Next Article in Journal
Improving Ammonium Sorption of Bayah Natural Zeolites by Hydrothermal Method
Next Article in Special Issue
Wheat Grinding Process with Low Moisture Content: A New Approach for Wholemeal Flour Production
Previous Article in Journal
Syngas Derived from Lignocellulosic Biomass Gasification as an Alternative Resource for Innovative Bioprocesses
Previous Article in Special Issue
Analysis of Selected Physicochemical Properties of Commercial Apple Juices
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Quality of Watermelon Juice Concentrated by Forward Osmosis and Conventional Processes

1
Healthy Processed Foods Research Unit, Western Regional Research Center, United States Department of Agriculture–Agricultural Research Service, 800 Buchanan Street, Albany, CA 94710, USA
2
Porifera Incorporated, 1575 Alvarado Street, San Leandro, CA 94577, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2020, 8(12), 1568; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8121568
Submission received: 6 November 2020 / Revised: 25 November 2020 / Accepted: 26 November 2020 / Published: 28 November 2020
(This article belongs to the Collection Sustainable Food Processing Processes)

Abstract

Watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) juice is known for its refreshing flavor, but its high perishability limits its availability throughout the year. Watermelon juice concentrate has extended shelf-life and lower transportation and storage costs, but the conventional thermal evaporation process for concentrating juice degrades the nutritional components and sensory quality of the product. Thus, in this work, a large-scale, non-thermal forward osmosis (FO) process was used to concentrate fresh watermelon juice up to 65°Brix. The FO concentrate was compared to thermal concentrate and fresh juices, and to commercially available refrigerated watermelon juices, in terms of lycopene and citrulline content, total soluble phenolics, antioxidant activity, and sensory properties. The FO concentrate had statistically similar (p < 0.05) levels of all the nutrients of interest except antioxidant activity, when compared to the thermal concentrate. The reconstituted FO concentrate maintained the same antioxidant activity as the raw source juice, which was 45% higher than that of the reconstituted thermal concentrate. Sensory results showed that reconstituted FO concentrate resulted in highly liked juice, and it outperformed the reconstituted thermal concentrate in the sensory hedonic rating. This work demonstrates the possibility to produce a high-quality watermelon juice concentrate by forward osmosis.
Keywords: forward osmosis; watermelon (Citrullus lanatus); juice; concentrate forward osmosis; watermelon (Citrullus lanatus); juice; concentrate
Graphical Abstract

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Milczarek, R.R.; Olsen, C.W.; Sedej, I. Quality of Watermelon Juice Concentrated by Forward Osmosis and Conventional Processes. Processes 2020, 8, 1568. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8121568

AMA Style

Milczarek RR, Olsen CW, Sedej I. Quality of Watermelon Juice Concentrated by Forward Osmosis and Conventional Processes. Processes. 2020; 8(12):1568. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8121568

Chicago/Turabian Style

Milczarek, Rebecca R., Carl W. Olsen, and Ivana Sedej. 2020. "Quality of Watermelon Juice Concentrated by Forward Osmosis and Conventional Processes" Processes 8, no. 12: 1568. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8121568

APA Style

Milczarek, R. R., Olsen, C. W., & Sedej, I. (2020). Quality of Watermelon Juice Concentrated by Forward Osmosis and Conventional Processes. Processes, 8(12), 1568. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8121568

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop