Next Article in Journal
Reliability Evaluation Method for Underground Cables Based on Double Sequence Monte Carlo Simulation
Previous Article in Journal
Experimental Investigation of Factors Influencing Spontaneous Imbibition in Shale Reservoirs
Previous Article in Special Issue
Optimization of Biodiesel–Nanoparticle Blends for Enhanced Diesel Engine Performance and Emission Reduction
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Production, Characterization Physical, Chemical, and Structural Analysis of Biochar Fines for Bio-Reinforcement in Composite Materials

by
Josinaldo Dias
*,
Amanda Conceição
,
Fabíola Martins Delatorre
and
Paula Siqueira
Agricultural Sciences and Engineering Center, Federal University of Espírito Santo, Vitória 29075-910, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2025, 13(2), 504; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13020504
Submission received: 29 September 2024 / Revised: 11 November 2024 / Accepted: 10 December 2024 / Published: 11 February 2025

Abstract

:
Several polymeric compounds are obtained from synthetic organic solids containing petrochemical derivatives. Biochar fines are considered waste and an alternative bio-reinforcement in composite materials, potentially serving as a possible substitute for non-renewable polymers based on petrochemical derivatives. In this context, the present study focuses on analyzing the properties of biochar fines obtained from the pyrolysis of Eucalyptus sp. biomass, aiming to support the use of this waste in the fabrication of a composite using biochar as a bio-reinforcement. The biochar was produced through pyrolysis in a muffle furnace at a final temperature of 800 °C, with a heating rate of 5 °C min−1 and a residence time of 60 min. The characterization of the obtained fines involved proximate analysis, Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) analysis, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), and X-ray diffraction (XRD). The results show that the material has a high fixed carbon content, high density, and good thermal resistance, making it stand out for use in composites.

1. Introduction

The incorporation of industrial waste into plastic composites has proven to be an effective strategy for improving the mechanical and thermal properties of these materials, in addition to reducing their environmental impact. This approach, explored in various studies [1,2], opens up new possibilities for the development of more sustainable materials with diverse applications. In this study, the properties of Eucalyptus sp. biochar were investigated as a bio-reinforcement in high-density polyethylene (HDPE) composites, aiming to develop more sustainable materials with enhanced mechanical and thermal properties. Studies conducted by Asyraf et al. (2023) have identified that lignocellulosic biomass fibers can provide significantly higher mechanical performance for several applications. Lignocellulosic biomass composites represent a promising alternative to replace conventional composites, especially in secondary structural applications that require low and medium impact resistance properties [3].
Brazil holds a leading position globally in charcoal production, with 7 million tons produced in 2022 [4]. Biochar is a highly friable material, produced in large quantities through the thermochemical conversion of plant biomass [5]. However, due to its high friability defined as the tendency of a solid material to fragment or disintegrate under friction, impact, or pressure, it generates a significant number of fines, which can account for up to 25% of the total produced [6]. The improper disposal of these residues poses a major challenge for industries, leading to additional operational costs related to final disposal and the potential for fines due to non-compliance with environmental regulations. Moreover, improper disposal can contaminate soil and water resources, causing harm to the environment and human health.
Charcoal, the main product of pyrolysis, emerges as a promising alternative to partially replace conventional reinforcements such as glass fibers, carbon fibers, natural fibers, and mineral particles in polymer matrices due to its relatively low cost and high availability. Its high thermal stability makes it suitable for melt processing [7]. Additionally, its carbon-based, porous, and hydrophobic structure allows for more significant interaction with polymer matrices [8].
The literature corroborates that the porosity of coal facilitates the interpenetration of polymeric resins, establishing a more intimate interface between the reinforcement and the matrix, which significantly enhances the mechanical strength of the composite [9,10]. However, the penetration of the polymer into the coal’s pores depends on the viscosity of the polymeric resin and the pore size, as well as the dimensions of the fine coal particles used as filler [10,11].
Polyethylene (PE), the most widely used polymer in the world, while recognized for its versatility and durability, presents significant challenges, such as its reliance on fossil resources and resistance to environmental degradation. The search for sustainable alternatives that maintain technical performance while reducing environmental impact is essential to mitigate these effects [12,13].
The production of biochar must meet specific chemical and physical properties for its effective application [14]. These characteristics need to be accurately understood and quantified in order to guide production decisions and optimize its performance as a bio-filler in polymer composites. In this context, it is essential to deepen the understanding of biochar’s behavior in response to carbonization variables and how its properties correlate, influencing the performance of the resulting composites. To achieve this, the use of relevant analyses, such as thermogravimetry (TGA), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and X-ray diffractograms, is crucial, providing support for greater control over composite production.
In this context, recent studies [1,2] have explored the valorization of these fines as bio-reinforcement in the development of polymer composites, thereby expanding their industrial applications. Accordingly, the present study aimed to evaluate the properties of biochar derived from commercial Eucalyptus spp. wood, with an emphasis on the potential valorization of charcoal residues and the development of new materials.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Production of Biochar Fines

For charcoal production, wood disk residues of Eucalyptus sp. from different longitudinal positions (BRA) along the trunk (base, 25%, 50%, 75%, and top) were used approximately 1–2 cm in length. The samples underwent a two-stage grinding process: First, the material was coarsely ground in a Tigre A4 hammer mill (Moinhos Tigre, São Paulo, Brazil). Subsequently, to obtain a fine and homogeneous particle size, the material underwent fine grinding in a Willy TE-650 knife mill (Tecnal, Piracicaba, Brazil) to achieve a particle size of approximately 50 mesh. The samples were then oven-dried at 103 ± 2 °C for 20 h prior to pyrolysis. The reduction in biomass particle size facilitated heat transfer during carbonization, resulting in a significant increase in the yield of biochar fines.
Pyrolysis was performed in a fixed-bed reactor, a straightforward, reliable, and widely established technology for processing solid feedstock particles with uniform size [15,16]. In each experiment, 250 g of feedstock was placed in a sealed metal reactor, 8 cm in diameter and 15 cm in length, placed inside a muffle furnace. The experiments were carried out in a low-oxygen atmosphere, without gas input, with an initial temperature of 30 °C and a final furnace temperature of 800 °C, at a heating rate of 5 °C/min and a residence time at a final temperature of 120 min. A gas condenser cooled with water and ice was coupled to the muffle furnace. These procedures followed the descriptions provided by Delatorre et al. [5].
The dried material was then pyrolyzed in a muffle furnace, reaching a final temperature of 800 °C, with a heating rate of 5 °C min−1 and a residence time at the final temperature of 60 min. These procedures followed the descriptions provided by Delatorre et al.
The preparation sequence of the residue, detailed in Figure 1, followed the protocol proposed by Delatorre et al. [5]. The raw residue was subjected to a size reduction process using a hammer mill followed by a knife mill. The resulting particulate material was then subjected to pyrolysis, ultimately yielding biochar fines.
To ensure a homogeneous distribution of the carbon fines in the polymer matrix, pilot tests were performed to identify the ideal particle size for the matrix used in this research. To this end, the particles underwent a classification process, selecting those that passed through the 40-mesh sieve (0.425 mm), and were retained in the 60-mesh sieve (0.250 mm). The choice of particles with this size aimed to minimize the formation of agglomerates and ensure a uniform distribution of the reinforcement in the matrix, promoting better interaction between the phases and, consequently, improving the properties of the composite material.

2.2. Characterization of Biochar Fines

The determination of the gravimetric yield in biochar (GY) was carried out based on the initial mass of the wood sawdust and the mass of the biochar, using Equation (1).
G Y ( % ) = M c v M m     100
where Mcv = dry mass of biochar; Mm = dry mass of wood.
The apparent density was determined following the guidelines of the NBR 11941 standard [17] by immersing biochar pieces in water. Subsequently, the samples were placed in an oven at 103 ± 2 °C and, after drying, removed from the oven and weighed using an analytical balance. The apparent density was calculated with five repetitions based on the ratio of the dry mass of the sample. This was estimated by dividing the mass of the biochar sample by its volume, as per Equation (2).
A D = M V
where M = co-pyrolytic coal mass; V = volume.
The determination of the true density of the biochar sample was conducted in accordance with the NBR 9165 standard [18]. A pycnometer was used to analyze the powdered sample, which had a particle size of 60 mesh (0.250 mm) and was previously dried. Thus, the mass of the system (pycnometer + water + coal) was determined using the equation below:
D V = M s ( M s ( M w M w ) )
where DV = true density (kg/m3); Ms = mass of the dry material (kg); Mw = mass of the pycnometer + water + material (kg); Mw’ = mass of the pycnometer with water (kg).
For the determination of immediate analysis, the fixed carbon content, volatile materials, and ash (on a dry basis) were determined following the procedures outlined in ASTM D1762-84 [19]. A microprocessor-controlled muffle furnace model Q318M24 (Quimis, Diadema, Brazil) was used.
To understand the mass variation in the biochar, thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was conducted using LABSYS EVO SETARAM (LabWrench, Midland, ON, Canada) equipment with a heating rate of 10 °C min−1 and a particle size of the biochar of 60 mesh (0.250 mm). Thermograms were recorded from ambient temperature (25 °C) in a nitrogen gas atmosphere with a flow rate of 1.8 bar up to 600 °C.
The observation of the morphology of coal fines obtained from pyrolysis was conducted using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Micrographs were obtained with a JEOL JSM 840A equipment (LabWrench, Midland, ON, Canada), operating with an electron beam at an acceleration voltage of 10 kV and a current of 6 × 10−11 A.
Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) analysis was also conducted to characterize and apply the surface area and porosity properties of the fine biochar. For this analysis, the samples underwent a thermal pre-treatment in a muffle furnace at 200 °C for 2 h. The analysis was performed using the JWGB MESO 112 equipment (JWGB Sci & Tech Co., Ltd, Beijing, China, with nitrogen gas for adsorption, at a temperature of 200 °C.
To characterize the crystalline structure of the biochar, X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis was performed. X-ray diffractograms were recorded from samples with a particle size of 60 mesh using a Rigaku MiniFlex600-C diffractometer (Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan). The diffraction angle 2θ ranged from 10° to 80° in increments of 0.02°, with a scan rate of 0.5 °C min−1.

3. Results

The gravimetric yields of the biochar obtained from the carbonization of the wood are presented in Table 1. The average yield was 28.27%. The average value observed in this study was higher than that reported by Delatorre et al. [20], who used a carbonization system similar to the one in this work and achieved a gravimetric yield of biochar in the range of 24.82% at a temperature of 800 °C in their study on biochar fines obtained from the pyrolysis of Eucalyptus sp. wood. Thus, the biochar yields obtained in this study are consistent with the values reported in the literature, where a minimum yield of 30% is commonly observed [21].
It is noteworthy that the achievement of higher biochar yields is a relevant factor for the efficient production of carbonaceous composites, as it ensures a larger volume of material to compose the matrix. Therefore, the chemical and physical properties of the biochar play a crucial role in the synergy between the components of the composites, significantly influencing the final properties of the composite material [21,22].
The gravimetric yield, although a relevant parameter, does not prove to be decisive for the applicability of biochar in composites. The optimization of the carbonization process, aimed at obtaining high-quality biochar, can compensate for a lower gravimetric yield, as the quality of the biochar is directly related to the properties of the final composite material.
Table 2 presents the means and descriptive analysis of the apparent and true densities of the produced biochar fines. The average values found were 306.4 and 1193.9 kg/m3 for the apparent and true densities, respectively. The apparent density of biochar has a significant influence on its mechanical properties. Materials with higher density tend to exhibit greater mechanical strength. This correlation can be attributed to the structural reorganization of the biomass during the carbonization process, resulting in a more graphitic structure, which imparts greater stiffness and strength to the material [23].
The density results indicate that the produced biochar exhibits high potential as a bio-reinforcement in polymer matrices. The higher density of the reinforcement suggests potential for increased stiffness and strength in the composite material, thus expanding its applications in areas requiring high structural performance, as evidenced by Delatorre et al. [11].
Apparent relative density values for biochar from Eucalyptus clones and species are frequently found in the literature, ranging from 266 kg/m3 to 351 kg/m3 [24,25], validating the methodology used and reinforcing the reliability of the results.
The results obtained regarding the influence of volatile matter content, fixed carbon, and biochar ash on the production of composites are presented in Table 3. The fixed carbon content is one of the primary indicators of the quality of biomass charcoal [26]. However, a comprehensive assessment of biochar properties requires consideration of additional attributes, such as porosity, to optimize its application [14].
Results similar to those found in this study were reported by Dufourny [27], who identified fixed carbon contents ranging from 80.5% to 98.1% in the carbonization of Eucalyptus globulus wood at 800 °C.
The presence of carbonaceous material is crucial for the use of charcoal as a reinforcement in composites. Biochar possesses a stable internal structure, similar to that of graphite, and a reactive peripheral structure due to the presence of various chemical groups (carboxylic, hydroxyl, ester, phenolic, carbonyl, among others) that can bond with organic substances, water, and chemical elements [28]. The graphitic structure present in biochar, formed during pyrolysis, plays a crucial role in the interaction with the polymer matrix. The high surface area and the presence of reactive functional groups on the surface of the graphite facilitate the formation of chemical and physical bonds with the polymers, potentially resulting in composites with enhanced mechanical and thermal properties.
Regarding ash content, the use of charcoal with high levels of this component is not recommended, as it indicates an elevated presence of minerals in the fuel, which may compromise the quality of the produced material by causing segregation and reducing its properties [26]. Although the ash content is low, a high coefficient of variation was observed, as also noted by Trugilho et al. [29], who highlight the significant variability of this characteristic, which may be related to various environmental and production factors.
Moreover, materials with higher carbon content generally exhibit greater mechanical strength [30]. The reduction in the ash content of the produced biochar indicates an increase in carbon purity, which can enhance the interaction with the polymer matrix and improve the mechanical properties of the composites.
According to Gomes [31], the fixed carbon content has a negative correlation with the volatile matter content and also with the yield of biochar, as obtaining biochar with a high carbon content requires higher pyrolysis temperatures, which results in a lower yield of biochar.
Li et al. [32] investigated the effect of carbon content in coal gangue and polyethylene composites. The results demonstrated a direct correlation between the increase in carbon content and the enhancement of the density, hardness, flexural strength, and elastic modulus of the composites. The microstructural analysis revealed that the carbon content significantly influenced the mechanical properties of the composite.
These findings underscore the potential of coal, with high fixed carbon content, as a reinforcing agent in polymer matrices, providing a new perspective for the development of composite materials with improved mechanical properties.
The microscopy images presented in Figure 2 show the results obtained from the scanning electron microscopy analysis of the produced biochar fines. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) revealed a porous and heterogeneous microstructure in the particles, as observed in images obtained at magnifications of 1000× and 2000×.
Similar results were reported by Martins et al. [33], who observed a considerable number of pores, particularly mesopores and macropores, in the micrographs of biochar obtained from the biomass of Eucalyptus sp. sawdust. This increase in porosity was particularly evident when the pyrolysis temperature was raised from 400 to 500 °C.
The porous microstructure of biochar, characterized by a complex network of interconnected pores and voids, serves as a mold for the infiltration of the polymer matrix during composite processing [34]. Polymers with good fluidity enable deep penetration into the pores, establishing a significant interfacial interface between the phases. This enhanced interaction contributes to improved adhesion between the matrix and the reinforcement, optimizing the mechanical properties of the composite.
The porous microstructure of biochar, characterized by a pore distribution demonstrated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), can be thoroughly analyzed using Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) analysis. BET analysis reveals the average pore diameter (nm), surface area (m2·g−1), and total pore volume (m3·g−1) of the produced charcoal (Table 4).
The surface area analysis of the biochar yielded a value of 293.136 m2/g (Table 4). This high surface area is largely attributed to the production conditions, especially the elevated temperatures used during the carbonization process.
Dias Junior et al. [14] have shown that carbonization parameters, including the final temperature, play a pivotal role in the formation and development of biochar’s porous structure, directly impacting its surface area. The pore characterization of the biochar fines indicated an average pore diameter of 2.374 nm. According to the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) [35], pores are classified as micropores (diameter < 2 nm), mesopores (diameter between 2 and 50 nm), and macropores (diameter > 50 nm).
Considering the IUPAC classification [35] for porosity, the produced biochar can be categorized as mesoporous. The predominance of mesopores in this material is consistent with the high specific surface area obtained, as the presence of intermediate-sized pores, such as mesopores, provides a greater contact area for interactions, contributing to the increase in specific surface area.
The combined analysis of SEM and BET allows us to conclude that the material exhibits a well-developed mesoporous structure. The SEM micrographs clearly demonstrate the presence of intermediate-sized pores, while the BET analysis quantifies the specific surface area associated with these pores.
The porous structure of coal serves as a support for the anchoring of polymer chains, promoting a closer interaction between the phases and, consequently, enhanced mechanical properties. However, the efficiency of this mechanism depends on the compatibility between the pore size of the coal and the viscosity of the polymer resin [10,11,34].
The highly developed porous structure of the studied biochar makes it a promising candidate for application in composites. The large number of pores and the high surface area facilitate excellent interaction with the polymer matrix, optimizing the mechanical properties of the composite material.
X-ray diffraction analysis was conducted to identify the crystalline phases present in the biochar fines and to understand how these phases may contribute to the interaction with the polymer matrix. The XRD pattern exhibits three main peaks: the first between 22° and 23° (2θ), the second between 25° and 26°, and the third between 43° and 44° (2θ) (Figure 3).
The detection of peaks around 25° (2θ) suggests the occurrence of crystallization processes in materials that, while exhibiting an increase in structural order, have not yet attained a fully developed crystalline organization [36].
The X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis, as highlighted by Fernandes et al. [37], reveals that pyrolysis at high temperatures promotes the formation of a predominantly amorphous carbon structure in biochars. The progressive loss of crystallinity in cellulose, evidenced by the broadening of the peak at 23.5° (2θ), along with the emergence of a broad peak between 22° and 26° attributed to carbon (002), supports this assertion. The increase in the intensity of the peak at 43.7° (2θ) starting from 750 °C suggests the formation of more complex and disordered carbonaceous structures.
Li et al. [32] highlighted the fundamental role of carbon content in modulating the properties of polyethylene composites. Variations in carbon content significantly influence the crystallinity of the polymer, with direct implications for the mechanical properties of the composite material. These findings underscore the potential of carbon as an effective reinforcement for the production of composite materials with optimized properties, opening up new avenues for the development of advanced materials across various fields.

4. Conclusions

The results of this study indicate that charcoal produced from Eucalyptus sp. biomass at 800 °C exhibits promising characteristics for application as a bio-reinforcement, enabling greater interaction and compatibility with polymer matrices.
  • The high fixed carbon content present in the biochar fines significantly contributes to the increased strength and thermal stability of the composites.
  • The thermal resistance of the material is a crucial factor that broadens the applicability of composites, making them suitable for high-temperature environments.
  • The biodegradable nature of biochar fines contributes to reducing the environmental impact of composites that utilize synthetic reinforcements, as it facilitates their natural decomposition and minimizes waste generation.
  • The experimental data support the hypothesis that coal fines can be utilized as bio-reinforcement, contributing to the development of composite materials with enhanced mechanical properties and reduced environmental impact.
  • This research opens new perspectives for the utilization of an industrial byproduct, promoting circular economy and sustainability. However, for the full exploration of the potential of biochar as a bio-reinforcement, more in-depth studies are essential regarding the optimization of the pyrolysis process and the characterization of the interfaces between the biochar and the polymeric matrix.
However, to fully exploit the potential of charcoal as a bio-reinforcement, further in-depth studies on optimizing the pyrolysis process and characterizing the interfaces between charcoal and various polymer matrices are essential.

Author Contributions

Each author contributed to this article. J.D. conceived and designed the experiments; A.C., F.M.D. and P.S. performed the experiments and analyzed the experimental data; A.C. wrote the manuscript; J.D., F.M.D., A.C. and P.S. revised the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work is supported by the Espírito Santo Research and Innovation Support Foundation (FAPES) by grant number 2025-QK2L2 and the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq), by grant number 444623/2024-8.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article; further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Das, S.C.; Ashek-E-Khoda, S.; Sayeed, M.A.; Paul, D.; Dhar, S.A.; Grammatikos, S.A. On the use of wood charcoal filler to improve the properties of natural fiber reinforced polymer composites. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 44, 926–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Akaluzia, R.O.; Edoziuno, F.O.; Adediran, A.A.; Odoni, B.U.; Edibo, S.; Olayanju, T.M.A. Evaluation of the effect of reinforcement particle sizes on the impact and hardness properties of hardwood charcoal particulate-polyester resin composites. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 38, 570–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Asyraf, M.R.M.; Syamsir, A.; Ishak, M.R.; Sapuan, S.M.; Nurazzi, N.M.; Norrrahim, M.N.F.; Ilyas, R.A.; Khan, T.; Rashid, M.Z.A. Mechanical Properties of Hybrid Lignocellulosic Fiber-Reinforced Biopolymer Green Composites: A Review. Fibers Polym. 2023, 24, 337–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Indústria Brasileira de Árvores (IBÁ). Relatório Atual 2023. Available online: https://www.iba.org/publicacoes (accessed on 15 August 2024).
  5. Delatorre, F.M.; Cupertino, G.F.M.; Silva, Á.M.; Santos Junior, A.J.; Mesquita, J.G.; Júnior, A.F.D. Potencial energético dos finos de carvão vegetal. Ed. Científica Digit. 2020, 1, 639–653. [Google Scholar]
  6. Dias Júnior, A.F.; Pirola, L.P.; Takeshyta, S.; Lana, A.Q.; Brito, J.O.; Andrade, A.M. Higroscopicity of charcoal produced in different temperatures. Cerne 2016, 22, 423–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Li, S.; Li, X.; Deng, Q.; Li, D. Three kinds of charcoal powder reinforced ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene composites with excellent mechanical and electrical properties. Mater. Des. 2015, 85, 54–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Polok-Rubiniec, M.; Włodarczyk-Fligier, A. Polypropylene matrix composite with charcoal filler. J. Achiev. Mater. Manuf. Eng. 2020, 103, 60–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Das, O.; Sarmah, A.K.; Bhattacharyya, D. Biocomposites from Waste Derived Biochars: Mechanical, Thermal, Chemical, and Morphological Properties. Waste Manag. 2016, 49, 560–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Batista, E.M.C.C.; Shultz, J.; Matos, T.T.S.; Fornari, M.R.; Ferreira, T.M.; Szpoganicz, B.; de Freitas, R.A.; Mangrich, A.S. Effect of Surface and Porosity of Biochar on Water Holding Capacity Aiming Indirectly at Preservation of the Amazon Biome. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 10677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Delatorre, F.M.; Cupertino, G.F.M.; Oliveira, M.P.; Gomes, F.S.; Profeti, L.P.R.; Profeti, D.; Dias Júnior, A.F. A novel approach to charcoal fine waste: Sustainable use as filling of polymeric matrices. Polymers 2022, 14, 5525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Ren, Y.; Zhang, D.; Yin, Y.; Ye, Z.; Yin, Z.; Tu, S.; Zhao, S. Mechanically strong, thermostable, and flame-retardant composites enabled by Brown paper made from bamboo. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2022, 226, 109544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Li, C.; Liao, H.; Gao, H.; Zhang, H.; Cheng, F. A facile green and cost-effective manufacturing process from coal gangue-reinforced composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2023, 233, 109908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Dias Junior, A.F.; Esteves, R.P.; Silva, A.M.; Sousa Júnior, A.D.; Oliveira, M.P.; Brito, J.O.; Braga, B.M. Investigating the pyrolysis temperature to define the use of charcoal. Eur. J. Wood Wood Prod. 2020, 78, 193–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kumar, R.; Gunjal, J.; Chauhan, S. Effect of carbonization temperature on properties of natural fiber and charcoal filled hybrid polymer composite. Compos. Part B Eng. 2021, 217, 108846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhiwei Wang, K.G.; Burra, T.; Lei, A.K. Gupta. Co-pyrolysis of waste plastic and solid biomass for synergistic production of biofuels and chemicals-A review. Prog. Energy Combust. Science 2021, 84, 100899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. ABNT NBR 11941; Wood—Determination of Basic Density. Brazilian National Standards Organization: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2003.
  18. ABNT NBR 9165; Carvão Vegetal: Determinação da Densidade Relativa Aparente, Relativa Verdadeira e Porosidade—Método de Ensaio. Brazilian National Standards Organization: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 1985.
  19. ASTM D 1762-84; Standard Method for Chemical Analyses of Wood Charcoal. American Society for Testing and Materials, ASTM: Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2021; p. 1042.
  20. Delatorre, F.M.; Pereira, A.K.S.; Silva, Á.M.; Souza, E.C.; Oliveira, M.P.; Profeti, D.; Dias Júnior, A.F. The addition of charcoal fines can increase the photodegradation resistance of polymeric biocomposites. Environ. Sci. Proc. 2021, 13, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Loureiro, B.A.; Vieira, T.A.S.; Costa, L.J.; Silva, A.B.; Assis, M.R.D.; Trugilho, P.F. Selection of superior clones of Corymbia hybrids based on wood and charcoal properties. Maderas Cienc. Tecnol. 2019, 21, 619–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ho, M.P.; Lau, K.T.; Wang, H.; Hui, D. Improvement on the Properties of Polylactic Acid (PLA) Using Bamboo Charcoal Particles. Compos. B Eng. 2015, 81, 14–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Assis, M.R.; Brancheriau, L.; Napoli, A.; Trugilho, P.F. Factors affecting the mechanics of carbonized wood: Literature review. Wood Sci. Technol. 2016, 50, 519–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Botrel, M.C.G.; Trugilho, P.F.; Rosado, S.C.S.; Silva, J.R.M. Melhoramento genético das propriedades do carvão vegetal de Eucalyptus. Rev. Árvore 2007, 31, 391–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Neves, T.A.; Protásio, T.P.; Couto, A.M.; Trugilho, P.F.; Silva, V.O.; Vieira, C.M.M. Avaliação de clones de Eucalyptus em diferentes locais visando à produção de carvão vegetal. Pesqui. Florest. Bras. 2011, 31, 319–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Souza, N.D.; Amodei, J.B.; Xavier, C.N.; Dias Júnior, A.F.; Carvalho, A.M.D. Estudo de caso de uma planta de carbonização: Avaliação de características e qualidade do carvão vegetal visando uso siderúrgico. Floresta Ambiente 2016, 23, 270–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Dufourny, A.; Van De Steene, L.; Humbert, G.; Guibal, D.; Martin, L.; Blin, J. Influence of pyrolysis conditions and the nature of the wood on the quality of charcoal as a 34 reducing agent. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2019, 137, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mangrich, A.S.; Maia, C.M.B.F.; Novotny, E.H. Biocarvão: As terras pretas de índios e o sequestro de carbono. Ciência Hoje 2011, 281, 48–52. [Google Scholar]
  29. Trugilho, P.F.; da Silva, J.R.M.; Mori, F.A.; Lima, J.T.; Mendes, L.M.; de Barros Mendes, L.F. Rendimentos e características do carvão vegetal em função da posição radial de amostragem em clones de Eucalyptus. Cerne 2005, 11, 178–186. [Google Scholar]
  30. Mullani, N.; Ali, I.; Dongale, T.D.; Kim, G.H.; Choi, B.J.; Basit, M.A.; Park, T.J. Comportamento de comutação resistiva aprimorado de filme composto de nanotubos de carbono de paredes múltiplas/nanorods de TiO2 por reservatório de vacância de oxigênio aumentado. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2020, 108, 104907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gomes, F.S. Investigando a Temperatura de Pirólise e o Carvão Vegetal. Masters Thesis, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Vitória, Brazil, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  32. Li, C.; Liao, H.; Gao, H.; Cheng, F. Effect of fixed carbon on the interfacial compatibility of coal gangue/polyethylene composites was investigated using anthracite as a model compound. Polym. Compos. 2024, 45, 8601–8612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Martins, A.F.; Diniz, J.; Stahl, J.A.; Cardoso, A.D.L. Characterization of liquid products and char from the pyrolysis of eucalyptus sawdust. Química Nova 2007, 30, 873–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ayrilmis, N.; Kwon, J.H.; Han, T.H.; Durmus, A. Effect of wood-derived charcoal content on properties of wood plastic composites. Mater. Res. 2015, 18, 654–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. IUPAC. International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry, 2011. Available online: https://iupac.org/ (accessed on 28 September 2024).
  36. Lee, S.H.; Kang, D.S.; Lee, S.M.; Roh, J.S. X-ray diffraction analysis of the effect of ball milling time on crystallinity of milled polyacrylonitrile-based carbon fiber. Carbon Lett. 2018, 26, 11–17. [Google Scholar]
  37. Fernandes, B.C.C.; Mendes, K.F.; Dias Júnior, A.F.; Caldeira, V.P.S.; Teófilo, T.M.S.; Silva, T.S.; Silva, D.V. Impact of pyrolysis temperature on the properties of eucalyptus wood-derived biochar. Materials 2020, 13, 5841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Sequential stages of Eucalyptus sp. biomass fragmentation up to the production of fines. (a) Initial biomass collected, exhibiting heterogeneous particle size distribution; (b) biomass after initial fragmentation in the hammer mill, showing a more uniform particle size with smaller particles; (c) end biomass after grinding in the knife mill, achieving a particle size of 0.053 mm; (d) fines obtained after the pyrolysis process.
Figure 1. Sequential stages of Eucalyptus sp. biomass fragmentation up to the production of fines. (a) Initial biomass collected, exhibiting heterogeneous particle size distribution; (b) biomass after initial fragmentation in the hammer mill, showing a more uniform particle size with smaller particles; (c) end biomass after grinding in the knife mill, achieving a particle size of 0.053 mm; (d) fines obtained after the pyrolysis process.
Processes 13 00504 g001
Figure 2. Micrographs of the produced coal fines at magnifications of (A) 50×; (B) 200×; (C) 1000×; and (D) 2000×.
Figure 2. Micrographs of the produced coal fines at magnifications of (A) 50×; (B) 200×; (C) 1000×; and (D) 2000×.
Processes 13 00504 g002
Figure 3. X-ray diffraction patterns of produced biochar.
Figure 3. X-ray diffraction patterns of produced biochar.
Processes 13 00504 g003
Table 1. Average values of gravimetric yield in charcoal (GCY) from Eucalyptus sp. wood.
Table 1. Average values of gravimetric yield in charcoal (GCY) from Eucalyptus sp. wood.
PyrolysisGCV (%)
129.20
227.35
Mean28.27
CVe4.63
Table 2. Average values of apparent and true density of biochar fines.
Table 2. Average values of apparent and true density of biochar fines.
RepetitionsApparent Density (kg/m3)True Density (kg/m3)
13241278.3
2300998.1
32961323.5
43081194.8
53041174.4
Mean306.41193.82
Standard deviation10.807125.138
Coefficient of variation3.52710.482
Table 3. Immediate analysis of produced biochar. FC = fixed carbon (%); VM = volatile matter (%); AS = ash (%).
Table 3. Immediate analysis of produced biochar. FC = fixed carbon (%); VM = volatile matter (%); AS = ash (%).
RepetitionsVolatile Matter Content (%)Ash Content (%)Fixed Carbon Content (%)
110.660.2589.09
210.480.0589.47
39.510.1190.38
412.930.1586.92
510.870.6188.52
Mean10.890.2388.87
Standard deviation1.250.221.28
Coefficient of variation11.4995.081.44
Table 4. Average values of the mean pore diameter, specific surface area (SSA), and total pore volume of the produced biochar.
Table 4. Average values of the mean pore diameter, specific surface area (SSA), and total pore volume of the produced biochar.
Average Pore Diameter (nm)Surface Area (m2·g−1)Total Pore Volume (m3·g−1)
2.374 ± (0.683)293.136 ± (36.68)0.174 ± (0.0254)
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dias, J.; Conceição, A.; Delatorre, F.M.; Siqueira, P. Production, Characterization Physical, Chemical, and Structural Analysis of Biochar Fines for Bio-Reinforcement in Composite Materials. Processes 2025, 13, 504. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13020504

AMA Style

Dias J, Conceição A, Delatorre FM, Siqueira P. Production, Characterization Physical, Chemical, and Structural Analysis of Biochar Fines for Bio-Reinforcement in Composite Materials. Processes. 2025; 13(2):504. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13020504

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dias, Josinaldo, Amanda Conceição, Fabíola Martins Delatorre, and Paula Siqueira. 2025. "Production, Characterization Physical, Chemical, and Structural Analysis of Biochar Fines for Bio-Reinforcement in Composite Materials" Processes 13, no. 2: 504. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13020504

APA Style

Dias, J., Conceição, A., Delatorre, F. M., & Siqueira, P. (2025). Production, Characterization Physical, Chemical, and Structural Analysis of Biochar Fines for Bio-Reinforcement in Composite Materials. Processes, 13(2), 504. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13020504

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop