Next Article in Journal
Effects of Over-Sintering on Cyclic Calcination and Carbonization of Natural Limestone for CO2 Capture
Previous Article in Journal
Nano-Hydroxyapatite Modified Tobacco Stalk-Based Biochar for Immobilizing Cd(II): Interfacial Adsorption Behavior and Mechanisms
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Study on Safety Tunneling Technology of Secondary Outburst Elimination by CO2 Gas Fracturing in High-Outburst Coal Seam

1
Gas Geology and Engineering Research Center, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454000, China
2
School of Civil Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454000, China
3
School of Resources & Environment, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2024, 12(9), 1925; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12091925
Submission received: 23 August 2024 / Revised: 3 September 2024 / Accepted: 5 September 2024 / Published: 7 September 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Energy Systems)

Abstract

:
The No. 3 coal seam in the Yuxi Coal Mine has a measured maximum gas content of 25.59 m3/t, along with a maximum gas pressure of 2.9 MPa, indicating its high risk to gas and outbursts. To mitigate outburst risks of the coal seam, the 1301 working face has been implemented with gas pre-drainage measures by grid boreholes from underlying roadways. After one year of extraction, it was confirmed that the gas content at all 33 test sites was below 8 m3/t, meeting the outburst prevention standards. However, during subsequent coal tunnel excavation, the gas desorption index K1 value frequently exceeded the standard, resulting in numerous occurrences of abnormal gas emission or small-scale outbursts. To tackle the challenges associated with safe excavation following the first-round regional outburst prevention measures, a research and industrial trial of CO2 gas fracturing (CO2-Frac) technology for secondary outburst prevention and rapid excavation was completed. The results show that the dual-hole and high-pressure (185 MPa) CO2-Frac considerably contributes to outburst prevention. K1 exceedances per hundred meters of tunnel excavations were from an average of 2.54 without CO2-Frac to an average of 0.28 after the new technology was implemented, leading to an eight-fold reduction. Additionally, the monthly excavation footage increased from an average of 81.64 m without CO2-Frac to an average of 162.42 m with CO2-Frac, resulting in a two-fold improvement. The dual-hole and high-pressure CO2-Frac is an advanced technology for safe and efficient excavation for secondary outburst elimination in highly outburst-prone coal seams in the Yuxi Coal Mine, with potential for widespread application in similar coal seam conditions.

1. Introduction

Coal and gas outbursts constitute the most severe coal mining disasters in China. According to data from the National Mine Safety Supervision Bureau as of the beginning of 2022, a total of eight accidents of coal and gas outburst have occurred in the past two years in provinces such as Guizhou, Yunnan, Shanxi, Shaanxi, Heilongjiang, and Henan. These accidents resulted in 44 fatalities and significant economic losses [1]. Most of the accidents occurred in the roadway excavation after a regional prevention was completed. Notable incidents include a gas outburst on 25 March 2021, in the excavation roadway of the Shanxi Shigang Coal Mine, which claimed four lives. On 4 June 2021, eight fatalities were recorded in a gas outburst accident in the excavation roadway at Hebi No. 6 Mine in Henan. Additionally, on 2 March 2022, eight individuals lost their lives in an outburst accident in the excavation roadway at the Limin Coal Mine in Guizhou. Thus, developing efficient technologies for secondary outburst prevention remains an ongoing and long-term scientific and technological challenge for the Chinese coal industry [2,3,4], particularly as mining operations are going deeper and deeper. Recognizing this urgency, the National Mine Safety Supervision Bureau has issued a notice emphasizing the need to strengthen the identification of outburst hazards, enhance gas geological exploration, improve gas pre-drainage techniques, and implement comprehensive gas control measures [1]. These directives are of paramount importance in ensuring the safety of coal mining production in China.
The mechanism of gas outbursts has been extensively studied by scholars both domestically and internationally, yielding numerous insightful explorations. B.B. Hodot [5] was the first to analyze the causes of gas outbursts from an energy triggering perspective, proposing that the primary contributors to outbursts include the elastic energy stored in coal bodies and the expansion energy of gas. Through dimensional analysis, Zhen [6] concluded that the expansion energy of gas is the primary contributor to outbursts. Xu [7] conducted numerical simulations of delayed coal and gas outbursts on the RFPA2D-Flow simulation software based on the established fluid–solid coupling model of gas-bearing coal and rock. The simulations revealed that outbursts are the result of the combined effects of three factors: geostress, gas pressure, and the physical–mechanical properties of coal. Yang [8] utilized the FLAC3D software and the Mohr–Coulomb failure criterion to analyze stress differentials ahead of the excavation face; by establishing eight heterogeneous models, he studied the influence of coal seam mechanical properties on outbursts. Zhao [9], based on the heterogeneity of coal, established a coupled model of the coal stress–damage field and gas diffusion–seepage field. Through numerical simulations of mining processes in horizontal and faulted coal seams, the results showed that mining disturbances disrupt the stress relief zone ahead of the working face, leading to an increase in the gas pressure gradient between the stress release and stress concentration zones, thereby enhancing the risk of coal and gas outbursts. The aforementioned scholars have conducted varying degrees of exploration into the mechanism of gas outbursts through theoretical analysis and numerical simulations. However, the geological structures in coal mines are highly complex, and factors such as geostress, gas pressure, and mining impacts are constantly changing. As a result, the complete assessment of outburst risks remains elusive. Therefore, there is an urgent need to research simple and efficient outburst prevention technologies and conduct industrial trials to ensure the safety of coal mine production. Currently, there are several widely applied technologies that include the mining liberation layer, gas pre-drainage underlying roadway (GPDUR) [10], dense borehole gas drainage technology [11,12], hydraulic fracturing [13,14,15], hydraulic punching [16,17], and water jet [18,19] and hydraulic slotting technologies [20,21]. Among these, GPDUR has gained common adoption and achieved favorable outcomes in mining areas such as Huainan, Huaibei, Pingdingshan, Zhengzhou, and Jiaozuo [22,23,24]. However, in coal seams characterized by complex geological conditions, tectonically deformed coal (TDC) development, and severe gas outbursts, combined with limited mining intervals and short drainage durations, the GPDUR may result in inadequate drainage or uneven effectiveness in preventing outbursts. Even when gas content meets the standards, there can still be significant outburst hazards in specific local sections. For instance, the three gas outburst accidents mentioned in the reference occurred during tunneling excavation after GPDUR, resulting in many fatalities [25]. Under such circumstances, the research and development of universally applicable secondary outburst prevention technologies hold practical importance and prospects for broader implementation.
The Yuxi Coal Mine of Shanxi Lanhua Group has implemented GPDUR techniques as precautionary measures against gas-related hazards in the initial 1301 working face of the coal mine. Following a drainage period of one year, tests conducted at 33 locations revealed an average residual gas content of 4.3 m3/t and a maximum content of 7.40 m3/t, indicating the absence of gas outburst risks in the region based on the national standard. However, during subsequent coal roadway tunneling, abnormal gas emission or small-scale outbursts occurred on multiple occasions. The gas outburst parameter K1 consistently surpassed the standard limit, resulting in sluggish tunneling progress and severe hindrance to safe and efficient mining operations. To prevent coal and gas outburst accidents, a joint research team conducted studies and industrial trials on CO2-Frac technology during tunneling. Leveraging previous theoretical research outcomes on CO2-Frac for outburst prevention [26,27,28,29] and numerous successful practical cases [30,31,32], this study amalgamated field experiments and technological optimization, resulting in the innovative development of a dual borehole and high-pressure CO2-Frac, and established the efficient secondary outburst prevention and safe tunneling technology model. This model effectively diminishes the K1 value, eradicates abnormal gas emission and outbursts, and ensures the secure and rapid tunneling of the coal mine. The application of this technology model holds significant universal significance for secondary outburst prevention and safe mining in coal seams prone to intense outbursts, thus making it suitable for widespread promotion and implementation.

2. Research Background

2.1. Engineering Background

Yuxi Coal Mine is situated in Qinshui County in the southern region of the Qinshui Basin in Shanxi Province, China. The mining area is 26.147 km2 and has a designed production capacity of 2.40 million tons per annum (Mt/a), with an expected operational lifespan of 41.7 a. The primary coal seam currently being extracted is the No. 3 coal seam in the Shanxi Formation (Figure 1). According to the microseismic monitoring data, the depth of the No. 3 coal seam is 590 m, the average vertical stress is 14.5 MPa, the average maximum horizontal principal stress is 16.0 MPa, and the average minimum horizontal principal stress is 8.6 MPa. The coal is classified as No. 3 anthracite, and the quality parameters are detailed in Table 1.
The 1301 working face serves as the initial mining area within Yuxi Mine, spanning 1250 m in strike length and 200 m in dip length. The geology of this working face exhibits relative simplicity, positioned on a large reginal monocline that dips towards the west at an angle of 3–6°. There are a few faults, although the collapse column has been well developed (Figure 1). Considering the high gas content, the ventilation system comprises two intakes and three return airways, as depicted in Figure 2. The roadway heading dimensions are 3.8 m in height and 5.8 m in width. As part of the initial preparations, two GPDURs have been completed, utilizing drilling and pre-drainage techniques to mitigate gas outbursts and prioritize safety (Figure 2).

2.2. Coal Mine Gas Geological Properties

The No. 3 coal seam exhibits a thickness that ranges from 5.12 to 7.20 m, with an average thickness of 5.85 m. This coal seam is characterized by a simple structure, consistent thickness, and is deemed fully recoverable across the entire area. The roof of the coal seam comprises mudstone, sandy mudstone, and siltstone, while in certain regions, fine-grained sandstone is prevalent. The floor consists of black carbonaceous mudstone, creating favorable conditions for gas preservation. In terms of composition, the coal seam primarily consists of bright coal with original undeformed structures, characterized by its hardness and protodyakonov coefficient (f-value), which ranges from 0.8 to 1.0. Within the middle to upper section, there exist two layers of TDC layers with a soft property (Figure 3). The upper TDC layer is mylonitic coal with a thickness of 0.3 to 0.5 m. It lacks discernible bedding planes, possesses a soil-like luster, and exhibits a fragile structure. The f-value of this layer generally ranges from 0.1 to 0.5. These characteristics align with typical outburst-prone coal, and all instances of abnormal gas emission have been observed within this upper layer. One meter to 1.8 m below the roof, there lies an unstable fragmented coal layer with a thickness varying from 0.5 to 0.8 m. Although the deformation degree is less pronounced compared to the upper one, this layer primarily consists of cataclastic and fragmented coal, characterized by disturbed bedding planes. It exhibits low hand-test strength and exemplifies angular and fragmented features. The f-value for this layer ranges from 0.3 to 0.5. No gas outbursts have been observed within this layer.
The gas parameters in the Yuxi Coal Mine have been obtained during the exploration period from borehole drilling and initial mining activities. The maximum measured original gas content was found to be 25.59 m3/t, 19.92 m3/t, and 18.53 m3/t at the main inclined shaft, auxiliary inclined shaft, and return air upcast shaft, respectively. Correspondingly, the maximum original gas pressures were recorded as 2.90 MPa, 2.79 MPa, and 1.76 MPa for each location. The initial gas emission velocity ΔP was relatively high, ranging from 25.2 to 27.8 mmHg, while the coal’s f-values varied from 0.45 to 1.09 (Table 2). According to the “Code for Prevention of Coal and Gas Outbursts” [33], the gas content and gas pressure are both greater than the critical value, indicating that the No. 3 coal seam is considered to possess the risk of coal and gas outbursts.

3. Methods

3.1. Evaluation of Gas Outburst Prevention Measures

The 1301 working face comprises six primary excavation roadways: the transportation roadway, starting cut, return airway 1, return airway 2, return airway 3, and counter-excavation of return airway 1 (Figure 2). Prior to the experimental phase of this project, 2 GPDURs were constructed. Gas pre-drainage was implemented through drilling grid boreholes into the coal seam in order to reduce the risk of outbursts in the coal roadway coverage area (Figure 2). After 1 year of gas extraction, the effectiveness of gas extraction and outburst prevention was conducted. The evaluation method involved performing borehole drilling every 50 m along the underlying roadways to collect coal samples for residual gas content analysis, and a total of 33 sampling tests were carried out. The results indicated that the residual gas content varied from 1.35 to 7.40 m3/t, with an average value of 4.34 m3/t, which was below the critical value of 8 m3/t. Thus, it is concluded that the gas extraction and outburst prevention were adequate, indicating that there was no risk of outbursts in the entire area. As a result, the excavation and construction of the coal roadway were able to proceed.
After confirming the absence of outburst risks, the excavation of the coal roadway commenced in May 2017. Throughout the excavation process, significant variations in gas emission were observed in most sections. While some sections displayed low gas emissions, facilitating smooth excavation, the majority of sections experienced high gas emissions, including multiple instances of short-duration anomalies and minor outbursts, which were observed in the upper mylonitic coal layer. The gas desorption index, K1, frequently exceeded the standard [34,35], with values surpassing 0.5 or even 1.0. By October 2017, five occurrences of gas anomalies and outbursts, shown in Figure 2, were documented within 150 d of the excavation process, resulting in gas exceedances in the ventilation system and tunneling stoppages.
The localized abnormal gas outbursts are mainly caused by the high original gas content and pressure of the coal seam. This is further exacerbated by inadequate and uneven gas extraction from the underlying roadway, leading to a persistently high local gas content or pressure, thereby increasing the risk of outbursts. Moreover, the locally increased thickness of the upper TDC layer induced by the coal bedding faults is the geological factor that contributes to these abnormal outbursts [36,37,38]. To ensure safe mining operations, it is crucial to develop techniques for specifically secondary outburst elimination as the current measures of GPDUR and outburst prevention are insufficient. Thus, the project team has undertaken research and has been promoting the use of CO2-Frac for outburst prevention in the excavation of the coal roadway since March 2018.

3.2. Experiment of the CO2-Frac for Outburst Prevention and Safe Excavation

3.2.1. CO2-Frac: Its Principles, Key Technical Parameters, and Experiment Scheme

Extensive industrial practices have demonstrated that CO2-Frac technology has comprehensive effects on enhancing fissure formation, pressure relief, permeability improvement, and gas extraction for coal mine gas control [26,39,40]. The fundamental principle of this technology involves heating chemicals to combustion providing thermal energy and leading the liquid CO2 in the storage tube to undergo a phase transition to gas or a supercritical fluid that creates a high-pressure jet which acts on the coal of the borehole walls. This process leads to a complex fracture network dispersed in the coal seam and matrix, relieving stress in the crack zone. Additionally, it significantly increases permeability and improves gas extraction efficiency.
The parameters of the CO2-Frac are designed as follows: the equipment model is C-74L, and the tube diameter is 73 mm with a length of 1200 mm, which can fill liquid CO2 with a mass of 2.2–2.5 kg per tube. The test pressures are designed as 120 MPa to 185 MPa, but 185 MPa was accepted as the most effective pressure.
The average effective radius of a single fracturing borehole is about 4.5 m [41]. According to the principle of uniform and intensive fracturing, the distance between two parallel hole segments is 3–5 m. Double fracturing boreholes, 1 m from the roadway walls (Figure 4), are drilled parallel to the direction of roadway excavation using a 113 mm bit. The depth of the boreholes ranges from 60–80 m, each borehole is equipped with 15–30 sets of fracturing tubes, and the length of the fracturing section is 30–60 m. It is a key rule that a strict control is exercised within the fracturing section that was evaluated as having no outburst risk during the subsequent excavation after the fracturing, with over-excavation being prohibited.

3.2.2. Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Eliminating Outbursts with K1 Value

Following the safety regulations of the Chinese coal mining industry, the effectiveness of the outburst prevention has to be evaluated with specific index mining regulations determined [33,34]. Subsequently, the gas desorption index K1 is used to evaluate the effectiveness of outburst prevention in this study. It is regulated that excavation can resume when all K1 values tested are below 0.5. In cases where K1 values exceed 0.5, additional measures for gas release through shallow boreholes are undertaken until the K1 value falls below 0.5, after which excavation may proceed [33,42].
The K1 value, an index of the gas desorption of drilling cuttings, is determined by Equation (1):
Q t Q max = 2 S V Dt π
where Qt is the gas content disported from the coal cuttings at the moment of exposure to time t, cm3/g; Qmax is the maximum gas content desorbed from the coal sample, cm3/g; S is the surface area of the tested coal cuttings, cm2/g; V is the total volume of the coal sample, cm3/g; D is the diffusion coefficient of the coal sample, cm2/min; and t is the diffusion time of the coal sample, min. Here, we can define the K1 value as follows:
K 1 = 2 S Q max V D π
Thus, Equation (1) is as follows:
Q t = K 1 t
The K1 value is a parameter indicating the gas desorption velocity, and it is promotional with the gas content of the coal cutting. K1 is determined by the following steps in the working face:
(1)
After the CO2-Frac is completed in the 2 boreholes, 18 shallow boreholes, with 75 mm bits and a depth of 16 m, shall be drilled on the working face to release gas for a period of 8–24 h (Figure 5);
(2)
Then, drill 9 holes with a depth of 10 m and 42 mm bits in the working face, as shown in Figure 5. The regulations require a K1 test from only 3 holes in which 1 is drilled in front and 2 in the two walls. The 9 holes are designed here by the safety management for evaluating the serious outburst-prone coal covering a large area;
(3)
Each borehole starts from the depth of 3 m of the hole, and a coal cutting sample is taken every 1 m or 2 m to measure the gas desorption index K1 of the drill cuttings; Require each drill hole to be taken the sample depth is staggered, that is, if the first borehole sampling hole depth is 3 m, 4 m, 6 m, 8 m, 10 m, the second borehole should be 3 m, 5 m, 7 m, 9 m, 10 m, the third borehole sampling hole is the same depth as the first borehole;
(4)
Take 10 g of 1–3 mm coal cuttings screened for a gas desorption index K1 test in a test equipment GDT following the Standard of AQ/T 1065-2008 [42];
(5)
A total of 45 K1 values were obtained from the 45 cutting samples of 9 holes;
(6)
When K1 < 0.5 from all the 45 tests, this indicates there is no outburst risk in the sampling and testing area, and excavation ahead of 7 m is allowed;
(7)
If there is 1 sample with K1 ≥ 0.5 from the 45 tests, this indicates an outburst risk existing in the area. Thus, continue to drill 18 shallow boreholes to release gas on the working face for the next round of K1 test and evaluation, until K1 < 0.5, which then allows for 7 m excavation ahead.

4. Results Analysis and Discussions

The high-pressure double-hole CO2-Frac and outburst prevention technology scheme was implemented in four tunnels, including return airway 1, return airway 2, return airway 3, and cutting airway in the 1301 face. The fracturing borehole dimensions and fracturing pressure were designed as shown in Figure 4. The gas desorption index of the K1 value was regularly tested after the fracturing following the measures described in Section 4.2, and the tunnel excavation speed before and after the CO2-Frac was compared and analyzed.

4.1. Outburst Risk Evaluation with K1 Value after CO2-Frac

It was estimated that all the tests of the gas desorption index K1 value would significantly decrease after the CO2-Frac in the four trial tunnels of the 1059.5 m roadway. It is confirmed that the outburst-prone coal was significantly mitigated, as indicated by the CO2-Frac.
The test results show that in the tunnel excavation of 630.5 m without CO2-Frac, a high K1 value (exceeding the standard or K1 ≥ 0.5) was tested for 16 samples, which means that there are 2.54 samples tested for a high K1 value per 100 m of excavation, indicating the roadway contains outburst risk. After CO2-Frac, there are only three samples tested for a high K1 value in the excavation tunnel of 1059.5 m, or only 0.28 samples tested for a high K1 value per 100 m of roadway excavation. This is to say that a high K1 reduced from 2.54 tests in a 100 m excavation without CO2-Frac to 0.28 tests with CO2-Frac, an 8.1-fold decrease (Table 3, Figure 6 and Figure 7), confirming that CO2-Frac significantly reduces the risk of outburst and effectively ensures continuous safe excavation (Figure 6).

4.2. Analyzing the Monthly Roadway Excavation

After CO2-Frac, the monthly excavation of the roadway is significantly increased. As shown in Figure 8, the average monthly footage of return airway 1, return airway 2, return airway 3, and starting cut was 95.18 m, 80.6 m, 70.55 m, and 80.24 m, respectively, with an average monthly footage of 81.64 m. After using dual-hole CO2-Frac, the monthly excavation footage of the four tunnels reached 166.75 m, 139.50 m, 172.06 m, 171.37 m, respectively, with an average of 162.42 m. The monthly excavation significantly increased by 0.75 times, 0.73 times, 1.44 times, and 1.14 times, respectively, with an average increase of 1 time (Figure 8). This indicates that CO2-Frac is an effective technical measure for secondary outburst prevention and rapid excavation in the outburst-prone coal seam in Yuxi Coal Mine.

4.3. Mechanism of Outburst Elimination and K1 Value Reduction by CO2-Frac

The No. 3 coal seam in Yuxi Coal Mine has a maximum gas content of 25.59 m3/t and a maximum gas pressure of 2.90 MPa, which causes the coal seam to be highly prone to outburst across a large area in the first 1301 working face. The 1-year gas pre-drainage of the underlying roadway has been conducted and reduced the gas content below 8 m3/t, thereby significantly reducing the risk of outbursts. However, due to the risk of the original gas condition being highly prone to outbursts, the gas pre-drainage is inadequate and has an uneven effectiveness in controlling outbursts. Specifically, areas with a thick mylonitic coal layer at the top of the seam are still facing gas abnormalities and frequent occurrences of small-scale outbursts during the roadway excavation. This phenomenon, which involves numerous small-scale outbursts occurring after extraction and a first round of outburst control measures, is common in severely outburst-prone coal seams. The outburst encountered during the excavation of the coal roadway in the 1301 working face is a typical example after the regional outburst control measures. The occurrence mechanism of this kind of outburst is primarily influenced by the regional distribution of layered mylonitic coal at the top as a result of coal bedding faults [36,37,38], and implementing targeted secondary prevention measures is of high necessity and urgency in China and globally.
Considering that the mechanism of the small-scale outbursts occurred in the top mylonitic coal layer during the excavation, secondary outburst prevention should effectively mitigate the outburst-prone risk in the top layer. The high-pressure CO2-Frac generates two sets of fracture system: the first is the radial long-fracture system dispersing in the whole coal seam [31,32], including the top mylonitic layer (Figure 9). Additionally, there is the nm-to-μm-scale micro-fractures network formed by multiple tri-wing fractures that disperses in the coal matrix (Figure 10) [26]. The two sets of fracture system built complex gas migration highways in the coal that significantly enhance gas desorption and releasing out of the coal seam, and which finally result in gas content dropping low. Thereby, the outburst mitigation mechanisms of CO2-Frac in this study are described as follows: the complex artificial fracture system induced by CO2-Frac in coal effectively enhanced pressure relief, increased permeability, quickened gas emission, further reduced gas content, and finally eliminated outburst-prone risk.
Quickly reducing gas content as well as then the outburst risk is the key function of CO2-Frac, which can be clearly illustrated by the large amount of reduced K1 tests after CO2-Frac, as shown in Figure 5 and Figure 6. Review Equation (3), where K1 is directly proportional to the gas content Q1 of the coal cutting samples. The lower K1 tests after CO2-Frac means that the gas content has dropped low and the outburst risk has been mitigated. Thus, we are confident that CO2-Frac can quickly reduce gas content through the highly developed artificial fracture system and then mitigate the outburst risk, since gas content always plays the most important role in inducing the coal and gas outburst. Chinese coal mining regulations defined that when the gas content is higher than 8 m3/t, the coal bears outburst risk, and the coal is without outburst risk when the gas content is lower than 8 m3/t.

5. Conclusions

This study aimed to tackle the challenges associated with gas anomalies and small-scale outbursts which persist during the excavation stages after regional outburst prevention measures of the gas pre-drainage underlying roadway (GPDUR) in coal seams. A research and industrial trial of CO2-Frac for secondary outburst prevention and rapid excavation was completed on the 1301 working face. The following conclusions were drawn:
(1)
Dual-bole and high-pressure CO2-Frac can promote the rapid release of gas, homogenize and rapidly reduce the gas pressure and gas content through intensive and uniform fracturing and a wide range of pressure relieving, so as to fully eliminate the outburst risks of tectonic coal zones that are prone to outburst, and it can effectively solve the problem of the mining–excavation connection;
(2)
After implementing high-pressure CO2-Frac, K1 exceedances per hundred meters of tunnel excavations decreased from an average of 2.54 without CO2-Frac to an average of 0.28 with CO2-Frac, an eight-fold decrease. The monthly excavation speed also increased from 81.64 m without CO2-Frac to 162.42 m with CO2-Frac, a two-fold increase;
(3)
On-site industrial tests have proven that high-pressure CO2-Frac, as an economical and efficient secondary outburst prevention technology, can effectively solve the problem of uneven and insufficient initial outburst prevention under complex gas-geological conditions. As an effective safety measure for secondary outburst prevention in coal tunnels, it is worth learning from and promoting coal tunnel excavation of severely protruding coal seams with similar gas-geological conditions.

Author Contributions

Validation, Z.X.; Formal analysis, Z.X.; Investigation, J.Z.; Resources, X.Z.; Data curation, X.Z.; Writing—review & editing, Y.C.; Supervision, Z.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42230814), the Post-doctoral Foundation of Henan Province (HN2022009), and Key Scientific and Technological Projects of Henan Province (232102320331).

Data Availability Statement

Data were curated by the authors and are available upon request.

Acknowledgments

Thank you to Shanxi Lu’an Mining (Group) Co., Ltd. for providing a scientific research platform and industrial testing site for Yuxi Coal Mine.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Li, J. The State Bureau of Mine Safety Supervision on Notice on Strengthening the Prevention and Control of Coal and Gas Outburst. Available online: https://www.chinamine-safety.gov.cn/zfxxgk/fdzdgknr/tzgg/202204/t20220415_411767.shtml (accessed on 19 July 2023).
  2. Lin, B. China’s High-Quality Economic Growth in the Process of Carbon Neutrality. China Financ. Econ. Rev. 2022, 11, 3–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Yuan, L. Challenges of countermeasures for high quality development of China’s coal industry. China Coal 2020, 46, 6–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Xie, H.; Ren, S.; Xie, Y. Development opportunities of the coal industry towards the goal of carbon neutrality. J. China Coal Soc. 2021, 46, 2197–2211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hodot, B.B. Coal and Gas Outbursts; Song, S.Z.; Wang, Y.A., Translators; China Industry Press: Beijing, China, 1966. [Google Scholar]
  6. Zheng, Z.M. Understanding the Mechanism of Coal and Gas Outbursts through Order of Magnitude and Dimensional Analysis. In Collected Works of Zheng Zhemin; Science Press: Beijing, China, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  7. Xu, T.; Tang, C.A.; Song, L. Numerical Simulation of Coupled Gas Flow in Failure Process of Gassy Coal-Rock. Chin. J. Rock Mech. Eng. 2005, 24, 1667–1673. [Google Scholar]
  8. Yang, W.; Lu, C.Z. Tunnelling outburst potential affected by mechanical properties of coal seam. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2019, 83, 99–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhao, Y.; Lin, B.Q.; Liu, T. Mechanism of multifield coupling-induced outburst in mining-disturbed coal seam. Fuel 2020, 272, 117716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yang, Y.L.; Han, P.H.; Zhao, Z.N.; Chen, W. The Method of Determining Layer in Bottom Drainage Roadway Taking Account of the Influence of Drilling Angle on Gas Extraction Effect. Sustainability 2022, 14, 5449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, H.F.; Cheng, Y.P.; Wang, L. Regional gas drainage techniques in Chinese coal mines. Int. J. Min. Sci. Technol. 2012, 22, 873–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Xie, S.; Yang, B.; Zhang, Q.; Song, H. Research on lift pressure system with combined pipeline and intensive drill-hole gas drainage along the layer in low permeability coal seam. J. Min. Sci. Technol. 2019, 4, 34–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mou, P.W.; Pan, J.N.; Wang, K.; Wei, J.; Yang, Y.; Wang, X. Influences of hydraulic fracturing on microfractures of high-rank coal under different in-situ stress conditions. Fuel 2021, 287, 119566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Dontsov, E.V. Morphology of multiple constant height hydraulic fractures versus propagation regime. Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech. 2022, 46, 1177–1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Cheng, Y.; Lu, Y.; Ge, Z.; Cheng, L.; Zheng, J.; Zhang, W. Experimental study on crack propagation control and mechanism analysis of directional hydraulic fracturing. Fuel 2018, 218, 316–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Min, R.; Chen, X.J.; Wang, L.; Huang, Z.; Li, H.T. Study and application of reasonable parameters for hydraulic punching of layer penetration boreholes in Changping Coal Mine. Energy Sci. Eng. 2023, 11, 3020–3032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kalore, S.A.; Sivakumar Babu, G.L. Hydraulic conductivity requirement of granular and geotextile filter for internally stable soils. Geotext. Geomembr. 2022, 50, 510–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wen, H.; Mi, W.S.; Fan, S.X.; Liu, M.Y.; Cheng, X.J.; Wang, H. Determining the reasonable volume required to inject liquid CO2 into a single hole and displace CH4 within the coal seam in bedding boreholes: Case study of SangShuPing coal mine. Energy 2023, 266, 126522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Mi, W.; Wen, H.; Fan, S.; Wei, G.; Liu, M.; Wang, S.; He, H.; Wu, X.; Cheng, X.; Liu, B.; et al. Pilot test of high-pressure water jet slotting with liquid CO2 injection to displace CH4 and improve coal seam permeability. Fuel 2023, 351, 128822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zou, Q.; Liu, H.; Cheng, Z.; Zhang, T.; Lin, B. Effect of Slot Inclination Angle and Borehole-Slot Ratio on Mechanical Property of Pre-cracked Coal: Implications for ECBM Recovery Using Hydraulic Slotting. Nat. Resour. Res. 2020, 29, 1705–1729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zou, Q.; Liu, H.; Jiang, Z.; Wu, X. Gas flow laws in coal subjected to hydraulic slotting and a prediction model for its permeability-enhancing effect. Energy Sources Part A Recovery Util. Environ. Eff. 2021, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Xiao, W.; Li, K.; Zhu, C.; Li, Z.; Lin, B.; Ma, C.; Si, M. Numerical Investigation on Potential Influencing Factors Affecting Drainage Effective Radius of Crossing Borehole. Sustainability 2023, 15, 2485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Li, Y.; Zhai, C.; Ding, X. Technology and application of dynamic pressure gas secondary drainage through borehole in bottom drainage roadway of high gas outburst coal seam. Saf. Coal Mines 2022, 53, 191–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Cheng, Z. Study on optimization of strata passing borehole sealing depth and borehole layout space in floor gas drainage gateway. Coal Sci. Technol. 2017, 45, 76–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Henan Energy Chemical Group Co., Ltd. Hebi Coal and Electricity Company Sixth Coal Mine ‘6.4’ Large Coal and Gas Outburst Accident Case. China Coal News. 2022. Available online: https://www.chinamine-safety.gov.cn/zfxxgk/fdzdgknr/sgcc/sgalks/202202/t20220221_408254.shtml (accessed on 21 February 2022).
  26. Cao, Y.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, X.; Liu, S.; Elsworth, D. Micro-fractures in coal induced by high pressure CO2 gas fracturing. Fuel 2022, 311, 122148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhang, J.F.; Cheng, S.F.; Gao, Z. Practice and simulation of coal-rock mining by liquid carbon dioxide blasting. Coal Sci. Technol. 2020, 48 (Suppl. S1), 24–27. [Google Scholar]
  28. Hu, G.Z.; He, W.R.; S, M. Enhancing coal seam gas using liquid CO2 phase-transition blasting with cross-measure borehole. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 2018, 60, 164–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sun, K.M.; Xin, L.W.; Wu, D. Simulation of fracture law of supercritical CO2 explosive under initial stress condition. J. Vib. Shock 2018, 37, 232–238. [Google Scholar]
  30. Chen, H.D.; Wang, Z.F.; Chen, X. Increasing permeability of coal seams using the phase energy of liquid carbon dioxide. J. CO2 Util. 2017, 19, 112–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Cao, Y.; Zhang, J.; Zhai, H.; Fu, G.; Tian, L.; Liu, S. CO2 gas fracturing: A novel reservoir stimulation technology in low permeability gassy coal seams. Fuel 2017, 203, 197–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Cao, Y.; Zhang, J.; Tian, L.; Zhai, H.; Fu, G. Research and application of CO2 gas fracturing for gas control in low permeability coal seams. J. China Coal Soc. 2017, 42, 2631–2641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. National Mine Safety Administration. Provisions on Prevention and Control of Coal and Gas Outbursts; China Coal Industry Publishing House: Beijing, China, 2019.
  34. Coal Information Research Institute. Prevention of Coal and Gas Outburst Rules and Prevention of Coal and Gas Outburst Provisions; China Coal Industry Publishing House: Beijing, China, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  35. Cheng, Y.; Zhou, H. Research progress of sensitive index and critical values for coal and gas outburst prediction. Coal Sci. Technol. 2021, 49, 146–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Cao, Y.; Peng, L.; Hou, Q. Basic characteristics of coal seam faults and their geological significance. Geol. Rev. 1993, 39, 522–528. [Google Scholar]
  37. Cao, Y.; Peng, L. Basic type of coal seam faults and their effect on controlling gas outburst zone. J. China Coal Soc. 1995, 20, 413–417. [Google Scholar]
  38. Cao, Y.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, G. Characteristics of coal and gas outburst and controlling mechanism of stress field in the hanging wall of normal faults. Coal Geol. Explor. 2022, 50, 61–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhang, F. Research into the Mechanism and Application of Liquid CO2 Phase-Transition Fracturing in a Coal Seam to Enhance Permeability. Sustainability 2023, 15, 3308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Shang, Z.; Wang, H.; Li, B.; Cheng, Y.; Zhang, X.; Wang, Z.; Geng, S.; Wang, Z.; Chen, P.; Lv, P.; et al. The effect of leakage characteristics of liquid CO2 phase transition on fracturing coal seam: Applications for enhancing coalbed methane recovery. Fuel 2022, 308, 122044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Xu, M.F. Research of Liquid CO2 Phase Transition Fracturing Technology Radius in Coal Seam. Master’s Thesis, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo, China, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  42. AQ/T 1065-2008; Determination Method of Gas Desorption Index by Drill Cuttings. Chongqing Research Institute of Coal Science Research Institute: Chongqing, China, 2008.
Figure 1. Gas-geological map of Yuxi Coal Mine.
Figure 1. Gas-geological map of Yuxi Coal Mine.
Processes 12 01925 g001
Figure 2. Engineering plan of the 1301 working face.
Figure 2. Engineering plan of the 1301 working face.
Processes 12 01925 g002
Figure 3. Sketch profile of the No. 3 coal seam.
Figure 3. Sketch profile of the No. 3 coal seam.
Processes 12 01925 g003
Figure 4. Double-hole CO2-Frac and outburst prevention layout plan.
Figure 4. Double-hole CO2-Frac and outburst prevention layout plan.
Processes 12 01925 g004
Figure 5. The layout of 9 boreholes for K1 test in the working face.
Figure 5. The layout of 9 boreholes for K1 test in the working face.
Processes 12 01925 g005
Figure 6. K1 tested before and after CO2-Frac in 4 roadways. ((a) return airway 1; (b) return airway 2; (c) return airway 3; (d) starting cut).
Figure 6. K1 tested before and after CO2-Frac in 4 roadways. ((a) return airway 1; (b) return airway 2; (c) return airway 3; (d) starting cut).
Processes 12 01925 g006
Figure 7. High K1 (≥0.5) per 100 m of tunneling before and after CO2-Frac.
Figure 7. High K1 (≥0.5) per 100 m of tunneling before and after CO2-Frac.
Processes 12 01925 g007
Figure 8. Monthly tunnel excavation footage before and after CO2-Frac.
Figure 8. Monthly tunnel excavation footage before and after CO2-Frac.
Processes 12 01925 g008
Figure 9. Radial long artificial fracture system in coal seam induced by CO2-Frac.
Figure 9. Radial long artificial fracture system in coal seam induced by CO2-Frac.
Processes 12 01925 g009
Figure 10. Tri-wing nm–μm scale fractures in coal matrix built complex fracture network. ((a) scanning electron microscope image of μm scale fractures in coal body by CO2-Frac; (b) scanning electron microscope image of nm scale fractures in coal body after fracturing; (c) schematic diagram of gas seepage.).
Figure 10. Tri-wing nm–μm scale fractures in coal matrix built complex fracture network. ((a) scanning electron microscope image of μm scale fractures in coal body by CO2-Frac; (b) scanning electron microscope image of nm scale fractures in coal body after fracturing; (c) schematic diagram of gas seepage.).
Processes 12 01925 g010
Table 1. Coal quality parameters.
Table 1. Coal quality parameters.
ParameterReflectanceMoistureAshVolatile Component
Romax (%)Mad (%)Ad (%)Vdaf (%)
Parameter r a n g e Average v a l u e 2.97 ~ 3.37 3.36 0.86 ~ 4.34 2.37 11.74 ~ 17.76 14.28 7.39 ~ 9.17 8.07
Table 2. Gas parameters of the No. 3 coal seam in intake–return air shaft.
Table 2. Gas parameters of the No. 3 coal seam in intake–return air shaft.
Sampling LocationInitial Gas Emission Velocity ΔP/mmHgProtodyakonov Coefficient f
Upper section of the coal seam in intake shaft25.21.03
Lower section of the coal seam in intake shaft26.40.87
Soft coal of the coal seam in intake shaft27.80.45
Upper section of the coal seam in return air shaft25.71.09
Middle section of the coal seam return air shaft26.80.74
Table 3. High K1 (≥0.5) tested before and after CO2-Frac.
Table 3. High K1 (≥0.5) tested before and after CO2-Frac.
RoadwayRoadway without CO2-FracRoadway with High-Pressure CO2-Frac
Footage
(m)
High K1
Tests
High K1
Tests per 100 m
Footage
(m)
High K1
Tests
High K1
Tests per 100 m
Return airway 1234.5020.85340.5000.00
Return airway 2123.0043.25242.0010.83
Return airway 3231.0052.16324.0020.62
Starting cut42.00511.90153.0000.00
Total/average 630.50162.541059.5030.28
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xu, Z.; Zhang, J.; Cao, Y.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, X. Study on Safety Tunneling Technology of Secondary Outburst Elimination by CO2 Gas Fracturing in High-Outburst Coal Seam. Processes 2024, 12, 1925. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12091925

AMA Style

Xu Z, Zhang J, Cao Y, Wang Z, Zhang X. Study on Safety Tunneling Technology of Secondary Outburst Elimination by CO2 Gas Fracturing in High-Outburst Coal Seam. Processes. 2024; 12(9):1925. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12091925

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xu, Zongwei, Junsheng Zhang, Yunxing Cao, Zhenzhi Wang, and Xinsheng Zhang. 2024. "Study on Safety Tunneling Technology of Secondary Outburst Elimination by CO2 Gas Fracturing in High-Outburst Coal Seam" Processes 12, no. 9: 1925. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12091925

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop