Next Article in Journal
Abrasive Water Jet Cutting of Hardox Steels—Quality Investigation
Previous Article in Journal
Thermal Hazard Analysis of Styrene Polymerization in Microreactor of Varying Diameter
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Current State of Porous Carbon for Wastewater Treatment

1
Materials, Environment and Energy Laboratory (UR14ES26), Faculty of Sciences of Gafsa, University of Gafsa, Gafsa 2112, Tunisia
2
Faculty of Sciences of Gafsa, University of Gafsa, Gafsa 2112, Tunisia
3
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, University of Hail, Hail PO Box 2440, Saudi Arabia
4
Higher Institute of Technological Studies, Ksar Hellal 5070, Tunisia
5
UR13 ES 63—Research Unity of Applied Chemistry & Environment, Faculty of Sciences, University of Monastir, Monastir 5000, Tunisia
6
LGP2, University of Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, LGP2, F-38000 Grenoble, France
7
Organic Chemistry Laboratory (LR17ES08), Faculty of Sciences of Sfax, University of Sfax, Sfax 3029, Tunisia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2020, 8(12), 1651; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8121651
Submission received: 5 August 2020 / Revised: 19 October 2020 / Accepted: 8 December 2020 / Published: 14 December 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Materials Processes)

Abstract

:
Porous materials constitute an attractive research field due to their high specific surfaces; high chemical stabilities; abundant pores; special electrical, optical, thermal, and mechanical properties; and their often higher reactivities. These materials are currently generating a great deal of enthusiasm, and they have been used in large and diverse applications, such as those relating to sensors and biosensors, catalysis and biocatalysis, separation and purification techniques, acoustic and electrical insulation, transport gas or charged species, drug delivery, and electrochemistry. Porous carbons are an important class of porous materials that have grown rapidly in recent years. They have the advantages of a tunable pore structure, good physical and chemical stability, a variable specific surface, and the possibility of easy functionalization. This gives them new properties and allows them to improve their performance for a given application. This review paper intends to understand how porous carbons involve the removal of pollutants from water, e.g., heavy metal ions, dyes, and organic or inorganic molecules. First, a general overview description of the different precursors and the manufacturing methods of porous carbons is illustrated. The second part is devoted to reporting some applications such using porous carbon materials as an adsorbent. It appears that the use of porous materials at different scales for these applications is very promising for wastewater treatment industries.

1. Introduction

Porous materials are defined as materials with cavities, or channels, called pores. Pores are empty spaces that exist between particles of any shape in materials. These empty spaces form the porosity of the materials, defined as the volume percentage of air in the material that correspond to the total volume occupied by the voids of the material divided by the total volume of the material [1]. The porous space is a continuity of absence of solid matter nested in the continuity of solid matter. It is essentially irregular in its forms and inconsistent also in its qualities, which can be given great complexity. There are two types of porosity: open porosity (on the external environment) and closed porosity. In all cases, it is generally characterized by its volume fraction (or by the density of the porous material) and the pore size distribution. The open porosity notably controls the adhesion properties of the coatings on the surface of the material [2].
Porous materials have attracted the attention of chemists and materials scientists, and the development of new porous materials has accelerated research development in recent decades [3,4,5]. This attention comes back not only to the commercial interest that porous materials have for their application in various fields such as separation [6,7], catalysis [7,8,9], adsorption [6,10,11,12,13,14,15], energy storage and conversion [16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24], and medicine [25,26], but also, because of the scientific interest in the challenges posed by their synthesis, their treatment and their characterization. Indeed, the progress of technology and the demand for porous materials have pushed researchers to develop synthesis methods allowing for controlling the parameters that determine the structural and textural characteristics of these materials. In this context, a lot of works have shown that controlling the pore size is essential for many specific applications. However, this technological and industrial development with the growth of the world population and domestic activities are causing a remarkable increase in water pollution. It is therefore necessary to purify wastewater before it is released into the environment. Thus, several wastewater treatment technologies have been developed, the adsorption of which on porous materials is proving to be one of the most promising techniques for the removal of pollutants from wastewater due to its affordable price and ease of disposal at large-scale use [27,28,29,30]. The most widely used adsorbents are activated carbons, and they are considered the most useful for the removal of organic and inorganic pollutants due to their structural variability (macro-, meso-, and micropores), their large specific surface area, and a wide availability of functional groups [29,31,32].
The purpose of this review is to discuss the preparation processes of porous carbons as well as the main carbon precursors used. In addition, the performance and characteristics of the resulting carbons are investigated. Finally, the contribution of activated carbon in the field of wastewater treatment will also be discussed in detail.

2. Classification of Porous Materials

According to the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry-USA(IUPAC) [33,34], porous materials are classified according to the diameter of the pores (dp) that constitute them, and the three classes are seen in Figure 1.

2.1. Microporous Materials

Microporous materials are those whose pore diameter is less than 2 nm (dp < 2 nm). They can be prepared by the sol-gel process and are widely used in catalysis and adsorption.

2.2. Mesoporous Materials

In this category of materials, the pore diameter varies between 2 and 50 nm (2 nm < dp < 50 nm). A distinction is made between crystalline mesoporous materials and ordered amorphous materials, which are intermediate between that of crystalline microporous solids of the zeolite type and disordered amorphous solids such as silica gel [35,36,37]. Mesoporous materials have several known applications such as catalysis, filtration, pollution control, optics, and even electronics.

2.3. Macroporous Materials

As these materials have fairly large pores (dp > 50 nm), they find their use in the field of decontamination of polluted water with organic dyes and as a catalyst support for the photodegradation of the pollutant [20,38,39,40,41].

3. Graphite and Graphene

Graphite consists of interconnected carbon atoms arranged to hexagonally form flat networks in the form of layers stacked parallel to each other (Figure 2b) [42,43]. These layers are connected by low energy van der Waals type bonds. This explains the laminated morphology of graphite [42,43]. Graphite is characterized by high thermal and electrical conductivity, good chemical stability, and remarkable plasticity [43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50]. A good thermal and electrical conductivity is attributed to the delocalization of the π-electrons of the carbon atoms in graphite, and its plasticity can be explained by the possibility of sliding the sheets layers one onto the other [42,43]. These favorable characteristics make graphite interesting materials for improving the transfer and storage of thermal energy, for preparing anodes of lithium-ion batteries, and for electrochemical applications. In this context, Zhong et al. [51] used pitch-based graphite foams to increase the thermal diffusivity of paraffin wax for a thermal energy storage application. Later, Jana et al. [45] studied the effect of the addition of graphite on the conductivity of a tannin-based resin. They showed, contrary to what was expected a priori, that the smaller graphite particles were much more suitable for obtaining conductive matrices. Indeed, the use of small grains made the viscosity higher because of their higher surface and made it possible to obtain homogeneous foams with a higher density [45]. In 2019, Zhang et al. [52] showed that the use of graphitized mesoporous carbon as anode materials for lithium-ion batteries improved speed performance and had a good cycling stability with a reversible capacity of 248.3 mA h g−1 at 1 C after 100 cycles. In the same context, porous graphitic carbon was synthesized from Eichhornia crassipes plants collected from the Coimbatore region, Tamilnadu-India, and has been used for the sustainable fabrication of hole-transporting materials electrode in perovskite solar cells [53].
Graphene is related to graphite, and it was isolated experimentally for the first time, in 2004, from graphite [54,55,56,57]. It is a planar material with a hexagonal structure (Figure 2a), often compared to a honeycomb network, in the form of a two-dimensional (2D) crystal consisting of a simple plane of carbon atoms in sp2 hybridizations [58]. Graphene represents the basic unit of graphite, and it has a high optical transparency and remarkable rigidity with a tensile strength of more than 130 GPa [59]. It can be wrapped to form many other forms of carbon such as fullerenes, nanotubes, or stacked in graphite. It is important to note that the honeycomb structure of graphene gives it excellent stability with a high mobility of the electrons on its surface [59,60,61] and can be used in multiple applications in the fields of electronics (flexible screens, high frequency electronics, nanoelectronics, batteries, chargers), the environment (atmospheric pollution sensors, desalination of seawater), and health (targeted therapy). Generally, there are three main techniques for making graphene. The first allows us to isolate a single plane of graphene by the exfoliation of a graphite crystal using adhesive ribbon; this operation is repeated several times so that the film is sufficiently thin before depositing it on a substrate, which more often is silica [55,56,62]. The second method consists of an annealing at high temperature of a silicon carbide substrate, which induces the sublimation of Si, consequently producing a reorganization of the carbon atoms, leading to the formation of graphene planes on the surface [63,64,65]. The third method is based on chemical deposition on metals from hydrocarbons [44,62,66,67,68,69]. The first technique is widely used because it is simple and inexpensive and also because the properties of graphene are easily accessible [55,70,71].
The chemical properties of graphene are similar to those of graphite, and graphene can be used in multiple applications, in particular for field effect transistors due to the high mobility of the surface electrons. Because graphene has chemical stability in contact with electrolytes, mechanical elasticity and good electrical conductivity, it is widely used as a storage medium for lithium [72,73,74,75]. It is also used in gas sensors such as NO2, CO, H2S, H2, NO, NH3, and CO2 [76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85], or even as a biosensor for the detection of dopamine [86,87], β-nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide [88], paracetamol [87,89], Kojic acid [90], uric acid [86,87], vanillin [91], and caffeic acid [92]. Graphene is also used as a drug carrier [93,94,95,96,97] and as a charge conductor in solar cells as well as a light collector including cells and photodetectors [53,60,61,62,98,99,100]. He et al. [101] prepared a three-dimensional graphene-CNTs@ Se aerogel, usingCNTs/selenium that is sandwiched between graphene nanosheets via an environmentally friendly solvothermal method. They showed that due to the 3D sandwich-type protection of the active Se, the cathode offers an initial coulombic efficiency of 92% as well as an excellent cyclic performance. This greatly facilitates the improvement of the specific energy density of Li-Se batteries [101]. Likewise, it has been shown that a graphene-CNTs-Li2S hybrid aerogel could be effectively used as a high capacity cathode for Li-S batteries with a reversible discharge capacity as large as 1123.6 mA h g−1, and a decrease in capacity of less than 0.02% per cycle [102,103]. The efficiency of these materials is attributed to the 3D structure, which is achieved by using two-dimensional (2D) graphene nanosheets and one-dimensional (1D) carbon nanotubes (CNTs), thus forming highly efficient channels for electron transfer and ionic diffusion [102,103]. This architecture was used for the development of a CoS2-carbon nanotubes-graphene anode for high performance lithium-ion batteries that can deliver an initial discharge capacity of 993 mA h g−1 at 100 mA g−1 [104].

4. Carbon Nanotubes

Carbon nanotubes are an allotropic form of carbon (Figure 2c), observed for the first time in 1991 by Japanese researcher Sumio Iijima during the synthesis of fullerenes by an electric arc [105]. They have been characterized as graphene sheets that are wound on themselves in the form of microtubes and will later be renamed multiwall carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs). In 1993, the synthesis of single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) was reported by optimizing the method of synthesis by an electric arc [106,107]. The multisheet nanotubes consist of several graphene sheets wound concentrically with a spacing between two sheets of approximately 3.6 Å, slightly greater than the spacing between two sheets in graphite. The diameter of the nanotubes varies, depending on the number of sheets, from 1 to 50 nm, and their lengths can reach 1 µm [43,105,108,109,110]. SWCNTs consist of a graphene sheet wound on itself, and they form a tube whose diameter is between 0.4 and 3 nm. Carbon nanotubes are therefore composed of one or more sheets of carbon atoms, as in graphite, wound on themselves forming a tube. Carbon nanotubes have good mechanical properties, good adhesion, and excellent electrical conductivity [43,111,112,113]. Some of these nanotubes have metallic properties [75,114,115], while others are semiconductors [116,117,118,119,120,121]. SWCNTs and MWCNTs are manufactured by almost the same method; the only distinction can appear on the use of the metal catalyst, generally nickel, iron, or cobalt, which is essential for the synthesis of fullerenes. They can be prepared mainly by arc discharge, laser ablation, and chemical vapor deposition [109,120,122,123,124,125,126], involving one of the following as carbon precursors: xylene, acetylene, toluene, methane, benzene, etc. [43]. On the industrial level, carbon nanotubes, with the particularity that they possess, residing in a small amount of impurities, are used in many forms such as the reinforcing elements of polymers and composites, nanoporous materials for energy storage, passive (nanometric conductors) or active components (diodes and transistors), and systems allowing for the vectorization of drug molecules for the treatment of certain diseases [120,121,122,127,128,129,130,131,132].

5. Activated Carbon

Activated carbon is porous, amorphous organic material with a complex structure, characterized by high carbon content [133]. These materials include a wide range of carbonaceous substances with different properties and characteristics (porosity, specific surface, chemical nature of the surface, density, etc.). Activated carbon can be produced from any substance with a high carbon content, whether of a vegetable, fossil, or material of a synthetic nature; examples include date stones [134,135], coffee grounds [133,136,137], almond shell [138], coconut shell [139], corncob wastes [140], Acacia glauca sawdust [141], waste potato residue [142,143], rice husk [144], sunflower piths [145], tomato stem [146], banana peel [147], etc.

5.1. Preparation of Activated Carbon

Generally, activated carbon is prepared in two stages. The first step is the carbonization of raw material to produce a carbon surface. This step is followed by the activation by chemical oxidation or heat treatment in order to further boost the surface of the material obtained (Figure 3).

5.1.1. Pyrolysis

Pyrolysis (carbonization) is the thermal decomposition of carbonaceous materials at high temperature between 400 and 800 °C, under an inert atmosphere. The resulting material is an amorphous solid rich in carbon. The remaining carbon atoms are grouped in sheets that arrange themselves irregularly, leaving gaps between them. These interstices give rise to a primary porosity of the charred product. It should be noted that the heat treatment strongly influences the texture of the materials [148]. Indeed, a gentle heating rate slightly modifies the carbon structure compared to the original structure of the material used and regenerates a reduced rate of volatile compounds. In the same context, the pyrolysis temperature and the residence time determine the mass loss and the nature of the surface of the biochar prepared.
The activated carbon can be obtained by the pyrolysis of carbon gels obtained by the sol-gel process. This process involves polycondensation reactions of organic precursors. In 1989, Pekala et al. introduced for the first time the synthesis of carbon aerogel by the polycondensation of resorcinol and formaldehyde in the presence of sodium carbonate as a basic catalyst [149,150]. Subsequently, numerous studies have vested in the preparation of polymers and activated carbon precursors by the condensation of hydroxylated benzene (phenol, catechol, 4-methylcatechol, m-cresol, hydroquinone, phloroglucinol, resorcinol, etc.) with aldehyde (formaldehyde, furfural, etc.) [151,152,153,154,155,156,157,158].

5.1.2. Activation

To improve the textural characteristics of the carbonate, it is necessary to subject it to an activation step. This involves opening the initial porosity and increasing accessibility to the internal structure, as well as creating new pores, eliminating the tar that clogs the pores and creating surface functions. This operation, therefore, leads to a loss of mass, and the estimation of the degree of activation can be determined by the “burn-off”:
Burn - off   ( % ) = ( ( m i - m f )   100 ) / m i )
where mi is initial mass and mf is final mass. The burn-off provides information on the rate of activation progress and the nature of porosity. Activation can be carried out by a physical or chemical process.

Physical Activation

Physical activation consists of oxidation of biochar at high temperature (>700 °C) under a stream of an oxidizing gas such as water vapor, oxygen, and carbon dioxide. The reactions are shown in Equations (1)–(4).
C   +   H 2 O     CO   +   H 2 C   +   H
C   +   O 2   CO 2 C   +   O
C   +   1 / 2   O 2   CO C   +   ½   O
C   +   CO 2   2   CO C   +   CO
During physical activation, the development of the porosity of the biochar depends on the nature of the oxidizing gas used, and the pores changes from micro- to mesopores and macropores [27,31,159,160]. The porosity is more developed in the presence of water vapor than in the presence of carbon dioxide. Indeed, the size of the water molecules is smaller than that of carbon dioxide, which gives it a greater diffusion in the pores of carbon, thus causing the enlargement of the micropores in mesopores and macropores. Generally, carbon dioxide promotes the formation of a microporous network, while water vapor generates a mesoporous or macroporous network [29,31,159,160,161]. Furthermore, the use of oxygen is accompanied by a significant loss in mass [27,159]. It should be noted here that physical activation is preferred because of the low cost of preparation and its simple operation, making it possible to optimize the pyrolysis step and therefore producing better control of the porosity of the activated carbon. In fact, optimization of the yield and surface properties of activated carbon lies in optimizing the temperature, the activation time, and the flow rate of the gas (CO2, vapor, N2) [27,160].

Chemical Activation

The chemical activation is carried out with chemical reagents that promote dehydration and a structural reorganization of the pores of the carbonaceous material. The procedure consists of impregnating the carbonaceous material with the chemical agent then undergoing a heat treatment at a temperature between 400 and 900 °C. Various chemical agents can be used, namely salts of alkali metals (AlCl3, ZnCl2), acids (H3PO4, H2SO4), or bases (KOH, NaOH, K2CO3, Na2CO3) [134,140,162,163]. Zinc chloride was the main chemical activator used on a large scale. It is now abandoned due to environmental problems linked to the toxicity of residual zinc-derived compounds. Alkali metal hydroxides (KOH, NaOH) are also used successfully to obtain a high surface area reaching 3000 m2/g [164]. Alkali metal hydroxides are often used to enlarge microporosity, while zinc chloride is used to develop strong microporosity alongside small mesoporosity. It turns out that KOH is the most effective activator (effective in terms of large specific surface area and high microporosity) for preparing activated carbon from biomass [31,165,166,167]. Furthermore, orthophosphoric acid (H3PO4) is widely used in industry to impregnate lignocellulosic precursors and synthetic materials to provide active carbon with smaller pores than those activated with ZnCl2 [168]. Indeed, phosphoric acid plays both the role of an acid catalyst to favor the reactions of the depolymerization of the macromolecules that constitute biomass (cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin) while promoting the formation of crosslinking through reactions of dehydration, cyclization, and condensation, and a combining agent that subsequently reacts with organic matter to form phosphate esters and polyphosphates, both of which serve as bridges between the fragments of biopolymers that constitute the lignocellulosic biomass [31,169,170]. Furthermore, the addition (or insertion) of phosphate groups leads to a process of expansion of the carbonaceous material which, after the elimination of the acid, leaves the matrix in a developed state with an accessible porous structure [31].

5.2. Different Forms of Activated Carbon

Activated carbon is widely used in the industry for a variety of applications [171]. Each application requires a type and form of activated carbon. The most available forms in the markets are seen in Figure 4 and also presented in the following subsections.

5.2.1. Activated Carbon Powder (CAP)

It occurs in the form of fine particles of size less than 100 μm with average pore diameters of between 0.15 and 0.25 μm (Figure 4a). They are characterized by a large external surface and pores of reduced depths. This type of carbon is frequently used for the treatment of liquid effluents in batch mode.

5.2.2. Granular Activated Carbon (CAG)

The granular or granular activated carbon is formed by grains with a size between 0.5 and 10 mm (Figure 4b). These grains are known by a small pore diameter, a large internal surface, and a relatively small external surface. This type of carbon is intended for the treatment of gases and liquid effluents.

5.2.3. Extruded Activated Carbon

To make extruded activated carbon, the carbonaceous raw material is finely ground; a binder is added to this powder in order to obtain a paste which, by an extrusion device, produces extrudates of a determined length and width (Figure 4c). These extrudates are then charred and activated under a gas flow. These materials are used for gas phase applications.

5.2.4. Impregnated Activated Carbon

Activated carbon can also be impregnated with a reagent to optimize its adsorption capacities for certain molecules (Figure 4d). Thus, the removal of certain impurities from gas is facilitated by this type of material, whereas it would have been impossible on a conventional carbon adsorbent.

5.2.5. Activated Carbon Fabric (CAT)

The active carbon tissues are obtained by the carbonization of a synthetic precursor tissue of viscose or polyacrylonitrile type followed by activation Figure 4e). These fabrics are extremely porous materials with a very high specific surface of up to 2000 m2/g and a distribution of micropores of 90% of the total pore volume. These materials are known for their medicinal applications and in catalysis.

5.3. Application of Activated Carbon for Wastewater Treatment

Activated carbon has long been one of the most widely used materials in the industrial sector due to its essential role in the purification of liquids and the filtration of gases. However, innovations in the manufacture and use of activated carbon are driven by the need to reuse natural resources and prevent environmental pollution. Thus, a lot of progress has been made on the optimization of these carbonaceous materials, both in terms of their manufacture and their regeneration. This has prompted several industries—for example, the metallurgical, petroleum, food, pharmaceutical, chemical, and automotive industries—to use activated carbon for various uses. Currently, the main application of activated carbon lies in the adsorption processes of pollutants in the gas or liquid phases. In fact, activated carbon is in the category of amorphous carbon, which has been chemically improved into a porous structure, mostly microporous with a surface functionality that offers active carbon the properties of excellent materials for the adsorption of various chemical species [43,172,173,174]. This adsorption phenomenon is due to the existence of van der Waals type physical forces, inducing a higher concentration of the adsorbate at the interface than in the fluid. Adsorption can also be caused by the formation of covalent bonds between the active sites present on the surface of the carbon and the adsorbate, which is similar to a phenomenon of chemisorption. In this regard, a limited overview is presented on the use of active carbon for the adsorption of pollutants in the liquid phase, and in particular, the field of wastewater treatment. The physicochemical surface properties of activated carbon are generally governed by the nature of the starting materials, the activation methods, and the preparation conditions (Table 1).
As a result, the adsorption properties of activated carbon vary from source to source. Biomass is widely used for the production of activated carbon because of its great abundance, its renewability, and its low cost. In fact, various biomass wastes have been used to produce adsorbents by chemical or physical activation. Nowicki et al. [181] studied the influence of the precursor on the structural and sorption properties of methyl red (Me-Red) and methylene blue (MB)of activated carbon obtained by chemical activation with potassium carbonate involving grapefruit, mandarin, pomelo, and banana peels as precursors. They confirmed that this waste can be successfully used as precursors for the preparation of activated carbon that show a well-developed porous structure with specific surfaces of 836, 1198, 1077, and 1188 m2/g, respectively, optimizing the conditions activation (temperature, time, impregnation ratio). It turns out that the efficiency of removal of Me-Red and MB from aqueous solutions depends on the type of precursor used and that the adsorption capacity increases with the increase in the specific surface area of the adsorbent. Charcoal from grapefruit peels was found to be the most effective adsorbent with a sorption capacity of 456.2and 454.5 mg/g for MB and Me-Red, respectively. In the same context, Baysal et al. [145] found that the adsorption capacity of MB increases from 580 to 965 mg/g when the surface area of activated carbon obtained from sunflower piths increases from 2090 to 2690 m2/g. The increase in specific surface area was attributed to the nature of the activating agent where the highest value was obtained with sodium hydroxide [138]. Activation by potassium hydroxide mainly caused the development of micropores with a very narrow pore distribution. Thus, the sodium hydroxide appeared to be more reactive, which resulted in the micropores fusing to form mesopores [135,145,193,204]. Indeed, several studies have reported that potassium hydroxide is an activator that promotes the formation of activated carbon with a microporous structure [166,167,183,206,221]. However, some authors obtained a mesoporous structure by activation with potassium hydroxide [134]. Indeed, the structural properties of activated carbon also depend on the temperature and the duration of activation as well as the impregnation ratio. For example, the activated carbon obtained from a near of corn passes from a macroporous structure for a pyrolysis temperature of 800 °C and duration of 1 h [192] to a microporous structure for a pyrolysis temperature of 850 °C and duration of 3 h [221]. Likewise, the specific surface increases from 1054 to 1618 m2/g [192,221]. In this respect, the variation in the parameters of preparation of the activated carbon offers varied in the textural and structural properties. Consequently, there is a variation of the porosity, both in shape and in dimensions, of the functional groups and of the pHZCN. These properties with the conditions of application determine the applicability of the activated carbon. Large-pore activated carbon is effectively used for the adsorption of large pollutants and vice versa [135,179,204,206].
Da Paixao Cansado et al. [206] did a comparative study of the adsorption of pesticides on chemically prepared activated carbon involving K2CO3 and KOH. The aim was to obtain activated carbon from polymer waste (Polyacrylonitrile (PAN) and Polyethyleneterephthalate (PET)) and to determine their main characteristics, namely the characterization of their porosity, their functional groups on the surface, and their adsorption capacities for 4-chloro-2-methylphenoxyacetic acid (MCPA) and 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D). The results showed that these pollutants were better adsorbed on the activated carbon obtained with KOH, which has a microporosity and a specific surface area greater than that obtained with K2CO3 [206]. In the same context, Laksaci et al. [136] studied the influence of the combination of CO2 with KOH on the morphological properties and the sorption capacities of adsorbents from coffee grounds for phenol and MB. Activation by KOH under CO2 flow considerably improves the porous structure of the adsorbents. Indeed, the use of CO2 makes it possible to increase the diameter of the pores and develop a narrow distribution of the size of the pores [136]. This improves the microporosity of the activated carbon and increases the adsorption for large organic molecules. The results showed that MB adsorbs better than phenol with adsorption capacities of 390 and 211 mg/g, respectively [136].
Activated carbon obtained from date palm petiole via chemical activation using sodium hydroxide showed a surface area of 655 m2/g, with a mesoporous structure [135]. This mesoporosity is a favorable structural property for use in the elimination of indigo carmine from aqueous solution in batch and continuous column systems. In batch mode, the adsorption was chemical and exothermic, and it underwent pseudo-second-order model kinetics. The adsorption mechanism is related to the physisorption enhanced by chemisorption. The adsorption capacity of the indigo carmine decreases from 53.76 to 32.57 mg/g if the temperature rises to 40°C [135]. However, in continuous mode, this activated carbon provides good efficiency removal of indigo carmine after three repetition cycles [135]. It appears that the adsorption is largely influenced by the pH of the solution and the pHZCN. The effect of pH on adsorption can manifest itself through two mechanisms: an electrostatic interaction between the functional groups of the adsorbent (carboxylic, phenolic, lactonic, basic functions, etc.) and the adsorbate, or a chemical reaction between adsorbent and adsorbate. In fact, at pH<pHZCN, the surface of the carbon is positively charged, which promotes the adsorption of the anions, while the adsorption of cations is favored at pH>pHZCN, where the surface of the carbon is negatively charged [28,29,30,135,159,176,184,196,211,222,223,224]. Tu et al. [183] studied the sorption properties of Bermuda grass derived activated carbon for Cr(VI) removal. Sorption of Cr(VI) ions depends on pH of the solution; the best Cr(VI) uptake was reported at pH 2.0 with a maximum adsorption capacity of 403.2 mg/g, and the removal mechanism was predominantly chemisorption. The same observations were reported by Bedada et al. [207] using activated carbon produced from Parthenium hysterophorus weed chemically activated by phosphoric acid. This is to highlight that mostly metal ions (Pb2+, Cd2+, Cr3+, Fe2+, Cu2+, Ni2+, Co2+, Hg2+, etc.) removal is favorable in the pH range 2–6 [143,163,188,192,213,219].
In addition, the search for inexpensive alternative resources as well as methods of preparing activated carbon has attracted the attention of scientific researchers. Several researchers are interested in converting waste from the polymer and textile industries into activated carbon as a favorable approach [176,206,217,218,219,225]. In this context, activated carbon derived from acrylic fiber waste is obtained by physical activation in the presence of air via controlled heat treatment and used as an adsorbent for the removal of MB from aqueous media [176]. The results indicate that the adsorption of MB on activated carbon requires a longer equilibrium time when the initial concentration of dye is increased with an adsorption capacity of 8.7 mg/g [176]. Likewise, Hassan and Elhadidy transformed carpet waste into activated carbon by activation with H3PO4 at different impregnation ratios [218]. They found that the specific surface area of activated carbon increases with the impregnation ratio, which reaches 953 m2/g for an impregnation ratio of 3. This carbon has a mesoporous structure promoting the adsorption of MB where the capacity of adsorption is 769.2 mg/g [218]. A study of the effects of the impregnation rate, the carbonization temperature, and the time on the characteristics of the active carbon produced from tomato waste by chemical activation with ZnCl2, was carried out by Saygili and Güzel [216]. This study showed that the influence of the operating parameters on the properties of the pores of the carbons followed a sequence of carbonization temperature> carbonization time> impregnation rate. The activated carbon produced under optimal conditions has a specific surface of 1093 m2/g with a mesoporous structure. This carbon has been used effectively for the adsorption of large MB and metanil yellow (MY) molecules, showing maximum monolayer adsorption capacities of 400 mg/g for MB and 385 mg/g for MY [216]. The same observations were made by Wang et al. [167] during the preparation of carbon derived from peanut shell by activation by potassium hydroxide.
Certain inorganic anions constitute a group of pollutants in wastewater that are known by their toxic and carcinogenic effects. Among these ions are the nitrates (NO3) and fluoride (F) ions. It was reported that activated charcoal, derived from Rice husk developed by chemical activation using potassium carbonate as an activating agent followed by modification by urea, could remove the nitrate ions from aqueous solutions with a maximum adsorption capacity of 8.1 mg/g [144]. In addition, activated carbon has been used effectively for defluorination of water. By way of example, the citrus limetta peels give, by activation with FeCl3, an activated carbon with a maximum monolayer capacity of 9.7 mg/g under the optimal adsorbent dosage conditions 1 g/L, a contact time of 240 min, and a temperature of 25 °C with fluoride concentration ranging from 5 to 30 mg/L [28].
It should be noted that an understanding of the activation process is a fundamental step for optimizing the preparation of activated carbon. Indeed, various chemical, physical, and physicochemical processes are used for the synthesis of activated carbon from different natural or synthetic resources. Chemical treatment involves the use of activating agents by impregnation followed by pyrolysis, whereas the physical process involves a high temperature heat treatment in the presence of vapor or carbon dioxide. However, the combination of these two methods has also been used for the production of activated carbon. It remains difficult to predict the physicochemical and morphological properties of carbons according to the treatment applied. It seems that the morphological, the physicochemical, the textural, and the surface properties of activated carbon change significantly by changing the activation time and temperature and the nature of the precursor used. The chemical nature of the surface of activated carbon depends on the type of heteroatoms, such as oxygen, nitrogen, sulfur, etc., that are present on the surface. These hetero atoms or groups accumulated on the surface either come from the starting material itself, or are incorporated during the activation process. This is largely related to the nature of the precursor. All these properties are of great importance for the use of carbons as an adsorbent of pollutants in aqueous solutions. Indeed, the adsorption of pollutants onto activated carbon is a complicated process, and various interactions can coexist during the process involving physical actions and/or chemical bonds. Thus, the adsorption mechanism referred to as electrostatic interactions, hydrogen bonds, π–π stacking interactions, pore filling, hydrophobic interactions, ion exchange, and also other interactions (n–π interactions, etc.) and complexation reactions can take place [30,184,187,194,197,203,205,220,226,227,228]. Figure 5 illustrates the principal interaction methods for adsorption of pollutants on activated carbon.
The micropores and mesopores of the porous network of activated carbon contribute to the adsorption of pollutants by pore-filling mechanisms according to their total volume and the size of the pollutant molecules, and this is influenced by the affinity of the adsorbent with respect to the pollutant [229]. The π–π stacking interactions are suggested for the sorption of aromatic compounds on the surface of activated carbon containing aromatic rings, suggesting the presence of graphene in the carbon [205]. Electrostatic interactions are encountered during the adsorption of ionic and ionizable compounds [30,135,230]. Positively charged compounds will tend to sorb onto negatively charged carbon surfaces, while anionic compounds will bind to positively charged sites. These interactions also involve the weak interaction forces and hydrogen bonds between the functional groups (carboxylic, lactonic, phenolic, etc.) present on the surface of the activated carbon and the functional groups of the adsorbate. In fact, the polar groups on the surface of the carbon facilitate the sorption of water and promote the formation of hydrogen bonds between the carbon and the sorbates containing electronegative elements [30,135,230,231]. Furthermore, the ion exchange and complexation processes are induced by the presence of cations or metal ions in the structure of the activated carbon [226,230,232].

6. Conclusions

Carbon materials are one of the most studied areas in the scientific community. Indeed, these materials have remarkable physical and chemical properties, and this explains their uses in various fields such as biology, chemistry of materials, energy storage, electrochemistry, and wastewater treatment. In addition, despite several advances made, researchers face many challenges concerning the synthesis, morphological uniformity, and reproducibility of carbonaceous materials. Graphene and graphite offer excellent electrical mobility that favors their use for the photodegradation of organic pollutants and the manufacture of anodes for lithium-ion batteries and pollution sensors. Thus, materials derived from graphene offer greater flexibility in modifying the properties of the catalyst according to specific requirements. In this respect, the morphological properties of carbon nanotubes combined with their chemical and thermal conduction properties give them an interesting future as a catalyst support. In the same context, activated carbon is widely used in the field of water treatment because of their adsorption properties that result from the diversity of chemical, structural, and textural composition. These properties are related to the precursors and the method of preparation of the activated carbon. In this review, the performance of the retention of pollutants from wastewater was detailed on the basis of recent examples from the literature. It turns out that mastering the methods of preparing carbonaceous materials for larger-scale production and understanding the many properties of these materials are important steps to be taken in order to be able to assist with their applications in the various areas of interest.

Author Contributions

M.b.M. and L.M. designed the manuscript and wrote the main text. R.K. and Y.M. designed and revised the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their deep gratitude to Mohamed Naceur Belgacem, the director of Grenoble INP-Pagora and Agefpi, for his valuable advice and assistance, and also to the Tunisian Ministry of Higher Education for its financial support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

2,4-DNP2,4-Dinitrophenol
2,4-DNT-3-SO32,4-dinitrotoluene-3-sulfonate
2,4-DNT-5-SO32,4-dinitrotoluene-5-sulfonate
2,4,6-TNP2,4,6-Trinitrphenol
4-ClP4-Chlorophenol
4-NP4-nitrophenol
Activ. Temp.Activation temperature
Activ. TimeActivation time
AMXAmoxicillin
Bis-ABisphenol A
C0Concentration initial
FBAFixed bed adsorption
MBMethylene blue
Me-RedMethyl red
MGMalachite green
MOMethyl orange
MsMunicipal sludge
MWMicrowave
MWCNTsMultiwalled carbon nanotubes
MYMetanil yellow
PANPolyacrylonitrile
PETPolyethyleneterephthalate
pHZCNpH of the point of zero charge
QmaxMaximum adsorption capacity
RB5Reactive Black 5
Rh-BRhodamine B
SBETBrunauer–Emmett–Teller area
SDSSodium dodecylbenzene sulfonate
SWCNTsSingle-walled carbon nanotubes
TMATriMethylAmine

References

  1. Rouquerol, F.; Luciani, L.; Llewellyn, P.; Denoyel, R.; Rouquerol, J. Techniques de L’ingénieur, Analyse et Caractérisation: Texture des Matériaux Pulvérulents ou Poreux; Inist-CNRS-Paris: Paris, France, 2003; pp. 1050–1057. [Google Scholar]
  2. Besson, J.; Billon, N.; Cantournet, S.; Chastel, Y.; Lorenzon, A.F.G.; Haudin, J.M.; Monasse, B.; Naze, L. Matériaux pour l’ingénieur; Edition Mines: Paris, France, 2006; pp. 81–82. [Google Scholar]
  3. Ma, T.Y.; Yuan, Z.Y. Bioinspired Approach to Synthesizing Hierarchical Porous Materials, Hierarchically Structured Porous Materials: From Nanoscience to Catalysis, Separation, Optics, Energy, and Life Science, 1st ed.; Su, B.L., Sanchez, C., Yang, X.Y., Eds.; Wiley: Weinheim, Germany, 2012; pp. 173–207. [Google Scholar]
  4. Zhuo, H.; Hu, Y.; Tong, X.; Zhong, L.; Peng, X.; Sun, R. Sustainable hierarchical porous carbon aerogel from cellulose for high performance supercapacitor and CO2 capture. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2016, 87, 229–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Canal-Rodríguez, M.; Menéndez, J.A.; Arenillas, A. Performance of carbon xerogel-graphene hybrids as electrodes in aqueous supercapacitors. Electrochim. Acta 2018, 276, 28–36. [Google Scholar]
  6. Sarvi, M.N.; Bee, T.B.; Gooi, C.K.; Woonton, B.W.; Gee, M.L.; O’Connor, A.J. Development of functionalized mesoporous silica for adsorption and separation of dairy proteins. Chem. Eng. J. 2014, 235, 244–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Xin, Y.; Peng, S.; Chen, J.; Yang, Z.; Zhang, J. Continuous flow synthesis of porous materials. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2019, 31, 1448–1461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wei, Y.; Parmentier, T.E.; de Jong, K.P.; Zecevic, J. Tailoring and visualizing the pore architecture of hierarchical zeolites. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 7234–7261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Zhong, W.; Liu, H.; Bai, C.; Liao, S.; Li, Y. Base-Free Oxidation of Alcohols to Esters at Room Temperature and Atmospheric Conditions using Nanoscale Co-Based Catalysts. ACS Catal. 2015, 5, 1850–1856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Xu, L.; Guo, L.; Hu, G.; Chen, J.; Hu, X.; Wang, S.; Dai, W.; Fan, M. Nitrogen-doped porous carbon spheres derived from d-glucose as highly-efficient CO2 sorbents. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 37964–37969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Li, D.; Chen, Y.; Zheng, M.; Zhao, H.; Zhao, Y.; Sun, Z. Hierarchically structured porous nitrogen-doped carbon for highly selective CO2 capture. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2016, 4, 298–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Xu, A.-R.; Chen, L.; Guo, X.; Xiao, Z.; Liu, R. Biodegradable lignocellulosic porous materials: Fabrication, characterization and its application in water processing. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 115, 846–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhu, L.; Shen, D.; Luo, K.H. A critical review on VOCs adsorption by different porous materials: Species, mechanisms and modification methods. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 389, 122102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Yang, F.; Sun, L.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, Y. One-pot synthesis of porous carbon foam derived from corn straw: Atrazine adsorption equilibrium and kinetics. Environ. Sci. Nano. 2017, 4, 625–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Little, I.; Alorkpa, E.; Khan, V.; Povazhnyi, V.; Vasiliev, A. Efficient porous adsorbent for removal of cesium from contaminated water. J. Porous Mater. 2019, 26, 361–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhu, Y.; Hu, H.; Li, W.; Zhang, X. Resorcinol-formaldehyde based porous carbon as an electrode material for supercapacitors. Carbon 2007, 45, 160–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhang, W.F.; Huang, Z.-H.; Cao, G.P.; Kang, F.; Yang, Y. A novel mesoporous carbon with straight tunnel-like pore structure for high rate electrochemical capacitors. J. Power Sources 2012, 204, 230–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wu, K.; Liu, Q. Nitrogen-doped mesoporous carbons for high performance supercapacitors. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2016, 379, 132–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, P.; Xu, J.; Xu, F.; Zhao, W.; Sun, P.; Zhang, Z.; Qian, M.; Huang, F. Constructing hierarchical porous carbon via tin punching for efficient electrochemical energy storage. Carbon 2018, 134, 391–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Wang, Y.; Qu, Q.; Gao, S.; Tang, G.; Liu, K.; He, S.; Huang, C. Biomass derived carbon as binder-free electrode materials for supercapacitors. Carbon 2019, 155, 706–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yu, K.; Wang, J.; Wang, X.; Liang, J.; Liang, C. Sustainable application of biomass by-products: Corn straw-derived porous carbon nanospheres using as anode materials for lithium ion batteries. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2020, 243, 122644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Huang, J.; Liang, Y.; Hu, H.; Liu, S.; Cai, Y.; Dong, H.; Zheng, M.; Xiao, Y.; Liu, Y. Ultrahigh-surface-area hierarchical porous carbon from chitosan: Acetic acid mediated efficient synthesis and its application in superior supercapacitors. J. Mater. Chem. 2017, 5, 24775–24781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Chen, Z.; Ye, S.; Evans, S.D.; Ge, Y.; Zhu, Z.; Tu, Y.; Yang, X. Confined assembly of hollow carbon spheres in carbonaceous nanotube: A spheres-in-tube carbon nanostructure with hierarchical porosity for high-performance supercapacitor. Small 2018, 14, 1704015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Kim, B.; Park, J.; Baik, S.; Lee, J.W. Spent coffee derived hierarchical porous carbon and its application for energy storage. J. Porous Mater. 2020, 27, 451–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Marsh, H.; Rodriguez-Reinoso, F. Activated Carbon; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  26. Yang, Y.; Wang, H.; Yan, F.-Y.; Qi, Y.; Lai, Y.-K.; Zeng, D.-M.; Chen, G.; Zhang, K.-Q. Bioinspired Porous Octacalcium Phosphate/Silk Fibroin Composite Coating Materials Prepared by Electrochemical Deposition. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 5634–5642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Pallares, J.; Cencerrado, A.G.; Arauzo, I. Production and characterization of activated carbon from barley straw by physical activation with carbon dioxide and steam. Biomass Bioenergy 2018, 115, 64–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Siddique, A.; Nayak, A.K.; Singh, J. Synthesis of FeCl3-activated carbon derived from waste Citrus limetta peels for removal of fluoride: An eco-friendly approach for the treatment of groundwater and bio-waste collectively. Groundw. Sustain. Dev. 2020, 10, 100339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chiang, C.-H.; Chen, J.; Lin, J.-H. Preparation of pore-size tunable activated carbon derived from waste coffee grounds for high adsorption capacities of organic dyes. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 103929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Giraldo, S.; Robles, I.; Ramirez, A.; Florez, E.; Acelas, N. Mercury removal from wastewater using agroindustrial waste adsorbents. SN Appl. Sci. 2020, 2, 1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Danish, M.; Ahmad, T. A review on utilization of wood biomass as a sustainable precursor for activated carbon production and application. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 87, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wong, S.; Ngadi, N.; Inuwa, I.M.; Hassan, O. Recent advances in applications of activated carbon from biowaste for wastewater treatment: A short review. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 175, 361–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sing, K.S.W. Reporting physisorption data for gas/solid systems with special reference to the determination of surface area and porosity (Recommendations 1984). Pure Appl. Chem. 1985, 57, 603–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Thommes, M.; Kaneko, K.; Neimark, A.V.; Olivier, J.P.; Rodriguez-Reinoso, F.; Rouquerol, J.; Sing, K.S.W. Physisorption of gases, with special reference to the evaluation of surface area and pore size distribution (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure Appl. Chem. 2015, 87, 1051–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Mnasri, N.; Charnay, C.; Ménorval, L.C.; Moussaoui, Y.; Elaloui, E.; Zajac, J. Silver nanoparticle-containing submicron-in-size mesoporous silica-based systems for iodine entrapment and immobilization from gas phase. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2014, 196, 305–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Costa, J.A.S.; Jesus, R.A.; Santos, D.; Manoa, J.F.; Romao, L.P.C.; Paranhos, C.M. Recent progresses in the adsorption of organic, inorganic, and gas compounds by MCM-41-based mesoporous materials. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2020, 291, 109698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Luo, X.; Guoa, J.; Chang, P.; Qian, H.; Pei, F.; Wang, W.; Miao, K.; Guo, S.; Feng, G. ZSM-5@MCM-41 composite porous materials with a core-shell structure: Adjustment of mesoporous orientation basing on interfacial electrostatic interactions and their application in selective aromatics transport. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2020, 239, 116516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhang, C.; Zhao, P.; Liu, S.; Yu, K. Three-dimensionally ordered macroporous perovskite materials for environmental applications. Chin. J. Catal. 2019, 40, 1324–1338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zeng, F.; Zhang, X.; Pan, Y.; Xu, M.; Yang, L.; Qu, Y.; Guo, M.; Yuan, C. Graphene-templated growth of vertical MnO nanosheets with open macroporous architectures as anode materials for fast lithium storage. J. Alloys Compd. 2018, 769, 10–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Simaioforidou, A.; Kostas, V.; Karakassides, M.A.; Louloudi, M. Surface chemical modification of macroporous and mesoporous carbon materials: Effect on their textural and catalytic properties. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2019, 279, 334–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lal, S.; Prat, M.; Plamondon, M.; Poulikakos, L.; Partl, M.N.; Derome, D.; Carmeliet, J. A cluster-based pore network model of drying with corner liquid films, with application to a macroporous material. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2019, 140, 620–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Deprez, N.; McLachlan, D.S. The analysis of the electrical conductivity of graphite conductivity of graphite powders during compaction. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 1988, 21, 101–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Liu, Y.; Li, X.; Fan, L.; Li, S.; Sari, H.M.K.; Qin, J. A Review of Carbon-Based Materials for Safe Lithium Metal Anodes. Front. Chem. 2019, 7, 721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Marinho, B.; Ghislandi, M.; Koning, C.E.; de With, G. Electrical conductivity of compacts of graphene, multi-wall carbon nanotubes, carbon black, and graphite powder. Powder Technol. 2012, 221, 351–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Jana, P.; Fierro, V.; Pizzi, A.; Celzard, A. Thermal conductivity improvement of composite carbon foams based on tannin-based disordered carbon matrix and graphite fillers. Mater. Des. 2015, 83, 635–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Dong, Y.; Meng, M.; Groves, M.M.; Zhang, C.; Lin, J. Thermal conductivities of two-dimensional graphitic carbon nitrides by molecule dynamics simulation. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2018, 123, 738–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Duan, J.; Wu, W.; Nolan, A.M.; Wang, T.; Wen, J.; Hu, C.; Mo, Y.; Luo, W.; Huang, Y. Lithium graphite paste: An interface compatible anode for solid-state batteries. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, 1807243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Luo, H.-M.; Chen, H.; Chen, Y.-Z.; Li, P.; Zhang, J.-Q.; Zhao, X. Simple synthesis of porous carbon materials for high-performance supercapacitors. J. Appl. Electrochem. 2016, 46, 703–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Li, G.; Yin, Z.; Guo, H.; Wang, Z.; Yan, G.; Yang, Z.; Liu, Y.; Ji, X.; Wang, J. Metalorganic Quantum Dots and Their Graphene-Like Derivative Porous Graphitic Carbon for Advanced Lithium-Ion Hybrid Supercapacitor. Adv. Energy Mater. 2019, 9, 1802878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Li, G.; Yang, Z.; Yin, Z.; Guo, H.; Wang, Z.; Yan, G.; Liu, Y.; Li, L.; Wang, J. Non-aqueous dual-carbon lithium-ion capacitors: A review. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 15541–15563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zhong, Y.; Guo, Q.; Li, S.; Shi, J.; Liu, L. Heat transfer enhancement of paraffin wax using graphite foam for thermal energy storage. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2010, 94, 1011–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zhang, J.; Xu, T.; Cong, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Li, X.; Dong, Z.; Li, Y.; Yuan, G.; Zhang, J.; Cui, Z. Improved rate performance and cycling stability of graphitized mesoporous carbon as anode materials for lithium-ion batteries. J. Mater. Sci. 2019, 54, 648–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Pitchaiya, S.; Eswaramoorthy, N.; Natarajan, M.; Santhanam, A.; Asokan, V.; Ramakrishnan, V.M.; Rangasamy, B.; Sundaram, S.; Ravirajan, P.; Velauthapillai, D. Perovskite Solar Cells: A Porous Graphitic Carbon based Hole Transporter/Counter Electrode Material Extracted from an Invasive Plant Species Eichhornia Crassipes. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 6835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Horiuchi, S.; Gotou, T.; Fujiwara, M.; Asaka, T.; Yokosawa, T.; Matsui, Y. Single graphene sheet detected in a carbon nanofilm. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2004, 84, 2403–2405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Novoselov, K.S.; Geim, A.K.; Morozov, S.V.; Jiang, D.; Zhang, Y.; Dubonos, S.V.; Grigorieva, I.V.; Firsov, A.A. Electric Field Effect in Atomically Thin Carbon Films. Science 2004, 306, 666–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Berger, C.; Song, Z.; Li, T.; Li, X.; Ogbazghi, A.Y.; Feng, R.; Dai, Z.; Marchenkov, A.N.; Conrad, E.H.; First, P.N.; et al. Ultrathin Epitaxial Graphite: 2D Electron Gas Properties and a Route toward Graphene-based Nanoelectronics. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 19912–19916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Novoselov, K.S.; Geim, A.K.; Morozov, S.V.; Jiang, D.; Katsnelson, M.I.; Grigorieva, I.V.; Dubonos, S.V.; Firsov, A.A. Two-dimensional gas of massless Dirac fermions in graphene. Nature 2005, 438, 197–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Allen, M.J.; Tung, V.C.; Kaner, R.B. Honeycomb Carbon: A Review of Graphene. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 132–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Nair, R.R.; Blake, P.; Grigorenko, A.N.; Novoselov, K.S.; Booth, T.J.; Stauber, T.; Peres, N.M.R.; Geim, A.K. Fine Structure Constant Defines Visual Transparency of Graphene. Science 2008, 320, 1308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Varghese, S.S.; Lonkar, S.; Singh, K.K.; Swaminathan, S.; Abdala, A. Recent advances in graphene based gas sensors. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2015, 218, 160–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. You, P.; Liu, Z.; Tai, Q.; Liu, S.; Yan, F. Efficient Semitransparent Perovskite Solar Cells with Graphene Electrodes. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 3632–3638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. De Nicola, F.; Purayil, N.S.P.; Miŝeikis, V.; Spirito, D.; Tomadin, A.; Coletti, C.; Polini, M.; Krahne, R.; Pellegrini, V. Graphene Plasmonic Fractal Metamaterials for Broadband Photodetectors. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 6882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Emtsev, K.V.; Bostwick, A.; Horn, K.; Jobst, J.; Kellogg, G.L.; Ley, L.; McChesney, J.L.; Ohta, T.; Reshanov, S.A.; Röhrl, J.; et al. Towards wafer-size graphene layers by atmospheric pressure graphitization of silicon carbide. Nat. Mater. 2009, 8, 203–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Guo, Z.; Dong, R.; Chakraborty, P.S.; Lourenco, N.; Palmer, J.; Hu, Y.; Ruan, M.; Hankinson, J.; Kunc, J.; Cressler, J.D.; et al. Record maximum oscillation frequency in C-face epitaxial graphene transistors. Nano Lett. 2013, 13, 942–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Tetlow, H.; Posthuma de Boer, J.; Ford, I.J.; Vvedensky, D.D.; Coraux, J.; et Kanto rovich, L. Growth of epitaxial graphene: Theory and experiment. Phys. Rep. 2014, 542, 195–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Eda, G.; Fanchini, G.; Chhowalla, M. Large-area ultrathin films of reduced graphene oxide as a transparent and flexible electronic material. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2008, 3, 270–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Ago, H.; Ogawa, Y.; Tsuji, M.; Mizuno, S.; Hibino, H. Catalytic growth of graphene: Toward large-area single-crystalline graphene. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2012, 3, 2228–2236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Mattevi, C.; Kim, H.; Chhowalla, M. A review of chemical vapour deposition of graphene on copper. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 3324–3334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Rabchinskii, M.K.; Ryzhkov, S.A.; Kirilenko, D.A.; Ulin, N.V.; Baidakova, M.V.; Shnitov, V.V.; Pavlov, S.I.; Chumakov, R.G.; Stolyarova, D.Y.; Besedina, N.A.; et al. From graphene oxide towards aminated graphene: Facile synthesis, its structure and electronic properties. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 6902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Mayorov, A.S.; Gorbachev, R.V.; Morozov, S.V.; Britnell, L.; Jalil, R.; Ponomarenko, L.A.; Blake, P.; Novoselov, K.S.; Watanabe, K.; Taniguchi, T.; et al. Micrometer-scale ballistic transport in encapsulated graphene at room temperature. Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 2396–2399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  71. Soldano, C.; Mahmood, A.; Dujardin, E. Production, properties and potential of grapheme. Carbon 2010, 48, 2127–2150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Kang, H.-K.; Woo, S.-G.; Kim, J.-H.; Lee, S.-R.; Lee, D.-G.; and Yu, J.-S. Three-dimensional monolithic corrugated graphene/Ni foam for highly stable and efficient Li metal electrode. J. Power Sources 2019, 413, 467–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Liu, W.; Xia, Y.; Wang, W.; Wang, Y.; Jin, J.; Chen, Y.; Paek, E.; Mitlin, D. Pristine or highly defective? Understanding the role of graphene structure for stable lithium metal plating. Adv. Energy Mater. 2019, 9, 1802918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Kang, H.K.; Woo, S.G.; Kim, J.H.; Yu, J.S.; Lee, S.R.; Kim, Y.J. Fewlayer graphene island seeding for dendrite-free Li metal electrodes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 26895–26901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Lin, D.; Liu, Y.; Liang, Z.; Lee, H.W.; Sun, J.; Wang, H.; Yan, K.; Xie, J.; Cui, Y. Layered reduced graphene oxide with nanoscale interlayer gaps as a stable host for lithium metal anodes. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2016, 11, 626–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Suvarnaphaet, P.; Pechprasarn, S. Graphene-Based Materials for Biosensors: A Review. Sensors 2017, 17, 2161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  77. Kang, M.-A.; Ji, S.; Kim, S.; Park, C.-Y.; Myung, S.; Song, W.; Lee, S.S.; Lima, J.; An, K.-S. Highly sensitive and wearable gas sensors consisting of chemically functionalized graphene oxide assembled oncotton yarn. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 11991–11996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Hong, H.S.; Phuong, N.H.; Huong, N.T.; Nam, N.H.; Hue, N.T. Highly sensitive and low detection limit of resistive NO2 gas sensor based on a MoS2/graphene two-dimensional heterostructures. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 492, 449–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Chou, C.-Y.; Tseng, S.-F.; Chang, T.-L.; Tu, C.-T.; Han, H.-C. Controlled bridge growth of ZnO nanowires on laser-scribed graphene-based devices for NO gas detection. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 508, 145204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Hoang, N.V.; Hung, C.M.; Hoa, N.D.; Duy, N.V.; Park, I.; Hieu, N.V. Excellent detection of H2S gas at ppb concentrations using ZnFe2O4 nanofibers loaded with reduced graphene oxide. Sens. Actuators B: Chem. 2019, 282, 876–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Pearce, R.; Iakimov, T.; Andersson, M.; Hultman, L.; Spetz, A.L.; Yakimova, R. Epitaxially grown graphene based gas sensors for ultra sensitive NO2 detection. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2011, 155, 451–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Shaban, M.; Ali, S.; Rabiaj, M. Design and application of nanoporous graphene oxide film for CO2, H2, and C2H2 gases sensing. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2019, 8, 4510–4520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Fan, Y.-Y.; Tu, H.-L.; Pang, Y.; Wei, F.; Zhao, H.-B.; Yang, Y.; Ren, T.-L. Au-decorated porous structure graphene with enhanced sensing performance for low-concentration NO2 detection. Rare Met. 2020, 39, 651–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Alfano, B.; Massera, E.; Miglietta, M.L.; Polichetti, T.; Schiattarella, C.; Di Francia, G. Graphene Decoration for Gas Detection. In Sensors and Microsystems; Leone, A., Forleo, A., Francioso, L., Capone, S., Siciliano, P., Di Natale, C., Eds.; AISEM 2017; Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering: Springer, 2018; Volume 457, pp. 35–40. [Google Scholar]
  85. Chen, Y.; Gao, B.; Zhao, J.-X.; Cai, Q.-H.; Fu, H.-G. Si-doped graphene: An ideal sensor for NO- or NO2-detectionand metal-free catalyst for N2O-reduction. J. Mol. Model. 2012, 18, 2043–2054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Wang, Y.; Li, Y.; Tang, L.; Lu, J.; Li, J. Application of graphene-modified electrode for selective detection of dopamine. Electrochem. Commun. 2009, 11, 889–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Brownson, D.A.C.; Foster, C.W.; Banks, C.E. The electrochemical performance of graphene modified electrodes: An analytical perspective. Analyst 2012, 137, 1815–1823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Lin, W.-J.; Liao, C.-S.; Jhang, J.-H.; Tsai, Y.-C. Graphene modified basal and edge plane pyrolytic graphite electrodes for electrocatalytic oxidation of hydrogen peroxide and β-nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide. Electrochem. Commun. 2009, 11, 2153–2156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Kang, X.; Wang, J.; Wu, H.; Liu, J.; Aksay, I.A.; Lin, Y. A graphene-based electrochemical sensor for sensitive detection of paracetamol. Talanta 2010, 81, 754–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Wang, Y.; Zhang, D.; Wu, J. Electrocatalytic oxidation of kojic acid at a reduced graphene sheet modified glassy carbon electrode. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2012, 664, 111–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Mohan, H.K.S.V.; Chee, W.K.; Li, Y.; Nayak, S.; Poh, C.L.; Thean, A.V.Y. A highly sensitive graphene oxide based label-free capacitive aptasensor for vanillin detection. Mater. Des. 2020, 186, 108208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Zhang, J.-W.; Wang, K.-P.; Zhang, X. Fabrication of SnO2 decorated graphene composite material and its application in electrochemical detection of caffeic acid in red wine. Mater. Res. Bul. 2020, 126, 110820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Zuchowska, A.; Chudy, M.; Dybko, A.; Brzozka, Z. Graphene as a new material in anticancer therapy-in vitro studies. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2017, 243, 152–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Cheng, C.; Li, S.; Thomas, A.; Kotov, N.A.; Haag, R. Functional Graphene Nanomaterials Based Architectures: Biointeractions, Fabrications, and Emerging Biological Applications. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 1826–1914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Rajakumar, G.; Zhang, X.-H.; Gomathi, T.; Wang, S.-F.; Ansari, M.A.; Mydhili, G.; Nirmala, G.; Alzohairy, M.A.; Chung, I.-M. Current Use of Carbon-Based Materials for Biomedical Applications-A Prospective and Review. Processes 2020, 8, 355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Russier, J.; León, V.; Orecchioni, M.; Hirata, E.; Virdis, P.; Fozza, C.; Sgarrella, F.; Cuniberti, G.; Prato, M.; Vázquez, E.; et al. Few-Layer Graphene Kills Selectively Tumor Cells from Myelomonocytic Leukemia Patients. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 3014–3019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Su, S.; Wang, J.; Vargas, E.; Wei, J.; Martinez-Zaguilan, R.; Sennoune, S.R.; Pantoya, M.L.; Wang, S.; Chaudhuri, J.; Qiu, J. Porphyrin Immobilized Nanographene Oxide for Enhanced and Targeted Photothermal Therapy of Brain Cancer. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2016, 2, 1357–1366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Fadlalla, M.I.; Kumar, P.S.; Selvam, V.; Babu, S.G. Emerging energy and environmental applicationof graphene and their composites: A review. J. Mater. Sci. 2020, 55, 7156–7183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Yao, Y.; Shankar, R.; Rauter, P.; Song, Y.; Kong, J.; Loncar, M.; Capasso, F. High-responsivity mid-infrared graphene detectors with antenna-enhanced photocarrier generation and collection. Nano Lett. 2014, 14, 3749–3754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  100. Begum, H.; Kim, Y.-B. Improvement of Catalytic Activity of Platinum Nanoparticles Decorated Carbon Graphene Composite on Oxygen Electroreduction for Fuel Cells. Processes 2019, 7, 586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. He, J.; Chen, Y.; Lv, W.; Wen, K.; Li, P.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, W.; Qin, W.; He, W. Three-Dimensional Hierarchical Graphene-CNT@Se: A Highly Efficient Freestanding Cathode for Li−Se Batteries. ACS Energy Lett. 2016, 1, 16–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. He, J.; Chen, Y.; Lv, W.; Wen, K.; Xu, C.; Zhang, W.; Qin, W.; He, W. Three-Dimensional CNT/Graphene−Li2S Aerogel as Freestanding Cathode for High-Performance Li−S Batteries. ACS Energy Lett. 2016, 1, 820–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. He, J.; Chen, Y.; Li, P.; Fu, F.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, W. Three-dimensional CNT/graphene–sulfur hybrid sponges with high sulfur loading as superior capacity cathodes for lithium–sulfur batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 18605–18610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Xu, C.; Jing, Y.; He, J.; Zhou, K.; Chen, Y.; Li, Q.; Lin, J.; Zhang, W. Self-assembled interwoven CoS2/CNTs/graphene architecture as anode for high-performance lithium ion batteries. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 708, 1178–1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Iijima, S. Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon. Nature 1991, 354, 56–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Bethune, D.S.; Klang, C.H.; De Vries, M.S.; Gorman, G.; Savoy, R.; Vasquez, J.; Beyers, R. Cobalt catalysed growth of carbon nanotubes with single-atomic-layer walls. Nature 1993, 363, 605–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Iijima, S.; Ichihashi, T. Single-shell carbon nanotubes of 1-nm diameter. Nature 1993, 363, 603–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Inagaki, M. Advanced Carbon Materials. In Handbook of Advanced Ceramics, 2nd ed.; Somiya, S., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2013; pp. 25–60. [Google Scholar]
  109. Gupta, S.; Tai, N.H. Carbon materials and their composites for electromagnetic interference shielding effectiveness in X-band. Carbon 2019, 152, 159–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Lee, D.W.; Park, J.; Kim, B.J.; Kim, H.; Choi, C.; Baughman, R.H.; Kim, S.J.; Kim, Y.T. Enhancement of electromagnetic interference shielding effectiveness with alignment of spinnable multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Carbon 2019, 142, 528–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Kumar, S.; Rani, R.; Dilbaghi, N.; Tankeshwar, K.; Kim, K.-H. Carbon nanotubes: A novel material for multifaceted applications in human healthcare. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 158–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Wang, K.; Luo, S.; Wu, Y.; He, X.; Zhao, F.; Wang, J.; Jiang, K.; Fan, S. Super-aligned carbon nanotube films as current collectors for lightweight and flexible lithium ion batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2013, 23, 846–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Qi, F.; He, J.; Chen, Y.; Zheng, B.; Li, Q.; Wang, X.; Yu, B.; Lin, J.; Zhou, J.; Li, P.; et al. Few-layered ReS2 nanosheets grown on carbon nanotubes: A highly efficient anode for high-performance lithium-ion batteries. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 315, 10–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Zhang, R.; Cheng, X.B.; Zhao, C.Z.; Peng, H.J.; Shi, J.L.; Huang, J.Q.; Wang, J.; Wei, F.; Zhang, Q. Conductive nanostructured scaffolds render low local current density to inhibit lithium dendrite growth. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 2155–2162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Deng, Y.; Lu, H.; Cao, Y.; Xu, B.; Hong, Q.; Cai, W.; Yang, W. Multiwalled carbon nanotube interlayers with controllable thicknesses for high capacity and long-life lithium metal anodes. J. Power Sources 2019, 412, 170–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Rutherglen, C.; Burke, P. Nanoelectromagnetics: Circuit and Electromagnetic Properties of Carbon Nanotubes. Small 2009, 5, 884–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Daneshvar, F.; Aziz, A.; Abdelkader, A.M.; Zhang, T.; Sue, H.-J.; Welland, M.E. Porous SnO2–CuxO nanocomposite thin film on carbon nanotubes as electrodes for high performance supercapacitors. Nanotechnology 2018, 30, 015401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  118. Moreno-Fernandez, G.; Ibanez, J.; Rojo, J.M.; Kunowsky, M. Activated carbon fiber monoliths as supercapacitor electrodes. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2017, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  119. Ma, W.L.; Cai, Z.H.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Z.Y.; Xia, L.; Ma, S.P.; Lia, G.H.; Huang, Y. An Overview of Stretchable Supercapacitors Based on Carbon Nanotube and Graphene. Chin. J. Polym. Sci. 2020, 38, 491–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Yang, Z.; Tian, J.; Yin, Z.; Cui, C.; Qian, W.; Wei, F. Carbon nanotube- and graphene-based nanomaterials and applications in high-voltage supercapacitor. Carbon 2019, 141, 467–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Duong, H.; Cheng, H.; Jewell, D. Advanced Supercapacitors Using Carbon Nanotubes. Mater. Res. Found. 2017, 12, 207–228. [Google Scholar]
  122. Ying, L.S.; Mohd Salleh, M.A.; Yusoff, H.M.; Rashid, S.B.A.; Razak, J. Continuous production of carbon nanotubes. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2011, 17, 367–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Tai, N.H.; Chen, H.M.; Chen, Y.J.; Hsieh, P.Y.; Liang, J.R.; Chou, T.W. Optimization of processing parameters of the chemical vapor deposition process for synthesizing high-quality single-walled carbon nanotube fluff and roving. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2012, 72, 1855–1862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Guo, T.; Nikolaev, P.; Rinzler, A.G.; Tomanek, D.; Colbert, D.T.; Smalley, R.E. Selfassembly of tubular fullerenes. J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99, 10694–10697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Ebbesen, T.W.; Ajayan, P.M. Large-scale synthesis of carbon nanotubes. Nature 1992, 358, 220–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Zhou, D.; Anoshkina, E.V.; Chow, L.; Chai, G. Synthesis of carbon nanotubes by electrochemical deposition at room temperature. Carbon 2006, 44, 1013–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Cao, C.; Zhou, Y.; Ubnoske, S.; Zang, J.; Cao, Y.; Henry, P.; Parker, C.B.; Glass, J.T. Highly stretchable supercapacitors via crumpled vertically aligned carbon nanotube forests. Adv. Energy Mater. 2019, 9, 1900618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Zhang, Z.; Wang, L.; Li, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Guan, G.; Pan, Z.; Zheng, G.; Peng, H. Nitrogen-doped core-sheath carbon nanotube array for highly stretchable supercapacitor. Adv. Energy Mater. 2017, 7, 1601814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Hua, C.; Shang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Xu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Li, X.; Cao, A. A flexible gas sensor based on single-walled carbon nanotube-Fe2O3 composite film. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 405, 405–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Tyagi, P.; Sharma, A.; Tomar, M.; Gupta, V. A comparative study of RGO-SnO2 and MWCNT-SnO2 nanocomposites based SO2 gas sensors, Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2017, 248, 980–986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Gupta, S.; Murthy, C.N.; Ratna Prabha, C. Recent advances in carbon nanotube based electrochemical biosensors. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 108, 687–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Farghali, A.A.; Tawab, H.A.A.; Moaty, S.A.A.; Khaled, R. Functionalization of acidified multi-walled carbon nanotubes for removal of heavy metals in aqueous solutions. J. Nanostruct. Chem. 2017, 7, 101–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  133. Getachew, T.; Hussen, A.; Rao, V.M. Defluoridation of water by activated carbon prepared from banana (Musa paradisiaca) peel and coffee (Coffe arabica) husk. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 12, 1857–1866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  134. Darweesh, T.M.; Ahmed, M.J. Batch and fixed bed adsorption of levofloxacin on granular activated carbon from date (Phoenix dactylifera L.) stones by KOH chemical activation. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2017, 50, 159–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Khadhri, N.; Saad, M.E.K.; ben Mosbah, M.; Moussaoui, Y. Batch and continuous column adsorption of indigo carmine onto activated carbon derived from date palm petiole. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 102775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Laksaci, H.; Khelifi, A.; Belhamdi, B.; Trari, M. Valorization of coffee grounds into activated carbon using physic—Chemical activation by KOH/CO2. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 5061–5066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Wang, Y.X.; Ngo, H.H.; Guo, W.S. Preparation of a specific bamboo based activated carbon and its application for ciprofloxacin removal. Sci. Total Environ. 2015, 533, 32–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Hashemian, S.; Salari, K.; Yazdi, Z.A. Preparation of activated carbon from agricultural wastes (almond shell and orange peel) for adsorption of 2-pic from aqueous solution. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2014, 20, 1892–1900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Talat, M.; Mohan, S.; Dixit, V.; Singh, D.K.; Hasan, S.H.; Srivastava, O.N. Effective removal of fluoride from water by coconut husk activated carbon in fixed bed column: Experimental and breakthrough curves analysis. Groundwater Sustainable Dev. 2018, 7, 48–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Vu, M.T.; Chao, H.-P.; Trinh, T.V.; Le, T.T.; Lin, C.-C.; Tran, H.N. Removal of ammonium from groundwater using NaOH-treated activated carbon derived from corncob wastes: Batch and column experiments. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 180, 560–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Dhorabe, P.T.; Lataye, D.H.; Ingole, R.S. Removal of 4-nitrophenol from aqueous solution by adsorption onto activated carbon prepared from Acacia glauca sawdust. Water Sci. Technol. 2016, 73, 955–966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Zhang, Z.; Luo, X.; Liu, Y.; Zhou, P.; Ma, G.; Lei, Z.; Lei, L. A low cost and highly efficient adsorbent (activated carbon) prepared from waste potato residue. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2015, 49, 206–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Osman, A.I.; Blewitt, J.; Abu-Dahrieh, J.K.; Farrell, C.; Al-Muhtaseb, A.H.; Harrison, J.; Rooney, D.W. Production and characterisation of activated carbon and carbon nanotubes from potato peel waste and their application in heavy metal removal. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 37228–37241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  144. Satayeva, A.R.; Howell, C.A.; Korobeinyk, A.V.; Jandosov, J.; Inglezakis, V.J.; Mansurov, Z.A.; Mikhalovsky, S.V. Investigation of rice husk derived activated carbon for removal of nitrate contamination from water. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 630, 1237–1245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Baysal, M.; Bilge, K.; Yilmaz, B.; Papila, M.; Yürüm, Y. Preparation of high surface area activated carbon from waste-biomass of sunflower piths: Kinetics and equilibrium studies on the dye removal. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 1702–1713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  146. Fu, K.; Yue, Q.; Gao, B.; Wang, Y.; Li, Q. Activated carbon from tomato stem by chemical activation with FeCl2. Colloids Surf. A 2017, 529, 842–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Liew, R.K.; Azwar, E.; Yek, P.N.Y.; Lim, X.Y.; Cheng, C.K.; Ng, J.-H.; Jusoh, A.; Lam, W.H.; Ibrahim, M.D.; Ma, N.L.; et al. Microwave pyrolysis with KOH/NaOH mixture activation: A new approach to produce micro-mesoporous activated carbon for textile dye adsorption. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 266, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Ioannidou, O.; Zabaniotou, A. Agricultural residues as precursors for activated carbon production-a review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2007, 11, 1966–2005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Pekala, R.W.; Kong, F.M. Proc. 2nd Int. Symp. of Aerogels (ISA2). Rev. Phys. Appl. 1989, 24 C4, 33. [Google Scholar]
  150. Pekala, R.W. Organic aerogels from the polycondensation of resorcinol with formaldehyde. J. Mater. Sci. 1989, 24, 3221–3227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Yamamoto, Y.; Sugimoto, T.; Suzuki, T.; Mukai, S.R.; Tamon, H. Preparation and characterization of carbon cryogel microspheres. Carbon 2002, 40, 1345–1351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Saliger, R.; Bock, V.; Petrcevic, R.; Tillostson, T.; Geis, S.; Fricke, J. Carbon aerogels from dilute catalysis of resorcinol with formaldehyde. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 1997, 221, 144–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Moussaoui, Y.; Elaloui, E.; Ben Salem, R. Etude mécanistique et structurale des résines R/F. C. R. Chimie 2012, 15, 493–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Bock, V.; Emmerling, A.; Fricke, J. Influence of monomer and catalyst concentration on RF and carbon aerogel structure. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2005, 225, 69–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Wei, W.; Hu, H.; Qin, G.; You, L.; Chen, G. Pore structure control of phenol–formaldehyde based carbon microfiltration membranes. Carbon 2004, 42, 679–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Tonanon, N.; Siyasukh, A.; Tanthapanichakoon, W.; Nishihara, H.; Mukai, S.R.; Tamon, H. Improvement of mesoporosity of carbon cryogels by ultrasonic irradiation. Carbon 2005, 43, 525–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Moussaoui, R.; ben mosbah, M.; Moussaoui, Y.; Elaloui, E. Structural Study of Microporous Xerogels Prepared by Polycondensation of Pyrogallol with Formaldehyde. J. Adv. Chem. 2013, 6, 878–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Moussaoui, R.; ben Mosbah, M.; Elghniji, K.; Elaloui, E.; Moussaoui, Y. Sol-gel synthesis of microporous carbon using Resorcinol and Formaldehyde. J. Chem. Res. 2016, 40, 209–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Ma, M.; Ying, H.; Cao, F.; Wang, Q.; Ai, N. Adsorption of congo red on mesoporous activated carbon prepared by CO2 physical activation. Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 2020, 28, 1069–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Rambabu, N.; Rao, B.V.S.K.; Surisetty, V.R.; Das, U.; Dalai, A.K. Production, characterization and evaluation of activated carbons from de-oiled canola meal for environmental applications. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2015, 65, 572–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Guoa, Y.; Tan, C.; Sun, J.; Li, W.; Zhang, J.; Zhao, C. Porous activated carbons derived from waste sugarcane bagasse for CO2 adsorption. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 381, 122736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Pezoti, O.; Cazetta, A.L.; Bedin, K.C.; Souza, L.S.; Martins, A.C.; Silva, T.L.; Júnior, O.O.S.; Visentainer, J.V.; Almeida, V.C. NaOH-activated carbon of high surface area produced from guava seeds as a high-efficiency adsorbent for amoxicillin removal: Kinetic, isotherm and thermodynamic studies. Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 288, 778–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Ibrahim, W.M.; Hassan, A.F.; Azab, Y.A. Biosorption of toxic heavy metals from aqueous solution by Ulva lactuca activated carbon. Egypt. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 2016, 3, 241–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  164. Benaddi, H.; Legras, D.; Rouzaud, J.N.; Beguin, F. Influence of the atmosphere in the chemical activation of wood by phosphoric acid. Carbon 1998, 36, 306–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Heidari, A.; Younesi, H.; Rashidi, A.; Ghoreyshi, A.A. Adsorptive removal of CO2 on highly microporous activated carbons prepared from Eucalyptus camaldulensis wood: Effect of chemical activation. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2014, 45, 579–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Nam, H.; Wang, S.; Jeong, H.R. TMA and H2S gas removals using metal loaded on rice husk activated carbonfor indoor air purification. Fuel 2018, 213, 186–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Wang, S.; Nam, H.; Nam, H. Preparation of activated carbon from peanut shell with KOH activation and its application for H2S adsorption in confined space. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 103683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Demiral, H.; Güngor, C. Adsorption of copper(II) from aqueous solutions on activated carbon prepared from grape bagasse. J. Cleaner Prod. 2016, 124, 103–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Gueye, M.; Richardson, Y.; Kafack, F.T.; Blin, J. High efficiency activated carbons from African biomass residues for the removal of chromium(VI) from wastewater. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2014, 2, 273–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Danish, M.; Hashim, R.; Ibrahim, M.N.M.; Sulaiman, O. Optimization study for preparation of activated carbon from Acacia mangium wood using phosphoric acid. Wood Sci. Technol. 2014, 48, 1069–1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Girgis, B.S.; El-Hendawy, A.A. Porosity development in activated carbons obtained from date pits under chemical activation with phosphoric acid. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2002, 52, 105–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Abdel-Ghani, N.T.; El-Chaghaby, G.A.; ElGammal, M.H.; Rawash, E.-S.A. Optimizing the preparation conditions of activated carbons from olive cake using KOH activation. New Carbon Mater. 2016, 31, 492–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Mahmoudi, K.; Hamdi, N.; Srasra, E. Preparation and characterization of activated carbon from date pits by chemical activation with zinc chloride for methyl orange adsorption. J. Mater. Environ. Sci. 2014, 5, 1758–1769. [Google Scholar]
  174. Wu, F.C.; Tseng, R.L.; Juang, R.S. Preparation of highly microporous carbons from fir wood by KOH activation for adsorption of dyes and phenols from water. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2005, 47, 10–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Rahman, A.; Hango, H.J.; Daniel, L.S.; Uahengo, V.; Jaime, S.J.; Bhaskaruni, S.V.H.S.; Jonnalagadda, S.B. Chemical preparation of activated carbon from Acacia erioloba seed pods using H2SO4 as impregnating agent for water treatment: An environmentally benevolent approach. J. Cleaner Prod. 2019, 237, 117689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Naeem, S.; Baheti, V.; Wiener, J.; Marek, J. Removal of methylene blue from aqueous media using activated carbon web. J. Text. Inst. 2016, 108, 803–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Marzbali, M.H.; Esmaieli, M. Fixed bed adsorption of tetracycline on a mesoporous activated carbon: Experimental study and neuro-fuzzy modeling. J. Appl. Res. Technol. 2017, 15, 454–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Li, Z.; Hanafy, H.; Zhang, L.; Sellaoui, L.; Netto, M.S.; Oliveira, M.L.S.; Seliem, M.K.; Dotto, G.L.; Bonilla-Petriciolet, A.; Li, Q. Adsorption of congo red and methylene blue dyes on an ashitaba waste and a walnut shell-based activated carbon from aqueous solutions: Experiments, characterization and physical interpretations. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 388, 124263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Kalra, A.; Hadi, P.; Hui, C.W.; Mackey, H.; Ansari, T.A.; Saleem, J.; McKay, G. Adsorption of Dyes from Water on to Bamboo-Based Activated Carbon—Error Analysis Method for Accurate Isotherm Parameter Determination. J. Water Sci. Eng. 2019, 1, 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  180. Liu, Y.; Cheng, H.; He, Y. Application and Mechanism of Sludge-Based Activated Carbon for Phenol and Cyanide Removal from Bio-Treated Effluent of Coking Wastewater. Processes 2020, 8, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  181. Nowicki, P.; Kazmierczak-Razna, J.; Pietrzak, R. Physicochemical and adsorption properties of carbonaceous sorbents prepared by activation of tropical fruit skins with potassium carbonate. Mater. Des. 2016, 90, 579–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Nirmala, G.; Murugesan, T.; Rambabu, K.; Sathiyanarayanan, K.; Show, P.L. Adsorptive removal of phenol using banyan root activated carbon. Chem. Eng. Commun. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Tu, B.; Wen, R.; Wang, K.; Cheng, Y.; Deng, Y.; Cao, W.; Zhang, K.; Tao, H. Efficient removal of aqueous hexavalent chromium by activated carbon derived from Bermuda grass. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2020, 560, 649–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Thabede, P.M.; Shooto, N.D.; Naidoo, E.B. Removal of methylene blue dye and lead ions from aqueous solution using activated carbon from black cumin seeds. S. Afr. J. Chem. Eng. 2020, 33, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Lütke, S.F.; Igansi, A.V.; Pegoraro, L.; Dotto, G.L.; Pinto, L.A.A.; Cadaval, T.R.S. Preparation of activated carbon from black wattle bark waste and its application for phenol adsorption. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 103396. [Google Scholar]
  186. Kasperiski, F.M.; Lima, E.C.; Umpierres, C.S.; dos Reis, G.S.; Thue, P.S.; Lima, D.R.; Dias, S.L.P.; Saucier, C.; da Costa, J.B. Production of porous activated carbons from Caesalpinia ferrea seed pod wastes: Highly efficient removal of captopril from aqueous solutions. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 197, 919–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Aguayo-Villarreal, I.A.; Bonilla-Petriciolet, A.; Muñiz-Valencia, R. Preparation of activated carbons from pecan nutshell and their application in the antagonistic adsorption of heavy metal ions. J. Mol. Liq. 2017, 230, 686–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Dwivedi, A.D.; Dubey, S.P.; Sillanpää, M.; Kwon, Y.-N.; Lee, C. Distinct adsorption enhancement of bi-component metals (cobalt and nickel) by Fireweed-derived carbon compared to activated carbon: Incorporation of surface group distributions for increased efficiency. Chem. Eng. J. 2015, 281, 713–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Islam, M.A.; Ahmed, M.J.; Khanday, W.A.; Asif, M.; Hameed, B.H. Mesoporous activated coconut shell-derived hydrochar prepared via hydrothermal carbonization-NaOH activation for methylene blue adsorption. J. Environ. Manag. 2017, 203, 237–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  190. Jain, A.; Balasubramanian, R.; Srinivasan, M.P. Tuning hydrochar properties for enhanced mesopore development in activated carbon by hydrothermal carbonization. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2015, 203, 178–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Rodiguez, M.H.; Yperman, J.; Carleer, R.; Maggen, J.; Dadi, D.; Gryglewicz, G.; der Bruggen, B.V.; Hernández, J.F.; Calvis, A.O. Adsorption of Ni(II) on spent coffee and coffee husk based activated carbon. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 1161–1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Liu, Z.; Sun, Y.; Xu, X.; Meng, X.; Qu, J.; Wang, Z.; Liu, C.; Qu, B. Preparation, characterization and application of activated carbon from corn cob by KOH activation for removal of Hg(II) from aqueous solution. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 306, 123154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Zhang, Y.; Song, X.; Zhang, P.; Gao, H.; Ou, C.; Kong, X. Production of activated carbons from four wastes via one-step activation and their applications in Pb2+ adsorption: Insight of ash content. Chemosphere 2020, 245, 125587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Yu, X.; Han, X.; Chang, C.; Hu, Y.; Xu, C.C.; Fang, S. Corncob-derived activated carbon for roxarsone removal from aqueous solution: Isotherms, kinetics, and mechanism. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 15785–15797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Yazidi, A.; Atrous, M.; Soetaredjo, F.E.; Sellaoui, L.; Ismadji, S.; Erto, A.; Bonilla-Petriciolet, A.; Dotto, G.L.; Ben Lamine, A. Adsorption of amoxicillin and tetracycline on activated carbon prepared from durian shell in single and binary systems: Experimental study and modeling analysis. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 379, 122320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Han, Q.; Wang, J.; Goodman, B.A.; Xie, J.; Liu, Z. High adsorption of methylene blue by activated carbon prepared from phosphoric acid treated eucalyptus residue. Powder Technol. 2020, 366, 239–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Chen, C.; Mi, S.; Lao, D.; Shi, P.; Tong, Z.; Li, Z.; Hu, H. Single-step synthesis of eucalyptus sawdust magnetic activated carbon and its adsorption behavior for methylene blue. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 22248–22262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  198. Kumar, A.; Jena, H.M. Removal of methylene blue and phenol onto prepared activated carbon from Fox nutshell by chemical activation in batch and fixed-bed column. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 137, 1246–1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Kumar, A.; Jena, H.M. Adsorption of Cr(VI) from aqueous solution by prepared high surface area activated carbon from Fox nutshell by chemical activation with H3PO4. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 2032–2041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Sayğili, H.; Güzel, F.; Önal, Y. Conversion of grape industrial processing waste to activated carbon sorbent and its performance in cationic and anionic dyes adsorption. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 93, 84–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Nagalakshmi, T.V.; Emmanuel, K.A.; Bhavani, P. Adsorption of disperse blue 14 onto activated carbon prepared from Jackfruit-PPI-I waste. Mater. Today: Proc. 2019, 18, 2036–2051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Shokry, H.; Elkady, M.; Hamad, H. Nano activated carbon from industrial mine coal as adsorbents for removal of dye from simulated textile wastewater: Operational parameters and mechanism study. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2019, 8, 4477–4488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Al-Ghouti, M.A.; Sweleh, A.O. Optimizing textile dye removal by activated carbon prepared from olive stones. Environ. Technol. Innovation 2019, 16, 100488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Elhleli, H.; Mannai, F.; Elaloui, E.; Moussaoui, Y. Nitrophenol Removal from Wastewater onto Prepared Activated Carbon from Opuntia ficus-indica. In Recent Advances in Environmental Science from the Euro-Mediterranean and Surrounding Regions; Kallel, A., Ksibi, M., Ben Dhia, H., Khélifi, N., Eds.; EMCEI 2017, Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation (IEREK Interdisciplinary Series for Sustainable Development); Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 1245–1246. [Google Scholar]
  205. Pamidimukkala, P.S.; Soni, H. Efficient removal of organic pollutants with activated carbon derived from palm shell: Spectroscopic characterisation and experimental optimization. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 3135–3149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. da Paixao Cansado, I.P.; Belo, C.R.; Mourao, P.A.M. Pesticides abatement using activated carbon produced from a mixture of synthetic polymers by chemical activation with KOH and K2CO3. Environ. Nanotechnol. Monit. Manag. 2019, 12, 100261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  207. Bedada, D.; Angassa, K.; Tiruneh, A.; Kloos, H.; Fito, J. Chromium removal from tannery wastewater through activated carbon produced from Parthenium hysterophorus weed. Energ. Ecol. Environ. 2020, 5, 184–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Xu, W.; Zhao, Q.; Wang, R.; Jiang, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Gao, X.; Ye, Z. Optimization of organic pollutants removal from soil eluent by activated carbon derived from peanut shells using response surface methodology. Vacuum 2017, 141, 307–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Danish, M.; Khanday, W.A.; Hashim, R.; Sulaiman, N.S.B.; Akhtar, M.N.; Nizami, M. Application of optimized large surface area date stone (Phoenix dactylifera) activated carbon for rhodamin B removal from aqueous solution: Box-Behnken design approach. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2017, 139, 280–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  210. Darweesh, T.M.; Ahmed, M.J. Adsorption of ciprofloxacin and norfloxacin from aqueous solution onto granular activated carbon in fixed bed column. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2017, 138, 139–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  211. Valizadeh, S.; Younesi, H.; Bahramifar, N. Highly mesoporous K2CO3 and KOH/activated carbon for SDBS removal from water samples: Batch and fixed-bed column adsorption process. Environ. Nanotechnol. Monit. Manag. 2016, 6, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Arampatzidou, A.C.; Deliyanni, E.A. Comparison of activation media and pyrolysis temperature for activated carbons development by pyrolysis of potato peels for effective adsorption of endocrine disruptor bisphenol-A. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2016, 466, 101–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Runtti, H.; Tuomikoski, S.; Kangas, T.; Lassi, U.; Kuokkanen, T.; Rämö, J. Chemically activated carbon residue from biomass gasification as a sorbent for iron(II), copper(II) and nickel(II) ions. J. Water Process Eng. 2014, 4, 12–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Bjorklund, K.; Li, L.Y. Adsorption of organic stormwater pollutants onto activated carbon from sewage sludge. J. Environ. Manag. 2017, 197, 490–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  215. Araga, R.; Soni, S.; Sharma, C.S. Fluoride adsorption from aqueous solution using activated carbon obtained from KOH-treated jamun (Syzygium cumini) seed. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 5608–5616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Saygili, H.; Güzel, F. High surface area mesoporous activated carbon from tomato processing solid waste by zinc chloride activation: Process optimization, characterization and dyes adsorption. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 113, 995–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Acosta, R.; Nabarlatz, D.; Sánchez-Sánchez, A.; Jagiello, J.; Gadonneix, P.; Celzard, A.; Fierro, V. Adsorption of Bisphenol A on KOH-activated tyre pyrolysis char. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 823–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Hassan, A.F.; Elhadidy, H. Production of activated carbons from waste carpets and its application in methylene blue adsorption: Kinetic and thermodynamic studies. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 955–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Nieto-Márquez, A.; Pinedo-Flores, A.; Picasso, G.; Atanes, E.; Kou, R.S. Selective adsorption of Pb2+, Cr3+ and Cd2+ mixtures on activated carbons prepared from waste tires. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 1060–1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Xiao, W.; Garba, Z.N.; Sun, S.; Lawan, I.; Wang, L.; Lin, M.; Yuan, Z. Preparation and evaluation of an effective activated carbon from white sugar for the adsorption of rhodamine B dye. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 253, 119989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Gebreegziabher, T.B.; Wang, S.; Nam, H. Adsorption of H2S, NH3 and TMA from indoor air using porous corncob activated carbon: Isotherm and kinetics study. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 103234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Taleb, F.; ben Mosbah, M.; Elaloui, E.; Moussaoui, Y. Adsorption of ibuprofen sodium salt onto Amberlite resin IRN-78: Kinetics, isotherm and thermodynamic investigations. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2017, 34, 1141–1148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Saad, M.K.; Khiari, R.; Elaloui, E.; Moussaoui, Y. Adsorption of anthracene using activated carbon and Posidonia oceanica. Arabian J. Chem. 2014, 7, 109–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  224. Saad, M.K.; Mnasri, N.; Mhamdi, M.; Chafik, T.; Elaloui, E.; Moussaoui, Y. Removal of methylene blue onto mineral matrices. Desalin. Water Treat. 2015, 56, 2773–2780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  225. Baheti, V.; Naeem, S.; Militky, J.; Okrasa, M.; Tomkova, B. Optimized preparation of activated carbon nanoparticles from acrylic fibrous wastes. Fibers Polym. 2015, 16, 2193–2201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  226. Fan, S.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Tang, J.; Tang, J.; Li, X. Removal of methylene blue from aqueous solution by sewage sludge-derived biochar: Adsorption kinetics, equilibrium, thermodynamics and mechanism. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 601–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  227. Abdelhafez, A.A.; Li, J. Removal of Pb(II) from aqueous solution by using biochars derived from sugar cane bagasse and orange peel. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2016, 61, 367–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  228. Liu, L.; Li, Y.; Fan, S. Preparation of KOH and H3PO4 Modified Biochar and Its Application in Methylene Blue Removal from Aqueous Solution. Processes 2019, 7, 891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  229. Inyang, M.; Dickenson, E. The potential role of biochar in the removal of organic and microbial contaminants from potable and reuse water: A review. Chemosphere 2015, 134, 232–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  230. Liu, L.; Fan, S.; Li, Y. Removal Behavior of Methylene Blue from Aqueous Solution by Tea Waste: Kinetics, Isotherms and Mechanism. Int. J. Approx. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 1321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  231. Ramesh, T.N.; Kirana, D.V.; Ashwini, A.; Manasa, T.R. Calcium hydroxide as low cost adsorbent for the effective removal of indigo carmine dye in water. J. Saudi Chem. Soc. 2017, 21, 165–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  232. Fan, S.; Tang, J.; Wang, Y.; Li, H.; Zhang, H.; Tang, J.; Wang, Z.; Li, X. Biochar prepared from co-pyrolysis of municipal sewage sludge and tea waste for the adsorption of methylene blue from aqueous solutions: Kinetics, isotherm, thermodynamic and mechanism. J. Mol. Liq. 2016, 220, 432–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Classification of porosity based on pore diameter according to the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC).
Figure 1. Classification of porosity based on pore diameter according to the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC).
Processes 08 01651 g001
Figure 2. A conceptual model depicting the structure of graphene (a), graphite (b), and carbon nanotubes (c).
Figure 2. A conceptual model depicting the structure of graphene (a), graphite (b), and carbon nanotubes (c).
Processes 08 01651 g002
Figure 3. Steps for preparation of activated carbons.
Figure 3. Steps for preparation of activated carbons.
Processes 08 01651 g003
Figure 4. Forms of activated carbon: (a) activated carbon powder, (b) granular activated carbon, (c) extruded activated carbon, (d) impregnated activated carbon, (e) activated carbon fabric.
Figure 4. Forms of activated carbon: (a) activated carbon powder, (b) granular activated carbon, (c) extruded activated carbon, (d) impregnated activated carbon, (e) activated carbon fabric.
Processes 08 01651 g004
Figure 5. Postulated mechanisms of the interactions of pollutant with activated carbon.
Figure 5. Postulated mechanisms of the interactions of pollutant with activated carbon.
Processes 08 01651 g005
Table 1. The experimental conditions for activated carbons production, specific surface area (SBET), and adsorption capacities against various toxicants.
Table 1. The experimental conditions for activated carbons production, specific surface area (SBET), and adsorption capacities against various toxicants.
Carbon PrecursorActiv. Temp./Activ. TimeActivationReagentSBET (m2/g)Dose (g/L)PollutantQmax (mg/g)/C0 (mg/L)Ref.
Acacia erioloba600 °C/1 hChemicalH2SO410.41MB1.5/25–500[175]
Acacia glauca450 °C/1 hChemicalH3PO4311.224-NP204.7/50–500[141]
Acrylic fibrous waste1200 °CPhysicalO22802MB8.7/2–10[176]
Apricot shell400 °C/1.5 hChemicalH3PO4307-Tetracycline76.9 (FBA)[177]
Ashitaba waste800 °C/1.5 hChemicalZnCl21228.50.01Congo Red345.1/0–100[178]
0.01MB289.2/0–50
Bamboo600 °C/4 hChemicalH3PO414001Reactive Black 5489.9/10–1000[179]
Bamboo waste + Ms550 °C/0.5 hChemicalZnCl2289.58Phenol25.3/227.5[180]
Banana peelsMW 700W/10 minChemicalKOH/NaOH10382.5MG22.5/10[147]
800 °C/0.5 hChemicalK2CO311880.4Me-Red400/40–220[181]
MB454.5/40–220
Banyan tree500 °C/1 hChemicalKOH9882.5Phenol26.9/20–100[182]
Bermuda grass450 °C/2 hChemicalKOH1833.60.5Cr(VI)403.2/0–200[183]
Black cumin seeds40 °C/48 hChemicalH2SO4-2MB16.8/100[184]
2Pb2+17.9/100
Black wattle bark waste700 °C/2 hChemicalZnCl24141Phenol85.7/50–500[185]
Caesalpinia ferrea600 °CChemicalZnCl214801.5Captopril535/120–2500[186]
Carya illinoinensis700 °C/2 hChemical + PhysicalNaCl, CaCl2, KCl/CO2490–8082Cu2+, Cd2+, Ni2+, Zn2+0.011–0.368 mmol/g[187]
Chamerion angustifolium450 °C/0.5 hPhysical-117.70.8Co2+9.8/1–40[188]
Ni2+10.1/1–40
Citrus limetta peels250 °C/2 hChemicalFeCl3-1F4.9/5–30[28]
500 °C/2 hChemicalFeCl3-1F9.7/5–30
Coconut husk350 °C/3 hChemicalKOH1448-F6.7 (FBA)[139]
Coconut shell600 °C/1 hChemicalNaOH8761MB200/25–250[189]
Cocos nucifera shell275 °C/2 hPhysico chemicalZnCl2/H2O16521Phenol Red351/500[190]
Phenol264/500
Coffee grounds800 °C/1 hPhysico chemicalKOH/CO218651Phenol211/10–200[136]
1MB390/50–500
950 °C/3 hPhysicalCO22407.80.66MB680/20−150[29]
0.66MO612/20−150
Coffee husk800 °C/0.5hPhysicalH2O3831Ni2+57.1/30–120[191]
Coffee spent4640.851.9/30–120
Corncob400 °C/1.5 hChemicalH3PO410972NH4+17/10–40[140]
Corncob800 °C/1 hChemicalKOH1054.20.02Hg(II)2.3/0.02–0.1[192]
Corncob800 °C/1.5 hChemicalNaOH23810.2Pb2+381/10–500[193]
Corncob892 °C/40 minPhysicalH2O-0.4Roxarsone309.6/40–350[194]
Date palm petiole600 °C/2 hChemicalNaOH6554Indigo carmine53.7/10–200[135]
Durian shell900 °C/15 minPhysicalCO291710AMX142.7/250[195]
10Tetracycline126/250
Eucalyptus residue400 °C/3 hChemicalH3PO415450.2MB977/140–260[196]
Eucalyptus sawdust700 °C/75 minChemicalFeCl3645.21MB162.8/50–500[197]
Fox nutshell600 °C/1 hChemicalZnCl228695Phenol75.3[198]
0.4MB968.7
700 °C/1 hH3PO426360.4Cr(VI)74.9/35[199]
Grape waste600 °C/1 hChemicalZnCl214550.6MY386/200–900[200]
MB417/200–900
Grapefruit peels800 °C/0.5 hChemicalK2CO311980.4Me-Red454.5/40–220[181]
MB456.2/40–220
Guava seeds750 °C/1.5 hChemicalNaOH2573.61AMX570.4/400–800[162]
Jackfruit-PPI-1600 °C/1 hChemicalK2CO39871Disperse Blue 14178.5/10–120[201]
Maghara coal550 °C/1.5 hChemicalNaOH490.5MB28/10–50[202]
Mandarin peels800 °C/0.5 hChemicalK2CO310770.4Me-Red357.1/40–220[181]
MB400/40–220
Olive stones500 °C/3 hPhysicalN29.11MB769/50–1000[203]
Opuntia ficus-indica600 °C/2 hChemicalNaOH331.564-NP16.1/10–150[204]
Palm shell900 °C/1 hChemicalH2SO4 + K2S2O8770-Bis-A45.45[205]
4-ClP163.9
4-NP166.7
2,4-DNP250.0
2,4,6-TNP142.0
PAN800 °C/0.5 hChemicalK2CO32217-MCPA4.2 mmol/g[206]
2,4-D3.4 mmol/g
KOH2828-MCPA5.1 mmol/g
2,4-D4.4 mmol/g
Parthenium hysterophorus500 °C/2hChemicalH3PO4256.590Cr0.7/40–100[207]
Peanut shells700 °C/3 hChemicalH2SO4570202,4-DNT-3-SO3 + 2,4-DNT-5-SO332[208]
PET800 °C/0.5 hChemicalK2CO31206-MCPA2.4 mmol/g[206]
-2,4-D1.9 mmol/g
KOH1439-MCPA2.6 mmol/g
-2,4-D2.5 mmol/g
Phoenix dactylifera L.500 °C/1 hChemicalKOH8170.15Levofloxacin101.3/50–250[134]
300 °C/ 0.5 hChemicalH3PO41225.55.25Rh-B196[209]
500 °C/1 hChemicalK2CO3852-Ciprofloxacin2 (FBA)[210]
Norfloxacin1.9 (FBA)
Pinus eldarica750 °C/3 hChemicalK2CO312010.1SDS347/10–125[211]
Pomelo peels800 °C/0.5 hChemicalK2CO38360.4Me-Red208.3/40–220[181]
MB222.2/40–220
Potato peels400 °C/1 hChemicalH3PO4904.50.5Bis-A445.9/0–300[212]
Potato peels500 °C/ 0.5 hChemicalH3PO467610Pb2+8.9/100[143]
Residue from biomass gasification600 °C/1 hChemicalZnCl22595Fe2+20.5/25–125[213]
Cu2+23.1/25–125
Ni2+18.2/25–125
Rice husk950 °C/1 hChemicalK2CO313301NO38.1/15[144]
Rice husk800 °C/1.5 hChemicalNaOH27860.2Pb2+492/10–500[193]
Sargassum fusiforme900 °C/0.5 hPhysicalCO213290.8Congo Red234/50–200[159]
Sewage sludge500 °C/1 hChemicalZnCl27210.1FL, ANT, PYR, BeP, OP, NP, DBP, DEHP0.07–2.8/
0.01–0.3
[214]
Sugarcane
bagasse
550 °C/0.5 hChemicalZnCl2182.90.2Hg2+11.5/1[30]
300 °C/1 hChemicalH3PO47.40.2Hg2+13.6/1
Sunflower piths700 °C/1 hChemicalNaOH26901MB965/50–1000[145]
KOH20901MB580/50–1000
Syzygium cumini seed900 °C/1 hChemicalKOH7476F1.2/20.04[215]
Tomato stem700 °C/1 hChemicalFeCl29711Congo red158.7/100–500[146]
Tomato waste600 °C/1 hChemicalZnCl210930.6MY385/200–900[216]
MB400/200–900
Tyre750 °CChemicalKOH7000.5Bis-A123/5–80[217]
Ulva lactuca800 °C/3 hChemicalKOH345.40.06Cu2+84.7/5–80[163]
Cd2+84.6/5–80
Cr3+82/5–80
Pb2+83.3/5–80
Walnut shell900 °C/1.5 hChemicalZnCl21626.90.01Congo Red281.4/0–100[178]
0.01MB314.1/0–50
Waste carpets700 °C/4 hChemicalH3PO49538MB769.2/50–800[218]
Waste tires750 °CChemicalKOH2650.3Pb2+49.7/5–100[219]
0.3Cd2+10.4/5–100
0.3Cr3+29.4/5–100
White sugar700 °C/2 hChemicalNaOH1144.70.8Rh-B123.4/25–100[220]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

ben Mosbah, M.; Mechi, L.; Khiari, R.; Moussaoui, Y. Current State of Porous Carbon for Wastewater Treatment. Processes 2020, 8, 1651. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8121651

AMA Style

ben Mosbah M, Mechi L, Khiari R, Moussaoui Y. Current State of Porous Carbon for Wastewater Treatment. Processes. 2020; 8(12):1651. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8121651

Chicago/Turabian Style

ben Mosbah, Mongi, Lassaad Mechi, Ramzi Khiari, and Younes Moussaoui. 2020. "Current State of Porous Carbon for Wastewater Treatment" Processes 8, no. 12: 1651. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8121651

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop