Next Article in Journal
Evaluation of Essential Oils as Natural Antibacterial Agents for Eggshell Sanitization and Quality Preservation
Next Article in Special Issue
VideoMamba Enhanced with Attention and Learnable Fourier Transform for Superheat Identification
Previous Article in Journal
Challenges in the Characterization and Purification of (Peptide)n-Calix[4]Resorcinarene Conjugates Synthesized via Thiol-Maleimide Reaction Using Liquid Chromatography
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Transfer Learning for Thickener Control

by
Samuel Arce Munoz
and
John D. Hedengren
*
Department of Chemical Engineering, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84604, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2025, 13(1), 223; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13010223
Submission received: 16 December 2024 / Revised: 9 January 2025 / Accepted: 10 January 2025 / Published: 14 January 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Machine Learning Optimization of Chemical Processes)

Abstract

Thickener control is a key area of focus in the minerals processing industry, particularly due to its crucial role in water recovery, which is essential for sustainable resource management. The highly nonlinear nature of thickener dynamics presents significant challenges in modeling and optimization, making it a strong candidate for advanced surrogate modeling techniques. However, traditional data-driven approaches often require extensive datasets, which are frequently unavailable, especially in new plants or unexplored operational domains. Developing data-driven models without enough data representative of the dynamics of the system could result in incorrect predictions and consequently, unstable response of the controller. This paper proposes the application of a methodology that leverages transfer learning to address these data limitations to enhance surrogate modeling and model predictive control (MPC) of thickeners. The performance of three approaches—a base model, a transfer learning model, and a physics-informed neural network (PINN)—are compared to demonstrate the effectiveness of transfer learning in improving control strategies under limited data conditions.
Keywords: model predictive control; thickener control; transfer learning; surrogate control model predictive control; thickener control; transfer learning; surrogate control

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Arce Munoz, S.; Hedengren, J.D. Transfer Learning for Thickener Control. Processes 2025, 13, 223. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13010223

AMA Style

Arce Munoz S, Hedengren JD. Transfer Learning for Thickener Control. Processes. 2025; 13(1):223. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13010223

Chicago/Turabian Style

Arce Munoz, Samuel, and John D. Hedengren. 2025. "Transfer Learning for Thickener Control" Processes 13, no. 1: 223. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13010223

APA Style

Arce Munoz, S., & Hedengren, J. D. (2025). Transfer Learning for Thickener Control. Processes, 13(1), 223. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13010223

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop