantaneous I–V relation of INa(P) in response to isosceles-triangular ramp pulse with a duration of 0.8 s (black color) or 3.2 s (blue color). The current traces in the upper part are controls, while those in the middle or lower part were respectively acquired from the presence of Tef (10 μM) alone or Tef (10 μM) plus ESAX (10 μM). The dashed orange arrows in the middle part and the right side of (B) show the direction of INa(P) trajectories in which time passes during the elicitation by the upright isosceles-triangular ramp pulse with a duration of 0.8 s (black color) or 3.2 s (blue color). The graph in the right side shows an expanded record of the dashed box in the left middle part. The asterisks in the middle part of (B) indicate the figure-of-eight (or infinity-shaped: ∞) loop (as demonstrated in the right side) of voltage-dependent hysteresis responding to the triangular ramp. (C) Figure-of-eight pattern in voltage-dependent hysteresis of INa(P) activated by isosceles-triangular ramp voltage with a ramp duration of 3.2 s (or a ramp speed of ±0.094 mV/ms) in the presence of 10 μM Tef. The ascending limb is indicated in blue color, while the descending one is in the orange color. The dashed arrow indicates the direction of current trajectory by which time goes. (D) Summary bar graph showing the effects of Tef (10 μM) and Tef (10 μM) plus ESAX (10 μM) on INa(P) amplitude activated by the upsloping and downsloping limb of 0.8-s triangular ramp pulse (mean ± SEM; n = 7 for each bar). Current amplitude in the left side was taken at the level of −30 mV in situations where the forward (upsloping) limb of triangular pulse was applied to evoke INa(P) (i.e., high-threshold INa(P)), while that in the right side (i.e., low-threshold INa(P)) was at −80 mV during the backward (downsloping) end of the pulse. * Significantly different from control (p < 0.05) and + significantly different from Tef (10 μM) alone group (p < 0.05).
Figure 6. Inhibitory effect of ESAX on Tef-mediated increase in persistent INa (INa(P)) activated by isosceles-triangular ramp pulse in GH3 cells. In these whole-cell current recordings, the potential applied to the examined cell was held at −50 mV and the isosceles-triangular ramp voltage with varying durations of 0.4 to 3.2 s (i.e., ramp speed of ± 0.094 to 0.75 to mV/ms) to activate INa(P) in response to the forward (from −100 to +50 mV) and backward (from +50 to −100 mV) ramp voltage-clamp command was delivered to it. (A) Representative current traces obtained in the control period (upper), and during cell exposure to Tef (10 μM) (middle), or to Tef (10 μM) plus ESAX (10 μM) (lower). The black, red, or blue color indicated in the right upper side respectively denote the duration of isosceles-triangular ramp pulse applied (i.e., 0.8, 1.6 or 3.2 s, (i.e., the ramp speed of ±0.38, ±0.19 or ±0.094 mV/ms)). Purple asterisks in the middle part of (A) shows Tef-induced augmentation in the amplitude of INa(P) elicited by the upsloping and downsloping ends of the triangular ramp. (B) Representative instantaneous I–V relation of INa(P) in response to isosceles-triangular ramp pulse with a duration of 0.8 s (black color) or 3.2 s (blue color). The current traces in the upper part are controls, while those in the middle or lower part were respectively acquired from the presence of Tef (10 μM) alone or Tef (10 μM) plus ESAX (10 μM). The dashed orange arrows in the middle part and the right side of (B) show the direction of INa(P) trajectories in which time passes during the elicitation by the upright isosceles-triangular ramp pulse with a duration of 0.8 s (black color) or 3.2 s (blue color). The graph in the right side shows an expanded record of the dashed box in the left middle part. The asterisks in the middle part of (B) indicate the figure-of-eight (or infinity-shaped: ∞) loop (as demonstrated in the right side) of voltage-dependent hysteresis responding to the triangular ramp. (C) Figure-of-eight pattern in voltage-dependent hysteresis of INa(P) activated by isosceles-triangular ramp voltage with a ramp duration of 3.2 s (or a ramp speed of ±0.094 mV/ms) in the presence of 10 μM Tef. The ascending limb is indicated in blue color, while the descending one is in the orange color. The dashed arrow indicates the direction of current trajectory by which time goes. (D) Summary bar graph showing the effects of Tef (10 μM) and Tef (10 μM) plus ESAX (10 μM) on INa(P) amplitude activated by the upsloping and downsloping limb of 0.8-s triangular ramp pulse (mean ± SEM; n = 7 for each bar). Current amplitude in the left side was taken at the level of −30 mV in situations where the forward (upsloping) limb of triangular pulse was applied to evoke INa(P) (i.e., high-threshold INa(P)), while that in the right side (i.e., low-threshold INa(P)) was at −80 mV during the backward (downsloping) end of the pulse. * Significantly different from control (p < 0.05) and + significantly different from Tef (10 μM) alone group (p < 0.05).
Biomedicines 09 00549 g006aBiomedicines 09 00549 g006b
Figure 7. Effect if ESAX on INa is present in MMQ pituitary lactotrophs. In this series of experiments, we kept cells bathed in Ca2+-free Tyrode’s solution and the electrodes were backfilled with Cs+-containing solution. As whole-cell configuration was firmly established, we voltage-clamped the cell at −80 mV and the depolarizing voltage step to −10 mV followed by return to −50 mV was delivered to it. (A) Representative INa traces in response to depolarizing command pulses (indicated in the upper part). (a): control; (b): 1 μM ESAX; (c): 3 μM ESAX. Inset in the right side indicates an expanded record from dashed box. (B) Summary of the data showing effect of ESAX (1 or 3 μM) on peak amplitude of INa in MMQ cells (mean ± SEM; n = 8 for each bar). Current amplitude was measured at the start of 40 ms depolarizing pulse from −80 to −10 mV. * Significantly different from control (p < 0.05).
Figure 7. Effect if ESAX on INa is present in MMQ pituitary lactotrophs. In this series of experiments, we kept cells bathed in Ca2+-free Tyrode’s solution and the electrodes were backfilled with Cs+-containing solution. As whole-cell configuration was firmly established, we voltage-clamped the cell at −80 mV and the depolarizing voltage step to −10 mV followed by return to −50 mV was delivered to it. (A) Representative INa traces in response to depolarizing command pulses (indicated in the upper part). (a): control; (b): 1 μM ESAX; (c): 3 μM ESAX. Inset in the right side indicates an expanded record from dashed box. (B) Summary of the data showing effect of ESAX (1 or 3 μM) on peak amplitude of INa in MMQ cells (mean ± SEM; n = 8 for each bar). Current amplitude was measured at the start of 40 ms depolarizing pulse from −80 to −10 mV. * Significantly different from control (p < 0.05).
Biomedicines 09 00549 g007
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chang, W.-T.; Wu, S.-N. Characterization of Direct Perturbations on Voltage-Gated Sodium Current by Esaxerenone, a Nonsteroidal Mineralocorticoid Receptor Blocker. Biomedicines 2021, 9, 549. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9050549

AMA Style

Chang W-T, Wu S-N. Characterization of Direct Perturbations on Voltage-Gated Sodium Current by Esaxerenone, a Nonsteroidal Mineralocorticoid Receptor Blocker. Biomedicines. 2021; 9(5):549. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9050549

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chang, Wei-Ting, and Sheng-Nan Wu. 2021. "Characterization of Direct Perturbations on Voltage-Gated Sodium Current by Esaxerenone, a Nonsteroidal Mineralocorticoid Receptor Blocker" Biomedicines 9, no. 5: 549. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9050549

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop