Next Article in Journal
Comparison of Surgical Outcomes of Laparoscopic Glue and Laparoscopic Suture Hernioplasty in Pediatric Female Inguinal Hernia
Next Article in Special Issue
Vitamin D and Parathyroid Hormone during Growth Hormone Treatment
Previous Article in Journal
Early and Innovative Rehabilitation in Warkany Syndrome 2 Associated with Agenesis of the Corpus Callosum: A Case Report
Previous Article in Special Issue
Perimenstrual Asthma in Adolescents: A Shared Condition in Pediatric and Gynecological Endocrinology
 
 
Case Report
Peer-Review Record

Early Diagnosis of Pseudohypoparathyroidism before the Development of Hypocalcemia in a Young Infant

Children 2022, 9(5), 723; https://doi.org/10.3390/children9050723
by Su Kyeong Hwang 1, Ye Jee Shim 2, Seung Hwan Oh 3 and Kyung Mi Jang 4,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Children 2022, 9(5), 723; https://doi.org/10.3390/children9050723
Submission received: 30 March 2022 / Revised: 10 May 2022 / Accepted: 11 May 2022 / Published: 15 May 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

In the manuscript " Early diagnosis of pseudohypoparathyroidism before developing hypocalcemia in a young infant and literature review", the authors present a case report along with a literature review of pseudohypoparathyroidism. The paper could have a clinical significance and an impact in the clinical practice. However, minor criticisms are present, as follows:

- The title should be changed to Early diagnosis of pseudohypoparathyroidism before developing hypocalcemia in a young infant, remove the literature review from the title, as the literature studies are not so many and in the discussion part we have to discuss the literature results. Thus this paper is not a literature review;

- Lines 28-29 from the abstract should be removed;

- Lines 65-66 from the introduction is a repetition;

 - A conclusions should be added in order to better highlight the point of the case report.

 

Author Response

Thank you for giving me the opportunity to submit a revised draft of my manuscript titled “Early diagnosis of pseudohypoparathyroidism before the development of hypocalcemia in a young infant” to Children. 

We really appreciate the kind evaluation of our manuscript.

Please see the attachment. Thank you. 

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Hwang et al. reported a girl diagnosed with PHP Ia when she had normal calcium, phosphorous, and PTH levels. The authors reviewed the literature regarding genetically confirmed PHP Ia before developing hypocalcemia in young infants, and described that the presented patient is the earliest diagnosed case of PHP before developing hypocalcemia.

AHO (obesity, round face, subcutaneous osteoma) in infancy can be a trigger to find it, but not many. Cases with increased TSH levels detected in neonatal mass screening have been  reported, yet few cases leading to the diagnosis of PHP. It is more common to find hypocalcemia after infancy (during febrile convulsions, etc.). In that sense, this is an important paper. However, the reviewer has some concerns.

Major comment 1
The authors described that the presented patient is the earliest diagnosed case of PHP before developing hypocalcemia. However, Sano et al. reported the patient diagnosed case of PHP before developing hypocalcemia at 1 month of age (J Endocr Soc. 2017 Nov 21;2(1):9-23. doi: 10.1210/js.2017-00293). Therefore, this patient is not the earliest diagnosed case of PHP before developing hypocalcemia. Furthermore, the authors need to cite this paper. 

Major comment 2
This patient with maternal GNAS mutation showed mild PHP phenotype and her mother with same mutation also had mild AHO features. The authors need to discuss about the mechanism of these mild phenotype.

Major comment 3
When she was referred to the authors for elevated TSH at one month of age, did you check her serum calcium level?

Author Response

Thank you for giving me the opportunity to submit a revised draft of my manuscript titled “Early diagnosis of pseudohypoparathyroidism before the development of hypocalcemia in a young infant” to Children. 

We really appreciate the kind evaluation of our manuscript. 

Please see the attchment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors responded appropriately to the reviewers' comments. We believe that this paper should be accepted.

Back to TopTop