Next Article in Journal
Assessment and Optimization of Residential Microgrid Reliability Using Genetic and Ant Colony Algorithms
Next Article in Special Issue
Investigation of Surface Quality and Productivity in Precision Hard Turning of AISI 4340 Steel Using Integrated Approach of ML-MOORA-PSO
Previous Article in Journal
Denoising Method of a Power Quality Signal Based on Parameter Coordination of Membership Function in Fuzzy Logic Theory
Previous Article in Special Issue
Surface Topography Analysis and Surface Roughness Prediction Model of Diamond Wire-Sawed NdFeB Magnet Based on Optimized Back Propagation Neural Network
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Optimized Machining Parameters for High-Speed Turning Process: A Comparative Study of Dry and Cryo+MQL Techniques

1
Mechanical Engineering Department, College of Engineering, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Alkharj 11942, Saudi Arabia
2
Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Selangor, Malaysia
3
Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, NED University of Engineering and Technology, Karachi 75270, Pakistan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2025, 13(3), 739; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13030739
Submission received: 14 February 2025 / Revised: 24 February 2025 / Accepted: 25 February 2025 / Published: 4 March 2025

Abstract

:
Hard turning is a precision machining process used to cut materials with hardnesses exceeding 45 HRC using single-point tools. It offers an efficient alternative to traditional grinding for finishing operations in manufacturing. This paper explores the machinability of hardened AISI 4340 steel for a hard turning process utilizing dry and cryogenic (Cryo) plus minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) (Cryo+MQL) techniques, focusing on critical machinability aspects such as cutting force, surface roughness, and tool life. The orthogonal dry turning was performed with a cutting speed (V) ranging from 300–400 m/min, a feed rate (f) between 0.05 and 1 mm/rev, and a depth of cut (doc) from 0.1 to 0.3 mm. A statistical analysis of the obtained results revealed that the feed rate was the most influential parameter, contributing 50.69% to the main cutting force and 80.03% to surface roughness. For tool life, cutting speed was identified as the dominant factor, with a contribution rate of 39.73%. Multi-objective optimization using Grey relational analysis (GRA) identified the optimal machining parameters for the hard turning of AISI 4340 alloy steel as V = 300 m/min, f = 0.05 mm/rev, and doc = 0.1 mm. The Cryo+MQL technique was subsequently applied to these parameters, yielding significant improvements, with a 48% reduction in surface roughness and a 184.5% increase in tool life, attributed to enhanced lubrication and cooling efficiency. However, a slight 4.6% increase in cutting force was observed, likely due to surface hardening induced by the low-temperature LN2 cooling. Furthermore, reduced adhesion and tool fracture on the principal cutting edge under Cryo+MQL conditions justify the superior surface quality and extended tool life achieved. This research highlights the industrial relevance of hybrid lubrication in addressing challenges associated with hard turning processes.

1. Introduction

Hard turning has become a key technique in advanced manufacturing, particularly within the framework of sustainable machining. As an alternative to conventional grinding, it enhances productivity and machining efficiency while minimizing environmental impact [1]. Sustainable manufacturing aims to reduce ecological damage while maintaining a balance between cutting performance and environmental conservation. This approach enables high-quality machining outputs with excellent surface finishes, especially for difficult-to-cut materials such as titanium, nickel, and high-strength alloy steels [2]. Among various shape-forming processes, hard turning is increasingly preferred for machining cylindrical components made from pre-heat-treated materials, due to its ability to deliver superior surface quality and dimensional accuracy [3]. Despite its advantages, hard turning presents significant challenges, particularly at high cutting speeds. The process generates high stresses and intense temperatures in the cutting zone, which can degrade tool life, compromise surface integrity, and diminish overall machining performance. These factors are critical in modern manufacturing industries, where product quality and production efficiency are paramount [4]. In this context, advancements in research have primarily focused on three key areas: (a) tool materials, (b) tool coatings, and (c) sustainable cooling and lubrication techniques. Despite these innovations, achieving optimal machining performance remains a challenge. Optimizing machining parameters is critical to addressing machinability issues and ensuring high-quality outputs. Parameters such as cutting speed, feed rate, and depth of cut play a pivotal role in determining cutting forces, surface roughness, tool wear, and chip morphology [5]. Effective optimization of these parameters not only improves machining performance but also extends tool life and reduces energy consumption, contributing to more efficient and sustainable manufacturing practices. Yaqoob et al. [6] optimized machining parameters for the hard turning process using Grey relation analysis (GRA) and found that a CVD-coated tool, operating at a cutting speed of 300 m/min, a feed rate of 0.05 mm/rev, and a depth of cut of 0.1 mm, yielded the longest tool life and the best surface finish. In addition to optimizing the machining parameters, using an effective cooling and lubrication medium can further enhance machinability. For instance, the recent adoption of hybrid lubrication, which combines cooling and lubrication, has been shown to significantly improve the production efficiency of hard-to-machine materials [7]. In a recent study, Sirin [8] reported a 34–39% reduction in surface roughness and a 36.7–42% decrease in vibration peaks with the application of Cryo+MQL lubrication, compared to dry and initial cryogenic conditions, during the turning of Hastelloy C22 superalloy using a TiAlN-TiN PVD-coated tool. Wu et al. [9] conducted high-speed machining on heat-treated steel and found that the LN2+MQL environment can delay accelerated tool wear, thereby extending tool life. Additionally, they reported exceptional surface quality, with a roughness value below 0.7 µm even when using a worn tool, highlighting the effectiveness of Cryo+MQL in machining difficult-to-cut materials.
Among the categories of difficult-to-cut materials, AISI 4340 steel with a hardness of 45 HRC or higher presents significant challenges, particularly in high-speed orthogonal turning process using a single-point cutting insert. Its high strength and toughness lead to increased tool wear and elevated cutting forces, especially when the machining parameters are not optimized [10]. Studies conducted by Da Silva et al. [11] demonstrated that high-speed turning achieves comparable results to grinding, offering superior dimensional accuracy, tighter tolerances, and significantly reduced cycle times. Ensuring high-quality machining is critical for operational efficiency, production effectiveness, and product reliability [12]. This is especially important in industries such as aerospace, automotive, and oil and gas, where materials like AISI 4340 alloy steel are commonly used [13]. In response to the industrial demand for higher precision and efficiency, recent studies have focused on improving the machining performance of AISI 4340 steel under various conditions. These include the use of vegetable-based cutting fluids, cryogenic turning methods, and optimization studies aimed at enhancing process efficiency and product quality [6].
The study conducted by Gunjal and Patil [14] evaluated the effects of cutting speed on tool life, surface roughness, and chip thickness in sustainability machining using a vegetable-based MQL approach that could reduce the environmental pollution and costs associated with conventional cutting fluids. The study revealed that the cutting speed significantly affects tool life, with higher speeds leading to reduced tool life due to increased heat and cutting forces at the machining zone. At a high cutting speed, canola oil under MQL was observed to provide superior performance in terms of tool life and surface finish compared to coconut oil, soybean oil, and synthetic. They also found that the MQL with vegetable-based cutting fluids showed better performance, demonstrating the longest tool life and decreased surface roughness compared to dry-cutting environments. According to Noor and Hadi [15] the effectiveness of MQL in machining various advanced materials can be further improved with nanoparticles and simultaneously spraying cryogenic coolant in milling titanium alloy.
Khare and Agarwal [16] focuses on optimizing the cryogenic turning of AISI4340 using the Taguchi methodology which aims to minimize surface roughness by determining the optimal machining variables, including cutting speed, feed rate, depth of cut, and rake angle. The robust L9 orthogonal array was employed to accommodate the experiments. The study found that the cutting speed and depth of cut had the most significant effect on the surface roughness, with cutting speed being the most significant factor, contributing to 50.85% of the surface roughness. The confirmation experiment conducted with these parameters showed a 5.32% error in the predicted signal-to-noise ratio. This indicates the effectiveness of the Taguchi method in optimizing the cryogenic turning process under investigation. Another similar study conducted by Ochengo et al. [17] also used the Taguchi method, along with an analysis of variance (ANOVA), to examine the influence of tool type, and turning parameters on surface roughness (Ra) and cutting power (Cp). The study concluded that coated tools are superior for both responses and recommended for machining hardened steel. The optimal parameter settings for minimizing Cp and Ra were determined by an uncoated tool at 320 m/min and 0.1 mm/rev for Cp and a coated tool at the same speed and feed rate for Ra. The study validated the effectiveness of the Taguchi method through confirmation experiments, demonstrating that the method is reliable for optimizing machining parameters.
Kumar et al. [18] systematically analyzed the effects of cutting speed, feed rate, and depth of cut on surface roughness and tool wear under wet and dry-machining conditions using the Taguchi L9 orthogonal array. Their findings revealed that dry machining led to higher surface roughness (Ra) and significant tool wear compared to wet machining, highlighting the importance of lubrication in optimizing machining parameters for enhanced performance. For an optimal surface finish under wet conditions, the study identified a high cutting speed (350 m/min), a low feed rate (0.04 mm/rev), and a low depth of cut (0.2 mm) as the ideal parameters. Maximum tool life was achieved with a low cutting speed (150 m/min), a low feed rate (0.04 mm/rev), and a low depth of cut (0.2 mm) under wet conditions. Feed rate was found to have the most significant influence on surface roughness, while depth of cut was the primary factor affecting tool wear, followed by cutting speed. The study concluded that hard turning under wet conditions provides a superior surface finish and extended tool life compared to dry conditions. Another study on hardened AISI 4340 alloy steel revealed that a blend of semi-vegetable oil reduces friction and enhances the machining efficiency [19].
Despite extensive research on high-speed turning with advanced tool materials and lubrication conditions, determining the optimal operating parameters for baseline dry turning of AISI 4340 steel remains a challenge. Our recent study [20], on the same material found that CVD-coated carbide tools provided better tool life and surface quality than PVD-coated carbide tools in dry cutting. However, feed rate remained the most influential factor for both parameters, with its lower range being more favorable for improved output variables. Building upon previous work, this research optimizes machining parameters by incorporating cutting force as well in the machinability criteria. Additionally, cooling and lubrication techniques will be evaluated for a comparative assessment. Thus, this study systematically examines the machinability of dry-turning AISI 4340 steel at high cutting speeds by analyzing the influence of critical machining parameters on key performance outputs. The primary objective is to explore the interrelationships between cutting speed, feed rate, and depth of cut concerning tool life, surface roughness, and cutting force. Furthermore, the study aims to determine the optimal machining parameters for cylindrical processing of heat-treated AISI 4340 steel using GRA. Based on the optimized parameters, this research also investigates the machinability improvements achieved through the application of an advanced Cryo+MQL (LN2 + MQL) strategy, comparing the results to baseline dry machining under optimized parametric settings.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Apparatus and Material

AISI 4340 is a medium carbon, low-alloy steel that is widely recognized for its high toughness and strength, which can be achieved through heat treatment. It is widely used in industries for components such as heavy-duty gears, shafts, etc. In this experiment, hardened AISI 4340 alloy steel with dimensions of Ø60 × 120 mm is used as a workpiece material. The hardening process involved austenitizing, quenching, and tempering, resulting in a hardness of 50 ± 2 HRC, classifying it as a high-hardness steel. Table 1 shows the mechanical properties of the common AISI 4340. Table 2 shows the chemical composition of heat treated AISI 4340 steel used for this research. The experiments were conducted on a Colchester–Harrison CNC Turning Center (TORNADO T4 model), designed for precision and consistency in turning operations. The T4 features an X-axis working travel of 200 mm, enabling lateral movement across the workpiece for operations up to 200 mm in width, and a Z-axis working travel of 450 mm, facilitating longitudinal movement along the workpiece for operations up to 450 mm in length.
Table 1. Mechanical properties of AISI 4340 [21].
Table 1. Mechanical properties of AISI 4340 [21].
Mechanical PropertiesValues
Tensile strength 951 MPa
Elongation13%
Hardness 282 BHN
Impact strength 44 J
Yield Strength651 MPa
The experiments were conducted under dry and Cryo+MQL conditions. In the Cryo+MQL setup, liquid nitrogen (LN2) serves as the cryogenic coolant, reducing the machining temperature at the cutting zone. It is applied through a nozzle at 3 bar, targeting the deformation zone. Simultaneously, Coolube 2210XP lubricant, derived from natural vegetable oils and designed for ferrous metals, is applied to the tool’s flank face at 120 ml/h. This lubricant has the ability to adhere to the tool surface, reducing friction more effectively than typical mineral oils and forming a durable lubrication layer during cutting. The application of the coolant and lubricant is illustrated in Figure 1.
The cutting tool used is a carbide insert coated with aluminum oxide (Al2O3) and titanium carbon nitride (TiCN) via chemical vapor deposition (CVD), as detailed in Table 3. Classified as a CNMG 120404 multi-cornered tool with a negative rake angle of −80°, it features a cutting-edge diameter of 12.7 mm, a thickness of 4.76 mm, a hole diameter of 5.16 mm, and a corner radius of 0.4 mm. This tool is suitable for machining various steels, including carbon steel, alloy steel, and mild steel.
Machinability data were recorded using various instruments. For analysis, only the main component of cutting force (Fc) was monitored and recorded during machining using an in-house-developed Neo-MoMac system. This comprehensive system is specifically designed for measuring cutting forces in both turning and milling operations. It incorporates multi-component force sensors aligned along the x, y, and z-axes to capture the force dynamics accurately. The dynamometer is initially connected to the tool and subsequently linked to a data acquisition system for real-time recording. The force recording system, displayed on a GUI computer interface, initiates data collection as the tool engages with the work material and continues to record throughout the cutting process until its completion. This setup ensures comprehensive data collection to analyze the forces exerted during the machining of hardened AISI 4340. The scheme of the Neo-MoMac system is shown in Figure 2.
The Mitutoyo Surftest SJ-210 was used to measure the surface roughness of the workpiece after each parametric run. This compact and portable device is ideal for on-site use. During measurement, the workpiece was stabilized to prevent vibrations, and the drive unit was positioned so that the stylus was perpendicular to the surface. As the stylus traversed the workpiece, the device recorded the roughness profile. The width of the flank wear on the cutting insert was monitored and measured using the ZEISS Stemi 305 stereo microscope. Integrated software ZEN 2012 SP2 with this setup allows for images to be captured and saved according to the machining time. Furthermore, a magnified view of tool wear was obtained using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) to investigate the underlying wear mechanism with the worn tools processed with different machining conditions. Figure 3 represents the experimental setup for evaluating the different machinability variables in this study.

2.2. Design of Experiment

This study employs the Taguchi L9 orthogonal array for the design of experiments, chosen to systematically organize the parameters influencing the turning process and their respective levels. This method ensures efficient data collection with a minimal number of experiments. The L9 array consists of nine distinct experiments, each representing a unique combination of parameter settings. The levels in the array should be replaced with the actual values used during the experiments. Table 4 presents the factors (parameters) and their respective levels for the turning process under dry and hybrid conditions in the finishing operation. Table 4 also illustrates the arrangement of these factors within the L9 array, with each row representing a distinct experimental run based on the specified parameter levels in Table 5. This structured approach facilitates the efficient evaluation of how different parameter combinations impact the quality and performance of the turning process.
Experimental data analysis was conducted using Minitab statistical software version 20 to compute the Taguchi signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) and analysis of variance (ANOVA), identifying the controllable variables demonstrating significant effect on the output variables. For this study, the ‘larger the better’ quality characteristic was applied to tool life (T), while ‘smaller is better’ was used for cutting force (Fc) and surface roughness (Ra). The Taguchi method helps identify the key parameters that significantly affect performance, enabling focused experimentation on these parameters while disregarding those with minimal impact. A multi-objective optimization technique was then employed to determine the optimal machining parameters. After identifying the optimal settings for dry conditions, the Cryo+MQL technique was applied to these parameters, and the results were compared to the dry conditions to assess the performance benefits of using coolant and lubricant in the hard turning process. Figure 4 shows the steps involved in conducting this study.

3. Results and Discussion

The CNC lathe was configured to conduct turning experiments under various combinations of machining input variables in a dry-cutting environment without lubrication or coolant. The results of the output variables, including cutting force, surface roughness, and tool life, are systematically presented in Table 6. Based on these key performance indicators, the analysis aimed to elucidate the interrelationships between the machining variables and their influence on process efficiency and surface quality.

3.1. Cutting Force (Fc)

Measuring cutting force (Fc) is crucial, as it provides insights into tool performance, energy consumption, and the mechanical load on the cutting tool, which are essential for optimizing machining processes and ensuring tool longevity [22]. Table 6 presents the cutting force measurements obtained under various machining settings. According to the signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio plot shown in Figure 5, the feed rate exerts the greatest influence on cutting force, followed by depth of cut and cutting speed in dry conditions. These findings are corroborated by the ANOVA analysis results in Table 7, which indicate that feed rate and depth of cut have the highest percentage contributions of 50.69% and 36.01%, respectively, making them the most influential variables affecting cutting force. The influence of the highest feed rate can be attributed to its imposition of a larger cross-sectional area of the uncut chip and the greater volume of deformed workpiece material, particularly at elevated levels of feed and depth of cut.
These results align with the findings of Sivaraman et al. [23] in the turning of microalloyed steel. They reported that feed rate and depth of cut significantly influence cutting force while cutting speed demonstrated a lesser effect. Specifically, a lower feed rate reduces the material volume removed per unit of time, decreasing resistance on the cutting tool. Similarly, a shallower depth of cut reduces the material thickness removed in each pass, requiring less force for machining. Together, these adjustments lower cutting force, improve machining efficiency, reduce tool wear, and enhance surface finish quality [24]. Therefore, the lowest Fc of 43.3 N was recorded at a low parametric setting, including a cutting speed of 300 m/min, a feed rate of 0.05 mm/rev, and a depth of cut of 0.1 mm. In contrast, Experiment 3, which involved higher feed rates and greater depths of cut, produced the highest Fc of 128.8 N. Another key finding, as shown in the S/N plot in Figure 5, is that increasing the cutting speed significantly reduces the main cutting force. This reduction is due to a shorter tool–chip contact length at higher surface speeds of the rotating workpiece, which decreases frictional force. Additionally, the combined effect of thermal softening, resulting from high heat generation during machining, reduces the material’s strength, making it easier to shear [25].
Mono-optimization using the Taguchi S/N ratio (Figure 5) indicated that the optimum conditions for minimizing cutting force in dry conditions are achieved at a cutting speed of 400 m/min, a feed rate of 0.05 mm/rev, and a depth of cut of 0.1 mm. Higher cutting speeds, along with lower feed rates and depths of cut, contribute to reduced cutting forces, which are crucial for minimizing energy consumption and extending tool life [26].

3.2. Surface Roughness

Surface quality is a critical factor in hard turning, as it significantly influences the performance and longevity of components, particularly those engaged in sliding mechanisms. Since hard turning is progressively being considered as a viable alternative to traditional grinding processes, the need for a superior surface finish becomes even more pronounced [27]. Therefore, surface roughness (Ra) was identified as one of the key factors representing the state of the surface finish. According to Jouini et al. [28], the profile length ratio (Lr) and Ra are the most relevant roughness parameters for distinguishing the effects of cutting parameters in the hard turning process. In this study, Ra was evaluated based on the average roughness value. Table 6 presents the Ra measurements obtained for various dry-machining conditions. Overall, the results show a decreasing trend with an increasing cutting speed and an increasing trend with an increasing feed rate. The S/N plot in Figure 6 highlights that the feed rate with a wider spread indicates the dominating effect on Ra. This finding is consistent with the ANOVA results presented in Table 8, where the feed rate, with a p-value of 0.012, is identified as the most significant factor, contributing 83.03% to Ra. In comparison, cutting speed has a relatively small impact, with a contribution rate of 15.59%, while the depth of cut has a minimal contribution of only 0.40%. Referring to Das et al. [29], increasing the cutting speed optimized the frictional and shear plane energy, which leads to higher temperatures at the shear plane area and machine surface. High temperature facilitates the thermal softening of the workpiece material, thereby reducing the cutting forces requirement for material removal. On the contrary, higher feeds require greater force to effectively remove material, which can lead to the onset of vibrations during the machining process. Özbek and Saruhan [30] states that vibrations disrupt the stability of the cutting operation and result in poor surface quality.
Mono-optimization using the Taguchi S/N ratio (Figure 6) indicated that the optimum conditions for reduced surface roughness in dry conditions is achieved at a cutting speed of 350 m/min, a feed rate of 0.05 mm/rev, and a depth of cut of 0.3 mm. This result is in line with previous findings by Ochengo et al. [17]; the higher cutting speed and lower feed rate led to decreased power consumption and surface roughness.

3.3. Tool Life

Tool life is a crucial factor in hard turning, as it directly impacts productivity, machining efficiency, and cost-effectiveness. A longer tool life allows for a more accurate estimation of machining time and reduces the frequency of tool changes, which can otherwise increase setup costs and process inefficiencies [31]. Frequent tool wear disrupts production flow, leading to increased downtime and reduced overall output [32]. To address these challenges, researchers are optimizing machining parameters and cooling techniques tailored to specific materials. In this study, tool life values were obtained for various combinations of machine settings, as presented in Table 6. Longer tool life is typically achieved with lower cutting speeds, feed rates, and depths of cut, as corroborated by the obtained results. Specifically, the combination of V = 300 m/min, f = 0.05 mm/rev, and doc = 0.1 mm resulted in the longest tool life of 1155 s. This finding aligns with Roy et al. [33], who observed longer tool life at lower cutting parameters. They attributed tool wear at higher cutting speeds and feed rates to thermal effects, including tool and workpiece softening, increased mechanical stresses, and the abrasive cutting environment. Consequently, the highest machining combination in Experiment 9 resulted in the shortest tool life of 206 s. However, Experiment 3, characterized by a high feed rate and depth of cut, also exhibited the shortest tool life. Grzesik et al. [34] explained that, at higher feed rates and cutting depths, plowing action may persist, increasing friction and promoting micro-chipping and crater wear, thereby reducing tool life.
Figure 7 shows the SN ratio plots for the factors affecting tool life. The plot indicates that cutting speed is the most influential parameter, followed by feed rate and depth of cut. This observation is supported by the ANOVA results from Table 9, where all of the parameters are deemed significant, as their p-values are less than 0.05. The percentage contribution analysis reveals that cutting speed has the largest impact on tool life, contributing 39.73%, while feed rate and depth of cut contribute similarly, with 32.26% and 27.08%, respectively. Higher cutting speeds typically lead to increased temperatures, which can accelerate tool wear mechanisms, such as diffusion and oxidation [35].

3.4. Multi-Objective Optimization Studies for Best Parametric Setting

The optimization of machining parameters is important to balance productivity, surface quality, and tool life. To determine the optimal parametric combination for hard turning AISI 4340 alloy steel, a multi-objective optimization approach using GRA was employed. In this approach, the obtained data was processed by following these steps:
Step 1—normalization: The data was normalized in the range between 0–1 using two quality characteristics, the smaller the better using Equation (1) and the larger the better using Equation (2). For this study, cutting force and surface roughness data were normalized using Equation (1) and tool life data using Equation (2).
X i j = M a x ( y i j ) y i j M a x ( y i j ) M i n ( y i j )
X i j = y i j M i n ( y i j ) M a x ( y i j ) M i n ( y i j )
where X i j represents the normalized value for the jth dependent response factor for the ith experimental run and y i j is the corresponding term in a row.
Step 2—computing the Grey relation coefficient ζ i j (GRC): The Grey relational coefficient, determined using Equation (3), quantifies how closely a set of actual results aligns with the desired outcomes by measuring the variation between the ideal and experimental values.
ζ i j = m i n i j   Δ i j + ζ m a x i j   Δ i j Δ i j + ζ m a x i j   Δ i j
where Δ i j is the difference between the ideal ( y i 0 ) and actual sequence ( y i j ) and ζ is the distinguishing coefficient in the range between zero and one, however, we used 0.5 to compute the Grey relation coefficient ζ i j .
Step 3—computing the Grey relation grade (GRG): In the following step, the Grey relation degree is calculated by summing the product of GRC and its corresponding weightage ( β i ) using Equation (4). An equal weightage of 33.33% was assigned to all output variables, as they are equally important in machinability performance evaluation.
γ j = 1 n i = 1 n   β i ζ i j
Step 4—Ranking: In the final step rank is assigned based on descending order to values that are close to one. The set of experimental run scored the maximum GRG identified as the optimal parametric setting for the conducted experimental scheme. The related step-wise computation of GRA is shown in Table 10, where it can be seen that a cutting speed at 300 m/min, a feed rate at 0.05 mm/rev, and a depth of cut at 0.1 mm achieved the highest GRG score of 0.879. Thus, this setting is optimal for the selected machinability criteria.

3.5. Application of Cryo+MQL Lubrication and Its Comparative Analysis with Dry Conditions

After identifying the optimized parameters for the dry environment, a hybrid lubrication approach, combining coolant (LN2) applied from the tool rake side and lubricant (MQL) from the flank side was employed to minimize the cutting temperature and enhance performance. The same machinability variables, including cutting force, surface roughness, and tool life, were examined and compared with those in the dry environment to evaluate the improvements.
The results from both machining environments, as shown in Table 11, reveal significant improvements in surface roughness and tool life by approximately 48% and 184.5%, respectively, with the application of Cryo+MQL. This demonstrates that hybrid conditions enhance cooling and lubrication, effectively reducing friction and dissipating heat. Consequently, surface quality and tool life improved significantly. The hybrid cooling approach minimized mechanical and thermal stresses on the cutting tool edge, slowing the wear rate by lowering cutting temperatures and friction. In contrast, dry machining resulted in higher temperatures and friction, accelerating tool wear and reducing tool life. These findings are consistent with Sivaiah et al. [36], who reported a 70% reduction in machining temperature with MQL compared to dry conditions, highlighting the critical role of lubrication in metal cutting. Furthermore, the hybrid Cryo+MQL approach offers additional benefits, and the approach provides additional benefits, as confirmed by a study conducted by Shokrani et al. [37]. They reported that combining LN2 and MQL reduces cutting and thrust forces by 30% compared to MQL and flooding methods alone, improving efficiency and tool longevity.
However, a 4.6% increase in cutting force was observed under the Cryo+MQL condition. This can be attributed to the fact that, in dry-cutting environments, the workpiece material softens due to higher cutting temperatures, leading to reduced cutting forces. In contrast, the cooling and lubrication effects of Cryo+MQL prevent excessive temperature rise, thereby influencing the mechanical behavior of the workpiece. Additionally, the introduction of LN2 creates a favorable temperature gradient, which may alter the material properties, potentially increasing the force required for effective machining. This observation aligns with the findings of Liu et al. [38], who reported an increase in cutting force due to the work-hardening effect induced by the hybrid lubrication environment. While the observed increase in cutting force is relatively small, its broader implications must be carefully evaluated through future studies. By focusing on tool wear, process efficiency, and industrial scalability, along with the optimization of the LN2 flow rate and its integration with other machining parameters, future research can enhance the practical benefits of Cryo+MQL while mitigating any unintended drawbacks, making it a more viable and sustainable alternative to conventional machining methods.
Figure 8 shows the plot of flank wear land (Vb) versus cutting time (t) for both dry and hybrid conditions. The tool wear progressions for both conditions show rapid wear at the start of cutting, followed by the development of uniform flank wear until 500 s of machining time. Afterward, the wear enters a stable stage, eventually progressing to a severe stage, reaching the maximum tool life criterion of Vb ≥ 0.3 mm. Notably, the stable wear stage is longer in hybrid environments, contributing to extended tool life. The initial wear stages were significantly reduced, and the steady wear stage was prolonged, indicating that the hybrid approach effectively mitigates the wear mechanisms that typically accelerate under dry cutting. The absence of lubrication leads to greater heat generation, causing severe wear on the tool’s cutting edge. In contrast, Cryo+MQL provided effective cooling and lubrication, which has significantly reduced the frictional and thermal stresses on the cutting tool, resulting in minimized tool wear and longer tool life. Zainol et al. [39] reported that the use of MQL in conjunction with LN2 resulted in better tool life and lower wear rates due to the effective boundary lubrication and efficient heat dissipation characteristics provided by both methods.
The microscopic images in Figure 9a,b represent the tool wear mechanisms observed using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). This representation offers a comparative analysis of dry and hybrid Cryo+MQL techniques. It can be observed that worn tools with dry machining demonstrated severe wear mechanisms, such as coating delamination, adhesion, and a larger fracture area. During the machining, the absence of lubrication and cooling media led to elevated cutting temperatures and mechanical stresses at the tool–workpiece interface, resulting in thermal softening of the tool material and subsequent coating delamination [40]. Additionally, high temperatures promoted diffusion and adhesion between the tool and workpiece materials, causing the formation of a thick buildup layer on the tool’s flank face. This is evident in Figure 9b, where severe adhesion of workpiece material can be observed. As machining progresses, abrasive wear, characterized by grooves and scratches from hard workpiece particles, exacerbates tool damage, leading to chipping and edge fractures. These are indicative of cyclic loading and thermal shocks, which compound the wear and result in significantly reduced tool life under dry machining [41]. Conversely, the Cryo+MQL lubrication approach effectively reduced the cutting temperature and friction, mitigating thermal and mechanical stresses on the tool. This resulted in minimal coating delamination, reflecting improved adhesion between the tool substrate and coating due to the stabilized thermal environment. While abrasive wear persisted, it was notably less severe, as shown by the relatively smoother tool surface compared to the dry cutting in Figure 9a. Moreover, slight chipping on the main cutting edge indicated enhanced edge stability, attributed to the cooling effect of LN2, which preserved the cutting edge’s structural integrity. Duc et al. [42] highlighted that effective chip removal facilitated by LN2 and MQL reduced friction, thereby minimizing potential wear mechanisms.

4. Conclusions

The following can be concluded from the study of the high-speed turning of AISI 4340 steel under dry and Cryo+MQL machining conditions:
  • The experimental results showed the lowest cutting force of 43.3 N and the longest tool life of 1155 s at the lowest machining settings: a cutting speed of 300 m/min, a feed rate of 0.05 mm/rev, and a depth of cut of 0.1 mm. However, the lowest surface roughness of 0.305 µm was achieved at a moderate cutting speed of 350 m/min, a depth of cut of 0.2 mm, and the lowest feed rate of 0.05 mm/rev. Mono-optimization using the Taguchi signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio revealed that a high cutting speed and the lowest feed rate are favorable for minimizing cutting force and improving surface roughness, whereas a low cutting speed and feed rate are optimal for maximizing tool life in a dry environment;
  • Statistical inference using ANOVA revealed that feed rate was the most significant factor, contributing 50.69% to cutting force and 80.03% to surface roughness, while cutting speed was the primary factor influencing tool life, with a contribution rate of 39.73% during the dry turning of hardened AISI 4340 alloy steel;
  • Multi-objective optimization using GRA showed that a cutting speed of 300 m/min, a feed rate of 0.05 mm/rev, and a depth of cut of 0.1 mm yielded the highest GRG score of 0.879, confirming this combination as the optimal setting for the selected machinability criteria. These parameters provided a balanced trade-off, ensuring a smooth surface finish, low cutting forces, and extended tool life;
  • The application of hybrid lubrication significantly improved surface roughness by 48% and extended tool life by 184.5%, which are attributed to the enhanced lubrication and cooling efficiency of the system. This demonstrates that concurrent cooling and lubrication are more effective than dry cutting in reducing machining heat. However, a 4.6% increase in cutting force was observed, likely due to the reduced temperature from LN2 cooling. In contrast, dry cutting typically results in higher temperatures, leading to material softening. Consequently, the lower temperatures in LN2 cooling may have contributed to surface hardening, increasing cutting force;
  • Fracturing at the cutting edge and excessive material adhesion are key factors influencing tool performance in dry cutting. The cooling effect of the Cryo+MQL lubrication approach significantly mitigates thermal and mechanical stresses on the tool, reducing coating delamination and adhesion while maintaining tool integrity and enhancing edge stability.

Author Contributions

N.J.: Methodology, writing—review and editing, funding acquisition. J.A.G.: Methodology, investigation, data curation, writing—review and editing, supervision. S.Y.: Methodology, investigation, data curation, writing—original draft. A.Z.J.: writing—review and editing, supervision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors extend their appreciation to Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University for funding this research work through the project number (PSAU/2024/01/29747).

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Mallick, R.; Kumar, R.; Panda, A.; Sahoo, A.K. Current Status of Hard Turning in Manufacturing: Aspects of Cooling Strategy and Sustainability. Lubricants 2023, 11, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Mane, P.A.; Kallol, A.N.; Doiphode, R.L.; Khadtare, A.N. CuO Nanoparticle Size Effect on Inconel-718 Turning with Nanofluid Minimum Quantity Lubrication. Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater. 2023, 25, 190–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Anand, A.; Behera, A.K.; Das, S.R. An Overview on Economic Machining of Hardened Steels by Hard Turning and Its Process Variables. Manuf. Rev. 2019, 6, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Shalaby, M.; Veldhuis, S. New Observations on High-Speed Machining of Hardened AISI 4340 Steel Using Alumina-Based Ceramic Tools. J. Manuf. Mater. Process. 2018, 2, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Mbangu Tambwe, G.; Pons, D. Optimization of Surface Roughness of Aluminium RSA 443 in Diamond Tool Turning. J. Manuf. Mater. Process. 2024, 8, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yaqoob, S.; Ghani, J.A.; Jouini, N.; Juri, A.Z.; Haron, C.H.C. Multi-Objective Optimization Using Grey Relational Analysis (GRA) for the High-Speed Orthogonal Turning of Heat-Treated Alloy Steel. J. Tribol. 2024, 43, 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  7. Sen, B.; Bhowmik, A.; Rachchh, N.; Patil, N.; Khatibi, A.; Kumar, R. Exploring Cryo-MQL Medium for Hard Machining of Hastelloy C276: A Multi-Objective Optimization Approach. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. 2024, 18, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Şirin, E. Evaluation of Tribological Performance of MQL Technique Combined with LN2, CO2, N2 Ecological Cooling/Lubrication Techniques When Turning of Hastelloy C22 Superalloy. Tribol. Int. 2023, 188, 108786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wu, S.; Liu, G.; Zhang, W.; Chen, W.; Wang, C. High-Speed Milling of Hardened Steel under Minimal Quantity Lubrication with Liquid Nitrogen. J. Manuf. Process. 2023, 95, 351–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, B.; Pan, Q.W.; Xu, Z.K.; Zhang, P.; Yan, Y.; Gu, X.Z.; Li, Y.; Hong, C.; Li, X.W.; Zhang, Z.F. Investigation on the Fatigue Crack Growth Behaviors of AISI 4340 Steel with Different Strength–Toughness Combinations. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2024, 26, 2301692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Da Silva, L.R.; Couto, D.A.; Dos Santo, F.V.; Duarte, F.J.; Mazzaro, R.S.; Veloso, G.V. Evaluation of Machined Surface of the Hardened AISI 4340 Steel through Roughness and Residual Stress Parameters in Turning and Grinding. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2020, 107, 791–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Roy, S.; Pradhan, A.; Padhan, S.; Das, A.; Das, S.R.; Dhupal, D. ANALYSIS ON POWER CONSUMPTION FOR LIFE CYCLE SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT IN HARD TURNING OF AISI 4140 STEEL USING SPPP—AlTiSiN-COATED CARBIDE TOOL UNDER VARIOUS CUTTING ENVIRONMENTS. Surf. Rev. Lett. 2024, 31, 2450043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Roy, S.; Kumar, R.; Das, R.K.; Sahoo, A.K. A Comprehensive Review on Machinability Aspects in Hard Turning of AISI 4340 Steel. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2018, 390, 012009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gunjal, S.U.; Patil, N.G. Experimental Investigations into Turning of Hardened AISI 4340 Steel Using Vegetable Based Cutting Fluids under Minimum Quantity Lubrication. Procedia Manuf. 2018, 20, 18–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Noor, N.D.M.; Hadi, M.A.; Mekatronik, U.M.P. Study of Tool Wear Progression Using Nano-Hybrid Cryogenic MQL in Milling Titanium Alloy. J. Tribol. 2023, 37, 76–83. [Google Scholar]
  16. Khare, S.K.; Agarwal, S. Optimization of Machining Parameters in Turning of AISI 4340 Steel under Cryogenic Condition Using Taguchi Technique. Procedia CIRP 2017, 63, 610–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ochengo, D.; Liang, L.; Wei, Z.; Ning, H. Optimization of Surface Quality and Power Consumption in Machining Hardened AISI 4340 Steel. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2022, 2022, 2675003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kumar, J.P.; Kishore, K.P.; Kumar, M.R.; Karthick, K.R.S.; Gowtham, S.V. Experimental Investigation on Hard Turning of AISI 4340 Steel Using Cemented Coated Carbide Insert. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2018, 314, 012004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Vaishnavi, B.; Kanchana, J.; Senthilkumar, M.; Siva Kumar, M. Sustainable Machining of AISI 4340 Steel Using Semi-Vegetable Oil Blends. Mater. Manuf. Process. 2024, 39, 1881–1893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yaqoob, S.; Ghani, J.A.; Jouini, N.; Juri, A.Z. Performance Evaluation of PVD and CVD Multilayer-Coated Tools in Machining High-Strength Steel. Coatings 2024, 14, 865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Dennison, M.S.; Barik, D.; Ponnusamy, S. Turning Operation of AISI 4340 Steel in Flooded, near-Dry and Dry Conditions: A Comparative Study on Tool-Work Interface Temperature. Mech. Mech. Eng. 2019, 23, 172–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kónya, G.; Csorba, B.; Szabó, N.; Kovács, Z.F. The Effects of Cutting Parameters on Cutting Force and Tribological Properties of Machined Surface Under Dry Turning of AISI304L Austenitic Stainless Steel. J. Manuf. Mater. Process. 2024, 8, 257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sivaraman, V.; Sankaran, S.; Vijayaraghavan, L. The Effect of Cutting Parameters on Cutting Force During Turning Multiphase Microalloyed Steel. Procedia CIRP 2012, 4, 157–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tanvir, M.H.; Hussain, A.; Rahman, M.M.T.; Ishraq, S.; Zishan, K.; Rahul, S.T.T.; Habib, M.A. Multi-Objective Optimization of Turning Operation of Stainless Steel Using a Hybrid Whale Optimization Algorithm. J. Manuf. Mater. Process. 2020, 4, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Demirpolat, H.; Binali, R.; Patange, A.D.; Pardeshi, S.S.; Gnanasekaran, S. Comparison of Tool Wear, Surface Roughness, Cutting Forces, Tool Tip Temperature, and Chip Shape during Sustainable Turning of Bearing Steel. Materials 2023, 16, 4408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Taylan, F.; Ermergen, T. The Effect of High-Pressure Jet Cooling on Surface Roughness, Cutting Force and Chip Formation of Ti-6Al-4V ELI in High-Speed Turning. Mach. Sci. Technol. 2023, 27, 453–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Gundarneeya, T.P.; Golakiya, V.D.; Ambaliya, S.D.; Patel, S.H. Experimental Investigation of Process Parameters on Surface Roughness and Dimensional Accuracy in Hard Turning of EN24 Steel. Mater. Today Proc. 2022, 57, 674–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Jouini, N.; Revel, P.; Bigerelle, M. Relevance of Roughness Parameters of Surface Finish in Precision Hard Turning. Scanning 2014, 36, 86–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ranjan Das, S.; Panda, A.; Dhupal, D. Hard Turning of AISI 4340 Steel Using Coated Carbide Insert: Surface Roughness, Tool Wear, Chip Morphology and Cost Estimation. Mater. Today Proc. 2018, 5, 6560–6569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Özbek, O.; Saruhan, H. The Effect of Vibration and Cutting Zone Temperature on Surface Roughness and Tool Wear in Eco-Friendly MQL Turning of AISI D2. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2020, 9, 2762–2772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yaqoob, S.; A. Ghani, J.; Jouini, N.; Sheik Muhamad, S.; Che Haron, C.H.; Juri, A. High-Speed Turning of AISI 4340 Alloy Steel Using Carbide Tools in a Sustainable Minimum Quantity Lubrication Environment. Ind. Lubr. Tribol. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Uzun, M.; Usca, Ü.A.; Kuntoğlu, M.; Gupta, M.K. Influence of Tool Path Strategies on Machining Time, Tool Wear, and Surface Roughness during Milling of AISI X210Cr12 Steel. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2022, 119, 2709–2720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Roy, S.; Kumar, R.; Sahoo, A.K.; Panda, A. Cutting Tool Failure and Surface Finish Analysis in Pulsating MQL-Assisted Hard Turning. J Fail. Anal. Preven. 2020, 20, 1274–1291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Grzesik, W.; Denkena, B.; Żak, K.; Grove, T.; Bergmann, B. Energy Consumption Characterization in Precision Hard Machining Using CBN Cutting Tools. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2016, 85, 2839–2845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Özdemir, M. Optimization with Taguchi Method of Influences on Surface Roughness of Cutting Parameters in CNC Turning Processing. Mech 2019, 25, 397–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Sivaiah, P.; Sudheera, M.; Muralidhar Singh, M.; Yuvaraj, C.; Chengal Reddy, V.; Lakshmi Narasimhamu, K.; Dilip Kumar, M. Investigation on Turning Process Performance during Machining of 15-5PH Stainless Steel Material with Eco-Friendly Machining Technique. Mater. Today Proc. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Shokrani, A.; Al-Samarrai, I.; Newman, S.T. Hybrid Cryogenic MQL for Improving Tool Life in Machining of Ti-6Al-4V Titanium Alloy. J. Manuf. Process. 2019, 43, 229–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Liu, M.; Li, C.; Zhang, Y.; An, Q.; Yang, M.; Gao, T.; Mao, C.; Liu, B.; Cao, H.; Xu, X.; et al. Cryogenic Minimum Quantity Lubrication Machining: From Mechanism to Application. Front. Mech. Eng. 2021, 16, 649–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zainol, A.; Yazid, M.Z.A. The Effect of Portable MQL Applicator onto Carbide Insert during Turning Inconel 718. J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 2018, 12, 3605–3613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Aslan, A.; Salur, E.; Kuntoğlu, M. Evaluation of the Role of Dry and MQL Regimes on Machining and Sustainability Index of Strenx 900 Steel. Lubricants 2022, 10, 301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yaqoob, S.; Ghani, J.A.; Juri, A.Z.; Muhamad, S.S.; Haron, C.H.C.; Jouini, N. A Review of Sustainable Hybrid Lubrication (Cryo-MQL) Techniques in Machining Processes. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2024, 131, 151–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Duc, T.M.; Ngoc, T.B.; Tuan, N.M.; Trang, D.T.H.; Long, T.T. A Study on Mechanisms of Saw-Tooth Chip Formation in Hard Turning under Hybrid Nanofluid-Assisted MQL Environment. Adv. Mech. Eng. 2024, 16, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Application of cryo-lubricant during the turning process.
Figure 1. Application of cryo-lubricant during the turning process.
Processes 13 00739 g001
Figure 2. Neo-MoMac system.
Figure 2. Neo-MoMac system.
Processes 13 00739 g002
Figure 3. Experimental setup illustrating employed dry, LN2+MQL schemes, input variables, and output machinability parameters.
Figure 3. Experimental setup illustrating employed dry, LN2+MQL schemes, input variables, and output machinability parameters.
Processes 13 00739 g003
Figure 4. Stepwise research scheme for conducting hard turning experiments.
Figure 4. Stepwise research scheme for conducting hard turning experiments.
Processes 13 00739 g004
Figure 5. Main effect S/N ratio plot for cutting force.
Figure 5. Main effect S/N ratio plot for cutting force.
Processes 13 00739 g005
Figure 6. Main effect S/N ratio plot for surface roughness in dry condition.
Figure 6. Main effect S/N ratio plot for surface roughness in dry condition.
Processes 13 00739 g006
Figure 7. Main effect S/N ratio plot for tool life.
Figure 7. Main effect S/N ratio plot for tool life.
Processes 13 00739 g007
Figure 8. Flank wear land (mm) Vs machining time (sec) in both conditions.
Figure 8. Flank wear land (mm) Vs machining time (sec) in both conditions.
Processes 13 00739 g008
Figure 9. SEM images of worn tools under (a) Cryo+MQL and (b) dry conditions.
Figure 9. SEM images of worn tools under (a) Cryo+MQL and (b) dry conditions.
Processes 13 00739 g009
Table 2. Chemical composition of AISI 4340.
Table 2. Chemical composition of AISI 4340.
ElementWt%
FeBalance
C0.39
Mn0.71
P0.015
S0.006
Si0.26
Ni1.73
Cr0.80
Mo0.22
Table 3. Details of the cutting insert utilized in experimentation.
Table 3. Details of the cutting insert utilized in experimentation.
SpecificationsCVD Tool
GradeP-grade
CoatingAl2O3/TiCN
Coating thickness18 µm
Hardness of substrate90.5 HRA
Nose radius0.4 mm
Rake angle−6°
Cutting edge angle95°
Table 4. Factors with their levels for the turning parameters.
Table 4. Factors with their levels for the turning parameters.
Factors/Level123
Cutting speed, V (m/min)300350400
Feed rate, f (mm/rev)0.050.0750.1
Depth of cut, doc (mm)0.10.20.3
Table 5. Taguchi L9 orthogonal array.
Table 5. Taguchi L9 orthogonal array.
Experiment V (m/min)f (mm/rev)doc (mm)
1V 1f 1doc 1
2V 1f 2doc 2
3V 1f 3doc 3
4V 2f 1doc 2
5V 2f 2doc 3
6V 2f 3doc 1
7V 3f 1doc 3
8V 3f 2doc 1
9V 3f 3doc 2
Table 6. Recorded results of machinability variables.
Table 6. Recorded results of machinability variables.
No.Cutting Force
Fc (N)
Surface Roughness
Ra (µm)
Tool Life
T (s)
Measured ValueS/N RatioMeasured ValueS/N RatioMeasured ValueS/N Ratio
143.3−32.72980.4656.6509115561.256
291.59−39.23700.6853.286271357.059
3128.8−42.19830.8950.963533950.064
468.88−36.76190.30510.31484758.553
599.22−39.93200.5415.336138051.604
676.65−37.69020.6963.147855454.876
749.55−33.90090.30710.257229049.242
847.68−33.56670.5355.432938851.767
997.3−39.76230.7262.781320646.294
Table 7. ANOVA for cutting force in dry conditions.
Table 7. ANOVA for cutting force in dry conditions.
ParameterDF ValueSeq SSAdj SSAdj MSF Valuep Value% Contribution
V211.036411.03645.518218.250.05212.61%
f244.383044.383022.191573.380.013 *50.69%
doc231.530831.530815.765452.130.019 *36.01%
Residual Error20.60480.60480.3024
Total887.551
* significant.
Table 8. Analysis of variance for cutting force in dry conditions.
Table 8. Analysis of variance for cutting force in dry conditions.
ParameterDF ValueSeq SSAdj SSAdj MSF Valuep Value% Contribution
V213.09913.0996.654916.040.05915.59%
f270.884870.884835.442485.400.012 *83.03%
doc20.34540.34540.17270.420.7060.40%
Residual Error20.83000.83000.4150
Total885.370
* significant.
Table 9. Analysis of variance for tool life.
Table 9. Analysis of variance for tool life.
ParametersDF ValueSeq SSAdj SSAdj MSF Valuep Value% Contribution
V230434230434215217143.300.023 *39.73%
f224717224717212358635.160.028 *32.26%
doc220746120746110373129.510.033 *27.08%
Residual Error2702970293515
Total8766004
* significant.
Table 10. Computation of GRA.
Table 10. Computation of GRA.
Exp. NoNormalized ValuesGrey Relation CoefficientGrey Relation Grade
(GRG)
Ranking
RaFcTLRaFcTL
10.7291.0001.0000.6481.0001.0000.8791.0
20.3560.4350.5340.4370.4700.5170.4736.0
30.0000.0000.1400.3330.3330.3680.3439.0
41.0000.7010.6741.0000.6260.6060.7412.0
50.6000.3460.1830.5560.4330.3800.4557.0
60.3370.6100.3670.4300.5620.4410.4765.0
70.9970.9270.0880.9930.8720.3540.7383.0
80.6100.9490.1910.5620.9070.3820.6154.0
90.2860.3680.0000.4120.4420.3330.3948.0
Table 11. Machinability results for dry and hybrid lubrication environments.
Table 11. Machinability results for dry and hybrid lubrication environments.
Output VariableDry
Condition
Cryo+MQL
Condition
Remarks
Cutting force (N)43.345.4A 4.6% increase in main cutting force is noticed when machining was performed with hybrid lubrication.
Surface roughness (µm)0.4650.24A 48% decrease in surface roughness was realized with hybrid environment.
Tool life (s)11553288A 184.5% improvement in tool life results was achieved with hybrid lubrication.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jouini, N.; A. Ghani, J.; Yaqoob, S.; Juri, A.Z. Optimized Machining Parameters for High-Speed Turning Process: A Comparative Study of Dry and Cryo+MQL Techniques. Processes 2025, 13, 739. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13030739

AMA Style

Jouini N, A. Ghani J, Yaqoob S, Juri AZ. Optimized Machining Parameters for High-Speed Turning Process: A Comparative Study of Dry and Cryo+MQL Techniques. Processes. 2025; 13(3):739. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13030739

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jouini, Nabil, Jaharah A. Ghani, Saima Yaqoob, and Afifah Zakiyyah Juri. 2025. "Optimized Machining Parameters for High-Speed Turning Process: A Comparative Study of Dry and Cryo+MQL Techniques" Processes 13, no. 3: 739. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13030739

APA Style

Jouini, N., A. Ghani, J., Yaqoob, S., & Juri, A. Z. (2025). Optimized Machining Parameters for High-Speed Turning Process: A Comparative Study of Dry and Cryo+MQL Techniques. Processes, 13(3), 739. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13030739

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop