Next Article in Journal
Investigation of Gas-Liquid Mass Transfer in the Fuel Scrubbing Inerting Process Using Mixed Inert Gas
Previous Article in Journal
Performance Evaluation of CO2 + SiCl4 Binary Mixture in Recompression Brayton Cycle for Warm Climates
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Population Composition, Physiology and Ecology of Filamentous Bacteria in Activated Sludge

by
Shang Gao
1,
Wenbo Pan
2,
Lu Niu
2,
Hai Lu
2 and
Xiaoling Wang
2,*
1
Changchun Dize Engineering Consulting Co., Ltd., Changchun 130012, China
2
Key Laboratory of Songliao Aquatic Environment, Ministry of Education, Jilin Jianzhu University, Changchun 130118, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2024, 12(10), 2156; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12102156
Submission received: 12 August 2024 / Revised: 25 September 2024 / Accepted: 27 September 2024 / Published: 3 October 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Waste-Activated Sludge Treatment)

Abstract

:
Filamentous bacteria are one of the main components of activated sludge microorganisms, which not only support flocculent bacteria in forming sludge flocs but also easily lead to sludge bulking. This article summarizes the high-throughput sequencing technology and database construction that integrates the FISH probe and 16s rRNA gene of filamentous bacteria. The detection frequency and abundance were statistically analyzed to determine the core filamentous bacteria. The filamentous bacteria searchable in the NCBI database belong to six phyla and 42 genera, with a total of 94 species. The core filamentous bacteria in the expanded activated sludge include Microthrix parvicella (M. parvicella), type 0092, Mycobacterium fortuitum, etc. The physiological ecology of the core filamentous bacteria is discussed in detail, aiming to establish targeted sludge expansion control strategies, reduce the incidence and harm of sludge expansion, and propose that future research needs to promote further development in the field of environmental microbiology.

1. Introduction

In 1914, the British Arden and Lockett [1] first introduced the concept of activated sludge and developed a process thereof. This method is suitable for various wastewater quality levels, has flexible and diverse operation modes, has high pollutant removal efficiency, has low operation cost, and has strong controllability. It is the most widely used biological wastewater treatment technology at present. Similar to soil and sediment, activated sludge is a highly complex system composed of bacteria, archaea, eukaryotes (protozoa and fungi) and viruses, with bacteria dominating and existing in the form of bacterial micelles [2,3]. From a morphological perspective, fungal flocs comprise flocculent and filamentous bacteria. For activated sludge systems, filamentous bacteria play a crucial role. They not only contribute to wastewater purification through biochemical processes, thanks to their larger specific surface area and greater capacity to absorb low-concentration pollutants than flocculent bacteria, but also serve as a supporting skeleton. In this physical role, filamentous bacteria and flocculent bacteria act as “bone and meat”, with the latter attaching to the “skeleton” with extracellular polymers such as pectin and polysaccharides [4,5,6].
According to the process flow of the activated sludge method, the concentrated sludge in the secondary sedimentation tank is returned to the biochemical tank through the external circulation system, and its concentration determines the amount of sludge in the biochemical tank. However, filamentous bacteria grow and reproduce excessively, and the mycelium extends beyond the surface of the sludge. In that case, it will cause loose flocs and the deterioration of sedimentation performance, resulting in filamentous sludge bulking [7,8,9,10], and the concentration of returned sludge decreases, ultimately affecting the effectiveness of sewage treatment. There are many species and a large number of filamentous bacteria which have low requirements for environmental conditions and strong adaptability. Due to their high frequency and harm to sludge bulking, they are one of the common operational difficulties in sewage treatment plants [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23]. Eikelboom took the lead in carrying out pioneering and groundbreaking research on filamentous bulking and foam bacteria classification in 1975 [24]. So far, research has preliminarily shown the species of filamentous bacteria, the process and mechanism of sludge bulking, influencing factors and control strategies [25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34]. Although a certain research foundation has been accumulated, the incidence of sludge bulking remains high and recurrent. Therefore, conducting a comprehensive review of filamentous bacteria in all existing sewage treatment plants is necessary.
This review integrates the existing literature on filamentous bacteria identification methods, population composition and physiological ecology. It comprehensively summarizes recent filamentous bacteria identification methods, including a detailed summary of FISH probes, high-throughput sequencing of 16s rRNA genes and database construction. For the first time, it comprehensively analyzes the detection frequency and abundance of filamentous bacteria in sewage treatment plants in different countries, regions and cities around the world and determines core filamentous bacteria based on this. It also analyzes and summarizes physiological ecology, providing references for developing effective sludge-swelling control strategies and filling the knowledge gap related to filamentous bacteria in the field of environmental microbiology.

2. Detection and Identification of Filamentous Bacteria

In the early stages of research, filamentous bacteria were identified and classified through morphology and chemical staining, and physiological ecology was studied using bacterial pure-culture techniques. However, these methods had their limitations. For instance, in 2000, Eikelboom et al. established a manual for identifying filamentous bacteria, which required extensive experience and had low sensitivity. Detecting filamentous bacteria inside flocs was particularly challenging, leading to unreliable identification results. The use of pure cultivation of filamentous bacteria also had its drawbacks, as the data obtained from the study were not easily generalizable to large-scale environments. It could not accurately depict the actual population biodiversity, and individual conclusions obtained may be contrary to in situ monitoring. Moreover, with the help of the filamentous bacteria identification manual, the number of identifiable filamentous bacteria is limited, and there are relatively few types of filamentous bacteria that can be isolated and cultured. In summary, traditional methods have severe shortcomings in revealing the accurate level of filamentous bacterial biodiversity. Since the beginning of this century, molecular biology methods that do not rely on pure cultivation have been introduced into the study of activated sludge microorganisms; notably, FISH technology with rRNA-directed oligonucleotides and high-throughput sequencing technology have revealed many previously unclassified taxa, improving the reliability of primary data and, more importantly, significantly enhancing the ability to distinguish bacteria and archaea. The species and quantities of filamentous bacteria detected have also increased, overcoming these challenges and providing more accurate results [35,36,37,38,39,40]. FISH and high-throughput sequencing technology can simultaneously detect multiple filamentous bacteria and determine their relative abundance. Based on this analysis, they can analyze the population structure and succession rules of filamentous bacteria in the sample and confirm the dominant filamentous bacteria. Combined with physiological ecology, the factors causing sludge swelling can be identified, providing a basis for targeted measures to be formulated.

2.1. Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) Technology

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) technology is intuitive, highly specific and sensitive. It does not require extraction and amplification of microbial Deoxyribo Nucleic Acid (DNA), which can avoid systematic errors and has unique advantages in identifying microorganisms [41,42]. The Probe Base provides detailed information on most filamentous bacterial probes, and for filamentous bacteria with known phylogenetics, targeted probes are selected based on evaluation results. Figure 1 summarizes the important known filamentous bacteria and their targeted probes for phylogenetics in the literature (indicated by the text on the horizontal line) [28,43,44,45,46]. Most filamentous bacteria can be directly identified, such as M. parvicella (MPAMIX probe); however, some filamentous bacteria need to be identified using a classification method. For example, when identifying filamentous bacteria of type 0092 in the species Chlorothallus, the universal probe CFXMIX needs to be used first, followed by the species-specific probes CLX197 or CLX221. Due to the lack of rRNA sequence data required for targeted probe design, FISH currently cannot recognize all filamentous bacteria, such as type 0803. Each probe is used to capture digital images under a microscope, which are then analyzed using ImageJ software to determine the biological volume of bacteria based on the pixel area of specific probe-positive cells [47]. The EUBmix probe measures the abundance of whole bacteria, while the abundance of filamentous bacteria is expressed as the percentage of specific probe-positive cell pixel area to the total bacterial-positive cell pixel area. During the measurement process, several images are extracted, and the average value is calculated to improve the accuracy of the results and avoid randomness.

2.2. High-Throughput Sequencing (HTS) and Filamentous Bacteria Database

HTS technology has been used to analyze detailed information on microbial community structures such as seawater, soil, human hand surfaces, remote human intestines and activated sludge. The unprecedented sequencing depth has shown overwhelming advantages in analyzing complex bacterial communities [48,49,50,51,52,53,54]. Especially with a detection limit of about 0.01%, the benefit of analyzing sub-dominant groups with abundance ranging from 0.01% to 1% is significant. When identifying filamentous bacteria, the 16S ribosomal RNA (16S rRNA) gene was amplified using universal primers for archaea or bacterial primers, and the amplified product was sequenced on the Illumina Miseq platform. The commonly used primers and amplification conditions are shown in Table 1.
Based on the amplification of the 16S rRNA gene and high-throughput sequencing results, a summary of 94 important filamentous bacteria belonging to 42 genera and six phyla that are widely present in sewage treatment plants and can be retrieved from the NCBI database [43,44,45] has been presented. Figure 1 shows the systematic development of important filamentous bacteria and the retrieval sequence of representative bacterial species. The filamentous bacteria and their related sequences are shown in Figure 1. When retrieving annotations, the e-value is set to 1 × 10−60, and the minimum similarity between the reference and query sequences is about 87%. For each annotated sequence, only list the closest reference sequence and filter the results: (1) remove results with similarity less than 95% (if identified by FISH probe, set to 90%); (2) delete pyrotags with more than two bases uncovered (i.e., 200 bp pyrotags with query coverage less than 99%) [62,63]. The abundance calculation formula is as follows (Formula (1)):
Filamentous   bacteria   abundance = N N T × 100 %
Note the following:
  • N—the number of annotated filamentous bacterial sequences under different truncation values (100%, 99%, 97%, etc.);
  • NT—total number of sample sequences.
In addition, to annotate and identify filamentous bacteria in activated sludge, Feng Guo et al. summarized literature reports and selected filamentous bacteria reference sequences from the NCBI database to establish a 16S rRNA gene database containing 22 strains of expansive bacteria and 5 strains of foaming bacteria [62]. In 2020, Bing Bing Li et al. updated it [63], an update which is currently widely used.

3. Total Abundance and Population Structure of Filamentous Bacteria in Activated Sludge

3.1. Filamentous Bacteria in Typical Activated Sludge

Filamentous bacteria are natural members of the activated sludge microbial community, and their total abundance value is closely related to sludge settling performance, making them the leading indicator of the filamentous bacterial community. According to research results for synchronous nitrogen and phosphorus removal wastewater treatment plants, the total abundance range of filamentous bacteria in activated sludge with average settling performance (sludge volume index (SVI) value is less than 120 mL/g) is 1–9%, and the spatial and geographical distribution pattern is not apparent, with little correlation with latitude location, human social activities, etc. [11,43,50,51,56,62,63].
In the activated sludge system, filamentous mycelium act as a “skeleton”. Other functional microorganisms, such as common heterotrophic bacteria, phosphorus-accumulating bacteria, ammonia-oxidizing bacteria, nitrite-oxidizing bacteria, denitrifying bacteria, etc., attach to them, forming bacterial micelle together with extracellular polymers, and finally become activated sludge floc. The sludge structure with normal sedimentation performance is shown in Figure 2. More than 50 species of filamentous bacteria have been detected in most normal or bulked activated sludge. Still, there are significant differences in their species and abundance among different sewage treatment plants. The detection frequency of Mycobacterium fortuitum in the phylum Actinobacteria is 100%, and the detection frequencies and abundances of M. parvicella, Nostocoida limicola II, and Gordonia are also high. Gordonia is a typical foaming bacterium with higher detection rates and abundance in foam than activated sludge. The detection frequency of thick-walled bacteria Nostocoida limicola I and Bacteroidetes type 1863 is also relatively high. According to the HTS measurement results, the abundance of Chloroflexi is low in the typical structure of activated sludge, but it is widely present. However, FISH detection results indicate that Chloroflexi is a filamentous species with high frequency and abundance [50,51,62,63].

3.2. Filamentous Bacteria in Expanded Sludge

In the same sewage treatment plant, the composition of the filamentous bacteria community in bulked sludge is the same as that in non-bulked sludge. Still, the abundance of individual filamentous bacteria varies significantly, often leading to sludge bulking. Figure 3 shows the growth of dominant filamentous bacteria in the decline stage of sludge settling performance when the operating environment, especially the sewage water temperature, of the same sewage treatment system changes [64].
In Denmark, the distribution range of SVI detected in the sewage treatment plant was 62–192 mL/g, with an average of 107 mL/g. Among them, 25% of the systems have SVI values greater than 120 mL/g; FISH technology testing found that the most abundant bacterial genus in activated sludge was the Actinobacteria M. parvicella, with a detection rate of 100% in all sludge samples and an average abundance of 6% (expressed as a percentage of EUBmix), far exceeding that of normal activated sludge. Secondly, Tetrasperera and Gordonia, both belonging to the phylum Actinobacteria, had a high detection frequency and abundance, making them the dominant filamentous bacteria in the expanded sludge of most wastewater treatment plants. In addition to Actinomycetes, the detection frequency of Chloroflexi bacteria was also relatively high [44]. FISH technology was used to identify filamentous bacteria in the bulking sludge of Polish sewage plants (The range of SVI values for all tested sludge samples was 66–389 mL/g.) It was found that the dominant species was Chloroflexi bacteria, with an average abundance of 14% (expressed as a percentage of EUBmix), among which 0803 and 1851 had the highest abundance. The most abundant genus of bacteria is M. parvicella, which accounts for 1.8–15% of the total abundance [65]. Similar results were obtained in the study by Beer and Kong et al., with 1 to 25 per cent and 8 to 30 per cent of the wastewater plants surveyed, respectively [66,67]. The urban sewage treatment plants operating under long mud age and low load conditions in South Africa have M. parvicella, type 0092, type 0675, type 0041, and type 1851 as dominant bacterial genera. The dominant filamentous bacteria in sewage treatment plants operating at low dissolved oxygen levels in the United States were type 1701, type 021N, type 1863, and planktonic bacteria. When operating at low organic loads, they are type 0041, type 0092, and M. parvicella. The main types of filamentous bacteria that cause sludge bulking in Europe are M. parvicella and type 021N bacteria, followed by type 1701 bacteria, type 0803 bacteria, Streptococcus, Sphaerotilus (Sphaerotilus) and Candidatus ‘Nostocoida limicola’ (Tetrasperera jenkinsii and Tetrasperera velonensis) [68]. The high-throughput sequencing results of the nutrient removal system activated sludge by Kang Hong et al. showed that Saprospira and M. parvicella were the dominant bacterial genera during the sludge bulking stage, with relative abundances of 13.58% and 12.55%, respectively, followed by Flavobacterium and Tetrasphaera, for which the relative abundances were 1.19% and 1.51% [69], respectively. The sequencing results of Gao Chundi et al. also found that the relative abundance of M. parvicella increased from 2% to 8% before and after sludge expansion, making it the bacterial genus with the highest growth [10]. The remaining filamentous bacteria were only detected in a small percentage of sludge samples. Still, they remained sporadically distributed with relatively low abundance and had no significant impact on the structure and properties of flocs [10,51,70,71,72,73,74].
In addition, FISH testing showed that the structure of the filamentous bacteria community of bulked sludge in sewage plants in European countries was similar, which may be due to their geographical proximity. However, the HTS measurement results showed that the community structure of filamentous bacteria in expanded sludge did not have obvious spatial geographic patterns [75,76].

4. Physiological and Ecological Analysis of Core Filamentous Bacteria

Filamentous bacteria are one of the main microbial communities in sewage treatment plants, with a high detection frequency and dominant abundance. The filamentous bacteria that have a structural effect on activated sludge are defined as core filamentous bacteria, regardless of whether the sludge expands or not. Relatively few filamentous bacteria make up the vast majority of the core filamentous bacteria in all systems: M. parvicella, type 0092, type 0041/0675, CandidatusNostocoida limicola’ (Tetrasperera jenkinsii and Tetrasperera veronensis), type 0803, type 1851, Gordonia spp., Mycobactrium fortuitoum and others. The physiological and ecological characteristics of core filamentous bacteria are shown in Table 2.
M. parvicella is a common key bacterium that causes sludge bulking in activated sludge systems, mainly distributed in soil, water environments, etc. In situ observation, laboratory validation and genomic identification results indicate carbon sources such as acetate, glucose and long-chain fatty acids (LCFAs) can maintain their growth and preferentially absorb LCFAs, the main carbon and energy sources [77]. The nitrogen source of M. parvicella is ammonia, and high concentrations of free ammonia can also promote growth [78]. Microradiometric autoradiography (MAR) analysis showed that M. parvicella could maintain activity within an extensive range of oxygen partial pressures. It grows well under aerobic and microaerophilic conditions but at a slower rate of 0.3–0.5 d−1. The absolute abundance of genes is negatively correlated with sludge load and positively correlated with sludge age [79,80]. Under anaerobic conditions, there is no growth, but it can absorb carbon sources [81]. Under low dissolved oxygen (DO) conditions, the microaerophilic properties and high specific surface area of M. parvicella make it easier to absorb limited oxygen and more competitive. The surface of M. parvicella a is hydrophobic, and the optimal growth temperature is 12−15 °C [82,83]. It is easy for it float on the surface of the biochemical pool in the form of foam. In winter, the solubility of LCFAs and other oil substances also decreases, and they also gather on the water surface, and the two are in full contact. Therefore, when the sewage treatment plant operates under low temperature, low DO and low load conditions, it is most suitable for the growth and reproduction of M. parvicella.
CandidatusNostocoida. limicola” (Tetrasperera jenkinsii and Tetrasperera. voronensis), a member of the Actinobacteria species, has been proven to belong to the Tetrasperera (T bacteria) genus in the Intrasporangiaceae, widely distributed in soil and water environments. The probability of existing in activated sludge is high, leading to swelling and foaming problems. This bacterium has a wide range of substrate assimilation characteristics and can utilize hydrophilic and hydrophobic substrates, including LCFA. However, it is currently unclear whether LCFA is used for growth, transformation and storage. It can also survive under anaerobic conditions using oxygen or nitrate nitrogen as electron acceptors. Nostocoida limicola II Tetrasphaera can store PHAs, and there is evidence to suggest that this bacterium has a considerable ability to store polyphosphate, belonging to polyphosphate-accumulating bacteria. However, the mechanism of synthesizing storage substances is still unclear [84,85,86].
The genera Gordonia and Mycobacteria are commonly present in the species Actinobacteria. Gordonia abundance varies significantly over time and has strong specificity. It is a rare actinomycete with aerobic demand, and 41 effective species have been isolated from habitats such as soil, animal feces, wastewater, compost and human infection sites. This mycobacterium is a common foaming bacterium which can produce glycolipids, glycosylated peptide lipids, and polysaccharide surfactants. Gordonia can biodesulfurize and biodegrade compounds such as phthalates, hydrocarbons, rubber, nitriles, etc., playing an essential role in environmental remediation [87,88]. The detection frequency of Mycobacterium isolated from soil, sewage and normal human oral and sputum in activated sludge is 100%. Still, regardless of swelling, the abundance of Mycobacterium in activated sludge from the same sewage treatment plant does not change much [50,51,63]. This bacterium is a non-sporous, non-motile, branched and acid-resistant Gram-positive bacterium. Its cell size is (0.2–0.8) μm × (1–10) μm; it is aerobic and grows slowly. According to the research results, it can be confirmed that the genus Mycobacterium is the “skeleton” of activated sludge, playing a structural role and rarely causing sludge swelling.
The phylum Chloroflexi often dominates alongside the phylum Actinobacteria because these two bacteria utilize different substrates; the former absorbs lipids, while the latter utilizes proteins, polysaccharides and dead cell debris, with no competition for energy sources, and occupies different ecological niches [65]. The influence of Chloroflexi on the floc structure of sludge is species-dependent, with some bacteria serving as “skeletons” and other microorganisms adhering to them, forming strong and dense flocs that hide inside the flocs and do not cause expansion. However, other forms are located at the edge of the sludge flocs and protrude into the sewage, which has a negative impact on the settling performance of the sludge. The surface of Chloroflexi is more hydrophilic than many other filamentous bacteria in activated sludge and can accept oxygen or nitrogen with nitrate as an electron acceptor. Degradation of glucose and mixed amino acids can also be observed under strict anaerobic conditions [89]. The common group of Chloroflexi bacteria, 0803 type, mainly exists within flocs. Still, sometimes clusters may also appear, resulting in open floc structures and deteriorating sedimentation performance, especially in winter, which is one of the main reasons for the decline in sludge sedimentation performance [90]. Types 0092 and 1851 are common in nutrient removal systems [44,89]. The abundance of Chloroflexi (including both populations defined by specific probes and unidentified species) is highest in summer and autumn, exhibiting a pattern opposite to that of M. parvicella.
The 0041/0675 population of Proteobacteria is also one of the core filamentous bacteria with a high detection frequency. Under aerobic conditions, it can absorb various monosaccharides and leucine, with some populations consuming galactose and a few assimilating glycine. Under anaerobic conditions with nitrate as the electron acceptor, glucose and galactose absorption levels are comparable to aerobic conditions, and glucose can also be utilized under strict anaerobic conditions. However, it is currently uncertain whether this strain is a fermenting organism. In addition, the abundance of these two filamentous bacteria varies seasonally, with the highest levels in summer and autumn [91,92].

5. Conclusions

Researchers have extensively researched the identification, population structure and physiological ecology of filamentous bacteria in activated sludge. However, there is still a lack of essential information for a comprehensive understanding of the activated sludge ecosystem and filamentous bacterial functions. Firstly, in terms of identifying filamentous bacteria, high-throughput sequencing primers and depth, filamentous bacteria databases, etc., need to be continuously improved, supplemented and updated to identify more filamentous bacteria. FISH probes also need to be continuously designed and combined with in situ detection techniques such as microradiography. Secondly, more comprehensive and systematic experiments should be conducted. If possible, reliable quantitative analyses of core filamentous bacteria should be undertaken to determine ecological factors that control individual population density and clarify the reasons for the excessive growth of filamentous bacteria. Finally, deep sequencing and analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequences attempt to address the distribution patterns and potential sources of filamentous bacterial community diversity, the driving factors behind filamentous bacterial community composition and whether there exists a latitudinal diversity gradient in filamentous bacteria. Understanding the global diversity and biogeographical mechanisms of activated sludge bacterial communities within the framework of theoretical ecology is of great significance for microbial ecology and wastewater treatment processes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.G.; methodology, S.G.; software, W.P.; validation, L.N.; formal analysis, H.L.; investigation, W.P.; resources, H.L.; data curation, L.N.; writing—original draft preparation, S.G.; writing—review and editing, X.W.; visualization, H.L.; supervision, X.W.; project administration, X.W.; funding acquisition, X.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 52170034).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

Shang Gao was employed by the company Changchun Dize Engineering Consulting Co., Ltd. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wang, H.C. The innovative direction of the 100-year activated sludge method. Water Wastewater 2014, 40, 1–3. [Google Scholar]
  2. Ju, F.; Zhang, T.; Ju, F.; Zhang, T. Advances in meta-omics research on activated sludge microbial Community. Microbiology 2019, 46, 2038–2052. [Google Scholar]
  3. Ju, F.; Zhang, T. Bacterial assembly and temporal dynamics in activated sludge of a full-scale municipal wastewater treatment plant. ISME J. 2015, 9, 683–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sezgin, M.; Jenkins, D.; Parker, D.S. A Unified Theory of Filamentous Activated Sludge Bulking. Water Pollut. Control Fed. 1978, 50, 362–381. [Google Scholar]
  5. Parker, D.S.; Kaufman, W.J.; Jenkins, D. Physical Conditioning of Activated Sludge Floc. J. Water Pollut. Control Fed. 1971, 43, 1817–1833. [Google Scholar]
  6. Parker, D.S.; Kaufman, W.J.; Jenkins, D. Floc Breakup in Turbulent Flocculation Processes. J. Sanit. Eng. Div. 1972, 98, 79–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Guo, J.; Peng, Y.; Wang, S.; Yang, X.; Yuan, Z. Filamentous and non-filamentous bulking of activated sludge encountered under nutrients limitation or deficiency conditions. Chem. Eng. J. 2014, 255, 453–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Long, T.R.; He, Q.; Lin, G. Research on the Relationships between Filamentous Organisms and Flocculate Structure in Activated Sludge. China Water Wastewater 2000, 16, 5–8. [Google Scholar]
  9. Bakos, V.; Gyarmati, B.; Csizmadia, P.; Till, S.; Vachoud, L.; Nagy Göde, P.; Tardy, G.M.; Szilágyi, A.; Jobbágy, A.; Wisniewski, C. Viscous and filamentous bulking in activated sludge: Rheological and hydrodynamic modelling based on experimental data. Water Res. 2022, 214, 118–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gao, C.D.; Zhang, N.; Han, H.; Ren, H.; Li, Y.; Hou, C.Y.; Wang, C.D.; Peng, Y.Z. Microbial Diversity of Filamentous Sludge Bulking at Low Temperature. Environ. Sci. 2020, 41, 3373–3383. [Google Scholar]
  11. Wu, L.W.; Ning, D.L.; Zhang, B.; Li, Y.; Zhang, P.; Shan, X.Y.; Zhang, Q.T.; Robert Brown, M.; Li, Z.X.; Van Nostrand, J.D.; et al. Author Correction: Global diversity and biogeography of bacterial communities in wastewater tre atment plants. Nat. Microbiol. 2019, 4, 1183–1195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Seviour, E.M.; Williams, C.; DeGrey, B.; Soddell, J.A.; Seviour, R.J.; Lindrea, K.C. Studies on filamentous bacteria from Australian activated sludge plants. Water Res. 1994, 28, 2335–2342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Graveleau, L.; Cotteux, E.; Duchène, P. Bulking and foaming in France: The 1999–2001 survey. Acta Hydrochim. Et Hydrobiol. 2005, 33, 223–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wanner, J.; Ruzicková, I.; Jetmarová, P.; Krhutková, O.; Paraniaková, J. A national survey of activated sludge separation problems in The Czech Republic: Filaments, floc characteristics and activated sludge metabolic properties. Water Sci. Technol. 1998, 37, 271–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sun, C.X.; Zhang, B.; Ning, D.L.; Zhang, Y.; Dai, T.J.; Wu, L.W.; Li, T.L.; Liu, W.; Zhou, J.Z.; Wen, X.H. Seasonal dynamics of the microbial community in two full -scale wastewater treatment plants: Diversity, composition, phylogenetic group based assembly and co-occurrence pattern. Water Res. 2021, 200, 117295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Du, B.; Yang, Q.; Li, X.; Yuan, W.; Wang, R. Impacts of long-term exposure to tetracycline and sulfamethoxazole on the sludge granules in an anoxic -aerobic wastewater treatment system. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 684, 67–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Strom, P.F.; Jenkins, D. Identification and significance of filamentous microorganisms in activated sludge. Water Pollut. Control Fed. 1984, 56, 449–459. [Google Scholar]
  18. Eikelboom, D.H.; Andreadakis, A.; Andreasen, K. Survey of filamentous populations in nutrient removal plants in four European countries. Water Sci. Technol. 1998, 37, 281–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Di Marzio, W.D. First results from a screening of filamentous organisms present in Buenos Aires’s activated sludge plants. Water Sci. Technol. 2002, 46, 119–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Rothman, M. Operation with biological nutrient removal with stable nitrification and control of filamentous growth. Water Sci. Technol. 1998, 37, 549–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yang, Q.; Zhao, H.; Du, B. Bacteria and bacteriophage communities in bulking and non-bulking activated sludge in full-scale municipal wastewater treatment systems. Biochem. Eng. J. 2017, 119, 101–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Nierychlo, M.; Mcilroy, S.J.; Kucheryavskiy, S.; Jiang, C.J.; Ziegler, A.S.; Kondrotaite, Z.; Stokholm-Bjerregaard, M.A.; Halkjær Nielsen, P. Candidatus Amarolinea and Candidatus Microthrix are mainly responsible for filamentous bulking in Danish municipal wastewater treatment plants. Front. Microbio. 2020, 11, 12–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Ma, Y.Y.; Qiao, Y.H.; Zhang, X.X.; Ye, L. Filamentous bacteria-induced sludge bulking can alter antibiotic resistance gene profiles and increase potential risks in wastewater treatment systems. Environ. Int. 2024, 190, 108920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Eikelboom, D.H. Filamentous Organisms Observed in Activated Sludge. Water Res. 1975, 9, 365–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Nierychlo, M.; Singleton, C.M.; Petriglieri, F.; Thomsen, L.; Petersen, J.F.; Peces, M.; Kondrotaite, Z.; Dueholm, M.S.; Nielsen, P.H. Low global diversity of Candidatus Microthrix, a troublesome filamentous organism in full-scale WWTPs. Front. Microbio. 2021, 12, 690251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. De Graaff, D.R.; Van Loosdrecht, M.C.; Pronk, M. Stable granulation of seawater -adapted aerobic granular sludge with filamentous Thiothrix bacteria. Water Res. 2020, 175, 115683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Fan, N.S.; Qi, R.; Huang, B.C.; Jin, R.C.; Yang, M. Factors influencing Candidatus Microthrix parvicella growth and specific filamentous bulking control: A review. Chemosphere 2020, 244, 125371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Fan, N.S.; Wang, R.F.; Qi, R.; Gao, Y.X.; Rossetti, S.; Tandoi, V.; Yang, M. Control strategy for filamentous sludge bulking: Bench-scale test and full-scale application. Chemosphere 2018, 210, 709–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Onetto, C.A.; Grbin, P.R.; McIlroy, S.J.; Eales, K.L. Genomic insights into the metabolism of ‘Candidatus Defluviicoccus seviourii’, a member of Defluviicoccus cluster III abundant in industrial activated sludge. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2019, 95, 231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Sun, C.X.; Zhang, B.; Chen, Z.; Qin, W.T.; Wen, X.H. Sludge retention time affects the microbial community structure: A large-scale sampling of aeration tanks throughout China. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 261, 114140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Ni, Y.J.; Yang, J.Q.; Pan, J.Y.; Wu, S.Y.; Zou, J.T.; Li, J. Effects of enhanced biological phosphorus removal on rapid control of sludge bulking and fast formation of aerobic granular sludge. Bioresour. Technol. 2024, 402, 130820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Lv, T.T.; Wang, D.Q.; Zheng, X.; Hui, J.Y.; Cheng, W.; Zhang, Y.X. Study on specific strategies of controlling or preventing sludge bulking in S2EBPR process. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2023, 11, 110363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wang, J.; Yang, X.; Chen, W.K.; Zhao, Y.F.; Gong, S.; Dong, D.Y.; Wang, J.F.; Ren, H.Q. Prediction of Activated Sludge Sedimentation Performance Using Deep Transfer Learning. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2024, 4, 1367–1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ma, C.Z.; Zeng, W.; Li, S.S.; Peng, X.J.; Peng, Y.Z. Metabolomic pathway regulation for prevention and control of granule sludge bulking in thiosulfate-driven denitrification. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 893, 164657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Eikelboom, D.H. Process Control of Activated Sludge Plants by Microscopic Investigation; IWA Publishing: London, UK, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  36. Andreasen, K.; Nielsen, P.H. Growth of Microthrix parvicella in nutrient removal activated sludge plants: Studies of in situ physiology. Water Res. 2000, 34, 1559–1569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Asaf, S.; Numan, M.; Khan, A.L.; Al-Harrasi, A. Sphingomonas: From diversity and genomics to functional role in environmental remediation and plant growth. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2020, 40, 138–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Asvapathanagul, P.; Huang, Z.H.; Gedalanga, P.B.; Baylor, A.; Olson, B.H. Interaction of operational and physicochemical factors leading to Gordonia amaraelike foaming in an incompletely nitrifying activated sludge plant. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2012, 78, 8165–8175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Kaetzke, A.; Jentzsch, D.; Eschrich, K. Quantification of Microthrix parvicella in activated sludge bacterial communities by real-time PCR. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2005, 40, 207–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Klindworth, A.; Pruesse, E.; Schweer, T.; Peplies, J.; Quast, C.; Horn, M.; Glöckner, F.O. Evaluation of general 16S ribosomal RNA gene PCR primers for classical and next-generation sequencing-based diversity studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41, e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Amann, R.; Fuchs, B.M.; Behrens, S. The Identification of Microorganisms by Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2001, 12, 231–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wilén, B.M.; Onuki, M.; Hermansson, M.; Lumley, D.; MinoM, T. Microbial Community Structure in Activated Sludge Floc Analysed by Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization and Its Relation to Floc Stability. Water Res. 2008, 42, 2300–2308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Nielsen, P.H.; Kragelund, C.; Seviour, R.J.; Nielsen, J.L. Identity and ecophysiology of filamentous bacteria in activated sludge. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2009, 33, 969–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Mielczarek, A.T.; Kragelund, C.; Eriksen, P.S.; Nielsen, P.H. Population dynamics of filamentous bacteria in Danish wastewater treatment plants with nutrient removal. Water Res. 2012, 46, 3781–3795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Loy, A.; Horn, M.; Wagner, M. Probebase: An online resource for rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31, 514–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Shi, X.F.; Su, Z.B.; Tao, X.X.; Zhou, X.; Zhao, J.B.; Wang, R.Q.; Qin, J.Y. Fe controls the reproduction of zoogloeal and sludge bulking in oil-in-iron wastewater. Water 2023, 5, 1289276. [Google Scholar]
  47. Collins, T.J. ImageJ for microscopy. Biotechniques 2007, 43, 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Zahra, S.A.; Abdullah, N.; Iwamoto, K.; Yuzir, A.; Mohamad, S.E. Alginate-like exopolysaccharides in aerobic granular sludge: A review. Mater. Today: Proc. 2022, 65, 3046–3053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Dunkel, T.; De Leon Gallegos, E.L.; Bock, C.; Lange, A.; Hoffmann, D.; Boenigk, J.; Denecke, M. Illumina sequencing for the identification of filamentous bulking and foaming bacteria in industrial activated sludge plants. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 15, 1139–1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Jiang, X.T.; Guo, F.; Zhang, T. Population dynamics of bulking and foaming bacteria in a full-scale wastewater treatment plant over five years. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 24180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wang, P.; Yu, Z.; Qi, R.; Zhang, H.X. Detailed comparison of bacterial communities during seasonal sludge bulking in a municipal wastewater treatment plant. Water Res. 2016, 105, 157–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Wang, P.; Yu, Z.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, H.X. Seasonal changes in bacterial communities cause foaming in a wastewater treatment plant. Microb. Ecol. 2016, 71, 660–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Fei, X.N.; Yue, Y.Q.; Jiao, X.M.; Chi, Y.Z.; Ding, Z.Q.; Bai, Y.Z. Effect of temperature on the relationship between quorum-sensing and sludge bulking. J. Water Process Eng. 2024, 58, 104883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Wang, S.; Wang, G.L.; Yan, P.; Chen, Y.P.; Fang, F.; Guo, J.S. Non-filamentous sludge bulking induced by exopolysaccharide variation in structure and properties during aerobic granulation. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 876, 162786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Bokulich, N.A.; Kaehler, B.D.; Rideout, J.R.; Dillon, M.; Bolyen, E.; Knight, R.; Huttley, G.A.; Caporaso, J.G. Optimizing taxonomic classification of marker-gene amplicon sequences with QIIME 2′s q2-feature-classifier plugin. Microbiome 2018, 6, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Tong, Z.; Ming, F.S.; Lin, Y. 454 Pyrosequencing reveals bacterial diversity of activated sludge from 14 sewage treatment plants. ISME J. 2012, 6, 1137–1147. [Google Scholar]
  57. Liu, C.; Li, J.B.; Rui, J.P.; An, J.X.; Li, X.Z. The applications of the 16S rRNA gene in microbial ecology: Current situation and problems. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2015, 35, 2769–2788. [Google Scholar]
  58. Nübel, U.; Engelen, B.; Felske, A.; Snaidr, J.; Wieshuber, A.; Amann, R.I.; Ludwig, W.; Backhaus, H. Sequence heterogeneities of genes encoding 16S rRNAs in Paenibacillus polymyxa detected by temperature gradient gel electrophoresis. J. Bacteriol. 1996, 178, 5636–5643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Wang, B.B.; Peng, D.C.; Hou, Y.P.; Li, H.J.; Pei, L.Y.; Yu, L.F. The Important Implications of Particulate Substrate in Determining the Physicochemical Characteristics of Extracellular Polymeric Substances (EPS) in Activated Sludge. Water Res. 2014, 58, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Wang, J.; Li, Q.; Qi, R.; Tandoi, V.; Yang, M. Sludge bulking impact on relevant bacterial populations in a full-scale municipal wastewater treatment plant. Process. Biochem. 2014, 49, 2258–2265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Jenkins, D.; Richard, M.G.; Daigger, G.T. Manual on the Causes and Control of Activated Sludge Bulking, Foaming, and Other Solids Separation Problems, 3rd ed.; IWA Publishing: London, UK, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  62. Guo, F.; Zhang, T. Profiling bulking and foaming bacteria in activated sludge by high throughput sequencing. Water Res. 2012, 46, 2772–2782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Li, B.B.; Peng, Z.Y.; Zhi, L.L.; Li, H.B.; Zheng, K.K.; Li, J. Distribution and diversity of filamentous bacteria in wastewater treatment plants exhibiting foaming of Taihu Lake Basin, China *. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 267, 115644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Wang, X.L.; Yin, J.; Ye, L.; Wu, X.H. Occurrence andcontrol of sludge bulking under low temperature in MUCT process. J. Harbin Inst. Technol. 2009, 41, 67–71. [Google Scholar]
  65. Miłobędzka, A.; Muszyn’ski, A. Population dynamics of filamentous bacteria identified in Polish full-scale wastewater treatment plants with nutrients removal. Water Sci. Technol. 2015, 71, 675–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Beer, M.; Stratton, H.M.; Griffiths, P.C.; Seviour, R.J. Which are the polyphosphate accumulating organisms in full scale activated sludge enhanced biological phosphate removal systems in Australia? J. Appl. Microbiol. 2006, 100, 233–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Kong, Y.H.; Xia, Y.; Nielsen, J.L.; Nielsen, P.H. Structure and function of the microbial community in a full-scale enhanced biological phosphorus removal plant. Microbiology 2007, 153, 4061–4073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Yang, K.; Lin, H.M.; Chen, T.; Yang, T.; Zhang, B. Research progress on dominant filamentous bacteria and biological control measures in bulking sludge. Appl. Chem. Ind. 2023, 52, 3365–3370. [Google Scholar]
  69. Kang, H.; Wang, Y.Y.; He, Y.X.; Li, J.Y.; Yu, Z.T.; Li, Q. Analysis of microbial population dynamics during the expansion of activated sludge in A2/O plant. Technol. Wind 2022, 12, 128–130. [Google Scholar]
  70. Zhang, M.; Yao, J.; Wang, X. The microbial community in filamentous bulking sludge with the ultra-low sludge loading and long sludge retention time in oxidation ditch. Sci. Rep 2019, 9, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Nittami, T.; Kasakura, R.; Kobayashi, T.; Suzuki, K.; Koshiba, Y.; Fukuda, J.; Takeda, M.; Tobino, T.; Kurisu, F.; Rice, D.; et al. Exploring the operating factors controlling Kouleothrix (type 1851), the dominant filamentous bacterial population, in a full-scale A2O plant. Sci. Rep 2020, 10, 6809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Xu, P.; Xie, Z.; Shi, L.; Yan, X.; Fu, Z.; Ma, J.; Zhang, W.; Wang, H.; Hu, B.; He, Q. Distinct responses of aerobic granular sludge sequencing batch reactors to nitrogen and phosphorus deficient conditions. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 834, 155369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Ferreira, R.; Amado, R.; Padrão, J.; Ferreira, V.; Dias, N.M.; Melo, L.D.R.; Santos, S.B.; Nicolau, A. The first sequenced Sphaerotilus natans bacteriophage–characterization and potential to control its filamentous bacterium host. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2021, 97, 029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Shen, Y.; Huang, D.M.; Chen, Y.P.; Yan, P.; Gao, X. New insight into filamentous sludge bulking during wastewater treatment: Surface characteristics and thermodynamics. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 712, 135795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Palm, J.C.; Jenkins, D.; Parker, D.S. Relationship Between organic loading, dissolved oxygen concentration and sludge settleability in the completely-mixed activated sludge process. J. Water Pollut. Control Fed. 1980, 52, 2482–2506. [Google Scholar]
  76. Cao, C.Y.; Lou, I.; Huang, C.; Lee, M.Y. Metagenomic sequencing of activated sludge filamentous bacteria community using the Ion Torrent platform. Desalination Water Treat. 2014, 57, 2175–2183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Dunkel, T.; De León Gallegos, E.L.; Schönsee, C.D.; Hesse, T.; Jochmann, M.; Wingender, J.; Denecke, M. Evaluating the influence of wastewater composition on the growth of Microthrix parvicella by GCxGC/qMS and real-time PCR. Water Res. 2016, 88, 510–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Kruit, J.; Hulsbeek, J.; Visser, A. Bulking sludge solved?! Water Sci. Technol. 2002, 46, 457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Kumari, S.K.S.; Marrengane, Z.; Bux, F. Application of quantitative RT-PCR to determine the distribution of Microthrix parvicella in full-scale activated sludge treatment systems. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2009, 83, 1135–1141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Noutsopoulos, C.; Mamais, D.; Andreadakis, A. Effect of solids retention time on Microthrix parvicella growth. Water SA 2007, 32, 315–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Nielsen, P.H.; Roslev, P.; Dueholm, T.E.; Nielsen, J.L. Microthrix parvicella, a specialized lipid consumer in anaerobic-aerobic activated sludge plants. Water Sci. Technol. 2002, 46, 73–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Sheik, A.R.; Muller, E.E.; Audinot, J.N.; Lebrun, L.A.; Grysan, P.; Guignard, C.; Willmes, P. In situ phenotypic heterogeneity among single cells of the filamentous bacterium Candidatus Microthrix parvicella. ISME J. 2016, 10, 1274–1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Rossetti, S.; Tomei, M.C.; Nielsen, P.H.; Tandoi, V. “Microthrix parvicella”, a filamentous bacterium causing bulking and foaming in activated sludge systems: A review of current knowledge. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2005, 29, 49–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Seviour, E.M.; Eales, K.L.; Izzard, L.; Beer, M.; Carr, E.L.; Seviour, R.J. The in situ physiology of ‘Nostocoida limicola’ II, a filamentous bacterial morphotype in bulking activated sludge, using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and microautoradiography (MAR). Water Sci. Technol. 2006, 54, 47–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Blackall, L.L.; Seviour, E.M.; Bradford, D.; Rossetti, S.; Tandoi, V.; Seviour, R.J. ‘Candidatus Nostocoida limicola’, a filamentous bacterium from activated sludge. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2000, 50, 703–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Liu, J.R.; Seviour, R.J. Design and application of oligonucleotide probes for fluorescent in situ identification of the filamentous bacterial morphotype Nostocoida limicola in activated sludge. Environ. Microbiol. 2001, 3, 551–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Kragelund, C.; Remesova, Z.; Nielsen, J.L.; Thomsen, T.R.; Eales, K.; Seviour, R.; Wanner, J. Ecophysiology of mycolic acid-containing Actinobacteria (Mycolata) in activated sludge foams. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2007, 61, 174–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Carr, E.L.; Eales, K.L.; Seviour, R.J. Substrate uptake by Gordonia amarae in activated foams by FISH-MAR. Water Sci. Technol. 2006, 54, 39–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Kragelund, C.; Levantesi, C.; Borger, A.; Thelen, K.; Eikelboom, D.; Tandoi, V.; Kong, Y. Identity, abundance and ecophysiology of filamentous Chloroflexi species from activated sludge treatment plants. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2007, 59, 671–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Kragelund, C.; Thomsen, T.R.; Mielczarek, A.T.; Nielsen, P.H. Eikelboom’s morphotype 0803 in activated sludge belongs to the genus Caldilinea in the phylum Chloroflexi. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2011, 76, 451–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Xia, Y.; Kong, Y.; Thomsen, T.R.; Nielsen, P.H. Identification and ecophysiological characterization of epiphytic proteinhydrolyzing Saprospiraceae (‘Candidatus Epiflobacter’ spp.) in activated sludge. Appl Environ. Microb. 2008, 74, 2229–2238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Thomsen, T.R.; Blackall, L.L.; De Muro, M.A.; Nielsen, J.L.; Nielsen, P.H. Meganema perideroedes gen. nov., sp. nov., a new filamentous alphaproteobacterium from activated sludge. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2006, 56, 1865–1868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Important filamentous bacterial genera and related sequences, with the horizontal line representing FISH probes. * here means Microthrix sp is not targeted by this probe. Summarize the filamentous bacteria related to sewage treatment in the NCBI database, analyze their phylogenetics and provide sequence numbers. The numbers on the horizontal line represent the probes used in FISH detection technology.
Figure 1. Important filamentous bacterial genera and related sequences, with the horizontal line representing FISH probes. * here means Microthrix sp is not targeted by this probe. Summarize the filamentous bacteria related to sewage treatment in the NCBI database, analyze their phylogenetics and provide sequence numbers. The numbers on the horizontal line represent the probes used in FISH detection technology.
Processes 12 02156 g001
Figure 2. Structure of activated sludge floc with normal sedimentation performance (filamentous bacteria act as “skeleton”).
Figure 2. Structure of activated sludge floc with normal sedimentation performance (filamentous bacteria act as “skeleton”).
Processes 12 02156 g002
Figure 3. Phase contrast micrographs of flocs (original magnification ×400) [64]. (a) The flocs during non-bulking period (T = 17–26 °C, SVI = 90 mL/g); (b) the flocs during initial sludge bulking period (T < 15 °C, SVI = 248 mL/g); (c) the flocs during serious bulking period (T < 15 °C, SVI = 391 mL/g).
Figure 3. Phase contrast micrographs of flocs (original magnification ×400) [64]. (a) The flocs during non-bulking period (T = 17–26 °C, SVI = 90 mL/g); (b) the flocs during initial sludge bulking period (T < 15 °C, SVI = 248 mL/g); (c) the flocs during serious bulking period (T < 15 °C, SVI = 391 mL/g).
Processes 12 02156 g003
Table 1. Primer sequences and amplification conditions are commonly used in high-throughput sequencing.
Table 1. Primer sequences and amplification conditions are commonly used in high-throughput sequencing.
No.TypePrimer Name and Sequence
(5′-3′)
Amplification ConditionsReference
1Bacteria27F (5′-AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3′)
534R (5′-ATTACCGCGGCTGCTGG-3′)
95 °C 2 min; (95 °C 20 s, 56 °C 30 s, 72 °C 60 s) × 30; 72 °C 5 min[55]
2Bacteria563f (AYTGGGYDTAAAGNG)
r1 (TACCRGGGTHTCTAATCC)
r2 (CAGAGTATCTAATTC)
r3 (CTACDSRGGTMTC TAATC)
r4 (TACNVGGGTATCTAATC)
98 °C 2 min; (98 °C 15 s, 56 °C 20 s, 68 °C 30 s) × 28; 68 °C 10 min[56]
3Bacteria338f (ACTCCTACGGGAGGCAGCA)
806r (GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT)
95 °C 3 min; (95 °C 30 s, 55 °C 30 s, 72 °C 45 s) × 27; 72 °C 10 min[57]
4Bacteria968F (AACGCGAAGAACCTTAC)
1401r (CGGTGTGTACAAGACCC)
95 °C 5 min; (95 °C 30 s, 63 °C 45 s, 72 °C 1 min) × 35; 72 °C 5 min[58]
5Universal primers341f (CCTACGGGNGGCWGCAGG)
785r (GACTACHVGGGTATCOTTCC)
95 °C 5 min; (95 °C 40 s, 55 °C 120 s, 72 °C 60 s) × 25; 72 °C 7 min[40]
6Universal primers341f (CCTACGGGNGGCWGCAGG)
534R (ATTACCGCGGCTGCTGG)
94 °C 5 min; (94 °C 30 s, 55 °C 30 s, 72 °C 30 s) × 30; 72 °C 10 min[59]
7Universal primers27f (AGA GTT TGA TCC TGG CTC AG)
1492r (TACGGYTACCTTGTTACGACTT)
95 °C 10 min; (95 °C 60 s, 55 °C 60 s, 72 °C 90 s) × 35; 72 °C 10 min[60]
8Actinomycetes243f (GGATGAGCCCGCGGCCTA)
513r (CGGCCGCGGCTGCTGGCACGTA)
95 °C 5 min; (95 °C 30 s, 63 °C 45 s, 72 °C 1 min) × 35; 72 °C 5 min[61]
Table 2. Physiological and ecological analysis of core filamentous bacteria.
Table 2. Physiological and ecological analysis of core filamentous bacteria.
Filamentous BacteriaUse of AcceptorsStorage CompoundsCarbon SourceOptimal Growth TemperatureGrows RateCharacteristic
M. parvicellaO2, NO3, NO2, anaerobicPHAAcetate, glucose and long-chain fatty acids12–15 °C0.3~0.5 d−1Bulking
CandidatusNostocoida limicolaO2, NO3, NO2PHA, Poly PHydrophilic and hydrophobic substrates, including LCFA15−37 °CNot reportedBulking and foaming
GordoniaO2, NO3, NO2PHA, Poly PPhthalates, hydrocarbons20−37 °CNot reportedFoaming
Mycobactrium fortuitoumO2, NO3, NO2, anaerobicPHAOrganic matter15−37 °Cgrows slowly“Skeleton”
ChloroflexiO2PHAProteins, polysaccharides and dead cell debris15−37 °CNot reportedBulking
type 0041/0675O2, NO3, NO2PHAAcetate, glucose15−37 °CNot reportedBulking
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gao, S.; Pan, W.; Niu, L.; Lu, H.; Wang, X. Population Composition, Physiology and Ecology of Filamentous Bacteria in Activated Sludge. Processes 2024, 12, 2156. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12102156

AMA Style

Gao S, Pan W, Niu L, Lu H, Wang X. Population Composition, Physiology and Ecology of Filamentous Bacteria in Activated Sludge. Processes. 2024; 12(10):2156. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12102156

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gao, Shang, Wenbo Pan, Lu Niu, Hai Lu, and Xiaoling Wang. 2024. "Population Composition, Physiology and Ecology of Filamentous Bacteria in Activated Sludge" Processes 12, no. 10: 2156. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12102156

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop