Effect of Skin-to-Skin Care on the Day of Birth on Skin Colonization in Preterm Infants: A Pre- and Post-Implementation Study
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Design and Setting
2.2. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
2.3. Study Interventions
2.4. Microbiological Swabs and Technique
2.5. Data Collection
2.6. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
4. Discussion
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Wassenaar, T.M.; Panigrahi, P. Is a foetus developing in a sterile environment? Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2014, 59, 572–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chu, D.M.; Ma, J.; Prince, A.L.; Antony, K.M.; Seferovic, M.D.; Aagaard, K.M. Maturation of the infant microbiome community structure and function across multiple body sites and in relation to mode of delivery. Nat. Med. 2017, 23, 314–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Brauncajs, M.; Olesiejuk, M.; Krzeminski, Z. [Microorganisms isolated from healthy newborns in the first and third twenty-four hours]. Med. Dosw. Mikrobiol. 2009, 61, 153–158. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Keyworth, N.; Millar, M.R.; Holland, K.T. Development of cutaneous microflora in premature neonates. Arch. Dis. Child. 1992, 67, 797–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Folgori, L.; Tersigni, C.; Hsia, Y.; Kortsalioudaki, C.; Heath, P.; Sharland, M.; Bielicki, J. The relationship between Gram-negative colonization and bloodstream infections in neonates: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2018, 24, 251–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stoll, B.J.; Hansen, N.; Fanaroff, A.A.; Wright, L.L.; Carlo, W.A.; Ehrenkranz, R.A.; Lemons, J.A.; Donovan, E.F.; Stark, A.R.; Tyson, J.E.; et al. Late-onset sepsis in very low birth weight neonates: The experience of the NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Pediatrics 2002, 110, 285–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- The Canadian Neonatal Network Annual Report 2022. Available online: http://www.canadianneonatalnetwork.org/portal/Portals/0/Annual%20Reports/2022%20CNN%20Annual%20Report.pdf (accessed on 31 December 2022).
- Gupta, N.; Deierl, A.; Hills, E.; Banerjee, J. Systematic review confirmed the benefits of early skin-to-skin contact but highlighted lack of studies on very and extremely preterm infants. Acta Paediatr. 2021, 110, 2310–2315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moore, E.R.; Bergman, N.; Anderson, G.C.; Medley, N. Early skin-to-skin contact for mothers and their healthy newborn infants. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2016, 11, CD003519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sivanandan, S.; Sankar, M.J. Kangaroo mother care for preterm or low birth weight infants: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Glob. Health 2023, 8, e010728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Charpak, N.; Ruiz-Pelaez, J.G.; Figueroa de C, Z.; Charpak, Y. Kangaroo mother versus traditional care for newborn infants ≤ 2000 grams: A randomized, controlled trial. Pediatrics 1997, 100, 682–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Conde-Agudelo, A.; Diaz-Rossello, J.L. Kangaroo mother care to reduce morbidity and mortality in low birthweight infants. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2016, 2016, CD002771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hendricks-Munoz, K.D.; Xu, J.; Parikh, H.I.; Xu, P.; Fettweis, J.M.; Kim, Y.; Louie, M.; Buck, G.A.; Thacker, L.R.; Sheth, N.U. Skin-to-Skin Care and the Development of the Preterm Infant Oral Microbiome. Am. J. Perinatol. 2015, 32, 1205–1216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Evans, N.J.; Rutter, N. Development of the epidermis in the newborn. Biol. Neonate 1986, 49, 74–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Abouelfettoh, A.; Ludington-Hoe, S.M.; Burant, C.J.; Visscher, M.O. Effect of skin-to-skin contact on preterm infant skin barrier function and hospital-acquired infection. J. Clin. Med. Res. 2011, 3, 36–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pammi, M.; O’Brien, J.L.; Ajami, N.J.; Wong, M.C.; Versalovic, J.; Petrosino, J.F. Development of the cutaneous microbiome in the preterm infant: A prospective longitudinal study. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0176669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Younge, N.E.; Araujo-Perez, F.; Brandon, D.; Seed, P.C. Early-life skin microbiota in hospitalized preterm and full-term infants. Microbiome 2018, 6, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hartz, L.E.; Bradshaw, W.; Brandon, D.H. Potential NICU Environmental Influences on the Neonate’s Microbiome: A Systematic Review. Adv. Neonatal Care 2015, 15, 324–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goldmann, D.A.; Leclair, J.; Macone, A. Bacterial colonization of neonates admitted to an intensive care environment. J. Pediatr. 1978, 93, 288–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brooks, B.; Firek, B.A.; Miller, C.S.; Sharon, I.; Thomas, B.C.; Baker, R.; Morowitz, M.J.; Banfield, J.F. Microbes in the neonatal intensive care unit resemble those found in the gut of premature infants. Microbiome 2014, 2, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Conceicao, T.; Aires de Sousa, M.; Miragaia, M.; Paulino, E.; Barroso, R.; Brito, M.J.; Sardinha, T.; Sancho, L.; Carreiro, H.; de Sousa, G.; et al. Staphylococcus aureus reservoirs and transmission routes in a Portuguese Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: A 30-month surveillance study. Microb. Drug Resist. 2012, 18, 116–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Govindarajan, V.; Devadas, S.; Shah, P.A.; Diggikar, S. Impact of Kangaroo Mother Care on Skin Microbiome of Very Preterm Infants—A Pilot Study. Indian J. Pediatr. 2024, 91, 229–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ghori, N.U.; Mullally, C.A.; Nicol, M.P.; Currie, A.; Hibbert, J.; Payne, M.S.; Patole, S.; Strunk, T. Skin-Microbiome Assembly in Preterm Infants during the First Three Weeks of Life and Impact of Topical Coconut Oil Application. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 16626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shah, P.A.; Govindarajan, V.; Diggikar, S.; Rangaiah, A.; Devadas, S.; Kariyappa, M. Exploring the Skin Mycobiome in Very Preterm babies during the early neonatal period in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit of India. Trop. Doct. 2022, 52, 362–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Pathogens | Commensal |
---|---|
Staphylococcus aureus β- haemolytic streptococcus groups A, B, C, G Haemophilus influenzae Streptococcus pneumoniae All aerobic Gram-negative bacilli | Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus Micrococcus species Corynebacterium species Bacillus species not B anthracis Propionibacterium species Non-pathogenic Neisseria species Enterococcus species Viridians Streptococcus group Yeasts |
Variables | Pre-Implementation Group N = 27 | Post-Implementation Group N = 17 | p |
---|---|---|---|
Gestational age (weeks) | 30.4 (28.0, 31.9) | 30.6 (28.4, 31.9) | 0.91 |
Female sex | 15 (55.6) | 7 (41) | 0.54 |
Birthweight (grams) | 1300 (540, 1880) | 1370 (1010, 2300) | 0.35 |
Multiple gestation | 8 (29.6) | 3 (17.6) | 0.49 |
Maternal age (years) | 33.5 (20, 43) | 35 (24, 50) | 0.43 |
Maternal infection during pregnancy | 1 (3.7) | 3 (17.6) | 0.28 |
Intrapartum antibiotics | 10 (37.0) | 7 (41.1) | 1 |
Duration of rupture of membranes (excluding cesarean section without labor) (hours) | 1.4 (0.0, 8.3) | 4.5 (0.2, 15) | 0.06 |
Delivery by cesarean section | 18 (66.7) | 10 (58.8) | 0.75 |
Apgar score 1 min | 8 (2, 9) | 8 (2, 9) | 0.84 |
Apgar score 5 min | 9 (4, 9) | 9 (7, 9) | 0.19 |
Antibiotics initiated at birth | 26 (96.3) | 12 (70.6) | 0.006 |
Positive blood culture at birth | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 |
Skin to skin duration within first 7 days after birth (hours) | 2.6 (0.0, 11.8) | 8. 2 (0.0, 22.8) | 0.03 |
Skin Colonization | Pre-Implementation Group N = 27 | Post-Implementation Group N = 17 | p |
---|---|---|---|
Day 2 | N = 27 | N = 17 | 0.36 |
Commensals Pathogens Sterile | 10 (37.0) 2 (7.4) 15 (55.6) | 10 (58.8) 1 (5.9) 6 (35.3) | |
Day 3 | N = 27 | N = 16 | 0.24 |
Commensals Pathogens Sterile | 13 (48.1) 3 (11.1) 11 (40.7) | 12 (75.0) 1 (6.3) 3 (18.8) | |
Day 7 | N = 25 | N = 13 | 0.22 |
Commensals Pathogens Sterile | 21 (84.0) 4 (16.0) 0 (0.0) | 8 (61.5) 5 (38.5) 0 (0.0) | |
Staphylococcus aureus on maternal nasal–rectal swabs | N = 25 | N = 13 | 0.16 |
10 (40.0) | 2 (15.4) | ||
Staphylococcus aureus in infant mouth–rectal swabs on day 7 of life | N = 25 4 (16.0) | N = 13 0 (0.0) | 0.54 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Deshpande, P.; Akhtar, N.; Mansur, M.; McGeer, A.; Shah, V. Effect of Skin-to-Skin Care on the Day of Birth on Skin Colonization in Preterm Infants: A Pre- and Post-Implementation Study. Children 2024, 11, 1506. https://doi.org/10.3390/children11121506
Deshpande P, Akhtar N, Mansur M, McGeer A, Shah V. Effect of Skin-to-Skin Care on the Day of Birth on Skin Colonization in Preterm Infants: A Pre- and Post-Implementation Study. Children. 2024; 11(12):1506. https://doi.org/10.3390/children11121506
Chicago/Turabian StyleDeshpande, Poorva, Nosheen Akhtar, Maura Mansur, Allison McGeer, and Vibhuti Shah. 2024. "Effect of Skin-to-Skin Care on the Day of Birth on Skin Colonization in Preterm Infants: A Pre- and Post-Implementation Study" Children 11, no. 12: 1506. https://doi.org/10.3390/children11121506
APA StyleDeshpande, P., Akhtar, N., Mansur, M., McGeer, A., & Shah, V. (2024). Effect of Skin-to-Skin Care on the Day of Birth on Skin Colonization in Preterm Infants: A Pre- and Post-Implementation Study. Children, 11(12), 1506. https://doi.org/10.3390/children11121506