Next Article in Journal
Positive Airway Pressure Therapy for Pediatric Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Previous Article in Journal
Associations between Paternal Anxiety and Infant Weight Gain
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Preference of Dental Practitioners toward the Use of Local and Topical Anesthetics for Pediatric Patients in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Survey

by
Fahad Shulaywih Alanazi
1,
Mohammed Fahad Alhazzaa
1,
Yazeed Mohammed Alosaimi
1,
Faisal Abdullah Alajaji
1,
Atallah Shulaywih Alanazi
2,
Abdullah Alassaf
3,
Basim Almulhim
3,
Sara Ayid Alghamdi
3 and
Sreekanth Kumar Mallineni
4,*
1
College of Dentistry, Majmaah University, Almajmaah 11952, Saudi Arabia
2
Humeidan and Khowaiter, Riyadh 12631, Saudi Arabia
3
Department of Preventive Science, College of Dentistry, Majmaah University, Almajmaah 11952, Saudi Arabia
4
Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Saveetha Dental College and Hospital, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai 600077, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Children 2021, 8(11), 978; https://doi.org/10.3390/children8110978
Submission received: 17 August 2021 / Revised: 19 October 2021 / Accepted: 19 October 2021 / Published: 28 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Pediatric Dentistry & Oral Medicine)

Abstract

:
Background: Local anesthesia administration techniques are slightly challenging to perform and master on the basis of experience. It is always delicate to adjust to the first patient injection, especially in children. This study investigated dental practitioners’ preferences toward topical and local anesthetics for children in Saudi Arabia. Materials and methods: A questionnaire was sent through google forms to the participants, including sociodemographic characteristics, as well as perceptions of local anesthesia and topical anesthesia. The details for each demographic variable were based the gender, occupation, and experience years. Descriptive statistics were carried out using SPSS (version 24.0), where a p-value of 0.05 at a 95% confidence interval was considered significant. Result: A total of 274 responses were received from Saudi Arabian dental practitioners, whereby 92.3% preferred lidocaine, and, while choosing local anesthesia, most participants (57.7%) considered precise bodyweight. The majority of the participants selected 27 gauge needles for infiltrations (46.3%) and blocks (63.9%). Short needles were preferred by the majority (93.4%) of the dental practitioners for infiltration, while long needles (83.9%) were chosen for nerve blocks. Benzocaine (68.2%) was preferred by the majority of the dental practitioners for topical anesthesia, and 55.8% of them were not aware of the brand of the topical anesthesia. The majority of dental practitioners felt that topical anesthesia was effective prior to administration of local anesthesia, and 83.6% of the Arabian dental practitioners expressed that patients complained regarding the taste of topical anesthesia. There were mixed opinions observed among the genders and occupations of dental practitioners regarding anesthetics used. Conclusion: The dental practitioners’ perceptions and preferences demonstrate that the most commonly preferred type of local anesthetic was lidocaine, whereas the most preferred type of topical anesthetic was benzocaine in gel form. Moreover, the most widely used factor in deciding the dosage of local anesthesia was precise body weight among Saudi dentists. The majority of participants preferred short needles for infiltrations and long needles for nerve blocks. The 27 gauge needle was chosen by the majority of the participants for both infiltration and nerve blocks.

1. Introduction

Anesthesia is a vital part of clinical Dentistry. It offers painless care and helps a dentist operate correctly within optimum comfort [1,2]. Painful dental treatments induce fear, while fear and anxiety increase the pain sensed [1]. In children, local anesthesia administration leads to fear and anxiety and is associated with pain and discomfort [1,2]. There is a close connection between a child’s dental anxiety and pain. Injection administration of local anesthesia is still the most common approach used in Dentistry [3]. Topical local anesthetic agents are applied to minimize the pain that results from the injection [4,5,6]. Topical anesthetics reduce the discomfort of needle penetration, and topical agents are available as a gel, liquid, spray, ointment, and patch [6]. The most widely used topical anesthesia is benzocaine, and it has a rapid-onset action. Topical anesthesia agents are applied prior to the local anesthesia administration site to minimize pain [4,6]. Nonetheless, after prolonged or repetitive use, localized allergic reactions can occur. Moreover, lidocaine and compound topical anesthetics have an issue of risk of methemoglobinemia [6].
Local anesthesia is the best and most successful approach to dental pain relief. Many local anesthetic agents are available to minimize pain and discomfort [7]. Children would typically have an adverse reaction to dental anesthesia, including a lack of cooperation with dental therapy and hysteric activity, making it impossible for the dentist to administer the procedure correctly [8]. Nonetheless, not all children are affected by actions, as dental fear is mainly due to a sense of loss of control and pain perception that may emerge from a child’s awareness of teeth and past painful suffering [8,9]. Local anesthesia administration techniques are slightly challenging to perform and master on the basis of experience. It is also challenging to deal with pediatric patients in dental operations while administering local anesthesia [3,9]. It is essential to regularly assess the perceptions and practices among dental practitioners. There is value in determining the perceptions of topical and local anesthetics in children among Saudi Arabian dental practitioners, and no studies have been published on this area. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate dental practitioners’ preferences of topical and local anesthesia to assess current practices in Saudi Arabia.

2. Materials and Methods

This cross-sectional questionnaire-based study was carried out following the STROBE guidelines. The ethical approval was obtained from the Institution Ethical Committee, Majmaah University, Saudi Arabia (IRB No: MUREC-Feb-28/Com-2021/24-2). The study was conducted among Saudi Arabian dental practitioners to investigate their perceptions and practices toward using local anesthesia and topical anesthesia for a period of 5 months from 1 February to 30 June 2021. A cross-sectional survey was sent through Google Forms to the participants. The questionnaire included 17 questions: seven questions for local anesthesia and 10 for topical anesthesia with respect to dental practitioners’ preferences, distributed through social media, general dentists, specialists, and consultants. The questionnaire was adopted from Kohli et al. [10] from a survey performed among dental practitioners in the United States of America. The survey included questions related to the most commonly used local and topical anesthetics drugs, as well as the most critical factor in deciding the dosage of local anesthesia. The questionnaire also had the most frequently used needle length and gauge for infiltrations and blocks, the adverse drug reaction to anesthetics, and the length of time to infuse a complete cartridge. The commonly used type and form of topical anesthesia, the effectiveness, and a common complaint from the patient regarding topical anesthetics were included in the questionnaire. Demographic data including gender and education were collected. The comparisons were made on the basis of gender (male and female) and occupation (consultants, general practitioners, and specialists). The data were analyzed using the statistical package IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows (Version 24.0. Armonk, NY, USA: IBM Corp; 2016) by computing the percentage response for each question. The comparisons were made in percentages using the chi-square test, with a p-value less than 0.05 considered significant.

3. Results

A total of 274 dental participants responded to the questionnaire in the study. The distribution of the participants was based on gender and occupation. Most of the participants were females (62.8%), with males accounting for 37.2%. In the study population, the majority of subjects were general practitioners (83.9%), with the remainder consisting of specialists (13.2%) and consultants (2.9%). The most commonly used local anesthetic drug was lignocaine (92.3%) (Table 1); 86% of female and 81.6% of male practitioners preferred using lignocaine (Table 2), and the findings were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). The majority of the consultants (100%), general practitioners (91.7%), and specialists (94.4%) also preferred using lignocaine as a local anesthetic drug (Table 2). The findings were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). The essential factor considered when deciding on the dose of the local anesthetic administration was body weight (57.7%), preferred by both males (56.9%) and females (58.1%), and the findings were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Furthermore, 50% of the consultants preferred age as the most common factor for deciding the dose of the local anesthetic drug, while general practitioners (58.3%) and specialists (61.1%) preferred body weight as an essential factor. The findings were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Most Arabian dental practitioners preferred 27 gauge needles for infiltration and nerve blocks in children (Table 1). Forty-eight percent of males and 45.3% of females preferred 27 gauge needles for infiltration, while 68% of females and 56.9% of males preferred 27 gauge needles for nerve blocks in children (Table 2). The findings were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). In the case of infiltration, the majority of consultants (62.5%) preferred 25 gauge needles, while general dental practitioners (47.4%) and specialists (50%) preferred 27 gauge needles (Table 3) for infiltrations in children. The findings were statistically significant (p > 0.05). In the case of nerve blocks, the majority of consultants (62.5%) also preferred 25 gauge needles, while general dental practitioners (66.5%) and specialists (61.1%) preferred 27 gauge needles (Table 3); the results were statistically significant (p < 0.05). In the case of the length of needles, 93.4% of the total Arabian dental practitioners preferred short needles for infiltration to long (2.9%) and ultra-short needles (3.6%), while 83.2% of them preferred long needles for nerve blocks in children (Table 1). Both males (95.3%) and females (90.2%) preferred short needles (Table 2), and the results were not statistically significant (p < 0.05). The majority of the consultants (50%), general dental practitioners (93.9%), and specialists (100%) preferred short needles in children for infiltrations (Table 3), and the results were statistically significant (p < 0.05).
In the case of nerve blocks, the majority of the males (74.5%) and females (88.4%) preferred long needles (Table 2), and the results were statistically significant (p < 0.05). The majority of the consultants (87.5%), general dental practitioners (87.4%), and specialists (55.6%) preferred long needles in children for nerve blocks (Table 3), and the results were statistically significant (p < 0.05). Thirty-one percent of the Arabian dental practitioners opined that 11–20 s was required for administration of a full cartridge of a local anesthesia solution. The majority of females (31.4%) identified 11–20 s as ideal to inject a full cartridge of the local anesthetic solution, while the majority of males (30.4%) preferred 30–60 s (Table 2), and the results were statistically significant (p < 0.05). There was an evident disagreement among the consultants (>10 s, 37.5%), general dental practitioners (11–20 s, 34.3%), and specialists (31–60 s, 41.7%) regarding time to inject a full cartridge of local anesthetic solution (Table 3), and the results were statistically significant (p < 0.05). The overall scores achieved by Saudi Arabia dentists related to topical anesthetics used in children are summarized in Table 4. The majority of dental practitioners in Saudi Arabia (65.7%) often use topical anesthesia prior to local anesthesia (Table 4), with more females (68.6%) than males (60.8%) implementing this practice (p > 0.05) (Table 5). The most commonly used form of topical anesthesia was gel by both males (86.4%) and females (90.4%), and the findings were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). The most commonly used drug for topical anesthesia was benzocaine (females, 62.3% and males, 61.0%); the findings were not statistically significant (p > 0.05).
There was evident agreement among the Arabian dentists regarding the use of topical anesthesia in children prior to administration of local anesthesia: consultants (62.5%), general dental practitioners (65.2%), and specialists (69.4%) (Table 6). The results were statistically significant (p < 0.05). The majority of the consultants (100%), general dental practitioners (89.1%), and specialists (80.6%) preferred using a gel form of topical anesthesia prior to administration of local anesthesia in children (Table 6), and the results were statistically significant (p < 0.05). Sixty-eight percent of the dental practitioners (females 68.6%, males 67.6%; p > 0.05) opined that they preferred using benzocaine as topical anesthesia in children. The majority of the consultants (62.5%), general dental practitioners (68.3%), and specialists (69.4%) used benzocaine as topical anesthesia (p > 0.05).
On the question regarding the brand of topical anesthesia, 55.8% of Arabian practitioners responded that they were not aware of the brand. Among them, 57.65% of females and 52.9% of males were unaware of the topical anesthesia brand (Table 5). All the consultants (100%) who participated in the study were aware of the topical anesthesia brand. In comparison, general dental practitioners (57.4%) and specialists (58.3%) were not aware of the brand that they used for topical anesthesia (Table 6), and the results were statistically significant (p < 0.05). The female (43.6%) and male (53.9%) practitioners felt that more than 30 s was adequate for application of a topical anesthetic drug before administration of local anesthesia (Table 5), and the results were statistically significant (p < 0.05). The consultants (62.5%) felt that 21–30 s was ideal for application of topical anesthesia, while 33% of specialists preferred 31–60 s and 23% of general practitioners preferred more than 60 s (p > 0.05). More than one-third of dental practitioners (38.7%) felt that topical anesthesia is effective in children. Among them, 41.3% of females considered it effective, while 39.2% of males considered it very effective, and the findings were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). The majority of general dental practitioners (40.4%) and specialists (30.6%) felt that topical anesthesia application in children was effective, while 75% of consultants felt it was very effective (p < 0.05). The most common complaint of pediatric patients in dental operations regarding topical anesthesia was taste (83.6%). Among them, 87.8% of females and 76.5% of males reported taste as the most common complaint regarding topical anesthesia (p > 0.05). The majority of consultants (87.55), general dentists (83.5%), and specialists (88.9%) reported it as the most common complaint from children regarding topical anesthesia, and the results were statistically significant. For the question “How many of your patients experienced any drug side-effect to the topical anesthetic preparation in the last year?”, 82.8% of the Arabian dental practitioners reported no side-effects of topical anesthesia (females 86%; males 77.5%; p > 0.05). More than 50% of consultants observed side-effects with topical anesthesia, while 83% of general practitioners and 88.9% of specialists never encountered any adverse effects in children (Table 6). For the question on what percentage of the time topical anesthetics work when applied prior to the local anesthetic injection, 36.1% of the Arabian dental practitioners successfully used topical anesthesia in 75% of cases (Table 4). The majority of females (34.9%) and males (38.2%) expressed that they successfully used topical anesthesia in 75% of the cases (Table 5), and the findings were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Fifty percent of the consultants reported successfully using topical anesthesia in 50% of cases, while 36.5% of general dentists and 36.1% of specialists reported successfully using topical anesthetics in 75% of cases (Table 6). The findings were statistically significant (p < 0.05).

4. Discussion

It is a big challenge in the pediatric population to distinguish behavior due to pain from behavior related to distress or fear associated with a mixture of environmental, social, parental, or developmental factors [11]. The behavior of the child in discriminating pain due to local anesthesia administration could determine whether patients make return appointments because children and their parents perceive a successful visit in delivering this essential component of care, or whether they find someone else whom they feel will be more sympathetic to their needs [12]. The present cross-sectional survey was accomplished to evaluate the perceptions and practices of local and topical anesthesia in children. A sample of 274 dental practitioners around Saudi Arabia was involved in the present study. The present survey was adopted from the research in the United States performed by Kohli et al. [10]. The questionnaire included commonly used local and topical anesthesia, commonly used needle gauge for infiltration and nerve blocks, widely used form of topical anesthesia, duration of application of local and topical anesthesia, and adverse effects experienced while administering anesthetic drugs.
The present study observed that lidocaine is the commonly used local anesthetic drug. Similar findings were reported by Kholi et al. [10] in the United States of America among pediatric dentists. A Canadian survey [13] also reported the frequent use of lidocaine 2% with epinephrine 1:100,000 for local anesthesia administration. Similar findings were reported by Khalil [14] from Saudi Arabia, who revealed that lidocaine is a commonly used local anesthetic drug in children. Among the study sample, 72% of general dentists and 74% of specialists preferred using lidocaine. However, in the present study, general practitioners (91.7%) and specialists (94.4%) also preferred using lignocaine as a local anesthetic drug; the findings were not in agreement with prior Saudi Arabian studies [14].
In the case of infiltration and nerve blocks in children, most Saudi dental practitioners preferred 27 gauge needles. The majority of the consultants (62.5%) preferred 25 gauge needles for infiltration in children, while general dental practitioners (47.4%) and specialists (50%) preferred 27 gauge needles. In the case of nerve blocks, the majority of consultants (62.5%) also preferred 25 gauge needles, while general dental practitioners (66.5%) and specialists (61.1%) preferred 27 gauge needles. The findings from the present study were in agreement with Kohli et al. study [10]. The present survey showed that 86.5% of practitioners use a long needle for nerve block and 91.9% use a short needle for infiltration, as recommended by Malamed [15], who proposed that a long needle should be used for all techniques requiring penetration of a significant thickness of soft tissue, whereas short needles should be used for penetration of insignificant depths of soft tissue. Moreover, Ram et al. [16] reported that children experienced pleasant mandibular block administered with a 27 gauge needle compared to a 30 gauge needle. No difference was evident in the maxillary infiltration provided with 27 or 30 gauge needles.
The primary aim of using local anesthesia is to treat the patient least painfully. This aim becomes particularly important when considering a very young, anxious, fearful, and/or needle-phobic patient. Numerous dental procedures may require no local anesthesia but may still have the potential for soft-tissue stimulation or pain. When used appropriately, adequate topical anesthesia can provide a safe and positive treatment outcome, improving patient behaviors and attitudes toward future care. The academic programs show some similarities across the entire kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Although benzocaine is the most used topical anesthesia, most dental practitioners in Saudi Arabia use topical anesthesia before local anesthesia administration. The clinical effectiveness of lidocaine and benzocaine has already been established [17]. Dentists who experience stress during the administration of mandibular blocks attach greater credibility to the child’s report of pain [14], and most patients’ determining factor for acceptance of topical anesthesia is taste [18,19]. Garg et al. [20] evaluated the efficacy of 2% lidocaine gel and 20% benzocaine gel for topical anesthesia. The authors used a split-mouth study design to compare these two topical anesthetic gels with placebo paste in the same patient for 1 min before needle insertion and found both are equally effective. However, in the present study, most dental practitioners preferred using benzocaine as a topical anesthesia agent. These findings are in agreement with the American study [10]. Only 37.9% of participants in this survey were willing to use a different topical anesthesia delivery system if available on the market, due to the widespread use of anesthetics, changes in injection technique, changes in anesthetic choice because of cost, and short-term changes in drug choice related to in-house availability [21]. Side-effects caused by topical anesthetics are not frequently reported by dental practitioners [20,22,23]. Pain at the injection site, damage of the periosteum, soft tissues, nerves, and blood vessels, needle breakage, and hypersensitivity reactions are commonly encountered complications with local anesthesia administration [7,22,23]. In the present survey, there were only questions about adverse effects in association with topical anesthesia. The majority of Arabian dental practitioners reported no side-effects of topical anesthesia; more than 50% of consultants experienced side-effects with topical anesthesia, while more than 80% of general practitioners specialists never encountered any adverse effects in children.
In earlier studies, Kohli et al. [10] surveyed pediatric dentists from the United States, a Canadian survey [13] was performed with the Royal College of Dental Surgeons of Ontario, and a prior study from Saudi Arabia surveyed 431 dentists (219 general practitioners and 212 specialists). In the present survey, 274 Arabian dental practitioners (230 general practitioners, 36 specialists, and eight consultants) participated. The survey was conducted through social media; hence, the response rate was not sought. This was considered a limitation of the study. The present study was conducted among general dental practitioners, consultants, and specialists, and the survey covered all dental professionals in Saudi Arabia. The comparisons among general dental practitioners, consultants, and specialists may not be feasible; hence, this was also considered a limitation. The consultants were significantly lower in number, which was also a possible limitation of the study. The province of the participant was not contemplated in data collection, which was also a potential limitation. The generalization of the findings is impossible, but these findings can be viewed as a reference for upcoming studies. Furthermore, a prospective study with a large sample size with an equal distribution of dentists from all provinces of Saudi Arabia is warranted. The present cross-sectional survey compared general dental practitioners, specialists, and consultants on the basis of gender and occupation setting. Moreover, the current survey is the only study to explore Arabian dental practitioners’ perceptions and preferences regarding local and topical anesthetics in children.

5. Conclusions

There were evident mixed opinions among genders and occupations of dental practitioners regarding topical and local anesthetics in Saudi Arabia. The most commonly preferred local anesthetic drug was lidocaine, and the most preferred topical anesthetic was benzocaine in gel form. The most widely used factor in deciding the dosage of local anesthesia was precise body weight among Saudi dentists. The 27 gauge needle was chosen by the majority of participants for both infiltration and nerve blocks. The majority of participants preferred short needles for infiltrations and long needles for nerve blocks. There was evidence of mixed opinions among genders and occupations of dentists in Saudi Arabia regarding anesthetic drugs in children.

Author Contributions

F.S.A. and Y.M.A. were involved in data collection; F.S.A., A.S.A. and F.A.A. were involved in analysis; A.A. and B.A. developed the concept; S.A.A. and S.K.M. wrote the first draft. F.S.A., M.F.A., Y.M.A., F.A.A., A.S.A., A.A., B.A., S.A.A. and S.K.M. involved in reviewing and editing the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical Committee Clearance was obtained from Majmaah University, Al-Majmaah, Saudi Arabia, under IRB No: MUREC-Feb-28/Com-2021/24-2.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank all the participants involved in the study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Van Wijk, A.J.; Makkes, P.C. Highly anxious dental patients report more pain during dental injections. Br. Dent. J. 2008, 205, E7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Appukuttan, D. Strategies to manage patients with dental anxiety and dental phobia: Literature review. Clin. Cosmet. Investig. Dent. 2016, 8, 35–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Peedikayil, F.; Vijayan, A. An update on local anesthesia for pediatric dental patients. Anesth. Essays Res. 2013, 7, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Becker, D.E.; Reed, K.L. Local Anesthetics: Review of pharmacological considerations. Anesth. Prog. 2012, 59, 90–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Mallineni, S.K.; Yiu, C. A Retrospective audit of dental treatment provided to special needs patients under general anesthesia during a ten-year period. J. Clin. Pediatr. Denty 2018, 42, 155–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Aminabadi, N.A.; Farahani, R.M.Z.; Oskouei, S.G. Site-specificity of pain sensitivity to intraoral anesthetic injections in children. J. Oral Sci. 2009, 51, 239–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Lee, J.; Lee, J.Y.; Kim, H.J.; Seo, K.S. Dental anesthesia for patients with allergic reactions to lidocaine: Two case reports. J. Dent. Anesth. Pain Med. 2016, 16, 209–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Revision, L. Use of local anesthesia for pediatric dental patients. Pediatr. Dent. 2018, 40, 274–280. [Google Scholar]
  9. Malamed, S.F. Local anesthetics: Dentistry’s most important drugs, clinical update 2006. J. Calif. Dent. Assoc. 2006, 34, 971–976. [Google Scholar]
  10. Kohli, K.; Ngan, P.; Crout, R.; Linscott, C.C. A survey of local and topical anesthesia use by pediatric dentists in the United States. Pediatr. Dent. 2001, 23, 265–269. [Google Scholar]
  11. Versloot, J.; Veerkamp, J.S.J.; Hoogstraten, J. Assessment of pain by the child, dentist, and independent observers. Pediatr. Dent. 2004, 26, 445–449. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  12. Noel, M.; Chambers, C.T.; McGrath, P.J.; Klein, R.M.; Stewart, S.H. The Role of State Anxiety in Children’s Memories for Pain. J. Pediatr. Psychol. 2012, 37, 567–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Gaffen, A.S.; Haas, D.A. Survey of local anesthetic use by Ontario dentists. J. Can. Dent. Assoc. 2009, 75, 649. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  14. Khalil, H. Local anesthetics dosage still a problem for most dentists: A survey of current knowledge and awareness. Saudi. J. Dent. Res. 2014, 5, 49–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Malamed, S.F.; DeLuke, D.M.; Cannon, D.; Carrico, C.; Byrne, B.E.; Laskin, D.M. Maximum recommended doses of dental local anesthetics. J. Dent. Educ. 2018, 82, 1017–1019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Ram, D.; Hermida, B.L.; Amir, E. Reaction of children to dental injection with 27- or 30-gauge needles. Int. J. Paediatr. Dent. 2007, 17, 383–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Rosa, A.L.; Sverzut, C.E.; Xavier, S.P.; Lavrador, M.A. Clinical effectiveness of lidocaine and benzocaine for topical anesthesia. Anesth. Prog. 1999, 46, 97–99. [Google Scholar]
  18. Reed, K.L.; Malamed, S.F.; Fonner, A.M. Local anesthesia part 2: Technical considerations. Anesth. Prog. 2012, 59, 127–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Brand, H.S.; Kuin, D.; Baart, J.A. A survey of local anaesthesia education in European dental schools. Eur. J. Dent. Educ. 2008, 12, 85–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mundiya, J.; Woodbine, E. Updates on topical and local anesthesia agents. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. Clin. N. Am. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Rasmussen, J.K.; Frederiksen, J.A.; Hallonsten, A.-L.; Poulsen, S. Danish dentists’ knowledge, attitudes and management of procedural dental pain in children: Association with demographic characteristics, structural factors, perceived stress during the administration of local analgesia and their tolerance towards pain. Int. J. Paediatr. Dent. 2005, 15, 159–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Finder, R.L.; Moore, P.A. Adverse drug reactions to local anesthesia. Dent. Clin. N. Am. 2002, 46, 747–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kaewjiaranai, T.; Srisatjaluk, R.L.; Sakdajeyont, W.; Pairuchvej, V.; Wongsirichat, N. The efficiency of topical anesthetics as antimicrobial agents: A review of use in dentistry. J. Dent. Anesth. Pain Med. 2018, 18, 223–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 1. Overall achieved scores by all the participants regarding local anesthetics used for children.
Table 1. Overall achieved scores by all the participants regarding local anesthetics used for children.
QuestionsResponses
What kind of local anesthesia do you most commonly use?
Articaine1.5%
Bupivacaine0.7%
Lidocaine92.3%
Mepivacaine4.4%
Prilocaine1.1%
When deciding on the dose of the local anesthetic you administer, what is the most important thing you consider?
Age and weight0.4%
Duration of treatment10.6%
Estimated child size2.2%
Medical history0.7%
One cartridge is given for all patients6.2%
Patient’s medical status0.4%
Precise age in years8.8%
Precise body weight57.7%
The level of difficulty of the procedure12.8%
Weight and child size and level of difficulty0.4%
What needle gauge do you use most of the time for infiltration?
25 gauge35.4%
27 gauge46.4%
30 gauge17.2%
Other1%
What needle gauge do you use most of the time for blocks?
25 gauge21.9%
27 gauge63.9%
30 gauge13.1%
Other1.2%
What length of needle do you use most of the time for infiltration?
Long2.9%
Short93.4%
Ultrashort3.6%
Other0
What length of needle do you use most of the time for blocks?
Long83.2%
Short16.4%
Ultrashort0.4%
Other0%
How long does it take you to inject a full cartridge of a local anesthetic solution?
10 s or less8.8%
11–20 s31.4%
21–30 s25.9%
31–60 s27.0%
61 s or more6.9%
Detailed questions are listed in bold.
Table 2. Perceptions of local anesthetics among dental practitioners based on gender.
Table 2. Perceptions of local anesthetics among dental practitioners based on gender.
QuestionsResponsesFemaleMalep-Value
What kind of local anesthesia do you most commonly use?Articaine1.7%1.0%0.06
Bupivacaine0.6%1.0%
Lidocaine91.3%94.1%
Mepivacaine4.7%3.9%
Prilocaine1.7%0.0%
When deciding on the dose of the local anesthetic you administer, what is the most important thing you consider?Age and weight0.0%1.0%0.16
Duration of treatment10.5%10.8%
Estimated child size2.9%1.0%
Medical history0.6%1.0%
One cartridge is given for all patients5.8%6.9%
Patient’s medical status0.0%1.0%
Precise age in years5.8%13.7%
Precise body weight58.1%56.9%
The level of difficulty of the procedure15.7%7.8%
Weight and child size and level of difficulty0.6%0.0%
What needle gauge do you use most of the time for infiltration?25 gauge33.7%38.2%0.64
27 gauge45.3%48.0%
30 gauge19.2%13.7%
Other1.8%0.0%
What needle gauge do you use most of the time for blocks?25 gauge19.8%25.5%0.26
27 gauge68.0%56.9%
30 gauge10.5%17.6%
Other1.8%0.0%
What length of needle do you use most of the time for infiltration?Long2.3%3.9%0.22
Short95.3%90.2%
Ultrashort2.3%5.9%
What length of needle do you use most of the time for blocks?Long88.4%74.5%0.006 *
Short11.0%25.5%
Ultrashort0.6%0.0%
How long does it take you to inject a full cartridge of a local anesthetic solution?10 s or less9.3%7.8%0.87
11–20 s31.4%31.4%
21–30 s27.3%23.5%
31–60 s25.0%30.4%
>60 s7.0%6.9%
* Significant.
Table 3. Perceptions of local anesthetics among Saudi dental practitioners based on occupation.
Table 3. Perceptions of local anesthetics among Saudi dental practitioners based on occupation.
Questions ResponsesConsultantsGeneral DentistsSpecialistp-Value
What kind of local anesthesia do you most commonly use?Articaine0.0%1.7%0.0%0.81
Bupivacaine0.0%0.4%2.8%
Lidocaine100.0%91.7%94.4%
Mepivacaine0.0%4.8%2.8%
Prilocaine0.0%1.3%0.0%
When deciding on the dose of the local anesthetic you administer, what is the most important thing you consider?Age and weight0.0%0.4%0.0%0.12
Duration of treatment12.5%10.4%11.1%
Estimated child size0.0%2.6%0.0%
Medical history0.0%.4%2.8%
One cartridge is given for all patients0.0%5.7%11.1%
Patient’s medical status0.0%0.4%0.0%
Precise age in years50.0%8.3%2.8%
Precise body weight25.0%58.3%61.1%
The level of difficulty of the procedure12.5%13.0%11.1%
Weight and child size and level of difficulty0.0%0.4%0.0%
What needle gauge do you use most of the time for? (infiltration)25 gauge62.5%35.7%27.8%0.01
27 gauge0.0%47.4%50.0%
30 gauge37.5%16.5%16.7%
Other0.00.45.6
What needle gauge do you use most of the time for? (blocks)25 gauge62.5%21.3%16.7%0.00 *
27 gauge0.0%66.5%61.1%
30 gauge37.5%11.7%16.7%
Other0.00.45.6
What length of needle do you use most of the time for? (infiltration)Long25.0%2.6%0.0%0.00 *
Short50.0%93.9%100.0%
Ultrashort25.0%3.5%0.0%
What length of needle do you use most of the time for? (blocks)Long87.5%87.4%55.6%0.00 *
Short12.5%12.6%41.7%
Ultrashort0.0%0.0%2.8%
How long does it take you to inject a full cartridge of a local anesthetic solution?10 s or less37.5%7.4%11.1%0.00 *
11–20 s0.0%34.3%19.4%
21–30 s25.0%27.8%13.9%
31–60 s12.5%25.2%41.7%
61 s or more25.0%5.2%13.9%
* Significant.
Table 4. Overall scores achieved by all participants regarding topical anesthetics used for children.
Table 4. Overall scores achieved by all participants regarding topical anesthetics used for children.
QuestionsResponses
How often do you use a topical anesthetic (gel, spray, liquid, etc.)?
Always65.7%
Never1.1%
Rarely6.6%
Sometimes26.6%
What form of topical anesthetic do you commonly use?
Gel88.3%
Liquid1.8%
Ointment0.7%
spray9.1%
Patch0.0%
What kind of topical anesthetic agent do you commonly use?
Benzocaine68.2%
Compounded topical anesthetics12.4%
Lidocaine19.3%
What brand of topical anesthetic do you use?
Avocaine spray0.4%
Benzojel0.4%
Gingicaine (gel, liquid, spray)4.4%
Hurricaine (gel, liquid, spray)14.2%
I do not know55.8%
Topex (gel, spray)4.4%
Topicale (gel, ointment, patch)20.4%
Would you like to use a different topical anesthesia delivery system if available on the market?
Maybe50.0%
No12.4%
Yes37.6%
How long do you wait to inject after applying a topical anesthetic?
10 s or less16.4%
11–20 s18.2%
21–30 s17.9%
31–60 s23.7%
61 s or more23.7%
Do you think that topical anesthetics are effective when used before the injection of local anesthesia?
Adequate20.4%
Effective38.7%
Ineffective1.8%
Poor5.1%
Very effective33.9%
What do your patients most complain about regarding the topical anesthetic available on the market today?
Burning sensation0.8%
Color5.5%
Consistency3.6%
Never complain4.9%
Smell1.5%
Taste83.6%
How many of your patients experienced any drug side-effect to the topical anesthetic preparation in the last year?
0%82.8%
1–3%14.6%
4–6%1.1%
More than 7%1.5%
In your years of practice treating pediatric patients, approximately what percentage of the time do topical anesthetics work when applied prior to the local anesthetic injection?
0%4.7%
2524.8%
50%22.3%
75%36.1%
100%12.0%
Table 5. Perceptions of topical anesthetics among Saudi dental practitioners based on gender.
Table 5. Perceptions of topical anesthetics among Saudi dental practitioners based on gender.
QuestionsResponsesFemale Male p-Value
How often do you use a topical anesthetic (gel, spray, liquid, etc.)?Always68.6%60.8%0.22
Never1.7%0.0%
Rarely6.4%6.9%
Sometimes23.3%32.4%
What form of topical anesthetic do you commonly use?Gel89.5%86.3%0.86
Liquid1.7%2.0%
Ointment0.6%1.0%
Spray8.1%10.8%
Gel89.5%86.3%
What kind of topical anesthetic agent do you commonly use?Benzocaine68.6%67.6%0.21
Compounded topical anesthetics14.5%8.8%
Lidocaine16.9%23.5%
What brand of topical anesthetic do you use?Avocaine spray0.0%1.0%0.61
Benzojel0.0%1.0%
Gingicaine (gel, liquid, spray)4.1%4.9%
Hurricaine (gel, liquid, spray)15.1%12.7%
I do not know57.6%52.9%
Topex (gel, spray)4.1%4.9%
Topicale (gel, ointment, patch)19.2%22.5%
Would you like to use a different topical anesthesia delivery system if available on the market?Maybe52.3%46.1%0.38
No10.5%15.7%
Yes37.2%38.2%
How long do you wait to inject after applying a topical anesthetic?10 s or less19.8%10.8%0.09
11–20 s20.3%14.7%
21–30 s16.3%20.6%
31–60 s23.8%23.5%
61 s or more19.8%30.4%
Do you think that topical anesthetics are effective when used before the injection of local anesthesia?Adequate20.9%19.6%0.55
Effective41.3%34.3%
Ineffective2.3%1.0%
Poor4.7%5.9%
Very effective30.8%39.2%
What do your patients most complain about regarding the topical anesthetic available on the market today?Burning sensation0.6%1.0%0.14
Color2.9%9.8%
Consistency2.9%4.9%
Never complain4.7%5.0%
Smell1.2%2.0%
Taste87.8%76.5%
How many of your patients experienced any drug side-effect to the topical anesthetic preparation in the last year?0%86.0%77.5%0.28
1–3%12.2%18.6%
4–6%0.6%2.0%
More than 7%1.2%2.0%
In your years of practice treating pediatric patients, approximately what percentage of the time do topical anesthetics work when applied prior to the local anesthetic injection?0%5.8%2.9%0.89
25%28.5%18.6%
50%22.1%22.5%
75%34.9%38.2%
100%8.7%17.6%
Table 6. Perceptions of topical anesthetics among Saudi dental practitioners based on occupation.
Table 6. Perceptions of topical anesthetics among Saudi dental practitioners based on occupation.
Questions ResponsesConsultantGeneral DentistSpecialistp-Value
How often do you use a topical anesthetic (gel, spray, liquid, etc.)?Always62.5%65.2%69.4%0.00 *
Never25.0%0.0%2.8%
Rarely0.0%7.4%2.8%
Sometimes12.5%27.4%25.0%
What form of topical anesthetic do you commonly use?Gel100.0%89.1%80.6%0.02 *
Liquid0.0%2.2%0.0%
Ointment0.0%0.9%0.0%
Spray0.0%7.8%19.4%
Patch0.0%0.0%0.0%
What kind of topical anesthetic agent do you commonly use?Benzocaine62.5%68.3%69.4%0.13
Compounded topical anesthetics12.5%13.0%8.3%
Lidocaine25.0%18.7%22.2%
What brand of topical anesthetic do you use?Avocaine spray0.0%0.4%0.0%0.01 *
benzojel0.0%0.4%0.0%
Gingicaine (gel, liquid, spray)0.0%4.3%5.6%
Hurricaine (gel, liquid, spray)50.0%14.3%5.6%
I do not know0.0%57.4%58.3%
Topex (gel, spray)0.0%3.9%8.3%
Topicale (gel, ointment, patch)50.0%19.1%22.2%
Would you like to use a different topical anesthesia delivery system if available on the market?Maybe0.0%53.5%38.9%0.01 *
No0.0%12.2%16.7%
Yes100.0%34.3%44.4%
How long do you wait to inject after applying a topical anesthetic?10 s or less0.0%17.8%11.1%0.00 *
11–20 s0.0%21.3%2.8%
21–30 s62.5%15.2%25.0%
31–60 s12.5%22.6%33.3%
61 s or more25.0%23.0%27.8%
Do you think that topical anesthetics are effective when used before the injection of local anesthesia?Adequate0.0%22.2%13.9%0.00 *
Effective25.0%40.4%30.6%
Ineffective0.0%0.9%8.3%
Poor0.0%3.9%13.9%
Very effective75.0%32.6%33.3%
What do your patients most complain about regarding the topical anesthetic available in the market today?Burning sensation12.5%0.4%0.0%0.35
Color0.0%5.7%5.6%
Consistency0.0%3.9%2.8%
Never complain0.0%5.6%5.6%
Sensation0.0%0.4%0.0%
Smell0.0%1.3%2.8%
Taste87.5%83.5%83.3%
How many of your patients experienced any drug side-effect to the topical anesthetic preparation in the last year?0%50.0%83.0%88.9%0.00 *
1–3%25.0%15.7%5.6%
4–6%0.0%0.4%5.6%
More than 7%25.0%0.9%0.0%
In your years of practice treating pediatric patients, approximately what percentage of the time do topical anesthetics work when applied prior to the local anesthetic injection?0%0.0%4.8%5.6%0.00 *
25%0.0%24.3%33.3%
50%50.0%23.0%11.1%
75%25.0%36.5%36.1%
100%25.0%11.3%13.9%
* Significant.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alanazi, F.S.; Alhazzaa, M.F.; Alosaimi, Y.M.; Alajaji, F.A.; Alanazi, A.S.; Alassaf, A.; Almulhim, B.; Alghamdi, S.A.; Mallineni, S.K. Preference of Dental Practitioners toward the Use of Local and Topical Anesthetics for Pediatric Patients in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Survey. Children 2021, 8, 978. https://doi.org/10.3390/children8110978

AMA Style

Alanazi FS, Alhazzaa MF, Alosaimi YM, Alajaji FA, Alanazi AS, Alassaf A, Almulhim B, Alghamdi SA, Mallineni SK. Preference of Dental Practitioners toward the Use of Local and Topical Anesthetics for Pediatric Patients in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Survey. Children. 2021; 8(11):978. https://doi.org/10.3390/children8110978

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alanazi, Fahad Shulaywih, Mohammed Fahad Alhazzaa, Yazeed Mohammed Alosaimi, Faisal Abdullah Alajaji, Atallah Shulaywih Alanazi, Abdullah Alassaf, Basim Almulhim, Sara Ayid Alghamdi, and Sreekanth Kumar Mallineni. 2021. "Preference of Dental Practitioners toward the Use of Local and Topical Anesthetics for Pediatric Patients in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Survey" Children 8, no. 11: 978. https://doi.org/10.3390/children8110978

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop