Next Article in Journal
A Two-Population Extension of the Exponential Smoothing State Space Model with a Smoothing Penalisation Scheme
Next Article in Special Issue
Portfolio Construction by Using Different Risk Models: A Comparison among Diverse Economic Scenarios
Previous Article in Journal
A New Approach to Risk Attribution and Its Application in Credit Risk Analysis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

No-Arbitrage Principle in Conic Finance

Department of Mathematics, Western Michigan University, 1903 West Michigan Avenue, Kalamazoo, MI 49008, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Risks 2020, 8(2), 66; https://doi.org/10.3390/risks8020066
Submission received: 1 May 2020 / Revised: 8 June 2020 / Accepted: 9 June 2020 / Published: 19 June 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Portfolio Optimization, Risk and Factor Analysis)

Abstract

In a one price economy, the Fundamental Theorem of Asset Pricing (FTAP) establishes that no-arbitrage is equivalent to the existence of an equivalent martingale measure. Such an equivalent measure can be derived as the normal unit vector of the hyperplane that separates the attainable gain subspace and the convex cone representing arbitrage opportunities. However, in two-price financial models (where there is a bid–ask price spread), the set of attainable gains is not a subspace anymore. We use convex optimization, and the conic property of this region to characterize the “no-arbitrage” principle in financial models with the bid–ask price spread present. This characterization will lead us to the generation of a set of price factor random variables. Under such a set, we can find the lower and upper bounds (supper-hedging and sub-hedging bounds) for the price of any future cash flow. We will show that for any given cash flow, for which the price is outside the above range, we can build a trading strategy that provides one with an arbitrage opportunity. We will generalize this structure to any two-price finite-period financial model.
Keywords: conic finance; convex optimization; arbitrage pricing conic finance; convex optimization; arbitrage pricing

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Vazifedan, M.; Zhu, Q.J. No-Arbitrage Principle in Conic Finance. Risks 2020, 8, 66. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks8020066

AMA Style

Vazifedan M, Zhu QJ. No-Arbitrage Principle in Conic Finance. Risks. 2020; 8(2):66. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks8020066

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vazifedan, Mehdi, and Qiji Jim Zhu. 2020. "No-Arbitrage Principle in Conic Finance" Risks 8, no. 2: 66. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks8020066

APA Style

Vazifedan, M., & Zhu, Q. J. (2020). No-Arbitrage Principle in Conic Finance. Risks, 8(2), 66. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks8020066

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop