Next Article in Journal
Effect of Spray Parameters on Electrical Characteristics of Printed Layer by Morphological Study
Previous Article in Journal
Review of Particle Filters for Internal Combustion Engines
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Sparger Characteristics on Bubble-Formation Dynamics under Oscillatory Air Pattern

1
School of Chemical Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China
2
Henan Province Industrial Technology Research Institute of Resources and Materials, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2022, 10(5), 997; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10050997
Submission received: 24 April 2022 / Revised: 13 May 2022 / Accepted: 16 May 2022 / Published: 18 May 2022

Abstract

:
The size of bubbles generated from a porous sparger is at least an order of magnitude larger than the pore diameter under the steady air pattern. Recent studies have shown that the bubble size can be significantly reduced when the steady air flow is replaced by an oscillatory pattern. However, the effectiveness of oscillatory air flow on reducing bubble size under different sparger characteristics is yet to be studied. This work fundamentally investigates the response of bubble size to sparger characteristics under an oscillatory air pattern by segregating the bubble formation subprocesses into bubble detachment and consequent coalescence. The results show that bubble size significantly decreased with hydrophilic plates regardless of contact angle, owing to depressed coalescence, while no impact was observed for a hydrophobic plate. The influence of the oscillatory air pattern on decreasing bubble size was weakened as the chamber volume was increased, and above a critical volume the bubble-formation process became similar with that under a steady air pattern. An optimum plate thickness was obtained for bubble generation by avoiding weeping, and meanwhile taking full advantage of the momentum force by the oscillatory airflow. The outcomes show that the oscillatory air pattern in determining bubble formation closely depends on the sparger characteristics, which should be appropriately determined.

1. Introduction

Microbubbles have been involved in many different physical and chemical industrial applications, including chemical mixing, froth flotation and the petrochemical industry [1,2,3,4,5]. Bubble size is of great importance since it determines the contact surface area for mass and heat transfer and thus influences process efficiency [6,7].
In industrial applications where two-phase flow is of great importance, spargers are usually used to produce and disperse bubbles efficiently in multiphase reactors or contacting devices. Different types of spargers have been designed, including ring-type distributors, perforated plates, porous membranes, and multiple-arm spargers [1,8,9,10], among which plate spargers with porous materials are often used owing to the simplicity of construction, reasonable price and high efficiency [11]. However, bubbles are usually formed at a size that is an order of ten times or more larger than the orifice diameter with a steady air pattern, which greatly hinders its industrial application. Recent studies have shown that changing air pattern from steady-state to oscillatory-state could be a cost-effective method for producing microbubbles [12,13]. Oscillatory air patterns lead to small bubbles by driving the bubbles breaking off from the orifice plate at an earlier stage and depressing bubble coalescence after the first bubble is detached from the orifice [12,14,15].
Bubble size for a porous plate is also determined by the sparger geometry [16,17]. In general, bubble size under a steady air pattern is closely related to the sparger geometrical characteristics, such as pore size [18,19], plate thickness [20], plate wettability condition [21] and chamber volume [22]. A preliminary study has been conducted to investigate the configuration influence of a multiorifice sparger on bubble size under an oscillatory air pattern. The sparger geometrical characteristics investigated included chamber volume, orifice size and plate thickness [23]. It was reported that the bubble size was positively correlated with the chamber volume and the orifice size, but a nonlinear relationship was observed between the bubble size and the plate thickness. However, the mechanism for the dependence of bubble-formation dynamics on sparger geometry under an oscillatory air pattern was not discussed.
Bubble formation from an orifice is ultimately determined by two subprocesses, including bubble detachment and coalescence. The present work aims to describe in detail the bubble-formation dynamics under an oscillatory air pattern by varying the sparger geometry. After careful consideration of which parameters affect the bubble-formation dynamics, three parameters were chosen for study: plate wettability, chamber volume and plate thickness. The underlying mechanisms for the change of bubble-formation subprocesses were also discussed. It is believed that the outcomes of this work could facilitate bubble generation when bubble size is crucial for determining process efficiency.

2. Experimental Setup and Methods

2.1. Materials and Experimental Setup

Methyl isobutyl methanol (Aladdin, Shanghai, China) was used as a frother. Deionized water was used throughout the work. The porous plates were purchased from the Ruipu metal material, China. The plate thickness was measured using a micrometer with a standard error of 0.01 mm. Anhydrous ethanol and acetone (Tianjin Damao Chemical Reagent Factory, Tianjin, China) were ultrasonically used to clean stainless-steel plate surfaces. Sulfuric acid, stearic acid, potassium permanganate and potassium dichromate (Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) were used to modify the plate wettability. The static contact angle for each plate was measured using the sessile drop method.
The porous sparger is shown in Figure 1. The subprocesses of bubble formation were observed through the transparent box made of acrylic material and the box dimension was as follows: length 10 cm, height 15 cm and width 3 cm. The observation box was divided into three sections: the two side chambers and the middle part. A single-orifice stainless-steel plate (length of 2 cm) with a pore diameter of 60 μm was placed in the middle part to observe the formation of bubbles. The two side chambers were equipped with porous stainless-steel plates with the same pore size. The side chambers were designed to divert some airflow from the middle plate to avoid jetting flow during bubble formation. An air chamber with a length of 9.5 cm and a width of 2.5 cm was positioned below the porous plate. The height of the air chamber can be adjusted to vary its volume. Oscillatory air supplies were provided by a high-frequency solenoid valve (MHE2, Festo, Esslingen, Germany). Air was introduced to the sparger when the valve was on and was cut off when the solenoid valve was off. A high-speed dynamic system (FASTCAM MINI UX, Tokyo, Japan), used to capture bubble-formation microprocess, was placed vertically in the middle of the observation chamber at a distance of 300 mm. The illuminated equipment was a halogen lamp. The obtained images of bubbles were processed and analyzed using the image-processing software ImageJ. Bubble size was characterized by the Sauter mean bubble diameter.
The monitoring device for air pressure consisted of three parts: a pitot tube (Dwyer Instruments, Michigan City, IN, USA) was used to transfer the air into the pressure transducer. A pressure transducer supplied by Conasen in China was used to measure the air-pressure change and a data-acquisition device produced by Heng kai in China was used to record and present the pressure change in the digital form of different voltage valves. The wettability (i.e., contact angle) of the plate surface was measured using a contact-angle measurement instrument (Biolin Scientific, Gothenburg, Sweden).

2.2. Experimental Procedure

The MIBC solution with a concentration of 50 ppm was added to the observation chamber to reach the liquid height of 5 cm. Note that the MIBC concentration exceeded its critical coalescence concentration to reduce the occurrence of bubble coalescence after formation [24]. The liquid level was maintained the same for the three parts of the viewing chamber to reduce the experimental deviation of bubble formation caused by the hydraulic-pressure differentiation. Then, the oscillatory frequency and on/off time ratio were set at 60 Hz and 0.2, respectively. The airflow volume and gas pressure were kept at 1.5 L·min−1 and 0.2 MPa, separately. When the experimental device reached a steady status, the high-speed camera began capturing the bubble formation microprocesses at a shooting speed of 4000 fps. The sparger with the required plate wettability and thickness was placed in position before air was supplied, and the chamber volume was adjusted as required.
The measured voltage signals by the pressure transmitter were converted to the air-pressure values. The conversion of voltage to pressure can be seen elsewhere [12]. The relationship of voltage value and air pressure was as follows:
U = 7.23 P
where U is the symbol of the voltage valve (V); P is the symbol of air pressure (MPa).

3. Results and Discussion

To fully study the influence of sparger configuration on bubble generation, the bubble-forming dynamics from an orifice were divided into two parts: the bubble detaching from the orifice, as well as the bubble coalescence between the leading and the successive bubbles after detachment. The characteristics of each part with different sparger configurations under an oscillatory air pattern were studied.

3.1. Plate Surface Wettability

To study the effect of surface wettability on bubble formation, a plate was selected with an orifice size of 60 μm and a thickness of 0.05 mm. The chamber volume was set at 5 mL. Figure 2 shows the spreading of a water drop on the plates with different wettability. The wettability was characterized by the contact angle. The plate hydrophobicity increased over the contact angle. As shown in Figure 2, the surface wettability varied from super-hydrophilic to hydrophobic with contact angles of 3.58°, 49.44°, 75.66° and 116.52°, respectively.
Figure 3b shows the bubble size of the first and final bubbles with the increase in contact angle under an oscillatory air pattern. The bubble-formation process under a steady air pattern is plotted in Figure 3a for comparison. Figure 3b reveals that switching air patterns from a steady state to an oscillatory state could significantly decrease bubble size, but the plate wettability exhibited little impact on bubble formation when the contact angle was less than 90°. More specifically, the size of the first bubble increased from 658 μm at 3.58° to 673 μm at 75.66° (an increase of only 2.28%) under a steady air state and remained constant under the oscillatory air state. The final bubble size increased by 10.43% for the steady air pattern, while it increased by only 3.71% under the oscillatory air pattern. The number of coalesced bubbles increased from 19 to 22 (a 15.79% increase) under a steady air pattern, while it remained constant under an oscillatory air pattern. Differently, the hydrophobic plate surface exhibited a different effect on bubble formation. According to Figure 3, bubble coalescence was completely depressed when the contact angle increased to 116.51°, regardless of the air pattern. The size of the first bubble sharply increased to 3851 μm and 3824 μm for steady and oscillatory air states, respectively. The result implies that oscillatory air patterns cannot effectively decrease bubble size when hydrophobic media is used for bubble formation.
To further study the influence of plate wettability on bubble formation under an oscillatory air state, Figure 4 presents the contact rims of bubbles at the hydrophilic and hydrophobic plate surfaces, respectively. The diameter of the contact rim was equal to the orifice diameter for the hydrophilic surface, while it was much larger than that for the hydrophobic surface. It is expected that the reinforced momentum force caused by the oscillatory air pattern would overwhelm the adhesive force resulting from the plate for the hydrophilic surface and drive bubbles to detach with a high velocity. The first bubble would have ascended away when the successive bubbles were formed and thus eliminate bubble coalescence. In contrast, the momentum force was offset by the increased adhesive force resulting from the enlarged contact rim for the hydrophobic surface [21,25]. Therefore, the first bubble detached from the orifice with a low velocity and the successive bubbles could catch up and coalesce with it. The results show that a hydrophilic plate needs to be selected for the bubble formation under an oscillatory air state.

3.2. Chamber Volume

Figure 5 shows the influence of the chamber volume on the bubble size and the number of coalesced trailing bubbles under different air patterns. The orifice diameter was set at 60 μm and the plate thickness remained at 0.05 mm. The air-chamber volume was varied at 5 mL, 12 mL, 33 mL, 55 mL, 142 mL, 470 mL and 492 mL, respectively. Again, the bubble-formation process as a function of chamber volume under a steady air state is also presented in Figure 5a for comparison.
Figure 5b reveals that the chamber volume exhibited a significant effect on bubble formation under an oscillatory air pattern. The first bubble size increased from 579 μm to 688 μm (an 18.8% increase) as the chamber volume was enlarged from 5 mL to 492 mL. Differently, the first bubble size was much bigger but experienced a small increase from 673 μm to 698 μm (i.e., a 3.7% increase) under a steady air state, as shown in Figure 5a. In contrast, the final bubble size increased from 933 μm to 1725 μm (an 84.9% increase) over increasing chamber volume under an oscillatory air pattern, while it increased from 1472 μm to 1618 μm (i.e., a 9.9% increase) under a steady air pattern. Similarly, it was observed that the increase in the number of coalesced trailing bubbles fell in the same trend with the final bubble size. The number of coalesced trailing bubbles increased from 4 for the chamber volume of 5 mL to 22 for the chamber volume of 492 mL (i.e., 4.5 times) under the oscillatory air pattern, showing that the bubble coalescence was the main cause for the increased bubble diameter. Note that the difference in bubble size between oscillatory and steady air supplies progressively decreased when the chamber volume increased to 470 mL, above which no difference was observed. The result indicates that the effect of the oscillatory air pattern on decreasing bubble size weakens as the chamber volume increases. Above a critical volume, the oscillatory air state functions similar to the steady air state in determining bubble size.
The flow status of air entering the orifice can be divided into three types as the chamber volume increases, according to the dimensionless capacitance number Nc: constant flow region (Nc < 1), transition region (1 < Nc < 10) and constant pressure region (Nc > 10) [26].
Nc =   4 g ρ g V c π d 0 2 P C
where ρ g is the symbol of the air density (kg·m−3), Vc is the symbol of the air chamber volume (L), d0 is the symbol of the diameter of an orifice (m), g is the symbol of the gravity acceleration (m·s−2) and P c is the symbol of the air-supplied gage pressure to the chamber (MPa).
It was calculated that under the current configuration, the critical chamber volume for a constant flow condition was 44.67 mL. The pressure became constant when the chamber volume was above 446.7 mL. In a volume within this range existed an intermediate flow status. For the constant flow condition in a small chamber, the flow status of gas exiting the air chamber (i.e., introduced into a bubble) is the same as that of air introduced into the air chamber. As shown in Figure 6a, air pressure at the orifice exit varied simultaneously over the air pattern and the peak pressure was far greater than that under a steady air pattern. Hence, the extra lifting force generated by the oscillatory airflow drove bubbles to detach from the orifice exit at an earlier stage. More importantly, the intensified momentum force pushed bubbles to detach with a high velocity. The high rising velocity eliminated the successive bubbles to catch up and coalesce; for the intermediate condition, the flow pattern of air exiting the chamber did not necessarily become synchronous to that of air introduced into the chamber; further enlarging the chamber would reach a constant pressure condition (as shown in Figure 6b). The large chamber imposed a cushioning effect on the airflow pattern and the pressure at the orifice exit became constant, which coincided with that under a steady air state. Therefore, the detached bubble had a low velocity due to the weakened momentum force because of the bigger air chamber. The low rising velocity enabled the successive bubbles to catch up and coalesce, which resulted in a bigger final bubble size.
In summary, the chamber volume could impose a significant impact on bubble formation by affecting the airflow pattern at the orifice outlet. Under an oscillatory air pattern, the air pressure varies with a periodic fluctuation [27] and its amplitude declines with the increase in gas chamber volume, which dramatically influences bubble detachment and coalescence. Therefore, to take advantage of the increased momentum force originating from the oscillatory air pattern, it is necessary to maintain the small chamber volume when microbubbles are required.

3.3. Plate Thickness

The effect of plate thickness on the process of bubble formation is presented in Figure 7. In these tests, the plate thickness was set at 0.01 mm, 0.05 mm, 0.1 mm and 0.2 mm, respectively. The orifice size was 60 μm, the chamber volume was maintained at 5 mL, and the oscillatory frequency and on/off time ratio were kept at 60 Hz and 0.2, respectively.
As shown in Figure 7, the size of the first bubble experienced little difference over increasing the plate thickness, varying from 699 μm at a thickness of 0.01 mm to 656 μm at a thickness of 0.2 mm (a decrease of 6.15%). A nonlinear correlation existed between the final bubble size and the plate thickness. The smallest final bubble size was 927 μm obtained at a plate thickness of 0.05 mm. Note that the number of coalesced trailing bubbles shows the same trend as the final bubble size, indicating that the plate thickness mainly influenced the bubble coalescence.
Figure 8 schematically shows the effect of plate thickness on the weeping under an oscillatory air pattern. For a thinner plate (e.g., 0.01 mm), the weeping phenomenon could appear when the airflow was shut down as the channel resistance is weak and could not hold the hydraulic pressure in the channel. The weeping liquid can lead to severe plugging in orifices [28], and a larger lifting force is needed in order to overcome the capillary pressure of the liquid column in the channel (see Figure 8a). Hence, the momentum force is dissipated and bubbles detach from the orifice at a low velocity. The successive bubble can reach and coalesce with the former, resulting in a bigger bubble size. As shown in Figure 8b, the capillary resistance increases as the plate thickness increases, which retards the downward liquid flow inside the orifice channel and avoids the occurrence of the weeping phenomenon [29]. Meanwhile, the increased capillary resistance can also weaken the lifting force resulting from the oscillatory air pattern. Similarly, bubbles detach at a low velocity, which causes more bubble coalescence. Therefore, an orifice plate of appropriate thickness should be selected to avoid the weeping while minimizing the energy dissipation of the oscillatory air pattern imposed by the channel resistance.

4. Conclusions

In the present work, the effect of sparger characteristics on bubble formation under an oscillatory air pattern was investigated, including the wetting condition, chamber volume and plate thickness. The main outcomes are given below:
  • An oscillatory air pattern could significantly decrease bubble size when a hydrophilic plate was used. However, its influence on bubble formation was offset by the increased restraining force resulting from the enlarged contact rim of bubbles with the plate when a hydrophobic surface was applied.
  • Bubble size and the number of coalesced trailing bubbles were positively related to the chamber volume under an oscillatory air state. A small chamber volume was preferred to maintain a constant flow condition to fully use the enhanced momentum force for bubble detachment.
  • A nonlinear relationship existed between the plate thickness and the bubble size. An appropriate thickness could not only avoid the weeping phenomenon but also reduce energy dissipation caused by capillary resistance. Therefore, the suitable plate thickness should be selected under an oscillatory air pattern.
The outcomes of this study revealed that the sparger characteristics could impose significant effects on the bubble-formation dynamics under oscillatory air supply. The sparger geometry should be properly designed to obtain the desired bubble size under oscillatory air supply.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.L.; methodology, A.S.; data curation, A.S. and S.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, A.S.; writing—review and editing, C.L.; supervision, Y.C.; funding acquisition, C.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Financial supports for this study, provided by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52004248), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2019M652580, 2021T140617), National key research and development program (2020YFC1908800), Key R&D and promotion program in Henan Province (212102310011), are gratefully appreciated.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Khalili, F.; Nasr, M.R.J.; Kazemzadeh, A.; Ein-Mozaffari, F. Analysis of gas holdup and bubble behavior in a biopolymer solution inside a bioreactor using tomography and dynamic gas disengagement techniques. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2018, 93, 340–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Maske, S.K.; Rai, D.S.; Kale, V.S.; Raut, B.D.; Chintale, G.A. Microbubble and its applications. Int. J. Pharm. Life Sci. 2012, 3, 2228–2235. [Google Scholar]
  3. Zhou, F.; Wang, L.; Xu, Z.; Ruan, Y.; Chi, R. A study on novel reactive oily bubble technology enhanced collophane flotation. Int. J. Miner. Process. 2017, 169, 85–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Li, C.; Wang, L. Improved froth zone and collection zone recoveries of fine mineral particles in a flotation column with oscillatory air supply. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2018, 193, 311–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Li, C.; Dong, L.; Wang, L. Improvement of flotation recovery using oscillatory air supply. Miner. Eng. 2019, 131, 321–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cao, B.; Fan, J.; Sun, X.; Li, S. Numerical Simulation of Mass-Transfer Characteristics of a Bubble Rising in Yield Stress Fluids. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 13878–13885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Jamialahmadi, M.; Zehtaban, M.R.; Müller-Steinhagen, H.; Sarrafi, A.; Smith, J.M. Study of Bubble Formation under Constant Flow Conditions. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2001, 79, 523–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Peng, W.L.; Yang, G.Q.; Fan, L.S. Experimental studies of liquid weeping and bubbling phenomena at submerged orifices. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2002, 41, 1666–1677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kulkarni, A.A. Effect of Sparger Design on the Local Flow Field in a Bubble Column. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2005, 83, 59–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Thorat, B.N.; Kulkarni, A.V.; Joshi, J.B. Design of sieve plate spargers for bubble columns: Role of weeping. Chem. Eng. Technol. 2001, 24, 815–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Shi, H.; Jiang, H.; Liu, Y.; Chen, R. Bubble dynamics and mass transfer characteristics from an immersed orifice plate. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2020, 95, 1729–1738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Song, A.; Ji, Y.; Li, C.; Cao, Y. Modeling and validation of the momentum force for bubble formation from submerged orifices with an oscillatory air supply. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2021, 233, 116387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zimmerman, W.B.; Tesar, V.; Butler, S.; Bandulasena, H.H. Microbubble generation. Recent Pat. Eng. 2008, 2, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Tesař, V. Microbubble smallness limited by conjunctions. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 231, 526–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Song, A.; Zhao, S.; Li, C.; Cao, Y. A Quantitative Study on the Decreased Diameter of Bubbles Generated from a Submerged Orifice with an Oscillatory Air Supply. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2022, 61, 3113–3122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kulkarni, A.V.; Badgandi, S.V.; Joshi, J.B. Design of ring and spider type spargers for bubble column reactor: Experimental measurements and CFD simulation of flow and weeping. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2009, 87, 1612–1630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Xing, X.; Zhang, C.; Jiang, B.; Sun, Y.; Zhang, L.; Briens, C. Numerical study of the effect of the inlet gas distributor on the bubble distribution in a bubbling fluidized bed. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2022, 177, 70–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bari, S.D.; Robinson, A.J. Experimental study of gas injected bubble growth from submerged orifices. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 2013, 44, 124–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Bae, K.; Kim, J.Y.; Go, K.S.; Nho, N.S.; Kim, D.; Bae, J.W.; Lee, D. Effect of distributor type on microbubble dispersion in a pressurized bubble column. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2021, 174, 188–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Stanovsky, P.; Ruzicka, M.C.; Martins, A.; Teixeira, J.A. Meniscus dynamics in bubble formation: A parametric study. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2011, 66, 3258–3267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Corchero, G.; Medina, A.; Higuera, F.J. Effect of wetting conditions and flow rate on bubble formation at orifices submerged in water. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2006, 290, 41–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Gokhale, O.S.; Jog, M.A.; Manglik, R.M. Experimental study of chamber volume effect on bubble formation from orifice plates submerged in water. Int. Mech. Eng. Congr. Expo. 2018, 9, 9–15. [Google Scholar]
  23. Ji, Y.; Song, A.; Li, C.; Cao, Y. Role of Sparger Configuration in Determining Flotation Performance under Oscillatory Air Supply. Processes 2021, 9, 638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Gourram-Badri, F.; Conil, G.M.P. Measurements of selectivity due to coalescence between two mineralized bubbles and characterization of MIBC action on froth flotation. Int. J. Miner. Process. 1997, 51, 197–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yu, X.X.; Wang, Y.W.; Huang, C.G.; Du, T.Z. Three stages of bubble formation on submerged orifice under constant gas flow rate. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2015, 656, 012042–012045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wen, J.; Sun, Q.; Sun, Z.; Gu, H. The effect of multi-orifice plate configuration on bubble detachment volume. Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 2019, 27, 72–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Fan, W.; Yin, X. Bubble formation in shear-thinning fluids: Laser image measurement and a novel correlation for detached volume. Chem. Ind. Chem. Eng. Q. 2017, 23, 301–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhang, W.X.; Tan, R.B.H. Bubble emission frequency and weeping rate at a submerged orifice with bulk liquid flow. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 2003, 81, 465–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wen, J.; Tian, R.; Tan, S.; Sun, Q.; Gu, H. The weeping characteristic of submerged multi-orifice plate. Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 2020, 28, 955–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. A schematic of the experimental setup.
Figure 1. A schematic of the experimental setup.
Processes 10 00997 g001
Figure 2. Shapes of water droplets and contact angle on modified stainless steels with different wettability.
Figure 2. Shapes of water droplets and contact angle on modified stainless steels with different wettability.
Processes 10 00997 g002
Figure 3. The bubble size and number of coalesced trailing bubbles under steady air pattern (a) and oscillatory air pattern (b).
Figure 3. The bubble size and number of coalesced trailing bubbles under steady air pattern (a) and oscillatory air pattern (b).
Processes 10 00997 g003
Figure 4. Comparison of contact rims of bubbles for a hydrophilic surface (contact angle: 3.58°) and a hydrophobic surface (contact angle: 116.52°).
Figure 4. Comparison of contact rims of bubbles for a hydrophilic surface (contact angle: 3.58°) and a hydrophobic surface (contact angle: 116.52°).
Processes 10 00997 g004
Figure 5. Effects of chamber volume on bubble formation under steady air pattern (a) and oscillatory air pattern (b).
Figure 5. Effects of chamber volume on bubble formation under steady air pattern (a) and oscillatory air pattern (b).
Processes 10 00997 g005
Figure 6. Air pressure at the orifice outlet for different chamber volumes with steady (a) and oscillatory (b) air patterns.
Figure 6. Air pressure at the orifice outlet for different chamber volumes with steady (a) and oscillatory (b) air patterns.
Processes 10 00997 g006
Figure 7. Effects of plate thickness on bubble size and number of coalesced trailing bubbles under oscillatory air pattern.
Figure 7. Effects of plate thickness on bubble size and number of coalesced trailing bubbles under oscillatory air pattern.
Processes 10 00997 g007
Figure 8. Schematic diagram of the effect of plate thickness on liquid movement when shutting off air supply.
Figure 8. Schematic diagram of the effect of plate thickness on liquid movement when shutting off air supply.
Processes 10 00997 g008
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Song, A.; Zhao, S.; Cao, Y.; Li, C. Effect of Sparger Characteristics on Bubble-Formation Dynamics under Oscillatory Air Pattern. Processes 2022, 10, 997. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10050997

AMA Style

Song A, Zhao S, Cao Y, Li C. Effect of Sparger Characteristics on Bubble-Formation Dynamics under Oscillatory Air Pattern. Processes. 2022; 10(5):997. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10050997

Chicago/Turabian Style

Song, Ajuan, Sijia Zhao, Yijun Cao, and Chao Li. 2022. "Effect of Sparger Characteristics on Bubble-Formation Dynamics under Oscillatory Air Pattern" Processes 10, no. 5: 997. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10050997

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop