Next Article in Journal
Integrated Process Design and Control for Smart Grid Coordinated IGCC Power Plants Using Economic Linear Optimal Control
Previous Article in Journal
Maleated Natural Rubber/Halloysite Nanotubes Composites
Previous Article in Special Issue
Performance Evaluation Using Multivariate Non-Normal Process Capability
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Special Issue on Performance Measurement and Optimization for Sustainable Production Processes Improvement

College of Business Administration, Incheon National University, Incheon 22012, Korea
Processes 2020, 8(3), 287; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8030287
Submission received: 28 February 2020 / Accepted: 28 February 2020 / Published: 3 March 2020

1. Introduction

Sustainable production process improvement is very important for all enterprises as its implementation can help them to achieve development plans, scheduling, and reduce costs and pollution. An increasing number of papers have discussed optimization and performance measurement for improvement and benchmarking. However, few studies have examined optimization and performance analysis in terms of sustainable process improvement. For these reasons, I had invited high quality papers on optimization and performance analysis for sustainable production process improvement for consideration for publication in the Processes journal.
The aim of this Special Issue was to publish state-of-art articles spanning all areas of analytical, theoretical and empirical articles related to sustainable production process improvement. The Special Issue had accepted 24 papers addressing a wide spectrum of topics following but not restricted to:
(1)
Benchmarking analysis for sustainable product process improvement
(2)
Optimization model for sustainable product process improvement
(3)
Productivity or efficiency estimation for sustainable product process improvement
(4)
Scheduling optimization for sustainable product process improvement
(5)
Strategies for sustainable product process improvement
(6)
Innovation for sustainable product process improvement

2. Performance Evaluation Issues

Alatefi et al. [1] measured the performance using multivariate non-normal process capability. They used two different models (Box-Cox and Johnson transformations) and compared them via generated data and case study from the previous literature. Kwak [2] analyzed inventory turnover as a performance evaluation of 421 companies in the manufacturing industry. In this paper, the author used Altman’s Z score approach to compare top and bottom companies’ performance.
Shin et al. [3] tried to find the right innovation type in chemical industry using data envelopment analysis. They used 64 Korean chemical firms from a 2016 Korean innovation survey. Aamir et al. [4] used water treatment waste as a soil stabilizer to measure performance of sustainable soil stabilization process. And Sevinç and Eren [5] used 82 firms in Konya Chamber of industry as automotive supplier industry. They used a data envelopment analysis, analytic hierarchy process and technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution method to analyze the dataset. Aslam et al. [6] evaluated the industrial process performance using control chart for monitoring the process capability index.

3. Sustainable Issues

Qurashi et al. [7] focused on sustainable design to find the sustainable engineering solution. Moreover, Yin et al. [8] argued the quality and speed improvement of green new product development. Wang et al. [9] used a fuzzy multicriteria decision-making model to evaluate sustainable supplier’s performance of garment industry in Vietnam. They also analyzed, with a triple bottom line model, the analytic hierarchy process and technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution method in their paper.

4. Optimization Issues

Realyvásquez-Vargas et al. [10] analyzed a case study about production process standardization implementation for better optimization and increasing efficiency. Kim [11] tried to find the optimal solution of production planning to reduce production cost in furniture production process using Korean furniture industry dataset.
Eghbali Babadi et al. [12] analyzed the operational variables effect on the urea coating process efficiency in a rotary pan. And Rozbroj et al. [13] investigated cylindrical pellet size optimization using discrete element method model. Tan et al. [14] proposed multi-energy interdependent system using robust scheduling optimization model. Zhao et al. [15] tried to obtain the optimal order sequence and the shortest operation time using Gurobi linear programming solver.

5. Operational Issues

Kim and Narasimhan [16] focused on the supply network design process of original equipment manufacturers in auto and consumer electronics industries. Wang et al. [17] proposed a multi-criterial decision-making model for supplier selection in the oil and gas industry. In addition, Frigura-Oliasa et al. [18] investigate the operational improvements and technical parameters of the metal oxide varistors manufacturing process.
Wittner et al. [19,20] focused on the air-core-liquid-ring atomization and Chan and Kuo [21] investigated the wheat germ drying performance. Holgado [22] used system engineering approach to performance-based maintenance services design. Yu et al. [23] tried to improve the occupational safety and health level in coal chemical enterprises. Kang et al. [24] used latent Dirichlet allocation to anlyze biochemical research trends.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

The special issue entitled the performance measurement and optimization for sustainable production processes improvement covers broad topics with 24 papers. We thank all the authors and Editor-in-Chief for their support for this special issue.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Alatefi, M.; Ahmad, S.; Alkahtani, M. Performance Evaluation Using Multivariate Non-Normal Process Capability. Processes 2019, 7, 833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Kwak, J.K. Analysis of Inventory Turnover as a Performance Measure in Manufacturing Industry. Processes 2019, 7, 760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Shin, J.; Kim, Y.; Yang, H.; Kim, C. What Is the Right Innovation Type for Your Industry? Evidence from Chemical Firms in Korea. Processes 2019, 7, 643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Aamir, M.; Mahmood, Z.; Nisar, A.; Farid, A.; Ahmed Khan, T.; Abbas, M.; Ismaeel, M.; Shah, S.A.R.; Waseem, M. Performance Evaluation of Sustainable Soil Stabilization Process Using Waste Materials. Processes 2019, 7, 378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Sevinç, A.; Eren, T. Determination of KOSGEB Support Models for Small- and Medium-Scale Enterprises by Means of Data Envelopment Analysis and Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods. Processes 2019, 7, 130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Aslam, M.; Rao, G.S.; AL-Marshadi, A.H.; Ahmad, L.; Jun, C.-H. Control Charts for Monitoring Process Capability Index Using Median Absolute Deviation for Some Popular Distributions. Processes 2019, 7, 287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Qurashi, M.A.; Shah, S.A.R.; Farhan, M.; Taufiq, M.; Khalid, W.; Arshad, H.; Tayyab, M.; Shahzadi, G.; Waseem, M. Sustainable Design and Engineering: A Relationship Analysis between Digital Destructive and Non-Destructive Testing Process for Lightweight Concrete. Processes 2019, 7, 791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Yin, S.; Li, B.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, M. How to Improve the Quality and Speed of Green New Product Development? Processes 2019, 7, 443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Wang, C.-N.; Yang, C.-Y.; Cheng, H.-C. A Fuzzy Multicriteria Decision-Making (MCDM) Model for Sustainable Supplier Evaluation and Selection Based on Triple Bottom Line Approaches in the Garment Industry. Processes 2019, 7, 400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Realyvásquez-Vargas, A.; Flor-Moltalvo, F.J.; Blanco-Fernández, J.; Sandoval-Quintanilla, J.D.; Jiménez-Macías, E.; García-Alcaraz, J.L. Implementation of Production Process Standardization—A Case Study of a Publishing Company from the SMEs Sector. Processes 2019, 7, 646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Kim, T. Production Planning to Reduce Production Cost and Formaldehyde Emission in Furniture Production Process Using Medium-Density Fiberboard. Processes 2019, 7, 529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Eghbali Babadi, F.; Yunus, R.; Abbasi, A.; Masoudi Soltani, S. Response Surface Method in the Optimization of a Rotary Pan-Equipped process for Increased Efficiency of Slow-Release Coated Urea. Processes 2019, 7, 125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Rozbroj, J.; Zegzulka, J.; Necas, J.; Jezerska, L. Discrete Element Method Model Optimization of Cylindrical Pellet Size. Processes 2019, 7, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Tan, Z.; Guo, H.; Lin, H.; Tan, Q.; Yang, S.; Gejirifu, D.; Ju, L.; Song, X. Robust Scheduling Optimization Model for Multi-Energy Interdependent System Based on Energy Storage Technology and Ground-Source Heat Pump. Processes 2019, 7, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Zhao, X.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Huang, K. Integer Programming Scheduling Model for Tier-to-Tier Shuttle-Based Storage and Retrieval Systems. Processes 2019, 7, 223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Kim, M.K.; Narasimhan, R. Designing Supply Networks in Automobile and Electronics Manufacturing Industries: A Multiplex Analysis. Processes 2019, 7, 176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Wang, C.-N.; Huang, Y.-F.; Cheng, I.-F.; Nguyen, V.T. A Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) Approach Using Hybrid SCOR Metrics, AHP, and TOPSIS for Supplier Evaluation and Selection in the Gas and Oil Industry. Processes 2018, 6, 252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Frigura-Iliasa, F.M.; Musuroi, S.; Sorandaru, C.; Vatau, D. New Technical Parameters and Operational Improvements of the Metal Oxide Varistors Manufacturing Process. Processes 2019, 7, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Wittner, M.O.; Karbstein, H.P.; Gaukel, V. Air-Core-Liquid-Ring (ACLR) Atomization: Influences of Gas Pressure and Atomizer Scale Up on Atomization Efficiency. Processes 2019, 7, 139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Wittner, M.O.; Ballesteros, M.A.; Link, F.J.; Karbstein, H.P.; Gaukel, V. Air-Core–Liquid-Ring (ACLR) Atomization Part II: Influence of Process Parameters on the Stability of Internal Liquid Film Thickness and Resulting Spray Droplet Sizes. Processes 2019, 7, 616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Chan, D.-S.; Kuo, M.-I. Wheat Germ Drying with Different Time-Temperature Combinations in a Fluidized Bed Dryer. Processes 2018, 6, 245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Holgado, M. A Systems Engineering Approach to Performance-Based Maintenance Services Design. Processes 2019, 7, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Yu, K.; Zhou, L.; Hu, C.; Wang, L.; Jin, W. Analysis of Influencing Factors of Occupational Safety and Health in Coal Chemical Enterprises Based on the Analytic Network Process and System Dynamics. Processes 2019, 7, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Kang, H.J.; Kim, C.; Kang, K. Analysis of the Trends in Biochemical Research Using Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA). Processes 2019, 7, 379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kim, C. Special Issue on Performance Measurement and Optimization for Sustainable Production Processes Improvement. Processes 2020, 8, 287. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8030287

AMA Style

Kim C. Special Issue on Performance Measurement and Optimization for Sustainable Production Processes Improvement. Processes. 2020; 8(3):287. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8030287

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kim, Changhee. 2020. "Special Issue on Performance Measurement and Optimization for Sustainable Production Processes Improvement" Processes 8, no. 3: 287. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8030287

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop