Next Article in Journal
An Automatic Monitoring System for High-Frequency Measuring and Real-Time Management of Cyanobacterial Blooms in Urban Water Bodies
Next Article in Special Issue
Green Hydrogen Production from Raw Biogas: A Techno-Economic Investigation of Conventional Processes Using Pressure Swing Adsorption Unit
Previous Article in Journal
Elucidating Cellular Population Dynamics by Molecular Density Function Perturbations
Previous Article in Special Issue
Systematic and Model-Assisted Evaluation of Solvent Based- or Pressurized Hot Water Extraction for the Extraction of Artemisinin from Artemisia annua L.
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Investigation of the Interaction between Benzene and SXFA Using DFT

by
Katherine M. E. Stewart
1,*,†,
Ian P. Hamilton
2 and
Alexander Penlidis
1
1
Department of Chemical Engineering, Institute for Polymer Research, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
2
Department of Chemistry, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, ON N2L 3C5, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Current address: Department of Chemistry and Physics, Troy University, Troy, Al 36082, USA.
Processes 2018, 6(2), 10; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr6020010
Submission received: 4 December 2017 / Revised: 21 January 2018 / Accepted: 22 January 2018 / Published: 25 January 2018

Abstract

:
Density Functional Theory (DFT) studies were conducted to evaluate the sensing mechanism between benzene and a polymeric sensing material, referred to as SXFA, which contains trifluoro-groups and OH-groups. These studies were undertaken to improve the understanding of how benzene and SXFA mechanistically interact based on their chemistry, information which can be used to more efficiently design polymeric sensing materials. We find that benzene adsorbed onto the OH-groups in SXFA rather than the trifluoro-groups as previously proposed. Specifically, we find that sorption results from electrostatic attraction between the negative benzene ring and the positive hydrogens of the OH-groups of SXFA.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Benzene is a byproduct of industrial processes and vehicle exhaust [1]. Benzene is toxic and contributes to poor indoor air quality, with no safe level recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) [2]. Due to the high toxicity of benzene, various polymeric sensing materials have been developed to monitor benzene levels in air [3,4,5,6].
Polymers are ideal sensing materials because they operate at low temperatures (below 100 °C) and are relatively inexpensive [6]. In addition, polymers can be tailor-made to attract a specific (target) gas, such as benzene, and thus, can have high selectivity [7]. This is done by modifying the polymer functional groups and side chains, thereby changing their surface chemistry so that they preferentially attract and adsorb a target analyte for a specific application.
To more efficiently design and tailor polymeric sensing materials for target analytes and specific applications, it is important to understand the sensing mechanisms by which analytes (and interferents) interact with sensing materials [8]. One way to investigate these sensing mechanisms is with Density Functional Theory (DFT) calculations [9,10].
Sensing mechanisms for a variety of gas sensors have recently been evaluated using DFT analysis [11,12,13]. These calculations have improved the understanding of how sensing materials and analytes interact with one another. By combining DFT studies with experimental work, sensing mechanisms can be better understood, which can significantly aid in improving the design of new sensing materials and sensors.
Recent experimental studies have shown that benzene preferentially adsorbs onto the trifluoro-containing polymer, SXFA (see Figure 1a) [14,15]. Chen et al. [14,15] evaluated SXFA at room temperature (22 °C) on three different capacitive, radio frequency identification (RFID) sensing platforms, using a specially designed test system [16]. In all cases, SXFA was exposed to gaseous benzene, resulting in benzene adsorbing onto the sensing material, causing a measurable frequency shift on the RFID sensors (see Figure 1b), with sensitivities (per percent frequency shift) of 5.92 × 10−4/%, 5.05 × 10−4/%, and 9.1 × 10−5/% for RFID 1, RFID 2, and RFID 3, respectively [14,15].
A sensing mechanism was subsequently suggested in which benzene π-stacks onto one of the trifluoro-groups on SXFA, since the fluorine atoms form a planar ring (see Figure 2) [8]. This paper evaluates the proposed sensing mechanism between benzene and SXFA using a DFT approach.
Previous studies have evaluated carbon tetrafluoride and benzene complexes both experimentally and computationally [17,18]. The optimized configuration of carbon tetrafluoride and benzene showed three fluorine atoms directed towards the benzene molecule. While this orientation of the carbon tetrafluoride-benzene complex agrees with the proposed sorption of benzene to SXFA, it has been shown that this orientation may not be explained by π-stacking, but rather charge transfer between the small molecules that reduces the electron density in the π-system [17].

2. Methodology

Calculations were performed using DFT with the B3LYP and M06 functionals and the LANL2DZ basis set, as implemented in Gaussian. The geometries were optimized from a variety of initial structures and complexes to ensure that the optimized geometry was the global minimum and not a function of the initial position of the molecules and atoms. Mulliken and Natural Bond Orbital (NBO) charges were used in the evaluation of the proposed sensing mechanism.

3. Results and Discussion

Initially, the complex of a single SXFA unit (a carbon chain with two trifluoro-groups and an OH-group) with benzene was evaluated. From there, short SXFA chains were evaluated, adding one SXFA unit at a time, up to four SXFA units. In all cases, and for both the B3LYP and M06 functionals, the benzene molecule oriented itself perpendicularly to the OH-group (see Figure 3) and not parallel to the trifluoro-group, as postulated by Stewart and Penlidis [8].
Since the benzene molecule is not parallel to the trifluoro-group on SXFA, benzene does not sorb to the trifluoro-groups in SXFA. Instead, benzene preferentially sorbs to the OH-group in SXFA. Due to benzene’s preference to interact with the OH-group instead of either of the trifluoro-groups, it can be concluded that the sensing mechanism proposed by Stewart and Penlidis [8] is incorrect. Rather than benzene π-stacking with one of the trifluoro-groups on SXFA, benzene is attracted to the OH-group in SXFA, as shown in Figure 3.
To examine the nature of this attraction, the Mulliken and NBO atomic charges were calculated on all the atoms in benzene and SXFA. Figure 4 shows the Mulliken charges on each atom of the SXFA unit and benzene. Both the Mulliken and NBO atomic charges do not significantly change when additional SXFA units are added to the SXFA chain (see Table 1).
Although the NBO analysis resulted in larger charges on the oxygen and hydrogen atoms, both the Mulliken and NBO charges show the same trend. Both DFT analyses calculated negative charges on the carbon atoms of the benzene ring and resulted in benzene orienting itself perpendicular to the OH-group on SXFA (Figure 3 and Figure 4). Therefore, benzene adsorbs onto the OH-group of SXFA and not one of the trifluoro-groups.
Delocalization of the electrons on a benzene ring, which draws electron density from the hydrogen atoms, results in benzene having a larger electron density in the middle of the ring. This results in benzene being more negative in the center of the ring [19]. Given that oxygen draws electron density away from the hydrogen in an OH-group, this results in an electrostatic interaction between the positive hydrogen of the OH-group on SXFA and the negative benzene ring, which can be seen in the positive and negative Mulliken atomic charges in Figure 4.
The bond length and angle of the OH-group on the SXFA chain were also evaluated (see Table 2). Note that the central SXFA unit was used in a chain with three repeating units for this comparison. When benzene was adsorbed, the C-O-H bond angle and the O-H bond length both increased which can be attributed the electrostatic interaction noted above.
The electrostatic attraction between the hydrogen of the OH-group and the benzene ring is consistent with other model studies which have examined the bonding of various small molecules, including water [20], alcohols (methanol and ethanol) [10], and ammonia [21], hydrogen bonding to the benzene ring. In addition, the benzene ring has been shown to interact electrostatically with cations through cation-π interactions, both in the gaseous phase and in solution [22].

4. Conclusions

DFT calculations were used to determine the optimized geometry of the benzene-SXFA complex. It was found that benzene adsorbed onto the OH-group of SXFA rather than onto one of the trifluoro-groups, as had been proposed by Stewart and Penlidis [8]. We have found that the sorption of benzene onto SXFA is due to electrostatic attraction between benzene and the OH-group, where the negative charge in the benzene ring is attracted to the positive charge on the hydrogen in the OH-group.
This paper demonstrates that DFT analysis can be used to improve understanding of how analytes sorb onto sensing materials. This improved understanding of the interactions between sensing materials and analytes (molecules) at an atomic level can aid in the optimization of sensors for particular molecules.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for financial support from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada and the Canada Research (CRC) program. The authors would also like to acknowledge Compute Canada for their computing resources.

Author Contributions

K.M.E.S. performed the calculations, data interpretations, and wrote the paper. I.P.H. provided access to the computing resources from Compute Canada and revised several drafts of the paper. A.P. supervised the work and revised several drafts of the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lee, S.C.; Chiu, M.Y.; Ho, K.F.; Zou, S.C.; Wang, X. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in urban atmosphere of Hong Kong. Chemosphere 2002, 48, 375–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. World Health Organization. Exposure to Benzene: A Major Public Health Concern; Public Health and Environment, World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  3. Mondal, R.K.; Dubey, K.A.; Bhardwaj, Y.K.; Varshney, L. Novel hybrid nanocarbons/poly (dimethylsiloxane) composites based chemiresistors for real time detection of hazardous aromatic hydrocarbons. Carbon 2016, 100, 42–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Spinelle, L.; Gerboles, M.; Kok, G.; Persijn, S.; Sauerwald, T. Review of portable and low-cost sensors for the ambient air monitoring of benzene and other volatile organic compounds. Sensors 2017, 17, 1520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Lonergan, M.C.; Severin, E.J.; Doleman, B.J.; Beaber, S.A.; Grubbs, R.H.; Lewis, N.S. Array-based vapor sensing using chemically sensitive, carbon black-polymer resistors. Chem. Mater. 1996, 8, 2298–2312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mabrook, M.; Hawkins, P. A rapidly-responding sensor for benzene, methanol, and ethanol vapours based on films of titanium dioxide dispersed in a polymer operating at room temperature. Sens. Actuators B 2001, 75, 197–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Talwar, V.; Singh, O.; Singh, R.C. ZnO assisted polyaniline nanofibers and its application as ammonia gas sensor. Sens. Actuators B 2014, 191, 276–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Stewart, K.M.E.; Penlidis, A. Designing polymeric sensing materials: What are we doing wrong? Polym. Adv. Technol. 2007, 28, 319–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Avramov, P.V.; Kudin, K.N.; Scuseria, G.E. Single wall carbon nanotubes density of states: Comparison of experiment and theory. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2003, 370, 597–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tolmachev, A.M.; Firsov, D.A.; Kuznetsova, T.A.; Anuchin, K.M. DFT modeling of the adsorption of benzene, methanol, and ethanol molecules in activated carbon nanopores. Mol. Supramol. Struct. Interfaces 2009, 45, 177–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pannopard, P.; Khongpracha, P.; Probst, M.; Limtrakul, J. Gas sensing properties of platinum derivatives of single-walled carbon nanotubes: A DFT analysis. J. Mol. Graph. Model. 2009, 28, 62–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Ullah, H.; Shah, A.A.; Bilal, S.; Ayab, K. DFT Study of Polyaniline NH3, CO2, and CO Gas Sensors: Comparison with Recent Experimental Data. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 23701–23711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Tran, H.T.; Spencer, M.J. Zinc oxide for gas sensing of formaldehyde: Density functional theory modelling of the effect of nanostructure morphology and gas concentration on the chemisorption reaction. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2017, 193, 274–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chen, W.T.; Stewart, K.M.E.; Yang, C.K.; Mansour, R.R.; Carroll, J.; Penlidis, A. Wearable RF Sensor Array Implementing Coupling-Matrix Readout Extraction Technique. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 2015, 63, 4157–4168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chen, W.T.; Stewart, K.M.E.; Mansour, R.R.; Penlidis, A. Novel underloaded radio-frequency (RF) resonant sensor for gaseous ethanol and interferents detection. Sens. Actuators A 2015, 230, 63–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Stewart, K.M.E.; Penlidis, A. Novel test system for gas sensing materials and sensors. Macromol. Symp. 2013, 324, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lazzaroni, R.; Calderone, A.; Bredas, J.; Rabe, J. Electronic structure of molecular van der Waals complexes with benzene: Implications for the contrast in scanning tunneling microscopy of molecular adsorbates on graphite. J. Chem. Phys. 1997, 107, 99–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Menapace, J.; Bernstein, E. Van der Waals modes of solute/solvent clusters: Benzene-methane, -deuteriomethane, and -carbon tetrafluoride. J. Phys. Chem. 1987, 91, 2843–2848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lee, E.; Kim, D.; Jurecka, P.; Tarakeshwar, P.; Hobza, P.; Kim, K. Understanding of assembly phenomena by aromatic-aromatic interactions: Benzene dimer and the substituted systems. J. Phys. Chem. A 2007, 111, 3446–3457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Suzuki, S.; Green, P.G.; Bumgarner, R.E.; Dasgupta, S.; Goddard, W.A., III; Blake, G.A. Benzene forms hydrogen bonds with water. Science 1992, 257, 942–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Wanna, J.; Menapace, J.; Bernstein, E. Hydrogen bonded and non-hydrogen bonded van der Waals clusters: Comparison between clusters of pyrazine, pyrimidine, and benzene with various solvents. J. Chem. Phys. 1986, 85, 1795–1805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Dougherty, D.A. Cation-pi interactions in chemistry and biology: A new view of benzene, Phe, Tyr, and Trp. Science 1996, 271, 163–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. (a) Chemical structure of SXFA and (b) Normalized response to benzene of three different RFID sensors using SXFA as a sensing material [14,15] (RFID: radio frequency identification).
Figure 1. (a) Chemical structure of SXFA and (b) Normalized response to benzene of three different RFID sensors using SXFA as a sensing material [14,15] (RFID: radio frequency identification).
Processes 06 00010 g001
Figure 2. Proposed sensing mechanism of benzene and SXFA [8].
Figure 2. Proposed sensing mechanism of benzene and SXFA [8].
Processes 06 00010 g002
Figure 3. Benzene coordinating with the OH-group on SXFA.
Figure 3. Benzene coordinating with the OH-group on SXFA.
Processes 06 00010 g003
Figure 4. Mulliken atomic charges on the SXFA unit and benzene atoms.
Figure 4. Mulliken atomic charges on the SXFA unit and benzene atoms.
Processes 06 00010 g004
Table 1. Mulliken and NBO Atomic Charges on OH-group.
Table 1. Mulliken and NBO Atomic Charges on OH-group.
Chain LengthMulliken Atomic Charge on OMulliken Atomic Charge on HNBO Atomic Charge on ONBO Atomic Charge on H
1 (Side chain only)−0.4510.393−0.7850.529
2−0.447
−0.483 *
0.388
0.459 *
−0.779
−0.781 *
0.518
0.525
3−0.448
−0.452
−0.486 *
0.387
0.381
0.454 *
−0.777
−0.781
−0.812 *
0.521
0.524
0.544 *
4−0.453
−0.454
−0.468
−0.497 *
0.389
0.380
0.404
0.468 *
−0.765
−0.781
−0.807
−0.811 *
0.512
0.524
0.492
0.495 *
* Hydrogen bonded to the OH-group at the end of the Si-O chain.
Table 2. Bond Length and Valence Angles of the OH-group.
Table 2. Bond Length and Valence Angles of the OH-group.
Bond Lengths and AnglesSXFAAdsorbed Benzene
C-O Length1.44438 Å1.43784 Å
O-H Length0.98162 Å0.98789 Å
C-O-H Angle111.294°112.839°

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Stewart, K.M.E.; Hamilton, I.P.; Penlidis, A. Investigation of the Interaction between Benzene and SXFA Using DFT. Processes 2018, 6, 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr6020010

AMA Style

Stewart KME, Hamilton IP, Penlidis A. Investigation of the Interaction between Benzene and SXFA Using DFT. Processes. 2018; 6(2):10. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr6020010

Chicago/Turabian Style

Stewart, Katherine M. E., Ian P. Hamilton, and Alexander Penlidis. 2018. "Investigation of the Interaction between Benzene and SXFA Using DFT" Processes 6, no. 2: 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr6020010

APA Style

Stewart, K. M. E., Hamilton, I. P., & Penlidis, A. (2018). Investigation of the Interaction between Benzene and SXFA Using DFT. Processes, 6(2), 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr6020010

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop