Next Article in Journal
Assessing Behavioral Disorders with SDQ in Very Preterm Children at 5 Years of Age in LIFT Cohort
Previous Article in Journal
Behavioral and Sleep Disorders in Children and Adolescents following COVID-19 Disease: A Case-Control Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Acute Kidney Injury with SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Pediatric Patients Receiving High-Dose Methotrexate Chemotherapy: A Report of Three Cases
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Study on the Preparation Method of Quality-Assured In-Hospital Drug Formulation for Children—A Multi-Institutional Collaborative Study

Children 2023, 10(7), 1190; https://doi.org/10.3390/children10071190
by Jumpei Saito 1,*, Eiji Suzuki 2, Yosuke Nakamura 3, Takashi Otsuji 3, Hiroshi Yamamoto 4, Hideki Yamamoto 4, Yuiko Kai 5, Maiko Totsu 5, Sayuki Hashimoto 6, Hidefumi Nakamura 7, Miki Akabane 1 and Akimasa Yamatani 1,8
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Reviewer 4: Anonymous
Children 2023, 10(7), 1190; https://doi.org/10.3390/children10071190
Submission received: 9 June 2023 / Revised: 7 July 2023 / Accepted: 7 July 2023 / Published: 10 July 2023

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors have already published articles regarding the stability of baclofen, clonidine, and hydrocortisone in an oral powder form compounded for pediatric patients in Japan. The Reviewer would like to ask how the present manuscript differs from the others already published by the group.

Author Response

Thank you for your peer review.
We have attempted to make the corrections as attached.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

I have no comment on this manuscript. Manuscript is simple and straightforward. It has practical application.

Author Response

Thank you for your peer review.
We have attempted to make the corrections as attached.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

This manuscript describes the preparation method of quality-assured in-hospital drug formulation. Quality assuring of in-hospital drug formulations is critical to achieving drug therapy from the viewpoints of efficacy and safety. The importance of obtaining data for quality assurance is understandable, but scientific papers must be based on a scientific rationale in addition to phenomenology.

 

1.       The manuscript is limited to describing experimental results, giving the impression that it is a different kind of manuscript from a scientific paper.

2.       The scientific novelty of this study is ambiguous. It is stated that the quality of in-hospital formulations in different environments and preparation methods is unknown, but what concerns are extracted? Physical stability, chemical stability, or variability in preparation among facilities? And will a method be proposed to scientifically resolve these concerns? Can the results of this study provide new criteria or standards for quality assurance?

3.       What does "Study methods" in Table 2 mean, and what does "Classical" mean?

4.       Data in Table 2 and Table 3 are not properly represented.

5.       The study only identified limited properties for three drugs. Therefore, it would be an overstatement to generalize as stated in the conclusions.

Author Response

Thank you for your peer review.
We have attempted to make the corrections as attached.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 4 Report

 

In the manuscript, the authors investigated how stability of drugs (baclofen, clonidine, hydrocortisone) can be changed when the commercially available dosage form is processed (decapsulation, tablet breaking, and milling, diluting) for pediatric therapy.
The structure of the manuscript is logical, although the introduction and conclusion could be more extended.

In the description of the preparation (2.1), the authors need to clarify some process parameters. For example, how long the milling process took? For sieving, it is necessary to specify particle size fraction. How long was the sieving time, for the sieve analyzer, what was the amplitude? Missing from the first table is how long was the mixing for the manual mixing process.

The manuscript can be be improved with giving additional information about the analytical method for determining the active substance content (e.g. eluent composition, type of columns, etc.)

Moderate checking and editing of English language is required

Author Response

Thank you for your peer review.
We have attempted to make the corrections as attached.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 3 Report

The authors appropriately respond to reviewer's comments and suggestions.

I think this munuscript is acceptable for the publication.

Before the publication, two comments to be considered are as follows:

1. In table 3, the authors changed "Study method" to "Storage conditions", but "Storage methods" could be appropriate.

2. In table 4, the authors must write in English.

Author Response

Please see attached file

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop