Next Article in Journal
Study on Ship Exhaust Gas Denitrification Technology Based on Vapor-Phase Oxidation and Liquid-Phase Impingement Absorption
Previous Article in Journal
Study on Short-Term Electricity Load Forecasting Based on the Modified Simplex Approach Sparrow Search Algorithm Mixed with a Bidirectional Long- and Short-Term Memory Network
Previous Article in Special Issue
Integrated Application of Dynamic Risk-Based Inspection and Integrity Operating Windows in Petrochemical Plants
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Comparison of Advanced Multivariable Control Techniques for Axial-Piston Pump

1
Department of Hydroaerodynamics and Hydraulic Machines, Technical University of Sofia, Kliment Ohridski 8 Boulevard, 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria
2
Department of Systems and Control, Technical University of Sofia, Kliment Ohridski 8 Boulevard, 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2024, 12(9), 1797; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12091797
Submission received: 19 July 2024 / Revised: 14 August 2024 / Accepted: 22 August 2024 / Published: 23 August 2024

Abstract

This article is devoted to a comparison of two advanced control techniques applied to the same plant. The plant is a certain type of axial-piston pump. A linear-quadratic (LQR) controller and an H-infinity (H) controller were synthesized to regulate the displacement volume of the pump. The classical solution to such a problem is to use a hydro-mechanical controller (by pressure, flow rate, or power) but, in the available sources, there are solutions that implement proportional-integral-derivative (PID), LQR, model predictive control (MPC), etc. Unlike a classical solution, in our case, the hydro-mechanical controller is replaced by an electro-hydraulic proportional valve, which receives a reference signal from an industrial microcontroller. It is used as the actuator of the pump swash plate. The pump swash plate swivel angle determines the displacement volume, respectively, and the flow rate of the pump. The microcontroller is capable of embedding various control algorithms with different structures and complexities. The developed LQR and H controllers are compared in the simulation and real experiment conditions. For this purpose, the authors have developed a laboratory experimental test bench, enabling a real-time function of the control system via USB/CAN communication. Both controllers are compared under different pump loading modes. Also, this paper contributes an uncertain model of an axial-piston pump with proportional valve control that is obtained from experimental data. Based on this model, the robust stability of the closed-loop system is investigated by comparing the structure of a singular value (μ). The investigations show that both control systems achieved robust stability. Moreover, they can tolerate up to four times larger uncertainties than modeled ones. The system with the H controller attenuates approximately at least 30 times the disturbances with frequency up to 1 rad/s while the system with the LQR controller attenuates at least 10 times the same disturbances.
Keywords: advanced control; linear-quadratic regulator; H-infinity controller; robust; axial-piston pump advanced control; linear-quadratic regulator; H-infinity controller; robust; axial-piston pump

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mitov, A.; Slavov, T.; Kralev, J. Comparison of Advanced Multivariable Control Techniques for Axial-Piston Pump. Processes 2024, 12, 1797. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12091797

AMA Style

Mitov A, Slavov T, Kralev J. Comparison of Advanced Multivariable Control Techniques for Axial-Piston Pump. Processes. 2024; 12(9):1797. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12091797

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mitov, Alexander, Tsonyo Slavov, and Jordan Kralev. 2024. "Comparison of Advanced Multivariable Control Techniques for Axial-Piston Pump" Processes 12, no. 9: 1797. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12091797

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop