Next Article in Journal
Finite Element Analysis on Bingham–Papanastasiou Viscoplastic Flow in a Channel with Circular/Square Obstacles: A Comparative Benchmarking
Next Article in Special Issue
Nitrogen Recovery from Swine Manure Using a Zeolite-Based Process
Previous Article in Journal
Alternative Briquette Material Made from Palm Stem Biomass Mediated by Glycerol Crude of Biodiesel Byproducts as a Natural Adhesive
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Fractal-Based Correlation for Time-Dependent Surface Diffusivity in Porous Adsorbents
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Studies on the Potential of Nonmodified and Metal Oxide-Modified Coal Fly Ash Zeolites For Adsorption of Heavy Metals and Catalytic Degradation of Organics for Waste Water Recovery

by
Silviya Boycheva
1,*,
Denitza Zgureva
2,*,
Simona Miteva
1,
Ivan Marinov
1,
Dominika Marcin Behunová
3,
Ivalina Trendafilova
4,
Margarita Popova
4 and
Miroslava Václaviková
3
1
Department of Thermal and Nuclear Power Engineering, Technical University of Sofia, 8 Kl. Ohridsky Blvd., 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria
2
College of Energy and Electronics, Technical University of Sofia, 8 Kl. Ohridsky Blvd., 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria
3
Institute of Geotechnics, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Watsonova 45, SK-043 53 Kosice, Slovak Republic
4
Institute of Organic Chemistry with Centre of Phytochemistry, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2020, 8(7), 778; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8070778
Submission received: 9 May 2020 / Revised: 21 June 2020 / Accepted: 29 June 2020 / Published: 3 July 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Remediation Processes Based on Zeolites)

Abstract

:
A nanocrystalline zeolite of Na-X type (CFAZ) was synthesized by ultrasonic-assisted double stage fusion-hydrothermal alkaline conversion of lignite coal fly ash. Modified CFAZ with magnetic nanoparticles (MNP-CFAZ) was obtained by adding presynthesized magnetic nanoparticles between the synthesis stages. CFAZs loaded by particles of copper (Cu-CFAZ) and cobalt (Co-CFAZ) oxides were prepared by postsynthesis modification of the parent CFAZ, applying a wet impregnation technique. The parent and modified CFAZs were examined for their phase composition by X-ray diffraction, morphology by scanning electron microscopy, and surface characteristics by N2 physisorption. Comparative studies have been carried out on the adsorption capacity of the starting CFAZ and its derivatives with respect to Cd2+- and Pb2+-ions from aqueous solutions. Adsorption isotherms of Cd2+-ions on the studied samples were plotted and described by the adsorption equations of Langmuir, Freundlich, Langmuir–Freundlich, and Temkin. The best correlation between the experimental and model isotherms for the parent and modified CFAZ was found with the Langmuir linear model, assuming a monolayer adsorption mechanism. Parent and modified CFAZs were also studied as catalysts for heterogeneous thermal Fenton oxidation of methylene blue. At 90 °C, the higher catalytic activity exhibits the nonmodified sample, but with the decrease in temperature to 60 °C, the modified samples are more effective catalysts.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Coal fly ash (CFA) is a solid byproduct of coal combustion in thermal power plants (TPPs). Due to the widespread use of coal for global energy production, CFA is being generated in huge quantities. In recent years, opportunities for smart utilization of this solid waste have been intensively explored with the aim to reduce its landfill and to utilize its resource as a source of valuable raw materials [1,2,3]. As the coal ash in its macrocomposition is predominantly aluminosilicate material, technological approaches to its conversion into zeolites are intensively studied [4]. The synthesis of coal fly ash zeolites (CFAZs) is based on the alkaline dissolution of the silica and alumina components of its composition, formation of a hydrogel, and its heterogeneous crystallization in a particular zeolite phase [5]. The alkaline conversion of coal ash is most efficiently accomplished by one-stage hydrothermal or two-stage hydrothermal-fusion syntheses [4,6]. The single hydrothermal treatment is usually performed at mild temperatures (below 100 °C), while in the two-step synthesis prealkaline fusion of the reaction mixtures is generally performed at 550 °C, followed by hydrothermal activation in the thermal range of 35–90 °C [7,8]. The high-thermal treatment facilitates the alkaline dissolution of the persistent silicate and alumosilicate crystalline phases usually found in the CFA composition, such as quartz (α-SiO2), mullite (3Al2O32SiO2), and anorthite (CaAl2Si2O8), whereby they are also converted into zeolites, and the obtained products are highly zeolitized [9]. The CFAZs are characterized by a sufficiently developed specific surface suitable for adsorption and catalytic applications [10]. Moreover, unlike their pure synthetic analogs, CFAZs possess a mixed micromesoporous structure that allows them to host and trap species of different diameters in their structural framework [10]. The outer surface of the zeolite powders can also be greatly enlarged by applying ultrasonic homogenization of the reaction slurries of coal ash and alkaline solutions preceding their synthesis [11]. In this way, the highly developed interphase boundaries will favor the efficiency of these materials in water and gas cleaning applications [12]. The CFA has been found to contain significant amounts of iron oxide phases in the form of hematite (α-Fe2O3), magnetite (γ-Fe3O4), and maghemite (γ-Fe2O3) [13]. In the alkaline conversion of CFA by a single-step hydrothermal synthesis, the iron oxide phases of the feedstock are transferred to the zeolite product without undergoing phase changes. Since γ-Fe3O4 and γ-Fe2O3 are ferrimagnetic, they also give magnetic properties to the hydrothermally synthesized CFAZs [14]. However, in the two-step synthesis, during the high-thermal stage, the ferrimagnetic phases of the ash composition are oxidized to paramagnetic hematite, and the products have no magnetic properties [15]. Magnetically active zeolites are valuable in water purification since, at the end of the process, they are easily removed from the aqueous medium by an applied external magnetic field [16]. Zeolites have long been used in the purification of contaminated water from organic pollutants, heavy metals, and some inorganic anions due to their strong adsorption capacity and ion exchange properties obeyed by their specific highly porous structure with mobile compensating cations [17,18]. CFAZs of faujasite (FAU, Na-X), linde (LTA, A), and gismondine (GIS, Na-P1) types are among the most studied adsorbents and ion exchangers for heavy metal uptake from contaminated waters [19,20]. The significant potential of CFAZs to eliminate effectively, separately or simultaneously, a variety of heavy metal ions such as Ni2+, Mn2+, Cd2+, Co2+, Cs2+, Hg2+, Cu2+, Pb2+, Zn2+, and Cr2+ from polluted water has been observed [21,22,23]. CFAZs are also able to adsorb dyes and a variety of organic contaminants from water, reaching significant dye removal efficiency [24,25]. Iron-embedded zeolites have been studied as catalysts for a heterogeneous Fenton oxidation process applied for degradation of organic contaminants from water [26]. Fenton reaction is based on the production of oxidative hydroxyl and hydroperoxyl radicals by chain reactions of photo or thermal degradation of H2O2 catalyzed by Fe2+- and Fe3+-ions. Some of the most effective Fenton catalysts are natural or synthetic zeolites loaded with ferrous salts or magnetite particles [27,28]. Fenton-like catalysts based on zeolites modified by other metal oxides have been recently studied [29]. The CFAZs have attracted the attention of researchers as catalysts for Fenton oxidation processes because they contain iron oxides in the form of magnetite, maghemite, and hematite, which are transferred from the raw coal ash [30,31]. In addition, they can be modified with different metal oxides to improve their catalytic properties [32,33]. Some comparative studies have revealed that the removal capacities of CFAZs are rather lower as compared to the widely used in practice adsorbents; however, their substantially lower cost and the complex environmental benefits of coal ash utilization make them promising adsorbents for wastewater treatment with great potential to remove a range of pollutants [34]. However, by the synthesis of nanoscale CFAZs and/or by their in-situ or postsynthesis modification, their adsorption capacity can be greatly enhanced to exceed that of pure synthetic zeolites [35,36]. Thanks to their low cost and comprehensive retention capability, CFAZs have been considered as effective sorbents in barriers against infiltration and for immobilization of pollutants in the soil [23]. In addition, recent studies on CFAZs reveal that although they carry heavy metals transferred from the raw ash, the leaching of harmful ions into the contact media is not observed over a wide pH range, making them safe for water decontamination [37].
This study seeks to clarify the applicability of CFAZs of Na-X type obtained by ultrasonic-assisted double stage fusion-hydrothermal alkaline conversion of lignite coal fly ash and their metal oxide-modified derivatives for remediation of polluted water. The sonicated CFAZs of Na-X type are characterized by highly developed total and external specific surface areas due to their nanocrystalline morphology and mixed micromesoporous structures. The combination of the two-step synthesis with the prealkaline melting of the reaction mixtures and the ultrasonic treatment of the suspensions ensures a fine distribution of the iron oxide particles in the zeolite structural framework [13]. It is expected that this unique combination of textural features of the parent CFAZs, as well as their further modification with nanoparticles of magnetic iron, copper, and cobalt oxides, will contribute to the high adsorption capacity and catalytic activity of these materials in the remediation of water contaminated with heavy metals and organic matter.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Synthesis of Non-Modified and Metal Oxide-Modified CFAZs

The CFA from lignite coal containing 70 wt % SiO2 + Al2O3 and 15 wt % Fe2O3 was used as a raw material for the synthesis of zeolites. The nonmodified CFAZ samples were prepared by a double-stage fusion-hydrothermal synthesis. Solid mixtures of CFA and NaOH (pure for analysis, Valerus, Sofia, Bulgaria) in a ratio of 1:2 were fused in Ni-crucibles at 550 °C. The resultant products were cooled down to ambient temperature, diluted in 100 mL distilled water and sonicated for 15 min. As a second stage, the reactant liquors were hydrothermally activated at 90 °C for 4 h in closed containers. After the syntheses, the precipitates were filtered, washed repeatedly with distilled water, and dried at 105 °C for 1 h. CFAZs were loaded with magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) by adding 4 wt % MNPs to the reaction mixtures between the fusion and hydrothermal stages (in situ modification). MNPs were uniformly spread into the reaction slurries via sonication. MNPs were preliminary prepared by dissolving 0.01 mol FeCl2∙4H2O (pure for analysis, Chempur, Piekary Śląskie, Poland) and 0.02 mol FeCl3∙6H2O (pure for analysis, Chempur, Piekary Śląskie, Poland) in 100 mL deionized water. The reaction solution was kept at 25 °C in a water bath and stirred under N2 flow at 500 rpm. A solution of 8 mol NaOH (pure for analysis, Valerus, Sofia, Bulgaria) was added continuously under stirring for 3 h until final pH = 12 was established. The suspension was decanted, washed, and the MNPs were separated by a permanent magnet and dried at room temperature. Thus, prepared magnetite nanoparticles (Fe3O4) were oxidized to maghemite (γ-Fe2O3) by exposing them to air and humidity, as described in [38]. Cu- and Co-modified CFAZs were obtained by postsynthesis modification of the parent samples applying an incipient wetness impregnation technique. Solutions of Cu(NO3)2∙3H2O (pure for analysis, Valerus, Sofia, Bulgaria) and Co(NO3)2∙6H2O (pure for analysis, Valerus, Sofia, Bulgaria) were mixed with CFAZ samples in amounts corresponding to 6 wt % of Cu and Co loading. The impregnated samples were dried at ambient temperature, and the precursor salts were decomposed in air at 500 °C for 2 h.

2.2. Characterization of Non-Modified and Metal Oxide-Modified CFAZs

The phase composition of CFAZ and modified samples were studied by X-ray diffraction (XRD) using a diffractometer Brucker D2 Phaser (Bucker Corporation, Karlsruhe, Germany) with CuKα-radiation and a Ni-filter. CFAZ morphology was observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) on a Carl Zeiss SMT SEM EVO LS25 microscope (Carl Zaiss AG, Oberkochen, Germany) with an EDAX Trident system. Surface characteristics of the samples were investigated through experimental nitrogen adsorption/desorption isotherms measured at 77 K using a volumetric adsorption analyzer Tristar II 3020 (Micromeritics Instrument Corporation, Gwinnett County, GA, USA). The parent and modified CFAZs were preliminarily degassed in a set-up FlowPrep 60 (Micromeritics, Instrument Corporation, USA) at 533 K for 16 hours under helium flow. BET specific surface area (SBET, m2/g) was calculated by the multi-point Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) model from the adsorption data in relative pressure p/p0 range, corresponding to the monolayer formation. The mesopore size distribution functions were computed by the Barrett–Joyner–Helenda (BJH) model applied to the desorption branch of the isotherms. The size of micropores and the specific surface and volume described by them were derived by the t-plot model.

2.3. Magnetite Nanoparticles Characterization

X-ray powder diffraction patterns of MNPs were recorded by a Philips PW 1810/3710 diffractometer (Philips, Nederlands) with Bragg-Brentano parafocusing geometry, applying monochromatized CuKα (λ = 0.15418 nm) radiation (40 kV, 35 mA) and proportional counter.
The magnetic properties of the iron oxide nanoparticles were measured using a Quantum Design MPMS-5S superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) magnetometer (Quantum Design Inc., USA). The dried samples were packed into gelatin capsules in vacuum grease. Zero-field-cooled–field-cooled (ZFC-FC) magnetization curves were obtained from −268 °C to 25 °C. In ZFC mode, the samples were cooled in a nominally zero magnetic field (in practice, in about −1 Oe) from 25 to −268 °C and the magnetization was subsequently measured in a field of 10 Oe with increasing temperature. In FC mode, the sample was cooled in 10 Oe from 25 to −268 °C and the magnetization was subsequently measured in the same field with increasing temperature. Hysteresis loops of dried samples were taken in fields between ± 50 kOe at −268 and 25 °C. The saturation magnetization (Ms) was defined as the value of the magnetization at 2 T.
Mössbauer spectroscopic measurements were performed by a KFKI spectrometer (KFKI Production, Hungary), operating in constant acceleration mode with 57Co/Rh source (0.5 GBq). The positional parameters are related to the alpha-iron standard. The accuracy of these data is ca. ±0.03 mm/s. In situ spectra were recorded at ambient (27 °C) and at liquid nitrogen (−196 °C) temperatures. The following parameters of hyperfine interactions were extracted from the spectral components by computer fitting: isomer shift (IS), quadrupole splitting (QS), line widths (FW), and relative intensities of the components (RI).

2.4. Heavy Metal Adsorption Tests

The adsorption ability of nonmodified and metal oxide-modified CFAZs to retain Cd2+- and Pb2+-ions was studied performing batch tests. Starting solutions of Cd(NO3)2.2H2O (reagent grade, Macrochem, Ukraine) and Pb(NO3)2 (reagent grade, Macrochem, Ukraine) in distilled water were prepared with concentrations of 200 ppm Cd2+-ions and 100 ppm Pb2+-ions. A series of test solutions for both ions were prepared by consecutive dilution of the stock solutions. The experiments were conducted at 22 ± 2 °C by immersing 0.02 g of CFAZs in 25 mL solutions containing the desired starting concentration of the heavy metal ions. The mixtures were agitated for 24 h in 50 mL plastic bottles using a tumbling mill and then filtered using filter papers. The adsorption isotherms were measured at pH = 5.5, and the effect of pH of the test solution on the heavy metal removal efficiency of the CFAZs was also studied in the pH-interval from 1 to 8. The exact initial and final concentrations of the heavy metal ions in the aqueous solutions were determined by a Fast Sequential Atomic Absorption Spectrometer AA240FS (Agilent, USA).

2.5. Fenton Oxidation Tests

The Fenton oxidation tests were performed toward methylene blue (MB, pure for analysis, Valerus, Sofia, Bulgaria) as a model contaminant by batch technique. Hydrogen peroxide was used as an oxidant adding 3 mL of 6% H2O2 (Kupro, Bulgaria) to 25 mL solution of MB with an initial concentration of 20 mg/L. The oxidation tests were performed using as catalysts 0.05 mg of the parent and modified CFAZ at fixed pH = 2.0 and temperatures of 60 and 90 °C. The optical absorption was measured at λmax = 665 nm using optical glass cuvettes with 10 mm in length.

3. Results

3.1. Material Characterization

Experimental X-ray diffractograms of the raw CFA, nonmodified and modified coal fly ash zeolites are plotted in Figure 1. The main crystalline phases observed in the CFA are quartz (α-SiO2), anorthite (CaAl2Si2O8), magnetite (γ-Fe3O4), and hematite (α-Fe2O3). X-ray diffraction pattern of nonmodified zeolite sample, denoted further as CFAZ, reveals a highly crystalline structure typical for zeolite Na-X, which is evidenced comparing to a reference X-ray diffractogram of zeolite Na-X. Individual reflexes of the sodalite phase (SOD), which often accompanies zeolite X during its crystallization at temperatures of 70–90 °C [8], are also found. Reflexes of the iron oxide phases transferred from the raw fly ash were not detected on the X-ray diffractogram of CFAZ. On the X-ray diffractogram of the MNP-loaded CFAZ (MNP-CFAZ), the main line of γ-Fe2O3 is observed. The impregnation of the parent zeolite sample with copper (Cu-CFAZ) and cobalt (Co-CFAZ) salts leads to the appearance of barely noticeable characteristic lines of their corresponding oxides, CuO and Co3O4, on the X-ray diffraction patters of the modified CFAZs. All of the samples, after their modification with metal oxides, retain the structure of the zeolite Na-X, as can be seen from its clearly expressed characteristic lines on the experimental diffraction patterns.
Typical SEM images of parent and modified CFAZs are presented in Figure 2. SEM analyses reveal the nanocrystalline morphology of all the coal fly ash zeolites due to ultrasonic agitation. The modified CFAZs are characterized by more agglomerated morphology as compared to the parent CFAZ.
The experimental N2-isotherms of adsorption and desorption for the nonmodified and metal oxide-modified zeolite samples are plotted in Figure 3a. The N2-isotherms for modified samples are shifted toward lower N2-adsorbed quantities in the studied relative pressure range p/p0 compared to the N2-isotherm of the nonmodified sample. The isotherms of the all studied zeolite specimens can be classified as type IV with H3 hysteresis loops (IUPAC, 1985), typical for materials with mixed micromesoporous textures.
CFAZ is characterized by high BET specific surface value (SBET, m2/g), revealing a significant yield of the zeolite phase. For the metal oxide-modified samples, SBET significantly decreases as the lowest values are obtained for Cu-CFAZ. The lowering of the specific surface values described by micropores (Smicro, m2/g) indicates that the metal oxide particles fill the micropores of the modified samples, and the decrease in the outer surface of the zeolite particles (Sextern, m2/g) corresponds to their agglomeration upon modification. The significant drop in the values for the volume described by the micropores (Vmicro, cm3/g) for modified CFAZs confirms their filling with metal oxide particles. The volume described by the mesopores (Vmeso, cm3/g) keeps commensurate values for the parent and derived coal fly ash zeolites, except Cu-FAZ, at which Vmeso is profoundly reduced. The total volume of pores (Vtotal, cm3/g) corresponds to the sum of Vmicro and Vmeso values. The average micro- and mesopore sizes are comparable for all the studied samples. The mesopore size distribution functions obtained by BJH-model are plotted in Figure 3b. It is observed that the biggest share for all the CFAZs belongs to the pores with diameters around 40 Å.
The calculated surface properties from the model studies of the experimental isotherms are summarized in Table 1.
X-ray driffraction and Mössbauer spectra of the MNPs used in the modification of CFAZ are presented in Figure 4.
The XRD patterns of the nanosized iron oxide particles show wider reflections typical of small nanoparticles (Figure 4a). The presence of two magnetic phases of magnetite (γ-Fe3O4) and maghemite (γ-Fe2O3) could be supposed as their crystalline structure is very similar. The difference is that the maghemite has a lower bulk saturation magnetization value than magnetite (~92 emu/g for magnetite, ~76 emu/g for maghemite). Magnetite γ-Fe3O4 and maghemite γ-Fe2O3 can be differentiated by the X-ray diffraction method based on the detailed profile analysis of (511) reflection at around 57 2θ°. The method is based on the small shift of (511) reflection of maghemite toward higher 2θ° values compared to magnetite when the FWHM (full widths at half maximum) of the two compounds makes it possible to differentiate their overlap [39]. However, the distinction between the two magnetic phases by X-ray diffraction is not unambiguous. The particle size calculated by the Sherrer equation, applying the profile fitting method, is 10 nm.
Mössbauer spectroscopic investigations support the predominant formation of maghemite nanoparticles. Comparison of Mössbauer spectra recorded at 27 and −196 °C clearly shows the dominant presence of superparamagnetic maghemite nanoparticles (Figure 4b). In the first approach, the magnetically split parts of spectra were decomposed to two sextets in correspondence with the two different possible coordinations of iron ions in maghemite (e.g., tetrahedral and octahedral; Table 2).
The small size of the particles is reflected in the superparamagnetic behavior, i.e., a decrease of the measuring temperature results in the increase of the extent of magnetic ordering—the presence of antiferromagnetic sextets is more pronounced in the −196 °C spectra.
Magnetic properties of the synthesized iron oxide nanoparticles were proved by magnetization measurements (Figure 5). The saturation magnetization (Ms) for our maghemite nanoparticles is 57 emu/g, which is lower than that of the bulk maghemite (75 emu/g) but is in accordance with the Ms values of 10 nm oxidized magnetite nanoparticles ranging from 52–62 emu/g in the literature [39].

3.2. Adsorption Studies of Cd2+-and Pb2+-ions onto Nonmodified and Modified Coal Fly Ash Zeolites

3.2.1. Equilibrium Adsorption Studies

The removal efficiency R (%) of coal fly ash zeolites toward Cd2+- and Pb2+-ions was calculated by the following equation:
R = ( C 0 C e ) C 0 · 100 ,   %
where C0 is the initial concentration of Cd2+- or Pb2+- ions in the tested solutions; Ce is the equilibrium concentration of Cd2+- or Pb2+- ions in the liquid phase after the adsorption, mg/L.
The dependence of the removal efficiency of the studied adsorbents on the initial concentration of the heavy metal ions in the tested solutions is demonstrated in Figure 6.
All of the studied adsorbents reveal strong efficiency to remove Cd2+-ions from water at concentration levels up to 50 mg Cd2+/L. By increasing the concentration of cadmium ions in the stock solution, their removal efficiency decreases but retains significant values for CFAZ and MNP-CFAZ, while for Cu-CFAZ and Co-CFAZ R-values drop down almost by half at starting concentration levels of 150–200 mgCd2+/L. All studied adsorbents show high efficiency toward the removal of Pb2+-ions from aqueous media and maintained high R-values up to 100 mg Pb2+/L. Cu-CFAZ, and Co-CFAZs exhibit a higher adsorption capacity for Pb2+ than for Cd2+, with the retention efficiency of lead ions being higher compared to CFAZs and MNP-CFAZs. Coal ash zeolites modified with copper and cobalt oxides completely retain Pb2+-ions from the treated aqueous solutions at starting concentration values of 100 mgPb2+/L.
The equilibrium adsorption capacities qe (mg/g) of the heavy metal ions on the studied adsorbents were calculated according to the following equation:
q e = ( C 0 C e ) m s · V ,   %
where V is the volume of the tested solution, L; ms—the weight of the used adsorbent, g.
In order to clarify the mechanism of capturing cadmium ions by the studied adsorbents, the experimental data were described by different thermodynamic models.
The adsorption of bivalent metal ions from water onto natural, synthetic, and coal ash zeolites is usually described with a good correlation by the thermodynamic models of Langmuir and Freundlich [40,41]. A number of studies have revealed that upon adsorption of bivalent heavy metals from iron particles or iron oxide phases, Temkin’s isotherm shows a good correlation with the experiment [42].
Langmuir model assumes that adsorption occurs by the formation of a monolayer of the adsorbate molecules on the homogeneous surface of the adsorbent. It is described by the following equation:
q e = Q s a t K L C e 1 + K L C e
where Qsat is the monolayer adsorption capacity, mg/g; KL—Langmuir constant related to adsorption capacity obeyed by the free adsorption energy, L/mg. The linear form of Equation (3) is presented as follows:
C e q e = 1 K L Q s a t + C e Q s a t
When multi-layer adsorption takes place on a heterogeneous surface, the process is described by the Freundlich model:
q e = K f C e 1 / n
where Kf is the Freundlich constant related to the adsorption capacity, L/g; n—adsorption intensity, describing the heterogeneity of the adsorbate sites.
Langmuir-Freundlich isotherm model is valid when monolayer adsorption takes place on heterogeneous surfaces. It is described by
q e = Q sat ( K L C e ) n ( K L C e ) n + 1
The Temkin isotherm model is relevant to the adsorption data when indirect interactions between the adsorbent and adsorbate take place, accompanied by a linear decrease in the adsorption free energy with an increase of the surface coverage. It is expressed by the following equation:
q e = ( R T b ) l n A t + ( R T b ) l n C e
where b is the Temkin constant related to the heat of adsorption, J/mol; At is the Temkin isotherm constant, L/g; R—universal gas constant, J/K mol; T—absolute temperature, K.
The models applied and the results obtained for their parameters, together with the values for the correlation coefficients (R2), are summarized in Table 3. The adsorption isotherms of the Cd2+-ions for all tested samples are described with the highest correlation coefficient by the linear Langmuir model. The experimental isotherms for Cd2+-adsorption onto parent and modified CFAZs and their linear and nonlinear Langmuir fittings are plotted in Figure 7.

3.2.2. pH-Dependence of Heavy Metal Adsorption onto Nonmodified and Modified CFAZs

The dependence of the adsorption efficiency of CFAZs and MNP-CFAZs toward Cd2+- and Pb2+-ions on the pH of the test solutions is demonstrated in Figure 8. In strongly acidic media (pH = 1–2), MNP-CFAZ exhibits poor adsorption capacity for Cd2+-ions, while the unmodified sample does not retain them at all (Figure 8a). By increasing the pH to neutral values (pH = 6.5–7.5), the adsorption capacity of both zeolites increases: at about pH = 3, it is higher for CFAZs, while at pH = 5.0–7.5, the more effective is MNP-CFAZs. Regarding the removal of Pb2+-ions, both samples reveal from moderate (pH = 1.0–2.0) to significant retaining capacities (pH = 2.5–3.5), as the CFAZ is more effective than the MNP-CFAZ in the region of strong acidity (pH = 1.0–3.5; Figure 8b). In the low acidic to neutral pH values, higher retaining efficiency of Pb2+-ions was measured for the MNP-CFAZ.

3.2.3. Heterogeneous Fenton Oxidation of Methylene Blue Using Nonmodified and Modified CFAZ

The efficiency of the heterogeneous oxidative degradation (D, %) of MB in the presence of CFAZs and modified CFAZs is calculated by the following equation:
D = C M B , 0 C M B , τ C M B , 0 · 100 ,   %
where CMB,0 and CMB,τ are the initial and the current MB concentrations, mg/L.
The efficiency of the Fenton oxidation degradation of MB measured at 90 °C and 60 °C is plotted in Figure 9. At higher temperatures, total oxidation of MB is achieved in less than 25 min, as all tested samples exhibit high catalytic activity in the Fenton oxidation process (Figure 9a). It can be noted that the nonmodified CFAZ exhibits the highest catalytic activity with the progress of the oxidation process, while the Co-CFAZ is the least active. However, when the temperature is lowered to 60 °C, the modified specimens exhibit higher catalytic activity than the parent CFAZ, with the highest Fenton oxidation rate recorded at the MNP-CFAZ (Figure 9b).
The experimental results were described, applying the pseudo first- (Equation (9)) and second-order (Equation (10)) kinetic models. The linear forms of the model equation used are as follows:
l n C M B , τ C M B , 0 = k 1 τ
τ C M B , τ = 1 k 2 C M B , 0 + τ C M B , 0
where k1 and k2 are the reaction rate constants for the kinetic models of the pseudo first- and second-order, correspondingly, min−1; τ is the reaction time, min.
The impact of the catalyst amount on the oxidation process was studied previously [33].
The obtained results for the calculated kinetic constants and the oxidation reaction half-life τ1/2 for the Fenton oxidation of MB at 90 °C are summarized in Table 4.
The regression coefficient values (R2) reveal that the degradation kinetics of MB is more accurately described by the pseudo first-order kinetic equation when CFAZ and MNP-CFAZ are used as catalysts, and by the pseudo second-order when the oxidation is catalyzed by Cu-CFAZ and Co-CFAZ. The calculations of the experimental results for degradation of MB by Fenton reaction onto CFAZ and modified CFAZ catalysts by applying the pseudo first- and second-order kinetic equations are demonstrated in Figure 10.

4. Discussion

Our previous studies revealed that due to the combination of ultrasonic-assisted homogenization and double-stage fusion-hydrothermal synthesis, the iron is distributed very finely into the zeolite matrix, mostly as Fe2+- and Fe3+-cations [12]. It was found that the adsorption of Cd2+-ions from aqueous solutions on nonmodified and modified CFAZs obeys the Langmuir mechanism. This indicates that the monolayer adsorption mechanism is dominant in the investigated samples. Taking into account that the Langmuir model assumes a uniform distribution of the adsorption sites and surface energy, it could be supposed that the coal ash zeolites prepared by the combination of ultrasonic homogenization and two-step synthesis are characterized by a homogeneous distribution of iron oxide phases and other components transferred from the raw ash, despite the complex composition of the feedstock. In spite of the significantly higher value of the specific surface area of CFAZ, as compared to the one of MNP-CFAZ, the values obtained from model studies for monolayer adsorption capacity Qsat are very similar for the two samples (Table 3). This indicates that although MNPs reduce the specific surface area of the zeolite, they most likely create a supplementary unsaturation of the surface, and therefore the adsorption properties are not deteriorated. Modification with copper and cobalt oxide particles significantly impairs both the surface properties of the specimens and their adsorption capacity with respect to Cd2+-ions. Comparative studies of the removal efficiency values of the CFAZs revealed a declination of R-values towards Cd2+-ions at solution concentrations of 100 mg/L, more pronounced at Co-CFAZ and Cu-CFAZ. The retention capacity of all zeolite samples to Pb2+-ions remains high at these concentration levels.
It has been established that the main factor inhibiting the adsorption of metal ions from aqueous media onto porous adsorbents is the size of the metal-hydrated ion [40]. Values for hydrated ionic radii for Pb2+ and Cd2+ are reported as 4.01 and 4.26 Å, correspondingly [43]. The sorption affinity decreases with increasing the size of the metal-hydrated ion, which explains the higher removal efficiency of Pb2+-ions compared to Cd2+-ions by increasing the concentration of the treated aqueous solutions. Other studies also have shown greater retention of Pb2+-ions onto zeolites in competition with Cd2+-ions [40]. The removal efficiency of Cd2+-ions decreases with increasing the concentration of test solutions above 100 mgCd2+/l and the decrease of R is greater for Cu-CFAZ and Co-CFAZ compared to CFAZ and MNP-CFAZ. This is explained by the lower specific surface area of the samples modified with copper and cobalt oxides. Most likely, the reduction in the SBET values of the zeolites modified by postsynthesis wet impregnation is due to the filling of their micro- and mesopores with metal oxide particles. This is confirmed by the measured lower values for their internal volume, determined by micro- (Vmicro) and mesopores (Vmeso) (Table 1). The decrease in the adsorption capacity of the samples due to the reduction of their specific surface area shows that the retention mechanism of Cd2+-ions is mainly adsorption instead of ion exchange. The retention of other heavy metal ions, such as Cu2+-ions and Zn2+-ions from coal ash zeolites of Na-X type, is assumed to take place by an ion-exchange mechanism [40].
Magnetic nanoparticles are widely studied for the treatment of heavy metal polluted wastewater due to the unique combination of electrical and magnetic properties, high adsorption capacity, and environmental compatibility [44]. The main disadvantage of MNPs is their tendency to agglomerate, which reduces the contact surface with the treated medium. The solution to this problem is MNP impregnation in zeolite matrices, thus creating composites with high adsorption potential, which have the property to magnetize and are harmless in water purification. The application of powdered adsorbents for water purification provides a larger solid/liquid contact surface, which increases with decreasing particle size. This results in greater adsorption capacity and decontamination efficiency. However, the smaller size of the solids makes it difficult to remove them from the treated medium at the end of the process. Magnetic zeolites have the advantage of technologically feasible solid/liquid separation from the treated media by applying an external magnet. The magnetic separation of adsorbents from water flows is very advantageous for industrial applications as it saves energy and time compared to alternative separation processes, such as filtration, centrifugation, or gravity separation.
Maghemite nanoparticles (γ-Fe2O3), and maghemite/silica nanocomposite (γ-Fe2O3/SiO2), have been evaluated as magnetic heterogeneous Fenton catalysts [45]. It has also been found that the maghemite-loaded nanocomposites possess a strong magnetic susceptibility and can be easily recovered by magnetic settlement [45]. In the case of MNP modified zeolites, despite the significant reduction of the specific surface, their adsorption capacity is comparable to that of the parent sample. This is explained by the additional surface instauration of MNP-CFAZ, as the iron atoms in the maghemite have unpaired electrons in 3d orbit and the presence of cation vacancies, which leads to additional electrostatic attraction [46]. Superparamagnetic characteristics of γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles favor their less agglomeration; however, they reveal strong magnetic susceptibility when an external magnetic field is applied [46]. Magnetic zeolites have the technological advantage of being easily removed from the treated media by applying an external magnetic field. It has been found that the maghemite creates Fe–OH and ≡Fe–O active surface sites, which act as a Lewis base [47]. These active sites take place in the formation of complexes with heavy metal ions, thus retaining them on the surface of the adsorbent [47]. Moreover, heavy metal ions can also occupy vacancies in tetrahedral places, which further facilitate their adsorption.
When the degradation of MB by Fenton oxidation takes place at 90 °C, all studied catalytic systems, consisting of zeolite support and active metal oxide centers, possess a high catalytic ability. Under these conditions, the parent CFAZ exhibits the highest catalytic activity due to the larger contact surface that the zeolite matrix provides. However, as the temperature decreases, the additional active catalytic centers created by modification of CFAZ contribute to the integral oxidation process. It has been observed that magnetite superior maghemite is a catalyst for advanced oxidation processes, as the Fe3+/H2O2 oxidation system is less active than the Fe2+/H2O2 because of the lower reactivity of Fe3+ with H2O2 [48]. However, a number of studies have shown that magnetite is oxidized to maghemite in Fenton oxidizing environments, and the residual Fe(II) content in the catalyst core, when nanoparticles are used, is of minor benefit for the catalytic activity [49]. Moreover, the catalytic activity and the stability of the γ-Fe2O3/CFAZ system can be improved by doping with copper oxide, which is to be further investigated. This is obeyed by the assumption that Cu2+-ions can replace Fe3+-ions in the crystal unit cell of maghemite due to its structural disorder. Co-CFAZ and Cu-CFAZ show higher catalytic activity than the parent sample, but MNP-CFAZ is ahead of them. This is due to the fact that the oxidation is carried out at low pH values in the acidic region, where maghemite is a better catalyst, while copper and cobalt oxides are more active at pH values close to neutral. The effect of pH on the catalytic behavior of nonmodified and modified CFAZs is to be studied in Fenton oxidation of various organic pollutants.

5. Conclusions

Coal fly ash zeolites with nanocrystalline morphology and with a mixed micro-mesoporous texture were synthesized from lignite coal fly ash by ultrasonic-assisted double-stage fusion-hydrothermal activation. The parent zeolites were loaded by maghemite nanoparticles and copper and cobalt oxides by in-situ modification or by the postsynthesis wet impregnation technique. The specific surface area of the starting zeolites reaches values of 486 m2/gCFAZ, whereas, when modified with metal oxides, the surface parameter is greatly reduced. Non-modified and modified coal fly ash zeolites were studied regarding their capacity to retain Cd2+- and Pb2+-ions from water solutions. It was observed that all of the coal fly ash derived zeolites almost completely adsorb Pb2+-ions from the treated water, up to concentrations of 100 mg/L. All zeolites were found to be effective in cadmium ion removal up to concentration levels of 50 mg/L. At higher concentrations of Cd2+-ions, stronger adsorption was observed by the parent and activated with maghemite nanoparticle zeolites, with adsorption capacity values exceeding 160 mgCd2+/gCFAZ. Model calculations show a mechanism of monolayer adsorption on all samples correlating with the Langmuir model. The highest adsorption capacities of zeolites were found at a pH range of 5–7 for cadmium ions and 3–5 for lead ions. The nonmodified and modified CFAZ reveal high catalytic activity in a Fenton oxidation process of methylene blue at 90 °C, but at lower temperatures, higher catalytic activity was established for the modified zeolites. The kinetics of the oxidation process is reliably described by the pseudo first-order kinetic equation at CFAZ and MNP-CFAZ and by the pseudo second-order kinetic equation at Cu-CFAZ and Co-CFAZ. Studies have shown that parent and magnetic zeolites are effective for cadmium adsorption and all samples for lead adsorption, and metal oxide modified zeolites are preferable in the Fenton oxidation process.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.B.; methodology, S.B., M.V., D.M.B., and M.P.; software, S.M., I.M., and D.Z.; validation, S.B., M.V., and D.Z.; formal analysis, D.Z. and D.M.B.; investigation, S.M., I.M., D.M.B., D.Z., and I.T.; resources, S.B.; data curation, D.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, S.B.; writing—review and editing, S.B., D.Z., and M.P.; visualization, D.Z. and S.B.; supervision, S.B. and M.V.; project administration, S.B. and M.V.; funding acquisition, S.B. and M.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by National Science Fund, Ministry of Education, and Science of R. Bulgaria under the Grant DNTS Slovak Republic 01/6. The APC was funded by the Technical University of Sofia. The authors thank Károly Lázár from the Centre of Energy Research, Department of Nuclear Analysis, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, for the Mössbauer spectroscopic measurements.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gollakota, A.R.; Volli, V.; Shu, C.-M. Progressive utilisation prospects of coal fly ash: A review. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 672, 951–989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Yao, Z.; Ji, X.; Sarker, P.; Tang, J.; Ge, L.; Xia, M.; Xi, Y. A comprehensive review on the applications of coal fly ash. Earth-Sci. Rev. 2015, 141, 105–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Iyer, R.; Scott, J. Power station fly ash—A review of value-added utilization outside of the construction industry. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2001, 31, 217–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Querol, X.; Moreno, N.; Umaña, J.; Alastuey, A.; Hernández, E.; Lopez-Soler, A.; Plana, F. Synthesis of zeolites from coal fly ash: An overview. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2002, 50, 413–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Murayama, N.; Yamamoto, H.; Shibata, J. Mechanism of zeolite synthesis from coal fly ash by alkali hydrothermal reaction. Int. J. Miner. Process. 2002, 64, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zgureva, D.; Boycheva, S. Synthesis of Highly Porous Micro- and Nanocrystalline Zeolites from Aluminosilicate By-Products. Count. Chem. Biol. Terror. East Eur. Ctries. 2014, 39, 199–204. [Google Scholar]
  7. Franus, W.; Wdowin, M.; Franus, M. Synthesis and characterization of zeolites prepared from industrial fly ash. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2014, 186, 5721–5729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Belviso, C.; Cavalcante, F.; Fiore, S. Synthesis of zeolite from Italian coal fly ash: Differences in crystallization temperature using seawater instead of distilled water. Waste Manag. 2010, 30, 839–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. R., C.A.R.; Williams, C.; Roberts, C.L. A comparative study of two methods for the synthesis of fly ash-based sodium and potassium type zeolites. Fuel 2009, 88, 1403–1416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Boycheva, S.V.; Zgureva, D.M. Surface studies of fly ash zeolites via adsorption/desorption isotherms. Bulg. Chem. Commun. 2016, 48, 101–107. [Google Scholar]
  11. Boycheva, S.; Marinov, I.; Miteva, S.; Zgureva, D. Conversion of coal fly ash into nanozeolite Na-X by applying ultrasound assisted hydrothermal and fusion-hydrothermal alkaline activation. Sustain. Chem. Pharm. 2020, 15, 100217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sivalingam, S.; Sen, S. Rapid ultrasound assisted hydrothermal synthesis of highly pure nanozeolite X from fly ash for efficient treatment of industrial effluent. Chemosphere 2018, 210, 816–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Popova, M.; Boycheva, S.; Lazarova, H.; Zgureva, D.; Lázár, K.; Szegedi, Á. VOC oxidation and CO2 adsorption on dual adsorption/catalytic system based on fly ash zeolites. Catal. Today 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Supelano, G.; Cuaspud, J.G.; Moreno-Aldana, L.C.; Ortiz, C.; Trujillo, C.; Palacio, C.; Vargas, C.P.; Gómez, J.M. Synthesis of magnetic zeolites from recycled fly ash for adsorption of methylene blue. Fuel 2020, 263, 116800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Boycheva, S.; Zgureva, D.; Vassilev, V. Kinetic and thermodynamic studies on the thermal behaviour of fly ash from lignite coals. Fuel 2013, 108, 639–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Feng, D.; Aldrich, C.; Tan, H. Removal of heavy metal ions by carrier magnetic separation of adsorptive particulates. Hydrometallurgy 2000, 56, 359–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wang, S.; Peng, Y. Natural zeolites as effective adsorbents in water and wastewater treatment. Chem. Eng. J. 2010, 156, 11–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Townsend, R.P.; Coker, E.N. Chapter 11 Ion exchange in zeolites. Adv. Pharmacol. 2001, 137, 467–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Querol, X.; Moreno, N.; Umaña, J.C.; Juan, R.; Hernandez, S.; Fernandez-Pereira, C.; Ayora, C.; Janssen, M.; García-Martínez, J.; Linares-Solano, A.; et al. Application of zeolitic material synthesised from fly ash to the decontamination of waste water and flue gas. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2002, 77, 292–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Visa, M. Synthesis and characterization of new zeolite materials from fly ash for heavy metal removal in advanced water treatment. Powder Technol. 2016, 204, 338–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. He, X.; Yao, B.; Xia, Y.; Huang, H.; Gan, Y.; Zhang, W. Coal fly ash derived zeolite for highly efficient removal of Ni2+ inwaste water. Powder Technol. 2020, 367, 40–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Joseph, I.; Tosheva, L.; Doyle, A. Simultaneous removal of Cd(II), Co(II), Cu(II), Pb(II), and Zn(II) ions from aqueous solutions via adsorption on FAU-type zeolites prepared from coal fly ash. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 103895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Koshy, N.; Singh, D. Fly ash zeolites for water treatment applications. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2016, 4, 1460–1472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wang, C.; Li, J.; Wang, L.; Sun, X.; Huang, J. Adsorption of Dye from Wastewater by Zeolites Synthesized from Fly Ash: Kinetic and Equilibrium Studies. Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 2009, 17, 513–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Cunico, P.; Kumar, A.; Fungaro, D. Adsorption of dyes from simulated textile wastewater onto modified nanozeolite from coal fly ash. J. Nanosci. Nanoeng. 2015, 1, 148–161. [Google Scholar]
  26. Olmos, R.G.; Roland, U.; Toufar, H.; Kopinke, F.-D.; Georgi, A. Fe-zeolites as catalysts for chemical oxidation of MTBE in water with H2O2. Appl. Catal. B 2009, 89, 356–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Arimi, M.M. Modified natural zeolite as heterogeneous Fenton catalyst in treatment of recalcitrants in industrial effluent. Prog. Nat. Sci. 2017, 27, 275–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Olmos, R.G.; Martín, M.J.; Georgi, A.; Kopinke, F.-D.; Oller, I.; Malato, S. Fe-zeolites as heterogeneous catalysts in solar Fenton-like reactions at neutral pH. Appl. Catal. B 2012, 125, 51–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Singh, L.; Rekha, P.; Chand, S. Cu-impregnated zeolite Y as highly active and stable heterogeneous Fenton-like catalyst for degradation of Congo red dye. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2016, 170, 321–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wang, N.; Xu, H.; Li, S. A microwave-activated coal fly ash catalyst for the oxidative elimination of organic pollutants in a Fenton-like process. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 7747–7756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Ramírez, H.; Núñez, M.M.G.; Bogoya, A.B.; Gomez, D.F.B.; Ramos, C.; Di Luca, C.; Inchaurrondo, N.; Haure, P. Synthesis of coal fly ash zeolite for the catalytic wet peroxide oxidation of Orange II. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 26, 4277–4287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Subbulekshmi, N.; Subramanian, E. Nano CuO immobilized fly ash zeolite Fenton-like catalyst for oxidative degradation of p -nitrophenol and p -nitroaniline. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 1360–1371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Boycheva, S.; Marinov, I.; Lazarova, H.; Zgureva, D.; Václavíková, M.; Popova, M. Cobalt- and copper-modified fly ash nanozeolites for environmental protection systems. In Proceedings of the CEST 2019, Rhodes, Greece, 4–7 September 2019; p. 563. [Google Scholar]
  34. Simate, G.S.; Maledi, N.; Ochieng, A.; Ndlovu, S.; Zhang, J.; Walubita, L.F. Coal-based adsorbents for water and wastewater treatment. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2016, 4, 2291–2312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sivalingam, S.; Kella, T.; Maharana, M.; Sen, S. Efficient sono-sorptive elimination of methylene blue by fly ash-derived nano-zeolite X: Process optimization, isotherm and kinetic studies. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 208, 1241–1254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Tauanov, Z.; Tsakiridis, P.; Mikhalovsky, S.; Inglezakis, V.J. Synthetic coal fly ash-derived zeolites doped with silver nanoparticles for mercury (II) removal from water. J. Environ. Manag. 2018, 224, 164–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Feng, W.; Wan, Z.; Daniels, J.; Li, Z.; Xiao, G.; Yu, J.; Xu, D.; Guo, H.; Zhang, D.; May, E.F.; et al. Synthesis of high quality zeolites from coal fly ash: Mobility of hazardous elements and environmental applications. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 202, 390–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Rebodos, R.L.; Vikesland, P.J. Effects of Oxidation on the Magnetization of Nanoparticulate Magnetite. Langmuir 2010, 26, 16745–16753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kim, W.; Suh, C.-Y.; Cho, S.-W.; Roh, K.-M.; Kwon, H.; Song, K.; Shon, I.-J. A new method for the identification and quantification of magnetite–maghemite mixture using conventional X-ray diffraction technique. Talanta 2012, 94, 348–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wang, C.; Li, J.; Sun, X.; Wang, L.; Sun, X. Evaluation of zeolites synthesized from fly ash as potential adsorbents for wastewater containing heavy metals. J. Environ. Sci. 2009, 21, 127–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Belova, T. Adsorption of heavy metal ions (Cu2+, Ni2+, Co2+ and Fe2+) from aqueous solutions by natural zeolite. Heliyon 2019, 5, e02320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Boparai, H.K.; Joseph, M.; O’Carroll, D.M. Kinetics and thermodynamics of cadmium ion removal by adsorption onto nano zerovalent iron particles. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011, 186, 458–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Chen, S.B.; Ma, Y.; Chen, L.; Xian, K. Adsorption of aqueous Cd2+, Pb2+, Cu2+ ions by nano-hydroxyapatite: Single- and multi-metal competitive adsorption study. Geochem. J. 2010, 44, 233–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. El-Dib, F.I.; Mohamed, D.E.; El-Shamy, O.A.A.; Mishrif, M.R. Study the adsorption properties of magnetite nanoparticles in the presence of different synthesized surfactants for heavy metal ions removal. Egypt. J. Pet. 2020, 29, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ferroudj, N.; Nzimoto, J.; Davidson, A.; Talbot, D.; Briot, E.; Dupuis, V.; Bée, A.; Medjram, M.S.; Abramson, S. Maghemite nanoparticles and maghemite/silica nanocomposite microspheres as magnetic Fenton catalysts for the removal of water pollutants. Appl. Catal. B 2013, 136, 9–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Fopase, R.; Pandey, L.M. Iron oxide magnetic nanomaterials for biomedical applications. In Magnetochemisty Materials and Applications; Boddula, I.R., Asiri, A.M., Eds.; Materials Research Forum LLC.: Millesville, PA, USA, 2020; Volume 66, pp. 276–322. [Google Scholar]
  47. Guivar, J.A.R.; Sadrollahi, E.; Menzel, D.; Fernandes, E.G.R.; López, E.O.; Torres, M.M.; Arsuaga, J.M.; Arencibia, A.; Litterst, F.J. Magnetic, structural and surface properties of functionalized maghemite nanoparticles for copper and lead adsorption. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 28763–28779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Pignatello, J.J. Dark and photoassisted Fe3+-catalysed degradation of chlorophenoxy herbicides by hydrogen peroxide. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1992, 26, 944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Rusevova, K.; Kopinke, F.-D.; Georgi, A. Nano-sized magnetic iron oxides as catalysts for heterogeneous Fenton-like reactions—Influence of Fe(II)/Fe(III) ratio on catalytic performance. J. Hazard. Mater. 2012, 241, 433–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Experimental X-ray diffraction patterns of a nanocrystalline zeolite of Na-X type (CFAZ) and modified CFAZ: Q—quartz, A—anorthite, H—hematite, Mag—magnetite, M—maghemite. A referent X-ray diffractogram of zeolite Na-X is plotted for comparison.
Figure 1. Experimental X-ray diffraction patterns of a nanocrystalline zeolite of Na-X type (CFAZ) and modified CFAZ: Q—quartz, A—anorthite, H—hematite, Mag—magnetite, M—maghemite. A referent X-ray diffractogram of zeolite Na-X is plotted for comparison.
Processes 08 00778 g001
Figure 2. SEM images of (a) CFAZ; (b) magnetic nanoparticles (MNP)-CFAZ.
Figure 2. SEM images of (a) CFAZ; (b) magnetic nanoparticles (MNP)-CFAZ.
Processes 08 00778 g002
Figure 3. Results from N2 adsorption/desorption analyses: (a) experimental N2-adsorption/desorption isotherms; (b) BJH-pore size distribution functions.
Figure 3. Results from N2 adsorption/desorption analyses: (a) experimental N2-adsorption/desorption isotherms; (b) BJH-pore size distribution functions.
Processes 08 00778 g003
Figure 4. X-ray diffraction pattern (a) and Mössbauer spectra (b) of the MNPs.
Figure 4. X-ray diffraction pattern (a) and Mössbauer spectra (b) of the MNPs.
Processes 08 00778 g004
Figure 5. Magnetic properties of iron oxide nanoparticles.
Figure 5. Magnetic properties of iron oxide nanoparticles.
Processes 08 00778 g005
Figure 6. Removal efficiency of nonmodified and modified coal fly ash zeolites toward (a) Cd2+-ions; (b) Pb2+-ions.
Figure 6. Removal efficiency of nonmodified and modified coal fly ash zeolites toward (a) Cd2+-ions; (b) Pb2+-ions.
Processes 08 00778 g006
Figure 7. Experimental isotherms and Langmuir linear and nonlinear fit for Cd2+-ions adsorption onto nonmodified and modified CFAZ: (a) CFAZ; (b) MNP-CFAZ; (c) Cu-CFAZ; (d) Co-CFAZ.
Figure 7. Experimental isotherms and Langmuir linear and nonlinear fit for Cd2+-ions adsorption onto nonmodified and modified CFAZ: (a) CFAZ; (b) MNP-CFAZ; (c) Cu-CFAZ; (d) Co-CFAZ.
Processes 08 00778 g007
Figure 8. Effect of pH values on the adsorption efficiency of CFAZ and MNP-CFAZ: (a) toward Cd2+-ions; (b) toward Pb2+-ions.
Figure 8. Effect of pH values on the adsorption efficiency of CFAZ and MNP-CFAZ: (a) toward Cd2+-ions; (b) toward Pb2+-ions.
Processes 08 00778 g008
Figure 9. Fenton oxidation of MB in the presence of CFAZ and modified CFAZ: (a) kinetic curves at 90 °C; (b) kinetic curves at 60 °C.
Figure 9. Fenton oxidation of MB in the presence of CFAZ and modified CFAZ: (a) kinetic curves at 90 °C; (b) kinetic curves at 60 °C.
Processes 08 00778 g009
Figure 10. Pseudo first (PFO)- and second-order (PSO) reaction kinetics for degradation of MB by Fenton reaction onto CFAZ and modified CFAZ catalysts: (a) PFO of sample Cu-CFAZ; (b) PSO of sample Cu-CFAZ; (c) PFO of sample Co-CFAZ; (d) PSO of sample Co-CFAZ; (e) PFO of sample CFAZ; (f) PSO of sample CFAZ; (g) PFO of sample MNP-CFAZ; (h) PSO fo sample MNP-CFAZ.
Figure 10. Pseudo first (PFO)- and second-order (PSO) reaction kinetics for degradation of MB by Fenton reaction onto CFAZ and modified CFAZ catalysts: (a) PFO of sample Cu-CFAZ; (b) PSO of sample Cu-CFAZ; (c) PFO of sample Co-CFAZ; (d) PSO of sample Co-CFAZ; (e) PFO of sample CFAZ; (f) PSO of sample CFAZ; (g) PFO of sample MNP-CFAZ; (h) PSO fo sample MNP-CFAZ.
Processes 08 00778 g010
Table 1. Surface properties of nonmodified and modified CFAZs.
Table 1. Surface properties of nonmodified and modified CFAZs.
SampleSBET, m2/gSmicro, m2/gSextern, m2/gVtotal, cm3/gVmicro, cm3/gVmeso, cm3/gdmicro, Ådmeso, Å
CFAZ4863341660.3070.1330.1741442
MNP-CFAZ2641371270.2460.0570.1891449
Cu-CFAZ6720470.0800.0090.0711351
Co-CFAZ213961170.2000.0400.1601348
SBET—specific surface area; Vtotal, Vmicro, Vmeso—total pore volume and internal volume described by micro and mesopores, correspondingly; dmicro, dmeso—average micro- and mesopore sizes.
Table 2. Mössbauer parameters of the iron oxide nanoparticles.
Table 2. Mössbauer parameters of the iron oxide nanoparticles.
Sample 300 K 77 K
CompISQSMHFRIISQSMHFRI
Iron oxideSext (1)0.35-45.6240.44-50.554
MNPSext (2)0.37-38.5760.41-46.946
Table 3. Results from the thermodynamic model studies of the experimental isotherms for adsorption of Cd2+-ions.
Table 3. Results from the thermodynamic model studies of the experimental isotherms for adsorption of Cd2+-ions.
Thermodynamic ModelsModel CFAZMNP-CFAZCu-CFAZCo-CFAZ
Parameters
Langmuir linearQsat, mg/g 170.1163.799.893.9
KL, L/mg 0.30.40.30.4
R20.9920.9950.9090.922
Langmuir nonlinearQsat, mg/g 159.1157.493.292.5
KL, L/mg0.50.71.61.4
R20.9780.9280.8250.886
FreundlichKf, mg/g 52.960.235.738.9
n3.44.04.44.9
R20.9030.7810.8510.820
Langmuir–FreundlichQsat, mg/g 161.8139.7-93.0
KL, L/mg0.521.51.3
n1.014.40.94
R20.9780.9530.886
Temkin b88.594.3204.3209.7
RT/b27.726.012.011.7
At, L/g7.10.835.239.8
R20.9750.8740.8460.864
Table 4. Kinetic constants and oxidation reaction half-life of the Fenton oxidation process of methylene blue onto nonmodified and metal oxide modified CFAZs.
Table 4. Kinetic constants and oxidation reaction half-life of the Fenton oxidation process of methylene blue onto nonmodified and metal oxide modified CFAZs.
SamplePseudo First OrderPseudo Second Order
K1, min−1τ1/2, min−1R2K2,M1min−1τ1/2, min−1R2
CFAZ0.2772.500.9823.1540.0160.979
MNP-CFAZ0.2033.410.9872.9460.0170.975
Cu-CFAZ0.2133.250.9542.8190.0180.993
Co-CFAZ0.1594.360.9453.2470.0150.973

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Boycheva, S.; Zgureva, D.; Miteva, S.; Marinov, I.; Behunová, D.M.; Trendafilova, I.; Popova, M.; Václaviková, M. Studies on the Potential of Nonmodified and Metal Oxide-Modified Coal Fly Ash Zeolites For Adsorption of Heavy Metals and Catalytic Degradation of Organics for Waste Water Recovery. Processes 2020, 8, 778. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8070778

AMA Style

Boycheva S, Zgureva D, Miteva S, Marinov I, Behunová DM, Trendafilova I, Popova M, Václaviková M. Studies on the Potential of Nonmodified and Metal Oxide-Modified Coal Fly Ash Zeolites For Adsorption of Heavy Metals and Catalytic Degradation of Organics for Waste Water Recovery. Processes. 2020; 8(7):778. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8070778

Chicago/Turabian Style

Boycheva, Silviya, Denitza Zgureva, Simona Miteva, Ivan Marinov, Dominika Marcin Behunová, Ivalina Trendafilova, Margarita Popova, and Miroslava Václaviková. 2020. "Studies on the Potential of Nonmodified and Metal Oxide-Modified Coal Fly Ash Zeolites For Adsorption of Heavy Metals and Catalytic Degradation of Organics for Waste Water Recovery" Processes 8, no. 7: 778. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8070778

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop