Missing Institutional Review Board Statement
In the original publication [1], the Institutional Review Board Statement was not mentioned: No ethical approval was required for the study in accordance with the requirements of ethical committees such as the medical University of Munich (LMU) (https://www.med.lmu.de/einrichtungen/ethik/beratungspflicht/index.html (accessed on 14 December 2023)) and the Bavarian ethical committee (https://ethikkommission.blaek.de/studien/sonstige-studien/antragsunterlagen-ek-primarberatend-15-bo (accessed on 14 December 2023)) as the data of the online survey was anonymised for the analysis and neither sensitive nor person related data was processed. All data was processed in strict complaints with GDPR requirements. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.
Reference
- Geiger, I.; Kostenzer, J.; Matthäus, V.; on behalf of the ESCNH Chair Committee; Mader, S.; Zimmermann, L.J.I. Reassessing and Extending the European Standards of Care for Newborn Health: How to Keep Reference Standards in Line with Current Evidence. Children 2024, 11, 179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).